Reader Perceptions of Hypertext: Readability, Comprehension, and Viability Tracey A. Stuckey-Mickell...
Transcript of Reader Perceptions of Hypertext: Readability, Comprehension, and Viability Tracey A. Stuckey-Mickell...
![Page 1: Reader Perceptions of Hypertext: Readability, Comprehension, and Viability Tracey A. Stuckey-Mickell COMS 547.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022072010/56649dbc5503460f94aaebbf/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Reader Perceptions of Hypertext: Readability,
Comprehension, and Viability
Tracey A. Stuckey-MickellCOMS 547
![Page 2: Reader Perceptions of Hypertext: Readability, Comprehension, and Viability Tracey A. Stuckey-Mickell COMS 547.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022072010/56649dbc5503460f94aaebbf/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Problem Statement
• Scholars disagree about the value of hypertext
• Very little research on general reader perceptions
• Reader perceptions are important– Different backgrounds– Expectations
• Account for reader AND scholar views
![Page 3: Reader Perceptions of Hypertext: Readability, Comprehension, and Viability Tracey A. Stuckey-Mickell COMS 547.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022072010/56649dbc5503460f94aaebbf/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Study Purpose & Overview
• Examine students’ experiences with hypertext in terms of perceived readability, perceived comprehension, and overall viability
• Qualitative & quantitative methods via email survey
![Page 4: Reader Perceptions of Hypertext: Readability, Comprehension, and Viability Tracey A. Stuckey-Mickell COMS 547.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022072010/56649dbc5503460f94aaebbf/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Research Questions
1. How do users of hypertext perceive the form in terms of difficulty?
2. Which form do users prefer—a multilinear hypertext form or traditional linear form?
3. What do users perceive as having the most impact on their ability to understand the main ideas of the hypertext document (e.g., multilinearity, background knowledge, etc.)?
![Page 5: Reader Perceptions of Hypertext: Readability, Comprehension, and Viability Tracey A. Stuckey-Mickell COMS 547.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022072010/56649dbc5503460f94aaebbf/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Definitions• Hypertext:
– non-sequential text; users are free to navigate through connected ideas via links (Nelson, 1987)
• Perceived readability– reader’s perception of how easy or difficult
• Perceived comprehension – reader’s discernment of his or her own ability
to understand
• Viability – usefulness or practicality as a valid format for
the presentation of information
![Page 6: Reader Perceptions of Hypertext: Readability, Comprehension, and Viability Tracey A. Stuckey-Mickell COMS 547.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022072010/56649dbc5503460f94aaebbf/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Method-Participants
• 14 graduate students and one undergraduate student
• From 25 to over 51 years of age • Most participants were female
(n=9)• Most from CoE, Instructional
Technology program (n=12)
![Page 7: Reader Perceptions of Hypertext: Readability, Comprehension, and Viability Tracey A. Stuckey-Mickell COMS 547.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022072010/56649dbc5503460f94aaebbf/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Method-Data Collection
• Read an online hypertext document converted to hypertext format
• Participants answered a survey about reading experience (Likert-type/open-ended)
• Participants answered a demographics survey
• Via email
![Page 8: Reader Perceptions of Hypertext: Readability, Comprehension, and Viability Tracey A. Stuckey-Mickell COMS 547.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022072010/56649dbc5503460f94aaebbf/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Method-Data Analysis
• Likert-type items – Descriptive statistics – Frequency of responses and trends
• Open-ended items – Examined for frequency of response
and dominant themes
![Page 9: Reader Perceptions of Hypertext: Readability, Comprehension, and Viability Tracey A. Stuckey-Mickell COMS 547.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022072010/56649dbc5503460f94aaebbf/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Findings
• Few perceived it as difficult reading (n=3) • Background knowledge impacted positively
– “… I had an underlying framework of personal experience…” “I had already read about this topic before…”
• Eight participants indicated a preference for hypertext – “…being able to link to unfamiliar concepts
right away…” “Hypertext allowed me to follow what seemed relevant or interesting or logical at the time…”
![Page 10: Reader Perceptions of Hypertext: Readability, Comprehension, and Viability Tracey A. Stuckey-Mickell COMS 547.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022072010/56649dbc5503460f94aaebbf/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Findings
• Hypertext links as source of confusion, distraction, or both – “I get too distracted and confused
after clicking on all the links…” “…the hypertexts within the paragraphs, if used, made everything confusing.” “Hypertext almost forces the reader to ‘zig-zag’ through a text, and can become a confusing maze of ideas.”
![Page 11: Reader Perceptions of Hypertext: Readability, Comprehension, and Viability Tracey A. Stuckey-Mickell COMS 547.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022072010/56649dbc5503460f94aaebbf/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Findings
• Hypertext as a optional reading technique – “…I tend to read using hypertext techniques.”
“Both can be read in a linear fashion, if so desired.”
• Implications for hypertext design – “… if the text is arranged in a linear fashion where
each perspective is on a different page and I could move quickly from one perspective to the next…” “To make linear documents have some of the advantages for non-linear documents, all one has to do is insert a table of contents and an index.”
![Page 12: Reader Perceptions of Hypertext: Readability, Comprehension, and Viability Tracey A. Stuckey-Mickell COMS 547.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022072010/56649dbc5503460f94aaebbf/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Conclusions
• Hypertext is viable for most, but not in its true form (that Nelson intended)– Indexes, tables of content, lists of links, menus– Reduce likelihood of getting “lost”
• Flexibility and control is important– But does it affect meaning making?– How does structure relate to control?
• Links to outside information are appreciated– Only with adequate navigational skills
![Page 13: Reader Perceptions of Hypertext: Readability, Comprehension, and Viability Tracey A. Stuckey-Mickell COMS 547.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022072010/56649dbc5503460f94aaebbf/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Conclusions
• Hypertext as poststructuralist medium– Do readers really want deconstruction?– Do they understand what is expected of
them?• Reader expectations influence how
text is “read”– Do we want readers to simply
“comprehend” a hypertext?– Break outside of old mold!!
![Page 14: Reader Perceptions of Hypertext: Readability, Comprehension, and Viability Tracey A. Stuckey-Mickell COMS 547.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022072010/56649dbc5503460f94aaebbf/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Limitations and Future Research
• Nearly all instructional technology majors• Structure of hypertext document used• Experience level with hypertext• Actual vs. perceived comprehension• PI’s frame of mind
– Same old mold??? Author------Transmission
– Creation of diverse understandings from one document
– Work OUTSIDE of old framework!!