Ralf-Udo Ehlers e-nema GmbH

17
Ralf-Udo Ehlers e-nema GmbH INNOVATION – THE WAY FORWARD: BIOLOGICAL PLANT PROTECTION greener CAP? Croke Park Confernce Centre, Dublin, Ireland April 10, 2013

description

Sealing the deal on a greener CAP? C roke Park Confernce Centre , Dublin, Ireland April 10, 2013 . Ralf-Udo Ehlers e-nema GmbH. INNOVATION – THE WAY FORWARD: BIOLOGICAL PLANT PROTECTION. Current tools available from the biocontrol industry. Tools have been available for many decades. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Ralf-Udo Ehlers e-nema GmbH

Page 1: Ralf-Udo Ehlers e-nema GmbH

Ralf-Udo Ehlerse-nema GmbH

INNOVATION – THE WAY FORWARD: BIOLOGICAL PLANT PROTECTION

Sealing the deal on a greener CAP?Croke Park Confernce Centre, Dublin, Ireland

April 10, 2013

Page 2: Ralf-Udo Ehlers e-nema GmbH

Microbials

Viruses, Bacteria & Fungal

Pathogens

Macrobials

Predatory mites & insects,

nematodes

Semiochemicals

Pheromones, Plant volatiles

Natural Products

Plant extracts, Seaweed products

& Basic substances

Current tools available from the biocontrol industry

Tools have been available for many decades

Page 3: Ralf-Udo Ehlers e-nema GmbH

e~nema SME, producing nematodes, fungi + bacteria for IPM

Page 4: Ralf-Udo Ehlers e-nema GmbH

Pests developed resistance against synthetic pesticides Farmers used pesticides more frequencly and in higher dosisSerious problems with pesticide residues in food

Success Story: Biological Control in European Greenhouse Industry

Page 5: Ralf-Udo Ehlers e-nema GmbH

Problems with residues

Page 6: Ralf-Udo Ehlers e-nema GmbH

Accepted Residues (MRL)Supermarkets go beyond governmental levels

Source: (Waldner W. Frutta e Vite, 2009)

Maximal pesticide Residue Level requested by Supermarket chains in Italy

Maximal pesticide Residue Level requested by Supermarket chains in Germany

100% Legal MRL 100% Legal MRL

50%

40%

30% 33%

70%

80%

Fruitlogistica 2013

Page 7: Ralf-Udo Ehlers e-nema GmbH

Governmental support of 1000 €/ha to pay for technical support

2004: 100 ha use of biocontrol2010: All 40.000 ha use BCAs

Concerted Action of government, farmer organisations and biocontrol industry in Spain

Today greenhouse vegetables are produced by IPM including biological control agents

In outdoor agriculture, however, biocontrol is not yet part of IPM

Page 8: Ralf-Udo Ehlers e-nema GmbH

Exaggerating regulation of biological control agents (micro-organisms, pheromones, botanicals)

Why?

Page 9: Ralf-Udo Ehlers e-nema GmbH

Risk Management + Registration Biocontrol agents regulated

according to EU Reg. 1107/2009, following rules developed for synthetic chemical compounds

EU Policy Support Action REBECA gave recommendations for improvement, but proposals have not been implemented

Page 10: Ralf-Udo Ehlers e-nema GmbH

Accelerate registration process (9 years is too long)

Formation of expert teams to handle BCAs only

Priorities for BCAs

What is necessary (incomplete list)

Page 11: Ralf-Udo Ehlers e-nema GmbH

Exaggerating regulation following rules developed for synthetic chemical compounds

Although EU pesticide legislation and political outreach is supporting non-chemical measures, the support for introduction of biocontrol in MS is half-hearted

Why?

Page 12: Ralf-Udo Ehlers e-nema GmbH

Integrated Pest Management in European PP legislation

The Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market:

Point 35: To ensure a high level of protection of human and animal health and the environment, plant protection products should be used properly, in accordance with their authorisation, having regard to the principles of integrated pest management and giving priority to nonchemical and natural alternatives wherever possible.

Page 13: Ralf-Udo Ehlers e-nema GmbH

MS give Art. 53 “emergency authorisations” although biocontrol agents are available.

Member States do NOT used PPP properly

MS give priority to chemical products

MS violate existing EU legislation

Page 14: Ralf-Udo Ehlers e-nema GmbH

Exaggerating regulation following rules developed for synthetic chemical compounds

Although EU pesticide legislation and political outreach is supporting non-chemical measures, the support for introduction of biocontrol in MS is half-hearted

Implementation of pesticide reduction programmes exclude biological control

Why?

Page 15: Ralf-Udo Ehlers e-nema GmbH

Sustainable Use Directive 2009/128 EC

Article 14: “the MS shall take all necessary measures to promote low pesticide-input pest management, giving wherever possible priority to non-chemical methods, so that professional users of pesticides switch to practices and products with the lowest risk to human health and the environment

As a consequence, MS must developed NAPs to reduce pesticide use in the EU

Page 16: Ralf-Udo Ehlers e-nema GmbH

NAPs hardly consider biological control as a possible means to reduce pesticides

EU funded projects like ENDURE and PURE „re-invent“ IPM, but do little for implementation of biological control

Instead of promotion of biocontrol, MS seem to protect markets for chemical PPPs

Page 17: Ralf-Udo Ehlers e-nema GmbH

Biological control is supporting greening of CAP

EU policy supports introduction of biocontrol

MS could do much more for implementation of biocontrol in the EU

Summary