Randomized trial of_stents_versus

25
Randomized Trial of Stents Versus Bypass Surgery for Left Main Coronary Artery Disease : 5- Year Outcomes of the PRECOMBAT Study Journal of the American C ollege of Cardiology Volume 65, Issue 20 , 26 May 2015

Transcript of Randomized trial of_stents_versus

Page 1: Randomized trial of_stents_versus

Randomized Trial of Stents Versus Bypass Surgery for Left Main Coronary Artery

Disease : 5-Year Outcomes of the PRECOMBAT Study

Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Volume 65, Issue 20, 26 May 2015

Page 2: Randomized trial of_stents_versus

PRECOMBAT

Premier of Randomized Comparison of Bypass Surgery versus Angioplasty Using Sirolimus-

Eluting Stent in Patients with Left Main Coronary Artery Disease

Page 3: Randomized trial of_stents_versus

Background

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was not inferior to coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for the treatment of unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis at 1 year.

Page 4: Randomized trial of_stents_versus

Study design and patients

• PRECOMBAT trial was a prospective, open-label, randomized trial conducted at 13 sites in South Korea

• Patients were randomly assigned to undergo PCI with sirolimus-eluting stents or CABG in a 1:1 ratio

Page 5: Randomized trial of_stents_versus

Study design and patients

• Between April 2004 and August 2009, a total of 1454 patients with unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis were enrolled.

Page 6: Randomized trial of_stents_versus

• 600 eligible patients were randomly assigned to undergo PCI with sirolimus-eluting stents (n = 300) or CABG (n = 300). Of those, 279 patients (93%) in the PCI group and 275 patients (91.7%) in the CABG group completed 5 years of follow-up

Page 7: Randomized trial of_stents_versus

Inclusion Criteria

• Atleast 18 years of age.• The patient must have significant de novo unprotected

left main coronary artery (ULMCA) stenosis (>50% by visual estimation) with or without any additional target lesions (>70% by visual estimation).

• Patients with stable angina or acute coronary syndromes(UA & NSTEMI) or patients with atypical chest pain or without symptoms but having documented myocardial ischemia may be enrolled.

• The patient or guardian must agree to the study protocol and the schedule of clinical and angiographic follow up, and must provide informed, written consent.

Page 8: Randomized trial of_stents_versus

Exclusion Criteria

1. Known hypersensitivity or contraindication to any of the following medications:

• Heparin• Aspirin• Both clopidogrel and ticlopidine• Sirolimus• Stainless steel and/or• Contrast media

2. Systemic (intravenous) sirolimus use within 12 months.

3. Any previous percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) within 1 year

4. Previous bypass surgery

Page 9: Randomized trial of_stents_versus

Exclusion Criteria

5. Any previous PCI of a ULMCA or ostial left circumflex artery or ostial left anterior descending artery lesion within 1 year

6. Intention to treat more than one totally occluded major epicardial vessel

7. Acute MI within 1 week

8. Ejection fraction <30%.

9. Cardiogenic shock

10. Any stroke with a persistent neurological deficit or any cerebrovascular accident within 6 months

11. Creatinine level≥2.0mg/dL or dependence on dialysis.

Page 10: Randomized trial of_stents_versus

Exclusion Criteria

• Severe hepatic dysfunction (AST and ALT≥3 times upper normal reference values).

• Gastrointestinal or genitourinary bleeding within the prior 3 months, or major surgery within 2 months.

• Unable or unwilling to follow-up with visits required by protocol

• History of bleeding diathesis or known coagulopathy (including heparin-induced thrombocytopenia), or will refuse blood transfusions.

• Current known current platelet count <100,000 cells/mm3 or Hgb <10 g/dL.

Page 11: Randomized trial of_stents_versus

Procedures

• Sirolimus-eluting stents were the default drug-eluting stents

• Use of IVUS, adjunctive devices, or glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors was at the operator’s discretion

• All patients undergoing PCI took aspirin plus clopidogrel (300-mg loading dose) or ticlopidine (500-mg loading dose) before or during the procedure

• After PCI, all patients were prescribed 100 mg/day aspirin indefinitely and 75 mg/day clopidogrel or 250 mg/day ticlopidine for at least 1 year

• During CABG, the internal thoracic artery was preferred for bypass of the left anterior descending artery

Page 12: Randomized trial of_stents_versus

Follow-up and endpoints

• After PCI, all patients were asked to undergo follow-up angiography 8 to 10 months after the procedure or earlier if they were experiencing symptoms of angina

• Routine follow-up angiography was not performed for patients who underwent CABG

• Other follow-up assessments were performed at 1, 6, 9, and 12 months and yearly

Page 13: Randomized trial of_stents_versus

• Primary endpoint: major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular event (MACCE) (a composite of death from any cause, MI, stroke, or ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization [TVR]) after randomization.

• Secondary endpoints included the individual components of the primary endpoint

Page 14: Randomized trial of_stents_versus
Page 15: Randomized trial of_stents_versus

Results

Page 16: Randomized trial of_stents_versus
Page 17: Randomized trial of_stents_versus
Page 18: Randomized trial of_stents_versus
Page 19: Randomized trial of_stents_versus

AT 5 YEAR FOLLOW UP

• At 5 years, the cumulative incidence of MACCE was 17.5% in the PCI group and 14.3% in the CABG group (HR: 1.27; 95% CI: 0.84 to 1.90; p = 0.26).

Page 20: Randomized trial of_stents_versus
Page 21: Randomized trial of_stents_versus
Page 22: Randomized trial of_stents_versus
Page 23: Randomized trial of_stents_versus
Page 24: Randomized trial of_stents_versus

LIMITATIONS

• Selected patients with relatively low-risk profiles

• limited sample size• Systematic performance of follow-up

angiography in the PCI group may have increased the rate of TVR

Page 25: Randomized trial of_stents_versus

CONCLUSION

• During the 5-year follow-up, study did not show a significant difference in the rate of MACCE between patients who underwent PCI with a sirolimus-eluting stent and those who underwent CABG, supporting current guidelines stating that left main stenting is a feasible revascularization strategy for patients with suitable coronary anatomy.