REF 2014 Briefing Professor Edmund Burke Dr John Rogers May 2013.
-
Upload
brandon-byrd -
Category
Documents
-
view
218 -
download
0
description
Transcript of REF 2014 Briefing Professor Edmund Burke Dr John Rogers May 2013.
REF 2014 Briefing
Professor Edmund BurkeDr John Rogers
May 2013
This briefing will cover:• Quality standard set for inclusion in
submissions• Intended Units of Assessment • Update on decision making process• Most importantly, your questions
“The 2014 REF marks a key performance milestone for the University's overallStrategic Plan.”
Strategic Objectives for 2014 REF• Upper quartile by overall quality rating• Overall Grade Point Average of 2.85 or higher• At least 20% 4*, 50% 3* and the remainder 2*• Demonstrate research impact (20% of grade)• Demonstrate research environment (15%)• Critical mass: upper quartile by volume in
many areas (at UoA level)• Increase in SFC quality related funding
Upper quartile cut off
Stirling 56th (of 132); 23rd of 33 in Q2Second quartile cut off
In the 2001 RAE, Stirling was 43rd out of 136 HEIs and 9th in the second quartile. In 2008…
Why quality matters:• Exceptionally competitive operating environment• Selective policy and funding focus on highest
level of research excellence • Reputation drives further success:
– Staff and student recruitment– Investment from funders– Attraction of partners and collaborators– Global position and recognition
The importance of 4* in fundingScenario profiles Weight Weighted Average Quality Weight Grade Point Average
Funding League Table
4* 5 15 20 30 3 15 45 60 90 4 20 60 80 120
3* 10 30 50 60 1 10 30 50 60 3 30 90 150 180
2* 45 35 30 10 0 0 0 0 0 2 90 70 60 20
1* 40 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 40 20 0 0
100 100 100 100 Sum 25 75 110 150 Sum 180 240 290 320
/100 0.25 0.75 1.10 1.50 /100 1.80 2.40 2.90 3.20
Ratio 1.00 3.00 4.40 6.00 1.00 1.33 1.61 1.78
Plus additional SFC funding for 4* only in 2013-14…
Volume: 2008 RAE by UoA
Quality and volume: How will the sector change?“Fears that historically low numbers of researchers will be submitted to the 2014 REF have abounded ever since the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills instructed the Higher Education Funding Council for England, at the end of 2010, to confine quality-related funding to ‘internationally excellent research’".
Times Higher Education, 20 Sept 2012
Key decisions• Senior Management Team considered at
length during February residential meeting• Unanimous view to focus on quality profile and
reputation• Critical mass in all UoAs submitted to also
important• Decisions by University Strategy and Policy
Group (USPG)
Output quality:
The quality of the portfolio of research outputs presented by a member of eligible staff in order to meet the standard required for inclusion in a REF 2014 submission is a Grade Point Average (GPA) of 2.75 or higher.
Units of AssessmentNumber Title
A3 Allied Health Professions, Dentistry, Nursing and PharmacyA4 Psychology, Psychiatry and NeuroscienceA6 Agriculture, Veterinary and Food ScienceB7 Earth Systems and Environmental ScienceB11 Computer Science and InformaticsC19 Business and Management StudiesC20 LawC22 Social Work and Social PolicyC25 EducationC26 Sports and Exercise Sciences, Leisure and TourismD29 English Language and LiteratureD30 HistoryD32 PhilosophyD36 Communication, Cultural and Media Studies
And possibly C17 Geography, Environmental Studies and ArchaeologyC21 Politics and International Studies
Decision Making Process• For inclusion of eligible staff in submissions:
– Governed by Court approved Code of Practice– REF Assessment Committee makes
recommendations to the Principal– Decisions made by Principal, advised by
USPG– All decisions must be made by 15 November– In practice, most will be taken earlier
Decision Making Process• To optimise the submissions made by the
University– Led by Deputy Principal for Research– Informed by research reviews– Ongoing discussion with Heads of School – Regular discussion by USPG – Final decisions by Principal, advised by
USPG
Current progress• Additional research reviews, following on from
2012 exercise, underway• Initial consideration of all eligible staff by REF
Assessment Committee undertaken (April)• No recommendations made yet, in order to
ensure best possible information is available to support the decision-making process
• Update provided by email to all academic staff on 14 May
Further information• Individual email communication with academic
staff as process continues• Full REF information via staff portal (under
both Working at Stirling and Research tabs)• Email Helpline: [email protected]
Questions?