RDA Revisited

102
RDA Revisited Emily Dust Nimsakont Cataloging Librarian Nebraska Library Commission September 16, 2014

description

Presented at Bellevue University

Transcript of RDA Revisited

Page 1: RDA Revisited

RDA Revisited

Emily Dust NimsakontCataloging Librarian

Nebraska Library CommissionSeptember 16, 2014

Page 2: RDA Revisited

Agenda

• RDA Basics• RDA Updates Since Implementation• Real World RDA• RDA Copy Cataloging Exercise• Toolkit Problem Solving• Lunch• Record Creation• Changes for the Future

Page 3: RDA Revisited

RDA Basics

Page 4: RDA Revisited

AACR2:520 p. : col. ill.; 28 cm.

RDA: 520 pages : color illustrations; 28 cm

Fewer Abbreviations

Page 5: RDA Revisited

Source: Third revised editionAACR2: 3rd rev. ed.RDA: Third revised edition

Source: 2nd enlarged ed., revisedAACR2: 2nd enl. ed., rev.RDA: 2nd enlarged ed., revised

Fewer Abbreviations

Page 6: RDA Revisited

Rule of Three is GoneSource: by Susan Brown, Melanie Carlson, Stephen Lindell, Kevin Ott, and Janet Wilson.

AACR2: by Susan Brown … [et al.].

RDA:by Susan Brown, Melanie Carlson, Stephen Lindell, Kevin Ott, and Janet Wilson.

RDA allows:by Susan Brown [and four others].

Page 7: RDA Revisited

Latin Terms are Gone

AACR2: [S.l. : s.n.], 2008.

RDA:[Place of publication not identified] : [Publisher not identified], 2008.

Page 8: RDA Revisited

GMD is Gone

GMD (General Material Designation) = bracketed information in the title that conveys the type of

material

[electronic resource] [sound recording] [videorecording]

Page 9: RDA Revisited

GMD is replaced by:

–Content type (text, performed music, spoken word, etc.) –Media type (audio, microform, video, etc.) –Carrier type (audio disc, online resource, videodisc, etc)

Terminology comes from lists in the RDA guidelines.

Page 10: RDA Revisited

Photo credits:http://www.flickr.com/photos/heidigoseek/115581765/http://www.flickr.com/photos/58571789@N00/5802294925/

Content Type

Page 11: RDA Revisited

Photo Credits: http://www.flickr.com/photos/77961177@N00/275256542/http://www.flickr.com/photos/57634636@N00/7185647878/

Media Type

Page 12: RDA Revisited

Photo Credits: http://www.flickr.com/photos/77961177@N00/275256542/http://www.flickr.com/photos/57634636@N00/7185647878/

Carrier Type

Page 13: RDA Revisited
Page 14: RDA Revisited
Page 15: RDA Revisited
Page 16: RDA Revisited

Relationship Designators

Page 17: RDA Revisited

Relationship Designators

Page 18: RDA Revisited

Relationship Designators

Page 19: RDA Revisited

RDA Updates

Photo credit: https://www.flickr.com/photos/kevandotorg/6229660191/

Page 20: RDA Revisited

Process for updating RDA

• constituency proposals for changes in intent of existing instructions and addition of new instructions

• a “fast track” process for correction of typographical errors, addition or removal of examples, addition of terms to vocabularies, addition of references, clarification in wording, etc.

http://www.rda-jsc.org/rdaupdating.html

Page 21: RDA Revisited

Updates since March 2013

• http://www.loc.gov/aba/rda/pdf/summary_rda_changes_2013.pdf

• http://www.loc.gov/aba/rda/pdf/summary_rda_changes_2014.pdf

Page 22: RDA Revisited

Summary of Updates

• New instructions for sources of information for online resources

• Added wording about braille to font size• Additions to glossary• Additions to Appendix I - relationship

designators• Clarification of inclusion of core vs. non-core

elements

Page 23: RDA Revisited

Real World RDA

Photo credit: https://www.flickr.com/photos/mniemand/3254191378/

Page 24: RDA Revisited

Hybrid Records

Photo credit: https://www.flickr.com/photos/trevira1/8399552085/

Page 25: RDA Revisited

OCLC Policy - Hybrid RecordsWhen editing and replacing master records in WorldCat, catalogers may choose to add some RDA elements to existing non-RDA records without re-cataloging the entire record according to RDA. Candidates for such editing include, but are not limited to:• Adding relator terms to access points• Spelling out non-transcribed abbreviations• Adding complete statements of responsibility in 245 (in place of "[et al.]")• Adding 336/337/338 fieldsWhen adding or editing one or more such elements in the master record without re-cataloging the record to RDA, do not code the record as RDA. OCLC will generally adhere to the PCC Guidelines on Hybrid Bibliographic Records and expects member libraries editing existing records to add selected RDA elements to follow these guidelines.

Page 26: RDA Revisited

Hybrid Records?

OCLC Records

#812568978#871575262#785808898

Page 27: RDA Revisited

Authority Control

Photo credit: https://www.flickr.com/photos/headinamilkbottle/1267959927/

Page 28: RDA Revisited

Nebraska. Department of Roads. RDA heading

Nebraska. Dept. of Roads. AACR2 heading

Page 29: RDA Revisited

Relationship Designators

Photo credit: https://www.flickr.com/photos/popoever/4247016365/

Page 30: RDA Revisited

Doyle, Arthur Conan, 1859-1930.

Doyle, Arthur Conan, 1859-1930, author.

Page 31: RDA Revisited

Batch AACR2-to-RDA Conversion

• Marcive http://home.marcive.com/marcive-rda-conversion-service-underway/

• Backstage Library Works http://www.bslw.com/faq/rda/

• MarcEdit http://marcedit.reeset.net/features

Page 32: RDA Revisited

RDA Copy Cataloging

Photo credit: https://www.flickr.com/photos/bolobilly/2101966591/

Page 33: RDA Revisited

How to Identify an RDA Record

• 040 $e = rda• Descriptive cataloging form = i

Page 34: RDA Revisited

Data Elements to Check

• Title and statement of responsibility - MARC field 245

• Edition statement - MARC field 250• Publication information - MARC field 264• Physical Description - MARC field 300• Content, media & carrier types - MARC fields

336, 337 & 338

Page 35: RDA Revisited

Title and statement of responsibility - MARC field 245

Ensure that RDA instructions have been followed:• Delete “[sic]” or “[i.e., ___].”• Remove $h if present. • Ensure the presence of the first statement of

responsibility.• In an existing statement of responsibility, replace

a supplied “[et al.]” with a full transcription of the statement as on the source, or record “[and ___ others]”

Page 36: RDA Revisited

Edition statement - MARC field 250

Ensure that the edition statement has been recorded exactly as it appears on the resource:• Expand unauthorized abbreviations to the full

form• Record numerals as found on the resource

Page 37: RDA Revisited

Publication information - MARC field 264

• Ensure that the field is tagged as a 264 field and use the appropriate 2nd indicator value based on the content of the field.

• Remember that there is no ‘home country’ requirement for either place or publisher

• Ensure that the data has been transcribed according to RDA instructions

Page 38: RDA Revisited

Place of publication - 264 $a

• Ensure that the first place of the first publisher is transcribed as found in the resource.

• Include both the local place name and the larger jurisdiction, if present on the source

• Replace “[S.l.]” with a supplied place (preferable) or “[Place of publication not identified]”.

Page 39: RDA Revisited

Publisher - 264 $b

• Ensure that the first publisher is transcribed as found in the resource

• Expand abbreviations as applicable, and add missing words in the name of the publisher.

• Add levels of hierarchy that have been omitted from the imported record

Page 40: RDA Revisited

Date of publication - 264 $c

• Ensure that the date is transcribed as found on the resource

• Ensure that the date of publication is given even if it is a supplied date (e.g., it is often possible to supply a publication date, inferred from a copyright date)

• You may, additionally -- but are not required to -- record a copyright date in a separate 264 field, with a second indicator of “4”; if recorded, this field contains only $c and the must be used.

Page 41: RDA Revisited

Physical Description - MARC field 300

• Expand abbreviations when applicable.

Page 42: RDA Revisited

Content, media & carrier types - MARC fields 336, 337 & 338

• Ensure that $a contains the appropriate term from RDA for the resource in hand

Page 43: RDA Revisited

Access Points to Check

• Creator - MARC field 1XX• Other creators, contributors & other entities -

MARC field 7XX

Page 44: RDA Revisited

Creator - MARC field 1XX

• Ensure that the principal or first-named creator has been recorded in the 1XX field, for a work by a single creator or by a group of collaborators.

• Note, especially, situations with more than 3 entities in a single statement of responsibility, which would have been ‘title main entry’ according to AACR2; remove a 7XX incorrectly provided for the first creator in such cases.

Page 45: RDA Revisited

Other creators, contributors & other entities - MARC field 7XX

• To the extent possible, accept the complement of 7XX fields in the imported record.

• Remember that the concept of “justification” is not present in RDA; an access point may be provided for an entity that is not recorded elsewhere in a descriptive element.

Page 46: RDA Revisited

Copy Cataloging Using RDA training materials from Library of Congress

http://www.loc.gov/catworkshop/RDA%20training%20materials/

Page 47: RDA Revisited

Should you convert AACR2 records to RDA records?

Photo credit: https://www.flickr.com/photos/dbdbrobot/140068142/

Page 48: RDA Revisited

Copy Cataloging Exercise

Photo credit: https://www.flickr.com/photos/bolobilly/2101966591/

Page 49: RDA Revisited

RDA Toolkit Problem Solving

Page 50: RDA Revisited

Exercise

Scenario: Two resources by the same author. One uses accent marks in the name, one does not. There is no AAP in the authority file.

How should you record the name (i.e., with or without diacritic marks) in the 100 field?

Page 51: RDA Revisited

Exercise

Scenario: Title page has Second edition; Spine has 2nd edition; CIP has 2nd ed.

What is the Preferred Source for Transcribing the Edition Statement?

Page 52: RDA Revisited

Exercise

Scenario: You have a book with pages numbered 1-23, 1-200, and A1-A34. Find the information about irregular paging in the RDA Toolkit.

What does the RDA guideline say? Is there an associated LC PCC PS?

Page 53: RDA Revisited

Exercise

Scenario: You are cataloging a book that is a compilation of 3 novellas (all by the same author), and you need to know how to record the title.

What does the RDA guideline say? Is there an associated LC PCC PS?

Page 54: RDA Revisited

RDA Record CreationPhoto credit: https://www.flickr.com/photos/montagecomms/2692226959/

Page 55: RDA Revisited

Book

Practical Cataloguing: AACR2, RDA and MARC21

Page 56: RDA Revisited

DVD

Ice: Hawaii’s Crystal Meth Epidemic

Page 57: RDA Revisited

CD

Rockabye Baby! Lullaby Renditions of Aerosmith

Page 58: RDA Revisited

Kit

Train Theme Kit– 6 books– 4 miniature toy train cars

Page 59: RDA Revisited

Online Resource

The Reporting of Supplement Use by Dental Patients on Their Medical History Questionnaire

http://hdl.handle.net/10156/4776

Page 60: RDA Revisited

Electronic Serial

In the Library with the Lead Pipe

http://www.inthelibrarywiththeleadpipe.org/

Page 61: RDA Revisited

RDA and the Future of Cataloging

Photo credit: https://www.flickr.com/photos/rofanator/190667304/

Page 62: RDA Revisited

Record vs. Element Set

Page 63: RDA Revisited

Elements vs. Areas of Description

• AACR2 - Publication area:

260 _ _ $a Chicago : $b American Library Association, $c c2005.

• RDA - Publication elements– Place of publication: Chicago– Publisher: American Library Association– Copyright date: 2005– Publication date: [2005]

Page 64: RDA Revisited

In traditional cataloging, a record is one package.

Author

Title

Bibliographic Record

Page 65: RDA Revisited

Bibliographic Record

Records can be exchanged, but there is no way to exchange the individual pieces of information within a record.

Bibliographic Record

Bibliographic Record

Page 66: RDA Revisited

Person

Is author of

Title

Bibliographic Record

When RDA (and a method of encoding that recognizes its elements) is used, a bibliographic record is made up of many pieces of data.

And the relationships between these pieces of data are defined.

Page 67: RDA Revisited

Person

Is author of

Title

Bibliographic RecordThe boundaries of the record can be dissolved…

Page 68: RDA Revisited

Person

Is author of

Title

Bibliographic Record

…and the data can interact with other information on the Web…

Page 69: RDA Revisited

Person

Is author of

Title

Bibliographic Record

…and make use of other data on the web.

Page 70: RDA Revisited
Page 71: RDA Revisited

What is an RDA Record?

http://www.slideshare.net/GordonDunsire/what-rda-record?

Page 72: RDA Revisited

BIBFRAME

Page 73: RDA Revisited

“The Bibliographic Framework Initiative (BIBFRAME) is an undertaking by the Library of Congress and the community to better accommodate future needs of the library community. A major focus of the initiative will be to determine a transition path for the MARC 21 exchange format to more Web based, Linked Data standards. Zepheira and The Library of Congress are working together to develop a Linked Data model, vocabulary and enabling tools / services for supporting this Initiative.”

- http://bibframe.org

Page 74: RDA Revisited

“The Bibliographic Framework Initiative (BIBFRAME) is an undertaking by the Library of Congress and the community to better accommodate future needs of the library community. A major focus of the initiative will be to determine a transition path for the MARC 21 exchange format to more Web based, Linked Data standards. Zepheira and The Library of Congress are working together to develop a Linked Data model, vocabulary and enabling tools / services for supporting this Initiative.”

- http://bibframe.org

Page 75: RDA Revisited

What’s Wrong with MARC?

Page 76: RDA Revisited

It’s meant for printing catalog cards.

Photo Credit: http://www.flickr.com/photos/28376044@N00/4350624388

Page 77: RDA Revisited

It’s only used by libraries.

Photo Credit: http://www.flickr.com/photos/34606192@N00/288022773

Page 78: RDA Revisited

It’s not very specific.

245 $b

“Interpreting MARC: Where’s the Bibliographic Data?” Jason Thomale

http://journal.code4lib.org/articles/3832

Page 79: RDA Revisited

We need data instead of records.

Photo Credit: http://www.contentdm.org/USC/training/2013/Lampert-Southwick-20131205.pdf

Page 80: RDA Revisited

A History of BIBFRAME

Photo Credit: http://www.flickr.com/photos/37657778@N07/4867695239/

Page 81: RDA Revisited

May 2011 – Bibliographic Framework Initiative announced by LCOctober 2011 – Bibliographic Framework Plan published – Linked Data model to be used

Page 82: RDA Revisited

November 2012 – BIBFRAME Draft Model & Primer published

Page 83: RDA Revisited

January 2013 – bibframe.org launched at ALA MidwinterAugust 2013 – discussion papers updated (use cases, annotations, resource types, authority)

Page 84: RDA Revisited

BIBFRAME Model & Vocabulary

http://bibframe.org

Page 85: RDA Revisited

Core Classes

• Work• Instance• Authority• Annotation

Page 86: RDA Revisited
Page 87: RDA Revisited

Work

“Resource reflecting a conceptual essence of the cataloging resource”

Page 88: RDA Revisited

Instance

“Resource reflecting an individual, material embodiment of the Work”

Page 89: RDA Revisited

Authority

“Resource reflecting key authority concepts that have defined relationships reflected in the Work and Instance”

Page 90: RDA Revisited

Annotation

“Resource that asserts additional information about other BIBFRAME resource”

Page 91: RDA Revisited

BIBFRAME & RDA

Page 92: RDA Revisited

“RDA is an important source of elements in the vocabulary for BIBFRAME, even though it generally aims to be independent of any particular set of cataloging rules.”

http://www.loc.gov/bibframe/faqs/

Page 93: RDA Revisited

http://www.niso.org/publications/isq/2013/v25no4

Page 94: RDA Revisited

Chicken or Egg?

Photo Credit: http://www.flickr.com/photos/24098698@N05/5556334141

“The change in rules for metadata creation, represented by RDA, will also help library metadata to be more useful, though perhaps to a lesser extent than BIBFRAME.”

Jason W. Deanhttp://www.inthelibrarywiththeleadpipe.org/2013/charles-a-cutter-and-edward-tufte-coming-to-a-library-near-you-via-bibframe/

Page 95: RDA Revisited

Practical Applications of BIBFRAME

Page 96: RDA Revisited

Resources at Bibframe.org

• Use cases• Demonstrations• Tools

Page 97: RDA Revisited

Use cases

http://bibframe.org/documentation/bibframe-usecases/

Page 98: RDA Revisited

Demonstrations

http://bibframe.org/demos/

Page 99: RDA Revisited

Tools

http://bibframe.org/tools/

Comparison service

Transformation service

Page 100: RDA Revisited

OpenCat

http://demo.cubicweb.org/opencatfresnes

Page 101: RDA Revisited

LibHubhttp://libhub.org

Page 102: RDA Revisited

Thank you!

Emily Dust Nimsakont800-307-2665

[email protected]