Rational Astrology you tell me your date of birth, the place of birth and the precise time of birth...
Transcript of Rational Astrology you tell me your date of birth, the place of birth and the precise time of birth...
For those who are willing to approach any subject rationally,
that is, neither being blindly in favor nor hysterically against…
This is a view from the middle, neither black nor white, but in
shades of gray.
Day 1
Welcome! You just walked in on a conversation between Mr Skeptic
and Ms Believer. Maybe you already know a fair deal about the
topic of their discussion; maybe you know nothing at all. Either way,
you are here because you are curious about what they are speaking.
Yes? – Perhaps, a little curious? No, curiosity isn’t such a bad thing
after all – not for cats, neither for humans. It has yielded us
centuries of progress, for good or for bad. So let us join them
without further ado, making a mental note to suspend our
opinions, keeping aside the little biases and prejudices that we all
carry, until we have heard them out.
S So you are an astrologer – one of those who can read my life
and predict what’s going to happen to me tomorrow?
B Actually, no one can really predict your future – not me, not
any other astrologer, no one. The idea that the future can be
precisely foretold implies one of two things – that either I
can read your mind, so I know what you are going to do, or
that you are a dummy, a puppet, sitting helplessly while
someone or something (a supernatural power or fate or what
you will) pulling strings does things to you or makes you act
in a pre-determined manner, willingly or unwillingly – and
both are false as far as we know. There is no evidence that
telepathy (mind reading) works, so relax, your private
thoughts are safe with you. Equally well, there is no evidence
of a supernatural power running (or ruining) your life for
you. Indeed, if I were stupid enough to venture a prediction,
it would be quite easy for you to prove me wrong. For
instance, if I were to predict that you would be out traveling
tomorrow, all you need do is lock yourself up at home and
stoutly refuse to set foot outside your door. And there! Or, if
you prefer the macabre, I could predict a long life for you
and just to prove me wrong you could walk into a busy
expressway.
S Ha, ha! No, thank you. But I am glad that for an astrologer you
seem to be debunking astrology.
B Not really. Let me give you a real-life anecdote. A friend’s
father had been warned by his astrologer that he faced the
risk of drowning in the near future. The gentleman was
traveling on work and had to cross a river by ferry. The
crossing would take less than an hour. The alternative was a
winding mountain road that would take 18 hours. As the
ferry was about to set off, the astrologer’s words came to
him, and he insisted on getting off and taking the road. His
two colleagues were reluctant but finally agreed and they
disembarked with their luggage. The ferry left and shortly
after, within their range of vision, it sank and everyone
aboard perished. So, when an astrologer “makes a
prediction,” she is only telling you what possibly lies ahead;
the decisions are all yours. There are those who attack
astrology by claiming that making predictions means that
everything is preordained and hence implies that there is no
place for free will. They are completely off course. Just as you
seek a financial planner’s advice before investing in the stock
market, you could get an astrologer’s counsel before taking
decisions about your life. So you can call me a life planner if
you wish. And just as there are folks who play the stock
market without expert advice, you could run your life without
a life planner. Either way, the decisions are yours and yours
alone. Astrology does not displace free will.
S And you claim you can plan my life and forewarn me of dangers
lurking ahead by looking at the stars?
B Kind of, but we will qualify that later. What matters
is the position of the planets at the moment of
your birth. If you tell me your date of birth, the
place of birth and the precise time of birth (within
a couple of minutes either way), I can draw up
your astrological chart (also called a horoscope).
Actually, you could do that yourself using any
software freely available on the web. It will show
you the positions of the planets, roughly along a
plane called the ecliptic plane, in terms of their
angular position given by an angle between 0 and
360 degrees. Mind you, this is just plain, simple
astronomy1 – there are no two ways about it. And
you can have your horoscope. What does the
horoscope signify? Let me give you an analogy.
Imagine a car rally where you turn up with your
own car. The organizers give you a map of your
route – the map shows you the ups and downs,
the highs and the lows, the easy stretches and the
bad patches. The horoscope is the route map of
your life. It marks out what you may expect at
critical junctures of your life. You can choose to
junk it and take the rally as it comes, or you can
get an astrologer to help you navigate. The choice
is yours.
S Whoa! This raises so many questions. Looks like everyone born
on the same date, at the same place, and about the same time
will have a common route map. So by comparing their
experiences it should be possible to verify or disprove your
statement.
B Yes, but remember that the horoscope does not uniquely
determine the future. The car you are driving (your family
and upbringing) and the driver (yourself) also matter. Even if
two persons have the same horoscope, the values they
imbibe and the experiences they have as they grow up
influence them and their decisions later in life. Even in the
case of twins, with the same family and if you assume an
identical upbringing, though they may have shared
experiences as children, as they grow up and begin to take
their own decisions, obviously their lives will diverge.
Astrology takes a holistic view of life including nature,
nurture and free will.
S At this rate, I wonder if you can make any astrological prediction
at all. Yet you insist on calling astrology a science… After all, the
hallmark of science is the ability to make verifiable predictions.
B For starters, personally, I am not too concerned about
whether astrology is called a science or not. But let me take
the bait. You will agree that not all the sciences are the same.
Yes, with some of the natural sciences, one can make 1 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ecliptic
predictions and verify them by repeatable experiments. But
as the number of elements involved in the phenomenon
increases, as the complexity of their interactions increases,
and as the uncertainty of our knowledge about them and
about external factors that affect them increases, predictions
become increasingly difficult. For example, the weather. Yet
we talk of climate science. The engineering sciences are full
of probabilities and empirical models that we don’t really
understand, but we use them because “they work.” Once you
come to sciences dealing with living organisms, predictions
become even rarer. For instance, here is a quote from This is
Biology, The Science of the Living World by Ernst Mayr
(1997): "Predictions in biology are at best probabilistic,
owing to the great variability of most biological phenomena
and owing to the occurrence of contingencies and
multiplicity of interacting factors that affect the course of
events. For the biologist, it is not so important that his
theory survive the test of prediction, it is more important
that his theory is useful in solving problems." Predictions are
of even lesser importance in medical science – no one goes
to a doctor to hear her prediction, they just want to get
cured. Predictions are almost impossible when dealing with
an intelligent human mind – think of psychology, a science.
And if dealing with a single human mind was not daunting
enough, consider the sciences that deal with the masses –
social sciences, political science, and economics. In my
personal opinion, an astrologer’s “prediction” has a better
shot at turning out right than an economist’s. Notice how
two doctors or two economists can legitimately disagree on
the correct course of treatment of a patient or a financial
crisis, and there is often no way to settle the issue but to wait
it out. If you insist, I would place astrology as a science
roughly at par with psychology.
S Be that as it may. You claim to draw up a route map of my life
based on the position of the planets at the time of my birth. But
scientists have clearly said that there is no way in which the
planets can affect any of us living here on Earth. So there is no
scientific basis for astrology.
B Well, firstly astrology does not claim that the planets directly
influence our lives. Frankly, we don’t know, and if we did in
the past, that knowledge has been lost. So right now we can
think of the planetary positions as a model that enables us
to calculate your life’s route map. Finding a scientific basis is
going to need research and possibly collaboration between
astrologers, natural scientists and medical experts. Secondly,
it is not as if scientists have all the answers about their own
fields. By their own admission, over 95% of the matter in the
universe is not accounted for, and the best we have so far is
a wildly speculative story about dark matter and dark energy
without a pinch of evidence. Besides when scientists claim
that there is no known cosmic effect on humans, they are
being economical with the truth. The fact is that there are
interactions; it is just that they do not know much about the
effects yet. For instance, it is known that every second we are
being bombarded by billions of neutrinos from the sun (solar
neutrinos) and from outer space (cosmic neutrinos). These
are tiny particles that were assumed to be mass-less and
appeared to pass through all matter without any interaction,
but some years ago it was discovered that they do possess a
very tiny mass, and hence must interact even if feebly with
other matter. There may be other effects that we have never
figured out so far. So to conclude in haste that there is no
cosmic or solar effect on our life is premature and frankly
unscientific.
S Wow! You seem to be well informed about scientific matters,
though I doubt whether your argument will cut any ice with the
scientific community.
B As scientists, we are supposed to think rationally. Before we
accept or disclaim anything, we are required to examine the
evidence impartially and draw our own conclusions
objectively. Just as I have read, listened to and thought
about other disciplines at length, one would expect other
scientists to make an honest attempt to appraise astrology
before making up their minds. Sadly most of them seem to
succumb to the peer pressure to berate astrology even as
they remain totally ignorant about it. I suppose it is
fashionable in some scientific circles to sneer at astrology,
but it would be nice to see less arrogance and more humility,
less prejudice and more rationality.
S But, you know, people have conducted scientific studies and
shown that astrology does not pass the test.
B By the same token, I could collect a bunch of scientists and
set them a problem to solve. If the majority of them fail, I
could conclude that the science itself was flawed. How much
sense does that make? Or give a doctor a bunch of blood
test reports and ask her to predict how many of them would
die of cancer. If she doesn’t hit bull’s eye (which is very
likely), I could conclude that blood tests were worthless. Bad
science unfortunately is all too common. It would be so
much nicer if these scientists actually bothered to
understand astrology before passing judgment. For all you
know, they may find a hint or a clue that might show them a
way out of an impasse in their own field.
S I would be very surprised if any of them were to take up your
invitation. I am not too convinced either right now but I am
sufficiently intrigued by what you say to want to learn more. Can
you recommend some reading for me? And I hope to meet you
again after I am more ‘literate’ in your subject.
B That’s nice. I don’t expect you to jump ship so soon, but just
to keep an open mind. I would recommend the books by the
famous Indian astrologer, B V Raman, but, mind you, I don’t
blindly accept everything that he says in there. And I will be
glad to meet with you again and carry this conversation
forward.
Day 2
Another day, another setting, same persona – Mr S, may be a shade
less unbending, and Ms B, perhaps not as strident as earlier.
S Well, I have been reading a lot and thinking quite a bit, but
much of this simply does not make sense to me. I am happier
dealing with numbers but there is no math in here at all.
B Ha, ha! That can soon be rectified. Let us start by
cutting up the ecliptic plane into boxes of 30
degrees each – that is, 12 boxes in all. You don’t
really need to do this, but it is a convenience. Here
we are, 12 boxes, all marked with the angle in
degrees, from 0 to 330. 360 degrees brings us
back to 0. Now we ink in the location of the
planets between 0 and 360 degrees at the
moment of your birth as seen from the place
where you were born.
S I am not sure I am ready to let you unravel my secrets yet. Why
don’t we work with a friend’s horoscope instead?
B That’s somewhat like taking a friend’s blood test
report to a doctor and asking her for a diagnosis.
Anyway, let’s humor you for now. You need to tell
me the location of the 5 planets – Mercury, Venus,
Mars, Jupiter, and Saturn – and the Sun, the
Moon, and the lunar nodes 2 (called Rahu and
Ketu). That’s 8 of them in all, since Ra and Ke are
always diametrically opposite each other.
S What about Uranus and Neptune? And I thought Rahu and Ketu
were mythological.
B My guess is that the visible 7 – Su, Mo, Me, Ve, Ma, Ju, Sa –
are the dominant factors. Everything else – the outer planets,
dwarf planets, satellites, meteors, comets, and the rest – is
lumped into a “correction term” which is placed at the lunar
nodes. If true, this would be a lovely ancient application of a
classical mathematical technique. I think this basic construct
2 www.earthview.com/images/46-600.jpg
predates religion and mythology – those I suspect were built
around this at a later date.
S Who knows? Anyway, here are the 8 planets and their angular
positions in degrees.
B OK, thanks. Now I have placed them in the correct
boxes along the ecliptic plane. Notice that Ve and
Mo are very close together; in fact, less than a
degree apart. Me and Su are pretty close together
too. Generally, planets within 5-7 degrees of each
other can be considered to have strongly paired
up. Ju is just over 12 degrees away from the Ke-Ra
axis, so we can take that to be a weak pairing. Ma
and Sa are separately on their own. That gives you
a general idea of the layout of the planets in this
horoscope.
S And that lets you draw conclusions about this person? I must
say it all sounds rather weird.
S Hold your horses and soon all will be revealed.
Next I must tell you that the planets are classified
as naturally benefic and naturally malefic. What
this means is that by themselves some of them
suggest good and some indicate bad. But their
benefic or malefic nature can get modified by
other factors which we shall see later. Ju, Mo, and
Ve are the natural benefics whereas Sa, Ma, and
Su are naturally malefic. Me may be taken as
naturally neutral. Ra and Ke are benefic, malefic or
neutral depending on their position. The boxes
where Ra/Ke are benefic (green), malefic (red) or
neutral (white) are marked alongside. In your
friend’s case, the location of Ra in green and Ke in
red means Ra is benefic and Ke is malefic. You can
call this the base state or the starting point – your
pal starts off with 4 benefics, 4 malefics and 1
neutral planet. Then we build on this start.
S What next?
B Next we need to judge the strength of the
planets given their arrangement in a
particular horoscope. There are 4 factors
which go into judging the strength of each
planet. The first of these is their position
along the ecliptic. Each planet has certain
positions where it is strong and others
where it is weak. There may also be some
positions where it is neither weak nor
strong. The chart shows the strong
positions for each planet in Green and weak
positions in Red. Unmarked positions are
neither weak nor strong. The positions for
Ke are just the reverse of that for Ra, so
they are not separately shown.
S And is there some kind of logic to
decide these strong and weak positions?
B May be there is but I have never
come across it so far. It would
certainly be an interesting topic for
research. Let’s figure out the
positional strengths of the planets
for your friend. Green is strong, red is
weak, and a blank is neither.
Planet Positional
Strength
Conjunction Aspects Others
(Flanking, etc.)
Ju
Mo
Ve
Ra
Me
Ke
Su
Ma
Sa
S Why don’t you use numbers instead of these buttons, +1 for
Green and -1 in place of Red? All these colored buttons makes it
look like a marketing survey or an airport departure information
screen.
B Ha, ha! That will sure make engineers like you happy but I
would like to make this accessible to a much larger audience.
Besides once you tire of engineering and go into
management, guess what you will be sticking up on your
charts! Still, if you like, we can start using half-circles for
lesser effects and full circles for more significant effects.
S Well, that’s a deal. But how did you figure out I am an engineer?
B Obviously you are not a scientist or you would have had
existential issues in even talking with me. So I figured you
were the lesser of the two evils – an engineer! Plenty smart,
aren’t I?
S Yeah, very smart for an astrologer. Shall we continue with the
class, ma’am?
B Right, next we look for strength or weakness due to
conjunction – the close association of two or more planets.
In general, hanging around with a good planet brings
strength and the company of a malefic planet makes one
weak. Common sense, huh? We can give full circles to
conjunctions within 5-7 degrees of each other, and anything
more than that up to 13-15 degrees gets a part circle. So, in
case of your friend, Mo and Ve gain by each other’s
company, Me loses by being too close to Su, and Ju is partly
affected by association with Ke, whereas Ke partly gains by
having Ju nearby. So, here’s the updated chart.
Planet Positional
Strength
Conjunction Aspects Others
(Flanking, etc.)
Ju Ke
Mo Ve
Ve Mo
Ra
Me Su
Ke Ju
Su
Ma
Sa
S All right, this is beginning to look interesting. What’s next?
B Next, we consider aspects – most planets “look at” others
that lie diametrically opposite them, but some planets have
additional aspects. This chart lists all of them. Ra and Ke
have no aspect.
Planet Acute aspect 180 deg aspect Obtuse aspect
Su, Mo, Me, Ve No Yes No Sa 60° Yes 270° Ma 90° Yes 210° Ju 120° Yes 240°
Again, we don’t really know the basis for this. As in the case
of conjunctions, aspects that are bang on (say, within 5-7
degrees) get a full circle, and grazing aspects (more than
that and up to 13-15 degrees) get a part circle. Aspect of
benefics gives strength and aspect by a malefic makes one
weak. So, this is how your friend’s chart looks after we have
added the aspects in. Also we consider other effects, such as
flanking, for instance. A planet that is flanked by two
benefics on either side gains strength. Likewise, a planet
flanked by malefics becomes weak, e.g., Su, Me gain by
being flanked by Ve-Mo and Ju. There may be some other
effects that we have ignored, but this is good enough for
now.
Planet Positional
Strength
Conjunction Aspects Others
(Flanking, etc.)
Ju Ke Sa
Mo Ve
Ve Mo
Ra Ju
Me Su Ve-Mo, Ju
Ke Ju
Su Ve-Mo, Ju
Ma
Sa
We can now sum up the effects and move the planets up if
they are strong and down if they are weak, like this. Thus, Ve,
Mo and Su have gained strength, and Ra and Ke are
marginally strong. On the other side, Me, Ma and Sa have
become weak and Ju is marginally weak too. The reasons for
their strength or weakness can be found from the chart with
Green and Red buttons. Also, I have arranged the planets in
terms of the extent of their natural benefic or natural malefic
nature – the ones further to the left in Green are more
benefic and the ones further to the right in Red are more
malefic.
S That seems to have come out quite nicely. But what does it
mean for a planet to be strong or weak?
B Generally speaking, a stronger planet has a greater impact
on a certain facet of one’s life than a weaker planet, provided
both of them influence that particular facet. Also each planet
is a signifier of certain attributes, and the stronger it is, the
better the prospect of that attribute being positive.
S So you are saying that Ve, Mo and Su are the big players in my
friend’s horoscope. But you still cannot say anything definitive
about her at this stage?
B Her (grinning)? No, not yet. You see, we need to consider 5
different inputs before we can draw a conclusion about any
attribute (say, intelligence). Right now, we have only one –
the strength of the signifier. So it is early days yet.
S Fine, thank you. I think I need a break. So shall we call it a day
and schedule another meeting later?
B Sure, I am glad you are still eager to know more. Bye for
now!
Day 3
The same cast of two, but do we sense a thaw in the air?
S Hi! You are looking good today.
B Thanks. That must be afterglow of the morning yoga session.
So, are you ready to analyze your girlfriend’s horoscope?
S Hey! I don’t have a girlfriend, OK? And I am curious to know
what you are up to – all these buttons and still no light at the
end of the tunnel.
B OK, OK. No need to get antsy. I hope you realize that
astrology is serious business, not mumbo-jumbo. Today let
me start by telling you that every planet represents different
attributes. I have listed the key ones here with the strength
or weakness of each planet in case of your friend.
Planet Key attributes Strength/
Weakness
in this case
Ju wisdom (philosophy), progeny,
leadership (spiritual, religious)
Mo mind (emotion, romance), mother, the
seas (as in journeys overseas)
Ve creativity, spouse, bodily pleasures
Ra affliction (accidents), alien (culture,
religion), discovery/invention
Me intelligence, commerce (as in
business/trade), speech
Ke the spiritual, release of the soul
(moksha), lies/deception
Su soul (atma), father, leadership (political)
Ma aggression, siblings, courage
Sa misfortune (injuries, sorrows), evil
(purpose, thinking), low status
S And you assert that the red button for Me does not imply that
she is stupid?
B Yeah, what’s the hurry? The red button implies that Me is
weak, so for an attribute like intelligence which Me signifies,
its contribution is poor. But there are other players and we
need to evaluate all of them together. Let’s get on with the
job. Next you need to tell me the position of the Ascendant
in her horoscope. The Ascendant is the location of the
eastern horizon on the ecliptic plane at the time of birth.
S All right, here it is.
B Good, and now I add this to the other planets
on the ecliptic, like here. The box with the
Ascendant (As) is numbered ‘1’ and the other
boxes are numbered in a clockwise order as
marked from ‘1’ to ’12’. Each box is called a
house.
S What’s the deal with As? Why does he get to
choose which house is the 1st?
B Well, the As is the fastest guy on the block; he
does a lap of the ecliptic in a day. That is a flat
2 hours per house. As for the others, well here’s
the list. You can see that Mo is the next fastest
taking about a month for 1 lap. The Su takes a
year whereas the outer planets – Ma, Ju, Sa –
take much longer. The lunar nodes, Ra, Ke,
take around 18.5 years to make a lap of the
ecliptic. Ideally speaking, there’s no reason why
we should not consider the other time scales as
well. Which means that we should ideally
analyze each horoscope from different points
of view – one each with As in the 1st house, Mo
in the 1st house, and so on. But that may take
forever. So usually we consider only the two
fastest ones – the As- and the Mo-centric
points of view. And since you are in a hurry, for
your friend, we shall restrict ourselves to the
As.
S Phew! Thank you. Sometimes I wonder if we are ever going to
get there at all. What happens if the As-centric and Mo-centric
evaluations turn out to be grossly different? How do you
conclude anything at all then?
B Good question. In my opinion, the As-centric version relates
to the logical self whereas the Mo-centric one gives the
emotional self. So if you knew the subject was largely a
logical person, or largely an emotional one, then you could
Planet Time for 1 lap around the ecliptic
As 1 day
Mo ~1 month
Su, Ve, Me 1 year
Ma ~2 years
Ju ~12 years
Ra, Ke ~18.5 years
Sa ~29.5 years
pick only the appropriate point of view and ignore the other.
Otherwise, you could do an average of the two, or just go
with the As.
S You don’t have a medical analogy for this?
B Ummm… not yet, but I will work on one now.
S So for someone born a couple of hours later, the As would have
moved into the next house, and that will then be his 1st house
and the other houses follow in a clockwise manner?
B Perfect. I see you are beginning to get the hang of this.
S Hardly. But I used to think the house numbers were fixed. You
know, the 1st house being the one between 0 and 30° (called
Aries), and so on.
B That may be the case in Western astrology which is
unfortunately both numerically and fundamentally flawed.
For instance, according to the Western system, as per her
date of birth your friend’s Sun sign should be Aries (0-30°)
but in reality as you can see, the Su at 344°36’ actually lies in
the previous box (called Pisces). In fact, when many scientists
find fault with astrology, they are referring to the Western
system – the only one they are aware of.
S If they knew of your system, I bet they would find fault with it
too.
B Firstly, it is not my system; it is something that has been
handed down to us over millennia. Secondly, instead of
finding fault, I would appreciate if they joined hands to
figure out the basis for some of our practices whose
rationale has been lost to us over the years. Anyway, shall we
return to your friend for now?
S Certainly. What else do you have for us today?
B One more thing you need to know. Each house has
an owner or lord as indicated here. Sa, Ju, Ma, Ve
and Me, each own two houses, and Su and Mo
own one each. This is common for all, irrespective
of the individual horoscope. But then depending
on where the As is located, the planets become
lords of different house numbers. Thus, in your
friend’s case, Ma is lord of 1 and 6, Ju owns 2 and
5, Sa lords over 3 and 4, Ve owns 7 and 12, Me is
lord of 8 and 11, Mo has 9 and Su owns 10.
Planets become benefic by owning certain houses
and malefic by becoming lords of some others.
Planets may gain (become benefic) or lose
(become malefic) by associating with other
planets. Likewise, when they get the aspect of
other planets. And there are other special
occurrences, such as exchange of houses between
planets (for example, 4th lord in the 9th house and
vice versa) that can help or mar a planet. It would
be too much to list all the rules here – better refer
a book like the one you have been reading – but
let us enumerate all this for the case of your friend.
S Not more Green and Red buttons?
B Sure, why not? I am beginning to like them. Don’t you? So
here goes…
Planet Ownership Conjunction
with
Aspected by Others
(Exchange, etc.)
Ju 2nd
, 5th
3rd
, 4th
(Sa)
Mo 9th
7th
, 12th
(Ve) exchange with
4th
lord
Ve 7th
, 12th
9th
(Mo)
Ra -- 2nd
, 5th
(Ju)
Me 8th
, 11th
10th
(Su)
Ke -- 2nd
, 5th
(Ju)
Su 10th
8th
, 11th
(Me)
Ma 1st, 6
th
Sa 3rd
, 4th
exchange with
9th
lord
S The Green button again means Stronger and the Red buttons
imply Weaker?
B No, we already gauged their strength and weakness earlier,
remember? The stronger ones went up on a chart and the
weaker ones fell down. These Green and Red buttons further
add to the benefic or malefic nature that we had marked on
the chart. Take a look at it again, if you like. The benefics (in
increasing order) were Ra, Ve, Mo, Ju and the malefics from
the least to the worst were Ke, Su, Ma, Sa. Me was neutral.
Now we adjust the benefics and malefics based on these
Green and Red buttons. More Green than Red means that
planet becomes more benefic – that is, moves to the left on
the chart. On the other hand, planets with more Red than
Green move to the right on the chart – they decrease their
beneficence and become more malefic. And here we are…
In the case of your friend, Mo is hugely benefic and
reasonably strong. Ju is very benefic, but is marginally weak.
Ve and Ra are moderately benefic, but Ve has good
strength. Mo is by far the biggest positive influence; we call
Mo in this case as a yogakaraka – one who signifies positive
things. Su and Ke are neutral, but Su is quite strong. On the
debit side, Me, Ma and Sa are moderately malefic, but they
are all weak too. So, at first glance the positives seem to
outweigh the negatives.
S Very impressive, I must say. I have never seen it presented so
colorfully before.
B Thank you, though this is just the packaging. The next time
we will unwrap this to see what is inside.
S Next time?
B I am afraid I need to leave now. But why don’t you come
over to my place for dinner next week and we can dissect
your friend’s horoscope. All right?
Day 4
Setting: The duo with cups of postprandial coffee in their hands.
S That was a very nice meal, I must say. You do cook well.
B Thanks. And you?
S Tea, instant noodles, an omelet, that’s it. Surely, you can tell by
looking at my horoscope.
B Ha, who was scared of letting me take a look at it? But let’s
settle with your friend first, shall we? And since I know
nothing of her, I need you to help me out here.
S At your service, ma’am.
B Very funny. OK, we are going to start with the houses. Each
house represents different traits of an individual. We shall list
the things that each house stands for and simultaneously
evaluate the house in your friend’s case. For each house, we
are going to look at 5 factors – the lord and its position, the
occupants, those who aspect the house, planets that may
flank the house, and the signifier for that attribute.
S All this seems so complicated. Don’t tell me you have to do all
this work each time you read a horoscope. I thought astrologers
could just take a look and know all.
B Are you feeling facetious after a full meal or what? Of course,
it is hard work. What we have done so far is the objective
part of astrology – it’s like gathering data from an
experiment. Soon we shall come to the subjective part –
making sense of that data and drawing reasonable
conclusions. It’s actually fun, so stop being a drag and come
along.
S Oh, well. Guess I am stuck with this for the evening anyway.
B Don’t pretend, I know you are dying to find out. We’ll start
with Houses 1, 5 and 9. These represent the soul, mind and
body, respectively – the three aspects of an individual. They
also represent the self, the children, and the father,
respectively. You see, each house can represent different
things, so we need to carefully evaluate the various factors.
For example, the 5th is common for mind and children, but
the signifiers for mind (Mo) and children (Ju) are different.
So, let’s fill in this chart for your friend. The Green bullets are
positives, the Red ones are negatives. And I have inked in a
tentative conclusion for each house.
Set I Lord Occupant Aspect Flanking Signifier
House 1 Atma (the soul), self, character,
personality
Weak Ma in the 8
th
None None None Su for soul
(atma), leadership (political)
The house is clean and Su is strong = good soul. But lord is weak and ill-placed = flaw in character.
House 5 Bhagya
(fortune), the mind, children
Marginally weak Ju ill-placed in the 6
th
10th
lord Su and 8
th, 11
th
lord Me, malefic
None Benefic Mo,Ve
and benefic
Ju
Ju for progeny
Mo for mind
(emotion, romance)
Ju is negative as lord and signifier, Su and 8th
lord Me present = difficult childbirth, loss of child. With
strong Mo = good mind, but temperamental/ high strung due to Me, Su. Both + and - = mixed fortunes.
House 9 Dharma
(righteousness), the body, religious devotion,
father, long journeys (usually
associated with pilgrimages in
the past)
Strong Mo well-placed in
the 4th
Malefic 3
rd, 4
th
lord Sa
None None Su for father
Ju for
leadership (spiritual, religious)
Mo for
the seas (as in
journeys overseas)
Strong, well-placed Mo dominates = sound body, overseas journeys. With strong Su = positive for
father. But with marginally weak Ju = not particularly religious/ spiritual. Malefic Sa = something negative
about either body or father or beliefs.
S Why tentative?
B Because we also need to cross-check with the timing. For
instance, one may suggest a good likelihood of childbirth,
but if the periods of the helpful planets occur either too
early in life or too late, then it is no good.
S OK, the hyper part matches sure enough, but she can be really
sweet when she wants to.
B Wait there’s more to come. Let’s look at the houses 4, 7, 10
next – 4 is for what you come into this world with, 7 for what
you acquire in this life, and 10 is for what you leave behind
when you are gone. Here are the details and the chart filled
in…
Set II Lord Occupant Aspect Flanking Signifier
House 4 Prosperity,
state of mind (peace &
happiness), ancestral property, mother,
education
Weak Sa well-
placed in the 9
th
Hugely benefic 9
th lord
Mo with benefic 7
th, 12
th
lord Ve
None None Mo for mother
Ju for
education
Strong, highly benefic Mo totally dominates, in a rajayoga with Ve = positive for childhood, mother. With marginally weak Ju = decent education, but not great.
House 7 Vyavahara
(acquisitions, material gains), health, bodily
pleasures, spouse,
marital life, earnings
Very strong lord Ve
well-placed in
the 4th
with Mo
None None Neutral Ke and malefic
Ma
Ve for spouse, bodily
pleasures
Strong, benefic combination of Ve, Mo = romantic, enjoys physical pleasures and comforts of life, marries for love, successful marriage. But malefic Ma = affects
married life.
House 10 Karma
(deeds), body of work,
profession, name & honors
Strong Su well-placed in
the 5th
with
weak 8th
and 11
th
lord Me
None Benefics Mo, Ve,
Ju
None Ju for wisdom
(philosophy)
Me for commerce
(as in business/
trade)
Ra for discovery/ invention
Strong Su and aspect of 3 benefics = good deeds, professionally successful. But weak Ju, Me = not
intellectual or commercial profession.
S OK, some of that rings true, but it all seems so general. Can’t
you pin it down more specifically? And what is a rajayoga?
B Not bad though for someone I have never met, isn’t it?
Actually, the purpose of this exercise is to help the person
build on their strengths and reduce losses due to their
weaknesses. For instance, the same Ma that hints at a minor
defect in her personality in house 1 also affects her married
life in house 7. If she can identify this, she can work on it to
improve herself and her life. But I will be able to tell you
something more definite when we start looking at the
various periods. Just hang on. Next, on to houses 2, 8 and
11…
Set III Lord Occupant Aspect Flanking Signifier
House 2 Wealth
(unearned), family,
creative abilities
Marginally weak Ju ill-placed in the 6
th
None Very benefic
Ju
Malefic Ma
None Ve for creativity
Ju
Dominated by middling Ju = average family background. Malefic Ma = affects family life. Strong Ve =
hard to determine area of creativity but not science or philosophy.
House 8 Longevity,
death, legacies, disgrace
Weak Me ill-placed in the 5
th
with Su
Malefic Ma
None None Sa for low
status
All indications negative = doubtful longevity, possible nervous debility/ heartbreak.
House 11 Non-material gains, friends, elder siblings, accomplishme
nts
Weak Me well-
placed in the 5
th
with Su
None Su, Me, Ma, Sa
all malefic
None Ma for siblings
Ju
Me not strong enough to overturn other malefics = largely negative, doesn’t gain much from friends, elder
siblings.
Ah, the rajayoga – it is a powerful, beneficial combination of
planets that does much good. For instance, the combination
of 9th lord Mo and 7th lord Ve is a rajayoga; it greatly
enhances the 4th house which they occupy and the 10th
which they aspect. Likewise, the exchange of houses
between the 9th lord Mo and 4th lord Sa is also a powerful
yoga.
S Aw! This lot did not turn out as good as some of the previous
houses.
B Yes, that’s how it’s going to be for most of us; some good,
some bad. We try to maximize gains from our strengths and
minimize losses due to our weaknesses. The key houses are
the 1st, 4th, 5th, 7th, 9th, 10th which we examined earlier. Nearly
all of them are pretty good in her case, except for the 5th and
the presence of the 1st lord Ma in the 8th house.
Unfortunately, Ju is not pulling weight and Me is weak –
those are the big negatives. Let’s round this up with the last
set of three houses.
Set IV Lord Occupant Aspect Flanking
Signifier
House 3 Intelligence,
younger siblings,
courage, loss of inherited
wealth
Weak Sa well placed in the
9th
None Malefics Ma, Sa
None Me for intelligence,
speech
Ma for aggression,
younger siblings, courage
All the players are weak = loses due to lack of diplomacy and verbal aggression.
House 6 Debts,
disease, enemies, generally material losses
Weak Ma
well-placed in the
8th
Very benefic Ju and neutral
Ke
Malefic Sa
None Sa for misfortune (injuries, sorrows)
Ra for
affliction (accidents)
Ke for
lies/deception
Benefic Ju = generally assures good health, finances and no enemies; losses, if any, are self-inflicted.
House 12 Moksha
(liberation of the soul),
spirituality (as in
Very strong
Ve well-
placed with
Mildly benefic
Ra
Benefic Ju
None Sa for evil (purpose, thinking)
Ke for the spiritual,
renunciation), residence
abroad (as in banishment),
misery, generally
non-material losses
Mo in the 4
th
release of the soul (moksha)
Ra for alien
(culture, religion)
Largely positive = Free from evil, may embrace foreign customs/ religion. Good combination of 9
th and 12
th
lords suggests travel abroad for work/ leisure, even marriage.
S You know, that didn’t turn out very badly at all. In fact, I am
quite impressed. I feel I can piece together all this and fashion
something pretty close to the original character.
B Thank you, that’s very kind of you. And now it’s getting
pretty late, so it’s time for you to be heading home.
S Hey! Wait a minute. I was just warming up…
B Right. That’s exactly what I am worried about…
S So, what happened to the predictions?
B Call me another day. In the meanwhile, you can get this
information for me.
Day 5
The pair comfortably seated in a cozy nook of his club.
S I hope the meal was satisfactory.
B Satisfactory? It was awesome. I can’t believe you dine like
this every day. How can you afford an expensive club like
this?
S Not every day, only on special occasions. And you are right, I
couldn’t afford it but it comes with the job. Part of the perks.
B Gosh! What kind of a job do you actually do?
S I design thingies in which you burn kerosene, you know.
B What? Like those cooking stoves we used to have ages ago?
Come on, you are pulling my leg.
S Well, not exactly those kinds of stoves, perhaps a little larger.
And you wouldn’t exactly use these for cooking, but I guess the
principle’s the same. Anyway, here’s the information you asked
for.
B Thanks, I need this to make “predictions.”
S What is this? It looks like a railway timetable. I assumed you
would use the present position of the planets to make
predictions.
B Those are the transits, they are of minor significance.
Imagine driving from Place A to Place B on the freeway and
you change lanes a few times along the way. The lane
changes are like the transits – they happen, but they mean
nothing; it’s the transport from A to B that matters.
S Aren’t all the astrological columns in the newspapers based on
transits?
B Yes, they are, and did you notice they are placed with the
comics?
S And how about those books that claim to predict your year
ahead? Also transits?
B I would suppose so and they should be placed in the fiction
section at the book stores.
S And you have a prediction method that works?
B It’s not mine; it’s something unique to the
Indian system of astrology and is called the
dasa or period. Every planet is given a certain
number of years and these periods run
cyclically in the sequence as shown here. It
totals up to 120 years. The starting point on
this cycle for a horoscope is determined by the
position of the Mo on the ecliptic. In the case
of your friend, the “railway timetable” shows
that she was born about 3 years into the dasa
of Ju, so she got nearly 13 years of the 16 years
allotted to Ju. This was followed by 19 years of
Sa, and now is the 17-year period of Me.
S This seems so arbitrary.
B True, we do not know how this arrangement came about.
Interestingly the 18-year period given to Ra matches closely
with the time taken by it to make a lap of the ecliptic (18.5
years as we have seen before). But there is no similar
correlation for the other planets.
S Fine. Each entry in the “railway timetable” has two planets, like
Ju/Sa. What does that mean?
B Within the dasa of each planet, the periods of all the planets
cycle – these are called the sub-periods. So, for instance, the
Sa period starts with the sub-period of Sa (written as Sa/Sa)
followed by that of Me (that is, Sa/Me), and so on. These
sub-periods are calculated on a pro rata basis – that is,
during the Sa period, the sub-period of each planet is equal
Planet Dasa (Period)
Su 6 years
Mo 10 years
Ma 7 years
Ra 18 years
Ju 16 years
Sa 19 years
Me 17 years
Ke 7 years
Ve 20 years
to 19/120 times its planetary period. There’s some math for
you. Happy?
S Now you are going to say that Sa for my friend is malefic and
weak, so the 19 years of Sa period are going to be bad for her.
Right?
B Wrong! It’s a little more complicated than that.
See, I have put down in this diagram the
various roles Sa plays in her horoscope. The
helpful ones are in Green and the harmful ones
are in Red. The neutral or minor ones are in
Black. Sa mainly helps in 4, 9 – so, that’s good
for mother, education, domestic life, father,
body, religious devotion. But Sa also has a
negative impact on 9, plus is not being helpful
for 6 – so a slight issue with health/body
perhaps. And, by its aspect on Ju, it affects 2
and 5. Importantly the exchange between Sa
and Mo brings the latter into the picture
indirectly – that is shown in a separate, linked
box. Mo further helps 4 and certain aspects of
9 (overseas travel), overpowers Sa on 12, and
aids in 5 (mind) and 10. Summing up all this,
one can make some inference about influences
on her life in this period.
S Can you, for instance, predict anything about her marriage in
this period?
B In Sa period? Let’s try… but remember, we
cannot predict what she would do, we can only
deduce the possibilities and their times. First
we look back at our analysis of the houses and
write down the planets that have a benefic
influence on the 7th house and those that have
a malefic effect. The biggest plus is obviously
Ve, lord and signifier, and with it is yogakaraka
Mo who is very benefic. On the minus side are
Ma and Ke. As for Sa himself, we have seen
that he does not have a direct impact on the
7th house. He is linked to Mo and that has an
association with Ve, but that may be a bit
tenuous. With that, let us examine the various
sub-periods in Sa dasa as shown here. The
periods boxed in Red are ruled out as being
too early or undesirable. The ones circled in
Green are preferable, either would be a
romantic alliance. But the good work can be
undone by discord in Sa/Ma period. Otherwise,
the back-up can be the sub-period of Ra which
takes its benefic nature from being in the
house of Ve, but then the advantage of the Ve-
Mo combination is lost. Ra also suggests an
unconventional marriage in terms of nationality
or religion or culture, and possibly one based
less on romance and more on other factors.
S That is astonishingly close, and the way you put it, it all sounds
so obvious. Is this all there is to it, or are you holding something
back from me?
B Of course, I haven’t revealed everything to you – that
wouldn’t be good for my business, would it? But barring
some finer corrections and a few complications, this is the
gist. Now what are you holding back from me?
S Nothing much. We had a good thing going but it didn’t work
out.
B I am sorry to hear that, but don’t tell me you have been
mooning over her ever since.
S No, I plunged myself in work and have done very well for
myself, as you can see. Besides, this is not about any individual,
this is about the principles. I am still curious to see how you can
make a prediction about the future.
B Right. How about considering the Me/Ve period? Fine, here
we go. I filled in this chart for you. On one side are all the
influences of Me, on the other are the effects of Ve. To this,
we also need to add the roles played by Ve when we
consider a Me-centric point of view. Of course, Ve continues
to be very strong as we determined right at the beginning
for this horoscope. But with respect to Me being in house
number 1, Ve owns houses 3 and 8 which are negative, so he
at best becomes neutral. Further, Ve is placed in the 12th
house from Me in the company of 5th lord Mo – that does
not help Ve, rather it negatively affects Mo. This information
is added at the top of the chart.
S And now can you please make sense of this chart for me?
B Isn’t it obvious? Take a look at the circled
numbers. For example, Me affects the 10th lord Su,
hence is negative for profession – the damage
should have happened early in Me dasa. But Ve
(with Mo) has a beneficial aspect on the 10th, so
we can expect a professional recovery which may
become fully apparent in the succeeding Su sub-
period. Next, Me as 8th lord is not helpful to the 8th
house, so Me dasa can bring in news of death. But
Ve has a beneficial influence on the 8th, so at least
the Ve sub-period may be without losses on that
front. Then, Me is a bad influence on the 5th, so
this period is not positive for childbirth. Here Ve as
8th lord from Me, in the 12th house, afflicts 5th lord
Mo – again a negative. So I would not recommend
trying to conceive a child during this period. And
so on… Remember, none of this will happen – they
are likely. It is up to the individual to make it
happen or not.
S How does it help someone to know all this? To borrow your
medical analogy, it’s like going to a doctor who tells you about
your disease but offers you no cure.
B Yes, that is a valid observation. But in this case the “cure” lies
with oneself. Forewarned, one can plan one’s life
accordingly. For instance, if there is a danger to profession,
one can consciously try to steer clear of any unpleasant
situation at work. Or if the period is known to be not
conducive for childbirth, one can avoid the pain, or decide to
adopt a child.
S Don’t you have simpler solutions – a religious offering, or a
pilgrimage, or a gemstone?
B There’s no dearth of tricksters and charlatans who offer you
these “services.” I wouldn’t want to add to their ilk. There is
no connection whatsoever between astrology and religion.
Yet I guess people who face trouble in their lives are willing
to give anything a shot, no matter how irrational it may
seem.
S Don’t you think these quacks give astrology a bad name?
B Sure, they do. Sadly the alternatives are few, so these cheats
have a field day. A seller’s market, I think you would call it.
Until we have a system where a person can walk into a
hospital or a clinic and meet a rational astrologer, the same
as meeting a dentist or a psychiatrist, we will have this huge
unregulated grey market.
S And you are doing your bit to rectify the situation?
B Not really. I do this because I find it enjoyable and satisfying.
I don’t offer any magic potions. I dig for the truth –
somewhat like a detective.
S And what kind of truths do you uncover, Hercule Poirot?
B I love those stories, don’t you? Well, here’s a recent example
– nothing as exciting, but real life. One of my friends, a
counselor at the university, was dealing with a student who
had complained of sexual harassment, but she wasn’t
entirely convinced. A look at her horoscope with a close
conjunction of Mo and Ra suggested psychological issues.
That prompted my friend to refer her to a shrink who
diagnosed her with low self-esteem problems. Apparently,
she told lies to gain sympathy, and they were able to
discover previous incidents of a similar nature involving her.
Though I didn’t make any money on this, I felt good that I
could save an innocent person whose career might have
been finished unfairly.
S But you can’t live on feel-good, can you?
B Oh, don’t worry. I make enough to sustain myself. You have
no idea of the number of people facing myriad problems,
none of which can even be approached by modern science.
S I guess astrologers make their killing in the matrimonial market.
B You mean matching horoscopes of the bride and the
groom? I don’t do that; don’t believe in it. Why that
astonished look? Those rules were made eons ago when a
patriarchal society preferred a bride who would serve her
husband until his death, deliver many sons, live peacefully in
an extended family, and so on. Yeah, yeah… I know things
are not far better in many parts of the world even today. But
since I won’t marry by those rules, I shouldn’t advise anyone
else to do so either.
S You mean that astrology has no role to play in the modern
marriage?
B No, I didn’t say that. To me, it would primarily depend on my
comfort level with the other person. But, you know, people
do put on their best behavior at those times. So, as a
secondary check, I would certainly scan his horoscope to
look for danger signs.
S Such as?
B An affliction of Mo by Ra (mental issues), a bad combination
of Ve and Ma (sexual extravagance), or a weak Ju (no high
thinking)…
S Gosh! And how many people have failed Level 2, if I may ask?
B Actually, not many have gotten that far, but I have a good
one in hand now. Ju, Mo in conjunction, which is a powerful
yoga; close conjunction of Ve-Me, which suggests a creative,
scientific mind; and the two pairs in mutual aspect without
any malefic influence – makes them all strong and benefic.
S Oh! I am happy for you. I was going to ask if you would care to
be the navigator of my car…
B Sure, that’s no problem.
S Uh, not professionally… I mean, personally.
B Is that a proposal?
S Well, it would have been, except… you seem to have already
found your soul-mate.
B Well, then I accept!
S What?
B That horoscope – it’s yours!
THE END