REG 265-Surface Drainage

43
REG 265 Surface Drainage Surface Drainage

description

Infratechnology

Transcript of REG 265-Surface Drainage

Page 1: REG 265-Surface Drainage

REG 265 Surface DrainageSurface Drainage

Page 2: REG 265-Surface Drainage

2

Objectives Identify rural drainage requirements and

design

Ref: AASHTO Highway Drainage Guidelines (1999), Guidelines for Road Drainage Design (Design Floods & Culvert Design – 2004))

Page 3: REG 265-Surface Drainage

3

Surface Drainage

Surface water removed from pavement and ROW

Redirects water into appropriately designed channels

Eventually discharges into natural water systems

Garber & Hoel, 2002

Page 4: REG 265-Surface Drainage

4

Surface Drainage

Two types of water– Surface water – rain and snow– Ground water – can be a problem when a water

table is near surface

Garber & Hoel, 2002

Page 5: REG 265-Surface Drainage

5

Inadequate Drainage

Damage to highway structures Loss of capacity Visibility problems with spray and loss of

retroreflectivity Safety problems, reduced friction and

hydroplaning

Garber & Hoel, 2002

Page 6: REG 265-Surface Drainage

6

Drainage

Transverse slopes– Removes water from pavement surface– Facilitated by cross-section elements (cross-slope, shoulder

slope) Longitudinal slopes

– Minimum gradient of alignment to maintain adequate slope in longitudinal channels

Longitudinal channels– Ditches along side of road to collect surface

water after run-off

Page 7: REG 265-Surface Drainage

7

Transverse slope

Page 8: REG 265-Surface Drainage

8

Longitudinal slope

Page 9: REG 265-Surface Drainage

9

Longitudinal channel

Page 10: REG 265-Surface Drainage

10

Surface Drainage System Design

Tradeoffs: Steep slopes provide good hydraulic capacity and lower ROW costs, but reduce safety and increase erosion and maintenance costs

Page 11: REG 265-Surface Drainage

11

Surface Drainage System Design

Three phases1. Estimate quantity of water to reach the system2. Hydraulic design of system elements3. Comparison of different materials that serve same

purpose

Page 12: REG 265-Surface Drainage

12

Hydrologic Analysis: Rational Method

Useful for small, usually urban, watersheds (<10acres, but DOT says <200acres)

Q = CIA (English) or Q = 0.0028CIA (metric)

Q = runoff (ft3/sec) or (m3/sec)C = coefficient representing ratio of runoff to rainfallI = intensity of rainfall (in/hour or mm/hour)A = drainage area (acres or hectares)

The Rational Method

Page 13: REG 265-Surface Drainage

13

Runoff Coefficient

o Coefficient that represents the fraction of rainfall that becomes runoff

o Depends on type of surface

The Rational Method

Page 14: REG 265-Surface Drainage

14

Runoff Coefficient depends on:

Character of surface and soil Shape of drainage area Antecedent moisture conditions Slope of watershed Amount of impervious soil Land use Duration Intensity

Page 15: REG 265-Surface Drainage

15

Runoff Coefficient - rural

The Rational Method

Page 16: REG 265-Surface Drainage

16

Runoff Coefficient - urban

The Rational Method

Page 17: REG 265-Surface Drainage

17

Runoff Coefficient For High Intensity Event (i.e. 100-

year storm)

The Rational Method

Page 18: REG 265-Surface Drainage

18

Runoff Coefficient For High Intensity Event (i.e. 100-

year storm)

The Rational Method

C = 0.16 for low intensity event for cultivated fields

C = 0.42 for high intensity event

Page 19: REG 265-Surface Drainage

19

Runoff Coefficient

When a drainage area has distinct parts with different C values

Use the weighted average

C = C1A1 + C2A2 + ….. + CnAn

ΣAi

Page 20: REG 265-Surface Drainage

20

Watershed Area

For DOT method measured in acres (hectares)

Combined area of all surfaces that drain to a given intake or culvert inlet

Determine boundaries of area that drain to same location– i.e high points mark boundary – Natural or human-made barriers

Page 21: REG 265-Surface Drainage

21

Watershed Area

Topographic maps Aerial photos Digital elevation models Drainage maps Field reviews

Page 22: REG 265-Surface Drainage

22

Intensity

Average intensity for a selected frequency and duration over drainage area for duration of storm

Based on “design” event (i.e. 50-year storm)– Overdesign is costly– Underdesign may be inadequate

Duration is important Based on values of Tc and T

Tc = time of concentration T = recurrence interval or design frequency

Page 23: REG 265-Surface Drainage

23

Design Event Recurrence Interval

2-year interval -- Design of intakes and spread of water on pavement for primary highways and city streets

10-year interval -- Design of intakes and spread of water on pavement for freeways and interstate highways

50 - year -- Design of subways (underpasses) and sag vertical curves where storm sewer pipe is the only outlet

100 – year interval -- Major storm check on all projects

Page 24: REG 265-Surface Drainage

24

Time of Concentration (tc)

Time for water to flow from hydraulically most distant point on the watershed to the point of interest

Rational method assumes peak run-off rate occurs when rainfall intensity (I) lasts (duration) >= Tc

Used as storm duration Iowa DOT says don’t use Tc<5 minutes

Page 25: REG 265-Surface Drainage

25

Time of Concentration (Tc)

Depends on:– Size and shape of drainage area– Type of surface– Slope of drainage area– Rainfall intensity– Whether flow is entirely overland or whether some is

channelized

Page 26: REG 265-Surface Drainage

26

Tc: Equation from Iowa DOT Manual

See nomograph, next page

Page 27: REG 265-Surface Drainage

27

Nomograph Method

Trial and error method:– Known: surface, size (length), slope– Look up “n”– Estimate I (intensity)– Determine Tc

– Check I and Tc against values in Table 5 (Iowa DOT, Chapter 4)

– Repeat until Tc (table) ~ Tc (nomograph)

– Peak storm event occurs when duration at least = Tc

Page 28: REG 265-Surface Drainage

28

Example (Iowa DOT Method)

Iterate finding I and Tc

L = 150 feet Average slope, S = 0.02 (2%) Grass Recurrence interval, T = 10 years Location: Keokuk Find I

From Iowa DOT Design Manual

Page 29: REG 265-Surface Drainage

29

Grass Surface, Mannings roughness coefficient = 0.4

Page 30: REG 265-Surface Drainage

30

First guess I = 5 in/hr

knowns

Tc=18

Page 31: REG 265-Surface Drainage

31

Example (continued) Tc with first iteration is 18 min Check against tables in DOT manual

Keokuk is in SE: code = 9

Page 32: REG 265-Surface Drainage

32

Convert intensity to inches/hour …

Page 33: REG 265-Surface Drainage

33

For intensity of 5 inch/hr, duration is 15 min

Tc from nomograph was 18 min ≠ 15 min

Tc ≠ Duration

Next iteration, try intensity = 4.0 inch/hr

Page 34: REG 265-Surface Drainage

34

Slope = 0.02

I = 4.0 inches/hr

Tc = 20 min For second iteration, tc = 20 min

Page 35: REG 265-Surface Drainage

35

Example (continued)

I = 4.0 inches/hour is somewhere between 30 min and 15 min,

Interpolate … OK!

Page 36: REG 265-Surface Drainage

36

What does this mean?

It means that for a ten-year storm, the greatest intensity to be expected for a storm lasting at least the Tc (18 min.) is 4.0 inches per hour …

that is the design intensity

Page 37: REG 265-Surface Drainage

37

Can also use equation, this example is provided in Chapter 4-4 of the Iowa DOT manual

Page 38: REG 265-Surface Drainage

38

Rational Method

used for mostly urban applications limited to about 10 acres in size (some sources suggest 200-

acre limit) Q = CIA Calculate Q once C, I, and A have been found

Page 39: REG 265-Surface Drainage

39

Area

Area of watershed Defined by topography Use GIS contours in lab

Page 40: REG 265-Surface Drainage

40

Page 41: REG 265-Surface Drainage

41

Lab-type Example

60-acre watershed 50-year storm Mixed cover Rolling terrain

Page 42: REG 265-Surface Drainage

42

180

Qdesign = 180 x 1.0 x 0.6 = 108CFS

Page 43: REG 265-Surface Drainage

43

What would the flow have been had we used the rational method?

Q=CIA Say, c = 0.2 (slightly pervious soils) I=? Assume round watershed of 60 acres = 60/640 = 0.093 sq

mi … L=D≈1800’ , assume slope=4% (rolling?) … Tc for I=6in/h = 41 min vs. 60 min … I=4.8in/h = 45 min vs. 30 min … call it 5.5in/h

A=60 … Q=.2×5.5×60 = 66 CFS vs. 108 cfs