Re+$e%$$and$the$infrared$value$of$the$QCD$coupling$constant$sites.ifi.unicamp.br/qcd-tnt4/files/2015/08/natale.pdf ·...
Transcript of Re+$e%$$and$the$infrared$value$of$the$QCD$coupling$constant$sites.ifi.unicamp.br/qcd-tnt4/files/2015/08/natale.pdf ·...
!Re+$e%$$and$the$infrared$value$of$the$QCD$coupling$constant$
$
!!!!A.$A.$Natale$IFT/Unesp$%$UFABC$
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$! $$$$$$$$$
$$$$$$$$1)$Phenomenology$and$$the$IR$QCD$coupling$!$$$$$$$$2)$SDE$and$an$infrared$finite$QCD$coupling$!$$$$$$$$3)$Re+$e%$$$$$$$$$$4)$“Smearing“$$$Re+$e%$$$$$$$$$$$$5)$Conclusion$$!
John!Gomez!&!AN!
1)$Phenomenology$and$$the$IR$QCD$coupling!
Strong$interacOon$at$low$energies$$ Models$
Evidences$for$a$finite$coupling:$
1) Jet$shapes$observables$→$α(0)$≈$0.63$$!!!!!!!!!!!!!![Dokshitzer,!Weber,...!PLB!352!(1995)451,!Nucl.Phys.B!469(1996)93]!!2) Quarkonium$potenOal$models$→α(0)$≈$0.6$!!!!!!!!!!!![Godfrey,!Isgur,!PRD!32(1985)189;!Eichten!et!al.!PRL!34(1975)369;!PRD!21(1980)203;!...]!!3) Optmized$perturbaOon$theory$(Re+$e%)$→α(0)$≈$0.8$!!!!!!!!!!!![MaUngly!and!Stevenson,!PRL!69(1992)1320,!PRD!49(1994)437]!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
4) Quarkonium$fine$structure$→$α(0)$≈$0.4$$$$$$$$$$$$$$[$Badalian,$Simonov,$Baker,...PRD$60(1990)116008,$PRD$62(2000)094031]$$5) QCD%inspired$models$(total$hadronic$cross$secOons)$→$α(0)$≈$0.5$!!!!!!!!!!![Block,!Halzen,!Margolis,!Pancheri,...!PRD!45(1992)!839;!PRD!60(1999)054024]!!6) Unpolarized$proton$structure$funcOon$→$α(0)$≈$0.4$–$0.56$!!!!!!!!!!![Courtoy,!LiuZ,!PLB!726(2013)320]!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!●!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!●!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!●!!
HERA$data$→$“...$fronOer$between$perturbaOve$and$non%perturbaOve$physics$$$$$$$$$$$$$may$occur$at$relaOvely$small$momenta....”$!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!![E.!Levin!and!I.!Potashnikova,!JHEP!1402(2014)089]!
TheoreZcal!arguments:!
FuncOonal$Schrodinger$equaOon$$$$$$$$$α(0)$≈$0.5$!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!![J.!Cornwall,!PRD!76(2007)025012]!!Gribov$papers$on$confinement$$$$$$$α(0)$≈$0.44$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$[see!Eur.Phys.J.!C!10(1999)91]!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!●!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!●!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!●!!
QCD$%%$If$any$dynamical$mass$scale$is$generated$for$the$gluons$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$(or...$scale$in$the$gluon$propagator)$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$→$the$coupling$freezes$in$the$IR$$!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!![Aguilar,!Silva,!AN,!PRL!90(2003)152001]!
Laice$QCD$and$Schwinger%Dyson$equaOons$$$$$consistent$with$IR$finite$gluon$propagator$
→$non%perturbaOve$IR$fixed$point$
2)$SDE$and$an$infrared$finite$QCD$coupling!
SDE$+$Pinch$Technique$→$gauge$invariant$soluOons$for$propagators$and$verOces$!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!![Cornwall,!Aguilar,!Binosi,!Papavassiliou,!et!al....!......!......!......!]!
an$effecOve$infrared$finite$QCD$charge:$
12
222
02 )]
)(4ln(4[)( −
Λ
+=
QCD
gs
QmQQ πβα
Cornwall,!PRD!26(1982)1453!
m$g$$=$500$MeV$→$ρ1$=$4.5$$,$$ρ2$=$%2$$$m$g$$=$600$MeV$→$ρ1$=$2.2$$,$$ρ2$=$%1.25$$$$$
1
2
2222
02 ))(,(ln4)(
−
""#
$
%%&
'
(()
*++,
-
Λ
+=
QCD
qmqhqq πβα
evoluOon$of$the$SDE$calculaOon....$
Aguilar,!Binosi,!Papavassiliou,!Quintero,!PRD!80(2009)085018!
)()()())(,( 222
24
222
1222
qmqqmqmqmqh
++= ρρ
simple$approximaOon$for$αs$$
12
222
02 )]
)(ln(4[)( −
Λ
+=
QCD
gs
QmQQ
ρπβα
$$$$$ρ$→$3$–$4$phenomenology!Courtoy,!LiuZ,...!
22
422 )(
g
gg mQ
mQm
+≈
Aguilar,!AN,!JHEP!0408!(2004)!057!
NOTE:$
This$is$not$your$favorite$αs$?$!Worried$about$non%perturbaOve$$αs$definiOon?$$
→!this!expression!maps!!!!!!any!IR!frozen!coupling...!!$$$$$$(is$the$possibility$αs$(0)$→$0$$alive?)$
3)$$Re+$e%$$
∑=→
→≡
−+−+
−+
−+
fn
iieeq
eehadronsee
sR 23)()()(
µµσσ
Parton!model!
QCD$)1(3)( 2 R(s)+= ∑−+
fn
iiee qsR
...)1()( 21 +++= ararasR
fn →!!!number!of!flavours!
21 1153.0986.1 fnr −=
22 00518.0200.1637.6 ff nnr −−−=
MSπα sa =
Re+$e%$$$$$ddd!!!Parton!model!!
Experimental$data$(PDG)$
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$[$OPT$→Maingly$and$Stevenson,$PRL$69(1992)1320,$PRD$49(1994)437,$recent$Stevenson,$NPB$875(2013)63]$
4)$$“Smearing“$$$Re+$e%$$$
Experiment$X$Theory$→$Smearing$
Poggio,$Quinn$and$Weinberg,$PRD$13(1976)1958$
( )∫∞
Δ+−%
%%
Δ=Δ
−+
0222
2 )();(
Qs
sRsdQR ee
pqwπ
smooth$curves$
Data$fit$
ρ,!φ,!J/ψ,!ψ(3686),!ψ(3770)!included!laier!(BW!→!δ!funcZons)!
PDG!data!
Red!curve!→!( )
24
1222
DQCAMQ
BAi ii
ii +++−
∑=
( )∫∞
Δ+−%
%%
Δ=Δ
−+
0222
2 )();(
Qs
sRsdQR ee
pqwπ
Exp.$$$→$$fit$$+$$narrow$resonances$
Th.→$QCD$$with$effecOve$charge$up$α3$
Exp.!data!–!Δ!=!1.5!GeV2!
!shaded!area!d!±!7%!TheoreZcal!curves!–!different!mg/Λ!!(0.7!magenta!–!excluded)!!
7%!d!ad!hoc!!!!!//!!!different!Δ!!!
Best$fit$→χ2$$test$$
( )∑Δ
−=
i i
thii
OOO
2exp
2exp2 ))(()( θθχ
12
222
02 )]
)(ln(4[)( −
Λ
+=
QCD
gs
QmQQ
ρπβα
22
422 )(
g
gg mQ
mQm
+≈
ρ!=!3!–!4!!!;!!!!Δ!=!!1.5!–!3!GeV2!!!;!!!mg/Λ!=!!0.5!–!2.5!
Considering:$
RPQW!!!!!up!to!Q2!=!2!GeV2!
χ2$$$$exp$X$th$$$$$(different$curves,$∆,$...)$$
ρ$$=$$4$$,$different$Δ$
Minimum$→$mg$/Λ$$≈$1.2$$$
Δ!=!1.5!GeV2!
ρ!!→!!3!!d!!!4!
Minimum→$$mg$/Λ$≈$1.4!! ρ!=!3!
!!Δ!=!2!GeV2! ρ!!→!!3!!d!!!4!
Minimum→$$mg$/Λ$≈$1.4$$ ρ!=!3!
If$$mg$/Λ$<$0.8$$$→$bad$χ2$$
Above$$mg$/Λ$=$1.6$,$slow$increase$of$$χ2$value$
Minimum$$$$$$$$$$$3$$<$ρ$<$$4$$$$$$$$→$$$$$$$$$$$$$1.2$$<$mg$/Λ$$<$$1.4$
12
222
02 )]
)(ln(4[)( −
Λ
+=
QCD
gs
QmQQ
ρπβα
20 48/)233( πβ fn−=
approximately$constant$with$the$product$$dd!!ρ$mg$/Λ$$
Global$duality$ [Bertlmann,!Launer,!de!Rafael,!NPB!250(1985)61]!
pQCD
ss
tdttdt )(Im1)(Im100
0exp
0
Π=Π ∫∫ ππ
$$matching$between$long$and$short$distances$$$$(s0=$1.5$GeV2)$
Imply:!
∫∫ =00
00
exp
s
th
s
RdsRds
Surface$of$$s0$$$$$and$ρ,$$mg$/Λ$
What$to$expect?$$Smaller$s0$
Other$consequences...!
(perturbaZve!α)!
Define!! ( ) ∫∫ −=ΔΛ00
00
exp02 ,/,,
s
th
s
g RdsRdsmsQε
Δ=1.5!;!mg/Λ=1.2!ddddddddddddddddddddddd!!!!!s0!!!!!!!!!!!!!ε(0)!!!!0.6!!!!!!!!d0.0987!!!!0.8!!!!!!!!d0.0276!!!!0.87!!!!!!d0.0060!!!!1.0!!!!!!!!!d0.0291!!!!1.2!!!!!!!!!d0.0812!!!!1.4!!!!!!!!!d0.1264!!!!!!!!
5)$Conclusion$
Re+$e%$$$$→$informaOon$about$the$IR$effecOve$QCD$charge!
Assuming$a$simplified$expression$for$the$effecOve$charge:$
12
222
02 )]
)(ln(4[)( −
Λ
+=
QCD
gs
QmQQ
ρπβα
we$obtain:$
α(0)$$$$$basically$dependent$on$the$product$$$$ρ$mg$/Λ$$
α$(0)$≈$0.7$
In!agreement!with!MaUngly!and!Stevenson!Improved!(or!different)!expressions!for!αs!...!?!How!it!will!change!at!next!order?!.......!
Smaller$scale$s0$$→$$fronOer$between$pert.$and$non%pert.$physics$!