Reducing Emissions from Compressor Rod Packing Lessons Learned from Natural Gas STAR Producers...
-
Upload
agatha-wilkins -
Category
Documents
-
view
212 -
download
0
Transcript of Reducing Emissions from Compressor Rod Packing Lessons Learned from Natural Gas STAR Producers...
Reducing Emissions from Reducing Emissions from Compressor Rod PackingCompressor Rod Packing
Lessons Learned from Natural Gas STARLessons Learned from Natural Gas STAR
Producers Technology Transfer WorkshopProducers Technology Transfer Workshop
Devon Energy CorporationDevon Energy Corporationandand
EPA’s Natural Gas STAR ProgramEPA’s Natural Gas STAR Program
April 20, 2005April 20, 2005
Page 2Reducing Emissions, Increasing Efficiency, Maximizing Profits
AgendaAgenda
Methane LossesMethane Losses
Methane RecoveryMethane Recovery
Is Recovery Profitable?Is Recovery Profitable?
Industry ExperienceIndustry Experience
Discussion QuestionsDiscussion Questions
Page 3Reducing Emissions, Increasing Efficiency, Maximizing Profits
Methane Losses from ProductionMethane Losses from Production
Production responsible for 42% of methane emissionsProduction responsible for 42% of methane emissions
Transmission & Storage Transmission & Storage 98 Bcf 98 Bcf
ProductioProduction n
150 Bcf150 Bcf
Processing Processing
36 Bcf 36 Bcf
Distribution Distribution 73 Bcf73 Bcf
25 Bcf25 Bcf
10 Bcf10 Bcf
18 Bcf18 Bcf
1 Bcf1 BcfOil Downstream Oil Downstream
2 Bcf 2 Bcf
Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks 1990 - 2002Emissions and Sinks 1990 - 2002
EmissionsEmissions
ReductionsReductions
Page 4Reducing Emissions, Increasing Efficiency, Maximizing Profits
Methane Losses from Methane Losses from Compressor Rod PackingCompressor Rod Packing
Reciprocating compressors account for 2% of production Reciprocating compressors account for 2% of production sector emissionssector emissions Gas lost from rod packing is estimated to be overGas lost from rod packing is estimated to be over
350 MMcf/yr costing over $1 million (gas price of $3/Mcf)350 MMcf/yr costing over $1 million (gas price of $3/Mcf)
Inventory of U.S. Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Emissions and Sinks 1990 - 2002Sinks 1990 - 2002
Pneumatic Pneumatic DevicesDevices60 Bcf60 Bcf
Meters andMeters andPipeline LeaksPipeline Leaks11 Bcf11 Bcf
Gas Engine Gas Engine ExhaustExhaust12 Bcf12 Bcf
Well Venting Well Venting and Flaringand Flaring12 Bcf12 Bcf
Storage Tank Storage Tank VentingVenting23 Bcf23 Bcf
Other Sources Other Sources 15 Bcf15 Bcf
Reciprocating Reciprocating CompressorsCompressors3 Bcf3 Bcf
Dehydrators Dehydrators and Pumpsand Pumps14 Bcf14 Bcf
Page 5Reducing Emissions, Increasing Efficiency, Maximizing Profits
Compressor Rod PackingCompressor Rod PackingWhat is the Problem?What is the Problem?
Rod packing accounts for 12% of reciprocating compressor Rod packing accounts for 12% of reciprocating compressor emissions in production sectoremissions in production sector Over 44,000 reciprocating compressors in natural gas industryOver 44,000 reciprocating compressors in natural gas industry Over 31,000 compressors in gas production sectorOver 31,000 compressors in gas production sector
CompressorStation
CompressorStation
Production
31,750 Compressors Processing
4,250 Compressors
Transmission & Storage
8,000 Compressors
Distribution
0 Compressors
CompressorStation
Page 6Reducing Emissions, Increasing Efficiency, Maximizing Profits
Methane Losses from Methane Losses from Rod PackingRod Packing
Reciprocating compressor rod packing leaks Reciprocating compressor rod packing leaks some gas by designsome gas by design Newly installed packing may leak 11 cubic feet Newly installed packing may leak 11 cubic feet
per hour (cf/h)per hour (cf/h) Worn packing has been reported to leak up to Worn packing has been reported to leak up to
900 cf/h900 cf/h
Distance PieceDistance Piece
Piston RodPiston Rod
(Side View, Cut in Half)(Side View, Cut in Half)
OILOIL
CylinderCylinder
SuctionSuction
DischargeDischarge
PistonPiston
Rod Packing CaseRod Packing Case
Page 7Reducing Emissions, Increasing Efficiency, Maximizing Profits
Reciprocating Compressor Reciprocating Compressor Rod PackingRod Packing
LubricationLubrication
FlangeFlange
GasGasLeakageLeakage
(Side View, Cut in Half)(Side View, Cut in Half)
Cylinder WallCylinder Wall
High Pressure High Pressure
Gas Inside Gas Inside
CylinderCylinder
Two RingsTwo Rings
(In Three Segments)(In Three Segments)
SpringsSprings
Packing CupPacking Cup
Piston RodPiston Rod
A series of flexible rings fit around the shaft to A series of flexible rings fit around the shaft to prevent leakageprevent leakage
Rings held in place by springs and packing cupsRings held in place by springs and packing cups
Page 8Reducing Emissions, Increasing Efficiency, Maximizing Profits
Methane Loss Sources from Methane Loss Sources from Rod PackingRod Packing
Leakage occurs Leakage occurs Around packing case through nose gasketAround packing case through nose gasket
Between packing cupsBetween packing cups
Around rings due to movement of the piston rodAround rings due to movement of the piston rod
Between rings and piston rodBetween rings and piston rod
Leaking gases escape either through vents on Leaking gases escape either through vents on the packing flange or into the distance piecethe packing flange or into the distance piece
Leakage gradually increases from normal wear Leakage gradually increases from normal wear of rings and rodof rings and rod
Page 9Reducing Emissions, Increasing Efficiency, Maximizing Profits
Leak rates from rod packing eventually Leak rates from rod packing eventually increase to a level that economically justifies increase to a level that economically justifies packing replacementpacking replacement Frequency of economic replacement depends Frequency of economic replacement depends
on lubrication, rod alignment, rod wear, rod on lubrication, rod alignment, rod wear, rod material and economic hurdle-ratematerial and economic hurdle-rate
Benefits of economic packing replacementBenefits of economic packing replacement Reduced methane emissionsReduced methane emissions Gas savings with lower leakage ratesGas savings with lower leakage rates Extended service life of compressor rodsExtended service life of compressor rods
Methane Recovery with EconomicMethane Recovery with EconomicRod Packing ReplacementRod Packing Replacement
Page 10Reducing Emissions, Increasing Efficiency, Maximizing Profits
Rod Packing Replacement Decision Rod Packing Replacement Decision ProcessProcess
Compare current leak rate to initial leak rateCompare current leak rate to initial leak rateto determine leak reduction expectedto determine leak reduction expected
Monitor and record baseline packing Monitor and record baseline packing leakage and piston rod wearleakage and piston rod wear
Assess costs of replacementsAssess costs of replacements
Determine economic replacement thresholdDetermine economic replacement threshold
Replace packing and rods where cost-effectiveReplace packing and rods where cost-effective
Page 11Reducing Emissions, Increasing Efficiency, Maximizing Profits
Establish Baseline LeaksEstablish Baseline Leaks
Step 1: Monitor and record baseline leakage Step 1: Monitor and record baseline leakage and rod wearand rod wear
Measure leaks immediately after installing new Measure leaks immediately after installing new seals (or new rods and seals)seals (or new rods and seals)
Monitor rods periodically for shaft dimensions Monitor rods periodically for shaft dimensions and surface roughness when replacing rings and surface roughness when replacing rings
““Out-of-round” rod seals poorly causing uneven wear Out-of-round” rod seals poorly causing uneven wear and allowing more leakage and allowing more leakage
It also causes uneven wear on the seals shortening It also causes uneven wear on the seals shortening the life of both seal and rodthe life of both seal and rod
Page 12Reducing Emissions, Increasing Efficiency, Maximizing Profits
Establish Leak Reduction ExpectedEstablish Leak Reduction Expected
Step 2: Compare current leak rate to initial Step 2: Compare current leak rate to initial leak rate to determine leak reduction expectedleak rate to determine leak reduction expected
Leak Reduction Expected (LRE) = Current Leak Leak Reduction Expected (LRE) = Current Leak Rate (CL) – Initial Leak Rate at the last ring/ rod Rate (CL) – Initial Leak Rate at the last ring/ rod replacement (IL)replacement (IL)
Example: The current leak rate is measured as Example: The current leak rate is measured as 50 cf/h, the same component leaked 10 cf/h 50 cf/h, the same component leaked 10 cf/h when first installedwhen first installed
LRE = 50 cf/h – 10 cf/hLRE = 50 cf/h – 10 cf/hLRE = 40 cf/hLRE = 40 cf/h
Page 13Reducing Emissions, Increasing Efficiency, Maximizing Profits
Step 3: Assess cost of replacementsStep 3: Assess cost of replacements Packing ring replacement costs depend on the Packing ring replacement costs depend on the
number of cylinders and the type of ringnumber of cylinders and the type of ring Cost of a set of rings:Cost of a set of rings: $ 500$ 500 to to $ 800$ 800
(with cups and case)(with cups and case) $1500$1500 to to $2500$2500
Rod replacement costs vary with rod dimension Rod replacement costs vary with rod dimension and rod typeand rod type Cost of Piston Rod:Cost of Piston Rod: $1800$1800 to to $3500$3500
Installation costs roughly equal equipment costsInstallation costs roughly equal equipment costs
Assess Costs for Economic Rod Assess Costs for Economic Rod Packing ReplacementPacking Replacement
Page 14Reducing Emissions, Increasing Efficiency, Maximizing Profits
Replacement Threshold for Economic Replacement Threshold for Economic Rod Packing ReplacementRod Packing Replacement
Step 4: Determine economic replacement thresholdStep 4: Determine economic replacement threshold Economic replacement threshold defines the specific Economic replacement threshold defines the specific
point at which it is cost effective to replace rings and point at which it is cost effective to replace rings and rodsrods
Discounted cash flow methodDiscounted cash flow method Economic replacement threshold (cfh)Economic replacement threshold (cfh)
= (CR*DF*1,000) / (H*GP)= (CR*DF*1,000) / (H*GP) where, CR = cost of replacement ($)where, CR = cost of replacement ($)
H = hours of compressor operation per H = hours of compressor operation per yearyear
GP = gas price ($/Mcf)GP = gas price ($/Mcf) DF = discount factor = i*(1+i)DF = discount factor = i*(1+i)n n / (1+i)/ (1+i)nn – 1 – 1 i = discount rate or company hurdle ratei = discount rate or company hurdle rate n = payback period selectedn = payback period selected
Page 15Reducing Emissions, Increasing Efficiency, Maximizing Profits
Is Recovery Profitable?Is Recovery Profitable? Step 5: Replace packing and rods when cost Step 5: Replace packing and rods when cost
effectiveeffective Example:Example:
Rod and RingsRod and RingsRings:Rings: $1,200$1,200Rod:Rod: $7,000$7,000Gas:Gas: $3/Mcf$3/McfOperating:Operating: 8,500 hrs/yr8,500 hrs/yr
Rings OnlyRings OnlyRings:Rings: $1,200$1,200Rod:Rod: $0$0Gas:Gas: $3/Mcf$3/McfOperating:Operating: 8,500 hrs/yr8,500 hrs/yr
Based on 10% interest rateMcf = thousand cubic feet, cfh = cubic feet per hour
Leak Reduction Expected Payback Period(cfh) (years)52 127 219 315 412 5
Leak Reduction Expected Payback Period(cfh) (years)354 1185 2129 3101 485 5
Page 16Reducing Emissions, Increasing Efficiency, Maximizing Profits
Industry Experience on New Rod Industry Experience on New Rod Packing Material and CoatingsPacking Material and Coatings
New packing materials can improve the life New packing materials can improve the life and performance of equipmentand performance of equipment Carbon impregnated TeflonCarbon impregnated Teflon®® rings cost almost rings cost almost
the same as bronze rings but last about one the same as bronze rings but last about one year longeryear longer Other factors like proper installation, cooling and Other factors like proper installation, cooling and
lubrication play an important rolelubrication play an important role
Piston rods coated with tungsten carbide or Piston rods coated with tungsten carbide or chromium increase service life of rodschromium increase service life of rods
Axially loaded packing installed in one of the Axially loaded packing installed in one of the last two cups reduces emissionslast two cups reduces emissions
Page 17Reducing Emissions, Increasing Efficiency, Maximizing Profits
Axially Loaded Three Ring Rod PackingAxially Loaded Three Ring Rod Packing
Page 18Reducing Emissions, Increasing Efficiency, Maximizing Profits
Discussion QuestionsDiscussion Questions
What is your practice on replaced rod What is your practice on replaced rod packing in reciprocating compressors?packing in reciprocating compressors?
How can the Lessons Learned study be How can the Lessons Learned study be improved upon or altered for use in your improved upon or altered for use in your operation(s)?operation(s)?
What are the barriers (technological, What are the barriers (technological, economic, lack of information, regulatory, economic, lack of information, regulatory, etc.) that are preventing you from etc.) that are preventing you from implementing this technology?implementing this technology?