Rare Decays

15
in collaboration with S. FRIOT and E. de RAFAEL David GREYNAT arXiv:hep-ph/0404136 or PLB 595 (2004) 301 RENCONTRES DE MORIOND March 2005

description

RENCONTRES DE MORIOND March 2005. Rare Decays. David GREYNAT. in collaboration with S. FRIOT and E. de RAFAEL. arXiv:hep-ph/0404136 or PLB 595 (2004) 301. Motivations. 1- New experimental results for the rare decays. [NA48 ’03]. Those results allow for a. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Rare Decays

Page 1: Rare                           Decays

Rare Decays

in collaboration with S. FRIOT and E. de RAFAEL

David GREYNAT

arXiv:hep-ph/0404136 or PLB 595 (2004) 301

RENCONTRES DE MORIOND

March 2005

Page 2: Rare                           Decays

Motivations

1- New experimental results for the rare decays

[NA48 ’03]

Re-analysis of the CP violating rare decay

Those results allow for a

2- Computation of some of the coupling constants of the effective

to leading and next-to-leading orders in Large NC QCD

Page 3: Rare                           Decays

CP Conserving part

CP Violating part

CP Direct Short Distance Contribution

CP indirect directly from

Interference Term ?Constructive

Destructive

Page 4: Rare                           Decays

Chiral Lagrangians

In fact the usual chiral electro-weak order p Lagrangian is [EPdeR ’87]

The nature of the interference is strongly linked to coupling constants of chiral Lagrangians

which can be rewritten in a more convenient way (Large NC counting)

where is

is

Experimental constraints on this coupling constants via

Precisely to and in their combination

Page 5: Rare                           Decays

[PDG ’02]

Constraints from Branching Ratios

Key-quantities

Order p4

[NA48 ’03]

Page 6: Rare                           Decays

Octet Dominance Hypothesis

and Large-NC Predictions

Through the bosonization of the factorized part of the operator

matched to O(p4) chiral Lagrangian gives

See also [Bruno Prades ’93]

Large-Nc Predictions :

Octet Dominance Hypothesis [EPdR ‘87]:

Page 7: Rare                           Decays

Results

Conclusion: Conclusion: in both cases thenin both cases then CONSTRUCTIVE CONSTRUCTIVE INTERFERENCEINTERFERENCE

But the sign of is not clearly predicted: Need for a Large NC next-to-leading order calculation

Page 8: Rare                           Decays

Constraints from the form factor

Clearly, the O(p4) is not sufficient

where is given by the pion chiral loop.

Order p4:

Page 9: Rare                           Decays

Beyond order p4

Guess of dominant O (p6 ) contributions [Isidori et al. ’03]

O (p4 )+ Chiral resummation (inspired by M.H.A of Large NC)

« Narrow Resonance Minimal Structure » 

Strategies:

Page 10: Rare                           Decays

Narrow resonances dynamical framework

K K K K

MHANRD Hyp.

In agreement with Octet Dominance assumption [EPdeR ’87]

chiral limit

Page 11: Rare                           Decays

Minimal Narrow Resonances Saturation

of the Form Factor

The form factor is now

Page 12: Rare                           Decays

Fit

Page 13: Rare                           Decays

PredictionsResults Experiments

Page 14: Rare                           Decays

CP Conserving Part [Buchalla et al. ‘03]

CP Direct Violating Part [Buchalla et al. ‘03]

CP Indirect Violating Part [NA48 ‘03]

Interference term [this work]

Prediction for

Page 15: Rare                           Decays

Conclusions and Outlook

This analysis which combined chiral perturbation theory at order p4 with a model inspired by Large NC

gives very good results for the known branching ratios of

We obtain a prediction for the golden mode closed to reachable experimental determination

Next-to-leading order calculation in Large-NC QCD of

In the framework of [Hambye et al. ’03]