R aising I mmunizations S afely & E ffectively Health Care Worker Campaign RISE-HCW David A. Nace,...
-
Upload
rebecca-griffin -
Category
Documents
-
view
212 -
download
0
Transcript of R aising I mmunizations S afely & E ffectively Health Care Worker Campaign RISE-HCW David A. Nace,...
Raising Immunizations Safely & Effectively
Health Care Worker Campaign
RISE-HCW
David A. Nace, MD, MPHDirector, Long Term Care and Flu Programs
University of Pittsburgh Institute on AgingJuly 18, 2008
Objectives
• Review the background work that led to RISE-HCW
• Describe the RISE-HCW program
• Present the RISE-HCW outcomes
Questions from the 1990’s
• 1) Can a facility reach a HCW influenza immunization rate of 60% or greater?
• 2) IF SO, can the facility maintain HCW influenza immunization rates of 60% or greater over time?
• 3) IF SO, can the program be deployed to other facilities?
BHWP PilotCommunity Based Long-Term Care (LTC) Facility
• 1996 – Identified influenza immunization as QI Indicator
• 1996-98 – flu outbreaks
• 2002-03 – implemented declination form
• 2002-03 – Act 95 implemented
• 2004-05 – national shortage
Organizational Barriers
inadequate vaccine supplies
general vaccine inaccessibility
lack of positive incentives for immunization
requirement of written consent
limited record keeping
lack of any feedback or shared learning
Individual Barriers
limited leadership knowledge and support
poor staff knowledge about influenza
negative staff attitudes about the vaccine and injections
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Flu Season
Pecentage of StaffVaccinated
54.03 55.32 77.52 62.79 63.03 64.09 93.67 95.45 73.71 86.02
1996-1997
1997-1998
1998-1999
1999-2000
2000-2001
2001-2002
2002-2003
2003-2004
2004-2005
2005-2006
BHWP HCW RatesNace DA, Hoffman EL, Resnick NM, Handler SM. Achieving and Sustaining High Rates of Influenza Immunization
Among Long-Term Care Staff. J Am Med Dir Assoc February 2007; 8(2):128-133.
Questions from the 1990’s
• 1) Can a facility reach a HCW influenza immunization rate of 60% or greater?
A = YES
• 2) IF SO, can the facility maintain HCW influenza immunization rates of 60% or greater over time?
A = YES
• 3) IF SO, can the program be deployed to other facilities?
PLTCVPPromoting LTC Vaccinations Project
• AMDA Foundation / Pfizer 2002 QI Award– 2002-2003 Season– 6 LTC Facilities in Western PA
• Goals– Improve resident immunization rates
• Flu & pneumococcal
– Improve HCW immunization rates• Flu
PLTCVPPromoting LTC Vaccinations Project
• Design– 3 usual care and 3 collaborative groups– All facilities
• received the ADMA Immunization Toolkit • Access to project team for questions/information
– Collaborative group (3)• Single collaborative training session October 2002• Email / Phone contacts every 1-2 months Oct –
February
PLTCVP ResultsPromoting LTC Vaccinations Project
Facility 2002 HCW Flu Rate %
2003 HCW Flu Rate %
Δ HCW Flu %
Non Collaborative 1 23.1 12.5 -10.6Non Collaborative 2 47.1 30.3 -16.7Non Collaborative 3 17.8 34.7 16.9Collaborative 1 56.9 67.2 10.3Collaborative 2 14.3 36.2 21.9Collaborative 3 46.4 46.8 0.4
Focus Group Evaluation
• Usual barriers identified
• Staff turnover problem– Nursing & CNA turnover of 30-55% average
annually– Nick Castle
• 1996-2004 OSCAR data• 43% ADM, 39% DON
– Facility UC2 champion team – 200% during study
RISE Program
Raising Immunizations Safely & Effectively
RISE ProgramDavid A. Nace, MD, MPH
Program Director
RISE Steering Committee
RISE - HCW
RISE-Influenza Prevention and
Management Network
RISE – Patient Immunization
Rx Partners, LTC
RISE-HCWRaising Immunizations Safely & Effectively-Healthcare Workers
• Created 2004-2005 season
• Collaborative effort– Rx Partners, LTC – a LTC pharmacy– University of Pittsburgh Institute on Aging– 9 Western PA LTC facilities
• Pharmacy based program
RISE-HCWOrganizational Structure
RISE STEERING CMT
Representatives include Administration, Nursing, Medical Director,
Marketing, Human Resources, Staff Development
Primary UPMC SRCFacilities
Rx Partner, LTC Facilities
Community Drug Facilities
A subsidiary of Rx Partners, LTC
Rx Partners, LTC
Facility Beds *skilled only when multi-level
No Staff(2007)
Urban/Rural
County Union
A 139* 356 Urban Allegheny No
B 59* 158 Urban Allegheny Yes
C 100 107 Rural Venango No
D 150 199 Urban Butler No
E 59 96 Rural Mercer No
F 145 176 Urban Allegheny No
G 180 243 Urban Allegheny No
H 60* 294 Urban Butler Yes
I 214 180 Rural Venango No
RISE-HCW Objectives
• Primary– 60% HCW Influenza Immunization Rate
• Secondary– 80% HCW Influenza Immunization Rate
Steering Committee Tasks
• Spring– Season activity– Vaccination rates– Vaccine supplies &orders
• Summer– Vaccination rates– Barrier assessment– Educational planning– Communications
• Fall– 2 meetings– Early implementation barriers– Mid-season push
Facility Responsibilities
• Leadership Contact Team– Communication of information– Accountability– Leadership buy-in– Sense of urgency
• Designate Flu Champion– Coordinate immunizations– Coordinate education– Data collection– Dissemination of outcomes
Pharmacy Responsibilities
• Vaccine Supplies• Defines Immunizations Process
– Policy and Procedures– Forms
• MAR• Preprinted labels
• Data collection• Vaccination Clinic
– Initial start date at each facility– Facility is responsible for administration
• Liaison between Steering Committee & Facilities
RISE-HCWTools Used
• Declination Form– Encouraged
• Incentives– Pizza party for winning facility– News coverage of positive outcomes
• Education– Training and reference materials– Formal training sessions– AMDA video
• RISE Prevention & Management Network
APPENDIX CRISE-HCW FlU IMMUNIZATION RATES 2001-2008*
(Baseline Seasons = 2001-2004, RISE Intervention Seasons = 2004-2008) (* 2008 Data as of May 7, 2008)
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
FACILITY
2001-2002
2002-2003
2003-2004
2004-2005
2005-2006
2006-2007
2007-2008*
Questions from the 1990’s
• 1) Can a facility reach a HCW influenza immunization rate of 60% or greater?
A = YES
• 2) IF SO, can the facility maintain HCW influenza immunization rates of 60% or greater over time?
A = YES
• 3) IF SO, can the program be deployed to other facilities?
A = YES
Models of Mandatory Program Systems
Mandatory Programs(Action Based)
Mandatory Vaccination(Shot or Mask)
eg Virginia Mason
Mandatory AnswerWritten Declination
(Shot or Sign)eg UPMC Cranberry Place
Mandatory AnswerTechnology (Intranet)
(Shot or Click)eg Cleveland Clinic
UPMC
Models of Voluntary Program Systems
Voluntary Programs(Passive Response)
No DeclinationNo NRT
eg UPMC Canterbury Place
DeclinationLimited NRTeg Asbury Heights
NRT - Non-respondent tracking
Facility Rate Declination NRT
Caring Place 90% Yes Complete
Grove Manor 88% Yes Complete
Cranberry Place 86% Yes Complete
Sugar Creek Station 83% Yes Complete
Asbury Heights 75% Yes Partial
Seneca Place 70% Yes Complete
Sherwood Oaks 66% Yes Partial
Heritage Place 61% No Partial
Canterbury Place 32% No None
NRT – non-respondent tracking
Recommendations
1. Pharmacy Based Program• Overcomes turnover issue
2. Mandatory – Action Based Program• Explicit declination forms
• Complete non-respondent tracking
3. Leadership Accountability• Require evidence based action if no improvement
• Don’t stipulate specific rate
4. Use Care Bundles
2008-2009 Pittsburgh HCW Immunization Plans
1. UPMC Health System• President’s Dashboard item
• HCW Immunization Rate• Declination Return Rate
2. UPMC Health Plan• Use of MyHealth Internet Survey
3. Allegheny County Health Department• Healthcare Facility Reporting of HCW Rates
• Website posting < 60%
2007-08 UPMC Flu Vaccination Rates
Facility Immunization Rate EstimatesUPMC Presbyterian Shadyside ( & WPIC) 33%UPMC South Side 37%UPMC McKeesport 44%UPMC Children’s 44%UPMC Magee 40%UPMC St. Margaret’s 48%UPMC Northwest 67%UPMC Horizon 50%UPMC Passavant 42%UPMC Braddock 56%UPMC Bedford 52%UPMC Mercy 44%Physician Services Division 30%
Team Members
• RISE Steering Committee– Sandra Carroll– Daniel Grant– Jay Harper– Steven Handler– Shikha Iyengar– Mary Ann Suda– Mark Tannis– Barry Young– Paula Carlock– Scott Stephens
• Facilities and their teams– Asbury Heights– Canterbury Place– Caring Place– Cranberry Place– Grove Manor– Heritage Place– Seneca Place– Sherwood Oaks– Sugar Creek Station