Reductions in Share Capital Under the Companies Act 2006
-
Upload
hafiaz-muhammad-imtiaz -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
0
Transcript of Reductions in Share Capital Under the Companies Act 2006
-
8/11/2019 Reductions in Share Capital Under the Companies Act 2006
1/5
Reductions in share capital under the Companies Act 2006
Written by Nigel Stanford
The Companies Act 2006 has introduced a new procedure for reductions in the share capital of private
companies. This article summarises the new procedure.
1 Introduction
A new procedure, both cheaper and simpler than its predecessor, has been introduced so that a private
company can reduce its share capital by passing a special resolution supported by solvency statements
from the company's directors. The existing court based procedure will still be available but it is widely
thought that the formal, slow and cumbersome nature of the court process, (as well as the not
insignificant professional fees that were involved) previously discouraged many companies from
undertaking a reduction of share capital.
2 How can a private company reduce its share capital?
From 1 October 2008, to reduce its share capital a private company limited by shares can either:
Option 1: pass a special resolution and apply to court for confirmation of the reduction (creditors of
the company have certain statutory rights to object to the reduction of share capital during the court
process); or
-
8/11/2019 Reductions in Share Capital Under the Companies Act 2006
2/5
Option 2: pass a special resolution supported by a solvency statement made by all ofits directors and
deliver certain documents (listed below) to Companies House, without requiring a court process (the
Solvency Statement Procedure).
A private company limited by shares can use the Solvency Statement Procedure unless its memorandum
or articles of association prohibit a reduction of share capital (i.e. express authority is not required).
3 What does the Solvency Statement Procedure require?
3.1 Special resolution to be passed by the shareholders of the company
If the special resolution is passed as a written resolution, the solvency statement (see below) must besent with it to each shareholder entitled to vote on it (otherwise an offence is committed by the
company and its officers).
If the special resolution is proposed ata general meeting, the supporting solvency statement must be
available for inspection throughout that general meeting.
3.2 Solvency statement to be made by each director of the company
There is no right for a creditor to object to a reduction of capital supported by a solvency statement.
However the solvency statement does protect the creditors of the company by requiring that all the
directors give the solvency statement and take all the company's liabilities into account (including
prospective and contingent liabilities) when doing so. Therefore, if one or more of the directors is
-
8/11/2019 Reductions in Share Capital Under the Companies Act 2006
3/5
unable or unwilling to make the solvency statement, the company will not be able to use the Solvency
Statement Procedure for its reduction of capital and will need to use the court approved procedure
(unless the relevant directors who object resign prior to the making of the statement).
The content of the solvency statement is prescribed by the companies act. It cannot be qualified in
anyway.
The solvency statement mustbe made not more than 15 days before the date on which the special
resolution is passed.
Before making the statement, each director must very carefully consider the companys financial
position and the effect of the proposed reduction of share capital. Directors can decide to rely on an
internal review of the company's financial position or they can ask the auditors to prepare an
independent assessment of its financial position.
An offence is committed by a director if he makes a solvency statement without reasonable grounds
for the opinions expressed in it. The maximum penalty for each director in default is imprisonment for aterm not exceeding two years or an unlimited fine (or both).
3.3 Statement by directors
Between the date of passing of the special resolution and it being sent to Companies House, the
directors must sign a statement confirming compliance with the statutory requirements as follows:
the solvency statement was made not more than 15 days before the date on which the special
resolution was passed, and
the solvency statement was circulated with the written resolution OR made available for inspection at
the general meeting.
3.4 Memorandum of capital
A memorandum of capital must be sent to Companies House which sets out:
the amount of the companys share capital (as reduced),
-
8/11/2019 Reductions in Share Capital Under the Companies Act 2006
4/5
-
8/11/2019 Reductions in Share Capital Under the Companies Act 2006
5/5
Any reserve that arises from a reduction of share capital using the Solvency Statement Procedure
(subject to any contrary provision contained in the special resolution or the company's constitutional
documents) is distributable and, therefore, may be treated as a distributable reserve and is treated as a
realised profit under Part 23 CA 2006.
A company may have capital which is surplus to its requirements and which it therefore wishes to return
to shareholders. The Solvency Statement Procedure can also be used in such instances: a reduction of
share capital will not give rise to a reserve (whether distributable or otherwise) if it is structured as a
direct return of capital to shareholders for example by cancelling some shares entirely or by reducing
the nominal value of each share and paying the difference between the original nominal value and the
reduced nominal value to the affected shareholders.
Furthermore a distributable reserve arising on a reduction of share capital using the Solvency Statement
Procedure does not necessarily need to be distributed to shareholders: where a company has a deficit
on its profit and less account and a reduction of share capital using the Solvency Statement Procedure
creates a distributable reserve, this reserve may be used to offset or reduce such deficit.
Nigel Stanford
Partner
January 2009