Quantum Mechanics Brighton College 3 rd March 2008 1 Everything you always wanted to know about...
-
date post
20-Dec-2015 -
Category
Documents
-
view
222 -
download
1
Transcript of Quantum Mechanics Brighton College 3 rd March 2008 1 Everything you always wanted to know about...
1Quantum MechanicsBrighton College 3rd March 2008
Everything you always wanted to know about Quantum Mechanics
but were too embarrassed to ask
John F. C. Turner
2Quantum MechanicsBrighton College 3rd March 2008
1. The physical problem
2. The microscopic world
3. Microscopic vs macroscopic
4. Future possibilities
5. Summary
6. Questions
Talk Structure
3Quantum MechanicsBrighton College 3rd March 2008
Newtonian mechanics is a very successful system for describing macroscopic mechanical systems.
The physical problem
'We're living in a material world and I am a material girl...'
In the Newtonian world, waves and particles are distinct.
There are trajectories, positions and velocities
Energies, velocities, momenta are continuous
4Quantum MechanicsBrighton College 3rd March 2008
Shrinking the length scale of our observation using scientific instruments does reveal a distinct difference – when our observations of the system become measurable perturbations on the system – the Dirac definition of small*
In this regime,
• Energy is transferred in discrete units, the quanta • Positions and momenta become uncertain• Trajectories are no longer useful• The world becomes statistical
and this is the world in which the microscopic mechanisms of life, the technological transformations of matter and electronic age exist.
The microscopic world
* P. A. M. Dirac, Principles of Quantum MechanicsInternational Series of Monographs on Physics, 4 th Ed.
5Quantum MechanicsBrighton College 3rd March 2008
Despite the success of the Newtonian (Maxwellian) world, there is were major
failures:
Failures of the Newtonian world
This is impossible in the classical
world…..
Quantum MechanicsBrighton College 3rd March 2008
The spectrum of any body in the classical limit should diverge at small wavelengths
Failures of the Newtonian world
4
2
Tck
=λf B
The spectrum is given
by the Rayleigh-Jeans
Law:
Quantum MechanicsBrighton College 3rd March 2008
Max Planck’s departure from the classical was an empirical adjustment – the energy
spectrum of all photons is not continuous but is discrete.
There was no basis for this, except that it worked…
This was still a classical theory however...
Planck’s departure
4
2
Tck
=λf B
1exp
125
2
Tkhc
hc=λf
B
Quantum MechanicsBrighton College 3rd March 2008
Newtonian mechanics and classical electrodynamics cannot describe the observed
structure of the atom.
Classically, electrons ‘in orbit’ around the nucleus will lose energy through
radiation – the electron is accelerating as it travels around the orbit – and should
slowly descend and ‘land’ on the nucleus.
These findings, between ~ 1900 – 1930 stimulated the development of quantum
mechanics, which does account for the observed structure of the atom.
The Newtonian world and the classical atom
9Quantum MechanicsBrighton College 3rd March 2008
“Quantum world”
Objects are profoundly affected by the physics of observation.
No trajectories No positions No velocity
Calculations of properties are probabilistic, not certain.
Energy is transferred in discrete packets or quanta
Many other properties are no longer continuous but are also discrete
Applies to small objects only – those that are affected by the act of observation
The quantum world and the quantum atom
10Quantum MechanicsBrighton College 3rd March 2008
The atom is a quantum system.
Louis de Broglie formulated that a particle of
momentum p has an associated wavelength, λ, where
and p=mv
De Broglie relationship relates the motion of a
particle to wave-like properties and the electron in
an atom behaves as a wave. Standing waves have
fixed energies
violin strings
organ pipes
The quantum atom
h=pλ
Electrons in the atom
11Quantum MechanicsBrighton College 3rd March 2008
Atomic Structure
The first model of the atom was the Bohr model; it is incorrect but is still shown as
the model of the atom today.
It is the model in which electrons orbit the nucleus in a similar way that planets
orbit the sun.
The strong central and radial force is provided by the electric force between the
nucleus and the electron.
The energies of the electrons are empirically quantized so that the embarrassment of
the classical atom is avoided.
The energy of the atom in the absence of a field is given by
Where n is the ‘Principle’ quantum number
2n
B=E
12Quantum MechanicsBrighton College 3rd March 2008
Atomic Structure
It is the model in which electrons
orbit the nucleus in a similar way
that planets orbit the sun.
13Quantum MechanicsBrighton College 3rd March 2008
Atomic Structure
Erwin Schrödinger improved on the Bohr description and succeeded in explaining
the internal dynamics of the atom, which occur when atoms are examined
spectroscopically in the presence of a field.
The Schrödinger description is based on the wave properties of matter, detailed by
Louis de Broglie.
14Quantum MechanicsBrighton College 3rd March 2008
Atomic Structure
The solutions of the Schrödinger wave equations are called wavefunctions and have
discrete energies. The solutions are complicated – the Schrödinger equation is
Where
This equation is insoluble when written in terms of the Cartesian coordinates x, y, z.
When we allow the natural symmetry of the atom to dictate our approach, it
becomes soluble
Eψ=ψH
Eψψz)y,V(x,zyx
2
2
2
2
2
22
2m
16Quantum MechanicsBrighton College 3rd March 2008
The atom is spherical and there are
three important coordinates
Coordinates and waves
Each coordinate of the electron-wave has a label attached to it – the quantum
number.
r
The distance between the electron
and the nucleus - r
The 'longitude' - φ
The 'latitude' - θ
The electron-wave is defined by
all three coordinates.
17Quantum MechanicsBrighton College 3rd March 2008
Atomic Structure
The solutions of the Schrödinger wave
equations are called wavefunctions and have
discrete energies.
The solutions are products of three functions
The equations are only soluble for the hydrogen
atom and give the shapes of the orbitals – the
space in which the electron can be found as
well as the energies.
Each of these functions has an associated
quantum number.
φΦΘrR=ψ
r
18Quantum MechanicsBrighton College 3rd March 2008
Atomic Structure
By considering the electron in an atom as a wave, the energy of the electron
becomes quantized and gives the correct energy relation that Bohr described
empirically by
and we term n as the principle quantum number.
We associate n with the radial function
E=− B
n2
r
19Quantum MechanicsBrighton College 3rd March 2008
Atomic Structure
Classically a particle on a sphere can also move over the surface and this motion
is circular. In a similar way, the electron in an atom has properties that we can
associate with circular or angular motion.
Electrons in an atom have angular momentum – the momentum that is associated
with angular motion
20Quantum MechanicsBrighton College 3rd March 2008
Atomic Structure
Classically a particle on a sphere can also move over the surface and this motion
is circular. In a similar way, the electron in an atom has properties that we can
associate with circular or angular motion.
Electrons in an atom have angular momentum – the momentum that is associated
with angular motion
The angular motion is described by two
quantum numbers – l and ml termed the
angular quantum number and the
magnetic quantum number respectively.
21Quantum MechanicsBrighton College 3rd March 2008
Atomic Structure
The principle quantum number defines the energy of the electron.
The angular quantum numbers define the shape of the region of space in which
the electron is confined – these are termed the orbitals of the atom and they have
definite shapes:
34Quantum MechanicsBrighton College 3rd March 2008
There are few if any divisions in the description of matter in our experiential world
The microscopic world
Although there are differences in behaviour, due to mass and other factors, mostly, ice is ice.......
35Quantum MechanicsBrighton College 3rd March 2008
Important numbers in this regime are:
Avogadro's Number
Planck's Constant
These are enormously large and extremely small:
The population of the world today* is estimated to be
requiring Earths for a 'mole of people'
The microscopic world
* http://www.census.gov/ipc/www/popclockworld.html
N A = 6.023 × 1023
h = 6.626 × 10−34 J s−1
6.654078261 × 109
~ 9.05 × 1013
1 mole of water occupies ~ 18 mL
36Quantum MechanicsBrighton College 3rd March 2008
Despite the statistical and quantum mechanical description of the microscopic world, we still require a macroscopic model that describes our sensible observations.
It cannot be 'mechanical' in the Newtonian sense and we require a way of describing spontaneous change simply because it is in these systems that the 'cleanest' display of principles is observed.
A spontaneous process is one that takes place without any influence external to the system.
The opposite of a spontaneous change is a non-spontaneous change – one where there must be an external influence to force the change.
For any observed, spontaneous change, the reverse process is non-spontaneous.
Microscopic vs macroscopic
Quantum MechanicsBrighton College 3rd March 2008
If we use energy as the sole criterion of spontaneous change, we are using effectively a mechanical analogy – systems move to the local minimum in energy as the point of equilibrium.
In the example of a ball falling, we have one variable, position, in a field, the gravitational field of the earth, and there is no endothermic path.
Potential energy is converted into kinetic energy in flight and then into heat and sound (q and w) at impact.
Microscopic vs macroscopic
Quantum MechanicsBrighton College 3rd March 2008
In this case, minimization of the potential energy and conversion ultimately into heat defines the point of equilibrium and appears to be linked to the direction of spontaneous change. Early theories of chemical thermodynamics rested on the evolution of heat as the 'driving force' for a reaction, which fails.
Microscopic vs macroscopic
Quantum MechanicsBrighton College 3rd March 2008
It is certainly true that many reactions that are spontaneous are accompanied by the evolution of heat:
But some are not and are endothermic and yet are still spontaneous:
So, in the 'mechanical' view of chemical change, in the case of ammonium chloride, we have a system that spontaneously moves to a higher state of energy.
Physical changes such as melting and boiling are inherently endothermic and the same problem occurs.
Microscopic vs macroscopic
NaOHs H2O
Naaq+ OHaq
- H = −44.51 kJ mol−1
NH4Cls H2O
NH4aq+ Claq
- H = 14.78.51 kJ mol−1
Quantum MechanicsBrighton College 3rd March 2008
Both of these examples have an associated enthalpy change:
Microscopic vs macroscopic
NaOHs H2O
Naaq+ OHaq
- H = −44.51 kJ mol−1
NH4Cls H2O
NH4aq+ Claq
- H = 14.78.51 kJ mol−1
q
T1 ≫ T2
T1 = T2
Some processes do not result in a net change of energy in the system and are still spontaneous:
In an insulated system that cannot exchange heat with the surroundings, heat will spontaneously move to equalize a temperature gradient between two bodies.
Quantum MechanicsBrighton College 3rd March 2008
Similarly, there are no forces between a particles of a perfect gas and the internal energy of the perfect gas is independent of volume. Yet a perfect gas will always expand to fill the volume available, with no net change in energy.
Microscopic vs macroscopic
Quantum MechanicsBrighton College 3rd March 2008
So spontaneous changes can take place endothermically, exothermically or with no exchange of energy
Microscopic vs macroscopic
q
T1 ≫ T2
T1 = T2
NaOHs H2O
Naaq+ OHaq
- H = −44.51 kJ mol−1
NH4Cls H2O
NH4aq+ Claq
- H = 14.78.51 kJ mol−1
Quantum MechanicsBrighton College 3rd March 2008
Our descriptions of reactions and other chemical changes are on the basis of exothermicity or endothermicity
As a description of changes in heat content and work, these are adequate but they do not describe whether a process is spontaneous or not.
There are endothermic processes that are spontaneous – evaporation of water, the dissolution of ammonium chloride in water, the melting of ice and so on.
We need a thermodynamic description of spontaneous processes in order to fully describe a chemical system
Microscopic vs macroscopic
Quantum MechanicsBrighton College 3rd March 2008
The magnitude and sign of the change in enthalpy associated with a chemical or physical change does not reflect the spontaneity of the process. It is not a good measure.
However, any description of a molecular system such as a mole of a perfect gas is inherently statistical:
A mole contains particles and the number of ways that we can arrange a mole of particles is going to be of the order of
There are therefore many ways of describing a chemical system while conserving the observed macroscopic properties – internal energy, pressure, temperature etc.
Microscopic vs macroscopic
6.023 × 1023
Number of ways = W ~ 101023
Quantum MechanicsBrighton College 3rd March 2008
If we have a large number of ways of describing the inside of the system so that the outside stays the same, then we have a large number of ways of distributing the energy of the system amongst these different configurations.
There are many equivalent ways of distributing the thermal energy of a system given a certain macroscopic energy.
A change is spontaneous when the number of ways of distributing the energy in the universe increases.
The point of equilibrium occurs when this number of ways is maximized.
Microscopic vs macroscopic
Quantum MechanicsBrighton College 3rd March 2008
We name the property of the distribution of energy the entropy and we will refer to
• the entropy of the system – the bit of the universe that holds our local interest
• the entropy of the surroundings – all the rest......
Together, these sum to give the entropy of the Universe.
Microscopic vs macroscopic
Ludwig Boltzmann quantified the entropy in terms of the number of ways of describing the system as
S = kBlnW
48Quantum MechanicsBrighton College 3rd March 2008
Any system above 0 K contains energy and can in principle do work with certain limitations. This energy is stored in modes inside the system; these modes can be translational, rotational, vibrational and electronic.
The type of modes, the number of them and the energy separations between individual modes depends critically on the system concerned and the state of matter.
Microscopic vs macroscopic
ni
N~
exp{−Ei
kBT }∑
j
exp{−E j
kBT }
The availability of the modes depends on the temperature and is governed by the Boltzmann distribution. E
i is the energy of the particular mode and
ni is the population that is present in that mode. N is the
total number of particles in the system.
49Quantum MechanicsBrighton College 3rd March 2008
Microscopic vs macroscopic
The population in each state is controlled by the energy spacing and the temperature
ni
N~
exp{−Ei
kBT }∑
j
exp{−E j
kBT }
Ei = 10 K
Ei = 100 K
Ei = 1000 K
Ei = 10000 K
Quantum MechanicsBrighton College 3rd March 2008
Given the definition of the 'statistical' entropy and the distribution of particles over the energy states present in the system, with some mathematical elbow grease we can derive the thermodynamic entropy:
which allows us to determine the entropy on transfer of heat.
Microscopic vs macroscopic
S = kBlnW S =qrevT
Quantum MechanicsBrighton College 3rd March 2008
In order to predict the direction of spontaneous change, we need to consider the total entropy change in the universe.
We write this as
from our definition of entropy. We know that the heat change in the system is equivalent to the opposite of the heat change in the surroundings:
and we know, that for a system that can do work, qSystem
=H
Microscopic vs macroscopic
SUniverse = SSurroundings SSystem
SUniverse =qSurroundings
T
qSystem
T
qSurroundings
T= −
qSystem
T
Quantum MechanicsBrighton College 3rd March 2008
Now we can write the change in the universe solely in terms of changes in the system.
This is important because the system is the part of the universe that we know enough about for an accurate description in principle.
The entropy then becomes
We define
where G is the Gibbs function.
Microscopic vs macroscopic
SUniverse = −HT SSystem
TSUniverse = −H TSSystem
−TSUniverse = H − TSSystem
G = H − TSSystem
qSurroundings
T= −
HT
Quantum MechanicsBrighton College 3rd March 2008
The Gibbs function is a disguised form of entropy and has the units of energy; it is not an energy term in the First Law sense (H, U etc) but is a measure of the change in entropy of the universe.
For a spontaneous change,
i.e. the change in the Gibbs function must be zero or less than zero for a spontaneous change.
The Gibbs function allows us to define quantitatively the direction of spontaneous change in the universe – it allows us to determine what will take place amongst all the energetically possible changes allowed by the First Law
Microscopic vs macroscopic
G 0
Quantum MechanicsBrighton College 3rd March 2008
All conceivable chemical changes
The Gibbs function allows us to draw a 'map' of chemical change for the universe:
All possible chemical changes allowed by the First Law
All observed, spontaneous chemical changes allowed by the Second Law
You are here
Microscopic vs macroscopic
Quantum MechanicsBrighton College 3rd March 2008
Open questions:
There is no necessary requirement for the direction of change – can we find one?
How does entropy relate to the initial and final states of the Universe?
What happens when the size of the surroundings is not very much larger than the size of the system?
Future possibilities
Quantum MechanicsBrighton College 3rd March 2008
The Universe is not mechanical
Spontaneous change concerns the change in the distribution of energy and nothing else
Entropy is straightforward and there is still much to learn
Conclusions