Regulating the real estate industry

1
,. \. "' - __ ..:. __ __ ·- - ·-·-&. _ ..,._ --·-- - ---- ----- . _ , ... -· ·- ...... .. . . ' 70 f 00. NSUMER AFFAIRS egulating . the re3I estate industry WE CONTINUE with our 'resumed' ca mpaign with a contribution by Dr David Fab1i. LLD .. a lecturer in con- sumer protection and legislation at the University of Malta: The position with regard to the reg- ulation of estate a!!.ents in Malta is chnt such regulation, any specific man- ner, does noL yet exisr. I am confident thac it will come in rime. Mo st econo mic and professional accivities which affect our lives, including our financial affairs ai1d other importanc 1ransac1ions, are, to one extent or anocher, siibject io spe- cific le!!.islacion and conlrol in Malta. One-can cercainly debate and aigue on the _ manner and che degree of inl111- si ve11ess or the legal framework that may be for this sector. There are various alternatives and precedents that may be considered. It should not be an exercise to impose a system of control just for its own sake, or merely to create a new source of revenue, A proposal for a new regulatory framework should have clear and. proper objectives, founded on an undets1anding of the market and the way it operates with its impe1f ections and needs, and taking into account legitimace grievances received from time co time from consumers of estate agency services. One way is to adopt a·financial ser- vices-type framework of licencing, coupled.with the intn ;xluction of the fit and proper rest fOf persons interested in assisting membt?rs of the public with lhe ir property needs. This may be seen as unduly s t.rin- genc. Or one can opt for a softer approach with a basic registration pro- cedure and low entrance thresholds. However, I would ce11ainly not sup- po11 any suggescion to move towards some form of self-regulation, which would ine 1 ,itably lapse into an ineff ec- rive pretence. Government has no cwrent policy on the regulation of estate agency. Ce11ainly, the subject cwrent ly Jacks a sense of urgency. One reason could be that Chere is no EU Directive on this s ubjec t chat Malt a cou ld have been obli ged co tr anspose. However, it is useful to remember ·chat some years ago a Nationalist gov- e rnme nt had actua lly g iven some attention co chis subject and had assumed a general policy position which it was happy to publish . However, 14 years ago and sund1y minis ter s and parliamentary secre- taries respons ible for consumer protection later, this published policy seems to have been completely forgot- ten. So here it is, straighc out of th e White Paper published under the heading "Righcs for the Consumers" in August 199 I. at a time when Dr Mi chael Frendo served as r/Je First ever Parliamentaiy Secrct<uy wirh spe- cific respons·ibili1y ror consumer pro- rection. (Incidentally this White Paper laid the foundations for a si!!nificant amount of consumer legisli:ltion in subsequent years, particularly in the shape of the Consumer Affairs Act. passed by Parliament in I 994 and brought in to force in 1996.) The Wl1ite Paper dedi cated no Jess rhan half of page 29 to "Purchasing a House". Atier exp l aining that "th e purchase of a house may be the most important and expen sive transaction entered into by a consumer through- ou t his entire life and thus requires consideration", it promised that atten- tion would be given to the matter by the Consumer Protection Council. This refers to a council-that- ne ver-was, enyisag ed in the White Paper as the new administrati1'e and central structure for consumer protection. h1stead, the following year, the then Minister L. Gate chose to immediately set up a new govemmenr department dedicated to the promotion of con- s umer interests, namely the Department for Consumer Affairs, which still exists today. ·Jn any event, g0-vemment promised lhat the new strucrure would cackle the following lliree objectives, that: a) property-dealing enterprises give their non-commer cial customers a fair deal; b) estate agents do not induf g'e in abusive sales methods; and c) advertisements and other in- fo1TI1ation defused to promote the sell- ing of a house are substantially truth- ful and relevant." In reality, no such action has been taken and no specific regulalion of property sales or es tate agency has been introduced to date. The wrrent legal situation appea rs to me to be untenable and inappr opriate. Sooner or later, this subject shall have to be addressed. Hopefully, the exercise eventually undertaken would reflect a common _sense and propor- tionate response to local realities. and not evolve into a typical kn ee-jerk quick fix sh ame le ss ly copi ed from some inappropriate foreign m odel. I would advise chat care be taken to ensure that: a) the agenda for such an exercise should not to be dominated ur Jed by the industry it self as significant vest- ed interests ai·e involved; b) any suggestion that could hijaCk the initiative towards ins ipid codes of practice or self -regulation should be nipped in the bud; and c) the new regulaco1y set-up would actively promote competition and con- sumer choice and not inadvertently create some new f01m of closed shop or cartel. Subject to these three reservations, representatives of the industry would have to be involved and consulted. Finally, one has to· reflect on the possible fate of the various amateur "sensara'', operating, often quite effi- cient ly and cheaply in many villages in Malta and Qozo. Would they be declared illegal? Perhaps, an attempt may be made to somehow rope them int o the riew legislative framework under a system of registration and bl- oad oversig ht. Hope fully, this brief note shal1 provid e your readers with sbme food for thought and shall prompt debate." (Dr David Fabri, LLD.) Your comments on the is sue, dear readers, are welcome.

Transcript of Regulating the real estate industry

Page 1: Regulating the real estate industry

,. \ .

"'

-~--~--~·- 6·--··-- ---,. - __ ..:. __ __ -··- -·-·-&. _..,._ ·-~---- --·-- - ---- ----- . _, ... -· ·- ........ . . '

70 f

00.NSUMER AFFAIRS

egulating . the re3I estate industry

WE CONTINUE with our 'resumed' campaign with a contribution by Dr David Fab1i. LLD .. a lecturer in con­sumer protection and legislation at the University of Malta:

The position with regard to the reg­ulation of estate a!!.ents in Malta is chnt such regulation, ~1 any specific man­ner, does noL yet exisr. I am confident thac it will come in rime.

Most economic and professional accivities which affect our lives, including our financial affairs ai1d other importanc 1ransac1ions, are, to one extent or anocher, siibject io spe­cific le!!.islacion and conlrol in Malta.

One-can cercainly debate and aigue on the _ manner and che degree of inl111-si ve11ess or the legal framework that may be de~·ised for this sector.

There are various alternatives and precedents that may be considered. It should not be an exercise to impose a system of control just for its own sake, or merely to create a new source of revenue,

A proposal for a new regulatory framework should have clear and. proper objectives, founded on an undets1anding of the market and the way it operates with its impe1fections and needs, and taking into account legitimace grievances received from time co time from consumers of estate agency services.

One way is to adopt a· financial ser­vices-type framework of licencing, coupled.with the intn;xluction of the fit and proper rest fOf persons interested in assisting membt?rs of the public with lheir property needs.

This may be seen as unduly st.rin­genc. Or one can opt for a softer approach with a basic registration pro­cedure and low entrance thresholds. However, I would ce11ainly not sup­po11 any suggescion to move towards some form of self-regulation, which would ine 1,itably lapse into an ineffec­rive pretence.

Government has no cwrent policy on the regulation of estate agency. Ce11ainly, the subject cwrently Jacks a sense of urgency. One reason could be that Chere is no EU Directive on this subject chat Malta could have been obliged co transpose.

However, it is useful to remember ·chat some years ago a Nationalist gov­ernment had actually given som e attention co chis subject and had assumed a general policy position which it was happy to publish. However, 14 years ago and sund1y ministers and parliamentary secre­taries responsible for consumer protection later, this published policy seems to have been completely forgot­ten.

So here it is , s traighc out of the White Paper published under the

heading "Righcs for the Consumers" in August 199 I. at a time when Dr Michael Frendo served as r/Je First ever Parliamentaiy Secrct<uy wirh spe­cific respons·ibili1y ror consumer pro­rection. (Incidentally this White Paper laid the foundations for a si!!nificant amount of consumer legisli:ltion in subsequent years, particularly in the shape of the Consumer Affairs Act. passed by Parliament in I 994 and brought in to force in 1996.)

The Wl1ite Paper dedicated no Jess rhan half of page 29 to "Purchasing a House". Atier explaining that "the purchase of a house may be the most important and expensive transaction entered into by a consumer through­out his entire life and thus requires consideration", it promised that atten­tion would be given to the matter by the Consumer Protection Council.

This refers to a council-that­never-was, enyisaged in the White Paper as the new administrati1'e and central structure for consumer protection.

h1stead, the following year, the then Minister L. Gate chose to immediately set up a new govemmenr department dedicated to the promotion of con­sumer interests, namely the Department for Consumer Affairs, which still exists today.

·Jn any event, g0-vemment promised lhat the new strucrure would cackle the following lliree objectives, that:

a) property-dealing enterprises give their non-commercial customers a fair deal;

b) estate agents do not indufg'e in abusive sales methods; and

c) advertisements and other in­fo1TI1ation defused to promote the sell­ing of a house are substantially truth­ful and relevant."

In reality, no such action has been taken and no specific regulalion of property sales or estate agency has been introduced to date. The wrrent legal situation appears to m e to be untenable and inappropriate.

Sooner or later, this subject shall have to be addressed. Hopefully, the exercise eventually undertaken would reflect a common _sense and propor­tionate response to local realities. and not evolve into a typical knee-jerk quick fix shamelessly copied from some inappropriate foreign model.

I would advise chat care be taken to ensure that:

a) the agenda for such an exercise should not to be dominated ur Jed by the industry itself as significant vest­ed interests ai·e involved;

b) any suggestion that could hijaCk the initiative towards insipid codes of practice or self-regulation should be nipped in the bud; and

c) the new regulaco1y set-up would actively promote competition and con-

sumer choice and not inadvertently create some new f01m of closed shop or cartel.

Subject to these three reservations, representatives of the industry would have to be involved and consulted.

Finally, one has to· reflect on the possible fate of the various amateur "sensara'', operating, often quite effi­ciently and cheaply in many villages in Malta and Qozo. Would they be declared illegal?

Perhaps, an attempt may be made to somehow rope them into the riew legislative framework under a system of registration and bl-oad oversig ht. Hope fully, this brief note shal1 provide your readers with sbme food for thought and shall prompt u,~efu l

debate." (Dr David Fabri, LLD.) Your comments on the issue, dear

readers, are welcome.