REDD-Workshop MONITORING, ASSESSMENT AND ......The UN-REDD Programme encourage coordinated and...
Transcript of REDD-Workshop MONITORING, ASSESSMENT AND ......The UN-REDD Programme encourage coordinated and...
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations UN-REDD Programme United Nations Development Programme Working Paper 3 United Nations Environment Programme 2008
UN-REDD Programme
REDD-Workshop MONITORING, ASSESSMENT AND
VERIFICATION
16 - 17 September 2008
REDD Monitoring and Verification Roadmap to UNFCCC COP-15 Copenhagen and Beyond
The UN-REDD Programme, implemented by FAO, UNDP and UNEP, has two components: (i) assisting developing countries prepare and implement national REDD strategies and mechanisms; (ii) supporting the development of normative solutions and standardized approaches based on sound science for a REDD instrument linked with the UNFCCC. The programme helps empower countries to manage their REDD processes and will facilitate access to financial and technical assistance tailored to the specific needs of the countries.
The application of UNDP, UNEP and FAO rights-based and participatory approaches will also help ensure the rights of indigenous and forest-dwelling people are protected and the active involvement of local communities and relevant stakeholders and institutions in the design and implementation of REDD plans.
The programme is implemented through the UN Joint Programmes modalities, enabling rapid initiation of programme implementation and channeling of funds for REDD efforts, building on the in-country presence of UN agencies as a crucial support structure for countries. The UN-REDD Programme encourage coordinated and collaborative UN support to countries, thus maximizing efficiencies and effectiveness of the organizations’ collective input, consistent with the “One UN” approach advocated by UN members.
UN-REDD Programme contacts: Peter Holmgren Environment, Climate Change and Bioenergy Division Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) [email protected] Tim Clairs Bureau for Development Policy, Environment Group United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) [email protected] Tim Kasten Division of Environmental Policy Implementation United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) [email protected] Website: www.undp.org/mdtf/un-redd (www.unredd.net under construction)
Disclaimer The UN-REDD Programme Working Paper Series is designed to reflect the activities and progress related to the Programme. These Working Papers are not authoritative information sources – they do not reflect the official position of FAO, UNDP or UNEP and should not be used for official purposes. The Working Paper Series provides an important forum for the rapid release of information related to the UN-REDD Programme. Should readers find any errors in the documents or would like to provide comments for improving their quality, they are encouraged to get in touch with one of the above contacts.
REDD Monitoring and Verification Roadmap to UNFCCC COP-15 Copenhagen and Beyond
The following Roadmap is current result of the Washington meeting. The latest version can always be found at http://redd.wetpaint.com as a
Wiki page and it will be also linked from the UN-REDD Programme web site.
• The purpose of the Roadmap is to provide an overview of the monitoring and verification needs of developing countries and the
international community, as well as activities planned and needed to make REDD monitoring and verification work.
• The Roadmap was set up by the UN-REDD Programme but is intended to serve and support the global community. The UN-REDD
Programme facilitates the processes and community participation, and everyone is invited to edit, update, and maintain this roadmap.
• The Roadmap is a living document and anyone can edit the Roadmap. Please add a new action item if you can't find it in the
Roadmap.
• Please add your activities, meetings, and initiatives that correspond to each action item in the Roadmap. If you are planning a REDD
event/meeting, please also add it to the REDD event calendar (available at http://redd.wetpaint.com)
The Roadmap is separated into the following broad categories.
• Data
• Tools
• Capacity building
• Coordination
• Infrastructure
• Co-benefits
• Field sampling
• Historical deforestation trends
• Historical degradation
• Future monitoring of degradation
• Verification
4 (18)
Available methodologies, approaches and initiatives
Actions (already planned item in bold, national level
implementation in italic) Who? When?
Data: Access to remote sensing data for developing countries
Make access to Landsat data easier to all users
UN-REDD Programme,
UNEP?
others?
2009Q1
Make all Landsat data available for free1
USGS/NASA January, 2009
Make access to Landsat data easier through Google Earth
Clinton Foundation
Create comprehensive website with links to existing
databases and link it to UNFCCC REDD data page.
GOFC-GOLD
others? 2009Q1
Support access and use of China-Brazil Earth Resources
Satellite (CBERS2), data at least as interim solution until
new Landsat data is available
2008Q4
GEO Forest Monitoring Symposium3 with data providers for carbon estimates to discuss constraints, access schemes and cost implications
GEO 4-7 Nov, 2008
Identify and aggregate data needs of many countries for
higher resolution data for negotiation with data providers.
Clinton Foundation is doing it with Spot data for Brazil UN-REDD Programme
others?
2009Q1
Enhance process to ensure international coordination of
data supply, requirements and standards 2009Q2
• South-south cooperation
• others?
Identify availability of historical data periods for trends
analysis and make data available 2008Q4
1 http://landsat.usgs.gov/products_data_at_no_charge.php
2 http://www.cbers.inpe.br/en/index_en.htm
3 http://www.dpi.inpe.br/geoforest/
5 (18)
Available methodologies, approaches and initiatives
Actions (already planned item in bold, national level
implementation in italic) Who? When?
TOOLS: Access to tools and development of tools for REDD monitoring and verification
Compile existing methodologies, manuals and standards,
for making better use of the existing information
UN-REDD Programme
Scientific community
GOFC-GOLD
others?
2009Q2 Access to tools
No currently available approaches?
Simplify access to tools: create free remote sensing REDD
monitoring toolbox.
UN-REDD Programme
Scientific community
GOFC-GOLD
others?
2009Q2
Tools for historical trends
Implement tools and methods for interpretation of
historical trends with particular attention to monitoring of
drivers.
UN-REDD Programme
Scientific community
GOFC-GOLD
others?
2009Q2
Tools for degradation assessments
(historical)
Estimate past levels of degradation at national level by
combining remote sensing areas affected by human
activities and ground observation of carbon density.
2009Q3
Explore applicability of existing methodologies to estimate
carbon stock changes from degradation
GOFC-GOLD
FAO
GEO
UNFCCC
others?
2009Q1
Develop new tools, if necessary 2009Q2
Develop and disseminate disturbance monitoring toolbox 2009Q3
Tools for future monitoring of
degradation
• UNFCCC Tokyo methodology
workshop4 presentations and
report
• GOFC-GOLD Sourcebook
• others?
Submit available tools to UNFCCC secretariat
2009Q2
4 http://unfccc.int/methods_and_science/lulucf/items/4289.php
6 (18)
Expert meeting on forest degradation UNFCCC 20-21 Oct, 2008
GEO Forest Monitoring Symposium5 GEO 4-7 Nov, 2008
Coordinate degradation monitoring protocols 2009Q3
Provide input to the UNFCCC workshop and follow-up
actions to address needs and opportunities identified
during the UNFCCC workshop on degradation (Oct 2008),
e.g. second expert meeting if necessary
2008Q4
Tools for uncertainties assessments Develop tools and methods or estimating uncertainties on
monitoring and forest degradation. 2009Q2
Disseminate Landsat-based deforestation and forest
disturbance monitoring program to NGO, government and
academic institutions located in rainforest nations.
Carnegie Institution for Science6
2009Q2-2011Q4
Future ALOS7 missions on ecosystem structure planned (incl. Woods Hole)
Facilitate/engage research institutions on identification of
relevant topics for assessing carbon stock changes from
degradation for various forest types and support them
Bilateral cooperation to support
research
Woods Hole
others?
2009Q1
Tools for disturbance emission factors
Submit above degradation research report to UNFCCC
secretariat 2009Q2
Conduct studies on options to monitor co-benefits, ways to
incorporate on reporting process. UN-REDD Programme 2009Q1 Tools and methods to evaluate co-
benefits Develop methods and tools for monitor co-benefits. UN-REDD Programme 2009Q1
Expand sections on degradation in IPCC Guidelines IPCC 2009Q2 • Methodology guidelines IPCC
2003 GPG and 2006
Guidelines Elaborate further GOFC-GOLD sourcebook and feed later
into IPCC GPG and Guidelines
GOFC-GOLD
others? 2008Q4
5 http://www.dpi.inpe.br/geoforest/
6 http://asnerlab.stanford.edu/
7 http://www.jaxa.jp/projects/sat/alos/index_e.html
7 (18)
Available methodologies, approaches and initiatives
Actions (already planned item in bold, national level
implementation in italic) Who? When?
Capacity building: Coordinated approach for capacity building /technology transfer at national level for government/civil society
Raise REDD awareness and motivate countries UN-REDD Programme 2008Q4
CD-REDD initiative, global workshop GTZ, FAO, CfRN, etc
Organize similar workshops as global CD-REDD
workshop at regional and national level to motivate
countries
UN-REDD Programme 2009Q1
Assemble and disseminate information about ongoing
training programs, their purpose and timing
UN-REDD Programme
Forum on Readiness for REDD,
WHRC
others?
2008Q4
Develop national strategies and multi-stakeholder
consultation process for monitoring in the REDD context
National governments
UN-REDD Programme
others?
start 2008Q4, due 2009Q3
Assess national-level training needs National governments
UN-REDD Programme
others?
2008Q4
CB general
• GOFC-GOLD Sourcebook8
• FAO
• IPCC GPG9 and Guidelines
10
and training materials
• UNDP-UNEP Capacity
building project (CM)
• CfRN
• Brazil, South-South
cooperation
• others?
Define a planning schedule and process for countries’
national needs
National governments
UN-REDD Programme
others?
2008Q4
CB on IPCC GPG and Guidelines and
training materials
No currently available approaches? Provide dedicated, consistent REDD training programme
linking science with technology transfer
GOFC-GOLD/FAO/IPCC and
others
Link to UNDP training
programme on GHG inventories
others?
National governments
2009Q1
8 http://www.gofc-gold.uni-jena.de/redd/index.php
9 http://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/gpglulucf/gpglulucf.html
10 http://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/2006gl/index.html
8 (18)
support for governments?
Provide formal academic trainings in developing countries
(e.g. USAID)
Link to UNDP training
programme on GHG inventories
others?
National governments
support for governments?
2009Q1
Training of trainers for GHG inventories
IPCC provides only training materials others?
2009Q1
Strengthen regional centres in the application of RS for
REDD GOFC-GOLD 2009Q1
Develop manual/tutorials/standards for data collection,
monitoring, use of remote sensing, estimating carbon
stocks with regard to REL and future monitoring for
REDD
GOFC-GOLD
others? 2009Q1
Implement training on software usage for data processing,
data collection/processing/management for
national/international monitoring
FAO
CfRN
National governments others?
2009Q1
Draw lessons from existing experiences
GOFC-GOLD
FAO
others?
2008Q4
CB on remote sensing for REDD
• Regional network initiative
from GOFC-GOLD11
(e.g.
data harmonization)
• FRA201012
: 30-40 countries
involved in RS approach will
also get CB
• South-south collaboration,
strengthen partnerships
• others?
Brazil Amazon Fund from Norway – 20% (about 20 mil $) for transferring Brazilian REDD monitoring system to other countries
Brazil
Develop cost-effective and simple methodologies that
provide credible field data available
FAO
National governments
support for governments?
Countries assisting other
countries supported by donors
others?
2009Q1
CB for field sampling for REDD
• CDM methodologies
(UNFCCC),
• CDM experiences at project
level
• community level inventories Promote south-south cooperation 2008Q4
11
http://www.fao.org/gtos/gofc-gold/networks.html 12
http://www.fao.org/forestry/fra/en/
9 (18)
Assess CDM to gather information and lessons learned 2008Q4 • The Nature Conservancy
(TNC) forest carbon projects
• others? Provide contributions to LULUCF Sourcebook
(Winrock)13
2009Q1
Provide legal support for monitoring systems to speed up
the process 2008Q4 CB on legal support
No currently available approaches? Organize trainings on legal support based on needs
assessment
National governments
others? 2009Q2
CB on GIS
No currently available approaches?
Provide GIS trainings at national level (carbon inventory
as starting point, also useful for integrating cobenefits
etc.)
National governments
others? 2009Q2
South-south cooperation Convene follow-up meeting to focus on south-south
dialogue, exchange of experience and collaboration
ITTO could initiate/convene
others? 2009Q1
Indigenous people
Provide training for governments on implementation of the
UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples
(UNDRIP) (e.g., prior informed consent, resource rights,
etc)
2009Q2
Establish carbon accounting system National governments
Set up policies for REDD National governments
Strengthen institutional capacity for REDD National governments
Strengthen law enforcement and cooperation and
coordination between national agencies and links to
regional and international enforcement bodies, local
communities, indigenous groups, and NGOs.
National governments
CB at national level (general)
Carry out remote sensing and field inventories,
information management and analysis, and statistics
services, for both national and sub-regional levels.
National governments
13
http://carbonfinance.org/Router.cfm?Page=News&ItemID=24669&NewsID=25900
10 (18)
Inform stakeholders of monitoring and verification in the
broader REDD context National governments
Raise awareness (for e.g., traditional knowledge) and
gather information National governments
Build constituency and confidence National governments
Consider payment structures National governments
Create mechanism/process to link policy makers, resource
users/dependents, and scientists/experts to address
nationally specific questions and commission relevant
studies (e.g., linking land tenure, land management and
monitoring, participatory measurement)
National governments
Explore establishment of national REDD consultation
groups National governments
Plan inter-sectoral cooperation landscape National governments
Explore further opportunities for linking research and
policymaking regarding forest degradation National governments
CB at national level (stakeholders
process)
Guarantee overarching actions, including support for
implementation of a third party monitoring and
verification process, at national and international level, to
achieve transparency of the process
National governments
11 (18)
Available methodologies, approaches and initiatives
Actions (already planned item in bold, national level
implementation in italic) Who? When?
Coordination: General coordination of REDD work internationally and within country
Strengthen coordination and communication among
existing and future REDD projects within country, e.g.,
Country level REDD coordination teams and strategy
National governments
others? 2009Q1
Strengthen coordination and communication amongst
existing and future REDD projects between countries,
including south-south cooperation.
2009Q1
Build on existing facilities to serve clearinghouse function
for M&V (e.g., Program for National Reporting under
UNFCCC?)
2009Q1
International and national coordination
• Program for National
Reporting under UNFCCC?
• Other currently available
approaches?
Create master calendar that tracks overall activities
planned for REDD from UN-REDD Programme and
related initiatives to best inform national engagement
UN-REDD Programme
others? 2009Q4
Incremental changes in carbon stock Clarification of proposals on how to include incremental
changes in carbon stocks in a future regime
UNFCCC
others? 2008Q4
12 (18)
Available methodologies, approaches and initiatives
Actions (already planned item in bold, national level
implementation in italic) Who? When?
Infrastructure: Infrastructure including data, models, GIS, knowledge sharing system
Improve access to hardware, software, internet GEO
others? 2009Q3
Build infrastructure for RS, e.g., set up RS labs in each
country or create/strengthen regional RS centres start 2009Q1
• GEO-Netcast (*) system in
place (radio transmissions
where no internet connection)
• others?
Put in place infrastructure for communication with local
communities 2009Q2
(*) GEO-Netcast uses existing commercial telecommunications infrastructure to allow for the broadcast of Earth observation data streams, for on-demand access to
observation data upon user request, as well as for the collection of data from isolated sites and observatories.
Available methodologies, approaches and initiatives
Actions (already planned item in bold, national level
implementation in italic) Who? When?
Co-benefits: Create synergies with other monitoring needs; co-benefits. See also tools section
Synthesize lessons from existing monitoring efforts
relevant for REDD
UN-REDD Programme
others? 2009Q1
Review possibilities to include co-benefits (principles,
monitoring, standards) (see tools and methods) UN-REDD Programme 2009Q2 Any available initiatives?
Start with simple and flexible carbon monitoring system
and then later add more parameters (outside legally
binding agreement)
2008Q4
13 (18)
Available methodologies, approaches and initiatives
Actions (already planned item in bold, national level
implementation in italic) Who? When?
Field sampling: Field sampling including uncertainties, conversion factors, compatibility with remote sensing data. See also capacity building and tools
Raise funding for field sampling 2009Q2
Develop mechanism to prioritize funding for different
kinds of field sampling 2009Q1
Quantification of field sampling
uncertainty and need for local
conversion factors (allometric equation,
etc)
• IPCC 2006 Guidelines as
default
• Site specific scientific research
• National government efforts
• others?
Support national field programme to quantify uncertainty
UN-REDD Programme
FAO
GEO
others?
2009Q1
Assess initiatives on field sampling towards synergy (e.g.,
sample plot size)
WB, ITTO, FAO, FLEGT14
(EU), FLEG15
(UNFF)
UN-REDD Programme to do
assessment
Remote sensing community
others?
2009Q1
Optimize compatibility where new inventories are going to
be established 2009Q3
Expert meeting to develop guidelines for inventory design
(statistics needs, RS needs, permanent sample plot system) 2009Q1
Complementarities of national data
from field sampling and remote sensing
• GEO, remote sensing
community
• Stratification of forest land
(with the help of RS) is key for
cost-efficient sampling
• others?
National REDD teams should look at the issue of
complementarities of national data
National governments
others? 2009Q2
14
http://ec.europa.eu/environment/forests/flegt.htm 15
http://www.un.org/esa/forests/index.html
14 (18)
Available methodologies, approaches and initiatives
Actions (already planned item in bold, national level
implementation in italic) Who? When?
Historical deforestation trends: Interpreting historical trends including identification and monitoring of past deforestation drivers. See also tools section.
Commission report from credible
international experts on current options
for various REL periods and pros/cons
learned from current activities, including
examples of applying options at pilot
country level.
UN-REDD Programme
others? report due 2009Q2
Workshop on Remote sensing sensors and systems available to measure and monitor tropical deforestation and degradation
Prince’s Rainforest Fund Oct 20-21, 2008
Continue research on implications of
different methods for RELs science community 2008Q4
• World Bank report "At Loggerheads?"16
• CIFOR experiences "Do trees grow on
money?"17
• Indonesia Forest Climate Alliance (IFCA)
study18
• Project experiences from voluntary markets
• Global land project19
, Bibliography20
• others?
Address drivers of deforestation and , e.g.,
other sectors such as agriculture and
infrastructure policies and effect on
deforestation; consider inclusion of
demographic factors such as population
growth, trends, post-conflict rebounds
National governments
others? 2009Q1
16
http://econ.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/EXTDEC/EXTRESEARCH/EXTPRRS/EXTTROPICALFOREST/0,,menuPK:2463898~
pagePK:64168092~piPK:64168088~theSitePK:2463874,00.html 17
http://www.cifor.cgiar.org/Publications/Detail?pid=2347 18
http://www.dephut.go.id/INFORMASI/LITBANG/IFCA/ifca.htm 19
http://www.globallandproject.org/documents.shtml 20
http://www.globallandproject.org/documents.shtml and http://resweb.llu.edu/rford/docs/VGD/LUCC/addread.html
15 (18)
Available methodologies, approaches and initiatives
Actions (already planned item in bold, national level
implementation in italic) Who? When?
Historical degradation: Establishing historic degradation emission factors including cost implications, accuracy, and causes. See also tools section.
Commission methodology report by recognized experts
about the current knowledge on forest degradations
UN-REDD Programme
FCPF
others?
report due 2009Q2
Special Study on Forest Degradation (planned) FAO
Review and synthesize existing studies of field/pilot cases 2009Q1
Conduct case studies to quantify emission factors for
different types of human intervention detectable by remote
sensing or other means (logging, shifting cultivation, fires,
pests/diseases), test the IPCC Guidelines and suggest
enhancements as needed (explore ways to include in pilot
country activities, e.g., FCPF/UN-REDD Programme)
2009Q2
• WRI (Bolivia, DRC,
Indonesia pilot project, Greg
Asner and Carlos Souza)
• Brazil
• ASB, ICRAF21
• GOFC/GOLD-Fire22
• IPCC GPG and
• GOFC-GOLD Sourcebook
• others?
Conduct demonstration projects for establishing historic
degradation emission factors including cost implications,
accuracy, and causes
GOFC-GOLD 2009Q1
21
http://www.asb.cgiar.org/ 22
http://gofc-fire.umd.edu/
16 (18)
Available methodologies, approaches and initiatives
Actions (already planned item in bold, national level
implementation in italic) Who? When?
Future monitoring of degradation: Projects and methods for future monitoring of degradation including disturbed area by logging and fire, severity of events, biomass changes. See also tools section.
Explore applicability of existing methodologies in the field
more broadly
Carnegie Institution
Conservation
International/Imazon
(Indonesia)
Woods Hole Research Centre
FAO
INPE25
Indian Forest Service
GOFC-GOLD
Australia Sentinel26
Australia NCAS
others?
2009Q1
Conduct feasibility studies of estimating past degradation 2009Q1
Facilitate North-South and South-South cooperation 2009Q2
• Carnegie Institution for
Science
• Imazon
• Woods Hole Research Centre
• Japan (Forest Carbon Density
mapping, CB through Asia-
Pacific Network for Global
Change Research (APN))
• WRI
• South Dakota State Univ23
• Research programme funded
by NASA (e.g., SAFARI 2000
(The Southern African
Regional Science Initiative))
• GEO
• Australia National Carbon
Accounting System (NCAS)24
• others? Improve complementarities between field sampling and
burned area estimates by RS 2009Q3
23
http://globalmonitoring.sdstate.edu/ 24
http://www.climatechange.gov.au/ncas/index.html 25
http://www.inpe.br/ingles/index.php 26
http://sentinel.ga.gov.au/acres/sentinel/index.shtml
17 (18)
Available methodologies, approaches and initiatives
Actions (already planned item in bold, national level
implementation in italic) Who? When?
Verification: Verification includes independent, apolitical review process, transparent methods and data for verifying national monitoring and reporting systems
Review existing experiences with CDM and Annex 1
countries for lessons learned to inform the development of
an international review process.
UN-REDD Programme
others? 2009Q1
Identify ways how to incorporate REDD needs in
UNFCCC independent review process for GHG
inventories
UNFCCC
others? 2009Q1
Establish and use independent data sets for verification and
make them available to countries (requires CB, well
documentation of methods and data, uncertainty estimates)
and also to NGOs, local communities
Data producers
research, legal and policy
institutes/NGOs (e.g. CIEL27
,
FIELD28
, Chatham house29
)
others?
2009Q2
Establish independent, transparent verification
group/committee/team on national emissions and carbon
stocks.
National governments
UNFCCC
others?
2009Q3
Convene international meeting on issues of governance,
transparency to provide NGOs and other institutions
meaningful input into process (possibly not limited to
monitoring)
USAID meeting in Latin America others?
2009?
Independent verification
Country-level case study on verification UN-REDD Programme
others? 2009Q2
Access by NGOs and local
communities to verification process
No currently available approaches?
Improve communication with NGOs, local communities
and indigenous people through a national stakeholder
process
2009Q3
27
http://www.ciel.org/ 28
http://www.field.org.uk/ 29
http://www.chathamhouse.org.uk/research/eedp/
18 (18)
Political support Ensure political commitment, and legislative mandate, and
institutional arrangements. 2009Q2
Establish forest carbon/terrestrial accounting system
infrastructure 2009Q4
National registry links?
Link national data management infrastructure to forest law
enforcement including legal and regulatory instruments. 2009Q4
Ensure transparency in accountability 2009Q3
National level
Strengthen public access to data and mainstream forest
monitoring information in national statistics services. 2009Q2
19 (18)