Rectangular Weir Report

Acknowledgements

I wish to express my deepest gratitude to my fellow group members, namely; Busawon Heetendr,

Lubrun Veeresh and Baichoo Ikhlaas, who played a vital role in allowing me to better understand this

experiment and to carry it out correctly.

Furthermore, I would like to acknowledge, with much appreciation, the crucial roles of the Laboratory

Technicians of the Fluid Mechanics Laboratory and my module lecturer, Mr Deejaysing Jogee, without

whom the conducted experiment would not have been performed as successfully as it has been.

Table of Contents

Abstract ................................................................................................................................................... 1

1.0 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... 2

2.0 Aim and objectives ........................................................................................................................... 2

2.1 Aim ............................................................................................................................................... 2

2.2 Objectives ..................................................................................................................................... 2

3.0 Literature Review .............................................................................................................................. 3

3.1 Components of a rectangular weir ................................................................................................ 3

3.2 Derivation of equation for the theoretical discharge over a rectangular weir ............................... 3

3.3 Assumptions made in derivation of equation ................................................................................ 5

3.4 Coefficient of discharge ................................................................................................................ 5

4.0 Methodology ..................................................................................................................................... 6

4.1 Description of apparatus ............................................................................................................... 6

4.2 Experimental Procedures .............................................................................................................. 6

5.0 Experimental Precautions ................................................................................................................. 6

6.0 Data Collection and Analysis ............................................................................................................ 7

6.1 Data Collection ............................................................................................................................. 7

6.1.1 Dimensions of rectangular weir ............................................................................................. 7

6.1.2 Volume of water collected at first pump speed ...................................................................... 7

6.1.3 Volume of water collected at second pump speed ................................................................. 7

6.1.4 Volume of water collected at third pump speed ..................................................................... 8

6.2 Data Analysis ................................................................................................................................ 8

6.2.1 Average flow rate for first pump speed.................................................................................. 8

6.2.2 Average flow rate for second pump speed ............................................................................. 9

6.2.3 Average flow rates for third pump speed ............................................................................... 9

6.2.4 Determination of discharge coefficient ................................................................................ 10

7.0 Observation and Discussion ............................................................................................................ 11

8.0 Limitations of methodology ............................................................................................................ 11

9.0 Recommended improvements ......................................................................................................... 12

10.0 Health and Safety .......................................................................................................................... 12

11.0 Recommendations (application of results in engineering practice) .............................................. 12

12.0 Dissemination of knowledge ......................................................................................................... 13

13.0 Contribution of Team Members and Resource ............................................................................. 14

13.1 Contribution of team members during conduction of experiment ............................................ 14

13.2 Contribution of team members for report writing ..................................................................... 14

13.3 Summary ................................................................................................................................... 14

13.4 Resource persons ...................................................................................................................... 15

14.0 Conclusion .................................................................................................................................... 15

References ............................................................................................................................................. 16

List of figures

Figure 1: Components of the rectangular weir ........................................................................................ 3

Figure 2: Orifice ...................................................................................................................................... 3

Figure 3: Section at sill. .......................................................................................................................... 4

Figure 4 - Graph of average discharge against h3/2. .............................................................................. 10

List of tables

Table 1: Dimensions of weir ................................................................................................................... 7

Table 2 - Data collection for first pump speed. ....................................................................................... 7

Table 3 - Data collection for second pump speed. .................................................................................. 7

Table 4 - Data collection for third pump speed. ..................................................................................... 8

Table 5 - Flow rates for first pump speed. .............................................................................................. 8

Table 6 - Average flow rate for first pump speed. .................................................................................. 8

Table 7 - Flow rates for second pump speed. ......................................................................................... 9

Table 8 - Average flow rate for second pump speed. ............................................................................. 9

Table 9 - Flow rates for third pump speed. ............................................................................................. 9

Table 10 - Average flow rate for third flow speed. ............................................................................... 10

Table 11 - Data required for plotting of graph. ..................................................................................... 10

Table 12 - Task distribution during the conduction of the experiment. ................................................ 14

1 | P a g e

Abstract

This report discusses about the flow characteristics over a rectangular weir. The discharge coefficient

of the fluid flow (water in this case) has been defined through this experiment. In order to achieve the

required objective, volumes of water, corresponding to a particular pump speed, have been collected

over a certain time period and the respective flow rates have been calculated. Graphs have been plotted

from the data obtained for analysing the flow characteristics. It has been confirmed experimentally that

the relationship between the discharge and height of water above datum is linear. Based on this graph,

the discharge coefficient has also been determined to be 0.68, which exceeds the usual value. An attempt

to explain the unusual high value for the discharge coefficient has been made, taking into account the

equipment used.

Key words: rectangular weir, volume of water, flow rates, pump speeds, discharge coefficient.

2 | P a g e

1.0 Introduction

Weirs are structures on which overflow of water occurs. Weirs can be defined as an obstruction in an

open channel over which flow takes place. The weirs are constructed to measure the volumetric rate of

flow of water in rivers or streams. A notch is an opening on the side of a tank such that the free surface

is found below the upper edge of the opening. Weirs and notches can be of two type namely, rectangular

and V-notch. A weir or notch may be considered as a large orifice and thus the head over the sill at the

outflow can be related to the discharge by using energy principles.

2.0 Aim and objectives

2.1 Aim

The aim of this experiment is to determine the value of Cd and verify the equation of flow over a

rectangular weir given by:

= 2

3 2 ()

32

Where cd is the coefficient of discharge.

b is the width of weir

h is the height of water above crest

g is the acceleration due to gravity

2.2 Objectives

The objectives of the experiment have been set as follows:

Obtain different values for the flow rate in a laboratory hydraulic bench by changing the

speed and hence the volume of water flowing and measuring the corresponding heights, h of

water above the crest.

Plot a graph of Q /cm3s-1 against h3/2 /cm to determine the value of Cd.

3 | P a g e

3.0 Literature Review

3.1 Components of a rectangular weir

The difference between a weir and a notch is that the notch is a small size while the weir is of a bigger

one used on large scale. Notches are usually made in a plate while weirs are made of masonry or

concrete. The different components of the rectangular weir are shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1: Components of the rectangular weir

As described in the figure above the nappe is a sheet of water flowing through a notch. The sill or crest

is the top of the weir over which water flows.

3.2 Derivation of equation for the theoretical discharge over a rectangular weir

A rectangular in used in an open channel flow. The head water flowing above the weir is measured and

it is correlated to the flow rate of water. Therefore the equation for the rectangular weir gives the flow

rate of water as a function of the head over the weir.

Consider an orifice with a jet shown in Figure 2.

Figure 2: Orifice

Applying Bernoullis equation between point 1 and 2:

P1/g + v12/ 2g + h = P2/g + v22/ 2g + h

Since the pressure at 1 and 2 are atmospheric pressure and v1 = 0

0+0+h = 0+ v22/ 2g

Nappe

Sill / Crest

Free water surface

h

d

1

2

4 | P a g e

h = v22/ 2g

The theoretical velocity (Torricellis Theorem) is given by:

v2 = 2

Consider the section at the sill shown in Figure 3

Figure 3: Section at sill.

Let, H = Height of water above sill of the notch

b = Length of weir

Consider a horizontal strip of water of width L and thickness h at a depth of h below the free surface

as shown above.

Area =

The theoretical velocity of water through the strip as given by Torricellis theorem:

Velocity = 2

Using the equation of continuity, Q = AV

Discharge through strip, dQ = b 2 . (1)

The total discharge, over the whole notch is the found by integration of equation (1) from h=0 at the

free surface to h = H at the bottom of the notch.

Therefore,

Q =

0 2

= 2

0

=2 [

12

+1

1

2+1

]

dh

h

b

dh

5 | P a g e

Q = 2/3 ()/ (Theoretical discharge)

The actual discharge is considered to be less than the theoretical discharge and hence, it is changed by

the introduction of a coefficient of discharge, Cd.

Therefore,

Actual discharge = Cd Theoretical discharge

Q = 2/3 ()/

3.3 Assumptions made in derivation of equation

Water discharges over the weir from the surface of a large reservoir, so it can be assumed that

the velocity of approach is negligible and the pressure is atmospheric.

There is no energy loss.

Flow is one dimensional.

The fluid is incompressible.

3.4 Coefficient of discharge

The theoretical discharge needs to be modified due to the following:

1. Loss of had due to friction

2. Free surface velocity is not zero

3. The actual flow area over the crest is less than the theoretical flow area due to crest and

surface contraction.

4. The streamlines curve near the weir producing centrifugal effects.

These deviations from the ideal flow is corrected by the introduction of the coefficient of discharge, Cd.

The Cd values for rectangular weirs varies with the head and height of weir from the bottom of the

channel. Experimental values obtained by J.B Francis in 1850 showed that the Cd may be taken as 0.622

in nearly all flow problems.

6 | P a g e

4.0 Methodology

4.1 Description of apparatus

The apparatus used consists of a channel with a rectangular notch at the end. Water is allowed to over

the rectangular notch and it is then collected in a trough and volume collected can be measured.

Furthermore, a stopwatch was required.

4.2 Experimental Procedures

1. The channel was allowed to fill with water until the free surface was at the same level as the

crest of the weir by switching on the pump found at the base of the apparatus.

2. The hook gauge was adjusted such that the pointer just touched the surface of the water and

the hook gauge reading was taken. This corresponded to the zero mark on the gauge.

3. The pump was set at the first speed such that the water began to flow over the weir.

4. The hook gauge was readjusted and new height, h was obtained for the new level of water.

5. The volume of water collected for a specified time was determined using a measuring

cylinder and a stopwatch.

6. The procedure was repeated until 8 readings were obtained.

7. The pump was set at a new speed and procedures 4 to 6 were repeated.

5.0 Experimental Precautions

While collecting water in the trough care should be taken to minimize the loss of water.

The trough should be cleaned dry before each experiment otherwise any residual fluid would

change the value for the actual volume collected.

A larger trough should be used as the speed of the pump is increased so as to avoid over

flowing of water in the trough.

Splashing of water should be avoided while collecting water in trough to prevent loss of

volume.

7 | P a g e

6.0 Data Collection and Analysis

6.1 Data Collection

6.1.1 Dimensions of rectangular weir

The dimensions of the cross section of the rectangular weir were measured using a ruler and shown in

the table below.

Table 1: Dimensions of weir

Side of weir Measurement taken /mm

Width 60

Height of crest from the bottom of channel 49

6.1.2 Volume of water collected at first pump speed

Height, h = 15 mm

Table 2 - Data collection for first pump speed.

Experiment No. Volume / cm Time / s

1 1455 6.45

2 950 4.39

3 835 3.57

4 960 4.26

5 885 4.01

6 860 4.00

7 980 4.50

8 1042 4.71

9 935 4.26

10 1025 4.81

6.1.3 Volume of water collected at second pump speed

Height, h = 22 mm

Table 3 - Data collection for second pump speed.


1 2630 6.61

2 2420 6.42

3 1510 4.00

4 1600 3.98

5 1350 3.65

6 1475 3.89

7 1092 3.20

8 1150 3.02

9 1210 3.13

10 1300 3.43

8 | P a g e

6.1.4 Volume of water collected at third pump speed

Height, h = 31 mm

Table 4 - Data collection for third pump speed.


1 4190 6.24

2 3235 4.83

3 2960 4.01

4 3380 5.01

5 3650 5.42

6 2410 3.55

7 3730 5.06

8 3590 5.34

6.2 Data Analysis

6.2.1 Average flow rate for first pump speed

Table 5 - Flow rates for first pump speed.

Volume / cm Time / s Flow rate, Q / cms

1455 6.45 225.58

950 4.39 216.40

835 3.57 233.89

960 4.26 225.35

885 4.01 220.70

860 4.00 215.00

980 4.50 217.78

1042 4.71 221.23

935 4.26 219.48

1025 4.81 213.10

For the first pump speed, the flow rates that were deemed to be most consistent are as follows.

Table 6 - Average flow rate for first pump speed.

Flow rate, Q / cms 216.40

215.00

217.78

219.48

Average flow rate, Qmean/ cm3s-1 217.17

9 | P a g e

6.2.2 Average flow rate for second pump speed

Table 7 - Flow rates for second pump speed.


2630 6.61 397.89

2420 6.42 376.95

1510 4.00 377.50

1600 3.98 402.01

1350 3.65 369.86

1475 3.89 379.18

1092 3.20 341.25

1150 3.02 380.79

1210 3.13 386.58

1300 3.43 379.01

For the second pump speed, the flow rates that were deemed to be most consistent are as follows.

Table 8 - Average flow rate for second pump speed.


377.50

379.18

379.01


6.2.3 Average flow rates for third pump speed

Table 9 - Flow rates for third pump speed.


4190 6.24 671.47

3235 4.83 669.77

2960 4.01 738.15

3380 5.01 674.65

3650 5.42 673.43

2410 3.55 678.87

3730 5.06 737.15

3590 5.34 672.28

10 | P a g e

For the third pump speed, the flow rates that were deemed to be most consistent are as follows.

Table 10 - Average flow rate for third flow speed.


674.65

673.43

672.28


6.2.4 Determination of discharge coefficient

Table 11 - Data required for plotting of graph.

Pump Speed Height, h / m Height, h3/2 x 10-3 / m3/2 Q average x 10-6 / m3s-1

1 0.015 1.837 217.17

2 0.022 3.263 378.16

3 0.031 5.458 672.96

Figure 4 - Graph of average discharge against h3/2.

Attempting to calculate Cd while ignoring y-intercept:

Gradient of graph = 0.1211

2

3 0.06 2 9.81 = 0.1211

= 0.68

y = 0.1266x - 2E-05

0

0.0001

0.0002

0.0003

0.0004

0.0005

0.0006

0.0007

0.0008

0 0.001 0.002 0.003 0.004 0.005 0.006

Qav

era

ge /

m3s-

1

Height, h3/2 / m3/2

Graph of average discharge against h3/2

11 | P a g e

7.0 Observation and Discussion

Due to the limits of the experiment, the graph plotted did not show the true relationship between

the flow rate and the height of the head above the weir edge. The theoretical equation showed

a linear relationship passing through the origin with the gradient equal to the constants

multiplied by the coefficient of discharge. A straight line was obtained using the set of data to

determine their relationship, indicating that it was linear but it did not pass on the origin.

From previous studies, it has been shown that the discharge coefficient for a rectangular weir

is normally taken as 0.622. The discharge coefficient determined in this case exceeds this value

and this may be due to a lower amount of energy losses (about 32 % in this case) during

discharge over the weir.

Surface tension and turbulence of the flow of water in the weir channel are some factors which may

have contributed to the energy losses. However, these parameters are difficult to be controlled,

especially in laboratory equipments and thus, they shall always be present.

Furthermore, there might have been secondary flows during the discharge, which might have

contributed to more water being discharged per unit time.

Lastly, it may that the measuring devices used to determine the flow rate over the rectangular weir may

themselves be faulty to some extent, leading to systematic errors along with the random errors caused

by the observer. This may have influenced the value of the discharge coefficient to a little extent.

8.0 Limitations of methodology

The experiment did not show accurate enough results due to the following limitations:

A small bucket was used to gather the volume of water flowing from the weir, limiting the time

range in calculating the flow rate to very short, thus affecting the accuracy.

Two testers had to coordinate their actions in order to measure both the flow volume and the

time taken; this might have led to random errors due to different reaction times.

A small weir was used, increasing frictional losses and turbulence.

The range of values of heights above the head of the weir was too short.

Only 3 flow rates were available from the apparatus.

A small measuring cylinder of capacity of 1L was used for the volumes which reached just

below 4L, resulting in the measurements becoming time-consuming.

12 | P a g e

9.0 Recommended improvements

To cater for the previously mentioned energy losses, the following improvements are recommended.

Integration of an inbuilt volume measuring system by either calibrating a bucket or the basin

itself.

A mechanism could have been built into the system allowing it to discharge over a fixed amount

of time.

Use of a larger weir to reduce losses (both water and energy losses).

Addition of more flow rates to increase the range of results.

According to theory, the discharge coefficient varies with the height of water above the datum

line. From an engineering point of view, this relationship must be verified through a graph of

discharge coefficient against height of water.

If a series of rectangular notches with different values of Cd were used, the independent variable

would be Cd, and dependent variable for a particular flow speed would be the height of the

head. Keeping the flow speed constant, the rectangular notches would have been fitted and the

height of the upstream measured.

10.0 Health and Safety

Anti-slippery shoes should be worn to avoid any injury due to any spillage of water on the floor.

The pump should not be operated with wet hands due to risk of electric shocks.

11.0 Recommendations (application of results in engineering practice)

Rectangular weirs have a wide range of engineering applications. However, they are mostly used in

hydraulic engineering, as for triangular ones. Some of the applications of rectangular weirs and the use

the discharge coefficient are listed below.

1. Weirs allow a simple method for hydrologists and engineers to measure the volumetric rate in

small to medium-sized streams or in industrial discharge locations. This is of particular use

when new water resources are to be investigated and reservoirs or dams are to be built.

2. The discharge coefficient allows engineers to determine how much energy is being lost while

water is being discharged from a particular body. This discharge coefficient plays an important

role in the determination of the storage capacity of a reservoir or dam. Furthermore, the

discharge coefficient allows an adequate design of pumps to be used in piping networks.

13 | P a g e

Note: The same engineering applications have been listed for triangular weirs in the previous report.

Weirs, in general, have common engineering applications. The only factor determining the use of a weir

of a particular shape may be the amount of water flowing, the amount of energy losses (related to

discharge coefficient) and the in-situ conditions of the water body.

12.0 Dissemination of knowledge

The measurement of water in large water bodies cannot be done by filling a container and measuring

the volume of water stored. This is a highly inaccurate and inadequate practice. Thus, engineers have

developped new structures which are able to determine, theoretically, the amount of water or any other

fluid passing in a channel or stream per unit time. These structures are called weirs and can exist in

many shapes: rectangular, triangular, trapezoidal etc

In simple terms, a weir can be described simply as a barrier, across a water body, used to alter its flowing

characteristics. The determination of the volume of water passing over the weir per unit time

(volumetric flow rate) is dependent on the following:

1. The geometry of the weir.

2. The depth of water above a reference line on the weir.

The geometry of the weir will always be the same. Thus, based on the depth of water above the datum

(reference line), engineers are able to calculate the volumetric flow rate through specific equations.

As said earlier, the equations provide a means to calculate the theoretical volumetric flow rate. But, in

practice, it is almost impossible to obtain such a flow rate. This is mainly because of energy losses

which occur while the water passes over the weir. Thus, in order to determine the actual flow rate,

investigations are carried out on site.

Past studies reveal that there is a discrepancy between the theoretical and actual flow rates. To be able

to describe this discrepancy quantitatively (so that on-site investigations are not required time and

again), engineers have developped a relationship between the 2 flow rates. This relationship is defined

by a factor called the discharge coefficient, CD. The relationship is as follows:

Actual flow rate = CD x Theoretical flow rate.

The discharge coefficient can be used to determine the amount of energy losses that occur when water

passes over the weir.

In this experiment, the main aim was to determine this discharge coefficient for a rectangular weir and

it was found to be 0.68 and this value exceeds the usual one.

14 | P a g e

Note: Once again, this section is similar as in the previous report due to the fact that both experiments

had the same aim.

13.0 Contribution of Team Members and Resource

13.1 Contribution of team members during conduction of experiment

Table 12 - Task distribution during the conduction of the experiment.

Activity Team member(s)

Setting up apparatus and ensuring necessary precautions

are taken.

Baichoo Ikhlaas, Veeresh Lubrun,

Veeramah Avinaash

Measurement for time and height of water. Heetendr Busawon

Recording raw data. Veeresh Lubrun.

Discharge of excess water from tanks. Veeramah Avinaash

Measurement of volume of water in measuring cylinders. Heetendr Busawon , Baichoo Ikhlaas

On-site calculations related to ensure that experiment has

been correctly performed.

Busawon. H, Baichoo. I, Veeramah.

A, Veeresh. L

13.2 Contribution of team members for report writing

This report was written both as a group and individually. The sections whereby all the group members

have contributed in writing include the following:

1. Introduction.

2. Aims and Objectives.

3. Literature Review.

4. Methodology.

5. Data Collection.

The remaining sections were written individually.

13.3 Summary

To complete the experiment and this report within the given time frame, a strategic plan needed to be

adopted by all team members to ensure that the work progressed as smoothly as possible and to ensure

that everybody are on the same page whenever an activity has been carried out. For this to be possible,

the flow pattern had been adopted.

1. Distribution of tasks prior to the conduction of the experiments.

2. Ensuring that all precautions are taken during the experiment.

15 | P a g e

3. Determine the flow rates on-site to see the relative closeness of the calculated values. The 4

closest values were then taken to obtain a mean flow rate for a particular pump speed.

4. Repeating the experiment if the calculations proved the experimental readings to be wrong.

5. Regular meetings to discuss outline of report.

6. Carry out the group work required for this report and ensuring that each member is satisfied

with the work.

13.4 Resource persons

The experiment conducted needed to be complemented by additional technical information, which were

provided to us by the following persons.

1. Mr Seebun Laboratory Technician at the Fluid Mechanics Laboratory.

2. Mr D.Jogee Module Lecturer

14.0 Conclusion

The discharge coefficient of the triangular weir was found to be 0.68, indicating a loss of energy of

nearly 32 %. Past rigorous studies have found that the discharge coefficient for a rectangular weir is

normally 0.622 and the determined value exceeds this one, indicating in a reduction of the amount of

energy lost. Thus, it can be said that this experiment catered for some of the factors that normally lead

to some of the energy losses. If a comparison is made between the discharge coefficients for a triangular

weir (previous report) and a rectangular one, it can be deduced that the one for the rectangular weir is

lower, thus indicating that there are more energy losses when water is discharged over a triangular weir.

It is this comparison that determines which weir shape is to be used for a particular application. In the

light of the above, it can be said that the aims and objectives of the experiment have been duly satisfied.

16 | P a g e

References

1. Douglas J.F., Gasiorek J.M., Swaffield J.A., 2003. Fluid Mechanics. 2nd ed. p 112 115,

Singapore: Longman

2. Kundu. P, 2004, Fluid Mechanics, 3rd ed. p 110 114: Elsevier Academic Press, California.

3. University of Mauritius, 2014, Hydraulics Practicals Laboratory Sheets, Faculty of

Engineering, Department of Civil Engineering.

4. Jecock, M (2011). River Fisheries and Coastal fish weirs, Heritage Assets [Online] Available

from: https://www.english-heritage.org.uk/publications/iha-river-fisheries-coastal-fish-

weirs/riverfisheriescoastalfishweirs.pdf [Accessed on 11.18.14]

5. Munson B, R, Young D, F, Okiishi, T, H and Huebsch W, W (2009). Fundamentals of Fluid

Mechanics, 6th Edition, John Wiley &Sons Inc, USA.

6. Rajput R, K (2013). A textbook of fluid mechanics and hydraulic machines in SI units. S Chand,

New Delhi.

7. Bright Hub Engineering, Open Channel Flow Measurement 5: the Rectangular Weir. [Online].

Available at: http://www.brighthubengineering.com/hydraulics-civil-engineering/65880-open-

channel-flow-measurement-5-the-rectangular-weir/ [Accessed on 14 December 2014]

8. Douglas J.F., Gasiorek J.M., Swaffield J.A., 2005. Fluid Mechanics. 5th ed., Person Education,

England.

9. Durgaiah D. R. 2004, Fluid Mechanics and Machinery. New Age International (P) Limited,

New Delhi, India.

10. Sharp Crested Weir 2, Derivation of the discharge equation for a rectangular weir. [Online].

Available at: http://www.jfccivilengineer.com/sharp_crested_weir_2.htm [accessed on: 13

December 2014]

Rectangular Weir Report

Documents

Transcript of Rectangular Weir Report