Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes
Transcript of Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes
![Page 1: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Reducing Flood Losses Through the International CodesMeeting the Requirements of the National Flood Insurance Program3rd Edition, 2008
in cooperation with the Federal Emergency Management Agency
®
NFIP_I-Code_cover_3rdEd_2008_don1 1 1/10/2008 9:30:07 AM
![Page 2: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
This guide is based on the 2006 editions of the International Codes® (I-Codes®) and the 2007 Supplement to the International Codes®
Reducing Flood Losses Through the International
Codes®: Meeting the Requirements of the
National Flood Insurance Program
3rd Edition, 2008
![Page 3: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
TTaabbllee ooff CCoonntteennttss
Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes®: Meeting the Requirements of the NFIP i
Executive Summary..................................................................................... v
Acknowledgments ...................................................................................... ix
1. Introduction.....................................................................................1-1
1.1 Purpose of This Guide ................................................................1-1
1.2 The I-Codes and the NFIP ..........................................................1-1
1.3 Intended Audience......................................................................1-2
1.4 Where to Get Help......................................................................1-2
1.5 Purpose and Overview of the NFIP ............................................1-3
1.6 Overview of Community and State Responsibilities Under the NFIP...........................................................................1-4
1.7 Benefits of Participating in the NFIP..........................................1-7
1.8 Implications of Not Participating in the NFIP............................1-8
1.9 FEMA’s Involvement with Model Codes and Standards Producing Organizations ............................................................1-9
1.10 ASCE 7: Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures ..................................................................................1-10
1.11 ASCE 24: Flood-Resistant Design and Construction ..............1-10
1.12 Flood-Resistant Materials.........................................................1-11
1.13 Flood Elevations: BFE and DFE .............................................1-11
2. Approaches to Floodplain Management ............................2-1
2.1 The Comprehensive Approach ...................................................2-1
2.2 Stand-Alone Floodplain Management Regulations Approach ...2-2
2.3 Building Code Approach ............................................................2-3
2.4 Advantages of Reducing Flood Losses Through the I-Codes..................................................................................2-4
3. Implications of Adopting the I-Codes ..................................3-1
3.1 Development Other Than Buildings...........................................3-1
3.2 The Utility-Related I-Codes .......................................................3-2
3.3 The NFIP’s Community Rating System and the I-Codes...........3-5
3.4 Considering Higher Standards....................................................3-8
![Page 4: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Table of Contents ii
3.5 Amending the I-Codes to Implement Higher Standards ............ 3-9
3.6 The Coastal A Zone ................................................................. 3-12
3.7 Substantial Improvement and Substantial Damage.................. 3-14
3.8 Historic Structures.................................................................... 3-18
3.9 Critical and Essential Facilities ................................................ 3-19
3.10 Increased Cost of Compliance.................................................. 3-22
4. Community Responsibilities Under the NFIP .................. 4-1
4.1 Modifications of the I-Codes...................................................... 4-1
4.2 Regulate All Development ......................................................... 4-2
4.3 Record Keeping.......................................................................... 4-2
4.4 Requiring Other Permits............................................................. 4-3
4.5 Notifying Potentially Impacted Parties ...................................... 4-4
4.6 Evaluating Floodway Impacts.................................................... 4-5
4.7 Flood Hazard Map-Related Duties............................................. 4-5
4.8 Elevation Certificates ................................................................. 4-7
4.9 Inspections................................................................................ 4-10
4.10 Enforcement and Violations..................................................... 4-12
4.11 The Variance Process ............................................................... 4-13
5. State Building Codes and Flood Provisions .................... 5-1
5.1 Meeting More Restrictive State Requirements .......................... 5-1
5.2 State Amendments to the I-Codes.............................................. 5-1
5.3 Local Amendments to State Building Codes ............................. 5-2
5.4 Exemptions from State Building Codes ..................................... 5-2
5.5 Direct State Regulation of Certain Activities or Buildings ........ 5-3
5.6 Referencing Flood Maps in the Building Codes ........................ 5-3
6. Your Community’s Approach ................................................. 6-1
6.1 Assessing Your Community’s Current Approach...................... 6-1
6.2 Modifying Your Community’s Approach.................................. 6-2
![Page 5: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes®: Meeting the Requirements of the NFIP iii
List of Tables, Figures, and Worksheets Table 1-1 Summary of Selected Key NFIP Provisions,
Code Citations, and Reference Documents ............................ 1-13
Table 3-1 Selected ASCE 24-05 Provisions and Opportunities for Community Rating System Credits .......................................... 3-7
Table 3-2 Maximum Allowable Points for Higher Standards .................. 3-9
Table 3-3 ASCE 24-05 Provisions Related to Critical Facilities............ 3-21
Figure 3-1 Schematic of Flood Hazard Zones in Coastal Areas .............. 3-13
Figure 6-1 Approaches to Fulfilling the Requirements of the NFIP.......... 6-3
Worksheet A The NFIP and the I-Codes........................................................ 6-4
Worksheet B Assessing Your Community’s Approach ................................. 6-5
Worksheet C Discussion Topics, Decision Steps........................................... 6-6
Appendices
Appendix A References and Online Resources............................................. A-1
Appendix B Crosswalk of the NFIP Regulations to the Flood Resistance Provisions of the IBC ....................................B-1
Appendix C Crosswalk of the NFIP Regulations to the Flood Resistance Provisions of the IRC ....................................C-1
Appendix D Flood Resistance Provisions of the IMC, IPC, IFGC, IPSDC & IEBC.............................................................. D-1
Appendix E FEMA Regional Offices and NFIP State Coordinators .............E-1
Appendix F Sample Plan Review and Inspection Checklists ........................ F-1
![Page 6: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
EExxeeccuuttiivvee SSuummmmaarryy
Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes®: Meeting the Requirements of the NFIP v
For more than 30 years, most local jurisdictions have participated in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) by adopting and enforcing floodplain management ordinances or regulations. The NFIP was created as a partnership: The federal government makes NFIP flood insurance and other federal assistance available to residents and businesses, and communities agree to regulate mapped flood hazard areas to reduce future flood damage. With the publication of the International Building Code® (IBC®), the International Residential Code® (IRC®), the International Existing Building Code® (IEBC®), and the rest of the International Codes® (I-Codes®), the opportunity exists for communities to integrate building safety and floodplain management. This guide, Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes®: Meeting the Requirements of the National Flood Insurance Program, will help communities decide how best to accomplish that integration in order to initiate or continue partici-pation in the NFIP. The 2003 and 2006 editions of the I-Codes contain provisions that are consistent with the minimum flood-resistant design and construction requirements of the NFIP. It is important to note, however, that adoption of one or more of the codes, by themselves, may not address all NFIP requirements. Crosswalks of the NFIP regulations and the I-Codes, including Appendix G of the IBC, have been prepared and included in this guide. This guide references the 2006 I-Codes (the crosswalks are annotated to show amendments approved in 2007). The flood-resistant provisions in the I-Codes stem from cooperative efforts among the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), the Structural Engineering Institute (SEI) of the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), and other individuals and organizations. These efforts began in 1991 with the development of flood load provisions. Those load provisions became part of ASCE 7 in 1995, were expanded in the 1998 edition of ASCE 7, and were further amended in ASCE/SEI 7-02. This guide references ASCE/SEI 7-05.
![Page 7: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Executive Summary vi
Cooperative efforts continued with the development of ASCE 24-98, a standard for minimum requirements for flood-resistant design and construction of buildings and structures in flood hazard areas. ASCE/SEI 24-05 is referenced in this guide. CChhaapptteerr 11 presents a brief overview of the NFIP, including the benefits of participation and the implications of choosing not to participate. The NFIP is a voluntary program, but its benefits are far-reaching. Responsibilities of participating communities extend beyond issuance of building permits, and include administrative and map-related functions. Technical assistance and support are available from NFIP State Coordinating Agencies and FEMA regional offices. CChhaapptteerr 22 outlines some broad approaches to managing flood hazard areas. Integrating a community’s approach with the I-Codes involves careful consideration and planning to reduce overlap of regulations, duplication of effort, and conflicts. Advantages of using the building code to satisfy certain floodplain requirements are outlined. CChhaapptteerr 33 is a collection of topics on the implications of adopting the I-Codes for participation in the NFIP:
• Section 3.1 reviews the NFIP definition of “development” because the NFIP requires that communities regulate all development in flood hazard areas, not just buildings and structures.
• Section 3.2 summarizes how the utility-related I-Codes address provisions to protect building utility systems.
• Section 3.3 briefly outlines the NFIP’s Community Rating System, which provides discounts on the cost of flood insurance within communities that adopt regulations that exceed the minimum requirements of the NFIP.
• Section 3.4 includes brief explanations for consideration by communities that may elect to adopt certain standards that are higher than the minimum requirements of the NFIP.
• Section 3.5 offers sample building code text amendments language to implement higher standards.
• Section 3.6 describes the Coastal A Zone, an area where flood conditions include waves that are less than required for the NFIP to designate the area a V Zone, but that field research has identified as sufficient to cause building damage.
![Page 8: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes®: Meeting the Requirements of the NFIP vii
• Section 3.7 summarizes the NFIP requirements pertaining to substantial improvements and repair of substantial damage; both concepts are particularly important when dealing with older buildings.
• Section 3.8 summarizes how the codes address certain historic structures and describes two options: issue permit or approve by variance.
• Section 3.9 describes critical and essential facilities and notes that the IBC, ASCE 7, and ASCE 24 include provisions that apply to such facilities.
• Section 3.10 is a brief explanation of a part of the standard coverage provided by NFIP flood insurance. Under specific circumstances, notably if a flood causes substantial damage, this coverage provides the owner with an additional payment towards the cost of bringing the building into compliance with the flood-resistant provisions.
CChhaapptteerr 44 outlines certain responsibilities that communities assume when they participate in the NFIP. While many responsibilities are incorporated into the I-Codes, a number of others should be reviewed to make sure that they are assigned or captured in a companion floodplain management ordinance. CChhaapptteerr 55 addresses several important considerations related to state requirements. States that adopt the I-Codes at the state level may have made amendments or may require that local amendments be approved by the state. Some states have specific requirements for flood hazard area development and some issue floodplain permits. Others exempt certain activities or types of buildings from the requirement to obtain a building permit, while some states may issue building permits for some activities. And, notably, if the code is adopted at the state level, then the matter of references to community flood hazard maps must be addressed. CChhaapptteerr 66 outlines a straightforward process, using worksheets, to help communities assess how their current approaches to regulating development in flood hazard areas and building permits compare with the NFIP requirements. Also, a review process is outlined to facilitate decisions about appropriate modifications to processes and regulations.
![Page 9: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Executive Summary viii
AAppppeennddiicceess include references and online resources (Appendix A), crosswalks of the NFIP requirements with the IBC (Appendix B) and the IRC (Appendix C), the flood resistant provisions of the IMC, IPC, IFGC, IPSDC and the IEBC (Appendix D), contact information for FEMA and state offices (Appendix E), and sample plan review and inspection checklists (Appendix F).
![Page 10: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
AAcckknnoowwlleeddggmmeennttss
Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes®: Meeting the Requirements of the NFIP ix
The original edition of this guide was prepared by the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE). This third edition was prepared with financial support provided by the Mitigation Directorate of the U. S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS/FEMA). The early contributions of the following reviewers are appreciated:
Wayne Berggren, CFM, City of Mandeville, Louisiana, representing the Association of State Floodplain Managers, Inc.
Lois Forster, DHS/FEMA
John Ingargiola, DHS/FEMA
Trudie Johnson, CFM, City of Hilton Head, South Carolina, representing the Association of State Floodplain Managers, Inc.
Gregory A. Main, CFM, Indiana Department of Natural Resources
Christy L. Miller, CFM, Alaska Department of Commerce, Community & Economic Development
Kimberly Paarlberg, International Code Council, Inc.
Laura Pfister, Montana Floodplain Management Program
Rebecca C. Quinn, CFM, RCQuinn Consulting, Inc.
Michael Robinson, DHS/FEMA
![Page 11: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
11.. IInnttrroodduuccttiioonn
Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes®: Meeting the Requirements of the NFIP 1-1
______________________
When the IBC is adopted, the IRC is adopted by reference. If a state or commun-ity chooses not to regulate one- and two-family dwellings through the IRC, it must specifically exclude the IRC in its Ordinance for Adoption. In this case, for the purpose of NFIP participation, the activities regu-lated by the IRC must be covered in a companion floodplain management ordinance or regulation.
______________________
______________________
This guide is based on the 2006 editions of the I-Codes. Appendices B, C and D contain crosswalks of the NFIP regulations and the flood provisions of the I-Codes. The I-Code texts are annotated to show code changes approved in the 2006/2007 cycle and published in the 2007 Supplement.
______________________
1.1 Purpose of This Guide This guide is intended to help community officials decide how to integrate the International Codes® (I-Codes®) into their current floodplain development and regulatory processes in order to meet the requirements to participate in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). Careful attention is required to ensure that all requirements of the NFIP are addressed by communities through a combination of building codes and other ordinances or regulations. Adoption of one or more of the I-Codes, by itself, does not necessarily meet those requirements. This guide is not intended as an endorsement of any specific approach for achieving effective management of flood hazards, nor does it explain the NFIP requirements and how to administer them. References and online resources are listed in Appendix A. 1.2 The I-Codes and the NFIP This guide covers the family of codes known as the I-Codes that were developed under the auspices of the International Code Council® (ICC®). Each code in the series either meets or exceeds the minimum requirements of the NFIP with respect to the scope of each code:
• The 2006 and 2003 editions of the International Building Codes meet the minimum design and construction requirements of the NFIP for all buildings and structures, including, by reference, one- and two-family dwellings. Appendix G addresses other NFIP requirements such as map-related duties, subdivisions, site work, manufactured homes, recreational vehicles, underground and above-ground storage tanks, and variances.
• The 2006 and 2003 editions of the International Residential Codes meet the minimum requirements for flood-resistant design and construction of one- and two-family dwellings. For construction in the floodway, the IRC refers to the IBC.
• The 2006 and 2003 editions of the International Plumbing Code® (IPC®) meet the minimum requirements for flood-resistant design and construction of plumbing systems.
• The 2006 and 2003 editions of the International Mechanical Code® (IMC®) meet the minimum requirements for flood-resistant design and construction of mechanical systems.
![Page 12: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Introduction 1-2
______________________
For the purposes of the NFIP and this guide, the term “community” means “any State or area or political subdivision thereof, or any Indian tribe or authorized tribal organization, or Alaska Native Village or authorized native organization, which has the authority to adopt and enforce floodplain manage-ment regulations for the areas within its jurisdiction.” Coun-ties, cities, towns, and parishes are com-munities. In some states, flood control districts or planning districts may meet the definition if they exercise land-use authority.
______________________
• The 2006 and 2003 editions of the International Fuel Gas Code® (IFGC®) meet the minimum requirements for flood-resistant design and construction of fuel gas systems.
• The 2006 and 2003 editions of the International Private Sewage Disposal Code® (IPSDC®) meet the minimum requirements for flood-resistant design and construction of private sewage disposal systems.
• The 2006 and 2003 editions of the International Existing Building Code® (IEBC®) meet the minimum requirements for flood-resistant design and construction for existing buildings by reference to the requirements of the IBC.
• The 2006 and 2003 editions of the 3 International Code Council Performance Code® (ICC PC®) provide performance-based standards to provide resistance to flood loads and damage.
Table 1-1, starting on page 1-13, lists key provisions of the NFIP that pertain to buildings. These provisions are cross-referenced to specific sections of the IBC and IRC, related standards, and NFIP resource documents. Appendices B and C contain crosswalks of the complete text of the NFIP regulations and the pertinent sections from the 2006 IBC and 2006 IRC, respectively (annotated with code changes approved in 2007). Appendix D summarizes the flood-resistant provisions of the 2006 editions of the IMC, IPC, IFGC, IPSDC and the IEBC. 1.3 Intended Audience This guide is intended for officials of any unit of government who are responsible for regulating land development and building processes. It is designed specifically to help those whose agencies are responsible for regulating floodplain development and those who administer building codes. These responsibilities may be under the jurisdiction of a single office or distributed among several offices. Regardless of how your community is organized, it is recommended that this guide be reviewed by every office that has a role in land development (including subdivisions) and construction regulation. 1.4 Where to Get Help Each state has an office that is designated as the State Coordinating Agency for the National Flood Insurance Program, commonly referred to as the “NFIP State Coordinator.” Contact information for the NFIP State
![Page 13: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes®: Meeting the Requirements of the NFIP 1-3
______________________
If your community does not currently participate in the NFIP (see Section 1.8), you are strongly urged to join. To do so, contact either your NFIP State Coordina-tor or your FEMA Regional Office listed in Appendix D.
______________________
Coordinators and a list of the Federal Emergency Management Agency’s (FEMA) 10 regional offices are included in Appendix E. FEMA and others have produced numerous documents and publications related to the NFIP and regulation of flood hazard areas. Reference and resource materials, including cited publications and online resources, are listed in Appendix A. 1.5 Purpose and Overview of the NFIP NFIP Purpose. The original authorizing legislation for the NFIP was passed in 1968. Congress expressly found that “a program of flood insurance can promote the public interest by encouraging sound land use by minimizing exposure of property to flood losses. . . ”. The NFIP is intended to encourage states and local governments to recog-nize and incorporate flood hazards in land use and development deci-sions. In some communities this is achieved by guiding development to areas with lower risk. When decisions result in development within flood hazard areas, application of the criteria set forth in federal regulation (44 CFR Section 60.3) is intended to minimize exposure and flood-related damage. Overview of the NFIP. The NFIP is administered by the DHS/FEMA and has three main elements:
1. Hazard identification and mapping, under which engineering studies are conducted and flood maps are prepared to delineate areas that are predicted to be subject to flooding under certain conditions;
2. Floodplain management criteria for development, which establish the minimum requirements for communities to apply to develop-ment within mapped flood hazard areas with the intent of recogniz-ing hazards in the entire land development process; and
3. Flood insurance, which provides financial protection for property owners to cover flood-related damage to buildings and contents.
Federal flood insurance is designed to provide an alternative to disaster assistance and disaster loans for home and business owners. Disaster assistance rarely comes close to covering all of the costs to repair and clean up. While available to qualified victims, disaster loans do not significantly ease the financial burden due to repayment terms. It is important to remember that disaster assistance is available only after
![Page 14: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Introduction 1-4
floods have been declared major disasters by the President of the United States. Disaster loans are available after major disasters and when the U.S. Small Business Administration determines that an event has affected a certain number of uninsured homes and businesses. In contrast, NFIP flood insurance claims will be paid any time damage is sustained from a qualifying flood event. Another important objective of the NFIP is to break the cycle of flood damage. Many buildings have been flooded, repaired or rebuilt, and flooded again. Before the NFIP, in some parts of the country this cycle occurred every couple of years: people rebuilt in the same flood-prone areas and used the same construction techniques that did not adequately resist flood damage. By encouraging communities to guide development to lower risk areas, and by requiring elevation of new buildings and nonconforming buildings that sustain major damage, one of the long-term objectives of the NFIP can be achieved: reduce flood damage and losses. Older buildings may be removed or replaced, or they may be upgraded or modified with techniques that lead to little or no flood damage. Through the land development process, developers can often be required or encouraged to keep new development out of high-risk areas. 1.6 Overview of Community and State
Responsibilities Under the NFIP Overview of Community Responsibilities. The NFIP regulations (44 CFR Section 59.22) outline actions to be taken by a community to become and remain eligible to participate in the NFIP. A community agrees to take certain actions, including:
• Adopting and enforcing floodplain management regulations that either meet or exceed the minimum standards of the NFIP.
• Applying the regulations to all designated special flood hazard areas (SFHAs) throughout its jurisdiction.
• Submitting to FEMA the regulations (and subsequent amendments thereto), including copies of related zoning, building, and subdivi-sion regulations; health codes; special purpose ordinances; and other corrective and preventive measures enacted to reduce or prevent flood-related damage.
• Submitting to FEMA certain estimates relating to the community as a whole and to flood hazard areas, including population, number of
![Page 15: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes®: Meeting the Requirements of the NFIP 1-5
residences, number of small businesses, and number of other types of structures.
• Responding to FEMA’s periodic request for information on the community, including the number of permits and variances that may have been issued for development in the flood hazard area.
• Identifying the location where flood hazard maps will be maintained and available for public inspection.
• Appointing or designating an agency or individual official with the responsibility for the floodplain management program.
• Maintaining a file with specific information on all development that occurs within the mapped flood hazard area, including documenta-tion of certain building elevations and documentation of floodproof-ing designs, and making this information available for public inspection.
• Conducting periodic field inspections to ensure that ongoing development complies with issued permits and to check for unpermitted development.
• Having objectives in the comprehensive plan that are consistent with floodplain management goals.
• Notifying FEMA when revisions to the flood hazard maps are necessary and providing available data to support those revisions.
• Cooperating with federal, state, local, and private entities that under-take projects to study, survey, identify, and map flood hazard areas.
• Notifying FEMA, the state, and adjacent communities of any alteration or relocation of a watercourse.
• Notifying FEMA when the community’s boundaries have been modified by such legal actions as annexation.
Overview of State Responsibilities. The states have agreed to coordinate the NFIP with their communities and have designated an agency that is responsible for those functions (see Appendix E). The NFIP State Coordinator’s office is specifically charged with being a link between FEMA and communities and can advise communities on how to comply with the NFIP requirements, as well as any applicable state laws and regulations. The NFIP State Coordinator stays current on NFIP issues and can advise communities as to how specific provisions have been interpreted in many situations. The duties and responsibilities of the NFIP State Coordinator’s office are set forth in the NFIP regulations (44 CFR Section 60.25) and include:
![Page 16: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Introduction 1-6
• Enacting, if necessary, legislation that enables communities to regulate development in designated flood hazard areas.
• Encouraging and assisting communities to qualify for participation in the NFIP.
• Guiding and assisting communities in developing, implementing, and maintaining floodplain management regulations.
• Providing communities and the general public with NFIP information.
• Assisting communities in disseminating information about flood hazard areas and floodplain management requirements.
• Assisting in the delineation of flood hazard areas when possible, and providing technical information to FEMA.
• Recommending priorities for federal activities relative to community needs.
• Notifying FEMA of problems with community regulations if such problems cannot be resolved between the state and the community.
• Establishing minimum floodplain management standards for state activities.
• Coordinating floodplain management activities with other state, regional, and local planning and enforcement agencies.
• Assisting in the identification and implementation of mitigation recommendations.
• Participating in training opportunities and preparedness programs. Other ways that some NFIP State Coordinators may support communities include:
• Providing advice on improvements to local administrative proce-dures for issuing permits, handling variances, inspecting construc-tion, and remedying violations.
• Producing a floodplain management newsletter. • Reviewing proposed code and ordinance amendments to ensure
NFIP compliance. • Explaining ways to use flood hazard maps, including how to seek
revisions. • Assisting communities with applications to participate in the NFIP’s
Community Rating System (CRS). • Conducting training workshops on all aspects of the NFIP and
floodplain management. • Performing on-site technical assistance visits.
![Page 17: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes®: Meeting the Requirements of the NFIP 1-7
______________________
General information about flood insurance is on the Internet at www.fema.gov
______________________
• Providing reports on community compliance to FEMA. • Developing a program of certification for floodplain managers.
1.7 Benefits of Participating in the NFIP While there is no federal requirement that communities participate in the NFIP, most communities choose to do so to make flood insurance avail-able to their citizens. In addition, federal assistance for acquisition or construction of buildings in flood hazard areas is not available in nonparticipating communities. To participate, a community agrees to adopt, administer, and enforce provisions that either meet or exceed the minimum floodplain management requirements set forth in federal regulations. If your community does not presently participate in the NFIP, you are strongly urged to join. To do so, contact either your NFIP State Coordinator or the FEMA Regional Office that supports your state. There are four significant benefits of participating in the NFIP. One focuses on property protection, while the remaining three focus on financial security. Specifically:
1. Development that complies with the minimum NFIP performance criteria is less likely to experience major damage. Studies have shown that, on average, buildings that meet the NFIP criteria sustain approximately 80 percent less damage than those that do not.
2. Federally insured or regulated lenders must require that improvements located in mapped flood hazard areas be insured for flood damage. If a community does not participate in the NFIP, then lenders must notify borrowers that federal disaster assistance for flood damage will not be available, including grants and loans.
3. People who have flood insurance have a significant advantage over those who have no financial support or those who have to get loans to help repair and rebuild. Most homeowners’ property insurance explicitly excludes damage from floods, and non-NFIP flood insurance is hard to find. However, it is easy for most home and business owners to get NFIP flood insurance because many private companies write and sell policies on behalf of the NFIP.
4. Federal disaster assistance is available to repair or restore public buildings in flood hazard areas if damaged by a disaster that is declared by the President of the United States.
![Page 18: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Introduction 1-8
In participating communities, NFIP flood insurance is available for both residential and nonresidential buildings, and additional coverage is available for contents. Policies on buildings in flood hazard areas shown on Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs) include coverage that provides a claim payment to help defray certain costs when a flood-damaged building is required to be brought into compliance with community floodplain management requirements. This additional coverage, called “Increased Cost of Compliance,” is described in Section 3.10. The amount of this coverage is stated in the flood insurance policy documents. 1.8 Implications of Not Participating in the NFIP Communities that have been provided a FIRM by FEMA may elect not to participate in the NFIP (unless required to do so by state law). If communities choose not to participate in the NFIP, the following apply:
• NFIP flood insurance is not available. • Federal agencies cannot provide grants and loans for construction,
reconstruction, repair, rehabilitation, or additions to buildings in mapped SFHAs, including such agencies as the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA), and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
• Federal disaster assistance will not be provided in identified flood hazard areas for permanent restorative construction. This means that public buildings damaged by flooding are not eligible for federal disaster assistance.
• Individuals and families will receive only limited federal disaster housing assistance when a major disaster is declared. Federal grants and assistance for repairs are not available.
• Direct federal loans to residents and developers for properties in flood hazard areas are not available from government programs such as the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) and the Federal Housing Administration (FHA).
• Other regulated mortgage lenders may make loans for properties in flood hazard areas, but they are required to notify borrowers that federal disaster assistance will not be provided in the event of a flood disaster.
Communities that initially declined to participate when the FIRM was prepared may subsequently decide to join the NFIP. Insurance on buildings that were constructed in flood hazard areas after the date of the FIRM will be rated based on the risk of flooding. If they were built
![Page 19: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes®: Meeting the Requirements of the NFIP 1-9
______________________
In 2008 the International Code Council is expected to publish ICC 600, Standard for Residential Construction in High Wind Regions. It will include FEMA 550 as guidance for design of flood-resistant foundations for residential buildings with wood or light-steel framed walls.
______________________
below the base flood elevation (BFE) and are subject to damage, then flood insurance will be very expensive. The FIRM in effect at the time a building was constructed, and the applicable actuarial rates based on that map, applies regardless of when the community elects to join the NFIP. 1.9 FEMA’s Involvement with Model Codes
and Standards Producing Organizations Many communities that participate in the NFIP do so through single-purpose floodplain management ordinances. For the most part, these ordinances are administered in land planning offices, usually in coordination with building permit offices. In other cases, communities participate through various combinations of laws, ordinances, and regulations. Despite efforts to coordinate, occasional conflicts have been known to arise between the NFIP requirements and a community’s building and other health and safety codes. In the early 1990s, FEMA requested assistance from the National Institute of Building Sciences to examine 23 model building codes and standards, and to perform a detailed comparison between NFIP regulations, model building codes, consensus standards, and technical guidance documents. The work was supported by the following model codes and standards organizations:
• Building Officials and Code Administrations International, Inc. (BOCA)*,
• Southern Building Code Congress International, Inc. (SBCCI)*, • International Conference of Building Officials (ICBO)*, • National Fire Protection Association (NFPA), and • National Conference of States on Building Codes and Standards
(NCSBCS).
* Effective February 1, 2003, BOCA, SBCCI and ICBO became one organization, the International Code Council, Inc. (ICC).
The result of this cooperative effort was the Code Compatibility Report, published in three volumes in October 1992. The report outlined recom-mended changes to the codes and to various FEMA documents. As the three major code organizations made progress on the development of the I-Codes, FEMA executed an agreement with the Structural Engineering Institute of the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE). ASCE was tasked with monitoring progress and proposing changes to the codes to improve consistency with the NFIP.
![Page 20: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Introduction 1-10
In the early 1990s, FEMA and ASCE’s Structural Engineering Institute initiated work to develop flood loads for inclusion in ASCE 7 and ASCE 24, a standard for flood-resistant design and construction (see Sections 1.10 and 1.11). Although the NFIP had been in effect since 1968, and by 1990 nearly 19,000 counties and towns were participating, there were no consensus standards for determining flood loads or for flood-resistant design and construction. As the I-Codes were developed, FEMA, with support of ASCE, proposed code changes. The 2000 editions were found to be nominally consistent with the NFIP minimum provisions. In the subsequent code development cycles, additional modifications continued to improve consistency. 1.10 ASCE 7: Minimum Design Loads for
Buildings and Other Structures In 1991, ASCE, with FEMA assistance, organized a committee of nation-ally recognized experts in the fields of structural engineering, construc-tion techniques, and building codes and regulations. The committee was tasked with developing flood load provisions to be included in ASCE 7. Following the consensus standards process, including balloting, these provisions first appeared in ASCE 7-95. Additional revisions were made to the flood load provisions in the 1998 edition of ASCE 7. The current edition, ASCE/SEI 7-05 is a referenced standard in the 2006 IBC. 1.11 ASCE 24: Flood-Resistant Design and
Construction In 1995, ASCE organized a standards development committee of nation-ally recognized individuals in the fields of floodplain management, structural engineering, construction techniques, and building codes and regulations. Following the consensus standards process, including ballot-ing, the committee’s work resulted in the first edition of ASCE 24 (1998), which provides minimum requirements for flood-resistant design and construction of buildings and structures located in flood hazard areas, including new structures and substantial repair or improvement of exist-ing structures that are not designated as historic structures. ASCE 24-98, is a referenced standard in the 2003 IBC and was used in the development of the flood-resistant design and construction provisions of the 2003 IRC.
![Page 21: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes®: Meeting the Requirements of the NFIP 1-11
A revised edition, ASCE/SEI 24-05, was produced in 2005 and is referenced in the 2006 edition of the I-Codes. 1.12 Flood-Resistant Materials The ICC Evaluation Service, Inc., a part of the International Code Council, performs technical evaluations of building products, components, methods, and materials. Acceptance criteria, which form the basis of the evaluations, are developed by the ICC-ES technical staff in consultation with interested parties and the applicants who submit documentation for the technical evaluations. The evaluation process results in the issuance of reports on code compliance, which are made available free of charge. As of late 2007, the ICC-ES has not been asked to evaluate materials to determine conformance with the requirements for flood-resistant materials. Details about the ICC-ES, acceptance criteria, the evaluation process, and the reports are available at www.icc-es.org. In 1999, the National Evaluation Service, Inc. (NES), with support from FEMA, convened an advisory committee to develop an evaluation plan for determining the flood resistance of materials entitled NES Evaluation Protocol for Determination of Flood-Resistance Properties of Building Elements. This protocol provides guidance for testing to evaluate building elements for the ability to resist the effects of floodwater exposure. It serves as a starting point for manufacturers to determine whether their building products are suitable for use below flood levels. Building materials that may be evaluated include interior and exterior wall, floor, ceiling, and roof materials and finishes; structural elements; insulating materials; and windows, doors, vents, and other types of fixed or operable openings. The protocol addresses determining the physical and/or performance characteristics of the evaluation subject, exposure to simulated floodwater (fresh and saline), minimum drying times, and testing after exposure to establish changes in performance characteristics. 1.13 Flood Elevations: BFE and DFE The BFE, as used by the NFIP, is the elevation of the floodwater surface relative to the datum specified on the FIRM that is expected to be reached by a flood having a 1-percent chance of being equaled or exceeded in any given year. Although the term is misleading, this flood is commonly called the “100-year flood.”
![Page 22: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Introduction 1-12
______________________
Seek advice from the NFIP State Coordinator or the FEMA Regional Office if your FIRMs show A99 or AR zones. A99 zones designate areas to be protected from base flood by levees or Federal Flood Protection Systems that are under construction. AR zones are where previously accredited flood protection systems have been decertified but are in the process of being restored to provide base flood or greater levels of protection.
______________________
The I-Codes, ASCE 7, and ASCE 24 use the term “design flood eleva-tion” (DFE). The DFE is the elevation of the design flood, including wave height in coastal areas, relative to a specified datum. The DFE must equal or exceed the BFE in all cases. The design flood, from which the DFE is derived, is the flood associated with the greater of the following two areas:
1. The area flooded by a 1-percent annual chance flood (base flood), or 2. The area designated as the flood hazard area on a community’s
flood hazard map. A community may designate flood hazard areas by electing to incorporate such factors as the impacts of future development conditions on runoff, or a surcharge on flood stages resulting from designation of a floodway that is more restrictive than that designated by FEMA. Communities also may choose to base the DFE on a lower frequency flood (greater magnitude) or on an historical flood that was higher than the base flood used by FEMA. Many states require freeboard and many communities choose to adopt freeboard where it is not required (see Section 3.5). Freeboard is an added factor of safety expressed in feet above a specific flood elevation. It tends to compensate for the many unknown factors that could contrib-ute to flood heights greater than those computed for ideal situations. Freeboard may be incorporated in the DFE (e.g., by defining the DFE as the BFE plus freeboard), or it may be specified to be added to the DFE. There are circumstances where FIRMs do not specify BFEs:
• Zone A is used for flood hazard areas where engineering analyses have not been performed to develop detailed flood elevations. In these areas, other sources for flood information should be consulted, including the state, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, and the Natural Resources Conservation Service. FEMA has prepared a guidance document that outlines simplified methods to approximate the BFE, Managing Floodplain Development in Approximate Zone A Areas: A Guide for Obtaining and Developing Base (100-Year) Flood Elevations (FEMA 265).
• AO and AH zones where shallow overland or sheetflow is expected. The flood elevation is designated as a depth number on the map, or if not designated, the flood elevation is to be at least 2 feet (610 mm) above the highest grade adjacent to the proposed building footprint.
![Page 23: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes®: Meeting the Requirements of the NFIP 1-13
Table 1-1. Summary of Selected Key NFIP Provisions, Code Citations, and Reference Documents
(See Appendices B and C for comprehensive crosswalks of the NFIP regulations to the IBC and IRC, respectively;
Appendix D contains the flood resistant provisions of the IMC, IPC, IFGC, IPSDC and the IEBC.)
Key Provisions of the NFIP 2006 IBC 2006 IRC ASCE/SEI 24-05 Other Publications
60.3(a)(3)(i) new construction and substantial improvements to be designed and adequately anchored to prevent flotation, collapse, or lateral movement
1605.2.2 and 1605.3.1.2 flood loads and load combinations (reference ASCE 7) 1612.4 design and construction (reference ASCE 24) [Reference Appendix D for IEBC; see IBC Chapter 34 for existing buildings]
R301.1 construction to support all loads, including flood loads R324.1.1 structural systems designed, connected, and anchored
Section 1.5.5 anchorage and connections to resist effects of vertical and lateral loads Section 1.6 flood loads and combination of loads
ASCE/SEI 7-02 or ASCE/SEI 7-05, Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures FEMA 550, Recommended Residential Construction for the Gulf Coast: Building on Strong and Safe Foundation
60.3(a)(3)(ii) new construction and substantial improvements to be constructed with materials resistant to flood damage
801.1.3 interior finishes, trim, and decorative materials to be in accordance with FEMA FIA-TB#2 1403.6 exterior walls to be resistant to water damage
R324.1.7 and R501.3 building materials to be flood-resistant, installation methods for flooring and walls to conform to FEMA FIA-TB#2
Chapter 5 exposed structural and nonstructural materials, including connections, to be resistant to damage, deterioration, corrosion or decay due to direct and prolonged contact with floodwater
National Evaluation Service, Inc., Evaluation Plan for Determination of Flood-Resistance of Building Elements Technical Bulletin FEMA FIA-TB#2: Flood-Resistant Material Requirements for Buildings Located In Special Flood Hazard Areas Technical Bulletin FEMA FIA-TB#8: Corrosion Protection for Metal Connectors in Coastal Areas for Structures Located in Special Flood Hazard Areas
60.3(a)(3)(iv) electrical, heating, ventilation, plumbing, and air-conditioning equipment and other service facilities to be designed and/or located to protect components
1403.7 components not to be mounted on or through breakaway walls 1612.4 design and construction of buildings and structures (including utility support systems) to be in accordance with ASCE 24 [See also Appendix D for IMC, IPC, IFGC, and IPSDC]
R324.1.5 new and replacement mechanical and electrical systems to be elevated IFGC R301.5 appliance installations to be elevated or otherwise protected R1601.3.8 ducts and duct systems to be elevated
Chapter 7 utilities and attendant equipment to be elevated or designed, constructed and installed to prevent floodwaters from entering or accumulating within the components; utilities not to be mounted on breakaway walls
FEMA 348, Protecting Building Utilities From Flood Damage: Principles and Practices for the Design and Construction of Flood Resistant Building Utility Systems
Technical Bulletin FEMA FIA-TB#4: Elevator Installation for Buildings Located in Special Flood Hazard Areas
60.3(a)(6)(i) new/replacement sanitary sewage system designed to minimize/eliminate infiltration/discharges (ii) on-site waste disposal systems located to avoid impairment or contamination
Appendix G 401.3 Sewer facilities
R324.1.6 general performance, refer to Chapter 3 of the International Private Sewage Disposal Code®
Section 7.3 buried and exposed plumbing systems, systems below flood level, and sanitary systems, including septic tanks
FEMA 348, Protecting Building Utilities From Flood Damage: Principles and Practices for the Design and Construction of Flood Resistant Building Utility Systems
![Page 24: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Introduction 1-14
Table 1-1. Summary of Selected Key NFIP Provisions, Code Citations, and Reference Documents
(See Appendices B and C for comprehensive crosswalks of the NFIP regulations to the IBC and IRC, respectively;
Appendix D contains the flood resistant provisions of the IMC, IPC, IFGC, IPSDC and the IEBC.)
Key Provisions of the NFIP 2006 IBC 2006 IRC ASCE/SEI 24-05 Other Publications
60.3(b)(1) require permits for all development, including placement of manufactured homes
Appendix G 101.3 Scope (and definition of Development)
R101.2 Scope R105.3.1.1 specifically addresses substantial improvement and substantial damage of existing buildings Appendix E Manufactured Housing Used as Dwellings AE101, Exception, refers to IRC R324 Appendix J Existing Buildings AJ102.5 work in existing buildings in flood hazard areas per R105.3.1.1
Section 1.1 defines the scope to be new structures, including subsequent work and substantial repair or substantial improvement
ASFPM and Federal Interagency Floodplain Management Task Force, Addressing Your Community’s Flood Problems: A Guide for Elected Officials
FEMA 480, NFIP Floodplain Management Requirements: A Study Guide and Desk Reference for Local Officials
60.3(b)(5) where flood elevation data are provided: (i) obtain lowest floor elevation of new and substantially improved structures (ii) for floodproofed nonresidential structures, obtain elevation to which structure was floodproofed (iii) maintain records of elevations
109.3.3 inspection and submission of Elevation Certificate 1612.5.1 submission of specific certifications, including Elevation Certificate 104.7 and Appendix G 103.8 retention of department records
R109.1.3 inspections and submission of Elevation Certificate R104.7 retention of department records
Does not address administrative requirements or submission of certifications
Elevation Certificate (FEMA Form 81-31). [Online]. Available: www.fema.gov/business/nfip/elvinst.shtm Floodproofing Certificate (FEMA Form 81-65) [Online]. Available: www.fema.gov/plan/prevent/fhm/dl_fpc.shtm FEMA 467-1, Floodplain Management Bulletin: Elevation Certificate
60.3(b)(8) require installation of MFH using methods to minimize flood damage, including anchoring, and to resist wind forces
Appendix G 501.1 elevation requirements Appendix G 501.2 foundation requirements Appendix G 501.3 anchoring requirements
R324.1.8 MFH elevation per R324.2; anchor and tie-down per AE604 and AE605. MFH in floodways per IBC Appendix AE101 refers to IRC R324
Does not specifically address manufactured housing separate from other buildings. Foundations for MFH to be designed as other foundations and based on location within flood hazard areas (with and without high-velocity wave action)
FEMA 85, Manufactured Home Installation in Flood Hazard Areas [Note: HUD, NFPA and ICC are developing MFH standards, including installation provisions.]
![Page 25: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes®: Meeting the Requirements of the NFIP 1-15
Table 1-1. Summary of Selected Key NFIP Provisions, Code Citations, and Reference Documents
(See Appendices B and C for comprehensive crosswalks of the NFIP regulations to the IBC and IRC, respectively;
Appendix D contains the flood resistant provisions of the IMC, IPC, IFGC, IPSDC and the IEBC.)
Key Provisions of the NFIP 2006 IBC 2006 IRC ASCE/SEI 24-05 Other Publications
60.3(c)(2) require all new and substantially improved structures to have the lowest floor elevated to or above the flood elevation
1603.1.6 Flood load (information in application) 1612.4 design and construction (reference ASCE 24) 3402.1 Exception requires substantial improvement or repair of existing buildings to be brought into compliance with flood provisions
R105.3.1.1 specifically addresses substantial improvement and substantial damage of existing buildings R324.2.1 elevation requirements, except for conforming enclosures R324.1.4 lowest floor, excluding enclosures that meet certain use limitations and are compliant
Section 2.3 specifies general elevation requirements Section 4.4 specifies elevation requirements in Coastal High Hazard Areas (V Zones) and Coastal A Zones
FEMA 259, Engineering Principles and Practices for Retrofitting Flood Prone Residential Buildings FEMA 550, Recommended Residential Construction for the Gulf Coast: Building on Strong and Safe Foundations
60.3(c)(3) for nonresidential structures: (i) lowest floor elevated, or (ii) floodproofed (including utility and sanitary facilities)
1612.4 design and construction (reference ASCE 24)
Not applicable to one- and two-family dwellings
Section 2.3 specifies general elevation requirements Chapter 6 details restrictions and requirements for dry and wet floodproofing
Technical Bulletin FEMA FIA-TB#3: Non-Residential Floodproofing – Requirements and Certification for Buildings Located in Special Flood Hazard Areas
FEMA 348, Protecting Building Utilities From Flood Damage: Principles and Practices for the Design and Construction of Flood Resistant Building Utility Systems
60.3(c)(4) for floodproofed nonresidential structures: (i) registered design professional to develop and/or review the structural design and certify (ii) certification retained in records
104.7 retention of department records 1612.5.1 submission of specific certifications, including Elevation Certificate
Not applicable to one- and two-family dwellings
Chapter 6 details restrictions and requirements for dry and wet floodproofing, but does not include administrative requirements
Floodproofing Certificate (FEMA Form 81-65) [Online]. Available: www.fema.gov/plan/prevent/fhm/dl_fpc.shtm
60.3(c)(5) fully enclosed areas below elevated buildings are to be: limited in use (parking, access, storage); provided with flood openings that meet minimum criteria or are designed and certified by a registered design professional
1202.3 under-floor ventilation (exception allows flood openings) 1612.4 design and construction (reference ASCE 24) 1612.5.1 Flood hazard certificates (for flood opening designs other than as specified)
R324.2.2 enclosed area below design flood elevation, use limitations and flood opening specifications R408.5 Enclosing underfloor spaces to have flood openings Garages allowed if elevated or compliant with provisions for enclosures below elevated buildings
Section 2.6 details provisions for enclosures below DFE, including engineered and nonengineered openings (in A and AE Zones)
Technical Bulletin FEMA FIA-TB#1: Openings in Foundation Walls for Buildings Located in Special Flood Hazard Areas
![Page 26: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Introduction 1-16
Table 1-1. Summary of Selected Key NFIP Provisions, Code Citations, and Reference Documents
(See Appendices B and C for comprehensive crosswalks of the NFIP regulations to the IBC and IRC, respectively;
Appendix D contains the flood resistant provisions of the IMC, IPC, IFGC, IPSDC and the IEBC.)
Key Provisions of the NFIP 2006 IBC 2006 IRC ASCE/SEI 24-05 Other Publications
60.3(d)(3) prohibit floodway encroach-ment unless no impact on flood levels is demonstrated
Appendix G 103.5 and G 401.1 floodway development not authorized unless no increase in flood level is demonstrated
R301.2.4 residential development in floodways to be reviewed under the IBC R324.1.8 manufactured housing in floodways to comply with the IBC
Section 2.2 flood elevations and conveyance to be maintained
FEMA 480, NFIP Floodplain Management Requirements: A Study Guide and Desk Reference for Local Officials FEMA FIA-12, Appeals, Revisions, and Amendments to NFIP Maps: A Guide for Community Officials
Additional requirements for buildings and structures in flood hazard areas subject to high-velocity wave action (V Zones) 60.3(e)(4) require all new and substantially improved construction to be elevated on pilings and columns so that: (i) bottom of lowest horizontal structural member of the lowest floor is at or above the flood elevation, (ii) pile or column foundation and structure are anchored to resist flotation, collapse and lateral movement due to wind and water loads; registered design professional to develop or review the design, specifications and plans and provide certification
1603.1.6 specifies elevation of the bottom of the lowest horizontal structural member 1605.2.2 and 1605.3.1.2 flood loads and combined loads 1612.4 design and construction (reference ASCE 24) 1612.5.2 submission of certifications
R324.3.1 elevation requirements R324.3.2 foundation requirements, including wind and water loads R324.3.5 registered professional to certify design and methods of construction
Section 2.3 and Section 4.4 specify elevation requirements Section 1.5, Sections 2.4 and 2.5, and Chapter 4 address foundations and designs
FEMA 55, Coastal Construction Manual Technical Bulletin FEMA FIA-TB #8: Corrosion Protection for Metal Connectors in Coastal Areas for Structures Located in Flood Hazard Areas FEMA 550, Recommended Residential Construction for the Gulf Coast: Building on Strong and Safe Foundation
60.3(e)(5) enclosed areas, if any, are to be constructed with non-supporting, breakaway walls, lattice, or screening intended to collapse under wind and water loads; uses limited to parking, building access, or storage
1612.4 requires design and construct in accordance with ASCE 24 1612.5.2 submission of certification of breakaway wall design under certain circumstances
R324.3.3 specifications for walls and partitions of enclosures below elevated buildings, specifically for breakaway walls
Section 4.6 outlines provisions for enclo-sures below DFE with breakaway walls, and references ASCE 7 for design criteria
FEMA 55, Coastal Construction Manual Technical Bulletin FEMA FIA-TB #5: Free of Obstruction Requirements for Buildings Located in Coastal High Hazard Areas Technical Bulletin FEMA FIA-TB #9: Design and Construction Guidance for Breakaway Walls Below Elevated Coastal Buildings
![Page 27: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
22.. AApppprrooaacchheess ttoo FFllooooddppllaaiinn MMaannaaggeemmeenntt
Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes®: Meeting the Requirements of the NFIP 2-1
______________________
The comprehensive approach yields another potential benefit. Avoiding and minimizing flood hazards may result in credits under the NFIP’s Community Rating System, described in Section 3.3.
______________________
States and communities throughout the United States take a number of approaches to floodplain management. While this guide does not cover every variation, it highlights three common approaches to illustrate the types of issues you may face in your community as you integrate floodplain management and building codes. The three approaches described below are:
• The comprehensive approach, • The stand-alone floodplain management regulation approach, and • The building code approach, relying on the International Codes® (I-
Codes). Section 2.4 outlines several advantages to using the I-Codes to participate in the NFIP. It is important for you to fully understand those advantages before you begin to evaluate your community’s approach. A suggested framework for evaluation is covered in Chapter 6. 2.1 The Comprehensive Approach Under the broad concept of “floodplain management,” many communities coordinate several separate regulatory functions in separate agencies to achieve multiple land use, environmental, and public safety goals. These goals often include avoiding flood hazard areas when buildable land is available outside of mapped flood hazard areas and otherwise minimizing flood hazard area development. Minimization techniques include such measures as low-density zoning, waterway buffers or setbacks, transfer of development rights, evacuation access requirements, and others. While specific programs or functional organizations may vary considerably from community to community, the “comprehensive approach” to floodplain management is generally considered to include:
• A plan – whether it is called a comprehensive plan, general plan, land use plan, master plan, or is a combination of several plans. This plan is a collection of policies and guidance on how the community is expected to grow, change, and look in the future. With respect to flood hazard areas, this plan may recognize existing and future risks and establish a goal of reducing future exposure through various mechanisms.
![Page 28: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Approaches to Floodplain Management 2-2
• A zoning ordinance – which is a tool to help achieve the goals set forth in the plan. Zoning typically divides a community into districts and establishes use and development criteria within each district type. Typical zoning districts are residential, commercial, industrial, and agriculture, and various permutations and combinations of these uses. Development criteria typically specify such parameters as density, size, bulk, height, setbacks, and appearance. Some communities address floodplains as a separate conservation zone with its own specifications, or as an “overlay” to the other zones, in which case the zoning specifications are modified to achieve flood-related goals.
• A subdivision ordinance – which is another tool to achieve the planning goals. These regulations typically address lot size, shape, and setbacks; curbs, sidewalks, and gutters; open space; and public improvements such as street layout and dimensions, drainage and storm water management, and installation of utilities. Many subdivision ordinances are designed to avoid mapped flood hazard areas through the use of open space conservation and setbacks from bodies of water. Where floodplain impacts are unavoidable, ordinances may guide development to less hazard-prone areas through lot layouts to put building pads on higher ground, or by requiring consideration of non-fill methods of elevating buildings.
• Building codes and other health and safety codes – which are applied after zoning, land use, and subdivision decisions, regarding what and where to build, have been made. The primary purpose of building codes and other health and safety codes is to provide minimum requirements to safeguard the public safety, health, and general welfare.
For a complete discussion of the comprehensive approach to floodplain management, and for an examination of a variety of tools to achieve flood damage reduction goals through the subdivision process, refer to Subdivision Design in Flood Hazard Areas, Planning Advisory Service Report Number 473, published by the American Planning Association. 2.2 Stand-Alone Floodplain Management
Regulations Approach Many communities that participate in the NFIP have adopted a separate ordinance to address most, if not all, of the minimum requirements of the NFIP. Typically administered by a planning office, this single-purpose, stand-alone ordinance also incorporates other state and community floodplain management requirements, including administrative
![Page 29: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes®: Meeting the Requirements of the NFIP 2-3
______________________
When the IBC is adopted, the IRC is adopted by reference. If you specifically exclude the IRC, then you must recapture one- and two-family dwellings in another ordinance in order to participate in the NFIP. Similarly, you will include in that ordinance the provisions of IBC
Appendix G if you do not adopt it.
______________________
procedures, land management criteria, and building-specific provisions. The extent to which the stand-alone ordinance is coordinated with the building code and other health and safety codes, whether on paper or through coordinated review procedures, varies significantly from state to state and community to community. Some states and communities do not regulate development in general, but have a single “special use” permit that is required only in mapped flood hazard areas. Typically, this approach is taken solely to meet the minimum floodplain management requirements of the NFIP. 2.3 Building Code Approach Prior to the availability of the 2000 I-Codes, the model building codes included flood-related provisions to varying degrees, but none were fully consistent with the requirements of the NFIP (FEMA, Code Compatibility Report). Therefore, to participate in the NFIP most communities adopted stand-alone floodplain management regulations or ordinances that typically included administrative, land use, and building sciences provisions. With the 2003 and 2006 editions of the I-Codes, it is possible to integrate building codes and floodplain management into a single administrative process. In order to participate in the NFIP using this approach, all of the I-Codes must be adopted, including International Building Code Appendix G. Because Appendix G covers some development activities other than buildings and structures, it may be most appropriately administered by a planning or zoning office. A separate ordinance is still required in order to capture development that is not covered by the scopes of the I-Codes (filling and grading not associated with buildings and structures, paving, roads, bridges, culverts, dams, ponds, levees, floodwalls, and some utility infrastructure). The inclusion of flood-resistant provisions in the I-Codes may bring new functions to many building departments, specifically with regard to the activities addressed in IBC Appendix G. However, it may help stream-line the development process for some communities.
![Page 30: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Approaches to Floodplain Management 2-4
2.4 Advantages of Reducing Flood Losses Through the I-Codes
Continued close coordination between departments is vital to achieve a comprehensive approach to floodplain management. Adopting the I-Codes may result in shifting some provisions and responsibilities to the building department. As part of the discussion and decision process outlined in Chapter 6, you will need to address some of the implications of participating in the NFIP through the I-Codes, including:
• All Hazard-Related Building Construction Requirements are in One Place. In the past, the model building codes have included, to some extent, provisions related to natural hazards such as seismic hazards, high winds, severe winter storms, and flood hazards. The I-Codes address all of these hazards on a consistent and rational basis, which allows mitigation of the effects of the natural hazards that are found within each jurisdiction’s boundaries.
• Minimize Code Conflicts. The likelihood of conflicting code pro-visions or interpretation increases when a community has two or more regulations that apply to a single project. When different departments, agencies, or offices administer the building code and other health and safety codes, along with the floodplain manage-ment ordinance, conflicts or misinterpretation among various code and ordinance provisions can result. This is especially true when one office administers the floodplain management provisions and another office administers the building code. Another way that code conflicts arise is when amendments are made to one code or ordinance and others are not amended at the same time to maintain consistency.
• Strengthened Enforcement. Building departments routinely inspect construction, and they have clear authority and responsibility to require compliance and to enforce building permit conditions. Stand-alone floodplain management ordinances also include administrative provisions, including enforcement. Often, these enforcement provisions do not parallel the building department’s enforcement procedures, especially if a model floodplain manage-ment ordinance was adopted without tailoring to local circum-stances. Having separate and perhaps differing provisions for inspection and enforcement may lead to problems, such as if a permittee claims inconsistent treatment by different departments, agencies, or offices.
• Effective, Routine Inspections. Building departments typically conduct multiple inspections at specific times during the construc-tion process, and builders are accustomed to standard notification procedures. In communities where the flood-resistant design and
![Page 31: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes®: Meeting the Requirements of the NFIP 2-5
______________________
Section 3.7 provides additional background on substantial im-provement and repair of substantially damaged buildings in flood hazard areas.
______________________
construction provisions are enforced by a department other than the building department, inspections to check those specific provisions may not be conducted with the same regularity or may not be coordinated with the building inspections.
• Consistent Permit Conditions and Requirements. Other problems arise if the building permit, construction plans and specifications, and inspection forms do not explicitly state the elements required for compliance with flood-resistant design and construction require-ments. Inspectors may lack the proper information to perform their required duties effectively. For example, it would be difficult to verify that a building footprint is located outside of the floodway if the floodway boundary is not shown on the site plan submitted as part of the application for a building permit. Similarly, if the flood openings specifications for an enclosed area beneath an elevated building are described in writing as a condition of the floodplain permit but are not shown on the construction drawings, they may be overlooked by both the contractor and the building inspector.
• Improved Treatment of Existing Buildings. One of the NFIP requirements that community officials sometimes find challenging to enforce effectively applies to existing buildings that are located in flood hazard areas that are proposed for improvements or restoration and repair after substantial damage. Building departments routinely handle permits for existing buildings, yet planning and zoning departments, which are often responsible for administering floodplain management ordinances, rarely deal with proposals to physically modify structures that are on sites that are already developed. This has been known to lead to gaps in enforcement of the substantial improvement and substantial damage requirements of the NFIP.
![Page 32: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
33.. IImmpplliiccaattiioonnss ooff AAddooppttiinngg tthhee II--CCooddeess
Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes®: Meeting the Requirements of the NFIP 3-1
______________________
The NFIP and IBC Appendix G define “Development” to mean “any man-made change to improved or unimproved real estate, including but not limited to build-ings or other struc-tures, mining, dredg-ing, filling, grading, paving, excavation or drilling operations, or storage of equipment or materials.” [NFIP §59.1]
______________________
As your community considers whether to use the International Codes® (I-Codes) as the primary means to regulate floodplain development and to participate in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP), you can use this section as a resource. It covers some of the floodplain management implications that will need to be addressed as you make your decisions. Worksheet B in Chapter 6 will help you assess your current floodplain management practices and procedures, the starting point for determining how the adoption of the I-Codes will impact those practices and what changes will be necessary as a result. Topics covered in this section include: floodplain development other than buildings; the utility-related I-Codes; the NFIP’s Community Rating System (CRS); choosing higher standards for flood hazard area develop-ment (including sample code revision texts); regulating substantial damage and substantial improvement; historic structures; and the NFIP’s Increased Cost of Compliance insurance coverage. Chapter 4 addresses community responsibilities, including record keeping, permitting requirements, modifications to the I-Codes, flood hazard map duties, elevation certificates, inspections, and variances. 3.1 Development Other Than Buildings The NFIP requires that minimum development standards be applied to all development, including buildings and structures that are built or substan-tially improved in the flood hazard area. The NFIP definition of “Development” is very broad: it includes temporary structures and development activities other than buildings. The same definition is included in the International Building Code (IBC), Appendix G. These other development activities are regulated to prevent floodway encroachments and obstructions that may increase flood heights. Because the NFIP requires communities to regulate all development in flood hazard areas, a code that applies only to buildings does not fulfill the requirements for participation. The building code, or a combination of the code and another ordinance, must address all development. It is also important to note that adopting the IBC alone will not meet NFIP
![Page 33: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Implications of Adopting the I-Codes 3-2
______________________
Section 1.13 explains the base flood elevation (BFE) used by the NFIP and the design flood elevation (DFE) used by the I-Codes and ASCE 24.
______________________
requirements because it does not contain the floodplain management criteria that apply to development other than buildings. IBC Appendix G addresses these development activities: subdivision of land; site development and utilities; placement of manufactured home units and recreational vehicles; above-ground and underground tanks; and other building work that is not within the scope of the IBC (detached accessory structures; fences in floodways that may block the passage of floodwaters; oil derricks; retaining walls; sidewalks and driveways; and prefabricated swimming pools). Certain other development activities that are not normally addressed by building officials are included in the scope of IBC Appendix G. Specifically, development includes “other structures” that may impact waterways and floodways, such as fills, transportation infrastructure (roads, bridges, and culverts), and water resources facilities (flood walls and levees, channel modifications, dams, and ponds). For the most part, these activities may be permitted if outside of a mapped floodway, although analyses are to be prepared if a floodway has not been determined. 3.2 The Utility-Related I-Codes With respect to minimizing flood damage, the overall objectives for on-site utility systems for buildings constructed in flood hazard areas are to minimize damage and to facilitate clean up and repairs so that people can return to their homes and businesses in a timely manner after a flood. The most effective way to achieve this objective is to elevate utilities to or above the design flood elevation (DFE). This requirement is specifically addressed in the IBC, the International Residential Code® (IRC®), and the specific utility codes, including the International Mechanical Code® (IMC®), the International Plumbing Code® (IPC®), the International Private Sewage Disposal Code® (IPSDC®), and the International Fuel Gas Code® (IFGC®). Post-flood field investigations conducted by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) reinforce the critical importance of elevating or otherwise protecting building utility systems from floodwater that may enter or accumulate within the system components. Exterior mechanical units, such as heat pumps and air-conditioning units, are easily elevated to or above the DFE on roofs, platforms, or fill pads. In
![Page 34: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes®: Meeting the Requirements of the NFIP 3-3
______________________
FEMA has prepared a guidance document on utilities: Protecting Building Utilities From Flood Damage: Prin-ciples and Practices for the Design and Construction of Flood Resistant Building Utility Systems (FEMA 348).
______________________
these cases, care should be directed to more than just the height of the platform. Utility platforms are subject to the same flood loads as building foundations, and should be designed and constructed to resist those loads. Platforms may be independent from the base building structure or attached to or cantilevered from the structure. If higher than 3 to 4 feet (914 to 1219 mm) off the ground, access stairs may be required by the applicable code, and the platform should be sized to allow access for repair and maintenance of the supported equipment. Where elevating building utility equipment or systems above the DFE is not feasible, the NFIP regulations provide a performance-based option:
If a proposed building site is in a flood-prone area, all new construction and substantial improvements shall . . . (iii) be constructed by methods and practices that minimize flood damages, and (iv) be constructed with electrical, heating, ventilation, plumbing, and air conditioning equipment designed and/or located so as to prevent water from entering or accumulating within the components during conditions of flooding. [Section 60.3(a)(3)]
To date, FEMA and most states and communities have relied on manu-facturers’ specifications, warranties, and written statements that specify which types of equipment meet this performance-based provision. For the community, this suggests that applicants may be required to submit a written statement from the manufacturer before a permit to use utility service equipment below the DFE is approved. States and communities have reported that manufacturers almost always refuse to provide such a statement or warranty because most equipment is not designed to be flood resistant. Indeed, experience indicates that most mechanical and electrical equipment suffers major damage when exposed to floodwater. Each of the I-Codes addresses protection of building utility systems from flood damage in the following manner:
• 2006 and 2003 IBC. Section 1612.1 sets forth the general require-ment that “all new construction of buildings, structures and portions of buildings and structures, including substantial improvements and restoration of substantial damage to buildings and structures, shall be designed and constructed to resist the effects of flood hazards and flood loads.” Although this text does not specifically reference utility service equipment, the NFIP requires that it apply to all elements of a building, including building utility systems.
![Page 35: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Implications of Adopting the I-Codes 3-4
Subsequent chapters of the IBC refer to the individual I-Codes for specific utilities.
• 2006 and 2003 IRC. Section R324 covers general flood-resistant construction provisions, including establishment of the DFE and protection of mechanical, plumbing, electrical systems, and ducts by elevation to or above the DFE. Section R324.1.6 includes requirements for the protection of water supply and sanitary sewage systems located in flood hazard areas, requiring both to be designed to minimize infiltration into the systems. In addition, sewage systems are to be located or designed to minimize discharges of sewage into floodwater.
• 2006 and 2003 IPC. Section 309 specifically addresses flood-resistant requirements. Systems and equipment in structures in flood hazard areas are to be capable of resisting hydrostatic and hydrodynamic loads and stresses, including the effects of buoyancy. Certain system elements must be sealed or elevated, including water supply pumps, potable water well seals, and manhole covers.
• 2006 and 2003 IMC. Section 301.13 includes the general require-ment that mechanical systems are to be placed above the BFE or protected to prevent water from entering or accumulating within appliance ducts or plenum spaces. Sections 602.4 and 603.7.3 require that plenum spaces and ducts meet the same criteria or be capable of resisting hydrostatic and hydrodynamic loads and stresses, including buoyancy.
• 2006 and 2003 IPSDC. Certain types of private sewage disposal systems involve placement of earthen fill. Sections 301, 303, and 304 are comprehensive in that prior to approval of a disposal system, the building official is required to receive written evidence that construction in and filling of flood hazard areas is acceptable. The code includes a number of restrictions on placement of private sewage disposal systems in floodways, and mound systems are not allowed in the flood hazard area (see Section 902). Section 805 specifies that new and replacement holding tanks are to be protected from flood damage and adequately anchored to counter buoyant forces. Vents and service manholes are to be at least 2 feet (610 mm) above the regulatory flood elevation established by the local jurisdiction.
• 2006 and 2003 IFGC. Section 301.11 includes the general require-ment that appliance installations are to be placed above the DFE or protected to prevent water from entering or accumulating within appliances, ducts, or plenum spaces.
![Page 36: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes®: Meeting the Requirements of the NFIP 3-5
______________________
The CRS has three goals:
1. Reduce flood losses;
2. Facilitate accurate insurance rating; and
3. Promote aware-ness of flood insurance.
______________________
• 2006 and 2003 International Existing Building Code (IEBC). Long-term reduction in exposure to flood hazards is one of the reasons that development in flood hazard areas is regulated. The IEBC is organized to address repairs, repairs of damaged buildings, alterations, additions, and relocated or moved buildings. For work covered by the IEBC, if the work constitutes substantial improve-ment (including repair of substantial damage), the proposed work and the existing building are to be brought into compliance with the flood-resistant design requirements for new construction. Certain historic buildings in flood hazard areas are not required to be brought into compliance provided they retain their historic designation.
• 2006 and 2003 International Code Council Performance Code (ICC PC). This code focuses the user on outcomes rather than prescriptive solutions. Based on building use and occupancy, designs are to resist certain event magnitudes such that maximum tolerated levels of damage are not exceeded. Section 501.3.4 identifies expected loads for design. The flood with a mean return period of 100 years is to be used to determine flood resistance for all structures except Performance Group I.
3.3 The NFIP’s Community Rating System
and the I-Codes For more than 30 years, communities that participate in the NFIP have recognized flood hazards in their construction and development decisions. Many communities have chosen to guide development towards areas of lower risk and new buildings are often located out of harm’s way. Until 1990, the NFIP had few incentives for communities to do more than administer the minimum NFIP regulatory provisions and flood insurance rates were the same in every community, even though some elected to exceed those provisions. The Community Rating System (CRS) was established to encourage specific community and state activities that exceed the NFIP minimum floodplain management requirements and that have been shown effective at reducing damage and claims against the NFIP. In communities that apply to the CRS and are verified as implementing some of those activities, citizens who purchase flood insurance benefit from discounted premiums. The amount of flood insurance premium discount is based on a community’s CRS classification. There are 10 classes, with a 5-percent
![Page 37: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Implications of Adopting the I-Codes 3-6
______________________
Adopting the I-Codes yields Community Rating System credit.
______________________
discount for each class. Class 10 has no premium discount, and Class 1 yields the maximum discount of 45 percent for policies on buildings in the mapped flood hazard area (and 10 percent on buildings not in the mapped area). A community’s CRS classification is based on the number of credit points calculated for specific floodplain management activities undertaken to meet the goals of the NFIP and the Community Rating System. To be a CRS Class 7 or better, a community must have Building Code Effectiveness Grading Schedule (BCEGS) classification of 6 or better for both residential/personal and nonresidential/commercial. BCEGS is a measure of both the provisions in the code as they relate to natural hazards and a community’s administration of the code. Participation in the CRS is voluntary. Any community that is in full compliance with the rules and regulations of the NFIP, also called “good standing,” may apply for a CRS classification. Technical support may be requested from your state’s NFIP State Coordinator and the appropriate FEMA Regional Office (Appendix D). The application process is described in the CRS Application (FEMA FIA-15A). Eighteen creditable activities are organized under four categories. FEMA conducted extensive evaluations of all the activities and developed a system of credit points. The points are based on how well each activity helps achieve the goals of the CRS. Communities are welcome to propose alternative approaches that go beyond the minimum requirements of the NFIP. FEMA will evaluate alternative approaches to determine how much, if any, CRS credit is appropriate. Table 3-1 lists some of ASCE 24-05 provisions and notes on corresponding CRS credits. The IBC incorporates specific requirements of the NFIP, in large measure by reference to ASCE 24, Flood Resistant Design and Construction. ASCE 24 is organized to apply standards based on the structure cate-gories used by the I-Codes. This means that some standards that exceed the minimum NFIP requirements are not applied uniformly to all build-ings and structures in flood hazard areas.
![Page 38: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes®: Meeting the Requirements of the NFIP 3-7
Table 3-1. Selected ASCE 24-05 Provisions and
Opportunities for Community Rating System Credits ASCE 24-05 Provisions Community Rating System Notes
Foundations to be designed for load combinations, including flood loads
Credit for Foundation Protection
Specific standards for High Risk Flood Hazard Areas (alluvial fans, flash flood, mudslide, erosion-prone, high-velocity, ice jam, and debris flow areas)
Credit based on the portion of the flood hazard area that is identified as subject to unique flood-related hazards where Special Hazards Regulations are applied
Based on structure category and type of flood hazard area, applies freeboard to lowest floor elevation
Credit for Freeboard, depending on the additional height (from 1 to 3 feet) and weighted by potential number of structures in each structure category
Based on structure category and type of flood hazard area, applies freeboard to utilities and mechanical and electrical equipment
Credit for Other Higher Standards, weighted by potential number of structures in each structure category
Tanks to be secured against 1.5 times potential buoyancy
Credit for Other Higher Standards
Specifies foundation types allowed in flood hazard areas subject to high-velocity wave action and high risk flood hazard areas
Credit for Other Higher Standards
In Coastal A Zones, applies requirements for flood hazard areas subject to high-velocity wave action
Credit for Other Higher Standards
Erosion analysis to establish minimum foundation depth in flood hazard areas subject to high-velocity wave action
Credit for Special Hazards, prorated by percent of flood hazard area that is subject to high-velocity wave action
Minimum warning time specified, and emergency operations plan required, for use of floodproofing that requires human intervention
Credit for Flood Warning Program, weighted by potential number of nonresidential buildings
Some activities that are eligible for CRS credit may be required or implemented by a state or a regional district, rather than at the local level. For example, some states have regulations that require freeboard, or state dam safety programs may meet national standards. All communities that apply for the CRS receive credit based on approved statewide standards and activities. FEMA periodically reviews each CRS community’s activities and performance. If the credited activities are not being implemented properly or fully, credit points and the CRS classification may be revised. A community may add, change, or drop creditable activities each year. The discount in flood insurance premiums is only one of the rewards that a community gains by undertaking activities credited by the CRS. Other reasons include improved public safety, reduced damage to property and public infrastructure, avoidance of economic disruption and losses,
![Page 39: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
Implications of Adopting the I-Codes 3-8
reduction of human suffering, protection of the environment and, most importantly, promotion of disaster-resistant communities. To learn more about the CRS, contact the NFIP State Coordinator, the appropriate FEMA Regional Office, or check the NFIP CRS section of FEMA’s website at www.fema.gov/business/nfip/crs.shtm. 3.4 Considering Higher Standards The NFIP sets minimum national standards that apply to all communities, regardless of the unique characteristics that may be present. For a num-ber of reasons, states may require higher standards, or communities may elect to apply provisions that exceed the minimum NFIP requirements:
• Flood history may prompt consideration of more restrictive provi-sions.
• Past events may have been more severe than the predicted 1-percent annual chance flood (also known as the 100-year flood) or events may have occurred more often than expected.
• Communities may have identified unique hazards associated with flooding, including flash flooding, alluvial fan flooding, ice jam flooding, mud flows, debris flows, and flood-related erosion and bluff failure.
• Upland development may have altered the runoff conditions, so that the magnitude and frequency of flooding have changed since the NFIP’s maps were prepared.
• Advances in recent years have improved the modeling methodol-ogies used to develop flood hazard mapping, but it may take many years before all current maps are revised to take advantage of the improved models.
Another frequently cited basis for electing to administer a higher standard is recognition that the engineering methods used to predict flood dis-charges and water surface elevations are mathematical approximations of the natural phenomenon of flooding. In addition, flood hazard maps may be based on topographic maps with wide contour intervals, or flood dis-charges were not computed to anticipate upland development. Choosing higher standards, such as freeboard, adds a factor of safety to acknowl-edge that flood hazard area delineation is not a precise science. The NFIP’s Community Rating System, described in Section 3.3, offers credit points to communities that adopt floodplain management
![Page 40: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes®: Meeting the Requirements of the NFIP 3-9
provisions that exceed the minimum requirements of the NFIP. The maximum number of points available for certain higher regulatory standards is summarized in Table 3-2. Actual points will be determined based on the specific provisions of a community’s program.
Table 3-2. Maximum Allowable Points for Higher Standards
Community Rating System Activity 430: Higher Regulatory Standards
Maximum CRS Credits
(as of 2006) Freeboard (up to 3’ above BFE) 300 pointsFoundation Protection (fill compaction, engineered design) 35 pointsCumulative Substantial Improvement (over specific period) 110 points Lower Substantial Improvement Threshold (less than 50%) 90 pointsProtect Critical Facilities (to 500-year flood level) 100 pointsProtect Flood Storage Capacity (minimize use of fill) 80 pointsProtect Natural and Beneficial Floodplain Functions 40 pointsProhibit or Limit Enclosures Below Elevated Buildings 300 pointsOther Higher Standards 100 pointsLand Development Criteria (e.g., low-density zoning) 700 pointsSpecial Hazards Regulations (unique flood-related hazards) Variable pointsState-Mandated Regulatory Standards 45 pointsBuilding Code and Staffing (BCEGS) 190 pointsManufactured Housing (stringent anchoring & elevation) 50 pointsCoastal A Zone (regulated to V Zone standards) 650 points
3.5 Amending the I-Codes to Implement Higher
Standards Once you have considered higher standards that are appropriate for your community’s circumstances, then you need to determine the best way to implement those standards. In this section some of the higher standards that apply specifically to buildings are described and sample language to amend the IBC and the IRC is suggested. One higher standard, known as the Coastal A Zone, is described in Section 3.6. Freeboard. Freeboard is a factor of safety that results in elevating build-ings above the minimum flood elevation. Floods can and do rise higher than established flood elevations selected for regulatory purposes. For riverine waterways, continuing development in upstream watersheds will, over time, cause more runoff that may worsen flooding. Future land use conditions, such as increased development and runoff, are presently not taken into consideration in FEMA’s flood insurance studies. One hundred CRS credit points are allowed for each additional foot of
______________________
Communities that adopt a freeboard usually do so to provide an inexpen-sive yet effective means to increase flood protection. There is another reason that property owners will appre-ciate. When homes are built above the BFE, whether 1 foot (304 mm), 2 feet (610 mm), or 3 feet (914 mm) higher, owners will qualify for a reduction in NFIP flood insurance premiums ranging from 20 to 40 percent.
______________________
![Page 41: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
Implications of Adopting the I-Codes 3-10
______________________
The report, Evaluation of the National Flood Insurance Program’s Building Standards, examines the incremental costs and benefits of adding freeboard to elevated foundations. The benefits include future avoided damage and lower cost NFIP flood insurance. The report is online at www.fema.gov/business/nfip/nfipeval.shtm
______________________
freeboard above the BFE, up to 3 feet (914 mm), for a maximum of 300 points. The IBC includes freeboard by reference to ASCE 24 for flood-resistant provisions. Freeboard is required for Category III and Category IV buildings (see Section 3.9 for the description of the categories). ASCE does not require freeboard for certain minor buildings (referred to as Category I structures) and one- and two-family homes (included in Category II structures). The IRC specifies that the lowest floors of homes in flood hazard areas must be at or above the DFE. To incorporate freeboard into the IRC, the best way to ensure that designers and builders are aware of the requirement is to amend the IRC in every section that cites the DFE, as appropriate. As an alternative, the following sample revision language would incorporate freeboard in text that in essence defines the DFE.
Sample code revision language IRC: R324.1.3.1 Freeboard. A freeboard of * ft ( * m) shall be added where the design flood elevation or other elevation requirements are specified.
* Insert selected freeboard height.
Prohibition on Enclosures Below Elevated Buildings. Flood hazard areas are subject to considerable forces that may be exerted on the foundation system and any portion of a building that extends below the DFE. Enclosures below otherwise properly elevated buildings are allowable under the NFIP and the I-Codes, provided the enclosures meet certain provisions. However, to minimize obstructing flow and damage that can still be sustained, some communities choose to prohibit enclosures below elevated buildings altogether. Prohibiting enclosures below elevated buildings may earn CRS credits.
![Page 42: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes®: Meeting the Requirements of the NFIP 3-11
Sample code revision language
IBC: 1612.4.1 Enclosures below design flood elevation. Fully enclosed areas below the design flood elevation shall not be permitted. Exception. Crawl spaces that comply with the requirements for openings in enclosures below the design flood elevation in ASCE 24.
IRC: R324.2.2 Enclosed area below design flood elevation. Enclosed areas, including crawl spaces, that are below the design flood elevation shall: Fully enclosed areas below the design flood elevation shall not be permitted.
(1) Be used solely for parking of vehicles, building access or storage.
Exception. Crawl spaces shall: (remainder of section unchanged)
IRC: R324.3.4 Walls below design flood elevation. Delete the existing text in its entirety and replace: Walls and partitions shall not be permitted below the elevated floor. Exception. Walls constructed with insect screening or open lattice.
IRC: R324.3.5 Enclosed areas below design flood elevation. Delete in its entirety and renumber following section.
Limit the Size of Enclosures Below Elevated Buildings. Limiting the size of enclosures below elevated buildings is another way to minimize flood damage. The NFIP and the I-Codes allow such enclosures that are used solely for building access, storage, or parking. All other uses are prohibited. Enclosures for access and storage do not need to be large, otherwise owners may be tempted to convert the areas to uses that are not allowed, such as bedrooms, family rooms, bathrooms, and workshops. Limiting the size of enclosures to less than 300 square feet (28 m2) yields 100 CRS credit points. An additional 50 points are available if the regulations require property owners to sign a nonconversion agreement whereby they acknowledge the use restrictions and agree not to convert enclosures below elevated buildings.
![Page 43: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
Implications of Adopting the I-Codes 3-12
Sample code revision language
IBC: 1612.4.1 Enclosures below design flood elevation. Fully enclosed areas below the design flood elevation shall be no larger than * square feet ( * m2) in total enclosed area. Exception. Crawl spaces that comply with the requirements for openings in enclosures below the design flood elevation in ASCE 24.
IRC: R324.2.2 Enclosed area below design flood elevation. Enclosed areas, including crawl spaces, that are below the design flood elevation shall:
1. Be no larger than * square feet ( * m2) in total enclosed area. Retain and renumber two items for allowable uses and criteria for flood openings.
Exception. Crawl spaces that comply with the openings criteria in (3) are not limited in size.
IRC: R324.3.5 Enclosed area below design flood elevation. Enclosed areas below the design flood elevation shall be:
1. No larger than * square feet ( * m2) in total enclosed area, and
2. Used solely for parking of vehicles, building access or storage. Exception. Walls constructed with insect screening or open lattice.
* Insert selected size limit.
3.6 The Coastal A Zone Flood maps for many coastal communities show both “V Zones” and “A Zones” along open shorelines. V Zones are flood hazard areas subject to high-velocity wave action, where breaking wave heights are greater than or equal to 3 feet (914 mm). Flood hazard areas immediately inland of V Zones (and inland of shorelines without V Zones) are labeled on the flood maps as A Zones. These areas experience some wind-driven waves, but the breaking wave heights are predicted to be less than 3 feet (914 mm). FEMA’s field observations in recent years and laboratory research have determined that flooding with breaking waves between 1.5 feet (457 mm) and 3 feet (914 mm) high produces more damage than flooding of similar depths without waves. Therefore, through reference to ASCE 24, the IBC requires application of V Zone design requirements in areas with such wave conditions, called “Coastal A Zones.”
![Page 44: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes®: Meeting the Requirements of the NFIP 3-13
The Coastal A Zone is not delineated on flood hazard maps prepared by FEMA, but is a zone where wave forces, overland transport of sand, debris impacts, foundation scour, and erosion potential should be taken into consideration. Figure 3-1 illustrates the two conditions that must be present in order for an area to be a Coastal A Zone: stillwater depth greater than or equal to 2 feet (610 mm), and breaking wave heights greater than or equal to 1.5 feet (457 mm). The stillwater depth is the vertical distance between the stillwater elevation and the ground. Note that the stillwater depth of at least 2 feet (610 mm) is necessary, but is not sufficient by itself to render an area a Coastal A Zone. In order for breaking waves to develop, there should be few obstructions between the shoreline and the site. Obstructions may block wind and limit the initial growth of waves or may cause friction that attenuates wave energy. Obstructions can include buildings, locally high ground, and dense, continuous stands of vegetation.
Figure 3-1. Schematic of Flood Hazard Zones in Coastal Areas
Because Coastal A Zones are not delineated on Flood Insurance Rate Maps, the question of determining whether the required conditions are likely to occur at a site needs to be addressed. One way to do this is to determine the inland extent of the 2-foot (610 mm) stillwater depth and assume that breaking waves will develop (i.e., there are no obstructions that would damp waves). Alternatively, a site-specific determination can
![Page 45: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
Implications of Adopting the I-Codes 3-14
be made by looking at sites and their surroundings, the actual surveyed ground elevations, and the estimated wave heights which can be calculated using predicted stillwater depths or derived from elevations shown on the FEMA flood map. One way to address the potential for damage due to Coastal A Zone waves and potential for scour is to apply the V Zone foundation and elevation requirements. As noted above, the IBC incorporates the Coastal A Zone by referencing ASCE 24. Communities that amend the IRC to incorporate the Coastal A Zone may qualify for up to 650 credit points under the NFIP’s Community Rating System (see Section 3.3). Sample code revision language
IRC: R324.2 [Flood hazard areas (including A Zones)
Exception: In flood hazard areas inland of and contiguous to flood hazard areas subject to high-velocity wave action (V zones), and flood hazard areas inland of shorelines without high-velocity wave action, buildings and structures shall be designed and constructed in accordance with R324.3. Areas subject to this requirement are those where the stillwater depth is greater than or equal to 2.0 feet (610 mm), and breaking wave heights are greater than or equal to 1.5 feet (457 mm).
3.7 Substantial Improvement and Substantial
Damage The I-Codes’ definition of “substantial improvement” is consistent with the NFIP. If a proposed improvement, or the repair of damage due to any cause, will cost more than 50 percent of the market value of the building before the improvement or repair, then the entire building is to be made compliant with the flood-resistant provisions. This requirement applies to all buildings and structures located in all flood hazard areas, except designated historic structures. To help address many of the questions that often arise, FEMA prepared Answers to Questions About Substantially Damaged Buildings (FEMA 213). It also has useful information about substantial improvements that are not triggered by a damaging event. Improvements to existing buildings generally are one of four types:
![Page 46: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes®: Meeting the Requirements of the NFIP 3-15
______________________
Complete with de-tailed diagrams and explanations, Home-owner’s Guide to Retrofitting: Six Ways to Protect Your House from Flooding (FEMA 312), is a good re-source for owners, designers, and builders who are considering improve-ments and repairs.
______________________
1. Rehabilitation of an older building without modifying its external dimensions.
2. Additions to an existing building that increase the square footage and usually involve modifying the structure of the original building.
3. Reconstruction of a building, in whole or in part, on the same footprint and foundation.
4. Restoration or repair of damage of any origin to restore a building to its predamaged condition.
Substantial damage may be caused by damage of any nature. Therefore, after a damage event, whether flood, fire, tornado, earthquake, vandalism, or any other cause, the substantial damage requirements of the I-Codes should prompt field inspections to evaluate damage that may trigger the substantial improvement/substantial damage requirements for buildings and structures located in flood hazard areas. After a damage event that affects multiple properties or large areas, buildings that are in flood hazard areas should be checked for damage. Some communities distribute flyers explaining permit requirements and how exposure to future flood damage can be reduced during repairs. Most property owners may be unaware that they need permits to repair and restore damaged buildings. Quick action is needed when substantial damage is discovered because most owners want to repair or rebuild immediately and get back to “normal.” It is good to keep in mind that if they have been damaged by flood, then “normal” means they are likely to get damaged again by the next flood. After major natural hazard events such as floods, tornadoes, and earthquakes, some communities and states organize special permit assistance teams or set up recovery center desks where impacted people can get help. Following major flooding, states and communities often seek technical support and assistance from FEMA to evaluate flood damage. Contact your NFIP State Coordinator or FEMA Regional Office to find out about post-disaster assistance that may be available when many damaged build-ings must be evaluated. FEMA has developed a user-friendly software program, and paper forms, that can be used to help determine whether specific buildings have been substantially damaged. The software is free and is included with Guidance on Estimating Substantial Damage Using
![Page 47: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
Implications of Adopting the I-Codes 3-16
the NFIP Residential Substantial Damage Estimator (FEMA 311), which also includes a field workbook and training video on CD-ROM. 2006 and 2003 IBC. The IBC covers substantial improvement and substantial damage in a number of places. First, the scope of the code is broad and includes:
• 101.2 Scope: includes alteration, movement, enlargement, replacement, and repair. Thus, activities that may qualify as substantial improvement or substantial repair are included within the scope.
• 105 Permits, 105.1 Required: reinforces intended activities that are subject to the requirements of the code, including those that enlarge, alter, repair, move, or demolish a building or structure.
• 105.2.3 Repairs: clarifies that applications for permits need not be submitted for “ordinary repairs,” provided such repairs do not include certain actions that may affect the structural design and other elements of the building.
The IBC includes substantial improvements and restoration of substantial damage among activities listed in Section 1612.1 that are to be designed and constructed to resist the effects of flood hazards and flood loads. “Substantial improvement” and “substantial damage” are defined in Section 1612.2. Importantly, Chapter 34 addresses existing buildings, and specific language addresses flood hazard areas:
3402.1 Existing buildings or structures.
Exception: For buildings and structures in flood hazard areas established in Section 1612.3, any additions, alterations or repairs that constitute substantial improvement of the existing structure, as defined in Section 1612.2, shall comply with the flood design require-ments for new construction and all aspects of the existing structure shall be brought into compliance with the requirements for new construction for flood design.
The scope of Chapter 34 is broad, covering “the alteration, repair, addition and change of occupancy of existing structures.” These definitions are substantially the same as the NFIP terminology:
• “Addition” is an extension or increase in floor area or height of a building or structure.
![Page 48: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes®: Meeting the Requirements of the NFIP 3-17
• “Alteration” is any construction or renovation to an existing structure other than repair or addition.
• “Repair” is the reconstruction or renewal of any part of an existing building for the purpose of its maintenance.
2006 and 2003 IRC. The IRC covers substantial improvement and substantial damage in three sections:
• R105.3.1.1 Substantially improved or substantially damaged existing buildings and structures in areas prone to flooding: specifies that the building official shall examine applications and prepare a finding with regard to the value of the proposed work. If the value equals or exceeds 50 percent of the market value of the building before the damage occurred or the improvement is started, the finding is provided to the board of appeals.
• R112.2.1 Determination of substantial improvement in areas prone to flooding: the board of appeals is to determine if a proposal, re-ferred to the board by the building official pursuant to Section R105.3.1.1, constitutes a substantial improvement (or repair of sub-stantial damage). If the proposed work is found to be a substantial improvement or repair of substantial damage, the work must meet the requirements of Section R324. Section R112.2.1 sets forth specific work that is not included in the term “substantial damage” and that need not be included in the valuation.
• Appendix J, Existing Buildings and Structures, Section AJ102.5 Flood hazard areas: specifies that work in existing buildings is subject to the provisions of Section R105.3.1.1, described above.
2006 and 2003 IEBC. The IEBC is organized based on the nature of the work: repairs; repair of damaged buildings; alterations (Levels 1, 2 and 3); work associated with change of occupancy classification; additions (horizontal, vertical, new/raised foundations); and relocated or moved buildings. The provisions of the IEBC that pertain to flood resistance are all triggered by the determination of whether the work constitutes sub-stantial improvement or substantial damage. In every instance where that occurs, the existing building is required to be brought into compliance with Section 1612 of the IBC. The 2006 IEBC includes, as Chapter 3, text from IBC Chapter 34 as an alternative compliance method. The IEBC also includes provisions for historic structures. The following section describes how certain historic structures may be handled.
![Page 49: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
Implications of Adopting the I-Codes 3-18
______________________
Substantial improve-ment or repair of substantial damage of historic structures may be handled in two ways. After a finding that the structure will retain its historic designation:
• If you are issuing a building permit for other work, you can cite the exception to the flood provisions; or
• You can issue a variance to the requirements.
______________________
3.8 Historic Structures Work that, by valuation, would be determined to be substantial improvement or repair of substantial damage of certain historic structures is treated in a different manner than is described in Section 3.7. If a historic structure retains its historic designation, the NFIP does not require that it be brought into compliance with the flood-resistant requirements. This provision is found in the I-Codes. The best way to determine if a structure retains its historic designation is to require the applicant to have the proposed work reviewed by the appropriate entity that makes such designations and keep a copy of the findings in your permanent records. It is important to note that only historic structures that meet certain criteria that are outlined in the I-Codes need not be brought into compliance. Simply being named “historic” or being located in an historic district does not qualify. The following language is found in the IBC (Section 3407.2), the IRC (Section R112.2.1) and the IEBC (Section 1001.4) to describe historic structures that are not subject to the compliance requirement:
Exception: Historic buildings that are: 1. Listed or preliminarily determined to be eligible for listing in
the National Register of Historic Places; or 2. Determined by the Secretary of the U.S. Department of
Interior as contributing to the historical significance of a registered historic district or a district preliminarily determined to qualify as an historic district; or
3. Designated as historic under a state or local historic preservation program that is approved by the Department of Interior.
Simply because a building qualifies for the exception does not relieve you of the responsibility to work with the owner to consider measures to reduce flood damage and protect historic resources. Such measures include: elevation on a raised foundation; use of water-resistant materials; relocation of flood-prone equipment and utilities; and reconfiguration of the use of flood-prone space.
![Page 50: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes®: Meeting the Requirements of the NFIP 3-19
______________________
The IBC does not define “critical facilities.” The term “essential facilities” is defined in IBC Section 1602: “Buildings and other structure that are intended to remain operational in the event of extreme environmental loading from flood, wind, snow or earth-quakes.”
______________________
3.9 Critical and Essential Facilities In general usage, the term “critical and essential facilities” is used to describe buildings and structures that, if destroyed, damaged, or functionally-impaired, have the potential to cause serious bodily harm, extensive property damage, or disruption of vital socioeconomic activities. Critical and essential facilities commonly include public and private facilities that a community considers essential for the delivery of vital services and for the protection of public safety. They usually include emergency response facilities (fire stations, police stations, rescue squads, and emergency operation centers, custodial/residential facilities (jails and other detention centers, long-term care facilities, hospitals, and other health care facilities), schools, emergency shelters, utilities (water supply, wastewater treatment facilities, and power), and any other assets determined by the community to be of critical importance for the protection of the health, safety and welfare. The NFIP does not have requirements that are specific to critical and essential facilities, although communities should be aware that Federal agencies are required to undertake a deliberative decision process when federal funding is proposed to be used for certain critical actions, includ-ing the construction, upgrade, or repair of critical facilities. (See box on the following page). The IBC, through reference to ASCE 24, does incorporate some additional requirements that apply to critical facilities that are located in flood hazard areas and that result in a higher level of flood-resistance (Table 3-3). ASCE 7 classifies buildings and other structures into four categories based on occupancy; most critical and essential facilities fall into Category III or Category IV, described below:
• Category I includes buildings and other structures whose failure would represent a low hazard to human life, such as agricultural buildings and storage facilities.
• Category II includes all buildings not specifically included in other categories.
![Page 51: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
Implications of Adopting the I-Codes 3-20
President’s Executive Order 11988 and Critical Facilities
When Federal funding is provided for the planning, design, and construction of new critical facilities, or for the repair of existing critical facilities located within the 500-year floodplain, the funding agency is required to address additional considerations. Executive Order 11988, Floodplain Management, requires Federal agencies to apply a decision-making process to avoid, to the extent possible, the long- and short-term adverse impacts associated with the occupancy and modification of floodplains, and to avoid the direct or indirect support of floodplain development whenever there is a practicable alternative. If there is no practicable alternative, the Federal agency must minimize any adverse impacts to life, property, and the natural and beneficial functions of floodplains.
The executive order establishes the base flood elevation as the minimum standard for all Federal agencies. Implementation guidance specifically addresses “critical actions,” which are described as those actions for which even a slight chance of flooding would be too great. The construction or repair of critical facilities, such as fire stations, hospitals and clinics, emergency operations centers, the storage of hazardous wastes, and the storage of critical records, are examples of critical actions.
After determining that a site is in a mapped flood hazard area, and after giving public notice, the Federal funding agency is required to identify and evaluate practicable alternatives to locating a critical facility in a 500-year floodplain. If the Federal agency has determined that the only practicable alternative is to proceed, then the impacts of the proposed action must be identified. If the identified impacts are harmful to people, property, and the natural and beneficial functions of the floodplain, the Federal agency is required to minimize the adverse effects on the floodplain and the funded activity.
Having identified the impacts of the proposed action and the methods to minimize these impacts, the Federal agency is required to re-evaluate the proposed action. The re-evaluation must consider whether the action is still feasible, whether the action can be modified to relocate the facility or eliminate or reduce identified impacts, or if a “no action” alternative should be chosen. If the finding results in a determination that there is no practicable alternative to locating a critical facility in the floodplain, or otherwise affecting the floodplain, then a statement of findings and a public explanation must be provided.
![Page 52: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes®: Meeting the Requirements of the NFIP 3-21
• Category III includes buildings and other structures that represent a substantial hazard to human life in the event of failure, including buildings with higher concentrations of occupants such as educational facilities with capacities greater than 250 for elementary and secondary facilities, 500 for colleges and adult education facilities, or 150 for daycare facilities.
• Category IV includes essential facilities such as hospitals, fire and police stations, rescue and other emergency service facilities, power stations, water supply facilities, aviation facilities, and other buildings critical for the national and civil defense.
Table 3-3. ASCE 24-05 Provisions Related to Critical Facilities
Category III Category IV A Zone: elevation of lowest floor
BFE +1 ft or DFE, whichever is higher
BFE +2 ft or DFE, whichever is higher
V Zone and Coastal A Zone: where the lowest horizontal structural member is parallel to direction of wave approach
BFE +1 ft or DFE, whichever is higher
BFE +1 ft or DFE, whichever is higher
Elevation of Lowest Floor or Bottom of Lowest Horizontal Structural Member
V Zone and Coastal A Zone: where the lowest horizontal structural member is perpendicular to direction of wave approach
BFE +2 ft or DFE, whichever is higher
BFE +2 ft or DFE, whichever is higher
A Zone BFE +1 ft or DFE, whichever is higher
BFE +2 ft or DFE, whichever is higher
V Zone and Coastal A Zone: where the lowest horizontal structural member is parallel to direction of wave approach
BFE +2 ft or DFE, whichever is higher
BFE +2 ft or DFE, whichever is higher
Elevation Below Which Flood-Damage-Resistant Materials Shall be Used
V Zone and Coastal A Zone: where the lowest horizontal structural member is perpendicular to direction of wave approach
BFE +3 ft or DFE, whichever is higher
BFE +3 ft or DFE, whichever is higher
A Zone BFE +1 ft or DFE, whichever is higher
BFE +2 ft or DFE, whichever is higher
V Zone and Coastal A Zone: where the lowest horizontal structural member is parallel to direction of wave approach
BFE +2 ft or DFE, whichever is higher
BFE +2 ft or DFE, whichever is higher
Minimum Elevation of Utilities and Equipment
V Zone and Coastal A Zone: where the lowest horizontal structural member is perpendicular to direction of wave approach
BFE +3 ft or DFE, whichever is higher
BFE +3 ft or DFE, whichever is higher
A Zone: elevation to which dry floodproofing extends
BFE +1 ft or DFE, whichever is higher
BFE +2 ft or DFE, whichever is higher
Dry Floodproofing
V Zone and Coastal A Zone: dry floodproofing not allowed
Not applicable Not applicable
![Page 53: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
Implications of Adopting the I-Codes 3-22
______________________
Although not widely available, some private insurance companies do provide flood coverage that is not underwritten by the federal govern-ment. Those policies most likely do not include additional coverage to help pay the increased cost of bringing a building into compliance.
______________________
______________________
To help answer ques-tions, FEMA prepared Guidance for State and Local Officials: Increased Cost of Compliance Coverage (FEMA 301).
______________________
3.10 Increased Cost of Compliance The requirement to achieve compliance after substantial damage is sus-tained has been part of the NFIP regulations since 1974. Standard NFIP flood insurance policies issued or renewed since May 1997 include coverage called Increased Cost of Compliance. This coverage is intended to help cover a substantial part of the cost of bringing a flood-damaged building into compliance with the flood-resistant provisions of the community’s codes and regulations. Most buildings in FEMA-mapped flood hazard areas that are insured by the NFIP that are declared “substantially damaged” by the community will qualify for an additional insurance claim payment of up to an amount stated in the flood insurance policy. In 2007, the maximum amount was $30,000; the actual amount that is paid is a function of the nature of the work and a determination of eligibility of costs. This additional claim payment may also be used as part of the nonfederal cost-share for certain federally funded flood mitigation grants. Building officials have a significant role in working with property owners and insurance adjusters in order for owners to be able to file a claim for Increased Cost of Compliance claim payments. A formal determination of substantial damage must be made and a building permit for the work required to achieve compliance must be issued. Contact your NFIP State Coordinator as soon as you suspect that flood damage may qualify as substantial damage. Increased Cost of Compliance claim payments may be available for insured buildings that sustain repetitive flood losses, but only if the community has adopted a specific cumulative substantial damage provision that either meets or exceeds the definition in the standard flood insurance policy.
![Page 54: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
44.. CCoommmmuunniittyy RReessppoonnssiibbiilliittiieess UUnnddeerr tthhee NNFFIIPP
Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes®: Meeting the Requirements of the NFIP 4-1
______________________
State or local modifications of the flood-resistant provisions of the I-Codes may result in a code that does not meet the minimum requirements of the NFIP. If this happens, in order to continue to participate in the NFIP, the state or community must adopt compensating provisions in a separate ordinance or regulation. Before changing any flood-resistant provision of the I-Codes, contact your NFIP State Coordinator or the appropriate FEMA Regional Office to dis-cuss the impact of the proposed changes.
______________________
If your community participates in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP), then the responsibilities described in this section are already being addressed, although perhaps by an office other than the building department. Worksheet B in Chapter 6 can be used to identify each department in your community that has a role in administering the current floodplain management regulations. The NFIP provides flood insurance and flood hazard information. In return, states and communities agree to regulate development in flood hazard areas. The NFIP was founded on the principle that managing floodplain development at the local level will lead to avoidance and minimization of future flood damage. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) provides convincing evidence to support this concept: Buildings that are constructed in compliance with the NFIP requirements sustain little or no damage during most floods. When a community decides to participate in the NFIP it accepts the responsibility to adopt, administer, and enforce floodplain management provisions that either meet or exceed the minimum NFIP requirements. Communities become partners with the federal government. The objectives of the partnership are to reduce safety risks to people, to protect the natural and beneficial functions of floodplains, to mitigate flood damage to real and personal property, and to create disaster-resistant communities. 4.1 Modifications of the I-Codes Review Chapter 5 about some state actions that may affect how you coordinate your building code and NFIP responsibilities. Check with your NFIP State Coordinator and the state building official to determine if your state has adopted the International Codes® (I-Codes) and if there were any modifications to the flood-resistant provisions of the I-Codes. As you compare the flood-resistant provisions of the I-Codes to your current floodplain management regulations, you may determine that you need to adopt amendments to the code or a companion floodplain
![Page 55: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
Community Responsibilities Under the NFIP 4-2
______________________
If your state or com-munity amends or does not adopt the administrative pro-visions outlined in the IBC (including Ap-pendix G) and the IRC, then you must recapture those pro-visions in a companion floodplain management ordinance. Be sure to review the remainder of this section and Section 1.6 for an overview of com-munity responsibilities under the NFIP.
______________________
management ordinance in order to retain local standards that exceed the minimums in the code. FEMA encourages communities to adopt higher or more restrictive standards and has established the NFIP Community Rating System (CRS) to recognize the value of doing so. Section 3.3 is a brief overview of the CRS. Examples of higher standards, along with suggested code revision language, are found in Section 3.4 and Section 3.5. 4.2 Regulate All Development As described in Section 3.1, to participate in the NFIP, communities are required to regulate all development. When examining how the I-Codes help you to fulfill that responsibility, pay special attention to ensure that this requirement is accomplished. Any activity that is either exempt or not covered by the codes must be recaptured in a companion floodplain management ordinance. 4.3 Record Keeping Keeping complete permit records is a key element of your community’s responsibilities under the NFIP. The I-Codes contain specific requirements concerning record keeping:
• Section 104.7 of the IBC requires retention of all official records “for the period required for retention of public records.”
• The NFIP and IBC Appendix G require that records related to development in flood hazard areas be maintained permanently and that they be available for public inspection and review. In addition to retaining permit files, many communities keep a separate log of permits issued in flood hazard areas.
• Section R104.7 of the IRC requires retention of official records of applications, permits and certificates issued, reports of inspections, and notices and orders issued. Such records are to be retained “for the period required for retention of public records.”
Required Documentation. The I-Codes require communities to obtain and retain documentation needed to determine that floodplain development activities are compliant, including:
• Documentation of lowest floor elevations (IBC Sections 109.3.3 and 1612.5; IRC Sections R109.1.3 and R324.1.9),
• Documentation of floodproofing (IBC Section 1612.5), • Documentation of the design of flood openings that meet the
performance specifications (IBC Section 1612.5),
![Page 56: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes®: Meeting the Requirements of the NFIP 4-3
• In certain circumstances, documentation of breakaway wall design (IBC Section 1612.5; IRC Section R324.3.6),
• Documentation of foundation design, only in flood hazard areas subject to high-velocity wave action (IBC Section 1612.5; IRC Section R324.3.6),
• Documentation that floodway encroachments will not increase flood levels (IBC Appendix G, Section G103.5),
• Notifications provided to adjacent communities, the state, and FEMA for watercourse alterations (IBC Appendix G, Section G103.6),
• Documentation of all floodplain management variance actions, including justifications (IBC Appendix G, Section G105.2; IRC Section R104.7),
• Notifications provided to recipients of floodplain management variances of certain cautions [IBC Appendix G, Section G105.7(5); IRC Section R112.2.2(5)], and
• Copies of inspection reports for buildings located in flood hazard areas (IBC Appendix G, Section G103.8; IRC Section R104.7).
Biennial Reports to FEMA. Periodically, FEMA sends Biennial Report forms to each participating community. The information to be reported by the community, including updates of previously submitted data, helps FEMA and the states plan for technical assistance and flood map needs. FEMA is particularly interested in the number of permits issued and variances granted. Accurate record keeping is essential for a community to be able to properly complete the Biennial Report forms. Plan Review and Inspection Checklist. Some communities use a check-list during plan review to verify that appropriate flood-resistant provisions have been checked and are acceptable. The sample plan review check-lists included in Appendix F are designed to be transferred to the inspection staff and used to document that specific flood-resistant construction details have been found to be acceptable. Use of a checklist is not required by the NFIP. However, it is a good way to document plan review and compliance. 4.4 Requiring Other Permits The NFIP regulations specifically require that communities review development proposed in flood hazard areas to ensure that all other necessary permits have been received. Such permits and approvals may
![Page 57: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/57.jpg)
Community Responsibilities Under the NFIP 4-4
need to be obtained from federal, state, or local regulatory authorities. Examples at the federal level include permitting under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act of 1972 and Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899, and consultation or permitting under the Endangered Species Act of 1973. State and regional agencies may also regulate activities in flood hazard areas, including activities that impact wetlands, forestry resources, dunes, the shoreline or coastal zone, subaquatic vegetation, threatened and endangered species, navigation, and waterways. Section 105.3.1 of the IBC directs the building official to reject applica-tions that do not conform to the requirements of pertinent laws. Although not defined, pertinent laws include applicable federal, state, or other local laws. IBC Appendix G, Section G103.2 specifically requires that pro-posed developments in flood hazard areas are not to be approved until applicants provide proof that other necessary permits have been granted by federal or state authorities. Coordination of multiple permits may help applicants to avoid added costs associated with differing requirements. 4.5 Notifying Potentially Impacted Parties When an applicant proposes activities that involve alteration of a watercourse, IBC Appendix G, Section G103, specifies that the building official shall require the applicant to notify FEMA, the state, and adjacent communities. Changes to streams and rivers have the potential to significantly alter flow patterns and carrying capacities, which may adversely impact upstream, cross-stream, and downstream properties. The NFIP regulations require that the carrying capacity of an altered watercourse be not less than that of the natural watercourse before alterations were made. Engineering analyses are required to demonstrate that this requirement is satisfied. Applicants are to submit a comparison of the existing and proposed channel capacities, a description of the proposed alterations, land use of the adjacent properties, information about adjacent property owners, and an assessment of the potential impacts.
![Page 58: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/58.jpg)
Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes®: Meeting the Requirements of the NFIP 4-5
______________________
Some flood hazard areas, mapped without benefit of engineering analyses to develop detailed BFEs, are shown as “Zone A” on FIRMs. A valuable resource document is FEMA 265, Managing Floodplain Development in Approximate Zone A Areas: A Guide for Obtaining and Developing Base (100-Year) Flood Elevations.
______________________
______________________
The floodway is the channel and adjacent land areas that must be reserved in order to pass the base flood without cumulatively increasing the water surface elevation more than a designated height, which is specified in the Flood Insurance Study. Floodways are delineated along most waterways that are studied using detailed methods.
______________________
4.6 Evaluating Floodway Impacts Communities are required to prohibit floodway encroachments, including fills, new construction, and substantial improvements, if they would cause flood levels to increase more than a designated height. The designated height limit on the allowable increase is found in the floodway tables of a community’s Flood Insurance Study. If a community decides to permit a floodway proposal that could cause an increase in the base flood elevation (BFE), a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) and floodway map revision must be reviewed and issued by FEMA. Preliminary permit approvals should be conditioned on the applicant obtaining the CLOMR. 4.7 Flood Hazard Map-Related Duties At a minimum, communities must use the Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) and floodway map, if provided by FEMA, in the administration of flood-resistant provisions adopted for participation in the NFIP. Flood hazard data that are available from other federal, state, or other sources may be used if FEMA has not provided a map or if detailed data are not specified, for example, in flood hazard areas without BFE information. Communities must notify FEMA and the NFIP State Coordinator if they intend to adopt maps showing flood hazard areas that are larger or different than those on the FIRMs. This situation may arise if a commun-ity conducts a detailed study of an area that was not mapped by FEMA. It may also arise if the community prepares maps of flood hazard areas using criteria that are different than the minimum map specifications used by the NFIP, such as future watershed development runoff, “no-rise” floodway, or other aspect that would result in a more restrictive flood hazard area. Under these circumstances, the elevation of the flood hazard area is referred to as the design flood elevation (DFE). At a minimum, the DFE equals the BFE, which is shown on the FIRM. Section 1.13 includes definitions of both DFE and BFE. Another map-related responsibility pertains to flood hazard areas for which base flood elevations are specified but floodway boundaries are not designated. In these flood hazard areas, the NFIP requires demonstration “that the cumulative effect of the proposed development, when combined with all other existing and anticipated development, will not increase the
![Page 59: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/59.jpg)
Community Responsibilities Under the NFIP 4-6
______________________
To help applicants gather and complete the data necessary for map changes, FEMA developed application and certification forms that are accessible online. Additional detailed guidance on all of the map change processes is found in Appeals, Revisions, and Amendments to NFIP Maps: A Guide for Community Officials (FEMA FIA-12).
______________________
water surface elevation of the base flood more than one foot at any point within the community.” [44 CFR 60.3(c)(10)] This is usually accomplished by requiring applicants to prepare floodway analyses using methods acceptable to FEMA. Communities that participate in the NFIP are required to:
• Participate in studies to produce or revise the maps. For the most part, flood-prone communities have some level of map issued by FEMA. From time to time, waterways are restudied or new studies are conducted in areas without detailed flood elevation data.
• Adopt map revisions issued by FEMA. A change to an effective NFIP map is called a “map revision.” The effective map is the most recent map. When a map revision is warranted, FEMA will revise and republish the affected map panels and, if necessary, the Flood Insurance Study report. This is referred to as a “physical map revision.” If the scale of the revision is small, or if it affects only one property, FEMA will issue a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR). A LOMR describes the changes and officially revises the effective map.
• Retain all versions of the maps. The most recent map, called the “effective” map, is to be used to regulate development in flood hazard areas. Previous versions of the map should be retained for historical purposes and in the event permit or enforcement decisions need to be reconstructed.
• Allow for public access to the maps. Flood hazard maps serve multiple purposes. They are the basis for mortgage lenders requir-ing flood insurance and insurance agents use them to determine insurance rates. Citizens should have ready access to the maps so they can better understand flood risks and the implications of decisions regarding permits and flood insurance.
• Notify FEMA when revisions are needed. FEMA should be notified when a community becomes aware of a significant need for a change to the flood hazard maps.
The following are related to FEMA’s efforts to keep maps current to reflect changes in conditions:
• Map Modernization. FEMA is in the midst of a multiyear initiative to improve and update the nation’s flood hazard maps. Partnerships with state, regional, and local stakeholders help to facilitate such tasks as collecting, updating, adopting and maintaining flood data.
• Community boundaries. Most older FIRMs were issued for individual communities, and the areas shown are those within the
![Page 60: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/60.jpg)
Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes®: Meeting the Requirements of the NFIP 4-7
______________________
Many communities attach a blank FEMA Elevation Certificate to the issued permit and clearly indicate when it must be completed and submitted.
______________________
______________________
Learn more by reading FEMA’s Technical Bulletin #10, Ensuring that Structures Built on Fill In or Near Special Flood Hazard Areas Are Reasonably Safe From Flooding (NFIP Interim Guidance).
______________________
corporate boundaries at the time the map was prepared. Over time, FEMA will convert FIRMs to digital media and will issue them on a “countywide” basis rather than individual towns, cities, and the unincorporated areas of counties.
• Engineering analyses of certain proposed activities. Applications for permits for certain proposed activities, such as flood control structures, bridges and culverts, waterway alterations, or fill for multiple lots, are to be supported with documented engineering analyses. FEMA reviews the analyses to determine whether the proposals meet the criteria for a map revision. FEMA’s initial comments are known as “conditional determinations” that are issued as CLOMR and Conditional Letters of Map Revision Based on Fill (CLOMR-F). When a project is completed, “as-builts” are submitted to support FEMA’s issuance of a final Letter of Map Amendment (LOMA) or a physical map revision.
• Flood fringe fills (individual lots). In flood hazard areas designated as AE Zones, if individual lots are filled so that the buildable surface is at or above the BFE or DFE, owners may submit docu-mentation and request that FEMA remove the flood hazard area designation. If the fill meets certain criteria, including acknowl-edgement by the community that any structures are “reasonably safe from flooding,” then FEMA will issue a Letter of Map Revision based on Fill (LOMR-F). Without the LOMR-F, lenders will require that flood insurance be purchased on buildings that, based on the FIRM, appear to be within the mapped flood hazard area.
• Naturally high ground (individual lots). Because of the scale of the original topography and the approximate nature of flood hazard mapping techniques, some land areas may have been inadvertently included in the mapped flood hazard area. Land owners may submit documentation to show that an individual structure and/or a legally described parcel of land is above the BFE. FEMA will issue a LOMA if it is determined that the natural grade of a parcel of land is actually above the BFE. The LOMA applies to only the described structure or parcel, and officially amends the effective map.
4.8 Elevation Certificates During construction, certain ground and building elevations are to be surveyed and certified so that building officials can determine the elevation of the lowest floor. The lowest floor elevation is the most significant element in determining that floodplain construction is compliant. The same elevation certification is used by insurance agents to determine appropriate insurance ratings. A good resource for
![Page 61: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/61.jpg)
Community Responsibilities Under the NFIP 4-8
______________________
Certain other design documentation may be required:
• Floodproofing, for certain nonresiden-tial buildings designed to be watertight.
• Piles or columns, for buildings in flood hazard areas subject to high -elocity wave action.
• Breakaway walls, only if anticipated loads exceed certain values set forth in the code.
• Flood openings, if flood openings do not conform to the prescriptive specifications in the code.
______________________
understanding the certification and documentation of elevations is the Floodplain Management Bulletin: Elevation Certificate (FEMA 467-1). IBC Section 109.3.3 and IRC Section 109.1.3 call for inspections when the lowest floor level is set and before further vertical construction takes place, and elevation data are to be submitted to the building official. That way, errors in the elevation can be corrected with minimal cost and delay. Because the building official’s determination of the “lowest floor” is, in part, dependent on the location of utilities and the final site grading, documentation of the a final “as-built” elevations must be completed and sealed when that work is finished. FEMA’s Elevation Certificate (FEMA Form 81-31) can be ordered from FEMA. It is available online in the library section of FEMA’s website, www.fema.gov/business/nfip/elvinst.shtm. The form includes several pages of instructions and illustrations with specifics for the surveyor/engineer and the building official:
• Surveyor/Engineer. A registered professional who is licensed to perform elevation surveys is required to complete, sign, and affix a professional seal to the documentation of elevations. The documentation must be dated to document when the elevations were surveyed because continuing construction or future modifications could alter and/or outdate the information. The registered professional is responsible for obtaining and certifying accurate elevations of key ground and building elevations. Using the diagrams provided by FEMA, the registered professional determines which building elevations to survey by selecting the building diagram that most closely represents the actual building. If the diagrams do not match the configuration of the building, the registered professional may need to note in the comment section to clarify the diagram selected. The Elevation Certificate and building diagrams specify the various elevations that are to be surveyed or measured, including:
− The bottom floor and the next higher floor; − The floor of enclosures, attached garages, below-grade areas,
and the interior grade of crawl spaces; − Lowest elevation of machinery, appliances and other utility
equipment servicing the building; − For buildings in flood hazard areas subject to high-velocity
wave action, the top of floors and the bottom of the lowest horizontal structural members;
![Page 62: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/62.jpg)
Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes®: Meeting the Requirements of the NFIP 4-9
− For all buildings, the highest and lowest adjacent grades; and − For buildings with enclosures below the elevated floor, the
number and total net area of flood openings that are within 12 inches (305 mm) of the adjacent grade are to be noted on the certificate.
• Building Official. The issued building permit should clearly specify the DFE and the minimum elevation of the lowest floor (including basement). When documentation of the elevations is submitted by a registered design professional, it is the building official’s responsibility to determine that all required surveyed elevations and information are noted on the “as-built” certification. If all the required elevations have been surveyed, the building official then determines which level is the lowest floor and compares its “as-built” elevation to the DFE. This comparison determines whether the building is compliant with the elevation provisions of the code. If not compliant, enforcement action should be initiated immediately.
In determining the lowest floor, two factors should be kept in mind:
• In flood hazard areas not subject to wave action (A Zones), if an enclosed area below an elevated building has flood openings, has flood-resistant materials, and if it is used only for parking, building access, or storage*, then it is not considered the “lowest floor.”
• In areas subject to high-velocity wave action (V Zones), if an enclosed area beneath an elevated building has breakaway walls, flood-resistant materials, and is used only for parking, building access, or storage*, then it is not considered the “lowest floor.”
* Enclosures intended for access and limited storage do not need to be large; otherwise, owners may be tempted to convert the areas to uses that are not permissible, such as bedrooms, family rooms, bathrooms, and workshops. Anything stored is subject to flooding. Therefore, only limited storage should be allowed. Storage does not include working appliances such as freezers, refrigerators, washers, and dryers.
A copy of the documentation of elevations (e.g., FEMA’s Elevation Certificate) is to be placed in the community’s permanent permit file. To facilitate reporting to FEMA and the state, some communities keep a separate log with information on flood hazard area permits. At a later date, if documentation of elevations is not found in the file, the community will be required to obtain a replacement to verify proper administration of the NFIP requirements.
![Page 63: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/63.jpg)
Community Responsibilities Under the NFIP 4-10
4.9 Inspections Even when building permits and construction plans are complete, good inspection and enforcement procedures are important. Building inspectors need to understand the flood-resistant design and construction requirements that they are to check. If deviations from the conditions of the permit are found early during construction, it is easier to work with the owner and builder to achieve compliance through corrective actions. Using a plan review and inspection checklist (examples in Appendix F) can make inspections easier because the inspector will have a standardized summary of flood-related requirements that are not seen in non-floodplain buildings. A checklist also documents the inspection, which can be important for maintaining a community’s good standing in the NFIP. The following summarizes some of the inspections that can be performed to facilitate compliance with flood-resistant provisions:
• Stake Out or Site Inspection. The best time to make sure a building will be located correctly is during the site inspection when setbacks and distances from the watercourse or floodway can be checked. Checking that the lowest floor is properly elevated is easier if there is a nearby elevation benchmark or reference mark. If one of the reference marks shown on the flood hazard map is not close to the site, placement of a temporary reference mark on site can make it easier to check the elevation when the floor level is set, and to certify the elevation when the “as-built” documentation of elevations is completed.
• Fill Inspection. Fill that is placed to structurally support an elevated building should be inspected to check compaction and compaction reports should be collected. It is also important to check that the final elevation of the fill is as high as required by the permit because this will affect the final elevation of the lowest floor.
• Footing or Foundation Inspection. For solid perimeter foundation walls that will create enclosures below otherwise elevated buildings (crawlspaces), inspectors should check for the specified number, size, and location of flood openings. Flood openings are to be close to the ground and should not be confused with under-floor air ventilation openings, which are located just under the floor level. For slab-on-grade (and stemwall) buildings, the lowest floor inspection is conducted at this time.
![Page 64: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/64.jpg)
Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes®: Meeting the Requirements of the NFIP 4-11
• Lowest Floor Inspection. Under Sections 109.3 of the IBC and R109.1.3 of the IRC, documentation of the lowest floor elevation is to be submitted. An important part of administering provisions for flood-resistant construction is making sure that buildings are elevated properly. The best time to verify compliance is when the lowest floor elevation is set and before further vertical construction takes place. An error of a foot or two in elevation may seem minor, but correction can be expensive and complicated if that error is discovered once the walls and roof are in place. In addition, federal flood insurance is very costly for new buildings that are constructed with the lowest floor below the DFE.
• Final Inspection. A final inspection to document compliance with the floodplain management requirements of the I-Codes can be done at the same time as the final inspection to issue the occupancy certificate. During the final inspection, the important things to check include:
− Verify that utilities and other building elements are located properly, usually above the DFE. Frequently overlooked items include: heating, cooling, and ventilation equipment; electrical outlets; plumbing fixtures; and ductwork that is installed under the floor, usually in a crawlspace.
− In flood hazard areas not subject to high-velocity wave action (A Zones), inspect enclosures below elevated buildings to ensure the flood openings are correct in number, total net open area, and placement. If standard air ventilation units are used as flood vents, the closure mechanism must be permanently disabled so that floodwater can automatically enter and exit freely, without any human intervention.
− In flood hazard areas subject to high-velocity wave action (V Zones), inspect enclosures below elevated buildings to determine that breakaway walls are constructed to break away freely without causing damage to the building’s foundation or the elevated portion of the building. To minimize transfer of loads during flood conditions, utility connections are not to be mounted on, or penetrate through, breakaway walls.
− For enclosed areas below the DFE, check that the approved use (only parking, storage, and building access) appears to be consistent with what has been built.
− Check that exterior fill is placed according to the approved plans and specifications, and that next to all sides of the foundation the fill is not higher than the interior slab or grade of crawl spaces (unless the interior crawlspace grade is filled to above the DFE).
![Page 65: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/65.jpg)
Community Responsibilities Under the NFIP 4-12
− Verify that flood damage-resistant materials are used below the DFE. Refer to FEMA Technical Bulletin Flood-Resistant Material Requirements for Buildings Located in Special Flood Hazard Areas (FEMA FIA-TB #2).
− Examine building utility systems and equipment to determine if they have been elevated or otherwise installed according to plans to resist flood damage. Heat pumps and pad-mounted air-conditioning units must be elevated.
− Collect the “as-built” documentation of elevations prior to the final sign-off and issuance of occupancy certificates.
− If used, complete and sign the plan review and inspection checklist and place all inspection reports in the permit file.
• Post-Damage Inspections. After a flood or any event that causes significant damage, buildings located in flood hazard areas should be inspected. Some communities distribute flyers explaining permit requirements and how future flood damage can be reduced during the repair process. Most homeowners do not realize that they may need permits to repair and restore damaged buildings if they are in flood hazard areas. Damage that may meet the “substantial damage” definition must be addressed in accordance with the applicable provisions of the I-Codes (see Section 3.7).
4.10 Enforcement and Violations Proper enforcement of the floodplain management provisions is a critical part of a community’s responsibility under the NFIP. During construc-tion, violations of these provisions are to be resolved as soon as they are discovered and before further construction takes place. What may appear to be a minor violation could end up being expensive when the owner purchases NFIP flood insurance. A community’s standing in the NFIP depends on making a good faith effort to successfully resolve violations. By allowing any violation to go unresolved, the community may set a precedent, making it more difficult to take future enforcement actions. Perhaps one of the more persuasive arguments for adopting the I-Codes is to consolidate enforcement authority for flood-resistant design and con-struction provisions. The building department typically has mechanisms in place to aggressively handle code violations, while planning and zoning departments may not.
![Page 66: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/66.jpg)
Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes®: Meeting the Requirements of the NFIP 4-13
______________________
Communities are encouraged to consult with either the NFIP State Coordinator or the appropriate FEMA Regional Office prior to issuing variances.
Even if allowed by a properly issued variance, NFIP flood insurance on a build-ing that is only 1 or 2 feet (305 or 610 mm) below the BFE may cost two to three times more than if the lowest floor of the building is at the minimum elevation.
______________________
______________________
If the administrative sections of the I-Codes (including Appendix G) are not adopted, the variance provisions must be recaptured in a companion floodplain management ordinance.
______________________
4.11 The Variance Process For the purposes of the NFIP, a variance is a grant of relief from the application of the NFIP floodplain management requirements. A variance allows construction in a manner that is otherwise prohibited. Variances are granted for floodplain management purposes only. A community may issue a variance to allow a building to be constructed in a manner that is at variance to the minimum NFIP provisions, but NFIP flood insurance will still be rated according to risk and might be prohibitively expensive. The primary goals of the flood-resistant provisions of the code are to reduce damage and to protect public health and safety for the entire community. Achieving these goals also results in disaster-resistant and livable communities. Very few variances to the floodplain management provisions can be justified. A variance should not be granted if a proposed activity increases the susceptibility of buildings and people to flooding and flood damage. As a guiding principle, a variance should pertain to the unique character-istics of the land itself. A properly issued variance may be granted for a parcel of land with physical characteristics so unusual that complying with the code would create an exceptional hardship for the applicant. A variance should not be granted based on the personal circumstances of an individual. 2006 and 2003 IBC. Section 112 creates a board of appeals to hear and decide appeals of orders, decisions, or determinations made by the building official. Specific requirements, considerations, and conditions for issuing variance from floodplain management requirements can be found in IBC Appendix G, Section G105. 2006 and 2003 IRC. Section R112 creates a board of appeals to hear appeals of orders, decisions, or determinations made by the building official. The board of appeals has specific responsibilities related to flood hazard area development:
• R112.2.1 Determination of substantial improvement in areas prone to flooding: requires the board of appeals to evaluate the building official’s finding regarding the value of proposed improvements to existing buildings to determine if the work constitutes a substantial improvement, and
![Page 67: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/67.jpg)
Community Responsibilities Under the NFIP 4-14
• R112.2.2 Criteria for issuance of a variance for areas prone to flooding: sets forth specific criteria, consistent with the minimum NFIP requirements, to be applied in the review and consideration of variances to the minimum flood hazard area requirements.
![Page 68: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/68.jpg)
55.. SSttaattee BBuuiillddiinngg CCooddeess aanndd FFlloooodd PPrroovviissiioonnss
Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes®: Meeting the Requirements of the NFIP 5-1
______________________
Freeboard is the most common state floodplain requirement that exceeds NFIP minimums. It is found in the statutes or regulations of 15 states. Section 3.4 offers sample language to capture this requirement in the I-Codes.
______________________
______________________
You may need to develop a companion floodplain management ordinance to assure that all NFIP requirements are addressed.
______________________
States handle building codes in a number of ways that can affect whether and to what extent communities can rely on the code to participate in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). Regardless of how your state does it, you need to be sure that state-level amendments do not jeopardize the minimum flood-resistant provisions. In addition, in order to achieve the level of flood protection desired by your community (especially if you participate in the Community Rating System and administer any higher standards), you will need to coordinate your amendments with both the state building code agency and the NFIP State Coordinator. Whether the building codes are adopted at the state level for local administration or adopted at the local level, either way will affect how you will reference the flood hazard maps that are the basis for regulation (see Section 5.6). 5.1 Meeting More Restrictive State
Requirements Many states have specific requirements that apply to development in flood hazard areas. Typically the requirements are set forth in statutes or regulations that are under the jurisdiction of the natural resource, community development, or emergency management agency. The NFIP State Coordinator can identify all specific state requirements. Some of the more common higher standards provisions imposed by state regulations include freeboard, more restrictive floodway encroachment limits, setbacks, and factors to address erosion. 5.2 State Amendments to the I-Codes Before considering any amendments to the International Codes (I-Codes) that are related to flood hazard areas and flood-resistant construction, the state agency that is responsible for the state code should work with the NFIP State Coordinator and the appropriate Federal Emergency Manage-ment Agency (FEMA) regional office. Whether amendments are proposed at the state level or local amendments are approved at the state level, care must be taken to ensure that modifications are consistent with
![Page 69: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/69.jpg)
State Building Codes and Flood Provisions 5-2
the requirements for the NFIP. Otherwise, the burden falls to communities to resolve inconsistencies in their floodplain management ordinances. 5.3 Local Amendments to State Building
Codes One of the primary purposes for a statewide building code is consistency between communities. For this reason, some states do not allow communities to amend the code. However, most state building code authorities have a mechanism by which communities can seek approval to adopt amendments to the code to address local circumstances with adequate justification. Many communities have incorporated provisions in their floodplain management ordinances that exceed the minimum requirements of the NFIP, and the justifications for those higher standards may vary from community to community. Common justifications include the need to provide a greater degree of protection given a community’s history of flooding or to recognize uncertainties in modeling and mapping the flood hazard. In addition, lower federal flood insurance premiums may be available if a community participates in the NFIP’s Community Rating System (see Section 3.3). Incorporating those higher standards into your local building code may require approval by the state building code agency or you may decide to capture them in the companion floodplain management ordinance. 5.4 Exemptions from State Building Codes The I-Codes list specific types of work that are exempt from the permit requirements of the codes. Some state building codes identify additional specific activities or additional types of buildings that also are exempt. Examples that have been identified include buildings under a certain size, manufactured housing units installed according to a manufacturer’s instructions, agricultural buildings and structures, and structures and activities undertaken by specific industries such as mining or logging. As described in Section 3.1, NFIP minimum standards require that participating communities apply floodplain management requirements to all development in flood hazard areas. If your state exempts specific activities or types of buildings from the state building code, you must
![Page 70: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/70.jpg)
Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes®: Meeting the Requirements of the NFIP 5-3
______________________
Most communities have FIRMs with more than one panel. Each map panel may have a different date. It is important that the date of each currently effective map panel be identified.
Check with your NFIP State Coordinator to learn how map revisions should be handled.
______________________
recapture them in a companion floodplain management ordinance to ensure compliance with the NFIP requirements. 5.5 Direct State Regulation of Certain
Activities or Buildings Some states issue building permits for certain activities or specific types of occupancies or buildings that are then exempt from a local building permit. For example, some states issue permits and conduct inspections of all public school buildings, some states regulate certain other public buildings, and some states regulate the installation of manufactured homes in manufactured home parks. In situations where the state has direct regulatory authority, the authority to address the floodplain development aspects may be shared between the community and the state. For example, the community may approve a project under its zoning ordinance or floodplain management ordinance, while the state requires compliance with codes pertaining to design and construction. Check with your state building code official and the NFIP State Coordinator to determine whether these or similar situations exist in your state. Coordinated actions may be necessary to ensure that all NFIP requirements are adequately addressed. You may need to recapture in a companion floodplain management ordinance those activities that are authorized by the state. 5.6 Referencing Flood Maps in the Building
Codes FEMA prepares Flood Insurance Studies and Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs) for flood-prone communities. Some waterways studied using detailed engineering methods show floodways, which may be shown on the FIRM or on a separate Flood Boundary and Floodway Map. FIRMs and floodway maps serve as the minimum basis for delineating flood hazard areas within which development is regulated. A growing number of communities develop and adopt their own maps, often using a basis that results in higher predicted water surface elevations and greater areas subject to regulation. Section 1.13 describes the base flood elevation (BFE) developed by the NFIP and the design flood elevation (DFE) that is referenced by the I-Codes.
![Page 71: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/71.jpg)
State Building Codes and Flood Provisions 5-4
Flood hazard areas are established in the International Building Code [see Section 1612.3] and in the International Residential Code [see Table R301.2(1)]. In both, the governing body is to adopt a flood hazard map and supporting data. At a minimum, FIRMs, floodway maps, and Flood Insurance Studies prepared by FEMA shall be cited:
• IBC Section 1612.3, Establishment of flood hazard areas: specifically requires the governing body to adopt a flood hazard map and supporting data. The text calls for insertion of the name of the jurisdiction and the date of issuance of the map and study. When the code is adopted at the local level, this approach works well. When the IBC is adopted at the state level for local administration, each community will need to cite its study and the dates of all effective maps in the companion floodplain management ordinance.
• IRC R301.2, Climatic and geographic design criteria: requires local jurisdictions to establish criteria in Table R301.2(1). The table is designed for insertion of criteria that may vary from community to community, such as wind speed, seismic design category, and other criteria. For flood hazards, the table requires each community to insert the date of entry into the NFIP and the dates of the FIRMs, floodway maps, or other maps adopted by the community.
![Page 72: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/72.jpg)
66.. YYoouurr CCoommmmuunniittyy’’ss AApppprrooaacchh
Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes®: Meeting the Requirements of the NFIP 6-1
______________________
The I-Code texts in the appendices are annotated to show code changes approved in the 2006/2007 cycle and published in the 2007 Supplement.
______________________
Regulating flood hazard area development is not a “one-size-fits-all” process. Communities vary considerably both within a state and across the country. Each state has its own statutes and regulations, which may mandate – or limit – how a community approaches building codes, other health and safety codes, and floodplain management regulations. The International Codes (I-Codes) include the provisions pertinent to buildings that are the minimum necessary to meet the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) floodplain management requirements [other provisions are included in the International Building Code, Appendix G]. Your community needs to assess the current approach used to satisfy the requirements of the NFIP in order to determine the best way to coordinate the building code with your current land planning, zoning, and regulatory framework. Before working through the process, you should review Chapter 5 and contact the NFIP State Coordinator and the state building code official to learn about state-specific requirements. States that adopt the I-Codes at the state level may have made amendments or may require that local amendments be approved by the state. Some states have specific require-ments for flood hazard area development and some issue floodplain permits. Others exempt certain activities or types of buildings from the requirement to obtain a building permit, and some states may issue building permits for some activities. 6.1 Assessing Your Community’s Current
Approach Perhaps the most important issue that you need to consider is whether the I-Codes will replace some or all of requirements in your current flood-plain management regulations. During this consideration, you may want to use the crosswalks in Appendices B, C, and D to compare specific sections of the 2006 editions of the I-Codes with the NFIP regulations. The worksheets on pages 6-4 and 6-5 are useful tools to assess your community’s current approach. Worksheet A lists certain functions and regulatory requirements related to the flood-resistant provisions of the NFIP. Across the top are listed the I-Codes in which those functions and
![Page 73: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/73.jpg)
Your Community’s Approach 6-2
requirements can be found. Worksheet B is set up for use in the following manner:
• Across the top you can list all of your community’s departments that are involved in regulating flood hazard areas. The typical depart-ments are listed, and space is provided for you to add others, if appropriate to your community’s organization.
• Consider the functions and regulatory requirements of the NFIP that are listed on the right. Mark the table to indicate the department that currently is responsible for each, keeping in mind that more than one department may share some responsibilities. Representatives from each of these departments should be invited to participate in the decision process that comes next.
6.2 Modifying Your Community’s Approach The next step you need to take to coordinate the I-Codes is to get together with representatives of all departments that currently have a role in flood-plain management, as noted on Worksheet B. More than likely, a series of meetings will be needed. The topics and objectives suggested in Worksheet C (page 6-6) may help you lay out the steps needed to produce a clearly coordinated approach to managing flood hazard areas. Chapter 2 outlined three approaches that should be reviewed to under-stand your options: the comprehensive approach; the stand-alone floodplain management regulations approach; and the building code approach. Review Chapter 3 to look at some options to consider, such as higher standards. Be sure that your discussions touch on all of community responsibilities listed in Chapter 4 so that each one is assigned to the appropriate office. And, before you get too far along, review Chapter 5 and check with the appropriate state offices to understand state-specific requirements and processes. The purpose of the initial session with representatives of different depart-ments in your community is to determine your approach (see Figure 6-1) and to start the process of effectively integrating the I-Codes. Keep the following objectives in mind:
• All NFIP requirements must be addressed; • If flood-related provisions are addressed in multiple codes or
regulations, then coordination is critical to avoid overlap, conflicting provisions, and duplication;
![Page 74: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/74.jpg)
Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes®: Meeting the Requirements of the NFIP 6-3
• A department must be designated to be responsible for each code or regulation related to floodplain management; and
• Communication between the departments that deal with related provisions needs to be arranged to facilitate the development review process.
Figure 6-1. Approaches to Fulfilling the Requirements of the NFIP
Use IBC Appendix G as guidance and review amendments to the I-Codes with your NFIP State Coordinator or FEMA Regional Office.
Review amendments to the IBC, IBC Appendix G, IRC, IEBC, or other I-Codes that affect NFIP compliance (if any) with your NFIP State Coordinator or FEMA Regional Office.
Review with other State and community authorities involved in regulation of flood hazard areas to avoid overlap, conflicting provisions, and duplication.
Thenyou must
Andbe certain to
Ifyou use this approach
NOTE: Take extra care if you propose amendments to the flood hazard provisions of the IBC, IBC Appendix G, IRC, IEBC, or other I-Codes. Amendments should be carefully reviewed to avoid inconsistencies with the NFIP minimum requirements. Prior to adoption of amendments consult with your NFIP State Coordinator or your FEMA Regional Office.
Adopt the IBC and IBC Appendix G (and by reference the IRC, IEBC, and other I-Codes).
Ensure that the NFIP requirements that are not retained when adopting the I-Codes are incorporated into community land use and other ordinances or regulations.
If your community has an NFIP-compliant floodplain management ordinance or regulation in place, then continue to maintain and enforce those provisions.
International CodesOnly.
Stand-Alone Floodplain Management Regulations.
Comprehensive Approach: Local Plans, Ordinances, and the International Codes.
![Page 75: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/75.jpg)
Your Community’s Approach 6-4
Worksheet A. The NFIP and the I-Codes
The International Codes
National Flood Insurance Program Provisions and Processes
IBC
IBC
App. G IRC IEBC IPC IMC IPSDC IFGC
Planning and Zoning 1. Compatibility with conservation, resource, or overlay
zoning (density, setbacks, etc.). 2. Consideration of overall planning objectives, including
flood hazard reduction objectives. 3. Storm water management and drainage. 4. Subdivision of land. Development Review 1. Changes to land (filling, grading, paving, excavation,
mining, dredging, drilling, channel modifications, alteration of sand dunes and/or mangrove stands).
2. One- and two-family dwellings (except in floodways). 3. Buildings and structures (including tanks, towers, and
one- and two-family dwellings in floodways). 4. Site-related public/private utilities (sewage disposal,
water supply). 5. Building utilities (electrical, plumbing, HVAC, fuel). 6. Existing buildings and structures (additions,
alterations, repairs, rehabilitations). 7. Site development (water, sewer, drainage, on-site
waste disposal systems). 8. Transportation infrastructure (roads, bridges,
culverts). 9. Other water resources infrastructure (dams, ponds,
levees, floodwalls). 10 Placement/replacement of manufactured housing. 11. Recreational vehicle parks. 12. Refer to other federal, state, local agencies and
require appropriate permits. 13. Review and grant of variances. Records 1. Maintain records of corporate boundaries; report
changes to FEMA. 2. Maintain record of permits and variances, including
documented elevations (Elevation Certificates) and documented floodproofing designs (Floodproofing Certificates); make available for public inspection.
3. Maintain flood hazard maps; make available for public inspection.
4. Identify, record, and report map needs to FEMA. Inspection and Enforcement 1. Subdivision lot layout (with respect to flood hazard
areas). 2. Location of building/structure footprints on lot. 3. Foundations. 4. Lowest floor elevation (buildings and structures). 5. Lowest floor elevation (manufactured housing units). 6. Enclosure below lowest floor (flood openings or
breakaway). 7. Collect/review documentation (elevation,
floodproofing, flood openings, breakaway wall). 8. Damaged buildings (to determine if building is
substantially damaged).
![Page 76: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/76.jpg)
Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes®: Meeting the Requirements of the NFIP 6-5
Worksheet B. Assessing Your Community’s Approach
Your Community’s Organization
Planning Zoning Sub- division Health
Flood Control or Storm Water
Engineer-ing or Public Works
Build-ing Code Other Other Other
Provisions and Processes (Check which department handles each code provision or function)
Planning and Zoning
1. Compatibility with conservation, resource, or overlay zoning (density, setbacks, etc.).
2. Consideration of overall planning objectives, including flood hazard reduction objectives.
3. Storm water management and drainage. 4. Subdivision of land.
Development Review
1. Changes to land (filling, grading, paving, excavation,
mining, dredging, drilling, channel modifications, alteration of sand dunes and/or mangrove stands).
2. One- and two-family dwellings (except in floodways).
3. Buildings and structures (including tanks, towers, and one- and two-family dwellings in floodways).
4. Site-related public/private utilities (sewage disposal, water supply).
5. Building utilities (electrical, plumbing, HVAC, fuel).
6. Existing buildings and structures (additions, alterations, repairs, rehabilitations).
7. Site development (water, sewer, drainage, on-site waste disposal systems).
8. Transportation infrastructure (roads, bridges, culverts).
9. Other water resources infrastructure (dams, ponds, levees, floodwalls).
10 Placement/replacement of manufactured housing. 11. Recreational vehicle parks.
12. Refer to other federal, state, local agencies and require appropriate permits.
13. Review and grant of variances.
Records
1. Maintain records of corporate boundaries; report changes to FEMA.
2. Maintain record of permits and variances, including
documented elevations (Elevation Certificates) and documented floodproofing designs (Floodproofing Certificates); make available for public inspection.
3. Maintain flood hazard maps; make available for public inspection.
4. Identify, record, and report map needs to FEMA.
Inspection and Enforcement
1. Subdivision lot layout (with respect to flood hazard areas).
2. Location of building/structure footprints on lot. 3. Foundations. 4. Lowest floor elevation (buildings and structures). 5. Lowest floor elevation (manufactured housing units).
6. Enclosure below lowest floor (flood openings or breakaway).
7. Collect/review documentation (elevation, floodproofing, flood openings, breakaway wall).
8. Damaged buildings (to determine if building is substantially damaged).
![Page 77: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/77.jpg)
Your Community’s Approach 6-6
Worksheet C. Discussion Topics, Decision Steps
Steps
Actions Date
Completed
1 Identify all offices involved in floodplain management (Worksheet B), circulate this guide as background, and convene a meeting.
2 Review how each of the NFIP functions and regulatory requirements is met under your current approach to floodplain management.
3 Review Chapter 3 to understand additional floodplain management implications of using the I-Codes to participate in the NFIP. This chapter also briefly discusses some opportunities to further reduce the impacts of flooding beyond those required under the NFIP.
4 Review Chapter 5 and check with the NFIP State Coordinator and the state building code agency for state-specific requirements.
5 Review Worksheet A to understand which of the NFIP functions and requirements are addressed in each of the I-Codes.
6 Discuss the NFIP functions and requirements that are currently performed by offices other than those that are responsible for administering the various building codes (Worksheet B).
7 Determine which of the I-Codes your community is required to adopt by state law, or which you will choose to adopt if your state does not have a requirement. Refer to Figure 6-1 to see how this determination influences how you handle development that is covered by IBC Appendix G.
8 Review Worksheet B again with respect to how the NFIP functions and requirements are currently addressed. Decide whether those functions and requirements will continue to be administered by the noted offices, which may be appropriate to the comprehensive approach and to effectively guide development as part of the planning, zoning, and subdivision processes.
9 Identify which functions and requirements will be administered by the building department upon adoption of the I-Codes.
10 If the decision is to consolidate some or all of those functions and requirements in the building department, then a critical review of all of the existing ordinances that address floodplain management provisions must be prepared to determine if there are any elements that are not covered by the I-Codes. Those elements must be recaptured either by amending the I-Codes or by inclusion in a companion floodplain management ordinance.
11 If elements are to be recaptured, review the I-Codes and prepare the appropriate language to be included in the Ordinance for Adoption.
12 Review Sections 3.3, 3.4 and 3.5 to understand how certain higher standards may be beneficial to your community.
13 If your community decides to adopt higher standards, prepare the appropriate language to be included in the Ordinance for Adoption.
14 Prepare the companion floodplain management ordinance to retain only those provisions not covered by the I-Codes.
15 Submit the Ordinance for Adoption of the I-Codes, plus the companion floodplain management ordinance, to your NFIP State Coordinator. The NFIP State Coordinator will coordinate with the FEMA Regional Office to review the materials and determine whether they are acceptable for your community’s continued participation in the NFIP.
![Page 78: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/78.jpg)
AAppppeennddiixx AA.. RReeffeerreenncceess aanndd OOnnlliinnee RReessoouurrcceess
Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes®: Meeting the Requirements of the NFIP A-1
FEMA publications and forms may be obtained at no cost. These and other materials may also be available online at http://www.fema.gov/library/index.jsp Hardcopy publications and forms may be ordered from:
DHS/FEMA P.O. Box 2012 Jessup, Maryland 20794-2012 Toll free: 1-800-480-2520
APA PAS #473, Subdivision Design in Flood Hazard Areas. Washington, DC: American Planning Association, 1997. ASCE 7-98, Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures. Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers, 1998. ASCE/SEI 7-05, Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures. Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers, 2005. ASCE/SEI 24-05, Flood Resistant Design and Construction. Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers, 2005. ASFPM and Federal Interagency Floodplain Management Task Force, Addressing Your Community’s Flood Problems: A Guide for Elected Officials. Madison, WI: Association of State Floodplain Managers, Inc., 1996. FEMA, 44 CFR, Part 59-60, National Flood Insurance Program. Washington, DC: Federal Emergency Management Agency, 1990. FEMA Federal Insurance Administration, Code Compatibility Report. Washington, DC: Federal Emergency Management Agency, 1992. FEMA FIA-12, Appeals, Revisions, and Amendments to NFIP Maps: A Guide for Community Officials. Washington, DC: Federal Emergency Management Agency, Federal Insurance Administration, 1993.
![Page 79: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/79.jpg)
References and Online Resources A-2
FEMA FIA-15A, CRS Application. Washington, DC: Federal Emergency Management Agency, Federal Insurance Administration, 2002. FEMA 55CD (3rd edition), Coastal Construction Manual: Principles And Practices of Planning, Siting, Designing, Constructing, And Maintaining Residential Buildings in Coastal Areas. Washington, DC: Federal Emergency Management Agency, 2000. FEMA 85, Manufactured Home Installation in Flood Hazard Areas. Washington, DC: Federal Emergency Management Agency, 1985. FEMA 213, Answers to Questions About Substantially Damaged Buildings. Washington, DC: Federal Emergency Management Agency, 1991. FEMA 259, Engineering Principles and Practices for Retrofitting Flood Prone Residential Buildings. Washington, DC: Federal Emergency Management Agency, 1995. FEMA 265, Managing Floodplain Development in Approximate Zone A Areas: A Guide for Obtaining and Developing Base (100-Year) Flood Elevations. Washington, DC: Federal Emergency Management Agency, 1995. FEMA 301, Guidance for State and Local Officials: Increased Cost of Compliance Coverage. Washington, DC: Federal Emergency Management Agency, 2003. FEMA 311, Guidance on Estimating Substantial Damage Using the NFIP Residential Substantial Damage Estimator. Washington, DC: Federal Emergency Management Agency, 1998. FEMA 312, Homeowner’s Guide to Retrofitting: Six Ways to Protect Your House from Flooding. Washington, DC: Federal Emergency Management Agency, 1998. FEMA 348, Protecting Building Utilities from Flood Damage: Principles and Practices for the Design and Construction of Flood
![Page 80: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/80.jpg)
Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes®: Meeting the Requirements of the NFIP A-3
Resistant Building Utility Systems. Washington, DC: Federal Emergency Management Agency, 1999. FEMA 480, NFIP Floodplain Management Requirements: A Study Guide and Desk Reference. Washington, DC: Federal Emergency Management Agency, 2005. FEMA 467-1, Floodplain Management Bulletin: Elevation Certificate. Washington, DC: Federal Emergency Management Agency, 2004. FEMA 550, Recommended Residential Construction for the Gulf Coast: Building on Strong and Safe Foundations. Washington, DC: Federal Emergency Management Agency, 2006. FEMA. Floodproofing Certificate (FEMA Form 81-65). [Online]. Available: www.fema.gov/plan/prevent/fhm/dl_fpc.shtm FEMA. Elevation Certificate (FEMA Form 81-31). [Online]. Available: www.fema.gov/business/nfip/elvinst.shtm FEMA. (various dates) NFIP Technical Bulletin Series. Washington, DC: National Flood Insurance Program. [Online]. Available: www.fema.gov/fima/techbul.shtm
FEMA FIA-TB #0: User’s Guide to Technical Bulletins. 1999.
FEMA FIA-TB #1: Openings in Foundation Walls for Buildings Located in Special Flood Hazard Areas. 1993.
FEMA FIA-TB #2: Flood-Resistant Material Requirements for Buildings Located in Special Flood Hazard Areas. 1993.
FEMA FIA-TB #3: Non-Residential Floodproofing—Requirements and Certification for Buildings Located in Special Flood Hazard Areas. 1993.
FEMA FIA-TB #4: Elevator Installation for Buildings Located in Special Flood Hazard Areas. 1993.
FEMA FIA-TB #5: Free of Obstruction Requirements for Buildings Located in Coastal High Hazard Areas. 1993.
FEMA FIA-TB #6: Below Grade Parking Requirements for Buildings Located in Special Flood Hazard Areas. 1993.
![Page 81: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/81.jpg)
References and Online Resources A-4
FEMA FIA-TB #7: Wet Floodproofing Requirements for Structures Located in Special Flood Hazard Areas. 1993.
FEMA FIA-TB #8: Corrosion Protection for Metal Connectors in Coastal Areas for Structures Located in Special Flood Hazard Areas. 1996.
FEMA FIA-TB #9: Design and Construction Guidance for Breakaway Walls Below Elevated Coastal Buildings. 1999.
FEMA FIA-TB #10: Ensuring that Structures Built on Fill in or Near Special Flood Hazard Areas Are Reasonably Safe From Flooding. 2001.
FEMA FIA-TB #11: Crawlspace Construction for Buildings Located in Special Flood Hazard Areas (NFIP Interim Guidance). 2001.
IBC 2003, International Building Code. Washington, DC: International Code Council, Inc., 2003. IBC 2006, International Building Code. Washington, DC: International Code Council, Inc., 2006. ICC 600, Standard for Residential Construction in High Wind Regions. Washington, DC: International Code Council, Inc., 2008 (anticipated publication date). ICC PC 2003, International Code Council Performance Code. Washington, DC: International Code Council, Inc., 2003. ICC PC 2006, International Code Council Performance Code. Washington, DC: International Code Council, Inc., 2006. IEBC 2003, International Existing Building Code. Washington, DC: International Code Council, Inc., 2003. IEBC 2006, International Existing Building Code. Washington, DC: International Code Council, Inc., 2006. IFGC 2003, International Fuel Gas Code. Washington, DC: International Code Council, Inc., 2003.
![Page 82: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/82.jpg)
Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes®: Meeting the Requirements of the NFIP A-5
IFGC 2006, International Fuel Gas Code. Washington, DC: International Code Council, Inc., 2006. IMC 2003, International Mechanical Code. Washington, DC: International Code Council, Inc., 2003. IMC 2006, International Mechanical Code. Washington, DC: International Code Council, Inc., 2006. IPC 2003, International Plumbing Code. Washington, DC: International Code Council, Inc., 2003. IPC 2006, International Plumbing Code. Washington, DC: International Code Council, Inc., 2006. IPSDC 2003, International Private Sewage Disposal Code. Washington, DC: International Code Council, Inc., 2003. IPSDC 2006, International Private Sewage Disposal Code. Washington, DC: International Code Council, Inc., 2006. IRC 2003, International Residential Code. Washington, DC: International Code Council, Inc., 2003. IRC 2006, International Residential Code. Washington, DC: International Code Council, Inc., 2006. Jones, Christopher P., W.L. Coulbourne, J. Marshall, and S.M. Rogers, Jr., Evaluation of the National Flood Insurance Program’s Building Standards. Washington, D.C.: American Institutes for Research, 2006. Supplement to the International Codes. Washington, DC: International Code Council, Inc., 2007. NES Evaluation Protocol for Determination of Flood-Resistance Properties of Building Elements. National Evaluation Service, Inc., April 2000.
![Page 83: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/83.jpg)
AAppppeennddiixx BB.. CCrroosssswwaallkk ooff tthhee NNFFIIPP RReegguullaattiioonnss ttoo tthhee FFlloooodd
RReessiissttaannccee PPrroovviissiioonnss ooff tthhee IIBBCC
Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes®: Meeting the Requirements of the NFIP B-1
![Page 84: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/84.jpg)
pa
ge B
-3
IBC
Cro
ssw
alk
of th
e N
FIP
Reg
ulat
ions
to th
e Fl
ood
Res
ista
nce
Prov
isio
ns o
f the
IBC
®.
NFI
P R
egul
atio
ns
2006
IBC
® a
nd A
ppen
dix
G [a
nnot
ated
with
200
7 Su
pple
men
t] Se
c. 5
9.1
Def
initi
ons
BA
SE F
LOO
D.
Bas
e flo
od m
eans
the
flood
hav
ing
a on
e pe
rcen
t cha
nce
of b
eing
equ
aled
or e
xcee
ded
in a
ny g
iven
yea
r. B
ASE
FLO
OD
. Th
e flo
od h
avin
g a
1-pe
rcen
t cha
nce
of b
eing
equ
aled
or e
xcee
ded
in a
ny g
iven
yea
r. B
ASE
FLO
OD
ELE
VATI
ON
. Th
e el
evat
ion
of th
e ba
se fl
ood,
incl
udin
g w
ave
heig
ht, r
elat
ive
to th
e N
atio
nal
Geo
detic
Ver
tical
Dat
um (N
GV
D),
Nor
th A
mer
ican
Ver
tical
Dat
um (N
AV
D) o
r oth
er d
atum
spe
cifie
d on
the
flood
insu
ranc
e ra
te m
ap (F
IRM
).
BA
SEM
ENT.
Any
are
a of
the
build
ing
havi
ng it
s flo
or s
ubgr
ade
(bel
ow g
roun
d le
vel)
on a
ll si
des.
B
ASE
MEN
T. T
he p
ortio
n of
a b
uild
ing
havi
ng it
s flo
or s
ubgr
ade
(bel
ow g
roun
d le
vel)
on a
ll si
des.
[Not
def
ined
in th
e N
FIP
regu
latio
ns.]
DES
IGN
FLO
OD
. Th
e flo
od a
ssoc
iate
d w
ith th
e gr
eate
r of t
he fo
llow
ing
two
area
s:
1.
Are
a w
ith a
floo
dpla
in s
ubje
ct to
a 1
-per
cent
or g
reat
er c
hanc
e of
floo
ding
in a
ny y
ear,
or
2.
Are
a de
sign
ated
as
a flo
od h
azar
d ar
ea o
n a
com
mun
ity’s
floo
d ha
zard
map
, or o
ther
wis
e le
gally
de
sign
ated
.
[Not
def
ined
in th
e N
FIP
regu
latio
ns.]
DES
IGN
FLO
OD
ELE
VATI
ON
. Th
e el
evat
ion
of th
e “d
esig
n flo
od,”
incl
udin
g w
ave
heig
ht, r
elat
ive
to th
e da
tum
spe
cifie
d on
the
com
mun
ity’s
lega
lly d
esig
nate
d flo
od h
azar
d m
ap.
In a
reas
des
igna
ted
as Z
one
AO
, th
e de
sign
floo
d el
evat
ion
shal
l be
the
elev
atio
n of
the
high
est e
xist
ing
grad
e of
the
build
ing’
s pe
rimet
er p
lus
the
dept
h nu
mbe
r (in
feet
) spe
cifie
d on
the
flood
haz
ard
map
. In
are
as d
esig
nate
d as
Zon
e A
O w
here
the
dept
h nu
mbe
r is
not s
peci
fied
on th
e m
ap, t
he d
epth
num
ber s
hall
be ta
ken
as b
eing
equ
al to
2 fe
et (6
10 m
m).
DEV
ELO
PMEN
T. A
ny m
an-m
ade
chan
ge to
impr
oved
or
unim
prov
ed re
al e
stat
e, in
clud
ing
but n
ot li
mite
d to
bui
ldin
gs o
r ot
her s
truct
ures
, min
ing,
dre
dgin
g, fi
lling
, gra
ding
, pav
ing,
ex
cava
tion
or d
rillin
g op
erat
ions
or s
tora
ge o
f equ
ipm
ent o
r m
ater
ials
.
101.
2 S
cope
10
5.1
[Per
mits
] Req
uire
d 10
5.2
Wor
k ex
empt
from
per
mit
App
endi
x G
. D
EVEL
OPM
ENT.
Any
man
-mad
e ch
ange
to im
prov
ed o
r uni
mpr
oved
real
est
ate,
incl
udin
g bu
t no
t lim
ited
to b
uild
ings
or o
ther
stru
ctur
es, t
empo
rary
stru
ctur
es, t
empo
rary
or p
erm
anen
t sto
rage
of m
ater
ials
, m
inin
g, d
redg
ing,
filli
ng, g
radi
ng, p
avin
g, e
xcav
atio
ns, o
pera
tions
and
oth
er la
nd d
istu
rbin
g ac
tiviti
es.
See
FLO
OD
PRO
OFI
NG
.
DR
Y FL
OO
DPR
OO
FIN
G.
A c
ombi
natio
n of
des
ign
mod
ifica
tions
that
resu
lt in
a b
uild
ing
or s
truct
ure,
in
clud
ing
the
atte
ndan
t util
ity a
nd s
anita
ry fa
cilit
ies,
bei
ng w
ater
tight
with
wal
ls s
ubst
antia
lly im
perm
eabl
e to
th
e pa
ssag
e of
wat
er a
nd w
ith s
truct
ural
com
pone
nts
havi
ng th
e ca
paci
ty to
resi
st lo
ads
as id
entif
ied
in A
SC
E
7.
EXIS
TIN
G C
ON
STR
UC
TIO
N (E
XIST
ING
STR
UC
TUR
ES).
For
th
e pu
rpos
es o
f det
erm
inin
g ra
tes,
stru
ctur
es fo
r whi
ch th
e “s
tart
of c
onst
ruct
ion”
com
men
ced
befo
re th
e ef
fect
ive
date
of t
he
FIR
M o
r bef
ore
Janu
ary
1, 1
975,
for F
IRM
s ef
fect
ive
befo
re th
at
date
. “E
xist
ing
cons
truct
ion”
may
als
o be
refe
rred
to a
s “e
xist
ing
stru
ctur
es.”
EXIS
TIN
G C
ON
STR
UC
TIO
N.
Any
bui
ldin
gs a
nd s
truct
ures
for w
hich
the
“sta
rt of
con
stru
ctio
n” c
omm
ence
d be
fore
the
effe
ctiv
e da
te o
f the
com
mun
ity’s
firs
t flo
odpl
ain
man
agem
ent c
ode,
ord
inan
ce o
r sta
ndar
d.
“Exi
stin
g co
nstru
ctio
n” m
ay a
lso
be re
ferr
ed to
as
“exi
stin
g st
ruct
ures
.” EX
ISTI
NG
STR
UC
TUR
ES.
See
“Exi
stin
g co
nstru
ctio
n.”
![Page 85: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/85.jpg)
pa
ge B
-4
IBC
Cro
ssw
alk
of th
e N
FIP
Reg
ulat
ions
to th
e Fl
ood
Res
ista
nce
Prov
isio
ns o
f the
IBC
®.
NFI
P R
egul
atio
ns
2006
IBC
® a
nd A
ppen
dix
G [a
nnot
ated
with
200
7 Su
pple
men
t] FL
OO
D o
r FLO
OD
ING
. (a
) A
gen
eral
and
tem
pora
ry c
ondi
tion
of p
artia
l or c
ompl
ete
inun
datio
n of
nor
mal
ly d
ry la
nd a
reas
from
:
(1
) The
ove
rflow
of i
nlan
d or
tida
l wat
ers.
(2) T
he u
nusu
al a
nd ra
pid
accu
mul
atio
n or
runo
ff of
sur
face
w
ater
s fro
m a
ny s
ourc
e.
FLO
OD
or F
LOO
DIN
G.
A g
ener
al a
nd te
mpo
rary
con
ditio
n of
par
tial o
r com
plet
e in
unda
tion
of n
orm
ally
dry
la
nd fr
om:
1.
The
over
flow
of i
nlan
d or
tida
l wat
ers.
2.
Th
e un
usua
l and
rapi
d ac
cum
ulat
ion
or ru
noff
of s
urfa
ce w
ater
s fro
m a
ny s
ourc
e.
[Not
def
ined
in th
e N
FIP
regu
latio
ns.]
FLO
OD
DA
MA
GE-
RES
ISTA
NT
MA
TER
IALS
. A
ny c
onst
ruct
ion
mat
eria
l cap
able
of w
ithst
andi
ng d
irect
and
pr
olon
ged
cont
act w
ith fl
oodw
ater
s w
ithou
t sus
tain
ing
any
dam
age
that
requ
ires
mor
e th
an c
osm
etic
repa
ir.
[Not
def
ined
in th
e N
FIP
regu
latio
ns.]
FLO
OD
HA
ZAR
D A
REA
. Th
e gr
eate
r of t
he fo
llow
ing
two
area
s:
1.
The
area
with
in a
floo
dpla
in s
ubje
ct to
a 1
per
cent
or g
reat
er c
hanc
e of
floo
ding
in a
ny y
ear.
2.
Th
e ar
ea d
esig
nate
d as
a fl
ood
haza
rd a
rea
on a
com
mun
ity’s
floo
d ha
zard
map
, or o
ther
wis
e le
gally
de
sign
ated
. FL
OO
D H
AZA
RD
AR
EA S
UB
JEC
T TO
HIG
H-V
ELO
CIT
Y W
AVE
AC
TIO
N.
Are
a w
ithin
the
flood
haz
ard
area
whi
ch is
sub
ject
to h
igh-
velo
city
wav
e ac
tion,
and
sho
wn
on a
Flo
od In
sura
nce
Rat
e M
ap o
r oth
er fl
ood
haza
rd m
ap a
s Zo
ne V
, VO
, or V
1-30
. FL
OO
D IN
SUR
AN
CE
RA
TE M
AP
(FIR
M).
An
offic
ial m
ap o
f a
com
mun
ity, o
n w
hich
the
Adm
inis
trato
r has
del
inea
ted
both
the
spec
ial h
azar
d ar
eas
and
the
risk
prem
ium
zon
es a
pplic
able
to
the
com
mun
ity.
FLO
OD
INSU
RA
NC
E R
ATE
MA
P (F
IRM
). A
n of
ficia
l map
of a
com
mun
ity o
n w
hich
the
Fede
ral E
mer
genc
y M
anag
emen
t Age
ncy
has
delin
eate
d bo
th th
e sp
ecia
l flo
od h
azar
d ar
eas
and
the
risk
prem
ium
zon
es
appl
icab
le to
the
com
mun
ity.
FLO
OD
INSU
RA
NC
E ST
UD
Y (s
ee F
LOO
D E
LEVA
TIO
N
STU
DY)
. A
n ex
amin
atio
n, e
valu
atio
n an
d de
term
inat
ion
of fl
ood
haza
rds
and,
if a
ppro
pria
te, c
orre
spon
ding
wat
er s
urfa
ce
elev
atio
ns, o
r an
exam
inat
ion,
eva
luat
ion
and
dete
rmin
atio
n of
m
udsl
ide
(i.e.
, mud
flow
) and
/or f
lood
-rel
ated
ero
sion
haz
ards
.
FLO
OD
INSU
RA
NC
E ST
UD
Y. T
he o
ffici
al re
port
prov
ided
by
the
Fede
ral E
mer
genc
y M
anag
emen
t Age
ncy
cont
aini
ng th
e Fl
ood
Insu
ranc
e R
ate
Map
, the
Flo
od B
ound
ary
and
Floo
dway
Map
(FB
FM),
the
wat
er s
urfa
ce
elev
atio
n of
the
base
floo
d an
d su
ppor
ting
tech
nica
l dat
a.
FLO
OD
WA
Y –
See
REG
ULA
TOR
Y FL
OO
DW
AY.
FL
OO
DW
AY.
The
cha
nnel
of t
he ri
ver,
cree
k, o
r oth
er w
ater
cour
se a
nd th
e ad
jace
nt la
nd a
reas
that
mus
t be
rese
rved
in o
rder
to d
isch
arge
the
base
floo
d w
ithou
t cum
ulat
ivel
y in
crea
sing
the
wat
er s
urfa
ce e
leva
tion
mor
e th
an a
des
igna
ted
heig
ht.
FUN
CTI
ON
ALL
Y D
EPEN
DEN
T U
SE.
A u
se w
hich
can
not
perfo
rm it
s in
tend
ed p
urpo
se u
nles
s it
is lo
cate
d or
car
ried
out i
n cl
ose
prox
imity
to w
ater
. Th
e te
rm in
clud
es o
nly
dock
ing
faci
litie
s, p
ort f
acili
ties
that
are
nec
essa
ry fo
r the
load
ing
and
unlo
adin
g of
car
go o
r pas
seng
ers,
and
shi
p bu
ildin
g an
d sh
ip
repa
ir fa
cilit
ies,
but
doe
s no
t inc
lude
long
-term
sto
rage
or r
elat
ed
man
ufac
turin
g fa
cilit
ies.
App
endi
x G
. FU
NC
TIO
NA
LLY
DEP
END
ENT
FAC
ILIT
Y. A
faci
lity
whi
ch c
anno
t be
used
for i
ts in
tend
ed
purp
ose
unle
ss it
is lo
cate
d or
car
ried
out i
n cl
ose
prox
imity
to w
ater
, suc
h as
a d
ocki
ng o
r por
t fac
ility
ne
cess
ary
for t
he lo
adin
g or
unl
oadi
ng o
f car
go o
r pas
seng
ers,
shi
pbui
ldin
g, o
r shi
p re
pair.
The
term
doe
s no
t in
clud
e lo
ng-te
rm s
tora
ge, m
anuf
actu
re, s
ales
, or s
ervi
ce fa
cilit
ies.
![Page 86: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/86.jpg)
pa
ge B
-5
IBC
Cro
ssw
alk
of th
e N
FIP
Reg
ulat
ions
to th
e Fl
ood
Res
ista
nce
Prov
isio
ns o
f the
IBC
®.
NFI
P R
egul
atio
ns
2006
IBC
® a
nd A
ppen
dix
G [a
nnot
ated
with
200
7 Su
pple
men
t] H
ISTO
RIC
STR
UC
TUR
E.
(a)
List
ed in
divi
dual
ly in
the
Nat
iona
l Reg
iste
r of H
isto
ric P
lace
s (a
list
ing
mai
ntai
ned
by th
e D
epar
tmen
t of I
nter
ior)
or
prel
imin
arily
det
erm
ined
by
the
Sec
reta
ry o
f the
Inte
rior a
s m
eetin
g th
e re
quire
men
ts fo
r ind
ivid
ual l
istin
g on
the
Nat
iona
l Reg
iste
r;
(b)
Cer
tifie
d or
pre
limin
arily
det
erm
ined
by
the
Sec
reta
ry o
f the
In
terio
r as
cont
ribut
ing
to th
e hi
stor
ical
sig
nific
ance
of a
re
gist
ered
his
toric
dis
trict
or a
dis
trict
pre
limin
arily
de
term
ined
by
the
Sec
reta
ry to
qua
lify
as a
regi
ster
ed
hist
oric
dis
trict
; (c
) In
divi
dual
ly li
sted
on
a st
ate
inve
ntor
y of
his
toric
pla
ces
in
stat
es w
ith h
isto
ric p
rese
rvat
ion
prog
ram
s w
hich
hav
e be
en
appr
oved
by
the
Sec
reta
ry o
f the
Inte
rior;
or
(d)
Indi
vidu
ally
list
ed o
n a
loca
l inv
ento
ry o
f his
toric
pla
ces
in
com
mun
ities
with
his
toric
pre
serv
atio
n pr
ogra
ms
that
hav
e be
en c
ertif
ied
eith
er:
(1) B
y an
app
rove
d st
ate
prog
ram
as
dete
rmin
ed b
y th
e S
ecre
tary
of t
he In
terio
r or
(2
) Dire
ctly
by
the
Sec
reta
ry o
f the
Inte
rior i
n st
ates
with
out
appr
oved
pro
gram
s.
HIS
TOR
IC B
UIL
DIN
GS.
Bui
ldin
gs th
at a
re li
sted
in o
r elig
ible
for l
istin
g in
the
Nat
iona
l Reg
iste
r of H
isto
ric
Pla
ces,
or d
esig
nate
d as
his
toric
und
er a
n ap
prop
riate
sta
te o
r loc
al la
w (s
ee S
ectio
n 34
07).
§340
7.2
Floo
d ha
zard
are
as.
With
in fl
ood
haza
rd a
reas
est
ablis
hed
in S
ec. 1
612.
3, w
here
the
wor
k pr
opos
ed c
onst
itute
s su
bsta
ntia
l im
prov
emen
t as
defin
ed in
Sec
. 161
2.2,
the
build
ing
shal
l be
brou
ght i
nto
conf
orm
ance
with
Sec
. 161
2.2.
Ex
cept
ion:
His
toric
bui
ldin
gs th
at a
re:
1.
List
ed o
r pre
limin
arily
det
erm
ined
to b
e el
igib
le fo
r lis
ting
in th
e N
atio
nal R
egis
ter o
f His
toric
Pla
ces;
or
2.
D
eter
min
ed b
y th
e S
ecre
tary
of t
he U
.S. D
epar
tmen
t of I
nter
ior a
s co
ntrib
utin
g to
the
hist
oric
al
sign
ifica
nce
of a
regi
ster
ed h
isto
ric d
istri
ct o
r a d
istri
ct p
relim
inar
ily d
eter
min
ed to
qua
lify
as a
n hi
stor
ic d
istri
ct; o
r 3.
D
esig
nate
d as
his
toric
und
er a
sta
te o
r loc
al h
isto
ric p
rese
rvat
ion
prog
ram
that
is a
ppro
ved
by th
e D
epar
tmen
t of I
nter
ior.
LOW
EST
FLO
OR
. Th
e lo
wes
t flo
or o
f the
low
est e
nclo
sed
area
(in
clud
ing
base
men
t). A
n un
finis
hed
or fl
ood
resi
stan
t enc
losu
re,
usab
le s
olel
y fo
r par
king
of v
ehic
les,
bui
ldin
g ac
cess
or s
tora
ge in
an
are
a ot
her t
han
a ba
sem
ent a
rea
is n
ot c
onsi
dere
d a
build
ing’
s lo
wes
t flo
or; P
rovi
ded,
that
suc
h en
clos
ure
is n
ot b
uilt
so a
s to
rend
er th
e st
ruct
ure
in v
iola
tion
of th
e ap
plic
able
non
-el
evat
ion
desi
gn re
quire
men
ts o
f Sec
. 60.
3.
LOW
EST
FLO
OR
. Th
e flo
or o
f the
low
est e
nclo
sed
area
, inc
ludi
ng b
asem
ent,
but e
xclu
ding
any
unf
inis
hed
or fl
ood
resi
stan
t enc
losu
re, u
seab
le s
olel
y fo
r veh
icle
par
king
, bui
ldin
g ac
cess
, or l
imite
d st
orag
e pr
ovid
ed
that
suc
h en
clos
ure
is n
ot b
uilt
so a
s to
rend
er th
e st
ruct
ure
in v
iola
tion
of th
is s
ectio
n.
MA
NU
FAC
TUR
ED H
OM
E. A
stru
ctur
e, tr
ansp
orta
ble
in o
ne o
r m
ore
sect
ions
, whi
ch is
bui
lt on
a p
erm
anen
t cha
ssis
and
is
desi
gned
for u
se w
ith o
r with
out a
per
man
ent f
ound
atio
n w
hen
atta
ched
to th
e re
quire
d ut
ilitie
s. T
he te
rm “m
anuf
actu
red
hom
e”
does
not
incl
ude
a “r
ecre
atio
nal v
ehic
le.”
App
endi
x G
. M
AN
UFA
CTU
RED
HO
ME.
A s
truct
ure
that
is tr
ansp
orta
ble
in o
ne o
r mor
e se
ctio
ns, b
uilt
on a
pe
rman
ent c
hass
is, d
esig
ned
for u
se w
ith o
r with
out a
per
man
ent f
ound
atio
n w
hen
atta
ched
to th
e re
quire
d ut
ilitie
s, a
nd c
onst
ruct
ed to
the
Fede
ral M
obile
Hom
e C
onst
ruct
ion
and
Saf
ety
Sta
ndar
ds a
nd ru
les
and
regu
latio
ns p
rom
ulga
ted
by th
e U
.S.
Dep
artm
ent o
f Hou
sing
and
Urb
an D
evel
opm
ent.
The
term
als
o in
clud
es m
obile
hom
es, p
ark
traile
rs, t
rave
l tra
ilers
, and
sim
ilar t
rans
porta
ble
stru
ctur
es th
at a
re p
lace
d on
a
site
for 1
80 c
onse
cutiv
e da
ys o
r lon
ger.
MA
NU
FAC
TUR
ED H
OM
E PA
RK
OR
SU
BD
IVIS
ION
. A
par
cel
(or c
ontig
uous
par
cels
) of l
and
divi
ded
into
two
or m
ore
man
ufac
ture
d ho
me
lots
for r
ent o
r sal
e.
App
endi
x G
. M
AN
UFA
CTU
RED
HO
ME
PAR
K O
R S
UB
DIV
ISIO
N.
A p
arce
l (or
con
tiguo
us p
arce
ls) o
f lan
d di
vide
d in
to tw
o or
mor
e m
anuf
actu
red
hom
e lo
ts fo
r ren
t or s
ale.
![Page 87: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/87.jpg)
pa
ge B
-6
IBC
Cro
ssw
alk
of th
e N
FIP
Reg
ulat
ions
to th
e Fl
ood
Res
ista
nce
Prov
isio
ns o
f the
IBC
®.
NFI
P R
egul
atio
ns
2006
IBC
® a
nd A
ppen
dix
G [a
nnot
ated
with
200
7 Su
pple
men
t] R
ECR
EATI
ON
AL
VEH
ICLE
. A
veh
icle
whi
ch is
:
(a)
built
on
a si
ngle
cha
ssis
; (b
) 40
0 sq
uare
feet
or l
ess
whe
n m
easu
red
at th
e la
rges
t ho
rizon
tal p
roje
ctio
n;
(c)
desi
gned
to b
e se
lf-pr
opel
led
or p
erm
anen
tly to
wab
le b
y a
light
dut
y tru
ck; a
nd
(d)
desi
gned
prim
arily
not
for u
se a
s a
perm
anen
t dw
ellin
g bu
t as
tem
pora
ry li
ving
qua
rters
for r
ecre
atio
nal,
cam
ping
, tra
vel,
or s
easo
nal u
se.
App
endi
x G
. R
ECR
EATI
ON
AL
VEH
ICLE
. A
veh
icle
that
is b
uilt
on a
sin
gle
chas
sis,
400
squ
are
feet
or l
ess
whe
n m
easu
red
at th
e la
rges
t hor
izon
tal p
roje
ctio
n, d
esig
ned
to b
e se
lf-pr
opel
led
or p
erm
anen
tly to
wab
le b
y a
light
dut
y tru
ck, a
nd d
esig
ned
prim
arily
not
for u
se a
s a
perm
anen
t dw
ellin
g bu
t as
tem
pora
ry li
ving
qua
rters
fo
r rec
reat
iona
l, ca
mpi
ng, t
rave
l, or
sea
sona
l use
. A
recr
eatio
nal v
ehic
le is
read
y fo
r hig
hway
use
if it
is o
n its
w
heel
s or
jack
ing
syst
em, i
s at
tach
ed to
the
site
onl
y by
qui
ck d
isco
nnec
t typ
e ut
ilitie
s an
d se
curit
y de
vice
s,
and
has
no p
erm
anen
tly a
ttach
ed a
dditi
ons.
REG
ULA
TOR
Y FL
OO
DW
AY.
The
cha
nnel
of a
rive
r or o
ther
w
ater
cour
se a
nd th
e ad
jace
nt la
nd a
reas
that
mus
t be
rese
rved
in
ord
er to
dis
char
ge th
e ba
se fl
ood
with
out c
umul
ativ
ely
incr
easi
ng th
e w
ater
sur
face
ele
vatio
n m
ore
than
a d
esig
nate
d he
ight
.
See
FLO
OD
WA
Y.
REM
EDY
A V
IOLA
TIO
N.
To b
ring
the
stru
ctur
e or
oth
er
deve
lopm
ent i
nto
com
plia
nce
with
Sta
te o
r loc
al fl
ood
plai
n m
anag
emen
t reg
ulat
ions
, or,
if th
is is
not
pos
sibl
e, to
redu
ce th
e im
pact
s of
its
nonc
ompl
ianc
e. W
ays
that
impa
cts
may
be
redu
ced
incl
ude
prot
ectin
g th
e st
ruct
ure
or o
ther
affe
cted
de
velo
pmen
t fro
m fl
ood
dam
ages
, im
plem
entin
g th
e en
forc
emen
t pr
ovis
ions
of t
he o
rdin
ance
or o
ther
wis
e de
terr
ing
futu
re s
imila
r vi
olat
ions
, or r
educ
ing
Fede
ral f
inan
cial
exp
osur
e w
ith re
gard
to
the
stru
ctur
e or
oth
er d
evel
opm
ent.
113
Vio
latio
ns
App
endi
x G
101.
4 V
IOLA
TIO
NS.
Any
vio
latio
n of
a p
rovi
sion
of t
his
appe
ndix
, or f
ailu
re to
com
ply
with
a
perm
it or
var
ianc
e is
sued
pur
suan
t to
this
app
endi
x or
any
requ
irem
ent o
f thi
s ap
pend
ix, s
hall
be h
andl
ed in
ac
cord
ance
with
Sec
tion
113.
SPEC
IAL
HA
ZAR
D A
REA
. A
rea
of s
peci
al fl
ood
haza
rd is
the
land
in th
e flo
od p
lain
with
in a
com
mun
ity s
ubje
ct to
a o
ne
perc
ent o
r gre
ater
cha
nce
of fl
oodi
ng in
any
giv
en y
ear.
The
are
a m
ay b
e de
sign
ated
as
Zone
A o
n th
e FH
BM
. A
fter
deta
iled
rate
mak
ing
has
been
com
plet
ed in
pre
para
tion
for p
ublic
atio
n of
th
e flo
od in
sura
nce
rate
map
, Zon
e A
usu
ally
is re
fined
into
Zo
nes
A, A
O, A
H, A
1-30
, AE
, A99
, AR
, AR
/A1-
30, A
R/A
E,
AR
/AO
, AR
/AH
, AR
/A, V
O, o
r V
1-30
, VE
, or V
. Fo
r pur
pose
s of
th
ese
regu
latio
ns, t
he te
rm “s
peci
al fl
ood
haza
rd a
rea
(SFH
A)”
is
syno
nym
ous
in m
eani
ng w
ith th
e ph
rase
“are
a of
spe
cial
floo
d ha
zard
.”
SPEC
IAL
FLO
OD
HA
ZAR
D A
REA
. Th
e la
nd a
rea
subj
ect t
o flo
od h
azar
ds a
nd s
how
n on
a F
lood
Insu
ranc
e R
ate
Map
or o
ther
floo
d ha
zard
map
as
Zone
A, A
E, A
1-30
, A99
, AR
, AO
, AH
, V, V
O, V
E, o
r V1-
30.
![Page 88: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/88.jpg)
pa
ge B
-7
IBC
Cro
ssw
alk
of th
e N
FIP
Reg
ulat
ions
to th
e Fl
ood
Res
ista
nce
Prov
isio
ns o
f the
IBC
®.
NFI
P R
egul
atio
ns
2006
IBC
® a
nd A
ppen
dix
G [a
nnot
ated
with
200
7 Su
pple
men
t] ST
AR
T O
F C
ON
STR
UC
TIO
N.
Con
stru
ctio
n (fo
r oth
er th
an n
ew
cons
truct
ion
or s
ubst
antia
l im
prov
emen
ts u
nder
the
Coa
stal
B
arrie
r Res
ourc
es A
ct (P
ub. L
. 97-
348)
), in
clud
es s
ubst
antia
l im
prov
emen
t, an
d m
eans
the
date
the
build
ing
perm
it w
as
issu
ed, p
rovi
ded
the
actu
al s
tart
of c
onst
ruct
ion,
repa
ir,
reco
nstru
ctio
n, re
habi
litat
ion,
add
ition
pla
cem
ent,
or o
ther
im
prov
emen
t was
with
in 1
80 d
ays
of th
e pe
rmit
date
. Th
e ac
tual
st
art m
eans
eith
er th
e fir
st p
lace
men
t of p
erm
anen
t con
stru
ctio
n of
a s
truct
ure
on a
site
, suc
h as
the
pour
ing
of s
lab
or fo
otin
gs,
the
inst
alla
tion
of p
iles,
the
cons
truct
ion
of c
olum
ns, o
r any
wor
k be
yond
the
stag
e of
exc
avat
ion;
or t
he p
lace
men
t of a
m
anuf
actu
red
hom
e on
a fo
unda
tion.
Per
man
ent c
onst
ruct
ion
does
not
incl
ude
land
pre
para
tion,
suc
h as
cle
arin
g, g
radi
ng a
nd
fillin
g; n
or d
oes
it in
clud
e th
e in
stal
latio
n of
stre
ets
and/
or
wal
kway
s; n
or d
oes
it in
clud
e ex
cava
tion
for a
bas
emen
t, fo
otin
gs, p
iers
, or f
ound
atio
ns o
r the
ere
ctio
n of
tem
pora
ry fo
rms;
no
r doe
s it
incl
ude
the
inst
alla
tion
on th
e pr
oper
ty o
f acc
esso
ry
units
or n
ot p
art o
f the
mai
n st
ruct
ure.
For
a s
ubst
antia
l im
prov
emen
t, th
e ac
tual
sta
rt of
con
stru
ctio
n m
eans
the
first
al
tera
tion
of a
ny w
all,
ceili
ng, f
loor
, or o
ther
stru
ctur
al p
art o
f a
build
ing,
whe
ther
or n
ot th
at a
ltera
tion
affe
cts
the
exte
rnal
di
men
sion
s of
the
build
ing.
STA
RT
OF
CO
NST
RU
CTI
ON
. Th
e da
te o
f per
mit
issu
ance
for n
ew c
onst
ruct
ion
and
subs
tant
ial
impr
ovem
ents
to e
xist
ing
stru
ctur
es, p
rovi
ded
the
actu
al s
tart
of c
onst
ruct
ion,
repa
ir, re
cons
truct
ion,
re
habi
litat
ion,
add
ition
pla
cem
ent,
or o
ther
impr
ovem
ent i
s w
ithin
180
day
s af
ter t
he d
ate
of is
suan
ce.
The
actu
al s
tart
of c
onst
ruct
ion
mea
ns th
e fir
st p
lace
men
t of p
erm
anen
t con
stru
ctio
n of
a b
uild
ing
(incl
udin
g a
man
ufac
ture
d ho
me)
on
a si
te, s
uch
as th
e po
urin
g of
a s
lab
or fo
otin
gs, i
nsta
llatio
n of
pili
ngs
or c
onst
ruct
ion
of c
olum
ns.
P
erm
anen
t con
stru
ctio
n do
es n
ot in
clud
e la
nd p
repa
ratio
n (s
uch
as c
lear
ing,
exc
avat
ion,
gra
ding
, or f
illin
g), o
r th
e in
stal
latio
n of
stre
ets
or w
alkw
ays,
or e
xcav
atio
n fo
r a b
asem
ent,
foot
ings
, pie
rs o
r fou
ndat
ions
, or t
he
erec
tion
of te
mpo
rary
form
s, o
r the
inst
alla
tion
of a
cces
sory
bui
ldin
gs s
uch
as g
arag
es o
r she
ds n
ot o
ccup
ied
as d
wel
ling
units
or n
ot p
art o
f the
mai
n bu
ildin
g. F
or a
sub
stan
tial i
mpr
ovem
ent,
the
actu
al “s
tart
of
cons
truct
ion”
mea
ns th
e fir
st a
ltera
tion
of a
ny w
all,
ceili
ng, f
loor
, or o
ther
stru
ctur
al p
art o
f a b
uild
ing,
whe
ther
or
not
that
alte
ratio
n af
fect
s th
e ex
tern
al d
imen
sion
s of
the
build
ing.
STR
UC
TUR
E. F
or fl
ood
plai
n m
anag
emen
t pur
pose
s, a
wal
led
and
roof
ed b
uild
ing,
incl
udin
g a
gas
or li
quid
sto
rage
tank
, tha
t is
prin
cipa
lly a
bove
gro
und,
as
wel
l as
a m
anuf
actu
red
hom
e.
“Stru
ctur
e” fo
r ins
uran
ce c
over
age
purp
oses
, mea
ns a
wal
led
and
roof
ed b
uild
ing,
oth
er th
an a
gas
or l
iqui
d st
orag
e ta
nk, t
hat i
s pr
inci
pally
abo
ve g
roun
d an
d af
fixed
to a
per
man
ent s
ite, a
s w
ell
as a
man
ufac
ture
d ho
me
on a
per
man
ent f
ound
atio
n. F
or th
e la
tter p
urpo
se, t
he te
rm in
clud
es a
bui
ldin
g w
hile
in th
e co
urse
of
cons
truct
ion,
alte
ratio
n or
repa
ir, b
ut d
oes
not i
nclu
de b
uild
ing
mat
eria
ls o
r sup
plie
s in
tend
ed fo
r use
in s
uch
cons
truct
ion,
al
tera
tion
or re
pair,
unl
ess
such
mat
eria
ls o
r sup
plie
s ar
e w
ithin
an
enc
lose
d bu
ildin
g on
the
prem
ises
.
101.
2 S
cope
10
5.2
Wor
k ex
empt
from
a p
erm
it
SUB
STA
NTI
AL
DA
MA
GE.
Dam
age
of a
ny o
rigin
sus
tain
ed b
y a
stru
ctur
e w
here
by th
e co
st o
f res
torin
g th
e st
ruct
ure
to it
s be
fore
da
mag
ed c
ondi
tion
wou
ld e
qual
or e
xcee
d 50
per
cent
of t
he
mar
ket v
alue
of t
he s
truct
ure
befo
re th
e da
mag
e oc
curr
ed.
SUB
STA
NTI
AL
DA
MA
GE.
Dam
age
of a
ny o
rigin
sus
tain
ed b
y a
stru
ctur
e w
here
by th
e co
st o
f res
torin
g th
e st
ruct
ure
to it
s be
fore
-dam
aged
con
ditio
n w
ould
equ
al o
r exc
eed
50 p
erce
nt o
f the
mar
ket v
alue
of t
he
stru
ctur
e be
fore
the
dam
age
occu
rred
.
![Page 89: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/89.jpg)
pa
ge B
-8
IBC
Cro
ssw
alk
of th
e N
FIP
Reg
ulat
ions
to th
e Fl
ood
Res
ista
nce
Prov
isio
ns o
f the
IBC
®.
NFI
P R
egul
atio
ns
2006
IBC
® a
nd A
ppen
dix
G [a
nnot
ated
with
200
7 Su
pple
men
t] SU
BST
AN
TIA
L IM
PRO
VEM
ENT.
Any
reco
nstru
ctio
n,
reha
bilit
atio
n, a
dditi
on, o
r oth
er im
prov
emen
t of a
stru
ctur
e, th
e co
st o
f whi
ch e
qual
s or
exc
eeds
50
perc
ent o
f the
mar
ket v
alue
of
the
stru
ctur
e be
fore
the
“sta
rt of
con
stru
ctio
n” o
f the
im
prov
emen
t. T
his
term
incl
udes
stru
ctur
es w
hich
hav
e in
curr
ed
“sub
stan
tial d
amag
e”, r
egar
dles
s of
the
actu
al re
pair
wor
k pe
rform
ed.
The
term
doe
s no
t, ho
wev
er, i
nclu
de e
ither
:
(1)
Any
pro
ject
for i
mpr
ovem
ent o
f a s
truct
ure
to c
orre
ct
exis
ting
viol
atio
ns o
f sta
te o
r loc
al h
ealth
, san
itary
, or s
afet
y co
de s
peci
ficat
ions
whi
ch h
ave
been
iden
tifie
d by
the
loca
l co
de e
nfor
cem
ent o
ffici
al a
nd w
hich
are
the
min
imum
ne
cess
ary
to a
ssur
e sa
fe li
ving
con
ditio
ns o
r (2
) A
ny a
ltera
tion
of a
“his
toric
stru
ctur
e”, p
rovi
ded
that
the
alte
ratio
n w
ill n
ot p
recl
ude
the
stru
ctur
e’s
cont
inue
d de
sign
atio
n as
a “h
isto
ric s
truct
ure.
”
SUB
STA
NTI
AL
IMPR
OVE
MEN
T. A
ny re
pair,
reco
nstru
ctio
n, re
habi
litat
ion,
add
ition
, or i
mpr
ovem
ent o
f a
build
ing
or s
truct
ure,
the
cost
of w
hich
equ
als
or e
xcee
ds 5
0 pe
rcen
t of t
he m
arke
t val
ue o
f the
stru
ctur
e be
fore
the
impr
ovem
ent o
r rep
air i
s st
arte
d. I
f the
stru
ctur
e ha
s su
stai
ned
subs
tant
ial d
amag
e, a
ny re
pairs
ar
e co
nsid
ered
sub
stan
tial i
mpr
ovem
ent r
egar
dles
s of
the
actu
al re
pair
wor
k pe
rform
ed.
The
term
doe
s no
t, ho
wev
er, i
nclu
de e
ither
: 1.
A
ny p
roje
ct fo
r im
prov
emen
t of a
bui
ldin
g re
quire
d to
cor
rect
exi
stin
g he
alth
, san
itary
or s
afet
y co
de
viol
atio
ns id
entif
ied
by th
e bu
ildin
g of
ficia
l and
that
are
the
min
imum
nec
essa
ry to
ass
ure
safe
livi
ng
cond
ition
s.
2.
Any
alte
ratio
n of
a h
isto
ric s
truct
ure
prov
ided
that
the
alte
ratio
n w
ill n
ot p
recl
ude
the
stru
ctur
e’s
cont
inue
d de
sign
atio
n as
a h
isto
ric s
truct
ure.
VAR
IAN
CE.
A g
rant
of r
elie
f by
a co
mm
unity
from
the
term
s of
a
flood
pla
in m
anag
emen
t reg
ulat
ion.
10
4.10
Mod
ifica
tions
10
4.11
Alte
rnat
ive
mat
eria
ls, d
esig
n an
d m
etho
ds o
f con
stru
ctio
n an
d eq
uipm
ent.
[In
flood
haz
ard
area
s, m
odifi
catio
ns re
quire
a fo
rmal
var
ianc
e.]
App
endi
x G
. VA
RIA
NC
E. A
gra
nt o
f rel
ief f
rom
the
requ
irem
ents
of t
his
sect
ion
whi
ch p
erm
its c
onst
ruct
ion
in a
man
ner o
ther
wis
e pr
ohib
ited
by th
is s
ectio
n w
here
spe
cific
enf
orce
men
t wou
ld re
sult
in u
nnec
essa
ry
hard
ship
. VI
OLA
TIO
N.
The
failu
re o
f a s
truct
ure
or o
ther
dev
elop
men
t to
be fu
lly c
ompl
iant
with
the
com
mun
ity’s
floo
d pl
ain
man
agem
ent
regu
latio
ns.
A s
truct
ure
or o
ther
dev
elop
men
t with
out t
he
elev
atio
n ce
rtific
ate,
oth
er c
ertif
icat
ions
, or o
ther
evi
denc
e of
co
mpl
ianc
e re
quire
d in
Sec
. 60.
3(b)
(5),
(c)(
4), (
c)(1
0), (
d)(3
), (e
)(2)
, (e)
(4),
or (e
)(5)
is p
resu
med
to b
e in
vio
latio
n un
til s
uch
time
as th
at d
ocum
enta
tion
is p
rovi
ded.
113
Viol
atio
ns
App
endi
x G
. VI
OLA
TIO
N.
A d
evel
opm
ent t
hat i
s no
t ful
ly c
ompl
iant
with
this
app
endi
x or
Sec
tion
1612
, as
ap
plic
able
.
59.2
2 [T
his
sect
ion
outli
nes
actio
ns to
be
take
n by
com
mun
ities
to b
e el
igib
le fo
r the
Nat
iona
l Flo
od In
sura
nce
Pro
gram
, inc
ludi
ng a
pplic
atio
n pr
oced
ures
, doc
umen
tatio
n re
quire
men
ts, a
nd a
com
mitm
ent t
o fu
lfill
certa
in fu
nctio
ns a
nd re
spon
sibi
litie
s.]
1 (a
)(9)
(iii)
Mai
ntai
n fo
r pub
lic in
spec
tion
and
furn
ish
upon
requ
est c
ertif
icat
es o
f ele
vatio
n an
d ce
rtific
ates
of
floo
dpro
ofin
g.
104.
7 D
epar
tmen
t Rec
ords
A
ppen
dix
G10
3.8
Rec
ords
. Th
e bu
ildin
g of
ficia
l sha
ll m
aint
ain
a pe
rman
ent r
ecor
d of
all
perm
its is
sued
in
flood
haz
ard
area
s, in
clud
ing
copi
es o
f ins
pect
ion
repo
rts a
nd c
ertif
icat
ions
requ
ired
in S
ectio
n 16
12.
![Page 90: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/90.jpg)
pa
ge B
-9
IBC
Cro
ssw
alk
of th
e N
FIP
Reg
ulat
ions
to th
e Fl
ood
Res
ista
nce
Prov
isio
ns o
f the
IBC
®.
NFI
P R
egul
atio
ns
2006
IBC
® a
nd A
ppen
dix
G [a
nnot
ated
with
200
7 Su
pple
men
t]
2 (b
)(1)
App
oint
the
agen
cy o
r offi
cial
with
the
resp
onsi
bilit
y, a
utho
rity,
and
mea
ns to
impl
emen
t the
co
mm
itmen
ts, i
nclu
ding
cer
tain
repo
rting
re
quire
men
ts.
103
Dep
artm
ent o
f Bui
ldin
g Sa
fety
10
4 D
utie
s an
d Po
wer
s of
the
Bui
ldin
g O
ffici
al
App
endi
x G
104.
3 V
alid
ity o
f per
mit.
The
issu
ance
of a
per
mit
unde
r thi
s ap
pend
ix s
hall
not b
e co
nstru
ed
to b
e a
perm
it fo
r, or
app
rova
l of,
any
viol
atio
n of
this
app
endi
x or
any
oth
er o
rdin
ance
of t
he ju
risdi
ctio
n. T
he
issu
ance
of a
per
mit
base
d on
sub
mitt
ed d
ocum
ents
and
info
rmat
ion
shal
l not
pre
vent
the
build
ing
offic
ial f
rom
re
quiri
ng th
e co
rrec
tion
of e
rror
s. T
he b
uild
ing
offic
ial i
s au
thor
ized
to p
reve
nt o
ccup
ancy
or u
se o
f a s
truct
ure
or s
ite w
hich
is in
vio
latio
n of
this
app
endi
x or
oth
er o
rdin
ance
s of
this
juris
dict
ion.
A
ppen
dix
G10
4.4
Exp
iratio
n. A
per
mit
shal
l bec
ome
inva
lid if
the
prop
osed
dev
elop
men
t is
not c
omm
ence
d w
ithin
180
day
s af
ter i
ts is
suan
ce, o
r if t
he w
ork
auth
oriz
ed is
sus
pend
ed o
r aba
ndon
ed fo
r a p
erio
d of
180
da
ys a
fter t
he w
ork
com
men
ces.
Ext
ensi
ons
shal
l be
requ
este
d in
writ
ing
and
just
ifiab
le c
ause
dem
onst
rate
d.
The
build
ing
offic
ial i
s au
thor
ized
to g
rant
, in
writ
ing,
one
or m
ore
exte
nsio
ns o
f tim
e, fo
r per
iods
not
mor
e th
an
180
days
eac
h.
App
endi
x G
104.
5 S
uspe
nsio
n or
revo
catio
n. T
he b
uild
ing
offic
ial i
s au
thor
ized
to s
uspe
nd o
r rev
oke
a pe
rmit
issu
ed u
nder
this
app
endi
x w
here
ver t
he p
erm
it is
issu
ed in
err
or o
r on
the
basi
s of
inco
rrec
t, in
accu
rate
or i
ncom
plet
e in
form
atio
n, o
r in
viol
atio
n of
any
ord
inan
ce o
r cod
e of
this
juris
dict
ion.
Se
c. 6
0.2
Min
imum
com
plia
nce
with
floo
d pl
ain
man
agem
ent c
riter
ia.
[S
ectio
ns (a
) thr
ough
(c) p
erta
in to
mee
ting
spec
ific
crite
ria s
et fo
rth h
erei
n, a
s a
func
tion
of th
e ty
pe o
f flo
od-r
elat
ed h
azar
d an
d th
e le
vel o
f det
ail p
rovi
ded
on th
e flo
od h
azar
d m
ap p
repa
red
by F
EM
A.
Sec
tion
(e) p
rovi
des
for c
oord
inat
ion
with
Sta
te C
oord
inat
ing
Age
ncie
s w
ith re
spec
t to
subm
issi
on o
f reg
ulat
ions
for p
artic
ipat
ion
in th
e N
FIP
; Sec
tion
(f)
addr
esse
s th
e co
mm
unity
func
tion
to s
ubm
it re
ports
per
iodi
cally
, whe
n re
ques
ted;
and
Sec
tion
(g) d
irect
s co
mm
uniti
es to
ass
ure
that
thei
r com
preh
ensi
ve p
lans
are
con
sist
ent
with
floo
dpla
in m
anag
emen
t obj
ectiv
es.]
![Page 91: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/91.jpg)
pa
ge B
-10
IBC
Cro
ssw
alk
of th
e N
FIP
Reg
ulat
ions
to th
e Fl
ood
Res
ista
nce
Prov
isio
ns o
f the
IBC
®.
NFI
P R
egul
atio
ns
2006
IBC
® a
nd A
ppen
dix
G [a
nnot
ated
with
200
7 Su
pple
men
t]
3 (h
) Th
e co
mm
unity
sha
ll ad
opt a
nd e
nfor
ce
flood
plai
n m
anag
emen
t reg
ulat
ions
bas
ed o
n da
ta
prov
ided
by
the
Adm
inis
trato
r. W
ithou
t prio
r ap
prov
al o
f the
Adm
inis
trato
r, th
e co
mm
unity
sha
ll no
t ado
pt a
nd e
nfor
ce fl
oodp
lain
man
agem
ent
regu
latio
ns b
ased
upo
n m
odifi
ed d
ata
refle
ctin
g na
tura
l or m
an-m
ade
chan
ges.
1612
.3 E
stab
lishm
ent o
f flo
od h
azar
d ar
eas.
To
esta
blis
h flo
od h
azar
d ar
eas,
the
appl
icab
le g
over
ning
au
thor
ity s
hall
adop
t a fl
ood
haza
rd m
ap a
nd s
uppo
rting
dat
a. T
he fl
ood
haza
rd m
ap s
hall
incl
ude,
at a
m
inim
um, a
reas
of s
peci
al fl
ood
haza
rd a
s id
entif
ied
by th
e Fe
dera
l Em
erge
ncy
Man
agem
ent A
genc
y in
an
engi
neer
ing
repo
rt en
title
d “T
he F
lood
Insu
ranc
e S
tudy
for [
INS
ER
T N
AM
E O
F JU
RIS
DIC
TIO
N],”
dat
ed [I
NS
ER
T D
ATE
OF
ISS
UA
NC
E],
as a
men
ded
or re
vise
d w
ith th
e ac
com
pany
ing
Floo
d In
sura
nce
Rat
e M
ap (F
IRM
) and
Fl
ood
Bou
ndar
y an
d Fl
oodw
ay M
ap (F
BFM
) and
rela
ted
supp
ortin
g da
ta a
long
with
any
revi
sion
s th
eret
o.
The
adop
ted
flood
haz
ard
map
and
sup
porti
ng d
ata
are
here
by a
dopt
ed b
y re
fere
nce
and
decl
ared
to b
e pa
rt of
this
sec
tion.
16
12.3
.1 D
esig
n flo
od e
leva
tions
. W
here
des
ign
flood
ele
vatio
ns a
re n
ot in
clud
ed in
the
flood
haz
ard
area
s es
tabl
ishe
d in
Sec
tion
1612
.3, o
r if f
lood
way
s ar
e no
t des
igna
ted,
the
build
ing
offic
ial i
s au
thor
ized
to re
quire
th
e ap
plic
ant t
o:
1.
Obt
ain
and
reas
onab
ly u
tiliz
e an
y de
sign
floo
d el
evat
ion
and
flood
way
dat
a av
aila
ble
from
a fe
dera
l, st
ate,
or o
ther
sou
rce,
or
2.
Det
erm
ine
the
desi
gn fl
ood
elev
atio
n an
d/or
floo
dway
in a
ccor
danc
e w
ith a
ccep
ted
hydr
olog
ic a
nd
hydr
aulic
eng
inee
ring
prac
tices
use
d to
def
ine
spec
ial f
lood
haz
ard
area
s. D
eter
min
atio
ns s
hall
be
unde
rtake
n by
a re
gist
ered
des
ign
prof
essi
onal
who
sha
ll do
cum
ent t
hat t
he te
chni
cal m
etho
ds
used
refle
ct c
urre
ntly
acc
epte
d en
gine
erin
g pr
actic
e.
App
endi
x G
102.
2 E
stab
lishm
ent o
f flo
od h
azar
d ar
eas.
Flo
od h
azar
d ar
eas
are
esta
blis
hed
in S
ectio
n 16
12.3
of t
he In
tern
atio
nal B
uild
ing
Cod
e, a
dopt
ed b
y th
e ap
plic
able
gov
erni
ng a
utho
rity
on _
____
____
_.
Sec.
60.
3 F
lood
plai
n m
anag
emen
t crit
eria
for f
lood
-pro
ne a
reas
.
(a)
Whe
n th
e A
dmin
istra
tor h
as n
ot d
efin
ed th
e sp
ecia
l flo
od h
azar
d ar
eas
with
in a
com
mun
ity, h
as n
ot p
rovi
ded
wat
er s
urfa
ce e
leva
tion
data
, and
has
not
pro
vide
d su
ffici
ent
data
to id
entif
y th
e flo
odw
ay o
r coa
stal
hig
h ha
zard
are
a, b
ut th
e co
mm
unity
has
indi
cate
d th
e pr
esen
ce o
f suc
h ha
zard
s by
sub
mitt
ing
an a
pplic
atio
n to
par
ticip
ate
in th
e P
rogr
am, t
he c
omm
unity
sha
ll:
![Page 92: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/92.jpg)
pa
ge B
-11
IBC
Cro
ssw
alk
of th
e N
FIP
Reg
ulat
ions
to th
e Fl
ood
Res
ista
nce
Prov
isio
ns o
f the
IBC
®.
NFI
P R
egul
atio
ns
2006
IBC
® a
nd A
ppen
dix
G [a
nnot
ated
with
200
7 Su
pple
men
t]
4 co
ntin
ued
on n
ext
page
(1)
Req
uire
per
mits
for a
ll pr
opos
ed c
onst
ruct
ion
or o
ther
dev
elop
men
t, in
clud
ing
the
plac
emen
t of
man
ufac
ture
d ho
mes
, to
dete
rmin
e w
heth
er s
uch
deve
lopm
ent i
s pr
opos
ed w
ithin
floo
d ha
zard
are
as;
101.
2 S
cope
10
5.2
Wor
k ex
empt
from
per
mit
105.
2.2
Rep
airs
16
12.1
Gen
eral
(Flo
od L
oads
). W
ithin
floo
d ha
zard
are
as a
s es
tabl
ishe
d in
Sec
tion
1612
.3, a
ll ne
w
cons
truct
ion
of b
uild
ings
, stru
ctur
es a
nd p
ortio
ns o
f bui
ldin
gs a
nd s
truct
ures
, inc
ludi
ng s
ubst
antia
l im
prov
emen
ts a
nd re
stor
atio
n of
sub
stan
tial d
amag
e to
bui
ldin
gs a
nd s
truct
ures
, sha
ll be
des
igne
d an
d co
nstru
cted
to re
sist
the
effe
cts
of fl
ood
haza
rds
and
flood
load
s. F
or b
uild
ings
that
are
loca
ted
in o
ne o
r m
ore
flood
haz
ard
area
, the
pro
visi
ons
asso
ciat
ed w
ith th
e m
ost r
estri
ctiv
e flo
od h
azar
d ar
ea s
hall
appl
y.
3403
.1 E
xist
ing
build
ings
or s
truc
ture
s. A
dditi
ons
or a
ltera
tions
to a
ny b
uild
ing
or s
truct
ure
shal
l con
form
w
ith th
e re
quire
men
ts o
f the
cod
e fo
r new
con
stru
ctio
n. A
dditi
ons
or a
ltera
tions
sha
ll no
t be
mad
e to
an
exis
ting
build
ing
or s
truct
ure
whi
ch w
ill c
ause
the
exis
ting
build
ing
or s
truct
ure
to b
e in
vio
latio
n of
any
pr
ovis
ions
of t
his
code
. A
n ex
istin
g bu
ildin
g pl
us a
dditi
ons
shal
l com
ply
with
the
heig
ht a
nd a
rea
prov
isio
ns o
f C
hapt
er 5
. P
ortio
ns o
f the
stru
ctur
e no
t alte
red
and
not a
ffect
ed b
y th
e al
tera
tion
are
not r
equi
red
to c
ompl
y w
ith th
e co
de re
quire
men
ts fo
r a n
ew s
truct
ure.
34
03.1
.1 F
lood
haz
ard
area
s. F
or b
uild
ings
and
stru
ctur
es in
floo
d ha
zard
are
as e
stab
lishe
d in
Sec
tion
1612
.3, a
ny a
dditi
ons,
alte
ratio
ns o
r rep
airs
that
con
stitu
te s
ubst
antia
l im
prov
emen
t of t
he e
xist
ing
stru
ctur
e,
as d
efin
ed in
Sec
tion
1612
.2, s
hall
com
ply
with
the
flood
des
ign
requ
irem
ents
for n
ew c
onst
ruct
ion
and
all
aspe
cts
of th
e ex
istin
g st
ruct
ure
shal
l be
brou
ght i
nto
com
plia
nce
with
the
requ
irem
ents
for n
ew c
onst
ruct
ion
for f
lood
des
ign.
A
ppen
dix
G10
1.1
Pur
pose
. Th
e pu
rpos
e of
this
app
endi
x is
to p
rom
ote
the
publ
ic h
ealth
, saf
ety,
and
ge
nera
l wel
fare
and
to m
inim
ize
publ
ic a
nd p
rivat
e lo
sses
due
to fl
ood
cond
ition
s in
spe
cific
floo
d ha
zard
ar
eas
thro
ugh
the
esta
blis
hmen
t of c
ompr
ehen
sive
regu
latio
ns fo
r man
agem
ent o
f flo
od h
azar
d ar
eas,
de
sign
ed to
: 1.
P
reve
nt u
nnec
essa
ry d
isru
ptio
n of
com
mer
ce, a
cces
s, a
nd p
ublic
ser
vice
dur
ing
times
of f
lood
ing;
2.
M
anag
e th
e al
tera
tion
of n
atur
al fl
oodp
lain
s, s
tream
cha
nnel
s, a
nd s
hore
lines
; 3.
M
anag
e fil
ling,
gra
ding
, dre
dgin
g, a
nd o
ther
dev
elop
men
t whi
ch m
ay in
crea
se fl
ood
dam
age
or
eros
ion
pote
ntia
l; 4.
P
reve
nt o
r reg
ulat
e th
e co
nstru
ctio
n of
floo
d ba
rrie
rs w
hich
will
div
ert f
lood
wat
ers
or w
hich
can
in
crea
se fl
ood
haza
rds;
and
5.
C
ontri
bute
to im
prov
ed c
onst
ruct
ion
tech
niqu
es in
the
flood
plai
n.
App
endi
x G
102.
1 G
ener
al (A
pplic
abili
ty).
Thi
s ap
pend
ix, i
n co
njun
ctio
n w
ith th
e In
tern
atio
nal B
uild
ing
Cod
e, p
rovi
des
min
imum
requ
irem
ents
for d
evel
opm
ent l
ocat
ed in
floo
d ha
zard
are
as, i
nclu
ding
the
subd
ivis
ion
of la
nd; i
nsta
llatio
n of
util
ities
; pla
cem
ent a
nd re
plac
emen
t of m
anuf
actu
red
hom
es; n
ew
cons
truct
ion
and
repa
ir, re
cons
truct
ion,
reha
bilit
atio
n, o
r add
ition
s to
new
con
stru
ctio
n; s
ubst
antia
l im
prov
emen
t of e
xist
ing
build
ings
and
stru
ctur
es, i
nclu
ding
rest
orat
ion
afte
r dam
age,
and
cer
tain
bui
ldin
g w
ork
exem
pt fr
om p
erm
it un
der S
ectio
n105
.2.
![Page 93: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/93.jpg)
pa
ge B
-12
IBC
Cro
ssw
alk
of th
e N
FIP
Reg
ulat
ions
to th
e Fl
ood
Res
ista
nce
Prov
isio
ns o
f the
IBC
®.
NFI
P R
egul
atio
ns
2006
IBC
® a
nd A
ppen
dix
G [a
nnot
ated
with
200
7 Su
pple
men
t]
4 co
ntin
ued
from
pr
evio
us
page
co
ntin
ued
on n
ext
page
A
ppen
dix
G10
3.1
Per
mit
appl
icat
ions
. Th
e bu
ildin
g of
ficia
l sha
ll re
view
all
perm
it ap
plic
atio
ns to
det
erm
ine
whe
ther
pro
pose
d de
velo
pmen
t site
s w
ill b
e re
ason
ably
saf
e fro
m fl
oodi
ng.
If a
prop
osed
dev
elop
men
t site
is
in a
floo
d ha
zard
are
a, a
ll si
te d
evel
opm
ent a
ctiv
ities
, inc
ludi
ng g
radi
ng, f
illin
g, u
tility
inst
alla
tion,
and
dra
inag
e m
odifi
catio
n, a
nd a
ll ne
w c
onst
ruct
ion
and
subs
tant
ial i
mpr
ovem
ent o
f exi
stin
g bu
ildin
gs a
nd s
truct
ures
, in
clud
ing
rest
orat
ion
afte
r dam
age;
tem
pora
ry s
truct
ures
and
tem
pora
ry o
r per
man
ent s
tora
ge; u
tility
and
m
isce
llane
ous
Gro
up U
bui
ldin
gs a
nd s
truct
ures
; an
d ce
rtain
bui
ldin
g w
ork
exem
pt fr
om p
erm
it un
der
Sec
tion1
05.2
, sha
ll be
des
igne
d an
d co
nstru
cted
with
met
hods
, pra
ctic
es, a
nd m
ater
ials
that
min
imiz
e flo
od
dam
age
and
that
are
in a
ccor
danc
e w
ith th
is c
ode
and
the
AS
CE
24.
A
ppen
dix
G10
4.1
[Per
mits
] Req
uire
d. A
ny p
erso
n, o
wne
r or a
utho
rized
age
nt w
ho in
tend
s to
con
duct
any
de
velo
pmen
t in
a flo
od h
azar
d ar
ea s
hall
first
mak
e ap
plic
atio
n to
the
build
ing
offic
ial a
nd s
hall
obta
in th
e re
quire
d pe
rmit.
G
801
Oth
er B
uild
ing
Wor
k G
801.
1 D
etac
hed
acce
ssor
y st
ruct
ures
. D
etac
hed
acce
ssor
y st
ruct
ures
sha
ll be
anc
hore
d to
pre
vent
flo
tatio
n, c
olla
pse
or la
tera
l mov
emen
t res
ultin
g fro
m h
ydro
stat
ic lo
ads,
incl
udin
g th
e ef
fect
s of
buo
yanc
y,
durin
g co
nditi
ons
of th
e de
sign
floo
d. F
ully
enc
lose
d ac
cess
ory
stru
ctur
es s
hall
have
floo
d op
enin
gs to
allo
w
for t
he a
utom
atic
ent
ry a
nd e
xit o
f flo
od w
ater
s.
G80
1.2
Fen
ces.
Fen
ces
in fl
oodw
ays
that
may
blo
ck th
e pa
ssag
e of
floo
dwat
ers,
suc
h as
sto
ckad
e fe
nces
an
d w
ire m
esh
fenc
es, s
hall
mee
t the
requ
irem
ent o
f BG
103.
5.
G80
1.3
Oil
derr
icks
. O
il de
rric
ks lo
cate
d in
floo
d ha
zard
are
as s
hall
be d
esig
ned
in c
onfo
rman
ce w
ith th
e flo
od lo
ads
in S
ectio
n 16
03.1
.6 a
nd S
ectio
n 16
12.
G
801.
4 R
etai
ning
wal
ls, s
idew
alks
and
driv
eway
s. R
etai
ning
wal
ls, s
idew
alks
and
driv
eway
s sh
all m
eet
the
requ
irem
ents
of S
ectio
n 18
03.4
.
G80
1.5
Pre
fabr
icat
ed s
wim
min
g po
ols.
Pre
fabr
icat
ed s
wim
min
g po
ols
in fl
oodw
ays
shal
l mee
t the
re
quire
men
t of B
G10
3.5.
G
901
Tem
pora
ry S
truc
ture
s an
d Te
mpo
rary
Sto
rage
G
901.
1 Te
mpo
rary
str
uctu
res.
Tem
pora
ry s
truct
ures
sha
ll be
ere
cted
for a
per
iod
of le
ss th
an 1
80 d
ays.
Te
mpo
rary
stru
ctur
es s
hall
be a
ncho
red
to p
reve
nt fl
otat
ion,
col
laps
e or
late
ral m
ovem
ent r
esul
ting
from
hy
dros
tatic
load
s, in
clud
ing
the
effe
cts
of b
uoya
ncy,
dur
ing
cond
ition
s of
the
desi
gn fl
ood.
Ful
ly e
nclo
sed
tem
pora
ry s
truct
ures
sha
ll ha
ve fl
ood
open
ings
to a
llow
for t
he a
utom
atic
ent
ry a
nd e
xit o
f flo
od w
ater
s.
G90
1.2
Tem
pora
ry s
tora
ge.
Tem
pora
ry s
tora
ge in
clud
es s
tora
ge o
f goo
ds a
nd m
ater
ials
for a
per
iod
of le
ss
than
180
day
s. S
tore
d m
ater
ials
sha
ll no
t inc
lude
haz
ardo
us m
ater
ials
.
G90
1.3
Tem
pora
ry s
truc
ture
s an
d st
orag
e. T
empo
rary
stru
ctur
es a
nd te
mpo
rary
sto
rage
in fl
oodw
ays
shal
l mee
t the
requ
irem
ents
of S
ectio
n G
103.
5.
![Page 94: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/94.jpg)
pa
ge B
-13
IBC
Cro
ssw
alk
of th
e N
FIP
Reg
ulat
ions
to th
e Fl
ood
Res
ista
nce
Prov
isio
ns o
f the
IBC
®.
NFI
P R
egul
atio
ns
2006
IBC
® a
nd A
ppen
dix
G [a
nnot
ated
with
200
7 Su
pple
men
t]
4 co
ntin
ued
from
pr
evio
us
page
G
1001
Util
ity a
nd M
isce
llane
ous
Gro
up U
G
1001
.1 U
tility
and
Mis
cella
neou
s G
roup
U.
Util
ity a
nd M
isce
llane
ous
Gro
up U
incl
udes
bui
ldin
gs th
at a
re
acce
ssor
y in
cha
ract
er a
nd m
isce
llane
ous
stru
ctur
es n
ot c
lass
ified
in a
ny s
peci
fic o
ccup
ancy
in th
e In
tern
atio
nal B
uild
ing
Cod
e, in
clud
ing,
but
not
lim
ited
to, a
gric
ultu
ral b
uild
ings
, airc
raft
hang
ars
(acc
esso
ry to
a
one-
or t
wo-
fam
ily re
side
nce)
, bar
ns, c
arpo
rts, f
ence
s m
ore
than
6 fe
et (1
829
mm
) hig
h, g
rain
silo
s (a
cces
sory
to
a re
side
ntia
l occ
upan
cy),
gree
nhou
ses,
live
stoc
k sh
elte
rs, p
rivat
e ga
rage
s, re
tain
ing
wal
ls, s
heds
, sta
bles
, an
d to
wer
s.
G10
01.1
Flo
od lo
ads.
Util
ity a
nd m
isce
llane
ous
Gro
up U
bui
ldin
gs a
nd s
truct
ures
, inc
ludi
ng s
ubst
antia
l im
prov
emen
t of s
uch
build
ings
and
stru
ctur
es, s
hall
be a
ncho
red
to p
reve
nt fl
otat
ion,
col
laps
e or
late
ral
mov
emen
t res
ultin
g fro
m fl
ood
load
s, in
clud
ing
the
effe
cts
of b
uoya
ncy,
dur
ing
cond
ition
s of
the
desi
gn fl
ood.
G
1001
.2 E
leva
tion.
Util
ity a
nd m
isce
llane
ous
Gro
up U
bui
ldin
gs a
nd s
truct
ures
, inc
ludi
ng s
ubst
antia
l im
prov
emen
t of s
uch
build
ings
and
stru
ctur
es, s
hall
be e
leva
ted
such
that
the
low
est f
loor
, inc
ludi
ng
base
men
t, is
ele
vate
d to
or a
bove
the
desi
gn fl
ood
elev
atio
n in
acc
orda
nce
with
Sec
tion
1612
of t
he
Inte
rnat
iona
l Bui
ldin
g C
ode.
G
1001
.4 E
nclo
sure
s be
low
des
ign
flood
ele
vatio
n. F
ully
enc
lose
d ar
eas
belo
w th
e de
sign
floo
d el
evat
ion
shal
l be
at o
r abo
ve g
rade
on
all s
ides
and
con
form
to th
e fo
llow
ing:
1.
In
flood
haz
ard
area
s no
t sub
ject
to h
igh-
velo
city
wav
e ac
tion,
sha
ll ha
ve fl
ood
open
ings
to a
llow
for t
he
auto
mat
ic in
flow
and
out
flow
of f
lood
wat
ers.
2.
In fl
ood
haza
rd a
reas
sub
ject
to h
igh-
velo
city
wav
e ac
tion,
sha
ll ha
ve w
alls
bel
ow th
e de
sign
floo
d el
evat
ion
that
are
des
igne
d to
bre
ak a
way
or c
olla
pse
from
a w
ater
load
less
than
that
whi
ch w
ould
occ
ur d
urin
g th
e de
sign
floo
d, w
ithou
t cau
sing
col
laps
e, d
ispl
acem
ent o
r oth
er s
truct
ural
dam
age
to th
e bu
ildin
g or
stru
ctur
e.
G10
01.5
Flo
od-d
amag
e re
sist
ant m
ater
ials
. Fl
ood-
dam
age
resi
stan
t mat
eria
ls s
hall
be u
sed
belo
w th
e de
sign
floo
d el
evat
ion.
G
1001
.6 P
rote
ctio
n of
mec
hani
cal,
plum
bing
and
ele
ctric
al s
yste
ms.
Mec
hani
cal,
plum
bing
and
el
ectri
cal s
yste
ms,
incl
udin
g pl
umbi
ng fi
xtur
es, s
hall
be e
leva
ted
to o
r abo
ve th
e de
sign
floo
d el
evat
ion.
Ex
cept
ion:
Ele
ctric
al s
yste
ms,
equ
ipm
ent a
nd c
ompo
nent
s, a
nd h
eatin
g, v
entil
atin
g, a
ir co
nditi
onin
g, a
nd
plum
bing
app
lianc
es, p
lum
bing
fixt
ures
, duc
t sys
tem
s, a
nd o
ther
ser
vice
equ
ipm
ent a
re p
erm
itted
to b
e lo
cate
d be
low
the
desi
gn fl
ood
elev
atio
n pr
ovid
ed th
at th
ey a
re d
esig
ned
and
inst
alle
d to
pre
vent
wat
er fr
om
ente
ring
or a
ccum
ulat
ing
with
in th
e co
mpo
nent
s an
d to
resi
st h
ydro
stat
ic a
nd h
ydro
dyna
mic
load
s an
d st
ress
es, i
nclu
ding
the
effe
cts
of b
uoya
ncy,
dur
ing
the
occu
rren
ce o
f flo
odin
g to
the
desi
gn fl
ood
elev
atio
n in
co
mpl
ianc
e w
ith th
e flo
od-r
esis
tant
con
stru
ctio
n re
quire
men
ts o
f the
Inte
rnat
iona
l Bui
ldin
g C
ode.
Ele
ctric
al
wiri
ng s
yste
ms
are
perm
itted
to b
e lo
cate
d be
low
the
desi
gn fl
ood
elev
atio
n pr
ovid
ed th
ey c
onfo
rm to
the
prov
isio
ns o
f the
ele
ctric
al p
art o
f the
Inte
rnat
iona
l Cod
e C
ounc
il E
lect
rical
Cod
e A
dmin
istra
tive
Pro
visi
ons
[for
wet
loca
tions
].
![Page 95: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/95.jpg)
pa
ge B
-14
IBC
Cro
ssw
alk
of th
e N
FIP
Reg
ulat
ions
to th
e Fl
ood
Res
ista
nce
Prov
isio
ns o
f the
IBC
®.
NFI
P R
egul
atio
ns
2006
IBC
® a
nd A
ppen
dix
G [a
nnot
ated
with
200
7 Su
pple
men
t]
5 (2
) R
evie
w p
ropo
sed
deve
lopm
ent t
o as
sure
that
al
l nec
essa
ry p
erm
its h
ave
been
rece
ived
from
oth
er
gove
rnm
enta
l age
ncie
s fro
m w
hich
app
rova
l is
requ
ired
by F
eder
al o
r Sta
te la
w, i
nclu
ding
sec
tion
404
of th
e Fe
dera
l Wat
er P
ollu
tion
Con
trol A
ct
Am
endm
ents
of 1
972,
33
U.S
.C. 1
334;
105.
3.1
Act
ion
on a
pplic
atio
n A
ppen
dix
G10
3.2
Oth
er p
erm
its.
It sh
all b
e th
e re
spon
sibi
lity
of th
e bu
ildin
g of
ficia
l to
assu
re th
at a
ppro
val
of a
pro
pose
d de
velo
pmen
t sha
ll no
t be
give
n un
til p
roof
that
nec
essa
ry p
erm
its h
ave
been
gra
nted
by
fede
ral
or s
tate
age
ncie
s ha
ving
juris
dict
ion
over
suc
h de
velo
pmen
t.
6 co
ntin
ued
on n
ext
page
(3)
Rev
iew
all
perm
it ap
plic
atio
ns to
det
erm
ine
whe
ther
pro
pose
d bu
ildin
g si
tes
will
be
reas
onab
ly
safe
from
floo
ding
. If
a pr
opos
ed b
uild
ing
site
is in
a
flood
-pro
ne a
rea,
all
new
con
stru
ctio
n an
d su
bsta
ntia
l im
prov
emen
ts s
hall:
(i)
be
des
igne
d (o
r mod
ified
) and
ade
quat
ely
anch
ored
to p
reve
nt fl
otat
ion,
col
laps
e, o
r la
tera
l mov
emen
t of t
he s
truct
ure
resu
lting
from
hy
drod
ynam
ic a
nd h
ydro
stat
ic lo
ads,
incl
udin
g th
e ef
fect
s of
buo
yanc
y,
(ii)
be c
onst
ruct
ed w
ith m
ater
ials
resi
stan
t to
flood
da
mag
e,
(iii)
be c
onst
ruct
ed b
y m
etho
ds a
nd p
ract
ices
that
m
inim
ize
flood
dam
ages
, and
(iv
) be
con
stru
cted
with
ele
ctric
al, h
eatin
g,
vent
ilatio
n, p
lum
bing
, and
air
cond
ition
ing
equi
pmen
t and
oth
er s
ervi
ce fa
cilit
ies
that
are
de
sign
ed a
nd/o
r loc
ated
so
as to
pre
vent
wat
er
from
ent
erin
g or
acc
umul
atin
g w
ithin
the
com
pone
nts
durin
g co
nditi
ons
of fl
oodi
ng.
106.
2.5
Site
pla
n. T
he c
onst
ruct
ion
docu
men
ts s
ubm
itted
with
the
appl
icat
ion
for p
erm
it sh
all b
e ac
com
pani
ed b
y a
site
pla
n sh
owin
g to
sca
le th
e si
ze a
nd lo
catio
n of
new
con
stru
ctio
n an
d ex
istin
g st
ruct
ures
on
the
site
, dis
tanc
es fr
om lo
t lin
es, t
he e
stab
lishe
d st
reet
gra
des
and
the
prop
osed
fini
shed
gra
des,
and
, as
appl
icab
le, f
lood
haz
ard
area
s, fl
oodw
ays,
and
des
ign
flood
ele
vatio
ns; a
nd it
sha
ll be
dra
wn
in a
ccor
danc
e w
ith a
n ac
cura
te b
ound
ary
line
surv
ey. I
n th
e ca
se o
f dem
oliti
on, t
he s
ite p
lan
shal
l sho
w c
onst
ruct
ion
to b
e de
mol
ishe
d an
d th
e lo
catio
n an
d si
ze o
f exi
stin
g st
ruct
ures
and
con
stru
ctio
n th
at a
re to
rem
ain
on th
e si
te o
r pl
ot. T
he b
uild
ing
offic
ial i
s au
thor
ized
to w
aive
or m
odify
the
requ
irem
ent f
or a
site
pla
n w
hen
the
appl
icat
ion
for p
erm
it is
for a
ltera
tion
or re
pair
or w
hen
othe
rwis
e w
arra
nted
.
R10
6.2.
5.1
Des
ign
flood
ele
vatio
n. W
here
des
ign
flood
ele
vatio
ns a
re n
ot s
peci
fied,
they
sha
ll be
es
tabl
ishe
d in
acc
orda
nce
with
Sec
tion
1612
.3.1
. 80
1.1.
3 A
pplic
abili
ty.
For b
uild
ings
in fl
ood
haza
rd a
reas
as
esta
blis
hed
in S
ectio
n 16
12.3
, int
erio
r fin
ishe
s,
trim
, and
dec
orat
ive
mat
eria
ls th
at e
xten
d be
low
the
desi
gn fl
ood
elev
atio
n sh
all b
e flo
od-d
amag
e-re
sist
ant
mat
eria
ls.
14
03.6
Flo
od re
sist
ance
. Fo
r bui
ldin
gs in
floo
d ha
zard
are
as a
s es
tabl
ishe
d in
Sec
tion
1612
.3, e
xter
ior
wal
ls e
xten
ding
bel
ow th
e de
sign
floo
d el
evat
ion
shal
l be
resi
stan
t to
wat
er d
amag
e.
Woo
d sh
all b
e pr
essu
re
pres
erva
tive
treat
ed in
acc
orda
nce
with
AW
PA
U1
for t
he s
peci
es, p
rodu
ct a
nd e
nd u
se u
sing
a p
rese
rvat
ive
liste
d in
Sec
tion
4 in
AP
WA
sta
ndar
ds o
r dec
ay-r
esis
tant
hea
rtwoo
d of
redw
ood,
bla
ck lo
cust
, or c
edar
. 16
03.1
.6 F
lood
des
ign
data
. Fo
r bui
ldin
gs lo
cate
d in
who
le o
r in
part
in fl
ood
haza
rd a
reas
as
esta
blis
hed
in
Sec
tion
1612
.3, t
he fo
llow
ing
docu
men
tatio
n pe
rtain
ing
to d
esig
n, if
requ
ired
in S
ectio
n 16
12.5
, sha
ll be
sh
own,
rega
rdle
ss o
f whe
ther
floo
d lo
ads
gove
rn th
e de
sign
of t
he b
uild
ing:
1.
In
floo
d ha
zard
are
as n
ot s
ubje
ct to
hig
h-ve
loci
ty w
ave
actio
n, th
e el
evat
ion
of p
ropo
sed
low
est f
loor
, in
clud
ing
base
men
t. 2.
In
floo
d ha
zard
are
as n
ot s
ubje
ct to
hig
h-ve
loci
ty w
ave
actio
n, th
e el
evat
ion
to w
hich
any
no
nres
iden
tial b
uild
ing
will
be
dry
flood
proo
fed.
3.
In
floo
d ha
zard
are
as s
ubje
ct to
hig
h-ve
loci
ty w
ave
actio
n, th
e pr
opos
ed e
leva
tion
of th
e bo
ttom
of
the
low
est h
oriz
onta
l stru
ctur
al m
embe
r of t
he lo
wes
t flo
or, i
nclu
ding
bas
emen
t.
![Page 96: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/96.jpg)
pa
ge B
-15
IBC
Cro
ssw
alk
of th
e N
FIP
Reg
ulat
ions
to th
e Fl
ood
Res
ista
nce
Prov
isio
ns o
f the
IBC
®.
NFI
P R
egul
atio
ns
2006
IBC
® a
nd A
ppen
dix
G [a
nnot
ated
with
200
7 Su
pple
men
t]
6 co
ntin
ued
from
pr
evio
us
page
co
ntin
ued
on n
ext
page
16
05.2
Loa
d co
mbi
natio
ns u
sing
str
engt
h de
sign
or l
oad
and
resi
stan
ce fa
ctor
des
ign.
16
05.2
.2 O
ther
load
s.
Whe
re F
a is
to b
e co
nsid
ered
in d
esig
n, th
e lo
ad c
ombi
natio
ns o
f Sec
tion
2.3.
3 of
A
SC
E 7
sha
ll be
use
d. [
Not
e: F
a = fl
ood
load
s.]
1605
.3 L
oad
com
bina
tions
usi
ng a
llow
able
str
ess
desi
gn.
1605
.3.1
.2 O
ther
load
s. W
here
Fa i
s to
be
cons
ider
ed in
des
ign,
the
load
com
bina
tions
of S
ectio
n 2.
4.2
of
AS
CE
7 s
hall
be u
sed.
[Not
e: F
a = fl
ood
load
s.]
1612
.4 D
esig
n an
d co
nstr
uctio
n. T
he d
esig
n an
d co
nstru
ctio
n of
bui
ldin
gs a
nd s
truct
ures
loca
ted
in fl
ood
haza
rd a
reas
, inc
ludi
ng fl
ood
haza
rd a
reas
sub
ject
to h
igh-
velo
city
wav
e ac
tion,
sha
ll be
in a
ccor
danc
e w
ith
AS
CE
24.
18
01.1
Sco
pe (S
oils
and
Fou
ndat
ions
). T
he p
rovi
sion
s of
this
cha
pter
sha
ll ap
ply
to b
uild
ing
and
foun
datio
n sy
stem
s in
thos
e ar
eas
not s
ubje
ct to
sco
ur o
r wat
er p
ress
ure
by w
ind
and
wav
e ac
tion.
Bui
ldin
gs
and
foun
datio
ns s
ubje
ct to
suc
h sc
our o
r wat
er p
ress
ure
load
s sh
all b
e de
sign
ed in
acc
orda
nce
with
Cha
pter
16
. 18
03.4
Gra
ding
and
fill
in fl
ood
haza
rd a
reas
. In
floo
d ha
zard
are
as e
stab
lishe
d in
Sec
tion
1612
.3, g
radi
ng
and/
or fi
ll sh
all n
ot b
e ap
prov
ed:
1.
U
nles
s fil
l is
plac
ed, c
ompa
cted
, and
slo
ped
to m
inim
ize
shift
ing,
slu
mpi
ng a
nd e
rosi
on d
urin
g th
e ris
e an
d fa
ll of
floo
dwat
er a
nd, a
s ap
plic
able
, wav
e ac
tion.
2.
In
floo
dway
s, u
nles
s it
has
been
dem
onst
rate
d th
roug
h hy
drol
ogic
and
hyd
raul
ic a
naly
ses
perfo
rmed
by
a re
gist
ered
des
ign
prof
essi
onal
in a
ccor
danc
e w
ith s
tand
ard
engi
neer
ing
prac
tice
that
the
prop
osed
gra
ding
or f
ill, o
r bot
h, w
ill n
ot re
sult
in a
ny in
crea
se in
floo
d le
vels
dur
ing
the
occu
rren
ce o
f th
e de
sign
floo
d.
3.
In fl
ood
haza
rd a
reas
sub
ject
to h
igh-
velo
city
wav
e ac
tion,
unl
ess
such
fill
is c
ondu
cted
and
/or p
lace
d to
avo
id d
iver
sion
of w
ater
and
wav
es to
war
d an
y bu
ildin
g or
stru
ctur
e.
4.
Whe
re d
esig
n flo
od e
leva
tions
are
spe
cifie
d bu
t flo
odw
ays
have
not
bee
n de
sign
ated
, unl
ess
it ha
s be
en d
emon
stra
ted
that
the
cum
ulat
ive
effe
ct o
f the
pro
pose
d flo
od h
azar
d ar
ea e
ncro
achm
ent,
whe
n co
mbi
ned
with
all
othe
r exi
stin
g an
d an
ticip
ated
floo
d ha
zard
are
a en
croa
chm
ent,
will
not
in
crea
se th
e de
sign
floo
d el
evat
ion
mor
e th
an o
ne fo
ot a
t any
poi
nt.
3001
.2 R
efer
ence
d st
anda
rds.
Exc
ept a
s ot
herw
ise
prov
ided
for i
n th
is c
ode,
the
desi
gn, c
onst
ruct
ion,
in
stal
latio
n, a
ltera
tion,
repa
ir an
d m
aint
enan
ce o
f ele
vato
rs a
nd c
onve
ying
sys
tem
s an
d th
eir c
ompo
nent
s sh
all c
onfo
rm to
AS
ME
A17
.1, A
SM
E A
90.1
, AS
ME
B20
.1, A
LI A
LCTV
, and
AS
CE
24
for c
onst
ruct
ion
in fl
ood
haza
rd a
reas
as
esta
blis
hed
in S
ectio
n 16
12.3
. 31
02.7
Eng
inee
ring
desi
gn.
The
stru
ctur
e sh
all b
e de
sign
ed a
nd c
onst
ruct
ed to
sus
tain
dea
d lo
ads,
load
s du
e to
tens
ion
or in
flatio
n, li
ve lo
ads
incl
udin
g w
ind,
sno
w, f
lood
, and
sei
smic
load
s an
d in
acc
orda
nce
with
C
hapt
er 1
6.
3403
.1.1
[Exi
stin
g bu
ildin
gs o
r str
uctu
res]
Flo
od h
azar
d ar
eas.
SE
E B
LOC
K 4
[F
or e
lect
rical
, hea
ting,
ven
tilat
ion,
plu
mbi
ng, a
nd a
ir co
nditi
onin
g eq
uipm
ent a
nd o
ther
ser
vice
faci
litie
s, s
ee
App
endi
x D
for t
exts
from
IMC
, IP
C, I
FGC
and
IPS
DC
.]
![Page 97: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/97.jpg)
pa
ge B
-16
IBC
Cro
ssw
alk
of th
e N
FIP
Reg
ulat
ions
to th
e Fl
ood
Res
ista
nce
Prov
isio
ns o
f the
IBC
®.
NFI
P R
egul
atio
ns
2006
IBC
® a
nd A
ppen
dix
G [a
nnot
ated
with
200
7 Su
pple
men
t]
6 co
ntin
ued
from
pr
evio
us
page
co
ntin
ued
on n
ext
page
A
ppen
dix
G10
1.1
Pur
pose
(Flo
od R
esis
tant
Con
stru
ctio
n).
SE
E B
LOC
K 4
A
ppen
dix
G10
1.2
Obj
ectiv
es.
The
obje
ctiv
es o
f thi
s ap
pend
ix a
re to
pro
tect
hum
an li
fe, m
inim
ize
the
expe
nditu
re o
f pub
lic m
oney
for f
lood
con
trol p
roje
cts,
min
imiz
e th
e ne
ed fo
r res
cue
and
relie
f effo
rts
asso
ciat
ed w
ith fl
oodi
ng, m
inim
ize
prol
onge
d bu
sine
ss in
terr
uptio
n, m
inim
ize
dam
age
to p
ublic
faci
litie
s an
d ut
ilitie
s, h
elp
mai
ntai
n a
stab
le ta
x ba
se b
y pr
ovid
ing
for t
he s
ound
use
and
dev
elop
men
t of f
lood
-pro
ne a
reas
, co
ntrib
ute
to im
prov
ed c
onst
ruct
ion
tech
niqu
es in
the
flood
plai
n, a
nd e
nsur
e th
at p
oten
tial o
wne
rs a
nd
occu
pant
s ar
e no
tifie
d th
at p
rope
rty is
with
in fl
ood
haza
rd a
reas
. A
ppen
dix
G10
1.3
Sco
pe.
The
prov
isio
ns o
f thi
s ap
pend
ix s
hall
appl
y to
all
prop
osed
dev
elop
men
t in
a flo
od
haza
rd a
rea
esta
blis
hed
in S
ectio
n 16
12 o
f thi
s co
de, i
nclu
ding
cer
tain
wor
k ex
empt
from
per
mit
unde
r S
ectio
n105
.2.
App
endi
x G
104.
2 A
pplic
atio
n fo
r per
mit.
The
app
lican
t sha
ll fil
e an
app
licat
ion
in w
ritin
g on
a fo
rm
furn
ishe
d by
the
build
ing
offic
ial.
Suc
h ap
plic
atio
n sh
all:
1.
Iden
tify
and
desc
ribe
the
deve
lopm
ent t
o be
cov
ered
by
the
perm
it.
2.
Des
crib
e th
e la
nd o
n w
hich
the
prop
osed
dev
elop
men
t is
to c
ondu
cted
by
lega
l des
crip
tion,
stre
et
addr
ess
or s
imila
r des
crip
tion
that
will
read
ily id
entif
y an
d de
finite
ly lo
cate
the
site
. 3.
In
clud
e a
site
pla
n sh
owin
g th
e de
linea
tion
of fl
ood
haza
rd a
reas
, flo
odw
ay b
ound
arie
s, fl
ood
zone
s, d
esig
n flo
od e
leva
tions
, gro
und
elev
atio
ns, p
ropo
sed
fill a
nd e
xcav
atio
n, a
nd d
rain
age
patte
rns
and
faci
litie
s.
4.
Indi
cate
the
use
and
occu
panc
y fo
r whi
ch th
e pr
opos
ed d
evel
opm
ent i
s in
tend
ed.
5.
Be
acco
mpa
nied
by
cons
truct
ion
docu
men
ts, g
radi
ng a
nd fi
lling
pla
ns, a
nd o
ther
info
rmat
ion
deem
ed a
ppro
pria
te b
y th
e bu
ildin
g of
ficia
l. 6.
S
tate
the
valu
atio
n of
the
prop
osed
wor
k.
7.
Be
sign
ed b
y th
e ap
plic
ant o
r the
app
lican
t’s a
utho
rized
age
nt.
App
endi
x G
401.
5 S
torm
dra
inag
e. S
torm
dra
inag
e sh
all b
e de
sign
ed to
con
vey
the
flow
of s
urfa
ce w
ater
s so
as
to m
inim
ize
or e
limin
ate
dam
age
to p
erso
ns o
r pro
perty
. A
ppen
dix
G40
1.6
Str
eets
and
sid
ewal
ks.
Stre
ets
and
side
wal
ks s
hall
be d
esig
ned
to m
inim
ize
pote
ntia
l for
in
crea
sing
or a
ggra
vatin
g flo
od le
vels
. A
ppen
dix
G70
1.1
Und
ergr
ound
tank
s. U
nder
grou
nd ta
nks
in fl
ood
haza
rd a
reas
sha
ll be
anc
hore
d to
pr
even
t flo
tatio
n, c
olla
pse
or la
tera
l mov
emen
t res
ultin
g fro
m h
ydro
stat
ic lo
ads,
incl
udin
g th
e ef
fect
s of
bu
oyan
cy, d
urin
g co
nditi
ons
of th
e de
sign
floo
d.
App
endi
x G
701.
2 A
bove
-gro
und
tank
s. A
bove
-gro
und
tank
s in
floo
d ha
zard
are
as s
hall
be e
leva
ted
to o
r ab
ove
the
desi
gn fl
ood
elev
atio
n or
sha
ll be
anc
hore
d or
oth
erw
ise
desi
gned
and
con
stru
cted
to p
reve
nt
flota
tion,
col
laps
e, o
r lat
eral
mov
emen
t res
ultin
g fro
m h
ydro
dyna
mic
and
hyd
rost
atic
load
s, in
clud
ing
the
effe
cts
of b
uoya
ncy,
dur
ing
cond
ition
s of
the
desi
gn fl
ood.
![Page 98: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/98.jpg)
pa
ge B
-17
IBC
Cro
ssw
alk
of th
e N
FIP
Reg
ulat
ions
to th
e Fl
ood
Res
ista
nce
Prov
isio
ns o
f the
IBC
®.
NFI
P R
egul
atio
ns
2006
IBC
® a
nd A
ppen
dix
G [a
nnot
ated
with
200
7 Su
pple
men
t]
6 co
ntin
ued
from
pr
evio
us
page
A
ppen
dix
G70
1.3
Tan
k in
lets
and
ven
ts.
In fl
ood
haza
rd a
reas
, tan
k in
lets
, fill
ope
ning
s, o
utle
ts a
nd v
ents
sh
all b
e:
1.
At o
r abo
ve th
e de
sign
floo
d el
evat
ion
or fi
tted
with
cov
ers
desi
gned
to p
reve
nt th
e in
flow
of
flood
wat
er o
r out
flow
of t
he c
onte
nts
of th
e ta
nks
durin
g co
nditi
ons
of th
e de
sign
floo
d.
2.
Anc
hore
d to
pre
vent
late
ral m
ovem
ent r
esul
ting
from
hyd
rody
nam
ic a
nd h
ydro
stat
ic lo
ads,
incl
udin
g th
e ef
fect
s of
buo
yanc
y, d
urin
g co
nditi
ons
of th
e de
sign
floo
d.
App
endi
x G
801.
1 D
etac
hed
acce
ssor
y st
ruct
ures
. D
etac
hed
acce
ssor
y st
ruct
ures
sha
ll be
anc
hore
d to
pr
even
t flo
tatio
n, c
olla
pse
or la
tera
l mov
emen
t res
ultin
g fro
m h
ydro
stat
ic lo
ads,
incl
udin
g th
e ef
fect
s of
bu
oyan
cy, d
urin
g co
nditi
ons
of th
e de
sign
floo
d. F
ully
enc
lose
d ac
cess
ory
stru
ctur
es s
hall
have
floo
d op
enin
gs to
allo
w fo
r the
aut
omat
ic e
ntry
and
exi
t of f
lood
wat
ers.
A
ppen
dix
G80
1.2
Fen
ces.
Fen
ces
in fl
oodw
ays
that
may
blo
ck th
e pa
ssag
e of
floo
dwat
ers,
suc
h as
st
ocka
de fe
nces
and
wire
mes
h fe
nces
, sha
ll m
eet t
he re
quire
men
t of B
G10
3.5.
A
ppen
dix
G80
1.3
Oil
derr
icks
. O
il de
rric
ks lo
cate
d in
floo
d ha
zard
are
as s
hall
be d
esig
ned
in c
onfo
rman
ce
with
the
flood
load
s in
Sec
tion
1603
.1.6
and
Sec
tion
1612
.
App
endi
x G
801.
4 R
etai
ning
wal
ls, s
idew
alks
and
driv
eway
s. R
etai
ning
wal
ls, s
idew
alks
and
driv
eway
s sh
all m
eet t
he re
quire
men
ts o
f Sec
tion
1803
.4.
App
endi
x G
801.
5 P
refa
bric
ated
sw
imm
ing
pool
s. P
refa
bric
ated
sw
imm
ing
pool
s in
floo
dway
s sh
all m
eet
the
requ
irem
ent o
f Sec
tion
G10
3.5.
7 4.
R
evie
w s
ubdi
visi
on p
ropo
sals
and
oth
er
prop
osed
new
dev
elop
men
t, in
clud
ing
man
ufac
ture
d ho
me
park
s or
sub
divi
sion
s,
to d
eter
min
e w
heth
er s
uch
prop
osal
s w
ill
be re
ason
ably
saf
e fro
m fl
oodi
ng.
If a
subd
ivis
ion
prop
osal
or o
ther
pro
pose
d ne
w
deve
lopm
ent i
s in
a fl
ood-
pron
e ar
ea, a
ny
such
pro
posa
ls s
hall
be re
view
ed to
ass
ure
that
: (i)
al
l suc
h pr
opos
als
are
cons
iste
nt w
ith th
e ne
ed
to m
inim
ize
flood
dam
age
with
in th
e flo
od-
pron
e ar
ea,
(ii)
all p
ublic
util
ities
and
faci
litie
s, s
uch
as s
ewer
, ga
s, e
lect
rical
, and
wat
er s
yste
ms
are
loca
ted
and
cons
truct
ed to
min
imiz
e or
elim
inat
e flo
od
dam
age,
and
(ii
i) ad
equa
te d
rain
age
is p
rovi
ded
to re
duce
ex
posu
re to
floo
d ha
zard
s;
App
endi
x G
301.
1 G
ener
al (S
ubdi
visi
ons)
. A
ny s
ubdi
visi
on p
ropo
sal,
incl
udin
g pr
opos
als
for m
anuf
actu
red
hom
e pa
rks
and
subd
ivis
ions
, or o
ther
pro
pose
d ne
w d
evel
opm
ent i
n a
flood
haz
ard
area
sha
ll be
revi
ewed
to
assu
re th
at:
1.
All
such
pro
posa
ls a
re c
onsi
sten
t with
the
need
to m
inim
ize
flood
dam
age,
and
2.
A
ll pu
blic
util
ities
and
faci
litie
s, s
uch
as s
ewer
, gas
, ele
ctric
, and
wat
er s
yste
ms
are
loca
ted
and
cons
truct
ed to
min
imiz
e or
elim
inat
e flo
od d
amag
e, a
nd
3.
Ade
quat
e dr
aina
ge is
pro
vide
d to
redu
ce e
xpos
ure
to fl
ood
haza
rds.
A
ppen
dix
G30
1.2
Sub
divi
sion
requ
irem
ents
. Th
e fo
llow
ing
requ
irem
ents
sha
ll ap
ply
in th
e ca
se o
f any
pr
opos
ed s
ubdi
visi
on, i
nclu
ding
pro
posa
ls fo
r man
ufac
ture
d ho
me
park
s an
d su
bdiv
isio
ns, a
ny p
ortio
n of
w
hich
lies
with
in a
floo
d ha
zard
are
a:
1.
The
flood
haz
ard
area
, inc
ludi
ng fl
oodw
ays
and
area
s su
bjec
t to
high
-vel
ocity
wav
e ac
tion,
as
appr
opria
te, s
hall
be d
elin
eate
d on
tent
ativ
e an
d fin
al s
ubdi
visi
on p
lats
; 2.
D
esig
n flo
od e
leva
tions
sha
ll be
sho
wn
on te
ntat
ive
and
final
sub
divi
sion
pla
ts;
3.
Res
iden
tial b
uild
ing
lots
sha
ll be
pro
vide
d w
ith a
dequ
ate
build
able
are
a ou
tsid
e th
e flo
odw
ay; a
nd
4.
The
desi
gn c
riter
ia fo
r util
ities
and
faci
litie
s se
t for
th in
this
app
endi
x an
d ap
prop
riate
Inte
rnat
iona
l C
odes
sha
ll be
met
. A
ppen
dix
G40
1.5
Sto
rm d
rain
age.
SE
E B
LOC
K 6
![Page 99: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/99.jpg)
pa
ge B
-18
IBC
Cro
ssw
alk
of th
e N
FIP
Reg
ulat
ions
to th
e Fl
ood
Res
ista
nce
Prov
isio
ns o
f the
IBC
®.
NFI
P R
egul
atio
ns
2006
IBC
® a
nd A
ppen
dix
G [a
nnot
ated
with
200
7 Su
pple
men
t]
8 (5
) R
equi
re w
ithin
floo
d-pr
one
area
s ne
w a
nd
repl
acem
ent w
ater
sup
ply
syst
ems
to b
e de
sign
ed to
m
inim
ize
or e
limin
ate
infil
tratio
n of
floo
d w
ater
s in
to
the
syst
ems;
and
App
endi
x G
401.
4 W
ater
faci
litie
s. A
ll ne
w o
r rep
lace
men
t wat
er fa
cilit
ies
shal
l be
desi
gned
in a
ccor
danc
e w
ith th
e pr
ovis
ions
of C
hapt
er 7
, AS
CE
24
to m
inim
ize
or e
limin
ate
infil
tratio
n of
floo
d w
ater
s in
to th
e sy
stem
s.
9 (6
) Req
uire
with
in fl
ood-
pron
e ar
eas
(i)
ne
w a
nd re
plac
emen
t san
itary
sew
age
syst
ems
to b
e de
sign
ed to
min
imiz
e or
el
imin
ate
infil
tratio
n of
floo
d w
ater
s in
to th
e sy
stem
s an
d di
scha
rges
from
the
syst
ems
into
flo
od w
ater
s an
d
(ii)
onsi
te w
aste
dis
posa
l sys
tem
s to
be
loca
ted
to
avoi
d im
pairm
ent t
o th
em o
r con
tam
inat
ion
from
them
dur
ing
flood
ing.
App
endi
x G
401.
3 S
ewer
faci
litie
s. A
ll ne
w o
r rep
lace
d sa
nita
ry s
ewer
faci
litie
s, p
rivat
e se
wer
trea
tmen
t pl
ants
(inc
ludi
ng a
ll pu
mpi
ng s
tatio
ns a
nd c
olle
ctor
sys
tem
s) a
nd o
nsite
was
te d
ispo
sal s
yste
ms,
sha
ll be
de
sign
ed in
acc
orda
nce
with
Cha
pter
7, A
SC
E 2
4 to
min
imiz
e or
elim
inat
e in
filtra
tion
of fl
ood
wat
ers
into
the
faci
litie
s an
d di
scha
rge
from
the
faci
litie
s in
to fl
ood
wat
ers,
or i
mpa
irmen
t of t
he fa
cilit
ies
and
syst
ems.
[S
ee A
ppen
dix
D fo
r tex
ts fr
om IP
SD
C.]
(b) W
hen
the
Adm
inis
trato
r has
des
igna
ted
area
s of
spe
cial
floo
d ha
zard
s (A
zon
es) b
y th
e pu
blic
atio
n of
a c
omm
unity
’s F
HB
M o
r FIR
M, b
ut h
as n
eith
er p
rodu
ced
wat
er s
urfa
ce
elev
atio
n da
ta n
or id
entif
ied
a flo
odw
ay o
r coa
stal
hig
h ha
zard
are
a, th
e co
mm
unity
sha
ll:
10 (1
) R
equi
re p
erm
its fo
r all
prop
osed
con
stru
ctio
n an
d ot
her d
evel
opm
ents
incl
udin
g th
e pl
acem
ent o
f m
anuf
actu
red
hom
es, w
ithin
Zon
e A
on
the
com
mun
ity’s
FH
BM
or F
IRM
; (2
) R
equi
re th
e ap
plic
atio
n of
the
stan
dard
s in
pa
ragr
aphs
(a) (
2), (
3), (
4), (
5) a
nd (6
) of t
his
sect
ion
to d
evel
opm
ent w
ithin
Zon
e A
on
the
com
mun
ity’s
FH
BM
or F
IRM
;
[Prio
r pro
visi
ons
cum
ulat
ive]
11 (3
) R
equi
re th
at a
ll ne
w s
ubdi
visi
on p
ropo
sals
and
ot
her p
ropo
sed
deve
lopm
ents
(inc
ludi
ng p
ropo
sals
fo
r man
ufac
ture
d ho
me
park
s an
d su
bdiv
isio
ns)
grea
ter t
han
50 lo
ts o
r 5 a
cres
, whi
chev
er is
the
less
er, i
nclu
de w
ithin
suc
h pr
opos
als
base
floo
d el
evat
ion
data
;
App
endi
x G
103.
3 D
eter
min
atio
n of
des
ign
flood
ele
vatio
ns.
If de
sign
floo
d el
evat
ions
are
not
spe
cifie
d,
the
build
ing
offic
ial i
s au
thor
ized
to re
quire
the
appl
ican
t to:
1.
O
btai
n, re
view
and
reas
onab
ly u
tiliz
e da
ta a
vaila
ble
from
a fe
dera
l, st
ate
or o
ther
sou
rce,
or
2.
2. D
eter
min
e th
e de
sign
floo
d el
evat
ion
in a
ccor
danc
e w
ith a
ccep
ted
hydr
olog
ic a
nd h
ydra
ulic
en
gine
erin
g te
chni
ques
. S
uch
anal
yses
sha
ll be
per
form
ed a
nd s
eale
d by
a re
gist
ered
des
ign
prof
essi
onal
. S
tudi
es, a
naly
ses,
and
com
puta
tions
sha
ll be
sub
mitt
ed in
suf
ficie
nt d
etai
l to
allo
w
thor
ough
revi
ew a
nd a
ppro
val b
y th
e bu
ildin
g of
ficia
l. T
he a
ccur
acy
of d
ata
subm
itted
for s
uch
dete
rmin
atio
n sh
all b
e th
e re
spon
sibi
lity
of th
e ap
plic
ant.
![Page 100: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/100.jpg)
pa
ge B
-19
IBC
Cro
ssw
alk
of th
e N
FIP
Reg
ulat
ions
to th
e Fl
ood
Res
ista
nce
Prov
isio
ns o
f the
IBC
®.
NFI
P R
egul
atio
ns
2006
IBC
® a
nd A
ppen
dix
G [a
nnot
ated
with
200
7 Su
pple
men
t]
12 (4
) O
btai
n, re
view
and
reas
onab
ly u
tiliz
e an
y ba
se
flood
ele
vatio
n an
d flo
odw
ay d
ata
avai
labl
e fro
m a
Fe
dera
l, S
tate
, or o
ther
sou
rce,
incl
udin
g da
ta
deve
lope
d pu
rsua
nt to
par
agra
ph (b
)(3)
of t
his
sect
ion,
as
crite
ria fo
r req
uirin
g th
at n
ew
cons
truct
ion,
sub
stan
tial i
mpr
ovem
ents
, or o
ther
de
velo
pmen
t in
Zone
A o
n th
e co
mm
unity
’s F
HB
M
or F
IRM
mee
t the
sta
ndar
ds in
par
agra
phs
(c)(
2),
(c)(3
), (c
)(5)
, (c)
(6),
(c)(
12),
(c)(1
4), (
d)(2
) and
(d)(3
) of
this
sec
tion;
1612
.3 E
stab
lishm
ent o
f flo
od h
azar
d ar
eas.
SE
E B
LOC
K 3
A
ppen
dix
G10
3.3
Det
erm
inat
ion
of d
esig
n flo
od e
leva
tions
. S
EE
BLO
CK
11
13 (5
) W
here
bas
e flo
od e
leva
tion
data
are
util
ized
, w
ithin
Zon
e A
on
the
com
mun
ity’s
FH
BM
or F
IRM
:
(i)
Obt
ain
the
elev
atio
n (in
rela
tion
to m
ean
sea
leve
l) of
the
low
est f
loor
(inc
ludi
ng b
asem
ent)
of a
ll ne
w a
nd s
ubst
antia
lly im
prov
ed
stru
ctur
es, a
nd
(ii)
Obt
ain,
if th
e st
ruct
ure
has
been
floo
dpro
ofed
in
acc
orda
nce
with
par
agra
ph (c
)(3)
(ii) o
f thi
s se
ctio
n, th
e el
evat
ion
(in re
latio
n to
mea
n se
a le
vel)
to w
hich
the
stru
ctur
e w
as fl
oodp
roof
ed,
and
(ii
i) M
aint
ain
a re
cord
of a
ll su
ch in
form
atio
n w
ith
the
offic
ial d
esig
nate
d by
the
com
mun
ity u
nder
S
ec.
59.2
2 (a
)(9)(i
ii);
104.
7 D
epar
tmen
t rec
ords
10
9.3.
3 L
owes
t flo
or e
leva
tion.
In
flood
haz
ard
area
s, u
pon
plac
emen
t of t
he lo
wes
t flo
or, i
nclu
ding
ba
sem
ent,
and
prio
r to
furth
er v
ertic
al c
onst
ruct
ion,
the
elev
atio
n do
cum
enta
tion
requ
ired
in S
ectio
n 16
12.5
sh
all b
e su
bmitt
ed to
the
code
offi
cial
.
1612
.5 F
lood
haz
ard
docu
men
tatio
n. T
he fo
llow
ing
docu
men
tatio
n sh
all b
e pr
epar
ed a
nd s
eale
d by
a
regi
ster
ed d
esig
n pr
ofes
sion
al a
nd s
hall
be s
ubm
itted
to th
e bu
ildin
g of
ficia
l:
1.
For c
onst
ruct
ion
in fl
ood
haza
rd a
reas
not
sub
ject
to h
igh-
velo
city
wav
e ac
tion:
1
.1 T
he e
leva
tion
of th
e lo
wes
t flo
or e
leva
tion,
incl
udin
g ba
sem
ent,
as re
quire
d by
the
low
est f
loor
el
evat
ion
insp
ectio
n in
Sec
tion
109.
3.3.
1
.2 F
or fu
lly e
nclo
sed
area
s be
low
the
desi
gn fl
ood
elev
atio
n w
here
pro
visi
ons
to a
llow
for t
he a
utom
atic
en
try a
nd e
xit o
f flo
odw
ater
s do
not
mee
t the
min
imum
requ
irem
ents
in S
ectio
n 2.
6.2.
1, A
SC
E 2
4,
cons
truct
ion
docu
men
ts s
hall
incl
ude
a st
atem
ent t
hat t
he d
esig
n w
ill p
rovi
de fo
r equ
aliz
atio
n of
hy
dros
tatic
floo
d fo
rces
in a
ccor
danc
e w
ith S
ectio
n 2.
6.2.
2, A
SC
E 2
4.
1.3
For
dry
floo
dpro
ofed
non
resi
dent
ial b
uild
ings
, con
stru
ctio
n do
cum
ents
sha
ll in
clud
e a
stat
emen
t tha
t th
e dr
y flo
odpr
oofin
g is
des
igne
d in
acc
orda
nce
with
AS
CE
24.
14 (6
) N
otify
, in
river
ine
situ
atio
ns, a
djac
ent
com
mun
ities
and
the
Sta
te C
oord
inat
ing
Offi
ce p
rior
to a
ny a
ltera
tion
or re
loca
tion
of a
wat
erco
urse
, and
su
bmit
copi
es o
f suc
h no
tific
atio
ns to
the
Adm
inis
trato
r;
App
endi
x G
103.
6 W
ater
cour
se a
ltera
tion.
Prio
r to
issu
ing
a pe
rmit
for a
ny a
ltera
tion
or re
loca
tion
of a
ny
wat
erco
urse
, the
bui
ldin
g of
ficia
l sha
ll re
quire
the
appl
ican
t to
prov
ide
notif
icat
ion
of th
e pr
opos
al to
the
appr
opria
te a
utho
ritie
s of
all
affe
cted
adj
acen
t gov
ernm
ent j
uris
dict
ions
, as
wel
l as
appr
opria
te s
tate
age
ncie
s.
A c
opy
of th
e no
tific
atio
n sh
all b
e m
aint
aine
d in
the
perm
it re
cord
s an
d su
bmitt
ed to
FE
MA
.
15 (7
) A
ssur
e th
at th
e flo
od c
arry
ing
capa
city
with
in
the
alte
red
or re
loca
ted
porti
on o
f any
wat
erco
urse
is
mai
ntai
ned;
App
endi
x G
103.
6.1
Eng
inee
ring
anal
ysis
. Th
e bu
ildin
g of
ficia
l sha
ll re
quire
sub
mis
sion
of a
n en
gine
erin
g an
alys
is w
hich
dem
onst
rate
s th
at th
e flo
od c
arry
ing
capa
city
of t
he a
ltere
d or
relo
cate
d po
rtion
of t
he
wat
erco
urse
will
not
be
decr
ease
d. S
uch
wat
erco
urse
s sh
all b
e m
aint
aine
d in
a m
anne
r whi
ch p
rese
rves
the
chan
nel’s
floo
d ca
rryi
ng c
apac
ity.
![Page 101: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/101.jpg)
pa
ge B
-20
IBC
Cro
ssw
alk
of th
e N
FIP
Reg
ulat
ions
to th
e Fl
ood
Res
ista
nce
Prov
isio
ns o
f the
IBC
®.
NFI
P R
egul
atio
ns
2006
IBC
® a
nd A
ppen
dix
G [a
nnot
ated
with
200
7 Su
pple
men
t]
16 (8
) R
equi
re th
at a
ll m
anuf
actu
red
hom
es to
be
plac
ed w
ithin
Zon
e A
on
a co
mm
unity
’s F
HB
M o
r FI
RM
sha
ll be
inst
alle
d us
ing
met
hods
and
pra
ctic
es
whi
ch m
inim
ize
flood
dam
age.
For
the
purp
oses
of
this
requ
irem
ent,
man
ufac
ture
d ho
mes
mus
t be
elev
ated
and
anc
hore
d to
resi
st fl
otat
ion,
col
laps
e, o
r la
tera
l mov
emen
t. M
etho
ds o
f anc
horin
g m
ay
incl
ude,
but
are
not
to b
e lim
ited
to, u
se o
f ov
er-th
e-to
p or
fram
e tie
s to
gro
und
anch
ors.
Thi
s re
quire
men
t is
in a
dditi
on to
app
licab
le S
tate
and
lo
cal a
ncho
ring
requ
irem
ents
for r
esis
ting
win
d fo
rces
.
App
endi
x G
501.
1 E
leva
tion
(Man
ufac
ture
d H
omes
). A
ll ne
w a
nd re
plac
emen
t man
ufac
ture
d ho
mes
to b
e pl
aced
or s
ubst
antia
lly im
prov
ed in
a fl
ood
haza
rd a
rea
shal
l be
elev
ated
suc
h th
at th
e lo
wes
t flo
or o
f the
m
anuf
actu
red
hom
e is
ele
vate
d to
or a
bove
the
desi
gn fl
ood
elev
atio
n.
App
endi
x G
501.
2 F
ound
atio
ns.
All
new
and
repl
acem
ent m
anuf
actu
red
hom
es, i
nclu
ding
sub
stan
tial
impr
ovem
ent o
f exi
stin
g m
anuf
actu
red
hom
es, s
hall
be p
lace
d on
a p
erm
anen
t, re
info
rced
foun
datio
n th
at is
de
sign
ed in
acc
orda
nce
with
Sec
tion
1612
of t
he b
uild
ing
code
. A
ppen
dix
G50
1.3
Anc
horin
g. A
ll ne
w a
nd re
plac
emen
t man
ufac
ture
d ho
mes
to b
e pl
aced
or s
ubst
antia
lly
impr
oved
in a
floo
d ha
zard
are
a sh
all b
e in
stal
led
usin
g m
etho
ds a
nd p
ract
ices
whi
ch m
inim
ize
flood
dam
age.
M
anuf
actu
red
hom
es s
hall
be s
ecur
ely
anch
ored
to a
n ad
equa
tely
anc
hore
d fo
unda
tion
syst
em to
resi
st
flota
tion,
col
laps
e, a
nd la
tera
l mov
emen
t. M
etho
ds o
f anc
horin
g ar
e au
thor
ized
to in
clud
e, b
ut a
re n
ot to
be
limite
d to
, use
of o
ver-
the-
top
or fr
ame
ties
to g
roun
d an
chor
s. T
his
requ
irem
ent i
s in
add
ition
to a
pplic
able
S
tate
and
loca
l anc
horin
g re
quire
men
ts fo
r res
istin
g w
ind
forc
es.
(c) W
hen
the
Adm
inis
trato
r has
pro
vide
d a
notic
e of
fina
l flo
od e
leva
tions
for o
ne o
r mor
e sp
ecia
l flo
od h
azar
d ar
eas
on th
e co
mm
unity
’s F
IRM
and
, if a
ppro
pria
te, h
as d
esig
nate
d ot
her s
peci
al fl
ood
haza
rd a
reas
with
out b
ase
flood
ele
vatio
ns o
n th
e co
mm
unity
’s F
IRM
, but
has
not
iden
tifie
d a
regu
lato
ry fl
oodw
ay o
r coa
stal
hig
h ha
zard
are
a, th
e co
mm
unity
sh
all:
17 (1
) R
equi
re th
e st
anda
rds
of p
arag
raph
(b) o
f thi
s se
ctio
n w
ithin
all
A1-
30 z
ones
, AE
zon
es, A
zon
es,
AH
zon
es, a
nd A
O z
ones
, on
the
com
mun
ity’s
FIR
M;
[Prio
r pro
visi
ons
cum
ulat
ive]
18 (2
) R
equi
re th
at a
ll ne
w c
onst
ruct
ion
and
subs
tant
ial i
mpr
ovem
ents
of r
esid
entia
l stru
ctur
es
with
in Z
ones
A1-
30, A
E a
nd A
H z
ones
on
the
com
mun
ity’s
FIR
M h
ave
the
low
est f
loor
(inc
ludi
ng
base
men
t) el
evat
ed to
or a
bove
the
base
floo
d le
vel,
unle
ss th
e co
mm
unity
is g
rant
ed a
n ex
cept
ion
by th
e A
dmin
istra
tor f
or th
e al
low
ance
of b
asem
ents
in
acco
rdan
ce w
ith S
ec. 6
0.6
(b) o
r (c)
;
1603
.1.6
Flo
od d
esig
n da
ta.
SE
E B
LOC
K 6
16
12.1
Gen
eral
(Flo
od L
oads
). S
EE
BLO
CK
4
1612
.3 G
ener
al (F
lood
Loa
ds).
SE
E B
LOC
K 3
16
12.4
Des
ign
and
cons
truc
tion.
SE
E B
LOC
K 6
18
07.1
.2.1
Flo
od h
azar
d ar
eas.
For
bui
ldin
gs a
nd s
truct
ures
in fl
ood
haza
rd a
reas
as
esta
blis
hed
in S
ectio
n 16
12.3
, the
fini
shed
gro
und
leve
l of a
n un
derfl
oor s
pace
suc
h as
a c
raw
l spa
ce s
hall
be e
qual
to o
r hig
her
than
the
outs
ide
finis
hed
grou
nd le
vel.
Exce
ptio
n: U
nder
floor
spa
ces
of G
roup
R-3
bui
ldin
gs th
at m
eet t
he re
quire
men
ts o
f FE
MA
/FIA
TB
11-
1.
3403
.1.1
Flo
od h
azar
d ar
eas
(Exi
stin
g bu
ildin
gs o
r str
uctu
res)
. S
EE
BLO
CK
4
![Page 102: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/102.jpg)
pa
ge B
-21
IBC
Cro
ssw
alk
of th
e N
FIP
Reg
ulat
ions
to th
e Fl
ood
Res
ista
nce
Prov
isio
ns o
f the
IBC
®.
NFI
P R
egul
atio
ns
2006
IBC
® a
nd A
ppen
dix
G [a
nnot
ated
with
200
7 Su
pple
men
t]
19 (3
) R
equi
re th
at a
ll ne
w c
onst
ruct
ion
and
subs
tant
ial i
mpr
ovem
ents
of n
on-r
esid
entia
l st
ruct
ures
with
in Z
ones
A1-
30, A
E a
nd A
H z
ones
on
the
com
mun
ity’s
FIR
M:
(i)
have
the
low
est f
loor
(inc
ludi
ng b
asem
ent)
elev
ated
to o
r abo
ve th
e ba
se fl
ood
leve
l or,
(ii
) to
geth
er w
ith a
ttend
ant u
tility
and
san
itary
fa
cilit
ies,
be
desi
gned
so
that
bel
ow th
e ba
se
flood
leve
l the
stru
ctur
e is
wat
ertig
ht w
ith w
alls
su
bsta
ntia
lly im
perm
eabl
e to
the
pass
age
of
wat
er a
nd w
ith s
truct
ural
com
pone
nts
havi
ng
the
capa
bilit
y of
resi
stin
g hy
dros
tatic
and
hy
drod
ynam
ic lo
ads
and
effe
cts
of b
uoya
ncy;
1603
.1.6
Flo
od d
esig
n da
ta.
SE
E B
LOC
K 6
16
12.1
Gen
eral
(Flo
od L
oads
). S
EE
BLO
CK
4
1612
.4 D
esig
n an
d co
nstr
uctio
n. S
EE
BLO
CK
6
3403
.1.1
Flo
od h
azar
d ar
eas
(Exi
stin
g bu
ildin
gs o
r str
uctu
res)
. S
EE
BLO
CK
4
20 (4
) P
rovi
de th
at w
here
a n
on-r
esid
entia
l stru
ctur
e is
inte
nded
to b
e m
ade
wat
ertig
ht b
elow
the
base
flo
od le
vel,
(i)
a
regi
ster
ed p
rofe
ssio
nal e
ngin
eer o
r arc
hite
ct
shal
l dev
elop
and
/or r
evie
w s
truct
ural
des
ign,
sp
ecifi
catio
ns, a
nd p
lans
for t
he c
onst
ruct
ion,
an
d sh
all c
ertif
y th
at th
e de
sign
and
met
hods
of
cons
truct
ion
are
in a
ccor
danc
e w
ith a
ccep
ted
stan
dard
s of
pra
ctic
e fo
r mee
ting
the
appl
icab
le
prov
isio
ns o
f par
agra
ph (c
)(3)
(ii) o
r (c)
(8)(
ii) o
f th
is s
ectio
n, a
nd
(ii)
a re
cord
of s
uch
certi
ficat
es w
hich
incl
udes
the
spec
ific
elev
atio
n (in
rela
tion
to m
ean
sea
leve
l) to
whi
ch s
uch
stru
ctur
es a
re fl
oodp
roof
ed s
hall
be m
aint
aine
d w
ith th
e of
ficia
l des
igna
ted
by
the
com
mun
ity u
nder
Sec
. 59
.22(
a)(9
)(iii
);
104.
7 D
epar
tmen
t rec
ords
. 16
12.5
.1 F
lood
haz
ard
docu
men
tatio
n. [
Floo
d ha
zard
are
as n
ot s
ubje
ct to
hig
h-ve
loci
ty w
ave
actio
n] S
EE
B
LOC
K 1
3 A
ppen
dix
G10
3.8
Rec
ords
. S
EE
BLO
CK
1
![Page 103: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/103.jpg)
pa
ge B
-22
IBC
Cro
ssw
alk
of th
e N
FIP
Reg
ulat
ions
to th
e Fl
ood
Res
ista
nce
Prov
isio
ns o
f the
IBC
®.
NFI
P R
egul
atio
ns
2006
IBC
® a
nd A
ppen
dix
G [a
nnot
ated
with
200
7 Su
pple
men
t]
21 (5
) R
equi
re, f
or a
ll ne
w c
onst
ruct
ion
and
subs
tant
ial i
mpr
ovem
ents
, tha
t ful
ly e
nclo
sed
area
s be
low
the
low
est f
loor
that
are
usa
ble
sole
ly fo
r pa
rkin
g of
veh
icle
s, b
uild
ing
acce
ss o
r sto
rage
in a
n ar
ea o
ther
than
a b
asem
ent a
nd w
hich
are
sub
ject
to
flood
ing
shal
l be
desi
gned
to a
utom
atic
ally
equ
aliz
e hy
dros
tatic
floo
d fo
rces
on
exte
rior w
alls
by
allo
win
g fo
r the
ent
ry a
nd e
xit o
f flo
odw
ater
s. D
esig
ns fo
r m
eetin
g th
is re
quire
men
t mus
t eith
er b
e ce
rtifie
d by
a
regi
ster
ed p
rofe
ssio
nal e
ngin
eer o
r arc
hite
ct o
r m
eet o
r exc
eed
the
follo
win
g m
inim
um c
riter
ia.
A
min
imum
of t
wo
open
ings
hav
ing
a to
tal n
et a
rea
of
not l
ess
than
one
squ
are
inch
for e
very
squ
are
foot
of
enc
lose
d ar
ea s
ubje
ct to
floo
ding
sha
ll be
pr
ovid
ed.
The
botto
m o
f all
open
ings
sha
ll be
no
high
er th
an o
ne fo
ot a
bove
gra
de.
Ope
ning
s m
ay b
e eq
uipp
ed w
ith s
cree
ns, l
ouve
rs, v
alve
s, o
r oth
er
cove
rings
or d
evic
es p
rovi
ded
that
they
per
mit
the
auto
mat
ic e
ntry
and
exi
t of f
lood
wat
ers.
1202
.3.2
[U
nder
-floo
r ven
tilat
ion]
Exc
eptio
ns
5.
Fo
r bui
ldin
gs in
floo
d ha
zard
are
as a
s es
tabl
ishe
d in
Sec
tion
1612
.3, t
he o
peni
ng re
quire
men
ts o
f A
SC
E 2
4 ar
e au
thor
ized
to b
e sa
tisfie
d by
ven
tilat
ion
open
ings
that
are
des
igne
d an
d in
stal
led
in
acco
rdan
ce w
ith A
SC
E 2
4.
1612
.4 D
esig
n an
d co
nstr
uctio
n. S
EE
BLO
CK
6
1612
.5 F
lood
haz
ard
docu
men
tatio
n. [
Floo
d ha
zard
are
as n
ot s
ubje
ct to
hig
h-ve
loci
ty w
ave
actio
n] S
EE
B
LOC
K 1
3
22 (6
) R
equi
re th
at m
anuf
actu
red
hom
es th
at a
re
plac
ed o
r sub
stan
tially
impr
oved
with
in Z
ones
A1-
30,
AH
, and
AE
on
the
com
mun
ity’s
FIR
M o
n si
tes:
(i)
ou
tsid
e of
a m
anuf
actu
red
hom
e pa
rk o
r su
bdiv
isio
n,
(ii)
in a
new
man
ufac
ture
d ho
me
park
or
subd
ivis
ion,
(ii
i) in
an
expa
nsio
n to
an
exis
ting
man
ufac
ture
d ho
me
park
or s
ubdi
visi
on, o
r (iv
) in
an
exis
ting
man
ufac
ture
d ho
me
park
or
subd
ivis
ion
on w
hich
a m
anuf
actu
red
hom
e ha
s in
curr
ed “s
ubst
antia
l dam
age”
as
the
resu
lt of
a
flood
, be
elev
ated
on
a pe
rman
ent f
ound
atio
n su
ch th
at th
e lo
wes
t flo
or o
f the
man
ufac
ture
d ho
me
is e
leva
ted
to o
r abo
ve th
e ba
se fl
ood
elev
atio
n an
d be
sec
urel
y an
chor
ed to
an
adeq
uate
ly a
ncho
red
foun
datio
n sy
stem
to
resi
st fl
oata
tion
colla
pse
and
late
ral m
ovem
ent.
App
endi
x G
. Se
ctio
n 50
1 M
anuf
actu
red
Hom
es.
SE
E B
LOC
K 1
6
![Page 104: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/104.jpg)
pa
ge B
-23
IBC
Cro
ssw
alk
of th
e N
FIP
Reg
ulat
ions
to th
e Fl
ood
Res
ista
nce
Prov
isio
ns o
f the
IBC
®.
NFI
P R
egul
atio
ns
2006
IBC
® a
nd A
ppen
dix
G [a
nnot
ated
with
200
7 Su
pple
men
t]
23 (7
) R
equi
re w
ithin
any
AO
zon
e on
the
com
mun
ity’s
FIR
M th
at a
ll ne
w c
onst
ruct
ion
and
subs
tant
ial i
mpr
ovem
ents
of r
esid
entia
l stru
ctur
es
have
the
low
est f
loor
(inc
ludi
ng b
asem
ent)
elev
ated
ab
ove
the
high
est a
djac
ent g
rade
at l
east
as
high
as
the
dept
h nu
mbe
r spe
cifie
d in
feet
on
the
com
mun
ity’s
FIR
M (a
t lea
st tw
o fe
et if
no
dept
h nu
mbe
r is
spec
ified
);
DES
IGN
FLO
OD
ELE
VATI
ON
SE
E D
EFI
NIT
ION
S
1612
.4 D
esig
n an
d co
nstr
uctio
n. S
EE
BLO
CK
6
24 (8
) R
equi
re w
ithin
any
AO
zon
e on
the
com
mun
ity’s
FIR
M th
at a
ll ne
w c
onst
ruct
ion
and
subs
tant
ial i
mpr
ovem
ents
of n
onre
side
ntia
l st
ruct
ures
(i) h
ave
the
low
est f
loor
(inc
ludi
ng
base
men
t) el
evat
ed a
bove
the
high
est a
djac
ent
grad
e at
leas
t as
high
as
the
dept
h nu
mbe
r spe
cifie
d in
feet
on
the
com
mun
ity’s
FIR
M (a
t lea
st tw
o fe
et if
no
dep
th n
umbe
r is
spec
ified
), or
(ii)
toge
ther
with
at
tend
ant u
tility
and
san
itary
faci
litie
s be
com
plet
ely
flood
proo
fed
to th
at le
vel t
o m
eet t
he fl
oodp
roof
ing
stan
dard
spe
cifie
d in
Sec
. 60
.3(c
)(3)
(ii);
DES
IGN
FLO
OD
ELE
VATI
ON
SE
E D
EFI
NIT
ION
S
1603
.1.6
Flo
od d
esig
n da
ta.
SE
E B
LOC
K 6
16
12.4
Des
ign
and
cons
truc
tion.
SE
E B
LOC
K 6
18
07.1
.2.1
Flo
od h
azar
d ar
eas.
SE
E B
LOC
K 1
8 34
03.1
.1 F
lood
haz
ard
area
s (E
xist
ing
build
ings
or s
truc
ture
s).
SE
E B
LOC
K 4
25 (9
) R
equi
re w
ithin
any
A99
zon
es o
n a
com
mun
ity’s
FIR
M th
e st
anda
rds
of p
arag
raph
s (a
)(1) t
hrou
gh (a
)(4)
(i) a
nd (b
)(5) t
hrou
gh (b
)(9)
of
this
sec
tion;
1603
.1.6
Flo
od d
esig
n da
ta.
SE
E B
LOC
K 6
16
12.4
Des
ign
and
cons
truc
tion.
SE
E B
LOC
K 6
18
07.1
.2.1
Flo
od h
azar
d ar
eas.
SE
E B
LOC
K 1
8 34
03.1
.1 F
lood
haz
ard
area
s (E
xist
ing
build
ings
or s
truc
ture
s).
SE
E B
LOC
K 4
26 (1
0) R
equi
re u
ntil
a re
gula
tory
floo
dway
is
desi
gnat
ed, t
hat n
o ne
w c
onst
ruct
ion,
sub
stan
tial
impr
ovem
ents
, or o
ther
dev
elop
men
t (in
clud
ing
fill)
shal
l be
perm
itted
with
in Z
ones
A1-
30 a
nd A
E o
n th
e co
mm
unity
’s F
IRM
, unl
ess
it is
dem
onst
rate
d th
at
the
cum
ulat
ive
effe
ct o
f the
pro
pose
d de
velo
pmen
t, w
hen
com
bine
d w
ith a
ll ot
her e
xist
ing
and
antic
ipat
ed d
evel
opm
ent,
will
not
incr
ease
the
wat
er
surfa
ce e
leva
tion
of th
e ba
se fl
ood
mor
e th
an o
ne
foot
at a
ny p
oint
with
in th
e co
mm
unity
.
R10
6.2.
5.1
Des
ign
flood
ele
vatio
n. S
EE
BLO
CK
6
1803
.4 G
radi
ng a
nd fi
ll in
floo
d ha
zard
are
as.
SE
E B
LOC
K 6
A
ppen
dix
G10
3.4
Act
iviti
es in
rive
rine
flood
haz
ard
area
s. I
n riv
erin
e flo
od h
azar
d ar
eas
whe
re d
esig
n flo
od e
leva
tions
are
spe
cifie
d bu
t flo
odw
ays
have
not
bee
n de
sign
ated
, the
bui
ldin
g of
ficia
l sha
ll no
t per
mit
any
new
con
stru
ctio
n, s
ubst
antia
l im
prov
emen
t or o
ther
dev
elop
men
t, in
clud
ing
fill,
unle
ss th
e ap
plic
ant
dem
onst
rate
s th
at th
e cu
mul
ativ
e ef
fect
of t
he p
ropo
sed
deve
lopm
ent,
whe
n co
mbi
ned
with
all
othe
r exi
stin
g an
d an
ticip
ated
floo
d ha
zard
are
a en
croa
chm
ent,
will
not
incr
ease
the
desi
gn fl
ood
elev
atio
n m
ore
than
one
fo
ot a
t any
poi
nt w
ithin
the
com
mun
ity.
27 (1
1) R
equi
re w
ithin
Zon
es A
H a
nd A
O, a
dequ
ate
drai
nage
pat
hs a
roun
d st
ruct
ures
on
slop
es, t
o gu
ide
flood
wat
ers
arou
nd a
nd a
way
from
pro
pose
d st
ruct
ures
.
App
endi
x G
401.
5 S
torm
dra
inag
e. S
EE
BLO
CK
6
![Page 105: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/105.jpg)
pa
ge B
-24
IBC
Cro
ssw
alk
of th
e N
FIP
Reg
ulat
ions
to th
e Fl
ood
Res
ista
nce
Prov
isio
ns o
f the
IBC
®.
NFI
P R
egul
atio
ns
2006
IBC
® a
nd A
ppen
dix
G [a
nnot
ated
with
200
7 Su
pple
men
t]
28 (1
2) R
equi
re th
at m
anuf
actu
red
hom
es to
be
plac
ed
or s
ubst
antia
lly im
prov
ed o
n si
tes
in a
n ex
istin
g m
anuf
actu
red
hom
e pa
rk o
r sub
divi
sion
with
in Z
ones
A
-1-3
0, A
H, a
nd A
E o
n th
e co
mm
unity
’s F
IRM
that
ar
e no
t sub
ject
to th
e pr
ovis
ions
of p
arag
raph
(c)(
6)
of th
is s
ectio
n be
ele
vate
d so
that
eith
er (i
) The
lo
wes
t flo
or o
f the
man
ufac
ture
d ho
me
is a
t or a
bove
th
e ba
se fl
ood
elev
atio
n, o
r (ii)
The
man
ufac
ture
d ho
me
chas
sis
is s
uppo
rted
by re
info
rced
pie
rs o
r ot
her f
ound
atio
n el
emen
ts o
f at l
east
equ
ival
ent
stre
ngth
that
are
no
less
than
36
inch
es in
hei
ght
abov
e gr
ade
and
be s
ecur
ely
anch
ored
to a
n ad
equa
tely
anc
hore
d fo
unda
tion
syst
em to
resi
st
float
atio
n, c
olla
pse,
and
late
ral m
ovem
ent.
App
endi
x G
501
Man
ufac
ture
d H
omes
. S
EE
BLO
CK
16
29 (1
3) N
otw
ithst
andi
ng a
ny o
ther
pro
visi
ons
of S
ec.
60.3
, a c
omm
unity
may
app
rove
cer
tain
de
velo
pmen
t in
Zone
s A
l-30,
AE
, and
AH
, on
the
com
mun
ity’s
FIR
M w
hich
incr
ease
the
wat
er s
urfa
ce
elev
atio
n of
the
base
floo
d by
mor
e th
an o
ne fo
ot,
prov
ided
that
the
com
mun
ity fi
rst a
pplie
s fo
r a
cond
ition
al F
IRM
revi
sion
, ful
fills
the
requ
irem
ents
fo
r suc
h a
revi
sion
as
esta
blis
hed
unde
r the
pr
ovis
ions
of S
ec.
65.1
2, a
nd re
ceiv
es th
e ap
prov
al
of th
e A
dmin
istra
tor.
App
endi
x G
103.
5 F
lood
way
enc
roac
hmen
t. P
rior t
o is
suin
g a
perm
it fo
r any
floo
dway
enc
roac
hmen
t, in
clud
ing
fill,
new
con
stru
ctio
n, s
ubst
antia
l im
prov
emen
ts a
nd o
ther
dev
elop
men
t or l
and
dist
urbi
ng a
ctiv
ity,
the
build
ing
offic
ial s
hall
requ
ire s
ubm
issi
on o
f a c
ertif
icat
ion,
alo
ng w
ith s
uppo
rting
tech
nica
l dat
a, th
at
dem
onst
rate
s th
at s
uch
deve
lopm
ent w
ill n
ot c
ause
any
incr
ease
of t
he le
vel o
f the
bas
e flo
od.
App
endi
x G
103.
5.1
Flo
odw
ay re
visi
on.
A fl
oodw
ay e
ncro
achm
ent t
hat i
ncre
ases
the
leve
l of t
he b
ase
flood
is a
utho
rized
if th
e ap
plic
ant h
as a
pplie
d fo
r a c
ondi
tiona
l FIR
M re
visi
on a
nd h
as re
ceiv
ed th
e ap
prov
al
of F
EM
A.
30 (1
4) R
equi
re th
at re
crea
tiona
l veh
icle
s pl
aced
on
site
s w
ithin
Zon
es A
1-30
, AH
, and
AE
on
the
com
-m
unity
’s F
IRM
eith
er (i
) Be
on th
e si
te fo
r few
er th
an
180
cons
ecut
ive
days
, (ii)
Be
fully
lice
nsed
and
re
ady
for h
ighw
ay u
se, o
r (iii
) Mee
t the
per
mit
re-
quire
men
ts o
f par
agra
ph (b
)(1)
of t
his
sect
ion
and
the
elev
atio
n an
d an
chor
ing
requ
irem
ents
for
“man
ufac
ture
d ho
mes
” in
para
grap
h (c
)(6)
of t
his
sect
ion.
A re
crea
tiona
l veh
icle
is re
ady
for h
ighw
ay
use
if it
is o
n its
whe
els
or ja
ckin
g sy
stem
, is
atta
ched
to th
e si
te o
nly
by q
uick
dis
conn
ect t
ype
utili
ties
and
secu
rity
devi
ces,
and
has
no
perm
anen
tly a
ttach
ed a
dditi
ons.
App
endi
x G
601.
1 P
lace
men
t pro
hibi
ted
(Rec
reat
iona
l Veh
icle
s).
The
plac
emen
t of r
ecre
atio
nal v
ehic
les
shal
l not
be
auth
oriz
ed in
floo
d ha
zard
are
as s
ubje
ct to
hig
h-ve
loci
ty w
ave
actio
n an
d in
floo
dway
s.
App
endi
x G
601.
2 T
empo
rary
pla
cem
ent.
Rec
reat
iona
l veh
icle
s in
floo
d ha
zard
are
as s
hall
be fu
lly
licen
sed
and
read
y fo
r hig
hway
use
, and
sha
ll be
pla
ced
on a
site
for l
ess
than
180
con
secu
tive
days
. A
ppen
dix
G60
1.3
Per
man
ent p
lace
men
t. R
ecre
atio
nal v
ehic
les
that
are
not
fully
lice
nsed
and
read
y fo
r hi
ghw
ay u
se, o
r tha
t are
to b
e pl
aced
on
a si
te fo
r mor
e th
an 1
80 c
onse
cutiv
e da
ys s
hall
mee
t the
re
quire
men
ts o
f Sec
tion
G50
1 fo
r man
ufac
ture
d ho
mes
.
(d) W
hen
the
Adm
inis
trato
r has
pro
vide
d a
notic
e of
fina
l bas
e flo
od e
leva
tions
with
in Z
ones
A1-
30 a
nd/o
r AE
on th
e co
mm
unity
’s F
IRM
and
, if a
ppro
pria
te, h
as d
esig
nate
d AO
zon
es,
AH z
ones
, A99
zon
es, a
nd A
zon
es o
n th
e co
mm
unity
’s F
IRM
, and
has
pro
vide
d da
ta fr
om w
hich
the
com
mun
ity s
hall
desi
gnat
e its
regu
lato
ry fl
oodw
ay, t
he c
omm
unity
sha
ll:
31 (1
) Mee
t the
requ
irem
ents
of p
arag
raph
s (c
) (1)
th
roug
h (1
4) o
f thi
s se
ctio
n;
[Prio
r pro
visi
ons
cum
ulat
ive]
![Page 106: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/106.jpg)
pa
ge B
-25
IBC
Cro
ssw
alk
of th
e N
FIP
Reg
ulat
ions
to th
e Fl
ood
Res
ista
nce
Prov
isio
ns o
f the
IBC
®.
NFI
P R
egul
atio
ns
2006
IBC
® a
nd A
ppen
dix
G [a
nnot
ated
with
200
7 Su
pple
men
t]
32 (2
) S
elec
t and
ado
pt a
regu
lato
ry fl
oodw
ay b
ased
on
the
prin
cipl
e th
at th
e ar
ea c
hose
n fo
r the
regu
la-
tory
floo
dway
mus
t be
desi
gned
to c
arry
the
wat
ers
of th
e ba
se fl
ood,
with
out i
ncre
asin
g th
e w
ater
sur
-fa
ce e
leva
tion
of th
at fl
ood
mor
e th
an o
ne fo
ot a
t any
po
int;
1612
.3 E
stab
lishm
ent o
f flo
od h
azar
d ar
eas.
SE
E B
LOC
K 3
A
ppen
dix
G10
3.4
Act
iviti
es in
rive
rine
flood
haz
ard
area
s. S
EE
BLO
CK
26
33 (3
) P
rohi
bit e
ncro
achm
ents
, inc
ludi
ng fi
ll, n
ew
cons
truct
ion,
sub
stan
tial i
mpr
ovem
ents
, and
oth
er
deve
lopm
ent w
ithin
the
adop
ted
regu
lato
ry fl
oodw
ay
unle
ss it
has
bee
n de
mon
stra
ted
thro
ugh
hydr
olog
ic
and
hydr
aulic
ana
lyse
s pe
rform
ed in
acc
orda
nce
with
sta
ndar
d en
gine
erin
g pr
actic
e th
at th
e pr
opos
ed
encr
oach
men
t wou
ld n
ot re
sult
in a
ny in
crea
se in
flo
od le
vels
with
in th
e co
mm
unity
dur
ing
the
occu
rren
ce o
f the
bas
e flo
od d
isch
arge
;
1803
.4 G
radi
ng a
nd fi
ll in
floo
d ha
zard
are
as.
SE
E B
LOC
K 6
A
ppen
dix
G10
3.5
Flo
odw
ay e
ncro
achm
ent.
SE
E B
LOC
K 2
9 A
ppen
dix
G10
3.5.
1 F
lood
way
revi
sion
. S
EE
BLO
CK
29
App
endi
x G
401.
1 D
evel
opm
ent i
n flo
odw
ays.
Dev
elop
men
t or l
and
dist
urbi
ng a
ctiv
ity s
hall
not b
e au
thor
ized
in th
e flo
odw
ay u
nles
s it
has
been
dem
onst
rate
d th
roug
h hy
drol
ogic
and
hyd
raul
ic a
naly
ses
perfo
rmed
in a
ccor
danc
e w
ith s
tand
ard
engi
neer
ing
prac
tice
that
the
prop
osed
enc
roac
hmen
t will
not
resu
lt in
an
y in
crea
se in
the
leve
l of t
he b
ase
flood
. A
ppen
dix
J101
.2 F
lood
haz
ard
area
s. T
he p
rovi
sion
s of
this
cha
pter
sha
ll no
t app
ly to
gra
ding
, exc
avat
ion
and
earth
wor
k co
nstru
ctio
n, in
clud
ing
fills
and
em
bank
men
ts, i
n flo
odw
ays
with
in fl
ood
haza
rd a
reas
es
tabl
ishe
d in
Sec
tion
1612
.3, o
r in
flood
haz
ard
area
s w
here
des
ign
flood
ele
vatio
ns a
re s
peci
fied
but
flood
way
s ha
ve n
ot b
een
desi
gnat
ed, u
nles
s it
has
been
dem
onst
rate
d th
roug
h hy
drol
ogic
and
hyd
raul
ic
anal
yses
per
form
ed in
acc
orda
nce
with
sta
ndar
d en
gine
erin
g pr
actic
e th
at th
e pr
opos
ed w
ork
will
not
resu
lt in
an
y in
crea
se in
the
leve
l of t
he b
ase
flood
.
34 (4
) N
otw
ithst
andi
ng a
ny o
ther
pro
visi
ons
of S
ec.
60.3
, a c
omm
unity
may
per
mit
encr
oach
men
ts w
ithin
th
e ad
opte
d re
gula
tory
floo
dway
that
wou
ld re
sult
in
an in
crea
se in
bas
e flo
od e
leva
tions
, pro
vide
d th
at
the
com
mun
ity fi
rst a
pplie
s fo
r a c
ondi
tiona
l FIR
M
and
flood
way
revi
sion
, ful
fills
the
requ
irem
ents
for
such
revi
sion
s as
est
ablis
hed
unde
r the
pro
visi
ons
of
Sec
. 65
.12,
and
rece
ives
the
appr
oval
of t
he
Adm
inis
trato
r.
1803
.4 G
radi
ng a
nd fi
ll in
floo
d ha
zard
are
as.
SE
E B
LOC
K 6
A
ppen
dix
G10
3.5.
1 F
lood
way
revi
sion
. S
EE
BLO
CK
29
(e) W
hen
the
Adm
inis
trato
r has
pro
vide
d a
notic
e of
fina
l bas
e flo
od e
leva
tions
with
in Z
ones
A1-
30 a
nd/o
r AE
on
the
com
mun
ity’s
FIR
M a
nd, i
f app
ropr
iate
, has
des
igna
ted
AH
zo
nes,
AO
zon
es, A
99 z
ones
, and
A z
ones
on
the
com
mun
ity’s
FIR
M, a
nd h
as id
entif
ied
on th
e co
mm
unity
’s F
IRM
coa
stal
hig
h ha
zard
are
as b
y de
sign
atin
g Zo
nes
V1-
30, V
E,
and/
or V
, the
com
mun
ity s
hall.
35 (1
) M
eet t
he re
quire
men
ts o
f par
agra
phs
(c)(
1)
thro
ugh
(14)
of t
his
sect
ion;
[P
rior p
rovi
sion
s cu
mul
ativ
e]
![Page 107: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/107.jpg)
pa
ge B
-26
IBC
Cro
ssw
alk
of th
e N
FIP
Reg
ulat
ions
to th
e Fl
ood
Res
ista
nce
Prov
isio
ns o
f the
IBC
®.
NFI
P R
egul
atio
ns
2006
IBC
® a
nd A
ppen
dix
G [a
nnot
ated
with
200
7 Su
pple
men
t]
36 (2
) W
ithin
Zon
es V
1-30
, VE
, and
V o
n a
com
mun
ity’s
FIR
M,
(i)
obta
in th
e el
evat
ion
(in re
latio
n to
mea
n se
a le
vel)
of th
e bo
ttom
of t
he lo
wes
t stru
ctur
al
mem
ber o
f the
low
est f
loor
(exc
ludi
ng p
iling
s an
d co
lum
ns) o
f all
new
and
sub
stan
tially
im
prov
ed s
truct
ures
, and
whe
ther
or n
ot s
uch
stru
ctur
es c
onta
in a
bas
emen
t, an
d
(ii)
mai
ntai
n a
reco
rd o
f al
l suc
h in
form
atio
n w
ith
the
offic
ial d
esig
nate
d by
the
com
mun
ity u
nder
S
ec.
59.2
2(a)
(9)(
iii);
104.
7 D
epar
tmen
t rec
ords
16
03.1
.6 F
lood
des
ign
data
. S
EE
BLO
CK
6
1612
.1 G
ener
al (F
lood
Loa
ds).
SE
E B
LOC
K 4
16
12.5
Flo
od h
azar
d do
cum
enta
tion.
The
follo
win
g do
cum
enta
tion
shal
l be
prep
ared
and
sea
led
by a
re
gist
ered
des
ign
prof
essi
onal
and
sha
ll be
sub
mitt
ed to
the
build
ing
offic
ial:
2.
Fo
r con
stru
ctio
n in
floo
d ha
zard
are
as s
ubje
ct to
hig
h-ve
loci
ty w
ave
actio
n:
2.1
The
ele
vatio
n of
the
botto
m o
f the
low
est h
oriz
onta
l stru
ctur
al m
embe
r as
requ
ired
by th
e lo
wes
t flo
or e
leva
tion
insp
ectio
n in
Sec
tion
109.
3.3.
2
.2 C
onst
ruct
ion
docu
men
ts s
hall
incl
ude
a st
atem
ent t
hat t
he b
uild
ing
is d
esig
ned
in a
ccor
danc
e w
ith
AS
CE
24,
incl
udin
g th
at th
e pi
le o
r col
umn
foun
datio
n an
d bu
ildin
g or
stru
ctur
e to
be
atta
ched
th
eret
o is
des
igne
d to
be
anch
ored
to re
sist
flot
atio
n, c
olla
pse
and
late
ral m
ovem
ent d
ue to
the
effe
cts
of w
ind
and
flood
load
s ac
ting
sim
ulta
neou
sly
on a
ll bu
ildin
g co
mpo
nent
s, a
nd o
ther
load
re
quire
men
ts o
f Cha
pter
16.
2
.3 F
or b
reak
away
wal
ls d
esig
ned
to re
sist
a n
omin
al lo
ad o
f les
s th
at 1
0 ps
f (0
.48
kN/m
2 ) or m
ore
than
20
psf
(0.9
6 kN
/m2 ),
cons
truct
ion
docu
men
ts s
hall
incl
ude
a st
atem
ent t
hat t
he b
reak
away
wal
l is
desi
gned
in a
ccor
danc
e w
ith A
SC
E 2
4.
App
endi
x G
103.
8 R
ecor
ds.
SE
E B
LOC
K 1
A
ppen
dix
G50
1 M
anuf
actu
red
Hom
es.
SE
E B
LOC
K 1
6
37 (3
) P
rovi
de th
at a
ll ne
w c
onst
ruct
ion
with
in Z
ones
V
1-30
, VE
, and
V o
n th
e co
mm
unity
’s F
IRM
is
loca
ted
land
war
d of
the
reac
h of
mea
n hi
gh ti
de;
App
endi
x G
401.
2 F
lood
haz
ard
area
s su
bjec
t to
high
-vel
ocity
wav
e ac
tion.
In
flood
haz
ard
area
s su
bjec
t to
high
-vel
ocity
wav
e ac
tion:
1.
N
ew b
uild
ings
and
bui
ldin
gs th
at a
re s
ubst
antia
lly im
prov
ed s
hall
only
be
auth
oriz
ed la
ndw
ard
of th
e re
ach
of m
ean
high
tide
.
2.
The
use
of fi
ll fo
r stru
ctur
al s
uppo
rt of
bui
ldin
gs is
pro
hibi
ted.
![Page 108: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/108.jpg)
pa
ge B
-27
IBC
Cro
ssw
alk
of th
e N
FIP
Reg
ulat
ions
to th
e Fl
ood
Res
ista
nce
Prov
isio
ns o
f the
IBC
®.
NFI
P R
egul
atio
ns
2006
IBC
® a
nd A
ppen
dix
G [a
nnot
ated
with
200
7 Su
pple
men
t]
38 (4
) P
rovi
de th
at a
ll ne
w c
onst
ruct
ion
and
subs
tant
ial
impr
ovem
ents
in Z
ones
V1-
30 a
nd V
E, a
nd a
lso
Zone
V if
bas
e flo
od e
leva
tion
data
is a
vaila
ble,
on
the
com
mun
ity’s
FIR
M, a
re e
leva
ted
on p
iling
s an
d co
lum
ns s
o th
at
(i)
the
botto
m o
f the
low
est h
oriz
onta
l stru
ctur
al
mem
ber o
f the
low
est f
loor
(exc
ludi
ng th
e pi
lings
or c
olum
ns) i
s el
evat
ed to
or a
bove
the
base
floo
d le
vel;
and
(ii)
the
pile
or c
olum
n fo
unda
tion
and
stru
ctur
e at
tach
ed th
eret
o is
anc
hore
d to
resi
st fl
otat
ion,
co
llaps
e an
d la
tera
l mov
emen
t due
to th
e ef
fect
s of
win
d an
d w
ater
load
s ac
ting
sim
ulta
neou
sly
on a
ll bu
ildin
g co
mpo
nent
s.
Wat
er lo
adin
g va
lues
use
d sh
all b
e th
ose
asso
ciat
ed w
ith th
e ba
se fl
ood.
Win
d lo
adin
g va
lues
use
d sh
all b
e th
ose
requ
ired
by
appl
icab
le S
tate
or l
ocal
bui
ldin
g st
anda
rds.
A
regi
ster
ed p
rofe
ssio
nal e
ngin
eer o
r arc
hite
ct
shal
l dev
elop
or r
evie
w th
e st
ruct
ural
des
ign,
sp
ecifi
catio
ns a
nd p
lans
for t
he c
onst
ruct
ion,
an
d sh
all c
ertif
y th
at th
e de
sign
and
met
hods
of
cons
truct
ion
to b
e us
ed a
re in
acc
orda
nce
with
ac
cept
ed s
tand
ards
of p
ract
ice
for m
eetin
g th
e pr
ovis
ions
of p
arag
raph
s (e
)(4)
(i) a
nd (i
i) of
this
se
ctio
n.
109.
3.3
Low
est f
loor
ele
vatio
n. S
EE
BLO
CK
13
1603
.1.6
Flo
od d
esig
n da
ta.
SE
E B
LOC
K 6
16
05.2
.2 O
ther
load
s. S
EE
BLO
CK
6
1605
.3.1
.2 O
ther
load
s. S
EE
BLO
CK
6
1612
.4 D
esig
n an
d co
nstr
uctio
n. S
EE
BLO
CK
6
1612
.5 F
lood
haz
ard
docu
men
tatio
n. [
Floo
d ha
zard
are
as s
ubje
ct to
hig
h-ve
loci
ty w
ave
actio
n] S
EE
B
LOC
K 3
6
![Page 109: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/109.jpg)
pa
ge B
-28
IBC
Cro
ssw
alk
of th
e N
FIP
Reg
ulat
ions
to th
e Fl
ood
Res
ista
nce
Prov
isio
ns o
f the
IBC
®.
NFI
P R
egul
atio
ns
2006
IBC
® a
nd A
ppen
dix
G [a
nnot
ated
with
200
7 Su
pple
men
t]
39
(5)
Pro
vide
that
all
new
con
stru
ctio
n an
d su
bsta
ntia
l im
prov
emen
ts w
ithin
Zon
es V
1-30
, VE
, and
V o
n th
e co
mm
unity
’s F
IRM
hav
e th
e sp
ace
belo
w th
e lo
wes
t flo
or e
ither
free
of o
bstru
ctio
n or
con
stru
cted
with
no
n-su
ppor
ting
brea
kaw
ay w
alls
, ope
n w
ood
latti
ce-w
ork,
or i
nsec
t scr
eeni
ng in
tend
ed to
col
laps
e un
der w
ind
and
wat
er lo
ads
with
out c
ausi
ng
colla
pse,
dis
plac
emen
t, or
oth
er s
truct
ural
dam
age
to th
e el
evat
ed p
ortio
n of
the
build
ing
or s
uppo
rting
fo
unda
tion
syst
em.
For t
he p
urpo
ses
of th
is s
ectio
n,
a br
eaka
way
wal
l sha
ll ha
ve a
des
ign
safe
load
ing
resi
stan
ce o
f not
less
than
10
and
no m
ore
than
20
poun
ds p
er s
quar
e fo
ot.
Use
of b
reak
away
wal
ls
whi
ch e
xcee
d a
desi
gn s
afe
load
ing
resi
stan
ce o
f 20
poun
ds p
er s
quar
e fo
ot (e
ither
by
desi
gn o
r whe
n so
re
quire
d by
loca
l or S
tate
cod
es) m
ay b
e pe
rmitt
ed
only
if a
regi
ster
ed p
rofe
ssio
nal e
ngin
eer o
r arc
hite
ct
certi
fies
that
the
desi
gns
prop
osed
mee
t the
fo
llow
ing
cond
ition
s:
(i)
Bre
akaw
ay w
all c
olla
pse
shal
l res
ult f
rom
a
wat
er lo
ad le
ss th
an th
at w
hich
wou
ld o
ccur
du
ring
the
base
floo
d; a
nd,
(ii)
The
elev
ated
por
tion
of th
e bu
ildin
g an
d su
ppor
ting
foun
datio
n sy
stem
sha
ll no
t be
subj
ect t
o co
llaps
e, d
ispl
acem
ent,
or o
ther
st
ruct
ural
dam
age
due
to th
e ef
fect
s of
win
d an
d w
ater
load
s ac
ting
sim
ulta
neou
sly
on a
ll bu
ildin
g co
mpo
nent
s (s
truct
ural
and
no
n-st
ruct
ural
). W
ater
load
ing
valu
es u
sed
shal
l be
thos
e as
soci
ated
with
the
base
floo
d.
Win
d lo
adin
g va
lues
use
d sh
all b
e th
ose
requ
ired
by a
pplic
able
Sta
te o
r loc
al b
uild
ing
stan
dard
s.
Suc
h en
clos
ed s
pace
sha
ll be
use
able
sol
ely
for
park
ing
of v
ehic
les,
bui
ldin
g ac
cess
, or s
tora
ge.
1403
.7 F
lood
resi
stan
ce fo
r hig
h-ve
loci
ty w
ave
actio
n ar
eas.
For
bui
ldin
gs in
floo
d ha
zard
are
as s
ubje
ct
to h
igh-
velo
city
wav
e ac
tion
as e
stab
lishe
d in
Sec
tion
1612
.3, e
lect
rical
, mec
hani
cal,
and
plum
bing
sys
tem
co
mpo
nent
s sh
all n
ot b
e m
ount
ed o
n or
pen
etra
te th
roug
h ex
terio
r wal
ls th
at a
re d
esig
ned
to b
reak
aw
ay
unde
r flo
od lo
ads.
16
12.4
Des
ign
and
cons
truc
tion.
The
des
ign
and
cons
truct
ion
of b
uild
ings
and
stru
ctur
es lo
cate
d in
floo
d ha
zard
are
as, i
nclu
ding
floo
d ha
zard
are
as s
ubje
ct to
hig
h-ve
loci
ty w
ave
actio
n, s
hall
be in
acc
orda
nce
with
A
SC
E 2
4.
1612
.5.2
Flo
od h
azar
d do
cum
enta
tion.
[Fl
ood
haza
rd a
reas
sub
ject
to h
igh-
velo
city
wav
e ac
tion]
SE
E
BLO
CK
36
[For
util
ity c
ompo
nent
s, s
ee A
ppen
dix
D fo
r tex
ts fr
om IM
C a
nd IP
C.]
40 (6
) P
rohi
bit t
he u
se o
f fill
for s
truct
ural
sup
port
of
build
ings
with
in Z
ones
V1-
30, V
E, a
nd V
on
the
com
mun
ity’s
FIR
M;
1803
.4 G
radi
ng a
nd fi
ll in
floo
d ha
zard
are
as.
SE
E B
LOC
K 6
A
ppen
dix
G40
1.2
Flo
od h
azar
d ar
eas
subj
ect t
o hi
gh-v
eloc
ity w
ave
actio
n. S
EE
BLO
CK
37
![Page 110: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/110.jpg)
pa
ge B
-29
IBC
Cro
ssw
alk
of th
e N
FIP
Reg
ulat
ions
to th
e Fl
ood
Res
ista
nce
Prov
isio
ns o
f the
IBC
®.
NFI
P R
egul
atio
ns
2006
IBC
® a
nd A
ppen
dix
G [a
nnot
ated
with
200
7 Su
pple
men
t]
41 (7
) P
rohi
bit m
an-m
ade
alte
ratio
n of
san
d du
nes
and
man
grov
e st
ands
with
in Z
ones
V1-
30, V
E, a
nd
V o
n th
e co
mm
unity
’s F
IRM
whi
ch w
ould
incr
ease
po
tent
ial f
lood
dam
age.
App
endi
x G
103.
7 A
ltera
tions
in c
oast
al a
reas
. P
rior t
o is
suin
g a
perm
it fo
r any
alte
ratio
n of
san
d du
nes
and
man
grov
e st
ands
in fl
ood
haza
rd a
reas
sub
ject
to h
igh-
velo
city
wav
e ac
tion,
the
build
ing
offic
ial s
hall
requ
ire s
ubm
issi
on o
f an
engi
neer
ing
anal
ysis
whi
ch d
emon
stra
tes
that
the
prop
osed
alte
ratio
n w
ill n
ot
incr
ease
the
pote
ntia
l for
floo
d da
mag
e.
42 (8
) R
equi
re th
at m
anuf
actu
red
hom
es p
lace
d or
su
bsta
ntia
lly im
prov
ed w
ithin
Zon
es V
1-30
, V, a
nd
VE
on
the
com
mun
ity’s
FIR
M o
n si
tes
(i) O
utsi
de o
f a
man
ufac
ture
d ho
me
park
or s
ubdi
visi
on, (
ii) In
a
new
man
ufac
ture
d ho
me
park
or s
ubdi
visi
on, (
iii) I
n an
exp
ansi
on to
an
exis
ting
man
ufac
ture
d ho
me
park
or s
ubdi
visi
on, o
r (iv
) In
an e
xist
ing
man
ufac
ture
d ho
me
park
or s
ubdi
visi
on o
n w
hich
a
man
ufac
ture
d ho
me
has
incu
rred
“sub
stan
tial
dam
age”
as
the
resu
lt of
a fl
ood,
mee
t the
sta
ndar
ds
of p
arag
raph
s (e
)(2)
thro
ugh
(7) o
f thi
s se
ctio
n an
d th
at m
anuf
actu
red
hom
es p
lace
d or
sub
stan
tially
im
prov
ed o
n ot
her s
ites
in a
n ex
istin
g m
anuf
actu
red
hom
e pa
rk o
r sub
divi
sion
with
in Z
ones
VI-3
0, V
, and
V
E o
n th
e co
mm
unity
’s F
IRM
mee
t the
requ
irem
ents
of
par
agra
ph (c
)(12
) of t
his
sect
ion.
App
endi
x G
501.
Man
ufac
ture
d H
omes
. S
EE
BLO
CK
16
43 (9
) R
equi
re th
at re
crea
tiona
l veh
icle
s pl
aced
on
site
s w
ithin
Zon
es V
1-30
, V, a
nd V
E o
n th
e co
mm
unity
’s F
IRM
eith
er (i
) Be
on th
e si
te fo
r few
er
than
180
con
secu
tive
days
, (ii)
Be
fully
lice
nsed
and
re
ady
for h
ighw
ay u
se, o
r (iii
) Mee
t the
requ
irem
ents
in
par
agra
phs
(b)(
1) a
nd (e
) (2)
thro
ugh
(7) o
f thi
s se
ctio
n. A
recr
eatio
nal v
ehic
le is
read
y fo
r hig
hway
us
e if
it is
on
its w
heel
s or
jack
ing
syst
em, i
s at
tach
ed to
the
site
onl
y by
qui
ck d
isco
nnec
t typ
e ut
ilitie
s an
d se
curit
y de
vice
s, a
nd h
as n
o pe
rman
ently
atta
ched
add
ition
s.
App
endi
x G
601.
Rec
reat
iona
l Veh
icle
s. S
EE
BLO
CK
30
![Page 111: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/111.jpg)
pa
ge B
-30
IBC
Cro
ssw
alk
of th
e N
FIP
Reg
ulat
ions
to th
e Fl
ood
Res
ista
nce
Prov
isio
ns o
f the
IBC
®.
NFI
P R
egul
atio
ns
2006
IBC
® a
nd A
ppen
dix
G [a
nnot
ated
with
200
7 Su
pple
men
t] Se
c. 6
0.6
Var
ianc
e an
d ex
cept
ions
44 (a
) Th
e A
dmin
istra
tor d
oes
not s
et fo
rth a
bsol
ute
crite
ria fo
r gra
ntin
g va
rianc
es fr
om th
e cr
iteria
set
fo
rth in
Sec
s. 6
0.3,
60.
4, a
nd 6
0.5.
The
issu
ance
of
a va
rianc
e is
for f
lood
pla
in m
anag
emen
t pur
pose
s on
ly.
Insu
ranc
e pr
emiu
m ra
tes
are
dete
rmin
ed b
y st
atut
e ac
cord
ing
to a
ctua
rial r
isk
and
will
not
be
mod
ified
by
the
gran
ting
of a
var
ianc
e. T
he
com
mun
ity, a
fter e
xam
inin
g th
e ap
plic
ant’s
ha
rdsh
ips,
sha
ll ap
prov
e or
dis
appr
ove
a re
ques
t.
Whi
le th
e gr
antin
g of
var
ianc
es g
ener
ally
is li
mite
d to
a
lot s
ize
less
than
one
-hal
f acr
e (a
s se
t for
th in
pa
ragr
aph
(a)(
2) o
f thi
s se
ctio
n), d
evia
tions
from
that
lim
itatio
n m
ay o
ccur
. H
owev
er, a
s th
e lo
t siz
e in
crea
ses
beyo
nd o
ne-h
alf a
cre,
the
tech
nica
l ju
stifi
catio
n re
quire
d fo
r iss
uing
a v
aria
nce
incr
ease
s. T
he A
dmin
istra
tor m
ay re
view
a
com
mun
ity’s
find
ings
just
ifyin
g th
e gr
antin
g of
va
rianc
es, a
nd if
that
revi
ew in
dica
tes
a pa
ttern
in
cons
iste
nt w
ith th
e ob
ject
ives
of s
ound
floo
d pl
ain
man
agem
ent,
the
Adm
inis
trato
r may
take
ap
prop
riate
act
ion
unde
r Sec
. 59
.24(
b) o
f thi
s su
bcha
pter
.
App
endi
x G
105.
1 G
ener
al (V
aria
nces
). T
he b
oard
of a
ppea
ls e
stab
lishe
d pu
rsua
nt to
Sec
tion
112
shal
l he
ar a
nd d
ecid
e re
ques
ts fo
r var
ianc
es.
The
boar
d of
app
eals
sha
ll ba
se it
s de
term
inat
ion
on te
chni
cal
just
ifica
tions
, and
has
the
right
to a
ttach
suc
h co
nditi
ons
to v
aria
nces
as
it de
ems
nece
ssar
y to
furth
er th
e pu
rpos
es a
nd o
bjec
tives
of t
his
appe
ndix
and
Sec
tion
1612
. A
ppen
dix
G10
5.6
Con
side
ratio
ns.
In re
view
ing
appl
icat
ions
for v
aria
nces
, the
boa
rd o
f app
eals
sha
ll co
nsid
er a
ll te
chni
cal e
valu
atio
ns, a
ll re
leva
nt fa
ctor
s, a
ll ot
her p
ortio
ns o
f thi
s ap
pend
ix, a
nd th
e fo
llow
ing:
1.
Th
e da
nger
that
mat
eria
ls a
nd d
ebris
may
be
swep
t ont
o ot
her l
ands
resu
lting
in fu
rther
inju
ry o
r da
mag
e;
2.
The
dang
er to
life
and
pro
perty
due
to fl
oodi
ng o
r ero
sion
dam
age;
3.
Th
e su
scep
tibili
ty o
f the
pro
pose
d de
velo
pmen
t, in
clud
ing
cont
ents
, to
flood
dam
age
and
the
effe
ct
of s
uch
dam
age
on c
urre
nt a
nd fu
ture
ow
ners
; 4.
Th
e im
porta
nce
of th
e se
rvic
es p
rovi
ded
by th
e pr
opos
ed d
evel
opm
ent t
o th
e co
mm
unity
; 5.
Th
e av
aila
bilit
y of
alte
rnat
e lo
catio
ns fo
r the
pro
pose
d de
velo
pmen
t tha
t are
not
sub
ject
to fl
oodi
ng
or e
rosi
on;
6.
The
com
patib
ility
of t
he p
ropo
sed
deve
lopm
ent w
ith e
xist
ing
and
antic
ipat
ed d
evel
opm
ent;
7.
The
rela
tions
hip
of th
e pr
opos
ed d
evel
opm
ent t
o th
e co
mpr
ehen
sive
pla
n an
d flo
odpl
ain
man
agem
ent p
rogr
am fo
r tha
t are
a;
8.
The
safe
ty o
f acc
ess
to th
e pr
oper
ty in
tim
es o
f flo
od fo
r ord
inar
y an
d em
erge
ncy
vehi
cles
; 9.
Th
e ex
pect
ed h
eigh
ts, v
eloc
ity, d
urat
ion,
rate
of r
ise,
and
deb
ris a
nd s
edim
ent t
rans
port
of th
e flo
od
wat
ers
and
the
effe
cts
of w
ave
actio
n, if
app
licab
le, e
xpec
ted
at th
e si
te, a
nd;
10.
10.
The
cost
s of
pro
vidi
ng g
over
nmen
tal s
ervi
ces
durin
g an
d af
ter f
lood
con
ditio
ns in
clud
ing
mai
nten
ance
and
repa
ir of
pub
lic u
tiliti
es a
nd fa
cilit
ies
such
as
sew
er, g
as, e
lect
rical
, and
wat
er
syst
ems,
stre
ets
and
brid
ges.
45 V
aria
nces
may
be
issu
ed fo
r the
repa
ir or
re
habi
litat
ion
of h
isto
ric s
truct
ures
upo
n a
dete
rmin
atio
n th
at th
e pr
opos
ed re
pair
or
reha
bilit
atio
n w
ill n
ot p
recl
ude
the
stru
ctur
e’s
cont
inue
d de
sign
atio
n as
a h
isto
ric s
truct
ure
and
the
varia
nce
is th
e m
inim
um n
eces
sary
to p
rese
rve
the
hist
oric
cha
ract
er a
nd d
esig
n of
the
stru
ctur
e.
App
endi
x G
105.
3 H
isto
ric s
truc
ture
s. A
var
ianc
e is
aut
horiz
ed to
be
issu
ed fo
r the
repa
ir or
reha
bilit
atio
n of
a h
isto
ric s
truct
ure
upon
a d
eter
min
atio
n th
at th
e pr
opos
ed re
pair
or re
habi
litat
ion
will
not
pre
clud
e th
e st
ruct
ure’
s co
ntin
ued
desi
gnat
ion
as a
his
toric
stru
ctur
e, a
nd th
e va
rianc
e is
the
min
imum
nec
essa
ry to
pr
eser
ve th
e hi
stor
ic c
hara
cter
and
des
ign
of th
e st
ruct
ure.
Ex
cept
ion:
With
in fl
ood
haza
rd a
reas
, his
toric
stru
ctur
es th
at a
re n
ot:
1.
List
ed o
r pre
limin
arily
det
erm
ined
to b
e el
igib
le fo
r lis
ting
in th
e N
atio
nal R
egis
ter o
f His
toric
Pla
ces;
or
2.
D
eter
min
ed b
y th
e S
ecre
tary
of t
he U
.S. D
epar
tmen
t of I
nter
ior a
s co
ntrib
utin
g to
the
hist
oric
al
sign
ifica
nce
of a
regi
ster
ed h
isto
ric d
istri
ct o
r a d
istri
ct p
relim
inar
ily d
eter
min
ed to
qua
lify
as a
n hi
stor
ic d
istri
ct; o
r 3.
D
esig
nate
d as
his
toric
und
er a
sta
te o
r loc
al h
isto
ric p
rese
rvat
ion
prog
ram
that
is a
ppro
ved
by th
e D
epar
tmen
t of I
nter
ior.
![Page 112: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/112.jpg)
pa
ge B
-31
IBC
Cro
ssw
alk
of th
e N
FIP
Reg
ulat
ions
to th
e Fl
ood
Res
ista
nce
Prov
isio
ns o
f the
IBC
®.
NFI
P R
egul
atio
ns
2006
IBC
® a
nd A
ppen
dix
G [a
nnot
ated
with
200
7 Su
pple
men
t]
46 P
roce
dure
s fo
r the
gra
ntin
g of
var
ianc
es b
y a
com
mun
ity a
re a
s fo
llow
s:
(1) V
aria
nces
sha
ll no
t be
issu
ed b
y a
com
mun
ity
with
in a
ny d
esig
nate
d re
gula
tory
floo
dway
if a
ny
incr
ease
in fl
ood
leve
ls d
urin
g th
e ba
se fl
ood
disc
harg
e w
ould
resu
lt;
App
endi
x G
105.
5 R
estr
ictio
ns.
The
boar
d of
app
eals
sha
ll no
t iss
ue a
var
ianc
e fo
r any
pro
pose
d de
velo
pmen
t in
a flo
odw
ay if
any
incr
ease
in fl
ood
leve
ls w
ould
resu
lt du
ring
the
base
floo
d di
scha
rge.
47 (2
) V
aria
nces
may
be
issu
ed b
y a
com
mun
ity fo
r ne
w c
onst
ruct
ion
and
subs
tant
ial i
mpr
ovem
ents
to
be e
rect
ed o
n a
lot o
f one
-hal
f acr
e or
less
in s
ize
cont
iguo
us to
and
sur
roun
ded
by lo
ts w
ith e
xist
ing
stru
ctur
es c
onst
ruct
ed b
elow
the
base
floo
d le
vel,
in
conf
orm
ance
with
the
proc
edur
es o
f par
agra
phs
(a)
(3),
(4),
(5) a
nd (6
) of t
his
sect
ion;
App
endi
x G
105.
1 G
ener
al (V
aria
nces
). S
EE
BLO
CK
44
App
endi
x G
105.
6 C
onsi
dera
tions
. S
EE
BLO
CK
44
48 (3
) V
aria
nces
sha
ll on
ly b
e is
sued
by
a co
mm
unity
up
on:
(i)
a sh
owin
g of
goo
d an
d su
ffici
ent c
ause
, (ii
) a
dete
rmin
atio
n th
at fa
ilure
to g
rant
the
varia
nce
wou
ld re
sult
in e
xcep
tiona
l har
dshi
p to
th
e ap
plic
ant,
and
(ii
i) a
dete
rmin
atio
n th
at th
e gr
antin
g of
a v
aria
nce
will
not
resu
lt in
incr
ease
d flo
od h
eigh
ts,
addi
tiona
l thr
eats
to p
ublic
saf
ety,
ex
traor
dina
ry p
ublic
exp
ense
, cre
ate
nuis
ance
s, c
ause
frau
d on
or v
ictim
izat
ion
of
the
publ
ic, o
r con
flict
with
exi
stin
g lo
cal l
aws
or
ordi
nanc
es;
App
endi
x G
105.
7 C
ondi
tions
for i
ssua
nce.
Var
ianc
es s
hall
only
be
issu
ed b
y th
e bo
ard
of a
ppea
ls u
pon:
1.
A
tech
nica
l sho
win
g of
goo
d an
d su
ffici
ent c
ause
that
the
uniq
ue c
hara
cter
istic
s of
the
size
, co
nfig
urat
ion,
or t
opog
raph
y of
the
site
rend
ers
the
elev
atio
n st
anda
rds
inap
prop
riate
; and
2.
A
det
erm
inat
ion
that
failu
re to
gra
nt th
e va
rianc
e w
ould
resu
lt in
exc
eptio
nal h
ards
hip
by re
nder
ing
the
lot u
ndev
elop
able
; and
3.
A
det
erm
inat
ion
that
the
gran
ting
of a
var
ianc
e w
ill n
ot re
sult
in in
crea
sed
flood
hei
ghts
, add
ition
al
thre
ats
to p
ublic
saf
ety,
ext
raor
dina
ry p
ublic
exp
ense
, nor
cre
ate
nuis
ance
s, c
ause
frau
d on
or
vict
imiz
atio
n of
the
publ
ic, o
r con
flict
with
exi
stin
g lo
cal l
aws
or o
rdin
ance
s; a
nd
4.
A d
eter
min
atio
n th
at th
e va
rianc
e is
the
min
imum
nec
essa
ry, c
onsi
derin
g th
e flo
od h
azar
d, to
affo
rd
relie
f; an
d 5.
5.
Not
ifica
tion
to th
e ap
plic
ant i
n w
ritin
g ov
er th
e si
gnat
ure
of th
e bu
ildin
g of
ficia
l tha
t the
issu
ance
of
a va
rianc
e to
con
stru
ct a
stru
ctur
e be
low
the
base
floo
d le
vel w
ill re
sult
in in
crea
sed
prem
ium
rate
s fo
r flo
od in
sura
nce
up to
am
ount
s as
hig
h as
$25
for $
100
of in
sura
nce
cove
rage
, and
that
suc
h co
nstru
ctio
n be
low
the
base
floo
d le
vel i
ncre
ases
risk
s to
life
and
pro
perty
.
49 (4
) V
aria
nces
sha
ll on
ly b
e is
sued
upo
n a
dete
rmin
atio
n th
at th
e va
rianc
e is
the
min
imum
ne
cess
ary,
con
side
ring
the
flood
haz
ard,
to a
fford
re
lief;
App
endi
x G
105.
7 C
ondi
tions
for i
ssua
nce.
BLO
CK
48
![Page 113: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/113.jpg)
pa
ge B
-32
IBC
Cro
ssw
alk
of th
e N
FIP
Reg
ulat
ions
to th
e Fl
ood
Res
ista
nce
Prov
isio
ns o
f the
IBC
®.
NFI
P R
egul
atio
ns
2006
IBC
® a
nd A
ppen
dix
G [a
nnot
ated
with
200
7 Su
pple
men
t]
50 (5
) A
com
mun
ity s
hall
notif
y th
e ap
plic
ant i
n w
ritin
g ov
er th
e si
gnat
ure
of a
com
mun
ity o
ffici
al th
at
(i)
the
issu
ance
of a
var
ianc
e to
con
stru
ct a
st
ruct
ure
belo
w th
e ba
se fl
ood
leve
l will
resu
lt in
in
crea
sed
prem
ium
rate
s fo
r flo
od in
sura
nce
up
to a
mou
nts
as h
igh
as $
25 fo
r $10
0 of
in
sura
nce
cove
rage
and
(ii
) su
ch c
onst
ruct
ion
belo
w th
e ba
se fl
ood
leve
l in
crea
ses
risks
to li
fe a
nd p
rope
rty.
Suc
h no
tific
atio
n sh
all b
e m
aint
aine
d w
ith a
reco
rd o
f al
l var
ianc
e ac
tions
as
requ
ired
in p
arag
raph
(a
)(6)
of t
his
sect
ion;
and
App
endi
x G
105.
7 C
ondi
tions
for i
ssua
nce.
SE
E B
LOC
K 4
8
51 (6
) A
com
mun
ity s
hall
(i) m
aint
ain
a re
cord
of a
ll va
rianc
e ac
tions
, inc
ludi
ng ju
stifi
catio
n fo
r the
ir is
suan
ce, a
nd (i
i) re
port
such
var
ianc
es is
sued
in it
s an
nual
or b
ienn
ial r
epor
t sub
mitt
ed to
the
Adm
inis
trato
r.
App
endi
x G
105.
2 R
ecor
ds.
The
build
ing
offic
ial s
hall
mai
ntai
n a
perm
anen
t rec
ord
of a
ll va
rianc
e ac
tions
, in
clud
ing
just
ifica
tion
for t
heir
issu
ance
.
52 (7
) V
aria
nces
may
be
issu
ed b
y a
com
mun
ity fo
r ne
w c
onst
ruct
ion
and
subs
tant
ial i
mpr
ovem
ents
and
fo
r oth
er d
evel
opm
ent n
eces
sary
for t
he c
ondu
ct o
f a
func
tiona
lly d
epen
dent
use
pro
vide
d th
at
(i)
the
crite
ria o
f par
agra
phs
(a)(
1) th
roug
h (a
)(4)
of
this
sec
tion
are
met
, and
(ii
) th
e st
ruct
ure
or o
ther
dev
elop
men
t is
prot
ecte
d by
met
hods
that
min
imiz
e flo
od d
amag
es
durin
g th
e ba
se fl
ood
and
crea
te n
o ad
ditio
nal
thre
ats
to p
ublic
saf
ety.
App
endi
x G
105.
4 F
unct
iona
lly d
epen
dant
faci
litie
s. A
var
ianc
e is
aut
horiz
ed to
be
issu
ed fo
r the
co
nstru
ctio
n or
sub
stan
tial i
mpr
ovem
ent o
f a fu
nctio
nally
dep
enda
nt fa
cilit
y pr
ovid
ed th
e cr
iteria
in S
ectio
n 16
12.1
are
met
and
the
varia
nce
is th
e m
inim
um n
eces
sary
to a
llow
the
cons
truct
ion
or s
ubst
antia
l im
prov
emen
t, an
d th
at a
ll du
e co
nsid
erat
ion
has
been
giv
en to
met
hods
and
mat
eria
ls th
at m
inim
ize
flood
da
mag
es d
urin
g th
e de
sign
floo
d an
d cr
eate
no
addi
tiona
l thr
eats
to p
ublic
saf
ety.
![Page 114: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/114.jpg)
AAppppeennddiixx CC.. CCrroosssswwaallkk ooff tthhee NNFFIIPP RReegguullaattiioonnss ttoo tthhee FFlloooodd
RReessiissttaannccee PPrroovviissiioonnss ooff tthhee IIRRCC
Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes®: Meeting the Requirements of the NFIP C-1
![Page 115: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/115.jpg)
Pa
ge C
-3
IRC
Cro
ssw
alk
of th
e N
FIP
Reg
ulat
ions
to th
e Fl
ood
Res
ista
nce
Prov
isio
ns o
f the
IRC
®.
NFI
P R
egul
atio
ns
2006
IRC
® [
anno
tate
d w
ith 2
007
Supp
lem
ent]
Sec.
59.
1 D
efin
ition
s B
ASE
FLO
OD
. B
ase
flood
mea
ns th
e flo
od h
avin
g a
one
perc
ent c
hanc
e of
bei
ng e
qual
ed o
r exc
eede
d in
any
giv
en y
ear.
R30
1.2.
4 F
lood
plai
n co
nstr
uctio
n. S
EE
BLO
CK
3
Tabl
e R
301.
2(1)
Clim
atic
and
Geo
grap
hic
Des
ign
Crit
eria
. Fl
ood
Haz
ards
. S
EE
BLO
CK
3
R32
4.1.
3 E
stab
lishi
ng th
e de
sign
floo
d el
evat
ion.
SE
E B
LOC
K 1
2
BA
SEM
ENT.
Any
are
a of
the
build
ing
havi
ng it
s flo
or s
ubgr
ade
(bel
ow g
roun
d le
vel)
on a
ll si
des.
R
324.
1.4
Low
est f
loor
. S
EE
BLO
CK
28
R32
4.2.
1 [F
lood
haz
ard
area
s (in
clud
ing
A Z
ones
)] El
evat
ion
requ
irem
ents
. S
EE
BLO
CK
18
R32
4.3.
2 [C
oast
al fl
ood
haza
rd a
reas
(inc
ludi
ng V
Zon
es)]
Elev
atio
n re
quire
men
ts.
SE
E B
LOC
K 3
6 R
408.
5 [U
nder
-Flo
or S
pace
] Fin
ishe
d gr
ade.
SE
E B
LOC
K 1
8
DEV
ELO
PMEN
T. A
ny m
an-m
ade
chan
ge to
impr
oved
or
unim
prov
ed re
al e
stat
e, in
clud
ing
but n
ot li
mite
d to
bui
ldin
gs o
r ot
her s
truct
ures
, min
ing,
dre
dgin
g, fi
lling
, gra
ding
, pav
ing,
ex
cava
tion
or d
rillin
g op
erat
ions
or s
tora
ge o
f equ
ipm
ent o
r m
ater
ials
.
R10
1.2
Sco
pe.
R10
5.1
Per
mits
requ
ired.
R
105.
2 W
ork
exem
pt fr
om p
erm
it.
R10
5.3.
1.1
Sub
stan
tially
impr
oved
or s
ubst
antia
lly d
amag
ed e
xist
ing
build
ings
and
str
uctu
res
in a
reas
pr
one
to fl
oodi
ng.
SE
E B
LOC
K 4
EXIS
TIN
G C
ON
STR
UC
TIO
N (E
XIST
ING
STR
UC
TUR
ES).
For
th
e pu
rpos
es o
f det
erm
inin
g ra
tes,
stru
ctur
es fo
r whi
ch th
e “s
tart
of c
onst
ruct
ion”
com
men
ced
befo
re th
e ef
fect
ive
date
of t
he
FIR
M o
r bef
ore
Janu
ary
1, 1
975,
for F
IRM
s ef
fect
ive
befo
re th
at
date
. “E
xist
ing
cons
truct
ion”
may
als
o be
refe
rred
to a
s “e
xist
ing
stru
ctur
es.”
R10
2.7.
2 [E
xist
ing
Stru
ctur
es] A
dditi
ons,
alte
ratio
ns o
r rep
airs
. S
EE
BLO
CK
4
BU
ILD
ING
, EXI
STIN
G in
Cha
pter
2.
FLO
OD
OR
FLO
OD
ING
. (a
) A
gen
eral
and
tem
pora
ry c
ondi
tion
of p
artia
l or c
ompl
ete
inun
datio
n of
nor
mal
ly d
ry la
nd a
reas
from
:
(1
) The
ove
rflow
of i
nlan
d or
tida
l wat
ers.
(2) T
he u
nusu
al a
nd ra
pid
accu
mul
atio
n or
runo
ff of
su
rface
wat
ers
from
any
sou
rce.
[Gen
eral
usa
ge th
roug
hout
.]
FLO
OD
INSU
RA
NC
E R
ATE
MA
P (F
IRM
). A
n of
ficia
l map
of a
co
mm
unity
, on
whi
ch th
e A
dmin
istra
tor h
as d
elin
eate
d bo
th th
e sp
ecia
l haz
ard
area
s an
d th
e ris
k pr
emiu
m z
ones
app
licab
le to
th
e co
mm
unity
.
R30
1.2.
4 F
lood
plai
n co
nstr
uctio
n. E
xcep
tion.
SE
E B
LOC
K 3
Ta
ble
R30
1.2(
1) C
limat
ic a
nd G
eogr
aphi
c D
esig
n C
riter
ia.
Floo
d H
azar
ds.
SE
E B
LOC
K 3
FLO
OD
WA
Y –
See
REG
ULA
TOR
Y FL
OO
DW
AY.
R
301.
2.4
Flo
odpl
ain
cons
truc
tion.
Exc
eptio
n. S
EE
BLO
CK
3
Tabl
e R
301.
2(1)
Clim
atic
and
Geo
grap
hic
Des
ign
Crit
eria
. Fl
ood
Haz
ards
. S
EE
BLO
CK
3
HIG
HES
T A
DJA
CEN
T G
RA
DE.
The
hig
hest
nat
ural
ele
vatio
n of
the
grou
nd s
urfa
ce p
rior t
o co
nstru
ctio
n ne
xt to
the
prop
osed
w
alls
of a
stru
ctur
e.
R32
4.2.
1 [F
lood
haz
ard
area
s (in
clud
ing
A Z
ones
)] El
evat
ion
requ
irem
ents
. S
EE
BLO
CK
18
![Page 116: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/116.jpg)
Pa
ge C
-4
IRC
Cro
ssw
alk
of th
e N
FIP
Reg
ulat
ions
to th
e Fl
ood
Res
ista
nce
Prov
isio
ns o
f the
IRC
®.
NFI
P R
egul
atio
ns
2006
IRC
® [
anno
tate
d w
ith 2
007
Supp
lem
ent]
HIS
TOR
IC S
TRU
CTU
RE.
Any
stru
ctur
e th
at is
: (a
) Li
sted
indi
vidu
ally
in th
e N
atio
nal R
egis
ter o
f His
toric
P
lace
s (a
list
ing
mai
ntai
ned
by th
e D
epar
tmen
t of I
nter
ior)
or
pre
limin
arily
det
erm
ined
by
the
Sec
reta
ry o
f the
Inte
rior
as m
eetin
g th
e re
quire
men
ts fo
r ind
ivid
ual l
istin
g on
the
Nat
iona
l Reg
iste
r;
(b)
Cer
tifie
d or
pre
limin
arily
det
erm
ined
by
the
Sec
reta
ry o
f th
e In
terio
r as
cont
ribut
ing
to th
e hi
stor
ical
sig
nific
ance
of a
re
gist
ered
his
toric
dis
trict
or a
dis
trict
pre
limin
arily
de
term
ined
by
the
Sec
reta
ry to
qua
lify
as a
regi
ster
ed
hist
oric
dis
trict
; (c
) In
divi
dual
ly li
sted
on
a st
ate
inve
ntor
y of
his
toric
pla
ces
in
stat
es w
ith h
isto
ric p
rese
rvat
ion
prog
ram
s w
hich
hav
e be
en a
ppro
ved
by th
e S
ecre
tary
of t
he In
terio
r; or
(d
) In
divi
dual
ly li
sted
on
a lo
cal i
nven
tory
of h
isto
ric p
lace
s in
co
mm
uniti
es w
ith h
isto
ric p
rese
rvat
ion
prog
ram
s th
at h
ave
been
cer
tifie
d ei
ther
:
(1
) By
an a
ppro
ved
stat
e pr
ogra
m a
s de
term
ined
by
the
Sec
reta
ry o
f the
Inte
rior o
r
(2) D
irect
ly b
y th
e S
ecre
tary
of t
he In
terio
r in
stat
es w
ithou
t ap
prov
ed p
rogr
ams.
[Not
exp
licitl
y de
fined
; ref
er to
def
initi
on in
IBC
.]
LOW
EST
FLO
OR
. Th
e lo
wes
t flo
or o
f the
low
est e
nclo
sed
area
(in
clud
ing
base
men
t). A
n un
finis
hed
or fl
ood
resi
stan
t en
clos
ure,
usa
ble
sole
ly fo
r par
king
of v
ehic
les,
bui
ldin
g ac
cess
or
sto
rage
in a
n ar
ea o
ther
than
a b
asem
ent a
rea
is n
ot
cons
ider
ed a
bui
ldin
g’s
low
est f
loor
; Pro
vide
d, th
at s
uch
encl
osur
e is
not
bui
lt so
as
to re
nder
the
stru
ctur
e in
vio
latio
n of
th
e ap
plic
able
non
-ele
vatio
n de
sign
requ
irem
ents
of S
ec. 6
0.3.
R30
9.5
[Gar
ages
and
Car
port
s] F
lood
haz
ard
area
s. S
EE
BLO
CK
21
R32
4.1.
4 L
owes
t flo
or.
SE
E B
LOC
K 1
8
MA
NU
FAC
TUR
ED H
OM
E. A
stru
ctur
e, tr
ansp
orta
ble
in o
ne o
r m
ore
sect
ions
, whi
ch is
bui
lt on
a p
erm
anen
t cha
ssis
and
is
desi
gned
for u
se w
ith o
r with
out a
per
man
ent f
ound
atio
n w
hen
atta
ched
to th
e re
quire
d ut
ilitie
s. T
he te
rm “m
anuf
actu
red
hom
e” d
oes
not i
nclu
de a
“rec
reat
iona
l veh
icle
.”
Cha
pter
2,
MA
NU
FAC
TUR
ED H
OM
E.
App
endi
x E
Man
ufac
ture
d H
ousi
ng U
sed
as D
wel
lings
.
MA
NU
FAC
TUR
ED H
OM
E PA
RK
OR
SU
BD
IVIS
ION
. A
par
cel
(or c
ontig
uous
par
cels
) of l
and
divi
ded
into
two
or m
ore
man
ufac
ture
d ho
me
lots
for r
ent o
r sal
e.
[Sub
divi
sion
of l
and
not a
ddre
ssed
in IR
C; s
ee IB
C A
ppen
dix
G.]
![Page 117: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/117.jpg)
Pa
ge C
-5
IRC
Cro
ssw
alk
of th
e N
FIP
Reg
ulat
ions
to th
e Fl
ood
Res
ista
nce
Prov
isio
ns o
f the
IRC
®.
NFI
P R
egul
atio
ns
2006
IRC
® [
anno
tate
d w
ith 2
007
Supp
lem
ent]
REC
REA
TIO
NA
L VE
HIC
LE.
A v
ehic
le w
hich
is:
(a
) bu
ilt o
n a
sing
le c
hass
is;
(b)
400
squa
re fe
et o
r les
s w
hen
mea
sure
d at
the
larg
est
horiz
onta
l pro
ject
ion;
(c
) de
sign
ed to
be
self-
prop
elle
d or
per
man
ently
tow
able
by
a lig
ht d
uty
truck
; and
(d
) de
sign
ed p
rimar
ily n
ot fo
r use
as
a pe
rman
ent d
wel
ling
but
as te
mpo
rary
livi
ng q
uarte
rs fo
r rec
reat
iona
l, ca
mpi
ng,
trave
l, or
sea
sona
l use
.
R10
7 Te
mpo
rary
str
uctu
res
and
uses
.
REG
ULA
TOR
Y FL
OO
DW
AY.
The
cha
nnel
of a
rive
r or o
ther
w
ater
cour
se a
nd th
e ad
jace
nt la
nd a
reas
that
mus
t be
rese
rved
in
ord
er to
dis
char
ge th
e ba
se fl
ood
with
out c
umul
ativ
ely
incr
easi
ng th
e w
ater
sur
face
ele
vatio
n m
ore
than
a d
esig
nate
d he
ight
.
See
FLO
OD
WA
Y.
REM
EDY
A V
IOLA
TIO
N.
To b
ring
the
stru
ctur
e or
oth
er
deve
lopm
ent i
nto
com
plia
nce
with
Sta
te o
r loc
al fl
ood
plai
n m
anag
emen
t reg
ulat
ions
, or,
if th
is is
not
pos
sibl
e, to
redu
ce th
e im
pact
s of
its
nonc
ompl
ianc
e. W
ays
that
impa
cts
may
be
redu
ced
incl
ude
prot
ectin
g th
e st
ruct
ure
or o
ther
affe
cted
de
velo
pmen
t fro
m fl
ood
dam
ages
, im
plem
entin
g th
e en
forc
emen
t pro
visi
ons
of th
e or
dina
nce
or o
ther
wis
e de
terr
ing
futu
re s
imila
r vio
latio
ns, o
r red
ucin
g Fe
dera
l fin
anci
al e
xpos
ure
with
rega
rd to
the
stru
ctur
e or
oth
er d
evel
opm
ent.
R11
3 V
iola
tions
.
STR
UC
TUR
E. F
or fl
ood
plai
n m
anag
emen
t pur
pose
s, a
wal
led
and
roof
ed b
uild
ing,
incl
udin
g a
gas
or li
quid
sto
rage
tank
, tha
t is
prin
cipa
lly a
bove
gro
und,
as
wel
l as
a m
anuf
actu
red
hom
e.
“Stru
ctur
e” fo
r ins
uran
ce c
over
age
purp
oses
, mea
ns a
wal
led
and
roof
ed b
uild
ing,
oth
er th
an a
gas
or l
iqui
d st
orag
e ta
nk, t
hat
is p
rinci
pally
abo
ve g
roun
d an
d af
fixed
to a
per
man
ent s
ite, a
s w
ell a
s a
man
ufac
ture
d ho
me
on a
per
man
ent f
ound
atio
n. F
or
the
latte
r pur
pose
, the
term
incl
udes
a b
uild
ing
whi
le in
the
cour
se o
f con
stru
ctio
n, a
ltera
tion
or re
pair,
but
doe
s no
t inc
lude
bu
ildin
g m
ater
ials
or s
uppl
ies
inte
nded
for u
se in
suc
h co
nstru
ctio
n, a
ltera
tion
or re
pair,
unl
ess
such
mat
eria
ls o
r su
pplie
s ar
e w
ithin
an
encl
osed
bui
ldin
g on
the
prem
ises
.
R10
2.1
Sco
pe.
R10
5.2
Wor
k ex
empt
from
per
mit.
A
ppen
dix
E M
anuf
actu
red
Hou
sing
Use
d as
Dw
ellin
gs.
SUB
STA
NTI
AL
DA
MA
GE.
Dam
age
of a
ny o
rigin
sus
tain
ed b
y a
stru
ctur
e w
here
by th
e co
st o
f res
torin
g th
e st
ruct
ure
to it
s be
fore
dam
aged
con
ditio
n w
ould
equ
al o
r exc
eed
50 p
erce
nt o
f th
e m
arke
t val
ue o
f the
stru
ctur
e be
fore
the
dam
age
occu
rred
.
R10
5.3.
1.1
Sub
stan
tially
impr
oved
or s
ubst
antia
lly d
amag
ed e
xist
ing
build
ings
and
str
uctu
res
in a
reas
pr
one
to fl
oodi
ng.
SE
E B
LOC
K 4
![Page 118: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/118.jpg)
Pa
ge C
-6
IRC
Cro
ssw
alk
of th
e N
FIP
Reg
ulat
ions
to th
e Fl
ood
Res
ista
nce
Prov
isio
ns o
f the
IRC
®.
NFI
P R
egul
atio
ns
2006
IRC
® [
anno
tate
d w
ith 2
007
Supp
lem
ent]
SUB
STA
NTI
AL
IMPR
OVE
MEN
T. A
ny re
cons
truct
ion,
re
habi
litat
ion,
add
ition
, or o
ther
impr
ovem
ent o
f a s
truct
ure,
the
cost
of w
hich
equ
als
or e
xcee
ds 5
0 pe
rcen
t of t
he m
arke
t val
ue
of th
e st
ruct
ure
befo
re th
e “s
tart
of c
onst
ruct
ion”
of t
he
impr
ovem
ent.
Thi
s te
rm in
clud
es s
truct
ures
whi
ch h
ave
incu
rred
“sub
stan
tial d
amag
e”, r
egar
dles
s of
the
actu
al re
pair
wor
k pe
rform
ed.
The
term
doe
s no
t, ho
wev
er, i
nclu
de e
ither
:
(1)
Any
pro
ject
for i
mpr
ovem
ent o
f a s
truct
ure
to c
orre
ct
exis
ting
viol
atio
ns o
f sta
te o
r loc
al h
ealth
, san
itary
, or
safe
ty c
ode
spec
ifica
tions
whi
ch h
ave
been
iden
tifie
d by
th
e lo
cal c
ode
enfo
rcem
ent o
ffici
al a
nd w
hich
are
the
min
imum
nec
essa
ry to
ass
ure
safe
livi
ng c
ondi
tions
or
(2)
Any
alte
ratio
n of
a “h
isto
ric s
truct
ure”
, pro
vide
d th
at th
e al
tera
tion
will
not
pre
clud
e th
e st
ruct
ure’
s co
ntin
ued
desi
gnat
ion
as a
“his
toric
stru
ctur
e.”
R10
2.7.
1 [E
xist
ing
stru
ctur
es] A
dditi
ons,
alte
ratio
ns o
r rep
airs
. R
105.
3.1.
1 S
ubst
antia
lly im
prov
ed o
r sub
stan
tially
dam
aged
exi
stin
g bu
ildin
gs a
nd s
truc
ture
s in
are
as
pron
e to
floo
ding
. S
EE
BLO
CK
4
R10
8.3
Bui
ldin
g pe
rmit
valu
atio
ns.
VAR
IAN
CE.
A g
rant
of r
elie
f by
a co
mm
unity
from
the
term
s of
a
flood
pla
in m
anag
emen
t reg
ulat
ion.
R
104.
10.1
[M
odifi
catio
ns] A
reas
pro
ne to
floo
ding
. B
LOC
K 4
4 R
112.
2.2
Crit
eria
for i
ssua
nce
of a
var
ianc
e fo
r flo
od h
azar
d ar
eas.
SE
E B
LOC
K 4
7
VIO
LATI
ON
. Th
e fa
ilure
of a
stru
ctur
e or
oth
er d
evel
opm
ent t
o be
fully
com
plia
nt w
ith th
e co
mm
unity
’s fl
ood
plai
n m
anag
emen
t re
gula
tions
. A
stru
ctur
e or
oth
er d
evel
opm
ent w
ithou
t the
el
evat
ion
certi
ficat
e, o
ther
cer
tific
atio
ns, o
r oth
er e
vide
nce
of
com
plia
nce
requ
ired
in S
ec. 6
0.3(
b)(5
), (c
)(4)
, (c)
(10)
, (d)
(3),
(e)(
2), (
e)(4
), or
(e)(
5) is
pre
sum
ed to
be
in v
iola
tion
until
suc
h tim
e as
that
doc
umen
tatio
n is
pro
vide
d.
R11
3 V
iola
tions
.
Sec.
59.
22 [
This
sec
tion
outli
nes
actio
ns to
be
take
n by
com
mun
ities
to b
e el
igib
le fo
r the
Pro
gram
, inc
ludi
ng a
pplic
atio
n pr
oced
ures
, doc
umen
tatio
n re
quire
men
ts, a
nd a
co
mm
itmen
t to
fulfi
ll ce
rtain
func
tions
and
resp
onsi
bilit
ies.
]
1 (a
)(9)
(iii)
Mai
ntai
n fo
r pub
lic in
spec
tion
and
furn
ish
upon
requ
est c
ertif
icat
es o
f ele
vatio
n an
d ce
rtific
ates
of f
lood
proo
fing.
R
104.
7 D
epar
tmen
t rec
ords
.
2 (b
)(1)
App
oint
the
agen
cy o
r offi
cial
with
the
resp
onsi
bilit
y, a
utho
rity,
and
mea
ns to
impl
emen
t th
e co
mm
itmen
ts, i
nclu
ding
cer
tain
repo
rting
re
quire
men
ts.
R10
3 D
epar
tmen
t of B
uild
ing
Safe
ty.
R10
4 D
utie
s an
d Po
wer
s of
Cod
e O
ffici
al.
![Page 119: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/119.jpg)
Pa
ge C
-7
IRC
Cro
ssw
alk
of th
e N
FIP
Reg
ulat
ions
to th
e Fl
ood
Res
ista
nce
Prov
isio
ns o
f the
IRC
®.
NFI
P R
egul
atio
ns
2006
IRC
® [
anno
tate
d w
ith 2
007
Supp
lem
ent]
Sec.
60.
2 M
inim
um c
ompl
ianc
e w
ith fl
ood
plai
n m
anag
emen
t crit
eria
. [S
ectio
ns (a
) thr
ough
(c) p
erta
in to
mee
ting
spec
ific
crite
ria s
et fo
rth h
erei
n, a
s a
func
tion
of th
e ty
pe o
f flo
od-r
elat
ed h
azar
d an
d th
e le
vel o
f det
ail p
rovi
ded
on th
e flo
od h
azar
d m
ap p
repa
red
by F
EM
A.
Sec
tion
(e) p
rovi
des
for c
oord
inat
ion
with
Sta
te C
oord
inat
ing
Age
ncie
s w
ith re
spec
t to
subm
issi
on o
f reg
ulat
ions
for p
artic
ipat
ion
in th
e N
FIP
; Sec
tion
(f)
addr
esse
s th
e co
mm
unity
func
tion
to s
ubm
it re
ports
per
iodi
cally
, whe
n re
ques
ted;
and
Sec
tion
(g) d
irect
s co
mm
uniti
es to
ass
ure
that
thei
r com
preh
ensi
ve p
lans
are
con
sist
ent
with
floo
dpla
in m
anag
emen
t obj
ectiv
es.]
3 (h
) The
com
mun
ity s
hall
adop
t and
enf
orce
flo
odpl
ain
man
agem
ent r
egul
atio
ns b
ased
on
data
pr
ovid
ed b
y th
e A
dmin
istra
tor.
With
out p
rior
appr
oval
of t
he A
dmin
istra
tor,
the
com
mun
ity s
hall
not a
dopt
and
enf
orce
floo
dpla
in m
anag
emen
t re
gula
tions
bas
ed u
pon
mod
ified
dat
a re
flect
ing
natu
ral o
r man
-mad
e ch
ange
s.
R30
1.2.
4 F
lood
plai
n co
nstr
uctio
n. B
uild
ings
and
stru
ctur
es c
onst
ruct
ed in
who
le o
r in
part
in fl
ood
haza
rd
area
s (in
clud
ing
A o
r V Z
ones
) as
esta
blis
hed
in T
able
R30
1.2(
1) s
hall
be d
esig
ned
and
cons
truct
ed in
ac
cord
ance
with
Sec
tion
R32
4.
Exce
ptio
n: B
uild
ings
and
stru
ctur
es in
iden
tifie
d flo
odw
ays
esta
blis
hed
in T
able
R30
1.2(
1) s
hall
be d
esig
ned
and
cons
truct
ed in
acc
orda
nce
with
Flo
od R
esis
tant
Des
ign
and
Con
stru
ctio
n (A
SC
E 2
4).
Tabl
e R
301.
2(1)
Clim
atic
and
Geo
grap
hic
Des
ign
Crit
eria
. Fl
ood
Haz
ards
. Th
e ju
risdi
ctio
n sh
all f
ill in
this
pa
rt of
the
tabl
e w
ith (a
) the
dat
e of
the
juris
dict
ion’
s en
try in
to th
e N
atio
nal F
lood
Insu
ranc
e P
rogr
am (d
ate
of
adop
tion
of th
e fir
st c
ode
or o
rdin
ance
for m
anag
emen
t of f
lood
haz
ard
area
s), (
b) th
e da
tes(
s) o
f the
cur
rent
ly
effe
ctiv
e FI
RM
and
FB
FM, o
r oth
er fl
ood
haza
rd m
ap a
dopt
ed b
y th
e co
mm
unity
, as
may
be
amen
ded.
R
324.
1 G
ener
al.
Bui
ldin
gs a
nd s
truct
ures
con
stru
cted
in w
hole
or i
n pa
rt in
floo
d ha
zard
are
as (i
nclu
ding
A o
r V
Zon
es) a
s es
tabl
ishe
d in
Tab
le 3
01.2
(1) s
hall
be d
esig
ned
and
cons
truct
ed w
ith th
e pr
ovis
ions
in th
is s
ectio
n.
Exce
ptio
n: B
uild
ings
and
stru
ctur
es lo
cate
d in
who
le o
r in
part
in id
entif
ied
flood
way
s sh
all b
e de
sign
ed a
nd
cons
truct
ed in
acc
orda
nce
with
AS
CE
24.
Sec.
60.
3 F
lood
plai
n m
anag
emen
t crit
eria
for f
lood
-pro
ne a
reas
. (a
) Whe
n th
e A
dmin
istra
tor h
as n
ot d
efin
ed th
e sp
ecia
l flo
od h
azar
d ar
eas
with
in a
com
mun
ity, h
as n
ot p
rovi
ded
wat
er s
urfa
ce e
leva
tion
data
, and
has
not
pro
vide
d su
ffici
ent
data
to id
entif
y th
e flo
odw
ay o
r coa
stal
hig
h ha
zard
are
a, b
ut th
e co
mm
unity
has
indi
cate
d th
e pr
esen
ce o
f suc
h ha
zard
s by
sub
mitt
ing
an a
pplic
atio
n to
par
ticip
ate
in th
e P
rogr
am, t
he c
omm
unity
sha
ll:
4 co
ntin
ued
on n
ext
page
(1) R
equi
re p
erm
its fo
r all
prop
osed
con
stru
ctio
n or
ot
her d
evel
opm
ent,
incl
udin
g th
e pl
acem
ent o
f m
anuf
actu
red
hom
es, t
o de
term
ine
whe
ther
suc
h de
velo
pmen
t is
prop
osed
with
in fl
ood
haza
rd a
reas
;
R10
1.2
Sco
pe.
R10
2.7.
1 [E
xist
ing
stru
ctur
es] A
dditi
ons,
alte
ratio
ns o
r rep
airs
. A
dditi
ons,
alte
ratio
ns o
r rep
airs
to a
ny
stru
ctur
e sh
all c
onfo
rm to
that
requ
ired
for a
new
stru
ctur
e w
ithou
t req
uirin
g th
e ex
istin
g st
ruct
ure
to c
ompl
y w
ith a
ll of
the
requ
irem
ents
of t
his
code
, unl
ess
othe
rwis
e st
ated
. A
dditi
ons,
alte
ratio
ns o
r rep
airs
sha
ll no
t ca
use
an e
xist
ing
stru
ctur
e to
bec
ome
unsa
fe o
r adv
erse
ly a
ffect
the
perfo
rman
ce o
f the
bui
ldin
g.
R10
5.2
Wor
k ex
empt
from
per
mit.
R
105.
3.1.
1 S
ubst
antia
lly im
prov
ed o
r sub
stan
tially
dam
aged
exi
stin
g bu
ildin
gs a
nd s
truc
ture
s in
are
as
pron
e to
floo
ding
. Fo
r app
licat
ions
for r
econ
stru
ctio
n, re
habi
litat
ion,
add
ition
, or o
ther
impr
ovem
ent o
f exi
stin
g bu
ildin
gs o
r stru
ctur
es lo
cate
d in
an
area
pro
ne to
floo
ding
as
esta
blis
hed
by T
able
R30
1.2(
1), t
he b
uild
ing
offic
ial s
hall
exam
ine
or c
ause
to b
e ex
amin
ed th
e co
nstru
ctio
n do
cum
ents
and
sha
ll pr
epar
e a
findi
ng w
ith
rega
rd to
the
valu
e of
the
prop
osed
wor
k. F
or b
uild
ings
that
hav
e su
stai
ned
dam
age
of a
ny o
rigin
, the
val
ue o
f th
e pr
opos
ed w
ork
shal
l inc
lude
the
cost
to re
pair
the
build
ing
or s
truct
ure
to it
s pr
edam
age
cond
ition
. If
the
build
ing
offic
ial f
inds
that
the
valu
e of
pro
pose
d w
ork
equa
ls o
r exc
eeds
50
perc
ent o
f the
mar
ket v
alue
of t
he
build
ing
or s
truct
ure
befo
re th
e da
mag
e ha
s oc
curr
ed o
r the
impr
ovem
ent i
s st
arte
d, th
e fin
ding
sha
ll be
pr
ovid
ed to
the
boar
d of
app
eals
for a
det
erm
inat
ion
of s
ubst
antia
l im
prov
emen
t or s
ubst
antia
l dam
age.
A
pplic
atio
ns d
eter
min
ed b
y th
e bo
ard
of a
ppea
ls to
con
stitu
te s
ubst
antia
l im
prov
emen
t or s
ubst
antia
l dam
age
shal
l req
uire
all
exis
ting
porti
ons
of th
e en
tire
build
ing
or s
truct
ure
to m
eet t
he re
quire
men
ts o
f Sec
tion
R32
4.
![Page 120: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/120.jpg)
Pa
ge C
-8
IRC
Cro
ssw
alk
of th
e N
FIP
Reg
ulat
ions
to th
e Fl
ood
Res
ista
nce
Prov
isio
ns o
f the
IRC
®.
NFI
P R
egul
atio
ns
2006
IRC
® [
anno
tate
d w
ith 2
007
Supp
lem
ent]
4 co
ntin
ued
from
pr
evio
us
page
R
106.
1.3
Info
rmat
ion
for c
onst
ruct
ion
in a
reas
pro
ne to
floo
ding
. Fo
r bui
ldin
gs a
nd s
truct
ures
loca
ted
in
who
le o
r in
part
in fl
ood
haza
rd a
reas
as
esta
blis
hed
by T
able
R30
1.2(
1), c
onst
ruct
ion
docu
men
ts s
hall
incl
ude:
1.
Del
inea
tion
of fl
ood
haza
rd a
reas
, flo
odw
ay b
ound
arie
s, a
nd fl
ood
zone
s, a
nd th
e de
sign
floo
d el
evat
ion,
as
app
ropr
iate
; 2.
Th
e el
evat
ion
of th
e pr
opos
ed lo
wes
t flo
or, i
nclu
ding
bas
emen
t; in
are
as o
f sha
llow
floo
ding
(AO
zon
es),
the
heig
ht o
f the
pro
pose
d lo
wes
t flo
or, i
nclu
ding
bas
emen
t, ab
ove
the
high
est a
djac
ent f
inis
hed
grad
e;
3.
The
elev
atio
n of
the
botto
m o
f the
low
est h
oriz
onta
l stru
ctur
al m
embe
r in
coas
tal h
igh-
haza
rd a
reas
(V
Zone
); an
d 4.
If
desi
gn fl
ood
elev
atio
ns a
re n
ot in
clud
ed o
n th
e co
mm
unity
’s F
lood
Insu
ranc
e R
ate
Map
(FIR
M),
the
code
offi
cial
and
the
appl
ican
t sha
ll ob
tain
and
reas
onab
ly u
tiliz
e an
y de
sign
floo
d el
evat
ion
and
flood
way
da
ta a
vaila
ble
from
oth
er s
ourc
es.
R30
1.2.
4 F
lood
plai
n co
nstr
uctio
n. S
EE
BLO
CK
3
Tabl
e R
301.
2(1)
Clim
atic
and
Geo
grap
hic
Des
ign
Crit
eria
. Fl
ood
Haz
ards
.. S
EE
BLO
CK
3
R32
4.2
Flo
od h
azar
d ar
eas
(incl
udin
g A
Zon
es).
All
area
s th
at h
ave
been
det
erm
ined
to b
e pr
one
to
flood
ing
but n
ot s
ubje
ct to
hig
h-ve
loci
ty w
ave
actio
n sh
all b
e de
sign
ated
as
flood
haz
ard
area
s. A
ll bu
ildin
gs
and
stru
ctur
es c
onst
ruct
ed in
who
le o
r in
part
in fl
ood
haza
rd a
reas
sha
ll be
des
igne
d an
d co
nstru
cted
in
acco
rdan
ce w
ith S
ectio
ns R
324.
2.1
thro
ugh
R32
4.2.
3.
App
endi
x E
Man
ufac
ture
d H
ousi
ng, S
ectio
n A
E101
Sco
pe.
Exce
ptio
n: I
n ad
ditio
n to
thes
e pr
ovis
ions
, ne
w a
nd re
plac
emen
t man
ufac
ture
d ho
mes
to b
e lo
cate
d in
floo
d ha
zard
are
as a
s es
tabl
ishe
d by
Tab
le
R30
1.2(
1) o
f the
Inte
rnat
iona
l Res
iden
tial C
ode
shal
l mee
t the
app
licab
le re
quire
men
ts o
f Sec
tion
R32
4 of
the
Inte
rnat
iona
l Res
iden
tial C
ode.
A
ppen
dix
J E
xist
ing
Bui
ldin
gs a
nd S
truc
ture
s, S
ectio
n A
J102
.5 F
lood
haz
ard
area
s. W
ork
perfo
rmed
in
exis
ting
build
ings
loca
ted
in a
floo
d ha
zard
are
a as
est
ablis
hed
by T
able
301
.2(1
) sha
ll be
sub
ject
to th
e pr
ovis
ions
of R
105.
3.1.
1.
5 (2
) Rev
iew
pro
pose
d de
velo
pmen
t to
assu
re th
at a
ll ne
cess
ary
perm
its h
ave
been
rece
ived
from
oth
er
gove
rnm
enta
l age
ncie
s fro
m w
hich
app
rova
l is
requ
ired
by F
eder
al o
r Sta
te la
w, i
nclu
ding
sec
tion
404
of th
e Fe
dera
l Wat
er P
ollu
tion
Con
trol A
ct
Am
endm
ents
of 1
972,
33
U.S
.C. 1
334;
R10
5.3.
1 (P
erm
its) A
ctio
n on
app
licat
ion.
![Page 121: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/121.jpg)
Pa
ge C
-9
IRC
Cro
ssw
alk
of th
e N
FIP
Reg
ulat
ions
to th
e Fl
ood
Res
ista
nce
Prov
isio
ns o
f the
IRC
®.
NFI
P R
egul
atio
ns
2006
IRC
® [
anno
tate
d w
ith 2
007
Supp
lem
ent]
6 co
ntin
ued
on n
ext
page
(3)
Rev
iew
all
perm
it ap
plic
atio
ns to
det
erm
ine
whe
ther
pro
pose
d bu
ildin
g si
tes
will
be
reas
onab
ly
safe
from
floo
ding
. If
a pr
opos
ed b
uild
ing
site
is in
a
flood
-pro
ne a
rea,
all
new
con
stru
ctio
n an
d su
bsta
ntia
l im
prov
emen
ts s
hall:
(i)
be
des
igne
d (o
r mod
ified
) and
ade
quat
ely
anch
ored
to p
reve
nt fl
otat
ion,
col
laps
e, o
r la
tera
l mov
emen
t of t
he s
truct
ure
resu
lting
fro
m h
ydro
dyna
mic
and
hyd
rost
atic
load
s,
incl
udin
g th
e ef
fect
s of
buo
yanc
y,
(ii)
be c
onst
ruct
ed w
ith m
ater
ials
resi
stan
t to
flood
da
mag
e,
(iii)
be c
onst
ruct
ed b
y m
etho
ds a
nd p
ract
ices
that
m
inim
ize
flood
dam
ages
, and
(iv
) be
con
stru
cted
with
ele
ctric
al, h
eatin
g,
vent
ilatio
n, p
lum
bing
, and
air
cond
ition
ing
equi
pmen
t and
oth
er s
ervi
ce fa
cilit
ies
that
are
de
sign
ed a
nd/o
r loc
ated
so
as to
pre
vent
w
ater
from
ent
erin
g or
acc
umul
atin
g w
ithin
the
com
pone
nts
durin
g co
nditi
ons
of fl
oodi
ng.
R10
5.3.
1.1
Sub
stan
tially
impr
oved
or s
ubst
antia
lly d
amag
ed e
xist
ing
build
ings
and
str
uctu
res
in a
reas
pr
one
to fl
oodi
ng.
SE
E B
LOC
K 4
R
301.
1 D
esig
n. B
uild
ings
and
stru
ctur
es, a
nd a
ll pa
rts th
ereo
f, sh
all b
e co
nstru
cted
to s
uppo
rt sa
fely
all
load
s, in
clud
ing
dead
load
s, li
ve lo
ads,
roof
load
s, fl
ood
load
s, s
now
load
s, w
ind
load
s an
d se
ism
ic lo
ads
as
pres
crib
ed in
this
cod
e. T
he c
onst
ruct
ion
of b
uild
ings
and
stru
ctur
es s
hall
resu
lt in
a s
yste
m th
at p
rovi
des
a co
mpl
ete
load
pat
h ca
pabl
e of
tran
sfer
ring
all l
oads
from
thei
r poi
nt o
f orig
in th
roug
h th
e lo
ad-r
esis
ting
elem
ents
to th
e fo
unda
tion.
R
301.
2.4
Flo
odpl
ain
cons
truc
tion.
SE
E B
LOC
K 3
R
324.
1 [F
lood
Res
ista
nt C
onst
ruct
ion]
Gen
eral
. Ex
cept
ion.
[R
efer
s to
IBC
for f
lood
way
con
stru
ctio
n.)
SE
E B
LOC
K 3
R
324.
1.1
Str
uctu
ral s
yste
ms.
All
stru
ctur
al s
yste
ms
of a
ll bu
ildin
gs a
nd s
truct
ures
sha
ll be
des
igne
d,
conn
ecte
d an
d an
chor
ed to
resi
st fl
otat
ion,
col
laps
e or
per
man
ent l
ater
al m
ovem
ent d
ue to
stru
ctur
al lo
ads
and
stre
sses
from
floo
ding
equ
al to
the
desi
gn fl
ood
elev
atio
n.
R32
4.1.
2 F
lood
-res
ista
nt c
onst
ruct
ion.
All
build
ings
and
stru
ctur
es e
rect
ed in
are
as p
rone
to fl
oodi
ng s
hall
be c
onst
ruct
ed b
y m
etho
ds a
nd p
ract
ices
that
min
imiz
e flo
od d
amag
e.
R32
4.1.
5 Pr
otec
tion
of m
echa
nica
l, pl
umbi
ng a
nd e
lect
rical
sys
tem
s. E
lect
rical
sys
tem
s, e
quip
men
t and
co
mpo
nent
s, a
nd h
eatin
g, v
entil
atin
g, a
ir co
nditi
onin
g, a
nd p
lum
bing
app
lianc
es, p
lum
bing
fixt
ures
, duc
t sy
stem
s, a
nd o
ther
ser
vice
equ
ipm
ent s
hall
be lo
cate
d at
or a
bove
the
desi
gn fl
ood
elev
atio
n. I
f rep
lace
d as
pa
rt of
a s
ubst
antia
l im
prov
emen
t, el
ectri
cal s
yste
ms,
equ
ipm
ent a
nd c
ompo
nent
s, a
nd h
eatin
g, v
entil
atio
n, a
ir co
nditi
onin
g, a
nd p
lum
bing
app
lianc
es, p
lum
bing
fixt
ures
, duc
t sys
tem
s, a
nd o
ther
ser
vice
equ
ipm
ent s
hall
mee
t the
requ
irem
ents
of t
his
sect
ion.
Sys
tem
s, fi
xtur
es, a
nd e
quip
men
t and
com
pone
nts
shal
l not
be
mou
nted
on
or p
enet
rate
thro
ugh
wal
ls in
tend
ed to
bre
ak a
way
und
er fl
ood
load
s.
Exce
ptio
n: E
lect
rical
sys
tem
s, e
quip
men
t and
com
pone
nts,
and
hea
ting,
ven
tilat
ing,
air
cond
ition
ing,
and
pl
umbi
ng a
pplia
nces
, plu
mbi
ng fi
xtur
es, d
uct s
yste
ms,
and
oth
er s
ervi
ce e
quip
men
t are
per
mitt
ed to
be
loca
ted
belo
w th
e de
sign
floo
d el
evat
ion
prov
ided
that
they
are
des
igne
d an
d in
stal
led
to p
reve
nt w
ater
fro
m e
nter
ing
or a
ccum
ulat
ing
with
in th
e co
mpo
nent
s an
d to
resi
st h
ydro
stat
ic a
nd h
ydro
dyna
mic
load
s an
d st
ress
es, i
nclu
ding
the
effe
cts
of b
uoya
ncy,
dur
ing
the
occu
rren
ce o
f flo
odin
g to
the
desi
gn fl
ood
elev
atio
n in
com
plia
nce
with
the
flood
-res
ista
nt c
onst
ruct
ion
requ
irem
ents
of A
SC
E 2
4. E
lect
rical
wiri
ng s
yste
ms
are
perm
itted
to b
e lo
cate
d be
low
the
desi
gn fl
ood
elev
atio
n pr
ovid
ed th
ey c
onfo
rm to
the
prov
isio
ns o
f the
el
ectri
cal p
art o
f thi
s co
de fo
r wet
loca
tions
.
![Page 122: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/122.jpg)
Pa
ge C
-10
IRC
Cro
ssw
alk
of th
e N
FIP
Reg
ulat
ions
to th
e Fl
ood
Res
ista
nce
Prov
isio
ns o
f the
IRC
®.
NFI
P R
egul
atio
ns
2006
IRC
® [
anno
tate
d w
ith 2
007
Supp
lem
ent]
6 co
ntin
ued
from
pr
evio
us
page
co
ntin
ued
on n
ext
page
R
324.
1.7
Flo
od-r
esis
tant
mat
eria
ls.
Bui
ldin
g m
ater
ials
use
d be
low
the
desi
gn fl
ood
elev
atio
n sh
all c
ompl
y w
ith th
e fo
llow
ing:
1.
A
ll w
ood,
incl
udin
g flo
or s
heat
hing
, sha
ll be
pre
ssur
e pr
eser
vativ
ely
treat
ed in
acc
orda
nce
with
AW
PA
U1
for t
he s
peci
es, p
rodu
ct, p
rese
rvat
ive
and
end
use
or th
e de
cay-
resi
stan
t hea
rtwoo
d or
redw
ood,
bla
ck
locu
st, o
r ced
ars.
Pre
serv
ativ
es s
hall
conf
orm
to A
WP
A P
1/13
, P2,
P3
or P
5.
2.
Mat
eria
ls a
nd in
stal
latio
n m
etho
ds u
sed
for f
loor
ing
and
inte
rior a
nd e
xter
ior w
alls
and
wal
l cov
erin
gs s
hall
conf
orm
to th
e pr
ovis
ions
of F
EM
A/F
IA-T
B-2
. R
324.
2.3
Fou
ndat
ion
desi
gn a
nd c
onst
ruct
ion.
Fou
ndat
ion
wal
ls fo
r all
build
ings
and
stru
ctur
es e
rect
ed in
flo
od h
azar
d ar
eas
shal
l mee
t the
requ
irem
ents
of C
hapt
er 4
. Ex
cept
ion:
Unl
ess
desi
gned
in a
ccor
danc
e w
ith S
ectio
n 40
4.
1.
The
unsu
ppor
ted
heig
ht o
f 6 in
ches
(152
mm
) pla
in m
ason
ry w
alls
sha
ll be
no
grea
ter t
han
3 fe
et
(914
mm
). 2.
Th
e un
supp
orte
d he
ight
of 8
inch
es (2
03 m
m) p
lain
mas
onry
wal
ls s
hall
be n
o gr
eate
r tha
n 4
feet
(1
219
mm
). 3.
Th
e un
supp
orte
d he
ight
of 8
inch
es (2
03 m
m) r
einf
orce
d m
ason
ry w
alls
sha
ll be
no
grea
ter t
han
8 fe
et (2
438
mm
). Fo
r the
pur
pose
of t
his
exce
ptio
n, u
nsup
porte
d he
ight
is th
e di
stan
ce fr
om th
e fin
ishe
d gr
ade
to th
e un
der-
floor
spa
ce a
nd th
e to
p of
the
wal
l. R
401.
1 [F
ound
atio
ns] A
pplic
atio
n. T
he p
rovi
sion
s of
this
cha
pter
sha
ll co
ntro
l the
des
ign
and
cons
truct
ion
of th
e fo
unda
tion
and
foun
datio
n sp
aces
for a
ll bu
ildin
gs.
In a
dditi
on to
the
prov
isio
ns o
f thi
s ch
apte
r, th
e de
sign
and
con
stru
ctio
n of
foun
datio
ns in
are
as p
rone
to fl
oodi
ng a
s es
tabl
ishe
d by
Tab
le R
301.
2(1)
sha
ll m
eet
the
prov
isio
ns o
f Sec
tion
R32
4.
M14
01.5
Flo
od h
azar
d.
In a
reas
pro
ne to
floo
ding
as
esta
blis
hed
by T
able
R30
1.2(
1), h
eatin
g an
d co
olin
g eq
uipm
ent a
nd a
pplia
nces
sha
ll be
loca
ted
or in
stal
led
in a
ccor
danc
e w
ith S
ectio
n R
324.
1.5
M16
01.3
.8 F
lood
haz
ard
area
s. I
n ar
eas
pron
e to
floo
ding
as
esta
blis
hed
by T
able
R30
1.2(
1), d
uct s
yste
ms
shal
l be
loca
ted
or in
stal
led
in a
ccor
danc
e w
ith S
ectio
n R
324.
1.5
M17
01.6
[C
ombu
stio
n ai
r] O
peni
ng lo
catio
n. I
n ar
eas
pron
e to
floo
ding
as
esta
blis
hed
by T
able
R30
1.2(
1),
open
ings
sha
ll be
loca
ted
at o
r abo
ve th
e de
sign
floo
d el
evat
ion
esta
blis
hed
in S
ectio
n R
324.
M
2001
.3 F
lood
resi
stan
t ins
talla
tion.
In
area
s pr
one
to fl
oodi
ng a
s es
tabl
ishe
d in
Tab
le R
301.
2(1)
, boi
lers
, w
ater
hea
ters
, and
thei
r con
trol s
yste
ms
shal
l be
loca
ted
or in
stal
led
in a
ccor
danc
e w
ith S
ectio
n R
324.
1.5.
![Page 123: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/123.jpg)
Pa
ge C
-11
IRC
Cro
ssw
alk
of th
e N
FIP
Reg
ulat
ions
to th
e Fl
ood
Res
ista
nce
Prov
isio
ns o
f the
IRC
®.
NFI
P R
egul
atio
ns
2006
IRC
® [
anno
tate
d w
ith 2
007
Supp
lem
ent]
6 co
ntin
ued
from
pr
evio
us
page
G24
04.7
(301
.11)
Flo
od h
azar
d. F
or s
truct
ures
loca
ted
in fl
ood
haza
rd a
reas
, the
app
lianc
e, e
quip
men
t and
sy
stem
inst
alla
tions
regu
late
d by
this
cod
e sh
all b
e lo
cate
d or
inst
alle
d at
or a
bove
the
desi
gn fl
ood
elev
atio
n an
d sh
all c
ompl
y w
ith th
e flo
od-r
esis
tant
con
stru
ctio
n re
quire
men
t of S
ectio
n R
324.
Ex
cept
ion:
The
app
lianc
e, e
quip
men
t and
sys
tem
inst
alla
tions
regu
late
d by
this
cod
e ar
e pe
rmitt
ed to
be
loca
ted
belo
w th
e de
sign
floo
d el
evat
ion
prov
ided
that
they
are
des
igne
d an
d in
stal
led
to p
reve
nt w
ater
fro
m e
nter
ing
or a
ccum
ulat
ing
with
in th
e co
mpo
nent
s an
d to
resi
st h
ydro
stat
ic a
nd h
ydro
dyna
mic
load
s an
d st
ress
es, i
nclu
ding
the
effe
cts
of b
uoya
ncy,
dur
ing
the
occu
rren
ce o
f flo
odin
g to
the
desi
gn fl
ood
elev
atio
n an
d sh
all c
ompl
y w
ith th
e flo
od-r
esis
tant
con
stru
ctio
n re
quire
men
ts o
f Sec
tion
R32
4.
M22
01.6
Flo
od re
sist
ant i
nsta
llatio
n.
In a
reas
pro
ne to
floo
ding
as
esta
blis
hed
by T
able
R30
1.2(
1), t
anks
sh
all b
e in
stal
led
at o
r abo
ve th
e de
sign
floo
d el
evat
ion
esta
blis
hed
in S
ectio
n R
324
or s
hall
be a
ncho
red
to
prev
ent f
lota
tion,
col
laps
e an
d la
tera
l mov
emen
t und
er c
ondi
tions
of t
he d
esig
n flo
od.
G24
04.7
(301
.11)
Flo
od h
azar
d. F
or s
truct
ures
loca
ted
in a
reas
pro
ne to
floo
ding
as
esta
blis
hed
by T
able
R
301.
2(1)
, the
app
lianc
e, e
quip
men
t and
sys
tem
inst
alla
tions
regu
late
d by
this
cod
e sh
all b
e lo
cate
d or
in
stal
led
in a
ccor
danc
e w
ith S
ectio
n R
324.
1.5.
P2
601.
3 F
lood
haz
ard
area
. In
are
as p
rone
to fl
oodi
ng a
s es
tabl
ishe
d by
Tab
le R
301.
2(1)
, plu
mbi
ng fi
xtur
es,
drai
ns, a
nd a
pplia
nces
sha
ll be
loca
ted
or in
stal
led
in a
ccor
danc
e w
ith S
ectio
n R
324.
1.5.
P2
705.
1 G
ener
al.
7.
In
area
s pr
one
to fl
oodi
ng a
s es
tabl
ishe
d by
Tab
le R
301.
2(1)
, plu
mbi
ng fi
xtur
es s
hall
be lo
cate
d or
inst
alle
d in
acc
orda
nce
with
Sec
tion
R32
4.1.
5.
P300
1.3
Flo
od re
sist
ant i
nsta
llatio
n. I
n ar
eas
pron
e to
floo
ding
as
esta
blis
hed
by T
able
R30
1.2(
1), d
rain
age
was
te a
nd v
ent s
yste
ms
shal
l be
loca
ted
and
inst
alle
d to
pre
vent
infil
tratio
n of
floo
dwat
ers
into
the
syst
ems
and
disc
harg
es fr
om th
e sy
stem
s in
to fl
oodw
ater
s.
P310
1.5
Flo
od re
sist
ance
. In
are
as p
rone
to fl
oodi
ng a
s es
tabl
ishe
d by
Tab
le R
301.
2(1)
, ven
ts s
hall
be
loca
ted
at o
r abo
ve th
e de
sign
floo
d el
evat
ion
esta
blis
hed
in S
ec. R
324.
A
ppen
dix
E M
anuf
actu
red
Hou
sing
, Sec
tion
AE5
02.3
Foo
tings
and
foun
datio
ns.
Pie
rs a
nd b
earin
g w
alls
sh
all b
e su
ppor
ted
on m
ason
ry o
r con
cret
e fo
unda
tions
or p
iles
or o
ther
app
rove
d fo
unda
tion
syst
ems
whi
ch
shal
l be
of s
uffic
ient
cap
acity
to s
uppo
rt al
l loa
ds.
![Page 124: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/124.jpg)
Pa
ge C
-12
IRC
Cro
ssw
alk
of th
e N
FIP
Reg
ulat
ions
to th
e Fl
ood
Res
ista
nce
Prov
isio
ns o
f the
IRC
®.
NFI
P R
egul
atio
ns
2006
IRC
® [
anno
tate
d w
ith 2
007
Supp
lem
ent]
7 (4
) Rev
iew
sub
divi
sion
pro
posa
ls a
nd o
ther
pr
opos
ed n
ew d
evel
opm
ent,
incl
udin
g m
anuf
actu
red
hom
e pa
rks
or s
ubdi
visi
ons,
to
dete
rmin
e w
heth
er s
uch
prop
osal
s w
ill b
e re
ason
ably
saf
e fro
m fl
oodi
ng.
If a
subd
ivis
ion
prop
osal
or o
ther
pro
pose
d ne
w d
evel
opm
ent i
s in
a
flood
-pro
ne a
rea,
any
suc
h pr
opos
als
shal
l be
revi
ewed
to a
ssur
e th
at:
(i)
all s
uch
prop
osal
s ar
e co
nsis
tent
with
the
need
to m
inim
ize
flood
dam
age
with
in th
e flo
od-p
rone
are
a,
(ii)
all p
ublic
util
ities
and
faci
litie
s, s
uch
as s
ewer
, ga
s, e
lect
rical
, and
wat
er s
yste
ms
are
loca
ted
and
cons
truct
ed to
min
imiz
e or
elim
inat
e flo
od
dam
age,
and
(ii
i) ad
equa
te d
rain
age
is p
rovi
ded
to re
duce
ex
posu
re to
floo
d ha
zard
s;
[Sub
divi
sion
of l
and
not a
ddre
ssed
in IR
C; s
ee IB
C A
ppen
dix
G.]
R32
4.1.
6 P
rote
ctio
n of
wat
er s
uppl
y an
d sa
nita
ry s
ewag
e sy
stem
s. N
ew a
nd re
plac
emen
t wat
er s
uppl
y sy
stem
s sh
all b
e de
sign
ed to
min
imiz
e or
elim
inat
e in
filtra
tion
of fl
ood
wat
ers
into
the
syst
ems
in a
ccor
danc
e w
ith th
e pl
umbi
ng p
rovi
sion
s of
this
cod
e. N
ew a
nd re
plac
emen
t san
itary
sew
age
syst
ems
shal
l be
desi
gned
to
min
imiz
e or
elim
inat
e in
filtra
tion
of fl
oodw
ater
s in
to s
yste
ms
and
disc
harg
es fr
om s
yste
ms
into
floo
dwat
ers
in
acco
rdan
ce w
ith th
e pl
umbi
ng p
rovi
sion
s of
this
cod
e an
d C
hapt
er 3
of t
he In
tern
atio
nal P
rivat
e S
ewag
e D
ispo
sal C
ode.
8 (5
) Req
uire
with
in fl
ood-
pron
e ar
eas
new
and
re
plac
emen
t wat
er s
uppl
y sy
stem
s to
be
desi
gned
to
min
imiz
e or
elim
inat
e in
filtra
tion
of fl
ood
wat
ers
into
the
syst
ems;
and
R32
4.1.
6 P
rote
ctio
n of
wat
er s
uppl
y an
d sa
nita
ry s
ewag
e sy
stem
s. S
EE
BLO
CK
7
P260
2.2
Flo
od re
sist
ant i
nsta
llatio
n. I
n ar
eas
pron
e to
floo
ding
as
esta
blis
hed
by T
able
R30
1.2(
1):
1.
Wat
er-s
uppl
y sy
stem
s sh
all b
e de
sign
ed a
nd c
onst
ruct
ed to
pre
vent
infil
tratio
n of
floo
dwat
ers.
2.
P
ipes
for s
ewag
e di
spos
al s
yste
ms
shal
l be
desi
gned
and
con
stru
cted
to p
reve
nt in
filtra
tion
of
flood
wat
ers
into
the
syst
ems
and
disc
harg
es fr
om th
e sy
stem
s in
to fl
oodw
ater
s.
9 (6
) Req
uire
with
in fl
ood-
pron
e ar
eas:
(i)
ne
w a
nd re
plac
emen
t san
itary
sew
age
syst
ems
to b
e de
sign
ed to
min
imiz
e or
el
imin
ate
infil
tratio
n of
floo
d w
ater
s in
to th
e sy
stem
s an
d di
scha
rges
from
the
syst
ems
into
flo
od w
ater
s an
d
(ii)
onsi
te w
aste
dis
posa
l sys
tem
s to
be
loca
ted
to
avoi
d im
pairm
ent t
o th
em o
r con
tam
inat
ion
from
them
dur
ing
flood
ing.
R32
4.1.
6 P
rote
ctio
n of
wat
er s
uppl
y an
d sa
nita
ry s
ewag
e sy
stem
s. S
EE
BLO
CK
7
![Page 125: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/125.jpg)
Pa
ge C
-13
IRC
Cro
ssw
alk
of th
e N
FIP
Reg
ulat
ions
to th
e Fl
ood
Res
ista
nce
Prov
isio
ns o
f the
IRC
®.
NFI
P R
egul
atio
ns
2006
IRC
® [
anno
tate
d w
ith 2
007
Supp
lem
ent]
(b) W
hen
the
Adm
inis
trato
r has
des
igna
ted
area
s of
spe
cial
floo
d ha
zard
s (A
zon
es) b
y th
e pu
blic
atio
n of
a c
omm
unity
’s F
HB
M o
r FIR
M, b
ut h
as n
eith
er p
rodu
ced
wat
er s
urfa
ce
elev
atio
n da
ta n
or id
entif
ied
a flo
odw
ay o
r coa
stal
hig
h ha
zard
are
a, th
e co
mm
unity
sha
ll:
10 (1
) R
equi
re p
erm
its fo
r all
prop
osed
con
stru
ctio
n an
d ot
her d
evel
opm
ents
incl
udin
g th
e pl
acem
ent o
f m
anuf
actu
red
hom
es, w
ithin
Zon
e A
on
the
com
mun
ity’s
FH
BM
or F
IRM
; (2
) Req
uire
the
appl
icat
ion
of th
e st
anda
rds
in
para
grap
hs (a
) (2)
, (3)
, (4)
, (5)
and
(6) o
f thi
s se
ctio
n to
dev
elop
men
t with
in Z
one
A o
n th
e co
mm
unity
’s F
HB
M o
r FIR
M;
[Prio
r pro
visi
ons
cum
ulat
ive.
]
11 (3
) Req
uire
that
all
new
sub
divi
sion
pro
posa
ls a
nd
othe
r pro
pose
d de
velo
pmen
ts (i
nclu
ding
pro
posa
ls
for m
anuf
actu
red
hom
e pa
rks
and
subd
ivis
ions
) gr
eate
r tha
n 50
lots
or 5
acr
es, w
hich
ever
is th
e le
sser
, inc
lude
with
in s
uch
prop
osal
s ba
se fl
ood
elev
atio
n da
ta;
[Sub
divi
sion
of l
and
not a
ddre
ssed
in IR
C; s
ee IB
C A
ppen
dix
G.]
12 (4
) Obt
ain,
revi
ew a
nd re
ason
ably
util
ize
any
base
flo
od e
leva
tion
and
flood
way
dat
a av
aila
ble
from
a
Fede
ral,
Sta
te, o
r oth
er s
ourc
e, in
clud
ing
data
de
velo
ped
purs
uant
to p
arag
raph
(b)(
3) o
f thi
s se
ctio
n, a
s cr
iteria
for r
equi
ring
that
new
co
nstru
ctio
n, s
ubst
antia
l im
prov
emen
ts, o
r oth
er
deve
lopm
ent i
n Zo
ne A
on
the
com
mun
ity’s
FH
BM
or
FIR
M m
eet t
he s
tand
ards
in p
arag
raph
s (c
)(2)
, (c
)(3),
(c)(
5), (
c)(6
), (c
)(12
), (c
)(14)
, (d)
(2) a
nd
(d)(3
) of t
his
sect
ion;
R10
6.1.
3(3)
Inf
orm
atio
n fo
r con
stru
ctio
n in
are
as p
rone
to fl
oodi
ng.
SE
E B
LOC
K 4
R
324.
1.3
Esta
blis
hing
the
desi
gn fl
ood
elev
atio
n. T
he d
esig
n flo
od e
leva
tion
shal
l be
used
to d
efin
e ar
eas
pron
e to
floo
ding
, and
sha
ll de
scrib
e, a
t a m
inim
um, t
he b
ase
flood
ele
vatio
n at
the
dept
h of
pea
k el
evat
ion
of
flood
ing
(incl
udin
g w
ave
heig
ht) w
hich
has
a 1
per
cent
(100
–yea
r flo
od) o
r gre
ater
cha
nce
of b
eing
equ
aled
or
exce
eded
in a
ny g
iven
yea
r. R
324.
1.3.
1 D
eter
min
atio
n of
des
ign
flood
ele
vatio
ns.
If de
sign
floo
d el
evat
ions
are
not
spe
cifie
d, th
e bu
ildin
g of
ficia
l is
auth
oriz
ed to
requ
ire th
e ap
plic
ant t
o:
1.
Obt
ain
and
reas
onab
ly u
tiliz
e da
ta a
vaila
ble
from
a fe
dera
l, st
ate
or o
ther
sou
rce,
or
2.
D
eter
min
e th
e de
sign
floo
d el
evat
ion
in a
ccor
danc
e w
ith a
ccep
ted
hydr
olog
ic a
nd h
ydra
ulic
en
gine
erin
g pr
actic
es u
sed
to d
efin
e sp
ecia
l flo
od h
azar
d ar
eas.
Det
erm
inat
ions
sha
ll be
und
erta
ken
by a
regi
ster
ed d
esig
n pr
ofes
sion
al w
ho s
hall
docu
men
t tha
t the
tech
nica
l met
hods
use
d re
flect
cu
rren
tly a
ccep
ted
engi
neer
ing
prac
tice.
Stu
dies
, ana
lyse
s, a
nd c
ompu
tatio
ns s
hall
be s
ubm
itted
in
suffi
cien
t det
ail t
o al
low
thor
ough
revi
ew a
nd a
ppro
val.
R
324.
1.3.
2 D
eter
min
atio
n of
impa
cts.
In
river
ine
flood
haz
ard
area
s w
here
des
ign
flood
ele
vatio
ns a
re
spec
ified
but
floo
dway
s ha
ve n
ot b
een
desi
gnat
ed, t
he a
pplic
ant s
hall
dem
onst
rate
that
the
effe
ct o
f the
pr
opos
ed b
uild
ings
and
stru
ctur
es o
n de
sign
floo
d el
evat
ions
, inc
ludi
ng fi
ll, w
hen
com
bine
d w
ith a
ll ot
her
exis
ting
and
antic
ipat
ed fl
ood
haza
rd a
rea
encr
oach
men
ts, w
ill n
ot in
crea
se th
e de
sign
floo
d el
evat
ion
mor
e th
an o
ne fo
ot a
t any
poi
nt w
ithin
the
juris
dict
ion.
![Page 126: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/126.jpg)
Pa
ge C
-14
IRC
Cro
ssw
alk
of th
e N
FIP
Reg
ulat
ions
to th
e Fl
ood
Res
ista
nce
Prov
isio
ns o
f the
IRC
®.
NFI
P R
egul
atio
ns
2006
IRC
® [
anno
tate
d w
ith 2
007
Supp
lem
ent]
13 (5
) Whe
re b
ase
flood
ele
vatio
n da
ta a
re u
tiliz
ed,
with
in Z
one
A o
n th
e co
mm
unity
’s F
HB
M o
r FIR
M:
(i)
Obt
ain
the
elev
atio
n (in
rela
tion
to m
ean
sea
leve
l) of
the
low
est f
loor
(inc
ludi
ng b
asem
ent)
of a
ll ne
w a
nd s
ubst
antia
lly im
prov
ed
stru
ctur
es, a
nd
(ii)
Obt
ain,
if th
e st
ruct
ure
has
been
floo
dpro
ofed
in
acc
orda
nce
with
par
agra
ph (c
)(3)
(ii) o
f thi
s se
ctio
n, th
e el
evat
ion
(in re
latio
n to
mea
n se
a le
vel)
to w
hich
the
stru
ctur
e w
as fl
oodp
roof
ed,
and
(ii
i) M
aint
ain
a re
cord
of a
ll su
ch in
form
atio
n w
ith
the
offic
ial d
esig
nate
d by
the
com
mun
ity
unde
r Sec
. 59.
22 (a
)(9)
(iii);
R10
4.7
Dep
artm
ent r
ecor
ds
R10
9.1.
3 F
lood
plai
n in
spec
tions
. Fo
r con
stru
ctio
n in
are
as p
rone
to fl
oodi
ng a
s es
tabl
ishe
d by
Tab
le
301.
2(1)
, upo
n pl
acem
ent o
f the
low
est f
loor
, inc
ludi
ng b
asem
ent,
and
prio
r to
furth
er v
ertic
al c
onst
ruct
ion,
the
build
ing
offic
ial s
hall
requ
ire s
ubm
issi
on o
f doc
umen
tatio
n, p
repa
red
and
seal
ed b
y a
regi
ster
ed d
esig
n pr
ofes
sion
al, o
f the
ele
vatio
n of
the
low
est f
loor
, inc
ludi
ng b
asem
ent,
requ
ired
in S
ectio
n R
324.
R
324.
1.9
As-
built
ele
vatio
n do
cum
enta
tion.
A re
gist
ered
des
ign
prof
essi
onal
sha
ll pr
epar
e an
d se
al
docu
men
tatio
n of
the
elev
atio
ns s
peci
fied
in S
ectio
n R
324.
2 or
R32
4.3.
[N
FIP
requ
irem
ent 6
0.3(
b)(5
)(ii)
app
lies
to n
on-r
esid
entia
l con
stru
ctio
n; s
ee IB
C.]
14 (6
) N
otify
, in
river
ine
situ
atio
ns, a
djac
ent
com
mun
ities
and
the
Sta
te C
oord
inat
ing
Offi
ce
prio
r to
any
alte
ratio
n or
relo
catio
n of
a
wat
erco
urse
, and
sub
mit
copi
es o
f suc
h no
tific
atio
ns to
the
Adm
inis
trato
r;
[Not
add
ress
ed in
IRC
, see
IBC
App
endi
x G
.]
15 (7
) A
ssur
e th
at th
e flo
od c
arry
ing
capa
city
with
in
the
alte
red
or re
loca
ted
porti
on o
f any
wat
erco
urse
is
mai
ntai
ned;
[Not
add
ress
ed in
IRC
, see
IBC
App
endi
x G
.]
16 (8
) R
equi
re th
at a
ll m
anuf
actu
red
hom
es to
be
plac
ed w
ithin
Zon
e A
on
a co
mm
unity
’s F
HB
M o
r FI
RM
sha
ll be
inst
alle
d us
ing
met
hods
and
pr
actic
es w
hich
min
imiz
e flo
od d
amag
e. F
or th
e pu
rpos
es o
f thi
s re
quire
men
t, m
anuf
actu
red
hom
es
mus
t be
elev
ated
and
anc
hore
d to
resi
st fl
otat
ion,
co
llaps
e, o
r lat
eral
mov
emen
t. M
etho
ds o
f an
chor
ing
may
incl
ude,
but
are
not
to b
e lim
ited
to,
use
of o
ver-
the-
top
or fr
ame
ties
to g
roun
d an
chor
s.
This
requ
irem
ent i
s in
add
ition
to a
pplic
able
Sta
te
and
loca
l anc
horin
g re
quire
men
ts fo
r res
istin
g w
ind
forc
es.
R32
4.1.
8 M
anuf
actu
red
hous
ing.
New
or r
epla
cem
ent m
anuf
actu
red
hous
ing
shal
l be
elev
ated
in
acco
rdan
ce w
ith S
ectio
n R
324.
2 an
d th
e an
chor
and
tie-
dow
n re
quire
men
ts o
f Sec
tions
AE
604
and
AE
605
of
App
endi
x E
sha
ll ap
ply.
The
foun
datio
n an
d an
chor
age
of m
anuf
actu
red
hous
ing
to b
e lo
cate
d in
iden
tifie
d flo
odw
ays
as e
stab
lishe
d in
Tab
le R
301.
2(1)
sha
ll be
des
igne
d an
d co
nstru
cted
in a
ccor
danc
e w
ith th
e ap
plic
able
pro
visi
ons
in th
e In
tern
atio
nal B
uild
ing
Cod
e.
App
endi
x E
Man
ufac
ture
d H
ousi
ng, S
ectio
n A
E101
Exc
eptio
n S
EE
BLO
CK
4
![Page 127: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/127.jpg)
Pa
ge C
-15
IRC
Cro
ssw
alk
of th
e N
FIP
Reg
ulat
ions
to th
e Fl
ood
Res
ista
nce
Prov
isio
ns o
f the
IRC
®.
NFI
P R
egul
atio
ns
2006
IRC
® [
anno
tate
d w
ith 2
007
Supp
lem
ent]
(c) W
hen
the
Adm
inis
trato
r has
pro
vide
d a
notic
e of
fina
l flo
od e
leva
tions
for o
ne o
r mor
e sp
ecia
l flo
od h
azar
d ar
eas
on th
e co
mm
unity
’s F
IRM
and
, if a
ppro
pria
te, h
as d
esig
nate
d ot
her s
peci
al fl
ood
haza
rd a
reas
with
out b
ase
flood
ele
vatio
ns o
n th
e co
mm
unity
’s F
IRM
, but
has
not
iden
tifie
d a
regu
lato
ry fl
oodw
ay o
r coa
stal
hig
h ha
zard
are
a, th
e co
mm
unity
sh
all:
17 (1
) Req
uire
the
stan
dard
s of
par
agra
ph (b
) of t
his
sect
ion
with
in a
ll A
1-30
zon
es, A
E z
ones
, A z
ones
, A
H z
ones
, and
AO
zon
es, o
n th
e co
mm
unity
’s
FIR
M;
[Prio
r pro
visi
ons
cum
ulat
ive.
]
18
(2) R
equi
re th
at a
ll ne
w c
onst
ruct
ion
and
subs
tant
ial i
mpr
ovem
ents
of r
esid
entia
l stru
ctur
es
with
in Z
ones
A1-
30, A
E a
nd A
H z
ones
on
the
com
mun
ity’s
FIR
M h
ave
the
low
est f
loor
(inc
ludi
ng
base
men
t) el
evat
ed to
or a
bove
the
base
floo
d le
vel,
unle
ss th
e co
mm
unity
is g
rant
ed a
n ex
cept
ion
by th
e A
dmin
istra
tor f
or th
e al
low
ance
of
base
men
ts in
acc
orda
nce
with
Sec
. 60.
6 (b
) or (
c);
R10
5.3.
1.1
Sub
stan
tially
impr
oved
or s
ubst
antia
lly d
amag
ed e
xist
ing
build
ings
and
str
uctu
res
in a
reas
pr
one
to fl
oodi
ng.
SE
E B
LOC
K 4
R
324.
2.1
[Flo
od h
azar
d ar
eas
(incl
udin
g A
Zon
es)]
Elev
atio
n re
quire
men
ts.
1.
Bui
ldin
gs a
nd s
truct
ures
sha
ll ha
ve th
e lo
wes
t flo
ors
elev
ated
to o
r abo
ve th
e de
sign
floo
d el
evat
ion.
2.
In
are
as o
f sha
llow
floo
ding
(AO
Zon
es),
build
ings
and
stru
ctur
es s
hall
have
the
low
est f
loor
(inc
ludi
ng
base
men
t) el
evat
ed a
t lea
st a
s hi
gh a
bove
the
high
est a
djac
ent g
rade
as
the
dept
h nu
mbe
r spe
cifie
d in
fe
et (m
m) o
n th
e FI
RM
, or a
t lea
st 2
feet
(51
mm
) if a
dep
th n
umbe
r is
not s
peci
fied.
3.
B
asem
ent f
loor
s th
at a
re b
elow
gra
de o
n al
l sid
es s
hall
be e
leva
ted
to o
r abo
ve th
e de
sign
floo
d el
evat
ion.
Ex
cept
ion:
Enc
lose
d ar
eas
belo
w th
e de
sign
floo
d el
evat
ion,
incl
udin
g ba
sem
ents
who
se fl
oors
are
not
bel
ow
grad
e on
all
side
s, s
hall
mee
t the
requ
irem
ents
of S
ectio
n R
324.
2.2.
R
324.
1.4
Low
est f
loor
. Th
e lo
wes
t flo
or s
hall
be th
e flo
or o
f the
low
est e
nclo
sed
area
, inc
ludi
ng b
asem
ent,
but e
xclu
ding
any
unf
inis
hed
flood
-res
ista
nt e
nclo
sure
that
is u
seab
le s
olel
y fo
r veh
icle
par
king
, bui
ldin
g ac
cess
or
lim
ited
stor
age
prov
ided
that
suc
h en
clos
ure
is n
ot b
uilt
so a
s to
rend
er th
e bu
ildin
g or
stru
ctur
e in
vio
latio
n of
this
sec
tion.
R
408.
5 (U
nder
-Flo
or S
pace
) Fin
ishe
d gr
ade.
. .
. whe
re th
ere
is e
vide
nce
that
the
surfa
ce w
ater
doe
s no
t re
adily
dra
in fr
om th
e bu
ildin
g si
te, t
he g
rade
in th
e un
der-
floor
spa
ce s
hall
be a
s hi
gh a
s th
e ou
tsid
e fin
ishe
d gr
ade,
unl
ess
an a
ppro
ved
drai
nage
sys
tem
is p
rovi
ded.
A
ppen
dix
J Ex
istin
g B
uild
ings
and
Str
uctu
res,
Sec
tion
AJ1
02.5
Flo
od h
azar
d ar
eas.
SE
E B
LOC
K 4
![Page 128: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/128.jpg)
Pa
ge C
-16
IRC
Cro
ssw
alk
of th
e N
FIP
Reg
ulat
ions
to th
e Fl
ood
Res
ista
nce
Prov
isio
ns o
f the
IRC
®.
NFI
P R
egul
atio
ns
2006
IRC
® [
anno
tate
d w
ith 2
007
Supp
lem
ent]
19 (3
) R
equi
re th
at a
ll ne
w c
onst
ruct
ion
and
subs
tant
ial i
mpr
ovem
ents
of n
on-r
esid
entia
l st
ruct
ures
with
in Z
ones
A1-
30, A
E a
nd A
H z
ones
on
the
com
mun
ity’s
FIR
M:
(i)
ha
ve th
e lo
wes
t flo
or (i
nclu
ding
bas
emen
t) el
evat
ed to
or a
bove
the
base
floo
d le
vel o
r,
(ii)
toge
ther
with
atte
ndan
t util
ity a
nd s
anita
ry
faci
litie
s, b
e de
sign
ed s
o th
at b
elow
the
base
flo
od le
vel t
he s
truct
ure
is w
ater
tight
with
wal
ls
subs
tant
ially
impe
rmea
ble
to th
e pa
ssag
e of
w
ater
and
with
stru
ctur
al c
ompo
nent
s ha
ving
th
e ca
pabi
lity
of re
sist
ing
hydr
osta
tic a
nd
hydr
odyn
amic
load
s an
d ef
fect
s of
buo
yanc
y;
[NFI
P re
quire
men
t 60.
3(c)
(3) a
pplie
s to
non
-res
iden
tial c
onst
ruct
ion,
see
IBC
.]
20 (4
) P
rovi
de th
at w
here
a n
on-r
esid
entia
l stru
ctur
e is
inte
nded
to b
e m
ade
wat
ertig
ht b
elow
the
base
flo
od le
vel,
(i)
A
regi
ster
ed p
rofe
ssio
nal e
ngin
eer o
r arc
hite
ct
shal
l dev
elop
and
/or r
evie
w s
truct
ural
des
ign,
sp
ecifi
catio
ns, a
nd p
lans
for t
he c
onst
ruct
ion,
an
d sh
all c
ertif
y th
at th
e de
sign
and
met
hods
of
con
stru
ctio
n ar
e in
acc
orda
nce
with
ac
cept
ed s
tand
ards
of p
ract
ice
for m
eetin
g th
e ap
plic
able
pro
visi
ons
of p
arag
raph
(c)(
3)(ii
) or
(c)(
8)(ii
) of t
his
sect
ion,
and
(ii
) A
reco
rd o
f suc
h ce
rtific
ates
whi
ch in
clud
es
the
spec
ific
elev
atio
n (in
rela
tion
to m
ean
sea
leve
l) to
whi
ch s
uch
stru
ctur
es a
re
flood
proo
fed
shal
l be
mai
ntai
ned
with
the
offic
ial d
esig
nate
d by
the
com
mun
ity u
nder
S
ec. 5
9.22
(a)(
9)(ii
i);
[NFI
P re
quire
men
t 60.
3(c)
(4) a
pplie
s to
non
-res
iden
tial c
onst
ruct
ion,
see
IBC
.]
![Page 129: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/129.jpg)
Pa
ge C
-17
IRC
Cro
ssw
alk
of th
e N
FIP
Reg
ulat
ions
to th
e Fl
ood
Res
ista
nce
Prov
isio
ns o
f the
IRC
®.
NFI
P R
egul
atio
ns
2006
IRC
® [
anno
tate
d w
ith 2
007
Supp
lem
ent]
21
(5) R
equi
re, f
or a
ll ne
w c
onst
ruct
ion
and
subs
tant
ial
impr
ovem
ents
, tha
t ful
ly e
nclo
sed
area
s be
low
the
low
est f
loor
that
are
usa
ble
sole
ly fo
r par
king
of
vehi
cles
, bui
ldin
g ac
cess
or s
tora
ge in
an
area
ot
her t
han
a ba
sem
ent a
nd w
hich
are
sub
ject
to
flood
ing
shal
l be
desi
gned
to a
utom
atic
ally
equ
aliz
e hy
dros
tatic
floo
d fo
rces
on
exte
rior w
alls
by
allo
win
g fo
r the
ent
ry a
nd e
xit o
f flo
odw
ater
s.
Des
igns
for m
eetin
g th
is re
quire
men
t mus
t eith
er
be c
ertif
ied
by a
regi
ster
ed p
rofe
ssio
nal e
ngin
eer o
r ar
chite
ct o
r mee
t or e
xcee
d th
e fo
llow
ing
min
imum
cr
iteria
: A m
inim
um o
f tw
o op
enin
gs h
avin
g a
tota
l ne
t are
a of
not
less
than
one
squ
are
inch
for e
very
sq
uare
foot
of e
nclo
sed
area
sub
ject
to fl
oodi
ng
shal
l be
prov
ided
. The
bot
tom
of a
ll op
enin
gs s
hall
be n
o hi
gher
than
one
foot
abo
ve g
rade
. Ope
ning
s m
ay b
e eq
uipp
ed w
ith s
cree
ns, l
ouve
rs, v
alve
s, o
r ot
her c
over
ings
or d
evic
es p
rovi
ded
that
they
pe
rmit
the
auto
mat
ic e
ntry
and
exi
t of f
lood
wat
ers.
R10
5.3.
1.1
Sub
stan
tially
impr
oved
or s
ubst
antia
lly d
amag
ed e
xist
ing
build
ings
and
str
uctu
res
in a
reas
pr
one
to fl
oodi
ng.
SE
E B
LOC
K 4
R
309.
5 [G
arag
es] F
lood
haz
ard
area
s. F
or b
uild
ings
loca
ted
in fl
ood
haza
rd a
reas
as
esta
blis
hed
by T
able
30
1.2(
1), g
arag
e flo
ors
shal
l be:
1.
E
leva
ted
to o
r abo
ve th
e de
sign
floo
d el
evat
ion
as d
eter
min
ed in
Sec
tion
R32
4; o
r 2.
Lo
cate
d be
low
the
desi
gn fl
ood
elev
ated
pro
vide
d th
ey a
re a
t or a
bove
gra
de o
n at
leas
t one
sid
e, a
re
used
sol
ely
for p
arki
ng, b
uild
ing
acce
ss, o
r sto
rage
, mee
t the
requ
irem
ents
of S
ectio
n R
324,
and
are
ot
herw
ise
cons
truct
ed in
acc
orda
nce
with
this
cod
e.
R32
4.2.
2 E
nclo
sed
area
bel
ow d
esig
n flo
od e
leva
tion.
Enc
lose
d ar
eas,
incl
udin
g cr
awl s
pace
s, th
at a
re
belo
w th
e de
sign
floo
d el
evat
ion
shal
l: 1.
B
e us
ed s
olel
y fo
r par
king
of v
ehic
les,
bui
ldin
g ac
cess
or s
tora
ge.
2.
Be
prov
ided
with
floo
d op
enin
gs w
hich
sha
ll m
eet t
he fo
llow
ing
crite
ria:
2.1
The
re s
hall
be a
min
imum
of t
wo
open
ings
on
diffe
rent
sid
es o
f eac
h en
clos
ed a
rea;
if a
bui
ldin
g ha
s m
ore
than
one
enc
lose
d ar
ea b
elow
the
desi
gn fl
ood
elev
atio
n, e
ach
area
sha
ll ha
ve o
peni
ngs
on e
xter
ior
wal
ls.
2.2
The
tota
l net
are
a of
all
open
ings
sha
ll be
at l
east
1 s
quar
e in
ch (6
45 m
m²)
for e
ach
squa
re fo
ot
(0.0
93 m
²) o
f enc
lose
d ar
ea, o
r the
ope
ning
s sh
all b
e de
sign
ed a
nd th
e co
nstru
ctio
n do
cum
ents
sha
ll in
clud
e a
stat
emen
t tha
t the
des
ign
and
inst
alla
tion
will
pro
vide
for e
qual
izat
ion
of h
ydro
stat
ic fl
ood
forc
es
on e
xter
ior w
alls
by
allo
win
g fo
r the
aut
omat
ic e
ntry
and
exi
t of f
lood
wat
ers.
2.
3 T
he b
otto
m o
f eac
h op
enin
g sh
all b
e 1
foot
(305
mm
) or l
ess
abov
e th
e ad
jace
nt g
roun
d le
vel.
2.4
Ope
ning
s sh
all b
e no
t les
s th
an 3
inch
es (7
6 m
m) i
n an
y di
rect
ion
in th
e pl
ane
of th
e w
all.
2.5
Any
louv
ers,
scr
eens
or o
ther
ope
ning
cov
ers
shal
l allo
w th
e au
tom
atic
flow
of f
lood
wat
ers
into
and
ou
t of t
he e
nclo
sed
area
. 2.
6 O
peni
ngs
inst
alle
d in
doo
rs a
nd w
indo
ws
that
mee
t req
uire
men
ts 2
.1 th
roug
h 2.
5, a
re a
ccep
tabl
e;
how
ever
, doo
rs a
nd w
indo
ws
with
out i
nsta
lled
open
ings
do
not m
eet t
he re
quire
men
ts o
f thi
s se
ctio
n.
R40
8.6
[Und
er-F
loor
Spa
ce] F
lood
resi
stan
ce.
For b
uild
ings
loca
ted
in a
reas
pro
ne to
floo
ding
as
esta
blis
hed
in T
able
R30
1.2(
1):
1.
W
alls
enc
losi
ng th
e un
derfl
oor s
pace
sha
ll be
pro
vide
d w
ith fl
ood
open
ings
in a
ccor
danc
e w
ith
Sec
tion
R32
4.2.
2.
2.
The
finis
hed
grou
nd le
vel o
f the
und
erflo
or s
pace
sha
ll be
equ
al to
or h
ighe
r tha
n th
e ou
tsid
e fin
ishe
d gr
ound
leve
l.
Exce
ptio
n: U
nder
floor
spa
ces
that
mee
t the
requ
irem
ents
of F
EM
A/F
IA T
B 1
1-1.
[TB
11-
1 is
Cra
wl S
pace
C
onst
ruct
ion
in S
peci
al F
lood
Haz
ard
Are
as]
![Page 130: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/130.jpg)
Pa
ge C
-18
IRC
Cro
ssw
alk
of th
e N
FIP
Reg
ulat
ions
to th
e Fl
ood
Res
ista
nce
Prov
isio
ns o
f the
IRC
®.
NFI
P R
egul
atio
ns
2006
IRC
® [
anno
tate
d w
ith 2
007
Supp
lem
ent]
22 (6
) Req
uire
that
man
ufac
ture
d ho
mes
that
are
pl
aced
or s
ubst
antia
lly im
prov
ed w
ithin
Zon
es
A1-
30, A
H, a
nd A
E o
n th
e co
mm
unity
’s F
IRM
on
site
s:
(i)
Out
side
of a
man
ufac
ture
d ho
me
park
or
subd
ivis
ion,
(ii
) In
a n
ew m
anuf
actu
red
hom
e pa
rk o
r su
bdiv
isio
n,
(iii)
In a
n ex
pans
ion
to a
n ex
istin
g m
anuf
actu
red
hom
e pa
rk o
r sub
divi
sion
, or
(iv)
In a
n ex
istin
g m
anuf
actu
red
hom
e pa
rk o
r su
bdiv
isio
n on
whi
ch a
man
ufac
ture
d ho
me
has
incu
rred
“sub
stan
tial d
amag
e” a
s th
e re
sult
of a
floo
d, b
e el
evat
ed o
n a
perm
anen
t fo
unda
tion
such
that
the
low
est f
loor
of t
he
man
ufac
ture
d ho
me
is e
leva
ted
to o
r abo
ve
the
base
floo
d el
evat
ion
and
be s
ecur
ely
anch
ored
to a
n ad
equa
tely
anc
hore
d fo
unda
tion
syst
em to
resi
st fl
oata
tion
colla
pse
and
late
ral m
ovem
ent.
R10
5.3.
1.1
Sub
stan
tially
impr
oved
or s
ubst
antia
lly d
amag
ed e
xist
ing
build
ings
and
str
uctu
res
in a
reas
pr
one
to fl
oodi
ng.
SE
E B
LOC
K 4
R
324.
1.8
Man
ufac
ture
d ho
usin
g. S
EE
BLO
CK
16
App
endi
x E
Man
ufac
ture
d H
ousi
ng, S
ectio
n A
E101
, Exc
eptio
n S
EE
BLO
CK
4
23 (7
) Req
uire
with
in a
ny A
O z
one
on th
e co
mm
unity
’s
FIR
M th
at a
ll ne
w c
onst
ruct
ion
and
subs
tant
ial
impr
ovem
ents
of r
esid
entia
l stru
ctur
es h
ave
the
low
est f
loor
(inc
ludi
ng b
asem
ent)
elev
ated
abo
ve
the
high
est a
djac
ent g
rade
at l
east
as
high
as
the
dept
h nu
mbe
r spe
cifie
d in
feet
on
the
com
mun
ity’s
FI
RM
(at l
east
two
feet
if n
o de
pth
num
ber i
s sp
ecifi
ed);
R10
5.3.
1.1
Sub
stan
tially
impr
oved
or s
ubst
antia
lly d
amag
ed e
xist
ing
build
ings
and
str
uctu
res
in a
reas
pr
one
to fl
oodi
ng.
SE
E B
LOC
K 4
R
324.
2.1
[Flo
od h
azar
d ar
eas
(incl
udin
g A
Zon
es)]
Elev
atio
n re
quire
men
ts.
SE
E B
LOC
K 1
8
24 (8
) Req
uire
with
in a
ny A
O z
one
on th
e co
mm
unity
’s
FIR
M th
at a
ll ne
w c
onst
ruct
ion
and
subs
tant
ial
impr
ovem
ents
of n
onre
side
ntia
l stru
ctur
es
(i)
have
the
low
est f
loor
(inc
ludi
ng b
asem
ent)
elev
ated
abo
ve th
e hi
ghes
t adj
acen
t gra
de a
t le
ast a
s hi
gh a
s th
e de
pth
num
ber s
peci
fied
in
feet
on
the
com
mun
ity’s
FIR
M (a
t lea
st tw
o fe
et if
no
dept
h nu
mbe
r is
spec
ified
), or
(ii
) to
geth
er w
ith a
ttend
ant u
tility
and
san
itary
fa
cilit
ies
be c
ompl
etel
y flo
odpr
oofe
d to
that
le
vel t
o m
eet t
he fl
oodp
roof
ing
stan
dard
sp
ecifi
ed in
Sec
. 60.
3(c)
(3)(
ii);
[NFI
P re
quire
men
t 60.
3(c)
(8) a
pplie
s to
non
-res
iden
tial c
onst
ruct
ion,
see
IBC
.]
![Page 131: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/131.jpg)
Pa
ge C
-19
IRC
Cro
ssw
alk
of th
e N
FIP
Reg
ulat
ions
to th
e Fl
ood
Res
ista
nce
Prov
isio
ns o
f the
IRC
®.
NFI
P R
egul
atio
ns
2006
IRC
® [
anno
tate
d w
ith 2
007
Supp
lem
ent]
25 (9
) Req
uire
with
in a
ny A
99 z
ones
on
a co
mm
unity
’s
FIR
M th
e st
anda
rds
of p
arag
raph
s (a
)(1)
thro
ugh
(a)(4
)(i) a
nd (b
)(5) t
hrou
gh (b
)(9) o
f thi
s se
ctio
n;
R10
5.3.
1.1
Sub
stan
tially
impr
oved
or s
ubst
antia
lly d
amag
ed e
xist
ing
build
ings
and
str
uctu
res
in a
reas
pr
one
to fl
oodi
ng.
SE
E B
LOC
K 4
R
324.
2.1
[Flo
od h
azar
d ar
eas
(incl
udin
g A
Zon
es)]
Elev
atio
n re
quire
men
ts.
SE
E B
LOC
K 1
8
26 (1
0) R
equi
re u
ntil
a re
gula
tory
floo
dway
is
desi
gnat
ed, t
hat n
o ne
w c
onst
ruct
ion,
sub
stan
tial
impr
ovem
ents
, or o
ther
dev
elop
men
t (in
clud
ing
fill)
shal
l be
perm
itted
with
in Z
ones
A1-
30 a
nd A
E o
n th
e co
mm
unity
’s F
IRM
, unl
ess
it is
dem
onst
rate
d th
at th
e cu
mul
ativ
e ef
fect
of t
he p
ropo
sed
deve
lopm
ent,
whe
n co
mbi
ned
with
all
othe
r exi
stin
g an
d an
ticip
ated
dev
elop
men
t, w
ill n
ot in
crea
se th
e w
ater
sur
face
ele
vatio
n of
the
base
floo
d m
ore
than
on
e fo
ot a
t any
poi
nt w
ithin
the
com
mun
ity.
R10
6.1.
3 In
form
atio
n fo
r con
stru
ctio
n in
are
as p
rone
to fl
oodi
ng.
SE
E B
LOC
K 4
27 (1
1) R
equi
re w
ithin
Zon
es A
H a
nd A
O, a
dequ
ate
drai
nage
pat
hs a
roun
d st
ruct
ures
on
slop
es, t
o gu
ide
flood
wat
ers
arou
nd a
nd a
way
from
pro
pose
d st
ruct
ures
.
R40
1.3
[Fou
ndat
ions
] Dra
inag
e. S
urfa
ce d
rain
age
shal
l be
dive
rted
to a
sto
rm s
ewer
con
nect
ion
or o
ther
ap
prov
ed p
oint
of c
olle
ctio
n so
as
to n
ot c
reat
e a
haza
rd.
Lots
sha
ll be
gra
ded
so a
s to
dra
in s
urfa
ce w
ater
aw
ay fr
om fo
unda
tion
wal
ls. .
. .
28 (1
2) R
equi
re th
at m
anuf
actu
red
hom
es to
be
plac
ed o
r sub
stan
tially
impr
oved
on
site
s in
an
exis
ting
man
ufac
ture
d ho
me
park
or s
ubdi
visi
on
with
in Z
ones
A-1
-30,
AH
, and
AE
on
the
com
mun
ity’s
FIR
M th
at a
re n
ot s
ubje
ct to
the
prov
isio
ns o
f par
agra
ph (c
)(6)
of t
his
sect
ion
be
elev
ated
so
that
eith
er:
(i)
The
low
est f
loor
of t
he m
anuf
actu
red
hom
e is
at
or a
bove
the
base
floo
d el
evat
ion,
or
(ii)
The
man
ufac
ture
d ho
me
chas
sis
is s
uppo
rted
by re
info
rced
pie
rs o
r oth
er fo
unda
tion
elem
ents
of a
t lea
st e
quiv
alen
t stre
ngth
that
ar
e no
less
than
36
inch
es in
hei
ght a
bove
gr
ade
and
be s
ecur
ely
anch
ored
to a
n ad
equa
tely
anc
hore
d fo
unda
tion
syst
em to
re
sist
floa
tatio
n, c
olla
pse,
and
late
ral
mov
emen
t.
R10
5.3.
1.1
Sub
stan
tially
impr
oved
or s
ubst
antia
lly d
amag
ed e
xist
ing
build
ings
and
str
uctu
res
in a
reas
pr
one
to fl
oodi
ng.
SE
E B
LOC
K 4
R
324.
1.8
Man
ufac
ture
d ho
usin
g. S
EE
BLO
CK
16
App
endi
x E
Man
ufac
ture
d H
ousi
ng, S
ectio
n A
E101
.1 G
ener
al.
Exce
ptio
n. S
EE
BLO
CK
4
![Page 132: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/132.jpg)
Pa
ge C
-20
IRC
Cro
ssw
alk
of th
e N
FIP
Reg
ulat
ions
to th
e Fl
ood
Res
ista
nce
Prov
isio
ns o
f the
IRC
®.
NFI
P R
egul
atio
ns
2006
IRC
® [
anno
tate
d w
ith 2
007
Supp
lem
ent]
29 (1
3) N
otw
ithst
andi
ng a
ny o
ther
pro
visi
ons
of S
ec.
60.3
, a c
omm
unity
may
app
rove
cer
tain
de
velo
pmen
t in
Zone
s A
l-30,
AE
, and
AH
, on
the
com
mun
ity’s
FIR
M w
hich
incr
ease
the
wat
er
surfa
ce e
leva
tion
of th
e ba
se fl
ood
by m
ore
than
on
e fo
ot, p
rovi
ded
that
the
com
mun
ity fi
rst a
pplie
s fo
r a c
ondi
tiona
l FIR
M re
visi
on, f
ulfil
ls th
e re
quire
men
ts fo
r suc
h a
revi
sion
as
esta
blis
hed
unde
r the
pro
visi
ons
of S
ec. 6
5.12
, and
rece
ives
th
e ap
prov
al o
f the
Adm
inis
trato
r.
[Not
add
ress
ed in
IRC
, see
IBC
App
endi
x G
.]
30 (1
4) R
equi
re th
at re
crea
tiona
l veh
icle
s pl
aced
on
site
s w
ithin
Zon
es A
1-30
, AH
, and
AE
on
the
com
mun
ity’s
FIR
M e
ither
(i)
B
e on
the
site
for f
ewer
than
180
con
secu
tive
days
, (ii
) B
e fu
lly li
cens
ed a
nd re
ady
for h
ighw
ay u
se,
or
(iii)
Mee
t the
per
mit
requ
irem
ents
of p
arag
raph
(b
)(1)
of t
his
sect
ion
and
the
elev
atio
n an
d an
chor
ing
requ
irem
ents
for “
man
ufac
ture
d ho
mes
” in
para
grap
h (c
)(6)
of t
his
sect
ion.
A
recr
eatio
nal v
ehic
le is
read
y fo
r hig
hway
use
if it
is
on
its w
heel
s or
jack
ing
syst
em, i
s at
tach
ed to
th
e si
te o
nly
by q
uick
dis
conn
ect t
ype
utili
ties
and
secu
rity
devi
ces,
and
has
no
perm
anen
tly a
ttach
ed
addi
tions
.
R10
7 T
empo
rary
str
uctu
res.
(d) W
hen
the
Adm
inis
trato
r has
pro
vide
d a
notic
e of
fina
l bas
e flo
od e
leva
tions
with
in Z
ones
A1-
30 a
nd/o
r AE
on
the
com
mun
ity’s
FIR
M a
nd, i
f app
ropr
iate
, has
des
igna
ted
AO
zo
nes,
AH
zon
es, A
99 z
ones
, and
A z
ones
on
the
com
mun
ity’s
FIR
M, a
nd h
as p
rovi
ded
data
from
whi
ch th
e co
mm
unity
sha
ll de
sign
ate
its re
gula
tory
floo
dway
, the
com
mun
ity
shal
l: 31 (1
) Mee
t the
requ
irem
ents
of p
arag
raph
s (c
) (1)
th
roug
h (1
4) o
f thi
s se
ctio
n;
[Prio
r pro
visi
ons
cum
ulat
ive.
]
32 (2
) Sel
ect a
nd a
dopt
a re
gula
tory
floo
dway
bas
ed
on th
e pr
inci
ple
that
the
area
cho
sen
for t
he
regu
lato
ry fl
oodw
ay m
ust b
e de
sign
ed to
car
ry th
e w
ater
s of
the
base
floo
d, w
ithou
t inc
reas
ing
the
wat
er s
urfa
ce e
leva
tion
of th
at fl
ood
mor
e th
an o
ne
foot
at a
ny p
oint
;
Tabl
e R
301.
2(1)
Clim
atic
and
Geo
grap
hic
Des
ign
Crit
eria
. Fl
ood
Haz
ards
. S
EE
BLO
CK
3
![Page 133: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/133.jpg)
Pa
ge C
-21
IRC
Cro
ssw
alk
of th
e N
FIP
Reg
ulat
ions
to th
e Fl
ood
Res
ista
nce
Prov
isio
ns o
f the
IRC
®.
NFI
P R
egul
atio
ns
2006
IRC
® [
anno
tate
d w
ith 2
007
Supp
lem
ent]
33 (3
) Pro
hibi
t enc
roac
hmen
ts, i
nclu
ding
fill,
new
co
nstru
ctio
n, s
ubst
antia
l im
prov
emen
ts, a
nd o
ther
de
velo
pmen
t with
in th
e ad
opte
d re
gula
tory
flo
odw
ay u
nles
s it
has
been
dem
onst
rate
d th
roug
h hy
drol
ogic
and
hyd
raul
ic a
naly
ses
perfo
rmed
in
acco
rdan
ce w
ith s
tand
ard
engi
neer
ing
prac
tice
that
th
e pr
opos
ed e
ncro
achm
ent w
ould
not
resu
lt in
any
in
crea
se in
floo
d le
vels
with
in th
e co
mm
unity
dur
ing
the
occu
rren
ce o
f the
bas
e flo
od d
isch
arge
;
R10
6.1.
3 In
form
atio
n fo
r con
stru
ctio
n in
are
as p
rone
to fl
oodi
ng.
SE
E B
LOC
K 4
R
301.
2.4
Flo
odpl
ain
cons
truc
tion.
Exc
eptio
n. S
EE
BLO
CK
3
34 (4
) Not
with
stan
ding
any
oth
er p
rovi
sion
s of
Sec
. 60
.3, a
com
mun
ity m
ay p
erm
it en
croa
chm
ents
w
ithin
the
adop
ted
regu
lato
ry fl
oodw
ay th
at w
ould
re
sult
in a
n in
crea
se in
bas
e flo
od e
leva
tions
, pr
ovid
ed th
at th
e co
mm
unity
firs
t app
lies
for a
co
nditi
onal
FIR
M a
nd fl
oodw
ay re
visi
on, f
ulfil
ls th
e re
quire
men
ts fo
r suc
h re
visi
ons
as e
stab
lishe
d un
der t
he p
rovi
sion
s of
Sec
. 65.
12, a
nd re
ceiv
es
the
appr
oval
of t
he A
dmin
istra
tor.
[IRC
not
app
licab
le to
floo
dway
con
stru
ctio
n; re
fer t
o IB
C.]
(e) W
hen
the
Adm
inis
trato
r has
pro
vide
d a
notic
e of
fina
l bas
e flo
od e
leva
tions
with
in Z
ones
A1-
30 a
nd/o
r AE
on
the
com
mun
ity’s
FIR
M a
nd, i
f app
ropr
iate
, has
des
igna
ted
AH
zo
nes,
AO
zon
es, A
99 z
ones
, and
A z
ones
on
the
com
mun
ity’s
FIR
M, a
nd h
as id
entif
ied
on th
e co
mm
unity
’s F
IRM
coa
stal
hig
h ha
zard
are
as b
y de
sign
atin
g Zo
nes
V1-
30, V
E,
and/
or V
, the
com
mun
ity s
hall:
35 (1
) Mee
t the
requ
irem
ents
of p
arag
raph
s (c
)(1)
th
roug
h (1
4) o
f thi
s se
ctio
n;
[Prio
r pro
visi
ons
cum
ulat
ive.
] R
301.
2.4.
1 A
ltern
ativ
e pr
ovis
ions
. A
s an
alte
rnat
ive
to th
e re
quire
men
ts in
Sec
tion
R32
4.3
for b
uild
ings
and
st
ruct
ures
loca
ted
in w
hole
or i
n pa
rt in
coa
stal
hig
h-ha
zard
are
as (V
Zon
es),
AS
CE
24
is p
erm
itted
sub
ject
to
the
limita
tions
of t
his
code
and
the
limita
tions
ther
ein.
![Page 134: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/134.jpg)
Pa
ge C
-22
IRC
Cro
ssw
alk
of th
e N
FIP
Reg
ulat
ions
to th
e Fl
ood
Res
ista
nce
Prov
isio
ns o
f the
IRC
®.
NFI
P R
egul
atio
ns
2006
IRC
® [
anno
tate
d w
ith 2
007
Supp
lem
ent]
36 (2
) W
ithin
Zon
es V
1-30
, VE
, and
V o
n a
com
mun
ity’s
FIR
M,
(i)
ob
tain
the
elev
atio
n (in
rela
tion
to m
ean
sea
leve
l) of
the
botto
m o
f the
low
est s
truct
ural
m
embe
r of t
he lo
wes
t flo
or (e
xclu
ding
pili
ngs
and
colu
mns
) of a
ll ne
w a
nd s
ubst
antia
lly
impr
oved
stru
ctur
es, a
nd w
heth
er o
r not
suc
h st
ruct
ures
con
tain
a b
asem
ent,
and
(ii
) m
aint
ain
a re
cord
of
all s
uch
info
rmat
ion
with
th
e of
ficia
l des
igna
ted
by th
e co
mm
unity
un
der S
ec. 5
9.22
(a)(
9)(ii
i);
R10
4.7
Dep
artm
ent r
ecor
ds.
R10
5.3.
1.1
Sub
stan
tially
impr
oved
or s
ubst
antia
lly d
amag
ed e
xist
ing
build
ings
and
str
uctu
res
in a
reas
pr
one
to fl
oodi
ng.
SE
E B
LOC
K 4
R
106.
1.3
Info
rmat
ion
for c
onst
ruct
ion
in a
reas
pro
ne to
floo
ding
. S
EE
BLO
CK
13
R10
9.1.
3 F
lood
plai
n in
spec
tions
. S
EE
BLO
CK
13
R32
4.1.
9 A
s-bu
ilt e
leva
tion
docu
men
tatio
n. S
EE
BLO
CK
13
R
324.
3 C
oast
al h
igh-
haza
rd a
reas
(inc
ludi
ng V
Zon
es).
Are
as th
at h
ave
been
det
erm
ined
to b
e su
bjec
t to
wav
e he
ight
s in
exc
ess
of 3
feet
(914
mm
) or s
ubje
ct to
hig
h-ve
loci
ty w
ave
actio
n or
wav
e-in
duce
d er
osio
n sh
all b
e de
sign
ated
as
coas
tal h
igh-
haza
rd a
reas
. All
build
ings
and
stru
ctur
es c
onst
ruct
ed in
who
le o
r in
part
in
coas
tal h
igh-
haza
rd a
reas
sha
ll be
des
igna
ted
and
cons
truct
ed in
acc
orda
nce
with
Sec
tions
R32
4.3.
1 th
roug
h R
324.
3.6.
R
324.
3.2
[Coa
stal
hig
h-ha
zard
are
as (i
nclu
ding
V Z
ones
)] El
evat
ion
requ
irem
ents
.
1.
All
build
ings
and
stru
ctur
es e
rect
ed w
ithin
coa
stal
hig
h-ha
zard
are
as s
hall
be e
leva
ted
so th
at th
e lo
wes
t po
rtion
of a
ll st
ruct
ural
mem
bers
sup
porti
ng th
e lo
wes
t flo
or, w
ith th
e ex
cept
ion
of m
at o
r raf
t fou
ndat
ions
, pi
ling,
pile
cap
s, c
olum
ns, g
rade
bea
ms
and
brac
ing,
is lo
cate
d at
or a
bove
the
desi
gn fl
ood
elev
atio
n.
2.
Bas
emen
t flo
ors
that
are
bel
ow g
rade
on
all s
ides
are
pro
hibi
ted.
3.
Th
e us
e of
fill
for s
truct
ural
sup
port
is p
rohi
bite
d.
4.
The
plac
emen
t of f
ill b
enea
th b
uild
ings
and
stru
ctur
es is
pro
hibi
ted.
Ex
cept
ion:
Wal
ls a
nd p
artit
ions
enc
losi
ng a
reas
bel
ow th
e de
sign
floo
d el
evat
ion
shal
l mee
t the
requ
irem
ents
of
Sec
tions
R32
4.3.
4 an
d R
324.
3.5.
37 (3
) Pro
vide
that
all
new
con
stru
ctio
n w
ithin
Zon
es
V1-
30, V
E, a
nd V
on
the
com
mun
ity’s
FIR
M is
lo
cate
d la
ndw
ard
of th
e re
ach
of m
ean
high
tide
;
R32
4.3.
1 L
ocat
ion
and
site
pre
para
tion.
1.
New
bui
ldin
gs a
nd b
uild
ings
that
are
det
erm
ined
to b
e su
bsta
ntia
lly im
prov
ed p
ursu
ant t
o S
ectio
n 10
5.3.
1.1,
sh
all b
e lo
cate
d la
ndw
ard
of th
e re
ach
of m
ean
high
tide
. 2.
Site
pre
para
tions
sha
ll no
t alte
r san
d du
nes
and
man
grov
e st
ands
if a
n en
gine
erin
g an
alys
is d
emon
stra
tes
that
the
pote
ntia
l for
floo
d da
mag
e is
incr
ease
d.
![Page 135: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/135.jpg)
Pa
ge C
-23
IRC
Cro
ssw
alk
of th
e N
FIP
Reg
ulat
ions
to th
e Fl
ood
Res
ista
nce
Prov
isio
ns o
f the
IRC
®.
NFI
P R
egul
atio
ns
2006
IRC
® [
anno
tate
d w
ith 2
007
Supp
lem
ent]
38 (4
) P
rovi
de th
at a
ll ne
w c
onst
ruct
ion
and
subs
tant
ial i
mpr
ovem
ents
in Z
ones
V1-
30 a
nd V
E,
and
also
Zon
e V
if b
ase
flood
ele
vatio
n da
ta is
av
aila
ble,
on
the
com
mun
ity’s
FIR
M, a
re e
leva
ted
on p
iling
s an
d co
lum
ns s
o th
at
(i)
the
botto
m o
f the
low
est h
oriz
onta
l stru
ctur
al
mem
ber o
f the
low
est f
loor
(exc
ludi
ng th
e pi
lings
or c
olum
ns) i
s el
evat
ed to
or a
bove
the
base
floo
d le
vel;
and
(ii
) th
e pi
le o
r col
umn
foun
datio
n an
d st
ruct
ure
atta
ched
ther
eto
is a
ncho
red
to re
sist
flot
atio
n,
colla
pse
and
late
ral m
ovem
ent d
ue to
the
effe
cts
of w
ind
and
wat
er lo
ads
actin
g si
mul
tane
ousl
y on
all
build
ing
com
pone
nts.
W
ater
load
ing
valu
es u
sed
shal
l be
thos
e as
soci
ated
with
the
base
floo
d. W
ind
load
ing
valu
es u
sed
shal
l be
thos
e re
quire
d by
ap
plic
able
Sta
te o
r loc
al b
uild
ing
stan
dard
s. A
re
gist
ered
pro
fess
iona
l eng
inee
r or a
rchi
tect
sh
all d
evel
op o
r rev
iew
the
stru
ctur
al d
esig
n,
spec
ifica
tions
and
pla
ns fo
r the
con
stru
ctio
n,
and
shal
l cer
tify
that
the
desi
gn a
nd m
etho
ds
of c
onst
ruct
ion
to b
e us
ed a
re in
acc
orda
nce
with
acc
epte
d st
anda
rds
of p
ract
ice
for
mee
ting
the
prov
isio
ns o
f par
agra
phs
(e)(
4)(I)
an
d (ii
) of t
his
sect
ion.
R10
5.3.
1.1
Sub
stan
tially
impr
oved
or s
ubst
antia
lly d
amag
ed e
xist
ing
build
ings
and
str
uctu
res
in a
reas
pr
one
to fl
oodi
ng.
SE
E B
LOC
K 4
R
324.
3.2
[Coa
stal
hig
h-ha
zard
are
as (i
nclu
ding
V Z
ones
)] El
evat
ion
requ
irem
ents
. S
EE
BLO
CK
36
R32
4.3.
3 F
ound
atio
ns.
All
build
ings
and
stru
ctur
es e
rect
ed in
coa
stal
hig
h-ha
zard
are
as s
hall
be s
uppo
rted
on p
iling
s or
col
umns
and
sha
ll be
ade
quat
ely
anch
ored
to s
uch
pilin
gs o
r col
umns
. Pili
ng s
hall
have
ade
quat
e so
il pe
netra
tions
to re
sist
the
com
bine
d w
ave
and
win
d lo
ads
(late
ral a
nd u
plift
). W
ater
load
ing
valu
es u
sed
shal
l be
thos
e as
soci
ated
with
the
desi
gn fl
ood.
Win
d lo
adin
g va
lues
sha
ll be
thos
e re
quire
d by
this
cod
e. P
ile
embe
dmen
t sha
ll in
clud
e co
nsid
erat
ion
of d
ecre
ased
resi
stan
ce c
apac
ity c
ause
d by
sco
ur o
f soi
l stra
ta
surr
ound
ing
the
pilin
g. P
ile s
yste
ms
desi
gn a
nd in
stal
latio
n sh
all b
e ce
rtifie
d in
acc
orda
nce
with
Sec
tion
R32
4.3.
6. M
at, r
aft o
r oth
er fo
unda
tions
that
sup
port
colu
mns
sha
ll no
t be
perm
itted
whe
re s
oil i
nves
tigat
ions
th
at a
re re
quire
d in
acc
orda
nce
with
Sec
tion
R40
1.4
indi
cate
that
soi
l mat
eria
l und
er th
e m
at, r
aft o
r oth
er
foun
datio
n is
sub
ject
to s
cour
or e
rosi
on fr
om w
ave-
velo
city
flow
con
ditio
ns.
Sla
bs, p
ools
, poo
l dec
ks a
nd
wal
kway
s sh
all b
e lo
cate
d an
d co
nstru
cted
to b
e st
ruct
ural
ly in
depe
nden
t of b
uild
ings
and
stru
ctur
es a
nd th
eir
foun
datio
ns to
pre
vent
tran
sfer
of f
lood
load
s to
the
build
ings
and
stru
ctur
es d
urin
g co
nditi
ons
of fl
oodi
ng, s
cour
or
ero
sion
from
wav
e-ve
loci
ty fl
ow c
ondi
tions
, unl
ess
the
build
ings
and
stru
ctur
es a
nd th
eir f
ound
atio
n ar
e de
sign
ed to
resi
st th
e ad
ditio
nal f
lood
load
.
R32
4.3.
6 C
onst
ruct
ion
docu
men
ts.
The
cons
truct
ion
docu
men
ts s
hall
incl
ude
docu
men
tatio
n th
at is
pr
epar
ed a
nd s
eale
d by
a re
gist
ered
des
ign
prof
essi
onal
that
the
desi
gn a
nd m
etho
ds o
f con
stru
ctio
n to
be
used
mee
t the
app
licab
le c
riter
ia o
f thi
s se
ctio
n.
![Page 136: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/136.jpg)
Pa
ge C
-24
IRC
Cro
ssw
alk
of th
e N
FIP
Reg
ulat
ions
to th
e Fl
ood
Res
ista
nce
Prov
isio
ns o
f the
IRC
®.
NFI
P R
egul
atio
ns
2006
IRC
® [
anno
tate
d w
ith 2
007
Supp
lem
ent]
39
(5)
Pro
vide
that
all
new
con
stru
ctio
n an
d su
b-st
antia
l im
prov
emen
ts w
ithin
Zon
es V
1-30
, VE
, and
V
on
the
com
mun
ity’s
FIR
M h
ave
the
spac
e be
low
th
e lo
wes
t flo
or e
ither
free
of o
bstru
ctio
n or
con
-st
ruct
ed w
ith n
on-s
uppo
rting
bre
akaw
ay w
alls
, op
en w
ood
latti
ce-w
ork,
or i
nsec
t scr
eeni
ng in
-te
nded
to c
olla
pse
unde
r win
d an
d w
ater
load
s w
ithou
t cau
sing
col
laps
e, d
ispl
acem
ent,
or o
ther
st
ruct
ural
dam
age
to th
e el
evat
ed p
ortio
n of
the
build
ing
or s
uppo
rting
foun
datio
n sy
stem
. For
the
purp
oses
of t
his
sect
ion,
a b
reak
away
wal
l sha
ll ha
ve a
des
ign
safe
load
ing
resi
stan
ce o
f not
less
th
an 1
0 an
d no
mor
e th
an 2
0 po
unds
per
squ
are
foot
. Use
of b
reak
away
wal
ls w
hich
exc
eed
a de
sign
saf
e lo
adin
g re
sist
ance
of 2
0 po
unds
per
sq
uare
foot
(eith
er b
y de
sign
or w
hen
so re
quire
d by
loca
l or S
tate
cod
es) m
ay b
e pe
rmitt
ed o
nly
if a
regi
ster
ed p
rofe
ssio
nal e
ngin
eer o
r arc
hite
ct
certi
fies
that
the
desi
gns
prop
osed
mee
t the
fo
llow
ing
cond
ition
s:
(i)
Bre
akaw
ay w
all c
olla
pse
shal
l res
ult f
rom
a
wat
er lo
ad le
ss th
an th
at w
hich
wou
ld o
ccur
du
ring
the
base
floo
d; a
nd,
(ii)
The
elev
ated
por
tion
of th
e bu
ildin
g an
d su
ppor
ting
foun
datio
n sy
stem
sha
ll no
t be
subj
ect t
o co
llaps
e, d
ispl
acem
ent,
or o
ther
st
ruct
ural
dam
age
due
to th
e ef
fect
s of
win
d an
d w
ater
load
s ac
ting
sim
ulta
neou
sly
on a
ll bu
ildin
g co
mpo
nent
s (s
truct
ural
and
no
n-st
ruct
ural
). W
ater
load
ing
valu
es u
sed
shal
l be
thos
e as
soci
ated
with
the
base
floo
d.
Win
d lo
adin
g va
lues
use
d sh
all b
e th
ose
requ
ired
by a
pplic
able
Sta
te o
r loc
al b
uild
ing
stan
dard
s. S
uch
encl
osed
spa
ce s
hall
be
usea
ble
sole
ly fo
r par
king
of v
ehic
les,
bui
ldin
g ac
cess
, or s
tora
ge.
R10
5.3.
1.1
Sub
stan
tially
impr
oved
or s
ubst
antia
lly d
amag
ed e
xist
ing
build
ings
and
str
uctu
res
in a
reas
pr
one
to fl
oodi
ng.
SE
E B
LOC
K 4
R
324.
3.4
Wal
ls b
elow
des
ign
flood
ele
vatio
n. W
alls
and
par
titio
ns a
re p
erm
itted
bel
ow th
e el
evat
ed fl
oor,
prov
ided
that
suc
h w
alls
and
par
titio
ns a
re n
ot p
art o
f the
stru
ctur
al s
uppo
rt of
the
build
ing
or s
truct
ure
and:
1.
E
lect
rical
, mec
hani
cal,
and
plum
bing
sys
tem
com
pone
nts
are
not t
o be
mou
nted
on
or p
enet
rate
thro
ugh
wal
ls th
at a
re d
esig
ned
to b
reak
aw
ay u
nder
floo
d lo
ads,
and
2.
A
re c
onst
ruct
ed w
ith in
sect
scr
eeni
ng o
r ope
n la
ttice
, or:
3.
Are
des
igne
d to
bre
ak a
way
or c
olla
pse
with
out c
ausi
ng c
olla
pse,
dis
plac
emen
t or o
ther
stru
ctur
al
dam
age
to th
e el
evat
ed p
ortio
n of
the
build
ing
or s
uppo
rting
foun
datio
n sy
stem
. Suc
h w
alls
, fra
min
g an
d co
nnec
tions
sha
ll ha
ve a
des
ign
safe
load
ing
resi
stan
ce o
f not
less
than
10
poun
ds p
er s
quar
e fo
ot (0
.48
kN/m
2 ) and
no
mor
e th
an 2
0 po
unds
per
squ
are
foot
(0.9
6 kN
/m2 );
or
4.
Whe
re w
ind
load
ing
valu
es o
f thi
s co
de e
xcee
d 20
pou
nds
per s
quar
e fo
ot (0
.96
kN/m
2 ), th
e co
nstru
ctio
n do
cum
ents
sha
ll in
clud
e do
cum
enta
tion
prep
ared
and
sea
led
by a
regi
ster
ed d
esig
n pr
ofes
sion
al th
at:
4.
1 Th
e w
alls
and
par
titio
ns b
elow
the
desi
gn fl
ood
elev
atio
n ha
ve b
een
desi
gned
to c
olla
pse
from
a
wat
er lo
ad le
ss th
an th
at w
hich
wou
ld o
ccur
dur
ing
the
desi
gn fl
ood.
4.2.
The
ele
vate
d po
rtion
of t
he b
uild
ing
and
supp
ortin
g fo
unda
tion
syst
em h
ave
been
des
igne
d to
w
ithst
and
the
effe
cts
of w
ind
and
flood
load
s ac
ting
sim
ulta
neou
sly
on a
ll bu
ildin
g co
mpo
nent
s (s
truct
ural
and
non
stru
ctur
al).
Wat
er lo
adin
g va
lues
use
d sh
all b
e th
ose
asso
ciat
ed w
ith th
e de
sign
flo
od. W
ind
load
ing
valu
es u
sed
shal
l be
thos
e re
quire
d by
this
cod
e.
R32
4.3.
5 E
nclo
sed
area
s be
low
des
ign
flood
ele
vatio
n. E
nclo
sed
area
s be
low
the
desi
gn fl
ood
elev
atio
n sh
all b
e us
ed s
olel
y fo
r par
king
of v
ehic
les,
bui
ldin
g ac
cess
or s
tora
ge.
40 (6
) Pro
hibi
t the
use
of f
ill fo
r stru
ctur
al s
uppo
rt of
bu
ildin
gs w
ithin
Zon
es V
1-30
, VE
, and
V o
n th
e co
mm
unity
’s F
IRM
;
R32
4.3.
2(3)
and
(4)
[Coa
stal
hig
h-ha
zard
are
as (i
nclu
ding
V z
ones
)] El
evat
ion
requ
irem
ents
. S
EE
B
LOC
K 3
6
![Page 137: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/137.jpg)
Pa
ge C
-25
IRC
Cro
ssw
alk
of th
e N
FIP
Reg
ulat
ions
to th
e Fl
ood
Res
ista
nce
Prov
isio
ns o
f the
IRC
®.
NFI
P R
egul
atio
ns
2006
IRC
® [
anno
tate
d w
ith 2
007
Supp
lem
ent]
41 (7
) Pro
hibi
t man
-mad
e al
tera
tion
of s
and
dune
s an
d m
angr
ove
stan
ds w
ithin
Zon
es V
1-30
, VE
, and
V
on th
e co
mm
unity
’s F
IRM
whi
ch w
ould
incr
ease
po
tent
ial f
lood
dam
age.
R32
4.3.
1 L
ocat
ion
and
site
pre
para
tion.
SE
E B
LOC
K 3
7
42 (8
) Req
uire
that
man
ufac
ture
d ho
mes
pla
ced
or
subs
tant
ially
impr
oved
with
in Z
ones
V1-
30, V
, and
V
E o
n th
e co
mm
unity
’s F
IRM
on
site
s
(i)
Out
side
of a
man
ufac
ture
d ho
me
park
or
subd
ivis
ion,
(ii
) In
a n
ew m
anuf
actu
red
hom
e pa
rk o
r su
bdiv
isio
n,
(iii)
In a
n ex
pans
ion
to a
n ex
istin
g m
anuf
actu
red
hom
e pa
rk o
r sub
divi
sion
, or
(iv)
In a
n ex
istin
g m
anuf
actu
red
hom
e pa
rk o
r su
bdiv
isio
n on
whi
ch a
man
ufac
ture
d ho
me
has
incu
rred
“sub
stan
tial d
amag
e” a
s th
e re
sult
of a
floo
d, m
eet t
he s
tand
ards
of
para
grap
hs (e
)(2)
thro
ugh
(7) o
f thi
s se
ctio
n an
d th
at m
anuf
actu
red
hom
es p
lace
d or
su
bsta
ntia
lly im
prov
ed o
n ot
her s
ites
in a
n ex
istin
g m
anuf
actu
red
hom
e pa
rk o
r su
bdiv
isio
n w
ithin
Zon
es V
I-30,
V, a
nd V
E o
n th
e co
mm
unity
’s F
IRM
mee
t the
requ
irem
ents
of
par
agra
ph (c
)(12
) of t
his
sect
ion.
R32
4.1.
8 M
anuf
actu
red
hous
ing.
SE
E B
LOC
K 1
6 A
ppen
dix
E M
anuf
actu
red
Hou
sing
AE1
01, E
xcep
tion.
SE
E B
LOC
K 4
43 (9
) Req
uire
that
recr
eatio
nal v
ehic
les
plac
ed o
n si
tes
with
in Z
ones
V1-
30, V
, and
VE
on
the
com
mun
ity’s
FIR
M e
ither
(i)
B
e on
the
site
for f
ewer
than
180
con
secu
tive
days
, (ii
) B
e fu
lly li
cens
ed a
nd re
ady
for h
ighw
ay u
se,
or
(iii)
Mee
t the
requ
irem
ents
in p
arag
raph
s (b
)(1)
an
d (e
) (2)
thro
ugh
(7) o
f thi
s se
ctio
n. A
re
crea
tiona
l veh
icle
is re
ady
for h
ighw
ay u
se if
it
is o
n its
whe
els
or ja
ckin
g sy
stem
, is
atta
ched
to th
e si
te o
nly
by q
uick
dis
conn
ect
type
util
ities
and
sec
urity
dev
ices
, and
has
no
perm
anen
tly a
ttach
ed a
dditi
ons.
R10
7 T
empo
rary
str
uctu
res.
![Page 138: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/138.jpg)
Pa
ge C
-26
IRC
Cro
ssw
alk
of th
e N
FIP
Reg
ulat
ions
to th
e Fl
ood
Res
ista
nce
Prov
isio
ns o
f the
IRC
®.
NFI
P R
egul
atio
ns
2006
IRC
® [
anno
tate
d w
ith 2
007
Supp
lem
ent]
Sec.
60.
6 V
aria
nce
and
exce
ptio
ns
44
(a) T
he A
dmin
istra
tor d
oes
not s
et fo
rth a
bsol
ute
crite
ria fo
r gra
ntin
g va
rianc
es fr
om th
e cr
iteria
set
fo
rth in
Sec
s. 6
0.3,
60.
4, a
nd 6
0.5.
The
issu
ance
of
a va
rianc
e is
for f
lood
pla
in m
anag
emen
t pur
pose
s on
ly. I
nsur
ance
pre
miu
m ra
tes
are
dete
rmin
ed b
y st
atut
e ac
cord
ing
to a
ctua
rial r
isk
and
will
not
be
mod
ified
by
the
gran
ting
of a
var
ianc
e. T
he
com
mun
ity, a
fter e
xam
inin
g th
e ap
plic
ant’s
ha
rdsh
ips,
sha
ll ap
prov
e or
dis
appr
ove
a re
ques
t. W
hile
the
gran
ting
of v
aria
nces
gen
eral
ly is
lim
ited
to a
lot s
ize
less
than
one
-hal
f acr
e (a
s se
t for
th in
pa
ragr
aph
(a)(
2) o
f thi
s se
ctio
n), d
evia
tions
from
th
at li
mita
tion
may
occ
ur. H
owev
er, a
s th
e lo
t siz
e in
crea
ses
beyo
nd o
ne-h
alf a
cre,
the
tech
nica
l ju
stifi
catio
n re
quire
d fo
r iss
uing
a v
aria
nce
incr
ease
s. T
he A
dmin
istra
tor m
ay re
view
a
com
mun
ity’s
find
ings
just
ifyin
g th
e gr
antin
g of
va
rianc
es, a
nd if
that
revi
ew in
dica
tes
a pa
ttern
in
cons
iste
nt w
ith th
e ob
ject
ives
of s
ound
floo
d pl
ain
man
agem
ent,
the
Adm
inis
trato
r may
take
ap
prop
riate
act
ion
unde
r Sec
. 59.
24(b
) of t
his
subc
hapt
er.
R10
4.10
.1 [
Mod
ifica
tions
] Are
as p
rone
to fl
oodi
ng.
The
build
ing
offic
ial s
hall
not g
rant
mod
ifica
tions
to a
ny
prov
isio
n re
late
d to
floo
d ha
zard
are
as a
s es
tabl
ishe
d by
Tab
le R
301.
2(1)
with
out t
he g
rant
ing
of a
var
ianc
e to
su
ch p
rovi
sion
s by
the
boar
d of
app
eals
.
![Page 139: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/139.jpg)
Pa
ge C
-27
IRC
Cro
ssw
alk
of th
e N
FIP
Reg
ulat
ions
to th
e Fl
ood
Res
ista
nce
Prov
isio
ns o
f the
IRC
®.
NFI
P R
egul
atio
ns
2006
IRC
® [
anno
tate
d w
ith 2
007
Supp
lem
ent]
45 V
aria
nces
may
be
issu
ed fo
r the
repa
ir or
re
habi
litat
ion
of h
isto
ric s
truct
ures
upo
n a
dete
rmin
atio
n th
at th
e pr
opos
ed re
pair
or
reha
bilit
atio
n w
ill n
ot p
recl
ude
the
stru
ctur
e’s
cont
inue
d de
sign
atio
n as
a h
isto
ric s
truct
ure
and
the
varia
nce
is th
e m
inim
um n
eces
sary
to p
rese
rve
the
hist
oric
cha
ract
er a
nd d
esig
n of
the
stru
ctur
e.
R11
2.2.
1 D
eter
min
atio
n of
sub
stan
tial i
mpr
ovem
ent i
n ar
eas
pron
e to
floo
ding
. W
hen
the
build
ing
offic
ial
prov
ides
a fi
ndin
g re
quire
d in
Sec
tion
R10
5.3.
1.1,
the
boar
d of
app
eals
sha
ll de
term
ine
whe
ther
the
valu
e of
th
e pr
opos
ed w
ork
cons
titut
es a
sub
stan
tial i
mpr
ovem
ent.
A s
ubst
antia
l im
prov
emen
t mea
ns a
ny re
pair,
re
cons
truct
ion,
reha
bilit
atio
n, a
dditi
on, o
r im
prov
emen
t of a
bui
ldin
g or
stru
ctur
e, th
e co
st o
f whi
ch e
qual
s or
ex
ceed
s 50
per
cent
of t
he m
arke
t val
ue o
f the
bui
ldin
g or
stru
ctur
e be
fore
the
impr
ovem
ent o
r rep
air i
s st
arte
d.
If th
e bu
ildin
g or
stru
ctur
e ha
s su
stai
ned
subs
tant
ial d
amag
e, a
ll re
pairs
are
con
side
red
subs
tant
ial
impr
ovem
ent r
egar
dles
s of
the
actu
al re
pair
wor
k pe
rform
ed.
The
term
doe
s no
t inc
lude
: 1.
Im
prov
emen
ts o
f a b
uild
ing
or s
truct
ure
requ
ired
to c
orre
ct e
xist
ing
heal
th, s
anita
ry, o
r saf
ety
code
vi
olat
ions
iden
tifie
d by
the
build
ing
offic
ial a
nd w
hich
are
the
min
imum
nec
essa
ry to
ass
ure
safe
livi
ng
cond
ition
s; o
r 2.
A
ny a
ltera
tion
of a
his
toric
bui
ldin
g or
stru
ctur
e pr
ovid
ed th
at th
e al
tera
tion
will
not
pre
clud
e th
e co
ntin
ued
desi
gnat
ion
as a
his
toric
bui
ldin
g or
stru
ctur
e. F
or th
e pu
rpos
es o
f thi
s ex
clus
ion,
a h
isto
ric b
uild
ing
is:
2.1
Lis
ted
or p
relim
inar
ily d
eter
min
ed to
be
elig
ible
for l
istin
g in
the
Nat
iona
l Reg
iste
r of H
isto
ric P
lace
s; o
r 2.
2 D
eter
min
ed b
y th
e S
ecre
tary
of t
he U
.S. D
epar
tmen
t of I
nter
ior a
s co
ntrib
utin
g to
the
hist
oric
al
sign
ifica
nce
of a
regi
ster
ed h
isto
ric d
istri
ct o
r a d
istri
ct p
relim
inar
ily d
eter
min
ed to
qua
lify
as a
n hi
stor
ic d
istri
ct; o
r
2.3
Des
igna
ted
as h
isto
ric u
nder
a s
tate
or l
ocal
his
toric
pre
serv
atio
n pr
ogra
m th
at is
app
rove
d by
the
Dep
artm
ent o
f Int
erio
r.
46 P
roce
dure
s fo
r the
gra
ntin
g of
var
ianc
es b
y a
com
mun
ity a
re a
s fo
llow
s: (1
) Var
ianc
es s
hall
not
be is
sued
by
a co
mm
unity
with
in a
ny d
esig
nate
d re
gula
tory
floo
dway
if a
ny in
crea
se in
floo
d le
vels
du
ring
the
base
floo
d di
scha
rge
wou
ld re
sult;
R30
1.2.
4 F
lood
plai
n co
nstr
uctio
n. E
xcep
tion.
[Flo
odw
ay a
ppro
vals
not
allo
wed
, ref
er to
IBC
.]
SE
E B
LOC
K 3
47 (2
) Var
ianc
es m
ay b
e is
sued
by
a co
mm
unity
for
new
con
stru
ctio
n an
d su
bsta
ntia
l im
prov
emen
ts to
be
ere
cted
on
a lo
t of o
ne-h
alf a
cre
or le
ss in
siz
e co
ntig
uous
to a
nd s
urro
unde
d by
lots
with
exi
stin
g st
ruct
ures
con
stru
cted
bel
ow th
e ba
se fl
ood
leve
l, in
con
form
ance
with
the
proc
edur
es o
f par
agra
phs
(a) (
3), (
4), (
5) a
nd (6
) of t
his
sect
ion;
R11
2.2.
2 C
riter
ia fo
r iss
uanc
e of
a v
aria
nce
for a
reas
pro
ne to
floo
ding
. A
var
ianc
e sh
all o
nly
be is
sued
up
on:
1.
A s
how
ing
of g
ood
and
suffi
cien
t cau
se th
at th
e un
ique
cha
ract
eris
tics
of th
e si
ze, c
onfig
urat
ion,
or
topo
grap
hy o
f the
site
rend
er th
e el
evat
ion
stan
dard
s of
Sec
tion
324
inap
prop
riate
. 2.
A
det
erm
inat
ion
that
failu
re to
gra
nt th
e va
rianc
e w
ould
resu
lt in
exc
eptio
nal h
ards
hip
by re
nder
ing
the
lot
unde
velo
pabl
e.
3.
A d
eter
min
atio
n th
at th
e gr
antin
g of
a v
aria
nce
will
not
resu
lt in
incr
ease
d flo
od h
eigh
ts, a
dditi
onal
thre
ats
to p
ublic
saf
ety,
ext
raor
dina
ry p
ublic
exp
ense
, nor
cre
ate
nuis
ance
s, c
ause
frau
d on
or v
ictim
izat
ion
of th
e pu
blic
, or c
onfli
ct w
ith e
xist
ing
law
s or
ord
inan
ces.
4.
A
det
erm
inat
ion
that
the
varia
nce
is th
e m
inim
um n
eces
sary
to a
fford
relie
f, co
nsid
erin
g th
e flo
od h
azar
d.
5.
Sub
mis
sion
to th
e ap
plic
ant o
f writ
ten
notic
e sp
ecify
ing
the
diffe
renc
e be
twee
n th
e de
sign
floo
d el
evat
ion
and
the
elev
atio
n to
whi
ch th
e bu
ildin
g is
to b
e bu
ilt, s
tatin
g th
at th
e co
st o
f flo
od in
sura
nce
will
be
com
men
sura
te w
ith th
e in
crea
sed
risk
resu
lting
from
the
redu
ced
floor
ele
vatio
n, a
nd s
tatin
g th
at
cons
truct
ion
belo
w th
e de
sign
floo
d el
evat
ion
incr
ease
s ris
ks to
life
and
pro
perty
.
![Page 140: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/140.jpg)
Pa
ge C
-28
IRC
Cro
ssw
alk
of th
e N
FIP
Reg
ulat
ions
to th
e Fl
ood
Res
ista
nce
Prov
isio
ns o
f the
IRC
®.
NFI
P R
egul
atio
ns
2006
IRC
® [
anno
tate
d w
ith 2
007
Supp
lem
ent]
48 (3
) V
aria
nces
sha
ll on
ly b
e is
sued
by
a co
mm
unity
upo
n
(i)
a sh
owin
g of
goo
d an
d su
ffici
ent c
ause
, (ii
) a
dete
rmin
atio
n th
at fa
ilure
to g
rant
the
varia
nce
wou
ld re
sult
in e
xcep
tiona
l har
dshi
p to
the
appl
ican
t, an
d
(iii)
a de
term
inat
ion
that
the
gran
ting
of a
var
ianc
e w
ill n
ot re
sult
in in
crea
sed
flood
hei
ghts
, ad
ditio
nal t
hrea
ts to
pub
lic s
afet
y,
extra
ordi
nary
pub
lic e
xpen
se, c
reat
e nu
isan
ces,
cau
se fr
aud
on o
r vic
timiz
atio
n of
th
e pu
blic
, or c
onfli
ct w
ith e
xist
ing
loca
l law
s or
ord
inan
ces;
R11
2.2.
2(2)
and
(3)
Crit
eria
for i
ssua
nce
of a
var
ianc
e fo
r are
as p
rone
to fl
oodi
ng.
SE
E B
LOC
K 4
7
49 (4
) Var
ianc
es s
hall
only
be
issu
ed u
pon
a de
term
inat
ion
that
the
varia
nce
is th
e m
inim
um
nece
ssar
y, c
onsi
derin
g th
e flo
od h
azar
d, to
affo
rd
relie
f;
R11
2.2.
2(4)
Crit
eria
for i
ssua
nce
of a
var
ianc
e fo
r are
as p
rone
to fl
oodi
ng.
SE
E B
LOC
K 4
7
50 (5
) A
com
mun
ity s
hall
notif
y th
e ap
plic
ant i
n w
ritin
g ov
er th
e s
igna
ture
of a
com
mun
ity
offic
ial t
hat
(i)
the
issu
ance
of a
var
ianc
e to
con
stru
ct a
st
ruct
ure
belo
w th
e ba
se fl
ood
leve
l will
resu
lt in
incr
ease
d pr
emiu
m ra
tes
for f
lood
insu
ranc
e up
to a
mou
nts
as h
igh
as $
25 fo
r $10
0 of
in
sura
nce
cove
rage
and
(ii
) su
ch c
onst
ruct
ion
belo
w th
e ba
se fl
ood
leve
l in
crea
ses
risks
to li
fe a
nd p
rope
rty. S
uch
notif
icat
ion
shal
l be
mai
ntai
ned
with
a re
cord
of
all
varia
nce
actio
ns a
s re
quire
d in
pa
ragr
aph
(a)(
6) o
f thi
s se
ctio
n; a
nd
R10
4.7
Dep
artm
ent R
ecor
ds.
R11
2.2.
2(5)
Crit
eria
for i
ssua
nce
of a
var
ianc
e fo
r are
as p
rone
to fl
oodi
ng.
SE
E B
LOC
K 4
7
51 (6
) A c
omm
unity
sha
ll (i)
mai
ntai
n a
reco
rd o
f all
varia
nce
actio
ns, i
nclu
ding
just
ifica
tion
for t
heir
issu
ance
, and
(ii)
repo
rt su
ch v
aria
nces
issu
ed in
its
ann
ual o
r bie
nnia
l rep
ort s
ubm
itted
to th
e A
dmin
istra
tor.
R10
4.7
Dep
artm
ent R
ecor
ds.
R11
2.1
[Boa
rd o
f App
eals
] Gen
eral
.
![Page 141: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/141.jpg)
Pa
ge C
-29
IRC
Cro
ssw
alk
of th
e N
FIP
Reg
ulat
ions
to th
e Fl
ood
Res
ista
nce
Prov
isio
ns o
f the
IRC
®.
NFI
P R
egul
atio
ns
2006
IRC
® [
anno
tate
d w
ith 2
007
Supp
lem
ent]
52 (7
) V
aria
nces
may
be
issu
ed b
y a
com
mun
ity fo
r ne
w c
onst
ruct
ion
and
subs
tant
ial i
mpr
ovem
ents
an
d fo
r oth
er d
evel
opm
ent n
eces
sary
for t
he
cond
uct o
f a fu
nctio
nally
dep
ende
nt u
se p
rovi
ded
that
(i)
th
e cr
iteria
of p
arag
raph
s (a
)(1)
thro
ugh
(a)(
4)
of th
is s
ectio
n ar
e m
et, a
nd
(ii)
the
stru
ctur
e or
oth
er d
evel
opm
ent i
s pr
otec
ted
by m
etho
ds th
at m
inim
ize
floo
d da
mag
es d
urin
g th
e ba
se fl
ood
and
crea
te n
o ad
ditio
nal t
hrea
ts to
pub
lic s
afet
y.
[Fun
ctio
nally
dep
ende
nt u
ses
are
non-
resi
dent
ial u
ses;
refe
r to
IBC
.]
![Page 142: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/142.jpg)
AAppppeennddiixx DD.. FFlloooodd RReessiissttaannccee PPrroovviissiioonnss ooff tthhee IIMMCC,, IIPPCC,,
IIFFGGCC,, IIPPSSDDCC && IIEEBBCC
Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes®: Meeting the Requirements of the NFIP D-1
![Page 143: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/143.jpg)
pa
ge D
-3
IMC
-IP
C-I
FGC
-IP
SD
C-I
EB
C
Floo
d R
esis
tanc
e Pr
ovis
ions
of t
he IM
C, I
PC, I
FGC
, IPS
DC
and
the
IEB
C.
Cod
e Ex
cerp
ts F
rom
200
6 ed
ition
s of
IMC
, IPC
, IFG
C, I
PSD
C, a
nd th
e IE
BC
20
06 In
tern
atio
nal M
echa
nica
l Cod
e M
301.
13 [B
] Flo
od h
azar
d. F
or s
truct
ures
loca
ted
in fl
ood
haza
rd a
reas
, mec
hani
cal s
yste
ms,
equ
ipm
ent a
nd
appl
ianc
es s
hall
be e
leva
ted
at o
r abo
ve th
e de
sign
floo
d el
evat
ion.
Ex
cept
ion:
Mec
hani
cal s
yste
ms,
equ
ipm
ent a
nd a
pplia
nces
are
per
mitt
ed to
be
loca
ted
belo
w th
e de
sign
flo
od e
leva
tion
prov
ided
that
they
are
des
igne
d an
d in
stal
led
to p
reve
nt w
ater
from
ent
erin
g or
ac
cum
ulat
ing
with
in th
e co
mpo
nent
s an
d to
resi
st h
ydro
stat
ic a
nd h
ydro
dyna
mic
load
s an
d st
ress
es,
incl
udin
g th
e ef
fect
s of
buo
yanc
y, d
urin
g th
e oc
curr
ence
of f
lood
ing
to th
e de
sign
floo
d el
evat
ion
in
com
plia
nce
with
the
flood
-res
ista
nt c
onst
ruct
ion
requ
irem
ents
of t
he In
tern
atio
nal B
uild
ing
Cod
e.
M30
1.13
.1 W
alls
bel
ow b
uild
ings
in fl
ood
haza
rd a
reas
sub
ject
to h
igh-
velo
city
wav
e ac
tion.
In
flood
ha
zard
are
as s
ubje
ct to
hig
h-ve
loci
ty w
ave
actio
n, m
echa
nica
l sys
tem
s an
d eq
uipm
ent s
hall
not b
e m
ount
ed
on o
r pen
etra
te w
alls
inte
nded
to b
reak
aw
ay u
nder
floo
d lo
ads.
M
401.
5.3
Floo
d ha
zard
. Fo
r stru
ctur
es lo
cate
d in
floo
d ha
zard
are
as, o
utsi
de a
ir ex
haus
t ope
ning
s an
d ai
r in
take
ope
ning
s sh
all b
e lo
cate
d at
or a
bove
the
desi
gn fl
ood
elev
atio
n.
M60
2.4
Floo
d ha
zard
. Fo
r stru
ctur
es lo
cate
d in
floo
d ha
zard
are
as, p
lenu
m s
pace
s sh
all b
e lo
cate
d ab
ove
the
desi
gn fl
ood
elev
atio
n or
sha
ll be
loca
ted
abov
e th
e de
sign
floo
d el
evat
ion
or s
hall
be d
esig
ned
and
cons
truct
ed to
pre
vent
wat
er fr
om e
nter
ing
or a
ccum
ulat
ing
with
in th
e pl
enum
spa
ces
durin
g flo
ods
up to
the
desi
gn fl
ood
elev
atio
n. I
f the
ple
num
spa
ces
are
loca
ted
belo
w th
e de
sign
floo
d el
evat
ion,
they
sha
ll be
ca
pabl
e of
resi
stin
g hy
dros
tatic
and
hyd
rody
nam
ic lo
ads
and
stre
sses
, inc
ludi
ng th
e ef
fect
s of
buo
yanc
y,
durin
g th
e oc
curr
ence
of f
lood
ing
to th
e de
sign
floo
d el
evat
ion.
M
603.
13 F
lood
haz
ard
area
s.
For s
truct
ures
in fl
ood
haza
rd a
reas
, duc
ts s
hall
be lo
cate
d ab
ove
the
desi
gn
flood
ele
vatio
n or
sha
ll be
des
igne
d an
d co
nstru
cted
to p
reve
nt w
ater
from
ent
erin
g or
acc
umul
atin
g w
ithin
the
duct
s du
ring
flood
s up
to th
e de
sign
floo
d el
evat
ion.
If t
he d
ucts
are
loca
ted
belo
w th
e de
sign
floo
d el
evat
ion,
th
e du
cts
shal
l be
capa
ble
of re
sist
ing
hydr
osta
tic a
nd h
ydro
dyna
mic
load
s an
d st
ress
es, i
nclu
ding
the
effe
cts
of b
uoya
ncy,
dur
ing
the
occu
rren
ce o
f flo
odin
g to
the
desi
gn fl
ood
elev
atio
n.
M12
06.9
.1 F
lood
haz
ard.
Pip
ing
loca
ted
in a
floo
d ha
zard
are
a zo
ne s
hall
be c
apab
le o
f res
istin
g hy
dros
tatic
an
d hy
drod
ynam
ic lo
ads
and
stre
sses
, inc
ludi
ng th
e ef
fect
s of
buo
yanc
y, d
urin
g th
e oc
curr
ence
of f
lood
ing
to
the
desi
gn fl
ood
elev
atio
n.
M13
05.2
.1 F
lood
haz
ard.
All
fuel
oil
pipe
, equ
ipm
ent a
nd a
pplia
nces
loca
ted
in fl
ood
haza
rd a
reas
sha
ll be
lo
cate
d ab
ove
the
desi
gn fl
ood
elev
atio
n or
sha
ll be
cap
able
of r
esis
ting
hydr
osta
tic a
nd h
ydro
dyna
mic
load
s an
d st
ress
es, i
nclu
ding
the
effe
cts
of b
uoya
ncy,
dur
ing
the
occu
rren
ce o
f flo
odin
g to
the
desi
gn fl
ood
elev
atio
n.
![Page 144: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/144.jpg)
pa
ge D
-4
IMC
-IP
C-I
FGC
-IP
SD
C-I
EB
C
Floo
d R
esis
tanc
e Pr
ovis
ions
of t
he IM
C, I
PC, I
FGC
, IPS
DC
and
the
IEB
C.
Cod
e Ex
cerp
ts F
rom
200
6 ed
ition
s of
IMC
, IPC
, IFG
C, I
PSD
C, a
nd th
e IE
BC
20
06 In
tern
atio
nal P
lum
bing
Cod
e P3
09.1
Gen
eral
. Plu
mbi
ng s
yste
ms
and
equi
pmen
t in
stru
ctur
es e
rect
ed in
floo
d ha
zard
are
as s
hall
be
cons
truct
ed in
acc
orda
nce
with
the
requ
irem
ents
of t
his
sect
ion
and
the
Inte
rnat
iona
l Bui
ldin
g C
ode.
P3
09.2
Flo
od h
azar
d. F
or s
truct
ures
loca
ted
in fl
ood
haza
rd a
reas
, the
follo
win
g sy
stem
s an
d eq
uipm
ent
shal
l be
loca
ted
abov
e th
e de
sign
floo
d el
evat
ion:
Ex
cept
ion:
Th
e fo
llow
ing
syst
ems
are
perm
itted
to b
e lo
cate
d be
low
the
desi
gn fl
ood
elev
atio
n pr
ovid
ed
that
the
syst
ems
are
desi
gned
and
inst
alle
d to
pre
vent
wat
er fr
om e
nter
ing
or a
ccum
ulat
ing
with
in th
eir
com
pone
nts
and
the
syst
ems
are
cons
truct
ed to
resi
st h
ydro
stat
ic a
nd h
ydro
dyna
mic
load
s an
d st
ress
es,
incl
udin
g th
e ef
fect
s of
buo
yanc
y, d
urin
g th
e oc
curr
ence
of f
lood
ing
to th
e de
sign
floo
d el
evat
ion.
1.
A
ll w
ater
ser
vice
pip
es.
2.
Pum
p se
als
in in
divi
dual
wat
er s
uppl
y sy
stem
s w
here
the
pum
p is
loca
ted
belo
w th
e ba
se fl
ood
elev
atio
n.
3.
Cov
ers
on p
otab
le w
ater
wel
ls s
hall
be s
eale
d, e
xcep
t whe
re th
e to
p of
the
casi
ng w
ell o
r pip
e sl
eeve
is e
leva
ted
to a
t lea
st 1
foot
(304
.8 m
m) a
bove
the
desi
gn fl
ood
elev
atio
n.
4.
All
sani
tary
dra
inag
e pi
ping
. 5.
A
ll st
orm
dra
inag
e pi
ping
. 6.
M
anho
le c
over
s sh
all b
e se
aled
, exc
ept w
here
ele
vate
d to
or a
bove
the
desi
gn fl
ood
elev
atio
n.
7.
All
othe
r plu
mbi
ng fi
xtur
es, f
auce
ts, f
ixtu
re fi
tting
s, p
ipin
g sy
stem
s an
d eq
uipm
ent.
8.
W
ater
hea
ters
.
9.
Ven
ts a
nd v
ent s
yste
ms.
P3
09.3
Flo
od h
azar
d ar
eas
subj
ect t
o hi
gh-v
eloc
ity w
ave
actio
n. S
truct
ures
loca
ted
in fl
ood
haza
rd
area
s su
bjec
t to
high
-vel
ocity
wav
e ac
tion
shal
l mee
t the
requ
irem
ents
of S
ectio
n 30
9.2
and
the
plum
bing
sy
stem
s, p
ipes
and
fixt
ures
sha
ll no
t be
mou
nted
on
or p
enet
rate
thro
ugh
wal
ls in
tend
ed to
bre
akaw
ay u
nder
flo
od lo
ads.
2006
Inte
rnat
iona
l Fue
l Gas
Cod
e FG
301.
11 F
lood
haz
ard.
For
stru
ctur
es lo
cate
d in
floo
d ha
zard
are
as, t
he a
pplia
nce,
equ
ipm
ent a
nd s
yste
m
inst
alla
tions
regu
late
d by
this
cod
e sh
all b
e lo
cate
d at
or a
bove
the
desi
gn fl
ood
elev
atio
n an
d sh
all c
ompl
y w
ith th
e flo
od re
sist
ant c
onst
ruct
ion
requ
irem
ents
of t
he In
tern
atio
nal B
uild
ing
Cod
e.
Exce
ptio
n: T
he a
pplia
nce,
equ
ipm
ent a
nd s
yste
m in
stal
latio
ns re
gula
ted
by th
is c
ode
are
perm
itted
to b
e lo
cate
d be
low
the
desi
gn fl
ood
elev
atio
n pr
ovid
ed th
at th
ey a
re d
esig
ned
and
inst
alle
d to
pre
vent
wat
er
from
ent
erin
g or
acc
umul
atin
g w
ithin
the
com
pone
nts
and
to re
sist
hyd
rost
atic
and
hyd
rody
nam
ic lo
ads
and
stre
sses
, inc
ludi
ng th
e ef
fect
s of
buo
yanc
y, d
urin
g th
e oc
curr
ence
of f
lood
ing
to th
e de
sign
floo
d el
evat
ion
and
shal
l com
ply
with
the
flood
-res
ista
nt c
onst
ruct
ion
requ
irem
ents
of t
he In
tern
atio
nal B
uild
ing
Cod
e.
![Page 145: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/145.jpg)
pa
ge D
-5
IMC
-IP
C-I
FGC
-IP
SD
C-I
EB
C
Floo
d R
esis
tanc
e Pr
ovis
ions
of t
he IM
C, I
PC, I
FGC
, IPS
DC
and
the
IEB
C.
Cod
e Ex
cerp
ts F
rom
200
6 ed
ition
s of
IMC
, IPC
, IFG
C, I
PSD
C, a
nd th
e IE
BC
20
06 In
tern
atio
nal P
rivat
e S
ewag
e D
ispo
sal C
ode
cont
inue
d on
nex
t pag
e
PSD
C10
6.2.
3 Si
te p
lan.
Site
pla
ns s
hall
be fi
led
show
ing
to s
cale
the
loca
tion
of a
ll se
ptic
tank
s, h
oldi
ng
tank
s or
oth
er tr
eatm
ent t
anks
, bui
ldin
g se
wer
s, w
ells
, wat
er m
ains
, wat
er s
ervi
ce, s
tream
s an
d la
kes,
floo
d ha
zard
are
as, d
osin
g or
pum
ping
cha
mbe
rs, d
istri
butio
n bo
xes,
effl
uent
sys
tem
s, d
ual d
ispo
sal s
yste
ms,
re
plac
emen
t sys
tem
are
as, a
nd th
e lo
catio
n of
all
build
ings
or s
truct
ures
. All
sepa
ratin
g di
stan
ces
and
dim
ensi
ons
shal
l be
show
n, in
clud
ing
any
dist
ance
to a
djoi
ning
pro
perty
. A v
ertic
al e
leva
tion
refe
renc
e po
int
and
a ho
rizon
tal r
efer
ence
poi
nt s
hall
be in
dica
ted.
For
oth
er th
an s
ingl
e-fa
mily
dw
ellin
gs, g
rade
slo
pe w
ith
cont
ours
sha
ll be
sho
wn
for t
he g
rade
ele
vatio
n of
the
entir
e ar
ea o
f the
soi
l abs
orpt
ion
syst
em a
nd th
e ar
ea
on a
ll si
des
for a
dis
tanc
e of
25
feet
(762
0 m
m).
PS
DC
108.
7 U
nsaf
e sy
stem
s. A
ny p
rivat
e se
wag
e di
spos
al s
yste
m re
gula
ted
by th
is c
ode
that
is u
nsaf
e or
th
at c
onst
itute
s a
heal
th h
azar
d, in
sani
tary
con
ditio
n or
is o
ther
wis
e da
nger
ous
to h
uman
life
is h
ereb
y de
clar
ed u
nsaf
e. A
ny u
se o
f priv
ate
sew
age
disp
osal
sys
tem
s re
gula
ted
by th
is c
ode
cons
titut
ing
a ha
zard
to
safe
ty, h
ealth
or p
ublic
wel
fare
by
reas
on o
f ina
dequ
ate
mai
nten
ance
, dila
pida
tion,
obs
oles
cenc
e, d
isas
ter,
dam
age
or a
band
onm
ent i
s he
reby
dec
lare
d an
uns
afe
use.
Any
suc
h un
safe
equ
ipm
ent i
s he
reby
dec
lare
d to
be
a pu
blic
nui
sanc
e an
d sh
all b
e ab
ated
by
repa
ir, re
habi
litat
ion,
dem
oliti
on o
r rem
oval
PS
DC
303.
1 G
ener
al.
Soi
l abs
orpt
ion
site
s sh
all b
e lo
cate
d ou
tsid
e of
floo
d ha
zard
are
as.
Ex
cept
ion:
Whe
re s
uita
ble
soil
abso
rptio
n si
tes
outs
ide
of th
e flo
od h
azar
d ar
ea a
re n
ot a
vaila
ble
it is
pe
rmitt
ed fo
r the
soi
l abs
orpt
ion
site
to b
e lo
cate
d w
ithin
the
flood
haz
ard
area
. Th
e so
il ab
sorp
tion
site
sh
all b
e lo
cate
d to
min
imiz
e th
e ef
fect
s of
inun
datio
n un
der c
ondi
tions
of t
he d
esig
n flo
od.
PSD
C30
3.2
Tan
ks.
In fl
ood
haza
rd a
reas
, tan
ks s
hall
be a
ncho
red
to c
ount
er b
uoya
nt fo
rces
dur
ing
cond
ition
s of
the
desi
gn fl
ood.
The
ven
t ter
min
atio
n an
d se
rvic
e m
anho
le o
f the
tank
sha
ll be
a m
inim
um o
f 2
feet
(610
mm
) abo
ve th
e de
sign
floo
d el
evat
ion
or fi
tted
with
cov
ers
desi
gned
to p
reve
nt th
e in
flow
of
flood
wat
er o
r out
flow
of t
he c
onte
nts
of th
e ta
nks
durin
g co
nditi
ons
of th
e de
sign
floo
d.
PSD
C30
3.3
Mou
nd s
yste
ms.
Mou
nd s
yste
ms
in fl
ood
haza
rd a
reas
sha
ll be
pro
hibi
ted.
PS
DC
401.
2 S
ite e
valu
atio
n. S
ite e
valu
atio
n sh
all i
nclu
de s
oil c
ondi
tions
, pro
perti
es a
nd p
erm
eabi
lity,
dep
th
to z
ones
of s
oil s
atur
atio
n, d
epth
to b
edro
ck, s
lope
, lan
dsca
pe p
ositi
ons,
all
setb
ack
requ
irem
ents
and
the
pres
ence
of f
lood
haz
ard
area
s. S
oil t
est d
ata
shal
l rel
ate
to th
e un
dist
urbe
d el
evat
ions
, and
a v
ertic
al
elev
atio
n re
fere
nce
poin
t or b
ench
mar
k sh
all b
e es
tabl
ishe
d. E
valu
atio
n da
ta s
hall
be re
porte
d on
app
rove
d fo
rms.
Rep
orts
sha
ll be
file
d fo
r all
site
s in
vest
igat
ed w
ith 3
0 da
ys o
f the
com
plet
ion
of te
stin
g.
PSD
C40
3.4
Allu
vial
and
col
luvi
al d
epos
its.
Sub
surfa
ce s
oil a
bsor
ptio
n sy
stem
s sh
all n
ot b
e pl
aced
in
allu
vial
and
col
luvi
al d
epos
its w
ith s
hallo
w d
epth
s, e
xten
ded
perio
ds o
f sat
urat
ion
or p
ossi
ble
flood
ing.
![Page 146: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/146.jpg)
pa
ge D
-6
IMC
-IP
C-I
FGC
-IP
SD
C-I
EB
C
Floo
d R
esis
tanc
e Pr
ovis
ions
of t
he IM
C, I
PC, I
FGC
, IPS
DC
and
the
IEB
C.
Cod
e Ex
cerp
ts F
rom
200
6 ed
ition
s of
IMC
, IPC
, IFG
C, I
PSD
C, a
nd th
e IE
BC
20
06 In
tern
atio
nal P
rivat
e S
ewag
e D
ispo
sal C
ode
cont
inue
d fr
om p
revi
ous
page
PSD
C40
6.1
Soi
l abs
orpt
ion
site
loca
tions
. Th
e su
rface
gra
de o
f all
soil
abso
rptio
n sy
stem
s sh
all b
e lo
cate
d at
a p
oint
low
er th
an th
e su
rface
gra
de o
f any
nea
rby
wat
er w
ell o
r res
ervo
ir on
the
sam
e or
adj
oini
ng
prop
erty
. W
here
this
is n
ot p
ossi
ble,
the
site
sha
ll be
loca
ted
so s
urfa
ce w
ater
dra
inag
e fro
m th
e si
te is
not
di
rect
ed to
war
d a
wel
l or r
eser
voir.
The
soi
l abs
orpt
ion
syst
em s
hall
be lo
cate
d w
ith a
min
imum
hor
izon
tal
dist
ance
bet
wee
n va
rious
ele
men
ts a
s in
dica
ted
in T
able
406
.2.
Priv
ate
sew
age
disp
osal
sys
tem
s in
co
mpa
cted
are
as, s
uch
as p
arki
ng lo
ts a
nd d
rivew
ays,
are
pro
hibi
ted.
Sur
face
wat
er s
hall
be d
iver
ted
away
fro
m a
ny s
oil a
bsor
ptio
n si
te o
n th
e sa
me
or n
eigh
borin
g lo
ts.
PSD
C40
6.1.
1 F
lood
haz
ard
area
s. T
he s
ite s
hall
be lo
cate
d ou
tsid
e of
floo
d ha
zard
are
as.
Ex
cept
ion:
Whe
re s
uita
ble
site
s ou
tsid
e of
the
flood
haz
ard
area
are
not
ava
ilabl
e it
is p
erm
itted
for t
he
site
to b
e lo
cate
d w
ithin
the
flood
haz
ard
area
. Th
e si
te s
hall
be lo
cate
d to
min
imiz
e th
e ef
fect
s of
in
unda
tion
unde
r con
ditio
ns o
f the
des
ign
flood
.
PSD
C90
2.2
Pro
hibi
ted
loca
tions
. A
mou
nd s
yste
m s
hall
be p
rohi
bite
d on
site
s no
t hav
ing
the
min
imum
de
pths
of s
oil s
peci
fied
in T
able
902
.2.
The
inst
alla
tion
of a
mou
nd in
a fi
lled
area
sha
ll be
pro
hibi
ted.
A
mou
nd s
hall
not b
e in
stal
led
in a
com
pact
ed a
rea
or o
ver a
faili
ng c
onve
ntio
nal s
yste
m.
2006
Inte
rnat
iona
l Exi
stin
g B
uild
ing
Cod
e co
ntin
ued
on n
ext p
age
101.
2 S
cope
. Th
e pr
ovis
ions
of t
he In
tern
atio
nal E
xist
ing
Bui
ldin
g C
ode
shal
l app
ly to
the
repa
ir, a
ltera
tion,
ch
ange
of o
ccup
ancy
, add
ition
, and
relo
catio
n of
exi
stin
g bu
ildin
gs.
101.
3 In
tent
. Th
e in
tent
of t
his
code
is to
pro
vide
flex
ibili
ty to
per
mit
the
use
of a
ltern
ativ
e ap
proa
ches
to
achi
eve
com
plia
nce
with
min
imum
requ
irem
ents
to s
afeg
uard
the
publ
ic h
ealth
, saf
ety,
and
wel
fare
inso
far a
s th
ey a
re a
ffect
ed b
y th
e re
pair,
alte
ratio
n, c
hang
e of
occ
upan
cy, a
dditi
on a
nd re
loca
tion
of e
xist
ing
build
ings
.
101.
5 C
ompl
ianc
e m
etho
ds. T
he re
pair,
alte
ratio
n, c
hang
e of
occ
upan
cy, a
dditi
on o
r rel
ocat
ion
of a
ll ex
istin
g bu
ildin
gs s
hall
com
ply
with
one
of t
he m
etho
ds li
sted
in S
ectio
ns 1
01.5
.1 th
roug
h 10
1.5.
3 as
sel
ecte
d by
the
appl
ican
t. A
pplic
atio
n of
a m
etho
d sh
all b
e th
e so
le b
asis
for a
sses
sing
the
com
plia
nce
of w
ork
perfo
rmed
un
der a
sin
gle
perm
it un
less
oth
erw
ise
appr
oved
by
the
code
offi
cial
. Sec
tions
101
.5.1
thro
ugh
101.
5.3
shal
l no
t be
appl
ied
in c
ombi
natio
n w
ith e
ach
othe
r. Ex
cept
ion:
Sub
ject
to th
e ap
prov
al o
f the
cod
e of
ficia
l, al
tera
tions
com
plyi
ng w
ith th
e la
ws
in e
xist
ence
at
the
time
the
build
ing
or th
e af
fect
ed p
ortio
n of
the
build
ing
was
bui
lt sh
all b
e co
nsid
ered
in c
ompl
ianc
e w
ith th
e pr
ovis
ions
of t
his
code
unl
ess
the
build
ing
is u
nder
goin
g m
ore
than
a li
mite
d st
ruct
ural
alte
ratio
n as
def
ined
in S
ectio
n 80
7.5.
3. N
ew s
truct
ural
mem
bers
add
ed a
s pa
rt of
the
alte
ratio
n sh
all c
ompl
y w
ith
the
Inte
rnat
iona
l Bui
ldin
g C
ode.
Alte
ratio
ns o
f exi
stin
g bu
ildin
gs in
floo
d ha
zard
are
as s
hall
com
ply
with
S
ectio
n 60
1.3.
![Page 147: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/147.jpg)
pa
ge D
-7
IMC
-IP
C-I
FGC
-IP
SD
C-I
EB
C
Floo
d R
esis
tanc
e Pr
ovis
ions
of t
he IM
C, I
PC, I
FGC
, IPS
DC
and
the
IEB
C.
Cod
e Ex
cerp
ts F
rom
200
6 ed
ition
s of
IMC
, IPC
, IFG
C, I
PSD
C, a
nd th
e IE
BC
20
06 In
tern
atio
nal E
xist
ing
Bui
ldin
g C
ode
cont
inue
d fr
om p
revi
ous
page
co
ntin
ued
on n
ext p
age
104.
10 M
odifi
catio
ns.
Whe
reve
r the
re a
re p
ract
ical
diff
icul
ties
in c
arry
ing
out t
he p
rovi
sion
s of
this
cod
e, th
e co
de o
ffici
al s
hall
have
the
auth
ority
to g
rant
mod
ifica
tions
for i
ndiv
idua
l cas
es, u
pon
appl
icat
ion
of th
e ow
ner
or o
wne
r’s re
pres
enta
tive,
pro
vide
d th
e co
de o
ffici
al s
hall
first
find
that
spe
cial
indi
vidu
al re
ason
mak
es th
e st
rict l
ette
r of t
his
code
impr
actic
al a
nd th
e m
odifi
catio
n is
in c
ompl
ianc
e w
ith th
e in
tent
and
pur
pose
of t
his
code
and
that
suc
h m
odifi
catio
n do
es n
ot le
ssen
hea
lth, a
cces
sibi
lity,
life
and
fire
saf
ety,
or s
truct
ural
re
quire
men
ts.
The
deta
ils o
f act
ion
gran
ting
mod
ifica
tions
sha
ll be
reco
rded
and
ent
ered
in th
e fil
es o
f the
de
partm
ent o
f bui
ldin
g sa
fety
. 10
4.10
.1 F
lood
haz
ard
area
s. F
or e
xist
ing
build
ings
loca
ted
in fl
ood
haza
rd a
reas
for w
hich
the
repa
irs,
alte
ratio
ns, a
nd a
dditi
ons
cons
titut
e su
bsta
ntia
l im
prov
emen
t, th
e co
de o
ffici
al s
hall
not g
rant
mod
ifica
tions
to
prov
isio
ns re
late
d to
floo
d re
sist
ance
unl
ess
a de
term
inat
ion
is m
ade
that
1.
Th
e ap
plic
ant h
as p
rese
nted
goo
d an
d su
ffici
ent c
ause
that
the
uniq
ue c
hara
cter
istic
s of
the
size
, co
nfig
urat
ion,
or t
opog
raph
y of
the
site
rend
er c
ompl
ianc
e w
ith th
e flo
od re
sist
ant c
onst
ruct
ion
prov
isio
ns in
appr
opria
te.
2.
Fa
ilure
to g
rant
the
mod
ifica
tion
wou
ld re
sult
in e
xcep
tiona
l har
dshi
p.
3.
The
gran
ting
of th
e m
odifi
catio
n w
ill n
ot re
sult
in in
crea
sed
flood
hei
ghts
, add
ition
al th
reat
s to
pub
lic
safe
ty, e
xtra
ordi
nary
pub
lic e
xpen
se, n
or c
reat
e nu
isan
ces,
cau
se fr
aud
on o
r vic
timiz
atio
n of
the
publ
ic, o
r con
flict
with
exi
stin
g la
ws
or o
rdin
ance
s.
4.
The
mod
ifica
tion
is th
e m
inim
um n
eces
sary
to a
fford
relie
f, co
nsid
erin
g th
e flo
od h
azar
d.
5.
A w
ritte
n no
tice
will
be
prov
ided
to th
e ap
plic
ant s
peci
fyin
g, if
app
licab
le, t
he d
iffer
ence
bet
wee
n th
e de
sign
floo
d el
evat
ion
and
the
elev
atio
n to
whi
ch th
e bu
ildin
g is
to b
e bu
ilt, s
tatin
g th
at th
e co
st o
f flo
od in
sura
nce
will
be
com
men
sura
te w
ith th
e in
crea
sed
risk
resu
lting
from
the
redu
ced
floor
el
evat
ion,
and
sta
ting
that
con
stru
ctio
n be
low
the
desi
gn fl
ood
elev
atio
n in
crea
ses
risks
to li
fe a
nd
prop
erty
.
109.
3.3
Low
est f
loor
ele
vatio
n. F
or a
dditi
ons
and
subs
tant
ial i
mpr
ovem
ents
to e
xist
ing
build
ings
in fl
ood
haza
rd a
reas
, upo
n pl
acem
ent o
f the
low
est f
loor
, inc
ludi
ng b
asem
ents
, and
prio
r to
furth
er v
ertic
al
cons
truct
ion,
the
elev
atio
n do
cum
enta
tion
requ
ired
in th
e In
tern
atio
nal B
uild
ing
Cod
e sh
all b
e su
bmitt
ed to
the
code
offi
cial
.
DEF
INIT
ION
S Fl
ood
Haz
ard
Are
a. T
he g
reat
er o
f the
follo
win
g tw
o ar
eas:
1.
Th
e ar
ea w
ithin
a fl
ood
plai
n su
bjec
t to
a 1-
perc
ent o
r gre
ater
cha
nce
of fl
oodi
ng in
any
yea
r, or
2.
Th
e ar
ea d
esig
nate
d as
a fl
ood
haza
rd a
rea
on a
com
mun
ity’s
floo
d ha
zard
map
, or o
ther
wis
e le
gally
des
igna
ted.
H
isto
ric B
uild
ings
. A
ny b
uild
ing
or s
truct
ure
that
is (a
) lis
ted
in th
e S
tate
or N
atio
nal R
egis
ter o
f His
toric
P
lace
s, (b
) des
igna
ted
as a
his
toric
pro
perty
und
er lo
cal o
r sta
te d
esig
natio
n, la
w, o
r sur
vey,
(c) c
ertif
ied
as a
co
ntrib
utin
g re
sour
ce w
ithin
a N
atio
nal R
egis
ter l
iste
d or
loca
lly d
esig
nate
d hi
stor
ic d
istri
ct, o
r (d)
with
an
opin
ion
or c
ertif
icat
ion
that
the
prop
erty
is e
ligib
le to
be
liste
d on
the
Nat
iona
l or S
tate
Reg
iste
rs o
f His
toric
P
lace
s ei
ther
indi
vidu
ally
or a
s a
cont
ribut
ing
build
ing
to a
his
toric
dis
trict
by
the
Sta
te H
isto
ric P
rese
rvat
ion
Offi
cer o
r the
Kee
per o
f the
Nat
iona
l Reg
iste
r of H
isto
ric P
lace
s.
![Page 148: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/148.jpg)
pa
ge D
-8
IMC
-IP
C-I
FGC
-IP
SD
C-I
EB
C
Floo
d R
esis
tanc
e Pr
ovis
ions
of t
he IM
C, I
PC, I
FGC
, IPS
DC
and
the
IEB
C.
Cod
e Ex
cerp
ts F
rom
200
6 ed
ition
s of
IMC
, IPC
, IFG
C, I
PSD
C, a
nd th
e IE
BC
20
06 In
tern
atio
nal E
xist
ing
Bui
ldin
g C
ode
cont
inue
d fr
om p
revi
ous
page
co
ntin
ued
on n
ext p
age
Subs
tant
ial D
amag
e. F
or th
e pu
rpos
e of
det
erm
inin
g co
mpl
ianc
e w
ith th
e flo
od p
rovi
sion
s of
this
cod
e,
dam
age
of a
ny o
rigin
sus
tain
ed b
y a
stru
ctur
e w
here
by th
e co
st o
f res
torin
g th
e st
ruct
ure
to it
s be
fore
da
mag
ed c
ondi
tion
wou
ld e
qual
or e
xcee
d 50
per
cent
of t
he m
arke
t val
ue o
f the
stru
ctur
e be
fore
the
dam
age
occu
rred
. Su
bsta
ntia
l Im
prov
emen
t. F
or th
e pu
rpos
e of
det
erm
inin
g co
mpl
ianc
e w
ith th
e flo
od p
rovi
sion
s of
this
cod
e,
any
repa
ir, a
ltera
tion,
add
ition
, or i
mpr
ovem
ent o
f a b
uild
ing
or s
truct
ure,
the
cost
of w
hich
equ
als
or e
xcee
ds
50 p
erce
nt o
f the
mar
ket v
alue
of t
he s
truct
ure
befo
re th
e im
prov
emen
t or r
epai
r is
star
ted.
If t
he s
truct
ure
has
sust
aine
d su
bsta
ntia
l dam
age,
any
repa
irs a
re c
onsi
dere
d su
bsta
ntia
l im
prov
emen
t reg
ardl
ess
of th
e ac
tual
repa
ir w
ork
perfo
rmed
. Th
e te
rm d
oes
not,
how
ever
, inc
lude
eith
er:
1.
Any
pro
ject
for i
mpr
ovem
ent o
f a b
uild
ing
requ
ired
to c
orre
ct e
xist
ing
heal
th, s
anita
ry o
r saf
ety
code
vi
olat
ions
iden
tifie
d by
the
code
offi
cial
and
that
are
the
min
imum
nec
essa
ry to
ass
ure
safe
livi
ng
cond
ition
s.
2.
Any
alte
ratio
n of
a h
isto
ric s
truct
ure
prov
ided
that
the
alte
ratio
n w
ill n
ot p
recl
ude
the
stru
ctur
e’s
cont
inue
d de
sign
atio
n as
a h
isto
ric s
truct
ure.
C
hapt
er 3
Pre
scrip
tive
Com
plia
nce
Met
hod
[B] S
ectio
n 30
2 A
dditi
ons,
Alte
ratio
ns o
r Rep
airs
[B
] 302
.1.1
Flo
od h
azar
d ar
eas.
For
bui
ldin
gs a
nd s
truct
ures
in fl
ood
haza
rd a
reas
est
ablis
hed
in S
ectio
n 16
12.3
of t
he In
tern
atio
nal B
uild
ing
Cod
e, a
ny a
dditi
ons,
alte
ratio
ns o
r rep
airs
that
con
stitu
te s
ubst
antia
l im
prov
emen
t of t
he e
xist
ing
stru
ctur
e, a
s de
fined
in S
ectio
n 16
12.2
of t
he In
tern
atio
nal B
uild
ing
Cod
e, s
hall
com
ply
with
the
flood
des
ign
requ
irem
ents
for n
ew c
onst
ruct
ion
and
all a
spec
ts o
f the
exi
stin
g st
ruct
ure
shal
l be
bro
ught
into
com
plia
nce
with
the
requ
irem
ents
for n
ew c
onst
ruct
ion
for f
lood
des
ign.
[B
] Sec
tion
306
His
toric
Bui
ldin
gs
306.
2 F
lood
haz
ard
area
s. W
ithin
floo
d ha
zard
are
as e
stab
lishe
d in
acc
orda
nce
with
Sec
tion
1612
.3 o
f the
In
tern
atio
nal B
uild
ing
Cod
e, w
here
the
wor
k pr
opos
ed c
onst
itute
s su
bsta
ntia
l im
prov
emen
t as
defin
ed in
S
ectio
n 16
12.2
of t
he In
tern
atio
nal B
uild
ing
Cod
e, th
e bu
ildin
g sh
all b
e br
ough
t int
o co
nfor
man
ce w
ith S
ectio
n 16
12 o
f the
Inte
rnat
iona
l Bui
ldin
g C
ode.
Ex
cept
ion:
His
toric
bui
ldin
gs th
at a
re:
1.
Li
sted
or p
relim
inar
ily d
eter
min
ed to
be
elig
ible
for l
istin
g in
the
Nat
iona
l Reg
iste
r of H
isto
ric P
lace
s;
or
2.
Det
erm
ined
by
the
Sec
reta
ry o
f the
U.S
. Dep
artm
ent o
f Int
erio
r as
cont
ribut
ing
to th
e hi
stor
ical
si
gnifi
canc
e of
a re
gist
ered
his
toric
dis
trict
or a
dis
trict
pre
limin
arily
det
erm
ined
to q
ualif
y as
an
hist
oric
dis
trict
; or
3.
D
esig
ned
as h
isto
ric u
nder
a s
tate
or l
ocal
his
toric
pre
serv
atio
n pr
ogra
m th
at is
app
rove
d by
the
Dep
artm
ent o
f Int
erio
r.
![Page 149: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/149.jpg)
pa
ge D
-9
IMC
-IP
C-I
FGC
-IP
SD
C-I
EB
C
Floo
d R
esis
tanc
e Pr
ovis
ions
of t
he IM
C, I
PC, I
FGC
, IPS
DC
and
the
IEB
C.
Cod
e Ex
cerp
ts F
rom
200
6 ed
ition
s of
IMC
, IPC
, IFG
C, I
PSD
C, a
nd th
e IE
BC
20
06 In
tern
atio
nal E
xist
ing
Bui
ldin
g C
ode
cont
inue
d fr
om p
revi
ous
page
co
ntin
ued
on n
ext p
age
Cha
pter
5 R
epai
rs
501.
4 F
lood
haz
ard
area
s. I
n flo
od h
azar
d ar
eas,
repa
irs th
at c
onst
itute
sub
stan
tial i
mpr
ovem
ent s
hall
requ
ire th
at th
e bu
ildin
g co
mpl
y w
ith th
e In
tern
atio
nal B
uild
ing
Cod
e S
ectio
n 16
12.
50
7.3
Dam
aged
bui
ldin
gs.
507.
3.5
Flo
od h
azar
d ar
eas.
In
flood
haz
ard
area
s, d
amag
ed b
uild
ings
that
hav
e su
stai
ned
subs
tant
ial
dam
age
shal
l be
brou
ght i
nto
com
plia
nce
with
Sec
tion
1612
of t
he In
tern
atio
nal B
uild
ing
Cod
e.
Cha
pter
6 A
ltera
tions
– L
evel
1
601.
3 F
lood
haz
ard
area
s. I
n flo
od h
azar
d ar
eas,
alte
ratio
ns th
at c
onst
itute
sub
stan
tial i
mpr
ovem
ent s
hall
requ
ire th
at th
e bu
ildin
g co
mpl
y w
ith th
e In
tern
atio
nal B
uild
ing
Cod
e S
ectio
n 16
12.
C
hapt
er 7
Alte
ratio
ns –
Lev
el 2
70
1.2
Alte
ratio
n le
vel 1
com
plia
nce.
In
addi
tion
to th
e re
quire
men
ts o
f thi
s ch
apte
r, al
l wor
k sh
all c
ompl
y w
ith th
e re
quire
men
ts o
f Cha
pter
6.
Cha
pter
8 A
ltera
tions
– L
evel
3
801.
2 C
ompl
ianc
e. I
n ad
ditio
n to
the
requ
irem
ents
of t
his
chap
ter w
ork
shal
l com
ply
with
the
requ
irem
ents
of
Cha
pter
s 6
and
7.
Cha
pter
9 C
hang
e of
Occ
upan
cy
901.
1 R
epai
r and
alte
ratio
n w
ith n
o ch
ange
of o
ccup
ancy
cla
ssifi
catio
n. A
ny re
pair
or a
ltera
tion
wor
k un
derta
ken
in c
onne
ctio
n w
ith a
cha
nce
of o
ccup
ancy
that
doe
s no
t inv
olve
a c
hang
e of
occ
upan
cy
clas
sific
atio
n as
des
crib
ed in
the
Inte
rnat
iona
l Bui
ldin
g C
ode
shal
l con
form
to th
e re
quire
men
ts o
f Cha
pter
s 5,
6,
7, a
nd 8
resp
ectiv
ely
for t
he a
pplic
able
occ
upan
cy g
roup
and
the
requ
irem
ents
of S
ectio
n 90
2 th
roug
h 91
1.
Sec.
912
Cha
nge
of O
ccup
ancy
Cla
ssifi
catio
n 91
2.1
Com
plia
nce
with
Cha
pter
8.
The
occu
panc
y cl
assi
ficat
ion
of a
n ex
istin
g bu
ildin
g m
ay b
e ch
ange
d,
prov
ided
the
build
ing
mee
ts a
ll th
e re
quire
men
ts o
f Cha
pter
8 a
pplie
d th
roug
hout
the
build
ing
for t
he n
ew
occu
panc
y gr
oup,
and
com
plie
s w
ith th
e re
quire
men
ts o
f Sec
tions
902
thro
ugh
912.
C
hapt
er 1
0 A
dditi
ons
1001
.1 S
cope
. A
n ad
ditio
n to
a b
uild
ing
or s
truct
ure
shal
l com
ply
with
the
build
ing,
plu
mbi
ng, e
lect
rical
, and
m
echa
nica
l cod
es, w
ithou
t req
uirin
g th
e ex
istin
g bu
ildin
g or
stru
ctur
e to
com
ply
with
any
requ
irem
ents
of
thos
e co
des
or o
f the
se p
rovi
sion
s ex
cept
as
requ
ired
by th
is c
hapt
er.
![Page 150: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/150.jpg)
pa
ge D
-10
IMC
-IP
C-I
FGC
-IP
SD
C-I
EB
C
Floo
d R
esis
tanc
e Pr
ovis
ions
of t
he IM
C, I
PC, I
FGC
, IPS
DC
and
the
IEB
C.
Cod
e Ex
cerp
ts F
rom
200
6 ed
ition
s of
IMC
, IPC
, IFG
C, I
PSD
C, a
nd th
e IE
BC
20
06 In
tern
atio
nal E
xist
ing
Bui
ldin
g C
ode
cont
inue
d fr
om p
revi
ous
page
co
ntin
ued
on n
ext p
age
1003
.1 C
ompl
ianc
e w
ith In
tern
atio
nal B
uild
ing
Cod
e.
1003
.5 F
lood
Haz
ard
Area
s. I
n flo
od h
azar
d ar
eas:
1.
Fo
r hor
izon
tal a
dditi
ons
that
are
stru
ctur
ally
inte
rcon
nect
ed to
the
exis
ting
build
ing:
1.
1. If
the
addi
tion
and
all o
ther
pro
pose
d w
ork,
whe
n co
mbi
ned,
con
stitu
te s
ubst
antia
l im
prov
emen
t, th
e ex
istin
g bu
ildin
g an
d th
e ad
ditio
n sh
all c
ompl
y w
ith In
tern
atio
nal B
uild
ing
Cod
e S
ectio
n 16
12.
1.2.
If th
e ad
ditio
n co
nstit
utes
sub
stan
tial i
mpr
ovem
ent,
the
exis
ting
build
ing
and
the
addi
tion
shal
l co
mpl
y w
ith In
tern
atio
nal B
uild
ing
Cod
e S
ectio
n 16
12.
2.
Fo
r hor
izon
tal a
dditi
ons
that
are
not
stru
ctur
ally
inte
rcon
nect
ed to
the
exis
ting
build
ing:
2.
1. T
he a
dditi
on s
hall
com
ply
with
Inte
rnat
iona
l Bui
ldin
g C
ode
Sec
tion
1612
. 2.
2. If
the
addi
tion
and
all o
ther
pro
pose
d w
ork,
whe
n co
mbi
ned,
con
stitu
te s
ubst
antia
l im
prov
emen
t, th
e ex
istin
g bu
ildin
g an
d th
e ad
ditio
n sh
all c
ompl
y w
ith In
tern
atio
nal B
uild
ing
Cod
e S
ectio
n 16
12.
3.
For v
ertic
al a
dditi
ons
and
all o
ther
pro
pose
d w
ork,
whe
n co
mbi
ned,
that
con
stitu
te s
ubst
antia
l im
prov
emen
t, th
e ex
istin
g bu
ildin
g sh
all c
ompl
y w
ith In
tern
atio
nal B
uild
ing
Cod
e S
ectio
n 16
12.
4.
For a
new
, rep
lace
men
t, ra
ised
or e
xten
ded
foun
datio
n, if
the
foun
datio
n w
ork
and
all o
ther
pro
pose
d w
ork,
whe
n co
mbi
ned,
con
stitu
te s
ubst
antia
l im
prov
emen
t, th
e ex
istin
g bu
ildin
g sh
all c
ompl
y w
ith
Inte
rnat
iona
l Bui
ldin
g C
ode
Sec
tion
1612
.
Cha
pter
11
His
toric
Bui
ldin
g 11
01.4
Flo
od h
azar
d ar
eas.
In
flood
haz
ard
area
s, if
all
prop
osed
wor
k, in
clud
ing
repa
irs, w
ork
requ
ired
due
to a
cha
nge
of o
ccup
ancy
, and
alte
ratio
ns, c
onst
itute
s su
bsta
ntia
l im
prov
emen
t the
n th
e ex
istin
g bu
ildin
g sh
all
com
ply
with
Inte
rnat
iona
l Bui
ldin
g C
ode
Sec
tion
1612
.
Exce
ptio
n. I
f a h
isto
ric b
uild
ing
will
con
tinue
to b
e a
hist
oric
bui
ldin
g af
ter t
he p
ropo
sed
wor
k is
co
mpl
eted
, the
n th
e pr
opos
ed w
ork
is n
ot c
onsi
dere
d to
be
a su
bsta
ntia
l im
prov
emen
t. F
or th
e pu
rpos
es
of th
is e
xcep
tion,
a h
isto
ric b
uild
ing
is:
1.
Li
sted
or p
relim
inar
ily d
eter
min
ed to
be
elig
ible
for l
istin
g in
the
Nat
iona
l Reg
iste
r of H
isto
ric
Pla
ces;
or
2.
D
eter
min
ed b
y th
e S
ecre
tary
of t
he U
.S. D
epar
tmen
t of I
nter
ior a
s co
ntrib
utin
g to
the
hist
oric
al
sign
ifica
nce
of a
regi
ster
ed h
isto
ric d
istri
ct o
r a d
istri
ct p
relim
inar
ily d
eter
min
ed to
qua
lify
as a
n hi
stor
ic d
istri
ct; o
r
3.
Des
igna
ted
as h
isto
ric u
nder
a s
tate
or l
ocal
his
toric
pre
serv
atio
n pr
ogra
m th
at is
app
rove
d by
th
e D
epar
tmen
t of I
nter
ior.
C
hapt
er 1
2 R
eloc
ated
or M
oved
Bui
ldin
gs
1202
.6 F
lood
haz
ard
area
s. I
f rel
ocat
ed o
r mov
ed in
to a
floo
d ha
zard
are
a, s
truct
ures
sha
ll co
mpl
y w
ith
Inte
rnat
iona
l Bui
ldin
g C
ode
Sec
tion
1612
.
![Page 151: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/151.jpg)
pa
ge D
-11
IMC
-IP
C-I
FGC
-IP
SD
C-I
EB
C
Floo
d R
esis
tanc
e Pr
ovis
ions
of t
he IM
C, I
PC, I
FGC
, IPS
DC
and
the
IEB
C.
Cod
e Ex
cerp
ts F
rom
200
6 ed
ition
s of
IMC
, IPC
, IFG
C, I
PSD
C, a
nd th
e IE
BC
20
06 In
tern
atio
nal E
xist
ing
Bui
ldin
g C
ode
cont
inue
d fr
om p
revi
ous
page
Cha
pter
13
Com
plia
nce
Alte
rnat
ives
13
01.3
Acc
epta
nce.
For
repa
irs, a
ltera
tions
, add
ition
s an
d ch
ange
s of
occ
upan
cy to
exi
stin
g bu
ildin
gs th
at
are
eval
uate
d in
acc
orda
nce
with
this
sec
tion,
com
plia
nce
with
this
sec
tion
shal
l be
acce
pted
by
the
code
of
ficia
l. 13
01.3
.3 C
ompl
ianc
e w
ith fl
ood
haza
rd p
rovi
sion
s. I
n flo
od h
azar
d ar
eas,
bui
ldin
gs th
at a
re e
valu
ated
in
acco
rdan
ce w
ith th
is s
ectio
n sh
all c
ompl
y w
ith In
tern
atio
nal B
uild
ing
Cod
e S
ectio
n 16
12 if
the
wor
k co
vere
d by
this
sec
tion
cons
titut
es s
ubst
antia
l im
prov
emen
t.
![Page 152: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/152.jpg)
AAppppeennddiixx EE.. FFEEMMAA RReeggiioonnaall OOffffiicceess aanndd NNFFIIPP SSttaattee CCoooorrddiinnaattoorrss
Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes®: Meeting the Requirements of the NFIP E-1
FEMA’s Regional Offices
FEMA HEADQUARTERS Office of the Assistant Administrator, Mitigation 500 C Street, S.W. Washington, DC 20472 (202) 646-2781
REGION I – CT, MA, ME, NH, RI, VT Mitigation Division 99 High St, 6th Floor Boston, MA 02110 (617) 832-4761
REGION II – NJ, NY, PR, VI Mitigation Division 26 Federal Plaza, Ste 1337 New York, NY 10278-0002 (212) 680-3600
REGION III – DE, DC, MD, PA, VA, WV Mitigation Division 615 Chestnut Street, Sixth Floor Philadelphia, PA 19106-4404 (215) 931-5530
REGION IV – AL, FL, GA, KY, MS, NC, SC, TN Mitigation Division 3003 Chamblee-Tucker Road, Rm 270 Atlanta, GA 30341 (770) 220-5200
REGION V – IL, IN, MI, MN, OH, WI Mitigation Division 536 S. Clark Street, 6th Floor Chicago, IL 60605-1521 (312) 408-5500
REGION VI – AR, LA, NM, OK, TX Mitigation Division Federal Regional Center 800 North Loop 288 Denton, TX 76209-3698 (940) 898-5399
REGION VII – IA, KS, MO, NE Mitigation Division 9221 Ward Pkwy, Ste 300 Kansas City, MO 64114-3372 (816) 283-7002
REGION VIII – CO, MT, ND, SD, UT, WY Mitigation Division Denver Federal Center Building 710, Box 25267 Denver, CO 80225-0267 (303) 235-4800
REGION IX – AZ, CA, GU, HI, NV Mitigation Division 1111 Broadway, Ste 1200 Oakland, CA 94607-4053 (415) 923-7100
REGION X – AK, ID, OR, WA Mitigation Division Federal Regional Center 130 228th Street, SW. Bothell, WA 98021-8627 (425) 487-4600
![Page 153: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/153.jpg)
FEMA Regional Offices and NFIP State Coordinators E-2
NFIP State Coordinators
ALABAMA Alabama Department of Economic & Community Affairs NFIP State Coordinator P.O. Box 5690 Montgomery, AL 36103-5690 (334) 353-0853
ALASKA Alaska Department of Commerce, Community & Economic Development NFIP State Coordinator 550 W. 7th Avenue, Suite 1770 Anchorage, AK 99501-3510 (907) 269-4583
ARIZONA Arizona Department of Water Resources NFIP State Coordinator 3550 N Central Avenue Phoenix, AZ 85012-2105 (602) 771-8657
ARKANSAS Arkansas Natural Resources Commission NFIP State Coordinator 101 E. Capitol, Suite 350 Little Rock, AR 72201 (501) 682-3969
CALIFORNIA California Department of Water Resources NFIP State Coordinator 3310 El Camino Ave Sacramento, CA 95821 (916) 574-0611
COLORADO Colorado Water Conservation Board NFIP State Coordinator 1313 Sherman St, Room 721 Denver, CO 80203 (303) 866-3803
CONNECTICUT Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection NFIP State Coordinator 79 Elm Street Hartford, CT 06106-5127 (860) 424-3706
DELAWARE Delaware Division of Soil and Water NFIP State Coordinator 89 Kings Highway Dover, DE 19901 (302) 739-9921
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA District of Columbia Department of Health NFIP State Coordinator 51 N Street, NE Room 5021 Washington, DC 20002 (202) 535-2248
FLORIDA Florida Department of Community Affairs NFIP State Coordinator 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Tallahassee, FL 32399-2100 (850) 413-9960
![Page 154: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/154.jpg)
Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes®: Meeting the Requirements of the NFIP E-3
GEORGIA Georgia Department of Natural Resources NFIP State Coordinator 7 Martin Luther King, Jr. Dr Ste 440 Atlanta, GA 30334 (404) 656-6382
HAWAII Hawaii Department of Land and Natural Resources NFIP State Coordinator PO Box 373 Honolulu, HI 96809 (808) 587-0267
IDAHO Idaho Department of Water Resources NFIP State Coordinator 322 E Front Street Boise, ID 83720 (208) 287-4928
ILLINOIS Illinois Department of Natural Resources Office of Water Resources NFIP State Coordinator One Natural Resources Way Springfield, IL 62702-1271 (217) 782-4428
INDIANA Indiana Division of Water NFIP State Coordinator 402 W. Washington Street, Room W264 Indianapolis, IN 46204-2748 (317) 234-1107
IOWA Iowa Department of Natural Resources NFIP State Coordinator Wallace State Office Building Des Moines, IA 50319 (515) 281-8942
KANSAS Kansas Department of Agriculture Division of Water Resources NFIP State Coordinator 109 SW 9th Street, 2nd Floor Topeka, KS 66612-1283 (785) 296-5440
KENTUCKY Kentucky Division of Water NFIP State Coordinator 14 Reilly Road Frankfort, KY 40601 (502) 564-3410
LOUISIANA Louisiana Department of Transportation & Development Floodplain Management Section NFIP State Coordinator P.O. Box 94245, Capitol Station Baton Rouge, LA 70804-9425 (225) 274-4354
MAINE Maine State Planning Office NFIP State Coordinator 38 State House Station Augusta, ME 04333-0038 (207) 287-8063
MARYLAND Maryland Department of Environment NFIP State Coordinator 1800 Washington Boulevard, Ste 430 Baltimore, MD 21230 (410) 537-3775
![Page 155: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/155.jpg)
FEMA Regional Offices and NFIP State Coordinators E-4
MASSACHUSETTS Massachusetts Department of Conservation & Recreation NFIP State Coordinator 251 Causeway Street, Suite 700 Boston, MA 02114 (617) 626-1406
MICHIGAN Michigan Department of Environmental Quality NFIP State Coordinator P.O. Box 38458 Lansing, MI 48909-7958 (517) 335-3448
MINNESOTA Minnesota Department of Natural Resources - Waters NFIP State Coordinator 500 Lafayette Road St. Paul, MN 55155-4032 (651) 259-5691
MISSISSIPPI Mississippi Emergency Management Agency NFIP State Coordinator P.O. Box 5644 Pearl, MS 39208 (601) 933-6844
MISSOURI Missouri State Emergency Management Agency NFIP State Coordinator P.O. Box 116 Jefferson City, MO 65102 (573) 526-9116
MONTANA Montana Floodplain Management Program NFIP State Coordinator 1424 9th Avenue Helena, MT 59620-1601 (406) 444-6654
NEBRASKA Nebraska Division of Natural Resources NFIP State Coordinator 301 Centennial Mall South Lincoln, NE 68509-4876 (402) 471-3936
NEVADA Nevada Division of Water Planning NFIP State Coordinator 901 S Steward Street Ste 2002 Carson City, NV 89701 (775) 684-2860
NEW HAMPSHIRE New Hampshire Office of Energy & Planning NFIP State Coordinator 57 Regional Dr, Ste 3 Concord, NH 03301-8519 (603) 271-2155
NEW JERSEY New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection Flood Plain Management Section NFIP State Coordinator P.O. Box 419 Trenton, NJ 08625 (609) 984-0859
NEW MEXICO New Mexico Office of Emergency Management NFIP State Coordinator P.O. Box 1628 Santa Fe, NM 87504-1628 (505) 476-9617
NEW YORK New York State Department of Environmental Conservation NFIP State Coordinator 625 Broadway Albany, NY 12233-3507 (518) 402-8146
![Page 156: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/156.jpg)
Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes®: Meeting the Requirements of the NFIP E-5
NORTH CAROLINA North Carolina Division of Emergency Management NFIP State Coordinator 4713 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-4713 (919) 715-8000
NORTH DAKOTA North Dakota State Water Commission NFIP State Coordinator 900 East Boulevard Avenue Bismarck, ND 58505-0850 (701) 328-4898
OHIO Ohio Department of Natural Resources Division of Water NFIP State Coordinator 2045 Morse Rd, Bldg B-2 Columbus, OH 43224 (614) 265-6754
OKLAHOMA Oklahoma Water Resources Board NFIP State Coordinator 3800 N. Classen Boulevard Oklahoma City, OK 73118 (918) 581-2924
OREGON Oregon Department of Land Conservation & Development NFIP State Coordinator 635 Capitol Street, NE, Suite 150 Salem, OR 97301-2540 (503) 373-0050, ext. 250 PENNSYLVANIA Pennsylvania Department of Community and Economic Development Floodplain Management Division NFIP State Coordinator 400 N Street, 4th Floor Harrisburg, PA 17120 (717) 720-7445
PUERTO RICO Puerto Rico Planning Board NFIP Coordinator Minillas Government Center P.O. Box 41119 Santurce, PR 00940-1119 (787) 723-6200
RHODE ISLAND Rhode Island Emergency Management Agency, MURI NFIP State Coordinator 645 New London Avenue Cranston, RI 02920 (401) 949-9996
SOUTH CAROLINA South Carolina Department of Natural Resources NFIP State Coordinator 1000 Assembly Street, Room 345C Columbia, SC 29201 (803) 734-9120
SOUTH DAKOTA South Dakota Division of Emergency Management NFIP State Coordinator 118 W Capitol Avenue Pierre, SD 57501 (605) 773-3238
TENNESSEE Tennessee Department of Economic & Community Development NFIP State Coordinator 312 8th Avenue, 10th Floor Nashville, TN 37243-0405 (615) 741-2211
TEXAS Texas Commission of Environmental Quality NFIP State Coordinator P.O. Box 13087-MC 160 Austin, TX 78711-3087 (512) 239-6155
![Page 157: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/157.jpg)
FEMA Regional Offices and NFIP State Coordinators E-6
U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS Virgin Islands Department of Planning & Natural Resources NFIP Coordinator CE King Airport, Terminal Bldg 2nd St. Thomas, VI 00802 (340) 774-3320
UTAH Utah Division of Comprehensive Emergency Management NFIP State Coordinator State Office Building, #1110 Salt Lake City, UT 84114 (801) 538-3750
VERMONT Vermont Agency of Natural Resources NFIP State Coordinator 1229 Portland St Ste 201 St. Johnsburg, VT 05819 (802) 751-0129
VIRGINIA Virginia Department of Conservation & Recreation NFIP State Coordinator 203 Governor Street, Suite 206 Richmond, VA 23219-2019 (804) 786-3914
WASHINGTON Washington Department of Ecology Land Resources Program NFIP State Coordinator P.O. Box 47600 Olympia, WA 98504-7600 (360) 407-6796
WEST VIRGINIA West Virginia Office of Emergency Services NFIP State Coordinator 1900 Kanawha Boulevard, Room EB-80 Charleston, WV 25305-0360 (304) 965-2331
WISCONSIN Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources NFIP State Coordinator 101 S. Webster Madison, WI 53702 (608) 266-8039
WYOMING Wyoming Emergency Management Agency NFIP State Coordinator 122 West 25th Street Cheyenne, WY 82002 (307) 777-4910
![Page 158: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/158.jpg)
AAppppeennddiixx FF.. SSaammppllee PPllaann RReevviieeww aanndd IInnssppeeccttiioonn CChheecckklliissttss
Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes Series: Meeting the Requirements of the NFIP F-1
![Page 159: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/159.jpg)
SAMPLE
page 1 – A Zone Checklist
Application #: _________________
Applicant: _________________________________
Plan Review Checklist FLOOD HAZARD AREA APPLICATION REVIEW – A ZONES
Terms: FHA = Flood Hazard Area; DFE = Design Flood Elevation Reviewer’s Initials and Date of Review
Review Steps NOTE: For variance requests, use this form to document efforts to achieve the greatest degree of compliance.
Is proposed development consistent with zoning?
□ NO, Applicant to request a zoning amendment.
□ YES, proceed with review. FIRM Panel # and date __________________ FLOODWAY Panel # and date __________________ DFE __________________
Check FIRM, floodplain/floodway boundaries, base flood elevations, and map revisions and LOMRs issued by FEMA. Is proposal in the floodplain and/or floodway?
□ NO, sign and date this form and put in file.
□ YES, must meet the flood resistant provisions of the code.
□ YES, FLOODWAY. All residential structures (including Manufactured Housing units) in floodways to comply with IBC.
□ YES, FLOODWAY. Require engineer’s “no rise” analysis and supporting hydraulic data in file before continuing review.
□ YES, in FHA without DFEs. Check other sources, use estimating methods, or require applicant to determine.
□ YES, in FHA, but applicant has elevation data that shows natural site elevation above DFE. Advise applicant to obtain LOMA and submit copy for the file.
□ YES, in Coastal A Zone; refer to V Zone Checklist if V Zone requirements are applied.
□ YES, in 500-year floodplain. Floodplain review not required; flood-resistance encouraged. Site plan shows nature of development proposal, location, dimensions, wetlands,
floodplain/floodway boundaries, and ground elevations.
□ YES, continue review.
□ NO, return to applicant to revise application and site plan. Can the proposed development be modified to avoid floodplain?
□ YES, explain flood hazards to applicant and make recommendations to modify proposal to minimize flood hazards and damage potential.
□ NO, but can impacts be further minimized? Reduce fill? Site on higher ground? Has the applicant provided copies of all necessary State and federal permits, e.g., wetlands?
□ NO, advise applicant which agencies to contact.
□ YES, require copies for the file.
Will a watercourse be altered?
□ NO, continue review.
□ YES, Applicant to provide copies of notices to adjacent communities, federal agencies, and the NFIP State Coordinator.
□ YES, engineer’s analysis required to show same flood carrying capacity; method of maintenance specified.
Is fill proposed? Compacted? Side-slopes are no steeper than 2H:1V? Protected from erosion?
□ NO fill, continue review.
□ YES, fill used to elevate building will be compacted, sloped, and stabilized.
□ YES, but not for building elevation. Purpose for fill: ________________________
![Page 160: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/160.jpg)
SAMPLE
page 2 – A Zone Checklist
Application #: _________________
Plan Review Checklist FLOOD HAZARD AREA APPLICATION REVIEW – A ZONES
Initials and Date Review Steps Is the application for improvement or addition to an existing building?
□ NO, a new structure is proposed, continue review. □ YES, but building is documented in file as a “historic structure” and proposed work will not change historic designation; encourage flood resistance. □ YES, costs of work are documented and compared to market value. □ If costs equal or exceed 50% of market value of structure, provide finding to Board of Appeals for determination of Substantial Improvement. □ Proposed work is not a Substantial Improvement. Flood hazard review not required.
Are new structures proposed to be elevated (new residential or non-residential buildings, storage tanks, manufactured homes)? Give applicant a blank Elevation Certificate. □ NO – STOP! A permit cannot be issued for non-elevated residential buildings. □ NO, non-residential may be floodproofed (see design documentation requirements) □ YES, on fill. Basements into fill are not allowed. □ YES, on piers, pilings, or columns. □ YES, on solid foundation walls (see Enclosed areas below DFE).
Check the following for Manufactured Housing units: □ Are flood hazards avoided as much as possible? □ In Floodway, refer to IBC® for foundation design. □ Foundation is reinforced (dry-stack block NOT allowed). □ Ground anchors and tie-downs shown on plans? □ Elevated above the DFE?
Check the following for utility support systems: □ Electrical, mechanical, plumbing, heating/air conditioning components elevated? □ Septic designed to minimize inflow/discharge under flood conditions? □ On-site water supply designed to minimize inflow under flood conditions? □ Above-ground tanks are anchored/elevated? □ Below-ground tanks are designed to resist flotation?
If new, non-residential structure is not elevated, will it be floodproofed? □ YES, non-residential building will be floodproofed to not less than 1' above DFE, and
signed and sealed design documentation is in file. □ YES, agricultural building to be wet floodproofed. □ NO, permit shall not be approved.
Enclosed areas below DFE (stairwells, sheds, garages, storage areas, crawl spaces)? □ NO, continue review. □ YES, number, total net open area, and location of flood openings shown on plan. □ YES, plan shows acceptable use (parking, limited storage, and access). □ YES, flood resistant materials specified. □ YES, utilities, if any, are all elevated above DFE.
□ Record permit in log of floodplain permits. □ Make sure that all necessary documents are in the file. □ Issue Permit and transfer file to Inspections.
PERMIT APPLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED BY: _________________________ DATE: ____________
□ ISSUE PERMIT approved by: ___________________________
□ DENY PERMIT approved by: ___________________________
![Page 161: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/161.jpg)
SAMPLE
page 3 – A Zone Checklist
Permit #: ________________
Date: ________________
Applicant: _________________________________
Inspection Checklist FLOOD HAZARD AREA INSPECTIONS – A ZONES
Inspector’s Initials and Date
of Inspection
Inspection Steps Before site inspection:
□ REVIEW permit file before going in the field.
□ ASK permit reviewer questions to understand requirements.
□ Are other State and federal permits in the file?
Measure stake out distances from waterway or landmark. Is development in the right place? Is fill correct distance from waterway or landmark?
□ YES, check fill compaction and side slopes. Basements into fill not allowed.
□ NO, take enforcement action to correct problems.
Elevation of lowest floor checked during framing or foundation inspection after lowest floor is in place. Elevations checked and acceptable?
□ YES, maintain copy of documentation of final elevations in permanent records.
□ NO, take enforcement action to correct problems.
Electrical, mechanical, plumbing, heating/air conditioning components elevated?
□ YES.
□ NO, take enforcement action to correct problems.
For enclosures below DFE (including crawl spaces): Are flood damage resistant materials used? Does use of enclosure appear to be limited to crawl space, parking, building access, or limited storage? Are flood openings no more than 12” above grade? Are there enough flood openings (based on net open area provided by the flood openings or certification of engineered openings), are they on at least two sides, and do they allow automatic entry/exit of floodwater (disable air vents in open position)?
□ YES.
□ Building does not have enclosures below DFE.
□ NO, take enforcement action to correct problems.
Other Notes Based on Inspection:
Issue Occupancy Certificate only if final inspection shows compliance with floodplain requirements.
FINAL INSPECTION COMPLETED BY: _________________________________ DATE: _______________
![Page 162: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/162.jpg)
SAMPLE
page 1 – V Zone Checklist
Application #: _________________
Applicant: _________________________________
Plan Review Checklist FLOOD HAZARD AREA APPLICATION REVIEW – V ZONES
Terms: FHA = Flood Hazard Area; DFE = Design Flood Elevation
Reviewer’s Initials and Date of Review
Review Steps NOTE: For variance requests, use this form to document efforts to achieve the greatest degree of compliance.
Is proposed development consistent with zoning?
□ NO, Applicant to request a zoning amendment.
□ YES, proceed with review.
Is proposal in Coastal Barrier Resources Area (CoBRA) or Otherwise Protected Area?
□ NO, continue review.
□ YES, advise applicant that Federal flood insurance is not available, document to file, continue review (must comply with flood provisions).
FIRM Panel # and date ____________________ DFE ________________
Check FIRM, floodplain and zone boundaries, base flood elevations, and map revisions or LOMRs issued by FEMA. Is proposal in the Coastal Flood Hazard Area subject to high velocity wave action (V Zone)?
□ NO, not in Flood Hazard Area; sign and date this form and put in file.
□ NO, in “Coastal A Zone” (apply V Zone requirements).
□ NO, in riverine A Zone. Use A Zone checklist.
□ YES, in V Zone, must meet flood resistant provisions of the code.
Site plan shows development proposal, location, dimensions, wetlands, FHA / V Zone boundaries, DFE, and ground elevations (NGVD or other datum on FIRM).
□ YES, continue review.
□ NO, return to applicant to revise application and site plan.
Can the proposed development be modified to avoid FHA / V Zone?
□ YES, explain flood hazards to applicant and make recommendations to modify proposal to minimize flood hazards and damage potential.
□ NO, can floodplain impacts be further minimized? Maximize setback from the water? Buildings moved to higher elevation?
Has the applicant provided copies of all necessary State and federal permits, e.g., wetlands, coastal zone consistency?
□ NO, advise applicant which agencies to contact.
□ YES, require copies in the file.
Will a dune be altered?
□ NO, continue review.
□ YES, if applicable, require State coastal zone approval before continuing.
Is a pool proposed?
□ NO, continue review.
□ YES, not attached to the building; continue review.
□ YES, attached to the building. Continue review only if included in foundation design.
![Page 163: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/163.jpg)
SAMPLE
page 2 – V Zone Checklist
Application #: _________________
Plan Review Checklist FLOOD HAZARD AREA APPLICATION REVIEW – V ZONES
Initials and Date Review Steps Is the application for improvement or addition to an existing building?
□ NO, a new structure is proposed, continue review.
□ YES, but building is documented in file as a “historic structure” and proposed work will not change historic designation; encourage flood resistance.
□ YES, costs of improvements are documented and compared to market value.
□ If costs of proposed addition equal or exceed 50% of market value of structure, provide finding to Board of Appeals for determination of Substantial Improvement.
□ Proposed work is not a Substantial Improvement. Flood hazard review not required.
Are new buildings proposed to be elevated? Give applicant a blank Elevation Certificate.
□ NO – STOP! A permit cannot be issued for non-elevated buildings.
□ YES, on fill. STOP! Structural fill not allowed in V Zones, require redesign.
□ YES, on piers, pilings, or columns; signed and sealed design certification submitted?
□ YES, on parallel shear walls (parallel to expected direction of flow?); signed and sealed design certification submitted?
Check the following for utility support systems:
□ Electrical, mechanical, plumbing, heating/air conditioning components elevated?
□ Septic designed to minimize inflow/discharge under flood conditions?
□ On-site water supply designed to minimize inflow under flood conditions?
□ Above-ground storage tanks are anchored/elevated?
□ Below-ground storage tanks are designed to resist flotation/erosion?
Enclosed area below DFE proposed (stairwells, sheds, garages, storage areas)?
□ NO, continue review.
□ YES, enclosed by insect screening or lattice. Continue review.
□ YES, applicant has provided signed and sealed documentation of breakaway wall design.
□ YES, design not documented. Advise applicant to obtain signed and sealed documentation of breakaway wall design from registered design professional.
□ YES, flood resistant materials will be used.
□ YES, utilities not penetrating or attached to breakaway walls.
□ Record permit in log of floodplain permits.
□ Make sure that all necessary documents are in the file.
□ Issue Permit and transfer file to Inspections.
PERMIT APPLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED BY: _________________________ DATE: ____________
□ ISSUE PERMIT approved by: ___________________________
□ DENY PERMIT approved by: ___________________________
![Page 164: Reducing Flood Losses Through the International Codes](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022052609/628d90cb87cfd15aee79fb95/html5/thumbnails/164.jpg)
SAMPLE
page 3 – V Zone Checklist
Permit #: ________________
Date: ________________
Applicant: _________________________________
Inspection Checklist FLOOD HAZARD AREA INSPECTIONS – V ZONES
Inspector’s Initials and Date of Inspection
Inspection Steps
Before site inspection:
□ REVIEW permit file before going in the field.
□ ASK permit reviewer questions to understand requirements.
□ Are other State and federal permits in the file?
Measure distances from landmark. Is development in the right place?
□ NO, take enforcement action to correct problems.
□ YES, continue inspection.
Elevation of lowest floor checked during framing or foundation inspection after lowest floor is in place. Elevations checked and acceptable?
□ YES.
□ NO, take enforcement action to correct problems.
For enclosures below DFE: Are walls insect screening or lattice? Are walls breakaway, and no utilities attached to or penetrate breakaway walls? Are flood damage resistant materials used? Does use of enclosure appear to be limited to parking, building access, or limited storage?
□ YES.
□ Building does not have enclosures.
□ NO, take enforcement action to correct problems.
Other Notes Based on Inspection:
Issue Occupancy Certificate only if final inspection shows compliance with floodplain requirements.
FINAL INSPECTION COMPLETED BY: ________________________________ DATE: ________________