Regular Meeting of the City Commission Monday, March 14 ... · 14/03/2016 · Please place the...

ALL INTERESTED PERSONS MAY ATTEND AND PARTICIPATE. PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES WHO NEED ASSISTANCE TO PARTICIPATE MAY CALL THE HUMAN RESOURCES OFFICE AT 779-5313. A 48-HOUR ADVANCE NOTICE IS NECESSARY FOR ACCOMMODATION. HEARING IMPAIRED INDIVIDUALS MAY CONTACT THE CITY VIA THE MICHIGAN RELAY CENTER FOR SPEECH & HEARING IMPAIRED: 1-800-649-3777.

Regular Meeting of the City Commission Monday, March 14, 2016

7:00 p.m.

AGENDA CALL TO ORDER: PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: ROLL CALL: PROCLAMATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS:

1. 2015 Community Improvement Awards. 2. Presentation of donation by Mercantile Bank for the Yost Playground

project and Proclamation on the same. 3. Potter Playground project crowd funding kick-off.

ADDITIONS/ DELETIONS TO AGENDA: PUBLIC INPUT ON AGENDA ITEMS: RECEIPT OF PETITIONS AND COMMUNICATIONS:

4. City Manager report on pending items. 5. Response to City Commission’s referral of September 28, 2015 to the

Planning Commission and Zoning Board of Appeals in regard to M-2 Redevelopment Procedures update.

6. Communication regarding Michigan Department of Transportation (MDOT) governed Request for Qualifications (RFQ) process for Airport Engineer and notification of preferred firm.

7. Correspondence regarding pedestrian street lighting project. 8. Communication from city resident Kevin Andrews regarding sidewalk snow

clearing. 9. Minutes of the Zoning Board of Appeals (October). 10. Minutes of the Parks and Recreation Commission (January). 11. Minutes of the Principal Shopping District Board (DDB) (January). 12. Minutes of the Planning Commission regular meeting (February). 13. Minutes of the Planning Commission work session (February). 14. Notice of Temporary Traffic Control Order 3-2016.

CONSENT CALENDAR: DESIGNATED (*) ITEMS CITY COMMISSION MINUTES:


City Commission Agenda March 14, 2016

15. Approval of the minutes of the regular meeting held February 22, 2016.

PUBLIC HEARINGS: STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS AND REPORTS:

16. Bids and Quotations

a. Pedestrian Street Lights b. 2016 Water Main (Lansing Street) c. Broadway Street- Phase II (Harris Street to Bridge) d. Trailer Mounted Asphalt Hauler e. Tree Trimming and Removal f. Utility Truck (Fire) g. Brush Truck (Fire)

17. Consider adjustment to contract with Corby Energy Services for the 2015 Sewer Relining project.

18. Receive staff report on Pedestrian Street Lighting Special Assessment and consider appropriate resolution regarding the assessment.

19. Consider resolution to adopt Stadium Drive as a City Street.

20. Consider Parking Lot Use Agreement between the City, Economic Development Corporation (EDC) and Mt. Pleasant Housing Commission.

21. Consider changes to the Owner Occupied Incentive Program eligibility requirements.

22. Receive City requests for Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribe 2% allocations.

23. Approval of payrolls and warrants. ANNOUNCEMENTS ON CITY-RELATED ISSUES AND NEW BUSINESS: PUBLIC COMMENT ON AGENDA AND NON-AGENDA ITEMS: RECESS: WORK SESSION: (UPSTAIRS- CONFERENCE ROOM A)

24. Potential Next Meeting Agenda Items: a. Tree abatement process for airport runway approach b. Evaluation format for City Manager

*

*

*

*

*

*

*


City Commission Agenda March 14, 2016

c. Request to reallocate Revolving Loan Funds to the Tax Increment Finance Authority-Central Business District (TIFA-CBD) for Downtown Façade Improvement Program.

25. Future Agenda Items:

a. Update on Indian Pines research

26. Commissioner Ideas for Potential Future Topics: RECESS: CLOSED SESSION: ADJOURNMENT:

MEMORANDUM

TO: Nancy Ridley City Manager CC: William Mrdeza Community Services and Economic Development Director FROM: Jacob Kain City Planner DATE: March 8, 2016 SUBJECT: 2015 Community Improvement Awards

Since 1979, the Planning Commission has presented a Community Improvement Award for a rebuilt or renovated residential and/or commercial property. These awards are a way for the Planning Commission to thank and acknowledge the property owners for investment in our community and making our neighborhoods better places to live. For the past several years these awards have been presented at a City Commission meeting. Properties on which construction was finalized in 2015 were considered for recognition this year. The following properties were selected by the Planning Commission for recognition:

Category Address Owner Commercial 111 E. Broadway Art Reach of Mid Michigan Single-family 1108 Watson John R Harkins Trust

Multi-family 808 Pleasant Olivieri Management Inc. For the second consecutive year, students from the Graphic Arts program at Gratiot-Isabella Technical Education Center produced the awards. Those students – Cailin Russell and Jason Guthrie – and their instructor Karen Lee have also been invited to attend the presentation. Requested Action:

Please place the Community Improvement Awards presentation ceremony on the March 14, 2016 City Commission meeting agenda and request that the Mayor present the awards to the recipients.

P R O C L A M A T I O N

WHEREAS, Mercantile Bank of Michigan is an organization made up of employees who dedicate themselves through volunteering and donation of financial resources to help make their communities and world a better place to live, work, and play.

WHEREAS, Mercantile Bank of Mt. Pleasant has shown their commitment to Mt. Pleasant youth and families by donating $10,000 toward a new playground and swing set along with a commitment of local bank staff and their families to help install the playground at Yost Park on July 16th 2016; and

WHEREAS, Mercantile Bank of Michigan has embodied their continuing commitment to communities by donating hundreds of thousands of dollars and employee time to support numerous organizations, programs and charities both locally and statewide;

NOW, THEREFORE, I, Kathleen Ling, Mayor of the City of Mount Pleasant,

Michigan, on behalf of the City Commission and the citizens of Mount Pleasant, do hereby proclaim our sincere appreciation and gratitude to Mercantile Bank; its employees and their families for their dedication and service to this community playground project, and wish Mercantile Bank of Mt. Pleasant continued success.

In Witness Whereof, I hereunto set my hand and the Great Seal of the City of Mount Pleasant, Michigan, this 14th day of March, 2016. ____________________________________ Kathleen Ling, Mayor City of Mount Pleasant

COMMISSION LETTER #039-16 MEETING DATE: MARCH 14, 2016

TO: MAYOR AND CITY COMMISSION MARCH 8, 2016

FROM: NANCY RIDLEY, CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: CITY MANAGER REPORT ON PENDING ITEMS This communication will serve as a brief update on the status of items that have been referred to staff for potential future City Commission action.

Shorter-Term

• Zoning text changes regarding redevelopment of non-conforming properties (September 28, 2015 meeting)

Updated guidelines used by ZBA/PC: Communication from Planning Commission and ZBA in Petitions and Communications of this packet.

• Zoning amendments on ZBA appeals (November 9, 2015 meeting)

Provide updated guidelines and applications to City Commission before beginning using them: Update was provided at December meeting and was removed from the agenda by the Commission. Old application will be used until a City Commission work session discussion is held.

• Provide recommendation for developing conceptual plans and obtaining community input into the plans for Mt. Pleasant Center property during 2016 (November 23, 2015 work session): City Planner recommended plan which will be discussed at joint meeting with Planning Commission March 14.

• Review Section 131 of the Mt. Pleasant Code of Ordinances and delay enforcement (January 11, 2016 meeting): Action to approve non-enforcement was approved January 25. A work session occurred February 22. City Attorney drafting amended ordinance for consideration.

• Indian Pines (January 25, 2016 meeting)

Staff to research options, implications and cost for making Indian Pines more readily accessible for foot traffic and obtain input from the Parks and Recreation Commission and Airport Advisory Board: Staff has initiated research into the vacation of River Road, the FAA guidelines for property adjacent to airport land, the use agreements with the model airplane club, and the easement wording for access on the north

side of Indian Pines. No changes in any signage have been made at this point. Staff investigating violation information shared at February 22 meeting.

• CMU Accreditation (February 8, 2016 meeting):

Send a letter of support regarding accreditation: Letter to be sent by March 11.

Work with Dr. Douglass to make the Commission Chambers available for a public input meeting if desired: Availability has been communicated to Dr. Douglass.

• Mosquito Control (February 8, 2016 meeting): Work with APM on a proposed contract for surveillance/monitoring and community education/engagement: Staff is working with APM on proposed contract.

• Non-motorized Plan-bike striping for 2016 (February 8 meeting):

Report on what is involved to implement proposed 13 miles of bike lane painting in 2016 and whether it could be done this year: Preliminary analysis of painting required within the City limits has been completed. Information will be presented at the March 28 meeting.

Provide information of traffic speed comparisons on northern portion of Fancher Street versus portion further south: an updated analysis will be done after snow season and then a comparison of 2011, 2014 and 2016 can be provided.

• Owner Occupied Residential Incentive Program (February 22, 2016 meeting)

Staff to review eligibility requirements and recommend amendments: alternatives recommended at March 14 meeting.

Longer-Term

• New Business (June 22, 2015 meeting)

I-Ride for 2016 poll shuttle service with continuous routes from campus to Vowles and Fancher: I-Ride is providing free rides to polling locations for the 2016 elections. Staff had preliminary discussion about providing continuous route for November 2016 election instead of free rides and I-Ride indicated they would continue discussions with us to determine if that could be done.

COMMISSION LETTER #039-16 MEETING DATE: MARCH 14, 2016 Page 2

• Alley Maintenance (July 27, 2015 work session)

Vegetation growth in alleys;

o Some trimming is occurring in particularly troublesome areas; major effort with property owners will occur in Spring 2016.

• Other trash and brush clean-up in alleys: Initial request to property owners occurred in October 2015 in anticipation of snow removal. Major effort to ensure compliance will occur in Spring 2016

• Gravel alleys-upgrade of maintenance: Concrete entrances will be addressed during Capital Improvement Plan update for 2016; 2016 funding for gravel and grading approved in 2016 budget discussions.

• Paved alleys-options of when to re-surface or reconstruct: TIF reconstructs will be addressed during Capital Improvement Plan for 2016; residential alley letters for required reconstructs will be mailed in early 2016.

• PEAK Enrollments (October 26, 2015 meeting)

Provide a report on enrollments after summer 2016 and try to identify if any enrollment change is related to cost of program: Report will be provided in September 2016.

• Solid waste changes (April 27, August 11 and October 12, 2015 meetings)

Report on exceptions requested and status for alley/street pickup after one year: Report to be provided May 2016

Report on pilot curbside recycling program: One year pilot ends September 2016

Large item pickup program report on how many tickets sold in first half of the year: Report due July 2016

• Zoning text changes regarding redevelopment of non-conforming properties (September 28, 2015 meeting)

Report every 6 months on how new ordinance language is working: First report will be May 2016.

• Tobacco Free Zone Policy (February 8, 2016 meeting)

Staff and Parks and Recreation Commission to provide report on effectiveness of policy: Report due February 2017.

COMMISSION LETTER ##039-16 MEETING DATE: MARCH 14, 2016 Page 3

NJR/ap

MEMORANDUM

TO: Nancy Ridley City Manager CC: William Mrdeza Community Services and Economic Development Director Brian Kench Building Official FROM: Jacob Kain City Planner DATE: February 29, 2016 SUBJECT: M-2 Redevelopment Procedures update

The City Commission, following their adoption of the text changes related to the M-2 zoning district, requested that the Planning Commission and Zoning Board of Appeals adopt guidelines on the provision of two versus one bonus occupants for M-2 redevelopment projects. The previously adopted M-2 redevelopment procedures included such guidelines. However, the procedures document also included information that was either inconsistent with or made redundant by the text changes passed in 2015. As the procedures had not been amended since February 7, 2013, and given the changes made to the zoning ordinance in relation to the M-2 zoning district since that date, the procedures were updated accordingly. The updated document retains the prior guidelines on the provision of two bonus occupants for M-2 redevelopment projects with the only additional modification being the clarification of “stacked parking” as a potential non-conformity given that the updated ordinance permits limited stacked parking. The Planning Commission endorsed the attached procedures at their December 3, 2015 regular meeting. The Zoning Board of Appeals endorsed the attached procedures at their February 24, 2016 regular meeting. Attachment 1. Documentation of Current Review Procedures and Standards, Redevelopment of Housing in the

M-2 Zoning District, December 3, 2015

Documentation of Current Review Procedures and Standards

Redevelopment of Housing in the M-2 Zoning District

December 3, 2015

Section 154.054 (M-2 Multiple Family) of the zoning ordinance was updated in 2015 with the intent of formalizing and updating the redevelopment process in that district for both conforming and non-conforming properties as well as new developments. Specific to non-conforming redevelopment projects, the Zoning Board of Appeals and Planning Commission may continue to consider occupancy increases of one or two people. In order for consideration for an occupancy increase of two, the redevelopment project must set itself apart as distinctive from others in the district.

As it is the goal of these standards and procedures to both substantially reduce the degree of nonconformance of properties in the district (consistent with the standards listed in subsection 154.007(B)(5) of the Zoning Ordinance) and to enhance and improve the general character of the neighborhood through improved building and site design, distinctive projects will only be considered

for two additional occupants if they are characterized by all of the following:

Elimination of notable nonconformities – Many properties in the district are characterized by a number of typical nonconformities, such as: a lack of a sufficient number of parking spaces, stacked parking spaces beyond the number permitted, parking on gravel lots, a lack of appropriate separation between buildings on adjoining properties, and building setbacks less than those required by ordinance.

However, the nature of the nonconformity on some properties is distinct from most others in the area, making them inconsistent with the general character of the neighborhood. Examples of such nonconformities include:

o Parcels that are narrower in width or smaller in area than others along the same street and block. o Properties with former accessory structures that have been converted into dwellings (so-called

“rear dwelling units”). o Properties with an inordinate number of nonconformities when compared to others on the same

street and block.

Demonstrated track record or (for new owners) capacity for long-term maintenance and code compliance – Specific consideration will be given to the property owner’s ability to assure the long-term maintenance of the proposed redevelopment and tenant compliance with City codes and ordinances. Property owners and their agents are expected to identify code violations on their properties and to accomplish timely compliance with ordinance requirements. Attention to these items will assure that properties will continue to enhance neighborhood character over the long run, while reducing demands on City staff and resources.

Durable and distinct building design – Redevelopment projects proposed for two additional tenants should be distinguished from other such projects by the extensive use of durable building materials and distinct building design and architectural details.

Consideration will be given to those buildings that match the notable features of existing and past historically significant homes within the district and in surrounding areas. Applicants should

demonstrate examples through photos of the homes and details that they identify as similar to the proposed redevelopment project and take particular note of the following: o Historic architectural style, including the use of details customarily expected with that style

throughout the building design o Building massing and composition o Roof pitch o Architectural details, including bracketing; moldings; window and door surrounds; column

details; the proportion and reveal of shingles, shakes, and clapboards, including decorative shingles; etc.

o Window placement and proportion o The extent of the use of durable building materials, including brick and other masonry. o When shingles, shakes, and/or clapboards are used, the extent of the use of hardwood, fiber

cement, and other similar products o Utilization of unique architectural elements such as turrets, box or bay windows, etc.

The preceding review standards and procedures for the redevelopment of housing in M-2 zoned neighborhoods have been reviewed and endorsed by the Zoning Board of Appeals and Planning Commission of the City of Mt. Pleasant on the dates noted below. Copies of these standards and procedures will be made available in the Planning and Community Development Department in City Hall and will be posted on the City’s website where other planning and zoning related documents can be found.

Planning Commission Date: March 1, 2012 Revised: February 7, 2013 Revised: December 3, 2015 Zoning Board of Appeals Date: May 23, 2012 Revised: January 23, 2013 Revised: February 24, 2016



FROM: NANCY RIDLEY, CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: COMMUNICATION REGARDING MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF

TRANSPORTATION (MDOT) GOVERNED REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ) PROCESS FOR AIRPORT ENGINEER AND NOTIFICATION OF PREFERRED FIRM

In 2011 the City followed the Michigan Department of Transportation (MDOT) governed Request for Qualifications (RFQ) process to identify an engineering firm as the preferred firm for all airport construction projects. This recommended process from MDOT is put in place to not only obtain efficiencies from bidding every project but also allows for ongoing expertise between our consultant, airport staff and the funding agencies. The Michigan Department of Transportation Office of Aeronautics recommends this process occur every five years. Although our prior process covered us through the end of 2016 it was recommended that we complete it early because of an upcoming project at the airport which requires specific expertise. Since our prior RFQ process did not include qualifications for tree work, MDOT recommended that it would be necessary to prove the qualifications for such a project. Staff therefore sent out RFQ’s and reviewed the responses received. Based on the attached memo from DPW Director John Zang we are recommending the City continue to have a preferred relationship with Mead and Hunt for our airport engineering projects. As has been the case for the last five years, each contract for each individual project will be brought to the City Commission for approval so that the City Commission approves the scope of work and the expected cost for the projects. That same approval must take place from MDOT as well. This recommendation of our preferred firm will be forwarded to MDOT for their review and concurrence. NJR/ap

To: Nancy Ridley, City Manager Date: 3/10/2016 From: John Zang, DPW Director Subject: Airport Professional Engineering Services agreement Request: We inform the City Commission that, using our "Request For Qualification" process we selected Mead & Hunt as our Professional Engineering Services provider at the Mt. Pleasant Municipal airport. Explanation: As we reviewed our existing Professional Engineering Services agreement we found that we have an upcoming projects related to trees and the approach path to runway 9, not covered in our Professional Engineering Services agreement. It is required that our Professional Engineering Services Agreement include these qualifications. MDOT Aero requires that an RFQ specifically spell out all services to be performed in the 5 year plan. We advertised for "request for qualifications" (RFQ) to any interested engineering firms for all services. This is not a bid process as the RFQ is intended to find the most qualified firm. Capital projects in the airport ALP and the City CIP will be approved by the City Commission and MDOT on a project by project basis. The results of the RFQ grading process included scores on corporate profile, understanding the project, the project team, and experience in this type work. The total scores are: Mead & Hunt 297, QoE Consulting 291. Both firms were qualified, we felt Mead & Hunt was more qualified. Action: We have selected the most preferred firm for airport Professional Services – Mead & Hunt. No commission action is needed at this time.

Parcel ti 17-000-09918-00 February 23, 2016

Address: 1005 S. Douglas Street

Nancy, thank you for your wiliingness to keep me posted, by e-mail, on the actions of the city council as

they review options for a more equitable distribution of the cost for the Pedestrian Lighting Project. I

appreciate their willingness to review the project.

On another note, here are three follow-up comments as a result of the council's discussions last night.

(1) The Mayor says she needs convincing that there is a difference between a sidewalk project and

street lighting. Quite simply, concrete stays put where it is placed. Street lights, on the other hand,

(especially these bright lights) are uncontrolled and spill out and illuminate the entire area. Take a drive

down Washington or Main streets at night. This, by itself, illustrates the major difference. (2) As per

David Rowley, the special assessment district that was created to fund a portion of the street lighting

project on the south end of Washington Street was initiated by a petition of the property owners

(voluntary) which is a bit different from a project that requires participation.

Lastly, I appreciate your explanation of the funding of this project in the R3 area. I have to tell you that it

makes me feel no better that tax-payer funds are being used to provide preferred treatment to this

selected group of property owners in the R3 area. According to the letters I received from the City Clerk,

dated January 28 and February 9, 2016, which announced the public hearing, this project was touted as

a shared project with the city paying approximately 30% and benefitting property owners (which

includes the R-3 area) paying roughly 70%. The truth is the city is paying the entire cost of the project

for the R3 zoned properties while the M2 and Cl areas are expected to pay 100% of the cost in their

area. This does not appear like a cost-sharing project. To make it even worse, the CMU contribution to

the project of $60,000 (which should be going to benefit the students housed in the area and not R3

residents) has been siphoned off, once again to benefit only the R3 zoned properties. At a minimum, this

funding should have been split {50 %-50%) between the city and property owners (Cl and M2) cost,

helping to defray some of the cost to all interested parties. What we have here is the city has chosen to

use tax-payer funds and CMU's public money contribution to pay the full cost of the project for the R3

(residential) property owners while requiring the non R3 property owners to pay the full cost of the

project in the other areas. It seems to me that any independent reviewing agency will see the fallacy in

this funding model. I would ask that this use of public funds be revisited as the review of the funding

plan is conducted.

Once again, thanks to you and your staff for the effort going into this project. I would appreciate it if you

would please share these thoughts with the appropriate people as this review process moves forward.

Sincerely~ t~

Lynn Fauv2r r .

March 2, 2016 Nancy Ridley City Manager Mt. Pleasant City Commissioners Mt Pleasant, MI Dear Nancy and Commissioners, I am writing in regards to the proposed street lights in the M-2 district. I received 2 letters from the city regarding installation of street lights on or near my properties in the M-2 district. The first letter was received after the date of the first meeting and I could not attend the second meeting. I have a number of problems with the proposed lighting project. First, I received the first letter without proper time to respond. When I have projects that are proposed through the city, the projects need to be advertised for at least a few weeks, to allow the public knowledge of the project, time to research the project and time to respond. As property owners, we were not given multiple weeks to research nor respond. My other problems were expressed by a fellow property owner, Brandon LaBelle, and because his statements were perfectly stated, I will submit them below, as I am in complete agreement: “I have a hard time understanding why the lights are needed on the sidewalks in these particular areas. Has crime increased in this area? Is this for safety? If so, do the commissioners have data that show that this is an unsafe area? Have the residents that live on these particular streets requested the lights? Has the city done a study to show the need for these lights? If there has been a study to show the need for the lights I would like the opportunity to review it. This particular lighting project is extremely expensive. At a cost of $270,000, I think most tax payers in the city of Mt. Pleasant would think of better ways to spend this large amount of money. Has the city explored potential grants for this particular project? Has the city considered more spacing between each light fixture to assist in reducing the cost of the project? I don’t believe there is justification for such a large percentage to be paid by the property owners in M-2 district when the city pays 100% in the R-2 districts. As a rental property owner, we already pay much higher non-homesteaded property taxes.” I find it extremely unfair that the city would fund the projects on Washington and Main Streets completely from tax dollars, but expect the owners of properties in the same area, literally within hundreds of feet, to pay a major portion of the expense. We did not ask for, nor do we want these lights. We do not see any return on the investment for this enormous expense, for us as property owners nor the citizens of Mt. Pleasant. I live on Washington, where the new street lights were installed and the lights are extremely bright. I had to purchase new blinds to cut out

the extreme light that shines through my windows at night. I have ample lighting on my house, that provides lighting around the perimeter of my house. The lights that I installed, for which I pay the electric, in my opinion, provide ample lighting for security and the lighting is subtle and attractive. I believe that the property owners should be able to chose what type of lighting is ample on our properties. We already have street lights that work very well. The new lighting is very expensive and far too bright. I recall a number of lengthy discussions at city meetings a few years ago, discussing the need for light pollution restrictions in the city. Now, we are discussing adding extremely bright lights, at extremely high prices, in areas where the property owners are in opposition. I believe that we could find much better ways to beautify the city, ways where more people would join, rather than protest. Sincerely, Ramon Beaulieu Home Owner 630 S. Washington

February 4, 2016

Dear Division of Public Works:

My name is Kevin Andrews, a senior at Central Michigan University who happens to be severely visually impaired. I have minimal vision, comprised mainly of color and shadow detection and light perception. Consequently, I navigate my environment using a white cane. I have confidently traveled through and around CMU, malls, parks, airports, bus stations, train stations, cities, and other spaces both familiar and unfamiliar to me around the country and abroad independently, but my ability to do this in the city of Mount Pleasant late last week was significantly impacted negatively, and I wish to address this with you.

Being extremely visually impaired, I am unable to drive a motorized vehicle. I walk everywhere a majority of the time, rain, snow, or shine. Crossing from the south to the north side of High Street along the east side of Main Street, I was unpleasantly disconcerted to find that upon crossing High, there was an extreme amount of snow and ice which had piled there, blocking the curb cut. As you well know, High Street is synonymous for M-20 and it is quite busy compared to the surrounding streets among that student housing bubble north of campus. Imagine it being after sundown, you are blind, and you are trying to use your cane to find the curb cut you expect to be there, all the while the light has changed so you are also trying to avoid being ran over by a car despite sticking to the curb. I eventually sought the assistance of a passerby, who aided me in making it over the 12 plus inch pile and I continued on my way.

Unfortunately, I have found this in other surrounding areas in the city north of campus. For instance, all along the east side of University Avenue between at least Gaylord and High, a couple of days later I discovered not only the huge snow and ice convergence, I also found the sidewalk to be a pure sheet of ice in many spots. I also noticed this a couple of weeks prior along the west side of Mission just north of Broomfield near the chemical bank and Buffalo Wild Wings, where the sidewalk again was nearly or completely covered with ice.

These situations are not only unsafe, they are potentially illegal. Never in my four years of attending CMU and going about my daily life in the city have I experienced it to such proportions.

The Department of Justice revised regulations for Titles II and III of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. Thus, this adopted revised, enforceable accessibility standards called the 2010 ADA Standards for Accessible Design. Title II of the ADA covers public entities. Section 28 CFR 35.133, part A states: A public entity shall maintain in operable working condition those features of facilities and equipment that are required to be readily accessible to and usable by persons with disabilities by the Act or this part. (https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/28/35.133)

The situations I have herein described are not only problematic for someone with a visual impairment, but even more frustrating and hindering for someone in a wheelchair. It would literally be impossible for someone in that capacity to be able to independently get to and from the sidewalk and street.

Individuals with disabilities deserve the enjoyment of the same liberties and rights to access and navigate public spaces as their able-bodied peers. I am an understanding and reasonable person. I realize we are all human, and that it takes time to clean these spaces, but this is frankly unacceptable. It prohibits individuals from safely enjoying the city and what it has to offer. I implore you to look into this, as well as to have a candid dialog with business owners about the imperativeness of maintaining the spaces in front of their businesses. I would be more than willing to speak with you and whomever else to ensure this is not a recurring theme throughout this and future winters in Mount Pleasant. I am graduating in May, but I would be distraught if someone other than myself had to experience this upon my departure from CMU and Mount Pleasant. This is a great school and town in which to learn, live, and play. Please ensure it is such for everybody, able-bodied or not.

I can be contacted at (248) 508-8569. Alternatively, I can be reached via email at [email protected].

Thank you for your time and attention to this matter.

Regards,

Kevin Andrews

Mt. Pleasant Zoning Board of Appeals

Minutes of Regular Meeting

10-28-15

Chairman Fokens called the meeting to order at 7:05 p.m.

I. Roll Call: Staff called roll.

Members Present: Ferden, Fokens, Friedrich, Orlik, Raisanen, White.

Members Absent: Berkshire

Staff: Kench, Murphy.

II. Approval of Agenda:

Motion by Raisanen, support by Friedrich, to approve the agenda.

Motion approved unanimously.

III. Approval of Minutes: October 1, 2015

Commissioner's Orlik noted two changes; one on page 10 and one on page 11,as noted

below.

Page 10: Kench reported that United Apartments held an open house earlier this month to

provide board members the opportunity to conduct a walkthrough of one of the

redevelopments.

Page 11: Commissioner Orlik also commented that for the larger complexes he feels extra

security is a good idea; and feels it needs to be equal to what we expect from the smaller

homes.

Motion by Raisanen, support by Orlik, to approve the minutes from the September 23, 2015

meeting as amended by Commissioner Orlik.


IV. Communications:

Staff reported that one communication was received from Tim Bebee regarding Case ZBA-

15-15 which will be discussed in further detail during that review.

V. Public Comments:

Chairman Fokens opened the floor for public comments.

Lara Raisanen, 507 S. University, commented on the upcoming election, urging citizens to

vote.

There being no one else who wished to speak, Chairman Fokens closed the public comments

session.

VI. Public Hearings:

Chairman Fokens explained board proceedings, noting that a quorum was present.


October 28, 2015

Page 2

A. ZBA-15-2015 - 914 W. Pickard - Coyne Convenience Stores.

Kench introduced case ZBA-15-2015 submitted by Coyne Convenience Stores asking for

relief from Section 154.049A to allow an increase in the signage on the CITGO pylon sign

to advertise Rec 90 fuel, which will result in the sign being lower and encroaching into the 8

ft. distance to grade requirement. In addition, the applicant is requesting additional signage

over what is allowed on the property.

Kench shared an aerial view of the site, noting the area that is zoned C-3, which provides

access to the facilities to the north, which are zoned I-1 Industrial.

Kench noted that the property in question is zoned C-3 and is surrounded by I-1 Industrial

property to the north, east and south and C-3 Commercial property to the west.

Kench shared the ordinance limitations for signage in the C-3 district, with a total sign area

of three square feet for each lineal foot of lot frontage permitted, with the maximum total of

all signs not to exceed 200 square feet. In addition, filling stations are also allowed one

pylon sign advertising the name of the business, including any special company or brand

name, insignia or emblem, not to exceed 60 square feet, and shall not extend beyond the

property line and shall not be less than 8 ft. or more than 30 ft. above the ground. Total

allowed signage would be 260 square feet.

Kench shared photos of the signs on the property, noting that if approved, the new signage

would total just under 400 square feet.

Kench shared site plans that were approved in previous years for this site and noted that the

calculations provided by the applicant included the I-1 Industrial zoned property; however,

commented that the Board should only take into consideration the C-3 property.

Kench shared the Ordinance language from section 154.164, listing the conditions that

would need to be present for the Board to grant the variance.

In closing, Kench reiterated that the applicant is looking for variances to encroach into the

8' clearance to grade and to increase the amount of allowable signage on the property.

Commissioner Orlik commented that the site is limited to 260 square feet; however, from

the numbers provided it appears as if the applicant is asking for 374 square feet.

Commissioner Orlik also commented that it appears from the photos that the Rec 90 sign

has already been installed. Kench verified that it was.

Chairman Fokens asked for clarification if they should only be looking at the C-3 zoned

property. Kench commented that yes, based on the approved site plan from 1994. Kench

also noted that there are currently two pylon signs on the property.

Tim Bebee, Central Michigan Surveying and Development, addressed the Board,

representing the applicant. Mr. Bebee referred to the email he had sent earlier in the day


October 28, 2015

Page 3

with revised calculations, noting that this would reduce the request to 310.29 square feet,

which would only put them 50.29 square feet over the allowed signage. Discussion ensued

on the calculations and which signage was included and/or excluded from the calculations.

Mr. Bebee commented that this property has frontage that is Industrial and frontage that is

Commercial, arguing that these each need to be considered. He also commented that there

are multiple uses on the site; the car wash, fueling station and restaurant portion of the

business. Mr. Bebee reiterated that he feels the Board should look at the entire property, not

just the portion that is shown in the 1994 site plan. He noted that it is "different out there"

whereas normally there is one business on a parcel, however in this case there are several

businesses on a single parcel.

Chairman Orlik asked who called attention to the Rec 90 sign. Mr. Bebee responded that

the city contacted the applicant after the sign went up.

Chairman Orlik commented that he has a concern with the height clearance and the clear

sight issue. Commissioner Ferden also noted a concern with possible vision obstruction.

Chairman Fokens asked if the Rec 90 could be displayed on the L.E.D sign and if that

would meet the distributor's requirements. Mr. Coyne, applicant and owner of the property,

indicated that it could be displayed there; however, he would have to check to see if it

would meet the distributor requirements. He further commented that this is a specialty gas

not offered by many places and using the L.E.D. sign doesn't satisfy him. Mr. Coyne also

noted that the high profile vehicles use the larger drives.

Chairman Fokens opened the public hearing. There being no one who wished to speak, the

public hearing was closed.

Kench shared the correspondence submitted by the Department of Fire Safety.

Board Discussion:

Commissioner Orlik commented that he has some concerns with the request, as the site

already exceeds the allowable signage. In addition, he feels that some consolidation could

take place to help with the overall amount of signage on the site, along with the height

issue. Commissioner Orlik commented that he is not prepared to vote in favor, noting that

perhaps a new site plan would help clarify the request and suggested that the case could be

postponed to see if some consolidation could take place.

Vice-Chair Raisanen agreed, commenting that approval would increase the non-conformity

that already exists on the site.

Commissioner Friedrich commented that he too feels steps could be taken to consolidate the

signage and still allow the applicant to display the Rec 90 signage.

Chairman Fokens commented that he feels they could utilize the existing L.E.D. sign.


October 28, 2015

Page 4

Motion by Orlik, support by Raisanen, to postpone Case ZBA-15-15 until such a time that

the applicant brings back a new site plan taking into consideration the Board's concerns and

to consolidate and reduce the overall signage on the site to reduce the existing non-

conformity.


B. ZBA-16-2015 - 510/612 W. Pickard.

Kench introduced case ZBA-15-2015 submitted by McGuirk Mini-Storage Inc., asking for a

variance from section 154.149 to install a new pylon sign within the required fifteen foot

setback (154.149B), with an overall height of 20 feet where ten foot is permitted, and a

ground clearance of 5.5 feet where eight feet is required.

Kench reported that the site is zoned I-1 Industrial with I-1 Industrial property to the north,

east and west and a combination of I-1 Industrial and C-3 General Business to the west.

Future land use is designated as Industrial.

Kench shared the site plan that was recently approved by the Planning Commission for the

new development. The first phase of this development will include a 100' x 100'

warehouse, along with a mini-storage building.

Kench shared photos of the site, along with aerial views, noting that the property sits

directly behind an already developed site, which limits the visibility to the property, making

this property somewhat unique. In addition, Kench noted the limited access to the property,

based on the location of the Railroad, the river and the site to the west of the entrance.

Kench reviewed the Ordinance language for granting variances, and also noted that the

applicant is trying to match the signage on the neighboring Pickard Place property.

Vice-Chair Raisanen asked if this is one of the parcels that an updated zoning ordinance

may benefit. Kench indicated it was, noting that along with the insufficiencies in the sign

ordinance for the Industrial districts, the ordinance doesn't address Industrial park type

developments.

Kench noted that this property is undergoing some environmental cleanup.

Tim Bebee, Central Michigan Surveying and Development, representing the applicant,

addressed the Board. Mr. Bebee commented that this industrial park has a "throat" out to

the main street. Looking at the development, he noted that there could be several

businesses located there and, as a business owner, noted that it is a concern that people are

able to find you.

Mr. Bebee commented that with several businesses potentially being located in the new

development, there is a need to have the signage at the entrance to the park to identify that

they are there. In addition, he noted there will be signage on the individual buildings once

you enter into the area.


October 28, 2015

Page 5

Chairman Fokens stated he visited the site and has a concern with visibility when exiting

the site and feels that keeping the shrubbery to a minimum or removing it would help.

It was noted that there were stanchions located on the site, which are part of a water main

vault, which extend 2' above the ground. Chairman Fokens commented that the drawing

shows 4 1/2 ft. from the cement to the signage and he would want assurance that a clear

vision area would be maintained with no additional signage to be added in the future.

Commissioner Ferden asked for clarification on the actual clearance of the requested sign.

Mr. Bebee stated that it is 4 1/2 feet from the bottom of the sign to the concrete.

Commissioner Ferden commented that she would prefer to see an increase in the clearance

to the bottom of the sign even if this meant an increase in the overall sign height.

Vice-Chair Raisanen commented that she appreciates the applicant's attempt to put in a sign

that is congruous to others in the area.

Chairman Fokens opened the public hearing.

There being no one who wished to speak, the public hearing was closed.

Kench shared the correspondence submitted by the Department of Public Safety.

Board Discussion:

Commissioner Ferden reiterated that she feels it is more important to have clearance from

the ground up for safety reasons.

Motion by Ferden, support by Orlik, to approve Case Number ZBA 16-2015, filed by Tim

Bebee, Central Michigan Surveying & Development Company on behalf of Chuck

McGuirk, seeking a variance to construct a new pylon sign for their new industrial park off

West Pickard Street with the following modification: That the sign meets the minimum

ground clearance of 8', and in doing so would allow an increase in the height of the sign by

1 1/2'.

Vice-Chair Raisanen suggested including in the motion a limitation on the height. Mr.

Bebee clarified that the concrete extends 2' above the ground, therefore the 8' ground

clearance would be 6' above the concrete.

Vice-Chair Raisanen also suggested that the open space be kept clear of foliage.

Kench noted that based on the plan, the Board would also need to address the setback issue.

Commissioner Ferden rescinded her previous motion.

Motion by Ferden, support by Orlik to approve Case Number ZBA 16-2015 filed by Tim

Bebee, Central Michigan Surveying & Development Company on behalf of Chuck


October 28, 2015

Page 6

McGuirk, seeking a variance to construct a new pylon sign for their new industrial park off

West Pickard Street with the following conditions:

1) The base of the sign will be no less than 6' above the cement casing, resulting in 8'

minimum ground clearance.

2) Foliage is to be kept clear of the area so as not to impair the clear vision area.

3) The overall height of the sign shall not exceed a height of 21 1/2 ft above the ground.

In addition, the Board approves the proposed setback.

The Board finds that the request complies with section 154.164 to permit the variance

request.

The Board recognizes the site is part of an environmental clean-up project that has been

redeveloped in phases over the past 10 years, creating difficulty in complying with the

zoning standards. The new site has limited access from the public street, is surrounded by

the railroad, the river and is screened from view by Pickard Place, which was part of the

initial redevelopment that occurred on this site.


VII. Old & New Business - None

VIII. New Business

A. November 18, 2015 Meeting: Kench reported that no applications were submitted

by the deadline, however, case ZBA-15-2015, which was postponed tonight may be

on the November agenda.

B. Citizen's Academy: Kench explained a new opportunity being presented to the

community. The City is ready to launch its first Citizens' Academy. This will be a

six session program beginning in January and going through February on Wednesday

evenings. The program is designed to help citizens gain knowledge of the functions

and structure of their city government. Applications are available online or through

the Community Services office.

XII. Adjournment

Motion by Orlik, support by Ferden, to adjourn.

Motion approved.

Meeting adjourned at 8:21 p.m.

BAM

Y:\COMMISSION (Parks & Recreation)\P&R Comm. 2016\Monthly Meetings\January\ApprMin1-26-16.docx

Approved Minutes Mt. Pleasant Parks and Recreation Commission

Regular Meeting Tuesday, January 26, 2016

7:00 p.m., City Hall

I. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE II. CALL TO ORDER – 7:04 p.m. III. ATTENDANCE AND DECLARATION OF QUORUM

A. Commission Members: Batcheller, Boyle, Busch, Nagler, Weaver B. Parks and Recreation Staff: Bundy, Longoria , Way C. Guests: None D. Public Attendance: Steve Covieo, The Pulse

IV. APPROVAL OF AGENDA/MINUTES & COMMISSION BUSINESS A. Changes/Approval of Agenda – Approved as presented. B. Approval of Minutes – Motion made by Comm. Busch, second by Comm.

Boyle to approve the minutes from Tuesday, Dec. 1, 2015. MOTION CARRIED.

V. ELECTION OF NEW OFFICERS A. Nominations – The floor was opened for nominations by Chair Weaver for

Chair and Vice-Chair positions. Comm. Boyle nominates Jim Batcheller, for Chair, second by Comm. Weaver. Comm. Weaver nominates Liz Busch for Vice-chair, second by Comm. Batcheller. Nominations were closed.

B. Election of Chair and Vice-Chair – The Commission voted unanimously to elect Comm. Batcheller as Chair and then voted unanimously to elect Comm. Busch as Vice-Chair for 2016.

VI PUBLIC COMMENTS - None VII. DEPARTMENT REPORTS

A. Parks – Director Bundy reported on the following: • Staff winter work including picnic table construction (for new

shelter at Horizon Park), repair/painting of restrooms, plowing/shoveling. Staff is utilizing several community service workers who are fulfilling their court ordered hours through the Diversion Program.

• Windstorm knocked down many trees; staff worked to remove several that had fallen on the GKB Trail.

• Seasonal hiring process now open – info on City website. B. Recreation – Director Longoria reported on the following:

Daddy-Daughter Date Night Sunday, 1/31. Two session offered (2-4 and 6-8 pm located at the Comfort Inn. Winter Kids Expo Sat. Feb. 13 at Finch Fieldhouse – kids free, parents $1.


Under the Big Top (partnership with CRDL) was successful with 500+ attendees. This year the event was held at Finch rather than Spinning Wheels as in the past years. Start Smart Tennis up and running at Morey Courts. Youth Basketball program started 1/24 at Morey courts with 400+ participants. Volunteers are essential to this program and all of our youth programs; we are fortunate to have approximately 50 for basketball. Man vs. Mountain to be held Feb. 6; currently 217 registered participants and 40 secured volunteers. MASA JO & Northern National Tournament registration open; staff securing sponsorships and hotels. PEAK fee increase was well received; smooth transition. PEAK sponsoring Parent’s Night Out to be held at West Intermediate on Feb. 13. Golf Outing scheduled for May 21. PEAK currently has three interns, placed through Child & Family Services Dept. at CMU. Staff Longoria and McKellar continue to meet with principals at MPPS to keep the lines of communication open.

VIII. OLD AND NEW BUSINESS A. Tobacco Free Park Zones – City Comm. tasked Parks and Recreation staff

to develop a tobacco free policy for city parks. After research, draft policy has been formulated. Research shows this type of policy is challenging to police. Comm. Boyle asked if this is what other communities do or do they create designated smoking zones? Designated smoking areas tend to promote smoking. After further discussion, A motion was made by Comm. Busch, second by Comm. Batcheller in support of the Policy and Procedure for Tobacco-free Park Zones in Parks and Recreation Areas and Facilities and move that the policy is forwarded to the City Commission for adoption. MOTION CARRIED.

B. GRLI Grant Project – working with Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribe and Isabella County, SCIT has secured a $101,000 riverbank protection grant geared towards riverbank erosion. Plans for this grant include native plantings and trees along the Chippewa River corridor (2-years to use funds). Comm. Nagler asked how parks staff disposes of wood from downed trees. Staff leaves the wood if not accessible; if accessible it is available to the public first come, first served.

C. 2017 – 2021 Capital Improvement Plan – Director Bundy updated Commissioners on 2016 projects and outlined 2017 – 2021 CIP projects. 2016 Projects Include:

• Yost and Potter Playground install - Director Longoria, working with MMDC, looking to secure additional funding for Potter Playground through crowdfunding. Kiwanis Club and WANA neighborhood group to assist in community install of playground. Mercantile Bank


has dedicated funds and volunteers to help with Yost playground installation.

• New gazebo at Nelson Park • Replace septic system at Chipp-a-Waters Park • River overlook repair at Nelson Park • Cemetery mausoleum roof repair • Replace roofs on both shelters at Island Park • Mill and re-pave GKB trail from Adams to Leaton • Island Park playscape replacement • Ribbon cutting – Horizon Shelter • GRLI Grant Program

IX. OTHER BUSINESS/COMMISSIONER COMMENTS Comm. Busch announced that the Washington Area Neighborhood Assoc. (WANA) will be meeting on Tuesday, Feb. 2 at the Library Annex. Group has Facebook page or communicate with email, [email protected]. Newly elected Chair Jim Batcheller thanked outgoing member Matt Weaver for his service to the Mt. Pleasant Parks & Recreation Commission.

X. ADJOURNMENT – 7:55 p.m.

THE CITY OF

MT. PLEASANT, MICHIGAN

CITY HALL 320 W. Broadway · 48858

(989) 779-5300 (989) 773-6791 fax

PUBLIC SAFETY 804 E. High · 48858

(989) 779-5100 (989) 773-4020 fax

PUBLIC WORKS 1303 N. Franklin · 48858

(989) 779-5400 (989) 772-6250 fax

JANUARY 21, 2016 MINUTES – DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT BOARD ROLL CALL & INTRODUCTIONS

EA Tim Brockman 12/31/2016 EA Rachel Blizzard 12/31/2016 P Sarah Christensen, Vice 12/31/2016 P Rick Swindlehurst 1/31/2018 P Allison Lents 12/31/2016 P Pat Gallagher 12/31/2017 P Paul Fox 12/31/2017 P Char Young 12/31/2017 EA Peggy Bongard 1/31/2018 P Michelle Sponseller, Secretary n/a

A = Absent without notification P = Present E = Excused Absence N/A = Not Applicable Guests: Bill Mrdeza, Damien Fisher ROLL CALL AND INTRODUCTIONS Introduction of new DDB members, Rachel Blizzard, Pat Gallagher and Rick Swindlehurst CHANGES/ADDITIONS TO AGENDA Motion to approve with addition of a.) parking ticketing and b.) snow removal on sidewalks under “other section.” M = Gallagher S = Lents Motion approved MINUTES Motion to approve October 2015 minutes. M = Lents S = Swindlehurst Motion approved. RECEIPT OF COMMUNICATION AND FINANCIALS

· December 2015 financials. · Downtown Development Directors report.

Motion to receive. M = Lents S = Swindlehurst Motion approved. PUBLIC COMMENT None COMMITTEE REPORTS

· Events and Promotions meeting – notes from last meeting were included in your packet. · Meet and Greet

o January was held at Main Frame Gallery. o February will be held at Gallagher Law office.

OLD BUSINESS A. Sidewalk License Review.

o No action taken, review only at this time. Discussion on: § Splitting merchandise and outdoor seating portions and providing more visuals. § Existing policy is very text heavy, remove redundant text with “follow existing code”

where possible. Use examples of what we want to see rather than a list of “don’ts.”

NEW BUSINESS A. Bylaws Revision

o No action taken, review only at this time. Discussion on: § Addition of “Board member may attend one meeting using electronic means

(teleconference, Skype, etc.) each 12 months.” Under Article V (Meetings).

B. Strategic Plan 2017 o No action taken, review only at this time. Discussion on:

§ Laying out timeline in fall 2016. § Begin plan in 2017.

C. Business Incubator Program

o Discussion and requested changes: § Under Business Expectations change wording to “Retailers are also strongly

encouraged to have a minimum one evening open. However, hours of operation should be established based on individual business needs.”

o Motion to approve with changes noted above and request Downtown Development Director to forward request for funding to city commission. M = Gallagher S = Blizzard Passed

D. City-Wide Garage Sales

o Discussion on request from city commission to the DDB for consideration to determine if city-wide garage sales might fit with any of the downtown events and make a recommendation back to the City Commission.

o Motion to and request staff communicate decision back to city commission that the DDB does not believe the city-wide garage sales fit into the existing downtown event mix and request staff to communicate this motion to the city commission. M = Lents S = Blizzard Passed

E. Special Assessment Debrief

o Quorum lost when DDB members Young and Gallagher left, meeting adjourned at 9:53. Secretary Sponseller will follow-up with DDB via email on: § Special Assessment Debrief § Business Retention One-on-One Meetings § Form Based Code Training

F. Business Retention One-On-One Meetings

o No action taken, review only at this time. G. Form-Based Code Training

o No action taken, review only at this time.

OTHER/ADDITIONS TO AGENDA A. Parking Tickets.

o No action taken. Quorum lost when DDB members Young and Gallagher left, meeting adjourned at 9:53.

B. Snow Removal on Sidewalks. o No action taken. Quorum lost when DDB members Young and Gallagher left, meeting

adjourned at 9:53. ADJOURNMENT Meeting adjourned 9:53am.

Mt. Pleasant Planning Commission

Minutes of Regular Meeting

February 4, 2016

I. Chairman Cotter called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.

Present: Cotter, Dailey, Friedrich, Hoenig, Horgan, Irwin, Ranzenberger.

Absent: Driessnack, Kostrzewa.

Staff: Kain, Murphy

II. Approval of Agenda:

Motion by Friedrich, support by Ranzenberger, to approve the agenda.


III. Election of Officers:

Kain reported that based on the Planning Commission bylaws, February is the month that the

Commission elects new officers. Kain reminded the Board of the procedures.

Commissioner Cotter nominated himself as Chair. There were no other nominations. Motion by

Dailey to close the nominations and cast a unanimous vote to elect Commissioner Cotter as

Chair.


Chairman Cotter nominated Commissioner Hoenig for Vice-Chair.

Commissioner Friedrich nominated Commissioner Horgan for Vice-Chair. Commissioner

Horgan declined.

Motion by Cotter to close nominations and cast a unanimous vote to elect Commissioner Hoenig

as Vice-Chair.


IV. Approval of Minutes

A. January 7, 2016 Regular Meeting:

Motion by Ranzenberger, support by Dailey, to approve the minutes from the January 7, 2016

regular meeting as submitted.



February 4, 2016

Page 2

V. Zoning Board of Appeals Report for December:

Commissioner Friedrich reported that the ZBA did not meet in January.

VI. Communications:

None

VII. Public Hearings:

None

VIII. Public Comments

Chairman Cotter opened the floor for public comments. There being no one who wished to

speak, public comments was closed.

IX. Site Plan Reviews:

None

X. Unfinished Business:

None

XI. New Business:

A. 2015 Annual Report and joint meeting with the City Commission:

Kain reported that each February, the Planning Commission issues a report on its activities

during the previous year. Following approval from the Planning Commission the report is

presented to the City Commission during a joint meeting. Kain noted that he is looking for

two actions from the Commission:

1) Approve the annual report or offer suggestions for changes;

2) Set a joint meeting with the City Commission for Monday, March 14th at 6:00 p.m. in the

Commission Chambers.

Commissioner Horgan noted she felt the report was very well written. Commissioner

Ranzenberger agreed, noting that it is easy to read and understand.

Motion by Dailey, support by Ranzenberger, to approve the Planning Commission 2015

Annual report as written.



February 4, 2016

Page 3

Motion by Friedrich, support by Horgan to set a joint meeting with the City Commission to

take place on March 14th at 6:00 p.m. in the Commission Chambers.


B. Set Work Session to follow the March 3, 2016 regular meeting:

Kain reported that the City Commission has requested that staff develop a conceptual plan for

the Mt. Pleasant Center. Kain noted that he is looking for input from the Planning

Commission on their thoughts regarding the future development of this property. Kain asked

that prior to next month's meeting, that the Commission review the information related to this

site that is located on the City's website and to also review the information in the Master Plan

in regards to this area of the City.

Kain noted he would like to hold a work session following the regular March meeting to

discuss this topic.

Motion by Friedrich, support by Horgan, to set a work session to take place immediately

following the March 3, 2016 regular meeting.


C. Recommend a Planning Commission Representative to the Zoning Board of Appeals:

Kain reported that each year the Planning Commission recommends someone to serve as a

crossover member to the Zoning Board of Appeals (ZBA). Kain noted that the City

Commission will make the actual appointment, and that this is just a recommendation.

Motion by Cotter, support by Irwin, to recommend that the City Commission appoint

Commissioner Friedrich to serve as the crossover member to the ZBA.


D. Zoning Ordinance RFQ and RFQ committee:

Kain reported that he is working on details for a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) to identify a

consultant to assist the City in creating a new zoning ordinance. Kain referred to the "Scope

of Work" document included in board packets and asked for feedback. In addition, Kain noted

he would like to have two commissioners volunteer to sit on the RFQ committee. The

committee members will work with staff (Kain) and the Building Official to review the

submissions to narrow down and identify which firms to interview. Kain suggested those who

have completed the Form Based codes training would be good candidates for this committee.

Kain noted that the committee determined which consultants to invite for interviews, and the

entire Planning Commission will be involved in the interviews and determination of which

consultant to recommend the City Commission enter into contract with.


February 4, 2016

Page 4

Commissioners Horgan and Hoenig volunteered to sit on the RFQ committee.

XII. Other:

A. Staff Report:

1. March Planning Commission Meeting: Staff noted that there have been several meetings

with developers regarding imminent projects and is expecting at least one request for a special

use permit to be submitted for next month's meeting, with another SUP request expected to

follow in April. In addition, he noted there are a handful of other projects that are in the

discussion/planning stages.

2. March training opportunity: Staff reminded the Commission that the Michigan Association

of Planning is hosting a Community Engagement training at City Hall on March 24th and asked

that if anyone is interested in attending that they let him know by February 15th.

XII. Adjournment to Work Session:

Motion by Friedrich, support by Irwin, to adjourn to work session.



bam


Minutes of Work Session

February 4, 2016

Present: Cotter, Dailey, Friedrich, Hoenig, Horgan, Irwin, Ranzenberger.

Absent: Driessnack, Kostrzewa.

Staff: Kain, Murphy

I. 2016 Work Plan

Kain reported that generally the Planning Commission holds a work session to discuss their goals for

the upcoming year. Last year, the PC focused on the City Commission's charge to complete the M-2

redevelopment guidelines, and in the previous year, the focus was on the update of the Master Plan.

This year the main focus will be on the development of a new zoning ordinance. In addition the City

Commission has requested that staff look at the Mt. Pleasant Center and the "tree" neighborhood.

Kain noted that next month's work session will focus on discussion of the Mt. Pleasant Center

property, and suggested that a future work session (mid-year) will be dedicated to the tree

neighborhood.

II. Zoning Ordinance:

A. Scope of Work:

Kain explained that the Scope of Work outlines the expectations of the City for the consultant we

wish to employ to develop our new zoning ordinance.

Discussion ensued on the potential format and method of regulation to be utilized in the new code as

well as considerations of the failings of the existing code and how to address those.

Commissioner Irwin asked for clarification on what a "multi-modal" form is. Kain explained that it

encourages making travel by something other than automobiles easier and safer. Discussion ensued

on how MDOT may or may not hamper this goal.

Kain explained that the consultant will be expected to:

• Ensure community involvement in and understanding of the process and the eventual product

• Work with the Planning Commission and the public to identify a vision for Mt. Pleasant that

is unique to our community and consistent with community input

• Create clear and concise language

• Draft the document and work with the public, the Planning Commission, and staff to refine it

B. Form-Based Codes Training


February 4, 2016

Page 2

Kain referred to the Form Based Codes training that he had asked the Commission to complete, and

asked that if anyone was interested in continuing their subscription to let him know. Kain encouraged

those who had not done the training to at least watch the introduction module, and also suggested the

neighborhood and corridor modules.

III. Training Goals and Needs

Kain asked that each member of the Commission set training goals for the upcoming year and

identify specific topic areas of interest. These will be discussed at the beginning of the March Work

Session.




FROM: NANCY RIDLEY, CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: NOTICE OF TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL ORDER 3-2106 The Commission will be asked for final consideration of the following Temporary Traffic Control Order at the May 23, 2016 City Commission meeting: 3-2016 – Remove all “No Parking” and “No Parking During School Days” signs on Anna, Elizabeth, Taylor and Brown Streets between Gaylord and Bellows Streets. NJR/ap

City of Mt. Pleasant, Michigan Traffic Control Order

TRAFFIC CONTROL ORDER NO. f 3 ~d.O/{f/

~~(~ Issued By:_...~~c.=..;;.._----=_,.~~---- Date: ?-7 ~( f, Traffic Engineer

Signs/work by: ~ Street Dep rt t

Date: 3 -8 ~ 1('7

Filed/ Attested: ________ _ Date: ____ _ City Clerk

This Traffic Control Order shall be presented to the City Commission and may receive final approval not more titan 90 days from the date the work was performed by the Street Department. It sltall not be renewed or extended except upon action by the City Commission.

Content: Remove all no parking and no parking during school days signs on Anna Street, Elizabeth Street, Taylor Street and Brown Street between Gaylord Street and Bellows Street.

Minutes of the regular meeting of the City Commission held Monday, February 22, 2016, at 7:00 p.m., in the City Commission Room. Mayor Ling called the meeting to order and the Pledge of Allegiance was recited. Commissioners Present: Mayor Ling and Vice Mayor Lents; Commissioners Gillis, Holton, Kulick, Madaj and Verleger Commissioners Absent: None Others Present: City Manager Ridley, City Clerk Howard and City Attorney Smith Proclamations and Presentations Director of Public Works John Zang introduced newly hired Water System Operators Jared Bowman and Dan Stewart. Additions/Deletions to Agenda Item 17a “Owner Occupied Incentive Program” was added to the agenda. Receipt of Petitions and Communications Received the following petitions and communications:

1. City Manager report on pending items. 2. Historic District Commission Minutes. (November) 3. Mt. Pleasant Planning Commission Minutes. (January) 4. Airport Advisory Board Minutes. (January) 5. Response to City Commission referral of 1/11/16 from the Downtown

Development Authority in regard to action on sidewalk clearing request. 6. Receipt of Mt. Pleasant Planning Commission 2015 Annual Report. 7. Correspondence from City resident Nathan Tubbs regarding proposed

sidewalks. 8. Correspondence from City resident Patty Krcmarik regarding mosquito control.

Moved by Commissioner Kulick and supported by Vice Mayor Lents to approve the following items on the Consent Calendar:

1. Minutes of the regular meeting of the City Commission held February 8, 2016. 2. Award contract to Malley Construction of Mt. Pleasant, Michigan in the amount

of $164,449 for the Southmoor Street Reconstruction Project. 3. Award contract to L & T Painting Company of Shelby Twp., Michigan in the

amount of $594,250 for the rehabilitation and painting of the 0.5MG elevated tank and approve a budget amendment from the line replacement reserve fund to cover the additional cost of the project.

4. Appoint Corey Friedrich as representative of the Planning Commission to the Zoning Board of Appeals as recommended by the Mt. Pleasant Planning Commission.

5. Payrolls dated February 12, 2016 and warrants dated February 10, 12 and 18, 2016 all totaling $844,781.64.

Motion unanimously adopted.

A public hearing was held on special assessment roll for Special Assessment District #2-16 and consideration of resolution #5 for approval of the roll and setting of payment terms for the special assessment district. Daniel van Schooneveld, 1016 S. University St. and Lynn Fauver, 1005 S. Douglas St. spoke in opposition to special assessment roll for Special Assessment District #2-16. Correspondence received from Paula and Daniel van Schooneveld, Lynn Fauver, Richard McGuirk (United Apartments), Barry DeLau, II, Brandon LaBelle (Rentwood Management) and Tim Driessnack regarding objections to S.A. #2-16.

Moved by Commissioner Kulick and supported by Vice Mayor Lents to adopt resolution #5 for approval of the roll and setting the repayment terms at up to seven years at a 3% interest rate. Moved by Commissioner Holton and supported by Commissioner Verleger to postpone action on S.A. #2-16 until staff can get more information on further options for cost distribution of the special assessment. AYES: Commissioners Holton, Kulick, Ling, Madaj and Verleger NAYS: Commissioners Gillis and Lents ABSENT: None Motion carried. A public hearing was held on conditional rezoning for property located at 210/212 W. Pickard Street. There being no public comments or communications the Mayor closed the public hearing. Moved by Commissioner Kulick and supported by Commissioner Madaj to approve the amended conditional rezoning of property located at 210/212 W. Pickard St. to allow for any retail business or service establishment that would be permitted in the C-district, and authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the agreement. Motion unanimously adopted. Moved by Commissioner Kulick and supported by Vice Mayor Lents to approve the Historic Preservation Improvement Awards Program and a budget amendment from the General Fund in the amount of $1,200 for the purchase of plaques. AYES: Commissioners Gillis, Kulick, Lents, Ling, Madaj and Verleger NAYS: Commissioner Holton ABSENT: None Motion carried

Moved by Commissioner Kulick and supported by Commissioner Madaj to approve the following appointments to various boards and commissions as recommended by the Appointments Committee: Term Expires: Isabella County Material Recovery Facility Governing Board Matthew Sous (Alternate) 12-31-2016 Historic District Commission Julie Taylor 12-31-2018 Building Authority Amanda Schafer 12-31-2021 Motion unanimously adopted. Commission asked to have the Owner Occupied Incentive Program referred to staff for further review of eligibility requirements. Announcements on City-Related Issues and New Business Commissioner Kulick announced that Western Weekend is October 1, 2016 and he would like to make sure the City is prepared. Commissioner Gillis invited residents to continue to submit applications to the City’s appointed boards and commissions. She announced that Mt. Pleasant High School is hosting the musical “The Big Fish” and encourages the public to attend. She also shared her concerns and showed pictures and video of the current status of Indian Pines Park Property.

Public Comment on Agenda and Non-Agenda Items Audra Flores, CMU student, would like to see a polling location on campus. Daniel van Schooneveld, 1016 S. University St., thanked the Commission for allowing further discussion on the special assessment regarding street lights. The Commission recessed at 8:31p.m. and went into a work session at 8:42 p.m. WORK SESSION – Discussion on enforcement of neighborhood standards. City Manager Ridley and Director of Public Safety Feldhauser led a discussion on enforcement of neighborhood standards.

Discussion ensued.

WORK SESSION – Discussion on Mt. Pleasant Code of Ordinances Section 131. City Manager Ridley and City Attorney Smith led a discussion on Mt. Pleasant Code of Ordinances Section 131. Discussion ensued. Based on general agreement and discussion the City Attorney will prepare a revised ordinance for Commission discussion. Mayor Ling adjourned the meeting at 9:56 p.m. without objection. _______________________________ ______________________________ Kathleen Ling, Mayor Jeremy Howard, City Clerk



FROM: NANCY RIDLEY, CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: BIDS AND QUOTATIONS

a. Pedestrian Street Lights The attached memo from DPW Director John Zang outlines the four bids that were received for the installation of pedestrian lighting on four streets north of CMU’s campus. The budget for the entire project was estimated at $309,000 and of that amount, $290,000 was estimated for the purchase and installation of the lighting. All of the bids received are below that original estimate for pedestrian street lights. Research was completed to see if “household shields” could be added to the pedestrian lights to reduce the amount of light spilling in to the residences. The low bidder has indicated the shield and labor to install is $155 per light. Staff recommends that 5 shields be added to the bid for a cost of $775 so that they can be installed on some lights on Washington north of High Street. This will allow for a visual evaluation of the impact on sidewalk lighting as well as the impact on the residences. If they are effective, additional shields can be ordered and installed at a later date. Forty lights have been installed and 60 lights will be installed this year so the potential cost for shield installation on those lights is $15,500. We have not received any complaints regarding Main Street, however there are 45 lights on Main Street so if shields for those lights are needed, there would be $6,975 more cost. In order to have the lights installed this summer it is necessary to award the contract now because of the lead time in receiving the light poles once they are ordered. Although the special assessment process is not complete and is expected to fund a portion of this project cost, we recommend the City Commission move forward with awarding the contract so that the construction can be completed in a timely manner. Recommended Motion Move to authorize a contract with Countyline Power for $261,595 for the purchase and installation of pedestrian lighting plus an additional $775 for five household shields.

b. 2016 Water Main (Lansing Street) The 2016 Operating Budget included a project to replace the existing 4 inch cast iron water main along Lansing Street between Broadway and Bennett. During the design of this project it was determined that there was an opportunity to enhance the distribution system by replacing the entire line with an 8 inch line which would create a loop in that section of town that would enhance fire protection and water pressure. The estimate for this change in scope predicted a cost greater than was budgeted so staff bid the project with a base bid and an alternate bid with the alternate piece including the additional costs related to upgrading to the full 8 inch loop. It is possible to just complete the base bid at a cost of $166,385 but staff is recommending awarding the base bid plus the alternate. This recommendation is based on the improved loop, the cost savings from on mobilization and less disruption to the neighborhood. It is recommended the City Commission award a contract for $311,720 to the Isabella Corporation to replace the main on Lansing Street from Bennett to Broadway with an 8 inch main. Recommended Motion Move to approve a contract with Isabella Corporation for $311,720 for the Lansing Street water main project. c. Broadway Street- Phase II (Harris Street to Bridge) The reconstruction of Broadway Street-Phase II is scheduled for 2016. The reconstruction project for Broadway includes curb and gutter from Harris Street east to the bridge. Five bids were received with the low bid coming from McGuirk Sand-Gravel of Mt. Pleasant. The attached memo from City Engineer Stacie Tewari recommends award of contract to McGuirk Sand-Gravel. Recommended Motion Move to award a contract to McGuirk Sand-Gravel for $321,765 for Broadway Street-Phase II reconstruction. d. Trailer Mounted Asphalt Hauler The attached memo from DPW Director John Zang recommends the purchase of a trailer mounted asphalt hauler from Spaulding Manufacturing at a price of $18,321. This piece of equipment is used for patching potholes and around manholes. Spaulding Manufacturing was the low bidder.


Recommended Motion Move to authorize the purchase of a trailer mounted asphalt hauler from Spaulding Manufacturing at a price of $18,321. e. Tree Trimming and Removal Annually, the City enters into a contract for the trimming and removal of street trees. Mailings were sent to local companies and two bids were received. Of the two bids received, Wonsey Tree Service was the lowest bidder. Staff recommends the award of contract to Wonsey Tree Service. Recommended Motion Move to authorize the award of contract for Tree Trimming and Removal to Wonsey Tree Service in the amount $38,120. f. Utility Truck (Fire) The 2016 Operating Budget includes an allocation from the Fire Truck Reserve to purchase a replacement utility pickup truck for the current 2005 truck. The attached memo from Fire Chief Rick Beltinck recommends the purchase of a utility truck from Krapohl Ford for the bid price of $31,196. As the memo indicates, the low bid did not fully meet the bid specifications whereas Krapohl Ford did and is therefore being recommended. The bid amount is within the budget amount. Recommended Motion Move to authorize the purchase of a replacement utility truck from Krapohl Ford for $31,196. g. Brush Truck (Fire) The 2016 Operating Budget also included an allocation from the Fire Truck Reserve to purchase a replacement for the 1995 brush truck. As Chief Beltinck’s memo indicates the low bid from Krapohl Ford meets the required specifications and is within the budgeted amount. Recommended Motion Move to authorize the purchase of a replacement brush truck from Krapohl Ford for $25,223.

NJR/ap


THE CITY OF


CITY HALL 320 W. Broadway · 48858-2447

(989) 779-5300 (989) 773-4691 fax

PUBLIC SAFETY 804 E. High · 48858-3595

(989) 779-5100 (989) 773-4020 fax

PUBLIC WORKS 1303 N. Franklin · 48858-4682

(989) 779-5400 (989) 772-6250 fax

Page | 1

To: Nancy Ridley, City Manager Date: 3/10/2016 From: John Zang, DPW Director Subject: 2016 Pedestrian Lighting Request: The City Commission is requested to authorize and award the contract for the 2016 Pedestrian Lighting project to Countyline Power, of Sanford, Michigan, in the amount of $261,595.00. Reason for Request: Installation of pedestrian lighting on Douglas, University, Franklin, and Lansing Streets is scheduled for 2016. The lighting project will provide light poles and LED fixtures for residents. The project is scheduled to begin construction on May 2nd, 2016 and be completed by July 1st, 2016. The budgeted amount for this project is $309,000. Process: On February 9, 2016, the following bids were received: Countyline Power, Sanford, MI $261,595.00 J. Ranck Electric, Inc. Mt. Pleasant, MI $267,361.00 C & R Electric LLC Shepherd, MI $280,990.00 Block Electric Company Weidman, MI $288,760.00 Method of Purchase: Contract Recommendation: The low bidder is Countyline Power. A reference check of Countyline Power indicates they are experienced and have performed work for other municipal groups within their project specifications. I recommend the City Commission award the 2016 Pedestrian Lighting project to Countyline Power. Funds in the amount of $309,000 are available in the budget for this project.

THE CITY OF



(989) 779-5300 (989) 773-4691 fax


(989) 779-5100 (989) 773-4020 fax


(989) 779-5400 (989) 772-6250 fax

Page | 1

To: Nancy Ridley, City Manager Date: 3/10/2016 From: John Zang, Director DPW Subject: 2016 Water Main Project

Purchase\Contract Recommendation Summary Request: The City Commission is requested to award the contract for the 2016 Water Main Project to The Isabella Corporation, of Mt. Pleasant, in the amount of $311,719.80. Reason for Purchase: In 2016, replacement of the existing 4” cast iron water main is scheduled for Lansing Street between Broadway and Bennett Streets. On February 16, 2016, the following bids were received.

Vendor Base Bid Alternate Bid Total Bid The Isabella Corporation, Mt. Pleasant $166,384.80 $145,335.00 $311,719.80 Malley Construction, Inc., Mt. Pleasant $173,382.50 $141,714.00 $315,096.50 Midwest Trenchless Services, LLC, Whitehall $212,638.00 $179,379.00 $392,017.00 Gustafson HDD, LCC, Pentwater $253,907.00 $224,411.00 $478,318.00 The bid documents included a base bid for the replacement of the north 972 linear feet of water main, with an add alternative of 1,020 linear feet of the south portion of water main on Lansing Street between Broadway and Bennett Streets. If the bids were favorable, it was intended that both the base and the add alternate bids would be combined as one project for completion this year. The budgeted amount for the 2016 project is $230,000. While the base bids are under budget, we will exceed the budget if we combine the base bids with the add alternative bids. However, additional funding is available to complete all 1,992 linear feet this year if we utilize 2017 funds in the amount of $144,000. In 2017, the final section of existing 4” cast iron water main in the City, located on Lansing Street from Pickard to Sampson Streets, is scheduled for replacement. This small section serves four homes only, and no other residential dwellings can be built in this area due to current zoning regulations. Because this section of Lansing Street remains underdeveloped, I suggest postponing the replacement of the water main in this area until 2022 and use those funds to complete the 2016 project described above. The water main in this section is not deteriorated to the point that it will fail before 2022 and poses no threat to residents. The City will receive better pricing and reduce the impact on residents if we replace 1,992 linear feet of water main this year, from Broadway to Bennett Streets, rather than split it up into several projects over multiple years. Recommendation: I recommend the City Commission award the contract for the 2016 Water Main Project to The Isabella Corporation in the amount of $311,719.80. Funds are available in the Water Line Replacement Reserve Budget.

THE CITY OF



(989) 779-5300 (989) 773-4691 fax


(989) 779-5100 (989) 773-4020 fax


(989) 779-5400 (989) 772-6250 fax

Page | 1

To: Nancy Ridley, City Manager Date: 3/1/16 From: Stacie Tewari, City Engineer Subject:

Contract Recommendation Summary Request: City Commission is requested to authorize the award of the contract for the "2016 Broadway Street – Phase II" project to McGuirk Sand-Gravel in the amount of $321,764.65. Reason for Purchase: The "2016 Broadway Street – Phase II" Project is part of the Capital Improvement Plan. The project includes the complete reconstruction of Broadway Street including curb and gutter from Harris Street to the bridge over the Chippewa River. The total construction budget is $395,000. Process: On February 23, 2016, the following bids were received: Bid McGuirk Sand-Gravel Mt. Pleasant, MI $ 321,764.65 The Isabella Corporation Mt. Pleasant, MI $ 347,710.63 Malley Construction Mt. Pleasant, MI $ 352,326.62 Crawford Contracting Mt. Pleasant, MI $ 389,784.95 Robbin Harsh Excavating, Inc. Clare, MI $ 424,904.15 Recommended Selection: McGuirk Sand-Gravel 510 W. Pickard St. PO Box 530 Mt. Pleasant, MI 48858 Reason for Selection: Lowest Responsive Responsible Bidder Method of Purchase: Contract Recommendation: City Commission is requested to authorize the award of the contract for the "2016 Broadway Street – Phase II" project to McGuirk Sand-Gravel, in the amount of $321,764.65.

J:\Construction\16 Const\Broadway Phase II\Construction\Commission Memo - Construction Contract.docx

THE CITY OF


CITY HALL 401 N. Main · 48858-1698

(989) 779-5300 (989) 773-4691 fax


(989) 779-5100 (989) 773-4020 fax


(989) 779-5400 (989) 772-6250 fax

Page | 1

To: Nancy Ridley, City Manager March 3, 2016 From: John Zang, DPW Director Subject: 2016 Trailer Mounted Asphalt Hauler Bid

Purchase\Contract Recommendation Summary

Request: The City Commission is requested to award the contract for the purchase of one 2016 Trailer Mounted Asphalt Hauler to Spaulding Manufacturing, Incorporated, of Saginaw, in the amount of $18,321. Reason for Purchase: The trailer mounted asphalt hauler is part of the scheduled equipment replacement in the Motor Pool’s Capital Replacement Plan. It will replace Unit 431, a 2000 Spaulding RMV trailer, currently used by the Street Department for asphalt patching of potholes and around manholes. On February 9, 2016, the following bids were received: Spaulding Manufacturing, Inc., Saginaw $18,321.00 Falcon Road Maintenance Equipment, LLC, Midland $18,932.00 Alta Equipment Company, New Hudson $23,185.00 Marathon Equipment, Inc., Burlington, Ontario, Canada $27,050.25 Vendor Name and Address: Reason for Selection: Method of Purchase: Spaulding Manufacturing, Inc. Lowest Responsive Bidder Direct Bill 5366 East Rd. Saginaw, MI 48601 Spaulding Manufacturing is the low bidder. Their model meets all of the bid specifications. Recommendation: I recommend the City Commission award 2016 Trailer Mounted Asphalt Hauler purchase to Spaulding Manufacturing, Incorporated, in the amount of $18,321. Funds for this purchase have been allocated in the 2016 Motor Pool Capital Outlay Budget.

THE CITY OF



(989) 779-5300 (989) 773-4691 fax


(989) 779-5100 (989) 773-4020 fax


(989) 779-5400 (989) 772-6250 fax

Page | 1

To: Nancy Ridley, Interim City Manager Date: 3/1/16 From: John Zang, DPW Director Subject: 2016 Tree Trimming and Removal Bid

Purchase\Contract Recommendation Summary

Request: City Commission is requested to award the contract for the 2016 Tree Trimming and Removal Bid to Wonsey Tree Service, of Alma, in the amount of $38,120. Reason for Purchase: The 2016 Tree Trimming and Removal Bid is part of the continuing tree maintenance program delineated in the 2016 Major and Local Streets Budgets. Each year the City contracts with a private firm for tree trimming and removal services for street trees. These services include routine trimming and removals, stump removal, and emergency tree removal services, when necessary. Process: Bid requests were sent to tree trimming companies in the Mt. Pleasant and surrounding area. On March 1, 2016, the following bids were received. Wonsey Tree Service, Alma $38,120.00 F & K’s Tree Service, Mt. Pleasant $48,600.00 Vendor Name and Address: Reason for Selection: Wonsey Tree Service Lowest Responsive Bidder PO Box 1142 Alma, MI 48801-1142 Wonsey Tree Service performed this type of work for the City in the past. They are a respected and established company. Recommendation: I recommend the Commission award the contract for the 2016 Tree Trimming and Removal bid to Wonsey Tree Service in the amount of $38,120. Funds for this work are available in the 2016 Major and Local Streets Operating Budget.

City of Mount Pleasant, Michigan DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY _____________________________________________________

804 East High Street, Mount Pleasant, MI 48858 Phone: 989.779.5100 Fax: 989.773.4020

www.mt-pleasant.org

MEMORANDUM DATE: March 9, 2016

TO: Nancy Ridley City Manager

FROM: Chief Rick Beltinck

SUBJECT: Fire Department Vehicles Bid Summary

This is a summary of the bids that were received for the following Fire Department vehicles. One new

2016 F-350 4x4 SD Super cab with a 6’ Box and one new 2016 F-250 4x4 SD Regular cab.

This summary represents the cost for one new 2016 F-350 4x4 SD Super cab with a 6’ Box (Utility Truck).

The breakdown is as follows:

Krapohl Ford $31,196

Jorgenson Ford $30,500

My Chrysler Dodge Jeep Ram $34,620

The low bid from Jorgenson Ford for the 2016 F-350 4x4 SD Super cab with a 6’ Box did not meet all the

required bid specifications therefore I recommend that we take the next lowest bid of $31,196 and

purchase the vehicle from Krapohl Ford. At this time the current utility truck will be utilized as a vehicle for

a code enforcement officer.

This summary represents the cost for one new 2016 F-250 4x4 SD Regular cab (Brush Unit).

The breakdown is as follows:

Krapohl Ford $25,223

Jorgenson Ford $25,250

My Chrysler Dodge Jeep Ram $26,805

The low bid for the 2016 F-250 4x4 SD Regular Cab was $25,223.00 from Krapohl Ford. I recommend

that we move forward with the purchase from Krapohl Ford. The existing Brush truck has been offered to

Shepherd Tri-Township Fire Department for $12,000.



FROM: NANCY RIDLEY, CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: CONSIDER ADJUSTMENT TO CONTRACT WITH CORBY ENERGY

SERVICES FOR THE 2015 SEWER RELINING PROJECT Last fall the City Commission authorized a contract with Corby Energy Services for a not-to-exceed amount of $217,500 for the 2015 Sewer Relining Project. Since the bid prices were lower than estimated additional lines were to be added to the project to utilize the full budgeted amount. As the attached memo indicates, there was a miscalculation on the approved additional footage and more relining was approved and completed than the $217,500 budget allowed for. All of the relining that was completed was needed and the work was completed, however it exceeded the approved contract amount. As the memo outlines, controls have been implemented to prevent this in the future. The additional sewers that were relined would have been part of the upcoming 2016 relining project. It is recommended the City Commission authorize a contract amendment for $29,060 to reflect the additional work that was completed. In addition, a budget amendment is needed in 2016 since most of the work was completed after January 1, 2016. The amount paid in 2015 plus the budget amendment will total $246,560 and adequate funds exist in the sewer line reserve to cover it. Recommended motion: Move to approve a contract amendment with Corby Energy Services for $29,060 and a 2016 budget amendment of $149,900 for the work that was completed after January 1. NJR/ap

THE CITY OF



(989) 779-5300 (989) 773-4691 fax


(989) 779-5100 (989) 773-4020 fax


(989) 779-5400 (989) 772-6250 fax

Page | 1

To: Nancy Ridley, City Manager Date: 3/10/2016 From: John Zang, DPW Director Subject: 2015 Sewer Relining Project – Contract Adjustment Request: The City Commission is requested to approve a contract adjustment with Corby Energy Services for the 2015 Sewer Relining project, in the amount of $29,060. Reason for Purchase: Several sewer locations were scheduled to be relined in 2015. This work was included in the 2015 operating budget in the amount of $217,500. The bids were received on October 6, 2015, and Corby Energy Services was the low bidder at $153,944. Because the bids were under budget, additional sewer main footage was added, and the Commission approved the contract for a not-to-exceed total amount of $217,500. The contractor completed the work, including additional footage. However, it was discovered that an error was made in the quantity of additional footage, which caused an overage in the not-to-exceed approved amount. Work was completed in the amount of $246,560, which exceeded the approved amount by $29,060. We have taken steps to ensure a similar miscalculation does not occur in the future. Recommendation: I recommend the City Commission approve a contract adjustment in the amount of $29,060 and approve a budget amendment of $149,900 for the additional relining and the relining performed in 2016 budgeted in 2015. Funds are available in the Sewer Line Replacement Reserve.



FROM: NANCY RIDLEY, CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: RECEIVE STAFF REPORT ON PEDESTRIAN STREET LIGHTING SPECIAL

ASSESSMENT AND CONSIDER APPROPRIATE RESOLUTION REGARDING THE ASSESSMENT

At the February 22 City Commission meeting, the Commission postponed action on finalizing the special assessment for the 2016 installation of pedestrian lighting on four streets north of Central Michigan University’s (CMU) campus. During the meeting the Commission requested staff look at potentially expanding the assessment district to include all of the properties in the non R-3 zoned area north of campus. It was also requested that the spread of the assessment be considered based on both a front footage calculation and a square footage calculation. Attached is a memo from City Assessor Dave Rowley and City Attorney Scott Smith that outlines two assessment options under an expanded district. Option #1 is based on a belief that all properties in the district benefit as it includes both sides of the street as well as the side streets. Option #2 is based on a belief that the parcels on the non-lighted sides of the district have a lesser benefit and therefore their assessment would be of a lower dollar amount. The attached spreadsheet shows a listing of all of the properties in that non R-3 zoned area, as well as the resulting calculations under both options #1 and #2 with both a front footage and square footage calculation. If the Commission desires to pursue such a district, the next step would be to approve resolution #2 as presented. This resolution would tentatively set the district and have staff notify all property owners of a public hearing on the project and the proposed district. Due to the K-12 spring break schedule, we are recommending the public hearing be set for April 11, 2016, instead of the next City Commission meeting since many property owners may be out of town. During the February 22 meeting there was discussion about the future plans for pedestrian lighting. It was indicated that in the short-term our goal is to install pedestrian lighting on just one side of some of the streets throughout the City. What may not have been clear during the discussion is that long-term there may be value in some streets having pedestrian lighting on both sides of the street. Since the City’s long-term plan is to eventually have sidewalks on both sides of most streets, it

seems practical that the installation of pedestrian lighting may make sense for both sides of some streets in the long-term too. Based on the potential long-term plan, it may not be advisable to structure our assessments for lighting in such a way to spread the cost to the non-lighted sides of the street at this point. Many of the communications received from property owners addressed the way that the contribution from CMU had been allocated to the project cost. Although the City Commission did not request a different allocation, staff is offering an alternative for the City Commission’s consideration. Option #3 is summarized on the attached information from City Assessor Dave Rowley. This option assumes the original district that was proposed for the special assessment but reduces the special assessment portion by the $60,000 contribution from CMU. This results in the property owners receiving the benefit of 70% of the contribution and the City at large receiving 30% of the allocation. Option #3 on the spreadsheet shows the resulting special assessment amounts by property under that type of allocation. As would be expected, the net City at large cost increases under this option from an estimated $60,000 to just under $102,000. If the City Commission is interested in this option, it would be necessary to allocate an additional $42,000 from the Capital Improvement Fund toward this project cost. Based on the potential for future lighting on both sides of some streets, staff is recommending that Option #3 in the attachments may be the better alternative for the spread of the special assessment in the original district. We believe the special assessment methodology reasonably apportions the costs among the specially benefited parcels. While some might contend that other approaches may more equitably apportion those costs, the approach used in Option #3 might appear to other to be the most equitable apportionment. Thus, it seems that Option #3 is, at the very least, based on a reasonable assessment methodology. If the City Commission is interested in this option, it can approve the attached resolution #5 which would finalize the special assessment process. The Commission has the option of scheduling another public hearing on the lower assessment roll, but it is not required to do so. Based on the written objections received from property owners in the original district, approval of resolution #5 would require five affirmative votes from the City Commission.


Recommended Motion Move to approve resolution #5 for Special Assessment District #2-16 as presented which reduces the property owner assessment by a portion of the monies received as a contribution toward the project and authorize a budget amendment of $42,000 from the Capital Improvement Fund toward the project. NJR/ap


To: From: Date: Re:

Nancy Ridley David S. Rowley and Scott G. Smith March 10, 2016

MEMORANDUM

Special Assessment Project 2-2016 - Pedestrian Lighting

At its meeting of February 22, 2016, the City Commission held a public hearing on the proposed special assessment roll for this pedestrian lighting project. Following that public hearing, Commissioners expressed individual questions regarding the proposed special assessment roll and possible revised approaches to it. The City Commission then postponed action on the proposed special assessment roll and directed City staff to review the proposed roll in light of information provided at the hearing, the questions asked by Commissioners, and other information City staff might have and then provide the City Commission additional options and a recommendation for consideration. The Commission expressed that it was even open to considering a recommendation that would redefine the boundaries of the special assessment district and revised the design and layout of the pedestrian lighting project.

This special assessment is to provide pedestrian lighting along one side of the streets. Most of the occupants of these parcels are students who are tenants renting from the property owners. Statistical and anecdotal information demonstrates that well-lit areas are safer with fewer repmted incidents and the lighting also makes occupants feel safer. Increased safety and feelings of safety, in turn, result in a willingness to pay higher rents. Previous memos and discussions have provided more information about the benefits of the pedestrian lighting.

CMU also recognizes the benefits of pedestrian lighting. Not only has it taken steps to increase lighting along streets within its campus, but it has also contributed $60,000 toward the cost of this project because of the benefits the added lighting will provide the students who reside in the property along these streets.

It is also important to understand that all pedestrian lighting layouts and designs have some advantages and some disadvantages. Depending upon one's views and preferences differing pedestrian lighting layouts and designs may appear more advantageous. Obviously, one constraint on any layout and design is cost, i.e. , affordability. Other factors include the current layouts and uses of paiticular parcels, existing infrastrncture that will suppmt or must be accommodated in any design, topography, street trees and other foliage, effects on traffic signals, street design, etc. However, as noted above, even with a blank streetscape to work with,

1

individuals viewing a pedestrian lighting design would likely have differing conclusions as to whether or not it is the best design.

As directed by the Commission, we have reviewed various approaches to the pedestrian lighting special assessment. Tentative special assessment spread sheets for each option have been prepared. Summary sheets are attached to this memo, The new options for the special assessment district are valued by both front foot and square foot. Also, attached are maps of the special assessment district as defined in the various options as well as an aerial photo from DPW noting the proposed locations of the pedestrian lighting poles. In reviewing the various options, the City Commission will need to make a determination as to which option they prefer and how the final rate will be spread either by front foot or by square foot. Revised Resolutions 2 and 5 are also attached and will apply depending upon which option the c01mnission selects.

Before explaining the options provided below, a few reminders about special assessments may be helpful. Special assessments are levied against property that is specially benefited by a public improvement. If there are special benefits to the property as well as benefits to the public-atlarge, some recognition of the benefit to the general public should be reflected in a payment toward the project cost by those other than the owners of the parcels being specially assessed.

Special assessments need to be roughly proportional to the benefits to the property being assessed. That can be measured by an increase in value to the specially assessed property or by burden (or cost) borne by that property that will be relieved as a result of the public improvement. The general rule is that while the purpose of a special assessment is to recover costs of improvements to property those improvements must "confer local and peculiar benefits upon a property with a defined area." Kadzban v City of Grandville, 442 Mich 495 (1993).

There is no perfect special assessment approach. Special assessments methodologies cannot take into acconnt all factors and cannot be exactly fair in every circumstance. No formula can do so given all the variables that one could apply or argue should be applied with respect to any pmiicular parcel. However, it is importm1t to reasonably consider particular situations to provide and apply a methodology that treats similar parcels in a similar manner and that does not unreasonably assess any pm·cel. Moreover, sometimes some of the special benefit to a given parcel may be delayed. Some parcels recently improved parcels may have more immediate benefit than a parcel yet to be developed, redeveloped, or otherwise improved.

It is also important to note that one can challenge the validity of an assessment against one's own parcel, but cannot challenge the lack of an assessment or the amount of the assessment against another's parcel. Appeals affect only the assessments against the parcel for which the it is filed.

We have considered three basic options. Though a number of permutations are possible, it seemed best to focus consideration along thrne approaches. Of course, if the Commission likes some aspects of a pmiiculm· approach m1d wishes refine it, the Commission may itself do so or direct staff to do so and report further.

2

Option 1. (Expanded District with original project cost - uniform spread of rates)

SA District to be comprised of all non R3 zoned parcels between Bellows and High Streets and Douglas and Fancher Streets except for Washington and Main Streets.

Estimated Project Cost Estimated Owners Share Estimated City share

$ $ $

270,340 189,240 81,100

The owners share of$189,240 was spread by parcel based upon the front foot of each parcel. A second calculation to spread the owner's sham was developed to spread the amount of $189 ,240 by the square feet of each parcel. Both values are listed on the summary sheet for comparison. The rates for Option 1 are $30.1939 per front foot and $0.270364 cents per square foot.

This district option is an expansion from the original proposal. Both sides of the streets are included in the calculation model. The rate is uniformly applied parcel by parcel regardless of the parcel's location in the district.

Those liking this approach might contend it evenly spreads the costs to all benefiting parcels. They might also contend it appreciates the difficulty in really measuring the benefit and to say that one parcel benefits more than another or, at least, it would be impossible to accurately approximate how much more one parcel benefits than another. They might further contend it more fairly spreads the costs, accounting even for differences in parcel sizes that might not be reflected in their front footage if the square footage option is used.

Those who dislike this approach might contend that it fails to appreciate that those parcels on the sides of the streets on which the lights are being installed will likely benefit more than those on the opposite sides of the street. So, they may contend, in this model, the determination of benefit may be more difficult to calculate as the rate is exactly the same for all parcels regardless of whether they are located on the lighted or non-lighted side or on a side street. They might also contend this approach likely could make it less likely that pedestrian lighting will be placed on the other sides of the streets. They might further contend that the depth of a parcel (which is taken into account by the square footage) is an irrelevant factor because only the parcel's frontage is lit by the pedestrian lighting.

Option 2. (Expanded District with original project cost - location adjustment of rates)

SA District to be comprised of all non R3 zoned parcels between Bellows and High Streets and Douglas and Fancher Streets except for Washington and Main Streets.

Estimated Project Cost Estimated Ovrners Share Estimated City share

$ $ $

270,340 189,240 81,100

3

As in Option 1, the owners share of $189 ,240 was spread by parcel based upon the front foot of each parcel. A second calculation to spread the owner's share was developed to spread the amount of $189 ,240 by the square feet of each parcel. Both values are listed on the summary sheet for comparison.

The difference, however, is that the rates per parcel and per square foot were adjusted to account for potential differences in the benefit each parcel receives based upon its location in the district. The argument is offered that the original parcels on the "lighted" side of the street receive a benefit greater than those added parcels located on the "non-lighted" side of the street or the side streets. This does not suggest that the "non-lighted" or side street parcels do not receive benefit from the pedestrian lighting. This option simply accounts for the potential difference in benefit of the lighting based on the location of the parcel to the lighting. The rates for Option 2 are $39.2309 per front foot and $0.396607 cents per square foot for the "lighted side" and $19.6154 per front foot and $0.14585 cents per square foot for the "non-lighted" side and side streets.

Those liking this approach might contend it more fairly spreads the costs, accounting even for differences in parcel sizes that might not be reflected in their front footage for the square foot option. Others liking this approach might appreciate that it also accounts for differences in the benefits parcels will receive on the sides of the streets that will not have pedestrian lights placed on them.

Those who dislike this approach might contend that the depth of a parcel (which is taken into account by the square footage) is an irrelevant factor because only the parcel's frontage is lit by the pedestrian lighting. They might also contend this approach likely could make it less likely that pedestrian lighting will be placed on the other sides of the streets. They might further contend that the location adjustment for the assessment does not accmately appreciate that this is the only pedestrian lighting these parcels will be assessed for and that they therefore are comparatively under assessed.

Option 3. (Original District with revised project cost based on CMU contribution)

This is the original SA District with parcels only on the lighted side and will be comprised of all non R3 zoned parcels and is described as: install pedestrian lights on the East side of Douglas between Bellows and High Street, West side of University between Bellows and May Street, East side of Franklin between Bellows and May Street, and West side of Lansing between Bellows and Gaylord Street.

Estimated Project Cost Estimated Owners Share Estimated City share

$ $ $

210,340 147,238 63,102

For Option 3, a front foot spread was used just as was done for the original special assessment. The difference in Option 3 is that the rate per front foot was calculated on a lower owners share

4

amount. The $60,000 CMU contribution was subtracted from the original estimated special assessment project cost to yield a lower project cost of $210,340. This amount was then divided along the 70% - 30% split between owner and city shares. Option 3 is simply the original district with a new spread accounting for the CMU contribution to the special assessment project cost.

The rate for Option 3 is $43.5615 per front foot. The original February Special Assessment spread sheet had a rate of $55.9882 per front foot.

Those liking this approach might contend it properly gives the property owners the benefit of CMU' s contribution. Others liking this approach might appreciate that it is would allow the City to specially assess the parcels on the other side of the streets if and when pedestrian lighting is installed on them in the future, as some hope will occur.

Those disliking this approach may contend it fails to assess the parcels on the other sides of the streets and side streets that will benefit, at least some, from the pedestrian lighting. They might also contend that its rather one-dimensional approach to the assessment fails to account for parcel size that may be related to the numbers of possible parcel occupants and, therefore, a reasonable factor to apply to measuring the benefit.

5

SUMMARY- PEDESTRIAN LIGHTS-ORIGINAL PARCELS- MARCH 9, 2016

Paree! Number Owner Property Address Original SA Option 3 Option 1 Option 1 Option Z Option 2

I 55.9882 Front Ft· 43.5615 Front Ft- 30.1939 Sq Ft .270354 Front Ft· Sq Ft· .396607

39.2309 & & .1983035

19.6154 United Apts-RCS LLC

$1,992.801 PD Box 222 i

17-000-03485-00 Mt Pl•osont, Ml 48804 920 S Univers;ty $3,695.22 $2,875.06 $2,176.97 $2,589.24 $3,193.48 Samuel F HoUO•<l

I I Molt Shop 110B8S Unlveroity

17-000-05045-00 [Mt Pleasant, Ml 48858 1088 S University $5,598.82 $4,356.15 $3,019.39 $3,298.44 $3,923.09 $4,838.61 UnltedApls-lJll llC

PO Box222

1.7-000-03487-00 Mt Pl••sont, Ml 48804 905 s University $11,085.66 $8,625.18 $5,978.39 $6,530.91, $7,767.72 $9,580.44 Ramonaeaulieu ! PO aox21H

17-000-09501-00 Mt Pleosant, Ml43804 1000 S University $2,799.41 $2,178.08 $1,509.70 $1,649.22 $1,961.55 $2,419.30! ~ogor & Pomelo Fult?. 6Z5SKinnoy

17-000-09502-00 Mt Pleo••nt. Ml 48858 1004 S University $2,799.41 $2,178.08 $1,509.70 $1,649.22 $1,961.55 $2,419.30 Karen Sherwood Trust 1109 Watson 1010 & 1010 1/2

17-000-09503-00 M\ Plea"nt, Ml 48858 S University $2,799.41 $2,178.08 $1,509.70 $1,649.22 $1,961.55 $2,419.30 Mich Chnsti;m Campus Ministry

I ! 1171 Trowbridge Rd

17-000-09504-00 ,East lans;ng, Ml 48823-5221 1012 s University $2,799.41 $2,178.08 $1,509.70 $1,649.22 $1,961.55 $2,419.30 John & Clalne Davis & Brigid Hinkley I 6691 f Baseline Rd I I

17-000-09505-00 MtPleasant,Ml43858 1014S University $2,799.41 $2,178.08 $1,509.70 $1,649.22! $1,961.55 $2,419.30

I PaulaVanSchooneveld

i11-000-09506-00 505S Kmney MtPlea<•nt, Ml4BBSB 1016 S University $2,799.41 $2,178.081 $1,509.70 $1,649,22 $1,961.55 $2,419.301 Rentwood Mgmt LLC I 405SMi,,;on5! I '

,117-000-09507-00 Mt Pieasont, Ml48BSS !1018 S University $2,799.41 $2,178.08 $1,509.70 $1,649.22 $1,961.55 $2,419.30 C & W lnv.,tments LLC 3385 S Chippowo Rd

17-000-09508-00 M! Plea .. nt, Ml 4885B 1020 S University $2,799.41 $2,178.08 $1,509.70 $1,649.22 $1,961.55 $2,419.30 Harley Hmkl•yTru>t

I I 1228 Abbey Ln

17-000-09509-00 ,Mtrlea••nt, M14885S 1024 S University $2,799.41 $2,178.08 $1,509.70 $1,649.22 $1,961.55 $2,419.30 Harley llinkleyTru>t 1228 Abbey Ln

17-000-09510-00 MtPlea••nt,M14B8SS 1026 S University $2,799.41 $2,178.08 $1,509.70 $1,649.22 $1,961.55 $2,419.30 Romon6eauliou ' POBoxllB I

17-000-09906-00 Ml Ploasont, Ml 48804 215 W Moy $6,158.70 $4,791.77 $3,321.33 $1,873.62 $4,315.40 $2,748.49 i 3 Ball Propertle•LLC

!17-000-09907-00 1814 Woods Woy

$2,785.391 Mt Ploas>nt, Ml48858 909 Douglas $3,975.16 $3,092.87 $2,143,77 $2,514.66 $3,688.84 3 BallPropert1esLLC I ' 1814 Woods W•y

$1,402.401

17-000-09908-00 Mt Pleasant, Ml 48858 911 Douglas $2,911.39 $2,265.20 $1,570.08 $956.01 $2,040.01 Rentwood MBmt LLC 4os s Mi.,ionst

17-000-09909-00 Mt Pleo,orll, Ml 48858 915 Douglas $5,430.86 ----iwashington Village

$4,225.47 $2,928.81 $1,783.32 $3,805.40 $2,616.02

PO Bo<222 ' 17-000-09916-00 MtPl•a•ont, Ml488D4 221 Clayton $4,870.97 $3,789.85 $2,626.87 $1,552.43 $3,413.09 $2,277.32 i Rentwoo<fl;;igmt LLC ! ' 405 S Mission St 1003 & 1003 1/2 ' : 17-000-09917-00 Mt Pie'"'"" Ml4B85B 1Douglas $4,367.08 $3,397.80 $2,355.12i $2,~14.62 $3,060.01 $3,542.10

Lynn & Cl>ristlno fou,er 376 Coachmon Dr

$3,245.83i 17-000-09918-00 MtPleo;ant, Ml 48858 1005 Douglas $3,695.22 $2,875.06 $1,992.80 $2,212.66 $2,589.24 'Wa>hlngtonVillage PO Bo• 222

,17-000-09919-00 Mt Ploasant, Ml48804 1015 Douglas $3,695,22 $2,875.06 $1,992.80, $2,212.66 $2,589.24 $3,245.83 UniteciApts·RC.S LLC ' PQ Box 222 ! I

17-000-09920-00 Mt Plea<ont, Ml 48804 11019 Dougios $9,126.08 $7,100.52 $4,921.61 $5,464.60! $6,394.64 $8,016.22 Marsholl~eal Est In, LLC ' 10H1 ChickagomiTr

17-000-09925-00 Brutu•. Ml 4971£ 1029 Douglas $5,169.95 $4,022.47 $2,788.10 $3,095.71 $3,622.58 $4,541.211 !United Apts-MMI LLC i jPO aox 2l2

17-000-09926-00 !Mt Pleasant, Ml 48804 210 W Bellows ' $3,452.79 $2,686.44 $1,862.06 - $2,067.50 $2,419.37 $3,032.89 Darnel CS.. A.my Scholl 2493 N Lincoln Rd

)17-000-10333-00 Rosebush, Ml 48878 305 & BOS 1/2Douglas $5,598.82 $4,356.15 $3,019.39 $2,703.64 $3,923.09 $3,966.07 R•ntwood Mgrntcrc

' 405SMssionst $2,264,541

I l± 7 -000_~ '.!-9~_3_§:QQ._ r~'.,~le,,ant, Ml4SSS8 807 Dnuglas $4,199.12 $3,267.11 $2,027.73 $2,942.32 $2,974.55 _J

SUMMARY- PEDESTRIAN LIGHTS-ORIGINAL PARCELS- MARCH 9, 2016

]Parcel Number Owner Property Address Original SA jOption 3 Option 1 Option 1 Option 2 !Option 2

I 55.9882 : Front Ft- 43.5615 Front Ft· 30.1939 Sq Ft .270364 Front Ft· lsq Ft- .396607

I I 39.2309 & I & .1983035 ' 19.6154

117-000-10340-00

C'fhornas Properties LLC i 3720!.apeerRd Auburn Hill~ Ml 48326 210 W May $4,199.12) $3,267.11 $2,264.54 $1,013.87 $2,942.32 $1,487.28 Rentwood"iiilgrnl LLC

i 17-000-03452-00 405 S Mjssion St

$2,393.081 Mt Pleasont, Ml 48858 925 s Franklin $3,415.28 $2,657.25 $1,841.83 $1,088.49 $1,596.74

117-000-03463-00

loriDriossnackTrust I

$1,596.741 U23 Country Woy Mt Pleo<ant, Ml 48858 921 S Franklin $3,415.28 $2,657.25 $1,841.83 $1,088.49 $2,393.0S! Rentwood MgrntLLC I 405 5 Mission 5!

17-000-10414-00 Mt Plea .. nt, Ml 48BSB 1001 S Franklin $2,799.41 $2,178,08 $1,509.70 $1,418.06 $1,961.55 $2,080.ZO! Rentwood MgmtLLC I 405SMl.,ion5t

17-000-10416-00 Mt Pleasant, Ml 48858 1005 S Franklin $2,799.41 $2,178.08 $1,509.70 $1,418.06 $1,961.55 $2,080.20 Rontwood Mgmt LlC i ! 4055 Ml'5ionSt

17-000-10417-00 MtPlo.sont, Ml48858 1007 S Franklin $2,799.41 $2,178.08 $1,509.70 $1,418.06 $1,961.55 $2,080.20

117-000-10418·00

Timothy Drlo.,nad< Tru•l

l1B Country Way M!Plea,,nt,M1488S8 1011 S Franklin $2,799.41 $2,178.08 $1,509.70 $1,418.06 $1,961.55 $2,080.20

' Rentwood Mgmt LLC

' 405 S Mi" ion St ' I [17-000-10419-00 MtPl•.,•nt,M14BBSB 1013 s Franklin $2,799.411 $2,178.08 $1,509.70 $1,418.0Gi $1,961.55 $2,080.20

oi1v1on Mgmt Inc I 1933 Churchill

17-000-10420-00 Mt Plea.,m, Ml 40858 i 1015 S Frnnklin $2,799.41 $2,178.08 $1,509.70 $1,418.06 $1,961.55 $2,080.20· Rentwood MG mt LLC 405 5 Ml"lon St

17-000-10421-00 Mt Pleasant, Ml 48858 1019 s Franklin ' $2,799.41 $2,178.08 $1,509.70 $1,418.06 $1,961.55 $2,080.20 I Lori Drie><nacl< Trust

i 1123CountryWay i 17-000-10422-00 Mt rlea,.nt, Ml 48858 1021 s Franklin $2,799.41 $2,178.08 ' $1,509.70 $1,282.88 $1,961.55 $1,881.90 Rentwood Mgmt llC

I 4055 Mission St

117-000-10423-00 Mt Pleasant, Ml48858 1023 S Franklin $2,799.41 $2,178.08 $1,509.70 $1,282.88 $1,961.55 $1,881.90 Rentwood Mgmt LLC

!11-000-10424-00 405 S Mb ion St

MtPleosont,M1485S8 1025 s Franklin $2,799.41! $2,178.08 $1,509.70 $1,282.88, $1,961.55 $1,881.90

'

im Dri«snackTrust

$1,282.881 1123 Country Woy :1027 & 1027 1/2 s

$1,961.551 17-000-10425-00 MtPlo•oant,Ml48BS8 [Franklin $2,799.41 $2,178.08 $1,509.70 $1,881.90 Tim Pri•><n•ckTru>I I 1123CountryWay

$1,961.551 11-ooq-10426-00 Mt Plea,,nt, Ml 48858 1031 s Franklin $2,799.41 $2,178.08 $1,509.70 $1,282.88 $1,881.90 Remwood Mgmt LLC

4oS 5 Ml><ionSt I 17-00Q..10428-00 Mt Pleosont, Mi 48858 315 E Bellows $8,398.23 $6,534.231 $4,529.09 $2,567.11 $5,884.64 $3,765.78,

1R.iitwood M~mt LLC

' l4055Mlsoion5t

' ' 17-000-10430·00 iMt Plea•ant, Ml 48858 1028 S Lansing ' $2,799.41 $2,178.08 i $1,509.70 $1,282.88 $1,961.55 $1,881.90 Rentwood Mgmt llC ' ' 4oSS Ml,,lonSt

;17-000-10431-00 MtPloas•nt, Ml48B58 1022 S Lansing $2,799.41 $2,178.08 $1,509.701 $1,282.88 $1,961.55 $1,881.90 Rentwood Mgmt LLC !

l2:?_-g9p-10432-00 405 S M;,,;onSt

Mt Ple•sant, Ml 4BBSB 1020 s Lansing $2,799.41' $2,178.08 $1,509.70 $1,418.06 $1,961.55 $2,080.20 Rentwood Mgmt LLC

405 s Mission St

17-000-10433-00 Mt Ple•-"nt, Ml 48858 1018 & 1018 1/2S Lansi $2,799.41 $2,178.08 $1,509.70 $1,418.06 $1,961.551 $2,080.20 i :~~t;'~~:"~~~tt LLC ' 17-000-10434-00 Mt Pl•••ont, Ml 48858 1014 s Lansing $2,799.41 $2,178.08 ' $1,509.70 $1,418.06 $1,961.55 $2,080.201 SchellDOVelupment Co 3S305 Moridion Rd

17-000-10435-00 Mi Pi•asant, Ml4B853 1012. S Lansing $2,799.41 $2,178.08 $1,509.70 $1,418.06 $1,961.55 $2,080.20 fiontwood Mgmt LLC I ' 405 S Mission St

11010 s .. Lansing 17-000-10436-00 Mt Ple:mnt, Ml 41l853 $5,150.91 $4,007.66 $2,777.84 $2,609.23 $3,609.24 $3,827.57 ' Rontwood Mgmt LLC

17-000-10438·00 l;:;it5 P~•~;~~~n~lt4assa 100? S Lansing $3,247.32 $2,526.57 $1,751.25 $1,644.95 $2,275.39 $2,413.04

Parcel Number Owner Property Address IOriglnalSA 55.9882

I 17-000-10411-00 Studont8ookExch•nE• 221 E Bellows I

2091.: B•llow' MtPleo»nt..Ml.B_l!fili!

17-000-09512.-00 smd•ntBookExch•ng• 205 E Bellows &I l09E Bellow5 209-219 MtPle0<<1nt.Ml4BB58

17-000-09514-00 Student Book Exohon~• 1021 S Univer:sity 209 E aelloW• MtP e" t Ml 088SS

17-000-09515-00 ~lchord Kerr 1019 S University lposox132 Mt Plea>ant. Ml 4S804-0132

17-000-09516-00 Mi<h•el S A'J;orm.nn 38fi3N•>h I 1017 S University

Trov Ml4808:1

17-000-09517-00 Olivieri Management Inc 1933Ch"rchill

1015 s University

Mt Plo•s;rnt. Ml48S58

17-000-09518-00 TOrimonockTru5l 1123 Country Woy

1009 S University

Mt Pio.son!. Ml48858

17-000-0951!1-00 lJnltedApts·RCS,LlC 1007 & lOOSi Po6ox222 S Universityi Mt Plo0>ant. Ml 48804-0122

17-000-09521-00 R•monR Bcoullou 1003 s University

' PO Box nn Mt Ple,,ont. Ml ~8$04·212'1

! 17·000-09522-00 Rontwood Mgmt LLC 40SS Mi"ionSt ! 1001 S University

MtPloo>a t ... '"B"fl

17-000-03474-00 RamonB••uiieu 915 & 917 POBox'120 S University M' 'I '" t. Ml 4SS04·2123

17-000-03473-00 Kim &Ali>a Ellert.on 909 S University 1<06 E S•o•dwav Mt Pleasaot Ml48S5S

17-000-03472.-00 Zeta XI ~ou>inglnc 905 S University

905 s UnTversity

M! Pleo5ont Ml '8"58

17"000-03471-00 Benjomin & Heather Coffman 901 S University 1007Watson & 204 E May

1.,,Pe '" ! Ml48BSB

17-000·10327-00 TroyVWood 806 Douglas I 2303Briarhlll lanslno. Ml '~SH

j 17-000-10321-00 UnltedApB-MMI lLC POBox212

816 Douglas

fv-000-0993&-oo MtPlea>ont.M14BRr"1

jMoryAllco Lansloi> I 914 Douglas 'Po Box88 Ml Pl•"aot Ml 4880~·0088

17-000-09937-00 Alllolanglois 1004 Douglas PO Bo•SB M!Pleas•nt. •·•4s•D4·'"8"

17-000-10401-00 Rentwood Mgmt LI.C 1002 S Franklin & 40SSMl»iMSt 210 E Gaylord M\Plo•<•nt Ml4SSSS

17-000-10402-00 Hu'5elllemkeTru5( 1004 S Franklin, 10D4SFranklln I MtPl00>ont.Ml4BSSS

117-000-10403-00 Hu,,ell &JacquelynPelletler I 1006 s Franklin 5108 Eleven Mile Rd

iRemus Ml49340

17-000-10404-00 5&M Enterptl>e>lLC 1010 s Franklin 170W Broomfield Rd Mt Ple••OHt Ml ""a>"

17-000-10405-00 Ronald & Thorn>• Osborne 1014 S Franklin 49730 'lorsoh"e New Boltimo e. Ml 48047

17-000-10406-00 Donald & Beth Zieman Trust 1016 s Franklin 3329M11nnlonRd .l• ln•w Ml 48603-1616

17-000-10407-00 jTOrlossnacl;Trust 1018 & 10181/2 L i1123CountryWay S F1<1nklin ~~- [MtPiegs• 0t."''4ijo5~

Option 3 Front H- 43.5615

I

i

'

SUMMARY PEDESTRIAN LIGHTS

ADDED PARCELS MARCH 9, 2016

Option l Front Ft· 30.1939

$1,509.70

$2,475.90

$1,449.31

$1,509.70

$1,509.70

$1,509.70

$1,509.701

$3,019.39

$1,509.70

$1,509.70

$1,992..80

$1,992.80

$1,992.80 I

$1,992.80

$1,509.70

$4,529.09

$3,985.59

$2,415.51

$1,509.70

$1,509.70

$1,509.70

$1,509.70

i $1,509.70 I ' I

$1,509.701

$1,539.89

Option l ,option2 10ption2 Sq Ft .270364 !Front Ft· 39.2309 & I Sq Ft• .395607 &

119.6154 1.14585

' I I

$3,455.25 $980.77 $1,863.96

$2,882.081 I

$1,608.461 $1,554.76

$1,518.36 $941.54 $819.09

$1,592.44 $980.77 $859.06

$1,592.44 $980.77 $859.06

$1,592.44 $980.77 $859.06

$1,592.44 $980.77 $859.06

' ' ' $3,184.89 $1,961.54 $1,718,11

$1,592..44 $980.77 $859.06

$1,581.63 $980.77 $853.22

$2,103.28 $1,294.62 $1,134.63

$2,103.28 $1,294.62 $1,134.63

$2,103.28 $1,294.62 ' $1,134.63i

$2,103.28 $1,294.62 $1,134.63

$1,892.55 $980.77 $1,020.95

I I $5,677.64 $2,942.31 $3,062.85

$7,351.74 $2,589.23 $3,965.95

$3,536.36 $1,569.23 $1,907.72

$1,592.44 $980.77 $859.06

$1,592.44 $980.77 $859.06 i

: $1,592.44 $980.77i $859.06

$1,592.44 $980.77 $859.06

$1,592.44 $980.77 $859.06

$1,592.44 $980.77 $859.06! I

$876.241 $1,624.291 $1,00Q.39

Parcel Number Owner

17-000-10408-00 Arthur& MorjorieF<iuntain Trnst

l032SFr•nklln ;,,,-p,~a-·nt.MI 48258

17-000-10409-00 Arthur & Marjorie Fountoin Trust 1032SFranklln

l"tP'eo>0"' M 4 •

'17-000-10410-00 TDrle5'nackTrust 1123 Country Way

1,,, Pleasant.Ml4BB58

17-00D-03475-00 Ollvlerl Management Inc 1933Churchm MtPlcos 14oo<g

17-000-03476-00 Barrett&Mlohollelehr 3091Sloorni;Rd MtPlemant.MI ·8-58

17-000-03477-00 Camilla Zaw•ckl TrVst

~~~~d 5R~~:~ H~E. ____

17-000-03478-00 United Apts-RCS LLC PO Box222 M• Plo,.ont. Ml 46804-0222

17-000-10441-00 Ames LLC

, I POBoxB3 "t P'oa>ant Ml 4B804-DOS3

: 17-000-10442-00 Amos LLC POBoxB3 Mt Plo"ant. Ml 4BB04-00B>

17-000-10444-00 laBellePropertie; LlC 405 S Mi,.ion, Ste F MtPloosont.Ml4B85B

17 000-10445-00 OBaliPrapor1le5 LLC 1814 Woods Way MtPloa<ant Ml48858

17-000-10446-00 Amy& Daniel Sohell 2493 N Lincoln Rd ose~u.<h Ml4BB7B

17-000-10447-00 Rentwood MB mt LLC 405SMi,,lonSt MtPloasant.Ml4BBSB

17-000-10448-00 Sorglo &5tonl5lova ChaVe< 1315 Hlgillond MtPleosani."' 48"SB

17-000-10449-00 DLCRontol5LLC 432Sl'ilnct...rlw• MtPlo•5'!!llJ.'i.L!l!W5H

17-000-10450-00 Central Mgmt& le•>ing LLC 1933Churchlll Mt Ple'5ant. M' ·a·sa

17-000-10451-00 United Ap!S- RCS LLC ,POBox222 !Mt Pie . a t Ml 4HB04-0222

17-000-10452-00 United Apt•· RCS Llt PO Box222 Mt Pl a nt Ml 4RR01-0lJ_2

17-000-10339-00 TOrle5'nackTrwst

~1t2~ 1 ~,~~1.~.v~7 17-000·03489-00 Marsholl Real Estate & Invest

19441 chlokosami Trail 8rutu> Ml 49716

17-000-03461-00 Rentwood Mgmt lLC 4055 Ml"jon, Ste F

iMtPloa<ant.MI 48"53

17-000-05001·00 Alpha Si~maTau Housing Corp cfo Blystone& Bailey 619SMl»lon Mt Pleasant, Ml 48&58

Grand Totals for Options:

Original Parcel Count 50

Added Parcel Count 47

Property Address

1028 & 10281/2.1 5 Franklin

1032 & 10321/2 S Franklin

1036 S Franldin

920 S Franklin

910 s Franklin

906 & 904 s Franklin

902 S Franklin

406 E Gaylord!

' 1003 S Lansing

1007 S Lansing

1011 S Lansing

1015 S Lansing

1017 S Lansing

1021 S Lansing

1027 S Lansin!q

i 1033 s Lansing 1

i 1035 S Lansing

403 E Bellows

204 W May

104 E May

303 E Gaylord

107 W Gaylord

Original SA Option3 55.9882 Front ft· 43.5615

i

I

I

SUMMARY

PEDESTRIAN LIGHTS

ADDED PARCELS MARCH 9, 2016

Option 1 Front Ft- 30.1939

$1,419.11

$1,509.70

$1,509.70

$1,992.80

I I $1,992.80

I $1,992.80

$1,992.80

$1,509.70

$3,019.39

$1,509.70

$1,509.70

$1,509.70

$1,509.701

$1,509.70

$1,509.70

$1,509.70

$1,509.70

$1,509.70

' $1,509.70

I $1,615.37

$1,992.80

$3,019.39

!Option 1 Sq Ft .270364

$1,496.90

$1,592.44

$1,592.44

$2,103.28

$2,103.36

$2,103.28

$2,103.28

$1,391.02

$2,782.05

$1,391.02

$1,391.02

$1,391.02

$1,391.02! , $1,391.021

' ' $1,391.02 1

$1,391.02

$1,391.02

$1,391,02

$1,013.87

$954.66

' $2,176.97

$2,703.64

Optron2 Option 2 Front Ft- 39.2309 & Sq Ft- .396607 &

19.6154 .14585

$921,92 $807.51

$980.77 $859.06

$980.77 $859.06

$1,294.62 $1,134.63

' $1,294.62 $1,134.681 I

$1,294.62 $1,134.63

$1,294.62 $1,134.63

$980.77 $750.40

$1,961.54 $1,500.80

$980.77 $750.40

$980.77 $750.40

$980.77 $750.401

$980.77 $750.40

$980.77 $750.40

$980.771 $750.40

' $980.77

I $750.40

$980.77 $750.40

$980.77 $750.40

$980.77 $546.94

$1,049.42 $515.ool

$1,294.62 $1,174.38

$1,961.54 $1,458.50

Original S.A. Option #3 Option #1- FF Option #1- sqft Option #2-FF Option #2- sqft

$189,240,68 $147,238,31 $189,240,57 $189,239.75 $189,240.30 $189,240.79

SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 2-16 RESOLUTION NO. 2 (Option 1 or Option 2)

WHEREAS, the City Manager has prepared a report concerning certain public improvements in Special Assessment District No. 2-16, which includes all of the information to be included by Section 33.20 "Survey and Report" of the City's Code of Ordinances; and,

WHEREAS, the City Conunission has reviewed said report; and,

WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of Mt. Pleasant determines that it is tentatively necessary to acquire and construct the public improvements in the City of Mt. Pleasant more particularly hereinafter described in this resolution;

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, THAT:

• The City Commission hereby tentatively determines that the public improvements described more particularly hereinafter provided for are necessary.

• The total cost of said improvements is estimated to be $270,340. The amount of $189,240 shall be spread over the special assessment district as hereinafter described as a result of benefits to be received by the affected properties in the special assessment district. The amount of $81,100 shall be paid by the City-at-large.

• Said special assessment district shall consist of lots and parcels of land as follows: all non R3 zoned parcels between Bellows and High Sh·eets and Douglas and Fancher Streets except for Washington and Main Street.

• Said estimated life of such public improvements is not less than fifteen (15) years.

• The affected properties in the special assessment district shall be assessed in accordance with the relative portion of the sum to be levied in the district, as the benefit to the parcel of land bears to the total benefit to all parcels.

• The aforesaid report shall be placed on file in the office of the City Clerk where the same shall be available for public examination.

• The City Conunission shall meet on April 11, 2016 at 7:00 p.1n., in the City

Commission Chambers, City Hall, 320 W. Broadway St., for the purpose of hearing public input on the making of said public improvements.

• The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause notice of said hearing to be published and mailed in accordance with applicable statutory and ordinance prov1s10ns.

• All resolutions and parts of resolutions conflicting with the provisions of this resolution are hereby rescinded.

SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 2-16 RESOLUTION NO. 5

(Option3)

WHEREAS, the City Cormnission has met after due and legal notice and reviewed the special assessment roll to defray Special Assessment District No. 2-16 share of the cost of certain public expenditures, described as: install pedesh·ian street lights on the East side of Douglas between Bellows and High Sh·eet and West side of University between Bellows and May Street and East side of Franklin between Bellows and May Sh·eet and West side of Lansing between Bellows and Gaylord Street;

WHEREAS, after hearing all persons interested therein and after carefully reviewing the special assessment roll, the Commission deems said special assessment roll to be fair, just and equitable and that each of the assessments contained thereon are in accordance with the benefits to be derived by each parcel of land assessed;

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT:

1. Said special assessment roll as prepared by the City Assessor, in the amount of $147,238 is hereby confirmed.

2. Said special assessment roll may be divided into seven (7) annual installments, the first of which shall be due and payable on July 1, 2017.

3. Interest shall be charged on the unpaid balance of said special assessment roll at the rate of tlu·ee percent (3 % ), commencing one (1) month after notification that the project has been completed. There will be no interest if paid within one month of the written notification from the City Treasurer.

4. The City Clerk is directed to attach his warrant to a certified copy of this resolution within ten (10) days after its adoption requesting the City Assessor to spread and the City Treasurer to collect the sums and amounts as directed by the Cormnission.

5. The City Clerk is directed to endorse the date of confirmation on the roll.

6. All resolutions and parts of resolutions conflicting with the provisions of this resolution are rescinded.

., 11>-----1......,_____.<>..4!-l '&' ?O' I ~

·.101u2

>... .. ':

·• 2 :8 1 g, .. . . . . ... • .

. , 3

~ , .~~ , , ;, • ' ' raB, • • • • •

· ~ 4

:· · · · · · · ·u:r· · · · · · · '

' '·' .•

5

· · · ·· ,;; · ··· 12

13 -09943-

tlj) ~A

- '1i d ' ~ -09914- ~ 011 , ::J

~ 15 ~ Cl) ' ' ' •G'(,'?~5· •. > £!>

16 ... . - ows Street

ll--.J""'•'~~iA<.<"------11 '1 ;1~·~1

~ J~ I 1

r, 2

-034~Lj ~

·- -----------

lf1046~- 1 r~474. 24 I

[ '--0j 84- ~ '. 1~ ~ - , ,,::__Jl·r ~ ' - .!J f ------

~ -- - -.:11.--.; _.

Ori g inal District & Option 3 -~

"--"t 1_..~, ~ ,,. I l f • =+"' z-=! ''Jj ,,~ ' 'i

(.\) :!J s::::: (.\) >

"' I t... (.\)

...c u SC CJ

1, -,~ lL I :::_'] ' I -· --.ll _ " __ ~

" ·~~. .. ...... .. ~"-4·=1==+' .. ·rr~ ·~· "

:~ 2

1 ~"· . . ... . ... .

·t 3

• / .l;: • • r. · •' i1!" 0' · ' •

l lt •

i '

J:T' jl' 1~ "' j s;: " ~~rn- ~ ; J\~~-o~ 1 0

r. +-

. ~~,

-o3t°01L , --.2;'.j.4' " . ... ';_• .•

·~ .tJt "'L ~

1-..,.,.,--jl t ••••• ~. . g1r' \(mo}&; (. i. !L

~ 1 . '. X, ~ ' l'i J,;,.· . . . . ' . . . . . . . • . ·~ tr) l 3 ~})! ' ·B?9ZO- ' '. .09J ~ cs

-o9-9·t3· ~j,,, . ; !;E D D .'. AL ~T. -.....;._ ...,,_ ..... _:_ _ _ !12~· · . . .. ; . . . . . . . . . . <

~ cr":'•;-·0 .~ · &.1qlv"I ~ """"' " " J: ... ~ ~ :::µ :; ,, .. F j' , •• ,. . • • •••• ' • « '~ " ~ @ .:--!JY.llJ'lS';,.,v '. ._. v 'J

I~ .. ·0;5_ .. 2,4) ,j 16 ·- f If

~J . ,.,... li'1· ~ "u ~· " ._,,,,.,

,___l,~- - 1.4, r;:.~ U U ,,._;

I

IL------.Jn 11 t 11 ··~._.~•

~1

~~!- 'ii ?

.-~2-r~~ _I a_· : , 413-_..._

-09511-

15 -05045-

!'»

l'~ ~ ~~: ' . • . m .. . . • •,

j:.-_..t'I- ·""__..!JI. _ _.....-,-.~ 1'---ll't' L--...<•.' ~£-=::::r'!---=f·· • ·=-rt"'---" ..... '"~ ,,,,. 11

c (i;.:

~

L ~

...£: u s;: 0

UL 11 • . • . an 11 :;:;:;:cr=I ·u ·-~- v J ;_ .

OPTI ON 1 & 2 (Non R3 Zone) except Washington and Main

2016 Pedestrian Lighting Citv of Mt.Pleasant

City of Mt. Pleasant· ·.·. DIYl~I(•"' OF J. t ·.1 tC--; "lil·~· ·3

r · '(r::rr .. ,, .. ·, rr 1:1r. ,. T -

* LightPoles

• New Meter

Light poles 75' apart 1YP All light pole locations will be determined and field marked by the city inspector prior to the start of the project

Pub!is;hed: hn·2S-2016 \'.comp'ile\J:\ ConstructJ.:in\ 16 Co."Ut1Ligh~nQ

Special Assessment District 2-16

Project Analysis

Original

CMU $ Total Spec Assmt $ 189,240 $ City $ 81,100 s District Total $ 270,340 $ R-3 Zoning $ 38,260 s Project Total $ 308,600 $

Special Assessment $ 189,240 $ City $ 59,360 $ CMU $ 60,000 s Project Total $ 308,600 $

Option 3

60,000

147,238 63,102

270,340 38,260

308,600

147,238 101,362

60,000

308,600

$ $ $ $

$

$ $ $

$

Option 1 Option 2

189,240 $ 189,240 81,100 $ 81,100

270,340 $ 270,340

38,260 $ 38,260

308,600 $ 308,600

189,240 $ 189,240

59,360 $ 59,360

60,000 $ 60,000

308,600 $ 308,600



FROM: NANCY RIDLEY, CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: CONSIDER RESOLUTION TO ADOPT STADIUM DRIVE AS A CITY

STREET The City receives funding through the state’s gas and weight tax to be used exclusively for streets within the City. The formula for distribution is based on the type and number of miles of streets within the City. As the attached memo from City Engineer Stacie Tewari indicates, the City Commission must take formal action to formally accept Stadium Drive into the City’s street inventory. We recommend the Commission approve the attached MDOT resolution recognizing the new drive. Recommended Motion Move to approve the resolution as presented accepting Stadium Drive into the local street inventory for the City of Mt. Pleasant. NJR/ap

THE CITY OF



(989) 779-5300 (989) 773-4691 fax


(989) 779-5100 (989) 773-4020 fax


(989) 779-5400 (989) 772-6250 fax

To: Nancy Ridley, City Manager Date: 3/10/2016 From: Stacie Tewari, City Engineer Subject: RESOLUTION TO ADOPT STADIUM DRIVE BETWEEN MISSION AND EAST CAMPUS AS A CITY STREET (ATTACHED) In order to properly allocate funding to local road authorities in the state, the Department of Transportation requires recertification of its street system maps on an annual basis. In the average year, the map for our area does not change, and it can simply be recertified by the designated street administrator. However, because we will be adding the newly constructed Stadium Drive, the state requires a resolution to be passed by the governing body making the following key statements:

· Acceptance of platted streets or centerline description. · Acknowledgement that said street is located within city/village right-of-way and is

under municipal control. · Acknowledgement that the street is a public street and is for public street

purposes. · Acknowledgement that the street has been accepted into the municipal street

system and is open to the public for public use prior to December 31, 2015.

Once the attached resolution is passed, it can be forwarded to the state along with the updated and certified map. Stadium Drive will be added to the inventory of local streets for the city and funding will be allocated appropriately.

Proposed Acceptance Resolution for Stadium Drive so called. The following resolution was offered by Commissioner __________________ and supported by Commissioner ________________________: WHEREAS: the City of Mt. Pleasant did acquire land for street right-of-way for street purposes in 2015, and the street was constructed in 2015, and WHEREAS: it is necessary to furnish certain information to the State of Michigan to place this street within the City of Mt. Pleasant street system for the purpose of obtaining funds under Act 51, P.A. 1951 as amended. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED:

1. That said street is to be named Stadium Drive. 2. That the Legal Description of said street is described as:

AN EASEMENT OVER THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED A PARCEL OF LAND IN THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 27, T.14 N.- R.4 W., CITY OF MT. PLEASANT, ISABELLA COUNTY, MICHIGAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: TO FIX THE POINT OF BEGINNING, COMMENCE AT THE EAST 1/4 CORNER OF SAID SECTION 27; THENCE N.00°-09'-59"W., ON AND ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION, 955.46 FEET; THENCE S.89°-51'-26"W., 59.99 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF MISSION STREET (SO-CALLED) AND TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THIS DESCRIPTION; THENCE CONTINUING S.89°-51'-26"W., 239.93 FEET TO A POINT ON A LINE THAT IS PARALLEL WITH AND 35.00 FEET, MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES, EAST OF THE PHYSICAL CENTERLINE OF EAST CAMPUS DRIVE; THENCE N.00°-00'-00"E., ON AND ALONG SAID LINE, 98.18 FEET; THENCE S.69°-38'-35"E., BEING PARALLEL WITH AND 2.00 FEET, MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES, NORTH OF THE NORTHERLY EDGE OF A PROPOSED 8 FOOT WIDE SIDEWALK, SAID LINE BEING THE NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF STADIUM DRIVE, 54.11 FEET TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A RADIUS OF 148.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY CONTINUING ON SAID LINE AND ON AND ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, 47.44 FEET TO THE POINT OF TANGENCY, SAID ARC BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD BEARING S.79°-49'-17"E., 52.31 FEET TO SAID POINT OF TANGENCY; THENCE N.90°-00'-00"E., CONTINUING ON SAID LINE, 137.51 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF MISSION STREET; THENCE S.00°-09'-59"E., ON SAID WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, SAID LINE BEING 60.00 FEET, MEASURED AT RIGHT-ANGLES, WEST OF SAID EAST SECTION LINE, 69.51 FEET BACK TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, CONTAINING 0.41 ACRES OF LAND. WITH A PHYSICAL CENTERLINE DESCRIPTION OF; THE PHYSICAL CENTER LINE OF STADIUM DRIVE, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: TO FIX THE POINT OF BEGINNING, COMMENCE AT THE EAST 1/4 CORNER OF SAID SECTION 27, SECTION 27, T.14 N.- R.4 W., CITY OF MT. PLEASANT, ISABELLA COUNTY, MICHIGAN; THENCE N.00°-09'-59"W., ON AND ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION, 984.32 FEET; THENCE

S.90°-00'-00"W., 59.99 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF MISSION STREET (SO-CALLED) AND TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THIS PHYSICAL CENTER LINE; THENCE CONTINUING S.90°-00'-00"W., 97.85 FEET; THENCE N.82°-18'-42"W., 100.91 FEET; THENCE S.90°-00'-00"W, 41.99 FEET TO A POINT ON A LINE THAT IS PARALLEL WITH AND 35.00 FEET, MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES, EAST OF THE PHYSICAL CENTERLINE OF EAST CAMPUS DRIVE AND TO THE POINT OF ENDING OF THIS PHYSICAL CENTER LINE. 3. That said street is located within a City of Mt. Pleasant right-of-way and is under the control of the City of Mt. Pleasant. 4. That said street is a public street and is for public street purposes. 5. That said street is accepted into the City of Mt. Pleasant Local Street system and was open to the public September 17, 2015. Resolution unanimously adopted. I, Jeremy Howard, City Clerk for the City of Mt. Pleasant, Michigan, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of a resolution adopted by the City Commission at a regular meeting held March 14, 2016. ___________________________ Jeremy Howard, City Clerk Dated: ____________________



FROM: NANCY RIDLEY, CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: CONSIDER PARKING LOT USE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY,

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (EDC) AND MT. PLEASANT HOUSING COMMISSION

When the restoration of the Borden Building was first designed, conversations about moving some of the parking for Riverview Apartments to the backside of the building occurred. For various reasons the movement of parking did not work for the Riverview residents at that time. In the spring of 2015 we initiated conversations with the Housing Commission Director again about the possibility of moving the parking. The current concern that needed to be addressed was the need for the construction of a sidewalk from the back parking lot to the back doors of the Riverview Apartments building. The Housing Commission indicated if the City was willing to construct the sidewalk, they would support the movement of the parking spaces. It is estimated the cost of the construction of the sidewalk will be less than $5,000. The Housing Commission worked through various HUD approvals which have now been received. Attached is an agreement for City Commission consideration that if approved would:

• Return 25 spaces in Lot 10 to the City for general public use • Allocate 31 spaces from the City Hall parking lot behind Riverview

Apartments for Riverview’s use • City would install the sidewalk from the parking lot to the building

The Housing Commission will relocate the “Riverview Residents Parking” signage if this agreement is approved. The attached agreement has been reviewed by the City Attorney, Housing Commission and Housing and Urban Development (HUD). The Economic Development Corporation (EDC) approved the agreement on March 3 since the EDC holds title to the City Hall parking lot. We recommend the City Commission authorize the Mayor and Clerk to sign the agreement and authorize a $5,000 budget amendment from the Capital Improvement fund to construct the sidewalk. This would free up 25 parking spaces in the center of downtown for general public

use. If this agreement is approved, staff will work with the Downtown Development Board to determine the appropriate time limits for the new parking spaces. Recommended motion: Move to authorize the Mayor and Clerk to sign the parking lot use agreement with the EDC and Housing Commission as presented and authorize a $5,000 budget amendment for sidewalk construction from the Capital Improvement Fund. NJR/ap


1

PARKING LOT USE AGREEMENT

THIS PARKING LOT USE AGREEMENT (the “Agreement”) is entered into as of _____________, 2016, among the CITY OF MOUNT PLEASANT, a Michigan municipal corporation, of 320 West Broadway, Mt. Pleasant, Michigan 48858 (the “City”), the ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF MT. PLEASANT, a Michigan public body corporate, of 320 West Broadway, Mt. Pleasant, Michigan 48858 (the “EDC”) and the MOUNT PLEASANT HOUSING COMMISSION, a Michigan public body corporate, of 1 Mosher Street, Mt. Pleasant, Michigan, 48858 (the “Commission”).

Recitals

A. The City is the owner of certain parcel of real property located in the City of Mt. Pleasant, Isabella County, Michigan commonly known as Municipal Parking Lot 10 (the “Parking Lot 10”) depicted on the attached Exhibit A.

B. The EDC is the owner of a certain parcel of real property located in the City of Mt.

Pleasant, Isabella County, Michigan commonly known as City Hall Parking Lot (the “City Hall Parking Lot”). Exhibit B.

C. The Commission has enjoyed exclusive use of 25 of the parking spaces in Parking Lot #10 for a number of years.

D. The City is desirous of freeing up the 25 spaces in Parking Lot #10 for general public use and the Commission is willing to give up exclusive use of the Parking Lot #10 spaces.

E. The Commission is willing to instead use a portion of the City Hall Parking Lot, located directly behind the Riverview Apartment building, consisting of 31 spaces, as depicted on Exhibit A (the “Parking Spaces”), to provide parking at Riverview Apartments, subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement.

F. The City is willing to construct a new ADA accessible sidewalk from the City Hall Parking Lot to the back entrances of Riverview Apartments to allow paved access from the lot to the back door.

G. The City is willing to allow the Commission use of the Parking Spaces for parking at Riverview Apartments, subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement.

2

Agreement

NOW THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged by the parties, the parties agree as follows.

1. Grant of Use. The EDC hereby grants to the Commission the exclusive right to use the Parking Spaces for parking at Riverview Apartments only. The Commission shall not use the Parking Spaces for any other purpose without prior written consent of the EDC.

2. Term and Automatic Renewal. The term of this Agreement shall be for a period of

three (3) years, commencing on May 1, 2016, and ending on April 30, 2019 (the “Term”), unless terminated earlier in accordance with Paragraph 3 below. This Agreement shall automatically renew for one (1) year periods unless either party provides ninety (90) days prior written notice of non-renewal.

3. Termination. If either party shall default in the performance of any covenant of this Agreement, and shall fail to cure such default within thirty (30) days after written notice from the other party specifying the default (or, if such default is of a nature that it cannot be cured within a thirty (30) day period, thereafter proceed diligently with the cure thereof), then the non-defaulting party may immediately terminate this Agreement at any time thereafter (before such default can be cured) by giving written notice of the termination. Notwithstanding the foregoing, either party shall have the right to terminate this Agreement, without cause, at any time prior to the expiration of the Term by providing ninety (90) days prior written notice to the other party of its intent to terminate. Furthermore, this Agreement shall automatically terminate at such time that either the City or the Commission no longer maintains ownership of their respective properties described above.

4. Maintenance of Property

4.1 The Commission shall maintain the Parking Spaces in good order, condition and repair, reasonable wear and tear excepted, including without limitation, crack sealing, overlays and striping, and shall be responsible for all snow removal.

4.2 The City shall maintain the City Hall Parking Lot (other than the Parking Spaces) and the access points to the City Hall Parking Lot Broadway Street in good order, condition and repair, normal wear and tear excepted, including without limitation, crack sealing, overlays and striping, and shall be responsible for all snow removal.

3

5. Indemnification

5.1 To the extent permitted by applicable law, the Commission shall defend, indemnify, and hold the City (including its employees, officials, administrators, and agents) harmless from and against any and all claims, counter-claims, suits, debts, demands, actions, judgments, liens, liabilities, costs, expenses, including reasonable attorneys’ fees and reasonable expert witness fees, arising out of or in connection with: a) the Commission’s use and/or occupancy of the Parking Spaces; b) the negligence of the Commission as it pertains to the Parking Spaces; and c) the Commission’s violation of any of the terms of this Agreement.

5.2 To the extent permitted by applicable law, the City shall defend, indemnify and hold the Commission harmless from and against any and all claims, counter-claims, suits, debts, demands, actions, judgments, liens, liabilities, costs, expenses, including reasonable attorneys’ fees and reasonable expert witness fees, arising out of or in connection with: a) the City’s use of the Parking Lot; b) the negligence of the City as it pertains to the Parking Lot; and c) the City’s violation of any of the terms of this Agreement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, this Agreement does not, and is not intended to impair, divest, delegate, or contravene any constitutional, statutory, and/or other legal right, privilege, power, obligation, duty or immunity of the City and shall not be construed to waive the defense of governmental immunity held by the City.

5.3 No federal funds or funds to be used on behalf of public housing residents will be used for indemnification purposes.

6. No Monetary Consideration. This Agreement is entered into based upon the mutual

covenants and conditions set forth herein and the parking rights are granted without monetary consideration.

7. Insurance. The Commission at its sole cost and expense, shall maintain and keep in

effect public liability insurance with the minimum limits of $1,000,000.00 on account of bodily injuries to or death of one person, and minimum limits of $2,000,000.00 on account of bodily injuries or death of more than one person as a result of any one accident or occurrence; and property damage insurance with minimum limits of $500,000.00. Such policies shall name the City as an additional insured and the Commission shall provide the City with a certificate or other written evidence of its coverage on an annual basis.

8. Compliance with Law. Each party shall, at its own expense, under penalty of forfeiture and damages, promptly comply with all applicable laws, orders, regulations, or ordinances.

4

9. Miscellaneous Provisions.

9.1 This Agreement shall be construed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of Michigan.

9.2 The captions of this Agreement shall have no effect on its interpretation. 9.3 This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which

shall be an original, but all such counterparts shall together constitute one and the same instrument.

9.4 All notices regarding this Agreement are to be in writing and delivered, or mailed by first-class mail, postage paid, by one party to the other party at the party’s respective address set forth in the preface of this Agreement. Notices which are mailed shall be deemed to have been given as of the second business day following the date of the mailing.

9.5 This Agreement shall not be modified, altered or amended except by written agreement duly executed by all parties to this Agreement in accordance with the terms hereof. Neither party may assign this Agreement without the express written consent of the other.

9.6 This Agreement sets forth all the covenants, agreements, stipulations, promises, conditions and understandings of the parties concerning the activities contemplated herein. No party, or its respective employees, attorneys, public officials, consultants, advisors, agents, or representatives, have made any covenant agreement, stipulation, promise, condition or understanding, warranty or representation, either oral or written, other than set forth herein.

9.7 The invalidity of any article, section, subsection, clause, or provision of this Agreement shall not affect the validity of the remaining sections, subsections, clauses or provisions hereof which remain valid and be enforced to the fullest extent permitted by law.

9.8 A party may not waive any default, condition, promise, obligation or requirement applicable to the other party hereunder, unless such waiver is in writing signed by an authorized representative of such party and expressly stated to constitute such waiver. Such waiver shall only apply to the extent given and shall not be deemed or construed to waive any such or other default, condition, promise, obligation, or requirement in any past or future instance. No failure by a party to insist upon strict performance of any covenant, agreement, term, or condition of this Agreement, or to the exercise any right or remedy in the event of default, shall constitute a waiver of any such default of such covenant, agreement, term or condition.

9.9 This Agreement is binding upon the parties hereto and their respective employees, public officials, guests, invitees, agents and representatives.

5

9.10 All parties represent that the individual executing this Agreement is duly authorized by, and has the authority to execute this Agreement and bind, the respective party.

CITY OF MOUNT PLEASANT MOUNT PLEASANT HOUSING

COMMISSION By:______________________________ By:________________________________ Kathleen Ling, Mayor Kim Carrion, Executive Director By:______________________________ Date:_______________________________ Jeremy Howard, Clerk Date:____________________________ ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF MOUNT PLEASANT By:___________________________________ Chairperson Date:_________________________________

EXHIBIT A

EXHIBIT B

City Hall P

arking Lot



FROM: NANCY RIDLEY, CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: CONSIDER CHANGES TO THE OWNER OCCUPIED INCENTIVE

PROGRAM ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS The City Commission requested staff look at adding eligibility requirements to the existing Owner Occupied Incentive Program. Based on the recent incentive that was provided, the following additional eligibility requirements are recommended for consideration:

• Must have possessed a valid rental license for a certain period of time. • Sale cannot be between two immediate family members.

The attached update to the overview of the program is provided for the City Commission’s consideration to address those issues. Based on the prior report provided to the Planning Commission and their review of the program which is attached, the City Commission has another alternative available. The Planning Commission review questioned whether the original goal of the program to reduce the number of rental units in the target area is being achieved since the data would seem to indicate this may not be the case. The City Commission could take action to suspend or eliminate future incentives under this program. The remaining $28,550 that was allocated for the program could be allocated to a different neighborhood program to impact rental units. The City will be receiving a target market analysis. This analysis is expected to provide information on current housing trends and the projected needs in the Mt. Pleasant area. It may be worthwhile for the City Commission to wait for that analysis to determine the most effective use for the remaining $28,550. Therefore we have provided two alternatives for the City Commission to consider regarding this program. Recommended Motion: Move to approve the amended eligibility requirements for the Owner Occupied Residential Incentive Program as attached. OR Move to suspend future incentives under the Owner Occupied Residential Incentive Program until the target market analysis is received.

NJR/ap

Revised: March 1, 2016

Owner Occupied Residential Incentive Program

Total Funds Available:

· $100,000 allocated in 2005 for rental license rights distributed on a “first come-first served” basis; as of March 2016 $ 28,550 remains available.

Target Neighborhood:

· Area outlined on attached map as the target area.

Eligibility Requirements:

· New purchasers of rental property · Properties must be converted to owner-occupied/primary residence · Purchasers must be pre-qualified for mortgage · Purchasers must execute document conveying property’s renal license

back to the City for a minimum of five years · Property must have been a licensed rental for at least 2 years prior to

purchase · Purchase/sale cannot be between two individuals within an immediate

family

Price for Rental Licensing Rights (City will pay):

· Single family rental license: 5% of the purchase price not to exceed $10,000

· “Rooming/boarding” license: 8% of the purchase price not to exceed $16,000

TO: N8ll0f llidl8y ChyMmar

CC: William R. MrdoQ

MEMOBANDlJM

Din:clor ofColl!!D!nrity Servia:e and Ecunmnic Dewlupmmt

FR.OM: JacahKmn 1JIL City PllnDer

DATE: Jamwy 13, 1016

On November S, tho P1mning Commis.tion discussed Ibo City's Owner-Occapiecl Jnc""'ive Pmgram in WOik BCl:rim Tho p:ogram WU CllabHtbed in 2008 Ind bu, to ~ plVVidcd ino:::ntivcs lo 14 homebuyers ill the c:altnl neighbodtoods oftbo City and ""P"'ded $68,679 of tho $100,000 piognm

fimd. Slaff i;:ompiled iDfomlatiOD for'lllllt work telliOD which ii attadled lo this memo. Pleuo DOte dlli two oftlie 14 ptogi-hlcenlivet -.me received aince the Navcmbet worlt llCStlon (ace upd"ed pro,81'11111 ac:Cmty tahlo below); lllaffhu alao updmd dlo "Mlp of iDeeZlled piopotties" aacl ~eat llllVeY remlta" lbat wc:n: im:W in the origiml wmk llCl!Sion pm:ht to n:l1cc:t tbate m...,...

Table 1. aw_. - ied Iiu:mlM: . . 2 -

Ihle imlenlal Adihct Type J:ni:aitive o.ten::nl mlriction end&

7131/2008 411PW Sinirte . S1.S87..50 9/112009

61312009 321 E. Wisa>mia. Two $6,745.00 61312014 816/2009 406E. M"" !illnale .

$3~.00 8/6'2014 8/1412009 411 Pino -Sl.S87.SO 9/18fZ009 31SOlk Sinole .

S3SOO 9/181'2014 11/16/'2011 422 N. KiiiiieY Smaie $4,125.00 11/16/2016 8/30/Z011 Sl4N • .Amold "!illin8 . $4,750.00 8130/'2016 3Al/Z012 502 S Urdvm!tv - $3.484.00 3/9/Z017

S/IS/'2012 310WD1inoi1 s;,.,,,,. . $3,350.00 4130/'2017 8/1'2012 313.Andrc . $6.400.00 8/131'l017

8/28/2012 702N• Sinne . $4,2.50.00 8127/2017 6/llf2014 811 S. Fllldler ,.;,..,.., .

$6 .00 611112019 9/11/2014 401 H. Palmer 9;,,..i., . $6,000.00 9/12fl019 1116'2015 401 S.Maln sm.ru. . $7,375.00 11/612020

12118'2015 so1 s.Kliiii£Y s- Sll"'.500.00 12/18/2020

• It is not clear what the actual intent of the program is/was and ifthe program is accurately framed to address that intent.

• The program does not appear to have been successful at changing the rental mix in the program area as the nwnber of overall rental licenses remained largely unchanged 2009-2014.

• It appears that most properties would have been purchased with or without the incentive dollars. • A narrower focus would result in a program that promoted more easily measured and more long

lasting change. • A focus on non-conforming properties (rooming and boarding dwellings or RSO dwellings) was

suggested as those uses, once eliminated, could not be reestablished, whereas the rental licenses are relinquished for only five years.

Requested Action:

The City Commission receive the comments and recommendations of the Planning Commission.

Attachments: I. Staff report dated November 5, 2015 2. Planning Commission work session minutes for November 5, 2015 (excerpt) 3. Map depicting Rental Certificate Changes in the Incentive Area, 2009-2014

TO: P!an11ing Comminion

FR.OM: Jacob Xain tJIL City~

DATE: November S, 2015

MEMOBANDlJM

Over llto comso ofllto put yeer, llUfhu been compilillg infiwmation on tho City's Owner-Occupied Jncmti'll: Prognan. The p:\lgnllll, startat in April 2008, pnl¥idea fimmclal i:nccnti'ICf fur the pun:1iaac: of an aisling MllBl propatyVlilltin 1lte City's centnl neiiJibotlloods (gener&llythe - weat ofMislioJl Sbcct, C88t of' the Chippewa Rivcr, toullt of Piebrd Sbcct, and north of'BdlOWI ~) pm..ukd 1ltat the puzdlalor l\llinqlliah dlo Jelllal lic- for a period of five years. Tllo program commonoed with a~ of Sl00,000.

To clato, tie progiam blll provided. illceatina to 12 plll'dlucn for a tolal ofSSl,804.00. Id thawD iD Tlble l, in.cmtimied pmcU- lncJndcd 9 aingle·fimlly dwelUJISS, 2 rooming dwclllnga, and cme twofamiq dwolliJlg. Ono nQpiOld made 1epa)lllllllt to llto City in cmlerto punuo natal limiriJJg Ono piopaty (the two-fmnil.y dwelliq) iB ~but ,..,...;n. a two-:fmnily with an:nllll U-fur tho socoad dwollillg 1mit. 'lbieo piop«lilll Javo boea l\lllOld 1111 II.OW OWW-0~ IUbtoquciat 1111 tllo oripw im:clllivin:d pun:hmc. FDm" of the twi:!Vl: pioputica an: mm:ndy clijp'l;h: for n:nlal liceming • five or1111m1 JeR' have elapsod ~ purdlme. However, eaeh propmty (arpmtio11. thereof) Ull:emim.od laClllialtly~

TQl.,1,0.- ied b:cnlivc . . 2 DatoiDie•dN ~ Typo Jncentive Dltllnatal

restriotion end& 7/31f2008 411 Pino Klnme . $1.587.50 911!200'J 6/lf2009 321 B. Wilcomin Two family $6,745.00 61312014 8/6/2f1(1} 406B.May Sinale fianily $3,250.00 81612014

8114/2009 411 Pino -Sl,.587.50 9/18/2009 31SOak su..ru. . $3,250.00 9/181'2014 8116'.2011 422 N. KiiiiieY Slftllle $4.125.00 8116/2016 8130/2011 Sl4N.Amold "5imlb

. $4,750.00 8130/2016 319/2012 502 S Univcnitv - . $3.484.00 3/9/2017

S/15/2012 310WD1inois su.o1 .. . $3,350.00 4130/2017 8/ll2012 313Alldio $6.400.00 811312017

8/28/2012 702N• s- $4,250.00 8127/2017 6111/2014 811 S. Fllld!er Sinne . $6,200.00 611112019 9/11/2014 401 B, Pllmcr !llnale . $6.000.00 9/12/2019

Staff mailed a survey to the 12 recipients of incentives to learn more about their experience with the current program. Eight responses were received and a summary of the results in attached.

During roughly this same time period (2009-2014) the following changes occurred in rental licensing citywide:

Table 2. Rental license activit . Year License closed License re-opened License new Net chanl!e 2009 32 51 7 26 2010 27 37 1 11 2011 27 39 6 18 2012 26 38 3 15 2013 24 51 2 29 2014 47 41 5 (1)

2009-2014 183 257 24 98

Census data from 2000 and 2010-2013 indicates the homeownership rate in the City is relatively steady, ranging from a low of34.3 percent in 2000 to a high of36.7 percent in 2011. This is comparable to the homeownership rate in the Charter Township of Union and like communities including East Lansing and Big Rapids.

Table 3. Homeownership rate (percent), City of Mt. Pleasant. Source: U.S. Census 2013 35.3 2012 36.6 2011 36.7 2010 35.1 2000 34.3

Table 4 1 d • Mt. P easant an eer commumties, 2013 s SC ource: U .. ensus Population Median Median home value, Owner-occupied

household owner-occupied units housing units income (percent)

Mt. Pleasant, city 26,129 28,336 123,400 35.3 Union, charter township 12,862 25,590 129,700 35.0 East Lansinl!, city 48,556 32,953 177,000 37.1 Bil! Rapids, citv 10,529 24,550 87,700 38.3 Ann Arbor, city 115,331 55,003 230,700 45.7 Kalamazoo, citv 74,812 31,893 97,600 46.7

Staff has included several attachments to this memo with additional information for your consideration.

Requested Action:

Please consider the questions, comments, or concerns you may have with the current Owner-Occupied Incentive Program, and be prepared to discuss during the work session.

Attachments: 1. Program brochure 2. Map of incented properties 3. Recipient survey results 4. Map of current rental properties

History

Since the 1960's, the percentage of owner-occupied housing units in the city has declined.

Traditionally, this changing percentage was largely attributed to more rental units being constructed in one decade than single family homes.

In 2002, the City received at grant from the Michigan Economic Development Corporation to prepare a HyettPalma Plan for the revitalization of the downtown. An important feature of the Plan, released in 2003, is having a stable residential base in and around the downtown.

In 2005, the City Commission allocated $100,000 for the purpose of increasing the amount of owner-occupied housing in the city, by providing an incentive to purchase and convert rentals back to single family owner-occupied homes.

City of Mt. Pleasant Economic Development

320 W. Broadway Mt. Pleasant, Ml 48858

989-779-5347

www.mt-pleasant.org

7/21/2009

Occupied

Residential

Program

Program Implementation

The goal of the Owner Occupied Residential Incentive Program is to reduce the number of rental units in a target area of the city and encourage neighborhood stability by increasing the number of owner occupied properties.

Applicants will need to contact a mortgage lender of their choice for pre-qualification of a home loan prior to making application at the City.

Applicants will be accepted on a first come, first served basis. Funds will be reserved for up to 60 days following delivery of a Purchase Agreement to the City and will be distributed at closing as follows:

• 5% of the purchase price up to $1 0,000 per applicant for the purchase of a licensed "family" rental.

• 8% of the purchase price up to $16,000 per applicant for the purchase of a licensed "rooming and boarding" rental.

Following the City's receipt of the lender's pre-approval letter, the applicant will find an existing rental property for sale in the target area. The applicant and their realtor will handle all negotiations related to the purchase of the property.

Existing duplexes may qualify, provided at least 50% of the property is converted to an owner-occupied state. Funding will be based

on the percentage of floor area in the rental portion of the duplex to the overall building area. Mixed residential, commercial and office structures may not be included in this program.

The City will be notified of the acceptance of the Purchase Agreement by receipt of a copy of the document, along with notification of the closing date.

Prior to closing, the City will prepare a check for up to the program limit, along with a document in which the purchaser agrees to:

a. Surrender the property's rental license.

b. Eliminate any nonconforming uses, such as a rooming dwelling or multi-unit

structure.

c. Own and occupy the property for at least 5 years, or sell to another owner-occupant.

Please do not cdll City Hall for assista;:ce in locating a property Jr assistance in listing a property.

; .. lnstev_d, please contact your local Central Michlgan.,dssociation Realtor Member.

Target Area

Owner Occupied Residential Incentive Program

The target area chosen for the Owner Occupied Residential Incentive Program (outlined above)

was based on the goals stated in the HyettPalma Plan for downtown to increase the quality of the housing stock and the mixture of owner and rental housing in that area.

Owner Occupied Rental Incentive Program Map

Legend

Parcels OORI Recipient

lt. OORJ Boondary

'" OORI Original Boondary

Lincoln

I P#UM•••••l··················1 ~ ' ~ . ,. . " ~ • ~ . I :• . .

... 1tidmer Palmer :ii:: I.... Palmei ~ - . • = • ~ = • : ~ . . ~ : • Bennett • Bennet

: ~ : . - . : -= : • ~ Andre • • Cll • : ~ : . ~ ~ . : S 1•• ••••••• erosslanest • £!: • • : ;· : : a: . . . ... tritMtk• Lincoij>. Linc«Jn ;.

• • • : : • g . : i......... . . : • • • • (") . .

~ g Mwttei ~ ~ . ~ Jockey ,... t"' •

-..t..O ID e

Chippewa

• • • ~· = • ~······························•••••'IU9}9••••,_,.: • • • • • • • • • • •

• • • • • • • • • • • •

!

• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •

Mill

Wisconsin

:3! ;

Washington

~

Michigan

Illinois

Wisconsin

Locust

Cherry

c:: = .. . ~ ~ Cll ... 4

Maple

• • lllincfs • • •

Cherry • • • • • •••94•••• .. •• .. ~••••••.. High ====~~~~~~==~========:

~ ID : : Cll le. • • ca ~ • .! 5' ;· Mtt,........ !:s:! : ~ i:: ~ : ~~ •

(1,!. 0 ~... 5 : ID 1:1 • ~ • ~layton .. •5'lflord ~ :

t"' • "'.! • SD : ID "c:I e = • = 0 • en • n c= • ... • 1:1" • l:S • ~ .!: : aq • ~ rn :l•••

Bellows ............ " ····· Q.

s ca 0

Wiscon~

a: .. . Cll (/I ... 0

=

OWNER-OCCUPIED INCENTNE PROGRAM SURVEY RESULTS (10 respondents of 14 recipients)

1. How did you first learn about the Owner-Occupied Incentive Program? (Please check one)

6 Realtor I Mortgage broker

2 City website

1 City staff

1 Friend I Relative I Neighbor

Other (please explain): 1

2. How important was the incentive to your decision to purchase your home? (Please check one)

9 Important

Neither important or unimportant

1 Unimportant

3. Would you have purchased the same home without the incentive program? (Please check one)

2 Absolutely

5 Maybe

3 Doubtful

4. Do you feel the current boundaries of the program are adequate? (See enclosed flyer for boundary map)

7 Yes

3 No opinion

No (please explain):

5. The amount of incentive provided was ... (Please check one)

2 Very generous

6 Just right

1 Not enough

[CONTINUED ON REVERSE]

6. The requirements of participation in the program (i.e. abandonment of rental licenses, owner-occupancy for 5 years, etc.) were ... (Please check one)

1 Too stringent

7 Fair

1 Not stringent enough

7. Are there any changes we could make to the program to make the program more attractive to other homebuyers?

No changes.

It does need to be promoted more to ensure mix of owner-occupied and rental properties.

Realtors could certainly promote it a lot more. I found this property on my own. Didn 't know about the program. Let neighbors know so other owners can promote the program. Promote it in city newsletter.

None - it was a great surprise and a pleasure to work with the city to get the benefits of the program.

Provide the incentive to the purchase price plus the cost to renovate home as many homes are in dire need for renovation.

Get the word out. Higher incentive to those with more work to do to bring the home back to single family use. i.e. Base rebate on amount of work needed to make property a single family residence. Not just 5% or 7.5% may need to be more. Encourage realtors to notifY prospective buyers of incentive.

Not many local citizens seemto know about it. Perhaps more advertising or website info would help.

8. Do you have any other feedback you would like to add?

The neighborhood will never be just owner-occupied- too many rentals. I would like rental license back.

Good program, maybe a little more advertising of the plan.

Maybe target certain areas with high rental ratio.

It would have been nice to be completely informed of all the repairs that were needed. My home inspector did a cursory job and missed a ton of deficiencies. Gutters improperly installed, cracked pipes, sink didn't hold water, duct work improperly routed, all VERY expensive repairs. It may help if the incentive was proportioned to the number of repairs necessary. I'm not sure how this house passed rental inspection because there were a number of things that weren't' to code that I had to repair for safety's sake. The incentive I received helped cover some of it so thot was nice. Thank you.

Thank you!

Rental Certificate Changes - Citywide

Totals South of High Deleted - 45 Reverted - 5 New Listed Prior - 42 New Never Listed - 9

City of MtPleasant Rental Data 2009 - 2014

Totals North of High Deleted - 129 Reverted - 13 New Listed Prior - 127 New Never Listed - 2

Legend - City Limits

Certificate Changes

Deleted

D Reverted Back to Rental

New Listed Prior

New Never Listed

Mt. Pleasant Planning Commission November 5, 2015 Page2

rewrite. The board discussed the need for nuance in that district to address unique contexts and adjacent uses within the district.

Commissioner Ranzenberger commented that he feels the reduced setbacks help with traffic calming, as was one of the goals. He also noted that he prefers the monument signage over the pylons.

Commissioner Driessnack commented on a project that he was involved in that went through the MROZ and the additional time and money that went towards the project. He spoke of the frustration of working with MDOT on easements and in hindsight, he commented that although the end result is nice, it was so cumbersome and expensive that they wouldn't choose to do another development under the current MROZ language.

Board consensus was that in order to achieve the vision of the MROZ the process must be easier, more predictable for all involved, and include the entire C-3 district.

Commissioner Driessnack commented that we want to be development friendly and having a clear ordinance creates predictability.

Commissioner Friedrich agreed that right now the MROZ is wide open with all the waiver options available to developers, which is not predictable for anyone.

Kain asked the Board to give some thought about what they would like to see; what they do and don't like in other communities; etc.

Commissioner Driessnack commented that for the short term, he is not in favor of constraining the percentage of residential or type of residential units. The board agreed that any discussion of use percentage would be best addressed during the zoning ordinance update.

B. Owner Occupied Incentive Program (OOIP):

Kain provided information from the OOIP program. Kain explained that since its inception in 2008, twelve buyers have received the incentive. To date, approximately $60,000 of the initial budget of $100,000 has been expended. Kain provided maps showing all the rental properties in Mt. Pleasant, the change in rental licenses during the period 2009-2014, and a comparison of how Mt. Pleasant compares with peer communities around the state. Kain also provided results of a survey that was sent to the recipients of the program.

Commissioner Driessnack questioned what the goal of the program is and ifit isn't achieving it, why continue it. Kain noted that there isn't a clear record of the discussions during the inception of the program but that the program does target owner-occupancy in a defined area of the City. Within the program area, the number oflicenses issued and deleted is virtually identical, which is similar to trends citywide during the period.

Chairman Cotter questioned the benefit to the City in converting single-family rentals to singlefamily owner-occupied housing. Chairman Cotter suggested that incenting the conversion of nonconforming properties, such as rooming and boarding dwellings, would be a better focus for the program and accomplish more for the City.

Mt. Pleasant Planning Commission November 5, 2015 Page 3

Commissioners Horgan and Driessnack agreed, with Commissioner Driessnack commenting that if the pool of eligible properties was narrower, the incentive could possibly be increased.

Commissioner Dailey commented he feels this was developed as a "feel good" program; however most of the incentives are only a "burp" in the price of the house.

Commission consensus was if the program were to continue the focus should narrow. Kain noted that he will be passing along an update on the program to the City Commission along with the input provided by the Planning Commission for their consideration.

Work session adjourned at 9:10 p.m.

Rental Certificate Changes - Incentive Area

Legend - Incentive Boundary

Certificate Changes

Deleted

D Reverted Back to Rental

New Listed Prior

New Never Listed

Iota.ls Deleted - 54 Reverted - 7 New Listed Prior - 38

City of MtPleasant Rental Data 2009 - 2014

Bellows

D

D



FROM: NANCY RIDLEY, CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: RECEIVE CITY REQUESTS FOR SAGINAW CHIPPEWA INDIAN TRIBE

2% ALLOCATIONS The Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribe invites local governmental jurisdictions to apply for 2% grants each fall and spring. Various departments have submitted applications for project funding for the spring allocation and are attached for your review. It has been the practice of the Commission to receive these requests at the first meeting in March and take formal action to submit the applications to the Tribal Council at the second meeting in March. The intervening period provides time for Commissioners to review the applications and determine whether they wish to prioritize and or rank them prior to submittal to the Tribal Council. NJR/ap

SEMI-ANNUAL TWO PERCENT ALLOCATION CITY OF MT. PLEASANT REQUESTS

SPRING 2016

AMOUNT

DEPARTMENT / PROJECT NAME REQUESTED COMMUNITY SERVICES Chipp-A-Waters Park Restroom Septic Repair and Upgrade $ 10,000 Mill Pond Park Trail Improvements $ 75,000 Nelson Park Flood Damage Repair River Overlook $ 11,000 PEAK After-School/Summer Camp Program $ 189,210 PUBLIC SAFETY Apparatus Bay Doors $ 70,000 Bay Area Narcotics Enforcement Team(BAYANET) $ 309,011 Youth and Community Services Unit $ 168,265 PUBLIC WORKS Airport Operations Support $ 40,000 Airport Runway Approach Clearing $ 23,750 Alley Clean Up and Gravel Alley Restoration $ 100,000 Sidewalk Replacement and ADA Ramps $ 50,000 Street Overlays and Resurfacing $ 100,000 Traffic Counters $ 15,548

TOTAL REQUESTED: $1,161,784

1

SEMIANNUAL TWO-PERCENT APPLICATION Organization Name: CITY OF MT. PLEASANT (06-017) Authorized Official Name and Title: Nancy Ridley, City Manager (person authorized to receive funds) Mailing Address: 320 W. Broadway, Mt. Pleasant, MI 48858 Phone: 989-779-5321 FAX: 989-773-4691 e-mail: [email protected] Request submitted by (agency or branch of organization listed above): City of Mt. Pleasant Parks Department Project Supervisor: Christopher Bundy, Director of Parks and Public Spaces Project Name: Chipp-A-Waters Park Restroom Septic Repair and Upgrade Amount Requested: $10,000 Signature:_________________________________________Date:_____________________ The Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribe request community involvement on projects responsible to government entities. Please describe the request that you would like to present to Tribal Council for possible funding on the following page. When this form is completed, please submit the form to your appropriate governmental agency. Be prepared for further inquires from the Tribal Council by having a complete copy of your project readily available. NOTE: If your project includes multiple organization participation and funding sources, a Memorandum of Understanding, signed by each board representative, must be attached to the application. PLEASE SEE PAGE TWO FOR COMPLETE INSTRUCTIONS.

The Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribe of Michigan 7070 East Broadway Rd. Mt. Pleasant, MI 48858

989-775-4000

2

A. Description of Project This project focuses on repair and upgrade of the septic system for the heavily used restroom facility at Chipp-A-Waters Park. This restroom facility has been in operation for many years and is one of the few that is not directly connected to the City’s municipal sewer system. Connection to the City’s system is cost prohibitive because of following factors: 1) Distance from existing City sewer connection point 2) Requires construction and ongoing maintenance of a sewage lift station for operation 3) Requires excavation of a major state and city intersection to accomplish connection The drain field for the septic system is failing and is in need of repair and upgrade to help prolong the use of the restroom and safeguard the nearby Chippewa River corridor.

B. Brief description of the project benefits to the Tribe, community, and governmental

service area The City Parks Department maintains 11 restroom facilities within the Mt. Pleasant Park system. Park and river users from the local community including the Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribe will benefit from the improved and up-to-date park facilities. The Chipp-A-Waters restroom facility is heavily used as it services park activities including shelter reservations, tubers, canoeists, kayakers as well as trail users and the Girl Scout Cabin that is located in the park.

C. Long-term funding requirements and how those requirements will be met.

The City of Mt. Pleasant’s operational budget includes ongoing funds to maintain the restroom facility with scheduled septic tank pumping and maintenance which would allow the facility to be successfully operated well into the future.

3

D. Itemized Budget

Tuesday, March 8, 2016

Mt. Pkasam Parks and Recreation

1565 Park. Placo Mt. Pleasant, Michigan 48858

989-772-2765

Subject: Cl•ipp-.i..\- \V:1ters P~11·k sept.ic syst,·n•

Craig,

lvlallcy Construction, Inc. has prepared a proposal the above 111entio11cd project. Our proposal is as follows:

Jlesc.ription C nl,·itv fed septi'' S\1S'f(•n1 1000 gallon septic tauks Septic licld Plu111bed to existing septic lead Topsoil and seeding

Tot~I:

Quantity

2EA 1500 Sr I LS I LS

Total

St0,000.00

If you should have any questions please feel free to contact me at (989) 772-2765.

&st Regards,

Tony Hale, Proj~'Ct Estimnlor MALLEY CO:-!STRUCTION. INC.

1

SEMIANNUAL TWO-PERCENT APPLICATION Organization Name: CITY OF MT. PLEASANT (06-017) Authorized Official Name and Title: Nancy Ridley, City Manager (person authorized to receive funds) Mailing Address: 320 W. Broadway, Mt. Pleasant, MI 48858 Phone: 989-779-5321 FAX: 989-773-4691 e-mail: [email protected] Request submitted by (agency or branch of organization listed above): City of Mt. Pleasant Parks Department Project Supervisor: Christopher Bundy, Director of Parks and Public Spaces Project Name: Mill Pond Park Trail Improvements Amount Requested: $75,000 Signature:_________________________________________Date:_____________________ The Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribe request community involvement on projects responsible to government entities. Please describe the request that you would like to present to Tribal Council for possible funding on the following page. When this form is completed, please submit the form to your appropriate governmental agency. Be prepared for further inquires from the Tribal Council by having a complete copy of your project readily available. NOTE: If your project includes multiple organization participation and funding sources, a Memorandum of Understanding, signed by each board representative, must be attached to the application. PLEASE SEE PAGE TWO FOR COMPLETE INSTRUCTIONS.


989-775-4000

2

A. Description of Project This project focuses on protecting the Chippewa River Corridor by repaving and protecting the Riverwalk Trail through Mill Pond Park from Leaton Street west to Adams Street. This section of Riverwalk Trail lies between an important community wetland and the Chippewa River and is subject to seasonal flooding and damaging high water events.


service area The Riverwalk Trail is a tremendous resource as it winds through the community park system. The quality and safety of the trail system has been a source of local pride for visitors and citizens from the area as they enjoy walking, biking, and nature viewing along the Chippewa River Corridor. Taking a proactive approach to protecting the Chippewa River’s natural and man-made resources is paramount to preserving healthy infrastructure and leisure enjoyment well into the future. This project strives to: Ø Protect and enhance our local trail resources keeping it vibrant, safe and up to date. Ø Reduce maintenance on riverbanks and river related infrastructure. Ø Protect natural and man-made resources directly impacted by the river. Ø Serve as a cooperative example for others to protect and improve the health of the

Chippewa River corridor. Ø Partner with the Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribe working together to secure available

local resources to protect resources along Chippewa River. C. Long-term funding requirements and how those requirements will be met.

The City of Mt. Pleasant has funds in its operational budget to pay for annual maintenance costs for trail repair, plantings and tree care along the riverbank and seasonal removal of log jams to help protect trail resources. Improving and maintaining the health of the river is ongoing and critical to the entire community.

D. Itemized Budget

ITEM QUANTITY UNIT UNIT RATE AMOUNT Mobilization 1 Lump Sum 5,000 $ 5,000.00 Permits 1 Lump Sum 3,000 $ 3,000.00 Tree and stump Removals 1 Lump Sum 4,000 $ 4,000.00 Pulverize and compact trail surface 1 Lump Sum 12,000 $12,000.00 Grade millings to site specifications 1 Lump Sum 5,000 $ 5,000.00 Concrete & Curb walkway repair 1 Lump Sum 5,000 $ 5,000.00 Outfall repair 1 Lump Sum 5,000 $ 5,000.00 Rip Rap trail and outfall stabilization 1 Lump Sum 7,000 $ 7,000.00 Grade & Pave trail connection points 1 Lump Sum 4,000 $ 4,000.00 Pave Trail per Asphalt specifications 1 Lump Sum 14,000 $14,000.00 Site Restoration 1 Lump Sum 4,000 $ 4,000.00 ESTIMATED SUBTOTAL $68,000.00 Engineering, Staking, Const. mgt. 1 Lump Sum 7,000 $ 7,000.00 ESTIMATED BUDGET AMOUNT $75,000.00

1

SEMIANNUAL TWO-PERCENT APPLICATION Organization Name: CITY OF MT. PLEASANT (06-017) Authorized Official Name and Title: Nancy Ridley, City Manager (person authorized to receive funds) Mailing Address: 320 W. Broadway, Mt. Pleasant, MI 48858 Phone: 989-779-5321 FAX: 989-773-4691 e-mail: [email protected] Request submitted by (agency or branch of organization listed above): City of Mt. Pleasant Parks Department Project Supervisor: Christopher Bundy, Director of Parks and Public Spaces Project Name: Nelson Park Flood Damage Repair River Overlook Amount Requested: $11,000 Signature:_________________________________________Date:_____________________ The Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribe request community involvement on projects responsible to government entities. Please describe the request that you would like to present to Tribal Council for possible funding on the following page. When this form is completed, please submit the form to your appropriate governmental agency. Be prepared for further inquires from the Tribal Council by having a complete copy of your project readily available. NOTE: If your project includes multiple organization participation and funding sources, a Memorandum of Understanding, signed by each board representative, must be attached to the application. PLEASE SEE PAGE TWO FOR COMPLETE INSTRUCTIONS.


989-775-4000

2

A. Description of Project This project repairs and protects the damaged Chippewa River overlook at Nelson Park by removing and replacing damaged asphalt leading to the overlook and further protects the wooden structure by armoring the bank near and around the structure shielding it from future flood events.


service area Existing Riverwalk Trail amenities such as bridges, decks, boardwalks, and viewing platforms are important connectors to the main trail and provide trail and park visitors with additional options to access view and interact with nature. These structures allow user access and at the same time serve to protect the sensitive riverbank from erosion. Due to these structure locations along the river, they are susceptible to annual flooding and damage during high water events. The quality and safety of the trail system has been a source of local pride for visitors and citizens from the area as they enjoy walking, biking, and nature viewing along the Chippewa River Corridor. Taking a proactive approach to protecting the Chippewa River’s natural and man-made resources is paramount to preserving healthy infrastructure and leisure enjoyment well into the future. This project strives to: Ø Protect and enhance our local trail resources keeping it vibrant, safe and up to date Ø Reduce maintenance on riverbanks and river related infrastructure Ø Protect natural and man-made resources directly impacted by the river Ø Serve as a cooperative example for others to protect and improve the health of the

Chippewa River corridor Ø Partner with the Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribe working together to secure available

local resources to protect resources along Chippewa River C. Long-term funding requirements and how those requirements will be met.

The City of Mt. Pleasant has funds in its operational budget to pay for annual maintenance costs for minor deck repairs along the riverbank and seasonal removal of log jams to help protect river resources.

D. Itemized Budget

ITEM QUANTITY UNIT UNIT RATE AMOUNT Cut and remove damaged asphalt 1 Lump Sum 400 $ 400.00 Furnish and install turbidity curtain 1 Lump Sum -0- $ -0- Furnish/install bank protecting fabric 1 Lump Sum 300 $ 300.00 Furnish/install natural stone rip rap 1 Lump Sum 5,000 $ 5,000.00 Furnish/install concrete connector 1 Lump Sum 3,300 $ 3,300.00 Site Restoration 1 Lump Sum 500 $ 500.00 Permit update 1 Lump Sum 500 $ 500.00 ESTIMATED SUBTOTAL $10,000.00 Engineering, Staking, Const. Mgt. 1 Lump Sum 1,000 $ 1,000.00 ESTIMATED TOTAL AMOUNT $11,000.00

1

SEMIANNUAL TWO-PERCENT APPLICATION Organization Name: CITY OF MT. PLEASANT (06-017) Authorized Official Name and Title: Nancy Ridley, City Manager (person authorized to receive funds) Mailing Address: 320 W. Broadway, Mt. Pleasant, MI 48858 Phone: 989-779-5321 FAX: 989-773-4691 e-mail: [email protected] Request submitted by: City of Mt. Pleasant Project Supervisor: Ryan Longoria Project Name: City of Mt. Pleasant PEAK After-School/Summer Camp Program Amount Requested: $189,210 Signature:_________________________________________Date:_____________________ The Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribe request community involvement on projects responsible to government entities. Please describe the request that you would like to present to Tribal Council for possible funding on the following page. When this form is completed, please submit the form to your appropriate governmental agency. Be prepared for further inquires from the Tribal Council by having a complete copy of your project readily available. NOTE: If your project includes multiple organization participation and funding sources, a Memorandum of Understanding, signed by each board representative, must be attached to the application. PLEASE SEE PAGE TWO FOR COMPLETE INSTRUCTIONS.


989-775-4000

3

A. Please give a description of the project, providing as much detail as possible.

The PEAK program stands for Partners Empowering All Kids and is a partnership between the City of Mt. Pleasant, Mt. Pleasant Public Schools and Isabella County United Way. PEAK has worked collaboratively with Isabella County United Way on multiple special events in order to provide children with enrichment and volunteer opportunities in order to provide food and school supplies for those in need in the Mt. Pleasant community. PEAK is entering its 16th year of operation and has become a staple for children’s services that the community and school system relies on to keep area children safe, educated and enriched.

The PEAK After-School program operates at all five Mount Pleasant Public School elementary schools (Fancher, Ganiard, McGuire, Pullen, Vowles) and West Intermediate every school day for two hours – serving area children grades K-8. The PEAK Summer Camp program operates for 8-10 weeks during the summer at Ganiard Elementary, Vowles Elementary, McGuire Elementary and West Intermediate from 7:30 AM to 5:30 PM. Historically, PEAK has submitted separate 2% applications for the elementary school age group (grades k-6) and the middle school age group (grades 7-8). However, after extensive program evaluation in 2015, these groups have been combined in order to provide consistency and commonality across the PEAK program. This restructuring will provide the program with more financial and procedural oversight that will create more consistent programming and operation from top to bottom.

PEAK provides mentorship and enrichment programming for 200 elementary school students every day after school and for 300 students daily during PEAK Summer Camp through educational, recreational, physical and social-based programming in collaboration with Mt. Pleasant Discovery Museum, Central Michigan University’s recreational, educational and athletics programs, John Ball Zoo, The Jump Station, Therapy Dogs International and many other area businesses and organizations. We are currently working with CMU’s Office of Native American Programs and the Niijkewehn Mentoring Program on ways in which we can collaborate and work together for a stronger community. In addition, we are currently talking with Erik Rodriguez, SCIT Interim Public Relations Director, on implementing Native American cultural programming into our after-school curriculum. The goal of this programming is to increase cultural awareness of the community’s Native American population. An increased focus has also been put on MPPS involvement from principals, teachers and other administrative staff in areas of hiring, program development and expectations in order to lay a foundation for continued program growth and strength.

In addition to the general education students, PEAK also staffs Special Needs Assistants at each site in order to provide the same high-quality programming for students with educational, emotional and physical disabilities. It’s very important to the program and to the community that we are able to meet the needs of every child, regardless of their limitations. Inclusivity of all children is a major component of the PEAK program. The PEAK staff consists of 45 highly-qualified individuals, most of which are CMU students majoring in general education, special education, recreation and other related fields. Another major component of the PEAK program is not simply to have staff, but to have qualified and trained staff who are capable of providing the children in the program with the care they need and deserve.

One of the goals of the PEAK program is to ensure that every child is able to participate, regardless of their ability to pay. Scholarship assistance is available to ensure that every

4

child has the opportunity to participate in the program and enjoy all the benefits – regardless of their ability to pay.

B. Please give a brief description of the project benefits to the Tribe, community, and

governmental service area. While there are literally thousands of studies and statistics to support the long-term

benefits of quality after-school and summer programming for children, the simple answer to why PEAK is so important is that there is a great number of area children who simply do not have a place to go after school. For those who do have a place to go, many times that place is not safe and/or conducive to educational, physical and social growth. PEAK is able to provide students of all walks of life and backgrounds the opportunity to grow in ways that will set them up for future success by means of quality programming, positive role models and a safe and enriching environment. Quite simply, without the PEAK program, hundreds of children would have no place to go after school and would be put in dangerous positions and situations that would compromise their safety and the safety of others. PEAK provides the program participants, their parents and the community as a whole with a sense of security, knowing that their children are well cared for in an environment that will help develop good educational and social habits to ensure future growth and success.

In addition to the school day and summer camp curriculum, PEAK also puts a strong focus on teaching children the importance of community and of giving back. Each summer, special events such as Community Service Day, Super Summer Showcase and the Penny War highlight the relationship with United Way and the community by having children generate monetary funds and thousands of food items and school supplies that they then give back to those who are in need. We feel that this is a benefit to the children by teaching to them the importance of giving back to those in need, while meeting critical needs in the community. The increased focus on MPPS involvement will also help ensure that the PEAK program serves as an extension of what teachers are trying to accomplish during the school day. Consistent communication with teachers and parents of the children enrolled in the PEAK program allows PEAK to put a focus on and meet the most challenging aspects of the school curriculum. PEAK offers one-on-one tutoring and homework help that can be targeted to specific areas of the school day that children find most challenging. Through the relationship with CMU, PEAK hires CMU students in education, recreation and other related fields so that they can gain real-life experience to better prepare them for both their professional and personal life after graduation. The PEAK program has been working very hard with members and organizations of the Tribe on implementing Native American cultural components into our after-school programming. We aim to increase cultural awareness and understanding of our local culture in order to create more accepting, understanding and culturally-educated students. Cultural diversity is a part of the Mt. Pleasant community that we are blessed to have and we feel this should be celebrated by working directly with the Tribe and their affiliated organizations to create fun, engaging and culturally enriching opportunities for both the Tribe and our PEAK students.

C. Please state the long-term funding requirements (if applicable) and how those

requirements will be met. The 21st Century Grant that awarded in 2000 only covered the first five years of

operation. Since then, the program has relied heavily on funding from outside sources in order to keep program fees low, without having to sacrifice the quality of care being

5

offered to local school children. The Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribe has been instrumental in allowing this program to exist in a manner that allows children of all economic and social backgrounds to participate – regardless of their ability to pay. Historically, one-half of the PEAK program budget came in the form of Tribal 2% funds. Tribal support is extremely important to the overall quality and long-term health of the PEAK program and all the children and families it serves and over time, efforts have been made to control expenses program-wide. The remaining PEAK budget is made up of program fees and support from entities such as United Way have provided the remaining funding needs. Program fees are kept at a minimum and are based on family income and a family’s ability to pay. Over $60,000 is made available annually in form of scholarship assistance to ensure that every child is able to participate in PEAK – regardless of their ability to pay. It has been the goal of PEAK to increase the amount of revenue generated from the PEAK K-8 program through fees, fundraising and other available grants while decreasing the portion requested form the Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribe. Without the continued support of the Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribe through 2% allocations, the PEAK program would need to undergo a comprehensive evaluation in order to determine if this is a program that is economically feasible. Therefore, the PEAK program is requesting approximately 30 percent of the total funds needed to continue to provide the K-8 grade PEAK program to children and families in the community as it currently exists.

D. Provide an itemized budget for your request and attach any documents justifying

those amounts (ie. Price quotes, bids, etc). Expenditures Staffing Costs $ 382,210 Special Needs Accommodation $ 40,000 Scholarships $ 60,000 Supplies $ 48,400 Contracted Services/Facility Fees $ 52,600 $ 583,210 Total Expenditures Revenue Tuition, Fees, & fundraising collected $ 394,000 Projected Revenue Total Requested from Tribal 2% $ 189,210

1

SEMIANNUAL TWO-PERCENT APPLICATION Organization Name: CITY OF MT. PLEASANT (06-017) Authorized Official Name and Title: Nancy Ridley, City Manager (person authorized to receive funds) Mailing Address: 320 W. Broadway, Mt. Pleasant, MI 48858 Phone: 989-779-5321 FAX: 989-773-4691 e-mail: [email protected] Request submitted by (agency or branch of organization listed above): City of Mt. Pleasant Fire Department Project Supervisor: Rick Beltinck, Fire Chief Project Name: Apparatus Bay Doors Amount Requested: $70,000 Signature:_________________________________________Date:_____________________ The Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribe request community involvement on projects responsible to government entities. Please describe the request that you would like to present to Tribal Council for possible funding on the following page. When this form is completed, please submit the form to your appropriate governmental agency. Be prepared for further inquires from the Tribal Council by having a complete copy of your project readily available. NOTE: If your project includes multiple organization participation and funding sources, a Memorandum of Understanding, signed by each board representative, must be attached to the application. PLEASE SEE PAGE TWO FOR COMPLETE INSTRUCTIONS.


989-775-4000


A. Please give a brief description of the project, providing as much detail as possible.

When the building was renovated in 2001 the apparatus bay garage doors were delivered without being painted. The contractor had the interior and exterior of the doors painted, at this time the doors are peeling paint and the gaskets and glazing are deteriorating. This project would replace all the overhead garage doors in the front and back of the Fire Department apparatus bays. The new doors being proposed would be insulated with an R value of 18.1 with a single full view section of glass. The existing doors have an estimated R value of 1.0 . This project would improve our energy efficiency in the fire bay area of the public safety building. The new doors would also contain less glass; the cleaning of the glass in the current doors is contracted as part of the building cleaning contract.

B. Please give a brief description of the project benefits to the Tribe, Community, and

governmental service area. Working together toward being a community with a reliable and sustainable infrastructure.

C. Please state the long term projection of funding requirements (if applicable).

The maintenance and operation of the garage doors would be maintained by Mt. Pleasant Fire Department.

D.

Garage Door Replacement

Clopay White Insulated R18.1 Single Full View Section of Glass

51,117.11

Paint all Doors Red to Match Existing Doors

17,200

Total

68,317.11

Note: Add 5% annually for overall cost increases

The Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribe of Michigan 7070 East Broadway Rd. Mt. Pleasant, Ml 48858

989-775-4000

SEMIANNUAL TWO-PERCENT APPLICATION

Organization Name: CITY OF MT. PLEASANT (06-017)

Authorized Official Name and Title: Nancy Ridley, City Manager (person authorized to receive funds)

Mailing Address: 320 W. Broadway, Mt. Pleasant, Ml 48858

Phone: 989-779-5321 FAX: 989-773-4691 e-mail: [email protected]

Request submitted by (agency or branch of organization listed above): City of Mt. Pleasant Police Department

Project Supervisor: D/F/Lt. Marvin Jenkins

Project Name: Bay Area Narcotics Enforcement Team (BAYANET) North Team- Based in Mt. Pleasant

Amount Requested: $309,011 (Spring 2016)

Signature: __________________ Date: ________ _

The Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribe request community involvement on projects responsible to government entities. Please describe the request that you would like to present to Tribal Council for possible funding on the following page. When this form is completed, please submit the form to your appropriate governmental agency. Be prepared for further inquires from the Tribal Council by having a complete copy of your project readily available.

NOTE: If your project includes multiple organization participation and funding sources, a Memorandum of Understanding, signed by each board representative, must be attached to the application.

PLEASE SEE PAGE TWO FOR COMPLETE INSTRUCTIONS.

I

2016 Spring 2% Application - Project Description

Project Description:

The Bay Area Narcotics Enforcement Team (BAY ANET) is a multi-jurisdictional investigative task force. We conduct professional covert investigations into any and all criminal activities, focusing on the manufacture, sale, and distribution of illicit narcotics and controlled substances. Our jurisdictional boundaries include six counties; Bay, Clare, Gladwin, Isabella, Midland and Saginaw.

Specific to this application, a six (6) person "street team" (BAYANET-North Team) specializes in major crimes and narcotics investigations within Clare, Gladwin and Isabella counties. This team is dedicated to the specific purpose of addressing those individuals who would take advantage of the financial opportunities within tribal lands. The sale and distribution of illicit drugs continues to impact the family structure, financial status, and overall social structure of the Native Americans who are preyed upon by this specialized criminal element. It is imperative that we recognize the motivation for drug dealers is nothing more than mere greed. With that understanding, we can aggressively investigate and mitigate the opportunity for financial gain.

BA YAN ET Detectives are a continued valuable resource for Saginaw Chippewa Tribal Police when investigating all narcotics investigations along with major crimes, such as; armed robbery, physical and sexual assaults, home invasions, and homicide. Narcotics dealers from Saginaw and Grand Rapids continue to recognize the economic impact that tribal monies play into the distribution of narcotics throughout BAYANET's area of responsibility, believed to be a contributing factor leading to the significant rise in heroin and methamphetamine investigations.

In 2015, Detectives seized approximately 757 grams of heroin ($189,392.00 street value), an increase of over 400% from 2014. During that same reporting time methamphetamine investigations increased over 200%. Ongoing investigations verified to BAY ANET and other law enforcement agencies, indicated that the distribution of illegal narcotics into the Isabella County region stretches far beyond Michigan's borders.

Project Benefits:

BAY ANET currently has investigations reaching throughout the State of Michigan, and beyond. These investigations, specifically address the Saginaw Chippewa Tribe and surrounding communities. The benefit of a team dedicated primarily to the tribal lands is significant. In 2015 BA YAN ET investigated 79 complaints in Isabella County, 89% of those complaints were investigated on Tribal Reservation Land. The arrests on Tribal Reservation Land increased to 91% of all arrests in Isabella County in 2015.

This grant provides for us the ability to maintain an office in the Mt. Pleasant community, which keeps the law enforcement resources here and local. The Michigan State Police (MSP) provides a Detective Lieutenant and Detective Sergeant as supervisors to this team. MSP has also assigned a Detective Trooper to BAYANET- North Team from the Mt. Pleasant Post. MSP pays 100% for the wages/benefits and vehicles for the supervisors and trooper. In addition to this, MSP provides the computers, IT support, police radios, user's fees and additional support staff for property management and administrative processes. This is a $548,076 value and is provided at no additional cost.

1

In conjunction with criminal investigations, BAYANET officers have continually advocated the benefits of education when it comes to deterring citizens from controlled substance use. We have actively pursued opportunities, and prepared informational presentations in order to assist potential victims in making the right choice when confronted with a dilemma involving illicit drugs as well as the new Designer Drugs. In 2015 from January to December, the BAYANET North Team has presented drug education and awareness information to over 202 people in Clare and Isabella Counties. Many of these narcotics and methamphetamine awareness classes have been presented to members of the Saginaw Chippewa Indian Reservation.

Activity for North Team from January - December 2015/Tribal Land:

Comolaints investiqated in Isabella Countv 79 Complaints investigated on Tribal Lands 70 Total Percentaqe of time spent on Tribal Land 89% Total Arrests in Isabella County 74 Arrests on Tribal Lands 67 Total Percentage of Arrests on Tribal Land 91% Total Percentage of Arrest Counts on Tribal 93% Land

Street Value of Drugs Seized in 2015:

During the entire year in 2015, BAYANET as a whole seized a street value of $3,449,900.09 in illegal narcotics.

Long-Term Funding Requirements and How They Will Be Met:

The investigations conducted by, and the social problems addressed by BAYANET are not ending. With the neutralization of one criminal enterprise, comes the opportunity for alternative criminal enterprises to continue the attack on those weakened by their dependence on controlled substances. Although culmination of a long-term investigation provides disruption to these individuals and the accompanying source for illicit narcotics, it is the constant and unrelenting pressure from covert operations that keep these individuals from setting up permanent business.

While the financial obligations of these operations are at times augmented by forfeiture, long-term funding sources are a necessity. (note: in recent years close to $600,000 in forfeiture monev has been used to offset North Team cost./

As forfeiture seizures drop and expenses increase, we have had to make adjustments to our operations and ask our partnering agencies to pick up additional costs. They too understand the value of BAYANET, the vital partnership that the Saginaw Chippewa Tribe provides with the generous gift of 2% money and they (Central Michigan University PD, Clare County Sheriff Dept. and Mt. Pleasant City PD) continue to dedicate funding and human resources to BAY ANET. The partnership of the Saginaw Chippewa Tribe, local law enforcement partners and the MSP is truly a value added service to this community.

Value of 2% Grant:

The 2% grant is the starting point for the true value of the BAYANET/Saginaw Chippewa Tribe partnership. Along with the receivership of the 2% grant, MSP commits another $548,076 in resources for vehicles, computers and personnel. Central Michigan University PD, Clare County Sheriff Dept. and Mt. Pleasant City PD commit personnel to the team - a value of well over $250,000.

2

This grant continues to return over one million dollars in benefit to the local area. This would not be possible without the generous 2% gift provided by the Saginaw Chippewa Tribe.

Itemized Budget for Request:

Please see attached - budget requests.

3

Budget Information - Request Made By BAYANET for Spring 2016

Current Personnel

MSP D/F/lieutenant Section Commander

MSP Lieutenant - Team leader

MSP Sgt. - Asst. Team leader

MSP Detective Trooper

Administrative Asst. (Main Office)

Administrative Staff (Mt. Pleasant Office)

Property Administrator (Part-Time)

Central Michigan University Officer

Mt. Pleasant Police Officer

Clare County Sheriff's Deputy

Sag/Chip Tribal Officer (Vacant Position)

'

Current Funding

Michigan State Police




BA YAN ET/Byrne Jag Grant

Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribal Grant

Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribal Grant - 1/2 Wages



Clare County

Saginaw Chippewa Tribe

Total Request: Saginaw Chippewa Indian

Tribal Grant ...

Page 1

Direct Cost

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$0.00

$24,210.00

$22,000.00

$50,000.00

$50,000.00

$50,000.00

$0.00

$196,210.00 .

Budget Information - Request Made By BA YAN ET for Spring 2016

Training Source of Cost

Narcotics School Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribal Grant 2,500.00

Surveillance School Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribal Grant 2,500.00

Raid Entry School Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribal Grant 2,500.00

Training Total $1,500.00 I Vehicles Source of Funding Cost

leased Vehicles \ Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribal Grant \ $30,500.00 This includes, (2) leased vehicles, gas, maintanance, insurance, police radios and 2 North Team owned vehicles

Vehicles Total $30,500.00

Equipment Source of Funding Cost

Phones, Copier/Fax Maintenance, Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribal Grant $8,000.00 Shredding Expense, Paper and Misc. Supplies

Cell Phones, GPS Trackers, Jet Pack Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribal Grant $11,800.00

Total Equipment $19,800.00 I Investigative Expenses Source of Funding Cost

Covert Operations I Saginaw Chippewa lndianTribal Grant I $55,000.00 Includes: Informant Expenses, Narcotics Purchases and Investigative Expenses

Total Investigative Expense $55,ooo.oo I Total - Page #2 $112,800.00 I Total - Page #1 $19s,210.oo I

•.• j !'•·• . [qt~! R~q\J~~t:\Y ... "iii'E;("T~·n~~~······

Page 2

1

SEMIANNUAL TWO-PERCENT APPLICATION Organization Name: CITY OF MT. PLEASANT (06-017) Authorized Official Name and Title: Nancy Ridley, City Manager (person authorized to receive funds) Mailing Address: 320 W. Broadway, Mt. Pleasant, MI 48858 Phone: 989-779-5321 FAX: 989-773-4691 e-mail: [email protected] Request submitted by (agency or branch of organization listed above): Police Department Project Supervisor: Glenn Feldhauser, DPS Director Project Name: Youth and Community Services Unit Amount Requested: $168,265 Signature:_________________________________________Date:_____________________ The Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribe request community involvement on projects responsible to government entities. Please describe the request that you would like to present to Tribal Council for possible funding on the following page. When this form is completed, please submit the form to your appropriate governmental agency. Be prepared for further inquires from the Tribal Council by having a complete copy of your project readily available. NOTE: If your project includes multiple organization participation and funding sources, a Memorandum of Understanding, signed by each board representative, must be attached to the application. PLEASE SEE PAGE TWO FOR COMPLETE INSTRUCTIONS.


989-775-4000


804 East High Street, Mount Pleasant, MI 48858 Phone: 989.779.5100 Fax: 989.773.4020

www.mt-pleasant.org

A. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The Youth and Community Services Unit is a collaborative effort of police, schools, parents, business and community members working together to positively impact our youth and their environment. Police officers with the Youth and Community Services Unit are involved with our kids at an early age establishing relationships and continuing those throughout their school years, interacting with kids in an encouraging manner and providing guidance and support when needed. Members of the unit serve as positive role models through leadership, education, guidance and intervention. Officers are involved in school and community events ensuring high visibility and being approachable to citizens as well as guests. The officers serve as a liaison between Mt. Pleasant Public Schools, business, private organizations, law enforcement agencies, juvenile, adult and Tribal courts, prosecutors, media, CMH, DHS, PEAK and CMU. Officers work with the school staff and Native American Advocates to mentor, coach and educate students on various topics, including internet safety, bullying, school violence, problem solving, and tobacco, drug and alcohol abuse. Youth and Community Services officers work in conjunction with residents, apartment managers and neighborhood groups to reduce and prevent crime in their neighborhoods and apartment complexes. They coordinate efforts with Code Enforcement and the Fire Department through the Neighborhood Resource Unit to eliminate code violations and blight in our neighborhoods providing a safer and cleaner community. Funding requested is crucial for this unit to deliver a high level of service. In order to design, conduct and participate in events that benefit our kids and community and stave off further cuts, two-percent funding is needed. Two-percent funding would allow us to keep officers in the schools, at after school functions, be present at community events and neighborhood meetings, while also being proactive in reducing, preventing and responding to crime. B. PROJECT BENEFITS TO THE TRIBE, COMMUNITY AND GOVERNMENTAL AREAS: The primary focus is on our youth, participating in their lives as both professionals and mentors to enhance their ability to learn, enjoy life and thrive as members of our community. The majority of our student contact is through the Mt. Pleasant Schools which serves approximately 4,400 students the latest count indicates 530 are Native American students. The Youth and Community Services Unit further strives in making our community a safe, clean and inviting environment for all who live, work and visit. The Youth and Community Services Unit will continue to lead and participate in programs which benefit not only our children, but our entire community. Studies have shown the most effective deterrent to school violence is a police presence in schools. For this reason, amongst others it is important that we keep this resource available. A consistent police presence will help achieve a safe learning environment while students attend class. More time spent with the students strengthens our relationships and builds trust and confidence with each other. Supplies and training are needed for our day to day activities, this information, whether it is in the form of a handout, presentation or counseling is passed along to students, faculty and parents. Crossing guards are required at certain intersections near our Elementary Schools. They help ensure the safety of our young children crossing streets when arriving and leaving school.

C. LONG TERM FUNDING REQUIREMENTS AND HOW THOSE REQUIREMENTS WILL BE MET: There are ongoing funding requirements for the program. The entire unit is comprised of three police officers and the crossing guards at most schools. The City General Fund covers one-half of the total cost of the unit. The remaining half of the program is currently funded through Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) monies through the City of Mt. Pleasant, Tribal 2% funds and donations. The Youth and Community Services Unit has partnered with the Mt. Pleasant Public Schools to seek funding from various sources. D. ITEMIZED BUDGET FOR REQUEST: Youth and Community Services Program 2016 Budget Personnel Costs $ 309,530 Supplies $ 16,500 Training $ 5,000 Communications $ 3,500 Insurance $ 2,000 Total $ 336,530 One half funded by City General Fund $ 168,265 Remaining amount funded By grants and donations $ 168,265 TOTAL REQUEST: $ 168,265

1

SEMIANNUAL TWO-PERCENT APPLICATION Organization Name: CITY OF MT. PLEASANT (06-017) Authorized Official Name and Title: Nancy Ridley, City Manager (person authorized to receive funds) Mailing Address: 320 W. Broadway, Mt. Pleasant, MI 48858 Phone: 989-779-5321 FAX: 989-773-4691 e-mail: [email protected] Request submitted by (agency or branch of organization listed above): Municipal Airport Project Supervisor: John Zang, DPW Director Project Name: Airport Operations Support Amount Requested: $40,000 Signature:_________________________________________Date:_____________________ The Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribe request community involvement on projects responsible to government entities. Please describe the request that you would like to present to Tribal Council for possible funding on the following page. When this form is completed, please submit the form to your appropriate governmental agency. Be prepared for further inquires from the Tribal Council by having a complete copy of your project readily available. NOTE: If your project includes multiple organization participation and funding sources, a Memorandum of Understanding, signed by each board representative, must be attached to the application. PLEASE SEE PAGE TWO FOR COMPLETE INSTRUCTIONS.

·


989-775-4000

2

A. Project Description: This funding request is to provide funds to support the basic operation of the airport for the next year. In order to provide the necessary funds for the basic operation of the Mt. Pleasant Municipal Airport, the City has had to contribute $40,000 - $50,000 per year from the General Fund. The subsidy is increasing due to a decline in revenue from T-Hanger vacancies and reductions in fuel sales, as well as higher personnel costs to provide appropriate service levels. Because of State revenue sharing reductions and increased cost pressures, the City continues to face a budget challenge such that the increasing needs of the airport compete with other City services. In 2006, reductions in the Airport budget were implemented that could have reduced the level of service and maintenance at the airport. In 2005, the Saginaw Chippewa Tribe provided $50,000 to assist in funding airport operations and in 2008, 2014, and 2015 provided $40,000. This 2% funding will provide the needed support. Additional funding is desired to provide required operations. B. Project Benefits To The Tribe, Community, And Governmental Service Area: Due to the poor economic climate in Michigan, the usage of the airport is changing and requiring additional funding from the general fund. The Mt. Pleasant Airport is a major gateway to the Tribal community’s casino and resort operations. Many entertainers appreciate the convenience and service that they experience at the airport when coming to perform at the resort. The additional funding from the Tribe would remove a portion of the operational subsidy from being dependent on the general fund. If the basic funding of the airport is cut, then the ability to provide essential services to the Tribal community’s visitors and business associates will have to be reduced. C. Long-Term Funding Requirements (if applicable) And How Those Requirements Will Be Met: D. Itemized Budget For Request (attach any documents justifying those amounts, i.e. price quotes, bids, etc.):

1

SEMIANNUAL TWO-PERCENT APPLICATION Organization Name: CITY OF MT. PLEASANT (06-017) Authorized Official Name and Title: Nancy Ridley, City Manager (person authorized to receive funds) Mailing Address: 320 W. Broadway, Mt. Pleasant, MI 48858 Phone: 989-779-5321 FAX: 989-773-4691 e-mail: [email protected] Request submitted by (agency or branch of organization listed above): Municipal Airport Project Supervisor: John Zang, DPW Director Project Name: Runway Approach Clearing Amount Requested: $23,750 Signature:_________________________________________Date:_____________________ The Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribe request community involvement on projects responsible to government entities. Please describe the request that you would like to present to Tribal Council for possible funding on the following page. When this form is completed, please submit the form to your appropriate governmental agency. Be prepared for further inquires from the Tribal Council by having a complete copy of your project readily available. NOTE: If your project includes multiple organization participation and funding sources, a Memorandum of Understanding, signed by each board representative, must be attached to the application. PLEASE SEE PAGE TWO FOR COMPLETE INSTRUCTIONS.

·


989-775-4000

2

· Project Description: In order to keep the approach slope clear of obstacles on runway 9, there is a need to procure easements on private property to keep trees pruned to levels that do not effect airport operations.

· · Project Benefits To The Tribe, Community, And Governmental Service Area: The Tribal community will benefit from this project by having a safe reliable airport with clear and sustainable approach plates. Long-Term Funding Requirements (if applicable) And How Those Requirements Will Be Met: Annual maintenance to keep trees below the required elevation will be put into the operating budget for the airport. Itemized Budget For Request (Attach any documents justifying those amounts, i.e. price quotes, bids, etc.): see attached Tree abatement and easement allocation total $475,000 Federal Share $427,500 State Share $23,750 Local Share $23,750

1


Organization Name: CITY OF MT. PLEASANT (06-017) Authorized Official Name and Title: Nancy Ridley, City Manager (person authorized to receive funds)

Mailing Address: 320 W. Broadway, Mt. Pleasant, MI 48858 Phone: 989-779-5321 FAX: 989-773-4691 e-mail: [email protected]

Request submitted by (agency or branch of organization listed above): City of Mt. Pleasant – Street Department Project Supervisor: Jennifer Flachs, Engineering Aide/Inspector Project Name: Alley Clean Up and Gravel Alley Restoration Amount Requested: $100,000 Signature:_________________________________________Date:_____________________

The Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribe request community involvement on projects responsible to government entities. Please describe the request that you would like to present to Tribal Council for possible funding on the following page. When this form is completed, please submit the form to your appropriate governmental agency. Be prepared for further inquires from the Tribal Council by having a complete copy of your project readily available. NOTE: If your project includes multiple organization participation and funding sources, a Memorandum of Understanding, signed by each board representative, must be attached to the application. PLEASE SEE PAGE TWO FOR COMPLETE INSTRUCTIONS.


989-775-4000

2

Project Description: The City’s Engineering Department recently completed an evaluation of all of the alleys within the city. This evaluation was based upon the maintenance needed to restore the alleys to a good quality surface. The alleys are not part of the street system and the City does not receive Federal or State funding to maintain them. The alleys are both gravel and paved, and many are in need of immediate repair or reconstruction. Many residents only have access to their driveways and garages from the alley side of their property. Without the necessary funding the alleys will continue to deteriorate. Furthermore, the alleys have become aesthetically unpleasing and a safety hazard due to the accumulation of large brush piles, tires, furniture, overgrown shrubbery, etc. A 2% Tribal contribution will allow us to remove the accumulated debris from the alleys and restore the drivable surface at no charge to residents. Project Benefits To The Tribe, Community, And Governmental Service Area: Repair of the gravel and asphalt alleys will improve the accessibility and safety of the alleys. Safety will be improved as potholes will be eliminated and water will no longer collect in the alley, and the aesthetics will improve by the removal of obstacles, such as large brush piles. The aesthetic appearance of the City will also improve as the alley conditions improve.

Long-Term Funding Requirements (if applicable) And How Those Requirements Will Be Met: Once the non-paved alleys have been restored with additional gravel and grading, the City plans to allocate annual funds to maintain them to the restored condition. Restoration of the paved alleys will require milling of the existing asphalt surface, repair of the subbase, if needed, and repaving. Therefore, the City would like to submit a future request for additional funding to complete this work. Restoration of the paved alleys would need to be bid or, if possible, added to the scope of a future street overlay project.

Itemized Budget For Request (Attach any documents justifying those amounts, i.e. price quotes, bids, etc.): Currently, the City does not have funding available for the entire project scope. A 2% Tribal contribution would allow City crews to remove the debris and overgrowth without charge to the residents, and restore the gravel alleys to a quality and safe drivable surface.

1




Request submitted by (agency or branch of organization listed above): City of Mt. Pleasant – Street Department Project Supervisor: Jennifer Flachs, Engineering Aide/Inspector Project Name: Sidewalk Replacement and ADA Ramps Amount Requested: $50,000 Signature:_________________________________________Date:_____________________



989-775-4000

2

Project Description: The City of Mt. Pleasant has approximately 80 miles of sidewalk within the City limits, 30% of which has reached the end of the life cycle and requires replacement. In addition, several sidewalk ramps need to be upgraded to meet ADA requirements. Project Benefits To The Tribe, Community, And Governmental Service Area: The sidewalk replacement program helps keep the sidewalk free of trip and fall hazards, and increases the safety and accessibility to the sidewalk for residents and visitors alike. Having attractive, easily accessible public spaces within the community is a key component to encourage and increase pedestrian traffic. The health benefits derived from a walking program are well documented. Long-Term Funding Requirements (if applicable) And How Those Requirements Will Be Met: None

Itemized Budget For Request (Attach any documents justifying those amounts, i.e. price quotes, bids, etc.): A budget amount of $50,000 is requested toward progress of this project. Please see attached documentation of the 2015 bid.

SIDEWALK REPLACEMENT

No. Description Quan. Unit Unit Price Total Price Unit Price Total Price Unit Price Total Price

1 Sidewalk, Conc, 4 inch 30,000 SFT 2.86$ 85,800.00$ 2.80$ 84,000.00$ 3.20$ 96,000.00$


3 Sidewalk, Rem 3,800 SYD 8.10$ 30,780.00$ 6.00$ 22,800.00$ 6.20$ 23,560.00$

4 Sidewalk Ramp, Conc. 6 inch 2,000 SFT 3.35$ 6,700.00$ 4.75$ 9,500.00$ 5.50$ 11,000.00$

5 Detectable Warning Surface, Modified 200 FT 62.50$ 12,500.00$ 77.00$ 15,400.00$ 61.00$ 12,200.00$

6 Curb and Gutter, Conc, DET F-4 800 FT 12.50$ 10,000.00$ 18.00$ 14,400.00$ 18.00$ 14,400.00$

7 Curb and Gutter, Rem 800 FT 5.00$ 4,000.00$ 8.45$ 6,760.00$ 9.00$ 7,200.00$

8 Subbase, LM 75 CYD 15.00$ 1,125.00$ 15.00$ 1,125.00$ 25.00$ 1,875.00$

9 Slope Restoration, Modified 7,000 FT 2.50$ 17,500.00$ 3.00$ 21,000.00$ 2.90$ 20,300.00$

TOTAL 175,105.00$ 181,485.00$ 194,735.00$





3 Sidewalk, Rem 3,800 SYD 8.00$ 30,400.00$ 17.25$ 65,550.00$ 10.71$ 40,698.00$





8 Subbase, LM 75 CYD 30.00$ 2,250.00$ 34.00$ 2,550.00$ 23.55$ 1,766.25$


TOTAL 207,650.00$ 215,080.00$ 237,834.25$





3 Sidewalk, Rem 3,800 SYD 9.10$ 34,580.00$ 8.00$ 30,400.00$ 12.11$ 46,018.00$





8 Subbase, LM 75 CYD 20.00$ 1,500.00$ 44.00$ 3,300.00$ 156.00$ 11,700.00$


TOTAL 238,000.00$ 269,810.00$ 324,416.00$

CITY OF MT. PLEASANT - 2015 REPLACEMENT SIDEWALK JKS, Inc.

793 W. Pine River Road

Midland, MI 48640

Midland, MI 48640

1993 Gover Parkway

Sugar Construction

2968 Venture Drive

4440 N. Eastman Road

The Isabella CorporationMalley Construction

1565 Park Place 2201 Commerce St.

J. Ranck Electric, Inc.

Mt. Pleasant, MI 48858


Wobig Construction


3399 Fashion Square Blvd.

527 N. Woodbridge Street

Saginaw, MI 48602

Clare, MI 48617 Midland, MI 48642 Saginaw, MI 48603

Robbin Harsh Excavating, Inc. Tri-City Groundbreakers, Inc. Graham Construction Corporation

9395 S. Clare Avenue

1




Request submitted by (agency or branch of organization listed above): City of Mt. Pleasant – Street Department Project Supervisor: Jennifer Flachs, Engineering Aide/Inspector Project Name: Street Overlays and Resurfacing Amount Requested: $100,000 Signature:_________________________________________Date:_____________________



989-775-4000

2

Project Description: The City’s Engineering Department completed an evaluation of all of the streets within the city limits. This evaluation was based upon the maintenance needed to restore the streets to a good quality surface. Many streets are in need of preventative maintenance to improve their condition and prevent further deterioration. If the streets are left unattended, they will eventually need to be reconstructed. For every mile of street that must be completely reconstructed, nearly nine (9) miles can be resurfaced for the same cost. With a $100,000 contribution by the Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribe, an additional mile of street can be resurfaced. Project Benefits To The Tribe, Community, And Governmental Service Area: The Tribal community will benefit from the improved street conditions. Safety will be improved as potholes will be eliminated and water will no longer collect in the street. The aesthetic appearance of the City will also improve as the street conditions improve. The benefits to the local government service area would be that the entire Mt. Pleasant community will benefit from the improved street conditions.

Long-Term Funding Requirements (if applicable) And How Those Requirements Will Be Met: There are no long-term funding requirements applicable.

Itemized Budget For Request (Attach any documents justifying those amounts, i.e. price quotes, bids, etc.): The City plans to allocate $642,000 over the next two years for street resurfacing and sidewalk ramp replacement. A 2% Tribal contribution would allow additional streets to be resurfaced earlier than scheduled. Please see the attached bid tab for the 2015 Street Overlay Project.

3

Streets to Receive Asphalt Overlay in 2016

Anna: Maple to Broadway $ 40,000.00

Fessenden: Henry to Leaton $ 34,000.00

Harold: Henry to Harris $ 29,000.00

Illinois: Mission to Brown $ 36,000.00

Livingston: Lyons to Broadway $ 23,000.00

Lyons: Bradley to Harris $ 73,000.00

Overlay Engineering (5%) $ 12,000.00

ADA Compliance Ramp Replacement (53) $ 57,000.00

TOTAL $304,000.00

Streets to Receive Asphalt Overlay in 2017

Arthur: Adams to Harris $ 16,000.00

Belnap: Wood to Adams $ 30,000.00

Elm: Bradley to Harris $ 67,000.00

Granger: Wood to Adams $ 34,000.00

Henry: Broadway to Elm $ 32,000.00

Harris: Lyons to Broadway $ 28,000.00

Leaton: Fessenden to Broadway $ 17,000.00

Michigan: Harris to Leaton $ 7,000.00

Upton: Wood to Adams $ 34,000.00

Wood: Belnap to Fessenden $ 19,000.00

Wood: Burch to Granger $ 9,000.00

Overlay Engineering (5%) $ 15,000.00

ADA Compliance Ramp Replacement (27) $ 30,000.00

TOTAL $338,000.00

City of Mt. Pleasant - Division of Public Works

Mt. Pleasant, Michigan

2015 Street Overlay Project

UNIT TOTAL

DESCRIPTION QTY UNIT PRICE PRICE

Division - LOCAL

Curb and Gutter, Conc, Det F4 70 LFT $19.00 $1,330.00

Curb and Gutter, Rem 70 LFT $13.00 $910.00

Dr Structure Cover, Adj, Case 1 13 EA $200.00 $2,600.00

Dr Structure Cover, SAN, Modified 23 EA $850.00 $19,550.00

Dr Structure Cover, STM, Modified 1 EA $850.00 $850.00

HMA, Ultra-Tin, Medium Volume 1,350 TON $74.25 $100,237.50

Restoration, Modified 70 LFT $8.50 $595.00

TOTAL DIVISION - LOCAL $126,072.50

Division - MAJOR

Curb and Gutter, Conc,Det F4 100 LFT $19.00 $1,900.00

Curb and Gutter, Rem 100 LFT $13.00 $1,300.00

Dr Structure Cover, Adj, Case 1 8 EA $200.00 $1,600.00

Dr Structure Cover, SAN, Modified 6 EA $850.00 $5,100.00

Dr Structure Cover, STM, Modified 2 EA $850.00 $1,700.00

HMA, Ultra-Tin, Medium Volume 890 TON $74.25 $66,082.50

Restoration, Modified 10 LFT $25.00 $250.00

Pavt. Mrkg, Waterborne, 4 inch, Yellow 465 LFT $1.00 $465.00

Pavt. Mrkg, Waterborne, 4 inch, White 125 LFT $1.00 $125.00

Pavt. Mrkg, Waterborne, 24 inch Stop Bar 80 LFT $2.00 $160.00

Pavt. Mrkg, Waterborne, 6 inch, White 235 LFT $1.00 $235.00

Pavt. Mrkg, Waterborne, Left Turn Arrow 3 EA $40.00 $120.00

Pavt. Mrkg, Waterborne, Right Turn Arrow 2 EA $40.00 $80.00

Pavt. Mrkg, Waterborne, Right and Thru Arrow 1 EA $40.00 $40.00

TOTAL DIVISION - MAJOR $79,157.50

Central Asphalt, Inc.

900 S. Bradley St.


1 of 2

Division - DOWNTOWN PARKING LOTS

Pavt. Mrkg, Waterborne, 4 inch, White, Parking 11,700 LFT $0.25 $2,925.00

Pavt. Mrkg, Waterborne, 4 inch, Blue, Parking 300 LFT $1.00 $300.00

Pavt. Mrkg, Waterborne, Blue Barrier Free Symbol 19 EA $25.00 $475.00

HMA, Ultra-Tin, Medium Volume 215 TON $95.69 $20,573.35

TOTAL DIVISION - PARKING LOTS $24,273.35

Division - WEST CAMPUS AND BELLOWS MARKING

Pavt. Mrkg, Waterborne, 4 inch, White 5,600 LFT $0.10 $560.00

Pavt. Mrkg, Waterborne, 6 inch, White, Crosswalk 475 LFT $1.00 $475.00

Pavt. Mrkg, Waterborne, 4 inch, Yellow 2,000 LFT $0.10 $200.00

Pavt. Mrkg, Waterborne, 4 inch, White, Parking 800 LFT $0.30 $240.00

Pavt. Mrkg, Waterborne, RR Symbol 2 EA $125.00 $250.00

Pavt. Mrkg, Waterborne, 12 inch, White, Stop Bar 55 LFT $2.00 $110.00

Pavt. Mrkg, Waterborne, Right and Thru Arrow 1 EA $50.00 $50.00

Pavt. Mrkg, Waterborne, Thru Arrow 1 EA $40.00 $40.00

Pavt. Mrkg, Waterborne, Left Arrow 1 EA $40.00 $40.00

Pavt. Mrkg, Waterborne, Right Arrow 1 EA $40.00 $40.00

Pavt. Mrkg, Waterborne, Only 1 EA $40.00 $40.00

Pavt. Mrkg, Waterborne, Bike Lane Symbol 16 EA $40.00 $640.00

TOTAL DIVISION-W. CAMPUS & BELLOWS $2,685.00

TOTAL ALL DIVISIONS $232,188.35

2 of 2

1




Request submitted by (agency or branch of organization listed above): City of Mt. Pleasant – Division of Public Works Project Supervisor: John Zang, DPW Director Project Name: Traffic Counters Amount Requested: $15,548 Signature:_________________________________________Date:_____________________



989-775-4000

2

Project Description: This funding request is to provide funds to purchase four traffic counting devices and associated software. In order to provide the necessary traffic data for design projects, as well as issue traffic control orders for certain regulatory signs, the City requires accurate traffic counting devices. These devices will collect the necessary data which will aide in redesign of streets, placement of regulatory signs within the City of Mt. Pleasant, as well as be used to analyze traffic flow patterns, and speed to aide in law enforcement efforts. The counters that the City currently uses are antiquated to the point that we are unable to download data properly or obtain replacement parts for the units. Project Benefits To The Tribe, Community, And Governmental Service Area: Existing traffic data is one of the key components needed in order to make safe, walkable, and bikeable street designs, while keeping all modes of transportation safe and enjoyable. Long-Term Funding Requirements (if applicable) And How Those Requirements Will Be Met: None Itemized Budget For Request (attach any documents justifying those amounts, i.e. price quotes, bids, etc.): See attached estimate.

JAMAR Technologies, Inc. TRAFFIC COUNTING EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLIES

DISTANCE MEASURING EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLIES

1500 Industry Road , Suite C Hatfield, PA 19440 Phone 215-361-2244 • Fax 215-361-2267

P - (989) 779-5407 Ext . 0000 F - (517) 772-6250 Ext. 0000

MOUNT PLEASANT; CITY OF 1303 N FRANKLIN ST. MOUNT PLEASANT MI 48858

ATTN: MR. BILL BRICKNER

1. 00 Each RADAR RECORDER 1.00 Each BLUETOOTH CONNECTION 2.00 Each BATTERIES 1. 00 Each BATTERY CHARGER 1. 00 Each MOUNTING KIT 1.00 Each TRAXPRO SOFTWARE

1 EACH *1000

3 EACH CRR-CK-BT 1.00 Each RADAR RECORDER 1. 00 Each BLUETOOTH CONNECTION 2.00 Each BATTERIES 1. 00 Each BATTERY CHARGER 1. 00 Each MOUNTING KIT

3 EACH *1000

RADAR RECORDER W BLUETOOTH & TRAXPRO THIS KIT INCLUDES :

2 YEAR EXTENDED WARRANTY FOR A TOTAL OF THREE YEAR WARRANTY RADAR RECORDER

2 YEAR EXTENDED WARRANTY FOR A TOTAL OF A THREE YEAR WARRANTY

*PRICE QUOTE IS VALID FOR 30 DAYS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED*

QUOTATION DATE:

QUOTATION NO.

2/18/2015

75364

$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

$199 .0000

$3, 550 .0000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

$199 .0000

Subtotal Misc Tax Freight Total

$0 . 00 $0 . 00 $0 . 00 $0 . 00 $0 . 00 $0 .00

$199 .00

$10,650 .00 $0 .00 $0 .00 $0 .00 $0 .00 $0 . 00

$597 . 00

$15, 441. 00 $0 . 00 $0.00

$107 .00 $15,548.00

03/03/2016 CHECK REGISTER FOR CITY OF MT PLEASANT

CHECK DATE FROM 02/19/2016 - 03/03/2016

Check Date Bank Vendor Vendor Name Description Amount

Bank COMM COMMON CASH

02/24/2016 COMM CITP/R CITY TREASURER-PAYROLL FUND REG PAY #4 - 02/26/16 235,416.98

03/01/2016 COMM KRAPOH KRAPOHL FORD LINCOLN MERC PICKUP TRUCKS/MARCH 2016 72,483.00

03/02/2016 COMM WRIEXP WRIGHT EXPRESS FINANCIAL SERVICES N/A 65,576.93

03/03/2016 COMM AIROXY AIRWAY OXYGEN, INC. D OXYGEN CYL 10.00

03/03/2016 COMM ARRUNI ARROW UNIFORM RENTAL UNIFORM/SERVICE 32.68

03/03/2016 COMM ATCO ATCO INTERNATIONAL SUPPLIES 972.00

03/03/2016 COMM ATIGRO ATI GROUP CONTRACT SERVICES 3,853.32

03/03/2016 COMM AUTVAL AUTO VALUE/BUMPER TO BUMPER BATTERY 183.98

03/03/2016 COMM AVFUEL AVFUEL CORPORATION WEBPOS - FEB 2016 20.00

03/03/2016 COMM AXIWIR AXIOM WIRING SERVICE, LLC SERVICE WATER 583.71

03/03/2016 COMM BARJAM JAMES BARBER 2016 YOUTH BASKETBALL REFEREE 128.00

03/03/2016 COMM BENCON BENEFIT CONSULTING GROUP, INC. ADMIN FEES - FEB 2016 390.00

03/03/2016 COMM BIGBRO BIG BROTHERS/BIG SISTERS LANE SPONSOR 150.00

03/03/2016 COMM BIXJUL JULIE BIXBY TRAINING 32.00

03/03/2016 COMM BLACRE BLACK CREEK CONSERVATION CLUB MEMBERSHIP 2016 1,820.00

03/03/2016 COMM UBREFUND G & K INVESTMENTS UB refund 14.52

03/03/2016 COMM BROJEF JEFFREY BROWNE TRAINING 16.00

03/03/2016 COMM BUNCHR CHRISTOPHER BUNDY MILEAGE 22.43

03/03/2016 COMM CAHRIC RICHARD CAHOON MAN V MOUNTAIN SERVICES 1,451.28

03/03/2016 COMM CRBUR CBC CREDIT SERVICES, INC. COLLECTIONS - JAN 2016 90.00

03/03/2016 COMM CDWGOV CDW GOVERNMENT, INC MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES 1,329.97

03/03/2016 COMM CMUMAIL CENTRAL MICH UNIV - MAILROOM POSTAGE - FEB 2016 5,444.37

03/03/2016 COMM CMSINC CENTRAL MICHIGAN STAFFING, INC CONTRACT SERVICES 662.20

03/03/2016 COMM CMUWAR CENTRAL MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY COLOR COPIES - 12/25-15 TO 01/24/16 308.21

03/03/2016 COMM CMUWAR CENTRAL MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY COPY CONTRACT MONTHLY - MAR 2016 735.00

03/03/2016 COMM CMUWAR CENTRAL MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY COPY MONTHLY - MAR 2016 183.00

03/03/2016 COMM CHACOM CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS CHARGES - 03/01-03/30/16 225.86

03/03/2016 COMM CHEMCO CHEMCO PRODUCTS, INC SODIUM SULFITE 1,635.00

03/03/2016 COMM CHIEFL CHIEF LAW ENFORCEMENT SUPPLY UNIFORM SUPPLIES 65.83

03/03/2016 COMM CINTAS CINTAS CORPORATION MEDICAL SUPPLIES 662.27

03/03/2016 COMM CLAHIL CLARK HILL P.L.C. SERVICES - JAN 2016 880.50

03/03/2016 COMM COACHR CHRISTOPHER COALE 2016 AIRPORT CONFERENCE 153.36

03/03/2016 COMM COLZAC ZACH COLORES 2016 YOUTH BASKETBALL REFEREE 196.00

03/03/2016 COMM CONENE CONSUMERS ENERGY CHARGES 24,885.84

03/03/2016 COMM COYNE COYNE OIL CORPORATION FUEL - 02/15/16 2,822.29

03/03/2016 COMM CRAEVA EVAN CRANK 2016 YOUTH BASKETBALL REFEREE 80.00

03/03/2016 COMM CULLIGAN CULLIGAN AIRPORT 52.00

03/03/2016 COMM DENREF DENT REFUSE AIRPORT - 4 YD 65.00

03/03/2016 COMM DICWRI DICKINSON WRIGHT PLLC SERVICES - JAN 2016 7,700.00

03/03/2016 COMM DIXENG DIXON ENGINEERING, INC CLARICONE PROJECT 2,500.00

03/03/2016 COMM DORSIG DORNBOS SIGN & SAFETY, INC. STREET SUPPLIES 610.69

03/03/2016 COMM DROKEN KEN DROUSE EMT LICENSE RENEWAL 25.00

03/03/2016 COMM DUNMIC MICHAEL DUNHAM TRAINING 130.00

03/03/2016 COMM DUSCHR CHRISTY DUSH TRAINING 48.00

03/03/2016 COMM ENVCHE ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMICAL ENTERPRISES BIO PAKS 739.95

03/03/2016 COMM ETNASU ETNA SUPPLY COMPANY MISC SUPPLIES 1,757.89

03/03/2016 COMM FLEVAN FLEIS & VANDENBRINK SAW GRANT - NOV/DEC 2015 24,073.65

03/03/2016 COMM GRERAI GREAT LAKES CENTRAL RAILROAD INC SIGNAL DEVICES 2,752.00

03/03/2016 COMM HOWJER JEREMY HOWARD MILEAGE 95.04

03/03/2016 COMM HUYSPE SPENCER HUYCK 2016 YOUTH BASKETBALL REFEREE 114.00

03/03/2016 COMM INCOCO INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL 15 IPMC SOFT 80.00

03/03/2016 COMM KEERAN RANDY KEELER TRAINING 130.00

03/03/2016 COMM KRAPOH KRAPOHL FORD LINCOLN MERC VEHICLE SERVICE 225.14

03/03/2016 COMM LATAND ANDREW LATHAM LEADERSHIP TRAINING 70.00

03/03/2016 COMM LESJOR JORDAN LESLIE 2016 YOUTH BASKETBALL REFEREE 140.00

03/03/2016 COMM MARHAC MHOK PROSECUTORIAL SERVICES - MAR 2016 6,914.00

03/03/2016 COMM MAYSTE STEVEN MAYNARD MILEAGE 29.70

03/03/2016 COMM MCKSPE SPENCER MCKELLAR TRAINING 253.63

03/03/2016 COMM NGSCOR MEDICAL EXCESS MARCH 2016 16,555.25

03/03/2016 COMM MISOFT MASA 2016 SOFTBALL 2,348.00

03/03/2016 COMM MIASAIR MAAE 2016 MEMBERSHIP 70.00

03/03/2016 COMM MACEO MACEO 2016 SPRING CONFERNCE 210.00

03/03/2016 COMM MACEO MACEO 2016 SPRING CONFERENCE 210.00

03/03/2016 COMM MACEO MACEO 2016 SPRING CONFERENCE 210.00

03/03/2016 COMM MIELEC MICHIGAN ELECTION RESOURCES ELECTION SUPPLIES 270.95

03/03/2016 COMM MICMET MICHIGAN METER TECHNOLOGY GRP., INC METERS 1,805.28

03/03/2016 COMM MIDCAB MID MICHIGAN AREA CABLE 2015 - 4TH QTR FRANCHISE FEE/VIDEO 24,012.75

03/03/2016 COMM MIDIND MID-MICHIGAN INDUSTRIES CURB SIDE - 01/31/16 6,169.00

03/03/2016 COMM MISCOM MISSION COMMUNICATIONS, LLC PUMP STATION SUPPLIES 260.00

03/03/2016 COMM MOEKIP KIPP MOE TRAINING 565.41

03/03/2016 COMM MPMOCK MOUNT PLEASANT MOCK ROCK INC 2016 SPONSOR 100.00

03/03/2016 COMM MPCOMED MT PLEASANT PUBLIC SCHOOL CONTRACT SERVICES - MARCH 2016 3,887.08

03/03/2016 COMM MPTIRE MT PLEASANT TIRE SERVICE, INC VEHICLE SERVICE 1,221.77

03/03/2016 COMM MPLEAS MPPS FOOD & NUTRITION SERV PEAK - DEC 2015 1,228.08

03/03/2016 COMM MUNCOM MUNICIPAL COMMERCE INC DEGREASER 1,279.80

03/03/2016 COMM NORCEN NCL OF WISCONSIN SUPPLIES 680.26

03/03/2016 COMM MCGPAT PAT MCGUIRK EXCAVATING, INC AIRPORT - 02/15 & 02/25/16 3,120.00

03/03/2016 COMM PATSER PATTERSON PLUMBING SERVICE 2016 BACKFLOW TESTING 875.00

03/03/2016 COMM PELLLOG LOGAN PELLEGROM 2016 YOUTH BASKETBALL REFEREE 144.00

03/03/2016 COMM PERCON PERCEPTIVE CONTROLS, INC. TANK 2,858.80

03/03/2016 COMM PETAUT PETE'S AUTO BODY, INC VEHICLE SERVICE 180.15

03/03/2016 COMM PCADAMS PETTY CASH - DIANNE ADAMS PETTY CASH RECEIPTS 382.61

03/03/2016 COMM PLEGRA PLEASANT GRAPHICS, INC SUPPLIES 296.00

03/03/2016 COMM POLINC POLYDYNE INC. CLARIFLOC 810.00

03/03/2016 COMM PRISYS PRINTING SYSTEMS, INC REMITTANCE CHECKS 125.01

03/03/2016 COMM PROCOM PRO COMM, INC SERVICES 755.00

03/03/2016 COMM PUBTRA PUBLIC AGENCY TRAINING COUNCIL TRAINING 590.00

03/03/2016 COMM PVSNOL PVS NOLWOOD CHEMICALS, INC SODIUM FLUORIDE - 50# 1,779.00

03/03/2016 COMM MURPHR R & T MURPHY TRUCKING, LLC SNOW REMOVAL - 02/25-02/26/16 4,572.50

03/03/2016 COMM RISEMA RISE MACHINE COMPANY MISC SERVICES 765.00

03/03/2016 COMM RTILAB RTI LABORATORIES, INC. MERCURY TESTING 252.00

03/03/2016 COMM SANSUS SUSAN SANDERSON TRAINING 16.00

03/03/2016 COMM SHACHE SHANNON CHEMICAL CORPORATION POLYPHOSPHATE 808.80

03/03/2016 COMM SPIGRO SPICER GROUP MP CENTER 45,352.27

03/03/2016 COMM MANBUD STATE OF MICHIGAN POSTAGE/HANDLING - JAN 2016 340.54

03/03/2016 COMM STTREA STATE OF MICHIGAN SALES TAX - FEB 2016 470.16

03/03/2016 COMM STIMIK MIKE STILTNER REFUND MASA TOURNAMENT FEE 417.00

03/03/2016 COMM TERCON TERRA CONTRACTING SERVICES, LLC STORM SEWER SERVICE 114,208.42

03/03/2016 COMM WILDET W.W. WILLIAMS ANNUAL SERVICE - 2016 3,380.00

03/03/2016 COMM WINTEL WINN TELECOM CHARGES - FEB 2016 2,465.56

COMM TOTALS:

Total of 100 Checks: 718,069.67

Less 0 Void Checks: 0.00

Total of 100 Disbursements: 718,069.67

Wright Express3/3/2016

Merchant Name Invoice description Sum

# of

Invoi

#91 ITALIAN OVEN Citizen's Academy 230.00 2

280 AUTO VALUE MOUNT P Batteries for plant generator 475.98 1

280 AUTO VALUE MOUNT P Core charge for batteries (100.00) 1

280 AUTO VALUE MOUNT P Motor Pool shop supplies - cleaner 82.99 1

280 AUTO VALUE MOUNT P Motor Pool stock items - wiper blades, Brakleen, glass cleaner 46.43 1

280 AUTO VALUE MOUNT P Unit 296 - paint 15.98 1

280 AUTO VALUE MOUNT P Unit 296 - tap plug, fittings; Motor Pool shop tools - drill bits 24.37 1

280 AUTO VALUE MOUNT P Unit 426 - spray gun, spray paint 34.66 1

280 AUTO VALUE MOUNT P Units 456 & 457 - car mats 30.69 1

4IMPRINT Man vs Mountain Supplies 1,106.51 1

5711 MT PLEASANT - 210 Daddy-Daughter Date Night 91.54 1

AGILE SAFETY LLC Equipment repair 126.96 1

AIRGASS NORTH Cut off wheel 19.97 1

AIRGASS NORTH Motor Pool - welding supplies 170.15 2

AIRGASS NORTH Nitrile gloves 75.80 1

AIRGASS NORTH Wire wheel 15.03 1

AM CANCER SOC CV Volunteer of the Month 50.00 1

AMAZON MKTPLACE PMTS Printer 285.50 1

AMAZON MKTPLACE PMTS Winter Kids Expo 332.12 3

AMAZON.COM Camera 88.24 1

AMAZON.COM storage 163.64 4

AMERICAN PUBLIC WORKS 24th Annual MPSI Conference 1,303.00 2

AMWAY GRAND PLAZA HOTE Chief's conference 417.70 1

ARBITERSPORTS Softball Umpire license fees 270.00 1

AUTOZONE #2199 Head lights 50.85 1

BATTERIES PLUS #12 Batteries for Mission Systems 118.76 1

BATTERIES PLUS #12 Equipment repair 113.31 1

BILL'S CUSTOM FAB Unit 159 - steel 203.13 3

BLUE SKY LLC office supplies 62.45 1

BRADY BUSINESS SYSTEMS Copier 2.30 1

CHEERS NEIGHBORHOOD GR City Commission Leadership Retreat 61.08 1

CHOICE OFFICE PRODUCTS Copyroom Supplies 509.85 1

CLAIRE'S #6866 Daddy-Daughter Date Night 30.00 1

CTO GOTOMYPC.COM Borden HVAC 11.95 1

CURTISS HARDWARE keys 7.08 1

DICKS SPORTING GOODS10 Airport Supplies 79.99 1

DICKS SPORTING GOODS10 Volunteer of the Month 50.00 1

DIESEL TRUCK SALES Unit 381 - parts 134.04 1

DOLRTREE 1754 00017541 Daddy-Daughter Date Night 25.00 1

DOUBLETREE HOTELS MLGMA Conference-2016 366.18 1

DTE ENERGY 800-477-474 UTILITIES DUE FEB 2016 13,823.50 14

DTE ENERGY 800-477-474 UTILITIES DUE JAN 2016 1,651.99 4

DTE ENERGY 800-477-474 UTILITIES DUE MARCH 2016 31.97 1

EB RESPONSE TO THE AC Training 107.48 1

EMPIRE WIRE & SUPPLY Surge Protector 361.33 1

ETNA DISTRIBUTORS MT P DPW building - Supplies 15.48 1

ETNA DISTRIBUTORS MT P Flange gasket 26.64 1

ETNA DISTRIBUTORS MT P Gasket 3.00 1

ETNA DISTRIBUTORS MT P Scrubbing towels 26.49 1

ETNA DISTRIBUTORS MT P Signs & Signals Maintenance supplies 9.98 1

ETNA DISTRIBUTORS MT P Stainless steel pipe dies 202.40 1

ETNA DISTRIBUTORS MT P Union and clamp 14.23 1

FACEBK ULRAC9ATG2 Man vs Mountain Advertising 99.03 1

FASTENAL COMPANY01 Motor Pool shop tools - drill set 129.99 1

FASTENAL COMPANY01 Signs & Signals Maintenance supplies 18.80 1

FASTENAL COMPANY01 tool supplies 83.12 1

FASTENAL COMPANY01 Unit 296-1 - hex nuts, washers, hex cap screws 35.60 1

FLEETPRIDE 475 Motor Pool stock items - fuel filters 71.04 1

FLEETPRIDE 475 Station Supplies 21.96 1

FLEETPRIDE 475 Unit 281 - slack adjuster 78.63 1

FLEETPRIDE 475 Unit 281 - Wheel end kit 210.00 1

FLEETPRIDE 475 Unit 440 - LED beacon light 62.98 1

FREDPRYOR CAREERTRACK Front Desk Safety Training 199.00 1

GET SMART PRODUCTS Citizen's Academy supplies 118.35 1

GFS STORE #0152 Citizen's Academy supplies 87.12 2

GFS STORE #0152 Daddy-Daughter Date Night 200.51 1

GFS STORE #0152 DPW building - restroom supplies 94.45 3

GFS STORE #0152 Paper towels 56.98 1

GILBOE S LOCK & SAFE Keys 5.00 1

GILLROYS HARDWARE 6743 Man vs Mountain Supplies 19.97 3

GILLROYS HARDWARE 6743 Ball peen hammer and level 12.98 1

GILLROYS HARDWARE 6743 construction supplies. 8.49 1

GILLROYS HARDWARE 6743 Corner Iron 11.97 1

GILLROYS HARDWARE 6743 Dog Park Trash Bags 8.59 1

GILLROYS HARDWARE 6743 DPW Building - hanging strips 4.59 1

GILLROYS HARDWARE 6743 DPW building - nuts, bolts, screws 10.76 1

GILLROYS HARDWARE 6743 DPW building - upholstery cleaner rental 44.96 1

GILLROYS HARDWARE 6743 DPW building- supplies 9.99 1

GILLROYS HARDWARE 6743 Fasteners 7.00 1

GILLROYS HARDWARE 6743 fire hyd maint. 19.47 1

GILLROYS HARDWARE 6743 Foam Sealant 9.99 1

GILLROYS HARDWARE 6743 Gasket maker 15.18 1

GILLROYS HARDWARE 6743 Heater 26.99 1

GILLROYS HARDWARE 6743 Man vs Mountain Supplies 124.50 4

GILLROYS HARDWARE 6743 Materials for sample container 41.76 1

GILLROYS HARDWARE 6743 Misc supplies 16.73 1

GILLROYS HARDWARE 6743 Motor Pool - batteries 5.59 1

GILLROYS HARDWARE 6743 Motor Pool - paint, conduit hanger, u-bolt for mudjacking pump 9.97 1

GILLROYS HARDWARE 6743 Motor Pool - spray paint 27.14 1

GILLROYS HARDWARE 6743 Motor Pool - wash brushes 56.97 1

GILLROYS HARDWARE 6743 Motor Pool shop tools - hammers, drill & tap bits 50.32 1

GILLROYS HARDWARE 6743 Motor Pool shop tools - sledge handle 12.99 1

GILLROYS HARDWARE 6743 Motor Pool stock items - nut, bolts 29.67 1

GILLROYS HARDWARE 6743 Motor Pool supplies - outlet strip 17.98 1

GILLROYS HARDWARE 6743 Paint pen and pipe fittings 14.97 1

GILLROYS HARDWARE 6743 Paint supplies 47.43 2

GILLROYS HARDWARE 6743 Propane 4.99 1

GILLROYS HARDWARE 6743 restroom paint supplies 2.79 1

GILLROYS HARDWARE 6743 Restroom Supplies 125.23 5

GILLROYS HARDWARE 6743 Shop Supplies 12.18 1

GILLROYS HARDWARE 6743 Shop supply. 51.98 1

GILLROYS HARDWARE 6743 Street Maintenance supplies 63.99 1

GILLROYS HARDWARE 6743 Supplies 7.98 1

GILLROYS HARDWARE 6743 tarp for C1 9.99 1

GILLROYS HARDWARE 6743 Trash can 23.99 1

GILLROYS HARDWARE 6743 Unit 159 - nuts, bolts, screws, spray primer & paint 104.86 1

GRAYBAR ELECTRIC COMPA Hoffman enclosure 319.15 1

GT RUBBER MP Air blow gun 13.26 1

GT RUBBER MP Degreasing wipes 75.60 1

GT RUBBER MP DPW building - camlocks for water pipe 60.04 1

GT RUBBER MP Motor Pool - soap degreaser 99.54 1

GT RUBBER MP RBC belts 181.62 1

GT RUBBER MP Wand and fittings 93.02 1

GUYS AND DOLLS PHOTOGR Photography 50.00 1

HOLIDAY INN EXP & SUIT Arson school lodging 81.77 1

HOTELS.COM127710766957 Training 199.78 1

IN FBI NAA Session Polo Shirt 50.00 1

IN FBI NAA Training 104.94 1

INTERNATIONAL INSTITUT IIMC Member Dues 95.00 1

JIMMY JOHN'S # 658 Citizen's Academy 103.98 1

JNR ENGRAVING LLC Name stamp 19.50 1

JNR ENGRAVING LLC nameplates for Community Improvement Awards 32.25 1

JO-ANN STORE #1869 Daddy Daughter Date Night 66.77 1

JOHNSTON ELEVATOR DPW building - sidewalk deicing 48.00 1

KINDLE-THEATLANTIC misc 1.99 1

KRAPOHL FORD-LINC-MERC Utility Vehicle Repair - Exhaust Manifold 2,426.70 1

LANDMARK MACHINERY, LL Motor Pool stock item - chipper blades 429.52 1

LIDS TEAM SPORTS 621 Staff Uniform Purchases 414.00 1

LITTLE CAESARS 0131 00 PEAK All-Staff Training 29.95 1

LOOPNET INC Sales Data / Comps for MTT cases 172.36 2

MAA PAYMENTS DSR MAA membership 77.00 1

MASTERGRAPHICS, INC Plotter Supplies 113.11 1

MAX & EMILYS BAKERY CA CMU Executive Director of International Affairs 50.67 1

MAXUM HARDWARE INC Engine 3 Repair Parts 164.78 1

MC SPORTS 028 Supplies 29.99 1

MCMASTER-CARR Compass and caliper 41.73 1

MCMASTER-CARR Rocker switch 14.12 1

MEDLER ELECTRIC MT PLE 24 volt relay 33.00 1

MEDLER ELECTRIC MT PLE DPW building - forward throw wall pack 394.94 1

MEDLER ELECTRIC MT PLE DPW building - photo controls, lamps 80.57 1

MEDLER ELECTRIC MT PLE Fuses 9.36 1

MEDLER ELECTRIC MT PLE Main Street lights - photo control 13.35 1

MEDLER ELECTRIC MT PLE Tools 65.15 1

MEDLER ELECTRIC MT PLE Water, sanitary and storm sewer, and street maintenance supplies 182.13 1

MEIJER INC #69 Q01 PEAK Supplies 17.85 1

MEIJER INC #69 Q01 Building supplies 54.99 1

MEIJER INC #69 Q01 Citizen's Academy supplies 69.31 5

MEIJER INC #69 Q01 Daddy-Daughter Date Night 21.45 1

MEIJER INC #69 Q01 Man vs Mountain 50.18 1

MEIJER INC #69 Q01 Office Supplies 34.71 1

MEIJER INC #69 Q01 PEAK Craft Supplies 5.14 1

MEIJER INC #69 Q01 PEAK Supplies 11.27 1

MEIJER INC #69 Q01 Pullen PEAK Supplies 94.46 5

MEIJER INC #69 Q01 Supplies 38.98 1

MEIJER INC #69 Q01 Vowles PEAK Supplies 46.64 2

MEIJER INC #69 Q01 West Peak Supplies 21.45 1

MEIJER INC #69 Q01 West Peak Office Supplies 22.98 1

MEIJER INC #69 Q01 West PEAK supplies 32.58 2

MEIJER INC #69 Q01 Winter Kids Expo 10.97 1

MENARDS MT. PLEASANT M DPW building - hanging strips 15.76 1

MENARDS MT. PLEASANT M DPW building and Street Maintenance supplies 38.08 1

MENARDS MT. PLEASANT M Street maintenance supplies 17.05 1

MENARDS MT. PLEASANT M Supplies 46.99 1

MENARDS MT. PLEASANT M Water Plant - break room 984.59 1

MENARDS MT. PLEASANT M Water Plant - range, sink clips, shelf liner 384.90 1

MENARDS MT. PLEASANT M Water Plant - supplies 30.95 1

MENARDS MT. PLEASANT M Water Plant kitchen - emery cloth, faucet supply 36.97 1

MENARDS MT. PLEASANT M Water Plant kitchen - toggle bolts, washers, spray adhesive 18.95 1

MI EMS LICENSE Medical License - State of Michigan 25.00 1

MI SECTION AWWA Basic Math and Hydraulics course 490.00 2

MI SECTION AWWA Cross connection seminar 155.00 1

MICHIGAN CAT NOVI CORP Unit 448 - lamp 118.85 1

MICHIGAN CAT SAGINAW Motor Pool stock item - cutting edges 703.90 1

MICHIGAN CAT SAGINAW Unit 448 - credit for lamp (118.85) 1

MICHIGAN CAT SAGINAW Unit 448 - lamp 155.39 2

MICHIGAN CAT SAGINAW Unit 448 - mirror 66.82 1

MICHIGAN CAT SAGINAW Unit 448 - mirror, seal 55.34 1

MICHIGAN MUNICIPAL LEA MML Capital Conference-Lansing 3/22 & 3/23 120.00 1

MICHIGAN MUNICIPAL LEA MML Capital Conference-Lansing 3/22 & 3/23 120.00 1

MICHIGAN MUNICIPAL LEA Priority Based Budgeting Conference 120.00 1

MICHIGAN RECREATION & MRPA Conference (180.00) 1

MICHIGAN RECREATION & Refund for Conference. (360.00) 1

MICHIGAN TRUCK SPRING Unit 281 - springs, rods, oil, washers 904.52 1

MICHIGAN WATER ENVIORN MWEA Operators Day 2016 100.00 1

MICROSOFT STORE Sales tax refund (343.25) 1

MICROSOFT STORE Surface Pro 2,405.72 2

MICROSOFT PROGRAMS Refund sales tax (28.50) 1

MIFMA Michigan Farmers Market Association Annual Membership 250.00 1

MIFMA Michigan Farmers Market Association Conference 100.00 1

MISSION LUMBER DPW building - cold storage shelving 49.14 1

MISSION LUMBER Unit 281 - corner brace 3.49 1

MOUNTAIN TOWN STATION Man vs Mountain 288.00 1

MPACC Legislative Breakfast - Mrdeza 30.00 1

MT PLEASANT AUTOMOTIVE Motor Pool - drills 3.68 1

MT PLEASANT AUTOMOTIVE Motor Pool - tape, paint 37.57 1

MT PLEASANT AUTOMOTIVE Motor Pool shop suplies - spray bottle 10.76 1

MT PLEASANT AUTOMOTIVE Motor Pool shop supplies - anti-seize 10.02 1

MT PLEASANT AUTOMOTIVE Motor Pool shop tools - female adapter 6.92 1

MT PLEASANT AUTOMOTIVE Motor Pool shop tools - wrench set 68.29 1

MT PLEASANT AUTOMOTIVE Unit 159 - switches 4.32 1

MT PLEASANT AUTOMOTIVE Unit 296 - brushes 18.14 1

MT PLEASANT AUTOMOTIVE Unit 296 - paint and supplies 262.48 1

MT PLEASANT AUTOMOTIVE Unit 386 - battery 91.60 1


MT PLEASANT AUTOMOTIVE Unit 404 - battery core credit (15.00) 1


MT PLEASANT HTG&AIR T-caps 24.00 1

NAME BADGES INT'L Staff Name Tags 67.17 1

NAPA AUTO 0021795 hyd pump saftey 53.98 1

NAPA AUTO 0021795 Motor Pool shop supplies - air filter 14.15 1

NAPA AUTO 0021795 Motor Pool shop tools - grease gun parts 158.95 1

NAPA AUTO 0021795 Motor Pool shop tools - socket set 51.99 1

NAPA AUTO 0021795 Motor Pool stock items - oil & air filters 108.79 1

NAPA AUTO 0021795 Motor Pool stock items - oil filters 64.78 1

NAPA AUTO 0021795 Motor Pool stock items - oil, air, and hydraulic filters 150.60 1

NAPA AUTO 0021795 Unit 384 - gas cap 10.75 1

NATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR Start Smart Tennis booklets 61.48 1

NATIONAL RECREATION & CPRP Renewal 70.00 1

NATIONAL RECREATION & Playground Safety 200.00 1

NATIONAL RECREATION & Training-CPSI. 200.00 1

NORM S FLOWER PETAL Daddy-Daughter Date Night 500.00 1

OFFICE DEPOT #1170 office supplies 67.45 1

OFFICE DEPOT #1170 Supplies 320.51 3

ORIENTAL TRADING CO Daddy-Daughter Date Night 794.30 1

PAYPAL MAMC MAMC Clerk Institute 600.00 1

PAYPAL MAMC MAMC Master Academy 150.00 1

PAYPAL MAMC MAMC Member Dues 60.00 1

PISANELLOS PIZZA Citizen's Academy 112.95 1

PISANELLOS PIZZA Street maintenance training 54.80 1

PLANETIZEN One month subscription 16.95 1

PLANETIZEN INC 2nd Month subscription 16.95 1

PLANETIZEN INC 2nd Month subscription 16.95 1

PLANETIZEN INC Engineering Department - webinars 16.95 1

PLANETIZEN INC One month subscription 16.95 1

PLANETIZEN-URBAN INSIG One month subscription 16.95 1

PLANETIZEN-URBAN INSIG Planetizen Course 16.95 1

PLANETIZEN-URBAN INSIG training 169.17 2

PRINTING SERVICES Great Egg Scramble 345.70 1

PUBLIC AGENCY TRAINING Arson school 295.00 1

RECKER MOTOR SPORTS Unit 450 - parts and labor to fix wiring 330.00 1

RENT RITE OF MOUNT PLE Man vs Mountain 294.49 2

RENT RITE OF MOUNT PLE Stripper pads 47.80 1

RIC'S FOOD CENTER Bottled Water 35.94 1

RIC'S FOOD CENTER DPW luncheon 37.46 1

RIC'S FOOD CENTER PEAK All-Staff Training 5.07 1

RIC'S FOOD CENTER Citizens Academy 8.38 1

RIC'S FOOD CENTER Training 38.58 1

ROBAIRE'S BAKERY Snow & Ice Control 25.90 1

S&S WORLDWIDE-ONLINE PEAK Supplies 476.22 1

SAMSCLUB #4982 LED LIghts 779.62 1

SAMSCLUB #4982 Membership 45.00 1

SCIENTIFIC BRAKE & EQU Unit 255 - lamp 78.00 1

SHERWIN WILLIAMS #1317 Paint and rollers 140.76 1

SHERWIN WILLIAMS #1317 Restroom Supplies 145.24 1

SHULTS EQUIPMENT Motor Pool stock items - anchor end & master pins, bearings, chain 2,630.52 1

SQ SINGLESOURCE LC DPW building - cleaning supplies 125.28 1

SQ SINGLESOURCE LC DPW building - concrete cleaner 69.60 1

SQ SINGLESOURCE LC Motor Pool - floor degreaser/cleaner, degreaser 294.00 1

STAPLES 00103101 Camera cable 16.99 1

STAPLES 00103101 DPW building - bulletin board 211.96 1

STAPLES 00103101 DPW office supplies 4.29 1

STAPLES 00103101 Event Postcards 26.99 1

STAPLES 00103101 Office Supplies 159.49 2

STAPLES 00103101 Shop Supplies 58.97 1

STAPLES 00103101 Supplies 15.79 1

STAPLES DIRECT Air Fresheners 58.27 1

STAPLES DIRECT Office supplies 55.97 1

STAPLES DIRECT Supplies 75.85 1

SUBWAY 00105296 Citizen's Academy 115.12 1

SWI SW IMPORT CO IN Man vs Mountain Flags 23.40 1

THE HOME DEPOT 2732 Airport Supplies 47.41 2

THE HOME DEPOT 2732 Citizen's Academy 35.94 2

THE HOME DEPOT 2732 cordmate kite 68.46 1

THE HOME DEPOT 2732 Daddy-Daughter Date Night 218.72 1

THE HOME DEPOT 2732 DPW building - paint and supplies for washbay 151.92 1

THE HOME DEPOT 2732 DPW building - wet/dry vac 46.97 1

THE HOME DEPOT 2732 electrical supplies, construction tool supplies, and floor paint supplies 590.11 1

THE HOME DEPOT 2732 Citizen's Academy 26.97 1

THE HOME DEPOT 2732 LED light fixture 189.00 1

THE HOME DEPOT 2732 Man vs Mountain Supplies 1,200.61 2

THE HOME DEPOT 2732 Motor Pool - spring storage clips 5.16 1

THE HOME DEPOT 2732 Paint supplies and electrical supplies 157.58 1

THE HOME DEPOT 2732 Plywood 37.51 1

THE HOME DEPOT 2732 Restroom Supplies 638.80 2

THE HOME DEPOT 2732 Shop and lighting supply. 454.94 1

THE HOME DEPOT 2732 Shoreline receptacles 35.94 1

THE HOME DEPOT 2732 Signs & Signals Maintenance supplies 169.38 3

THE HOME DEPOT 2732 Street maintenance & water plant building supplies 24.86 1

THE HOME DEPOT 2732 Tarp and Batteries 117.13 1

THE HOME DEPOT 2732 Unit 159 - construction adhesive, pressure treated lumber, plywood sheathing 68.14 1

THE HOME DEPOT 2732 Unit 159 - pressure treated pine board, window bolts, hinge, door pull 17.63 1

THE HOME DEPOT 2732 Work light 69.97 1

THE WEBSTAURANT STORE Daddy-Daughter Date Night 32.18 1

TIM HORTONS#910769 Man vs Mountain 152.24 1

TRACTOR-SUPPLY-CO #064 Supplies 62.32 1

TRACTOR-SUPPLY-CO #064 Unit 421 - lock pin 9.16 1

TST KILLER HIBACHI misc 23.00 1

ULINE SHIP SUPPLIES sand bags 214.98 1

UNITED 01624785581285 Training 371.20 1

UNITED 01629253545076 Training 64.00 1

UPS (800) 811-1648 Ship biosolids sample 9.29 1

UPS (800) 811-1648 Ship probe 10.32 1

UPS (800) 811-1648 Ship samples 19.20 1

USPS 25644008530809198 Potential Airport Partners Meeting 18.04 1

USPS 25644008530809198 Shipping tubes and postage 11.74 1

USPS 25644095520801833 Stamps 49.00 1

USPS.COM EDDM 36102424 Print Newsletter Mailing 1,693.85 2

VZWRLSS MY VZ VB P PHONES DUE FEB 2016 3,290.06 4

W.S. DARLEY & CO. Hydrant Pressure Gauge 112.04 1

WALGREENS #12346 West PEAK supplies 24.75 1

WALGREENS #7247 Downtown supplies 770.45 1

WALGREENS #7247 Sales Tax Reimbursement (2.29) 1

WAL-MART #1428 2 cameras for patrol cars/bags/sd cards 215.76 1

WAL-MART #1428 Daddy-Daughter Date Night 282.04 1

WAL-MART #1428 Supplies for Citizen's Academy 18.91 1

WAL-MART #1428 Vowles PEAK Supplies 16.75 1

WALMART.COM Man vs Mountain MC gear 26.51 1

WHOLE DOG JO Dog Park journal 20.00 1

WIELAND TRUCK CENTE Unit 456 - mirror kit 46.93 1

WILCO 759 00007591 Fuel 24.90 1

WM SUPERCENTER #1428 West PEAK supplies 25.02 2

WM SUPERCENTER #1428 Winter Kids Expo 26.58 2

WW GRAINGER Janitorial supply. 1,587.60 1

WWW.NEWEGG.COM Hard Rrive 119.99 1

Total 65,576.93

Regular Meeting of the City Commission Monday, March 14 ... · 14/03/2016 · Please place the...

Documents

Transcript of Regular Meeting of the City Commission Monday, March 14 ... · 14/03/2016 · Please place the...