Ray Monk - How to Read Wittgenstein (2005)

download Ray Monk - How to Read Wittgenstein (2005)

of 122

Transcript of Ray Monk - How to Read Wittgenstein (2005)

  • 8/10/2019 Ray Monk - How to Read Wittgenstein (2005)

    1/122

    kS>

    W I T T G E N S T E I N

    R A Y M 0 N K

  • 8/10/2019 Ray Monk - How to Read Wittgenstein (2005)

    2/122

    W IT T G E N S T E IN

    R A Y M O N K

    G r a n t a B o o k s

    L o n d o n

  • 8/10/2019 Ray Monk - How to Read Wittgenstein (2005)

    3/122

    H O W T O R E A D

    A v a i l a b l e n o w

    H o w t o R e a d D a r u n n b y M a r k R i d l e y

    H o w t o R e a d F r e u d b y J o s h C o h e n

    H o w t o R e a d H i t l e r b y N e i l G r e g o r

    H o w t o R e a d N i e t z s c h e b y K e i t h A n s e l l P e a r s o n

    H o w t o R e a d S a d e b y J o h n P h i l l i p s

    H o w t o R e a d W i t t g e n s t e i n b y R a y M o n k

    P u b l i s h e d A u t u m n 2 0 0 5

    H o w t o R e a d F o u c a u l t b y I a n H a c k i n g

    H o w t o R e a d H e i d e g g e r b y M a r k W r a t h a l l

    H o w t o R e a d J u n g b y A n d r e w S a m u e l s

    H o w t o R e a d M a r x b y P e t e r O s b o r n e

    H o w t o R e a d S h a k e s p e a r e b y N i c h o l a s R o y l e

    F o r t h c o m i n g

    H o w t o R e a d d e B e a u v o i r b y S t e l l a S a n d f o r d

    H o w t o R e a d D e r r i d a b y P e n e l o p e D e u t s c h e r

    H o w t o R e a d S a r t r e b y R o b e r t B e r n a s c o n i

  • 8/10/2019 Ray Monk - How to Read Wittgenstein (2005)

    4/122

    G r a n u P u b l i c a t i o n s , 2 / 3 H a n o v e r Y a r d , N o e l R o a d , L o n d o n N I 8 B E

    F i r s t p u b l i s h e d i n G r e a t B r i t a i n b y G r a n t a B o o k s 2 0 0 5

    C o p y r i g h t C * R a y M o n k . 2 0 0 5

    T r a c ta t u s L o g i c o - P h i l o s o p h i e s b y L u d w i g W i t t g e n s t e i n , t r a n s l a t e d b y P e a r s

    a n d M c G u i n n e s s , 1 9 7 5 , R o u d e d g e . L o g i c a n d K n o w l e d g e b y B e r t r a n d

    R u s s e l l , 1 9 5 7 , R o u d e d g e , T h e B e r t r a n d R u s s e l l P e a c e F o u n d a t i o n . B l u e

    a n d B r o w n B o o k s : P r e l i m i n a r y S t u d i e s f o r t h e P h i l o s o p h i c a l I n v e s t i g a t i o n s '

    b y L u d w i g W i t t g e n s t e i n , t r a n s l a t e d b y G . E . M . A n s c o m b e , B l a c k w e l l

    P u b l i s h i n g . P h i lo s o p h i c a l I n v e s t i g a t i o n s b y L u d w i g W i t t g e n s t e i n , t r a n s l a t e d

    b y G . E . M . A n s c o m b e . B l a c k w e l l P u b l i s h i n g . P h i l o s o p h i c a l R e m a r k s b y

    L u d w i g W i t t g e n s t e i n , e d i t e d b y R u s h R h e e s , t r a n s l a t e d b y R . H a r g r e a v e s

    a n d R . W h i t e , B l a c k w e l l P u b l i s h i n g . L a s t W r i t i n g s o n t h e P h i l o s o p h y o f

    P s y c h o l o g y b y W i t t g e n s t e i n , e d . V o n W r i g h t a n d H e i k k i N y m a n , t r a n s l a t e d

    b y L u c k h a r d , V o l s I a n d 1 1 , B l a c k w e l l P u b l i s h i n g . L e t t e r s t o R u s s e l l , K e y n e s , a n d

    M o r e , e d . V o n W r i g h t , B l a c k w e l l P u b l i s h i n g . U s e d w i t h k i n d p e r m i s s i o n .

    R a y M o n k h a s a s s e r t e d h i s m o r a l r i g h t u n d e r t h e C o p y r i g h t . D e s i g n s a n d

    P a t e n t s A c t , 1 9 8 8 , t o b e i d e n t i f i e d a s t h e a u t h o r o f t h i s w o r k .

    A l l r i g h t s r e s e r v e d . N o r e p r o d u c t i o n , c o p y o r t r a n s m i s s i o n s o f t h i s

    p u b l i c a t i o n m a y b e m a d e w i t h o u t w r i t t e n p e r m i s s i o n . N o p a r a g r a p h

    o f t h i s p u b l i c a t i o n m a y b e r e p r o d u c e d , c o p i e d o r t r a n s m i t t e d s a v e w i t h

    w r i t t e n p e r m i s s i o n o r i n a c c o r d a n c e w i t h t h e p r o v i s i o n s o f t h e

    C o p y r i g h t A c t 1 9 5 6 ( a s a m e n d e d ) . A n y p e r s o n w h o d o e s a n y

    u n a u t h o r i z e d a c t i n r e l a t i o n t o t h i s p u b l i c a t i o n m a y b e l i a b l e t o

    c r i m i n a l p r o s e c u t i o n a n d c i v i l c l a i m s f o r d a m a g e s .

    A C I P c a t a l o g u e r e c o r d f o r t h i s b o o k

    i s a v a i l a b l e f r o m t h e B r i t i s h L i b r a r y .

    1 3 5 7 9 1 0 8 6 4 2

    T V p e s e t b y M R u l e s

    P r i n t e d a n d b o u n d i n G r e a t B r i t a i n b y

    B o o k m a r q u e L i m i t e d , C r o y d o n , S u r r e y

  • 8/10/2019 Ray Monk - How to Read Wittgenstein (2005)

    5/122

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    v i i

    1

    3

    1 5

    3 4

    4 4

    5 2

    5 4

    6 1

    6 9

    8 3

    9 4

    9 9

    1 0 7

    1 0 9

    1 1 1

    CONTENTS

    S e r i e s E d i t o r s F o r e w o r d

    I n t r o d u c t i o n

    L o g i c , S c i e n c e a n d B u s i n e s s

    C l e a r i n g u p P h i l o s o p h y i n T h r e e W o r d s

    P i c t u r i n g t h e W o r l d

    W h a t is a P r o p o s i t i o n ?

    W h a t is P h i l o s o p h y ?

    T h e D i s i n t e g r a t i o n o f L o g i c a l F o r m

    T h e N e w P h i l o s o p h y : G i v i n g u p t h e C r y s t a l l i n e

    P u r i t y o f L o g i c

    L a n g u a g e G a m e s

    C a n t h e r e b e a P r i v a t e L a n g u a g e ?

    R e a d i n g W i t t g e n s t e i n i n t h e R i g h t S p i r i t

    U n d e r s t a n d i n g O t h e r s , U n d e r s t a n d i n g O u r s e l v e s :

    I m p o n d e r a b l e E v i d e n c e

    C h r o n o l o g y

    S u g g e s t i o n s f o r F u r t h e r R e a d i n g

    I n d e x

  • 8/10/2019 Ray Monk - How to Read Wittgenstein (2005)

    6/122

    SERIES EDITOR'S FOREWORD

    H o w a m I t o r e a d How to R eadl

    T h i s s e r i e s is b a s e d o n a v e r y s i m p l e , b u t n o v e l i d e a . M o s t

    b e g i n n e r s g u i d e s t o g r e a t t h i n k e r s a n d w r i t e r s o f f e r e i t h e r

    p o t t e d b i o g r a p h y o r c o n d e n s e d s u m m a r i e s o f t h e i r m a j o r

    w o r k s , o r p e r h a p s e v e n b o t h . H o w t o R e a d , b y c o n t r a s t ,

    b r i n g s t h e r e a d e r f a c e - t o - f a c e w i t h t h e w r i t i n g i t s e l f i n t h e

    c o m p a n y o f a n e x p e r t g u i d e . I t s s t a r t i n g p o i n t i s t h a t i n

    o r d e r t o g e t c l o s e t o w h a t a w r i t e r is a l l a b o u t , y o u h a v e t o

    g e t c l o s e t o t h e w o r d s t h e y a c t u a l l y u s e a n d b e s h o w n h o w

    t o r e a d t h o s e w o r d s .

    E v e r y b o o k i n t h e s e r i e s is i n a w a y a m a s t e r c l a s s i n r e a d i n g .

    E a c h a u t h o r h a s s e l e c t e d t e n o r s o s h o r t e x t r a c t s f r o m a

    w r i t e r s w o r k a n d l o o k s a t t h e m i n d e t a i l a s a w a y o f r e v e a l i n g

    t h e i r c e n t r a l i d e a s a n d t h e r e b y o p e n i n g d o o r s o n t o a w h o l e

    w o r l d o f t h o u g h t . S o m e t i m e s t h e s e e x t r a c t s a r e a r r a n g e d

    c h r o n o l o g i c a l l y t o g i v e a s e n s e o f a t h i n k e r s d e v e l o p m e n t

    o v e r t i m e , s o m e t i m e s n o t . T h e b o o k s a r e n o t m e r e l y c o m p i

    l a t i o n s o f a t h i n k e r s m o s t f a m o u s p a s s a g e s , t h e i r g r e a t e s t h i t s ,

    b u t r a t h e r t h e y o f f e r a s e r i e s o f c l u e s o r k e y s t h a t w i l l e n a b l e

    l e a d e r s t o g o o n a n d m a k e d i s c o v e r i e s o f t h e i r o w n . I n a d d i

    t i o n t o t h e t e x t s a n d r e a d i n g s , e a c h b o o k p r o v i d e s a s h o r t

    j W o g r a p h i c a l c h r o n o l o g y a n d s u g g e s t i o n s f o r f u r t h e r r e a d i n g

  • 8/10/2019 Ray Monk - How to Read Wittgenstein (2005)

    7/122

    SERIES EDITORS FOREWORD

    a n d s o o n . T h e b o o k s i n t h e H o w t o R e a d s e r i e s d o n t c l a i m

    t o t e l l y o u a l l y o u n e e d t o k n o w a b o u t F r e u d , N i e t z s c h e a n d

    D a r w i n , o r i n d e e d S h a k e s p e a r e a n d t h e M a r q u i s d e S a d e , b u t

    t h e y d o o f f e r t h e b e s t s t a r t i n g p o i n t f o r f u r t h e r e x p l o r a t i o n .

    U n l i k e t h e a v a i l a b l e s e c o n d - h a n d v e r s i o n s o f t h e m i n d s

    t h a t h a v e s h a p e d o u r i n t e l l e c t u a l , c u l t u r a l , r e l i g i o u s , p o l i t i c a l

    a n d s c i e n t i f i c l a n d s c a p e , H o w t o R e a d o f f e r s a r e f r e s h i n g s e t o f

    f i r s t - h a n d e n c o u n t e r s w i t h t h o s e m i n d s . O u r h o p e i s t h a t

    t h e s e b o o k s w i l l , b y t u r n , i n s t r u c t , i n t r i g u e , e m b o l d e n ,

    e n c o u r a g e a n d d e l i g h t .

    vi

    S i m o n C r i t c h l e y

    N e w S c h o o l f o r S o c i a l R e s e a r c h , N e w Y o r k

  • 8/10/2019 Ray Monk - How to Read Wittgenstein (2005)

    8/122

    INTRODUCT ION

    L u d w i g W i t t g e n s t e i n ( 1 8 8 9 - 1 9 5 1 ) w a s b y u n i v e r s a l a g r e e

    m e n t o n e o f g r e a t e s t a n d o n e o f t h e m o s t i n f l u e n t i a l

    p h i l o s o p h e r s o f t h e t w e n t i e t h c e n t u r y . T h e r e , h o w e v e r , t h e

    a g r e e m e n t s t o p s . T h e q u e s t i o n o f h o w t o r e a d h i m i s o n e t h a t

    h a s e x c i t e d a g r e a t d e a l o f c o n t r o v e r s y e v e r s i n c e h i s f i r s t

    b o o k , T r a c t a t u s L o g i c o - P h i l o s o p h i c u s , w a s p u b l i s h e d i n 1 9 2 1 .

    T h e r e i s n o c o n s e n s u s o n h o w t h a t b o o k s h o u l d b e i n t e r

    p r e t e d , o r o n h o w h i s l a t e r w o r k , P h i l o s o p h i c a l I n v e s t i g a t i o n s ,

    o u g h t t o b e r e a d , o r a g a i n o n t h e e x t e n t t o w h i c h t h e l a t e r

    w o r k r e p u d i a t e s t h e e a r l i e r .

    I n t h i s c o n t e x t , i t i s e x t r e m e l y p r e s u m p t u o u s t o p u b l i s h a

    b o o k c a l l e d H o w t o R e a d W i t t g e n s t e i n . I a p o l o g i z e i n a d v a n c e

    f o r d o i n g s o a n d w a n t t o m a k e i t c l e a r t h a t w h a t I o f f e r h e r e

    i s o n l y o n e p o s s i b l e w a y o f r e a d i n g W i t t g e n s t e i n .

    T h e e x t r a c t s f r o m W i t t g e n s t e i n s o w n w r i t i n g s t h a t a r e

    r e p r o d u c e d a n d d i s c u s s e d b e l o w a r e a r r a n g e d i n b r o a d l y

    c h r o n o l o g i c a l o r d e r a n d I g i v e s o m e b i o g r a p h i c a l d e t a i l s i n

    a m o n g s t t h e c o m m e n t a r y t h a t I o f f e r . H o w e v e r , i t m i g h t b e a s

    w e l l t o b e g i n w i t h a s u m m a r y .

    W i t t g e n s t e i n w a s b o r n i n V i e n n a i n 1 8 8 9 i n t o o n e o f t h e

    w e a l t h i e s t f a m i l i e s o f t h e A u s t r o - H u n g a r i a n E m p i r e . H i s

    f a t h e r w a s a n i n d u s t r i a l i s t w h o o w n e d p r a c t i c a l l y t h e w h o l e

    o f t h e A u s t r i a n i r o n a n d s t e e l i n d u s t r y . U n d e r h i s f a t h e r s

  • 8/10/2019 Ray Monk - How to Read Wittgenstein (2005)

    9/122

    2 INTRODUCTION

    i n f l u e n c e , W i t t g e n s t e i n s t u d i e d e n g i n e e r i n g , f i r s t a t B e r l i n a n d

    t h e n a t M a n c h e s t e r , b u t t h e n b e c a m e g r i p p e d b y p h i l o s o p h i c a l

    q u e s t i o n s a n d c a m e t o C a m b r i d g e i n t h e a u t u m n o f 1 9 1 1 t o

    s t u d y w i t h B e r t r a n d R u s s e l l . W i t t g e n s t e i n q u i c k l y b e c a m e

    R u s s e l l s f a v o u r i t e p u p i l a n d t h e o n e t o w h o m R u s s e l l l o o k e d

    f o r a s o l u t i o n t o t h e u n r e s o l v e d q u e s t i o n s i n t h e p h i l o s o p h y o f

    l o g i c . I n 1 9 1 3 , W i t t g e n s t e i n l e f t C a m b r i d g e t o l i v e a l o n e i n

    N o r w a y , h o p i n g t h a t t h e s o l i t u d e w o u l d h e l p h i s c o n c e n t r a

    t i o n . H e s p e n t a y e a r t h e r e , t h i n k i n g a b o u t l o g i c , b e f o r e

    r e t u r n i n g t o V i e n n a o n t h e e v e o f t h e F i r s t W o r l d W a r .

    D u r i n g t h e w a r , W i t t g e n s t e i n s e r v e d i n t h e A u s t r i a n a r m y

    a n d , a t t h e e n d o f t h e w a r , w a s t a k e n p r i s o n e r b y t h e I t a l i a n s .

    B y t h a t t i m e , h e h a d f i n i s h e d T r a c t a tu s L o g ic o - P h i l o s o p h ic u s ,

    w h i c h , h o w e v e r , w a s n o t p u b l i s h e d u n t i l 1 9 2 1 . T h i n k i n g

    h e h a d , i n t h a t b o o k , s o l v e d a l l p h i l o s o p h i c a l p r o b l e m s ,

    W i t t g e n s t e i n g a v e u p p h i l o s o p h y a n d b e c a m e a s c h o o l t e a c h e r .

    H i s t i m e a s a t e a c h e r w a s s h o r t , u n s u c c e s s f u l a n d m i s e r a b l e

    a n d i n 1 9 2 6 h e s w i t c h e d t o b e i n g a n a r c h i t e c t , b e f o r e , i n

    1 9 2 9 , r e t u r n i n g t o C a m b r i d g e t o w o r k o n p h i l o s o p h y a g a i n ,

    h a v i n g b e c o m e c o n v i n c e d t h a t t h e T r a c t a t u s d i d n o t , a f t e r a l l ,

    p r o v i d e t h e f i n a l s o l u t i o n t o a ll t h e p r o b l e m s o f p h i l o s o p h y .

    F r o m 1 9 2 9 u n t i l h i s d e a t h i n 1 9 5 1 , W i t t g e n s t e i n w o r k e d

    o u t a n e w w a y o f d o i n g p h i l o s o p h y t h a t h a s n o p r e c e d e n t i n

    t h e h i s t o r y o f t h e s u b j e c t . I t i s a w a y o f a p p r o a c h i n g p h i l o s o

    p h y t h a t t r i e s t o r e m a i n f a i t h f u l t o t h e i n s i g h t h e h a d i n t h e

    T r a c ta t u s t h a t p h i l o s o p h y c a n n o t b e a s c i e n c e , o r a n y t h i n g l i k e

    a s c i e n c e . I t i s n o t a b o d y o f d o c t r i n e b u t a n a c d v i t y , t h e

    a c t i v i t y o f c l e a r i n g u p t h e c o n f u s i o n s c a u s e d b y t h e b e w i t c h

    m e n t s c a s t b y l a n g u a g e .

    T h i s c o n c e p t i o n o f t h e s u b j e c t i s , i n m y o p i n i o n ,

    W i t t g e n s t e i n s m o s t r a d i c a l a n d m o s t i m p o r t a n t c o n t r i b u t i o n

    t o p h i l o s o p h y .

  • 8/10/2019 Ray Monk - How to Read Wittgenstein (2005)

    10/122

    L O G I C , S C I E N C E A N D B U S IN E S S

    T h e S c i e n c e o f L o g i c :an inquiry into the principles of accurate

    thought and scientific method. By P. Coffey, Ph.D.

    (Louvain). Professor of Logic and Metaphysics, Maynooth

    College. Longmans, Green & Co. 1912.

    In no branch of learning can an author disregard the results

    of honest research with so much impunity as he can in

    Philosophy and Logic. To this circumstance we owe the pub

    lication of such a book as Mr Coffeys 'Science of Logic: and

    only as a typical example of the work of many logicians today

    does this book deserve consideration. The authors Logic is

    that of the scholastic philosophers and he makes all their

    mistakes - of course with the usual references to Aristotle.

    (Aristotle, whose name is so much taken in vain by our logicians, would turn in his grave if he knew that so many

    Logicians know no more about Logic to-day than he did

    2,000 years ago.) The author has not taken the slightest

    notice of the great work of the modern mathematical logi

    cians - work which has brought about an advance in Logic

    comparable only to that which made Astronomy out of

    Astrology, and Chemistry out of Alchemy.

  • 8/10/2019 Ray Monk - How to Read Wittgenstein (2005)

    11/122

    LOGIC, SCIENCE AND BUSINESS

    Mr Coffey, like many logicians, draws a great advantage

    from an unclear way of expressing himself; for if you cannot

    tell whether he means to say 'Yes' or No, it is difficult to

    argue against him. However, even through his foggy expres

    sion, many grave mistakes can be recognized clearly

    enough; and I propose to give a list of some of the most

    striking ones, and would advise the student of Logic to

    trace these mistakes and their consequences in other books

    on Logic also. (The numbers in brackets indicate the pages

    of Mr Coffeys book - Volume 1 - where a mistake occurs forthe first time; the illustrative examples are my own.)

    I. (36) The author believes that all propositions are of

    the subject-predicate form.

    II. [31] He believes that reality is changed by becoming

    an object of thoughts.

    III. (6) He confounds the copula is with the word is'

    expressing identity. (The word is has obviously differ

    ent meanings in the propositions -

    Twice two is four

    and Socrates is mortal.)

    IV. (46) He confounds things with the classes to which

    they belong. (A man is obviously something quite different from mankind.)

    V. [48] He confounds classes and complexes. (Mankind

    is a class whose elements are men; but a library is not

    a class whose elements are books, because books

    become parts of a library only by standing in certain

    spatial relations to one another - while classes are

    independent of the relations between their members.)

    VI. [47] He confounds complexes and sums. (Two plus

    two is four, but four is not a complex of two and itself.)

  • 8/10/2019 Ray Monk - How to Read Wittgenstein (2005)

    12/122

    LOGIC. SCIENCE AND BUSINESS 5

    This list of mistakes could be extended a good deal.

    The Worst of such books as this is that they prejudice sen

    sible people against the study of Logic.

    Cambridge Review, 1913

    W i t t g e n s t e i n s p u b l i s h e d o u t p u t w a s t i n y . I n h i s l i f e t i m e , h e

    p u b l i s h e d j u s t o n e b o o k , o n e a r t i c l e a n d o n e b o o k r e v i e w .

    T h i s ( t h e a b o v e ) i s t h e b o o k r e v i e w . I t w a s p u b l i s h e d i n 1 9 1 3

    i n a C a m b r i d g e u n d e r g r a d u a t e m a g a z i n e c a l l e d t h e C a m b r i d g e

    R e v i e w ; a n d w a s h i s v e r y f i r s t p u b l i c a t i o n . W i t t g e n s t e i n w a s

    t h e n a s t u d e n t o f p h i l o s o p h y a t T r i n i t y C o l l e g e , C a m b r i d g e ,

    h a l f w a y t h r o u g h h i s s e c o n d y e a r o f s t u d y . I n m a n y w a y s ,

    t h o u g h , i t w o u l d b e m i s l e a d i n g t o p i c t u r e h i m a t t h i s t i m e a s

    a n u n d e r g r a d u a t e s t u d e n t , o r , i n a n y c a s e , i t w o u l d b e m i s

    l e a d i n g t o t h i n k o f h i m a s , i n a n y s e n s e , a n o r d i n a r y

    u n d e r g r a d u a t e s t u d e n t . F o r o n e t h i n g , a t t w e n t y - f o u r , h e w a s

    a f e w y e a r s o l d e r t h a n t h e u s u a l s e c o n d - y e a r u n d e r g r a d u a t e ,

    h a v i n g s p e n t t h r e e y e a r s b e f o r e h e w e n t t o C a m b r i d g e a s a n

    e n g i n e e r i n g s t u d e n t i n M a n c h e s t e r . F o r a n o t h e r t h i n g , h e

    w a s a l r e a d y r e g a r d e d b y t w o o f t h e m o s t i n f l u e n t i a l p h i l o s o

    p h e r s o f t h e d a y , G . E . M o o r e a n d B e r t r a n d R u s s e l l , a s a

    s i g n i f i c a n t p h i l o s o p h e r i n h i s o w n r i g h t . I n d e e d , w h e n

    W i t t g e n s t e i n s s i s t e r , H e r m i n e , v i s i t e d h i m a t C a m b r i d g e i n

    t h e s u m m e r o f 1 9 1 2 , w h e n h e h a d b e e n t h e r e l e s s t h a n a

    y e a r , R u s s e l l t o l d h e r : W e e x p e c t t h e n e x t b i g s t e p i n p h i l o s

    o p h y t o b e t a k e n b y y o u r b r o t h e r .

    A s R u s s e l l s r e m a r k s u g g e s t s , W i t t g e n s t e i n w a s n o t f o l l o w

    i n g a c o n v e n t i o n a l u n d e r g r a d u a t e c o u r s e i n p h i l o s o p h y . H e

    a t t e n d e d R u s s e l l s l e c t u r e s , a n d , o c c a s i o n a l l y , t h o s e b y M o o r e

    a n d t h e o t h e r C a m b r i d g e p h i l o s o p h e r s , b u t t h e r e i s n o t h i n g t o

    i n d i c a t e t h a t h e e v e r s e r i o u s l y c o n s i d e r e d s i t t i n g a n y e x a m i

    n a t i o n s . H i s f o r m a l s t a t u s w a s t h a t o f a n u n d e r g r a d u a t e , b u t h e

  • 8/10/2019 Ray Monk - How to Read Wittgenstein (2005)

    13/122

    6 LOGIC. SCIENCE AND BUSINESS

    r e g a r d e d h i m s e l f , a n d , m o r e r e m a r k a b l y , w a s r e g a r d e d b y

    o t h e r s , n o t a s a s t u d e n t o f p h i l o s o p h y b u t a s a n o r i g i n a l

    p h i l o s o p h e r , a t t e m p t i n g t o p r o v i d e n e w s o l u t i o n s t o p r o b l e m s

    t h a t w e r e a t t h e v e r y c u t t i n g e d g e o f t h e d i s c i p l i n e .

    I t i s p o s s i b l e , I t h i n k , t h a t C a m b r i d g e i s t h e o n l y u n i v e r s i t y

    i n t h e w o r l d t h a t w o u l d h a v e a c c e p t e d W i t t g e n s t e i n o n t h e s e

    t e r m s . H a d h e b r o k e n o f f h i s e n g i n e e r i n g s t u d i e s i n o r d e r t o

    s t u d y p h i l o s o p h y a t O x f o r d , V i e n n a , B e r l i n , P a r i s , H a r v a r d o r

    a n y o t h e r l e a d i n g u n i v e r s i t y o f t h e t i m e , h e w o u l d h a v e f a l l e n

    a t t h e f i r s t h u r d l e , m o s t l i k e l y r e j e c t e d b e c a u s e o f h i s a l m o s t

    c o m p l e t e i g n o r a n c e o f t h e w o r k o f a n y p h i l o s o p h e r s o t h e r

    t h a n F r e g e a n d R u s s e l l . A n d , e v e n i f h e h a d o v e r c o m e t h i s

    h u r d l e , h e w o u l d h a v e b e e n o b l i g e d t o d o w h a t , i n f a c t , h e

    n e v e r d i d t h r o u g h o u t h i s e n t i r e l i f e , n a m e l y s t u d y t h e w o r k s o f

    t h e g r e a t p h i l o s o p h e r s o f t h e p a s t . O n l y a f t e r h e h a d s h o w n

    s o m e u n d e r s t a n d i n g o f P l a t o , A r i s t o d e , D e s c a r t e s , L e i b n i z ,

    H u m e , e t c . w o u l d h e h a v e b e e n a l l o w e d , a s a g r a d u a t e s t u

    d e n t , t o d e v o t e h i m s e l f t o h i s o w n r e s e a r c h .

    A t C a m b r i d g e , t o i t s g r e a t c r e d i t , a ll t h a t w a s r e q u i r e d o f

    W i t t g e n s t e i n i n o r d e r f o r h i m t o r e a c h t h i s l a s t s t a g e t h e

    s t a g e a t w h i c h h e s p e n t h i s t i m e t r y i n g t o s o l v e p h i l o s o p h i c a l

    p r o b l e m s r a t h e r t h a n l e a r n i n g h o w p r e v i o u s p h i l o s o p h e r s h a d

    t r i e d t o s o l v e t h e m - w a s t h a t h e a r o u s e t h e i n t e r e s t a n d a d m i

    r a t i o n o f B e r t r a n d R u s s e l l . T h i s h e d i d i n t h e M i c h a e l m a s

    ( a u t u m n ) t e r m o f 1 9 1 1 , w h e n , w i t h o u t a n y p r i o r w a r n i n g , h e

    a r r i v e d a t R u s s e l l s l e c t u r e s t o h e a r h i m s p e a k a n d t o a r g u e

    w i t h h i m a b o u t l o g i c . I n d e c i d i n g w h e t h e r o r n o t t o t a k e o n

    t h i s e c c e n t r i c y o u n g A u s t r i a n a s a s t u d e n t , R u s s e l l d i d n o t a s k

    W i t t g e n s t e i n w h a t h e k n e w a b o u t t h e w o r k s o f t h e g r e a t

    p h i l o s o p h e r s o f t h e p a s t ; h e a s k e d h i m t o w r i t e s o m e t h i n g

    a b o u t a p h i l o s o p h i c a l p r o b l e m t h a t i n t e r e s t e d h i m . W h a t

    W i t t g e n s t e i n w r o t e i s l o s t t o h i s t o r y , b u t i t w a s e n o u g h t o

  • 8/10/2019 Ray Monk - How to Read Wittgenstein (2005)

    14/122

    LOGIC. SCIENCE AND BUSINESS 7

    c o n v i n c e R u s s e l l t h a t W i t t g e n s t e i n w a s s e r i o u s a n d i n t e r e s t

    i n g , a n d s i x m o n t h s l a t e r , h e w a s l o o k i n g t o W i t t g e n s t e i n t o

    m a k e t h e n e x t b i g s t e p i n p h i l o s o p h y .

    W i t t g e n s t e i n s r e v i e w o f C o f f e y s T h e S c ie n c e o f L o g i c w a s

    w r i t t e n a t a t r a n s i t i o n a l s t a g e i n t h e r e l a t i o n s h i p b e t w e e n h i m

    a n d R u s s e l l . D u r i n g h i s f i r s t y e a r a t C a m b r i d g e , W i t t g e n s t e i n

    h a d b e c o m e R u s s e l l s f a v o u r i t e s t u d e n t , t h e o n e o f w h o m h e

    h a d t h e g r e a t e s t e x p e c t a t i o n s . I n 1 9 1 3 , h o w e v e r , R u s s e l l

    s t o p p e d t r e a t i n g W i t t g e n s t e i n a s a s t u d e n t a l t o g e t h e r , a n d

    b e g a n t o d e f e r t o h i m o n p o i n t s o f l o g i c . I n t h e s u m m e r o f

    t h a t y e a r , a f e w m o n t h s a f t e r t h i s r e v i e w w a s w r i t t e n , R u s s e l l s

    d e f e r e n t i a l a t t i t u d e t o w a r d s W i t t g e n s t e i n w a s t o h a v e d e v a s

    t a t i n g r e p e r c u s s i o n s o n R u s s e l l s o w n i n t e l l e c t u a l d e v e l o p m e n t ,

    w h e n , a f t e r W i t t g e n s t e i n c r i t i c i z e d w i t h g r e a t s e v e r i t y a d r a f t

    o f a b o o k t h a t h e w a s w o r k i n g o n , R u s s e l l b e c a m e c o n v i n c e d ,

    t e m p o r a r i l y a t l e a s t , t h a t h e h a d n o t h i n g f u r t h e r t o c o n t r i b u t e

    t o f u n d a m e n t a l q u e s t i o n s i n p h i l o s o p h y .

    A n d y e t , f o r a l l t h a t , t h e r e v i e w , m o r e t h a n a n y t h i n g e l s e

    t h a t W i t t g e n s t e i n e v e r w r o t e , b e a r s t h e m a r k o f h a v i n g b e e n

    w r i t t e n b y a d i s c i p l e o f R u s s e l l s . B e c a u s e o f t h e t e n s i o n s i n

    t h e i r r e l a t i o n s h i p , b o t h i n t e l l e c t u a l a n d p e r s o n a l , t h a t d e v e l

    o p e d i n s u b s e q u e n t y e a r s , i t i s c u s t o m a r y t o e m p h a s i z e t h e

    d i s a g r e e m e n t s b e t w e e n W i t t g e n s t e i n a n d R u s s e l l a n d t o

    f o r g e t - w h a t t h i s r e v i e w s h o w s w i t h g r e a t c l a r i t y - t h a t

    W i t t g e n s t e i n w a s a t o n e t i m e n o t o n l y a n a d h e r e n t o f R u s s e l l s

    i d e a s , b u t a f i e r c e l y p a r t i s a n c h a m p i o n o f t h e m . I n t h i s w a y ,

    t h e r e v i e w , t h o u g h a d m i t t e d l y a s h o r t a n d s l i g h t w o r k o f n o

    g r e a t s i g n i f i c a n c e i n i t s e l f , p r o v i d e s a g o o d i n t r o d u c t i o n t o

    W i t t g e n s t e i n s w o r k , o n e t h a t b o t h p r o v i d e s t h e i n t e l l e c t u a l

    c o n t e x t o f h i s t h i n k i n g a b o u t l o g i c a n d h e l p s o n e t o a v o i d t h e

    e x e g e t i c a l m i s t a k e o f t h i n k i n g t h a t W i t t g e n s t e i n s w o r k s h o u l d

    a l w a y s b e s e e n i n c o n t r a s t t o R u s s e l l s w o r k . W h a t w e s e e i n

  • 8/10/2019 Ray Monk - How to Read Wittgenstein (2005)

    15/122

    8 LOGIC, SCIENCE AND BUSINESS

    t h i s r e v i e w i s W i t t g e n s t e i n f i g h t i n g , w i t h a l l t h e c o n s i d e r a b l e

    p o l e m i c a l f o r c e a t h i s d i s p o s a l , o n t h e s a m e s i d e a s R u s s e l l .

    T h e t a r g e t o f W i t t g e n s t e i n s p o l e m i c , t h e u n f o r t u n a t e

    P r o f e s s o r P . C o f f e y , i s a f o r g o t t e n f i g u r e , o b s c u r e d u r i n g h i s

    d a y a n d n o w k n o w n f o r n o t h i n g o t h e r t h a n b e i n g t h e a u t h o r

    o f a b o o k d i s t i n g u i s h e d o n l y f o r t h e e x t r e m e h o s t i l i t y w i t h

    w h i c h i t w a s r e v i e w e d b y W i t t g e n s t e i n . C o f f e y w a s a n I r i s h

    C a t h o l i c , w h o a n n o u n c e s h i m s e l f i n t h e p r e f a c e t o T h e S c i e n c e

    o f L o g ic t o b e a d e f e n d e r o f t h e s u p e r i o r i t y o f t h e

    A r i s t o t e l i a n / S c h o l a s t i c s y s t e m o f l o g i c o v e r w h a t h e c a l l s

    o t h e r s y s t e m s n o w a c t u a l l y i n v o g u e * . I t i s p o s s i b l e t h a t h e i s

    h e r e a l l u d i n g t o t h e n e w l o g i c o f F r e g e a n d R u s s e l l , t h o u g h

    i n f a c t h e n e v e r o n c e m e n t i o n s e i t h e r ( h e n c e W i t t g e n s t e i n s

    a c c u s a t i o n t h a t h e h a s n o t t a k e n t h e s l i g h t e s t n o t i c e o f t h e

    g r e a t w o r k o f t h e m o d e r n m a t h e m a t i c a l l o g i c i a n s ') . M o r e

    l i k e l y , h e i s t h i n k i n g o f t h e v a r i o u s s y s t e m s o f l o g i c d e v e l o p e d

    b y K e y n e s , V e n n , D e M o r g a n , J e v o n s , M i l l a n d W h c w e l l , a l l

    o f w h o m h e d o e s d i s c u s s i n t h e c o u r s e o f h i s d e f e n c e o f t h e

    A r i s t o t e l i a n s y s t e m . W h a t e v e r , a n d w h o e v e r , h e w a s d e f e n d

    i n g A r i s t o t l e s l o g i c a g a i n s t , h i s d e f e n c e h a s w o n v e r y f e w

    a d m i r e r s a n d e v e n f e w e r a d h e r e n t s .

    I n a r e v i e w i n M i n d - t h e l e a d i n g B r i t i s h j o u r n a l o f p h i l o s

    o p h y , w h i c h o n e m i g h t r e g a r d a s r e p r e s e n t a t i v e o f t h e B r i t i s h

    p h i l o s o p h i c a l e s t a b l i s h m e n t - C o f f e y s b o o k w a s c r i t i c i z e d

    f o r b e i n g a g g r e s s i v e l y t h e o l o g i c a l , a n d , e v e n i n 1 9 1 3 , i t

    w o u l d h a v e s t r u c k m o s t l o g i c i a n s a n d p h i l o s o p h e r s a s a l m o s t

    q u a i n d y o l d - f a s h i o n e d . I t i s c l e a r f r o m W i t t g e n s t e i n s r e v i e w ,

    h o w e v e r , t h a t h e w a s n o t e s p e c i a l l y i n t e r e s t e d i n t h e b o o k

    i t s e l f ( o n l y a s a t y p i c a l e x a m p l e o f t h e w o r k o f m a n y l o g i c i a n s

    t o d a y d o e s t h i s b o o k d e s e r v e c o n s i d e r a t i o n * ) ; w h a t i n t e r e s t s

    h i m , r a t h e r , i s t h e o p p o r t u n i t y p r e s e n t e d b y t h e r e v i e w t o

    s t a t e h i s c o n v i c t i o n t h a t t h e w o r k o n l o g i c d o n e b y F r e g e

  • 8/10/2019 Ray Monk - How to Read Wittgenstein (2005)

    16/122

    LOGIC. SCIENCE AND BUSINESS 9

    a n d R u s s e l l r e p r e s e n t s a h u g e a d v a n c e o v e r t h e t r a d i t i o n a l

    A r i s t o t e l i a n s y s t e m , a n a d v a n c e c o m p a r a b l e o n l y t o t h a t

    w h i c h m a d e A s t r o n o m y o u t o f A s t r o l o g y , a n d C h e m i s t r y o u t

    o f A l c h e m y .

    T h i s i s a v e r y l a r g e c l a i m , n o t o n l y i n i t s p r a i s e o f m o d e r n

    m a t h e m a t i c a l l o g i c b u t a l s o i n i t s d e n i g r a t i o n o f A r i s t o t l e ' s

    l o g i c , w h i c h i s , a f t e r a l l , u s u a l l y c o n s i d e r e d o n e o f t h e g r e a t

    e s t i n t e l l e c t u a l m o n u m e n t s o f W e s t e r n c i v i l i z a t i o n . F o r o v e r

    t w o t h o u s a n d y e a r s , t h e l o g i c t a u g h t a n d s t u d i e d a t a c a d e m i e s ,

    u n i v e r s i t i e s a n d m o n a s t e r i e s w a s , e s s e n t i a l l y , t h a t d e v i s e d b y

    A r i s t o d e . T h e o n l y c o n t r i b u t i o n t o s c i e n c e a n d c u l t u r e t h a t

    c o m e s c l o s e t o i t i n t h e l o n g e v i t y o f i t s d o m i n a n c e i s E u c l i d s

    s y s t e m o f g e o m e t r y , w h i c h r u l e d t h e f i e l d f r o m t h e s i x t h

    c e n t u r y B C u n t i l t h e d e v e l o p m e n t o f n o n - E u c l i d e a n

    g e o m e t r i e s i n t h e m i d d l e o f t h e n i n e t e e n t h c e n t u r y . T h e

    r e i g n o f A r i s t o d e s l o g i c l a s t e d s l i g h t l y l o n g e r , c o m i n g t o a n

    e n d d u r i n g t h e f i r s t d e c a d e o f t h e t w e n t i e t h c e n t u r y - j u s t

    w h e n W i t t g e n s t e i n d e c i d e d h i s f u t u r e l a y i n p h i l o s o p h y r a t h e r

    t h a n i n e n g i n e e r i n g .

    L i k e K i n g C a n u t e , C o f f e y , i n d e f e n d i n g A r i s t o d e s l o g i c

    a g a i n s t t h e m o d e r n m a t h e m a d c a l b a r b a r i a n h o r d e s , w a s t r y i n g

    t o h o l d b a c k a n i n e x o r a b l e t i d e , a t i d e t h a t h a s w i d e r c u l t u r a l

    i m p l i c a t i o n s t h a n m i g h t a t f i r s t b e a p p a r e n t . C o f f e y , l i k e m o s t

    e x p e r t s o n A r i s t o t l e s l o g i c , w a s n o t a s c i e n t i s t o r a m a t h e

    m a t i c i a n ; h e w a s a c l a s s i c i s t , a m a n t r a i n e d i n L a d n a n d G r e e k

    w i t h l i t d e o r n o s c i e n t i f i c e d u c a t i o n . T h e m e n a g a i n s t w h o m

    C o f f e y w a s d e f e n d i n g A r i s t o t l e - K e y n e s , V e n n , D e M o r g a n ,

    J e v o n s , M i l l a n d W h e w e l l - w e r e e i t h e r s c i e n t i s t s o r m e n

    w i t h a s c i e n r i f i c e d u c a t i o n . T h e f i n a l d e m i s e o f A r i s t o t e l i a n

    l o g i c m a r k s t h e p o i n t a t w h i c h l o g i c a s a d i s c i p l i n e w a s t a k e n

    o u t o f t h e h a n d s o f c l a s s i c a l l y t r a i n e d s c h o l a r s a n d p u t i n t h o s e

    o f m a t h e m a t i c i a n s . E v e r y s i g n i f i c a n t a d v a n c e i n l o g i c m a d e i n

  • 8/10/2019 Ray Monk - How to Read Wittgenstein (2005)

    17/122

    10 LOGIC, SCIENCE AND BUSINESS

    t h e t w e n t i e t h c e n t u r y w a s m a d e b y s o m e o n e w i t h a m a t h e

    m a t i c a l b a c k g r o u n d , a n d y e t b e f o r e t h e t w e n t i e t h c e n t u r y

    l o g i c w a s t h e p r e s e r v e o f t h e g e n d e m a n s c h o l a r s . T h e w o r s t

    o f s u c h b o o k s a s t h i s i s t h a t t h e y p r e j u d i c e s e n s i b l e p e o p l e

    a g a i n s t t h e s t u d y o f L o g i c , s a y s W i t t g e n s t e i n i n t h e c o n c l u

    s i o n t o h i s r e v i e w W h a t h e m e a n s b y s e n s i b l e p e o p l e , I

    t h i n k , i s t h o s e w i t h a s c i e n t i f i c e d u c a t i o n . H i s p o i n t i s t h a t , s o

    l o n g a s p e o p l e l i k e C o f f e y c a n g e t a w a y w i t h p u b l i s h i n g b o o k s

    o n T h e S c i e n c e o f L o g i c , l o g i c w i l l b e a v o i d e d b y g e n u i n e

    s c i e n t i s t s .

    I f o n e w a n t s t o u n d e r s t a n d w h y R u s s e l l e n c o u r a g e d W i t t g e n

    s t e i n s p h i l o s o p h i c a l a m b i t i o n s e v e n t h o u g h W i t t g e n s t e i n w a s ,

    f r o m a c o n v e n t i o n a l p o i n t o f v i e w , w o e f u l l y u n d e r - e d u c a t e d i n

    p h i l o s o p h y , i t h e l p s t o t h i n k o f t h e w i d e r c u l t u r a l s t r u g g l e

    p l a y e d o u t i n W i t t g e n s t e i n s r e v i e w o f C o f f e y . R u s s e l l h a d

    b e e n , f o r s o m e t i m e b e f o r e h e m e t W i t t g e n s t e i n , a n a d v o c a t e

    o f w h a t h e c a l l e d s c i e n t i f i c m e t h o d i n p h i l o s o p h y . H i s v i e w

    w a s t h a t p r o g r e s s i n p h i l o s o p h y w o u l d b e m a d e b y t h e k i n d o f

    e x a c t t h i n k i n g t h a t h a d d r i v e n p r o g r e s s i n m a t h e m a t i c s a n d

    p h y s i c s , a n d t h a t , t h e r e f o r e , p h i l o s o p h y w o u l d d o w e l l t o

    r e c r u i t s t u d e n t s w i t h s o m e m a t h e m a t i c a l a b i l i t y r a t h e r t h a n

    t h o s e t r a i n e d i n t h e c l a s s i c s . W h e n h e m e t W i t t g e n s t e i n , a

    m a n w i t h a s c i e n t i f i c e d u c a t i o n a n d a p a s s i o n a t e i n t e r e s t i n

    m a t h e m a t i c a l l o g i c , h e t h o u g h t h e h a d d i s c o v e r e d h i s i d e a l . A s

    h e p u t i t i n a l e t t e r t o h i s l o v e r . O t t o l i n e M o r r e l l :

    I believe a certain sort of mathematicians have far more

    philosophical capacity than most people who take up

    philosophy. Hitherto the people attracted to philosophy

    have been mostly those who loved the big generalizations,

    which were all wrong, so that few people with exact minds

    have taken up the subject. It has long been one of my

  • 8/10/2019 Ray Monk - How to Read Wittgenstein (2005)

    18/122

    LOGIC, SCIENCE AND BUSINESS 11

    dreams to found a great school of mathematically minded

    philosophers, but I don't know whether I shall ever get it

    accomplished. I had hopes of Norton, but he has not the

    physique, Broad is all right, but has no fundamental

    originality. Wittgenstein of course is exactly my dream.

    I n t h e y e a r s t o c o m e , W i t t g e n s t e i n w o u l d s u r p r i s e a n d d i s

    a p p o i n t R u s s e l l b y h i s v e h e m e n t r e j e c t i o n o f w h a t R u s s e l l

    c a l l e d t h e s c i e n t i f i c o u t l o o k , b u t i n 1 9 1 3 i t l o o k e d a s i f

    W i t t g e n s t e i n m i g h t w e l l b e t h e a b l e l i e u t e n a n t R u s s e l l w a s

    l o o k i n g f o r i n h i s c a m p a i g n t o i n j e c t s o m e s c i e n t i f i c r i g o u r

    i n t o t h e s t u d y o f p h i l o s o p h y .

    C e r t a i n l y , W i t t g e n s t e i n s h o w s C o f f e y - a n d t h e e n t i r e

    s c h o l a r l y t r a d i t i o n h e s e e k s t o d e f e n d - n o m e r c y i n t h i s

    e x t r a o r d i n a r i l y v i t r i o l i c , s e l f - c o n f i d e n t a n d d i d a c t i c r e v i e w .

    I n p l a c e o f a c a r e f u l c o n s i d e r a t i o n o f t h e m e r i t s a n d d e m e r i t s

    o f C o f f e y s b o o k , W i t t g e n s t e i n p r e s e n t s C o f f e y a s r e p r e s e n t a

    t i v e o f a n i n t e l l e c t u a l l y l a z y a n d o u t m o d e d a p p r o a c h t o l o g i c ,

    o n e t h a t f e e l s a b l e , i n t h e n a m e o f A r i s t o t l e , t o d i s r e g a r d t h e

    r e s u l t s o f h o n e s t r e s e a r c h a n d , c o n s e q u e n t l y , t o r e p e a t w h a t

    t h e g r e a t w o r k o f t h e m o d e r n m a t h e m a t i c a l l o g i c i a n s h a d

    s h o w n w e r e g r a v e m i s t a k e s .

    A l l s i x o f t h e m i s t a k e s w h i c h W i t t g e n s t e i n a c c u s e s C o f f e y

    o f m a k i n g i n v o l v e i g n o r i n g a s p e c t s o f t h e w o r k o f F r e g e a n d

    R u s s e l l . T h e f i r s t o n e ( T h e a u t h o r b e l i e v e s t h a t a l l p r o p o s i

    t i o n s a r e o f t h e s u b j e c t - p r e d i c a t e f o r m * ) r a i s e s a n i s s u e t h a t

    h a d , f o r a l o n g t i m e , b e e n c l o s e t o R u s s e l l s h e a r t . A t t h e

    v e r y b e g i n n i n g o f h i s 1 9 0 0 b o o k o n L e i b n i z , R u s s e l l h a d

    a n n o u n c e d : T h a t a l l s o u n d p h i l o s o p h y s h o u l d b e g i n w i t h a n

    a n a l y s i s o f p r o p o s i t i o n s i s a t r u t h t o o e v i d e n t , p e r h a p s , t o

    d e m a n d a p r o o f . R u s s e l l s t h e m e t h r o u g h o u t t h e b o o k i s t h a t

    L e i b n i z s m i s t a k e n v i e w s a b o u t m e t a p h y s i c s c a n b e t r a c e d t o a

  • 8/10/2019 Ray Monk - How to Read Wittgenstein (2005)

    19/122

    12 LOGIC, SCIENCE AND BUSINESS

    m i s t a k e n a s s u m p t i o n a b o u t p r o p o s i t i o n s , n a m e l y t h e v e r y o n e

    o f w h i c h W i t t g e n s t e i n a c c u s e s C o f f e y : t h a t e v e r y p r o p o s i t i o n

    h a s a s u b j e c t a n d a p r e d i c a t e . T h e a s s u m p t i o n t h a t a l l p r o p o

    s i t i o n s a r e o f t h e s u b j e c t - p r e d i c a t e f o r m l e a d s , R u s s e l l

    t h o u g h t , t o t h e b e l i e f t h a t a l l t r u th s a r e o f t h a t f o r m , w h i c h , i n

    t u r n , l e a d s o n e t o i m a g i n e t h e w o r l d a s c o n s i s t i n g o f o n l y t w o

    k i n d s o f t h i n g : o b j e c t s ( w h i c h c o r r e s p o n d t o s u b j e c t s ) a n d

    p r o p e r t i e s ( w h i c h c o r r e s p o n d t o p r e d i c a t e s ) .

    I t w a s o f e n o r m o u s p h i l o s o p h i c a l i m p o r t a n c e , R u s s e l l

    b e l i e v e d , t o a c k n o w l e d g e t h a t , a s w e l l a s o b j e c t s a n d p r o p e r

    t i e s , t h e w o r l d c o n t a i n e d r e l a t i o n s . P r o p o s i t i o n s s u c h a s J o h n

    i s t a l l e r t h a n h i s f a t h e r a n d F o u r i s t h e s q u a r e r o o t o f s i x t e e n

    m u s t b e u n d e r s t o o d , n o t a s t h e p r e d i c a t i o n o f a p r o p e r t y t o a n

    o b j e c t , b u t a s t h e a s s e r t i o n o f a r e l a t i o n b e t w e e n t w o o b j e c t s .

    B u t , t o u n d e r s t a n d t h e m a s s u c h r e q u i r e s o n e t o b r e a k o u t o f

    t h e s u b j e c t - p r e d i c a t e s t r a i t j a c k e t i m p o s e d u p o n p r o p o s i t i o n s

    b y A r i s t o t e l i a n l o g i c . T h e l o g i c o f F r e g e a n d R u s s e l l , w h i c h

    t r e a t s p r o p o s i t i o n s z s f o n c t i o n s , a c h i e v e s t h i s b r e a k t h r o u g h . T h e

    w o r d f u n c t i o n h e r e i s u s e d w i t h a c o n s c i o u s a l l u s i o n t o i t s

    o r i g i n s i n m a t h e m a t i c s . T h u s , j u s t a s t h e m a t h e m a t i c a l f u n c

    t i o n X 2 h a s t h e v a l u e 1 6 w h e n x = 4 , a n d 2 5 w h e n x = 5 , s o

    t h e p r o p o s i t i o n a l f u n c t i o n x i s t a l l e r t h a n y h a s t h e t r u t h v a l u e

    t r u e w h e n x = J o h n a n d y = h i s f a t h e r a n d f a l s e w h e n x = h i s

    f a t h e r a n d y = J o h n .

    R e l a t e d t o t h e n o t i o n o f a p r o p o s i t i o n a l f u n c t i o n i s t h e

    n o t i o n - c e n t r a l t o t h e l o g i c d e v e l o p e d b y F r e g e a n d R u s s e l l -

    o f a c la s s . A c la s s is t h e e x t e n s i o n o f a p r o p o s i t i o n a l f u n c t i o n :

    i . e . , i t i s t h e c o l l e c t i o n o f t h i n g s t h a t , w h e n g i v e n a s t h e

    v a l u e ( s ) o f t h e v a r i a b l e ( s ) i n t h e f u n c t i o n , r e s u l t i n a t r u e

    p r o p o s i t i o n . F o r e x a m p l e , t h e f u n c t i o n x i s a m a n h a s , a s i t s

    e x t e n s i o n , t h e c la s s o f m e n . T h e m i s t a k e s I V , V a n d V I t h a t

    W i t t g e n s t e i n a c c u s e s C o f f e y o f m a k i n g a l l i n v o l v e m i s u n d e r -

  • 8/10/2019 Ray Monk - How to Read Wittgenstein (2005)

    20/122

    LOGIC, SCIENCE AND BUSINESS 13

    S t a n d i n g t h e n o t i o n o f c l a s s a s t h a t n o t i o n w a s u s e d i n t h e

    l o g i c o f F r e g e a n d R u s s e l l . O f t h e o t h e r s , I I i s a m i s t a k e o n l y

    i f t h e k i n d o f p h i l o s o p h i c a l r e a l i s m e s p o u s e d b y F r e g e a n d

    R u s s e l l h a p p e n s t o b e t r u e , a n d I I I ( t h e c o n f u s i o n b e t w e e n

    t h e t w o u s e s o f t h e w o r d is * ) r a i s e s a g a i n a p o i n t c l o s e t o

    R u s s e l l s p h i l o s o p h i c a l h e a r t a n d o n e t h a t h e r e p e a t e d l y

    i n v o k e d i n a r g u i n g f o r t h e s u p e r i o r i t y o f m o d e r n m a t h e m a t

    i c a l l o g i c o v e r t h e l o g i c o f A r i s t o t l e .

    A l l i n a l l , t h e n , t h e r e v i e w s h o w s W i t t g e n s t e i n a t t h e v e r y

    b e g i n n i n g o f h i s p h i l o s o p h i c a l c a r e e r t o b e a p a r t i c u l a r l y b e l

    l i g e r e n t a n d p a r t i s a n c h a m p i o n o f t h e l o g i c o f F r e g e a n d

    R u s s e l l . I t a l s o r e f l e c t s v i e w s a b o u t p h i l o s o p h y t h a t r e m a i n e d

    c h a r a c t e r i s t i c o f W i t t g e n s t e i n s w o r k t h r o u g h o u t h i s l i f e .

    I n t h e f i r s t p l a c e , i t s h o w s t h a t , l i k e F r e g e a n d R u s s e l l b e f o r e

    h i m , h e t o o k l o g i c t o l i e a t t h e v e r y h e a r t o f p h i l o s o p h y .

    I n d e e d , f o r h i m , p h i l o s o p h y s i m p l y w a s t h e a t t e m p t t o u n d e r

    s t a n d l o g i c . S e c o n d l y , i t s h o w s h o w s e r i o u s l y W i t t g e n s t e i n

    t o o k t h e v i e w t h a t t h e w o r k o f F r e g e a n d R u s s e l l s u p e r s e d e d

    p r e v i o u s w o r k i n l o g i c ( a n d t h e r e f o r e i n p h i l o s o p h y ) , t o t h e

    e x t e n t t h a t t h i s p r e v i o u s w o r k w a s s i m p l y n o t w o r t h r e a d i n g

    a n d c o n s i d e r i n g . W i t t g e n s t e i n o f t e n r e v e a l e d ( o r p e r h a p s

    b o a s t e d i s t h e w o r d ) t o f r i e n d s t h a t h e h a d n e v e r r e a d a w o r d

    o f A r i s t o d e . E v i d e n d y , h e f e l t t h a t h e d i d n o t n e e d t o . I f t h e

    w o r k o f F r e g e a n d R u s s e l l h a d i n d e e d b r o u g h t a b o u t a n

    a d v a n c e i n L o g i c c o m p a r a b l e t o t h a t w h i c h m a d e A s t r o n o m y

    o u t o f A s t r o l o g y , a n d C h e m i s t r y o u t o f A l c h e m y , t h e n

    A r i s t o d e s w o r k - l i k e t h a t o f , s a y , D e s c a r t e s , L e i b n i z , S p i n o z a ,

    L o c k e , H u m e , H e g e l a n d M i l l ( n o n e o f w h i c h W i t t g e n s t e i n

    e v e r r e a d ) - w a s a s o b s o l e t e a s t h e w o r k s o f t h e m e d i a e v a l

    a l c h e m i s t s .

    I n l a t e r l i f e , W i t t g e n s t e i n r e l a x e d t h i s a t t i t u d e s o m e w h a t ,

    a n d r e a d w i t h e v i d e n t c a r e a n d a t t e n t i o n t h e w o r k o f , f o r

  • 8/10/2019 Ray Monk - How to Read Wittgenstein (2005)

    21/122

    14 LOGIC. SCIENCE AND BUSINESS

    e x a m p l e , P l a t o a n d K a n t , b u t i t r e m a i n s t r u e t h a t n o g r e a t

    p h i l o s o p h e r h a s e v e r b e e n s o i g n o r a n t o f t h e h i s t o r y o f h i s

    s u b j e c t a s W i t t g e n s t e i n w a s . H e d i d n o t h a v e t h e k i n d o f e d u

    c a t i o n i n p h i l o s o p h y t h a t a l m o s t a l l o t h e r p h i l o s o p h e r s h a v e

    h a d a n d t h a t m a n y c o n s i d e r t o b e a p r e r e q u i s i t e f o r h a v i n g

    a n y t h i n g i n t e r e s t i n g t o s a y o n t h e s u b j e c t . R i g h t f r o m t h e v e r y

    s t a r t , W i t t g e n s t e i n s a t t i t u d e t o p h i l o s o p h y w a s v e r y d i f f e r e n t

    f r o m t h a t w h i c h p r e v a i l s a m o n g p r o f e s s i o n a l p h i l o s o p h e r s i n

    a c a d e m i c i n s t i t u t i o n s . H e d i d n o t t h i n k o f p h i l o s o p h y p r i m a r i l y

    a s a n a c a d e m i c s u b j e c t , s t i l l l e s s a s a p r o f e s s i o n . F o r h i m , p h i l o s

    o p h y w a s t h e a c t i v i t y o f s o l v i n g p h i l o s o p h i c a l p r o b l e m s . H e

    u s e d t o s a y t h a t , j u s t a s h i s f a t h e r h a d b e e n a b u s i n e s s m a n , s o h e

    t o o k a b u s i n e s s l i k e a t t i t u d e t o p h i l o s o p h y . H e w a n t e d t o c le a r

    u p p h i l o s o p h i c a l p r o b l e m s , l i k e a b u s i n e s s m a n c l e a r s h i s d e s k .

  • 8/10/2019 Ray Monk - How to Read Wittgenstein (2005)

    22/122

    C L E A R IN G U P P H IL O S O P H Y IN T H R E E W O R D S

    This book will perhaps only be understood by those who

    have themselves already thought the thoughts which are

    expressed in it - or similar thoughts. It is therefore not a

    text-book. Its object would be attained if it afforded pleas

    ure to one who read it with understanding.

    The book deals with the problems of philosophy andshows, I believe, that the method of formulating these

    problems rests on the misunderstanding of the logic of our

    language. Its whole meaning could be summed up some

    what as follows: What can be said at all can be said clearly;

    and whereof one cannot speak thereof one must be silent.

    The book will, therefore, draw a limit to thinking, or

    rather - not to thinking, but to the expression of thoughts;

    for in order to draw a limit to thinking we should have to be

    able to think both sides of this limit (we should therefore

    have to be able to think what cannot be thought).

    The limit can, therefore, only be drawn in language and

    what lies on the other side of the limit will be simply non

    sense.How far my efforts agree with those of other philosophers

  • 8/10/2019 Ray Monk - How to Read Wittgenstein (2005)

    23/122

    16 CLEARING UP PHILOSOPHY IN THREE WORDS

    I will not decide. Indeed what I have here written makes no

    claim to novelty in points of detail; and therefore I give no

    sources, because it is indifferent to me whether what I have

    thought has already been thought before me by another.

    I will only mention that to the great works of Frege and

    the writings of my friend Bertrand Russell I owe in large

    measure the stimulation of my thoughts.

    If this work has a value it consists in two things. First

    that in it thoughts are expressed, and this value will be the

    greater the better the thoughts are expressed. The more thenail has been hit on the head. Here I am conscious that

    I have fallen far short of the possible. Simply because my

    powers are insufficient to cope with the task. May others

    come and do it better.

    On the other hand the truthof the thoughts communi

    cated here seems to me unassailable and definitive. I am,

    therefore, of the opinion that the problems have in essen

    tials been finally solved. And if I am not mistaken in this,

    then the value of this work secondly consists in the fact

    that it shows how little has been done when these prob

    lems have been solved.

    Preface to Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, 1921

    I n 1 9 2 1 , e i g h t y e a r s a f t e r p u b l i s h i n g h i s r e v i e w o f C o f f e y s The

    Science of Logic,W i t t g e n s t e i n p u b l i s h e d h i s f i r s t a n d o n l y b o o k .

    A s t h e p r e f a c e m a k e s c l e a r , i t w a s s u p p o s e d t o b e t h e l a s t

    w o r d o n p h i l o s o p h i c a l p r o b l e m s , t o b r i n g p h i l o s o p h y t o a n

    e n d . ( A n d , s u r e e n o u g h , w h e n h e h a d f i n i s h e d t h e b o o k ,

    W i t t g e n s t e i n g a v e u p p h i l o s o p h y , r e t u r n i n g t o i t o n l y w h e n ,

    s i x y e a r s a f t e r t h e T r a c t a t u s w a s p u b l i s h e d , h e b e c a m e c o n v i n c e d

    t h a t i t w a s n o t , a f t e r a l l , t h e f i n a l w o r d o n t h e s u b j e c t . )

    R u s s e l l h a d d r e a m e d o f f o u n d i n g a s c h o o l o f p h i l o s o p h e r s

  • 8/10/2019 Ray Monk - How to Read Wittgenstein (2005)

    24/122

    CLEARING UP PHILOSOPHY IN THREE WORDS 17

    t r a i n e d i n m a t h e m a t i c s w h o s e e x a c t m i n d s w o u l d r e s i s t t h e

    t e m p t a t i o n s o f t h e b i g g e n e r a l i z a t i o n s , a l l o f w h i c h w e r e f a l s e .

    W h a t W i t t g e n s t e i n t h e m a n R u s s e l l r e g a r d e d a s t h e e m b o d

    i m e n t o f t h a t d r e a m h a d p r o d u c e d w a s a b o o k t h a t s o u g h t t o

    a v o i d , n o t o n l y t h e b i g g e n e r a l i z a t i o n s , b u t a r ty a n s w e r s t o

    p h i l o s o p h i c a l p r o b l e m s a s t h e y h a v e t r a d i t i o n a l l y b e e n r a i s e d .

    P h i l o s o p h y w o u l d b e c l e a r e d u p , i t s p r o b l e m s s o l v e d o n c e a n d

    f o r a l l , n o t b y p r o v i d i n g n e w a n s w e r s t o o l d q u e s t i o n s b u t b y

    s h o w i n g t h a t t h o s e o l d q u e s t i o n s w e r e i l l - f o r m e d a n d a r o s e

    f r o m n o t h i n g m o r e t h a n t h e m i s u n d e r s t a n d i n g o f t h e l o g i c o f

    o u r l a n g u a g e .

    R u s s e l l h a d s h o w n - o r a t t e m p t e d t o s h o w - t h a t L e i b n i z s

    m e t a p h y s i c a l v i e w s r e s t e d u p o n a m i s t a k e n u n d e r s t a n d i n g o f

    t h e n a t u r e o f p r o p o s i t i o n s ; W i t t g e n s t e i n w a n t e d t o s h o w t h a t

    a l l p h i l o s o p h i c a l v i e w s r e s t e d u p o n a m i s t a k e n u n d e r s t a n d i n g

    o f t h e n a t u r e o f p r o p o s i t i o n s . I n d e e d , t h e v e r y q u e s t i o n s t h a t

    p h i l o s o p h e r s a s k e d r e s t e d u p o n s u c h m i s u n d e r s t a n d i n g s . T o

    a t t e m p t t o a n s w e r a p h i l o s o p h i c a l q u e s t i o n w a s a l r e a d y t o

    m a k e a g r a v e m i s t a k e , o f t h e k i n d t h a t C o f f e y m a d e i n

    d e f e n d i n g A r i s t o t e l i a n l o g i c . W h a t w a s r e q u i r e d w a s a c o r r e c t

    u n d e r s t a n d i n g o f t h e l o g i c o f o u r l a n g u a g e . O n c e o n e h a d

    t h a t , p h i l o s o p h i c a l q u e s t i o n s w o u l d n o t a r i s e , f o r o n e w o u l d

    b e a b l e t o s e e t h a t a n y t e m p t a t i o n t o a s k , l e t a l o n e t o a n s w e r ,

    a p h i l o s o p h i c a l q u e s t i o n a r o s e f r o m a c o n f u s i o n a b o u t t h e

    l o g i c o f o u r l a n g u a g e . A l i n e w o u l d b e d r a w n b e t w e e n w h a t

    w a s t h i n k a b l e a n d w h a t w a s n o t , b e t w e e n s e n s e a n d n o n

    s e n s e , a n d t h e w h o l e o f p h i l o s o p h y a s t r a d i t i o n a l l y c o n c e i v e d

    w o u l d b e s e e n t o l i e o n t h e w r o n g s i d e o f t h a t l i n e . I n t h i s

    w a y , t h e b i g g e n e r a l i z a t i o n s w o u l d b e s h o w n t o b e n o t

    f a l s e , b u t n o n s e n s i c a l .

    B u t w a i t . I s n t t h e v i e w t h a t a l l p h i l o s o p h i c a l p r o b l e m s r e s t

    u p o n a m i s u n d e r s t a n d i n g o f t h e l o g i c o f o u r l a n g u a g e i t s e l fa b i g

  • 8/10/2019 Ray Monk - How to Read Wittgenstein (2005)

    25/122

    18 CLEARING UP PHILOSOPHY IN THREE WORDS

    g e n e r a l i z a t i o n ? A n d s o m u s t w e r e g a r d t h a t a s n o n s e n s e ?

    W i t t g e n s t e i n a l l u d e s t o t h i s p r o b l e m i n t h e p r e f a c e w h e n h e s a y s :

    The book will, therefore, draw a limit to thinking, or

    rather - not to thinking, but to the expression of thoughts;

    for in order to draw a limit to thinking we should have to be

    able to think both sides of this limit (we should therefore

    have to be able to think what cannot be thought).

    The limit can, therefore, only be drawn in language and

    what lies on the other side of the limit will be simply nonsense.

    B u t t h i s w a y o f p u t t i n g t h e p r o b l e m s i m p l y a v o i d s t h e d i f f i

    c u l t y . H e a d m i t s t h a t t o d r a w a l i m i t t o t h i n k i n g w e s h o u l d

    h a v e t o p r e t e n d t o t h i n k b o t h s i d e s o f t h e l i m i t a n d t h u s p r e

    t e n d t o b e a b l e t o t h i n k w h a t c a n n o t b e t h o u g h t , b u t h e

    a p p e a r s t o d e n y t h a t t h e s a m e t h i n g a p p l i e s t o t h e e x p r e s s i o n o f

    t h o u g h t s . I f w e d r a w a l i m i t i n l a n g u a g e t o w h a t c a n b e

    e x p r e s s e d a n d t h u s d r a w a l i n e b e t w e e n s e n s e a n d n o n s e n s e ,

    w h a t s i d e o f t h e l i m i t d o e s o u r l i n e - t h e e x p r e s s i o n o f t h a t

    l i m i t - b e l o n g t o ? J u s t a s , b e f o r e , w e h a d t o t h i n k w h a t c a n n o t

    b e t h o u g h t , d o w e n o t n o w h a v e t o e x p r e s s w h a t c a n n o t b e

    e x p r e s s e d ?

    I n t h e b o d y o f t h e b o o k , W i t t g e n s t e i n d e a l s d i r e c t l y w i t h t h i s

    p r o b l e m a n d d r a w s a s u r p r i s i n g c o n c l u s i o n : t h a t t h e b o o k i s a n

    a t t e m p t t o e x p r e s s w h a t c a n n o t b e e x p r e s s e d , a n d , t h e r e f o r e ,

    n o n s e n s e :

    My propositions serve as elucidations in the following way:

    anyone who understands me eventually recognizes them as

    nonsensical, when he has used them - as steps - to climb

    up beyond them. (He must, so to speak, throw away the

  • 8/10/2019 Ray Monk - How to Read Wittgenstein (2005)

    26/122

    CLEARING UP PHILOSOPHY IN THREE WORDS 19

    ladder after he has climbed up it.) He must transcend these

    propositions, and then he will see the world aright.

    T h u s , t h e v i e w p u t f o r w a r d i n T r a c t a tu s L o g i c o - P h i l o s o p h i c u s

    a p p e a r s t o b e t h a t a l l p h i l o s o p h i c a l p r o p o s i t i o n s a r e n o n s e n s i

    c a l - i n c l u d i n g t h e o n e s i n T r a c t a t u s L o g i c o - P h i lo s o p h i c u s . O n e

    i s r e m i n d e d o f t h e f i r s t l i n e o f t h e T a o T e C h i n g y w h i c h s a y s :

    T h e T a o t h a t c a n b e e x p r e s s e d i s n o t t h e e t e r n a l T a o .

    F o r B e r t r a n d R u s s e l l , i t c a m e a s s o m e t h i n g o f a s h o c k a n d

    a d i s a p p o i n t m e n t t o d i s c o v e r t h a t , w h e n h i s f a v o u r i t e s t u

    d e n t , t h e v e r y p e r s o n i f i c a t i o n o f h i s d r e a m o f s c i e n t i f i c a l l y

    m i n d e d p h i l o s o p h e r s , f i n a l l y p r o d u c e d a b o o k , i t h a d a t i t s v e r y

    h e a r t a m y s t i c a l p a r a d o x . I n t h e i n t r o d u c t i o n t h a t h e w r o t e

    t o t h e b o o k , R u s s e l l w a s f u l s o m e i n h i s p r a i s e o f t h e b o o k s

    a c h i e v e m e n t s a n d o f i t s s i g n i f i c a n c e . H o w e v e r , w h e n h e c a m e

    t o d i s c u s s W i t t g e n s t e i n s a p p a r e n t v i e w t h a t t h e t r u t h s o f l o g i c

    a n d p h i l o s o p h y ( e v e n t h o s e t h a t w e r e u n a s s a i l a b l e a n d d e f i n i

    t i v e ) a r e i n e x p r e s s i b l e , h e d e m u r r e d . W h a t c a u s e s h e s i t a t i o n ,

    R u s s e l l w r o t e , i s t h e f a c t t h a t , a f t e r a ll , M r W i t t g e n s t e i n m a n a g e s

    t o s a y a g o o d d e a l a b o u t w h a t c a n n o t b e s a i d .

    W h e n R u s s e l l f i r s t r e a d t h e b o o k , t w o y e a r s b e f o r e i t w a s

    p u b l i s h e d , h e s e n t W i t t g e n s t e i n s o m e q u e s t i o n s a b o u t i t .

    S o m e w h a t r e l u c t a n t l y , W i t t g e n s t e i n a n s w e r e d R u s s e l l s q u e s

    t i o n s , b u t w h a t h e w a s m o s t c o n c e r n e d t o e m p h a s i z e t o

    R u s s e l l w a s t h e i m p o r t a n c e o f t h e d i s t i n c t i o n b e t w e e n s a y i n g

    a n d s h o w i n g :

    Now Im afraid you havent really got hold of my main

    contention, to which the whole business of logical propfosi-

    tionls is only a corollary. The main point is the theory of

    what can be expressed (gesagt) by propositionJs - i.e., by

    language - (and, which comes to the same, what can be

  • 8/10/2019 Ray Monk - How to Read Wittgenstein (2005)

    27/122

    20 CLEARING UP PHILOSOPHY IN THREE WORDS

    thought) and what cannot be expressed by prop[osition]s,

    but only shown (gezeigt); which, I believe, is the cardinal

    problem of philosophy.

    I n t h e T r a c t a t u s i t s e l f , W i t t g e n s t e i n s a y s : W h a t c a n b e s h o w n ,

    c a n n o t b e s a i d . '

    D o e s t h i s m e a n t h a t W i t t g e n s t e i n t h o u g h t t h a t t h e u n a s

    s a i l a b l e a n d d e f i n i t i v e t r u t h s t h a t h e c l a i m s i n t h e p r e f a c e t o

    b e c o m m u n i c a t e d i n t h e b o o k a r e c o m m u n i c a t e d b y b e i n g

    s h o w n r a t h e r t h a n s a i d ? T h i s i s h o w R u s s e l l i n t e r p r e t e d h i m .

    I n h i s i n t r o d u c t i o n , h e s a y s :

    The whole subject of ethics, for example, is placed by

    Mr Wittgenstein in the mystical, inexpressible region. Never

    theless he is capable of conveying his ethical opinions.

    His defence would be that what he calls the mystical can

    be shown, although it cannot be said. It may be that this

    defence is adequate, but, for my part, I confess that it leaves

    me with a certain sense of intellectual discomfort.

    F r a n k R a m s e y , t h e y o u n g C a m b r i d g e p h i l o s o p h e r w h o h a d a

    h a n d i n t h e t r a n s l a t i o n o f t h e T r a c t a t u s a n d w a s o n e o f i t s m o s t

    p e r c e p t i v e a n d e n t h u s i a s t i c a d m i r e r s , p u t i t m o r e b l u n t l y .

    W h a t c a n t b e s a i d , c a n t b e s a id , R a m s e y o n c e r e m a r k e d ,

    a n d i t c a n t b e w h i s d e d e i t h e r .

    M o r e r e c e n d y , s t r o n g d o u b t s h a v e b e e n r a i s e d b y i n t e r

    p r e t e r s o f W i t t g e n s t e i n a b o u t w h e t h e r h e w a s t r y i n g t o

    w h i s d e i t , t r y i n g t o s h o w p h i l o s o p h i c a l t r u t h s r a t h e r t h a n t o

    s t a t e t h e m . J a m e s C o n a n t a n d C o r a D i a m o n d , t w o l e a d i n g

    W i t t g e n s t e i n s c h o l a r s , h a v e d e v e l o p e d a r e a d i n g o f t h e T r a c t a t u s

    t h a t t r i e s t o f r e e i t f r o m t h e p a r a d o x t h a t t r o u b l e d R u s s e l l a n d

    R a m s e y . A c c o r d i n g t o t h e m , t h e r e i s n o w a y t h a t o n e c a n

  • 8/10/2019 Ray Monk - How to Read Wittgenstein (2005)

    28/122

    CLEARING UP PHILOSOPHY IN THREE WORDS 21

    m a k e s e n s e o f t h e b o o k i f o n e i n t e r p r e t s W i t t g e n s t e i n a s b e l i e v

    i n g t h a t i t s p r o p o s i t i o n s 1 . e x p r e s s u n a s s a i l a b l e a n d d e f i n i t i v e

    t r u t h s a n d 2 . a r e n o n s e n s i c a l . S u r e l y , t h e y a r g u e , a n o n s e n s i c a l

    p r o p o s i t i o n l a c k s a n y m e a n i n g , s o i t c a n n o t p o s s i b l y e x p r e s s a

    t r u t h , u n a s s a i l a b l e o r o t h e r w i s e . N o n s e n s e , a c c o r d i n g t o t h e m ,

    c a n n e i t h e r s a y n o r s h o w a n y t h i n g . T h e y b e l i e v e t h a t t h e

    p r o p o s i t i o n s i n t h e T r a c ta t u s t h a t l o o k a s i f t h e y a r e t r y i n g t o

    e x p r e s s p h i l o s o p h i c a l t r u t h s a r e i n d e e d - a n d w e r e i n t e n d e d

    b y W i t t g e n s t e i n t o b e s i m p l y n o n s e n s i c a l . A n d , t h e r e f o r e ,

    C o n a n t a n d D i a m o n d b e l i e v e , t h e s e p r o p o s i t i o n s d o n o t s a y

    a n y t h i n g , a n d n e i t h e r d o t h e y s h o w a n y t h i n g .

    H o w e v e r , t h e b o o k , o n t h e i r r e a d i n g , s t i l l m a n a g e s t o c o m

    m u n i c a t e a n u n a s s a i l a b l e a n d d e f i n i t i v e t r u t h a b o u t p h i l o s o p h y -

    v i z . , t h a t a n y a t t e m p t t o s a y s o m e t h i n g p h i l o s o p h i c a l r e s u l t s i n

    n o n s e n s e . I t d o c s t h i s b y g e t t i n g t h e r e a d e r t o s e e t h a t i t s o w n

    p r o p o s i t i o n s a r e n o n s e n s e a n d t h a t t h e y a r e n o n s e n s e b e c a u s e

    t h e y t r y t o s a y s o m e t h i n g p h i l o s o p h i c a l . T h i s i n t e r p r e t a t i o n

    o f f e r s a n i n g e n i o u s w a y r o u n d t h e p a r a d o x t h a t l i e s a t t h e

    h e a r t o f t h e s t a n d a r d r e a d i n g o f t h e b o o k . U n f o r t u n a t e l y , i t

    i s e x t r e m e l y h a r d t o s q u a r e i t w i t h t h e t e x t o f t h e b o o k i t s e l f

    a n d w i t h o t h e r t h i n g s t h a t W i t t g e n s t e i n s a i d a n d w r o t e a r o u n d

    t h e t i m e t h a t h e w r o t e t h e b o o k , t h i n g s t h a t s e e m t o d e m o n

    s t r a t e t h a t W i t t g e n s t e i n d i d i n d e e d b e l i e v e t h a t o n e c o u l d

    s h o w d e e p t r u t h s , e i t h e r b y r e m a i n i n g s i l e n t a b o u t t h e m o r b y

    s a y i n g t h i n g s t h a t , s t r i c t l y s p e a k i n g , w e r e n o n s e n s i c a l .

    T o w a r d s t h e e n d o f T r a c ta tu s L o g ic o -M i l o s o p h i c u s , W i t t g e n s t e i n

    s a y s : T h e r e i s i n d e e d t h e i n e x p r e s s i b l e . T h i s s h o w s i t s e l f ; i t i s t h e

    m y s t i c a l . A m o n g t h o s e t h i n g ? t h a t s h o w t h e m s e l v e s a r e e t h i c s ,

    a e s t h e t i c s , r e l i g i o n , t h e m e a n i n g o f l i f e , l o g i c a n d p h i l o s o p h y .

    I n a l l t h e s e a r e a s , W i t t g e n s t e i n a p p e a r s t o b e l ie v e , t h e r e a r e i n d e e d

    t r u t h s , b u t n o n e o f t h e s e t r u t h s c a n b e e x p r e s s e d i n l a n g u a g e ;

    t h e y a l l h a v e t o b e s h o w n , n o t s a i d .

  • 8/10/2019 Ray Monk - How to Read Wittgenstein (2005)

    29/122

    22 CLEARING UP PHILOSOPHY IN THREE WORDS

    T h e d i s t i n c t i o n b e t w e e n w h a t c a n b e s a i d a n d w h a t c a n

    o n l y b e s h o w n - w h a t W i t t g e n s t e i n , i n h i s l e t t e r t o R u s s e l l ,

    c a l l s t h e m a i n p o i n t o f h i s b o o k a n d t h e c a r d i n a l p r o b l e m o f

    p h i l o s o p h y w a s 6 r s t m a d e i n w r i t i n g b y W i t t g e n s t e i n i n

    s o m e n o t e s o n l o g i c t h a t h e d i c t a t e d t o M o o r e i n t h e s p r i n g

    o f 1 9 1 4 . A t t h a t t i m e , h o w e v e r , i t w a s a p p l i e d o n l y t o l o g i c ,

    n o t t o e t h i c s , a e s t h e t i c s , r e l i g i o n a n d t h e m e a n i n g o f l i f e . S o

    w h a t W i t t g e n s t e i n d e s c r i b e s t o R u s s e l l a s o n l y a c o r o l l a r y t o

    h i s m a i n p o i n t w a s , i n f a c t , t h e o r i g i n o f t h e d i s t i n c t i o n . T h e

    e x t e n s i o n o f t h e d i s t i n c t i o n t o t h e s e o t h e r a r e a s o c c u r r e d t o

    W i t t g e n s t e i n a b o u t t w o y e a r s l a t e r , w h e n , w h i l e h g h t i n g f o r

    t h e A u s t r i a n a r m y o n t h e R u s s i a n F r o n t , h e c o n t i n u e d t o

    w o r k o n h i s b o o k .

    W i t t g e n s t e i n s c o n c e p t i o n o f t h e b o o k h e w a s w r i t i n g

    c h a n g e d c o n s i d e r a b l y d u r i n g t h e F i r s t W o r l d W a r . B e f o r e

    t h e w a r , h e c o n s i d e r e d h i m s e l f t o b e p r e p a r i n g a w o r k o n

    l o g i c ; a f t e r i t , h e c o n s i d e r e d h i m s e l f t o h a v e w r i t t e n a

    b o o k , t h e c e n t r a l p o i n t o f w h i c h w a s f u n d a m e n t a l l y e t h i c a l .

    I n a l e t t e r t o a p r o s p e c t i v e p u b l i s h e r , L u d w i g v o n F i c k e r ,

    W i t t g e n s t e i n w a r n e d t h a t t h e b o o k w a s d i f f i c u l t t o u n d e r

    s t a n d a n d t h a t v o n F i c k e r w o u l d m o s t p r o b a b l y n o t

    u n d e r s t a n d i t b e c a u s e t h e c o n t e n t w i l l b e s t r a n g e t o y o u .

    B u t , h e a d d e d :

    In reality, it isnt strange to you, for the point of the book is

    ethical. I once wanted to give a few words in the foreword

    which now are actually not in it, which, however, I'll write

    to you now because they might be a key for you: I wanted

    to write that my work consists of two parts: of the one

    which is here, and of everything which I have notwritten.

    And precisely this second part is the important one. For the

    Ethical is delimited from within, as it were, by my book;

  • 8/10/2019 Ray Monk - How to Read Wittgenstein (2005)

    30/122

    CLEARING UP PHILOSOPHY IN THREE WORDS 23

    and Im convinced that, strictlyspeaking, it can ONLY be

    delimited in this way. In brief, I think: All of that which

    manyare babblingtoday, I have defined in my book byremaining silent about it. Therefore the book will, unless

    Im quite wrong, have much to say which you want to say

    yourself, but perhaps you won't notice that it is said in it.

    For the time being, Id recommend that you read the fore

    word and the conclusion since these express the point

    most directly.

    T h i s s e e m s t o c o n n e c t w i t h W i t t g e n s t e i n s r e m a r k s t o

    R u s s e l l a b o u t t h e m a i n p o i n t o f t h e b o o k . I t s m a i n p o i n t

    i s t o a n s w e r t h e c a r d i n a l p r o b l e m o f p h i l o s o p h y , i . e . , t h e

    q u e s t i o n o f w h e r e t h e l i m i t s o f e x p r e s s i b i l i t y l i e . I n g i v i n g

    w h a t h e t h o u g h t w a s a d e f i n i t i v e l y a n d u n a s s a i l a b l y t r u e

    a n s w e r t o t h a t q u e s t i o n , W i t t g e n s t e i n c o n s i d e r e d h i m s e l f

    t o h a v e c l e a r e d u p a l l p r o b l e m s o f p h i l o s o p h y , a n d , i n p a r t i c

    u l a r , t o h a v e d e f i n e d t h e r e a l m o f t h e e t h i c a l . I n b o t h l o g i c

    a n d e t h i c s , t h e c e n t r a l p o i n t i s t h e s a m e a n d c a n b e s u m m e d

    u p i n t h e s e n t e n c e t h a t o c c u r s t w i c e i n t h e b o o k , o n c e i n t h e

    p r e f a c e a n d a g a i n a s t h e f i n a l s e n t e n c e : W h e r e o f o n e c a n n o t

    s p e a k t h e r e o f o n e m u s t b e s i l e n t .

    I n i t s f i n a l f o r m , t h e n , T r a c ta tu s L o g ic o - P h il o s o p h ic u s i s a c u r i

    o u s h y b r i d o f a b o o k , a t r e a t i s e o n l o g i c a n d t h e e x p r e s s i o n o f

    a d e e p l y m y s t i c a l p o i n t o f v i e w . A t t h e e n d o f 1 9 1 9 , R u s s e l l ,

    w h o h a d n o t s e e n W i t t g e n s t e i n f o r s i x y e a r s , s p e n t a w e e k i n

    H o l l a n d w i t h h i m i n o r d e r t o g o t h r o u g h t h e T r a c t a t u s l i n e b y

    l i n e . H e w a s s h o c k e d a t t h e t r a n s f o r m a t i o n i n h i s d r e a m s t u

    d e n t b r o u g h t a b o u t b y h i s e x p e r i e n c e s i n t h e w a r . I h a d f e l t

    i n h i s b o o k . a f l a v o u r o f m y s t i c i s m , h e w r o t e t o O t t o l i n e

    M o r r e l l :

  • 8/10/2019 Ray Monk - How to Read Wittgenstein (2005)

    31/122

    24 CLEARING UP PHILOSOPHY IN THREE WORDS

    . . . but was astonished when I found he has become a

    complete mystic. He reads people like Kierkegaard and

    Angelus Silesius, and he seriously contemplates becoming

    a monk. It all started from William Jamess Varieties of

    Religious Experience, and grew (not unnaturally) during

    the winter he spent alone in Norway before the war, when

    he was nearly mad. Then during the war a curious thing

    happened. He went on duty to the town of Tarnov in

    Galicia, and happened to come upon a bookshop, which,

    however, seemed to contain nothing but picture postcards.However, he went inside and found that it contained just

    one book: Tolstoy on the Gospels. He bought it merely

    because there was no other. He read it and re-read it, and

    thenceforth had it always with him, under fire and at all

    times. But on the whole he likes Tolstoy less than

    Dostoewski (especially Karamazov). He has penetrated

    deep into mystical ways of thought and feeling, but I think

    (though he wouldnt agree) that what he likes best in mys

    ticism is its power to make him stop thinking.

    D u r i n g t h e w a r , a t t h e v e r y t i m e t h a t h i s w o r k w a s b r o a d

    e n i n g o u t f r o m l o g i c t o e t h i c s , r e l i g i o n a n d t h e m e a n i n g o f

    l i f e , W i t t g e n s t e i n m a d e a c l o s e f r i e n d w h o w a s a s s y m p a

    t h e t i c t o a n d e n t h u s i a s t i c a b o u t W i t t g e n s t e i n s m y s t i c i s m

    a s R u s s e l l h a d b e e n e a r l i e r a b o u t h i s l o g i c . H i s n a m e w a s

    P a u l E n g e l m a n n . A f t e r W i t t g e n s t e i n s d e a t h , E n g e l m a n n

    p u b l i s h e d h i s c o r r e s p o n d e n c e w i t h W i t t g e n s t e i n , t o g e t h e r

    w i t h a m e m o i r . H i s m o t i v e i n p u b l i s h i n g t h e s e t h i n g s w a s t o

    e n c o u r a g e a r e a d i n g o f t h e T r a c t a t u s t h a t g a v e a s m u c h , o r

    m o r e , w e i g h t t o i t s m y s t i c i s m a s t o i t s t h e o r y o f l o g i c . A b o u t

    R u s s e l l s i n t r o d u c t i o n t o t h e b o o k , E n g e l m a n n w r o t e : [ I t ]

    m a y b e c o n s i d e r e d o n e o f t h e m a i n r e a s o n s w h y t h e b o o k ,

  • 8/10/2019 Ray Monk - How to Read Wittgenstein (2005)

    32/122

    CLEARING UP PHILOSOPHY IN THREE WORDS 25

    t h o u g h r e c o g n i z e d t o t h i s d a y a s a n e v e n t o f d e c i s i v e i m p o r

    t a n c e i n t h e f i e l d o f l o g i c , h a s f a i l e d t o m a k e i t s e l f u n d e r s t o o d

    a s a p h i l o s o p h i c a l w o r k i n t h e w i d e r s e n s e .

    W i t t g e n s t e i n s c o r r e s p o n d e n c e w i t h E n g e l m a n n d o e s

    i n d e e d h e l p o n e t o u n d e r s t a n d h i s m y s t i c i s m . F o r e x a m p l e , i n

    A p r i l 1 9 1 7 , E n g e l m a n n s e n t W i t t g e n s t e i n a p o e m b y U h l a n d

    c a l l e d C o u n t E b e r h a r d s H a w t h o r n , w h i c h , v e r y s i m p l y a n d

    w i t h o u t a n y e m b e l l i s h m e n t , d r a w i n g o f m o r a l s o r e v e n c o m

    m e n t , t e l l s t h e s t o r y o f a s o l d i e r w h o , w h i l e o n c r u s a d e , c u t s

    a s p r a y f r o m a h a w t h o r n b u s h , w h i c h , w h e n h e r e t u r n s h o m e ,

    h e p l a n t s i n h i s g a r d e n . I n o l d a g e , h e s i t s b e n e a t h t h e s h a d e

    o f t h e f u l l y g r o w n h a w t h o r n t r e e , w h i c h s e r v e s a s a r e m i n d e r

    o f h i s y o u t h . A l m o s t a l l o t h e r p o e m s , E n g e l m a n n w r o t e t o

    W i t t g e n s t e i n , a t t e m p t t o e x p r e s s t h e i n e x p r e s s i b l e ; h e r e t h a t

    i s n o t a t t e m p t e d , a n d p r e c i s e l y b e c a u s e o f t h a t i t i s a c h i e v e d .

    W i t t g e n s t e i n a g r e e d . T h e p o e m , h e s a i d , w a s r e a l l y m a g

    n i f i c e n t . . . A n d t h i s i s h o w i t is : i f o n l y y o u d o n o t t r y t o

    u t t e r w h a t is u n u t t e r a b l e t h e n n o t h i n g g e t s l o s t . B u t t h e u n u t

    t e r a b l e w i l l b e - u n u t t e r a b l y - c o n t a i n e d i n w h a t h a s b e e n

    u t t e r e d !

    T h i s c l e a r l y b e c a m e W i t t g e n s t e i n s i d e a l : t o c o m m u n i c a t e

    t h e i n e x p r e s s i b l e b y n o t a t t e m p t i n g t o e x p r e s s i t . A t t h e e n d o f

    t h e T r a c t a t u s , i n b e t w e e n t h e t w o r e m a r k s a l r e a d y q u o t e d

    o n e t o t h e e f f e c t t h a t t h e i n e x p r e s s i b l e s h o r n i t s e l f a n d t h e

    o t h e r t o t h e e f f e c t t h a t t h e p r o p o s i t i o n s i n t h e T r a c t a tu s a r e

    n o n s e n s e a n d t o b e t r e a t e d l i k e a l a d d e r w h i c h o n e k i c k s a w a y

    a f t e r o n e h a s u s e d i t - i s t h e f o l l o w i n g r e m a r k a b o u t h o w ,

    s t r i c t l y s p e a k i n g , p h i l o s o p h y o u g h t t o b e d o n e :

    The right method of philosophy would be this. To say

    nothing except what can be said, i.e., the propositions of

    natural science, i.e., something that has nothing to do with

  • 8/10/2019 Ray Monk - How to Read Wittgenstein (2005)

    33/122

    26 CLEARING UP PHILOSOPHY IN THREE WORDS

    philosophy: and then always, when someone else wished to

    say something metaphysical, to demonstrate to him that he

    had given no meaning to certain signs in his propositions.

    This method would be unsatisfying to the other - he would

    not have the feeling that we were teaching him philoso

    phy - but it would be the only strictly correct method.

    I t w o u l d s e e m t o f o l l o w f r o m t h i s t h a t , i f o n e f o l l o w e d t h e

    r i g h t m e t h o d o f p h i l o s o p h y , t h e n i t w o u l d s i m p l y b e i m p o s

    s i b l e t o w r i t e a b o o k o f p h i l o s o p h y . S u c h a b o o k w o u l d

    b e l i k e t h e s e c o n d p a r t o f t h e T r a c ta tu s a s d e s c r i b e d b y

    W i t t g e n s t e i n t o v o n F i c k e r , t h e i m p o r t a n t p a r t c o n s i s t i n g o f

    e v e r y t h i n g h e h a d n o t w r i t t e n . I t w o u l d , i n o t h e r w o r d s , n o t

    e x i s t . T h e E r s t p a r t o f t h e b o o k , h o w e v e r , t h e p a r t h e d i d

    w r i t e , c l e a r l y d o e s n o t c o n f o r m t o w h a t h e d e s c r i b e s h e r e a s

    t h e r i g h t m e t h o d o f p h i l o s o p h y . A r e w e t o r e g a r d h i m , t h e n ,

    a s j u s t s t r a i g h t f o r w a r d l y i n c o n s i s t e n t a b o u t h o w ( a n d w h e t h e r )

    p h i l o s o p h y s h o u l d b e w r i t t e n ?

    I s W i t t g e n s t e i n , i n o t h e r w o r d s , c o m p r o m i s i n g h i s i d e a l

    w h e n h e w r i t e s a n y t h i n g i n p h i l o s o p h y ? I f p h i l o s o p h y , l i k e

    l o g i c a n d e t h i c s , b e l o n g s t o t h e i n e x p r e s s i b l e , s h o u l d h e n o t

    c o n f o r m t o t h e a d v i c e g i v e n t w i c e i n t h e b o o k a n d r e m a i n

    s i l e n t a b o u t i t ? T h e m o t t o W i t t g e n s t e i n c h o s e f o r t h e b o o k i s

    a q u o t a t i o n f r o m t h e p o e t K i i r n b e r g e r : * . . . a n d a n y t h i n g a

    m a n k n o w s , a n y t h i n g h e h a s n o t m e r e l y h e a r d r u m b l i n g a n d

    r o a r i n g , c a n b e s a i d i n t h r e e w o r d s . B u t , i n t h e c a s e o f t h e

    i n e x p r e s s i b l e , s u r e l y , e v e n t h r e e w o r d s a r e t o o m a n y S h o u l d

    w e n o t , m u s t w e n o t , r e f r a i n f r o m u s i n g a n y w o r d s a t a ll ?

    W e l l , t h e p o e m b y U h l a n d t h a t w a s s o a d m i r e d b y

    E n g e l m a n n a n d W i t t g e n s t e i n d o e s , a f t e r a l l , c o n t a i n s o m e

    w o r d s . O n l y t h o s e w o r d s a r e n o t a b o u t t h e m e a n i n g o f l i f e ;

    t h e y a r e a b o u t C o u n t E b e r h a r d a n d h i s h a w t h o r n t r e e . A n d

  • 8/10/2019 Ray Monk - How to Read Wittgenstein (2005)

    34/122

    CLEARING UP PHILOSOPHY IN THREE WORDS 27

    y e t , E n g e l m a n n a n d W i t t g e n s t e i n a p p e a r e d t o b e l i e v e , p r e

    c i s e l y b e c a u s e n o t h i n g d i r e c t l y w a s s a i d i n t h e p o e m a b o u t i t s

    d e e p e r m e a n i n g , t h a t i t m a n a g e d t o c o n v e y a n i n e x p r e s s i b l e

    t r u t h a b o u t t h e n a t u r e o f l i f e . W i t t g e n s t e i n o n c e w r o t e : I

    t h i n k I s u m m e d u p m y a t t i t u d e t o p h i l o s o p h y w h e n I s a i d :

    p h i l o s o p h y o u g h t r e a l l y t o b e w r i t t e n o n l y a s a p o e t i c c o m p o s i

    t i o n ! H i s a d m i r a t i o n f o r U h l a n d s p o e m , I t h i n k , g i v e s u s a

    c l u e a s t o w h a t h e h a d i n m i n d . I f p h i l o s o p h i c a l u n d e r s t a n d

    i n g i s t o b e c o n v e y e d , t h e n i t c a n n o t b e i n t h e s a m e w a y t h a t

    s c i e n t i f i c k n o w l e d g e i s c o n v e y e d - i . e . , s t a t e d d i r e c t l y i n l i t e r a l

    l a n g u a g e - i t m u s t b e t h r o u g h s o m e t h i n g m o r e a n a l o g o u s t o

    p o e t r y . T h e p h i l o s o p h e r h a s t o