REGIONAL DISTRICT OF NORTH OKANAGAN · REGIONAL DISTRICT OF NORTH OKANAGAN REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL...

REGIONAL DISTRICT OF NORTH OKANAGAN

REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL #2017-P05

RDNO SUB-REGIONAL PARKS

Indoor Soccer Center Artificial Turf Replacement

INSTRUCTIONS TO PROPOSERS

1. The Regional District of North Okanagan (RDNO) is requesting proposals for the provision of

consulting services for the public consultation, detail design and construction management of an artificial turf replacement project. The proposal submissions must be returned in a sealed envelope clearly marked as follows:

Request for Proposal #2017 – P05 RDNO Sub-Regional Parks – Indoor Soccer Center

Artificial Turf Replacement – Detail Design & Construction Management

2. Proposer’s name and address must be clearly marked on the envelope, addressed to the Regional District of North Okanagan, 9848 Aberdeen Road, Coldstream, B.C., V1B 2K9, Attention: Keith Pinkoski, Manager Parks.

3. Proposals must be received at the above location no later than 4:30 pm Local Time, Friday

April 14, 2017. 4. Proposals received after the above time will be returned (unopened) to proposer(s) without

consideration. 5. The RDNO does not accept proposals received via our facsimile machine or in any electronic

format. 6. Proposals, rather than tenders, have been requested in order to afford proposers a more

flexible opportunity to employ their expertise and innovation, and thereby satisfy the RDNO’s needs in a more cost-effective manner. Proposals should be based on these Instructions and the attached Terms of Reference.

RFP 2017-P05 – Indoor Soccer Center Artificial Turf Replacement – Detail Design & Construction Management. 7. Written Addenda issued by the RDNO will be the only means of varying, clarifying or otherwise

changing any of the information contained in this RFP. The RDNO reserves the right to issue Addenda up to 24 hours prior to the RFP closing date and time. The date set for submitting Responses may be changed if, in RDNO’s opinion, more time is necessary to enable Respondents to revise their Responses. Addenda will state any changes to the RFP, closing date and time.

8. The successful proposer (Consultant) and any Sub-Consultants shall at all times indemnify and save harmless the RDNO and or any of its officers, employees or agents from and against all claims and demands, losses, costs, damages, actions, suit fees, or other proceedings by whomsoever made, brought or prosecuted, in any manner based upon, occasioned by or attributable to the execution of this assignment, or any action taken or things done or maintained by virtue of this assignment or the exercise in any manner of rights except claims for damage resulting from the negligence of any officer, servant or agent of the RDNO while acting within the scope of their duties of employment.

9. All proposal submissions should include (3) copies preferably in an 8.5 inch x 11 inch format.

Proposal submissions must be suitable for black and white photocopying and should include an electronic PDF version. Proposers are solely responsible for any costs or expenses related to the preparation and submission of proposals.

10. The proposal should clearly show the complete company name, nearest location to the

RDNO, and name and telephone number of the primary contact person for the project. 11. The proposal should identify other organizations to which the company and/or team members

have provided a similar service. 12. The RDNO is subject to the provisions of the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy

Act. As a result, while Section 21 of the Act does offer some protection for third party business interests, the RDNO cannot guarantee that any information provided to the RDNO can be held in confidence. All proposals, after closing time and date, become the property of the RDNO.

13. Unless specifically outlined in the proposal, the services or any part thereof may not be sub-

contracted, transferred or assigned to another firm, person or company without the prior written authorization of the RDNO.

14. Project Team (Sub-Consultants)

a. Any project team members if any, (Sub-Consultants) listed in the proposal must

provide the following information for consideration by the RDNO:

i. Name ii. Company for which they work iii. Job Description iv. Specific Duties assigned on this project v. Recent experience and projects relating to Artificial Turf Replacement as

outlined in the scope of work in this RFP.

b. In the case of joint submissions, one party (Prime Consultant) must be prepared to take overall responsibility for the successful completion of the work defined.

RFP 2017-P05 – Indoor Soccer Center Artificial Turf Replacement – Detail Design & Construction Management. 15. The activities or tasks listed in the attached Terms of Reference are minimum requirements

to be undertaken.

16. The RDNO reserves the right to not proceed with the assignment or to reduce or expand the scope of the program as necessary.

17. The RDNO reserves the right to conduct post-selection meetings in order to correct, change,

or adapt proposals to the wishes of the RDNO. The RDNO also reserves the right to not accept any of the proposals.

18. If the RDNO selects the preferred proposer, the RDNO will enter into negotiations with the

preferred proposer. If the RDNO does not enter into an agreement with the preferred proposer, the RDNO is entitled to cease negotiations and begin negotiations with another proposer.

19. All questions / inquiries should be directed to Keith Pinkoski, Manager Parks at (250) 550-3658. The deadline for inquiries regarding this RFP is Monday, April 10, 2017.

20. The proposer shall include information regarding the Company’s Insurance protection if

applicable, including: General Liability Insurance – Amount and Expiry Date Errors and Omissions Insurance – Amount and Expiry Date Workers Compensation Board certificate Business Fire and Theft Insurance.

21. Proposal Format

The proposal should include the following information:

a) Title Page, including Proposer’s name, address, telephone number and other contact information

b) Introduction describing knowledge of the RDNO’s scope of work.

c) Outline of methodology including any special considerations concerning:

a. Design and Construction Timeframe

i. Detail Design Complete (3 weeks) May 12, 2017

ii. Tender (4 weeks) June 9, 2017

iii. Construction Completion (4-6 weeks) July 21, 2017

b. Assist in compiling and researching as-builts from Indoor Soccer Center build 2005.

c. Stakeholder Meeting (1)

d) Confirmation of ability to meet milestones for deliverables, and construction timelines as proposed by the Regional District.

e) Expand on (3) recent projects relevant to the scope of work included in this RFP, including specific levels of involvement, specific duties performed by each member of your proposed team, and innovative considerations derived from the projects.

RFP 2017-P05 – Indoor Soccer Center Artificial Turf Replacement – Detail Design & Construction Management.

f) Adherence to requirements outlined in the Greater Vernon Parks & Recreation Development Guidelines & Standard Specifications for Landscape Construction. Standard Details & Supplementary Specifications will be posted on the RDNO website.

g) Project Team including key personnel for each responsibility relating to the project which includes but is not limited to: Architectural, Mechanical, Electrical, Structural, Civil, etc.

h) References – Minimum 3, on projects with similar scope.

i) The proposal will define the fees for the proposer’s services as well as any sub-consultants included in the project team. Provide an estimate of reimbursable expenses in performing the work and a schedule of hourly rates of staff should additional services be requested. We also as that you identify the number of site visits you anticipate for the duration of the work (including all sub-consultants).

*Consultants are advised to review the scoring sheet attached to this RFP and model proposals where possible to fit with the sequential order of the scoring sheet. Attachment – “A” Scoring Sheet.

22. Proposal Evaluations

The RDNO reserves the right to accept any or none of the proposals submitted and will evaluate proposal submissions based on “best value” according to the scoring sheet attached to this RFP.

PART II – TERMS OF REFERENCE A. INTRODUCTION

The Regional District entered into a Management, Operation and Construction Agreement in 2005 with the Vernon Soccer Association to construct an indoor soccer center on Marshall Field’s Park at 6891 Okanagan Landing Road, Vernon BC. The building structure includes 2 story concrete cinderblock building (approx. 5,000 sq.ft / floor) and a coverall fabric roof structure over an artificial turf field (approx. 30,000 sq.ft). Existing artificial turf installed in 2005 has reached its product life expectancy (10-12 yrs) and as such the synthetic turf replacement is scheduled for the off-season (April – September) of 2017. Demolition and turf replacement are to be completed by end of July 2017.

B. OBJECTIVES

The Regional District is seeking proposals for consulting services to provide a high quality, artificial turf product that can accommodate multiple sport uses and a wide variety of users regardless of age and ability. The indoor soccer center will allow residents to further their own physical activity and provide a safe venue for off-season training and play.

RFP 2017-P05 – Indoor Soccer Center Artificial Turf Replacement – Detail Design & Construction Management. C. SCOPE OF WORK

The project includes detailed design, tendering, contract preparation, contract administration, construction inspection, and provision of as-built drawings for the components included in the artificial turf replacement. As the prime consultant the successful proposer will be responsible for providing and coordinating all the necessary Architectural, Civil, Structural, Mechanical, Electrical services associated with the project.

Tasks to be undertaken will include, but need not be limited to:

1. Review as-built documents compiled with research from previous build. 2. Coordinate (1) Stakeholders Meeting – meet with and compile information from

individual sport user groups to ensure input is received and included in the detail design where possible. Meeting should be after 50% review of design and prior to submitting 90% drawings.

3. Prepare detailed design and refined cost estimates for components to be included in the project scope.

4. Prepare tender documents for public offering to the appropriate standard (MMCD / CCDC) and in such a manner as to proceed and complete the project by July 31, 2017.

5. Administer the tendering process, including receipt of tenders, review and analysis of tenders received, and preparation of a recommendation for award to be submitted to the RDNO.

6. Work with external utilities as required (BC Hydro, Telus, Terasen, Shaw, etc) as required.

7. Contract administration, including review of shop drawings, progress claims, recommendations for payment, and review of change orders.

8. Contract administration and Site Inspection of the works during construction weekly to ensure standards of the contract and the RDNO are being adhered to.

9. Prepare as-built record drawings to document the final product. Inspection reports shall be made available to the RDNO on a regular basis.

The Consultant will be required to prepare agendas, schedule, attend, and record minutes for meetings with the RDNO and Contractors as applicable. As a minimum, the Consultant should allow for the following meetings with RDNO staff:

1. Project initiation 2. 50% review of design 3. Stakeholder Meeting 4. 90% review of design 5. Pre tender site meeting for Contractors 6. Tender close 7. Substantial Completion walk through 8. Final Acceptance walk through 9. Warranty and Maintenance Inspections

RFP 2017-P05 – Indoor Soccer Center Artificial Turf Replacement – Detail Design & Construction Management. D. PRODUCTS

As a minimum, the Consultant will be required to deliver the following:

1. Detail Design Drawings 2. Refined Cost Estimates 3. Tender package / Proposal to MMCD / CCDC standard. 4. Recommendation for Award of Contract. 5. Recommendations regarding payments and Change Orders. 6. As-built drawings and Inspection reports. Electronic versions shall be submitted as

well as paper copies. 7. Other documents as required by the RDNO.

E. ATTACHMENTS Attachment “A” – RFP Scoring Sheet Attachment “B” – Facility Assessment Document Attachment “C” – Facility Photos (3)

Prop

osal

Nam

e:

Con

sulta

nt:

Dat

e:

FAC

TOR

NO

TES

Cap

abili

ty25

Pro

j Mgr

Exp

erie

nce

(Key

Per

sone

l)15

Com

pany

Exp

erie

nce

(Rec

ent P

roje

cts)

10

Met

hodo

logy

15

Qua

lity

of P

ropo

sal (

Ove

rall

Org

aniz

atio

n)5

Wor

k P

lan

(Pro

cedu

re)

5

Inno

vativ

e C

onsi

dera

tions

(Spe

cial

Con

side

ratio

ns)

5

His

toric

al P

erfo

rman

ce10

Ref

eren

ces

5

Con

tract

Adm

inis

tratio

n5

Tota

l50

Fees

20

Cos

t Poi

nts

20

Gra

nd T

otal

70

Nam

e of

Per

son(

s) S

corin

g: _

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

____

__

SCO

RE

REG

ION

AL

DIS

TRIC

T O

F N

OR

TH O

KA

NA

GA

NC

onsu

ltant

Ser

vice

s Pr

opos

al E

valu

atio

n Fo

rmATTACHMENT "A"

Inspection ReportMarshall Fields Regional District of North Okanagan

Property Address:6891 Okangan Landing Road

Vernon BC

Lloyd Kenzle CPBC # 47652

Kenzle Holdings Ltd. dba C4U Inspections3518 Webber Rd.

West Kelowna, BCV4T 1H9

866 [email protected]

ATTACHMENT "B"

Table of Contents

Cover Page .................................................1

Table of Contents........................................2

Intro Page ...................................................3

Short Term Summary 1-5 Years .................4

1 General Description .................................7

2 Site / Parking..........................................10

3 Office......................................................13

4 Structural Frame and Building Envelope14

5 Utilities ...................................................16

6 Mechanical and Electrical System .........17

7 Fire Protection........................................23

Back Page.................................................24

Work Scope ................................................0

C4U Inspections Regional District of North Okanagan

6891 Okangan Landing Road Page 2 of 26

ATTACHMENT "B"

Date: 2016-10-10 Time: Report ID:Property:6891 Okangan Landing RoadVernon BC

Customer:Marshall Fields Regional Districtof North Okanagan

Real Estate Professional:

Executive Summary

This is a Property Condition Report "PCR" using the ASTM E2018 as a standard guideline to describe the condition ofbuilding or buildings for the property inspected. This process involves observation of the property by a person or entity. It caninclude interviews of sources, and reviews of available documentation for the purpose of developing an opinion andpreparing a PCR of a commercial real estate's current physical condition. At the option of the user, a PCA may include ahigher level of inquiry and due diligence than the baseline scope described within this guide or, at the user's option, it mayinclude a lower level of inquiry or due diligence than the baseline scope described in this guide. If there are such deviationsfrom this guide's scope it should be disclosed here on this page. A PCR is a written report, prepared in accordance with therecommendations contained in this guide, that outlines the consultant's observations, opinions as to the subject property'scondition, and opinions of probable costs to remedy any material physical deficiencies observed.

In defining good commercial and customary practice for conducting a baseline PCA, the goal is to identify and communicatephysical deficiencies to a user. The term physical deficiencies means the presence of conspicuous defects or materialdeferred maintenance of a subject property's material systems, components, or equipment as observed during the fieldobserver's walk-through survey. This definition specifically excludes deficiencies that may be remedied with routinemaintenance, miscellaneous minor repairs, normal operating maintenance, etc., and excludes de minimis conditions thatgenerally do not present material physical deficiencies of the subject property. A walk-through survey, conducted during thefield observer's site visit of the subject property, that consists of nonintrusive visual observations, survey of readilyaccessible, easily visible components and systems of the subject property. Concealed physical deficiencies are excluded. Itis the intent of this guide that such a survey should not be considered technically exhaustive. It excludes the operation ofequipment by the field observer and is to be conducted without the aid of special protective clothing, exploratory probing,removal of materials, testing, or the use of equipment, such as scaffolding, metering/testing equipment, or devices of anykind, etc. It is literally the field observer's visual observations while walking through the subject property.

This report will include short-term cost estimates, opinions of probable costs to remedy physical deficiencies, such asdeferred maintenance, that may not warrant immediate attention, but require repairs or replacements that should beundertaken on a priority basis in addition to routine preventive maintenance. Such opinions of probable costs may includecosts for testing, exploratory probing, and further analysis should this be deemed warranted by the consultant. Theperformance of such additional services are beyond this guide. Generally, the time frame for such repairs is within one to twoyears.

The purpose of the PCA is to observe and report, to the extent feasible pursuant to the processes prescribed herein, on thephysical condition of the subject property.

Deviations from the Guide: None

Recommendations: It is recommended that the user of this report review both summaries and the entire report. Thecomplete report may include additional information of concern.

A phase one environmental study and an ADA assessment were not requested and have not been conducted.

This property and subsequent building (s) has been inspected by Lloyd Kenzle of C4U Inspections



ATTACHMENT "B"

Short Term Summary 1-5 Years

C4U Inspections

Kenzle Holdings Ltd. dba C4U Inspections3518 Webber Rd.

West Kelowna, BCV4T 1H9

866 [email protected]

CustomerMarshall Fields Regional District of North Okanagan

Address6891 Okangan Landing Road

Vernon BC

Scope: Opinions of probable costs should be provided for material physical deficiencies and not for repairs or improvementsthat could be classified as: (1) cosmetic or decorative; (2) part or parcel of a building renovation program or tenantimprovements/finishes; (3) enhancements to reposition the subject property in the marketplace; (4) for warranty transferpurposes; or (5) routine or normal preventive maintenance, or a combination thereof.

Threshold Amount for Opinions of Probable Costs. It is the intent of this guide that the material physical deficienciesobserved and the corresponding opinions of probable costs (1) be commensurate with the complexity of the subject property;(2) not be minor or insignificant; and (3) serve the purpose of the user in accordance with the user's risk tolerance level.Opinions of probable costs that are either individually or in the aggregate less than a threshold amount of $3,000 for likeitems are to be omitted from the PCR. If there are more than four separate items that are below this threshold requirement,but collectively total over $10,000, such items should be included. The user may adjust this cost threshold amount providedthat this is disclosed within the PCR's Executive Summary under the heading Deviations from the Guide. Actual Costs MayVary. Opinions of probable costs should only be construed as preliminary budgets. Actual costs most probably will vary fromthe consultant's opinions of probable costs depending on such matters as type and design of suggested remedy, quality ofmaterials and installation, manufacturer and type of equipment or system selected, field conditions, whether a physicaldeficiency is repaired or replaced in whole, phasing of the work (if applicable), quality of contractor, quality of projectmanagement exercised, market conditions, and whether competitive pricing is solicited, etc

Estimating of Quantities: It is not the intent of this guide that the consultant is to prepare or provide exact quantities oridentify the exact locations of items or systems as a basis for preparing the opinions of probable costs.



ATTACHMENT "B"

Basis of Costs. The source of cost information utilized by the consultant may be from one or more of the following resources:(1) user provided unit costs; (2) owner's historical experience costs; (3) consultant's cost database or cost files; (4)commercially available cost information such as published commercial data; (5) third party cost information from contractors,vendors, or suppliers; or (6) other qualified sources that the consultant determines appropriate. Opinions of probable costsshould be provided with approximate quantities, units, and unit costs by line item. If in the reasonable opinion of theconsultant, a physical deficiency is too complex or difficult to develop an opinion of probable cost using the quantity and unitcost method, the consultant may apply a lump sum opinion of probable costs for that particular line item. Opinions ofprobable costs should be limited to construction related costs; those types of costs that commonly are provided bycontractors who perform the work. Business related, design, management fees, and other indirect costs should be excluded.

Costs for Additional Study. For some physical deficiencies, determining the appropriate suggested remedy or scope maywarrant further study/research or design, testing, exploratory probing, and exploration of various repair schemes, or acombination thereof, all of which are outside the scope of this guide. In these instances, the opinions of probable costs foradditional study should be provided.

Opinions of Probable Costs Contingent on Further Discovery-The consultant is not required to provide opinions ofprobable costs to remedy physical deficiencies, which may require the opinions of specialty consultants or the results oftesting, exploratory probing, or further research to determine the cause of the physical deficiency and the appropriateremedy, scope, and scheme for repair or replacement unless user and consultant have agreed to such an expansion of thescope of work.

4. Structural Frame and Building EnvelopeA. Structural Description

350000Description: Indoor Soccer Facilities:

• coverall fabric roof covering has approximately 10 years old, (Typical life expectancy of coverall fabric(inner & outer liners) is approximately 20 years. With proper maintenance and good quality product youshould get full life expectancy of the product replacement cost approximately $175,000).

• artificial turf at soccer pitch surface is approximately 10 years old and will need replacing in 2017. (Typicallife expectancy of artificial turf (including shockpad & infill) is approximately 10 years. With propermaintenance and good quality product you should get full life expectancy of the product replacement costapproximately $350,000).

6. Mechanical and Electrical SystemC. Domestic hot water production

1000Description: Hot Water Tank:

There is one small hot water tank: Bradford White, Serial # EC103....., 10 years old, 40 gal. it appears to befunctional as intended.

Financial Analysis:

There will be an expenditure needed with in the ten-year time frame of this report for replacing the tank.

Condition Analysis:

Hot water tank at this time is operational, however, the appliance could fail at anytime to operate as intended (eithermechanical, electrical and/or plumbing components and/or system). Life expectancy for a hot water heater is8-10-years.

Have the tank serviced (per item section), including replacement of anode rod and drain sediment soon



ATTACHMENT "B"

Prepared Using HomeGauge http://www.HomeGauge.com : Licensed To Lloyd Kenzle



ATTACHMENT "B"

http://www.HomeGauge.com

1. General Description

Inspection ItemsA. Description of Property

Comments:Marshall Fields Park

This park consist of an indoor soccer field with offices, change rooms, small concession, viewing areas up and down, twoball diamonds, one playground facility, four out door soccer fields, four tennis courts with two parking lots.

B. Paving, Curbing and ParkingComments:The asphalt parking and road way is for day use for park patrons.

C. Recreational FacilitiesComments:(1) Description: Ball Diamonds

There are two ball diamonds at this facility some have dug outs that are constructed of wood and metal posts with metalroofing all appears to be functional as intended.

Financial Analysis:

There should be no expenditures needed with in the ten year time frame of this report other than mechanical orvandalism.

Condition Analysis:

We estimate that the dugouts and bleachers have ~30 year service life expectancy.

C. Item 1(Picture)

(2) Description: Tennis Courts

There is a tennis court with four surfaces.



ATTACHMENT "B"

Financial Analysis:

There should be no expenditures needed with in the ten-year time frame of this report.

Condition Analysis:

We estimate that the tennis court surface should have ~50-year service life expectancy.

C. Item 2(Picture)

(3) Description: Out Door Soccer Fields

There is four soccer fields at this park and they appear to be functional as intended.

Financial Analysis:

There should be no expenditures needed with in the ten-year time frame of this report.

Condition Analysis:

We estimate that the fields have ~50-year service life expectancy.

(4) Description: Indoor Soccer Field

There is one soccer field and appears to be functional as intended.

Financial Analysis:

There will be an expenditures needed with in the ten-year time frame of this report.

Condition Analysis:

We estimate that the facility have ~50-year service life expectancy.



ATTACHMENT "B"

C. Item 3(Picture)



ATTACHMENT "B"

2. Site / Parking

Inspection ItemsA. Landscaping General Condition

Comments:Landscaping is mainly grass, appears satisfactory.

B. SignageComments:The sign is located at the street and on building.

B. Item 1(Picture) B. Item 2(Picture)

C. Paving, Curbing and Parking SpacesComments:Description:

This component includes all paved roadways and parking.

Financial Analysis:

An ongoing practice of crack filling and pot hole repair every year is recommended this should be covered under theoperational budget.

Potential Deterioration:

Asphalt like most other materials exposed to the elements will begin to lose flexibility, and suffer from substrate erosionor be poorly applied. The result is that the surface sinks or cracks and allows water to penetrate. The result is that theproduct is now vulnerable to the damaging effects of freezing. Cracks will become larger and sections of asphalt willbegin to de-laminate from the underlying base course or substrate. Winter snow removal will further damage the surface.A preventative measure which may prove helpful would be to use a good quality crack filler to seal out moisture as soonas possible after a crack appears.

Condition Analysis:

There were no areas of sinking or heaving noted. Paved surfaces appear to be in average to good condition.



ATTACHMENT "B"

C. Item 1(Picture) C. Item 2(Picture)

D. Access and EgressComments:There is access and egress to this park from the street and appeared functional.

E. TopographyComments:(1) The grounds are generally level around the building with positive drainage away from the structure.(2) Vernon Creek boarders this park and some erosion at banks has occurred, (this is for your information and beyondthe scope of this inspection).



ATTACHMENT "B"

E. Item 1(Picture) E. Item 2(Picture)

E. Item 3(Picture)



ATTACHMENT "B"

3. Office

Inspection ItemsA. Ceilings

Comments:Appears to be functional as intended.

B. WallsComments:Appears functional as intended.

C. FloorsComments:Appears functional as intended.

D. WindowsComments:Appears functional as intended.

E. DoorsComments:Appears functional as intended.



ATTACHMENT "B"

4. Structural Frame and Building Envelope

Inspection ItemsA. Structural Description

Comments:Description: Indoor Soccer Facilities:

• coverall fabric roof covering has approximately 10 years old, (Typical life expectancy of coverall fabric (inner &outer liners) is approximately 20 years. With proper maintenance and good quality product you should get fulllife expectancy of the product replacement cost approximately $175,000).

• artificial turf at soccer pitch surface is approximately 10 years old and will need replacing in 2017. (Typical lifeexpectancy of artificial turf (including shockpad & infill) is approximately 10 years. With proper maintenance andgood quality product you should get full life expectancy of the product replacement cost approximately$350,000).

A. Item 1(Picture) A. Item 2(Picture)




ATTACHMENT "B"



Out of Scope Issues:

Entering of Crawlspace or confined areas (however, the field observer should observe conditions to the extent easily visible from the point of access to thecrawl or confined space areas), determination of previous substructure flooding or water penetration unless easily visible or if such information is provided.Roof: Walking on pitched roofs, or any roof areas that appear to be unsafe, or roofs with no built-inaccess, or determining any roofing design criteria.



ATTACHMENT "B"

5. Utilities

Styles & MaterialsWater Source:

Public UtilityElectric source:

Power companyGas supply:

Natural Gas

Sanitary Sewer:Public sewer system

Inspection ItemsA. Water

Comments:The water source is the public utility company.

B. ElectricityComments:The source for electricity is the public utility company.

C. Electrical Meter (s) LocationComments:Meter at back side of building.

C. Item 1(Picture)

D. Natural gasComments:The fuel source is natural gas and is supplied by the public utility company.

E. Sanitary SewerComments:Sanitary waste discharges into the municipal sewer at the street.


Utilities: Operating conditions of any systems or accessing manholes or utility pits.



ATTACHMENT "B"

6. Mechanical and Electrical System

Inspection ItemsA. Plumbing water supply and Distribution and Fixtures

Comments:(1) Description: Piping

This component includes all copper piping in the restrooms.

Financial Analysis:

The only repairs that are going to be needed pipe breaks and the repairs will be needed at that time which would becovered under the operational budget.

Condition Analysis:

We estimate that the copper piping has ~60-year service life expectancy.

(2) Description: Irrigation

This component includes all irrigation on the property.

Financial Analysis:

The only repairs that are going to be needed to the irrigation piping and sprinkler heads when they cracks or break andthe repairs will be needed at that time which would be covered under the operational budget.

Condition Analysis:

We estimate that the irrigation piping has ~60-year service life expectancy.

B. Plumbing Drain, Waste and Vent SystemsComments:Description: Drain Piping

This component includes all drain, sinks, urnals and toilets in the restrooms.

Financial Analysis:

There should be no expenditures needed with in the ten year time frame of this report.

Condition Analysis:

We estimate that these components have ~60-year service life expectancy.

C. Domestic hot water productionComments:Description: Hot Water Tank:



ATTACHMENT "B"

There is one small hot water tank: Bradford White, Serial # EC103....., 10 years old, 40 gal. it appears to be functional asintended.

Financial Analysis:

There will be an expenditure needed with in the ten-year time frame of this report for replacing the tank.

Condition Analysis:

Hot water tank at this time is operational, however, the appliance could fail at anytime to operate as intended (eithermechanical, electrical and/or plumbing components and/or system). Life expectancy for a hot water heater is 8-10-years.


C. Item 1(Picture)

D. Heating EquipmentComments:(1) Description: Heating & Air conditioner

These roof top units are on the roof of the two story building.

Financial Analysis:

Components are original. There has been no expenditures in this area. Filters are missing and should be replaced.


The units at this time appears operational, however, the appliance could fail at anytime to operate as intended (eithermechanical, electrical and/or plumbing components and/or system). Life expectancy for a gas unit is approximately25-years. An extended life is possible when properly maintained

Condition Analysis:

Components are operating as intended.



ATTACHMENT "B"

D. Item 1(Picture) D. Item 2(Picture)

D. Item 3(Picture)

(2) Description: Ventilation System

This unit is in the mechanical room.

Financial Analysis:

Components are original. There has been no expenditures in this area. Filters will need servicing on a regular bases.


The unit at this time appears operational, however, the appliance could fail at anytime to operate as intended (eithermechanical, electrical and/or plumbing components and/or system). Life expectancy for a gas unit is approximately25-years. An extended life is possible when properly maintained

Condition Analysis:

Component is operating as intended.



ATTACHMENT "B"

D. Item 4(Picture)

(3) Description:Baseboard Heaters

These heaters are in several areas..

Financial Analysis:

Components are original. There has been no expenditures in this area.


The heaters at this time appears operational, however, the appliance could fail at anytime to operate as intended (eithermechanical, electrical components and/or system). Life expectancy for a baseboard heater is approximately 25-30-years.An extended life is possible when properly maintained

Condition Analysis:

Component is operating as intended.

D. Item 5(Picture) D. Item 6(Picture)

(4) Description: Radiant Space Heaters



ATTACHMENT "B"

These radiant space heaters are in the covered soccer field.

Financial Analysis:

Components are original. There has been no expenditures in this area.


The units at this time appears operational, however, the appliance could fail at anytime to operate as intended (eithermechanical, electrical and/or plumbing components and/or system). Life expectancy for a gas unit is approximately25-years. An extended life is possible when properly maintained

Condition Analysis:

Components are operating as intended.

D. Item 7(Picture)

E. DuctworkComments:Appears functional as intended.

F. Electric DistributionComments:(1) Description:Indoor Soccer Facility:

This component includes all lighting. There is a 200-amp service.

Financial Analysis:

The lighting appears functional as intended. The only problems that could occur are vandalism, mechanical damage orburned out bulbs and should all be covered under the operational budget.

Condition Analysis:

We estimate that the lighting should be ~60-year service life expectancy.



ATTACHMENT "B"

F. Item 1(Picture) F. Item 2(Picture)

(2) Electrical Certificate Dated 2014/12/31 Permit # EL196748-2014

F. Item 3(Picture)

G. Vertical Transportation (Elevators and Escalators)Comments:No vertical transportation at this facility.


Plumbing: Determining adequate pressure and flow rate, fixture-unit values and counts, verifying pipe sizes, or verifying the point of discharge forunderground systems. Observation of flue connections, interiors of chimneys, flues or boiler stacks, or tenant owned or maintained equipment. Removing ofelectrical panel and device covers, except if removed by building staff, EMF issues, electrical testing, or operating of any electrical devices, or opining onprocess related equipment or tenant owned equipment. Examining of cables, sheaves, controllers, motors, inspection tags, or entering elevator/escalatorpits or shafts.



ATTACHMENT "B"

7. Fire Protection

Inspection ItemsA. Alarm Systems

Comments:The fire alarm system appears to be operable.



Out of Scope Issues

Determining NFPA hazard classifications, classifying, or testing fire rating of assemblies.



ATTACHMENT "B"

C4U Inspections

Lloyd Kenzle

QualificationsQualifications

Lloyd Kenzle: Lloyd has completed the Home Inspection Training and Reserve Fund Analyzing and Home InspectionTraining. Lloyd is also a member in good standing, and have successfully completed, all membership requirements of theApplied Science Technologists and Technicians of BC Property Inspectors (ASTTBC-PI) www.asttbc.rog and InternationalAssociation of Certified Home Inspectors. www.nachi.org.

Lloyd has provide strata corporations with Depreciation Reports, Reserve Fund Analysis and a Contingency Reserve FundPlan that they can afford and implement Applied Science Technologists and Technicians of BC Property Inspectors (ASTTBC-PI) www.asttbc.org. He has successfully completed the Reserve Fund Analysis Course required by ASTTBC. He hascontinually upgraded my knowledge and skills with continuing education through course and examination put forth byWestern Pacific Inspection Institute and ASTTBC Education. He is also a member in good standings with ConsumerProtections BC License # 47652 and Associated Reserve Planners of Canada Inc.

Other important things you should know about your C4U Inspector:

Lloyd owns and manages an apartment building, has been involved in several building projects, including many homeimprovements. He has been trained to identify the positive attributes, maintenance requirements and explain potentialproblems, deficiencies and safety concerns.

Professional Affiliation & CertificationsProfessional Affiliation & CertificationsApplied Science Technologists & Technicians of BC Property Inspectors (ASTT-PI)· Certified Technician, CTech

· Certified House Inspector, CHI

· Registered Reserve Fund Analyst, RRFA-L

· Associated Reserve Planner of Canada

· Business Practices & Consumer Protection Authority License #47652

· United States EPA AHERA Building Inspection Training # CAPI-13-006

Insurance:Insurance:Errors and Omissions Insurance for the Members of the applied Science Technologists and Technicians of British Columbia(ASTTBC)· Encon Insurance Policy # SRD402122



ATTACHMENT "B"

http://www.asttbc.org/

· Name of Insured: Kenzle Holdings Ltd. DBA C4U Inspections

· Policy Period: 5/1/2014 to 5/1/2017

· Limits of Liability: $1,000,000 per loss and $1,000,000 per policy period

Lloyd Kenzle ASTTBC-PI, CTech, CHI, RRFA-L, AHERA-CAPILloyd Kenzle ASTTBC-PI, CTech, CHI, RRFA-L, AHERA-CAPI



ATTACHMENT "B"

Work Scope

Project Sub-Items EstimateArtificial Turf 350000.00

Structural Description 350000.00Description: Indoor Soccer Facilities:

• artificial turf at soccer pitch surface is approximately 10 years old and will need replacing in 2017. (Typical life expectancy ofartificial turf (including shockpad & infill) is approximately 10 years. With proper maintenance and good quality product youshould get full life expectancy of the product replacement cost approximately $350,000).

Hot Water Tank 1000.00

Domestic hot water production 1000.00Description: Hot Water Tank:

Hot water tank at this time is operational, however, the appliance could fail at anytime to operate as intended (either mechanical,electrical and/or plumbing components and/or system). Life expectancy for a hot water heater is 8-10-years.


Grand Total: $351000.00



ATTACHMENT "B"

ATTACHMENT "C1"

ATTACHMENT "C2"

ATTACHMENT "C3"

REGIONAL DISTRICT OF NORTH OKANAGAN · REGIONAL DISTRICT OF NORTH OKANAGAN REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL...

Documents

Transcript of REGIONAL DISTRICT OF NORTH OKANAGAN · REGIONAL DISTRICT OF NORTH OKANAGAN REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL...