Questions Pupils Ask!: Asking Questions

2
Questions Pupils Ask!: Asking Questions Author(s): Colin Foster Source: Mathematics in School, Vol. 35, No. 4 (Sep., 2006), p. 24 Published by: The Mathematical Association Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/30215939 . Accessed: 30/09/2013 16:18 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. . The Mathematical Association is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Mathematics in School. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 139.132.1.23 on Mon, 30 Sep 2013 16:18:21 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

Transcript of Questions Pupils Ask!: Asking Questions

Page 1: Questions Pupils Ask!: Asking Questions

Questions Pupils Ask!: Asking QuestionsAuthor(s): Colin FosterSource: Mathematics in School, Vol. 35, No. 4 (Sep., 2006), p. 24Published by: The Mathematical AssociationStable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/30215939 .

Accessed: 30/09/2013 16:18

Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp

.JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range ofcontent in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new formsof scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected].

.

The Mathematical Association is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access toMathematics in School.

http://www.jstor.org

This content downloaded from 139.132.1.23 on Mon, 30 Sep 2013 16:18:21 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

Page 2: Questions Pupils Ask!: Asking Questions

Questions PupRiis ilk!

Afisking Questions by Colin Foster

As a rule, I don't go looking for trouble, so I am not in the habit of browsing through the back pages of pupils' books when I take them in! But in the course of searching for a piece of homework I stumbled across a question a Year 8 pupil had written (for himself, I presume) under the intriguing heading 'maths queries'.

(Ydk~ll~ ~l~kvnla

vex V-t,~

ca ICLL,

'Why do the internal angles have to add up to 1800 to be a triangle when a square and a circle are 36007 It's not as though a triangle has gaps in it.' (David)

To put this in some context, we had recently used the result that the interior angle sum of a triangle is 180' to find the interior angle sums of other polygons by cutting them up into triangles. We had also mentally 'walked round' various polygons and concluded that the exterior angle sum of any polygon has to be 360'.

I read and re-read David's (a pseudonym) query, trying to break into his thinking - a precarious business, but all I could do under the circumstances. When he assigns 360' to a circle is he thinking of a total exterior angle? Is he imagining walking right round the circle to the point where he started and realizing that he has turned through one revolution? Or is he thinking of a radius rotating through one turn? These thoughts led me to ask myself (I believe for the first time) what it might mean to think of the interior angles of a circle and, if it has any meaning, what their sum could be. Infinitely many vertices, each of 180'? The formula 180(n - 2) for the interior angle sum of an n-gon does indeed tend to infinity as n tends to infinity.

Does David see that all closed shapes ought to share this property (total exterior angle equal to 360') and wonders how a triangle can join up if it doesn't? Yet a triangle does, like all polygons, have an exterior angle equal to 360', though it is, perhaps, less often mentioned. Maybe the fact that a square (or any other quadrilateral) has an interior angle sum equal to the exterior angle sum of 360' is causing confusion? Or the fact that the interior angle sum of a triangle is exactly half its exterior angle sum? David's query has made me realize a number of potential confusions in this area that I was unaware of.

In the following week, some LOGO work in the computer room gave us plenty of opportunities to consider the differences between interior and exterior angles. Asking pupils to draw an equilateral triangle led many, predictably, to produce half a regular hexagon. Drawing a circle (well, a 360-gon and then a 3600-gon) satisfied me about my thoughts on the 'interior angles' of a circle.

My wish is that more of my pupils would question when a new idea seems to clash with the current structure they are carrying in their heads. As the teacher, I cannot reliably predict when and how this is going to happen. Being aware of common misconceptions has its uses, but can leave me trying to answer questions pupils are not asking. I believe that such clashes are crucial and can lead to fruitful opportunities for examining both the new idea and tweaking (or completely reworking) the existing mental structure to fit it. Perhaps we all need a 'maths queries' page?

Keywords: Questions.

Author Colin Foster, King Henry VIII School, Coventry. e-mail: [email protected]

24 Mathematics in School, September 2006 The MA web site www.m-a.org.uk

This content downloaded from 139.132.1.23 on Mon, 30 Sep 2013 16:18:21 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions