Registering Cell and Gene Therapy Products (ATMPs) in Europe...ATMP Certification for SMEs 20...

29
Registering Cell and Gene Therapy Products (ATMPs) in Europe Daniel Rabbie Regulatory Affairs Manager September 2017

Transcript of Registering Cell and Gene Therapy Products (ATMPs) in Europe...ATMP Certification for SMEs 20...

  • Registering Cell and Gene Therapy Products (ATMPs) in Europe

    Daniel RabbieRegulatory Affairs Manager September 2017

  • Outline

    2

    1. Introduction

    2. Regulatory Framework

    3. Your ATMP within the EU

    4. GMO Legislation

    5. European Medicines Agency

    ❖ Approach to Innovation

    ❖ Navigating the Regulatory Pathway(s)

    6. Conclusion

  • Introduction

  • Opportunity

    4

    • Unmet healthcare needs that cell and gene therapy could address

    • Offer of long term cures

    • Unlike anything Big Pharma has seen before

    • A cottage industry nurtured in academia and a handful of pioneering companies

  • Interdisciplinary Barriers

    5

    Health Economics & Market Access

    Product Manufacturing Development

    • Cost effective scale-up

    • QC/Analytical assays

    • Product storage

    POCNonclinical Safety

    • Risk-based approach

    • Relevance of animal model(s)

    • Dose extrapolation

    Clinical Development

    • Trial design and patient population selection

    • Complex logistic• Long term monitoring

    Regulatory Pathway

    • Reimbursement strategies

    • Pricing• Limited comparative

    effectiveness data

    • Uncertain, complex regulations

    • Non-conventional product development

    • Product-specific considerations

  • The Cell and Gene Therapy Catapult

    6

    • Process Industrialisation, Scale-up & Manufacturing

    • Health Economics and Reimbursement

    • Regulatory

    • Non-clinical safety

    • Clinical Operations

    • Manufacturing and Supply Chain

    Main office & development laboratories1,200m2 - Guy’s Hospital Tower (London clinical research cluster)

    Advanced Therapies Manufacturing Centre7,200m2 - Stevenage Biocatalyst

    • Bridge the gap between businesses, academia, research and government• Long-term investment to transform the UK’s ability to create new products and services• Open up global opportunities for the UK and generate sustained economic growth

    for the future

    Teams

  • European Regulatory Framework

  • EU Regulatory Framework for ATMPs

    8

    Orphan designation

    Paediatric plan

    Legislative support for early access

    Legislation transposed into

    Member State law

    Approval of MAA

    Guidance to developers

    Member States

    Approval of clinical trials

    Guidance to developers

  • Licensed ATMPs in the EU

    9

    • Currently licensed ATMPs: 5 (excl. Glybera)

    – 1 CTMP (Zalmoxis)

    – 2 GTMP (Imlygic, Strimvelis)

    – 2 TEP (Holoclar, Spherox)

    • Withdrawn ATMPs: 4

    – 1 TEP (Chondroselect)

    – 1 CTMP (Provenge)

    – 1 GTMP (Glybera, from Oct)

    – 1 Combined TEP (MACI)0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

    Licensed ATMPs in Europe

    TEP GTMP CTMP Combined ATMP

  • Your ATMP within the EU

  • Your ATMP within the EU Framework

    11

    Gene Therapy Medicinal Product

    Annex I to Directive 2001/83/EC

    Somatic Cell Therapy Medicinal Product

    Annex I to Directive 2001/83/EC

    Tissue Engineered Medicinal Product

    Article 2(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No. 1394/2007

    Combined ATMPArticle 2(1)(d) of Regulation (EC) No. 1394/2007

    Administered with a view to regenerating, repairing or replacing a human tissue

    e.g. Chondroselect ®

    Holoclar ®

    Spherox ®

    Cell/tissue with matrix/scaffold interactions?

    e.g. MACI ®

    Prevention, diagnosis and/or treatment of diseases via

    pharmacological, metabolic actions

    e.g. Provenge®

    Recombinant nucleic acid administered with a view to

    regulating, repairing, replacing, adding or deleting genetic sequence

    Therapeutic, prophylactic or diagnostic effect relates directly to

    the recombinant nucleic acid sequence it contains

    e.g. Glybera®

    Strimvelis®

  • Considerations for GM ATMPs

    12

    Gene Therapy Medicinal Product

    Annex I to Directive 2001/83/EC

    Somatic Cell Therapy Medicinal Product

    Annex I to Directive 2001/83/EC

    GMO LegislationDirective 2009/41/ECDirective 2001/18/EC

    In-vivo transient transfection

    - RNAi- Plasmid DNA

    TherapeuticGenetic

    Modification

    e.g. Glybera ®

    Kymriah®

    Strimvelis®

    Safety (suicide gene) Genetic Modification

    e.g. Zalmoxis®

    Ex-vivo transient transfection

    e.g. mRNA electroporation of Dendritic/T-Cells

  • European GMO Legislation

  • European GMO Legislation

    14

    GMO Approval

    CTA

    Approval

    EC

    Approval

    • Non-harmonised between Member States• Deliberate Release or Contained Use?• Regional or National procedures?• Documentation/forms, in local language

    • Agencies often lacking resource and/or experience in medicinal product reviews

    • Coordinated interaction between sponsor, clinical site(s) and GMO agency required

    • Process may run in parallel, sequential or independently to CTA

    Challenges require prior planning and effective management to coordinate

    multicentre European trials

    Member State Regulations

    Directive 2009/41/EC

    Directive 2001/18/EC

  • Navigating Netherlands – one office, coordinating role

    15

    Cell and Gene Therapy Catapult - GMO Registration Manuals

    Gene therapy trials are considered as ‘Deliberate Release’

  • Navigating Belgium – regional considerations

    16

    Cell and Gene Therapy Catapult - GMO Registration Manuals

    Gene therapy trials are considered either ‘Contained Use’ and/or ‘Deliberate Release’

  • There are others…

    17

    EuropeanMember State

    Contained Use Regulations

    Deliberate Release

    GMOAgency

    Austria BMGF

    Belgium SBB

    Finland GTLK

    France MESR/HCB

    Germany PIE

    Netherlands GTO

    Sweden SWEA

    UK HSE

  • European Medicines Agency

  • Approach to Innovation

    19

    • Range of potential treatment/manufacturing approaches represented by ATMPs is vast

    – Unrealistic to expect regulators to produce detailed guidance on every aspect

    • Clinical progress combined with increasing pressure to accelerate access to innovative medicines has led to an evolving framework with greater relevance to ATMPs

  • ATMP Certification for SMEs

    20

    Specific provision in the ATMP regulation (Article 18, No 1394/2007)

    • To certify that each submitted study complies with the relevant scientific and technical requirements set out in Annex I of Directive 2001/83/EC [module 3&4 / quality & nonclinical] and adequately follows state-of-the-art scientific standards and guidelines

    • Opportunity for SMEs to get an early “snapshot” assessment of the data they have generated to date and check that they are on the right track for Marketing Authorisation Application (MAA)

    • Tool to attract further potential investment

    Important:

    • Not binding for future MAA or Clinical trial application (CTA)

    • Not an assessment of benefit versus risk profile

    • Not providing development ‘advice’

  • Approach to Innovation

    21

  • PRIME (Priority Medicines) Initiative

    22

    • Early access tool, supporting patient access to innovative medicines to foster development of medicines with a high public health potential

    Key Features

    General Benefits for Development• Iterative Scientific advice• Enhanced regulatory guidance • Incremental knowledge gain • Proactive dialogue• Promote use of existing tools

    Speed to Market

  • PRIME (Priority Medicines) Initiative

    23

    • Eligibility to PRIME based on accelerated assessment criteria:

    – An unmet medical need

    ˃ No satisfactory method or if method exists, bring a major therapeutic advantage

    ˃ Introducing new methods or improving existing ones

    ˃ Meaning improvement of efficacy (impact on onset, duration, improving morbidity, mortality)

    – Scientific justification, based on data and evidence available from nonclinical and clinical development

    • As of 20th September 2017, from 26 products granted PRIME since May 2016:

    • 11/26 are advanced therapy medicinal products

    • No products granted PRIME based on nonclinical data alone, just 1 with only tolerability

  • Approach to Innovation

    24

  • Adaptive Pathways

    25

    • Prospectively planned, development approach to commercialisation for medicines with high medical need

    • Starting from an authorised (usually “niche”) indication, through phases of evidence gathering (controlled trials and real-world data) leading to progressive licensing adaptation to existing and/or new approvals

    • Balances timely patient access with the need to provide adequate evolving information on risk vs benefit

    Patients treated, no active surveillance

    Patients in observational studies, registries, etc.

    Patients in RCTs (or other interventional studies)

  • Adaptive Pathways – a good candidate profile

    26

    1. An iterative development plan (staggered approval): start in a well-defined subpopulation with unmet medical need and expand, or have a Conditional Marketing Authorisation, maybe on surrogate endpoints and confirm.

    2. Real World Data (safety and efficacy) can be acquired to supplement Clinical Trials, e.g. through well planned registries

    3. Input of all stakeholders, particularly HTAs, is fundamental

    Important:

    - AP should not be viewed as an ‘accelerated development’ tool

    - AP is a long-term “life-cycle management” approach from the EMA

    - AP is different to PRIME (not instead of PRIME)

  • Navigating the regulatory pathway(s)

    27

    Q. Is my product an ATMP? Q. Is my product for a rare disease?

    Q. Will my clinical trials provide full efficacy data?

    Q. Does my product address an urgent unmet need?

    Conditional Approval

    Exceptional Approval

    No

    Standard MAA

    Accelerated Assessment

    Yes

    No

    Orphan incentives

    are available

    Orphan Designation Procedure

    Orphan incentives

    not available

    Yes No

    COMP

    ATMP Classification Procedure

    MAA is required

    Yes

    NoCAT

    CHMP

    Non-clinical studiesClinical trials

    EUTCD(‘Transplants’)

    PRIME Designation

    Q. Is the collection of RWD* through registries feasible?

    Yes

    Yes

    No

    Adaptive Pathways Approach

    EMA ITF- Platform for early dialogue on scientific, regulatory and legal requirements- Informal, not binding

    *RWD = Real World Data

  • Conclusion

    28

    • The innovative, complex and heterogenous group of products represented by ATMPs challenges the current regulatory ‘patchwork’ in Europe

    • European legislation raises various new considerations for developers, particularly important for effective and timely set-up of multicentre clinical trials –planning is key

    • Underpinned by the emergence of clinical data, regulators (and the industry) are shifting gears - we are at the start!

    • Understanding the ATMP framework in the EU is valuable however navigating through it effectively through to commercialisation will make the difference

  • Cell and Gene Therapy Catapult

    12th Floor Tower WingGuy’s HospitalGreat Maze PondLondon SE1 9RT

    +44 (0)20 3728 [email protected]: @CTCatapult

    Introduction 29