Red light camera darren-chaker

20
II 2) Unjust Enrichment 1) Violation of Business & Professions Code § 17200, et seq. CASE NO. CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES ti S.D. Jadeja SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN MATEO Plaintiff, vs. 1 BRUCE L. SIMON (Bar No. 96241) WILLIAM J. NEWSOM (Bar No. 267643) 2 PEARSON, SIMON, W ARSHAW & PENNY, LLP 44 Montgomery Street, Suite 2450 3 San Francisco, California 94104 Telephone: (415) 433-9000 4 Facsimile: (415) 433-9008 5 P. TERRY ANDERLINI (BarNo. 44783) MERRILL G. EMERICK (Bar No. 117248) 6 ANDERLINI & EMERICK, LLP 411 Borel Avenue, Suite 501 7 San Mateo, California 94402 Telephone: (650) 24 -4884 8 Facsimile: (650) 2 -0081 14 REDFLEX TRAFFIC SYSTEMS, INC.; 19 REDFLEX TRAFFIC SYSTEMS (CALIFORNIA), INC.; AMERICAN 20 TRAFFIC SOLUTIONS, INC.; and DOES 1- 20, 15 S.D. JADEJA, individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated, 16 17 18 9 10 11 12 13 21 22 Defendants. DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL 23 24 25 26 27 28 817609.1 COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES

description

Red light camera lawsuit in California alleging cameras are illegal and thanks to the law firm providing the complaint to Darren Chaker.

Transcript of Red light camera darren-chaker

Page 1: Red light camera darren-chaker

II

2) Unjust Enrichment

1) Violation of Business & ProfessionsCode § 17200, et seq.

CASE NO.

CLASS ACTION

COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES

ti S.D. Jadeja

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

COUNTY OF SAN MATEO

Plaintiff,

vs.

1 BRUCE L. SIMON (Bar No. 96241)WILLIAM J. NEWSOM (Bar No. 267643)

2 PEARSON, SIMON, WARSHAW & PENNY, LLP44 Montgomery Street, Suite 2450

3 San Francisco, California 94104Telephone: (415) 433-9000

4 Facsimile: (415) 433-9008

5 P. TERRY ANDERLINI (BarNo. 44783)MERRILL G. EMERICK (Bar No. 117248)

6 ANDERLINI & EMERICK, LLP411 Borel Avenue, Suite 501

7 San Mateo, California 94402Telephone: (650) 24 -4884

8 Facsimile: (650) 2 -0081

14

REDFLEX TRAFFIC SYSTEMS, INC.;19 REDFLEX TRAFFIC SYSTEMS

(CALIFORNIA), INC.; AMERICAN20 TRAFFIC SOLUTIONS, INC.; and DOES 1­

20,

15 S.D. JADEJA, individually and on behalf ofall those similarly situated,

16

17

18

9

10

11

12

13

21

22Defendants.

DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

23

24

25

26

27

28

817609.1

COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES

Page 2: Red light camera darren-chaker
Page 3: Red light camera darren-chaker
Page 4: Red light camera darren-chaker
Page 5: Red light camera darren-chaker
Page 6: Red light camera darren-chaker
Page 7: Red light camera darren-chaker
Page 8: Red light camera darren-chaker
Page 9: Red light camera darren-chaker
Page 10: Red light camera darren-chaker
Page 11: Red light camera darren-chaker
Page 12: Red light camera darren-chaker
Page 13: Red light camera darren-chaker
Page 14: Red light camera darren-chaker
Page 15: Red light camera darren-chaker
Page 16: Red light camera darren-chaker
Page 17: Red light camera darren-chaker
Page 18: Red light camera darren-chaker
Page 19: Red light camera darren-chaker
Page 20: Red light camera darren-chaker