Reactions to the Shared Values Initiative
description
Transcript of Reactions to the Shared Values Initiative
![Page 1: Reactions to the Shared Values Initiative](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56816330550346895dd3b0bb/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Reactions to theShared Values Initiative
Alice Kendrick, Ph.D.Southern Methodist UniversityandJami A. Fullerton, Ph.D.Oklahoma State University
![Page 2: Reactions to the Shared Values Initiative](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56816330550346895dd3b0bb/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Overview
In the fall of 2001, the State Dept., led by Undersecretary of State and former ad executive Charlotte Beers, launched a first-of-its kind television ad campaign in the Middle East featuring the happy lives of American Muslims. The ads were part of the U.S. government’s “Shared Values Initiative.”
![Page 3: Reactions to the Shared Values Initiative](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56816330550346895dd3b0bb/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Shared Values Initiative
• Post 9/11 public diplomacy campaign• Targeted predominantly Muslim
countries• Attempts to convince the Muslim
world not “to hate us”• Consists of numerous communication
elements including TV spots• $15 million budget
![Page 4: Reactions to the Shared Values Initiative](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56816330550346895dd3b0bb/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
The Spots
• 5 spots in the campaign• Termed “mini documentaries” by DOS• Produced by McCann-Erickson Ad
Agency• Testimonial-style commercials
featuring slice-of-life treatments of prosperous Muslim Americans in various professional and personal roles
![Page 5: Reactions to the Shared Values Initiative](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56816330550346895dd3b0bb/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Shared Values Initiative
• First time that the U.S. purchased international broadcast time to run a public diplomacy message
• Used TV to reach the people• The media plan was cut short• Spots ran only in Pakistan,
Malaysia,Indonesia and Kuwait. Some satellite spill-out in Jordan, Egypt, Saudi Arabia and the UAE
![Page 6: Reactions to the Shared Values Initiative](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56816330550346895dd3b0bb/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Show the Spots
• “Baker”• “Doctor” • “School Teacher” • “Journalist” • “Firefighter”
![Page 7: Reactions to the Shared Values Initiative](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56816330550346895dd3b0bb/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Timeline
• Oct. 29, 2002– television ad campaign launches in Indonesia
to coincide with Ramadan– Al-Jazeera and other Arab countries refuse to
run the spots• Jan. 16, 2003
– Washington Post reports that the campaign was suspended because it failed
– Beers tells CNN that campaign would continue
![Page 8: Reactions to the Shared Values Initiative](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56816330550346895dd3b0bb/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Timeline
• Feb. 3, 2003– DOS reports that ads stopped running in
Dec. and were being revised• March 2003
– Beers resigns for “health reasons”• Since March 2003
– Media, Congress and administration criticize Beers and distance themselves from the ad campaign
![Page 9: Reactions to the Shared Values Initiative](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56816330550346895dd3b0bb/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Target Audience
• “The People” in countries with high Muslim populations
• Beers cited the importance of reaching women - “mothers and teachers”
![Page 10: Reactions to the Shared Values Initiative](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56816330550346895dd3b0bb/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Effects & Evaluation
• Media reports at home and abroad generally negative– considered a propaganda tool– Beers said it was successful because it
“started a dialogue”• CNN and WSJ said it failed to register
with Muslim audience and was prevented from airing in most countries
• Criticized for not explaining U.S. policy
![Page 11: Reactions to the Shared Values Initiative](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56816330550346895dd3b0bb/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Effects & Evaluation
• No formal quantitative evaluation made public
![Page 12: Reactions to the Shared Values Initiative](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56816330550346895dd3b0bb/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Research Questions
1. Attitudes toward the U.S. government 2. Attitudes toward U.S. people 3. Attitudes toward how Muslims are treated
in America 4. Believability of commercials5. Appropriateness and helpfulness the U.S. to
run the commercials6. Perceived effectiveness of the commercials 7. Main message, first impressions, likes and
dislikes8. Subgroup analyses
![Page 13: Reactions to the Shared Values Initiative](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56816330550346895dd3b0bb/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Method
• Pre/post experimental design• Traditional advertising copy test
![Page 14: Reactions to the Shared Values Initiative](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56816330550346895dd3b0bb/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Method
• Paper and pencil questionnaire (including pre-test)
• Viewing of Shared Values Initiative commercials
• Remainder of the questionnaire (including post-test)
![Page 15: Reactions to the Shared Values Initiative](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56816330550346895dd3b0bb/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Sample
• 105 international students • Regents College • London, England • July 2003
![Page 16: Reactions to the Shared Values Initiative](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56816330550346895dd3b0bb/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Questionnaire
• Dependent variables – attitude toward U.S. government – attitude toward U.S. people– treatment of Muslims
![Page 17: Reactions to the Shared Values Initiative](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56816330550346895dd3b0bb/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Questionnaire
• Copy test questions – first impression– main message– liked most/least – believability– effectiveness – appropriateness – confusing elements– persuasion
![Page 18: Reactions to the Shared Values Initiative](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56816330550346895dd3b0bb/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Findings
• Respondent Profile– 54% female; 46% male– average age 22– English was native language of 7%– 58% spoke English fluently
![Page 19: Reactions to the Shared Values Initiative](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56816330550346895dd3b0bb/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Findings
• Respondent Profile– 25 different countries– 70% European – 2/3 know someone in the U.S.– Half have regular email contact with
the U.S. – 97% said they would like to visit the
U.S.
![Page 20: Reactions to the Shared Values Initiative](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56816330550346895dd3b0bb/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Findings
• Pre- v. Post-Attitudes toward the U.S. Government and U.S. People
Favorability scale of 1-44 = most favorable
![Page 21: Reactions to the Shared Values Initiative](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56816330550346895dd3b0bb/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Pre/Post Attitudes
• U.S. Government– more positive after the videos– mean = 1.86 v. 2.05– Christians and “not religious”
remained negative– Muslims and “other religions”
improved
![Page 22: Reactions to the Shared Values Initiative](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56816330550346895dd3b0bb/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Pre/Post Attitudes
• U.S. People– not statistically significant– women more favorable than men – Europeans less favorable
![Page 23: Reactions to the Shared Values Initiative](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56816330550346895dd3b0bb/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Pre/Post Attitudes
• Attitudes Toward Treatment of Muslims– Stronger agreement after videos– Mean = 2.82 v. 3.14– Primary communication objective was
met
![Page 24: Reactions to the Shared Values Initiative](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56816330550346895dd3b0bb/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
First Impressions
• Most frequent first reactions: disbelief and skepticism
• Focus on aspects of U.S. image: “America on its best behavior”
• Intended main message registered among 12%
![Page 25: Reactions to the Shared Values Initiative](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56816330550346895dd3b0bb/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Main Message
• Most (59.8%) involved U.S. image• One-third: Muslims living freely
and happily in the U.S. • One-half of main message
registrations were Muslim-related
![Page 26: Reactions to the Shared Values Initiative](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56816330550346895dd3b0bb/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Believability of Commercials
• Fewer than half considered them believable
• Doubt that the videos would be considered credible among target
• 64% found elements confusing or hard to believe
• One-sided nature objectionable • Europeans judged less believable • Christians and “not religious” judged less
believable
![Page 27: Reactions to the Shared Values Initiative](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56816330550346895dd3b0bb/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Appropriateness of Commercials
• Students divided on appropriateness of strategy
• One-third agreed “appropriate and helpful”
• Europeans: less appropriate and helpful
• Muslims and “other”: more appropriate and helpful
![Page 28: Reactions to the Shared Values Initiative](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56816330550346895dd3b0bb/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Perceived Effectiveness of Commercials
• Half said videos “an effective tool” for Muslim countries
• Women agreed more strongly • Those who had visited U.S. or
fluent in English less likely to agree
![Page 29: Reactions to the Shared Values Initiative](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56816330550346895dd3b0bb/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Elements Liked and Disliked
• One-fourth said they liked “nothing” • Likes: overall “objective” and
“friendly” style and tone • Likes: information content (15.6%);
specific information about Muslims (15.6%).
• Dislikes: lack of believability (70.4%)• Few comments about specific
executional elements
![Page 30: Reactions to the Shared Values Initiative](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56816330550346895dd3b0bb/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Implications/Recommendations
• SVI approach achieved its objectives• Mass media may be an appropriate
method to communicate with audiences in the Middle East
• Need to address erosion of attitude toward America in Westernized countries
![Page 31: Reactions to the Shared Values Initiative](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56816330550346895dd3b0bb/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Implications/Recommendations
• Concept testing and pre-testing should be used before spots are aired– Message strategy should be
altered– Avoid “travel video” appeal
![Page 32: Reactions to the Shared Values Initiative](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56816330550346895dd3b0bb/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Implications/Recommendations
• Messages should be less one-sided– May not be perceived as
propaganda– More likely to persuade and
inoculate
![Page 33: Reactions to the Shared Values Initiative](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56816330550346895dd3b0bb/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Implications/Recommendations
• Using two-step flow theory of mass communication– Mass media messages are filtered
through friends, family & church– Target communication to opinion
leaders in the community, especially clerics
![Page 34: Reactions to the Shared Values Initiative](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56816330550346895dd3b0bb/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
First Impression – Table 1TOTAL COMMENTS 118** 100%
Muslim Life in the United States How Muslims live in the United States 7 Muslims are accepted/free in America 6 Muslim life after 9-11 6 Muslims like the United States 3 Muslims can practice religion freely 2 Happy Muslims in the United States 1 TOTAL 25 21.2%
Image of the United States Image of United States/”best behavior” 7 Acceptance/respect of other cultures 6 Opportunities/freedom 5 Americans like/accept Muslims 4 Kind/”Beautiful” people 2 Efforts to improve image after 9-11 2 Other image 2 American people v. government 1 Americans justifying ‘actions’ 1 TOTAL 30 25.4%
Positive Reactions Friendly/good/cool/interesting 8 Appropriate for situation 1 TOTAL 9 7.6%
Negative Reactions Not true/fake/suspicious/could backfire 19 Propaganda/public relations/persuasion 13 Misleading/one-sided 7 Skeptical/unsure/hopeful 6 Why were the videos made? 2 TOTAL 47 39.8%
Other Groups of people 2 Relationships between people 1 Ramadan 1 No category 3 TOTAL 7 5.9%
![Page 35: Reactions to the Shared Values Initiative](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56816330550346895dd3b0bb/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Main Message – Table 2
TOTAL COMMENTS 107** 100% Muslim Life in the United States
How Muslims live in the United States 12 Muslims are accepted/free in America 11 Muslims can practice religion freely 6 Happy Muslims in the United States 5 TOTAL 34 31.8%
Image of the United States Image of United States/”best behavior” 7 Acceptance/respect of other cultures 22 Opportunities/freedom 11 Americans like/accept Muslims 16 Efforts to improve image after 9-11 3 Other image 2 Americans are not fighting against Muslims 2 American people v. government 1 TOTAL 64 59.8%
Negative Reactions Not true/fake/suspicious/could backfire 2 Misleading/one-sided 1 Skeptical/unsure/hopeful 2 TOTAL 5 4.7%
Other People can live together 1 Don’t know 1 No category 2 TOTAL 4 3.7%
![Page 36: Reactions to the Shared Values Initiative](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56816330550346895dd3b0bb/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Most Liked Elements – Table 3
Tone/Point of View/Style 32 29.4% Friendly/happy/positive 16 “Normal” people/diverse, different people 9 Objective/realistic 7
Overall Concept and Information Content 17 15.6% Good effort/good faith/good idea/well done 10 Information/content/learning 6 The story 1
Information About Muslims 17 15.6% About Muslims/positive 6 Respect for Muslims 2 Muslims free/free to practice Islam 6 Appropriate for Muslim countries 1 Will help ease Muslim life after 9-11 1 The teacher 1
Information About the United States 18 16.5% U.S. tolerance/respect 7 Opportunities for other people in US 5 U.S. opportunities/successes/freedom 4 U.S. image after 9-11 1 Changed U.S. image 1
Negative Comments 25 22.9% Nothing/’cheesy’/dislike/skeptical 25
![Page 37: Reactions to the Shared Values Initiative](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062501/56816330550346895dd3b0bb/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Most Disliked Elements Table 4
Lack of Believability 69 70.4% Misleading/false/not real 35 One-sided/biased 23 Too positive 6 Skeptical 5
Strategy/Approach/Format 7 7.1% Seems like advertising/propaganda 6 Why was this (video) done? 1
Specific Content 10 10.2% The ending (from American people) 2 Only about Muslims 2 Only about religion 2 Children’s hospital 1 That Americans are friendly 1 Muslim women with heads covered 1 U.S. too strong/dominant 1
Nothing Disliked 9 9.2%
“Everything” Disliked 3 3.1%