Real World Evidence A Path Forward - Duke University · PDF fileReal World Evidence A Path...

download Real World Evidence A Path Forward - Duke University · PDF fileReal World Evidence A Path Forward Jacqueline Corrigan-Curay Director Office of Medical Policy Center for Drug Evaluation

If you can't read please download the document

Transcript of Real World Evidence A Path Forward - Duke University · PDF fileReal World Evidence A Path...

  • Real World EvidenceA Path Forward

    Jacqueline Corrigan-CurayDirector

    Office of Medical Policy Center for Drug Evaluation and Research

    FDA September 13, 2017

  • Presenter Disclosure Information

    Jacqueline Corrigan-Curay, JD MD

    FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE:

    No relevant financial relationship exists

    The views expressed herein are those of the author and should not be

    construed as FDAs views or policies

  • 4

    Overview

    Definitions

    Goals and expectations

    FDA experience with Real World Data (RWD)/Real World Evidence (RWE)

    Foundational activities

    Looking forward

  • 5

    Definitions

    Real-World Data (RWD) are data relating to patient health status and/or the delivery of health care routinely collected from a variety of sources.

    Real-World Evidence (RWE) is the clinical evidence regarding the usage and potential benefits or risks of a medical product derived from analysis of RWD.

    RWD include data derived from electronic health records (EHRs), claims and billing data, data from product and disease registries, patient-generated data including in home-use settings, and data gathered from other sources that can inform on health status, such as mobile devices.

  • 6

    RWE: What are the Goals?

    Maximize the opportunities to have regulatory decisions incorporate data/evidence from settings that more closely reflect clinical practice

    Increase the diversity of populations

    Improve efficiencies

    o Population identification/selection

    o Reduce duplicative capture of data

  • 7

    RWE: What are the Expectations?

    21St Century Cures

    FDA shall establish a program

    to evaluate the potential use of

    real world evidence (RWE) to

    support:

    approval of new indication

    for a drug approved under

    section 505(c)

    satisfy post-approval study

    requirements

    Real world evidence means data regarding the usage, or the potential benefitsor risks, of a drug derived from sources other than traditional clinical trials

  • 8

    21st Century Cures

    Program will be based on a framework that:

    Categorizes sources of RWE and gaps in data collection activities

    Identifies standards and methodologies for collection and analysis

    Describes the priority areas, remaining challenges and potential pilot opportunities that the program will address

    Framework will be developed in consultation

    with stakeholders

  • 9

    PDUFA VI Commitments

    Enhance use of RWE in regulatory decision making

    Conduct a public workshop to gather input into topics related to the use of RWE for regulatory decision-making

    Initiate appropriate activities (e.g. pilot studies or methodology development projects) to address key issues in the use of RWE for regulatory decision making purposes

    Publish draft guidance on how RWE can contribute to the assessment of safety and effectiveness in regulatory submissions (e.g. supplemental applications, post-marketing applications)

  • FDA Experience with RWD/RWE

    https://www.sentinelinitiative.org/

    425 million person years of observation

    time

    43 million people currently accruing new

    data

    5.9 billion pharmacy dispensings

    7.2 billion unique medical encounters

    42 million people with at least one

    laboratory test result

    9

  • large numbers of reported cases of

    bleeding with dabigatran is an example of

    stimulated reporting. The Mini-Sentinel

    assessment suggests that bleeding rates

    with dabigatran are not higher than those

    with warfarin, a finding that is consistent with

    the results of RE-LY

    -April 2013

    Making Informed Decisions

    10

  • 12

    Signal Identification:Potential safety

    concern identified

    Signal Refinement:

    Initial evaluation of safety concerns

    Signal Evaluation:

    Detailed assessment

    Post-Market Safety Assessment

    Modular Programs

    >Level 2 Modular Programs/

    Protocol-based Assessments

    Data Mining

    (e.g.

    TreeScan)

    Case Reports RegistriesObservational

    StudiesClinical Trials

  • 13

    Epidemiology Final Guidance

    Pertains to pharmacoepidemiology

    safety studies using electronic

    healthcare data

    Final guidance was issued May 14,

    2013

  • Real-world evidence can inform therapeutic development,

    outcomes research, patient care, research on health

    systems, quality improvement, safety surveillance and

    well-controlled effectiveness trials

    As we adapt the tools and methods of traditional trials to

    real-world data settings, we must consider the

    components of such trials that are critical to obtaining

    valid results and minimizing bias.

    Discussions of real world evidence must be informed by a

    clear understanding of the methods used, so that the best

    methods that have been developed and validated can be

    combined with the most appropriate research settings.N ENGL J MED 375;23 December 8, 2016

  • 15

    Turning RWD into RWE

    RWD Fitness for

    useRWE Study Design

    RWE Study Design

    RWD Assessing Fitness for

    Use

    Regulatory Consider-

    ations

    Data Standards

    and Implement-

    ation

    Engage with FDA early on this journey

  • 16

    Laying the Foundation

    Stakeholder Engagement

    Demonstration Projects

    Guidances

    Data Standards

    Use of Electronic

    Informed Consent

    FDAS THERAPEUTIC AREA

    STANDARDS PROJECT

    Of the 54 TAs prioritized, 44 have started with 21 of those completed as of Feb 2017

  • 17

    Demonstration Projects-Assessing Data Fitness

    Collaboration Duke Clinical Research Institute and GlaxoSmithKline

    Supported by FDA

    Assess EHR ability to: Facilitate recruitment

    Populate baseline characteristics

    Identify clinical endpoints

    July 14, 2017: Leveraging Electronic Health Data in a Multinational Clinical Trial: Early Learnings from the HARMONY-Outcomes EHR Ancillary Study

    http://www.rethinkingclinicaltrials.org/grand-rounds-7-14-17/

    Effect of Albiglutide, When Added to Standard Blood Glucose Lowering Therapies,on Major Cardiovascular Events in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus NCT02465515

  • 18

    Demonstration Projects-Assessing Data Fitness

    Oncology Center for Excellence : Information Exchange and Data Transformation (INFORMED)

    Contact: Sean Khozin, MD

    ASCO Annual Meeting

  • 19

    Demonstration Projects-Assessing Data Fitness /Standards

    OneSource: enter the right clinical data once, use many times

    FDA collaboration with Dr. Laura Esserman, UCSF

    Integration of standards based tools into the EHR to bring together health care and research

    Demonstration in breast cancer clinical trials

    Courtesy of Dr. Laura Esserman and Susan Dubman

  • 20

    Data Standards Demonstration

    Networks of observational data use different Common data Models

    Open, consensus-based standards might not be leveraged in these CDMs (ex: CDISC, HL7)

    There is a need to facilitate interoperability among these collaborations

    FUTURE State

  • 21

    https://www.sentinelinitiative.org/sites/default/files/About/IMPACT-AFib_Protocol_Public_Comment_03012017.pdf

    Demonstration Projects-Evidence Generation

    IMPLEMENTATION OF A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL TO

    IMPROVE TREATMENT WITH ORAL ANTICOAGULANTS IN PATIENTS

    WITH ATRIAL FIBRILLATION (IMPACT-AFib)

    An individually randomized trial of a practice and

    patient level educational intervention to increase

    anticoagulant use for individuals with atrial

    fibrillation and increased risk of stroke (i.e.

    CHA2DS2-VASc score 2). This project is a proof

    of concept effort, the first trial conducted using

    Sentinel Infrastructure, and will inform future

    interventional studies that are designed to utilize

    existing healthcare data as part of their design.

    9% of people >65 years have Afib

    AFib increases stroke risk by 4-5x

    Oral anticoagulants significantly decrease risk of stroke

    Source -- CDC Atrial Fibrillation Fact Sheet

  • 22

    Spectrum of Reliance on RWD

  • 23

    Looking Forward

    Continued engagement with stakeholders to identify the key questions that FDA needs to answer to facilitate sponsor use of RWD and RWE for regulatory decisions

    Provide appropriate guidance(s)

    Identify knowledge gaps and support appropriate demonstration projects to facilitate development of RWE for regulatory decisions

    Develop a framework and program

  • 24

    Acknowledgments

    Melissa Robb Dianne Paraoan Robert Ball Michael Blum Laura Esserman Leslie Curtis Sean Khozin Mitra Rocca Mary Ann Slack Vaishali Popot

  • 25

    Questions/ Comments

    [email protected]

    mailto:[email protected]

  • 27

    Turning RWD into RWE

    Defining the

    scientific question

    Identify suitable trial

    design

    Selection of RWD Sources that are Fit for

    Purpose

    Data standards/ analytics

    Ensure compliance

    with FDA Regs

    e.g. Part 11 and GCP

    Submission of RWE for

    regulatory action

    Decision

  • Public Meeting: A Framework for Regulatory Use of Real-