Reform. Perform. Transform. · TDS should not apply for provisions made and reversed during the...
Transcript of Reform. Perform. Transform. · TDS should not apply for provisions made and reversed during the...
www.skpgroup.com/budget2018
Reform. Perform. Transform.
Union Budget 2018Industry Expectations
© 2
018
SKP
Bu
sin
ess
Co
nsu
ltin
g LL
P. A
ll ri
ghts
res
erve
d.
Winner of India Tax Firm of the Year 2016 at the Asia Tax Awards
Typical Scenario
Rationalise Effective Tax Rates
Simplification Measures
Making TDS Less Tedious
Set Right Unjust Enrichment
Tax Incentives
Migration to LLP
Capital Gains on Indirect Transfer of Shares
Section 79
Other Aspects
Our Story
Coverage
224-01-2018
© 2
018
SKP
Bu
sin
ess
Co
nsu
ltin
g LL
P. A
ll ri
ghts
res
erve
d.
Typical Scenario
324-01-2018
© 2
018
SKP
Bu
sin
ess
Co
nsu
ltin
g LL
P. A
ll ri
ghts
res
erve
d.
Winner of India Tax Firm of the Year 2016 at the Asia Tax Awards
Typical Scenario
424-01-2018
© 2
018
SKP
Bu
sin
ess
Co
nsu
ltin
g LL
P. A
ll ri
ghts
res
erve
d.
Rationalise Effective Tax Rates
524-01-2018
© 2
018
SKP
Bu
sin
ess
Co
nsu
ltin
g LL
P. A
ll ri
ghts
res
erve
d.
Winner of India Tax Firm of the Year 2016 at the Asia Tax Awards
India’s tax rates are among the highest in the world
United States reduced the corporate tax rate from 35% to 21%
High tax rates affect competitive advantage of Indian businesses
Corporate Taxation
624-01-2018
Country Tax Rate*
Germany 15%
Canada 15%
Singapore 17%
United Kingdom 19%
Finland 20%
United States 21%
Sweden 22%
Japan 24%
China 25%
India 34%*indicative tax rates
Expectations
Finance Minister should deliver on his promise to cut corporate tax rate to 25%
25% should be effective tax rate – after surcharge and cess
25% headline rate is effectively 29% in highest bracket
MAT should be correspondingly reduced, so that corporate tax rate cut is effective
DDT should be reduced since dividends are now also being taxed in the hands of individual shareholders
© 2
018
SKP
Bu
sin
ess
Co
nsu
ltin
g LL
P. A
ll ri
ghts
res
erve
d.
Winner of India Tax Firm of the Year 2016 at the Asia Tax Awards
Tax cost disproportionately high
Equity lacking between salaried and self-employed taxpayers
Low tax base
Low and archaic exemption limits
Individual Taxation
724-01-2018
Expectations
Widen the tax slabs – especially for 20% and 30% tax rate
Reduce the age limit to qualify as very senior citizen (currently 80 years)
Enhance section 80C limit – payments for first house to be deductible at actual
Enhance section 80D limit - Health-care premium to be deductible at actual
Enhance exemption limits for allowances (medical expenses, children education allowance, meal expenses)
Provide deductions for:
Skill development expenses
Expenditure incurred for benefit of dependant parents
Personal expenditure incurred through digital means
Expenditure on crèche
Should basic exemption be enhanced?
Should standard deduction be introduced?
© 2
018
SKP
Bu
sin
ess
Co
nsu
ltin
g LL
P. A
ll ri
ghts
res
erve
d.
Simplification Measures
824-01-2018
© 2
018
SKP
Bu
sin
ess
Co
nsu
ltin
g LL
P. A
ll ri
ghts
res
erve
d.
Winner of India Tax Firm of the Year 2016 at the Asia Tax Awards
An Overview
Situation
Surcharge and cess create confusion in understanding effective tax rate
Income-tax law does not recognise concept of materiality
Tax Residency Certificate (TRC) mandatory to avail tax treaty benefit
Courts have consistently held that surcharge and cess do not apply on tax treaty rates
Delhi High Court held that most of ICDS provisions were constitutionally invalid
Expectation
Do away with surcharge and cess with a corresponding change in basic tax rate
Provide 100% depreciation on assets of smaller value (say INR 10,000 per asset)
For small payments (say up to INR 5 lac), the requirement of TRC should be dispensed with
Suitable clarification should be provided in the law itself
Delhi High Court judgment should be accepted and ICDS should be removed from law in entirety
924-01-2018
© 2
018
SKP
Bu
sin
ess
Co
nsu
ltin
g LL
P. A
ll ri
ghts
res
erve
d.
Making TDS Less Tedious
1024-01-2018
© 2
018
SKP
Bu
sin
ess
Co
nsu
ltin
g LL
P. A
ll ri
ghts
res
erve
d.
Winner of India Tax Firm of the Year 2016 at the Asia Tax Awards
Section 199 v CPC procedures
Many cases of denial of TDS credit based on Form 26AS though claim is as per law
Substantial time and effort in seeking relief from Assessing Officer
Conceptually, 26AS cannot reflect TDS credit as per section 199 in 100% cases
TDS | Income
1124-01-2018
Expectations
Allow the assessee an option to claim TDS credit as per section 199 or Form 26AS
© 2
018
SKP
Bu
sin
ess
Co
nsu
ltin
g LL
P. A
ll ri
ghts
res
erve
d.
Winner of India Tax Firm of the Year 2016 at the Asia Tax Awards
Excess TDS deposited under different sections cannot be easily interchanged
For example, TDS on salaries cannot be used for non-salaries
TDS applies on provisions made and reversed during the year
TDS on software purchase – applicable in all cases based on literal interpretation
Notification 21/2012 not comprehensive
TDS on reimbursements – whether fees for technical services?
TDS on cost sharing arrangements – whether TDS will apply?
TDS | Expenses
1224-01-2018
Expectations
TDS deposited should be treated as a running account – remove section-specific distinctions
TDS should not apply for provisions made and reversed during the same year
TDS should not apply on purchase of standard software
Guidance to be provided on what constitutes cost to cost reimbursement and cost sharing
© 2
018
SKP
Bu
sin
ess
Co
nsu
ltin
g LL
P. A
ll ri
ghts
res
erve
d.
Set Right Unjust Enrichment
1324-01-2018
© 2
018
SKP
Bu
sin
ess
Co
nsu
ltin
g LL
P. A
ll ri
ghts
res
erve
d.
Winner of India Tax Firm of the Year 2016 at the Asia Tax Awards
Sale of Unlisted Shares Below Fair Market Value (FMV)
Mr A sold certain unlisted shares to Mr B at INR 100. FMV was INR 130
Mr A will be taxed considering sale price to be INR 130 (Section 50CA)
Mr B, the buyer, will also be taxed on INR 30 (INR 130 – INR 100) (Section 56(2)(x))
Tax on INR 30 is collected from Mr A as well as Mr B – double taxation?
An Overview
1424-01-2018
Expectations
Levy tax either on the buyer or on the seller, but not both
© 2
018
SKP
Bu
sin
ess
Co
nsu
ltin
g LL
P. A
ll ri
ghts
res
erve
d.
Winner of India Tax Firm of the Year 2016 at the Asia Tax Awards
Interest on Excess/Short Payment of Tax
Interest on short payment of self-assessment tax is charged @ 1% per month
Interest on refund is given @ 0.5% per month
Interest paid is not tax deductible but interest received is taxable
An Overview
1524-01-2018
Expectations
Interest on short/excess payment of tax should be at the same rate – It is intended to be compensatory
Interest on delayed payment of TDS should be calculated on days basis, rounded-off to nearest month
Interest on Delayed Payment of TDS
For example, TDS deducted on 30 September 2017 is to be paid by 7 October 2017
If TDS is paid on 10 October, tax authorities charge interest for 2 months!
© 2
018
SKP
Bu
sin
ess
Co
nsu
ltin
g LL
P. A
ll ri
ghts
res
erve
d.
Tax Incentives
1624-01-2018
© 2
018
SKP
Bu
sin
ess
Co
nsu
ltin
g LL
P. A
ll ri
ghts
res
erve
d.
Winner of India Tax Firm of the Year 2016 at the Asia Tax Awards
Benefit available to all kinds of businesses
Should be increase in number of employees over earlier year
30% of salary paid to additional employees is allowed as an additional deduction for three (3) years
For a salary of INR 100 in first year, deduction allowed is INR 190 over 3 years
Certain Conditions
Employee should work for a minimum period of 240 days during the year (150 days for manufacture of apparel)
Salary of additional employees should not be more than INR 25,000 per month (excluding employer’s contribution to provident fund)
For Employment Generation | Section 80JJAA
1724-01-2018
Expectations
Condition of 240 days should be done away with/suitably relaxed
Salary threshold should be significantly increased
Condition to be inserted to ensure new employees are retained for a particular period of time
© 2
018
SKP
Bu
sin
ess
Co
nsu
ltin
g LL
P. A
ll ri
ghts
res
erve
d.
Winner of India Tax Firm of the Year 2016 at the Asia Tax Awards
An Overview
1824-01-2018
Scientific Research Expenditure – extension for period of applicability for weighted deduction
Highway Trauma/Accident Centres
Water Purification and Supply Projects
Sanitation Projects
Tourism
© 2
018
SKP
Bu
sin
ess
Co
nsu
ltin
g LL
P. A
ll ri
ghts
res
erve
d.
Migration to LLP
1924-01-2018
© 2
018
SKP
Bu
sin
ess
Co
nsu
ltin
g LL
P. A
ll ri
ghts
res
erve
d.
Winner of India Tax Firm of the Year 2016 at the Asia Tax Awards
Conversion of an existing company into a Limited Liability Partnership (LLP) is exempt from capital gains, if certain conditions are satisfied
Some of the conditions
Turnover of the company for any of the last 3 years should not exceed INR 60 lac (INR 6 million)
Value of assets of the company for any of the last 3 years should not exceed INR 500 lac (INR 50 million)
An Overview
2024-01-2018
Expectations
Conversion of a company into an LLP should be tax neutral
Alternatively, the limits of INR 60 lac and INR 500 lac should be suitably enhanced
© 2
018
SKP
Bu
sin
ess
Co
nsu
ltin
g LL
P. A
ll ri
ghts
res
erve
d.
Capital Gains on Indirect Transfer of Shares
2124-01-2018
© 2
018
SKP
Bu
sin
ess
Co
nsu
ltin
g LL
P. A
ll ri
ghts
res
erve
d.
Winner of India Tax Firm of the Year 2016 at the Asia Tax Awards
Seller holds shares of F, a foreign company
F Co holds shares of I, an Indian company
Seller sells F’s shares to a buyer outside India
Transaction can attract capital gains tax in India, if substantial value of shares of F is derived from I (assets situated in India)
Substantial value
Value of INR 100 million (USD 1.50 million)
At least 50% of value of F should be derived from I
An Overview
2224-01-2018
Expectations
Intra-group transfer of shares, where ultimate ownership remains the same, should be exempted from indirect transfer provisions
Seller Buyer
F
I
outside India
in India
Sale
© 2
018
SKP
Bu
sin
ess
Co
nsu
ltin
g LL
P. A
ll ri
ghts
res
erve
d.
Section 79
2324-01-2018
© 2
018
SKP
Bu
sin
ess
Co
nsu
ltin
g LL
P. A
ll ri
ghts
res
erve
d.
Winner of India Tax Firm of the Year 2016 at the Asia Tax Awards
Applies to closely held companies
Where there is change in voting power by more than 49%, brought forward business losses cannot be carried forward
Illustration
A is the holding company of B
B is the holding company of C
C has substantial brought forward business loss
As a part of group restructuring, B sold its shares in C to A. Resultantly, shareholding of C changes from B to A – change in shareholding
Section 79 could be attracted in such situations
An Overview
2424-01-2018
A
B
C
100%
100%
A
B C
100% 100%
Existing Structure
Amended Structure
© 2
018
SKP
Bu
sin
ess
Co
nsu
ltin
g LL
P. A
ll ri
ghts
res
erve
d.
Other Aspects
2524-01-2018
© 2
018
SKP
Bu
sin
ess
Co
nsu
ltin
g LL
P. A
ll ri
ghts
res
erve
d.
Winner of India Tax Firm of the Year 2016 at the Asia Tax Awards
India’s tax base is quite narrow – only 1.7% of the total population pays income tax
Rising popularity of crypto-currencies
Tax on long-term capital gains on sale of listed equity shares
More companies getting covered under IND-AS
Discussions regarding moving to the calendar year as the new financial year
New direct tax code
Points To Consider
2624-01-2018
Expectations
Stringent provisions to be introduced to widen tax base
Tax treatment for crypto-currencies should be clarified
Tax should not be imposed on long term capital gains on listed securities
Period of holding may be increased to 2 years – listed securities could be at par with unlisted securities and real estate
Specific provisions to be introduced to clarify how tax computation would operate for companies following IND-AS
Roadmap should be laid out for moving to calendar year system – should not be immediate
© 2
018
SKP
Bu
sin
ess
Co
nsu
ltin
g LL
P. A
ll ri
ghts
res
erve
d.
Our Story
2724-01-2018
© 2
018
SKP
Bu
sin
ess
Co
nsu
ltin
g LL
P. A
ll ri
ghts
res
erve
d.
Winner of India Tax Firm of the Year 2016 at the Asia Tax Awards
SKP Today
2824-01-2018
The contents of this presentation are intended for general marketing and informative purposes only and should not be construed to be complete. Thispresentation may contain information other than our services and credentials. Such information should neither be considered as an opinion or advice nor berelied upon as being comprehensive and accurate. We accept no liability or responsibility to any person for any loss or damage incurred by relying on suchinformation. This presentation may contain proprietary, confidential or legally privileged information and any unauthorised reproduction, misuse or disclosureof its contents is strictly prohibited and will be unlawful.
Disclaimer
Mumbai
Pune
Hyderabad
New Delhi
Chennai
Bengaluru
Toronto
Chicago
Dubai
Connect with us
Subscribe
www.skpgroup.com
SKP Business Consulting LLP is a member firm of the "Nexia International" network. Nexia International Limited does not deliverservices in its own name or otherwise. Nexia International Limited and the member firms of the Nexia International network(including those members which trade under a name which includes the word NEXIA) are not part of a worldwide partnership.For the full Nexia International disclaimer, please click here.
Icons designed by Freepik © 2
018
SKP
Bu
sin
ess
Co
nsu
ltin
g LL
P. A
ll ri
ghts
res
erve
d.
2924-01-2018