Utilitarianism Lesson # 4 Leadership and Ethics. Utilitarianism What is Utilitarianism?
Questioning Natural Rights: Utilitarianism ER 11, Spring 2012.
-
Upload
verity-shields -
Category
Documents
-
view
217 -
download
0
Transcript of Questioning Natural Rights: Utilitarianism ER 11, Spring 2012.
![Page 1: Questioning Natural Rights: Utilitarianism ER 11, Spring 2012.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56649ea25503460f94ba6bc6/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Questioning Natural Rights:Utilitarianism
ER 11, Spring 2012
![Page 2: Questioning Natural Rights: Utilitarianism ER 11, Spring 2012.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56649ea25503460f94ba6bc6/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
![Page 3: Questioning Natural Rights: Utilitarianism ER 11, Spring 2012.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56649ea25503460f94ba6bc6/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
First suspicion:
Can there be foundations for rights/morality without God?
![Page 4: Questioning Natural Rights: Utilitarianism ER 11, Spring 2012.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56649ea25503460f94ba6bc6/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Yes, in principle there canbut we have yet to offer an account
![Page 5: Questioning Natural Rights: Utilitarianism ER 11, Spring 2012.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56649ea25503460f94ba6bc6/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Second suspicion:
Maybe rights are not as important as we thought?
![Page 6: Questioning Natural Rights: Utilitarianism ER 11, Spring 2012.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56649ea25503460f94ba6bc6/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Maybe they are not foundational?
![Page 7: Questioning Natural Rights: Utilitarianism ER 11, Spring 2012.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56649ea25503460f94ba6bc6/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Utilitarianism
• act in such a way that brings about maximal amount of net happiness (compared to other available actions)
• Focused on consequences of actions; states of affairs
• Thinks of consequences in terms of overall happiness
• Aggregates happiness - does not care about distribution
![Page 8: Questioning Natural Rights: Utilitarianism ER 11, Spring 2012.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56649ea25503460f94ba6bc6/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Example
• Scenario 1 -- Units of happiness: 10, 10, 10, 10, 10
• Scenario 2 – Units of happiness: 20, 5, 5, 20, 5
• Utilitarians choose 2
![Page 9: Questioning Natural Rights: Utilitarianism ER 11, Spring 2012.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56649ea25503460f94ba6bc6/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
What utilitarianism is not..
• “greatest happiness of greatest number”
• Incoherent, like search for house that is both cheapest and largest
![Page 10: Questioning Natural Rights: Utilitarianism ER 11, Spring 2012.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56649ea25503460f94ba6bc6/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
What utilitarianism is not..
• “greatest happiness of the greatest number”
• Incoherent, like search for the house that is both cheapest and largest
![Page 11: Questioning Natural Rights: Utilitarianism ER 11, Spring 2012.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56649ea25503460f94ba6bc6/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
What utilitarianism is not..
• “greatest happiness of the greatest number”
• Incoherent, like search for the house that is both cheapest and largest
![Page 12: Questioning Natural Rights: Utilitarianism ER 11, Spring 2012.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56649ea25503460f94ba6bc6/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Why utilitarianism?
• Intuitively plausible: just seems correct that one ought always to do what promotes overall good
• Seems to capture essence of morality: impartiality
• simple, determinate
![Page 13: Questioning Natural Rights: Utilitarianism ER 11, Spring 2012.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56649ea25503460f94ba6bc6/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Jeremy Bentham (1748-1832)
• Social reformer
• Prisons, animals
• Against theology, conventional morality
![Page 14: Questioning Natural Rights: Utilitarianism ER 11, Spring 2012.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56649ea25503460f94ba6bc6/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Natural rights: “nonsense upon stilts”
No good foundation available for them
![Page 15: Questioning Natural Rights: Utilitarianism ER 11, Spring 2012.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56649ea25503460f94ba6bc6/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
![Page 16: Questioning Natural Rights: Utilitarianism ER 11, Spring 2012.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56649ea25503460f94ba6bc6/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Bentham Association
![Page 17: Questioning Natural Rights: Utilitarianism ER 11, Spring 2012.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56649ea25503460f94ba6bc6/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
John Stuart Mill (1806-1873): “The creed which accepts as the
foundation of morals, Utility, or the Greatest-Happiness Principle, holds that actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness. By happiness is intended pleasure, and the absence of pain; by unhappiness, pain, and the privation of pleasure.” (chapter 2)
“ the greatest amount of happiness altogether”
![Page 18: Questioning Natural Rights: Utilitarianism ER 11, Spring 2012.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56649ea25503460f94ba6bc6/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Happiness = Pleasure
Bentham: all pleasures count equally
Mill: higher and lower pleasures
Judgments of those who know both
“Better Socrates dissatisfied than a pig satisfied”
![Page 19: Questioning Natural Rights: Utilitarianism ER 11, Spring 2012.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56649ea25503460f94ba6bc6/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Two kinds of utilitarianism
• Act-utilitarianism: maximize happiness for each action
– Utilitarians will never stop calculating; need more information than they normally have
• Rule-utilitarianism: maximize happiness at level of rules
– But what if exception to rule creates more happiness?
![Page 20: Questioning Natural Rights: Utilitarianism ER 11, Spring 2012.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56649ea25503460f94ba6bc6/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Careful
• Not always clear which version of utilitarianism an author defends
• Case in point: Mill
![Page 21: Questioning Natural Rights: Utilitarianism ER 11, Spring 2012.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56649ea25503460f94ba6bc6/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Approaching Mill chapter -- Reaction to utilitarianism
• Concerns about distribution – fairness matters too
• Focus on happiness: not anything that makes individuals happy creates claims on others
• Asking too much of individuals
![Page 22: Questioning Natural Rights: Utilitarianism ER 11, Spring 2012.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56649ea25503460f94ba6bc6/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Utilitarianism and rights
• Sheriff in remote town
• Should he give one innocent person to the mob so that several others are saved?
• Doesn’t the innocent person have a right that this not be done?
![Page 23: Questioning Natural Rights: Utilitarianism ER 11, Spring 2012.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56649ea25503460f94ba6bc6/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Utilitarianism and rights
• Forced organ donations?
![Page 24: Questioning Natural Rights: Utilitarianism ER 11, Spring 2012.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56649ea25503460f94ba6bc6/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Utilitarianism and Rights
“In all ages of speculation, one of the strongest obstacles to the reception of the doctrine that Utility or Happiness is the criterion of right and wrong, has been drawn from the idea of justice.” (p 1)
Chapter V of Ut.
![Page 25: Questioning Natural Rights: Utilitarianism ER 11, Spring 2012.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56649ea25503460f94ba6bc6/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Mill’s strategy
• show that utilitarianism can say everything about rights/justice that makes sense to say
• not basic (natural), but highly derivative – devices of social coordination
![Page 26: Questioning Natural Rights: Utilitarianism ER 11, Spring 2012.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56649ea25503460f94ba6bc6/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
A central PassageTo have a right, then, is, I conceive, to have something
which society ought to defend me in the possession of. If the objector goes on to ask, why it ought? I can give him no other reason than general utility. (…) The interest involved is that of security, to every one's feelings the most vital of all interests. (….) Our notion, therefore, of the claim we have on our fellow-creatures to join in making safe for us the very groundwork of our existence, gathers feelings around it so much more intense than those concerned in any of the more common cases of utility, that the difference in degree (…) becomes a real difference in kind.
![Page 27: Questioning Natural Rights: Utilitarianism ER 11, Spring 2012.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56649ea25503460f94ba6bc6/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
But what happens to rights if considerations of general utility
outweigh them?
![Page 28: Questioning Natural Rights: Utilitarianism ER 11, Spring 2012.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56649ea25503460f94ba6bc6/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Another central passage
[J]ustice is a name for certain moral requirements, which, regarded collectively, stand higher in the scale of social utility, and are therefore of more paramount obligation, than any others; though particular cases may occur in which some other social duty is so important, as to overrule any one of the general maxims of justice. Thus, to save a life, it may not only be allowable, but a duty, to steal, or take by force, the necessary food or medicine, or to kidnap, and compel to officiate, the only qualified medical practitioner.
![Page 29: Questioning Natural Rights: Utilitarianism ER 11, Spring 2012.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56649ea25503460f94ba6bc6/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Rights are suspended if considerations of general utility outweigh them
![Page 30: Questioning Natural Rights: Utilitarianism ER 11, Spring 2012.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56649ea25503460f94ba6bc6/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Upshot
• In light of sheriff/forced organ donation scenarios, rights are too important to give up on them to the extent utilitarianism does
• But Bentham’s skepticism specifically of natural rights might still be correct
• Must see whether we can make sense of them in some other way before we give up on them
![Page 31: Questioning Natural Rights: Utilitarianism ER 11, Spring 2012.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56649ea25503460f94ba6bc6/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Second suspicion:
Maybe rights are not as important as we thought?
![Page 32: Questioning Natural Rights: Utilitarianism ER 11, Spring 2012.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56649ea25503460f94ba6bc6/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Answer: Rights really are as important as we
thought, but we still need a good account of human rights
![Page 33: Questioning Natural Rights: Utilitarianism ER 11, Spring 2012.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022062322/56649ea25503460f94ba6bc6/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Gallery of Skeptics Demanding Answers