qwertyu
2
Category 1 2 3 4 Score Poor Acceptable Good Excellent Presentati on/ Explanatio n (50%) -presenting the model of living and non-living things in an ecosystem The explanation of the students had a poor understandi ng of the relationshi p of living and non- living things in an environment The explanation of the students showed understandi ng of the concepts of the relationshi p of living and non- living things in an environment . The explanation of the student showed an accurate understandi ng of the relationshi p of living and non- living things in an environment The explanation of the students showed a clear and accurate understandi ng of the relationshi p of living and non- living things in an environment Positionin g and types (25%) -the positions and types of living and non-living things The model by the students had more than 6 mistakes in terms of the positions and types of living and non- living things in an environment . The model by the students had 3-5 mistakes in terms of the positions and types of living and non- living things in an environment . The model by the students had 1-2 mistakes in terms of the positions and types of living and non- living things in an environment . The model by the students had no mistakes in terms of positioning and types of living and non- living things in an environment . Organizati on and Neatness (25%) -organization and neatness of the model. The model was a very disorganize d and messy model of an ecosystem . (models The model was a bit of messy organizatio n of a model of an ecosystem The model was an organized and neat model of an ecosystem. The model was a very organized and neat model of an ecosystem.
-
Upload
mico-lorenzo -
Category
Documents
-
view
4 -
download
2
description
qwertyu
Transcript of qwertyu
Category 1 2 3 4 ScorePoor Acceptable Good Excellent
Presentation/Explanation
(50%)-presenting the model of living and non-living
things in an ecosystem
The explanation of the students
had a poor understanding
of the relationship of living and non-living things in
an environment
The explanation of the students
showed understanding of the concepts
of the relationship of living and non-living things in
an environment.
The explanation of the student
showed an accurate
understanding of the
relationship of living and non-living things in
an environment
The explanation of the students showed a clear and accurate
understanding of the
relationship of living and non-living things in
an environmentPositioning and
types (25%)
-the positions and types of
living and non-living things
The model by the students had
more than 6 mistakes in
terms of the positions and types of living and non-living
things in an environment.
The model by the students had 3-5 mistakes in
terms of the positions and types of living and non-living
things in an environment.
The model by the students had 1-2 mistakes in
terms of the positions and types of living and non-living
things in an environment.
The model by the students
had no mistakes in terms of
positioning and types of living and non-living
things in an environment.
Organization and Neatness
(25%)-organization and neatness of the model.
The model was a very
disorganized and messy model of an ecosystem .
(models that are lying down)
The model was a bit of messy
organization of a model of an ecosystem
The model was an organized
and neat model of an ecosystem.
The model was a very organized and neat model
of an ecosystem.
Total
RUBRIC FOR A MINIATURE MODEL OF AN ECOSYSTEM
