Real Investments under Knightian Uncertainty Johan Walden Yale School of Management October 6, 2003.
-
date post
22-Dec-2015 -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
0
Transcript of Real Investments under Knightian Uncertainty Johan Walden Yale School of Management October 6, 2003.
![Page 1: Real Investments under Knightian Uncertainty Johan Walden Yale School of Management October 6, 2003.](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051516/56649d7a5503460f94a5ecc3/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Real Investments under Knightian Real Investments under Knightian UncertaintyUncertainty
Johan WaldenJohan WaldenYale School of ManagementYale School of Management
October 6, 2003October 6, 2003
![Page 2: Real Investments under Knightian Uncertainty Johan Walden Yale School of Management October 6, 2003.](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051516/56649d7a5503460f94a5ecc3/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Presentation•Why is Knightian uncertainty important for real investments?
•How does it modify decision makers’ behavior?• Expected utility theory• Investment decisions
•What are the implications of the changed behavior?
Discussion
AgendaAgenda
![Page 3: Real Investments under Knightian Uncertainty Johan Walden Yale School of Management October 6, 2003.](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051516/56649d7a5503460f94a5ecc3/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Classical expected utility theory breaks Classical expected utility theory breaks down down under Knightian uncertainty under Knightian uncertainty
Expert 1
Expert 2
Decision problem? Uncertain information
“75% chance that A will win - quality is superior”
“80% chance that B will win - marketing is superior”
Management chooses conservative estimate - Estimates probability for A to win to be 30% and does not invest
If the choice was the
opposite: Would we
really expect the firm to
estimate B’schance of success to
70%?
PRODUCTION EXAMPLE
Cash flow
-100+250=+150
-100+0= -100
Invest in A?
No
Yes
0
A wins
B wins
Comple-mentary products, A and B
![Page 4: Real Investments under Knightian Uncertainty Johan Walden Yale School of Management October 6, 2003.](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051516/56649d7a5503460f94a5ecc3/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Content Access
DSL
Cable
Fiber
WirelessVoice
News
Movies
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Pri
ce (
EU
R)
10 20 30 40 50Household Penetration (%)
Demand for service is high... …But unclear who will capture value...
…And regulations prohibit hedging
•Restrictions on horizontal integration •Restrictions on vertical integration
•Even though the business case is solid, uncertainty make investors reluctant•Consequently, roll-out has been slow in many European and Asian markets
BROADBAND EXAMPLE Knightian uncertainty is important in many Knightian uncertainty is important in many real life situationsreal life situations
![Page 5: Real Investments under Knightian Uncertainty Johan Walden Yale School of Management October 6, 2003.](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051516/56649d7a5503460f94a5ecc3/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
MEU MODEL
* Multiple priors Expected Utility
•In classical setup: “I give you probabilities, you
choose lottery”
•In MEU setup: “I give you
information, you choose
probabilities and lottery”
Structure of decision maker’s choice
Classical theory can be modified to take Classical theory can be modified to take Knightian uncertainty into account - MEU* Knightian uncertainty into account - MEU* setup (1/2)setup (1/2)
![Page 6: Real Investments under Knightian Uncertainty Johan Walden Yale School of Management October 6, 2003.](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051516/56649d7a5503460f94a5ecc3/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
MEU MODEL
Decision theoretic axioms:
•Weak order•Continuity•Monotonicity•Nondegeneracy•C-Independence•Uncertainty aversion
Decision maker is rational with respect to axioms
“I prefer situations with known probabilities” C
MEU Theorem:
Classical theory can be modified to take Classical theory can be modified to take Knightian uncertainty into account - MEU Knightian uncertainty into account - MEU results (2/2)results (2/2)
![Page 7: Real Investments under Knightian Uncertainty Johan Walden Yale School of Management October 6, 2003.](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051516/56649d7a5503460f94a5ecc3/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
•Are averse towards uncertainty
•Are MEU optimizers
•Are “one-shot” (now or never)
•Are irreversible
•Have Knightian uncertainty
•Are hedgeable
When uncertainty increases, decision maker: 1. Acts as if cost of capital has increased2. Supplements NPV rule with other value measures3. Invests differently than under increased risk aversion
MEU theory changes decision makers’ MEU theory changes decision makers’ investment behaviorinvestment behavior
Investments:Decision makers (DMs):
![Page 8: Real Investments under Knightian Uncertainty Johan Walden Yale School of Management October 6, 2003.](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051516/56649d7a5503460f94a5ecc3/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
•3 Projects with Payoffs
•Logarithmic utility function•u(x)=log(x)
•Multiple priors for horse lottery:•P(sH)=[0.95-19/20,0.95+/20]
•Probabilities for roulette lottery:•P(qH)=P(qL)=0.5
•Horse dimension •State space (sL,sH)
•Roulette dimension•State space (qL,qH)
2 PERIOD EXAMPLE
(sH,qH)
(sH,qL)(sL,qH)(sL,qL)
p0 p1 p2
1
1
1
1
1.3
0.9
0
0
0
0
0.2
0.2
Changed investment behavior is shown in a Changed investment behavior is shown in a two period example (1/4)two period example (1/4)
![Page 9: Real Investments under Knightian Uncertainty Johan Walden Yale School of Management October 6, 2003.](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051516/56649d7a5503460f94a5ecc3/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
2 PERIOD EXAMPLE
1. When uncertainty increases, required 1. When uncertainty increases, required minimum minimum IRR to invest in a project increases (2/4)IRR to invest in a project increases (2/4)
Results hold for multi-period
investments with general utility
functions under additional
assumptions on projects:
“Nondegeneracy”
![Page 10: Real Investments under Knightian Uncertainty Johan Walden Yale School of Management October 6, 2003.](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051516/56649d7a5503460f94a5ecc3/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
2. When uncertainty increases, fewer NPV 2. When uncertainty increases, fewer NPV positive positive projects will be “wanted” by decision projects will be “wanted” by decision maker (3/4)maker (3/4)
Results hold for multi-period
investments with general utility
functions under additional
assumptions on projects:
“Strong moment conditions ”
2 PERIOD EXAMPLE
![Page 11: Real Investments under Knightian Uncertainty Johan Walden Yale School of Management October 6, 2003.](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051516/56649d7a5503460f94a5ecc3/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
•For hedgeable investments, a low risk aversion will explain behavior
•For small investments, a high risk aversion is needed to explain behavior
•Results hold in multiperiod framework
2 PERIOD EXAMPLE
3. Uncertainty averse and risk averse 3. Uncertainty averse and risk averse decision decision makers choose different types of projects makers choose different types of projects (4/4)(4/4)
“Let’s do it: It’s a no regret move”
“Let’s skip it: Opportunities
are limited anyway”
![Page 12: Real Investments under Knightian Uncertainty Johan Walden Yale School of Management October 6, 2003.](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051516/56649d7a5503460f94a5ecc3/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
•Value of being able to hedge increases drastically
•Barriers to hedging become very costly
•Challenging to develop incentive schemes for uncertainty averse managers
•Uncertainty could be incorporated into firms’ investment analyses
Implications of modified investment Implications of modified investment behaviorbehavior
![Page 13: Real Investments under Knightian Uncertainty Johan Walden Yale School of Management October 6, 2003.](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051516/56649d7a5503460f94a5ecc3/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
BACK UP
![Page 14: Real Investments under Knightian Uncertainty Johan Walden Yale School of Management October 6, 2003.](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051516/56649d7a5503460f94a5ecc3/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Ellsberg example Ellsberg example
Information:•Urn contains 90 balls•Each ball is either red, blue or yellow•There are 30 red balls
4 Games: Pick ball from urn•RL: $10 if red•BL: $10 if blue•NRL: $10 if not red•NBL: $10 if not blue
If you rank RL > BL and NRL > NBL, you are not a (subjective) expected utility maximizer
30
?
? = 90
![Page 15: Real Investments under Knightian Uncertainty Johan Walden Yale School of Management October 6, 2003.](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051516/56649d7a5503460f94a5ecc3/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
BACK UPSpaces involved in in MEU setupSpaces involved in in MEU setup
![Page 16: Real Investments under Knightian Uncertainty Johan Walden Yale School of Management October 6, 2003.](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051516/56649d7a5503460f94a5ecc3/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
BACK UP ““Kinked” demand curves ariseKinked” demand curves arise
![Page 17: Real Investments under Knightian Uncertainty Johan Walden Yale School of Management October 6, 2003.](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051516/56649d7a5503460f94a5ecc3/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Results hold for multi-period
investments with general utility
functions under additional
assumptions on ordering of outcomes:
“Normality”
Demand for risky projects decreaseDemand for risky projects decrease BACK UP
![Page 18: Real Investments under Knightian Uncertainty Johan Walden Yale School of Management October 6, 2003.](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051516/56649d7a5503460f94a5ecc3/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Results hold for multi-period
investments with general utility
functions under additional
assumptions on ordering of outcomes:
“Weak moment conditions”
BACK UP
Fewer projects are preferred to riskfree Fewer projects are preferred to riskfree projectproject
![Page 19: Real Investments under Knightian Uncertainty Johan Walden Yale School of Management October 6, 2003.](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051516/56649d7a5503460f94a5ecc3/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Requirements on expected IRRs are high...
•50-70% For seed investments
•30-50% For third stage investments
… and realized IRRs seem to be too
•22.7% 1980-2000 according to Thomson Financial•>26% 1964-1987 according to Venture Economics.
However, recent studies suggest that they could be lower...
As (high) risks are largely idiosyncratic, this seems to be in violation of standard NPV rule
VC EXAMPLE
BACK UP
High rates of return required for venture High rates of return required for venture capitalcapital