R. Margutti Harvard University LOS ALAMOS 2011. Where do we stand Log(Time) Log(Flux) Gamma-ray...

14
Bridging the gap between the prompt and the afterglow emission: the lag-luminosity relation… R. Margutti Harvard University LOS ALAMOS 2011

Transcript of R. Margutti Harvard University LOS ALAMOS 2011. Where do we stand Log(Time) Log(Flux) Gamma-ray...

Page 1: R. Margutti Harvard University LOS ALAMOS 2011. Where do we stand Log(Time) Log(Flux) Gamma-ray Prompt X-ray Flares Swift Steep Decay Shallow Decay Normal.

Bridging the gap between the prompt and the afterglow emission:

the lag-luminosity relation…

R. MarguttiHarvard

UniversityLOS ALAMOS 2011

Page 2: R. Margutti Harvard University LOS ALAMOS 2011. Where do we stand Log(Time) Log(Flux) Gamma-ray Prompt X-ray Flares Swift Steep Decay Shallow Decay Normal.

Where do we stand

Log(Time)

Log

(Flu

x)

Gamma-rayPrompt

X-ray Flares

Swift

Steep Decay

Shallow Decay

Normal Decay

10-100 s102-103 s ~104s

t-1

Is there any physical

link between a

prompt pulse and an X-ray

flare?

Page 3: R. Margutti Harvard University LOS ALAMOS 2011. Where do we stand Log(Time) Log(Flux) Gamma-ray Prompt X-ray Flares Swift Steep Decay Shallow Decay Normal.

Log(Time)

Log(

Flux

) Gamma-rayPrompt

X-ray Flares

Flares are softer and less energetic time-stretched versions of a prompt pulse

Margutti et al., 2010,MNRAS, 406, 2149

Temporal Properties1.Pulse Asymmetry

2.Fast rise- Exponential decay

Spectral Properties1.Band spectral energy distribution

2.Peak energy evolution with time Ep(t)3. Ep(t)-Liso(t)

4. Lag-Luminosity relation

Page 4: R. Margutti Harvard University LOS ALAMOS 2011. Where do we stand Log(Time) Log(Flux) Gamma-ray Prompt X-ray Flares Swift Steep Decay Shallow Decay Normal.

Lag-Luminosity

PROMPT

L(0.3−10keV ) ∝ tlag−0.95±0.23

FLARES

Lag

Margutti et al., 2010,MNRAS, 406, 2149

LONG!!!!

Page 5: R. Margutti Harvard University LOS ALAMOS 2011. Where do we stand Log(Time) Log(Flux) Gamma-ray Prompt X-ray Flares Swift Steep Decay Shallow Decay Normal.

LOS ALAMOS 2011

060801051221A

050724

100117A

050724

070724A

071227

Short GRBs ??!!??

Page 6: R. Margutti Harvard University LOS ALAMOS 2011. Where do we stand Log(Time) Log(Flux) Gamma-ray Prompt X-ray Flares Swift Steep Decay Shallow Decay Normal.

LOS ALAMOS 2011

Page 7: R. Margutti Harvard University LOS ALAMOS 2011. Where do we stand Log(Time) Log(Flux) Gamma-ray Prompt X-ray Flares Swift Steep Decay Shallow Decay Normal.

LOS ALAMOS 2011

Different toolsDifferent definitions (e.g. pulse-peak lag vs. CCF lag)

…No Homogeneity…

PULSE property vs. Time-averaged measurements

Strongly dependent on the definition of the energy bands used

Using rest-frame defined energy bands is enough?

Page 8: R. Margutti Harvard University LOS ALAMOS 2011. Where do we stand Log(Time) Log(Flux) Gamma-ray Prompt X-ray Flares Swift Steep Decay Shallow Decay Normal.

LOS ALAMOS 2011

Different toolsDifferent definitions (e.g. pulse-peak lag vs. CCF lag)

No Homogeneity + Difficult to model

PULSE property vs. Time-averaged measurements

Strongly dependent on the definition of the energy bands used

Using rest-frame defined energy bands is enough?

Page 9: R. Margutti Harvard University LOS ALAMOS 2011. Where do we stand Log(Time) Log(Flux) Gamma-ray Prompt X-ray Flares Swift Steep Decay Shallow Decay Normal.

LOS ALAMOS 2011

Progress requires:

Homogenous analysis of a statistically significant number of GRBsStep back to the analysis of more basic effects that are known to contribute to the lag measure to understand how each of them is correlated to the final lag measureTime resolved approach to determine a MAP of the obs. properties of GRBs with time.

Page 10: R. Margutti Harvard University LOS ALAMOS 2011. Where do we stand Log(Time) Log(Flux) Gamma-ray Prompt X-ray Flares Swift Steep Decay Shallow Decay Normal.

LOS ALAMOS 2011

Observables map:

Page 11: R. Margutti Harvard University LOS ALAMOS 2011. Where do we stand Log(Time) Log(Flux) Gamma-ray Prompt X-ray Flares Swift Steep Decay Shallow Decay Normal.

LOS ALAMOS 2011

Observables map:

Epeak (t)alpha (t)beta (t) Lag (t)Variability (t)Pulses properties(t)Pulses properties (E)??????

Page 12: R. Margutti Harvard University LOS ALAMOS 2011. Where do we stand Log(Time) Log(Flux) Gamma-ray Prompt X-ray Flares Swift Steep Decay Shallow Decay Normal.

LOS ALAMOS 2011

The GTAC MANIFESTO

Galaxy NNN

050822

Gamma-Ray Burst

(GRB050822)

1) Selection of a GRB

2) Production of a MAP of properties

3) Writing of a document

ACT as a TEAMUseful for FUNDING(we have

something to show..)

Page 13: R. Margutti Harvard University LOS ALAMOS 2011. Where do we stand Log(Time) Log(Flux) Gamma-ray Prompt X-ray Flares Swift Steep Decay Shallow Decay Normal.

LOS ALAMOS 2011

061121WISH LIST:GRB detected by Swift- FermiPrompt emission seen by XRTPrompt emission see by UVOTBrightKnown z…good for GBM-BAT cross calibration…

Page 14: R. Margutti Harvard University LOS ALAMOS 2011. Where do we stand Log(Time) Log(Flux) Gamma-ray Prompt X-ray Flares Swift Steep Decay Shallow Decay Normal.

LOS ALAMOS 2011

Raffaella: Variability Time scale of BAT; XRT expertise (XRT+BAT spectral fits; pulse properties in the X-ray regime)Mike: Time-resolved lag using the CCFJohn: Prompt Pulse properties

List of people to complete….