Reducing Trans-boundary Degradation of the Kura-Aras River Basin
description
Transcript of Reducing Trans-boundary Degradation of the Kura-Aras River Basin
Reducing Trans-boundary Degradation of the Kura-Aras River Basin
UNDP/SidaUnited Nations Development Programme
Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency
Presented by:Mariam Shotadze, Programme Analyst
Reducing Trans-boundary Degradation of the Kura-Aras River Basin
Overall objective: ensure the quality and quantity of water resources of the Kura-Aras meets short and long-term needs of ecosystems and communities using the ecosystem
Immediate objectives: foster regional co-operation; increase national and regional capacity; address water quality and quantity problems; promote changes in the economic sectors causing
pollution, water shortages and habitat degradation
Reducing Trans-boundary Degradation of the Kura-Aras River Basin
Reducing Trans-boundary Degradation of the Kura-Aras River Basin
Program phases: Phase I, Design phase (PDFA) Phase II, Planning Phase (PDF B); Phase III, Implementation Phase (full-size project)
Current Phase: Phase II - Planning Phase (PDF B) Two Components: Leading GEF & Suplementary
Sida Funding: GEF ….. + Sida: USD 690,000 Duration:
Sida: October 2003-December 2005 (2.5 years); GEF 2005 October-March 2007 (1.6 years)
Reducing Trans-boundary Degradation of the Kura-Aras River Basin
Objectives of the Sida Component: Identification of National Legal-Institutional and Policy needs
for Integrated Management of the Kura River Basin; Background Analyses of the Kura River Basin (feedback to
TDA): Water quality and quantity; Major ecosystems; Socio-economic trends, driving forces and pressures on the basin’s
degradation; Existing water infrastructure
Identification of Optimal Institutional arrangement for the management of the Basin;
Development of National Action Plans
Reducing Trans-boundary Degradation of the Kura-Aras River Basin
Geographic Scope: Armenia; Azerbaijan; Georgia
Project OrganizationProject Organization
UNDPGeorgia
Executing Manager
Tbilisi OfficeNTL
Support staff
Yerevan OfficeNTL
Support staff
Baku Office
NTLSupport
staff
Chief Technical Advisor
Three National Advisory Committees
Reducing Trans-boundary Degradation of the Kura-Aras River Basin
Progress Achieved : Policy, Legal and Institutional needs report;
Pre-cursory gender study report;
Background Analyses;
National objectives for IRBP&M identified and prioritized;
Overview of existing basin management institutional models made and several options applicable for the Kura Basin developed;
National needs and priorities for IRBP&M identified;
Preparation of National Action Plans started
Reducing Trans-boundary Degradation of the Kura-Aras River Basin
Progress Achieved (cont.): Study Tour arranged in Hungary to learn the cooperation within Danube
river basin;
As a technical assistance to the project focal point agencies:
trainings of representatives of water-related agencies in Access database and GIS applications conducted;
Basic office equipment purchased;
High-speed internet access provided to the Georgian hydromet
Preparation of national and regional GIS maps started
Reducing Trans-boundary Degradation of the Kura-Aras River Basin
Major Achievements, Challenges, Weaknesses:
Achievements, positive sides: Good basis prepared for SAP and NAPs; Good national channels established; Roster of national consultants developed; Regional network of technical experts further developed and
strengthened; Cross-sectoral approach used through contribution from Advisory
Committees; Incetive-based approach proved successful for effective
functioning of advisory committees; Once fully operational DEX proved very quick and effective
mechanism for project delivery and controling expenditures
Reducing Trans-boundary Degradation of the Kura-Aras River Basin
Major Achievements, Challenges, Weaknesses:Challenges and Weakness:
Assumtion of two components to go in parallel didn’t work that hindered start-up of Sida component and Iran’s involvement;
No/weak involvement of other UNDP country offices; focus on national-level needs and keeping of low political profile; Thin market of national experts and difference in national expertise; Problems with data availability and quality, especially in Georgia; Poor project QA/QC: none of the offices had project coordination function,
project assurance role was unclear; Poor risk management; Focus mostly on water resources and very weak/no consideration of other
resources; No involvement of all major sectors, i.e. hydropower.
Reducing Trans-boundary Degradation of the Kura-Aras River Basin
Thank you!!!