Nonpolar Europe? Examining the causes and drivers behind ...
Re-examining health systems financial sustainability in Europe
description
Transcript of Re-examining health systems financial sustainability in Europe
www.observatory.dkwww.observatory.dk
Utrecht, 25Utrecht, 25thth September 2007 September 2007
Josep FiguerasJosep Figueras
Re-examining health systems Re-examining health systems financial sustainability in Europefinancial sustainability in Europe
www.observatory.dkwww.observatory.dk
Health Expenditure as % of GDP Health Expenditure as % of GDP EU 15 plus selected countries (2004)EU 15 plus selected countries (2004)
9,4
7,1
7,5
8
8,1
8,3
8,8
8,9
8,9
9,1
9,2
9,6
9,8
9,9
10
10,5
10,9
11,6
15
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
EU 15 average
Ireland
Finland
Luxembourg
Spain
United Kingdom
Italy
Denmark
Netherlands
Sweden
Norway
Austria
Greece
Belgium
Portugal
France
Germany
Switzerland
US
Source:OECD Health Data (2006)
www.observatory.dkwww.observatory.dk
Health Expenditure % GDP
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005
Belgium
Canada
France
Germany
Ireland
Italy
Netherlands
Norway
Spain
Switzerland
United Kingdom
United States
Health Expenditure % GDP
Source: OECD Health Data (2005)
www.observatory.dkwww.observatory.dk
Sustainability against solidarity?Sustainability against solidarity?
www.observatory.dkwww.observatory.dk
Addressing financial sustainability Addressing financial sustainability
• Reforming the funding of health care
• Reforming the supply (payment & provision)
• Strengthening public health (reducing demand)
www.observatory.dkwww.observatory.dk
Reforming the funding of health care Reforming the funding of health care
• Reform statutory (insurance or tax) funding
– Stability of main systems: Bismark & Beveridge
– Increase in tax component in SHI countries
• Shift costs to patients: privatisation of funding
• Introducing insurance competition
www.observatory.dkwww.observatory.dk
“In the longer term, America, like this adamantly pro-market newspaper, may have no choice other than to accept a more overtly European-style system. In such a scheme, the government would pay for a mandate insurance system, but leave the provision of care to a mix of public and private providers.”
The Economist, January 28th 2006
www.observatory.dkwww.observatory.dk
“Rather than copying Europe’s distorting payroll taxes, the basic insurance package would be paid for directly by government, though that cash might be raised by a “hypothecated” tax which would make the cost of health care more evident”
The Economist, January 28th 2006
www.observatory.dkwww.observatory.dk
7551
62687071
747576777878
838385
90
0 25 50 75 100
EU 15 averageGreece
NetherlandsAustria
PortugalSpain
BelgiumItaly
FranceFinlandIreland
GermanyUK
DenamarkSweden
Luxembourg
Public expenditure as a % of totalPublic expenditure as a % of total EU 15 (2003)EU 15 (2003)
OECD Health Data, 2005
www.observatory.dkwww.observatory.dk
Concentration of total health expenditures, France 2001
Source : CNAMTS/EPAS
5%
51%
64%
10%
78%
20%
98%
70%
100%
90%
100%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
% of people % of expenses
www.observatory.dkwww.observatory.dk
www.observatory.dkwww.observatory.dk
Insurance competitionInsurance competitionIn Theory:In Theory: it ought to work it ought to work
• Consumer freedom of choice
• Market competition incentives: efficiency & quality– Insurers as ‘prudent buyers’– Cost-effective purchasing – Selective contracting
• Without negative impact on equity & quality– Risk adjustment formula, open enrolment,…
www.observatory.dkwww.observatory.dk
• Equity: risk selection
• Efficiency; consider transaction costs
• Efficiency; linked to active (strategic) purchasing
• Implementation ability (regulatory, information,..)?
Insurance competitionInsurance competitionIn Practice: the evidenceIn Practice: the evidence
www.observatory.dkwww.observatory.dk
“Although elegant in theory, the implementation of the managed competition model in practice appears to be complex because it is hard to fulfill the necessary preconditions”
W Van de Ven (December 2006)
www.observatory.dkwww.observatory.dk
Addressing financial sustainability Addressing financial sustainability
• Reforming sources of funding
– Reform main (SHI or tax) source of funding
– Shift costs to patients: privatisation of funding
– Introducing insurance competition
• Reforming the supply (payment & provision)
• Strengthening public health (reducing demand)
www.observatory.dkwww.observatory.dk
Reforming the supply (payment)Reforming the supply (payment)
• From passive to active (strategic) purchasing?
• Selective contracting / provider competition
• Towards performance based payment systems
– Case mix measures, DRGs
www.observatory.dkwww.observatory.dk
Paying doctorsPaying doctors
“The only way to communicate with a doctor is to write it in the back of a cheque”
Bob Evans
www.observatory.dkwww.observatory.dk
Paying doctorsPaying doctors
“The only way to pay doctors is to change the system every three years, because by then they will have found ways to get round it to their own advantage”
Bob Evans
www.observatory.dkwww.observatory.dk
Reforming the supply (provision)Reforming the supply (provision)
• Health care substitution
• Cost effective capital investment
• Increasing consumer choice
• Primary care at the driving seat
• Setting priorities / limiting package of care
• Evidence base medicine / HTA agencies
www.observatory.dkwww.observatory.dk
Addressing financial sustainability Addressing financial sustainability
• Reforming sources of funding
• Reforming the supply (payment & provision)
• Strengthening public health (reducing demand)
www.observatory.dkwww.observatory.dk
Strengthening public healthStrengthening public health The ultimate demand reduction strategy The ultimate demand reduction strategy
• Prevention is (often) better than cure
– Cost effectiveness of public health interventions
• Stepping up public health policies in the EU– Health in All Policies: Finland presidency (2006)
– Wanless reports (2002, 2004) in the UK
– Public health bills: France (2003), Sweden (2002) Netherlands (2007?)
– Smoking bans: Ireland, Spain, UK, Belgium…
www.observatory.dkwww.observatory.dk
Re-examining financial sustainabilityRe-examining financial sustainability
1. Sustainability as willingness to pay
2. Consider financial versus social sustainability
3. An ageing crisis?
4. “It’s the economy stupid”
5. The contribution of health to the economy
6. Investing in health: health systems and public health
www.observatory.dkwww.observatory.dk
• Solidarity: key in European policy• WHO, EU, Council of Europe• Health as a human right
Solidarity vs sustainability
www.observatory.dkwww.observatory.dk
1. Sustainability as willingness to pay
• Citizens may be willing to pay more through statutory sources particularly when earmarked for health?
• Health expenditure as a luxury good?
• Solidarity a central goal in European systems
• Disconnect between population views & politicians?
www.observatory.dkwww.observatory.dk
2.2. Financial (vs Social) sustainabilityFinancial (vs Social) sustainability
• Health and social cohesion
• Coverage of minority groups
• Economic impact of reduced solidarity
www.observatory.dkwww.observatory.dk
3.3. An ageing crisis?An ageing crisis?
• Health expenditure incurred at the end of life
• Longer (and healthier?) life expectancy– Compression of morbidity
• Late retirement– Increasing labour market participation– Drawing less from the health services
www.observatory.dkwww.observatory.dk
4.4. ““It’s the economy stupid !!”It’s the economy stupid !!”
• Health expenditure as percentage of GDP
• Addressing sluggish economic (GDP) growth
• The Lisbon agenda: global competitiveness
• Emphasis on measures to increase productivity
www.observatory.dkwww.observatory.dkSource: The Contribution of Health to the Economy Surke, Mckee et al 2005
5.5. The contribution of health to the economyThe contribution of health to the economy “Health is Wealth”“Health is Wealth”
www.observatory.dkwww.observatory.dk
The contribution of health to the economy:The contribution of health to the economy:The evidenceThe evidence
• Cost of illness• Wages and earnings• Hours worked• Labour force participation• Early retirement• Labour supply by relatives of those in poor
health• Personal investment in education• Propensity to save
www.observatory.dkwww.observatory.dk
WealthWealthHealthHealth
Health SystemsHealth Systems
6. Investing in health systems6. Investing in health systemsA conducting framework A conducting framework
Impact on the Impact on the economy economy
Impact on HealthImpact on Health
Economic Economic growth growth
WHO EURO Ministerial Conference Tallinn Summer 2008
www.observatory.dkwww.observatory.dk
“However beautiful the strategy, you should occasionally look at the results”
Winston Churchill
www.observatory.dkwww.observatory.dk
WealthWealthHealthHealth
Health SystemsHealth Systems
WHO EURO Ministerial Conference Tallinn Summer 2008
Performance Performance •TransparencyTransparency •Accountability Accountability
6. Investing in health systems6. Investing in health systemsA conducting framework A conducting framework
www.observatory.dkwww.observatory.dk
In sum….In sum….
• Limited scope of funding reforms
• Increased emphasis on reform of supply
– Cost effectiveness rather than cost containment
• Strengthen public health measures
• Increased willingness to pay
• Investing in health systems (productive sector) leading to economic growth
• But…. demonstrating performance
www.observatory.dkwww.observatory.dk
www.observatory.dk