Recent Progress in X-Ray Emittance Diagnostics at...

26
Recent Progress in X-ray Emittance Diagnostics at SPring-8 S. Takano, M. Masaki, and H. Sumitomo * JASRI/SPring-8, Hyogo, Japan SES, Hyogo, Japan *

Transcript of Recent Progress in X-Ray Emittance Diagnostics at...

  • Recent Progress inX-ray Emittance Diagnostics

    at SPring-8

    S. Takano, M. Masaki, and H. Sumitomo *

    JASRI/SPring-8, Hyogo, JapanSES, Hyogo, Japan *

  • Outline

    Introduction

    X-ray Pinhole Camera

    X-ray Fresnel Diffractometry Monitor (XFD)

    Conclusions

    15 September 2015 IBIC 2015 Melbourne 1

  • IntroductionLight Source Facilities are Competing to

    Achieve Lower Emittance and Emittance Coupling Ratio for Higher Brilliance.

    Serious and Elaborate Efforts are being Paid forUpgrade Plans of Existing Rings or New Plans of Low Emittance Rings.

    X-ray Synchrotron Radiation (SR) isKey Diagnostic Probe for Non-Destructive Beam Emittance Measurement.

    Both Direct Imaging and Interferometric Techniquecan Resolve the Micrometer-order Transverse Beam Size.

    Emittance is Obtained from the Measured Sizewith Other Knowledge (Betatron and Dispersion Functions, Energy Spread).

    15 September 2015 IBIC 2015 Melbourne 2

  • IntroductionTwo Alternative Targets of X-ray Emittance Diagnostics at Light Source Rings

    Dipole Magnet Source and Insertion Device Source (Undulator)

    It Seems from the View Point of Machine Operation thatEmittance Diagnostics of Dipole Source is Necessary and Sufficientfor Tuning the Beam of the Accelerator

    Nonetheless,Diagnostics of Undulator Source Emittance Cannot be AvoidedBecause the Undulator is Just the Source of Light Delivered to Experimental Users

    Two X-ray Instruments for Emittance Diagnostics Recently Implemented at SPring-8Dipole Source: X-ray pinhole cameraUndulator source: X-ray Fresnel Diffractometry monitor (XFD)

    15 September 2015 IBIC 2015 Melbourne 3

  • X-ray Pinhole Camera @ SPring-8

    15 September 2015 IBIC 2015 Melbourne 4

    X-ray Window@ 6.24 m

    Source:Dipole (29B2) Pinhole @ 11.43 m Scintillator @ 34.31 m

    Layout

  • X-ray Pinhole Camera @ SPring-8

    15 September 2015 IBIC 2015 Melbourne 5

    X-ray Window @ 6.2 mSource: Dipole (29B2)

    B = 0.5 T Ec = 21.1 keV Aluminum 3mm thick

    X-ray

    Alminum 5052OFHC mask

    1mm (H) X 5mm (V)

    2 10134 10136 10138 10131 1014

    1.2 10141.4 1014

    0 50 100 150

    Source

    Filtered by X-ray Window

    Flux

    Den

    sity

    (pho

    tons

    /s/m

    rad2

    /0.1

    %b.

    w.)

    Photon Energy (keV)

  • X-ray Pinhole Camera @ SPring-8

    15 September 2015 IBIC 2015 Melbourne 6

    Pinhole Assembly @ 11.4 mY slit

    Tungsten 3mm thick

    X-ray

    Aperture: 20 μm x 20μm

    manual XZ stage

    rotary stage

    gonio stage

    X slitTungsten 3mm thick

  • X-ray Pinhole Camera @ SPring-8

    15 September 2015 IBIC 2015 Melbourne 7

    Scintillator & Camera Assembly@ 34.3mMirror

    manual XZ stage

    CCD Camera (Basler piA2400-17gm)GigE interface2448 x 2050 pixels3.45 μm x 3.45 μm pixel size

    Lensobject-space

    telecentricx2 magnificationW. D. = 111 mm

    X-ray

    ScintillatorCdWO4 (CWO)0.5mm thick

  • X-ray Pinhole Camera @ SPring-8

    15 September 2015 IBIC 2015 Melbourne 8

    Resolution of Pinhole ( PSF calculation based on Wave Optics )

    Pinhole Resolution (rms)

    σdiff = 6.9 μm@ 42 kev

    0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1

    1.2

    0 0.05 0.1 0.15

    PSF

    Inte

    nsity

    (a.u

    .)

    Y(mm) on the screen

    Ep = 50 keV

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70

    Resolution (rms)

    Res

    olut

    ion

    (um

    )

    E (keV)0

    5 1015

    1 1016

    1.5 1016

    2 1016

    2.5 1016

    3 1016

    0 50 100 150

    Power absorbed by CWO (a.u.)

    Abs

    obed

    Pow

    er (e

    V-1

    )

    E (keV)

  • X-ray Pinhole Camera @ SPring-8

    15 September 2015 IBIC 2015 Melbourne 9

    Scintillator & Camera AssemblyResolution Calibration

    Resolution (rms) ofScintillator & Camera Assembly

    σCAM = 2.2 μm

    sharpness of edge of W bar placed in front of scintillatormeasured

    0

    50

    100

    150

    200

    250

    200 250 300 350 400

    Inte

    nsity

    X (pxl)

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    260 280 300 320 340

    dI/d

    x

    X(pxl)

    σ = 2.2 um

  • X-ray Pinhole Camera @ SPring-8

    15 September 2015 IBIC 2015 Melbourne 10

    Total Spatial Resolution σXPC (rms)

    = 7.2 μm Pinhole σdiff = 6.9 μmScintillator & Camera σCAM = 2.2 μm

    Scale of Camera Pixel to Beam Coordinate

    measured by introducing vertical bump orbits

    consistent withdesigned value 0.8625 μm/pixel

    XPCσ = diffσ 2 + CAMσ 2

    -0.15

    -0.1

    -0.05

    0

    0.05

    0.1

    0.15

    830 840 850 860 870 880

    y [m

    m]

    s [m]

    29B2

    -0.2

    0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000

    Y_b

    ump

    (mm

    ) Y (pxl)

    0.848 um / pxl

  • X-ray Pinhole Camera @ SPring-8

    15 September 2015 IBIC 2015 Melbourne 11

    Projected σx = 113.5 pixels

    Projected σy = 21.3 pixels

    Projected profiles(horizontal and vertical)consistent withGaussian profiles

    Projected Beam Sizeσx = 96.0 μmσy = 16.6 μm

    (resolution subtracted)

    Example of data I = 100 mA, exposure time 1 ms

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    0 200 400 600 800 1000

    Inte

    nsity

    (a.u

    .)

    X (pixel)

    0 10 20 30 40 50 600100

    200300

    400500

    Intensity (a.u.)

    Y (pixel)

  • X-ray Pinhole Camera @ SPring-8

    15 September 2015 IBIC 2015 Melbourne 12

    Control Room Display Live Beam Image View~ 15 fps

    Parameters of Beam Profilebeam size σx and σybeam tilt angle θ

    Continuously Loggedto SPring-8 Control Database

    By Periodical Image Analysis(1s cycle time)

    2D Gaussian Profile isFitted to Beam Image Data

    εy = 7.5 pm.rad(coupling 0.3%)

  • X-ray Pinhole Camera @ SPring-8

    15 September 2015 IBIC 2015 Melbourne 13

    Control Room Display Live Beam Image View~ 15 fps

    Parameters of Beam Profilebeam size σx and σybeam tilt angle θ

    Continuously Loggedto SPring-8 Control Database

    By Periodical Image Analysis(1s cycle time)

    2D Gaussian Profile isFitted to Beam Image Data

    εy = 7.5 pm.rad(coupling 0.3%)

  • X-ray Pinhole Camera @ SPring-8

    15 September 2015 IBIC 2015 Melbourne 14

    Diagnostics for User Operation: Betatron Coupling induced by ID20

    ID error fields excitebetatron couplingin user operation.

    Betatron couplingis correctedby tuningskew Q parameters.

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    -0.5

    0

    0.5

    1

    1.5

    2

    2.5ID20 gap (mm) skew_Q_20_2

    ID20

    / ga

    p (m

    m)

    skew_Q

    _20_2 / I (A)

    12.5

    13

    13.5

    14

    14.5

    1515

    /7/9

    0:0

    0:00

    15/7

    /9 6

    :00:

    00

    15/7

    /9 1

    2:00

    :00

    15/7

    /9 1

    8:00

    :00

    15/7

    /10

    0:00

    :00

    15/7

    /10

    6:00

    :00

    15/7

    /10

    12:0

    0:00

    15/7

    /10

    18:0

    0:00

    15/7

    /11

    0:00

    :00

    σy (μm)

    σ y (

    μm) gap closed skew Q correction

    gap opened

  • X-ray Pinhole Camera @ SPring-8

    15 September 2015 IBIC 2015 Melbourne 15

    Diagnostics for Machine Tuning: Betatron Coupling induced by ID10

    Search forCorrecting skew Q parameters

    Gap 6 mm Gap 50 mm (full-open)

    * radiation induced-demagnetizationof ID10 suspected,and B field readjusted in March 2015

    16

    18

    20

    22

    24

    -2

    -1.5

    -1

    -0.5

    0

    0.5

    1

    1.5

    2

    0 10 20 30 40 50 60

    σ y (μ

    m)

    Tilt A

    ngle (deg)

    ID 10 Gap (mm)

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    -8 -7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0

    gap 6 mmgap 8 mmgap 10 mm

    Proj

    eted

    Ver

    atic

    al B

    eam

    Siz

    e (u

    m)

    ΔI of skew Q magnets (A)

  • X-ray Pinhole Camera @ SPring-8

    15 September 2015 IBIC 2015 Melbourne 16

    Preliminary Plan for SPring-8 Upgrade (SPring-8-II)

    Source: Dipole MagnetLayout (distance from source)

    Pinhole: 6.5m, Scintillator: 32m

    PinholeMagnification : x 3.9Size: 20 μm x 20 μm

    Point Spread Function ( Wave Optics Calculation )

    Pinhole Resolution (rms) better than 5 μmfeasible for 40 – 50 keV X-rays

    Resolution of Present Scintillator Assemblyscales to 1.1 μm

    0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1

    1.2

    0 0.05 0.1 0.15

    PSF

    Inte

    nsity

    (a.u

    .)

    Y(mm) on the screen

    Ep = 40 keV

    σ = 4.69 μm

  • X-ray Pinhole Camera @ SPring-8Summary

    Live Beam Image View @ Control Room ~ 15 fpsParameters of Beam Profile Continuously Logged to SPring-8 Control DBIndispensable for Beam Tuning and User OperationResolution (rms) Better than 5 μm Feasible for Upgrade Plan of SPring-8

    15 September 2015 IBIC 2015 Melbourne 17

    Specifications of the SPring-8 X-ray Pinhole Camera

    Light Source Bending Magnent (29B2)

    Pinhole Distance from Source (m) 11.4

    Aperture Size (μm) 20 x 20

    Scintillator Distance from Source (m) 34.3

    Material CdWO4Camera Number of Pixels 2448 x 2050

    Pixel Size (μm) 3.45 x 3.45

    Magnification Factor x 4 ( Pinhole: x 2, Lens: x 2 )

    Resolution (rms) (μm) 7.2 ( Pinhole: 6.9, Scintillator & Camera: 2.2 )

  • 15 September 2015 IBIC 2015 Melbourne 18

    RLLRA+

    ≈ λ7

    Diffraction patterns depending on a width A of the slitFraunhofer Diffractionnarrow slit (A2 Rλ )

    X-ray Fresnel Diffractometry Monitor (XFD)Principle

    Double-LobedFresnel Diffraction

    The depth of a median dip correlates with a light source size.

    optimum slit widthfor the deepest dip

    M. Masaki et al., IBIC2014 TUCZB1 (2014).M. Masaki et al., Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 18, 042802 (2015).

  • XFD @ SPring-8

    15 September 2015 IBIC 2015 Melbourne 19

    ID05

    - Nu=51- λu=76 mm

    Monochromator

    L = 26.8 m R = 65.4 m

    X-ray cameraSlit

    Setup for Initial Experiments

    RLLRA+

    ≈ λ7optimum slit width Afor the deepest dip

    - P43 Screen- lenses- CCD cameramin. exp. time: 1msresolution σres: 6.8 μm

  • XFD @ SPring-8

    15 September 2015 IBIC 2015 Melbourne 20

    Initial Results M. Masaki et al., IBIC2014 TUCZB1 (2014).M. Masaki et al., Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 18, 042802 (2015).

    deep

    erdi

    p

    (a) νx = 41.133, skew-Q on

    (b) νx = 41.137, skew-Q off

    (c) νx = 41.361, skew-Q off

    (d) νx = 41.357, skew-Q off

    a

    b

    c

    d

    X-ray energy 7.2 keV

    slit width ΔY = 150 μm

    0.5

    0.6

    0.7

    0.8

    0.9

    1

    -0.2 -0.15 -0.1 -0.05 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2

    exp. data

    9.6 m

    9.1 m

    8.6 m

    8.1 m

    7.6 m

    7.1 m

    6.6 m

    Norm

    alize

    d In

    tens

    ity

    y (mm)

    + 0.5 μm

    - 0.5 μm Best fit

    Undulator source size smaller than 10 μmsuccessfully resolved

  • XFD @ SPring-8

    15 September 2015 IBIC 2015 Melbourne 21

    Recent ProgressNew X-ray Imaging Setup

    X-ray

    Lens: x20

    Imaging Resolution (rms) @ Source Point:2.2 μm

  • XFD

    15 September 2015 IBIC 2015 Melbourne 22

    Summary

    Diagnostic technique for light source ringsto measure small beam size at ID (undulator) source point

    Able to resolve beam size smaller 5 μm

    Requires onlyslit, monochromator, and imaging device (X-ray camera)

    Has potential universal availability to ID beamlines of thediffraction limited storage rings (DLSRs)

  • Conclusions

    15 September 2015 IBIC 2015 Melbourne 23

    SPring-8 X-ray Pinhole Camera

    Resolution (rms) ~ 7 μm

    Live Beam Image View @ Control Room ~ 15 fps

    Beam Parameters Logged to Control DB by Periodical (1s cycle) Image Analysis

    Indispensable for Beam Tuning and User Operation of SPring-8

    X-ray Fresnel Diffraction (XFD) Monitor

    Diagnostic Technique for Light Source Ringsto Measure Small Beam Size at ID (Undulator) Source Point

    Requires OnlySlit, Monochromator, and Imaging Device (X-ray Camera)

    Able to Resolve Beam Size smaller 5 μm

  • Acknowledgements

    15 September 2015 IBIC 2015 Melbourne 24

    Many thanks to

    colleagues of SPring-8/SACLA and SES

    For their help in

    vacuum, alignment, control and operation etc.

  • 15 September 2015 IBIC 2015 Melbourne 25

    Thank you for your attention !

    /ColorImageDict > /JPEG2000ColorACSImageDict > /JPEG2000ColorImageDict > /AntiAliasGrayImages false /CropGrayImages true /GrayImageMinResolution 300 /GrayImageMinResolutionPolicy /OK /DownsampleGrayImages true /GrayImageDownsampleType /Bicubic /GrayImageResolution 300 /GrayImageDepth -1 /GrayImageMinDownsampleDepth 2 /GrayImageDownsampleThreshold 1.50000 /EncodeGrayImages true /GrayImageFilter /DCTEncode /AutoFilterGrayImages true /GrayImageAutoFilterStrategy /JPEG /GrayACSImageDict > /GrayImageDict > /JPEG2000GrayACSImageDict > /JPEG2000GrayImageDict > /AntiAliasMonoImages false /CropMonoImages true /MonoImageMinResolution 1200 /MonoImageMinResolutionPolicy /OK /DownsampleMonoImages true /MonoImageDownsampleType /Bicubic /MonoImageResolution 1200 /MonoImageDepth -1 /MonoImageDownsampleThreshold 1.50000 /EncodeMonoImages true /MonoImageFilter /CCITTFaxEncode /MonoImageDict > /AllowPSXObjects false /CheckCompliance [ /None ] /PDFX1aCheck false /PDFX3Check false /PDFXCompliantPDFOnly false /PDFXNoTrimBoxError true /PDFXTrimBoxToMediaBoxOffset [ 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 ] /PDFXSetBleedBoxToMediaBox true /PDFXBleedBoxToTrimBoxOffset [ 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 ] /PDFXOutputIntentProfile (None) /PDFXOutputConditionIdentifier () /PDFXOutputCondition () /PDFXRegistryName (http://www.color.org) /PDFXTrapped /False

    /CreateJDFFile false /SyntheticBoldness 1.000000 /Description >>> setdistillerparams> setpagedevice