1

REFERENCIAS

Aczel, P. (1988) Non-Well-Founded Sets. CSLI Lecture Notes 14, Stanford: CSLI

Publications.

Anscombe, G.E.M., (1971) [1959], An Introduction to Wittgenstein's Tractatus, University

of Pennsylvania Press.

Audi, Robert, (1983), “The Application of Conceptual Analysis” en Jonathan Dancy y

Ernest Sosa (eds.), A Companion to Epistemology, Oxford: Blackwell, 326-8.

Azzouni, Jody, (1998) “On “On what there is””, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, vol. 79,

No. 1, pp. 1-18.

(1994), Metaphysical Myths, Mathematical Practice, Cambridge: Cambridge

University Press.

Balaguer, Mark, (2005), “Indexical Propositions and De Re Belief Ascriptions,” Synthese,

146 (3) , pp. 325-355.

(2004), "Platonism in Metaphysics", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy

(Summer 2004 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = http://plato.stanford.edu/

archives/sum2004/entries/platonism/

Balzer, Wolfgang & C. Ulises Moulines (eds.), (1996) Structuralist Theory of Science,

Focal Issues, New Results, (Perspectives in Analytical Philosophy, 6) Walter de

Gruyter, Berlin.

Barceló, Axel, (2008a) “Patrones Inferenciales”, Crítica. vol. 40, No. 120 , pp. 3-35.

(2008b) “Los Enfoques Analítico y Sintético de las Funciones Lógicas”, en Silvio

Pinto (ed.), Bertrand Russell y el Análisis Filosófico a partir de “On Denoting”,

UAM-Iztapalapa, México. Pp. 203-228.

(2007), “De la Interpretación”, en Adolfo García de la Sienra (ed.), La Pradoja de

Orayen, Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas, UNAM.

2

(2004), “Sobre la Idea Misma de Análisis Semántico: Sobre “Tres Métodos de

Análisis Semántico”, de Max Fernández de Castro”, Signos Filosóficos, vol. VI, no.

12. Pp. 9-32.

(2003), “Grammatical Necessity in Wittgenstein’s Middle Period”, en Jesús Padilla-

Galvez (ed.) Wittgenstein, from a New Point of View. Número Especial de la Revista

Wittgenstein-Studien, 6, 47-66.

(2001) “A Circular Logic for Computational Semantics.” Carlos Zozaya et. al. (eds.)

Memoria del 3er Encuentro Internacional de Ciencias de la Computación, ENC01.

Sociedad Mexicana de Ciencias de la Computación / Instituto Nacional de

Estadística, Geografía e Informática. Pp. 793-802.

(en prensa a) “The Birth of Formal Objects”, en Sébastien Maronne (ed.), Essays in

Honor of Henk Bos, Collegiate Publications, Londres.

(en prensa b) “Subsentential Logical Form”, Crítica.

Barwise, Jon y Gerard Allwein, (1993), Working Papers on Diagrams and Logic, Indiana

University Logic Group Preprint No. IULG-93-24.

Barwise, Jon y Jerry Seligman, (1997), Information Flow: The Logic of Distributed

Systems, Cambridge University Press.

Barwise, Jon y Lawrence Moss, (1991) “Hypersets”, Mathematical Intelligencer, no. 13.

Pp. 31-41.

(1996) Vicious Circles. On the Mathematics of Non-wellfounded Phenomena,

Stanford: CSLI

Barwise, Jon, (1993), “Heterogenous Reasoning”, en Barwise y Allwein (1993), pp. 1-13.

Bealer, George, (1998), “Universals and Properties”, en Stephen Laurence y Cynthia

Macdonald (eds.), Contemporary Readings in the Foundations of Metaphysics,

Blackwell, Oxford.

3

Beaney, Michael, (2007), The Analytic Turn: Analysis in Early Analytic Philosophy and

Phenomenology, Londres, Routledge.

(2003), "Analysis", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2003

Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/

sum2003/entries/analysis/>.

(2002) “Decompositions and Transformations: Conceptions of Analysis in the Early

Analytic and Phenomenological Traditions”, Southern Journal of Philosophy 40

(volúmen sumplementario). Pp. 53-99.

Béziau, J.Y., (2001), “Sequents and Bivaluations”, Logique et Analyse 176, pp. 373-394.

Berkeley, George, (1710), Principles of Human Knowledge, Renascence Editions, The

University of Oxford, 1999. URL = <http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~rbear/

berkeley.html>

Bermúdez, José Luis, (2007), “Negation, Contrariety, and Practical Reasoning: Comments

on Millikan’s Varieties of Meaning”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research,

75 (3): 663-669.

Beuchot, Mauricio, (1991), La Filosofía del Lenguaje en la Edad Media, 2a edición,

corregida y aumentada, México: UNAM.

Block, Ned y Robert Stalnaker (1999) “Conceptual Analysis, Dualism, and the Explanatory

Gap,” Philosophical Review 108, 1–46.

Blumson, Ben, (2009), “Defining Depiction”, The British Journal of Aesthetics, 49(2):

143-157.

Boghossian, Paul, (1997), “Analyticity”, en A Companion to the Philosophy of Language,

Bob Hale y Chripsin Wright (eds.), Oxford: Blackwell, 331–68.

(1996), "Analyticity Reconsidered", Noûs 30, pp. 360-92.

Boghossian, Paul y Christopher Peacocke (eds.), (2001), New Essays on the a-priori,

Oxford University Press.

4

Bonjour, Laurence, (1998) In Defense of Pure Reason: A Rationalist Account of Apriori

Justrification, Oxford : Clarendon ; New York : Oxford University.

Boolos, George, (1984), "To be is to be the value of a variable (or to be some values of

some variables)." Journal of Philosophy, 81, pp. 430-449.

Bradley, Francis Herbert (1893), Appearance and Reality: A Metaphysical Essay, S.

Sonnenschein & Company.

Braithwaite, Richard Bevan, (1926), "Universals and the Method of Analysis," Aristotelian

Society Supplementary Volume VI, pp. 27-38.

Brandom, Robert, (2001), Articulating Reasons: An Introduction to Inferentialism, Harvard

University Press.

Brentano, Franz, (1995) Psychology from an Empirical Standpoint, segunda edición,

traducida al ingles por A.C. Rancurello, D.B. Terrell, y L. McAlister, introducción

de Peter Simons, London: Routledge.

Brouwer, Luitzen Egbertus (1975), Collected Works 1. Philosophy and Foundations of

Mathematics, Arend Heyting (ed.), Amsterdam: North-Holland.

Brown, James Robert, (2008), Philosophy of Mathematics: An Introduction to the World of

Proofs and Pictures, segunda edición, Routledge.

Brown, J. A., (1998), “Natural Kind Terms and Recognitional Capacities”, Mind, 107, pp.

275-303

Burgess, John P. And Gideon Rosen (1997) A Subject with no Object: Strategies for

Nominalistic Interpretation of Mathematics: Strategies for Nominalistic

Interpretation of Mathematics, Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Burgess, John P., (2004) “Quine Analyticity and Philosophy of Mathematics”, The

Philosophical Quarterly, vol. 54, no. 214, pp.38-55

(2005) “Nominalism Reconsidered” en S. Shapiro, (ed.), Handbook for the

Philosophy of Mathematics, Oxford University Press.

5

(2004), Reseña de Deflating existential consequence: a case for Nominalism de

Jody Azzouni, Bulletin of Symbolic Logic, vol. 10, pp. 573-4.

Cappelen, Herman & John Hawthorne, (2008), Relativism and Monadic Triuth, Oxford:

Oxford University Press.

Carnap, Rudolf, (2000), Untersuchungen zur allgemeinen Axiomatik, Darmstadt: Wissen-

schaftliche Buchgesellschaft.

(1967), The Logical Structure of the World and Pseudoproblems in Philosophy,

traducido al inglés por R. George, Berkeley: Universityof California Press.

(1950) 'Empiricism, Semantics and Ontology' Revue Internationale de Philosophie,

4: 20-40. Reimpreso como suplemento a (1956)

(1956), Meaning and Necessity: A Study in Semantics and Modal Logic, enlarged

edition, University of Chicago Press.

(1928), Der Logische Aufbau der Welt. (Leipzig: Felix Meiner Verlag).

Carey, Susan (1985). Conceptual Change in Childhood. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Crane, Tim, (2009), “Is Perception a Propositional Attitude?”, Philosophical Quarterly 59

(236): 452-469.

(2008), "The Problem of Perception", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy

(Fall Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.),

URL = <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2008/entries/perception-problem/>.

Crane, Tim y Katalin Farkas, (2004), Metaphysics: A Guide and Anthology, Oxford: Oxford

University Press.

Corry, Leo, (2004), Modern Algebra and the Rise of Mathematical Structures, Basel:

Birkhauser.

(2001), “Mathematical Structures from Hilbert to Bourbaki: The Evolution of an

Image of Mathematics” in Umberto Bottazzini and Amy Dahan Dalmedico,

6

Changing Images in Mathematics. From the French Revolution to the New

Millenium, London; Routledge, pp. 167-185.

Davidson, Donald, (1984), Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation, Oxford: Oxford

University Press.

De Donato, Xavier, (2005), Idelaization and the Growth of Physics: A Contribution to the

Methodology of Science, disertación doctoral, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität,

Munich.

DeMan, Paul, (1990), “Semiología y Retórica” en Alegorías de la Lectura, Barcelona,

Lumen, 15-33.

Derrida, Jacques, (1989), La Deconstrucción en las Fronteras de la Filosofía: La Retirada

de la Metáfora, Paidós / I.C.E. – U.B.A., Barcelona.

Dummett, Michael, (1991), Frege: Philosophy of Mathematics, Cambridge: Harvard

University Press.

(1981), The Interpretation of Frege’s Philosophy, Cambridge: Harvard University

Press.

(1973), Frege: Philosophy of Language, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Eco, Umberto (1988), “El Anti-Porfirio”, en Gianni Vattimo y Pier Aldo Rovatti (eds.), El

Pensamiento Débil, Cátedra, Madrid, pp. 76-144.

Elklund, Matti, (1996), “On How Logic Became First-Order“, Nordic Journal of

Philosophical Logic, 1, 147-67.

Enderton, H. (1987), Una Introducción Matemática a la Lógica, México D.F., Instituto de

Investigaciones Filosóficas, UNAM.

Estrada, Luis, (en prensa), Estudio Crítico de Maite Ezcurdia (compiladora), Orayen: de la

forma lógica al significado, Dianoia.

Etchemendy, John, (1999), The Concept of Logical Consequence, CSLI, Stanford.

7

Evans, Gareth, (1981), “Understanding Demonstratives,” en H. Parret y J. Bouveresse

(eds.), Meaning and Understanding, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, 280-303.

Ezcurdia, Maite y Olbeth Hansberg, (2003) “Sensaciones, Conciencia Fenoménica y los

Límites de la Explicación”, introducción a Ezcurdia y Hansberg comps. (2003) pp.

5-44.

Comps. (2003), La Naturaleza de la Experiencia: Vol. 1 Sensaciones, UNAM,

México.

Fernández de Castro, Max, (2004), Quine y la Ontología Abstracta, Biblioteca de Signos

Filosóficos, México, D.F.

Ferreirós, José, (2007), Labyrinth of Thought: A History of Set Theory and Its Role in

Modern Mathematics, segunda edición, Birkhäuser, Basel.

Field, Hartry, (1980). Science Without Numbers. Oxford: Blackwell.

(1989) “Realism and Anti-Realism about Mathematics” en Realism, Mathematics

and Modality. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 53-78.

(2001), Truth and the Absence of Fact, Oxford: Blackwell.

Fine, Kit, (2007), Semantic Relationism, Oxford: Blackwell.

(2003), "The Role of Variables," Journal of Philosophy, vol. 50, no. 12, 605-631.

Fodor, Jerry & Ernest Lepore, (1992), Holism, A Shopper's Guide (Oxford: Blackwell).

Forbes, G., (1987), “Indexicals and Intensionality: A Fregean Perspective,” The

Philosophical Review, 96: 3-31.

Frege, Gottlöb, (1919), “The Thought: A Logical Inquiry,” reimpreso en Essays on Frege,

E.D. Klemke (ed.), Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press, 1968, 507-35.

(1892), “Über Sinn und Bedeutung.” traducido por H. Feigl al inglés cómo “On

Sense and Nominatum,” en A.P. Martinich (ed.), The Philosophy of Language,

Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990.

8

(1884), Der Grundlagen die Arithmetik, traducido al ingles por J.L. Austin cómo

The Foundations of Arithmetic, Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1953.

(1996), “Sobre concepto y objeto” en Escritos Filosóficos, Jesús Mosterín (Ed.),

Barcelona: Grijalbo Mondadori-Crítica, 207-22.

(1879) Begriffsschrift, eine der arithmetischen nachgebildete Formelsprache des

reinen Denkens, Verlag von L. Nebert, Halle.

Friedman, Michael, (2001), Dynamics of Reason: The 1999 Kant Lectures at Stanford

University, CSLI Pub, Stanford, California.

(1990), “Kant on Concepts and Intuitions in the Mathematical Sciences.” Synthese

no. 84, pp. 213-57.

Gadamer, Hens-Georg, (1988), Verdad y método: Fundamentos de una hermenéutica

filosófica, Sígueme, Salamanca.

Gamut, L.T.F. (J. van Benthem, J. Groenendijk, D. de Jongh, M. Stokhof y H. Verkuyl),

(1993), Logic Language and Meaning, vol. 2 “Intensional Logic and Logical

Grammar”, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

Geach, P. T. (1950), “Subject and Predicate”, Mind 59, 461-82.

(1975), “Names and Identity” en S. Guttenplan (ed), Mind and Language, Oxford:

Clarendon Press, pp. 139-58.

Gentzen, Gerhard (1935), “Untersuchungen über das logische Schlieen”, Mathematische

Zeitschrift, 39:176-210, 405-431.

Gödel, Kurt, (1964), “Russell’s Mathematical Logic”, en Paul Benacerraf y Hilary Putnam

(eds.), Philosophy of Mathematics: Selected Readings, pp.470–85, Cambridge:

CambridgeUniversityPress.

Goldfarb, Warren D., (1979), “Logic in the Twenties: The Nature of the Quantifier”,

Journal of Symbolic Logic, 44, 351-368.

9

Gómez-Torrente, Mario, (manúscrito), “The Sorites, Linguistic Preconceptions, and the

Dual Picture of Vagueness”, en R. Dietz y S. Moruzzi (eds.), Cuts and Clouds.

Essays in the Nature and Logic of Vagueness, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

(2000), Forma y Modalidad. Una Introducción al Concepto de Consecuencia

Lógica, EUDEBA, Buenos Aires.

Gopnik, Alison & A. N. Meltzoff (1997) Words, thoughts, and theories. Cambridge, Mass.:

Bradford, MIT Press.

Grattan-Guinness, Ivor (2000), The Search for Mathematical Roots 1870-1940: Logics, Set

Theories, and the Foundations of Mathematics from Cantor through Russell to

Gödel. Princeton Univ. Press.

Groarke, Leo, (1996), “Logic, Art and Argument”, Informal Logic, vol. 18, Nos. 2&3, pp.

105-129.

Hacker, P. M. S., (2006), “Passing by the Naturalistic Turn: On Quine’s Cul-de-Sac”,

Philosophy, 81, 231-253.

Hacking, Ian (1983), Representing and Intervening. Cambridge: Cambridge University

Press.

Hale, Robert, (1987), Abstract Objects, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.

Harman, Gilbert, (1999), Reasoning, Meaning, and Mind, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

(1987), "(Non-Solipsistic) Conceptual Role Semantics," in E. Lepore, ed., New

Directions in Semantics, London: Academic Press: 55-81.

(1986) Change in View: Principles of Reasoning. Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press/

Bradford Books.

10

Hartmann, Stephan (1995), “Models as a Tool for Theory Construction: Some Strategies of

Preliminary Physics”, en Herfel, William, Wladiyslaw Krajewski, Ilkka Niiniluoto

and Ryszard Wojcicki (eds.), Theories and Models in Scientific Process. (Poznan

Studies in the Philosophy of Science and the Humanities 44.) Amsterdam: Rodopi.

Pp. 49-67.

Hart, William D., (1990), “Clarity,” en The Analytic Tradition, ed. David Bell and Neil

Cooper, Oxford, Blackwell, 197–222.

Heidegger, Martin, (1968), What is Called Thinking?, Harper & Row, Nueva York.

Heim, I., and Kratzer, A., (1998), Semantics in Generative Grammar, Oxford: Blackwell

Publishing.

Hellman, Geoffrey, (1989), Mathematics without Numbers, Oxford: Oxford University

Press.

(2001), “On Nominalism”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, vol. 62,

pp. 691—705.

Hertzberg, Lars, (2006), “On Excluding Contradictions from Our Language”, Acta

Philosophica Fennica, 80, pp.169-183.

Hilbert, David, (1926), "Über das Unendliche", Mathematische Annalen, 95,pp. 161-90.

Conferencia dada en Münster el 4 de Junio de 1925.

(1899), “Grundlagen der Geometrie”, Festschrift zur Feier der Enthüllung des

Gauss-Weber-Denkmals in Göttingen, 1–92.

Humberstone, I.L., (1996), “Intrinsic/Extrinsic,” Synthese, 108 (2): 205-67.

Hume, David, (1978), A Treatise of Human Nature, segunda edición, Oxford: Oxford

University Press.

Hurtado, Guillermo, (1998), Proposiciones Russellianas, IIFs/UNAM, México.

Jackson, Frank, (1998), From Metaphysics to Ethics: A Defense of Conceptual Analysis,

Oxford: Clarendon Press.

11

(1986), “What Mary Didn’t Know”, The Journal of Philosophy, 83 (5), pp. 291-295,

traducido por Laura Manríquez como “Lo que María no sabía” en Ezcurdia y

Hansberg (2003) pp. 111-118.

Joachim, Harold H., (1906), The Nature of Truth; An Essay. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Kanamori, Akihiro (2003), “The Empty Set, the Singleton, and the Ordered Pair”, The

Bulletin of Symbolic Logic, 9 (3), pp. 273-298.

(1996), “The Mathematical Development of Set Theory from Cantor to Cohen”, The

Bulletin of Symbolic Logic, 2 (1), pp. 1-71.

Kant, Emmanuel, (1988), Crítica de la Razón Pura, 2a edición, Alfaguara, Madrid.

Original de 1787.

Kaplan, David, (1989), “Demonstratives”, en Almog, Joseph, John Perry & Howard

Wettstein (eds.) Themes From Kaplan, New York, Pp. 481-563

Katz, Jerrold, (2004), Sense, Reference, and Philosophy. Oxford.

(1998), Realistic Rationalism, Boston: MIT Press.

(1992), “The New-Intensionalism”, Mind. 101: 689-719

Keil, Frank C., (1989), Concepts, Kinds and Cognitive Development, Cambridge, The

MIT Press.

Kennedy, C., & McNally, L., (2005), “Scale structure and the semantic typology of

gradable predicates”, Language, vol. 81, no. 2, pp. 345–381.

Kitcher, Philip, (1984), The Nature of Mathematical Knowledge, Oxford: Oxford

University Press.

Kleiner, Israel (1989) “Evolution of the Function Concept; A Brief Survey”, The College

Mathematical Journal, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 282-300.

Klement, Kevin, (2005), "Russell's Logical Atomism", The Stanford Encyclopedia of

Philosophy (Winter 2005 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <http://

plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2005/entries/logical-atomism/>.

12

Kment, B. (2006) “Counterfactuals and the Analysis of Necessity,” Philosophical

Perspectives 20, 237–302.

Kripke, Saul A., (1980), Naming and Necessity, Oxford: Blackwell and Cambridge:

Harvard University Press.

(1982), Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language : An Elementary Exposition,

(New York: Harvard).

Khun, Thomas, (1971), La Estructura de las Revoluciones Científicas, Fondo de Cultura

Económica, México.

Kurtonina, Natasha & Maarten De Rijke, (1997), “Simulating without Negation”, Journal

of Logic and Computation, 7(4): 501-522.

Lapointe, Sandra (2002) “Substitution: An Additional Conception of Analysis in the Early

Analytic and Phenomenological Traditions?: On Beaney”, in T. Hogan et al. Spindel

Conference 2001. Origins: The Common Sources of the Analytic and

Phenomenological Traditions, The Southern Journal of Philosophy, vol. XL,

Suplement. Pp. 1011-13.

Laurence, Stephen y Eric Margolis, (1999) “Concepts and Cognitive Science” en Margolis

& Laurence (eds.) Concepts: Core Readings, Boston: MIT Press/Bradford Books,

Pp. 3-81.

Levine, James (2002), “Analysis and Decomposition in Frege and Russell”, The

Philosophical Quarterly, vol. 52, no. 207, Pp. 195-216.

Lewis, David, (1970), “General Semantics”, Synthese, vol. 22, no. 1/2, version castellana

de Alejandro Herrera en Cuadernos de Crítica, no. 29, 1981.

Livingston, Paul, (2006), “Philosophical Analysis in the Twentieth Century – A Review”,

Inquiry, 40 (3), pp. 290-311.

(2004), Philosophical History and the Problem of Consciousness, Cambridge

University Press, Cambridge.

13

Locke, John, (1980), Ensayo sobre el Entendimiento Humano, dos volúmenes, Madrid:

Editorial Nacional.

Lowe, E. J., (2002), A Survey of Metaphysics, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

Luzin, N. (1998) “Function: Part I” in Abe Shenitzer (ed. y trad.) “The Evolution of . . .”

American Mathematical Monthly, pp. 59-67. Republicado en Abe Shenitzer & John

Stillwell (eds.) Mathematical Evolutions, Mathematical Association of America/

Spectrum, 2001

Lynch, Michael y Steve Woolgar, editors, (1990), Representation in Scientific Practice,

Cambridge: The MIT Press.

MacBride, Fraser, (2005a), “The Particular–Universal Distinction: A Dogma of

Metaphysics?”, Mind, 114 (455), pp. 565-61.

(2005b) 'Ramsey on Universals' in H. Lillehammer & D.H. Mellor (eds), Ramsey's

Legacy. (Cambridge University Press, 2005), pp. 83-104.

(1998), “Where are Particulars and Universals?”, Dialectica,52, pp. 203-27.

(2001), “Four New Ways to Change Your Shape”, Australasian Journal of

Philosophy, 79, pp. 81-9.

MacFarlane, John, (2005), “Making Sense of Relative Truth,” Proceedings of the

Aristotelian Society 105, 321–39.

Maddy, Penelope, (1990), Realism in Mathematics, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

(1997), Naturalism in Mathematics, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Mancosu, Paolo, Richard Zach & Calixto Badesa, (2004), “The Development of

Mathematical Logic from Russell to Tarski: 1900–1935”, en Leila Haaparanta (ed.),

The Development of Modern Logic. New York and Oxford: Oxford University

Press.

Margolis, Eric & Stephen Laurence (eds.), (1999), Concepts: Core Readings, The MIT

Press.

14

McCarty, David (1998) “Intuitionism”, Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, vol. 4. pp.

846-853.

Mendell, Henry, (2004) "Aristotle and Mathematics", The Stanford Encyclopedia of

Philosophy (Summer 2004 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <http://

plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2004/entries/aristotle-mathematics/>.

Mill, Stuart, (1843), A System of logic, Londres: Longmans, Green and Company.

Mills, E., (2008), “Are Analytic Philosophers Shallow and Stupid?”, The Journal of

Philososphy, vol. 105, no. 6, pp. 301-319.

Millikan, Ruth, (2000), On Clear and Confused Ideas: An Essay about Substance Concepts,

Cambridge University Press.

(2004), Varieties of Meaning; The 2002 Jean Nicod Lectures, (Boston: MIT Press).

Moore, G. E., (1997), “Las Clases de Wittgenstein durante el periodo 1930 – 1933”, en

Wittgenstein (1997), pp. 69-140.

(1919-20), “External and Internal Relations”, Proceedings of the Aristotelian

Society, 20, 40-62.

Murphy, Gregogy L. (2002). The Big Book of Concepts. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Nagel, Ernest, (1979), “The Formation of Modern Conception of Formal Logic in the

Development of Geometry” en Teleology Revisited and Other Essays in the

Philosophy and History of Science, Nueva York, Columbia University Press.

Orayen, Raúl, (1989) Lógica, Significado y Ontología, México D.F., Instituto de

Investigaciones Filosóficas, UNAM.

(1976) “Verdad Lógica y Significado”, with English summary by José Antonio

Robles, Crítica, vol. VIII, no. 22. Pp. 11-43

Otte, Michael & Marco Panza eds., (1997), Analysis and Synthesis in Mathematics: History

andPhilosophy, Springer Verlag,.

15

Panza, Marco, (en prensa), “Ante Rem Structuralism and Neo-Fregean Platonism:What

Should Count as a Substantial Response to Benacerraf’s Dilemma?”

(2007), “What is new and what is old in Viète's analysis restituita and algebra nova,

and where do they come from? Some reflections on the relations between algebra

and analysis before Viète “, Revue d’Histoire des mathématiques, 13, 83–153.

(2006), “François Viète, between analysis and cryptanalysis”, Studies in History and

Philosophy of Sciences, 37, pp. 269-289.

Paseau, Alexander, (2005), “Naturalism in Mathematics and the Authority of Philosophy”,

Brittish Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 56, 377-396

Pataut, Fabrice (2001), “Una Perspectiva Anti-Realista sobre: Lenguaje, Pensamiento,

Lógica e Historia de la Filosofía Analítica (Entrevista con Michael Dummett)”,

Tópicos, 8/9, 129-162.

Peacocke, Christopher, (2004), Christopher Peacocke, The Realm of Reason. Oxford:

Oxford University Press.

(1981), “Demonstrative Thought and Psychological Explanation,” Synthese 49:

187-217.

Peregrin, Jaroslav (2000), “Fregean Logic and Russellian Logic”, Australasian Journal of

Philosophy, vol. 78, no. 4, pp. 557-574

Pereira, Fernando C. N. & Stuart M. Shieber, (1987), Prolog and Natural-Language

Analysis, CSLI Lecture notes No. 10, Stanford University.

Pickering, Barbara & Randall Lake, (1995) "Refutation in Visual Argument: An

Exploration," en van Eemeren R. Grootendorst, JA Blair, & CA Willard (eds.),

Reconstruction and Application, Vol. III of the Proceedings of the Third

International Conference on Argumentation, Amsterdam: Sic Sat.

Pratt, Scott L., (2009), Logic: Inquiry, Argument, and Order, John Wiley and Sons.

16

Puntel, Lorenz B., (2002), “The Concept of Ontological Category: A New Approach”, en

Richard M. Gale (ed.), The Blackwell Guide to Metaphysics, Blackwell, Oxford.

Pp. 110-130.

Putnam, Hilary, (1975), Mind, Language and Reality: Philosophical Papers, Volume Two.

Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Quine, W. v. O., (1981a), “Things and Their Place in Theories” en Theories and Things,

Cambridge: Harvard University Press, pp. 1-23

(1981b), "Five Milestones of Empiricism," en Theories and Things, Cambridge:

Harvard University Press, 71. Original de 1975.

(1976), “Posits and Reality” en The Ways of Paradox, editción revisada, Cambridge,

MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 246-254. Original de 1955.

(1960), “On what there is” en From a Logical Point of View: Nine Logico-

Philosophical Essays, segunda edición, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press,

pp. 1-19. Original de 1948.

(1951) “Two Dogmas of Empiricism”, The Philosophical Review, 60, pp. 20-43,

reimpreso en (1953) y revisado para la edición de (1961).

(1953) From a Logical Point of View (Harvard University Press; segunda edición

revisada en 1961)

Radder, Hans (2002), “How Concepts both Structure the World and Abstract from it”, The

Review of Metaphysics, no. 55. pp. 581–613.

Raley, Ivonne, (2005) “Ontological Naturalism”, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, vol. 86,

no. 2, pp. 284-294.

Ramsey, Frank Plumpton, (1925), “Universals”, Mind, 34 (136), pp. 401-417.

(1931), “The Foundations of Mathematics” en The Foundations of Mathematics and

other Logical Essays (New York: Harcourt, Brace and Co., 1931)

Ramsey, William, (1992), “Prototypes and Conceptual Analysis”, Topoi, 11: 59-70.

17

Randall A. Lake & Barbara A. Pickering, (1998), "Argumentation, the Visual, and the

Possibility of Refutation: An Exploration", Argumentation, 12 (1), 79-93.

Rayo, Agustín, (2003), “Success by Default?”, Philosophia Mathematica, 11(3), pp.

305-322.

(manúscrito) “An Account of Possibility”

Reisch, G.A., (2005), How the Cold War transformed Philosophy of Science: To the Icy

Slopes of Logic, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Resnik, Michael, (1997), Mathematics as a Science of Patterns, Oxford: Oxford University

Press.

(1980), Frege and the Philosophy of Mathematics, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

Restall, Greg, (2009), “Truth Values and Proof Theory”, Studia Logica, 92 (2), 241-264.

Ricoeur, Paul, (1974), The Conflict of Interpretations: Essays in Hermeneutics,

Northwestern University Press, Chicago.

Rosch, Eleanor, (1978), “Principles of Categorization”, en E. Rosch & B. Lloyd (eds.),

Cognition and Categorization. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp.

27-48.

(1975), “Cognitive Representation of Semantic Categories”, Journal of

Experimental Psychology, 104, pp. 192-233.

Rosch, Eleanor, & Carolyn Mervis, (1975), “Family Resemblances: Studies in the Internal

Structure of Categories”, Cognitive Psychology, 7, pp. 573-605.

Rosen, Gideon, (2006), "Abstract Objects", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy

(Spring 2006 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <http://plato.stanford.edu/

archives/spr2006/entries/abstract-objects/>.

(1999), Estudio Crítico de Naturalism in Mathematics de Penelope Maddy, British

Journal for the Philosophyof Science

18

Russell, Bertrand, (1919), Introduction to Mathematical Philosophy, London: George Allen

and Unwin; New York: The Macmillan Company.

(1905) “On Denoting”, Mind 14. Pp. 479-493.

(1907) “The Monistic Theory of Truth" en Philosophical Essays, London,

Longmans, (1910). Pp. 131-46

(1911) "Le Réalisme analytique", tradudcido al ingles como "Analytic Realism," en

Russell on Metaphysics, ed. S. Mumford. London, Routledge, (2003). Pp. 91-96.

(1914) “Logic in Mathematics” en Posthumous Writings. Pp. 203-250

(1918), The Philosophy of Logical Atomism, editado por David Pears (Open Court,

1985)

(1919), Introduction to Mathematical Philosophy, (Dover, 1993)

(1937), The Principles of Mathematics, 2nd edition, Cambridge University Press.

Sandin, Per, (2006), “Has Psychology debunked Conceptual Analysis?”, Metaphilosophy,

37 (1), pp. 26-33.

Schaffer, John, (2007), “Knowing the Answer”, Philosophy and Phenomenological

Research, 75 (2), 383 – 403.

Searle, John, (1997), Actos de Habla, Cátedra, Madrid.

Shapiro, Stewart, (1997), Philosophy of Mathematics; Structure and Ontology, Oxford:

Oxford University Press.

(2000), Thinking about Mathematics: The Philosophy of Mathematics, Oxford:

Oxford University Press.

Shiff, Richard, (2002), “Expression: Natural, Personal, Pictorial”, en Paul Smith y Carolyn

Wilde (eds.), A Companion to Art Theory, Blackwell, 159-172.

Shoesmith, D. J. & Timothy John Smiley, (1987), Multiple-conclusion logic, Cambridge:

Cambridge Univ. Press.

19

Sider, Ted, (2003) “Reductive Theories of Modality”, en M. J. Loux & D. W. Zimmerman,

(eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Metaphysics, Oxford University Press, pp. 180-208.

Smith, A. D., (2005), “Natural Kind Terms: A Neo-Lockean Theory”, European Journal of

Philosophy, v. 13, n. 1, pp.70-88.

Smith, Edward & Douglas L. Medin, (1981), Categories and Concepts, Harvard University

Press, Cambridge, Mass.

Soames, Scott, (2005), Reference and Description: The Case Against Two-Dimensionalism,

Princeton University Press

(2003), Philosophical Analysis in the Twentieth Century, dos volúmenes, Princeton

University Press, Princeton.

Solomon, Karen O., Douglas L. Medin & Elizabeth Lynch, (1999), “Concepts do more than

Categorize”, Trends in Cognitive Science, 3 (3), 99 - 104.

Stalnaker, Robert, (1987), "Semantics for Belief" in Philosophical Topics Volume XV, No.

1, pp.177-190.

(1988), "Belief Attribution and Context" in Grimm and Merrill (eds.) Contents of

Thoughts, Tucson : University of Arizona Press.

Stanford, P. K. y P. Kitcher, (2000), “Refining the Causal Theory of Reference for Natural

Kind Terms”, Philosophical Studies 97, pp. 99-129.

Stanley, Jason, (2008), “Philosophy of Language” en Dermont Moran (ed.) The Routledge

Companion to XXth Century Philosophy, Routledge. Pp. 382-437.

(2002), “Making it Articulated”, Mind & Language, 17 (1 - 2), 149–168.

Strawson, Peter Frederick (1959), Individuals, An Essay in Descriptive Metaphysics,

Routledge: Londres.

(1950), “On Referring”, Mind 59, pp. 320-344.

Tarski, Alfred, (1965), Introduction to Logic and the Methodology of Deductive Science,

New York, Oxford University Press.

20

(1936), “On the Concept of Logical Consequence”, en Alfred Tarski, (1956), Logic,

Semantics, Metamathematics, Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp. 409 - 420.

(1933), “The Concept of Truth in the Languages of the Deductive Sciences",

versión extendida en inglés en Logic, Semantics, Metamathematics; Papers from

1923 to 1938, editado por John Corcoran, (Indianapolis : Hackett Publishing

Company, 1983) 152-278.

Tennant, Neil (2000) “What is Naturalism in Mathematics, Really?”, Philosophia

Mathematica (3), vol. 8, pp.316-338.

Tomasini, Alejandro, (2003), “Russell y Wittgenstein sobre Contradicciones y Paradojas”,

en Estudios Sobre las Filosofías de Wittgenstein, (México: Plaza y Váldes) 77-92.

Torretti, Roberto, (1978), Philosophy of Geometry from Riemann to Poincaré, Holanda,

Reidel.

Tye, Michael, (1991), The Imagery Debate, Cambridge, MIT Press.

Van Benthem, Johan, (manúcscrito) “Where is Logic going , and should it?”, a aparecer en

E. Bencivenga (ed.) What is to be done in Philosophy?.

(2003), “Logic and the Dynamics of Infomration”, Minds and Machines, 13 (4),

503-519.

Vattimo, Gianni y Pier Aldo Rovatti (eds.), El Pensamiento Débil, Cátedra, Madrid.

Wagner, Steven J. & Richard Warner, (2003), Introducción a Naturalism: A Critical

Appraisal, University of Nortre Dame, Nortre Dame.

Waismann, Friedrich, (1979), Wittgenstein and the Vienna Circle, conversations recorded

by Friedrich Waismann, ed., B. McGuinness, trans. J. Schulte and B. McGuinness,

Harper and Row.

Williams, Timothy, (2000), Knowledge and its Limits, Oxford University Press

(2007), The Philosophy of Philosophy, Oxford: Blackwell.

Wimsatt, William. (1987), “False Models as Means to Truer Theories”, in N. Nitecki and A.

Hoffman(eds.), Neutral Models in Biology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 23-55.

21

Winsberg, Eric (2001), “Simulations, Models and Theories: Complex Physical Systems and

their Representations”, Philosophy of Science 68 (Proceedings): 442-454.

Winther, Rasmus, (manuscrito), “Abstraction and Deduction”

Wisdom, John. (1934), Problems of Mind and Matter, Cambdridge, Cambridge University

Press.

Wittgenstein, Ludwig, (1992), Gramática Filosófica (Philosophische Grammatik) Edición

Bilingüe (Español y Alemán). Traducida por Luis Felipe Segura del texto editado

por Rush Rhees. (Mexico: Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas, Universidad

Nacional Autónoma de México).

(1977) Remarks on Color. Editado y traducido por G. E. M. Anscombe (Cambridge:

MIT Press).

(1975) Philosophical Remarks. Editado por Rush Rhees. Traducido por Raymond

Hargeaves y Roger White (Oxford: Basil Blackwell).

(1976), Lectures in the Philosophy of Mathematics, cambridge 1939: From the

notes of R. G. Bosanquet, Norman Mlcolm, Rush Rhees and Yorick Smythies.

Editado por Cora Diamond, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

(1983) Remarks on the Foundations of Mathematics. Editado por G. H. von Wright,

R. Rhees, G. E. M. Anscombe. Traducido por G. E. M. Anscombe (Cambridge:

MIT Press).

(1997a), Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Edición Bilingüe (Español y Alemán).

Traducida por Jacobo Muñoz e Isidoro Reguera. (Madrid: Alianza Editorial).

(1997b), Ocasiones Filosóficas. 1912-1951. Editado por James C. Klagge & Alfred

Nordmann. Traducido por Ángel García Rodríguez, (Madrid: Cátedra).

(1997c) Observaciones Filosóficas. Edición Bilingüe (Español y Alemán).

Traducida por Alejandro Tomassini, compulsada con el texto alemán por Marlene

Zinn, Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de

México, México D.F.

22

(1929), “Some Remarks on Logical form”, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society,

Supplementary Volume, vol. 9: 162–71, traducido como “Algunas observaciones

sobre la forma lógica” en Wittgenstein (1997), pp. 46-54.

(1988) Investigaciones Filosóficas, edición bilingüe alemán/español, traducida por

Alfonso García Suárez y Ulises Moulines de la edidción de G. E. M. Anscombe y R.

Rhees, Barcelona: Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas, Universidad Nacional

Autónoma de México / Crítica, 1988.

Wright, Crispin (2001) ‘On Basic Logical Knowledge”, Philosophical Studies, no. 106. Pp.

41-85

(1999), “Is Hume’s Principle Analytic?”, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 40

(1), pp. 6–30.

(1983), Frege's Conception of Numbers as Objects, Aberdeen, Scotland: Aberdeen

University Press

(1992), Truth and Objectivity, Cambridge, Harvard Univeristy Press.

Yablo, Stephen (1998), “Does ontology rest on a mistake?” Proceedings of the Aristotelian

Society, supplement. vol. 72, 229-261.

Young, Michael J., (1982), “Kant on the Construction of Mathematical Concepts”, Kant-

Studien 73: 17-46.