RATIONALISING HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS TO IMPROVE HEALTH OUTCOMES Public Health Services...

26
RATIONALISING HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS TO IMPROVE HEALTH OUTCOMES Public Health Services Queensland Health Australia 1998-2000

Transcript of RATIONALISING HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS TO IMPROVE HEALTH OUTCOMES Public Health Services...

Page 1: RATIONALISING HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS TO IMPROVE HEALTH OUTCOMES Public Health Services Queensland Health Australia 1998-2000.

RATIONALISING HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS TO

IMPROVE HEALTH OUTCOMES

Public Health ServicesQueensland Health

Australia1998-2000

Page 2: RATIONALISING HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS TO IMPROVE HEALTH OUTCOMES Public Health Services Queensland Health Australia 1998-2000.

Dr Magnolia Cardona Coordinating EpidemiologistMB.BS, MPH, Grad DAE, CHEcon

Page 3: RATIONALISING HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS TO IMPROVE HEALTH OUTCOMES Public Health Services Queensland Health Australia 1998-2000.

Objectives of this lecture

Provide an overview of information system types and potential uses

Increase awareness on need to balance amount of data with cost and confidentiality concerns

Present case scenarios to set up and enhance information systems

Page 4: RATIONALISING HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS TO IMPROVE HEALTH OUTCOMES Public Health Services Queensland Health Australia 1998-2000.

Characteristics of Good Health Surveillance Systems

Clear objectives • administration

• routine documentation

• monitoring

• research/evaluation

Simple (MDS)Standard item formatJustification and validation of items

Page 5: RATIONALISING HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS TO IMPROVE HEALTH OUTCOMES Public Health Services Queensland Health Australia 1998-2000.

Characteristics of Good Health Surveillance Systems (cont)

•Relevant to users•Minimum burden to providers•Amenable to modification•Provision for security/confidentiality•Associated reporting system •Feedback to collectors•Linked to action

Page 6: RATIONALISING HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS TO IMPROVE HEALTH OUTCOMES Public Health Services Queensland Health Australia 1998-2000.

Options

•Paper-based centralised

•Sentinel/selected surveillance

•Computerised stand alone

•Single site

•Multicentre

Page 7: RATIONALISING HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS TO IMPROVE HEALTH OUTCOMES Public Health Services Queensland Health Australia 1998-2000.

Options

•Computerised networked

•Encrypted data transfer

•Combination

•Paper-based notifications

•electronic entry at central location

Page 8: RATIONALISING HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS TO IMPROVE HEALTH OUTCOMES Public Health Services Queensland Health Australia 1998-2000.

Setting up a Health Information

System

Which option is best?

Page 9: RATIONALISING HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS TO IMPROVE HEALTH OUTCOMES Public Health Services Queensland Health Australia 1998-2000.

SCENARIO: Cholera epidemic in Africa

No routine surveillancePoorly kept clinical recordsUnderstaffed facilitiesUnreliable communicationsNo ongoing fundingNo computers

Page 10: RATIONALISING HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS TO IMPROVE HEALTH OUTCOMES Public Health Services Queensland Health Australia 1998-2000.

Cholera epidemic in Africa

Example of a paper-based system that worked in an endemic area for at least 2 years

Page 11: RATIONALISING HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS TO IMPROVE HEALTH OUTCOMES Public Health Services Queensland Health Australia 1998-2000.

Occupational exposure to bloodborne illnesses among health staff

Hundreds of health facilitiesInfrequent incidentsNon-compulsory recordingNo ongoing fundingConfidentiality issuesCompensation issues

Page 12: RATIONALISING HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS TO IMPROVE HEALTH OUTCOMES Public Health Services Queensland Health Australia 1998-2000.

Nutritional Status Monitoring in a remote indigenous community

Routine surveillance of some conditionsSomehow comprehensive clinical recordsServices staffed by communityUnreliable communicationsSome funding availableSome computers usable

Page 13: RATIONALISING HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS TO IMPROVE HEALTH OUTCOMES Public Health Services Queensland Health Australia 1998-2000.

•How the data will be collected•How the data will be used•Who will have access to the data•Confidentiality issues•Perceived discrimination•Financial implications

Major stakeholder’s concerns

Page 14: RATIONALISING HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS TO IMPROVE HEALTH OUTCOMES Public Health Services Queensland Health Australia 1998-2000.

Indigenous Community Health

Computerised systemEasy front-endComplete patient information (alias/residence)Promotes opportunistic P.H. actionCapability for health worker plans Population based reporting systemGenerates customised prevalence/incidence

Page 15: RATIONALISING HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS TO IMPROVE HEALTH OUTCOMES Public Health Services Queensland Health Australia 1998-2000.

Burden of depression at Medical Practitioners rooms

Non-standard recording practices ? Availability of clinical recordsBusy medical practicesVariable communication systemsLow computer coverageEthical issuesIncentives required for doctors

Page 16: RATIONALISING HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS TO IMPROVE HEALTH OUTCOMES Public Health Services Queensland Health Australia 1998-2000.

Doctors-based Sentinel Surveillance

•Enables documentation of non-hospital data•Burden of disease measurement•Paper-based with weekly notifications•Limited patient information & # conditions•Selected Locations (self-selected doctors)•Inability to calculate prevalence/incidence

Page 17: RATIONALISING HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS TO IMPROVE HEALTH OUTCOMES Public Health Services Queensland Health Australia 1998-2000.

Example of project to maximise efficiency of existing health

information systems

Real case scenario

Page 18: RATIONALISING HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS TO IMPROVE HEALTH OUTCOMES Public Health Services Queensland Health Australia 1998-2000.

Improve health outcomes through enhancement of

Public Health information systems

Aim

Page 19: RATIONALISING HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS TO IMPROVE HEALTH OUTCOMES Public Health Services Queensland Health Australia 1998-2000.

Objectives High quality /timely data Minimise duplication/cost Standard coding practices Common table structures Common operating environment Shared hardware Data Linkage

Page 20: RATIONALISING HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS TO IMPROVE HEALTH OUTCOMES Public Health Services Queensland Health Australia 1998-2000.

Inventory of DatabasesPurpose/Scope /ContentsSize/AccessibilityOperating system/server/interfaceData tablesRemote access/re-developmentSpecial requirementsStaff involved

Page 21: RATIONALISING HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS TO IMPROVE HEALTH OUTCOMES Public Health Services Queensland Health Australia 1998-2000.

Integration Protocols

Hardware /softwareData definitions {NHDD}Reference tablesData Entry & TransferSecurity /Confidentiality

Page 22: RATIONALISING HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS TO IMPROVE HEALTH OUTCOMES Public Health Services Queensland Health Australia 1998-2000.

Working Group Discuss IT requirements Re/development experience Security Principles Sharing of reference tables Integration protocols Recommendations

Page 23: RATIONALISING HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS TO IMPROVE HEALTH OUTCOMES Public Health Services Queensland Health Australia 1998-2000.

Network (WAN, LAN)

Platforms (hardware)

Database (execute instructions)

Data use (structure)

User interface

Business LevelsIntegration

Page 24: RATIONALISING HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS TO IMPROVE HEALTH OUTCOMES Public Health Services Queensland Health Australia 1998-2000.

Business

Interface

Data use

Database

Platforms

Network

*BSR PSR Lead *NOCs VIVAS *MODDs

Page 25: RATIONALISING HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS TO IMPROVE HEALTH OUTCOMES Public Health Services Queensland Health Australia 1998-2000.

How does this improve Health Outcomes?

Outbreak response/timingImmunisation ratesPrescription controlStandard Indigenous identifiersEarly cancer detection\QA

Page 26: RATIONALISING HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS TO IMPROVE HEALTH OUTCOMES Public Health Services Queensland Health Australia 1998-2000.

SummaryRelevance & cost-effectivenessConsultation with users and data

holdersFinancial considerationsEthical implicationsUltimate goal to improve health