Rabobank Group - Global Aquaculture Alliance
Transcript of Rabobank Group - Global Aquaculture Alliance
1
Trade dynamics in key aquaculture industries
Rabo Research Food & AgribusinessGorjan Nikolik, October 2019
Rabobank Group
2
Toronto
New York
Mexico City
Sao Paulo
Buenos Aires SydneySantiago de Chile
Willemstad
Calgary
Washington DC
Chicago
AtlantaDallas
El Centro
San Francisco
Tasmania
Melbourne
Wellington
Cedar Falls
St Louis London
Madrid
Milan
AntwerpFrankfurt
Warsaw
Utrecht
Hong Kong
Singapore
Mumbai
Kolkata
Jakarta
Tokyo
Beijing
Delhi
Kuala Lumpur
Moscow
Istanbul
Dublin
Lubuan
Amsterdam
Paris
Bangalore
Shanghai
MaputoChimoio
Beira
Tete
Ulónguè
Malema
Maxixe
Nampula
Kigali
Asuncion
46 Countries Over 600 Offices Over 50,000 Employees
Rabobank: Globally leading food and agribusiness lender and financial services provider
EUR
623bnoutstanding capital
ranked amongst the
Top 15safest commercial banks globally
• Tier 1 ratio of 15%
• Credit rating of Aa2 from Moody’s, A+ from S&P and AA-from Fitch
3
Seafood, the most traded protein globally
1
23
Salmon
Shrimp Tilapia – Pangasius
5
Salmonids: high profitability attracts alternative supply
6
Salmonid trade in 2012
2012
Source: UN Comtrade, Rabobank, 2019Note*: Russia exports are inclusive of Belarus
Norway à EU (#1)
656,861 tonnes $3,290.2 Million
Chile à Japan (#2)
194,143 tonnes $1,134.3 Million
Chile à USA (#5)
93,160 tonnes $675.4 Million
Norway à USA (#7)
16,354 tonnes $147.7 Million
Chile à Russia* (#6)
22,446 tonnes $97.0 Million
Canada à USA(#4)
96,681 tonnes $584.8 Million
Norway à Russia*(#3)
171,924 tonnes $815.5 Million
7
Salmon trade in 2018, relatively few changes so far, the sector is maturing
Source: UN Comtrade, Rabobank, 2019Note*: Russia exports are inclusive of Belarus
Chile à Japan (#3)
142,247 tonnes $1,071.4 Million
Chile à USA (#2)
153,229 tonnes $1,592.2 Million
Canada à USA(#4)
89,198 tonnes $794.4 Million
Chile à Russia* (#5)
63,397 tonnes $447.0 Million
Norway à EU (#1)
803,267 tonnes $6,147.3 Million
Norway à Russia*(#7)
13,601 tonnes $99.5 Million
2018
Norway à USA (#6)
53,772 tonnes $606.2 Million
8
Value growth in times of limited supply
Global salmon imports in volume (left axis) and value (right axis)
Source: ITC, Rabobank, 2019
-
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
0
500,000
1,000,000
1,500,000
2,000,000
2,500,000
3,000,000
3,500,000
4,000,000
20132014
20152016
20172018
Million USD
Thou
sand
s
tonnes
USA EU28 China Japan Russia+Belarus Brazil South Korea Rest of the World Total Value
9
Most growth is out side of Europe, the most mature salmon market
Top importers of Salmon, (Difference of 12 months, 07/18-06/19 to 07/17-06/18)
Source: ITC, Rabobank, 2019
Importer Country Value (USD Million) Change Volume (tonnes) Change
EU28 15,527 -0.6% 1,881,391 3.7%
US 4,845 9.4% 432,080 7.6%
Japan 2,268 8.6% 261,123 8.5%
China 1,374 14.2% 308,480 30.3%
Brazil 594 4.8% 90,949 6.1%
10
Salmon RAS: many projects, only few will be realized, but those that succeed will be in regions physically far from traditional suppliers
Sources: Rabobank 2019
7.000 mtCanada
Iceland
Norway
Rest of Europe
Russia
Africa
Middle East310.000 mt
US
2.500 mt
26.600 mt
9.500 mt
165.000 mt
15.000 mt
38.500 mtJapan
China137.000 mt
11.500 mt
6
6
3
13
11
1
34
2
3
Number of announced RAS salmon projects increasing from 30 to over 50 from 2018 to 2019
0
7,500
15,000
22,500
30,000
-
200,000
400,000
600,000
800,000
Publ
icly
anno
unce
dpr
ojec
ts in
2018
(LH
S)
Publ
icly
anno
unce
dpr
ojec
ts in
2019
(LH
S)
Curr
ent
prod
uctio
nin
201
9(R
HS)
met
ric to
ns
met
ric to
ns
11
Salmon: enjoying excellent demand, but high prices will create a supply response sooner or later
Despite recent slow down Norway followed by Chile will be 80% of volume growth. Watch
for the post-smolt strategy and a possible
harvest weight recovery in Norway
Salmon demand is growing in both developed and
developing nations, despite high prices
Product innovation and marketing in
salmon have been an example to the
seafood industry. How will the existence of
RAS change marketing communication?
Technology: global trade can be impacted
by RAS and by offshore supply
especially in the US, China and Japan
New supplier regions coming up in the
future: Iceland and Russia, both can
potentially have 100k industries
Salmon
12
Shrimp: growth in a low price period
13
Global marine shrimp aquaculture: EMS induced contraction and recovery
Source: Rabobank, FAO 2019*Chinese production includes freshwater Vannamei farming . M. Rosenbergii is not included. After 2011 we make significant corrections to FAO data based on industry sources
Global Shrimp aquaculture (marine species) 2008 – 2018
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
4,000
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
000’ tonnes
China Indonesia Vietnam Thailand IndiaEcuador Mexico Bangladesh Malaysia BrazilCentral America Peru Colombia/Venezuela Phillipines Others
14
Shrimp trade in 2012, pre peak EMS
2012
Source: UN Comtrade, Rabobank, 2019Note*: It includes exports to China and Vietnam
India à USA(#2)
105,563 tonnes $600.2 Million
Ecuador à EU (#3)
86,245 tonnes $492.7 million
Thailand à USA(#1)
129,455 tonnes $1,149.7 Million
Ecuador àChina*(#6)
24,322 tonnes $150.6 million
India à EU(#5)
70,495 tonnes $445.8 millionIndonesia à USA(#4)
72,880 tonnes $595.5 Million
15
Shrimps trade in 2018, major new trade flows emerge originating from Ecuador and India
2018
Source: UN Comtrade, Rabobank, 2019Note*:It includes exports to China and Vietnam
India à USA(#2)
248,160 tonnes $2,182.7 million
Thailand à USA(#7)
50,107 tonnes $556.0 Million
Indonesia à USA(#4)
130,042 tonnes $1,173.2 Million
Ecuador àChina*(#1)
299,513 tonnes $1,797.8 Million
Ecuador à EU (#5)
103,294 tonnes $729.5 Million
India à EU(#6)
75,361 tonnes $543.3 million
India àChina(#3)
179,914 tonnes
$1,095.0million
16
Based on US shrimp imports a clear picture emerges of India substituting Thailand and driving growth
US shrimp imports in volume (left axis) and value (right axis)
-
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
-
200
400
600
800
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Million USD‘000 tonnes
India Thailand Vietnam Indonesia Ecuador Mexico China Others Value
Source: UN Comtrade, Rabobank, 2019
17
While China is the main demand driver, emerging as the new largest shrimp importer
Global marine shrimp imports in volume (left axis) and value (right axis)
10000
12000
14000
16000
18000
20000
22000
24000
0
500,000
1,000,000
1,500,000
2,000,000
2,500,000
3,000,000
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Value in Million USD
Mill
ions
tonnes
USA EU China+Vietnam* Japan Rest of the World Total Value
8%
28%
33%
25%
Source: UN Comtrade, Rabobank, 2019Note: *We have used exports to China+Vietnam from World
18
Two growth markets US and China and two in decline EU and Japan contributing to the low prices we are experiencing
Top importers of Shrimps, (Difference of 12 months, 07/18-06/19 to 07/17-06/18)
Importer Country Value (USD Million) Change Volume (tonnes) Change
EU28 6,664 -13.4% 794,198 -6.2%
US 6,153 -9.7% 696,915 2.1%
China 2,880 142.3% 443,944 169.2%
Japan 2,311 -8.4% 220,691 -4.2%
Vietnam 1,107 -63.2% 184,192 -59.5%
China + Vietnam 3,988 -4.9% 628,137 1.4%
Source: ITC, Rabobank, 2019
19
-
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
-
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Million USD‘000 tonnes
USA EU28 China & Vietnam Japan Others Value
Exports dominated by EU and Japan
Exports dominated by China and US
Source: UN Comtrade, Rabobank, 2019
Indian Shrimp Exports
Consequently India, once reliant on the EU and Japan is now fully focused on US and China
20
Top exporters of Shrimp, (Difference of 12 months, 07/18-06/19 to 07/17-06/18)
Exporter Country Value (USD Million) Change Volume (tonnes) Change
Ecuador4 2,094 12.1% 364,011 38.4%
India4 2,491 -7.9% 348,650 -3.4%
Indonesia3 756 -9.8% 91,174 -0.2%
China4 929 -19.9% 84,102 -18.3%
Thailand4 738 -6.1% 72,028 -3.5%
Vietnam3 1,440 -11.9% NA NA
Note: 3:January-June 2019; 4: January-July 2019Source: STIP, Trade Map GACC, VASEP, CAN, BPS, 2019
But interesting to see the difference in trade performance between Ecuador and the Asia shrimp exporters in recent months
21
If price is the only factor explaining supply changes this could suggest a difference in cost, but there are other factors also
Shrimp prices: Left axis US import prices, right axis Thai export prices
Asian Shrimp supply in 2019 Ecuador
Shrimp supply in
2019Down c.5 to 10%?
Up 15-20%?
100
140
180
220
260
300
2
3
4
5
6
7
jan-09 jan-10 jan-11 jan-12 jan-13 jan-14 jan-15 jan-16 jan-17 jan-18 jan-19
THB/
kg
USD
/lb
Urner Barry HLSO Farm – Raised White Shrimp Index
Monthly Thai White Shrimp (Vannamei), wholesale prices, sized 60pc/kg in THB
22
Shrimp: still supply growth despite lower prices, but not everyone seems to be impacted equally
Growth continuing despite price crash
Supply momentum surprisingly strong
Intensification, technology and
professionalization are the key drivers. And still some new land entering the sector
China is the big unknown
Domestic supply, exchange rate, domestic
economy are variables that can change the net
trade
Currently Ecuador / LAM seem to operate in a market only partially related to that of India
and the Asia producers. Meaning a price
recovery for the Asian producers is more likely
India to contract (temporarily in 2019), Ecuador still showinggrowth , while other Asian produces are somewhat stable
SalmonShrimp
23
Fresh water white fish: China to soon become a net importer?
24
Back in 2015 China and Vietnam were the exporters and the US and EU the importers, a situation not changed since the 1990s
2015
Source: UN Comtrade, Rabobank, 2019
Vietnam à USA (#3)
112,688 tonnes $353.7 million
China à USA (#1)
168,744 tonnes $697.5 million
Vietnam à Brazil (#6)
31,069 tonnes $57.1 million
China àAfrica (#4)
91,491 tonnes $73.4 million
Vietnam à M. East(#5)
53,298 tonnes $85.4 million
Vietnam à EU28 (#2)
118,392 tonnes $293.0 million
25
But by 2018 Chine is emerging as a new and unexpected designation while the EU is loosing relevance
2018
Note:*Vietnam to China trade flow is for 2017Source: UN Comtrade, Rabobank, 2019
Vietnam à USA (#2)
118,028 tonnes $540.4 million
China à USA (#1)
142,977 tonnes $497.9 million
Vietnam à EU28 (#3)
71,299 tonnes $209.5 million
Vietnam* àChina (#4)
55,030 tonnes $118.2 million
Vietnam à Brazil (#5)
28,423 tonnes $84.2 million
China à EU28 (#6)
17,078 tonnes $39.5 million
26Source: UN Comtrade, Rabobank, 2019
EU pangasius imports and prices
In EU the booming fresh water fillet market has come … and gone
0
1
2
3
4
5
0
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
EUR/Kilotonnes product weight
27Source: GOAL 2017, FAO 1990-2014, Miscellaneous sources 2015-2019, Rabobank 2018Note: NMFS: Prices US import frozen fillet Prices are annual averages, except for 2017 (January-July average), Global Aquaculture Alliance 2017
US imports of Tilapia and Pangaisus
Now there is seems to be a declining trend in the US imports ..
0
40
80
120
160
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Million lbs.
Tilapia Frozen Fillets Pangasius Frozen Fillets Tilapia Frozen Whole Fish Tilapia Fresh Fillets
Tilapia Frozen Fillets
Pangasius Frozen Fillets
28Source: UN Comtrade, Rabobank, 2019
Global fresh water white fish (pangasius and tilapia) imports in volume (left axis) and value (right axis)
-
900
1,800
2,700
3,600
0
300,000
600,000
900,000
1,200,000
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Value in Million USD
Mill
ions
tonnes
USA EU ChinaAfrica Latin America Middle EastAsia Ex China&Middle East Rest of the World Total Value
9.5%23.7%
9.6%
Fresh water white fish trade is stable, but China is emerging as a new market compensating for the decline in the EU and US
29
Top importers of Fresh water fish, (Difference of 12 months, 07/18-06/19 to 07/17-06/18)
Source: ITC, Rabobank, 2019
Importer Country Value (USD Million) Change Volume (tonnes) Change
US 1,288 17.5% 296,960 9.9%
EU28 458 8.6% 136,274 0.9%
China 353 62.1% 139,968 55.0%
Top exporters of Fresh water fish, (Difference of 12 months, 07/18-06/19 to 07/17-06/18)
Exporter Country Value (USD Million) Change Volume (tonnes) Change
Vietnam 1,694 23.2% 565,485 5.7%
China 668 -9.2% 245,495 -8.1%
China’s net export of fresh water fish is rapidly declining due to tariffs on exports in the US and success of Vietnamese pangasius in China
30
The ASF outbreak can be a further driver of fresh water fish imports into China and re-focus of the tilapia industry domestically
Unprecedented decline forecast in Chinese pork productionHerd decline drives production losses
Source: China Statistics Yearbook, Rabobank, 2019
0
10
20
30
40
50
0
100
200
300
400
500
2018 2019f 2020f
million headMillion head
Total herd (LHS) High case Sows (RHS)
20
30
40
50
60
2018 2019f 2020f
Million metric tons
31
Retail prices of all proteins are rising, in response to pork
Source: Chinese Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Boyar, Rabobank 2019
ASF is pressuring pork prices up
Pork prices are increasing, impacting all proteins and eventually seafood prices. Tilapia and Pangasius are species that could benefit
0
15
30
45
60
Dec
-13
Apr
-14
Aug
-14
Dec
-14
Apr
-15
Aug
-15
Dec
-15
Apr
-16
Aug
-16
Dec
-16
Apr
-17
Aug
-17
Dec
-17
Apr
-18
Aug
-18
Dec
-18
Apr
-19
Aug
-19
RMB/kg
Piglet Live hog Pork
0
20
40
60
80
Jan-
14
May
-14
Sept
-14
Jan-
15
May
-15
Sept
-15
Jan-
16
May
-16
Sep-
16
Jan-
17
May
-17
Sep-
17
Jan-
18
May
-18
Sep-
18
Jan-
19
May
-19
CNY/kg
Pork Beef Sheepmeat Chicken
32
Fresh water white fish
Fresh water white fish: US-China trade war and ASF can convert China for a leading exporter to a net importer
Profit pool has contracted due to falling exports of fillets and lower
price to EU and US
US-China trade war will create more trade shifts and
changes in profitability globally
New target markets are developing
counties, Brazil, China, Indonesia,
Egypt, Sub Saharan Africa, India
Both production and trade show large
markets emerging in developing countries
Will a major newcomer emerge to challenge China and Vietnam? Barrier to
entry is relatively low.
33
Contact Us
This document is meant exclusively for you and does not carry any right of publication or disclosure other than to Coöperatieve Rabobank U.A. (“Rabobank”), registered in Amsterdam. Neither this document nor any of its contents may be distributed, reproduced, or used for any other purpose without the prior written consent of Rabobank. The information in this document reflects prevailing market conditions and our judgement as of this date, all of which may be subject to change. This document is based on public information. The information and opinions contained in this document have been compiled or derived from sources believed to be reliable; however, Rabobank does not guarantee the correctness or completeness of this document, and does not accept any liability in this respect. The information and opinions contained in this document are indicative and for discussion purposes only. No rights may be derived from any potential offers, transactions, commercial ideas, et cetera contained in this document. This document does not constitute an offer, invitation, or recommendation. This document shall not form the basis of, or cannot be relied upon in connection with, any contract or commitment whatsoever. The information in this document is not intended, and may not be understood, as an advice (including, without limitation, an advice within the meaning of article 1:1 and article 4:23 of the Dutch Financial Supervision Act). This document is governed by Dutch law. The competent court in Amsterdam, the Netherlands has exclusive jurisdiction to settle any dispute which may arise out of, or in connection with, this document and/or any discussions or negotiations based on it. This report has been published in line with Rabobank’s long-term commitment to international food and agribusiness. It is one of a series of publications undertaken by the global department of RaboResearch Food & Agribusiness. ©2018 - All Rights Reserved.
Rabobank
Gorjan NikolikSenior Analyst – Seafood
Telephone +31 30 712 3825
Mobile +31 6 1243 2463
E-mail [email protected]