Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

199
Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

description

Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM. This slideshow presentation was created by Sheldon P. Gordon Farmingdale State University of New York [email protected] with contributions from Nancy Baxter Hastings (Dickinson College) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

Page 1: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

Refocusing theCourses

Below CalculusA Joint Initiative of

MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

Page 2: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

This slideshow presentation was created by Sheldon P. Gordon

Farmingdale State University of New [email protected]

with contributions fromNancy Baxter Hastings (Dickinson College)

Florence S. Gordon (NYIT)Bernard Madison (University of Arkansas)

Bill Haver (Virginia Commonwealth University)Bill Bauldry (Appalachian State University)

Permission is hereby granted to anyone to use any or all of these slides in any related presentations.

We gratefully acknowledge the support provided for the development of this presentation package by the National Science Foundation under

grants DUE-0089400, DUE-0310123, and DUE-0442160. The views expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Foundation.

Page 3: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

College Algebra and Precalculus

Each year, more than 1,000,000 students take college algebra and precalculus courses.

The focus in most of these courses is on preparing the students for calculus.

We know that only a relatively small percentage of these students ever go on to start calculus.

Page 4: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

Some Questions

How many of these students actually ever do go on to start calculus?

How well do the ones who do go on actually do in calculus?

Page 5: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

Some Questions

Why do the majority of these 1,000,000+ students a year take college algebra courses?

Are these students well-served by the kind of courses typically given as “college algebra”? If not, what kind of mathematics do these students really need?

Page 6: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

Enrollment FlowsBased on several studies of enrollment flows from college algebra to calculus:

• Less than 5% of the students who start college algebra courses ever start Calculus I

• The typical DFW rate in college algebra is typically well above 50%

• Virtually none of the students who pass college algebra courses ever start Calculus III

• Perhaps 30-40% of the students who pass precalculus courses ever start Calculus I

Page 7: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

Some Interesting Studies

In a study at eight public and private universities in Illinois, Herriott and Dunbar found that, typically, only about 10-15% of the students enrolled in college algebra courses had any intention of majoring in a mathematically intensive field. At a large two year college, Agras found that only 15% of the students taking college algebra planned to major in mathematically intensive fields.

Page 8: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

Some Interesting Studies

Steve Dunbar has tracked over 150,000 students taking mathematics at the University of Nebraska – Lincoln for more than 15 years. He found that:• only about 10% of the students who pass college algebra ever go on to start Calculus I• virtually none of the students who pass college algebra ever go on to start Calculus III. • about 30% of the students who pass college algebra eventually start business calculus.• about 30-40% of the students who pass precalculus ever go on to start Calculus I.

Page 9: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

Some Interesting Studies

William Waller at the University of Houston – Downtown tracked the students from college algebra in Fall 2000. Of the 1018 students who started college algebra:• only 39, or 3.8%, ever went on to start Calculus I at any time over the following three years. • 551, or 54.1%, passed college algebra with a C or better that semester• of the 551 students who passed college algebra, 153 had previously failed college algebra (D/F/W) and were taking it for the second, third, fourth or more time

Page 10: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

Some Interesting Studies

The Fall, 2001 cohort in college algebra at the University of Houston – Downtown was slightly larger. Of the 1028 students who started college algebra:• only 2.8%, ever went on to start Calculus I at any time over the following three years.

Page 11: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

The San Antonio ProjectThe mayor’s Economic Development Council of San Antonio recently identified college algebra as one of the major impediments to the city developing the kind of technologically sophisticated workforce it needs.

The mayor appointed a special task force with representatives from all 11 colleges in the city plus business, industry and government to change the focus of college algebra to make the courses more responsive to the needs of the city, the students, and local industry.

Page 12: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

Why Students Take These Courses

Required by other departments

• Satisfy general education requirements

• To prepare for calculus

• For the love of mathematics

Page 13: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

What the Majority of Students Need

• Conceptual understanding, not rote

manipulation

• Realistic applications and mathematical

modeling that reflect the way mathematics

is used in other disciplines and on the job in

today’s technological society

Page 14: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

Some Conclusions

Few, if any, math departments can exist based solely on offerings for math and related majors. Whether we like it or not, mathematics is a service department at almost all institutions.

And college algebra and related courses exist almost exclusively to serve the needs of other disciplines.

Page 15: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

Some Conclusions

If we fail to offer courses that meet the needs of the students in the other disciplines, those departments will increasingly drop the requirements for math courses. This is already starting to happen in engineering.

Math departments may well end up offering little beyond developmental algebra courses that serve little purpose.

Page 16: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

Four Special Invited Conferences

• Rethinking the Preparation for Calculus,

October 2001.

• Forum on Quantitative Literacy,

November 2001.

• CRAFTY Curriculum Foundations Project,

December 2001.

• Reforming College Algebra,

February 2002.

Page 17: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

Common Recommendations

• “College Algebra courses should stress conceptual understanding, not rote manipulation.

• “College Algebra” courses should be real-world problem based:

Every topic should be introduced through a real-world problem and then the mathematics necessary to solve the problem is developed.

Page 18: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

Common Recommendations

• “College Algebra” courses should focus on mathematical modeling—that is,

– transforming a real-world problem into mathematics using linear, exponential and power functions, systems of equations, graphing, or difference equations.

– using the model to answer problems in context.

– interpreting the results and changing the model if needed.

Page 19: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

Common Recommendations

• “College Algebra” courses should emphasize communication skills: reading, writing, presenting, and listening.

These skills are needed on the job and for effective citizenship as well as in

academia.

• “College Algebra” courses should make appropriate use of technology to enhance conceptual understanding, visualization, inquiry, as well as for computation.

Page 20: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

Common Recommendations

• “College Algebra” courses should be student-centered rather than instructor-centered pedagogy.

- They should include hands-on activities rather than be all lecture.

- They should emphasize small group projects involving inquiry and inference.

Page 21: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

Important Volumes

• CUPM Curriculum Guide: Undergraduate Programs and Courses in the Mathematical Sciences, MAA Reports.

• AMATYC Crossroads Standards and the Beyond Crossroads report.

• NCTM, Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. •Ganter, Susan and Bill Barker, Eds.,

A Collective Vision: Voices of the Partner Disciplines, MAA Reports.

Page 22: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

Important Volumes

• Madison, Bernie and Lynn Steen, Eds., Quantitative Literacy: Why Numeracy Matters for Schools and Colleges, National Council on Education and the Disciplines, Princeton.

• Baxter Hastings, Nancy, Flo Gordon, Shelly Gordon, and Jack Narayan, Eds., A Fresh Start for Collegiate Mathematics: Rethinking the Courses below Calculus, MAA Notes.

Page 23: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

CUPM Curriculum Guide

• All students, those for whom the (introductory mathematics) course is terminal and those for whom it serves as a springboard, need to learn to think effectively, quantitatively and logically.

• Students must learn with understanding, focusing on relatively few concepts but treating them in depth. Treating ideas in depth includes presenting each concept from multiple points of view and in progressively more sophisticated contexts.

Page 24: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

CUPM Curriculum Guide

• A study of these (disciplinary) reports and the textbooks and curricula of courses in other disciplines shows that the algorithmic skills that are the focus of computational college algebra courses are much less important than understanding the underlying concepts.

• Students who are preparing to study calculus need to develop conceptual understanding as well as computational skills.

Page 25: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

AMATYC Crossroads Standards

In general, emphasis on the meaning and use of mathematical ideas must increase, and attention to rote manipulation must decrease.

•Faculty should include fewer topics but cover them in greater depth, with greater understanding, and with more flexibility. Such an approach will enable students to adapt to new situations.

•Areas that should receive increased attention include the conceptual understanding of mathematical ideas.

Page 26: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

NCTM Standards

These recommendations are clearly very much in the same spirit as the recommendations in NCTM’s Principles and Standards for School Mathematics.

If implemented at the college level, they would establish a smooth transition between school and college mathematics.

Page 27: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

These guidelines are the recommendations of the MAA/CUPM subcommittee, Curriculum Renewal Across the First Two Years, concerning the nature of the college algebra course that can serve as a terminal course as well as a pre-requisite to courses such as pre-calculus, statistics, business calculus, finite mathematics, and mathematics for elementary education majors.

CRAFTY College Algebra Guidelines

Page 28: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

College Algebra provides students with a college level academic experience that emphasizes the use of algebra and functions in problem solving and modeling, provides a foundation in quantitative literacy, supplies the algebra and other mathematics needed in partner disciplines, and helps meet quantitative needs in, and outside of, academia.

Fundamental Experience

Page 29: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

Students address problems presented as real world situations by creating and interpreting mathematical models. Solutions to the problems are formulated, validated, and analyzed using mental, paper and pencil, algebraic, and technology-based techniques as appropriate.

Fundamental Experience

Page 30: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

• Involve students in a meaningful and positive, intellectually engaging, mathematical experience;

• Provide students with opportunities to analyze, synthesize, and work collaboratively on explorations and reports;

• Develop students’ logical reasoning skills needed by informed and productive citizens;

Course Goals

Page 31: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

• Strengthen students’ algebraic and quantitative abilities useful in the study of other disciplines;

• Develop students’ mastery of those algebraic techniques necessary for problem-solving and mathematical modeling;

• Improve students’ ability to communicate mathematical ideas clearly in oral and written form;

Course Goals

Page 32: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

• Develop students’ competence and confidence in their problem-solving ability;

• Develop students’ ability to use technology for understanding and doing mathematics;

• Enable and encourage students to take additional coursework in the mathematical sciences.

Course Goals

Page 33: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

• Solving problems presented in the context of real world situations;

• Developing a personal framework of problem solving techniques;

• Creating, interpreting, and revising models and solutions of problems.

Problem Solving

Page 34: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

• Understanding the concepts of function and rate of change;

• Effectively using multiple perspectives (symbolic, numeric, graphic, and verbal) to explore elementary functions;

• Investigating linear, exponential, power, polynomial, logarithmic, and periodic functions, as appropriate;

Functions & Equations

Page 35: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

• Recognizing and using standard transformations such as translations and dilations with graphs of elementary functions;

• Using systems of equations to model real world situations;

• Solving systems of equations using a variety of methods;

• Mastering those algebraic techniques and manipulations necessary for problem-solving and modeling in this course.

Page 36: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

• Collecting, displaying, summarizing, and interpreting data in various forms;

• Applying algebraic transformations to linearize data for analysis;

• Fitting an appropriate curve to a scatterplot and use the resulting function for prediction and analysis;

• Determining the appropriateness of a model via scientific reasoning.

Data Analysis

Page 37: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

An Increased Emphasis on Pedagogy

and

A Broader Notion of Assessment

Of Student Accomplishment

Page 38: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

CRAFTY & College Algebra

Confluence of events:• Curriculum Foundations Report published• Large scale NSF project - Bill Haver, VCU• Availability of new modeling/application based texts

CRAFTY responded to a perceived need to address course and instructional models for College Algebra.

Page 39: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

CRAFTY & College Algebra

• Task Force charged with writing guidelines- Initial discussions in CRAFTY meetings- Presentations at AMATYC & Joint Math Meetings with public discussions- Revisions incorporating public commentary

• Guidelines adopted by CRAFTY (Fall, 2006)• Pending adoption by CUPM (Spring, 2007)

Copies (pdf) available athttp://www.mathsci.appstate.edu/~wmcb/ICTCM

Page 40: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

CRAFTY & College Algebra

The Guidelines:• Course Objectives College algebra through applications/modeling

Meaningful & appropriate use of technology

• Course GoalsChallenge, develop, and strengthen students’understanding and skills mastery

Page 41: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

CRAFTY & College AlgebraThe Guidelines:

• Student Competencies - Problem solving

- Functions and Equations- Data Analysis

• Pedagogy- Algebra in context- Technology for exploration and analysis

• Assessment- Extended set of student assessment tools- Continuous course assessment

Page 42: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

CRAFTY & College AlgebraChallenges

• Course development

- There are current models• Scale

- Huge numbers of students

- Extraordinary variation across institutions• Faculty development

- Who teaches College Algebra?

- How do we fund change?

Page 43: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

Conceptual Understanding

• What does conceptual understanding mean?

• How do you recognize its presence or absence?

• How do you encourage its development?

• How do you assess whether students have

developed conceptual understanding?

Page 44: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

What Does the Slope Mean?

Comparison of student response on the final exams in

Traditional vs. Modeling College Algebra/Trig

Brookville College enrolled 2546 students in 2000 and 2702 students in 2002. Assume that enrollment follows a linear growth pattern.

a. Write a linear equation giving the enrollment in terms of the year t.b. If the trend continues, what will the enrollment be in the year 2016?c. What is the slope of the line you found in part (a)? d. Explain, using an English sentence, the meaning of the

slope.e. If the trend continues, when will there be 3500 students?

Page 45: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

Responses in Traditional Class1. The meaning of the slope is the amount that is gained in years

and students in a given amount of time. 2. The ratio of students to the number of years. 3. Difference of the y’s over the x’s.4. Since it is positive it increases.5. On a graph, for every point you move to the right on the x-

axis. You move up 78 points on the y-axis.6. The slope in this equation means the students enrolled in

2000. Y = MX + B .7. The amount of students that enroll within a period of time.8. Every year the enrollment increases by 78 students.9. The slope here is 78 which means for each unit of time, (1

year) there are 78 more students enrolled.

Page 46: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

Responses in Traditional Class

10. No response11. No response12. No response 13. No response 14. The change in the x-coordinates over the change in the y-coordinates.15. This is the rise in the number of students.16. The slope is the average amount of years it takes to get 156

more students enrolled in the school.17. Its how many times a year it increases.18. The slope is the increase of students per year.

Page 47: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

Responses in Reform Class1. This means that for every year the number of students

increases by 78.2. The slope means that for every additional year the number of

students increase by 78.3. For every year that passes, the student number enrolled

increases 78 on the previous year.4. As each year goes by, the # of enrolled students goes up by 78.5. This means that every year the number of enrolled students

goes up by 78 students.6. The slope means that the number of students enrolled in

Brookville college increases by 78.7. Every year after 2000, 78 more students will enroll at

Brookville college.8. Number of students enrolled increases by 78 each year.

Page 48: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

Responses in Reform Class

9. This means that for every year, the amount of enrolled students increase by 78.

10. Student enrollment increases by an average of 78 per year.11. For every year that goes by, enrollment raises by 78

students.12. That means every year the # of students enrolled increases

by 2,780 students. 13. For every year that passes there will be 78 more students

enrolled at Brookville college.14. The slope means that every year, the enrollment of students

increases by 78 people.15. Brookville college enrolled students increasing by 0.06127.16. Every two years that passes the number of students which is

increasing the enrollment into Brookville College is 156.

Page 49: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

Responses in Reform Class

17. This means that the college will enroll .0128 more students each year.

18. By every two year increase the amount of students goes up by 78 students.19. The number of students enrolled increases by 78 every 2 years.

Page 50: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

Understanding Slope

Both groups had comparable ability to calculate the slope of a line. (In both groups, several students used x/y.)

It is far more important that our students understand what the slope means in context, whether that context arises in a math course, or in courses in other disciplines, or eventually on the job.

Unless explicit attention is devoted to emphasizing the conceptual understanding of what the slope means, the majority of students are not able to create viable interpretations on their own. And, without that understanding, they are likely not able to apply the mathematics to realistic situations.

Page 51: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

Further ImplicationsIf students can’t make their own connections with a concept as simple as the slope of a line, they won’t be able to create meaningful interpretations and connections on their own for more sophisticated mathematical concepts. For instance,

• What is the significance of the base (growth or decay factor) in an exponential function?

• What is the meaning of the power in a power function? • What do the parameters in a realistic sinusoidal model tell about the phenomenon being modeled? • What is the significance of the factors of a polynomial? • What is the significance of the derivative of a function? • What is the significance of a definite integral?

Page 52: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

Further Implications

If we focus only on manipulative skills

without developing

conceptual understanding,

we produce nothing more than students

who are only

Imperfect Organic Clones

of a TI-89

Page 53: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

Developing Conceptual Understanding

Conceptual understanding cannot be just an add-on.It must permeate every course and be a major focus

of the course.

Conceptual understanding must be accompanied by realistic problems in the sense of mathematical modeling.

Conceptual problems must appear in all sets of examples, on all homework assignments, on all project assignments, and most importantly, on all tests.

Otherwise, students will not see them as important.

Page 54: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

Should x Mark the Spot?All other disciplines focus globally on the entire universe of a through z, with the occasional contribution of through .

Only mathematics focuses on a single spot, called x.

Newton’s Second Law of Motion: y = mx,

Einstein’s formula relating energy and mass: y = c2x,

The ideal gas law: yz = nRx.

Students who see only x’s and y’s do not make the connections and cannot apply the techniques when other letters arise in other disciplines.

Page 55: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

Should x Mark the Spot?

Kepler’s third law expresses the relationship between the

average distance of a planet from the sun and the length

of its year.

If it is written as y2 = 0.1664x3, there is no suggestion of

which variable represents which quantity.

If it is written as t2 = 0.1664D3 , a huge conceptual

hurdle for the students is eliminated.

Page 56: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

Should x Mark the Spot?

When students see 50 exercises

where the first 40 involve solving for x, and

a handful at the end that involve other letters,

the overriding impression they gain is that x is the only

legitimate variable and the few remaining cases are just

there to torment them.

Page 57: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

Some Illustrative Examples of Problems

to Develop or Test for Conceptual Understanding

Page 58: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

Identify each of the following functions (a) - (n) as linear, exponential, logarithmic, or power. In each case, explain your reasoning.

(g) y = 1.05x (h) y = x1.05

(i) y = (0.7)t (j) y = v0.7

(k) z = L(-½) (l) 3U – 5V = 14

(m) x y (n) x y

0 3  0

5

1 5.1  1

7

2 7.2  2

9.8

3 9.3  3

13.7

Page 59: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

For the polynomial shown,(a) What is the minimum degree? Give two different reasons for your answer.(b) What is the sign of the leading term? Explain.(c) What are the real roots?(d) What are the linear factors? (e) How many complex roots does the polynomial have?

Page 60: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

Two functions f and g are defined in the following table. Use the given values in the table to complete the table. If any entries are not defined, write “undefined”.

x f(x) g(x) f(x) - g(x) f(x)/g(x) f(g(x)) g(f(x))

0 1 3        

1 0 1        

2 3 0        

3 2 2        

Page 61: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

Two functions f and g are given in the accompanying figure. The following five graphs (a)-(e) are the graphs of f + g, g - f, f*g, f/g,

and g/f. Decide which is which.

-1

1

0 1 2 3 4 5

(a)

-1.5

-1

-0.5

0

0.5

1

1.5

0 1 2 3 4 5

g(x)

f(x)

-2

0

2

0 1 2 3 4 5

(b)

-2

0

2

0 1 2 3 4 5

(c)

-10

-5

0

5

10

0 1 2 3 4 5

(d)

-10

-5

0

5

10

0 1 2 3 4 5

(e)

Page 62: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

The following table shows world-wide wind power generating capacity, in megawatts, in various

years.

Year 1980 1985 1988 1990 1992 1995 1997 1999

Windpower 10 1020 1580 1930 2510 4820 7640 13840

0

5000

10000

15000

1980 1985 1990 1995 2000

Page 63: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

(a) Which variable is the independent variable and which is the dependent variable?(b) Explain why an exponential function is the best model to use for this data.(c) Find the exponential function that models the relationship between power P generated by wind and the year t. (d) What are some reasonable values that you can use for the domain and range of this function?(e) What is the practical significance of the base in the exponential function you created in part (c)?(f) What is the doubling time for this exponential function? Explain what does it means. (g) According to your model, what do you predict for the total wind power generating capacity in 2010?

Page 64: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

Biologists have long observed that the larger the area of a region, the more species live there. The relationship is best modeled by a power function. Puerto Rico has 40 species of amphibians and reptiles on 3459 square miles and Hispaniola (Haiti and the Dominican Republic) has 84 species on 29,418 square miles.

(a) Determine a power function that relates the number of species of reptiles and amphibians on a Caribbean island to its area.

(b) Use the relationship to predict the number of species of reptiles and amphibians on Cuba, which measures 44218 square miles.

Page 65: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

The accompanying table and associated scatterplot give some data on the area (in square miles) of various Caribbean islands and estimates on the number species of amphibians and reptiles living on each.

Island Area N

Redonda 1 3

Saba 4 5

Montserrat 40 9

Puerto Rico 3459 40

Jamaica 4411 39

Hispaniola 29418 84

Cuba 44218 76

0

20

40

60

80

100

0 15000 30000 45000

Area (square miles)

Num

ber o

f Spe

cies

Page 66: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

(a) Which variable is the independent variable and which is the dependent variable?(b) The overall pattern in the data suggests either a power function with a positive power p < 1 or a logarithmic function, both of which are increasing and concave down. Explain why a power function is the better model to use for this data.(c) Find the power function that models the relationship between the number of species, N, living on one of these islands and the area, A, of the island and find the correlation coefficient. (d) What are some reasonable values that you can use for the domain and range of this function?(e) The area of Barbados is 166 square miles. Estimate the number of species of amphibians and reptiles living there.

Page 67: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

Write a possible formula for each of the following trigonometric functions:

Page 68: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

The average daytime high temperature in New York as a function of the day of the year varies between 32F and 94F. Assume the coldest day occurs on the 30th day and the hottest day on the 214th. (a) Sketch the graph of the temperature as a function of time over a three year time span.(b) Write a formula for a sinusoidal function that models the temperature over the course of a year.(c) What are the domain and range for this function?(d) What are the amplitude, vertical shift, period, frequency, and phase shift of this function?(e) Estimate the high temperature on March 15.(f) What are all the dates on which the high temperature is most likely 80?

Page 69: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

Some Conclusions

We cannot simply concentrate on teaching the mathematical techniques that the students need. It is as least as important to stress conceptual understanding and the meaning of the mathematics.

We can accomplish this by using a combination of realistic and conceptual examples, homework problems, and test problems that force students to think and explain, not just manipulate symbols.

If we fail to do this, we are not adequately preparing our students for successive mathematics courses, for courses in other disciplines, and for using mathematics on the job and throughout their lives.

Page 70: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

Functions

It is only in math classes that functions are given.

Everywhere else,

• The existence of functions is observed

• Formulas for functions are created

• Functions are used to answer questions about a context

Page 71: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

The Need for Real-World Problems

and Examples

Page 72: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

Realistic Applications and Mathematical Modeling

• Real-world data enables the integration of data analysis concepts with the development of mathematical concepts and methods

• Realistic applications illustrate that data arise in a variety of contexts

• Realistic applications and genuine data can increase students’ interest in and motivation for studying mathematics

• Realistic applications link the mathematics to what students see in and need to know for other courses in other disciplines.

Page 73: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

The Role ofTechnology

Page 74: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

The Role of Technology

• Technology allows us to do many standard topics differently and more easily.

• Technology allows us to introduce new topics and methods that we could not do previously.

• Technology allows us to de-emphasize or even remove some topics that are now less important.

Page 75: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

Technology: How?

• Students can use technology as a problem-solving tool to– Model situations and analyze functions

– Tackle complex problems

• Students can use technology as a learning tool to– Explore new concepts and discover new ideas

– Make connections

– Develop a firm understanding of mathematical ideas

– Develop mental images associated with abstract concepts

Page 76: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

Technology - Caution

• Students need to balance the use of technology and the use of pencil and paper.

• Students need to learn to use technology appropriately and wisely.

Page 77: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

Changing the Learning and Teaching Environment

Page 78: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

Traditional Approach vs. Student-Centered Approach

With a traditional approach, students• Listen to lectures

• Copy notes from the board

• Mimic examples

• Use technology to do calculations

• Do familiar problems in homework and on exams

• Fly through the material

• Hold instructor responsible for learning

• Go to instructor for help

Page 79: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

Traditional Approach vs. Student-Centered Approach

With a student-centered approach, students• Participate in discussions

• Work collaboratively

• Find solutions and approaches

• Use technology to investigate ideas

• Write about and use new ideas in homework and on exams

• Take time to think

• Accept responsibility for learning

• First try to help each other

Page 80: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

Student-Centered Learning: The Role of the Instructor

• The instructor– Designs activities– Emphasizes learning– Interacts with students– Approaches ideas from the student’s point of view– Controls the learning environment

• The instructor is a – Facilitator– Coach– Intellectual manager

Page 81: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

Student-Centered Learning: Intended Outcomes

• Impel students to be active learners• Make learning mathematics an enjoyable experience• Help students develop confidence to read, write and do

mathematics• Enhance students’ understanding of fundamental

mathematics concepts• Increase students’ ability to use these concepts in other

disciplines• Inspire students to continue the study of mathematics

Page 82: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

But, if college algebra and related courses change,

what happens to the next generation of math and science majors?

Don’t they need all the traditional algebraic skills?

But, if they don’t develop conceptual understanding and the ability to apply the mathematics, what value are the skills?

Page 83: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

The Link to Calculus

Page 84: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

Calculus and Related Enrollments

In 2000, about 676,000 students took Calculus, Differential Equations, Linear Algebra, and Discrete Mathematics

(This is up 6% from 1995)

Over the same time period, however, calculus enrollment has been steady, at best.

Page 85: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

Calculus and Related Enrollments

In comparison, in 2000, 171,400 students took one of the two AP Calculus exams – either AB or BC.

(This is up 40% from 1995)

In 2004, 225,000 students took AP Calculus exams

In 2005, about 240,000 took AP Calculus exams

Reportedly, about twice as many students take calculus in high school, but do not take an AP exam.

Page 86: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

AP Calculus

Students Taking AP Calculus Exam

0

50000

100000

150000

200000

1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003

Page 87: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

Some Implications

Today more students take calculus in high school than in college

And, as ever more students take more mathematics, especially calculus, in high school, we should expect:

• Fewer students taking these courses in college

• The overall quality of the students who take these courses in college will decrease.

Page 88: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

Another Conclusion

We should anticipate the day, in the not too distant future, when

college calculus, like college algebra,

becomes a semi-remedial course.

(Several elite colleges already have stopped giving credit for Calculus I.)

Page 89: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

Another Conclusion

It is not conscionable for departments to treat students as mathematical cannon-fodder, by pushing them into courses they have little hope of surviving in order to increase the number of sections of calculus that are offered.

Page 90: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

Associates Degrees in Mathematics

In 2002,

P There were 595,000 associate degrees

P Of these, 685 were in mathematics

This is one-tenth of one percent!

Page 91: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

Bachelor’s Degrees in Mathematics

In 2002,

PThere were 1,292,000 bachelor’s degrees

POf these, 12,395 were in mathematics

This is under one percent!

Page 92: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

Master’s Degrees in Mathematics

In 2002,

PThere were 482,000 master’s degrees

POf these, 3487 were in mathematics

This is 7 tenths of one percent!

Page 93: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

PhD’s Degrees in Mathematics

In 2002,

• There were 44,000 doctoral degrees

• Of these, 958 were in mathematics

This is just over two percent!

But less than half were U.S. citizens

Page 94: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

Who Are the Students?

Based on the enrollment figures, the students

who take college algebra and related courses

are not going to become mathematics majors.

They are not going to be majors in any of the

mathematics intensive disciplines.

Page 95: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

The Focus in these Courses

But most college algebra courses and certainly

all precalculus courses were designed to

prepare students for calculus and most of them

are still offered in that spirit.

Even though only a small percentage of the

students have any intention of going into

calculus!

Page 96: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

A Fresh Start for Collegiate MathematicsRethinking the Courses

Below Calculus MAA Notes, 2005

Nancy Baxter Hastings, et al(editors)

Page 97: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

A Fresh Start to Collegiate Math

Refocusing Precalculus, College Algebra, and Quantitative Literacy

Shelly GordonPreparing Students for Calculus in the Twenty-First

Century

Bernie Madison Preparing for Calculus and Preparing for Life

Don Small College Algebra: A Course in Crisis

Scott Herriott Changes in College Algebra

Janet AndersenOne Approach to Quantitative Literacy: Mathematics

in Public Discourse

The Transition from High School to CollegeZal Usiskin High School Overview and the Transition to College

Dan Teague Precalculus Reform: A High School Perspective

Eric Robinson &John Maceli

The Influence of Current Efforts to Improve School Mathematics on Preparation for Calculus

Page 98: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

A Fresh Start to Collegiate Math

The Needs of Other Disciplines

Susan Ganter and Bill Barker

Fundamental Mathematics: Voices of the Partner Disciplines

Rich West Skills versus Concepts

Allan RossmanIntegrating Data Analysis into Precalculus

Courses

Student Learning and Research

Florence Gordon

Assessing What Students Learn: Reform versus Traditional Precalculus and Follow-up Calculus

Rebecca WalkerStudent Voices and the Transition from

Standards-Based Curriculum to College

Page 99: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

A Fresh Start to Collegiate MathImplementati

onRobert

MegginsonSome Political and Practical Issues in Implementing

Reform

Judy AckermanImplementing Curricular Change in Precalculus: A

Dean's Perspective

Bonnie GoldAlternatives to the One-Size-Fits-All

Precalculus/College Algebra Course

Al CuocoPreparing for Calculus and Beyond: Some

Curriculum Design Issues

Lang Moore and David Smith Changing Technology Implies Changing Pedagogy

Shelly Gordon The Need to Rethink Placement in Mathematics

Influencing the Mathematics Community

Bernie MadisonLaunching a Precalculus Reform Movement:

Influencing the Mathematics Community

Naomi Fisher &Bonnie Saunders Mathematics Programs for the "Rest of Us"

Shelly GordonWhere Do We Go from Here: Forging a National

Initiative

Page 100: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

A Fresh Start to Collegiate Math

Ideas and Projects that Work (long papers)Doris

Schattschneider

An Alternate Approach: Integrating Precalculus into Calculus

Bill FoxCollege Algebra Reform through

Interdisciplinary Applications

Dan KalmanElementary Math Models: College Algebra

Topics and a Liberal Arts Approach

Brigette Lahme, Jerry Morris and Elias Toubassi The Case for Labs in Precalculus

Ideas and Projects that Work (short papers)

Gary Simundza The Fifth Rule: Experiential Mathematics

Darrell Abney and James Hougland

Reform Intermediate Algebra in Kentucky Community Colleges

Marsha Davis Precalculus: Concepts in Context

Page 101: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

A Fresh Start to Collegiate Math

Benny Evans Rethinking College Algebra

Sol Garfunkel From the Bottom Up

Florence Gordon & Shelly Gordon Functioning in the Real World

Deborah Hughes Hallett Importance of a Story Line Functions as a Model

Nancy Baxter Hastings

Using a Guided-Inquiry Approach to Enhance Student Learning in Precalculus

Allan Jacobs Maricopa Mathematics

Linda Kime Quantitative Reasoning

Mercedes McGowan

Developmental Algebra: The First Course for Many College Students

Allan Rossman Workshop Precalculus: Functions, Data and Models

Chris Schaufele & Nancy Zumoff The Earth Math Projects

Don Small Contemporary College Algebra

Page 102: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

A Fresh Start to Collegiate Math

Ernie Danforth, Brian Gray, Arlene Kleinstein, Rick Patrick and

Sylvia Svitak

Mathematics in Action: Empowering Students with Introductory and Intermediate College Mathematics

Todd SwansonPrecalculus: A Study of Functions and Their Applications

David WellsLynn Tilson

Successes and Failures of a Precalculus Reform Project

Page 103: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

The Need to RethinkPlacement

in Mathematics

Page 104: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

Rethinking Placement Tests

Two Types of Placement Tests:

1. National (standardized) testsNot much we can do about them.

2. Home-grown tests

Page 105: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

Rethinking Placement TestsFour scenarios:

1. Students come from traditional curriculum into traditional curriculum.

2. Students from Standards-based curriculum into traditional curriculum.

3. Students from traditional curriculum into reform curriculum.

4. Students from Standards-based curriculum into reform curriculum.

Page 106: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

One National Placement Test

1. Square a binomial.2. Determine a quadratic function arising from a verbal description (e.g., area of a rectangle whose sides are both linear expressions in x).3. Simplify a rational expression.4. Confirm solutions to a quadratic function in factored form.5. Completely factor a polynomial.6. Solve a literal equation for a given unknown.

Page 107: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

A National Placement Test

7. Solve a verbal problem involving percent.8. Simplify and combine like radicals.9. Simplify a complex fraction.10. Confirm the solution to two simultaneous linear equations.11. Traditional verbal problem (e.g., age problem).12. Graphs of linear inequalities.

Page 108: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

A Tale of Three Colleges in NYS

1. Totally traditional curriculum – developmental through calculus.

2. Traditional courses – developmental through college algebra, then reform in precalculus on up.

3. Totally reform – developmental through upper division offerings.

All use the same national placement test.

Page 109: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

A Tale of Three Colleges in NYS

BUTNew York State has not offered the traditional

Algebra I – Geometry – Algebra II – Trigonometry

curriculum in over 20 years!

Instead, there is an integrated curriculum that emphasize topics such as statistics and data analysis, probability, logic, etc. in addition to algebra and trigonometry.

Page 110: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

A Tale of Three Colleges in NYS

So students are being placed one, two, and even three semesters below where they should be based on the amount of mathematics they have studied!

And they are being punished: because of what is being assessed and what is not

being assessed, because of what was stressed in high school and what

was not stressed, because of what was taught, not what they learned or

didn’t learn.

Page 111: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

A Modern High School Problem

Given the complete 32-year set of monthly CO2 emission levels (a portion is shown below), create a mathematical model to fit the data.

Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Avg

1968 322 323 324 325 325 325 324 322 320 320 320 322 323

1969 324 324 325 326 327 326 325 323 322 321 322 324 324

Page 112: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

A Modern High School Problem1. Students first do a vertical shift of about 300 ppm and then fit an exponential function to the transformed data to get:

0.03923( ) 1.656 299.5tF t e

2. They then create a sinusoidal model to fit the monthly oscillatory behavior about the exponential curve

13.5sin 2 0.5

24S t t

3. They then combine the two components to get

0.03923 11.656 3.5sin 2 299

24tC t F t S t e t

4. They finally give interpretations of the various parameters and what each says about the increase in concentration and use the model to predict future or past concentration levels.

Page 113: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

Placement, Revisited

Picture an entering freshman who has taken high school courses with a focus on problems like the preceding one and who has developed an appreciation for the power of mathematics based on understanding the concepts and applying them to realistic situations.

What happens when that student sits down to take a traditional placement test? Is it surprising that many such students end up being placed into developmental courses?

Page 114: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

What a High School Teacher Said

“If you try to teach my students with the mistaken belief that they know the mathematics I knew at their age, you will miss a great opportunity. My students know more mathematics than I did, but it is not the same mathematics; and I believe they know it differently. They have a different vision of mathematics that would be helpful in learning calculus if it were tapped.”

Dan Teague

Page 115: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

Rethinking Placement Tests

What Can Be Done:

1. Home-grown tests:Develop alternate versions that reflect both your curriculum AND the different curricula that your students have come through.

2. National (standardized) testsContact the test-makers (Accuplacer – ETS and Compass – ACT) and lobby them to develop alternative tests to reflect both your curriculum and the different curricula that your students have come through.

Page 116: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

Why Students Take These Courses

The vast majority of students take college algebra and related courses because:• they are required by other departments or • they are needed to satisfy general education requirements

As a consequence, we have to pay attention to what the other disciplines want their students to gain from these courses.

Page 117: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

Connecting with Other Disciplines

All other disciplines are under pressure to teach

more material to their students, and that material

is much more than just the mathematical ideas

and applications.

If we do not provide courses that satisfy today’s

needs of the other disciplines, they are likely going

to drop the requirements for our courses and

include the needed material in their own offerings.

Page 118: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

Voices of the Partner Disciplines

CRAFTY’s Curriculum Foundations Project

Page 119: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

Curriculum Foundations Project

A series of 11 workshops with leading educators from 17 quantitative disciplines to inform the mathematics community of the current mathematical needs of each discipline.

The results are summarized in the MAA Reports volume: A Collective Vision: Voices of the Partner Disciplines, edited by Susan Ganter and Bill Barker.

Page 120: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

What the Physicists Said

• Conceptual understanding of basic mathematical principles is very important for success in introductory physics. It is more important than esoteric computational skill. However, basic computational skill is crucial.

• Development of problem solving skills is a critical aspect of a mathematics education.

Page 121: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

What the Physicists Said

• Courses should cover fewer topics and place increased emphasis on increasing the confidence and competence that students have with the most fundamental topics.

Page 122: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

What the Physicists Said

• The learning of physics depends less directly than one might think on previous learning in mathematics. We just want students who can think. The ability to actively think is the most important thing students need to get from mathematics education.

Page 123: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

What the Physicists Said

• Students should be able to focus a situation into a problem, translate the problem into a mathematical representation, plan a solution, and then execute the plan. Finally, students should be trained to check a solution for reasonableness.

Page 124: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

What the Physicists Said

• Students need conceptual understanding first, and some comfort in using basic skills; then a deeper approach and more sophisticated skills become meaningful. Computational skill without theoretical understanding is shallow.

Page 125: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

What Business Faculty Said

Mathematics is an integral component of the business school curriculum. Mathematics Departments can help by stressing conceptual understanding of quantitative reasoning and enhancing critical thinking skills. Business students must be able not only to apply appropriate abstract models to specific problems but also to become familiar and comfortable with the language of and the application of mathematical reasoning. Business students need to understand that many quantitative problems are more likely to deal with ambiguities than with certainty. In the spirit that less is more, coverage is less critical than comprehension and application.

Page 126: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

What Business Faculty Said

• Courses should stress problem solving, with the incumbent recognition of ambiguities.• Courses should stress conceptual understanding (motivating the math with the “why’s” – not just the “how’s”).• Courses should stress critical thinking.• An important student outcome is their ability to develop appropriate models to solve defined problems.

Page 127: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

What Business Faculty Said

• Courses should use industry standard technology (spreadsheets).

• An important student outcome is their ability to become conversant with mathematics as a language. Business faculty would like its students to be comfortable taking a problem and casting it in mathematical terms.

Page 128: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

What the Engineers Said

• One basic function of undergraduate electrical engineering education is to provide students with the conceptual skills to formulate, develop, solve, evaluate and validate physical systems. Mathematics is indispensable in this regard.

Page 129: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

What the Engineers Said

• The mathematics required to enable students to achieve these skills should emphasize concepts and problem solving skills more than emphasizing the repetitive mechanics of solving routine problems.

Page 130: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

What the Engineers Said

• Students must learn the basic mechanics of mathematics, but care must be taken that these mechanics do not become the focus of any mathematics course.

Page 131: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

What the Chemists Said

• Introduce multivariable, multidimensional problems from the outset

• Listen to the equations – most specific mathematical expressions can be recovered from a few fundamental relationships in a few steps.

• Of widespread use in chemistry teaching and research are spreadsheets to produce graphs and perform statistical calculations

Page 132: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

Health-Related Life Sciences

• Put special emphasis on the use of models as a way to organize information for the purpose of gaining insight and to provide intuition into systems that are too complex to understand any other way.

• Students should master appropriate computer packages, such as a spreadsheet, symbolic/numerical computational packages (Mathematica, Maple, Matlab), statistical packages.

Page 133: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

Common Themes from All Disciplines

• Strong emphasis on problem solving

• Strong emphasis on mathematical modeling

• Conceptual understanding is more important than skill development

• Development of critical thinking and reasoning skills is essential

Page 134: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

Common Themes from All Disciplines

• Use of technology, especially spreadsheets

• Development of communication skills (written and oral)

• Greater emphasis on probability and statistics

• Greater cooperation between mathematics and the other disciplines

Page 135: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

Some Implications

Although the number of college students taking calculus is at best holding steady, the percentage of students taking college calculus is dropping, since overall college enrollment has been rising rapidly.

But the number of students taking calculus in high school already exceeds the number taking it in college. It is growing at 8%.

Page 136: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

Some Implications

Few, if any, math departments can exist based solely on offerings for math and related majors. Whether we like it or not, mathematics is a service department at almost all institutions.

And college algebra and related courses exist almost exclusively to serve the needs of other disciplines.

Page 137: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

Some Implications

If we fail to offer courses that meet the needs of the students in the other disciplines, those departments will increasingly drop the requirements for math courses. This is already starting to happen in engineering.

Math departments may well end up offering little beyond developmental algebra courses that serve little purpose.

Page 138: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

What Can Be Removed?

How many of you remember that there used to be something called the Law of Tangents?

What happened to this universal law?

Did triangles stop obeying it?

Does anyone miss it?

Page 139: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

What Can Be Removed?

• Descartes’ rule of signs

• The rational root theorem

• Synthetic division

• The Cotangent, Secant, and Cosecant

were needed for computational purposes;

Just learn and teach a new identity:

22 1

cos1 tan

xx

Page 140: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

How Important Are Rational Functions?

• In DE: To find closed-form solutions for several differential equations, (usually done with CAS today, if at all)

• In Calculus II: Integration using partial fractions–often all four exhaustive (and exhausting) cases

• In Calculus I: Differentiating rational functions

• In Precalculus: Emphasis on the behavior of all kinds of rational functions and even partial fraction decompositions

• In College Algebra: Addition, subtraction, multiplication, division and especially reduction of complex fractional expressions

In each course, it is the topic that separates the men from the boys! But, can you name any realistic applications that involve rational functions? Why do we need them in excess?

Page 141: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

New Visions of College Algebra

• Crauder, Evans and Noell: A Modeling Alternative to College Algebra

• Herriott: College Algebra through Functions and Models • Kime and Clark: Explorations in College Algebra • Small: Contemporary College Algebra

Page 142: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

New Visions for Precalculus

• Gordon, Gordon, et al: Functioning in the Real World: A Precalculus Experience, 2nd Ed

• Hastings & Rossman: Workshop Precalculus

• Hughes-Hallett, Gleason, et al: Functions Modeling Change: Preparation for Calculus

• Moran, Davis, and Murphy: Precalculus: Concepts in Context

Page 143: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

New Visions for Alternative Courses

• Bennett: Quantitative Reasoning• Burger and Starbird: The Heart of Mathematics: An Invitation to Effective Thinking • COMAP: For All Practical Purposes • Pierce: Mathematics for Life• Sons: Mathematical Thinking

Page 144: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

How Does the Quantitative Literacy

InitiativeRelate to College

Algebra?

Page 145: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

What is Quantitative Literacy?

Quantitative literacy (QL), or numeracy, is the knowledge and habits of mind needed to understand and use quantitative measures and inferences necessary to function as a responsible citizen, productive worker, and discerning consumer.

QL describes the quantitative reasoning capabilities required of citizens in today's information age -- from the QL Forum White Paper

Page 146: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

QL and the Mathematics Curriculum

• In high school, the route to competitive colleges.• The sequence is linear and hurried.• No time to teach mathematics in contexts.• Courses are routes to somewhere else.• Other sequences are terminal and often second rate.

The focus of the math curriculum is the geometry-algebra-trigonometry-calculus

sequence.

Page 147: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

Elements of QL

• Confidence with mathematics

• Cultural appreciation

• Interpreting data• Logical thinking• Making decisions

• Mathematics in context

• Number sense• Practical skills• Prerequisite

knowledge• Symbol sense

Page 148: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

Two Kinds of Literacy

• Inert - Level of verbal and numerate skills required to comprehend instructions, perform routine procedures, and complete tasks in a routine manner.

• Liberating - Command of both the enabling skills needed to search out information and power of mind necessary to critique it, reflect upon it, and apply it in making decisions.

Lawrence A. Cremins, American Education: The Metropolitan Experience 1876-1980. New York: Harper & Row, 1988. (as quoted by R. Orrill in M&D)

Page 149: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

How does the US compare to other countries?

Page 150: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

NALS Quantitative Paradigm National Adult Literacy Survey

Skill Level 1 - Minimal

Approximate Educational Equivalence - Dropout

NALS Competencies - Can perform a single, simple arithmetic operation such as addition. The numbers used are provided and the operation to be performed is specified.

NALS Examples - Total a bank deposit entry

Page 151: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

NALS Quantitative Paradigm

Skill Level 2 - BasicApproximate Educational Equivalence - Average or below average HS graduate

NALS Competencies -Can perform a single arithmetic operation using numbers that are given in the task or easily located in the material. The arithmetic operation is either described or easily determined from the format of the materials.

NALS Examples - Calculate postage and fees for certified mail- Determine the difference in price between tickets for two shows- Calculate the total costs of purchase from an order form

Page 152: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

NALS Quantitative ParadigmSkill Level 3 - CompetentApproximate Educational Equivalence -Some postsecondary educationNALS Competencies -Can perform tasks where two or more numbers are needed to solve the problem and they must be found in the material. The operation(s) needed can be determined from the arithmetic relation terms used in the question or directive.NALS Examples - Use a calculator to calculate the difference between the regular and sale price- Calculate miles per gallon from information on a mileage record chart - Use a calculator to determine the discount from an oil bill if paid within 10 days

Page 153: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

NALS Quantitative ParadigmSkill Level 4 - AdvancedApproximate Educational Equivalence -Bachelor’s or advanced degreeNALS Competencies -Can perform two or more operations in sequence or a single operation in which the quantities are found in different types of displays, or where the operations must be inferred from the information given or from prior knowledge.NALS Examples- Determine the correct change using information in a menu-Calculate how much a couple would receive from Supplemental Security Income, using an eligibility pamphlet- Use information stated in a news article to calculate the amount of money that should go to raising a child

Page 154: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

NALS Quantitative ParadigmSkill Level 5 - SuperiorApproximate Educational Equivalence -High achieving college-educated populationsNALS Competencies -Can perform multiple operations sequentially, and can also find the features of problems embedded in text or rely on background knowledge to determine the quantities or operations needed.NALS Examples- Use a calculator to determine the total cost of carpet to cover a room- Use information in a news article to calculate the difference in time for completing a race- Determine shipping and total costs on an order form for items in a catalog

Page 155: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

Source: USDOE, NCES, National Adult Literacy Survey, 1992, in Literacy in the Labor Force: Results from the NALS, September 1999, p. 61.

Many College Graduates Demonstrate Weak Quantitative Literacy Skills

Grads:2 Yr. Colleges

Grads:4 Yr. Colleges

Level 5: High 5 13

Level 4 30 40

Level 3 44 40

Level 2 17 10

Level 1: Low 4 3

Page 156: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

Quantitative Literacy and Job Opportunity, 1998-2008

Quantitative

Skill Level

Mathematical Literacy Level

15% of the Labor Force

9% of New Jobs, 1998-2008 1998 Earnings: $20,300

12% of All Jobs in 2008

(Below Average H. S. Graduate) 24% of the Labor Force

21% of New Jobs, 1998-2008 1998 Earnings: $25,500

24% of All Jobs in 2008

35% of the Labor Force

36% of New Jobs, 1998-2008 1998 Earnings: $31,600

37% of All Jobs in 2008

Minimal(Dropout)

Basic

Competent

(Some Postsecondary)

Advanced/Superior(Bachelor’s Degree)

26% of the Labor Force

33% of New Jobs, 1998-2008 1998 Earnings: $45,40027% of All Jobs in 2008

Source: National Adult Literacy Survey; Current Population Survey; Bureau of Labor Statistics Employment Projections, 1998-2008.

Page 157: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

Where Does College Algebra Fit In?

QL is something that should permeate the entire mathematics curriculum, so that every student develops these skills.

The one existing course that provides the best opportunity to stress QL is college algebra:• It has the largest enrollment• It does not prepare or motivate large numbers of students to go on to calculus• It is taken to prepare students for courses in other disciplines, and the themes of QL are the mathematical topics needed in most other disciplines today.

Page 158: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

SomeSample

Programs

Page 159: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

A Sample Program

Page 160: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

A Sample Program

Page 161: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

A Sample Program

Page 162: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

The Challenges to Be Faced

Page 163: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

The Challenges Ahead

• Convincing the math community

1. Conducting a series of extensive tracking studies to determine how many (or how few) students who take these courses actually go on to calculus.

2. Identifying and highlighting “best practices” in programs that reflect the goals of this initiative.

Page 164: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

CRAFTY’s Demonstration Project

All 1800 MAA Liaisons were asked if their departments would be interested in participating in a planned pilot/research proposal.

Within 6 days, 211 departments indicated that they were interested in seriously considering this possibility.

Page 165: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

CRAFTY’s Demonstration Project

Eleven colleges and universities were selected to participate.

Each agreed to offer multiple pilot sections of modeling based college algebra courses as well as control sections in order to determine the effectiveness of these approaches.

Page 166: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

CRAFTY’s Demonstration Project

University of Arizona

Essex Community College

Florida Southern University

Harrisburg Area Community College

Mesa State University

Missouri State University

North Carolina A&T

University of North Dakota

University of South Carolina

South Dakota State University

Southeastern Louisiana University

Page 167: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

CRAFTY’s Demonstration Project

The 11 institutions agreed to pilot sections of college algebra with the following features:

• Course organized around mathematical modeling; • Students assigned long-term project(s); • Students assigned work to be completed in collaboration

with other students; • Graphing calculators and/or computer utilities utilized

throughout; • Algebraic skills deemed as critical will be maintained, but

deemphasized.

Page 168: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

The Research Component

The following data is being collected:

• Grades;

• Retention information;

• Performance on common test items;

• Student retention and grades in subsequent courses

Page 169: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

Preliminary Findings

• 10 of 11 institutions offered sections as planned;

• Great variation in extent to which planned features were incorporated;

• Persistence in modeling sections was greater overall;

• Institutions requested more professional development.

Page 170: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

Still To Be Determined

• Performance on common exams;

• Performance in future courses.

Page 171: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

The Challenges Ahead

2. Convincing college administrators to support (academically and financially) efforts to refocus the courses below calculus.

Page 172: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

What Can Administrators Do?

When the University of Michigan wanted to change to calculus reform, including going from large lectures of 800 students to small classes of 20 taught by full-time faculty, the department argued to the dean that by saving only 2% of the students who fail out because of calculus, the savings to the university would exceed the $1,000,000 annual additional instructional cost. The dean immediately said “Go for it.”

Page 173: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

What Can Administrators Do?

At Stony Brook University, all faculty applying for promotion or tenure must supply evidence documenting significant achievement in instructional innovation in addition to research and service achievements. The message is a strong signal that a major research university places a strong value on students’ education and the undergraduate curriculum.

Page 174: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

What Can Administrators Do?

At Farmingdale State University of New York, all faculty who were involved in a major NSF project to promote interaction between mathematics and other quantitative fields were rewarded with merit pay increases. These activities were also counted highly in promotion and tenure decisions.

Page 175: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

The Challenges Ahead

3. Convincing academic bodies outside of mathematics to allow alternatives to traditional college algebra courses to fulfill general education requirements.

Page 176: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

An Example: Georgia

The state education department in Georgia had a mandate for general education that every student must take college algebra. A group of faculty from various two and four year colleges across the state lobbied for years until they finally convinced the state authorities to allow a course in mathematical modeling at the college algebra level to serve as an alternative for satisfying the Gen Ed math requirement.

Page 177: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

The Challenges Ahead

4. Convincing the testing industry to begin development of a new generation of placement and related tests that reflect the NCTM Standards-based curricula in the schools and the kinds of refocused courses below calculus in the colleges that we hope to being about.

Page 178: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

The Challenges Ahead

5. Gaining the active support of a wide variety of other disciplines that typically require college algebra in the effort to refocus the courses below calculus.

• CRAFTY and MAD (Math Across the Disciplines) committee have launched a second round of Curriculum Foundations workshops to address this issue.

Page 179: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

The Challenges Ahead

6. Gaining the active support of representatives of business, industry, and government in this initiative.

• Discussions are underway about revisiting some of the participants in the Forum on Quantitative Literacy.

Page 180: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

The Challenges Ahead

7. Creating a faculty development program to assist faculty, especially part time faculty and graduate TA’s, to teach the new versions of these courses.

This is a major focus of CRAFTY’s demonstration project and AMATYC is planning to extend its Traveling Workshop program to encompass this.

Page 181: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

The Challenges Ahead

8. Influencing teacher preparation programs to rethink the courses they offer to prepare the next generation of teachers in the spirit of this initiative.

This would better prepare prospective teachers to teach classes that are more attuned to the spirit of the NCTM Standards.

Page 182: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

The Challenges Ahead

9. Developing a regional network through the MAA sections and the AMATYC affiliates to influence the local mathematics communities and to provide support at the local and regional levels to faculty and departments who seek to change these courses.

Page 183: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

The Challenges Ahead

10. Influencing funding agencies such as the NSF to develop new programs that are specifically designed to promote both the development of new approaches to the courses below calculus and the widespread implementation of existing “reform” versions of these courses.

Page 184: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

Influencing the Funding Agencies

The NSF recently requested the MAA and the other national societies to provide guidance about possible program efforts that would promote both the development of new approaches to algebra at all levels and the widespread implementation of existing “reform” versions of these algebra courses.

Page 185: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

• Annually 650,000 to 750,000 college students enroll in College Algebra.

• Less than 10% of the students who enroll in College Algebra intend to prepare for technical careers and a much smaller percentage end up entering the workforce in technical fields.

• Nationwide more than 45% of students enrolled in College Algebra either withdraw or receive a grade of D or F.

What is known about College Algebra?

Page 186: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

What is known about College Algebra?• When given an opportunity, faculty from other disciplines

and representatives from business, industry, and commerce have consistently called for mathematics departments to make a major change in the content of College Algebra.

• The curriculum committees of national mathematics

organizations have uniformly called for replacing the current college algebra course with one in which students address problems presented as real world situations by creating and interpreting mathematical models.

Page 187: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

What is known about College Algebra?

• With support from NSF, a large number of exemplary materials have been developed and put in place, although on a very small scale. The materials address the areas stressed by faculty from other disciplines and representatives from industry and the student success rate has increased.

Page 188: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

Based upon what is known concerning college algebra, the working group proposes an eight-year program of four million dollars a year that would produce a dramatic change in college algebra nationwide.

Primary Recommendations to NSF

Page 189: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

It is recommended that the NSF offer extended change programs to large numbers of institutions.

Each participating institution would engage in a four year implementation project that would include participation in an initial workshop followed by on-going mentoring, site visits, faculty development activities, material and curriculum development, presentations, publications and research.

Large Scale Program to Enable Institutions to Refocus College Algebra

Page 190: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

It is recommended that NSF fund two or three in-depth, multi-year, longitudinal research projects to study all aspects of the development and implementation of refocused college algebra with an emphasis on determining the impact of well-designed and well-supported refocused college algebra courses on student achievement and understanding.

Research on Impact of Refocused College Algebra on Student Learning

Page 191: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

It is recommended that NSF provide support to projects that would provide departments and individual instructors with resources (electronic and video) to enable and equip them to teach re-focused college algebra.

Electronic Library of Exemplary College Algebra Resources

Page 192: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

It is recommended that NSF fund a long-term project to prepare and maintain a national resource database that would include (summary) information on funded projects, textbooks, research articles, etc. An evaluation component of the database related to retention and other student successes is recommended. This could be based on a TIMSS-like model.

National Resource Database on College Algebra

Page 193: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

Concluding Thoughts

For years, we have used the

metaphor of the mathematics

curriculum being a pipeline.

But what is a pipeline?

Page 194: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

Concluding Thoughts

Picture the Alaska pipeline that carries oil

from Prudhoe Bay to Valdez.

Every drop of oil lost en route is a valuable

commodity that is, at best, a complete loss,

and at worst, a potential threat to the

environment.

Page 195: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

Concluding Thoughts

Do we really want to view the roughly 1,000,000

students who take college algebra and related

courses each year and do not end up majoring

in one of the SMET fields as a complete loss?

Maybe the pipeline metaphor has outlived its

usefulness!

Page 196: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

Concluding Thoughts

The pipeline metaphor causes us to apply a

very negative psychological image to the

overwhelming majority of our students.

In turn, it leads many of us to think of the

courses we offer to these students as second-

class courses for students who are not

important to the mathematical enterprise.

Page 197: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

Concluding Thoughts

The pipeline analogy is wrong!

The students who “leak out” are not losses. They

are simply going into other fields that require less

math or even different math.

That is the psychological image that this pipeline

metaphor causes us to apply to the overwhelming

majority of our students.

Page 198: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

A Better Metaphor

Picture a river, particular one in the southwest.

Very little of the water from the headwaters ever reach its end; many of these rivers eventually peter out and all that remains are dry stream beds.

But the water that doesn’t make it all the way downstream is diverted to irrigate huge areas and has been used to bring the desert to life.

Page 199: Refocusing the Courses Below Calculus A Joint Initiative of MAA, AMATYC & NCTM

A Better Metaphor

What a wonderful metaphor for how we should view our students.

Those who only take college algebra or statistics or finite mathematics should not be thought of as losses; they should be thought of as valuable commodities who, with the right emphases in these courses, can irrigate all these other fields and enrich them by bringing the value of mathematics to bear.