Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

187
1 Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics Jakub Kielbasa This book is written for students for free, so feel free to use, cite, steal example etc. It is a learning tool, but please cite it when you do use it. If you come across any mistakes, please contact [email protected] . The wording of all theory, as well as all the content of all examples and exercises were the sole work of the author. ISBN: 5555000008952 A huge thanks to my editor Alex Tharby, for helping me edit and publish this textbook.

description

Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

Transcript of Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

Page 1: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

1

Quantitative Methods

for

Business and Economics

Jakub Kielbasa

This book is written for students for free, so feel free to use, cite, steal example etc. It is a learning tool, but please cite it when you do

use it. If you come across any mistakes, please contact [email protected].

The wording of all theory, as well as all the content of all examples and exercises were the sole work of the author.

ISBN: 5555000008952

𝑑𝑙𝑎 𝑤𝑎𝑠 A huge thanks to my editor Alex Tharby, for helping me edit and publish this textbook.

Page 2: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

2

Contents Chapter 1: Vital Mathematical Knowledge p. 4

1.1 Revision of Negative Numbers p. 6

1.2 Multiplying and Dividing Fractions p. 7

1.3 Adding and Subtracting Fractions p. 8

1.4 Notes on Fractions p. 12

1.5 Defining a Variable p. 13

1.6 Indices p. 14

1.7 BIMDAS p. 18

1.8 Equations p. 21

1.9 Factorisation p. 25

1.10 Inequalities and Absolute Values p. 26

1.11 The Number Zero p. 28

Chapter One Summary p. 28

Chapter One Questions p. 29

Chapter 2: Linear Algebra p. 30 2.1 Linear Equations p. 31

2.2 Main Features of Linear Equations p. 32

2.3 Negative Gradients p. 33

2.4 Graphing Lines from Equations p. 34

2.5 Obtaining the Equation of a Line p. 36

2.6 Intersecting Lines p. 38

2.7 Microeconomic Applications p. 40

2.8 Elasticity p. 42

2.9 Interpreting Elasticity p. 44

Chapter Two Summary p. 46

Chapter Two Questions p. 47

Chapter 3: Simultaneous Equations and Matrices p.49 3.1 Simultaneous Equations p. 50

3.2 Two Simultaneous Equations p. 50

3.3 Three Simultaneous Equations p. 52

3.4 The Matrix p. 54

3.5 Solving Two Equation Matrices p. 55

3.6 Solving Three Equation Matrices p. 59

3.7 Notes on Solutions to Matrices p. 61

3.8 Applications p. 62

3.9 The Determinant of a 2 × 2 Matrix p. 65

3.10 The Determinant of a 3 × 3 Matrix p. 65

3.11 Using the Jacobian Determinant p. 68

Chapter Three Summary p. 70

Chapter Three Questions p. 71

Chapter 4: Non-Linear Functions p. 73 4.1 Defining Non-Linear Functions p. 74

4.2 Defining a Quadratic Function p. 75

4.3 Quadratic Graphs p. 76

4.4 Sketching a Quadratic Function p. 77

4.5 The Cubic Function p. 80

4.6 The Exponential Function p. 82

4.7 The Logarithmic Function p. 84

4.8 Logarithmic Graphs p. 88

Page 3: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

3

4.9 The Natural Number 𝑒 p. 89

4.10 The Hyperbolic Function p. 90

4.11 Economic Applications p. 91

Chapter Four Summary p. 93

Chapter Four Questions p. 94

Chapter 5: Single Variable Differentiation p. 96 5.1 What is Differentiation? p. 97

5.2 Differentiation by First Principles p. 99

5.3 Differentiation Rules: Power Rule p. 103

5.4 Differentiation Rules: Chain Rule p. 104

5.5 Differentiation Rules: Product Rule p. 105

5.6 Differentiation Rules: Quotient Rule p. 108

5.7 Differentiation Rules: 𝑒 Rule p. 109

5.8 Differentiation Rules: ln Rule p. 110

5.9 The Second Derivative p. 111

5.10 The Gradient Function p. 112

5.11 Simple Applications p. 113

Chapter Five Summary p. 114

Chapter Five Questions p. 115

Chapter 6: Applications of Differentiation p. 117 6.1 Graphical Optimisation p. 118

6.2 Mathematical Optimisation p. 118

6.3 The Nature of an Optimal Point p. 120

6.4 Inflection Points p. 123

6.5 Combining all Theory p. 124

6.6 Applications – Profit p. 126

6.7 Applications – Break-Even p. 129

6.8 Applications: Marginal and Average Values p. 130

6.9 Differentiation and Elasticity p. 133

6.10 Elasticity and Total Revenue p. 135

Chapter Six Summary p. 137

Chapter Six Questions p. 138

Chapter 7: Multiple Variable Differentiation p. 140 7.1 Additional Variables p. 141

7.2 Simple Partial Differentiation p. 142

7.3 Complex Partial Differentiation p. 144

7.4 Second Order Partial Derivatives p. 146

7.5 Application of Partial Differentiation p. 147

7.6 Total Differentiation p. 148

7.7 Optimisation with Many Variables p. 151

7.8 Economic Applications p. 155

Chapter Seven Summary p. 158

Chapter Seven Questions p. 158

Page 4: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

4

Chapter 8: Financial Mathematics p. 160 8.1 Index Numbers and Averages p. 161

8.2 Series and Sums p. 163

8.3 Simple Interest p. 164

8.4 Compound Interest p. 168

8.5 Annual Interest Rates p. 170

8.6 Net Present Value p. 172

8.7 Internal Rate of Return p. 174

Chapter Eight Summary p. 177

Chapter Eight Questions p. 177

Solutions p. 180

Page 5: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

5

Chapter 1

Vital Mathematical Knowledge

Things you must know 1.1 Revision of Negative Numbers 6

1.2 Multiplying and Dividing Fractions 7

1.3 Adding and Subtracting Fractions 8

1.4 Notes on Fractions 12

1.5 Defining a Variable 13

1.6 Indices 14

1.7 BIMDAS 18

1.8 Equations 21

1.9 Factorisation 25

1.10 Inequalities and Absolute Values 26

1.11 The Number Zero 27

Chapter One Summary 28

Chapter One Questions 29

Page 6: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

6

1.1 revision of negative numbers

Adding and subtracting negative numbers is very

similar to adding and subtracting positive

numbers.

Working on the number line (a line with all

negative and positive numbers) will help you revise

the methods of adding and subtracting negative

numbers.

For the problem 4 − 3, find the number 4 on the

number-line, then go back three places to get 1.

Similarly with negative numbers, for the problem

−1 − 2, find the number −1 on the number-line,

then go back two places to get −3.

Example 1: solve

−4 + 5 − 2 − 4 + 6

Solution: find the number −4 on the number-line,

then add 5, take 2, take 4, then add 6. The answer

is 1.

After you get the hang of it, you will never need to

use the number-line again.

Example 2: solve:

−5 − 6 − 7 − 2 + 15

Solution: do it without the number-line

= −5

Theory:

Adding a negative number is the same as

subtracting the positive value of that same

number. E.g. 5 + −3 = 5 − 3

Subtracting a negative number is the same as

adding the positive value of that number. E.g.

4 − −6 = 4 + 6

The two rules above are very important.

Example 3: solve

3 − −4 + 2

Solution: the two negatives (one after the other)

can be changed into a positive sign:

= 3 + 4 + 2

Then solve:

= 3 + 4 + 2 = 9

Example 4: solve

−4 + −3 − (−5)

Solution: this is a bit more complex. Do one

section at a time; the −4 remains as it is, because

it cannot be changed using the rules, but the

+(−3) can be changed to −3. Then the −(−5)

can be changed to +5 to get:

= −4 − 3 + 5 = −2

Example 5: solve

− −5 − 6 + −8 − −9

Solution: simplify each part separately. −(−5)

becomes +5, −6 remains as it is, +(−8) becomes

−8, and − −9 becomes +9.

= +5 − 6 − 8 + 9 = 0

A similar theory applies to multiplying negative

numbers.

Theory:

The multiplication of two negative numbers

equals a positive number.

The multiplication of a positive and a negative

number equals a negative number.

This is best explained with examples.

Example 6: solve

−6 × (−5)

Solution: multiplying two negative numbers equals

a positive number. Since

6 × 5 = 30

then −6 × −5 = 30

−4 −3 −2 −1 0 1 2 3 4

Page 7: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

7

Example 7: solve

(−6) × 4

Solution: a negative number multiplied by a

positive number equals a negative number. Since

6 × 4 = 24, then −6 × 4 = −24

Theory: mathematicians use the dot “∙” to mean

multiplication, e.g. 6 ∙ 4 is the same as 6 × 4

Similarly, if two terms are in brackets without

anything between the brackets, this is taken as a

multiplication. E.g. 6 4 = 6 × 4

Example 8: solve

−5 (−7)

Solution: two negative numbers are multiplied

together which must equal a positive number.

5 ∙ 7 = 35 so −5 −7 = 35.

Dividing with negative numbers also follows the

rule of two negatives equals a positive.

Theory:

The division of two negative numbers equals a

positive number.

The division of one negative and one positive

number equals a negative number.

Example 9: solve

−15

−3

Solution: dividing two negative numbers equals a

positive number.

15

3= 5 then

−15

−3= 5

Example 10: solve

−24

3

Solution: division with both a negative number

and a positive number gives a negative number.

24

3= 8 so

−24

3= −8

Note: there is a reason brackets were used so

often in this section. Later in this chapter, you will

see the consequence of not using brackets

appropriately.

Exercises: 1. Simplify the following:

𝑎) −2 + 3 − 4

𝑏) −2 + −4 − −1

𝑐) −4 − −4 − 4

𝑑) 5 + 1 − 4 + (−3)

𝑒) −6 − 7 − 3 − −21 + 1

2. Simplify the following: 𝑎) 3 ∙ −2

𝑏) −6 −6

𝑐) −36 ÷ −4

𝑑) 81/ −9

𝑒) −20 −3

1.2 multiplying and dividing fractions

Most students hate fractions, but they are part of

the real world. For example, 50𝑐 is half a dollar,

$100,000 is one tenth of a million dollars,

$4million is 4

1000 of a billion dollars. Most things

can have fractions, so you must be able to

manipulate them.

Theory: to multiply two fractions, multiply the two

tops (numerators) to give a new top, then multiply

the two bottoms (denominators) to give a new

bottom.

Example 1: solve

2

3∙

4

5

Solution: multiply the two tops: 2 ∙ 4 = 8, then

multiply the two bottoms: 3 ∙ 5 = 15, and these

form the new numerator and the new

denominator:

=2 ∙ 4

3 ∙ 5=

8

15

Page 8: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

8

Example 2: solve

6

5∙

7

3

Solution:

=6 ∙ 7

5 ∙ 3=

42

15

Dividing fractions is very similar except it has one

difference.

Theory: when dividing fractions, invert the second

fraction then proceed just like multiplication.

Inverting a fraction is flipping the fraction; making

the bottom the new top, and making the top the

new bottom.

Inverting 𝑎

𝑏 makes it

𝑏

𝑎.

Example 3: solve

2

3

4

Solution: invert the second fraction, and change

the division sign to a multiplication sign:

=2

5∙

4

3

Proceed with the multiplication:

=2 ∙ 4

5 ∙ 3=

8

15

Example 4: solve

2

3/

1

16

Solution: invert the second fraction, then proceed

as for multiplication.

2

3∙

16

1=

32

3= 10

2

3

Exercises: 1. Simplify the following fractions:

𝑎) 3

4

2

3

𝑏) 5

7

12

5

𝑐) 3

−8

3

1

𝑑) 5

2

3

𝑒) 7

2/ −

3

10

2. Simplify the fractions into a single fraction

𝑎) 14

−3

−5

12

𝑏) 14

−3 /

5

−12

𝑐) −3

3 /

23

17

𝑑) −5

9/

−3

−7

𝑒) 17

23 −1

12

1.3 adding and subtracting fractions

The hardest aspect of fractions is adding and

subtracting fractions. Multiplying and dividing

fractions is easier.

The concept used for adding/subtracting fractions

is the Common Denominator approach. The

denominator is the bottom of a fraction.

Before the theory is given, an intuition of the

concept is needed. Apologies for the patronising

subject, but it works well.

You purchased a pie, and you take it home. You

cut the pie into quarters, and since you are hungry,

you eat half the pie. After two hours, you are

hungry again and take a quarter of the original pie,

so that only one quarter is left. The question is

how much of the pie have you eaten?

Write out the fractions:

1

2+

1

4

That is, first you ate half the pie, then you ate a

quarter. You might be tempted to simply add the

top numbers and the bottom numbers. If we do

that, we get:

1 + 1

2 + 4=

2

6=

1

3

Have you really eaten only one third of the pie?

No, you ate three quarters. The theory of common

denominator helps find the true answer.

Page 9: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

9

Intro example 1: from the pie example, solve

1

2+

1

4

The common denominator process is finding the

same denominator for all fractions. In this

example, the 1/2 must be changed to a fraction

with a 4 on the bottom, however if the 2 is erased

and replaced with a 4, the value will no longer be

one half. What is wanted is to change the form of

the fraction 1

2 so the bottom number is 4, while

keeping the value of the fraction unchanged.

Another way of writing 1

2 is

2

4 or

3

6 or

4

8 but since 4

needs to be on the bottom, 2

4 is used. The problem

becomes:

2

4+

1

4

The first part still has the value of a half, and the

second part is still one quarter. The form of the

first fraction has changed but the value is the

same.

Once all fractions have the same denominator, all

the top numbers (numerators) can be written over

the Common Denominator:

2

4+

1

4=

2 + 1

4

Then simplify the top:

2 + 1

4=

3

4

Exactly as is intuitive.

Theory: the Common Denominator approach

changes the form of all fractions so that the

denominators are all the same, but leaves the

values of all fractions unchanged.

Sometimes it is not so obvious how the fractions

need to be changed. For example, solving:

1

3+

1

7

What is the common denominator here? How can

1

3 be changed into something with 7 as a

denominator? Or alternatively, how can 1

7 be

changed to have 3 as a denominator? There is a

simple solution.

Theory: a Common Denominator is found by

multiplying the denominators (bottoms) of all the

fractions to be added or subtracted.

Intro example 2: solve

1

3+

1

7

A Common Denominator is the multiplication of

the two denominators 3 and 7:

3 ∙ 7 = 21

The form of 1

3 needs to be changed to have 21 on

the bottom but the value must be left unchanged.

Multiply the 1

3 by

7

7:

1

3∙

7

7

The number 7

7 has value 1, so the value of

1

3 is

unchanged however the form is changed:

1

3∙

7

7 =

7

21

Similarly, 1

7 needs to be multiplied by some number

to get 21 on the bottom, while leaving the value of

the fraction unchanged. That number is 3

3:

1

7∙

3

3 =

3

21

Rewrite the original problem with the equivalent

fractions:

7

21+

3

21=

7 + 3

21=

10

21

Theory: to add/subtract fractions, change the form

of each fraction without changing its value, so that

all the denominators are the same. Then

add/subtract the numerators (top numbers),

having this over the common denominator.

Page 10: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

10

Example 1: solve

1

9+

1

5

Solution: a Common Denominator is 9 ∙ 5 = 45.

The first fraction 1

9 needs to be multiplied by

5

5 to

have 45 on the bottom, but leaving the value of

the fraction unchanged. The 5 in 5

5 comes from the

denominator of the other fraction.

1

9∙

5

5 =

5

45

Similarly for 1

5, to change the form of this fraction

to get 45 on the bottom, it needs to be multiplied

by 9

9 where the 9 comes from the denominator of

the other fraction:

1

5∙

9

9 =

9

45

Rewrite the original problem and solving:

5

45+

9

45=

5 + 9

45=

14

45

Notice that the 1

5 was multiplied by

9

9 where the 9

came from the denominator of the other fraction.

Similarly for 1

9 which was multiplied by

5

5 where the

5 came from the denominator of the other

fraction.

Example 2: solve

3

11+

4

5

Solution: a common denominator is 11 ∙ 5 = 55.

Then, change the 3

11 to have 55 as a denominator

without changing its value, by multiplying it by 5

5

(where the 5 comes from the denominator of the

other fraction):

3

11∙

5

5 =

15

55

Similarly for the other fraction, to change 4

5 to have

a 55 on the bottom, it needs to be multiplied by 11

11

(where the 11 comes from the denominator of the

other fraction):

4

5∙

11

11 =

44

55

Rewrite the original problem:

15

55+

44

55=

15 + 44

55=

59

55

Subtracting fractions uses the same process,

except it has a negative sign in between.

Example 3: solve

7

11−

1

4

Solution: a Common Denominator is 11 ∙ 4 = 44.

To change the 11 to a 44, multiply by 4

4 (as this

does not change the value of the fraction):

7

11∙

4

4 =

28

44

Then change the form (but not the value) of the

second fraction:

1

4∙

11

11 =

11

44

Rewrite the original problem:

28

44−

11

44=

28 − 11

44=

17

44

So far, we have only been using two fractions at a

time, but a very similar theory applies for adding

and subtracting more than two fractions.

Theory: when adding or subtracting many

fractions, to change the form of each fraction

without changing its value, it is multiplied by 𝑥/𝑥

where 𝑥 is the multiplication of all the other

denominators.

Example 4: solve

3

11+

3

4−

1

5

Solution: a Common Denominator is the

multiplication of all the denominators, which is

11 ∙ 4 ∙ 5 = 220. The fraction 3

11 needs to be

Page 11: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

11

multiplied by some number to get 220 as a

denominator (bottom). This number is 20

20 which is

obtained by the multiplication of all the other

denominators (i.e. 4 ∙ 5 = 20):

3

11∙

20

20 =

60

220

Similar theory applies for the other two fractions.

The 3

4 needs to be multiplied by

55

55. The number 55

is obtained by multiplying the denominators of all

the other fractions (i.e. 5 ∙ 11 = 55):

3

4∙

55

55 =

165

220

Lastly:

1

5∙

44

44 =

44

220

Rewrite the original fraction:

60

220+

165

220−

44

220=

60 + 165 − 44

220

=181

220

Go over this last example to make sure you know

how the form of each fraction was changed

without changing its value.

Example 5: Solve

1

3−

7

13−

1

10

Solution: a Common Denominator is 3 ∙ 13 ∙ 10 =

390. To change the form of the first fraction

without changing its value, it must be multiplied by

130

130, where the 130 comes from the multiplication

of the other denominators (i.e. 13 ∙ 10 = 130):

1

3∙

130

130 =

130

390

The second fraction must be multiplied by 30

30

where the 30 is from the multiplication of all the

other denominators (i.e. 3 ∙ 10 = 30):

7

13∙

30

30 =

210

390

The third fraction must be multiplied by 39

39 which

comes from 3 ∙ 13 = 39:

1

10∙

39

39 =

39

390

Do not use the negative signs yet, as so far, we are

just changing the form of the fraction. The

problem is rewritten with all the relevant signs

added in after the form of each fraction has been

changed to have a Common Denominator.

130

390−

210

390−

39

390=

130 − 210 − 39

390

Simplify the numerator (top):

= −119

390

Exercises: 1. Simplify the following fractions:

𝑎) 1

4+

1

3

𝑏) 2

5−

1

8

𝑐) 7

3+

12

2+

1

6

𝑑) 21

13−

1

11

𝑒) 9

13+

15

39−

2

1

2. Simplify the fractions into a single fraction:

𝑎) 1

2+

1

3+

1

4+

1

5

𝑏) 1

2−

1

3+

1

4−

1

5

𝑐) 21

11+

3

17−

2

23

𝑑) 99

12+

3

2−

12

9+

7

8

𝑒) 10

3−

15

4+

17

9+

12

7

3. If a shareholder owns 3/11 of a company, and his brother owns 9/83 of that same company, what proportion of the company do the brothers own combined?

4. Jane, the CEO of a company, owns 9/11 of the company. She is ready to retire, so to have cash, she sells 5/12 of the shares she owns. What proportion of the company does she still own after the sale. What if Jane had sold 5/12 of the total company stock from her portfolio; how much would she have left then?

Page 12: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

12

1.4 notes on fractions

Fractions can be written in many different ways, so

you must be familiar with all of them.

Theory: for a negative fraction, the negative sign

can be in three different places without changing

the value of the fraction:

−𝑎

𝑏=

−𝑎

𝑏=

𝑎

−𝑏

For example:

−2

5=

−2

5=

2

−5

All three are the same. Applying this to a larger

context:

2

3−

5

3=

2

3+

−5

3=

2

3+

5

−3

All three coloured parts are equal. It may be

convenient to write it one of these three ways

when you are doing a question with fractions.

Now, a more common kind of fraction is one with

a number out front, such as:

21

3

This means “two wholes plus one third”. This can

also be rewritten as:

2 +1

3

Write the 2 as 2

1:

2

1+

1

3

Then find a Common Denominator:

6

3+

1

3=

6 + 1

3=

7

3

This is the long way which shows the theory. The

short-cut is shown below.

Theory: to simplify a fraction involving whole

numbers, multiply the number out front with the

denominator (bottom), then add that result to the

top.

Example 1: change the following to a single

fraction

41

3

Solution: multiply the “whole” number with the

denominator (4 × 3 = 12), then adding this to the

numerator 12 + 1 = 13 giving:

41

3=

12 + 1

3=

13

3

Example 2: find the single fraction equivalent of

46

11

Solution: multiply the “whole” number out front

with the denominator (4 × 11 = 44), then add the

result to the numerator (top): (44 + 6 = 50)

46

11=

50

11

The reverse theory is the same, but the process is

slightly different.

Theory: to find how many “whole” numbers there

are in a fraction, work out how many

denominators will fit into the numerator without

exceeding the numerator. Then remove that

number from the numerator, and any remaining

numbers are written over the original

denominator.

Example 3: find how many “wholes” and a

remaining fraction results from

43

6

Solution: 6 goes into 43 seven times (to give 42)

as any more would exceed 43, so the number out

front in 7, and the remainder is 1 (as 43 − 42 =

1), so this is written as a fraction:

43

6= 7

1

6

Page 13: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

13

Example 4: change the following fraction into

“whole” numbers and a remaining fraction:

97

10

Solution: 10 can go into 97 nine times as if we had

ten times, then it would exceed the numerator

(97). This gives 7 as a remainder, written over the

original denominator:

97

10= 9

7

10

Exercises: 1. Give the following fractions as a single fraction:

𝑎) 21

2 𝑑) 3

1

3

𝑏) 122

3 𝑒) 9

3

9

𝑐) 97

8 𝑓) 11

13

27

2. Change the following into whole numbers and a remaining fraction:

𝑎) 12

3 𝑑)

27

13

𝑏) 15

4 𝑒)

91

12

𝑐) 21

4 𝑓)

103

13

3. Simplify the following into a single fraction:

𝑎) −12

5

3

7 −

1

3

𝑏) 13

2

1

12 2

2

3 1

3

7

𝑐) 12

3 +

−2

7−

−3

−10

1.5 defining a variable

Theory: A variable is something that can change.

Temperature is a variable, because it can change.

The Woolworths share price can change, therefore

it is a variable. Variables are found everywhere in

life.

Different letters are used to distinguish different

variables. In business, a variable is often something

like quantity sold (usually 𝑄). Companies do not

know how many of a certain product they are

going to sell (say computers), so variables are used

that allow those companies to forecast how much

profit will be made if 𝑄 units are sold – where 𝑄 is

a variable number of computers.

However, it is not always that simple. Profit is also

a variable but the amount of profit depends on

how many computers are sold. So profit is called a

‘dependent variable’ because it is a variable (i.e. it

can change), but the extent to which it changes

‘depends’ on another variable (i.e. the number of

computers sold). Also, the number of computers

the company sells is called an ‘independent

variable’ because it is not determined by other

variables.

For now, we need to learn the basics of

manipulating variables and constants.

Theory: “collecting like terms” is the process of

bring together things that are the same. Things

that are different cannot be grouped together.

Intro example 1: There are two boxes of fruit:

Box 1: 7 bananas, 5 apples and 8 peaches.

Box 2: 3 bananas, 6 apples and 12 peaches.

To find out the total number of each fruit, the

bananas can be added to each other, but they

cannot be added to the apples or the peaches (this

is logical). To simplify the variables, the two boxes

can be rewritten as:

Box 1: 7𝑏 + 5𝑎 + 8𝑝

Box 2: 3𝑏 + 6𝑎 + 12𝑝

Where 𝑏 =bananas, 𝑎 = apples and 𝑝 = peaches.

Add Box 1 to Box 2:

𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 = 7𝑏 + 5𝑎 + 8𝑝 + 3𝑏 + 6𝑎 + 12𝑝

Since only apples can be added to apples, then

5𝑎 + 6𝑎 = 11𝑎. This is the same for bananas and

peaches. That is, only like terms can be added.

𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 = 10𝑏 + 11𝑎 + 20𝑝

Page 14: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

14

Example 1: collect all like terms in the following

3𝑥 + 5𝑥 + 𝑦 − 𝑥 + 5𝑦 + 𝑧

Solution: collect all the 𝑥’s together, all the 𝑦′s

together and all the 𝑧’s together:

7𝑥 + 6𝑦 + 𝑧

The 𝑥’s cannot be added to the 𝑦’s or 𝑧’s as they

are not like terms.

Example 2: collect the like terms in

5𝑥 − 𝑦 + 4𝑥 + 3 − 7𝑦 − 9

Solution: collect all the 𝑥’s together, all the 𝑦’s

together, and all the lone numbers together.

9𝑥 − 8𝑦 − 6

Note: lone numbers are only like other lone

numbers, and are not like anything with a variable

in it.

Example 3: collect all like terms

5𝑥 + 3𝑦 − −4𝑥 + 7𝑦 − 13

Solution: get rid of the brackets:

5𝑥 + 3𝑦 + 4𝑥 + 7𝑦 − 13

Collect like terms:

9𝑥 + 10𝑦 − 13

Applying variables to fractions; finding a Common

Denominator of fractions with variables is easiest

when you think of them as numbers. That is, work

with them as if they were numbers.

Example 4: find the Common Denominator and

put the following two fractions under a single

denominator:

1

𝑥+

2

𝑦

Solution: a Common Denominator is the

multiplication of all the denominators, so in this

case will be 𝑥𝑦.

Then, the first fraction needs to be multiplied by 𝑦

𝑦

to get 𝑥𝑦 on the bottom (the 𝑦 in 𝑦

𝑦 comes from

the denominator of the other fraction):

1

𝑥∙

𝑦

𝑦 =

𝑦

𝑥𝑦

It is easiest to ignore the fact that they are letters,

and just do what you would do if they were

numbers.

The other fractions also needs 𝑥𝑦 on the bottom,

so must be multiplied by 𝑥

𝑥:

2

𝑦∙

𝑥

𝑥 =

2𝑥

𝑥𝑦

Rewrite the original problem and solve:

𝑦

𝑥𝑦+

2𝑥

𝑥𝑦=

𝑦 + 2𝑥

𝑥𝑦

The terms on top cannot be added as they are not

like terms.

Exercises: 1. Collect the like terms in the following

𝑎) 5𝑥 + 4𝑦 − 3𝑥 − 9𝑥 + 4𝑦 − 3

𝑏) 13𝑥 − 12𝑥 − 11𝑥 − 10 − 9𝑦

𝑐) − 8𝑥 − 4𝑦 − −3𝑥 − 4𝑦 − −1

𝑑) 8𝑥 + 8𝑥 + 8𝑦 + 8𝑧 − 8 + 12𝑥 − 13𝑦

2. Collect like terms using all the theory learnt so far:

𝑎) 1

2𝑥 +

1

3𝑥 −

2

5𝑥 𝑑)

𝑥

2+

𝑥

3−

2𝑥

5

𝑏) 12𝑥

5+

13𝑥

6 𝑒)

12𝑥

3−

−2𝑥

4+

2𝑦

3−

13

12

𝑐) 3

𝑥+

4

𝑦 𝑓) 2 +

5

𝑥+

5

𝑦

3. Simplify the following fractions into a single fraction:

𝑎) 12𝑥

−5−

−2𝑦

3 +

2𝑥

30+

4𝑦

10

𝑏) 5

3−

5

𝑦−

3

𝑧+ 2

𝑐) 3

2𝑥+

3

5𝑦

1.6 indices

When mathematicians talk about an index, they

are talking about numbers or variables to the

power of other numbers or variables.

Theory: an index (plural indices) is when a number

(called a base) is put to the power of another

number (called an index).

𝐵𝐴𝑆𝐸𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑥

Page 15: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

15

Examples of indices include 22 , 53 , 𝑥2 , 1 + 𝑦 9,

𝑥2+𝑦 .

An index means that the base number is multiplied

by itself the number of times of the index.

For the index 36

The 3 is multiplied by itself 6 times:

3 ∙ 3 ∙ 3 ∙ 3 ∙ 3 ∙ 3 = 36

For 𝑥3, it is:

𝑥 ∙ 𝑥 ∙ 𝑥 = 𝑥3

There are seven rules you need to learn before you

can successfully manipulate indices:

Theory: RULE 1: when two numbers with the same

base are multiplied together, the indices can be

added to one another.

𝑥𝑎 ∙ 𝑥𝑏 = 𝑥𝑎+𝑏

Example 1: simplify the indices in

𝑥3 ∙ 𝑥5 = 𝑥3+5 = 𝑥8

Solution: write this out in extended form:

𝑥 ∙ 𝑥 ∙ 𝑥 ∙ 𝑥 ∙ 𝑥 ∙ 𝑥 ∙ 𝑥 ∙ 𝑥 = 𝑥8

The brackets do not matter as everything is

multiplied.

Theory: RULE 2: when two numbers are divided

and have the same base, the index on the bottom

of the fraction is subtracted from the index on the

top of the fraction.

𝑥𝑎

𝑥𝑏= 𝑥𝑎−𝑏

Example 2: simplify the indices in:

𝑥7

𝑥3

Solution: use the above theory

𝑥7

𝑥3= 𝑥7−3 = 𝑥4

Rewrite in extended form:

Three of the 𝑥’s on top cancel with three 𝑥’s on

the bottom.

Theory: RULE 3: any number with an index of zero

equals one.

𝑥0 = 1

This is something you simply have to know.

Theory: RULE 4: the 𝑛𝑡𝑕 root of a number is the

same as having the number to the power of 1/𝑛.

This is a bit complex in words, but simple in

practice.

𝑥𝑛

= 𝑥1/𝑛

Example 3: rewrite the following as an index

𝑥2

Solution: the square root of 𝑥 is simply 𝑥 to the

power of half.

𝑥2 = 𝑥1/2

Note: the square root sign 2

is often written

with the number 2 omitted: .

Example 4: write the following as an index

𝑥4

Solution: it is 𝑥 to the power of one on four:

𝑥4 = 𝑥1/4

Theory: RULE 5: when a number to the power of

one index is put to the power of another index, the

two indices are multiplied together.

𝑥𝑎 𝑏 = 𝑥𝑎∙𝑏

Example 5: simplify the following to a single index

𝑥3 2

Solution: multiply the indices together:

𝑥3 2 = 𝑥3∙2 = 𝑥6

This can also be written out in extended form so

you see where it comes from:

𝑥3 𝑥3 = 𝑥 ∙ 𝑥 ∙ 𝑥 ∙ 𝑥 ∙ 𝑥 ∙ 𝑥 = 𝑥6

𝒙 ∙ 𝒙 ∙ 𝒙 ∙ 𝒙 ∙ 𝒙 ∙ 𝒙 ∙ 𝒙

𝒙 ∙ 𝒙 ∙ 𝒙= 𝒙𝟒

Page 16: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

16

As the two brackets represent 𝑥3 squared.

Theory: RULE 6: a number with a negative index

can be made to have a positive index by inverting

the fraction.

𝑥−𝑎 =1

𝑥𝑎

Example 6: rearrange the following to have a

positive index:

𝑥−3

Solution: invert the fraction, and change the sign

on the index:

𝑥−3

1=

1

𝑥3

The 𝑥−3 is really a fraction with 𝑥−3 “on one”, so

to have a positive power, the fraction is inverted

and the sign of the index is changed.

Example 7: change the following to have a

negative index

𝑥4

Solution: invert the fraction, and change the sign

of the index:

𝑥4

1=

1

𝑥−4

Example 8: change the following to have a positive

index

1

𝑥−5

Solution: invert the fraction, then change the sign

of the index:

1

𝑥−5= 𝑥5

Theory: RULE 7: when the product of two or more

bracketed terms are put to an index, that index

applies to each term within the brackets.

𝑥𝑦 𝑎 = 𝑥𝑎𝑦𝑎

Example 9: expand

2𝑥𝑦 3

Solution: since all terms in the brackets are

multiplied together, every term is raised to the

index:

23𝑥3𝑦3

Simplify the 23:

8𝑥3𝑦3

Example 10: expand

−𝑥𝑦 4

Solution: despite the negative sign inside the

brackets, all the terms are still multiplied together.

The brackets can be rewritten as:

−1 ∙ 𝑥𝑦 4

Then it can be seen that every term in the brackets

is put to the index:

−1 4𝑥4𝑦4

Simplifying −1 4 = 1 gives:

𝑥4𝑦4

All these rules can work forwards and backwards.

The following examples involve the use of multiple

rules.

Example 11: simplify the following to only have

positive indices

𝑥0.5𝑦3𝑥2𝑦−4

Solution: only the like terms can be simplified, so

using RULE 1 on the 𝑥’s and 𝑦’s respectively:

= 𝑥0.5+2𝑦3−4 = 𝑥2.5𝑦−1

To have all indices positive, the 𝑦−1 must be

brought to the bottom using RULE 6, then the sign

of the index is changed:

=𝑥2.5

𝑦1=

𝑥2.5

𝑦

Example 12: simplify the following leaving all

indices positive

Page 17: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

17

8𝑦53

𝑥3𝑦2 𝑥3

𝑦𝑥2

Solution: get rid of the root signs first (remember

that if there is no number outside the root sign, it

is assumed to be a square root):

= 8𝑦5 1/3𝑥3𝑦2𝑥1/3

𝑦1/2𝑥2

Get rid of the brackets using RULE 5 with RULE 7:

=81/3𝑦5/3𝑥3𝑦2𝑥1/3

𝑦1/2𝑥2

Then use RULE 1 on the top for the 𝑥’s (as well as

simplifying the addition of fractions):

=81/3𝑦5/3𝑥10/3𝑦2

𝑦1/2𝑥2

And again use RULE 1 for the 𝑦’s on the top (a

Common Denominator needs to be used):

=81/3𝑥10/3𝑦11/3

𝑦1/2𝑥2

The 11/3 comes from 5/3 + 2. Then using RULE 2

for both 𝑥 and 𝑦:

= 81/3𝑥4/3𝑦19/6

Where the 19/6 comes from 11/3 − 1/2; and the

4/3 comes from 10/3 − 2.

Finally, change the 81/3 into 2, as it is of the same

value:

= 2𝑥4/3𝑦19/6

Go over this last example, as the fractions were

difficult.

Example 13: collect all like terms and make all

indices positive for

2

−1𝑥3𝑦0.5

20.5𝑥0𝑦 3

Solution: use RULE 4 to change all the root signs:

= 20.5 −1𝑥3𝑦0.5

20.5𝑥0𝑦 30.5

Get rid of the brackets using RULE 5:

=2−0.5𝑥3𝑦0.5

20.5𝑥0𝑦 30.5

Use RULE 3 to change anything to the power of

zero to 1, which can then be removed from the

bottom:

=2−0.5𝑥3𝑦0.5

20.5𝑦 30.5

Doing this the long way to begin with, use RULE 2

to bring everything on the bottom up top while

changing the sign of each of the indices:

= 2−0.5𝑥3𝑦0.52−0.5𝑦−1 3−0.5

Then use RULE 1 to bring the like terms together.

Remember, the bases must be the same!

= 2−1𝑥3𝑦−0.53−0.5

Now, to make all the indices positive, bring any

bases with negative indices to the bottom while

changing the sign of the index:

=𝑥3

2𝑦0.530.5

This is as far as simplification can go, as all the

bases are different.

In many questions, numbers may need to be

simplified to contain indices. For example, the

number 81 may need to be simplified to either 92

which you should be familiar with, or maybe even

34.

Theory: be aware that each of the following

numbers can be written as the indicated base, to

the power of a whole number:

BASE 2: 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, 128 ,256

BASE 3: 3, 9, 27, 81, 243

BASE 4: 4, 16, 64, 256

BASE 5: 5, 25, 125, 625

Example 14: simplify the following as much as

possible

3𝑥272𝑥 𝑦−63

9𝑥𝑦2

Page 18: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

18

Solution: get rid of the root sign using RULE 4:

3𝑥272𝑥 𝑦−6 1/3

9𝑥𝑦2

Then use RULE 5 to get rid of the brackets:

3𝑥272𝑥𝑦−2

9𝑥𝑦2

Change the 27 to 33 and 9 to 32:

3𝑥 33 2𝑥𝑦−2

32 𝑥𝑦2

Use RULE 5 again to get rid of the brackets:

3𝑥36𝑥𝑦−2

32𝑥𝑦2

Then use RULES 1 and 2 to collect all the indices

with base 3:

3𝑥+6−2𝑥𝑥𝑦−2

𝑦2

Simplify the index with base 3 and using RULE 6 to

get the 𝑦−2 to the bottom and with a positive

index:

3−𝑥+6𝑥

𝑦4

Theory: the square root of a positive number will

always have two solutions: one positive and one

negative.

In the first section in this chapter, one of the

exercises was −6 −6 which you should have

worked out to be 36. Similarly, 6 6 = 36.

Example 15: simplify 36

Solution: 36 = ±6

The ± sign means that there are two solutions,

one positive and one negative. It is pronounced

“plus or minus”.

Example 16: simplify 144

Solution: 144 = ±12

Exercises:

1. Simplify the following to have all positive indices

and fraction answers.

𝑎) 𝑥2𝑥−3𝑥−6𝑥15 𝑓) 𝑥2𝑦3𝑥4𝑦5𝑥6𝑧7

𝑏) 𝑥3𝑥5 𝑥

𝑥−2 𝑔)

𝑥−4 𝑥25𝑦3

𝑥−1𝑦𝑥2𝑦1.5𝑥

𝑐) 𝑥2𝑦383

𝑥−2𝑦−42 𝑕)

𝑥3.5 𝑥−63𝑥0.25

𝑥−2𝑦−3 𝑥𝑦

𝑑) 5 𝑥4 −1 10𝑥23

𝑦4

3𝑥2𝑦2𝑥−2 𝑖)

27𝑥33𝑥−5𝑦3

𝑥𝑦𝑥−0.2

𝑒) 25 𝑥44

625𝑥23𝑦−5

625𝑥2𝑥−1 𝑗)

81𝑥34𝑥−1/2𝑦−1/6

𝑥0.1𝑦0.4𝑥0.2

1.7 BIMDAS

Theory: the order in which you conduct

mathematical operation (such as addition,

multiplication etc.) is very important. BIMDAS is a

method that gives the order in which operations

must be done. BIMDAS stands for:

Brackets

Indices

Multiplication

Division

Addition

Subtraction

The multiplication/division have no precedence

over one another, and neither does the pair of

addition/subtraction. Because of this, it is

sometimes called BIDMAS.

Intro example: for a number to an index, which is

then added to another number, the index takes

precedence (as Index takes precedence over

Addition in BIMDAS). When solving:

24 + 5

to be able to add the 5, the index must be

simplified first:

16 + 5 = 2

If you were thinking that the 2 and 5 can be added

to one another, and then put that to the power of

4 you would be incorrect, as that does not follow

the order of BIMDAS.

Page 19: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

19

Example 1: using BIMDAS, simplify the following

5 ∙ 34 − 7 ∙ (−2)

Solution: following BIMDAS, get rid of the Brackets

first by multiplying the 7 into the −2 :

= 5 ∙ 34 − −14

Since two negative signs equals a positive sign:

= 5 ∙ 34 + 14

Expand the Indices:

= 5 ∙ 81 + 14

Multiplication/Division:

= 405 + 14

Addition/Subtraction:

= 419

BIMDAS must be followed to simplify correctly.

Example 2: using BIMDAS, simplify the following

−8 ÷ 4 + 32 × 4 ÷ 2 + 7/2

Solution: since there are no brackets, simplify the

Index:

= −8 ÷ 4 + 9 × 4 ÷ 2 + 7/2

Get rid of the Multiplication/Division:

= −2 + 18 + 3.5

Finally, Add/Subtract the numbers:

= 19.5

Example 3: using BIMDAS, simplify the following to

a single fraction

−3 ÷ 5 + 3 × 22/32 − 1

Solution: before using BIMDAS, it is easiest to

rewrite the problem with the “÷” changed:

= −3

5+

3 × 22

32− 1

Get rid of the brackets:

= −3

5+

3 × 22

32− 1

Get rid of the indices:

= −3

5+

3 × 4

9− 1

Then the multiplication:

= −3

5+

12

9− 1

This is now a Common Denominator problem:

= −3

5

9

9 +

12

9

5

5 −

1

1

45

45

= −27

45+

60

45−

45

45

=−27 + 60 − 45

45= −

12

45

Moving on to a harder concept that is common

throughout this book; informally, it is called the

crab-claw method, and it is used to simplify the

multiplication of two (or more) brackets. It is also

called the FOIL rule (First, Outer, Inner, Last). It will

make sense soon.

For the multiplication of the following brackets:

𝑥 + 2 𝑦 + 4

Draw in lines to match the letters of FOIL or to look

like a “crab-claw” (the reason is explained below).

Theory: to expand the multiplication of two

brackets, every term in one bracket must be

multiplied with every term in the other bracket

(i.e. First, Outer, Inner, Last – FOIL)

Looking back at the crab-claw that was drawn,

each term in the first bracket is multiplying every

term in the second bracket. That is, 𝑥 multiplies

the 𝑦 (to give 𝑥𝑦), then that same 𝑥 also multiplies

the 4 (to give 4𝑥). The 2 multiplies the 𝑦 to give 2𝑦

and the 2 also multiplies the 4 to give 8. Adding

these together:

𝑥 + 2 𝑦 + 4 = 𝑥𝑦 + 4𝑥 + 2𝑦 + 8

Example 4: expand the brackets for

𝑦 = 2𝑥 + 1 −𝑥 − 1

Solution: draw in the crab claw:

𝑦 = 2𝑥 + 1 (−𝑥 − 1)

𝑦 = 𝑥 + 2 𝑦 + 4

Page 20: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

20

Follow the lines:

𝑦 = 2𝑥 −1 + 2𝑥 −𝑥 + 1 −𝑥

+ 1 −1

Simplify:

𝑦 = −2𝑥 − 2𝑥2 − 𝑥 − 1

Collect like terms:

𝑦 = −3𝑥 − 2𝑥2 − 1

The following is where many students make

mistakes, so don’t be one of them!

Theory: when a bracket containing two terms

separated by an addition/subtraction sign is put to

an index, write out the bracket that many times. If

given:

𝑥 + 3 2

Write the bracket out twice:

𝑥 + 3 2 = 𝑥 + 3 𝑥 + 3

This is index theory. However, many students think

they can simply put the index into each of the two

terms inside the bracket:

𝑥 + 3 2 = 𝑥2 + 32

This is incorrect as there is an addition (or

subtraction) sign separating two terms inside the

brackets. This is a VERY common mistake. The

correct answer to this problem is 𝑥2 + 6𝑥 + 9.

Find it for yourself using the crab-claw method.

Example 5: expand

𝑥 − 7 2

Solution: write out the brackets twice:

= 𝑥 − 7 𝑥 − 7

Draw in the crab-claw:

Follow the lines:

= 𝑥2 − 7𝑥 − 7𝑥 + 49

Collect like terms:

= 𝑥2 − 14𝑥 + 49

Example 6: expand the bracket

−2𝑥 + 4 2

Solution: write out the two brackets:

= −2𝑥 + 4 −2𝑥 + 4

Draw in the crab-claw:

Follow the lines:

= 4𝑥2 − 8𝑥 − 8𝑥 + 16

Collect like terms:

= 4𝑥2 − 16𝑥 + 16

Example 7: using BIMDAS, expand and collect like

terms for

−3𝑥 + 1 2 + 2 − 𝑥 + 1 2 + 52

Solution: This seems complex, but do it one small

step at a time. To get rid of the Brackets, take the

−3𝑥 + 1 2 and expand this first (ignoring

everything else):

−3𝑥 + 1 2 = −3𝑥 + 1 −3𝑥 + 1

Using the crab-claw:

Follow the lines gives:

= 9𝑥2 − 3𝑥 − 3𝑥 + 1

= 9𝑥2 − 6𝑥 + 1

Replace this in the original statement (in brackets):

9𝑥2 − 6𝑥 + 1 + 2 − 𝑥 + 1 2 + 52

Move on to the other bracket:

𝑥 + 1 2 = 𝑥 + 1 𝑥 + 1

Use the crab-claw method again:

Follow the lines:

= 𝑥2 + 𝑥 + 𝑥 + 1

= 𝑥2 + 2𝑥 + 1

𝑥 + 1 𝑥 + 1

−3𝑥 + 1 −3𝑥 + 1

= −2𝑥 + 4 (−2𝑥 + 4)

= 𝑥 − 7 𝑥 − 7

Page 21: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

21

Substitute back into the original statement:

9𝑥2 − 6𝑥 + 1 + 2 − 𝑥2 + 2𝑥 + 1 + 52

The brackets must still be there as that negative

sign must go into every term in the brackets:

9𝑥2 − 6𝑥 + 1 + 2 − 𝑥2 − 2𝑥 − 1 + 52

All the brackets have been removed, so move on

to Indices:

9𝑥2 − 6𝑥 + 1 + 2 − 𝑥2 − 2𝑥 − 1 + 25

The index of 𝑥2 cannot be simplified as 𝑥 is a

variable so it is left alone. Move on to

Multiplication/Division (of which there is none),

and then onto Addition/Subtraction by collecting

like terms:

= 8𝑥2 − 8𝑥 + 27

Example 8: show that the expanded forms of the

two statements below are not the same:

Statement 1: 𝑥 + 3 𝑥 + 5 − 15𝑥 + 4

Statement 2: 𝑥 + 3 𝑥 + 5 − 15𝑥 + 4

Solution:

For statement 1: use BIMDAS to get rid of the

Brackets:

𝑥 + 3 𝑥 + 5 − 15𝑥 + 4

The only thing multiplying 𝑥 + 5 is 3, so only half

a crab-claw is required. The reason is that 𝑥 + 3 is

not in brackets so only the 3 needs to be crab-

clawed:

= 𝑥 + 3𝑥 + 15 − 15𝑥 + 4

Collecting like terms:

= −11𝑥 + 19

For statement 2: use BIMDAS to get rid of the

Brackets first, by using the crab-claw:

Which gives:

= 𝑥2 + 3𝑥 + 5𝑥 + 15 − (15𝑥 + 4)

The other brackets need to have the negative sign

introduced into each term:

= 𝑥2 + 3𝑥 + 5𝑥 + 15 − 15𝑥 − 4

Since there are no Indices (that can be simplified),

nor multiplication/division, the only thing left is to

collect like terms:

= 𝑥2 − 7𝑥 + 11

Despite the two statements having the same

numbers, the placement of brackets is very

important as obviously, the two statements are

not the same.

The more practice you have with BIMDAS, the

easier it will become.

Exercises: 1. Simplify the following using BIMDAS

𝑎) 2 5 + 7 − 12 − 23

𝑏) 4 − 1 5 + 32 − 16 + 16 ÷ 8

𝑐) 12 ÷ 4 + 3 ÷ 3 × 2 + 1

𝑑) 7 3 − 22 ÷ −1 + 5𝑥 − 4 + 22

2. Simplify the following using the crab-claw 𝑎) 𝑥 + 1 𝑥 + 1

𝑏) 𝑥 + 3 𝑥 − 4

𝑐) 𝑥 + 2 2 + 1

𝑑) 2𝑥 + 2 𝑥 − 1

𝑒) −3𝑥 − 1 −𝑥 + 2

3. Simplify the following using the crab-claw and BIMDAS

𝑎) 3 − 42 − 𝑥2 + 𝑥 + 13 2

𝑏) 𝑥 + 1 2 − 5 + 22 2 ÷ 3 + 1

𝑐) 5 − 1 − 13 2 + 𝑥 + −1 2 2 + 1 − 𝑥

𝑑) 𝑥 − 1 2 + 2𝑥 + 1 2 + 12

𝑒) 2 𝑥 − 1 2 + 3𝑥 − 22 − 4 3 − 𝑥

4. Simplify the following using all the theory from this chapter.

𝑎) 3𝑏2 3 + 4𝑏 𝑏2

𝑏3

𝑏) 5𝑎 2𝑎 + 3

9 + 𝑎2

𝑐) 7𝑏 1

𝑏3+ 2𝑏2 − 𝑏2

𝑑) 3𝑏 𝑏2

𝑏0.5 𝑏+ 1

2

1.8 equations

You have already been introduced to equations

without it being said explicitly.

𝑥 + 3 𝑥 + 5 − 15𝑥 + 4

𝑥 + 3 𝑥 + 5 − 15𝑥 + 4

Page 22: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

22

Theory: an equation is anything with an equals

sign.

Examples of equations include:

5 + 1 = 6

3𝑥 − 4 = 7

𝑦 = 𝑥2 + 6𝑥 − 3

All these have equals signs so all are equations.

Equations are used widely to find solutions to

problems.

Intro example 1: a customer wants to buy 45

laptop computers from a retail company. The

retailer has only 13 in stock. The problem is to find

how many computers need to be ordered. Write

the problem as an equation:

13 + 𝑥 = 45

The left side is what is in stock (13) plus what

needs to be ordered (𝑥), and the right side (45) is

what the customer wants. This is a very simple

example, and when 13 is taken from 45, the result

will be 𝑥, the number of computers that need to

be ordered (𝑥 = 45 − 13 = 32).

Manipulating equations is difficult to begin with,

but the more you practice, the more natural it

becomes. There are a few rules and a few hints

which will make rearranging equations very

simple.

Theory: make sure there is a reason for

rearranging an equation.

This sounds obvious, but it is often forgotten. Most

of the time, rearranging an equation is to isolate a

variable. In the above example, 𝑥 was isolated to

give the number of computers to be ordered.

Theory: RULE 1: whatever is done to one side of

the equation must also be done to the other side.

If one side of an equation is changed without

changing the other, it will no longer be equal.

Example 1: isolate 𝑥 in

𝑥 + 5 = 9

Solution: to isolate 𝑥, the 5 needs to be removed.

A “+5” is “reversed” by subtracting 5 from the left

side; but whatever is done to one side has to be

done to the other side as well. So 5 is taken from

both sides:

𝑥 + 5 − 5 = 9 − 5

This can then be simplified to:

𝑥 = 4

As on the left side, 5 − 5 = 0 and on the right side,

9 − 5 = 4. To make sure, go back to the original

equation and substitute 𝑥 = 4. Does 4 + 5 = 9?

Yes.

Example 2: isolate 𝑥 in

𝑥

4= 10

Solution: to isolate 𝑥, the 4 needs to be removed.

The “reverse” of a “÷ 4” is to multiply the left side

by 4. But once again, whatever is done to one side

must be done to the other, so both sides must be

multiplied by 4:

4 ∙𝑥

4= 4 ∙ 10

On the left side, the 4’s cancel to give 1𝑥 or simply

𝑥 on the left side:

𝑥 = 40

Substitute this into the original equation:

40

4= 10 ? Yes

Theory: RULE 2: when isolating a variable, use the

reverse order of BIMDAS to get rid of the elements

around the variable to be isolated.

This simply means work backwards to BIMDAS

when deciding what to get rid of on the side you

are trying to isolate 𝑥.

Page 23: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

23

Example 3: isolate 𝑥 in the following:

𝑥

3+ 5 = 7

Solution: to isolate 𝑥, the 3 and the 5 need to be

“reversed”, but they must be done one at a time.

Using the reverse of BIMDAS, get rid of the 5 as it

is an addition. To “reverse” the +5, subtract 5

from both sides:

𝑥

3+ 5 − 5 = 7 − 5

𝑥

3= 2

To “reverse” the ÷ 3 multiply both sides by 3

(remember that 3 =3

1):

3

1∙𝑥

3= 3 ∙ 2

𝑥 = 6

If 𝑥 = 6 is substituted into the original equation:

6

3+ 5 = 2 + 5 = 7

Which is correct.

Example 4: isolate 𝑥 in the following:

−3𝑥

5+ 7 = −4

Solution: to isolate 𝑥, work backwards through

BIMDAS. Get rid of the +7 by subtracting 7 from

both sides:

−3𝑥

5+ 7 − 7 = −4 − 7

−3𝑥

5= −11

The negative sign on the left can be put either up

top, or down bottom (they are the same, and both

will give the same answer):

3𝑥

−5= −11

To get rid of the ÷ −5 , multiply both sides by

−5 (remember −5 =−5

1):

−5

1∙

3𝑥

−5= −11 ∙ −5

3𝑥 = 55

Divide both sides by 3 to get rid of the × 3 on the

left side:

3𝑥

3=

55

3

𝑥 =55

3= 18

1

3

Note: the negative sign could have been moved to

give −3𝑥

5 without changing the answer. Also, the 3

could have been “reversed” first, and then the −5,

as BIMDAS does not give precedence to

Division/Multiplication.

Example 5: isolate 𝑥 in the following

𝑥

7+ 𝑦 − 3 = 9

Solution: using the reverse of BIMDAS, the +𝑦 or

−3 must be removed. Below, the −3 is removed

first by adding 3 to both sides, but the 𝑦 could

have been removed first without changing the

solution:

𝑥

7+ 𝑦 − 3 + 3 = 9 + 3

𝑥

7+ 𝑦 = 12

Get rid of the +𝑦 (treat this as you would any

other number). To reverse this +𝑦, subtract 𝑦

from both sides:

𝑥

7+ 𝑦 − 𝑦 = 12 − 𝑦

𝑥

7= 12 − 𝑦

Finally, “reverse” the ÷ 7 by multiplying both sides

by 7:

𝑥 = 7 ∙ 12 − 𝑦

Brackets are needed around the 12 − 𝑦 as RULE 1

above is really:

Theory: RULE 1: whatever is done to the whole of

one side of an equation must be done to the

whole of the other side.

Page 24: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

24

You might have thought to write:

𝑥 = 7 ∙ 12 − 𝑦

This is incorrect as the whole of the right side must

be multiplied by 7, however here, only the 12 is

being multiplied by 7.

Given the correct form:

𝑥 = 7 ∙ 12 − 𝑦

It can be expanded using half a crab-claw:

𝑥 = 84 − 7𝑦

Example 6: isolate 𝑥 in

−2

5𝑥 + 3𝑥 −

2

3𝑦 + 5 = 7

Solution: firstly, put everything not with an 𝑥 onto

the right side, by adding 2

3𝑦 to both sides and

subtracting 5 from both sides:

−2

5𝑥 + 3𝑥 −

2

3𝑦 +

2

3𝑦 + 5 − 5 = 7 +

2

3𝑦 − 5

−2

5𝑥 + 3𝑥 = 2 +

2

3𝑦

Change each side to have a Common Denominator

(the left side Common Denominator does not have

to be the same as the Common Denominator on

the right):

−2𝑥

5+

3𝑥

1=

2

1+

2𝑦

3

On the left side, the Common Denominator is 5, so

3𝑥/1 needs to be changed to have 5 on the

bottom, by multiplying by 5/5:

−2𝑥

5+

3𝑥

1

5

5 =

2

1+

2𝑦

3

−2𝑥

5+

15𝑥

5=

2

1+

2𝑦

3

Change the left side under a single division:

−2𝑥 + 15𝑥

5=

2

1+

2𝑦

3

Simplify the top of the left side:

13𝑥

5=

2

1+

2𝑦

3

Find a Common Denominator for the right side

(1 × 3 = 3):

13𝑥

5=

6

3+

2𝑦

3

13𝑥

5=

6 + 2𝑦

3

The reason why a Common Denominator is found

for both sides is that it makes it easier to “reverse”

the ÷ 5 making it easier to simplify the right side:

13𝑥

5∙ 5 =

6 + 2𝑦

3 ∙ 5

Remember that ∙ 5 is really like multiplication by 5

1:

13𝑥

5∙

5

1=

6 + 2𝑦

3 ∙

5

1

13𝑥 =5 6 + 2𝑦

3

Finally, to get rid of the × 13, divide the whole of

both sides by 13:

13𝑥

13=

5 6 + 2𝑦

13

1

To get rid of the ÷ sign on the right, invert the

second fraction and multiply:

𝑥 =5 6 + 2𝑦

3∙

1

13

𝑥 =5 6 + 2𝑦

39

That is the answer. Half a crab claw could be used

to put that 5 into the brackets, which would give:

𝑥 =30 + 10𝑦

39

A common application of equations is finding

exchange rates.

Example 7: if the currency conversion rate from

American dollars (𝑈𝑆$) to Euros (€) is:

𝑈𝑆$1.50 = €1

How many Euros would be obtained from

converting 𝑈𝑆$173?

Solution: to solve this sort of question, find how

many Euros you will get per American dollar. This

Page 25: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

25

means both sides must be divided by 1.50, so as to

get a single 𝑈𝑆$ on the left side:

𝑈𝑆$1 = €1

1.5

Since 𝑈𝑆$173 is being converted, multiply both

sides by 173:

𝑈𝑆$173 = €1

1.5 173 ≈ €115.33

Theory: for currency conversions, obtain the

exchange rate for a single unit of the currency you

have, then multiply both sides of that conversion

equation by the number of units of currency

initially had.

Exercises: 1. Solve for 𝑥 in the following equations:

𝑎) 2𝑥 − 3 = 4𝑥 + 7

𝑏) 12𝑥 − 15 +10

2= 2𝑥

𝑐) 17𝑥 − 3𝑥 = 15𝑥 − 2𝑥 + 13.5𝑥

𝑑) 19

3𝑥 − 15 = 17 − 5

𝑒) −2𝑥

3+ 5𝑥 −

1

3𝑥 − 3 = 15 − 𝑥

𝑓) 𝑥 +𝑥

2−

𝑥

3+

1

4= 5

2. Isolate 𝑥 in the following equations, leaving answers as a single fraction (where applicable):

𝑎) 3𝑦 − 2𝑥 = 𝑥 + 15

𝑏) 𝑦 = 3𝑥 − 15 − 𝑦

𝑐) 𝑦 + 1 + 𝑥 = 𝑦 − 1

𝑑) 3𝑥

4+

5

3𝑦 − 4 = 0

𝑒) 17𝑥 − 13𝑦 − 11 = 7

𝑓) 4𝑦 − 1

𝑥 + 2= 5

3. Given the initial amount of currency, and given the exchange rate, determine the equivalent value in the other currency.

𝑎) 𝐴$181 𝐴𝑈𝑆$0.80 = 𝑁𝑍$1.00

𝑏) 𝑈𝑆$47 𝑈𝑆$0.94 = 𝐶𝐴𝑁$1.04

𝑐) ¥1801 𝑈𝑆$1.03 = ¥96.1

𝑑) 𝐴𝑈𝑆$94 𝐴𝑈𝑆$1.23 = 𝐶𝐴𝑁$0.92

1.9 factorisation

Factorisation is the opposite of expansion of

brackets. The application of factorising will be seen

in subsequent chapters. Factorising does not

change the equation, but rather is a method of

manipulating an equation.

Intro example 1: for the equation

𝑦 = 2𝑥 + 2

Factorise out the number 2. Factorising out 2 from

every part of the right side is analogous to

“dividing” each term by the number 2, but then

bringing 2 out front of brackets:

𝑦 = 2 𝑥 + 1

This may be confusing but if half a crab-claw was

used to get rid of the brackets, the original

equation will be obtained.

Example 1: factorise 𝑥 out of the following

𝑦 = 4𝑥 + 3𝑥2

Solution: “divide” each of the parts on the right

side by 𝑥, then bring 𝑥 out front of brackets:

𝑦 = 𝑥 4 + 3𝑥

Example 2: factorise anything common in the

equation

𝑦 = 4𝑥2 + 8𝑥3

Solution: each part on the right has an 𝑥2 (the 𝑥3

is the same as 𝑥2𝑥), and also a 4 (as 8 = 4 ∙ 2), so

this means that 4𝑥2 can be factorised out from

each part on the right side:

𝑦 = 4𝑥2 1 + 2𝑥

Theory: for a statement which is separated by

additions/subtractions, and each part of the

statement has a certain common aspect, then each

separate part of the statement can be “divided” by

the common aspect, then having that common

aspect being put outside of the brackets.

Example 3: factorise

𝑦 = 3𝑥3 − 12𝑥 + 6𝑥2

Page 26: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

26

Solution: the common aspect in each part is 3𝑥, so

put 3𝑥 out front of brackets and then “divide”

each part by 3𝑥:

𝑦 = 3𝑥 𝑥2 − 4 + 2𝑥

A common use of factorisation is finding the

solution(s) to complex statements being equal to

zero. However, after the statements are

factorised, there are at least two big parts being

multiplied together.

Theory: when two statements are multiplied

together and they equal zero, one of the

statements must be equal to zero.

Example 4: solve

0 = 3𝑥2 + 6𝑥

Solution: factorise a common 3𝑥 out of each part:

0 = 3𝑥 𝑥 + 2

Now there are two parts being multiplied to give

zero. The two “parts” are colour coded below:

0 = 3𝑥 𝑥 + 2

For the whole right side to equal zero, either

3𝑥 = 0 making 𝑥 = 0 or 𝑥 + 2 = 0 making

𝑥 = −2. The two solutions are 𝑥 = 0 and 𝑥 = −2.

Exercises: 1. Factorise

𝑎) 2𝑥 + 4𝑥𝑦 + 8𝑥2 𝑏) 3𝑥2 + 9𝑥 − 12𝑦 𝑐) 3𝑥3 + 2𝑥2 𝑑) 13𝑥2 + 𝑥

𝑒) −3𝑥

4+

𝑥2

4

𝑓) 18𝑥2𝑦 − 91𝑥𝑦2 𝑔) 12𝑥2𝑦2 − 48𝑥𝑦

2. Solve for 𝑥 using factorisation: 𝑎) 18𝑥2 − 9𝑥 𝑏) 8𝑥 − 4𝑥2 𝑐) 19𝑥2 − 38𝑥 𝑑) 17𝑥 − 18𝑥2 − 𝑥 𝑒) 12𝑥4 − 37𝑥3

1.10 inequalities and absolute values

An equality is when two things are equal.

Inequalities are when two things are not equal.

Theory: inequalities are noted with the signs “<”

and “>”. The sign > means the left side is greater

than the right side, and the sign < means the left

side is less than the right side. Similarly, the sign ≥

means “greater than or equal to”, and the

converse sign ≤ means “less than or equal to”.

The easiest way of remembering which side is

greater than and which side is less than, is that the

side of the open part of the signs is greater than

the pointed end. E.g. 5 > 3 as 5 is on the side of

the open end meaning that 5 is greater than 3.

Example 1: put in the inequality sign for

6∎8

Solution: since 6 is less than 8, the inequality sign

has to have the open part to the right:

6 < 8

Manipulating inequalities is a little different from

equations.

Theory: addition and subtraction of inequalities is

identical to that of equalities.

Example 2: take 5 from both sides of

11 > 7

Solution:

11 − 5 > 7 − 5

6 > 2

Theory: multiplication and division of inequalities

is identical to equalities only when multiplied or

divided by a positive number.

Example 3: divide both sides of the inequality by 5

50 > −40

Solution:

50

5>

−40

5

10 > −8

Page 27: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

27

Theory: when multiplying or dividing an inequality

by a negative number, the inequality sign must be

reversed.

Example 4: multiply both sides by −3

8 > 5

Solution:

8 −3 > 5 −3

−24 > −15

This is not true, so the inequality sign must be

reversed to give the correct answer:

−24 < −15

Moving on to absolute values.

Theory: an absolute value makes any statement

which is negative into a positive statement.

Absolute values are denoted with straight lines

around the statement:

𝑥 means “the absolute value of 𝑥”.

Example 5: find the absolute value of

−5

Solution: −5 = 5

Example 6: Find the absolute value of

7

Solution: 7 = 7

This is not the extent of absolute values, but it is

what you will need for understanding this book.

Exercises: 1. Divide both sides of the inequality by the number in

brackets 𝑎) 15 > 4 2

𝑏) 13 < 15 −2

𝑐) − 12 < −6 −1

𝑑) 1

5>

1

8 −5

2. Isolate 𝑥 in the following inequalities: 𝑎) 2𝑥 > 15 − 𝑥

𝑏) 13𝑥 +1

3𝑥 < 0 − 15

𝑐) 11𝑥 − 12𝑥 < 12 − 11

𝑑) 2𝑥 − 3𝑥 +15

2𝑥 −

𝑥

3> 21 − 3𝑥

3. Find the absolute values of the following (Hint: simplify before finding the absolute value).

𝑎) | − 4|

𝑏) |79|

𝑐) |5 − 4|

𝑑) |32 − 42|

𝑒) |4 − 6 − 1|

1.11 the number zero

Zero is a special number, with special properties.

Theory:

Any number multiplied by zero has a result

equal to zero. E.g. 5 ∙ 0 = 0

Zero divided by any number (other than

another zero) is zero. 0

15= 0

Zero divided by zero does not exist, but is not

necessarily equal to zero. 0

0≠ 0

Example 1: solve the following problem when

𝑥 = 0:

𝑥

𝑥

Solution: this is impossible, and further

investigation into the original function is required.

This above example does not mean that 𝑥

𝑥 cannot

be simplified. What it means is that when 𝑥 = 0, 𝑥

𝑥

is undefined. However, 𝑥

𝑥 is equal to 1, whenever 𝑥

is not equal to zero.

Example 2: solve

15𝑥2 0

Solution: because there is a multiplication by zero,

the value of 𝑥 is irrelevant:

15𝑥2 0 = 0

Theory: as mentioned in the previous section,

when two statements are multiplied together and

they equal zero, one of the statements must be

zero.

Page 28: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

28

Example 3: solve for:

0 = 𝑥 + 3 𝑥 − 1

Solution: the two parts (bracketed statements) are

colour coded below:

0 = 𝑥 + 3 𝑥 − 1

Either 𝑥 + 3 = 0 which gives 𝑥 = −3 or

𝑥 − 1 = 0 giving 𝑥 = 1. So the solutions are:

𝑥 = −3 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑥 = 1

Exercises: 1. Solve for 𝑥 in the following: 𝑎) 3 − 5𝑥 + 12 0 = 3 − 16𝑥 0

𝑏) 15𝑥 + 0 − 15 = 0

𝑐) 30 𝑥 + 0 2 + 10 𝑥 = 30𝑥2 − 20

𝑑) 0

0+ 1 = 𝑥

chapter one summary

Arithmetic with negative numbers: 𝑎 + −𝑏 = 𝑎 − 𝑏 𝑎 − −𝑏 = 𝑎 + 𝑏

−𝑎 −𝑏 = 𝑎 ∙ 𝑏 𝑎 −𝑏 = −𝑎 ∙ 𝑏

−𝑎

−𝑏=

𝑎

𝑏

−𝑎

𝑏=

𝑎

−𝑏= −

𝑎

𝑏

Different ways of denoting a multiplication: 𝑎 ∙ 𝑏 = 𝑎 × 𝑏 = 𝑎 𝑏

Multiplication of fractions: 𝑎

𝑏∙𝑐

𝑑=

𝑎 ∙ 𝑐

𝑏 ∙ 𝑑

Division of fractions: 𝑎

𝑏÷

𝑐

𝑑=

𝑎

𝑏×

𝑑

𝑐=

𝑎 ∙ 𝑑

𝑏 ∙ 𝑐

Addition and subtraction of fractions uses the Common Denominator approach. This approach changes the form of all fractions so that the denominators are all the same, but leaves the values of all fractions unchanged. A Common Denominator is found by multiplying the denominators (bottoms) of all the fractions to be added or subtracted. The form of each individual fraction is changed by multiplying by 𝑥/𝑥 where 𝑥 is the multiplication of all the other denominators. The numerators (tops) are then put over the common denominator.

Simplifying a fraction involving whole numbers: multiply the whole number out front by the denominator (bottom), then add that result to the top. To find how many “whole” numbers there are in a fraction, work out how many denominators will fit into the numerator without exceeding the numerator. Then remove that many denominators from the numerator, and any remaining numbers are left over the original denominator.

“Collecting like terms” is the process of bring together things that are the same.

INDEX RULE 1: 𝑥𝑎 ∙ 𝑥𝑏 = 𝑥𝑎+𝑏

INDEX RULE 2: 𝑥𝑎

𝑥𝑏 = 𝑥𝑎−𝑏

INDEX RULE 3: 𝑥0 = 1

INDEX RULE 4: 𝑥𝑛

= 𝑥1/𝑛 INDEX RULE 5: 𝑥𝑎 𝑏 = 𝑥𝑎∙𝑏

INDEX RULE 6: 𝑥−𝑎 =1

𝑥𝑎

INDEX RULE 7: 𝑥𝑦 𝑎 = 𝑥𝑎𝑦𝑎 Common numbers and their base: BASE 2: 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, 128, 256 BASE 3: 3,9,27,81,243

BASE 4: 4,16,64,256 BASE 5: 5,25,125,625

The square root of a positive number will always have two solutions: one positive and one negative.

BIMDAS is a method that gives the order in which operations must be done. BIMDAS is Brackets, Indices, Multiplication, Division, Addition, Subtraction. The multiplication/division have no precedence over one another, and neither does the pair of addition/subtraction.

To expand the multiplication of two brackets, every term in one bracket must be multiplied with every term in the other bracket (i.e. First, Outer, Inner, Last – FOIL) EQUATION RULE 1: whatever is done to the whole of one side of the equation must also be done to the whole of the other side. EQUATION RULE 2: when isolating a variable, use the reverse order of BIMDAS to get rid of the elements around the variable to be isolated.

For currency conversions, obtain the exchange rate for a single unit of the currency you have, then multiply both sides of that conversion equation by the number of units of currency initially had.

To factorise a statement which is separated by additions/subtractions, and each part of the statement has a certain common aspect, then each separate part of the statement can be “divided” by the common aspect, then having that common aspect being put outside of the brackets. When two statements are multiplied together and they equal zero, one of the statements must be equal to zero.

Inequalities are noted with the signs “<” and “>”. The sign > means the left side is greater than the right side, and the sign < means the left side is less than the right side.

Addition and subtraction of inequalities is identical to that of equalities. Multiplication and division of inequalities is identical to equalities only when multiplied or divided by a positive number. When multiplying or dividing an inequality by a negative number, the inequality sign must be reversed.

An absolute value makes any statement which is negative into a positive statement. Absolute values are denoted with straight lines around the statement: 𝑥 means “the absolute value of 𝑥”.

Page 29: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

29

Any number multiplied by zero has a result equal to zero. Zero divided by any number (other than another zero) is

zero. 0

15= 0

Zero divided by zero does not exist, but is not necessarily

equal to zero. 0

0≠ 0

chapter one questions

1. Simplify the following negative numbers: 𝑎) −3 −5 𝑏) −2 2

𝑐) 5 ∙ −5 ∙ −2 𝑑) 3 ∙ −2

2. Simplify the following fractions:

𝑎) 1

2∙

1

3 𝑏)

2

3∙

1

8

𝑐) 1

2/

1

3 𝑑) −

4

3

2

5

𝑒) 9

−7∙−3

7 𝑓)

18

1

3

𝑔) 27

13×

1

3

8 𝑕)

5

4

3

2

1

3

3. Simplify the following fractions:

𝑎) 1

2+

1

3 𝑏)

2

3+

1

8

𝑐) 3

4+

4

3 𝑑)

2

11−

1

2

𝑒) 2

13+

1

5 𝑓)

1

2−

1

3+

1

4

𝑔) 6

7+

5

6−

4

5 𝑕) 3 +

2

3−

3

7

4. Simplify the following fractions:

𝑎) 1

3∙

2

−7 −

1

2 𝑏)

2

2∙

1

6 +

1

5

𝑐) 1

𝑥+

1

3 𝑑)

1

−2−

−2

3 −

1

2

𝑒) 4

5/

3

4−

1

6 𝑓) 1 +

1

2+

1

3+

1

4+

1

𝑥

𝑔) 2 𝑥

2 /

3

4 ∙

5

1 +

𝑥

3 𝑕)

1

𝑥+

1

𝑦

2

3

5. Simplify using index rules, leaving positive indices: 𝑎) 𝑥𝑦2 3

𝑏) 2𝑥 9𝑦𝑥4 3

𝑐) 𝑥84

𝑥−3𝑦−4 −2

𝑑) 4𝑥0.5𝑥−1.25𝑦

3𝑥𝑦

𝑒) 81𝑥290.5 3𝑥𝑦2 3

27𝑥𝑦−2

𝑓) 2𝑥𝑦 4𝑦0.125 8𝑦−2𝑥−1 2

𝑔) 216𝑥−3𝑦83

36𝑥𝑦𝑥𝑦𝑥1.5𝑦−0.5

𝑕) 25𝑥4𝑦−0.25 −0.5 −𝑥𝑦 3

𝑥𝑦 125𝑦33

6. Simplify the following using BIMDAS: 𝑎) 3 + 5 ∙ 7 − (−3 + 5) ∙ 2

𝑏) 4 −2 + 4 ∙ 32 − 2 ∙ 2

𝑐) 3 − 2 ∙ 2 − 3 2 + 23

𝑑) 14𝑥 − 𝑥 3 + 4 2 + 3 − 1 𝑥

𝑒) 2 − 3 ∙ 32 − 1 2 + 4

𝑓) 2 − 6 3 + 33 + −2 − 1 + 2

𝑔) −2 −3 − 43 + 2 ∙ −3

𝑕) 2𝑥 − 3 𝑥 + 2𝑦 − 1 + 2 3𝑦 − 𝑥 + 3

7. Expand and simplify the following: 𝑎) 𝑥 + 2 2 𝑏) 𝑥 − 3 2

𝑐) 2𝑥 + 1 2 𝑑) 1 − 𝑥 2

𝑒) 𝑥 + 3 2 + 2𝑥 − 4

𝑓) 2 − 2𝑥 − 1 2 + 3𝑥 − 40.5

𝑔) 3 𝑥 − 1 2 + 1

𝑕) − 2 − 𝑥 + 1 2 − 14

8. Isolate 𝑥 in the following equations:

𝑎) 𝑥 − 4 = 1 𝑏) 3𝑥 + 1 = 7

𝑐) 2𝑥 − 1 = 4𝑥 − 3 𝑑) 3𝑥 − 7 = 4

𝑒) 2𝑥 + 2

3= 5 𝑓) 7𝑥 +

2

3= 1

𝑔) 12𝑥 + 3 = −6 + 2𝑥 𝑕) 3𝑥 + 𝑦 − 7 = 2

𝑖) 4𝑥 − 2

𝑦= 2 𝑗) 𝑥 − 7 = 5𝑥 − 3𝑦 + 2

9. Factorise out anything possible in the following: 𝑎) 2𝑥 + 2𝑥𝑦 + 2 𝑏) 2𝑥2 + 6𝑥𝑦 − 8𝑦2𝑥

𝑐) 13𝑦𝑥 − 12𝑦2 + 𝑦 𝑑) 3𝑥2 + 9𝑥3 + 12𝑥5

𝑒) 4𝑄𝑃 + 𝑟𝑃𝑄 − 𝑥𝑃𝑦𝑄 𝑓) 1

3𝑥2 +

1

3𝑥4 +

1

6

𝑔) 15𝑥3 + 25𝑥 − 50𝑥4 𝑕) 1

𝑥+

1

𝑥2−

1

𝑥3

10. Simplify and solve for 𝑥 in the following: 𝑎) 𝑥2 − 𝑥 = 0 𝑏) 𝑥2 + 3𝑥 = 0

𝑐) 2𝑥 − 6𝑥2 = 0 𝑑) 4𝑥2 + 4𝑥 = 0

𝑒) 𝑥3 − 𝑥2 = 0 𝑓) 3𝑥4 − 5𝑥3 = 0

11. Simplify, then factorise, the following: 𝑎) 2𝑥 + 3 2 + 3

𝑏) 9 − 𝑥 2

− 𝑥2 + 3

𝑐) 216𝑥6 13 − 3 + 𝑥2 + 3 + 𝑥−2

𝑑) −3 − 2 𝑥 − 32 + 1 −3𝑥2 + 6𝑥3

12𝑥

𝑒) 27𝑥63− 𝑥2

2

+𝑥(𝑥−3 −2 𝑥4.5

4𝑥

𝑓) −125𝑥93

+ 3𝑥3𝑥−2

1𝑥2

− 5𝑥2 + 3𝑥

12. Solve for 𝑥 in the following equations: 𝑎) 𝑥 − 3 𝑥 − 2 = 0

𝑏) 𝑥 + 7 𝑥 − 4 = 0

𝑐) 2𝑥 − 4 𝑥 − 3 = 0

𝑑) −3𝑥 − 1 6𝑥 + 15 = 0

𝑒) 3𝑥5 − 6𝑥4

𝑥3= 0

𝑓) 4 − 𝑥 2

− 𝑥2 = 0

13. Find the absolute value of the following: 𝑎) −3 𝑏) 4 𝑐) | − 1|

𝑑) −15 𝑒) −0.1 𝑓) |2 − 3|

Page 30: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

30

Chapter 2

Linear Algebra How to describe and draw lines in maths

2.1 Linear Equations 31

2.2 Main Feature of Linear Equations 32

2.3 Negative Gradients 33

2.4 Graphing Lines from Equations 34

2.5 Obtaining the Equation of a Line 36

2.6 Intersecting Lines 38

2.7 Microeconomic Applications 40

2.8 Elasticity 42

2.9 Interpreting Elasticity 44

Chapter Two Summary 46

Chapter Two Questions 47

Page 31: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

31

2.1 linear equations

Theory: linear equations have the general form:

𝑦 = 𝑚𝑥 + 𝑐

Where 𝑚 is the gradient, 𝑐 is a constant, and 𝑥 and

𝑦 are variables.

For example 𝑦 = 2𝑥 + 3. Both 𝑚 and 𝑐 are

definite numbers (𝑚 = 2, 𝑐 = 3).

In simple terms, 𝑚 is the gradient of the line –

which is another way of saying the slope of the

line. Steeper lines have larger values of 𝑚. The 𝑐 is

a constant which is added to everything else (it is

just a number). The 𝑥 and the 𝑦 are variables; 𝑦 is

the dependent variable, because its value depends

on 𝑥, which is the independent variable (see

chapter 1).

Graphs of linear equations are straight lines.

Below is a graph of two lines which might help you

understand this theory.

Line 𝐴 is steeper than line 𝐵, so it has a larger

gradient (slope=gradient). Thus, line 𝐴 has a larger

value of 𝑚 than line 𝐵.

The graph below shows how the value of 𝑐 affects

the position of a line.

These lines have the same slope (𝑚), but the

values of 𝑐 differ. The value of 𝑐 is a constant that

determines how much the graph of the line is

shifted up or down (line 𝐷 has a larger value of 𝑐

than line 𝐸).

Theory: a mathematical definition of gradient is:

𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑖𝑒𝑛𝑡 = 𝑚 =𝑟𝑖𝑠𝑒

𝑟𝑢𝑛

The graph below shows how this definition is used:

Going from point 𝐹 to point 𝐺, ask, how much

does the line rise for every unit it goes across

(runs)?

Example 1: determine the gradient of the

following line:

Plan: use the equation 𝑚 =𝑟𝑖𝑠𝑒

𝑟𝑢𝑛

Solution:

𝑚 =𝑟𝑖𝑠𝑒

𝑟𝑢𝑛=

3

10= 0.3

Theory: the gradient of a line is the same at all

points along it.

The values of 𝑚 and 𝑐 are actual numbers, such as:

𝑦 = 4𝑥 + 5 𝑚 = 4 𝑐 = 5

𝑦 = 81𝑥 − 7 𝑚 = 81 𝑐 = −7

3

10

𝑥

𝑦

𝑥

𝑦

𝑟𝑢𝑛

𝑟𝑖𝑠𝑒 𝐹

𝐺

𝑥

𝑦

𝐸

𝐷

𝑥

𝐴

𝐵

𝑦

Page 32: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

32

𝑦 = −1

4𝑥 +

3

4 𝑚 = −

1

4 𝑐 =

3

4

The constants 𝑚 and 𝑐 can be positive or negative,

and can be whole numbers, fractions or decimals.

The 𝑦 = 𝑚𝑥 + 𝑐 equation is the general form of

a line, but there are many other forms. Despite all

these other forms, it is best practice to manipulate

equations of lines to get them into this easier,

general form. From Chapter 1, you should be able

to rearrange equations easily:

Example 2: rearrange to get into the general form

−7𝑥 + 4𝑦 = 𝑦 − 3

Plan: use the reverse of BIMDAS to isolate 𝑦.

Solution: add 7𝑥 to both sides.

−7𝑥 + 7𝑥 + 4𝑦 = 𝑦 − 3 + 7𝑥

Take 𝑦 from both sides (to have all the 𝑦’s on the

left side):

+4𝑦 − 𝑦 = 𝑦 − 𝑦 − 3 + 7𝑥

3𝑦 = 7𝑥 − 3

Then divide the whole of both sides by 3.

3𝑦

3=

7𝑥 − 3

3

𝑦 =7

3𝑥 −

3

3

𝑦 =7

3𝑥 − 1

Example 3: rearrange to get into the general form

3𝑦 − 4

𝑥 + 1= 6

Plan: apply the reverse of BIMDAS to isolate 𝑦.

Solution: multiply both sides by (𝑥 + 1):

3𝑦 − 4

𝑥 + 1(𝑥 + 1) = 6(𝑥 + 1)

3𝑦 − 4 = 6𝑥 + 6

Add 4 to both sides:

3𝑦 − 4 + 4 = 6𝑥 + 6 + 4

3𝑦 = 6𝑥 + 10

Divide both sides by 3:

3𝑦

3=

6𝑥 + 10

3

𝑦 = 2𝑥 +10

3

The gradient (𝑚) and the constant (𝑐) of each line

is unknown until it is rearranged into the general

form.

Exercises: 1. Get the following equations in general form:

𝑎) − 𝑥 − 𝑦 = 7 𝑏) 2𝑥 − 2𝑦 − 4 = 0 𝑐) 3𝑦 + 4𝑥 = 17 𝑑) − 3 𝑥 − 2𝑦 = 𝑦 − 2 𝑒) 𝑦 = 2𝑥 − 0.5𝑦 + 8

𝑓) 𝑦 + 3

𝑥 + 3= 3

2. Determine the exact gradient and 𝑐 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒 of the following equations:

𝑎) 8𝑦 + 3𝑥 − 7 = 0 𝑏) − 3𝑥 − 5𝑦 = 7 − 𝑥

𝑐) 𝑥

−3+

4

−1𝑦 = 7

𝑑) −−5

4𝑥 + 𝑦

6

7 = 𝑦 − 1

𝑒) 𝑦 = 9

𝑓) 2𝑦 − 1

𝑥 + 1= 5

2.2 main features of linear equations

The graph below shows a couple of lines.

Theory: the 𝑥 − 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑝𝑡 is where the line cuts

the 𝑥 − 𝑎𝑥𝑖𝑠. Similarly, the 𝑦 − 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑝𝑡 is

where the line cuts the 𝑦 − 𝑎𝑥𝑖𝑠.

There are two aspects to note when graphing

lines:

1. steeper lines have larger gradients (𝑚 values).

2. lines cutting the 𝑦 − 𝑎𝑥𝑖𝑠 higher up have larger

𝑐 value; the 𝑐 value shifts the line up or down.

𝑥 − 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑝𝑡

𝑦 − 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑝𝑡

𝑥 − 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑝𝑡

𝑦 − 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑝𝑡

𝑥

𝑦

Page 33: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

33

Example 1: from the following graph, order the

lines from the largest 𝑚 value to the lowest 𝑚

value. Then order the lines from the largest 𝑐 value

to the smallest 𝑐 value.

Plan: use the fact that 1) steeper lines have larger

gradients, and 2) lines cutting the 𝑦 − 𝑎𝑥𝑖𝑠 higher

have larger 𝑐 values.

Solution: Looking only at the slopes of the lines, 𝐵

is steeper than 𝐷 which is steeper than 𝐴. So the

order of gradients is 𝐵, 𝐷, 𝐴.

Now, look at where the lines cut the 𝑦 − 𝑎𝑥𝑖𝑠; 𝐴

cuts it higher than 𝐵 which cuts it higher than 𝐷,

so the order of 𝑐 values is 𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐷.

Exercises: 1. Order the lines from the one with the largest

gradient to the one with the lowest gradient:

2. Order the above lines from the one with the largest

𝑐 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒 to the one with the lowest.

2.3 negative gradients

Up to this point, all linear equations have had a

positive gradient.

Theory: lines with a positive gradient go from the

bottom left to the top right, and lines with a

negative gradient go from the top left to the

bottom right.

The graph below shows lines with negative

gradients:

Both lines have a negative gradient, however line

𝐴 is steeper than line 𝐵. So the gradient 𝑚 is

bigger for 𝐴 than for 𝐵 in absolute terms. That is,

line 𝐴 has gradient −3 and line 𝐵 has gradient −1.

Remember from Chapter 1 that −1 > −3, but in

absolute terms (ignoring the negative signs) 3 > 1.

Theory: the steeper a line with a negative gradient,

the smaller is the gradient 𝑚 (as it is more

negative) and at the same time, the larger the

absolute value of 𝑚.

Example 1: for the three lines graphed below,

determine 1) which has a larger 𝑚 value, 2) which

has a larger absolute value of 𝑚, and 3) which has

a larger 𝑐 value.

Plan: the line which is steeper has a higher

absolute 𝑚 value, and at the same time has a

more negative 𝑚 value than lines less steep. The

line with the higher 𝑦 − 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑝𝑡 has a larger 𝑐

value.

𝐵

𝐴

𝐷

𝑥

𝑦

𝐴: 𝑦 = −3𝑥 − 1

𝐵: 𝑦 = −𝑥 + 3

𝑥

𝑦

𝐵

𝐴

𝐷

𝑥

𝑦

𝐵

𝐴 𝐷

𝑥

𝑦

Page 34: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

34

Solution: From the graph, 𝐴 is steeper than 𝐵

which is steeper than 𝐷. So the absolute values of

the gradient 𝑚 is 𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐷. Because 𝐴 is steeper

than the other two, it must have a more negative

gradient; similarly 𝐵 is steeper than 𝐷 so it must

have a more negative 𝑚 value than 𝐷. Thus, the

normal 𝑚 value order is the opposite of the one

above: 𝐷, 𝐵, 𝐴.

Finally, 𝐵 cuts the 𝑦 − 𝑎𝑥𝑖𝑠 higher than 𝐷, which

cuts it higher than 𝐴, so the order for the size of 𝑐

is 𝐵, 𝐷, 𝐴.

Exercises: For the following lines:

a) Order the lines from the one with the lowest

gradient to the one with the largest gradient: b) Order the lines from the shallowest to the steepest

(in absolute terms). Compare a) and b). c) Order the lines from the one with the largest

𝑐 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒 to the one with the lowest.

2.4 graphing lines from equations

Lines can be easily plotted on a set of axes.

Theory: to plot a line, points are needed which are

called coordinates. Coordinates are written as

(𝑥, 𝑦), where 𝑥 is always written first, and 𝑦

second.

For the coordinate (3,7), 𝑥 = 3 and 𝑦 = 7.

To be able to draw a line, you need at least two

points (sets of coordinates).

It is good practice to have equations of lines in the

general form, but the following method allows

plotting of lines in any initial form.

Theory: to find:

1. the 𝑥 − 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑝𝑡 (where the line crosses the

𝑥 − 𝑎𝑥𝑖𝑠), replace all values of 𝑦 with zero,

then solve for 𝑥.

2. the 𝑦 − 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑝𝑡, replace all values of 𝑥 with

zero, then solve for 𝑦.

This may be a little bit confusing at first.

Example 1: plot the line

𝑦 = 2𝑥 + 6

Plan: set all 𝑦′𝑠 equal to zero then solve for 𝑥 to

find the 𝑥 − 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑝𝑡. Then set all the 𝑥's equal

to zero, and solve for 𝑦 to find the 𝑦 − 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑝𝑡.

Solution: for 𝑥 − 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑝𝑡, set 𝑦 = 0:

0 = 2𝑥 + 6

2𝑥 = −6

𝑥 = −3

This gives the coordinate −3,0 . Remember that

at the 𝑥 − 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑝𝑡, the value of 𝑦 = 0, and

coordinates are written with 𝑥 first then 𝑦: (𝑥, 𝑦).

To find the 𝑦 − 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑝𝑡, set 𝑥 = 0:

𝑦 = 2 0 + 6

𝑦 = 6

This gives the coordinate (0,6), as at the

𝑦 − 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑝𝑡, the value of 𝑥 = 0.

These two points can be plotted on a set of axes,

then joined with a ruler.

Theory: the 𝑥 − and 𝑦 − 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑝𝑡𝑠 are usually

the easiest points to find to be able to plot a line.

(−3,0)

(0,6)

𝑥

𝑦

𝐷

𝐴

𝐵

𝑥

𝑦

Page 35: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

35

Example 2: Plot 𝑦 = 3𝑥 − 7

Plan: find:

1) the 𝑥 − 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑝𝑡 by setting 𝑦 = 0 and

solving for 𝑥

2) the 𝑦 − 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑝𝑡 by setting 𝑥 = 0 and

solving for 𝑦.

Plot these two points then join them with a ruler.

Solution: for the 𝑥 − 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑝𝑡, set 𝑦 = 0:

0 = 3𝑥 − 7

3𝑥 = 7

𝑥 =7

3

Thus the 𝑥 − 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑝𝑡 is:

7

3, 0

For the 𝑦 − 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑝𝑡, set 𝑥 = 0:

𝑦 = 3 0 − 7

𝑦 = −7

Which gives the 𝑦 − 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑝𝑡 0, −7 .

Plot these two points and join with a ruler:

Example 3: plot the equation

3𝑦 − 2𝑥 = 5

Plan: find:

1) the 𝑥 − 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑝𝑡 by setting 𝑦 = 0 and

solving for 𝑥

2) the 𝑦 − 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑝𝑡 by setting 𝑥 = 0 and

solving for 𝑦.

Plot these two points then join them with a ruler.

Solution: to find the 𝑥 − 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑝𝑡, set 𝑦 = 0:

3 0 − 2𝑥 = 5

−2𝑥 = 5

𝑥 = −2.5

The coordinate of the 𝑥 − 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑝𝑡 is (−2.5,0).

To find the 𝑦 − 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑝𝑡, set 𝑥 = 0:

3𝑦 − 2 0 = 5

3𝑦 = 5

𝑦 =5

3

The coordinates of the 𝑦 − 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑝𝑡 is 0,5

3 .

Plot these two points, then join with a ruler:

Note, that if asked for the gradient of this last

equation (3𝑦 − 2𝑥 = 5), you would have to

rearrange the equation into the general form. Try

rearranging it, and plotting the rearranged

equation.

Example 4: find the gradient and plot the line

3𝑦 + 4

2𝑥 − 1= −1

Plan: rearrange into the general form to find the

gradient. Then find two points:

1) the 𝑥 − 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑝𝑡 by setting 𝑦 = 0 and

solving for 𝑥

2) the 𝑦 − 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑝𝑡 by setting 𝑥 = 0 and

solving for 𝑦.

Plot these two points then join them with a ruler.

Solution: rearrange into the general form:

3𝑦 + 4

2𝑥 − 1(2𝑥 − 1) = −1(2𝑥 − 1)

3𝑦 + 4 − 4 = −2𝑥 + 1 − 4

3𝑦

3=

−2𝑥 − 3

3

𝑦 = −2

3𝑥 −

3

3

𝑦 = −2

3𝑥 − 1

(−2.5,0)

0,5

3

𝑥

𝑦

(0, −7)

7

3, 0

𝑥 𝑦

Page 36: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

36

Now that it is in the general form, the gradient is

𝑚 = −2

3

To plot the line, use either the original equation, or

the equation in the general form. The following

uses the original equation:

1. To find the 𝑥 − 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑝𝑡, set 𝑦 = 0:

3 0 + 4

2𝑥 − 1= −1

4

2𝑥 − 1= −1

4 = −2𝑥 + 1

3 = −2𝑥

𝑥 = −1.5

Giving 𝑥 − 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑝𝑡 coordinates (−1.5,0).

2. To find the 𝑦 − 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑝𝑡, set 𝑥 = 0:

3𝑦 + 4

2 0 − 1= −1

3𝑦 + 4

−1= −1

3𝑦 + 4 = 1

3𝑦 = −3

𝑦 = −1

This gives coordinates of (0, −1). Plot these two

points:

Exercises: 1. Find the gradient of each of the equations, then

plot the function: 𝑎) 𝑦 = 2𝑥 − 3

𝑏) 3𝑦 = 6𝑥 − 9

𝑐) 2𝑦 + 3𝑥 = 7

𝑑) 12𝑥 − 𝑦 = 3

𝑒) 7𝑦 − 3 = −2 + 𝑥

𝑓) 𝑦 − 𝑥 = 4 − 𝑥

𝑔) 3𝑦 − 1

2𝑥 + 1= 3

𝑕) 8𝑦 + 𝑥

𝑥 − 𝑦= 4

2.5 obtaining the equation of a line

In many cases you will need to find the equation of

a line without being given a graph.

Theory: when given two points, approximately plot

the points on a set of axes (if not given the graph),

then find how much the line “runs” along the

𝑥 − 𝑎𝑥𝑖𝑠, and then how much it “rises” along the

𝑦 − 𝑎𝑥𝑖𝑠 between the two points.

Applying the 𝑟𝑖𝑠𝑒/𝑟𝑢𝑛 formula, the gradient can

be found.

Using the general form of a line, substitute in the

gradient and any one of the points given, and solve

for 𝑐. Rewrite the equation of the line.

You will always be given either two coordinates, or

a coordinate and a gradient. The second case is a

subset of the first case, so if you know how to do

the first case, you will be able to do the second.

Intro example 1: find the equation of the line

passing through the points (1,3) and (3,7).

Solution: approximately plot the points:

Then draw a horizontal line from the point that is

most left, and a vertical line at the point most

right.

Ask yourself: how much does the horizontal line

“run” before it reaches the intersection? The

answer is two units along the 𝑥 − 𝑎𝑥𝑖𝑠. Then ask:

(1,3)

(3,7)

2

4

intersection

𝑥

𝑦

(0, −1)

−1.5,0

𝑥

𝑦

Page 37: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

37

from this intersection, how much does the vertical

line “rise”? The answer is four units on the

𝑦 − 𝑎𝑥𝑖𝑠.

Use the 𝑟𝑖𝑠𝑒/𝑟𝑢𝑛 formula to find the gradient:

𝑚 =𝑟𝑖𝑠𝑒

𝑟𝑢𝑛=

4

2= 2

Rewrite the general form of a line:

𝑦 = 𝑚𝑥 + 𝑐

Then replace the gradient with the value found:

𝑦 = 2𝑥 + 𝑐

To find 𝑐, substitute either one of the two point in

for 𝑥 and 𝑦. Using the point (1,3), substitute 1 for

𝑥 and 3 for 𝑦 in the general form of the line:

3 = 2(1) + 𝑐

3 = 2 + 𝑐

1 = 𝑐

So the equation of the line is:

𝑦 = 2𝑥 + 1

Using the other point (3,7) will give the same

answer. Try it!

Theory: a gradient can be found using the

𝑟𝑖𝑠𝑒/𝑟𝑢𝑛 formula, which can be written in

mathematical terms as:

𝑚 =𝑦2 − 𝑦1

𝑥2 − 𝑥1=

𝑟𝑖𝑠𝑒

𝑟𝑢𝑛

where the subscripts refer to the two points

(𝑥1 , 𝑦1) and 𝑥2 , 𝑦2 . This formula allows you to

find the gradient between two points without

plotting the points.

Example 1: find the equation of the line going

through the points: (−16,4) and (−9, 2)

Plan: use the 𝑟𝑖𝑠𝑒/𝑟𝑢𝑛 formula to find the

gradient, then substitute that gradient and one of

the points into 𝑦 = 𝑚𝑥 + 𝑐 to solve for 𝑐.

Solution: approximately plot the points:

The line “runs” between −16 and −9 , which is 7,

and “rises” between 4 and 2 which is 2. Now, we

ask, for every 7 that the line runs, how much does

it rise?

If the line falls, as in this case, the rise is negative!

So:

𝑚 =𝑟𝑖𝑠𝑒

𝑟𝑢𝑛=

−2

7 (leave it as a fraction)

This could also have been done using the

mathematical 𝑟𝑖𝑠𝑒/𝑟𝑢𝑛 formula:

𝑚 =𝑦2 − 𝑦1

𝑥2 − 𝑥1=

4 − 2

−16 − −9 =

2

−7

Substitute this gradient into the general form:

𝑦 = −2

7𝑥 + 𝑐

Next, substitute in either of the original points. The

point (−9,2) is used below, but the other point

(−16,4) will give the same answer.

Substitute 𝑥 = −9, 𝑦 = 2:

2 = −2

7 −9 + 𝑐

2 =18

7+ 𝑐

14

7−

18

7= 𝑐

𝑐 = −4

7 (leave this as a fraction)

So the equation of this line is:

𝑦 = −2

7𝑥 −

4

7

You must know how to manipulate fractions to be

able to find equations of lines (see Chapter 1).

(−16,4)

(−9,2)

7

2

𝑥

𝑦

Page 38: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

38

Example 2: find the equation of a line which has a

gradient of −3 and passes through the point

(−1,6).

Plan: use the general form of a line:

𝑦 = 𝑚𝑥 + 𝑐

Substitute the given facts (𝑚 = −3, and the point

(−1,6)) and solve for 𝑐.

Solution: substitute everything into the general

form of a line:

6 = −3 −1 + 𝑐

6 = 3 + 𝑐

𝑐 = 3

So the equation of the line is 𝑦 = −3𝑥 + 3.

This example did not require you to sketch the

line, as it involved only substitution.

Exercises: 1. Determine the equations of the lines passing

through each of the two points (respectively): 𝑎) (1,10)(2,13)

𝑏) (1,6)(3,16)

𝑐) (−1,3)(1,7)

𝑑) (1,1)(3, −3)

𝑒) (−2,1)(−5,0)

𝑓) −1,21

15 −7,

63

15

2. Determine the equation of a line passing through one point, having the gradient shown:

𝑎) 2,7 𝑚 = 4

𝑏) 6,2

3 𝑚 = −3

𝑐) −1, −1 𝑚 = −1

𝑑) 15,8 𝑚 =3

7

2.6 intersecting lines

All this mathematical theory is leading to real

world applications. If you draw two lines on a set

of axes, chances are they will cross.

Theory: lines with different gradients will intersect

only once.

The two lines above cross only once. Another way

of thinking about this is that if you look along the

blue line, the only point that it touches the red line

is at the intersection; similarly, if you look along

the red line, the only time it touches the blue line

is at the intersection.

On this graph, the two lines are labelled with

subscripts on the 𝑦 and the 𝑥 to distinguish

between the two lines. The only point on the

graph where the lines do not need to be

distinguished is at the intersection, as it is common

to both lines. So at the intersection:

𝑦1 = 𝑦2 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑥1 = 𝑥2

Theory: when linear equations with different

gradients intersect, there is only one set of

coordinates that is similar on both lines. At the

intersection, the 𝑥 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒𝑠 of both lines are the

same and at the same time the 𝑦 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒𝑠 of

both lines are the same.

This only applies to the intersection, as no other

point will satisfy this condition.

Example 1: find the intersection of the following

lines

𝑦 = 2𝑥 + 5

𝑦 = −𝑥 − 3

Plan: the only point where the 𝑥 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒𝑠 of both

lines are equal, and at the same time, the

𝑦 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒𝑠 of both lines are equal is at the

intersection. Set the two 𝑦's equal to each other

and solve for 𝑥; this gives the 𝑥 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒 at the

𝑥

𝑦

𝑦1 = 5𝑥1 + 1

𝑦2 = −4𝑥2 + 11

Page 39: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

39

intersection. Substitute this into either of the

original equations to give the 𝑦 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒.

Solution: rewrite the above equations with

subscripts to distinguish between the two

equations:

𝑦1 = 2𝑥1 + 5

𝑦2 = −𝑥2 − 3

Set the two 𝑦’s equal to each other:

𝑦1 = 𝑦2

Then substitute the 𝑦's for their respective

equations:

2𝑥1 + 5 = −𝑥2 − 3

At the intersection, the 𝑥’s are the same so the

subscripts can be removed and 𝑥 solved:

2𝑥 + 5 = −𝑥 − 3

3𝑥 = −8

𝑥 = −8

3

This gives the 𝑥 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒 of the intersection, but

the 𝑦 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒 is still required to get the

coordinates. The 𝑦 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒 comes from one of the

original equations (it doesn’t matter which one, as

at the intersection, they both have the same 𝑥 −

and 𝑦 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒𝑠). Using 𝑦1:

𝑦1 = 2 −8

3 + 5

𝑦 = −1

3

So the intersection is at −8

3, −

1

3 .

Try using the other equation to see if you get the

same solution.

Subscripts were used to distinguish between the

two functions, however, this is not necessary.

Example 2: find the intersection of:

4𝑦 − 3𝑥 − 11 = 1

𝑦 − 4 = −2𝑥

Plan: rearrange into the general form, then set the

𝑦's equal to each other. Substitute with the

equations, and solve for 𝑥. Substitute 𝑥 into one of

the equations to find 𝑦.

Solution: rearrange the first equation:

4𝑦 − 3𝑥 = 12

4𝑦 = 3𝑥 + 12

𝑦 =3

4𝑥 + 3

And the other equation:

𝑦 = −2𝑥 + 4

Set 𝑦1 = 𝑦2 and substitute the equations:

𝑦1 = 𝑦2

3

4𝑥 + 3 = −2𝑥 + 4

11

4𝑥 = 1

𝑥 =4

11

This is the 𝑥 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒 of the intersection, and now

for the 𝑦 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒:

𝑦 =3

4𝑥 + 3

𝑦 =3

4

4

11 + 3

𝑦 =36

11

Thus, the two lines intersect at 4

11,

36

11 .

If you are struggling with fractions, go back to

Chapter 1.

Exercises: 1. Determine where the following pairs of equations

intersect: 𝑎) 𝑦 = −4𝑥 + 3

𝑦 = −6𝑥 + 7

𝑏) 𝑦 = 3𝑥 + 8

𝑦 = 7𝑥 + 4

𝑐) 𝑦 = −7𝑥 + 12

𝑦 = 2𝑥 + 21

𝑑) 𝑦 = −4𝑥 − 12

𝑦 = −1.5𝑥 − 7

𝑒) 𝑦 = 0.5𝑥 + 15

3𝑦 = −𝑥 + 15

𝑓) 5𝑦 − 3𝑥 = 31

8𝑦 − 2𝑦 = 16

𝑔) 2𝑦 = −3𝑥 − 19

9𝑦 = −3𝑥 − 12

Page 40: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

40

𝑕) 7𝑦 + 12𝑥 = 72

4𝑦 = −3𝑥 + 36

2.7 microeconomic applications

Economic theory:

DEMAND: this is what you do as a consumer. You

demand goods and services. For example, when

you go to a surf shop to purchase clothes, you are

demanding those clothes. If board shorts cost

$1000 each, would you buy many? Probably not,

as it’s too expensive. What about if they cost $2

each. Would you buy many? Yes, most probably.

So at low prices, you would buy more, and at

higher prices, you would buy less. This explains the

downward slope of the demand function:

SUPPLY: when you go to purchase board-shorts,

the shop supplies them, making them the supplier.

If the price of board-shorts was $1000 (totally

ignoring demand) the shop would supply a lot, to

make a big profit. If the price went down to $2,

then the shop wouldn’t make much profit, so they

wouldn’t supply very many. This is why the supply

curve slopes upwards. At higher prices, shops

would want to sell more so supply more.

Intro example: you are thinking of starting a

business selling guitars so you do a little research

into the market for guitars.

Looking at the demand side of the market, you

estimate that if you started your business, the

demand curve would be:

𝑄𝑑 = −2𝑃 + 700

Now looking at the supply side of the market,

meaning how many guitars you would make at

certain prices, the supply function is given by:

𝑄𝑠 = 4𝑃 − 500

You would like to know the equilibrium price and

quantity (i.e. when the supply and demand curves

intersect).

Solution: at equilibrium, there is no excess supply

or excess demand (don’t worry too much if you

don’t understand excess supply/demand).

Despite there not being any 𝑥's or 𝑦's, simply apply

the same theory of lines; set the 𝑄𝑠 = 𝑄𝑑 (similar

to 𝑦1 = 𝑦2 in the previous section).

𝑄𝑠 = 𝑄𝑑

Then substitute the functions of 𝑃:

4𝑃 − 500 = −2𝑃 + 700

Rearrange to find 𝑃:

6𝑃 = 1200

𝑃 = 200

This is the price the guitars should be sold for, but

the quantity of guitars to be made is still unknown.

This quantity comes from either 𝑄𝑠 or 𝑄𝑑 (either

one as it is at equilibrium):

𝑄𝑠 𝑃 = 200 = 4 200 − 500

𝑄𝑠 𝑃 = 200 = 300

The interpretation is that 300 guitars should be

produced and sold for $200 each.

You may also be asked to draw the two lines on a

set of axes. If you are asked to do this, in

economics, the price of a good (𝑃) is on the

𝑃

𝑄

𝑆 1000

2

𝑄1 𝑄2

𝑃

𝑄

𝐷 2

1000

𝑄1 𝑄2

Page 41: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

41

𝑦 − 𝑎𝑥𝑖𝑠, and the quantity of that good (𝑄) is on

the 𝑥 − 𝑎𝑥𝑖𝑠. This is a standard which is used by

economists, so to be consistent, you will have to

rearrange both the supply and demand equation

to have the price (𝑃) by itself.

For the demand equation:

𝑄𝑑 = −2𝑃 + 700

𝑄𝑑 − 700 = −2𝑃

𝑄𝑑 − 700

−2= 𝑃

𝑃 = −0.5𝑄𝑑 + 350

For the supply equation:

𝑄𝑠 = 4𝑃 − 500

𝑄𝑠 + 500 = 4𝑃

𝑃 = 0.25𝑄𝑠 + 125

Plot both equations individually using the method

earlier in the chapter. For the demand equation:

1. To find the 𝑃 − 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑝𝑡, set 𝑄 = 0:

𝑃 = −0.5 0 + 350

𝑃 = 350

Giving a coordinate of 0,350 , remembering

that 𝑃 is on the 𝑦 − 𝑎𝑥𝑖𝑠 and 𝑄 on the

𝑥 − 𝑎𝑥𝑖𝑠.

2. To find the 𝑄 intercept, set 𝑃 = 0:

0 = −0.5𝑄𝑑 + 350

0.5𝑄𝑑 = 350

𝑄𝑑 = 700

Giving a coordinate of (700,0).

For the supply equation, you should get

𝑄𝑠 = −500 and 𝑃 = 125. Make sure you get this.

Then plot both demand and supply on the same

axes:

Theory: demand and supply can only exist when

quantity and price are positive or zero. You cannot

have a negative quantity, or a negative price

(hence the dotted extensions).

Also, in economics, 𝑃 is on the 𝑦 − 𝑎𝑥𝑖𝑠 and 𝑄 is

on the 𝑥 − 𝑎𝑥𝑖𝑠.

Example 1: find the equilibrium quantity and price

for the demand and supply equations

𝑄𝑑 = −0.5𝑃 + 25

𝑄𝑠 =1

4𝑃 − 2

Then sketch the two lines, and draw in the

equilibrium.

Plan: set 𝑄𝑑 = 𝑄𝑠 then solve for 𝑄 and 𝑃. Sketch

each of the two equations by finding the four axis

intercepts.

Solution: set 𝑄𝑑 = 𝑄𝑠

−0.5𝑃 + 25 =1

4𝑃 − 2

Rearrange to isolate 𝑃:

27 =1

4𝑃 + 0.5𝑃

Use fraction theory from Chapter 1 to find a

Common Denominator:

27 =𝑃

4+

2𝑃

4

27 =3𝑃

4

108 = 3𝑃

𝑃 =108

3= 36

(0,350)

(0,125)

(−500,0)

(700,0)

𝑄

𝑃 𝑆

𝐷

Page 42: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

42

To find the quantity, use either demand or supply

(it does not matter). Demand is used below:

𝑄𝑑 = −0.5 36 + 25

𝑄𝑑 = −18 + 25 = 7

The equilibrium is 𝑄 = 7, 𝑃 = 36.

To sketch the lines, find the two intercepts

(remember that 𝑃 is on the vertical axis, and 𝑄 is

on the horizontal axis).

Demand: to find the 𝑃 − 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑝𝑡, set 𝑄 = 0:

𝑄𝑑 = −0.5𝑃 + 25

0 = −0.5𝑃 + 25

0.5𝑃 = 25

𝑃 = 50

This gives coordinates of (50,0).

To find the 𝑄 − 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑝𝑡, set 𝑃 = 0:

𝑄𝑑 = −0.5𝑃 + 25

𝑄𝑑 = 25

Supply: to find the 𝑃 − 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑝𝑡, set 𝑄 = 0:

𝑄𝑠 =1

4𝑃 − 2

0 =1

4𝑃 − 2

0.25𝑃 = 2

𝑃 = 8

To find the 𝑄 − 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑝𝑡, set 𝑃 = 0:

𝑄𝑠 =1

4 0 − 2

𝑄𝑠 = −2

Plot demand and supply separately, then join the

respective dots:

Exercises: 1. Find the equilibrium price and quantity given the

following demand and supply equations: 𝑎) 𝑃𝑑 = −7𝑄𝑑 + 50

𝑃𝑠 = 0.5𝑄𝑠 = 5

𝑏) 𝑄𝑑 =𝑃𝑑

−9+

77

9

𝑄𝑠 = 4𝑃𝑠 − 12

𝑐) 𝑄𝑑 − 0.25𝑃𝑑 + 23

𝑃𝑠 = 0.2𝑄𝑠 + 8

𝑑) 𝑃𝑠 = 0.8𝑄𝑠 + 15

𝑃𝑑 = −1.2𝑄𝑑 + 115

𝑒) −0.7𝑄𝑠 + 𝑃𝑠 = 6

7𝑄𝑑 + 𝑃𝑑 = 61

2. Find the equilibrium price and quantity given the following demand and supply equations, then plot the functions.

𝑎) 𝑃𝑠 = 0.9𝑄𝑠 + 12

𝑃𝑑 + 0.9𝑄𝑑 = 117

𝑏) 𝑃𝑠 = 2.5𝑄𝑠 + 26

𝑃𝑑 = −2𝑄𝑑 + 158

𝑐) 𝑃𝑠 = 1.7𝑄𝑠 + 21

𝑃𝑑 + 2.3𝑄𝑑 = 182

𝑑) 𝑃𝑠 = 1.3𝑄𝑠 + 24

𝑃𝑑 = −1.5𝑄𝑑 + 148

𝑒) −0.9𝑄𝑠 + 𝑃𝑠 = 4

7𝑄𝑑 = −𝑃𝑑 + 61

2.8 elasticity

The concept of elasticity is best explained with

intuition. Let’s say that you own a business selling

cars. You have a car that is not selling well, so you

decide to reduce the price by $3,000. That’s a

large reduction, right? Well, we don’t really know.

If the original price of the car was $6,000, then

yes, the reduction is huge. But if the original price

was $50,000 then the reduction is not very big at

all. What we really want to know it the percentage

change in price. In the first instance, the

percentage change is price is −50% (it’s negative

because the price has decreased), and in the

second instance, the percentage change in price is

−6%.

Theory: percentage changes are found like any

other percentage is found:

0,50

25,0 (−2,0)

(0,8)

𝑄

𝑃

7,36

𝑆

𝐷

Page 43: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

43

%∆𝑃 =∆𝑃

𝑃× 100 =

𝑐𝑕𝑎𝑛𝑔𝑒 𝑖𝑛 𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑒

𝑜𝑟𝑖𝑔𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑒× 100

If there is a $3,000 decrease, the ∆𝑃 = −3000.

And if the original price 𝑃 = 50,000, then:

%∆𝑃 =−3000

50,000× 100 = −6%

Back to the elasticity concept: will you sell more

cars if you reduce the price by 6% or 50%? You

probably said 50%. Yes that would be sort–of

correct: you would sell more cars, but by what

percentage will your car sales increase? If you sell

3 cars when you decrease price by 6%, and sell 4

cars when you decrease price by 50%, what is a

better option? (You don’t need to answer this, just

think about the concept).

Theory: elasticity of demand is the responsiveness

of quantity demanded to a change in price.

Another way of thinking about this is: how

sensitive is the quantity demanded to changes in

price.

An intuitive example is; if the shop reduced the

price of beer by $1, would the number of cartons

of beer sold increase a little or increase a lot? This

is what elasticity determines. It uses percentages

to get rid of the error we encountered in the car

example before.

Theory: the elasticity formula is:

𝜀𝑑 =𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑔𝑒 𝑐𝑕𝑎𝑛𝑔𝑒 𝑖𝑛 𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑡𝑦

𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑔𝑒 𝑐𝑕𝑎𝑛𝑔𝑒 𝑖𝑛 𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑒=

%𝛥𝑄

%𝛥𝑃

The %𝛥𝑄 and %𝛥𝑃 can be replaced with their

respective definitions (%∆𝑃 =∆𝑃

𝑃× 100 and

%∆𝑄 =∆𝑄

𝑄× 100):

𝜀𝑑 = 𝛥𝑄𝑄 × 100

𝛥𝑃𝑃 × 100

= 𝛥𝑄

𝛥𝑃 ×

𝑃

𝑄

NOTE:

1. the 100

100 cancels off

2. the 𝛥𝑄 and 𝛥𝑃 are symbols which are

different from 𝑄 and 𝑃. The 𝛥𝑄 and 𝛥𝑃 mean

change in 𝑄 and change in 𝑃, respectively.

The form of elasticity used most often is:

𝜀𝑑 = 𝛥𝑄

𝛥𝑃 ×

𝑃

𝑄

This last equation is simpler than you think. The

first part 𝛥𝑄

𝛥𝑃 is simply the slope of the line (𝑚)

when you have the equation in the general form

(with 𝑄 by itself). The second part is a point along

the line.

Intro example 1: a business selling motorboats to

James Bond decides to hire an economist to

estimate the demand curve. The economist comes

back and gives the following function before he is

shot:

𝑄𝑑 = −0.0004𝑃 + 10

Initially, the business sells 6 boats per year at

$10,000 each, but then decides to increase the

price by 25%. The question is, how responsive are

boat sales to changes in price?

Solution: a 25% price increase means the new

price will be $12,500 = 10,000 × 1.25 .

Substituting this into the demand equation:

𝑄𝑑(12,500) = −0.0004(12,500) + 10

𝑄𝑑(7,500) = 5

So 6 boats are sold initially, and this is reduced to

5 after the 25% price increase. Now, what is the

change in 𝑄𝑑?

∆𝑄𝑑 = 5 − 6 = −1

What is the percentage change in 𝑄𝑑?

%𝛥𝑄 =𝛥𝑄

𝑄× 100 =

−1

6× 100

%𝛥𝑄 ≈ −16.67%

Putting all this information into the original

elasticity equation:

𝜀𝑑 =%𝛥𝑄

%𝛥𝑃≈

−16.67

25≈ −0.67

Page 44: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

44

Now the much easier way of doing this question.

Using the easier form of elasticity:

𝜀𝑑 = 𝛥𝑄

𝛥𝑃 ×

𝑃

𝑄

Look at the original demand equation:

𝑄𝑑 = −0.0004𝑃 + 10

Is the 𝑄 by itself? Yes, so remembering that 𝛥𝑄

𝛥𝑃 is

the slope of the demand function, which is

−0.0004. Substitute this into the elasticity

equation:

𝜀𝑑 = −0.0004 × 𝑃

𝑄

The 𝑃

𝑄 needs to be found and it is simply the

original point. The original price is $10,000 and

original quantity sold is 6, so substitute these in:

𝜀𝑑 = −0.0004 × 10,000

6 = −

2

3≈ −0.67

The same answer as before. Plus this is a more

precise answer. In the next section, the meaning of

this number will be discussed. Also, the elasticity

of demand will always be negative.

Example 1: a producer of laptops has a supply

curve approximated by

𝑄𝑠 = 4𝑃 − 400

The price the laptops are sold to a retailer is

$1000 each. How sensitive is the quantity supplied

to changes in price?

Plan: use the elasticity formula, but now supply

instead of demand:

𝜀𝑠 = 𝛥𝑄

𝛥𝑃 ×

𝑃

𝑄

Solution: the gradient 𝑚 of the supply curve, when

𝑄 is by itself is 4. Substitute this into the elasticity

formula:

𝜀𝑠 = 4 × 𝑃

𝑄

The price of the laptops is $1000, however 𝑄 is

still required; it is found using the supply curve:

𝑄𝑠(1000) = 4(1000) − 400

= 3600

Substitute 𝑄 = 3600, 𝑃 = 1000 into the elasticity

formula:

𝜀𝑠 = 4 × 1000

3600

=10

9≈ 1.11

The elasticity of supply is approximately 1.11.

The elasticity of supply will always be positive.

Exercises: 1. Determine the elasticity of demand for the given

information: 𝑎) 𝑃𝑑 = −0.5𝑄𝑑 + 50 𝑎𝑡 𝑃 = 20

𝑏) 𝑄𝑑 = −3.5𝑃𝑑 + 75 𝑎𝑡 𝑄 = 31

𝑐) 𝑄𝑑 = −4.15𝑃𝑑 + 103 𝑎𝑡 𝑄 = 27

2. Determine the elasticity of supply for the given information: 𝑎) 𝑃𝑠 = 3 + 𝑄𝑠 𝑎𝑡 𝑃 = 15

𝑏) 𝑄𝑠 = 0.4𝑃𝑠 − 44 𝑎𝑡 𝑄 = 17

𝑐) 𝑄𝑠 = 1.2𝑃𝑠 − 37.5 𝑎𝑡 𝑄 = 21

2.9 interpreting elasticity

Theory: the negative sign of the elasticity of

demand means that as prices changes in one

direction (either a positive or negative change),

then the quantity demanded will move in the

opposite direction.

The positive value of the elasticity of supply means

that as prices change, the quantity will change in

the same direction as the price changes.

Example 1: given the demand equation

𝑃𝑑 = 100 − 0.5𝑄𝑑

determine the elasticity at 𝑄𝑑 = 20 and also

determine by what percentage and in what

direction quantity will change when price is

increased by 10%.

Plan: find the elasticity using

𝜀𝑑 = 𝛥𝑄

𝛥𝑃 ×

𝑃

𝑄

Page 45: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

45

Then use the other definition of elasticity to

determine the %∆𝑄

𝜀𝑑 =%𝛥𝑄

%𝛥𝑃

Solution: isolate 𝑄 in the demand equation:

𝑄 = 200 − 2𝑃

The gradient is −2 so substitute this into the first

elasticity equation:

𝜀𝑑 = −2 × 𝑃

𝑄

Since 𝑄 = 20, 𝑃𝑑 is found using the demand

equation:

𝑃𝑑 𝑄 = 20 = 100 − 0.5 20 = 90

𝜀𝑑 = −2 90

20 = −9

Now substitute the 10% increase in price and the

elasticity into the other elasticity equation:

−9 =%∆𝑄

10

%∆𝑄 = −90

This means that as price is increased by 10%, the

quantity demanded will decrease (i.e. move in the

opposite direction due to the negative sign) by

90%.

The interpretation of the actual number of an

elasticity tells you the degree to which quantity

changes when price is changed.

Theory: to interpret elasticity, take the absolute

value of the elasticity (if it is negative, make it

positive, and if it is positive, leave it as a positive

number), then apply the following rules:

ε < 1 : INELASTIC – in this case, if the price of a

good is changed by a certain percentage, the

quantity will change by a smaller percentage.

ε = 1 : UNITARY ELASTIC – if the price of a good

is changed by a certain percentage, the

quantity will change by that same percentage.

ε > 1 : ELASTIC – if the price of a good is

changed by a certain percentage, the quantity

will change by a larger percentage.

The James Bond question from the previous

section had an elasticity of demand 𝜀𝑑 ≈ −0.67,

so to interpret this number, take the absolute

value of this number (i.e. giving 0.67). Since

0.67 < 1, it means that this good is inelastic to

price changes. That is, if price of the motorboats

changed by a certain percentage, the percentage

change in sales would not be as large (i.e. only

0.67 as large)

In the laptop example, the elasticity of supply 𝜀𝑠

was approximately 1.11, which means that the

supply of laptops is elastic. Specifically, if price

changed by a certain percentage, the producer

would respond with a 1.11 times larger

percentage change.

Example 2: the demand function for cigarettes is

(with quantity in millions):

𝑃𝑑 = −40𝑄𝑑 − 400

and the price of cigarettes is $80/carton. Find and

interpret the elasticity of demand for cigarettes.

Plan: use the elasticity equation

𝜀𝑑 = 𝛥𝑄

𝛥𝑃 ×

𝑃

𝑄

and the demand function to find the elasticity.

Solution: 𝑄 needs to be isolated in the demand

equation so the gradient can be determined:

𝑃 + 400 = −40𝑄𝑑

𝑃 + 400

−40= 𝑄𝑑

𝑄𝑑 = −1

40𝑃 + 100

The gradient observed is −1/40. Substitute this

into the elasticity formula:

𝜀𝑑 = −1

40 ×

𝑃

𝑄

Page 46: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

46

Given 𝑃 = 80, to get 𝑄 substitute this into the

rearranged demand function:

𝑄𝑑(80) = −1

40(80) + 100

𝑄𝑑 80 = 98

So 98million cartons are sold. The elasticity is:

𝜀𝑑 = −1

40 ×

80

98

𝜀𝑑 = −80

3920= −

1

49≈ −0.02

Taking the absolute value, |𝜀𝑑 | = 0.02 which

means it is (highly) inelastic. For any price changes,

the change in quantity will be significantly less

(only 0.02 of the change in price).

A highly inelastic product like cigarettes means

prices can be changed by a large percentage

without the loss of many sales. In reality, this is the

case; smoking is addictive so when price increases,

people still need to smoke, but maybe won’t buy

as many cartons.

Example 3: a company selling beer conducted

research and found that elasticity of demand was

−1.2. Interpret this number. If the company

increased price by 15%, how much would quantity

demanded change?

Plan: interpret the elasticity from the theory. Use

the original definition of elasticity to work out by

what percentage quantity will change:

𝜀𝑑 =%𝛥𝑄

%𝛥𝑃

Solution: the absolute value of 𝜀𝑑 is 1.2, and since

1.2 > 1, then beer is an elastic good. This means

that if price changes by a certain percentage,

quantity demanded will change by a larger

amount.

Now, using the original definition of elasticity, and

the fact that 𝜀𝑑 = −1.2 and %𝛥𝑃 = 15%,

substitute into the original definition:

−1.2 =%𝛥𝑄

15%

Rearrange to isolate %𝛥𝑄:

−1.2 × 15% = %𝛥𝑄

%∆𝑄 = −18%

So the percentage change in 𝑄 will be larger than

the percentage change in 𝑃, but in the opposite

direction (as it is the elasticity of demand).

Exercises: 1. Determine and interpret the elasticity for the

following functions: 𝑎) 𝑄𝑠 = 1.6𝑃𝑠 − 27 𝑎𝑡 𝑄 = 27

𝑏) 𝑃𝑑 = 49 − 0.7𝑄𝑑 𝑎𝑡 𝑄 = 40

𝑐) 𝑄𝑑 = −2.7𝑃𝑑 + 111 𝑎𝑡 𝑄 = 100

𝑑) 𝑃𝑠 = 50 + 0.1𝑄𝑠 𝑎𝑡 𝑄 = 50

𝑒) 𝑄𝑠 = 1.7𝑃𝑠 − 104 𝑎𝑡 𝑃 = 20

2. Interpret the following elasticities, and determine the effect on quantity of a 10% price decrease. 𝑎) 𝜀𝑠 = 1.19

𝑏) 𝜀𝑑 = −2.3

𝑐) 𝜀𝑠 = 0.43

𝑑) 𝜀𝑑 = 1.0

𝑒) 𝜀𝑑 = 0.97

chapter two summary

Linear equations have the general form: 𝑦 = 𝑚𝑥 + 𝑐

𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑖𝑒𝑛𝑡 = 𝑚 =𝑟𝑖𝑠𝑒

𝑟𝑢𝑛=

𝑦2 − 𝑦1

𝑥2 − 𝑥1

The gradient of a line is the same at all points

along it. 1. steeper lines have larger (absolute) gradients

(𝑚 values). 2. lines cutting the 𝑦 − 𝑎𝑥𝑖𝑠 higher up have

larger 𝑐 value; the 𝑐 value shifts the line up or down.

Coordinates are written as (𝑥, 𝑦). To be able to draw a line, you need at least two points (sets of coordinates).

To find: 1. the 𝑥 − 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑝𝑡, replace all values of 𝑦 with

zero, then solve for 𝑥. 2. the 𝑦 − 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑝𝑡, replace all values of 𝑥 with

zero, then solve for 𝑦.

Linear equations with different gradient intersect only once and there is only one set of coordinates that is similar on both lines.

Page 47: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

47

DEMAND: this is what you do as a consumer. You demand goods and services. A demand curve slopes downwards. SUPPLY: this is what a firm does. A supply curve slopes upwards. Demand and supply can only exist when quantity and price are non-negative.

Percentage changes are found:

%∆𝑃 =∆𝑃

𝑃× 100 =

𝑐𝑕𝑎𝑛𝑔𝑒 𝑖𝑛 𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑒

𝑜𝑟𝑖𝑔𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑒× 100

Elasticity of demand is the responsiveness of quantity demanded to a change in price.

𝜀𝑑 =%𝛥𝑄

%𝛥𝑃=

𝛥𝑄

𝛥𝑃 ×

𝑃

𝑄

The 𝛥𝑄 and 𝛥𝑃 are symbols which are different from 𝑄 and 𝑃. The 𝛥𝑄 and 𝛥𝑃 mean change in 𝑄 and change in 𝑃, respectively.

The negative sign of the elasticity of demand means that as prices changes in one direction (either a positive or negative change), then the quantity demanded will move in the opposite direction. The positive value of the elasticity of supply means that as prices change, the quantity will change in the same direction as the price change.

To interpret elasticity: take the absolute value of the elasticity, then apply the following rules:

ε < 1 : INELASTIC

ε = 1 : UNITARY ELASTIC

ε > 1 : ELASTIC

chapter two questions

1. Rearrange the following linear equations into the general form: 𝑎) 𝑦 − 4 = 𝑥 − 5 𝑏) 2𝑦 + 𝑥 = 3

𝑐) 2𝑦 − 𝑥 = 𝑥 + 3 − 1 𝑑) 2𝑥 − 𝑦 = 4

𝑒) 14𝑥 −2𝑦

5= 𝑦 − 3 𝑓)

2𝑦 + 1

4= 𝑥

𝑔) 𝑦

−5+

𝑥

3= 4 𝑕)

𝑦 − 𝑥

𝑥 − 3= 4

𝑖) 3𝑦 − 4𝑥

3 − 𝑥= 14 − 5

2. For the following graph:

Determine: a) The order of the gradients 𝑚 from lowest to

highest. b) The order of the steepness (the absolute value

of the gradients) from shallowest to steepest. c) The order of the values of 𝑐 from lowest to

highest. 3. Determine the gradients of each of the following

linear functions, then plot them: 𝑎) 𝑦 = 4𝑥 + 1

𝑏) 2𝑦 = 6𝑥 − 4

𝑐) 3𝑦 − 1 = 4𝑥 + 1

𝑑) 𝑦 − 𝑥

3= 2

𝑒) 2𝑥 − 3𝑦 =3

2

𝑓) 12𝑦 − 18𝑥 − 16 = 4 + 2𝑥

𝑔) 𝑦 + 3𝑥

2𝑦 − 3= 4

𝑕) 𝑦 = 4

4. For each of the following graphs, determine the equation of the line: 𝑎)

𝑏)

5. Determine the equation of the line passing through

each of the two points: 𝑎) 1,3 𝑎𝑛𝑑 3,15 𝑏) 2,1 𝑎𝑛𝑑 5,16 𝑐) 0,0 𝑎𝑛𝑑 3,4 𝑑) −1,7 𝑎𝑛𝑑 7, −1 𝑒) −5, −2 𝑎𝑛𝑑 3, −12

6. Determine the equation of the line passing through the point indicated, with the corresponding gradient: 𝑎) 2,3 𝑚 = 2

𝑏) −1, −1 𝑚 = 3

𝑐) 7,7 𝑚 = 1

𝑑) −3, −6 𝑚 = −2

𝑒) 1.4, −3.1 𝑚 = 2.5

(−2,3)

2, −9

𝑥

𝑦

(0, −6)

5,0

𝑥 𝑦

𝐵

𝐴

𝐶

𝑥

𝑦 𝐷 ??? ???

𝐹

Page 48: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

48

7. Determine the coordinates where the following lines intersect: 𝑎) 𝑦 = 3𝑥 + 9 𝑦 = 2𝑥 + 3

𝑏) 𝑦 = 4𝑥 − 9 𝑦 = 3𝑥 − 3

𝑐) 𝑦 = −5𝑥 + 7 𝑦 = 2𝑥 + 14

𝑑) 2𝑦 + 3𝑥 − 26 = 0 5𝑦 + 4𝑥 = −51

𝑒) 𝑦 + 4.5𝑥 = 44.75 5.5𝑥 + 2𝑦 = 58

8. Given the following supply and demand functions, determine the equilibrium quantity and price.

𝑃𝑑 = −0.5𝑄𝑑 + 89 𝑃𝑠 = 2𝑄𝑠 + 44

Plot the two functions, and include the axis intercepts and the equilibrium.

9. Given the demand equation: 𝑃𝑑 = −0.4𝑄𝑑 + 24

And the supply equation: 𝑃𝑠 = 3.1𝑄𝑠 + 6.5

Determine the equilibrium price and quantity, and plot the market on a set of axes.

10. For the demand equation: 𝑃𝑑 = −0.6𝑄𝑑 + 89

Determine the elasticity at 𝑄 = 45, and interpret its meaning.

11. Determine the elasticity of supply at 𝑄 = 12 for the supply equation:

𝑃𝑠 = 1.75𝑄𝑠 + 4.8 12. A car manufacturer estimates its demand curve to

be (in hundreds of thousands): 𝑃𝑑 = −0.2𝑄𝑑 + 23.06

And its supply curve is estimated to be: 𝑃𝑠 = 3.1𝑄𝑠 + 15.58

Determine: a) The equilibrium quantity and price. b) The elasticity of demand at the equilibrium,

and its meaning. c) The elasticity of supply at the equilibrium, and

its meaning. 13. The market for steel has an estimated demand and

supply curve (in millions of tonnes) to be: 𝑃𝑑 = −1.7𝑄𝑑 + 26.48

𝑃𝑠 = −1

3𝑄𝑠 + 21.6

Determine: a) The equilibrium quantity and price. b) The elasticity of demand at the equilibrium,

and its meaning. c) The elasticity of supply at the equilibrium, and

its meaning.

Page 49: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

49

Chapter 3

Simultaneous Equations and Matrices Solving the intersection of lines using different methods

3.1 Simultaneous Equations 50

3.2 Two Simultaneous Equations 50

3.3 Three Simultaneous Equations 52

3.4 The Matrix 54

3.5 Solving Two Equation Matrices 55

3.6 Solving Three Equation Matrices 58

3.7 Notes on Solutions to Matrices 61

3.8 Applications 62

3.9 The Determinant of a 2 × 2 Matrix 65

3.10 The Determinant of a 3 × 3 Matrix 66

3.11 Using the Jacobian Determinant 68

Chapter Three Summary 70

Chapter Three Questions 71

Page 50: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

50

3.1 simultaneous equations

In Chapter 2, the intersection of two lines was

found mathematically. Essentially, simultaneous

equations were used to do this.

Theory: simultaneous equations are used to solve

for the variables when there are two or more

equations. It involves finding the common

intersection of multiple lines.

Given the two equations:

𝑦 = 2𝑥 + 5

𝑦 = −3𝑥 + 6

Simultaneous equations can be used to solve for 𝑥

and 𝑦. The and are notes to distinguish the

two different equations.

Theory: to be able to solve simultaneous

equations, there needs to be at least as many

equations as there are variables (this is not the

only condition).

Remember that 𝑥 and 𝑦 are two different

variables, so there is no reason why more variables

cannot be introduced. One such equation could

be:

𝑧 = 4𝑥 + 3𝑦 − 1

Here, z is the dependent variable, and x and y are

the independent variables.

Can the following equations be solved?

𝑧 = 4𝑥 + 3𝑦 − 1

𝑧 = −2𝑥 + 2𝑦 + 4

The answer is no, as according to the theory

above, there are more variables (3) than there are

equations (2), so there will be no unique solution.

In the following case, there are three equations

(, and ) and three variables (𝑥, 𝑦 and 𝑧).

𝑧 = 4𝑥 + 3𝑦 − 1

𝑧 = −2𝑥 + 2𝑦 + 4

𝑧 = 3𝑥 − 3𝑦 − 3

Thus a solution is possible (Note: see Section 3.7).

Simultaneous equations are simply a certain

number of equations to help solve for a certain

number of variables.

However, sometimes a set of lines do not all cross

at a single point, and in such a case, there is no

unique solution. Similarly, sometimes sets of

equations cross at an infinite number of points, so

there are an infinite number of solutions. This is

explained in detail in Section 3.7.

Exercises: 1. Determine if the following sets of equations can be

solved: 𝑎) 𝑦 = 2𝑥 + 3

𝑦 = −3𝑥 − 14

𝑏) 𝑦 = 𝑥 + 𝑧 − 3

𝑦 = −2 − 𝑥 − 𝑧

𝑦 − 𝑧 = 15

𝑐) 𝑦 = 𝑧 + 𝑥 − 1

𝑦 = 12𝑥 − 3

𝑦 = 𝑧 + 𝑥 + 𝑎 − 3

3.2 two simultaneous equations

Theory: to solve simultaneous equations:

1. set the 𝑦’s equal to each other.

2. substitute the functions of 𝑥 in and solve for 𝑥.

3. substitute the solutions of 𝑥 back into either of

the original equations to find the 𝑦 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒 of

the solution.

Note: you could also set the 𝑥’s equal to each in

step 1, and substitute for the functions of 𝑦. This

will give the same solution.

Example 1: solve for 𝑥 and 𝑦 in

𝑦1 = 2𝑥 + 1

𝑦2 = −𝑥 + 4

Plan: set 𝑦1 = 𝑦2 and substitute the equations,

then solve for 𝑥. Substitute back into one of the

Page 51: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

51

original equations to find the 𝑦 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒 at the

intersection.

Solution:

𝑦1 = 𝑦2

2𝑥 + 1 = −𝑥 + 4

3𝑥 = 3

𝑥 = 1

So 𝑥 = 1, but for a coordinate, a 𝑦 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒 is still

needed. To find this 𝑦 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒, substitute the

𝑥 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒 back into either of the original

equations (both will give the same answer).

Using equation :

𝑦 = − 1 + 4

= 3

So the solution to the two equation is 𝑥 = 1, 𝑦 = 3

or in coordinate form: (1,3).

Try substituting the 𝑥 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒 into equation to

see if the 𝑦 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒 is the same (it should be).

Theory: another method of solving simultaneous

equations is:

1. isolate one variable in one equation

2. substitute it into the other equation.

3. solve for the other variable,

4. substitute this solution back into either of the

original equations to solve for the other

variable.

Example 2: solve for 𝑥 and 𝑦 in

2𝑦 + 2𝑥 − 1 = 7

5𝑦 − 3𝑥 + 4 = 0

Plan: isolate one variable in one of the equations,

and substitute it into the other equation to solve

for the other variable. Substitute this solution into

any of the modified or original equations to solve

for the other variable.

Solution: choose as the numbers in front of the

variables are even and look easy to solve

compared to . Now, choose the variable easiest

to isolate. In the following, 𝑦 is isolated however 𝑥

is just as easy.

2𝑦 + 2𝑥 − 1 = 7

2𝑦 + 2𝑥 = 8

2𝑦 = 8 − 2𝑥

𝑦 = 4 − 𝑥 ’

This rearranged version is labelled ’. Substitute

(4 − 𝑥) in for 𝑦 in the other equation.

’ → (this means the modified equation 1

(labelled ’) is substituted into equation )

5 4 − 𝑥 − 3𝑥 + 4 = 0

Use the crab-claw from Chapter 1:

20 − 5𝑥 − 3𝑥 + 4 = 0

24 − 8𝑥 = 0

𝑥 = 3

To find the value of 𝑦, substitute 𝑥 = 3 into either

, ’ or .

’ is easiest as 𝑦 is already isolated:

𝑦 = −𝑥 + 4

𝑦 = − 3 + 4

𝑦 = 1

Thus the solution is 𝑥 = 3, 𝑦 = 1, or in coordinates

(3,1).

Go back to the beginning of this example, and try

to isolate 𝑥 in . Also, try to isolate 𝑥 or 𝑦 in . All

these should give the same solution.

The hardest part using of this method is knowing

which equation is easier to use and this will take

practice. However, even if you choose the harder

one, the answer will still be the same. It is also a

good idea to substitute the solution you get back

into both original equations, to double check that

you have the correct solution.

Exercises: 1. Solve the following sets of equations 𝑎) 7𝑦 = −5𝑥 + 9 𝐴𝑁𝐷 5𝑦 = −4𝑥 + 15

Page 52: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

52

𝑏) 2𝑦 = −3𝑥 + 8 𝐴𝑁𝐷 4𝑥 + 𝑦 = 9

𝑐) 5𝑥 + 9𝑦 = 15 𝐴𝑁𝐷 6𝑦 + 4𝑥 = 15

𝑑) −6𝑥 + 7𝑦 = 15 𝐴𝑁𝐷 6𝑦 = 3𝑥 + 12

𝑒) 2𝑥 = −7𝑦 + 13 𝐴𝑁𝐷 − 4𝑥 − 5𝑦 − 17 = 0

3.3 three simultaneous equations

A similar theory applies to three equation systems.

A simple example will show you the technique

before the theory is introduced.

Example 1: Solve for 𝑥, 𝑦 and 𝑧 in

𝑧 = 2𝑥 + 3𝑦 + 6

𝑧 = 𝑥 + 𝑦 + 4

𝑧 = −2𝑥 + 5𝑦 + 8

Plan: use the substitution method to solve one

variable at a time.

Solution: To solve for three equations; first, take

one of the equations, and substitute it into the

other two equations (below, is put into both

and ):

→:

𝑧1 = 𝑧2

2𝑥 + 3𝑦 + 6 = 𝑥 + 𝑦 + 4

𝑥 + 2𝑦 = −2 ’

→:

𝑧1 = 𝑧3

2𝑥 + 3𝑦 + 6 = −2𝑥 + 5𝑦 + 8

4𝑥 − 2𝑦 = 2 ’

The two modified equations ’ and ’ are now

two simultaneous equations with two variables

(like in the last section). is no longer used.

Isolate 𝑥 in ’:

𝑥 + 2𝑦 = −2 ’

𝑥 = −2𝑦 − 2 ’’

Substitute ’’→’:

4 −2𝑦 − 2 − 2𝑦 = 2

−8𝑦 − 8 − 2𝑦 = 2

−10𝑦 = 10

𝑦 = −1

This is the solution to one variable. Substitute this

value of 𝑦 into an equation with only 𝑥 and 𝑦; use

either ’ or ’’ (’’ is easier as 𝑥 is already

isolated):

𝑥 = −2𝑦 − 2 ’’

𝑥 = −2(−1) − 2

𝑥 = 0

With two variables solved, the last variable can

now be solved (i.e. 𝑧) using :

𝑧 = 2𝑥 + 3𝑦 + 6

𝑧 = 2(0) + 3(−1) + 6

𝑧 = 3

So the solution is 𝑥 = 0, 𝑦 = −1, 𝑧 = 3, or in three

dimensional coordinates 𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧 = 0, −1,3 .

Theory: to solve three simultaneous equations:

1. take one equation and substitute it into the

other two equations. This will make two new

equations with only two variables.

2. substitute one of those equations into the

other to solve for one of the unknowns.

3. use this solution to solve for one of the other

variables.

4. lastly, use these two solutions to solve for the

third variable.

Note: the hardest part is organising and

manipulating the three equations. The solution is

also written in coordinate form 𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧 .

Example 2: Solve for 𝑥, 𝑦 and 𝑧 in

𝑧 − 3𝑥 + 8 = 4𝑦

4𝑧 = −𝑥 + 7𝑦 − 1

4𝑥 − 2𝑦 = 3𝑧 − 9

Plan: substitute one equation into the other two,

then use those two modified equation to solve for

one of the variables. Work backwards to solve for

the other variables.

Page 53: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

53

Solution: 𝑧 in looks easiest to isolate

𝑧 − 3𝑥 + 8 = 4𝑦

𝑧 = 4𝑦 + 3𝑥 − 8 ’

Correctly label this as ’ as it has been slightly

modified. Then put ’ into both and :

’→:

4(4𝑦 + 3𝑥 − 8) = −𝑥 + 7𝑦 − 1

16𝑦 + 12𝑥 − 32 = −𝑥 + 7𝑦 − 1

9𝑦 + 13𝑥 = 31 ’

Again, this equation is labelled as ’ as it has been

modified.

’→:

4𝑥 − 2𝑦 = 3(4𝑦 + 3𝑥 − 8) − 9

4𝑥 − 2𝑦 = 12𝑦 + 9𝑥 − 24 − 9

−5𝑥 − 14𝑦 = −33 ’

Again, notice the labelling.

Working with only ’ and ’ isolate any variable

in either ’ or ’. Both are difficult, so use either.

Equation ’ has been used below:

−5𝑥 − 14𝑦 = −33

−5𝑥 = −33 + 14𝑦

𝑥 =−33 + 14𝑦

−5

𝑥 =33

5−

14

5𝑦 ’’

Again, this equation is labelled appropriately.

This equation (’’) is substituted into the other

equation (i.e. ’ ).

’’→’:

9𝑦 + 13(33

5−

14

5𝑦) = 31

9𝑦 +429

5−

182

5𝑦 = 31

−137

5𝑦 = −

274

5

𝑦 = −

2745

−137

5

= 2

This solution for 𝑦 is used to find the other two

unknowns. Substitute 𝑦 = 2 into either of the

equations with only two variables (i.e. ’’ or ’).

Substitute 𝑦 = 2 →’’:

𝑥 =33

5−

14

5 2

𝑥 =33

5−

28

5

𝑥 =5

5= 1

Finally, use any of the equations with all three

variables to solve for 𝑧. The easiest is ’ as 𝑧 is

already isolated.

Substitute 𝑥 = 1, 𝑦 = 2→’

𝑧 = 4𝑦 + 3𝑥 − 8

𝑧 = 4(2) + 3(1) − 8

𝑧 = 3

The solution is 𝑥 = 1, 𝑦 = 2, 𝑧 = 3, or 1,2,3 .

Solutions will not always be nice round numbers,

so it is a good habit to always work with fractions,

as then you will always have an exact answer.

Exercises: 1. Solve the following sets of equations: 𝑎) 𝑧 = 4𝑥 + 𝑦 − 6

2𝑧 = −𝑥 + 2𝑦 + 6

𝑧 = −𝑥 + 2𝑦 + 2

𝑏) 5𝑥 − 𝑦 − 𝑧 = 13

2𝑥 − 2𝑦 + 4𝑧 = 8

𝑥 − 3𝑦 + 2𝑧 = 2

𝑐) −𝑧 + 2𝑦 = −3𝑥 + 12

2𝑥 = 5𝑦 + 2𝑧 + 7

−𝑥 + 2𝑦 − 5𝑧 − 20 = 0

𝑑) 2𝑦 + 5𝑧 = 4 + 2𝑥

4𝑥 + 4𝑦 + 6𝑧 = 10

4𝑦 = 2𝑥 + 2𝑧 + 8

𝑒) 5𝑧 = −7𝑦 − 6𝑥 + 8

5𝑦 = −2𝑥 − 8𝑧 + 12

2𝑥 + 2𝑦 + 2𝑧 = 16

Page 54: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

54

3.4 the matrix

The substitution method for solving equations was

quite easy for two equations, but was a lot harder

for three equations. There is a short–cut method

for solving simultaneous equations and it involves

using matrices.

To understand what a matrix is and how it is

created, equations need to be in a particular order.

Theory: every equation has to be in the general

matrix form:

𝑎𝑥 + 𝑏𝑦 + 𝑐𝑧 = 𝑑

Where 𝑎, 𝑏, 𝑐 and 𝑑 are constants. Essentially, this

form has all the variables on the left in a consistent

order (e.g. alphabetical), and any numbers without

variables (i.e. solitary constants) on the right side.

For the equation

𝑧 − 3𝑦 + 4 = 5𝑥

To get it into the general matrix form, rearrange it:

−5𝑥 − 3𝑦 + 𝑧 = −4

Here, 𝑎 = −5, 𝑏 = −3, 𝑐 = 1 and 𝑑 = −4. The

order of the variables is alphabetical order, as it is

easy to remember.

Example 1: rearrange the following equations into

the general matrix form

𝑧 = 2𝑥 − 3𝑦 + 9

3𝑧 − 4 = −4𝑥 + 2𝑦

−𝑦 + 𝑧 = 𝑥 − 2

Plan: rearrange to get variables in alphabetical

order on the left, and any numbers without

variables (constants) on the right.

Solution: use alphabetical order

: 𝑧 = 2𝑥 − 3𝑦 + 9

−2𝑥 + 3𝑦 + 𝑧 = 9 ’

: 3𝑧 − 4 = 4𝑥 + 2𝑦

−4𝑥 − 2𝑦 + 3𝑧 = 4 ’

: −𝑦 + 𝑧 = 𝑥 − 2

−𝑥 − 𝑦 + 𝑧 = −2 ’

Rewrite the original equations into a new set:

−2𝑥 + 3𝑦 + 𝑧 = 9 ’

−4𝑥 − 2𝑦 + 3𝑧 = 4 ’

−𝑥 − 𝑦 + 𝑧 = −2 ’

It is from this new set that a matrix can be

constructed.

Theory: a matrix is a set of square brackets

summarising equations in a simpler form.

To construct a matrix:

1. take the numbers in front of the variables and

put them into square brackets.

2. draw a new set of brackets and vertically write

the order of the variables you have chosen

(e.g. alphabetical).

3. after writing an equals sign, the constants on

the right side are written vertically in square

brackets.

Example 2: write the following equations in matrix

form

−2𝑥 + 3𝑦 + 𝑧 = 9 ’

−4𝑥 − 2𝑦 + 3𝑧 = 4 ’

−𝑥 − 𝑦 + 𝑧 = −2 ’

Solution:

−2 3 1−4 −2 3−1 −1 1

𝑥𝑦𝑧 =

94

−2

Look at the left matrix. The first column is the 𝑥

column, the middle column is the 𝑦 column and

the right column is the 𝑧 column. The next matrix

has the 𝑥, 𝑦 and 𝑧 so that the variables are

defined. Then there is the equals sign, with the

𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑠 from the equations as another matrix.

To understand how this system works, take your

left index finger and put it onto the −2 on the top

left of the left matrix, then put your right index

Page 55: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

55

finger on the 𝑥 in the middle matrix. What you are

pointing to is the number in front of the 𝑥 in the

first equation (look back up at ’, it is −2𝑥). Now

move your left hand across one entry, and your

right hand down one entry. You should be on 3

with your left hand, and 𝑦 with your right, just like

in ’). Move your left finger across one more

place and your right finger down one place. You

should have the last entry of 1𝑧 (or just 𝑧). Going

across these three numbers gives the left side of

’, and this is equal to 9, which is the top entry of

the last matrix.

If you go back to the beginning and put your left

index finger at the start of the second row (i.e. the

number 4), your right index finger back on 𝑥 and

repeat the process, you will get equation ’.

Example 3: find the original equations for the

matrix

−1 −1 13 7 3

−3 0 2

𝑥𝑦𝑧 =

1152

Plan: go across each row of the left matrix and

multiply by each entry of the variables column.

Add these together and make this equal to the

entry in the respective row of the right matrix.

Solution:

−𝑥 − 𝑦 + 𝑧 = 11

3𝑥 + 7𝑦 + 3𝑧 = 5

−3𝑥 + 2𝑧 = 2

This is how matrices work. Once you are

comfortable with moving between equations and

matrices, you will find there is an easier way of

writing all the information in a matrix:

−2 3 1 ⋮4 −2 3 ⋮

−1 −1 1 ⋮

94

−2

In this form, the first column is the 𝑥 column, the

second column the 𝑦 column and the third column

the 𝑧 column. The 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑠 are separated from

𝑥, 𝑦 and 𝑧 by a dotted line. A good habit is to write

what the columns represent with a different

colour:

𝑥 𝑦 𝑧 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡

−2 3 1 ⋮4 −2 3 ⋮

−1 −1 1 ⋮

94

−2

You have to understand how a matrix relates to a

set of equations before you can solve that system.

Exercises: 1. Put the following sets of equations into a matrix: 𝑎) −3𝑥 + 5𝑦 − 12𝑧 − 12 = 4

5𝑥 + 2𝑦 − 3 = 15

−2𝑥 + 5𝑦 − 3𝑧 = 3𝑧 + 1

𝑏) 12𝑥 − 11𝑦 + 10𝑧 = 9

7𝑧 − 3𝑥 + 2𝑦 = 7𝑦 − 1

2𝑥 + 3𝑥 − 4𝑥 + 𝑦 = 𝑥 − 14

𝑐) −2𝑥 + 4𝑦 = 14

7𝑥 + 7𝑧 = −7

9𝑧 − 𝑦 + 5 = 0

𝑑) 𝑧 − 12𝑥 − 5𝑦 = 3

𝑥 = 3𝑥 − 2𝑦 + 4

13𝑥 = 12𝑦 − 4

2. Extract the equations from the following matrices.

𝑎) −2 1 −35 2 64 7 −1

⋮ ⋮ ⋮

51411

𝑐) 6 7 153 −2 02 12 2

⋮ ⋮ ⋮

−2−35

𝑏) 4 8 3

−5 12 39 −4 0

⋮ ⋮ ⋮

5−70

𝑑) 5 8 0

−5 0 −41 2 1

⋮ ⋮ ⋮

522

3.5 solving two equation matrices

Having a set of equations in matrix form allows

you to solve for 𝑥, 𝑦 and 𝑧 in an easier way than

the substitution method.

Intro example 1: solve the following equations

using matrices

2𝑦 = 3𝑥 + 5

0 = −𝑥 + 10 − 𝑦

First, these equations must be rearranged into the

general matrix form:

: 2𝑦 = 3𝑥 + 5

−3𝑥 + 2𝑦 = 5 ’

: 0 = −𝑥 + 10 − 𝑦

Page 56: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

56

𝑥 + 𝑦 = 10 ’

Equations ’ and ’ allow construction of the

matrix:

The idea now is to change the second row to get

the number zero in the bottom left corner (circled

in blue). The reason is that an equation made from

that row, would be of the form:

0𝑥 + 𝑏𝑦 = 𝑐

Where 𝑏 and 𝑐 are constants. Then 0𝑥 is just zero,

leaving:

𝑏𝑦 = 𝑐

Which can then be solved for 𝑦.

However, the circled number cannot simply be

erased and replaced by 0, as this would change the

equation. What must be done is use something

called row operations to manipulate that bottom

row to get a zero in the bottom left corner.

Theory: A row operation is a process where a

multiple of one ROW is added/subtracted from

another ROW.

Before row operations are done on a matrix, it is

best to understand what is being done. For the

two equations below to be added to one another:

−3𝑥 + 2𝑦 = 5 ’

𝑥 + 𝑦 = 10 ’

The two left sides must be added, and the two

right sides must be added.

’ +’:

−3𝑥 + 2𝑦 + 𝑥 + 𝑦 = 5 + 10

Simplifying this gives:

−2𝑥 + 3𝑦 = 15

Back to the matrix, if the columns are added

together:

−31

21

⋮ ⋮

5

10

−2 3 15

The results are in red, which is the same as adding

the two equations together.

Theory: ROW operations involve adding/

subtracting the COLUMNS of a matrix.

Using this theory, to get a zero in the bottom left

corner, and knowing row operations can be used

without changing the equalities, how many

ROW2’s will need to be added/subtracted to how

many ROW1’s?

Look only at the first column (the 𝑥 column). If 3

times ROW2 were added to ROW1, the answer

would be zero (as 3 × 1 + (−3) = 0). This is

similar to finding a common denominator is

Chapter 1.

This ratio cannot be only applied to one column;

this same ratio must be applied to all columns. The

easiest method of doing this is to come up with a

short sentence once you have figured out the

ratio. In the above example, the sentence would

be:

“three lots of bottom plus top”

−3 2 ⋮ 51 1 ⋮ 10

For the first column:

“three lots of one plus negative three” is

3 × 1 + (−3) = 0

For the second column:

“three lots of one plus two” is

3 × 1 + 2 = 5

For the third column:

“three lots of ten plus five” is

3 × 10 + 5 = 35

The way this is represented on a matrix is:

−3 2 ⋮ 51 1 ⋮ 10

𝑅2’ = 3𝑅2 + 𝑅1

−3 2 ⋮ 50 5 ⋮ 35

−3 2 ⋮ 51 1 ⋮ 10

Page 57: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

57

This is pronounced: “the new ROW2 is three times

the old ROW2 plus ROW1”.

Once the zero is in the bottom left, the equations

can be extracted from this matrix:

−3𝑥 + 2𝑦 = 5

0𝑥 + 5𝑦 = 35

Then working from the bottom equation up, solve

for the unknowns:

5𝑦 = 35

𝑦 = 7

Move up to the next equation, and substitute in

𝑦 = 7:

−3𝑥 + 2(7) = 5

−3𝑥 + 14 = 5

−3𝑥 = −9

𝑥 = 3

The hardest part when using matrices is finding the

ratio to be able to get zero in the bottom left

corner.

Theory: use ROW operations to find the ratio of

ROW 1 added/subtracted from ROW 2, which will

give a zero in the bottom left corner. Apply this

ratio to all columns, then extract the equations

from the modified matrix. Solve for the unknowns,

working from the bottom equation up.

Example 1: solve for 𝑥 and 𝑦 in

−1 6 ⋮ 7−4 2 ⋮ −5

Plan: use row operations to get a zero in the

bottom left corner.

Then extract the equations from this matrix, and

solve for 𝑥 and 𝑦 from the bottom up.

Solution: how many lots of −1 's need to be

added/subtracted to how many lots of −4 's to

get zero in the bottom left? Four of the top are

required to make the bottom, but if you are not

sure whether to add or subtract, then write it out:

4 × −1 ∎ −4 = 0

−4∎ −4 = 0

If you have an addition, it will make −8 so the

black space must be a subtract sign. This is where

many students stuff up, so don’t be one of them.

Write out your saying:

“four lots of top minus bottom”

For the first column:

“four lots of negative one subtract negative four”

4 × −1 − (−4) = 0

For the second column:

“four lots of six subtract two”

4 × 6 − 2 = 22

For the third column:

“four lots of seven subtract negative five”

4 × 7 − (−5) = 33

In matrix form, this whole process would be

written:

−1 6 ⋮ 7−4 2 ⋮ −5

𝑅2’ = 4𝑅1 − 𝑅2

−1 6 ⋮0 22 ⋮

7 33

There is now a zero in the bottom left corner, so

the equations can be extracted:

−𝑥 + 6𝑦 = 7

0𝑥 + 22𝑦 = 33

Solve from the bottom up:

22𝑦 = 33

𝑦 =33

22= 1.5

Up to the next equation:

−𝑥 + 6(1.5) = 7

−𝑥 + 9 = 7

𝑥 = 2

So the solution is 𝑥 = 2, 𝑦 = 1.5 or 2,1.5 .

−1 6 ⋮ 7−4 2 ⋮ −5

Page 58: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

58

Check if the solution is correct by substituting it

into either of the original equations (the bottom

row of the matrix, just for consistency):

−𝑥 + 6𝑦 = 7

− 2 + 6 1.5 = 7

−2 + 9 = 7

This means the solution is correct.

Example 2: use matrices to solve for 𝑥 and 𝑦

−4𝑦 = −3𝑥 + 17

6 + 9𝑦 = −2𝑥

Plan: construct a matrix from the equations, then

use row operations to get a zero in the bottom left

corner. Extract the equations, then solve for the

unknowns, one at a time.

Solution: put and into general matrix form:

3𝑥 − 4𝑦 = 17 ’

2𝑥 + 9𝑦 = −6 ’

Construct the matrix:

3 −4 ⋮2 9 ⋮

17−6

Find the correct ratio from the first column

“two lots of top minus three lots of bottom”

Apply this to all columns:

3 −4 ⋮2 9 ⋮

17−6

𝑅2’ = 2𝑅1 − 3𝑅2

3 −4 ⋮0 −35 ⋮

1752

Write the equations from this matrix:

3𝑥 − 4𝑦 = 17

0𝑥 − 35𝑦 = 52

Working up, solve for 𝑦:

−35𝑦 = 52

𝑦 = −52

35

Then solve for 𝑥:

3𝑥 − 4 −52

35 = 17

3𝑥 +208

35= 17

3𝑥 =595

35−

208

35

3𝑥 =387

35

𝑥 =129

35

The solution is 𝑥 =129

35, 𝑦 = −

52

35

Then check that the solution is correct:

−4𝑦 = −3𝑥 + 17

−4 −52

35 = −3

129

35 + 17

208

35=

208

35

Exercises: 1. Solve the following matrices for the unknowns:

𝑎) 2 13 4

⋮ ⋮

128

𝑐) 1 −12 1

⋮ ⋮

99

𝑏) 3 −24 2

⋮ ⋮

−70

𝑑) 5 −1

−1 7 ⋮ ⋮

939

2. Solve the following equations using matrices. 𝑎) 2𝑥 − 𝑦 = −7 𝑐) 3𝑥 + 7𝑦 = 13

−4𝑥 + 4𝑦 = 8 5𝑥 + 9𝑦 = 11

𝑏) 𝑦 = −𝑥 + 8 𝑑) 9 − 3𝑦 = 5𝑥

4𝑥 = −2𝑦 − 3 −𝑥 = −3𝑦 + 13

3. A company initially sets a price for a good at 𝑃 = 15, and sells a quantity of 𝑄 = 30. When they increase price to 𝑃 = 20, the company sells 25 units. Find the equation of the demand function, then determine the equilibrium price and quantity given that supply is 𝑄𝑠 = 0.5𝑃𝑠 − 1.5.

3.6 solving 3 equation matrices

Solving three equation matrices uses row

operations, but there are some differences.

Theory: to solve a three equation system, zeros

are needed in the bottom left triangular area:

From this matrix, the bottom equation will be

0𝑥 + 0𝑦 + 𝑎𝑧 = 𝑏

This will have some multiple of 𝑧 equal to a

constant. The middle row will have 𝑧 and 𝑦, so 𝑦

can be solved as 𝑧 will already be known, and the

top row will have all three variables, so 𝑥 can be

found. This is the reason why zeros are needed in

𝑋 𝑋 𝑋 ⋮0 𝑋 𝑋 ⋮0 0 𝑋 ⋮

𝑋 𝑋 𝑋

Page 59: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

59

the bottom left triangular area; working from the

bottom up, we can solve for 𝑥, 𝑦 and 𝑧.

However, these zeros need to be found in a

particular order.

Theory: the two bottom entries of the first column

must be changed to zero first, and then the

bottom entry of the second column can be

changed to zero.

The reason for this will soon emerge.

Intro example 1: solve for the unknowns in the

matrix

Firstly, both the 6 and 2 in the blue box must be

changed to zeros. For now, they will be done one

at a time, but later you can do them at the same

time. To get zeros in the blue box, ROW1 must be

used.

To change the 6 into a zero, work with ROW1 and

ROW2:

Find the ratio by asking: for the new ROW2, how

many ROW1’s will need to be added/subtracted

from how many ROW2’s? The short sentence is:

“two tops minus bottom”

3 −1 16 2 32 2 3

⋮⋮⋮

8 10 18

𝑅2′ = 2𝑅1 − 𝑅2

Remember that the “two tops minus bottom”

applies to every entry in the second row.

To change the number 2 to a zero in the third row

(i.e. the bottom left corner), ROW1 and ROW3

must be used, ignoring ROW2. How many ROW1’s

will need to be added/subtracted from how many

ROW3’s? The short sentence is:

“two tops minus three bottoms”

3 −1 10 −4 −12 2 3

⋮ ⋮ ⋮

86

18

𝑅3′ = 2𝑅1 − 3𝑅3

Now that the circled entries are zeros, the next

requirement is to change the −8 (highlighted) into

a zero. If the top row is used, it would ruin the zero

in the bottom left corner, as the number 3 from

the first row would be introduced again. However,

if ROW3 is changed using ROW2, then the blue

zeros will remain unchanged (as any ratio of two

zeros added or subtracted is still zero!).

To get a zero in place of the highlighted −8 , ask:

how many ROW2’s will you have to add/subtract

from ROW3? Two lots of ROW2 are needed, but

because of the negative signs, you may not be sure

whether to add or subtract. So write it out:

2 −4 ∎ −8 = 0

−8∎ −8 = 0

The sign can only be a subtraction, so:

“two tops minus bottom”

In matrix form:

3 −1 10 −4 −10 −8 −7

⋮ ⋮ ⋮

86

−38

𝑅3′ = 2𝑅2 − 𝑅3

3 −1 10 −4 −10 0 5

⋮ ⋮ ⋮

86

50

The matrix is reduced into the form that is

required, so 𝑥, 𝑦 and 𝑧 can now be solved. Extract

the equations from this matrix:

3𝑥 − 𝑦 + 𝑧 = 8

−4𝑦 − 𝑧 = 6

5𝑧 = 50

Work from the bottom equation up:

𝑧 =50

5= 10

Substitute into the next equation up:

−4𝑦 − 10 = 6

3 −1 10 −4 −10 −8 −7

⋮ ⋮ ⋮

86

−38

3 −1 10 −4 −12 2 3

⋮ ⋮ ⋮

86

18

3 −1 1 ⋮6 2 3 ⋮2 2 3 ⋮

8 10 18

Page 60: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

60

−4𝑦 = 16

𝑦 = −4

Next equation up:

3𝑥 − −4 + (10) = 8

3𝑥 + 14 = 8

𝑥 = −2

The solution is 𝑥 = −2, 𝑦 = −4 and 𝑧 = 10, or

−2, −4,10 .

Finally, to check if the solution is correct,

substitute it back into the bottom row of the

original matrix:

2𝑥 + 2𝑦 + 3𝑧 = 18

2 −2 + 2(−4) + 3(10) = 18

−4 − 8 + 30 = 18

Theory: to solve a system of three equations, row

operations need to be used to get zeros in the

bottom left triangle corner of the variables matrix,

getting zeros in the left-most columns first.

Example 1: solve for 𝑥, 𝑦 and 𝑧 in the matrix

2 −1 −13 −1 45 −3 −5

⋮ ⋮ ⋮

17−11

9

Plan: use row operations to get zeros in the first

column where 3 and 5 are located using

ROW1. Then using the modified ROW2, get a zero

in the bottom entry of the second column.

Rewrite the equations from the final matrix then

work up to solve for 𝑥, 𝑦 and 𝑧.

Solution:

For ROW2: “three lots of top minus two lots of

bottom”

For ROW3: “five lots of top minus two lots of

bottom”

2 −1 −13 −1 45 −3 −5

⋮ ⋮ ⋮

17−11

9 𝑅2’ = 3𝑅1 − 2𝑅2

𝑅3′ = 5𝑅1 − 2𝑅3

2 −1 −10 −1 −110 1 5

⋮ ⋮ ⋮

177367

To get a zero in the bottom entry of the second

column:

“one lot of top plus bottom”

2 −1 −10 −1 −110 1 5

⋮ ⋮ ⋮

177367

𝑅3’ = 𝑅2 + 𝑅1

2 −1 −10 −1 −110 0 −6

⋮ ⋮ ⋮

1773

140

Rewrite the equation from this matrix:

2𝑥 − 𝑦 − 𝑧 = 17

−𝑦 − 11𝑧 = 73

−6𝑧 = 140

Solve for 𝑧 using the bottom equation:

𝑧 = −140

6= −

70

3

Solve for 𝑦 using the next equation up:

−𝑦 − 11 −70

3 = 73

−𝑦 = 73 −770

3

−𝑦 =219

3−

770

3

𝑦 =551

3

Solve for 𝑥 using the next equation up:

2𝑥 − 551

3 − −

70

3 = 17

2𝑥 −481

3= 17

2𝑥 =51

3+

481

3

2𝑥 =532

3

𝑥 =266

3

The solution is: 𝑥 =266

3, 𝑦 =

551

3, 𝑧 = −

70

3 or

266

3,

551

3, −

70

3 .

Check this solution is correct:

5𝑥 − 3𝑦 − 5𝑧 = 9

5 266

3 − 3

551

3 − 5 −

70

3 = 9

Page 61: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

61

1330

3−

1653

3+

350

3= 9

27

3= 9

Note: the notes next to any matrix, such as

𝑅3’ = 𝑅2 + 𝑅1 refer to the what is being done to

that matrix, and the solution is shown in the

following matrix. The 𝑅1, 𝑅2 etc. do not refer to

the original matrix, just the matrix the note is

written next to.

These notes are also a good way of finding any

mistakes, if the final check is found to be incorrect.

Exercises: 1. Solve the following matrices.

𝑎) 5 2 −92 2 31 3 −4

⋮ ⋮ ⋮

912

−13 𝑐)

4 −1 −27 3 43 3 −1

⋮ ⋮ ⋮

8−1025

𝑏) 2 −3 42 1 72 −3 7

⋮ ⋮ ⋮

815 𝑑)

1 −5 12 5 63 −3 14

⋮ ⋮ ⋮

15122

2. Solve the following sets of equations using matrices. 𝑎) −2𝑥 + 6𝑦 − 3𝑧 = 6

𝑥 + 3𝑦 − 𝑧 = 17

4𝑥 + 2𝑦 + 4𝑧 = 4

𝑏) 6𝑥 + 4𝑦 + 6𝑧 = 2

−𝑥 + 2𝑦 − 𝑧 = 3

2𝑥 − 3𝑦 + 3𝑧 = 6

𝑐) 3𝑦 − 6 = −𝑧 + 4𝑥

2𝑧 + 𝑥 = 2𝑦 + 𝑥 + 12

6𝑥 + 𝑦 + 𝑧 + 4 = 0

𝑑) 4𝑥 = −7𝑦 − 𝑧 + 5

4𝑦 = 𝑥 + 𝑧 + 15

−2𝑥 − 2𝑧 − 10 = −2𝑦

3. A computing company makes computers at to capacity in three identical factories in three different states. Each factory uses labour 𝐿 , metal 𝑀 and silicone chips 𝑆 . Due to differences in union powers, taxation laws and property rights, the costs of 𝐿, 𝑀 and 𝑆 in these three states are not the same:

State 1: $7.20/𝐿, $18.50/𝑀 and $31.00/𝑆

State 2: $7.50/𝐿, $21.00/𝑀 and $29.00/𝑆

State 3: $9.00/𝐿, $16.50/𝑀 and $30.00/𝑆 At full capacity, the total cost for each of the three factories is:

State 1: $3373.00

State 2: $3589.00

State 3: $3564.00 Determine: a) Three expressions equating units of each of the

three inputs to total cost.

b) The amount of 𝐿, 𝑀 and 𝑆 used in each of the three identical factories.

3.7 notes on solutions to matrices

When the intersection of two lines was found back

in Chapter 2, if the two lines had the same

gradient 𝑚 but different constants 𝑐, then there

would be no intersection. Similarly, if two lines had

the same gradient 𝑚 and the same constants 𝑐

(that is, two equations for the same line), then

there would be infinite intersections (every point

on the two lines is an intersection).

Theory: since matrices are just a simpler form of

writing out a number of equations, then there can

be:

A single solution (what we have been doing in

the last two sections)

No solutions (if there is no common

intersection of all lines)

Infinite solutions (if we do not have enough

equations and/or if some of the equations are

the same)

Only after you have tried getting the zeros in the

bottom left triangle can you determine if there is

infinite, a unique, or no solutions.

The following is a matrix where there are no

solutions (notice that there are zeros in the

bottom left triangle):

2 −1 4 ⋮0 2 3 ⋮0 0 0 ⋮

−9 5 4

If the bottom row is written in equation form:

0𝑥 + 0𝑦 + 0𝑧 = 4

0 = 4

But it is impossible for 4 to be equal to zero, thus

there are no solutions.

Page 62: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

62

An example with an infinite amount of solutions

(again, notice that the zeros in the bottom left

triangle):

−5 1 5 ⋮0 1 3 ⋮0 0 0 ⋮

9 6 0

This matrix has the same number of equations as

there are variables, however one of these

equations is all zeros:

0𝑥 + 0𝑦 + 0𝑧 = 0

This gives no information, because any values of 𝑥,

𝑦 and 𝑧 will give 0 = 0, which is already known. If

the other equations are extracted:

−5𝑥 + 𝑦 + 5𝑥 = 9

𝑦 + 3𝑧 = 6

The result is two equations and three variables, so

this cannot be solved for a unique solution, thus

there are infinitely many solutions.

Exercises: 1. Determine the number of solutions for the

following matrices:

𝑎) 6 2 46 6 43 4 2

⋮ ⋮ ⋮

53

20 𝑐)

7 5 −321 3 714 34 −38

⋮ ⋮ ⋮

−175

−146

𝑏) 12 2 66 3 7

18 19 41

⋮ ⋮ ⋮

55

12 𝑑)

5 2 46 6 43 4 2

⋮ ⋮ ⋮

532

2. Determine if the following sets of equations can be solved, then solve them if possible.

𝑎) −12𝑥 − 5𝑧 = −7𝑥 + 19

𝑧 = −8𝑦 − 4𝑥 + 8

−6𝑥 + 34.5𝑦 − 4.5𝑧 − 52.5 = 0

𝑏) −8𝑥 − 3𝑦 = 14 − 𝑧

−5𝑧 − 12 = −6𝑥 − 4𝑦

4𝑥 + 5𝑦 + 2𝑧 = 2

𝑐) 12𝑧 + 4𝑥 = −9𝑦 + 16

2𝑥 + 9.5𝑦 + 3𝑧 = 15

−6𝑥 − 3.5𝑦 = 24𝑧 − 10

3. Find the value(s) of 𝑎 where there are zero solutions, infinite solutions and a unique solution.

6 4 −33 8 31 1 𝑎

⋮ ⋮ ⋮

1283

3.8 applications

An application you will surely come across is the

macroeconomic model of an economy.

Economic theory: the macroeconomic model of an

economy determines the income of all the people

in an economy, and is written:

𝑌 = 𝐶 + 𝐼 + 𝐺

Where 𝑌 is the total income of an economy, 𝐶 is

the total consumption expenditure in an economy,

𝐼 is the sum of all investment expenditure in an

economy, and 𝐺 the government spending.

To be able to solve for 𝑌, 𝐶, 𝐼 or 𝐺, other

independent equations need to be found. That is,

above is one equation with four variables, so it

cannot be solved.

After earning income from working, the

government takes a proportion of it through taxes,

so that income is reduced. If the government taxes

at a rate 𝑡 (e.g. 20%: 𝑡 = 0.20), then the income

actually obtained is called disposable income

(denoted 𝑌𝑑 ):

𝑌𝑑 = 1 − 𝑡 𝑌

Most people do not spend everything they earn,

but rather save a proportion of it. The assumption

is made that individuals save at a rate “𝑠” of their

disposable income (i.e. the income they physically

receive).

𝑆 = 𝑠𝑌𝑑

Where “𝑆” is the total savings of all consumers.

Whatever is not saved, must be spent on

consumption goods:

𝐶 = 1 − 𝑠 𝑌𝑑

From before, 𝑌𝑑 = 1 − 𝑡 𝑌 so this allows us to

get rid of the 𝑌𝑑 in the above two equations:

𝑆 = 𝑠 1 − 𝑡 𝑌

𝐶 = 1 − 𝑠 1 − 𝑡 𝑌

Lastly, for anyone in an economy to invest money

(say in constructing an office block), that money

needs to come from somewhere; it comes from

savings. Thus 𝑆 = 𝐼, so from the above equation:

Page 63: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

63

𝐼 = 𝑠 1 − 𝑡 𝑌

Where the right side is the equivalent of “𝑆”.

This gives three equations, and six variables:

𝑌 = 𝐶 + 𝐼 + 𝐺

𝐼 = 𝑠 1 − 𝑡 𝑌

𝐶 = 1 − 𝑠 1 − 𝑡 𝑌

However, assumptions are made about 𝐺, 𝑠 and 𝑡.

Government spending (𝐺) is constant regardless of

the level of income (as even in a recession, the

government spends approximately the same

amount); the savings rate 𝑠 takes a long time to

change, so is assumed to be constant; the

government sets the tax rate 𝑡 and is usually the

same for at least a year, and if it is changed, it is

not changed much.

Working through the following example will show

you how to solve this set of equations.

Example 1: if the government of an economy

spends $300billion and taxes at a rate of 30%,

with the citizens, on average, saving 20% of their

income, what is the consumption, investment and

total income of the economy?

Plan: use the model of a closed economy

𝑌 = 𝐶 + 𝐼 + 𝐺

𝐶 = 1 − 𝑠 1 − 𝑡 𝑌

𝐼 = 𝑠 1 − 𝑡 𝑌

Substitute all the values that are known, then

rearrange into the general matrix form, use row

operations to get the zeros in the bottom left

triangle, then solve for 𝐶, 𝐼 and 𝑌.

Solution:

𝑌 = 𝐶 + 𝐼 + 300

𝐶 = 1 − 0.2 1 − 0.3 𝑌

𝐼 = 0.2 1 − 0.3 𝑌

The variables will be arranged in alphabetical

order: 𝐶, 𝐼 and 𝑌. Rearranging the equations into

the general matrix form:

’: −𝐶 − 𝐼 + 𝑌 = 300

’: 𝐶 − 0.56𝑌 = 0

’: 𝐼 − 0.14𝑌 = 0

Construct the matrix:

−1 −1 11 0 −0.560 1 −0.14

⋮ ⋮ ⋮

30000

Use row operations to get zeros in the bottom two

entries of the first column:

−1 −1 11 0 −0.560 1 −0.14

⋮ ⋮ ⋮

30000

𝑅2′ = 𝑅1 + 𝑅2

−1 −1 10 −1 0.440 1 −0.14

⋮ ⋮ ⋮

300300

0

Get a zero in the bottom entry of the second

column:

−1 −1 10 −1 0.440 1 −0.14

⋮ ⋮ ⋮

300300

0

𝑅3′ = 𝑅2 + 𝑅3

−1 −1 10 −1 0.440 0 0.3

⋮ ⋮ ⋮

300300300

Extract the equations from this last matrix:

−𝐶 − 𝐼 + 𝑌 = 300

−𝐼 + 0.44𝑌 = 300

0.3𝑌 = 300

Work from the bottom up:

𝑌 =300

0.3= 1000

Substitute this into the next equation up:

−𝐼 + 0.44 1000 = 300

𝐼 = 140

Lastly:

−𝐶 − 𝐼 + 𝑌 = 300

−𝐶 − 140 + 1000 = 300

𝐶 = 560

Page 64: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

64

This economy has consumption of $560billion,

invests $140billion and has a total income of

$1,000billion (or $1trillion).

Example 2: If a government has a tax rate of 40%

and spends $600billion, and the people in the

economy save, on average, 20% of their income,

what is the consumption, investment and total

income of the economy?

Plan: use the model for a closed economy

𝑌 = 𝐶 + 𝐼 + 𝐺

𝐼 = 𝑠 1 − 𝑡 𝑌

𝐶 = 1 − 𝑠 1 − 𝑡 𝑌

Substitute in the known information (𝑠 = 0.2, 𝑡 =

0.4, 𝐺 = 600), then rearrange to get into the

general matrix form. Use row operations to get

zeros in the bottom left triangle, then solve for

𝐶, 𝐼 and 𝑌.

Solution: substitute in all the known information:

𝑌 = 𝐶 + 𝐼 + 600

𝐼 = 0.2 1 − 0.4 𝑌 = 0.12𝑌

𝐶 = 1 − 0.2 1 − 0.4 𝑌 = 0.48𝑌

Rearrange into the general matrix form:

−𝐶 − 𝐼 + 𝑌 = 600 ’

𝐼 − 0.12𝑌 = 0 ’

𝐶 − 0.48𝑌 = 0 ’

Construct the matrix:

−1 −1 10 1 −0.121 0 −0.48

⋮ ⋮ ⋮

60000

𝑅3′ = 𝑅1 + 𝑅3

−1 −1 10 1 −0.120 −1 0.52

⋮ ⋮ ⋮

6000

600

𝑅3′ = 𝑅2 + 𝑅3

−1 −1 10 1 −0.120 0 0.4

⋮ ⋮ ⋮

6000

600

Extract the equations from this last matrix:

−𝐶 − 𝐼 + 𝑌 = 600

𝐼 − 0.12𝑌 = 0

0.4𝑌 = 600

Work upwards:

𝑌 =600

0.4= 1500

Then up one equation:

𝐼 − 0.12 1500 = 0

𝐼 = 180

Up one more equation:

−𝐶 − 180 + 1500 = 600

𝐶 = 720

Thus consumption is $720billion, investment is

$180billion and total income is $1,500billion.

If you think it would be easier to solve the model

using the substitution method, you would be

correct. Unless you are not given enough

information to solve for actual numbers.

Example 3: Given the following closed economy

𝑌 = 𝐶 + 𝐼 + 𝐺

𝐶 = 1 − 𝑠 1 − 𝑡 𝑌

𝐼 = 𝑠(1 − 𝑡)𝑌

and assuming the tax rate is 15% and government

spending is $600billion, what is the solution to this

system of equation in terms of the savings rate 𝑠?

Plan: substitute the numbers that are known, and

then rearrange to get into the general matrix form,

assuming 𝑠 is just a number. Solve for 𝐶, 𝐼 and 𝑌 in

terms of 𝑠.

Solution: substitute in the known numbers

𝑌 = 𝐶 + 𝐼 + 600

𝐶 = 1 − 𝑠 1 − 0.15 𝑌

𝐶 = 0.85𝑌 − 0.85𝑠𝑌

𝐼 = 𝑠 1 − 0.15 𝑌 = 0.85𝑠𝑌

Rearrange to get into the general matrix form

−𝐶 − 𝐼 + 𝑌 = 600 ’

𝐶 − (0.85 − 0.85𝑠)𝑌 = 0 ’

𝐼 − 0.85𝑠𝑌 = 0 ’

Page 65: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

65

Remember that 𝑠 is the savings rate and is a

constant. Construct the relevant matrix:

−1 −1 11 0 −0.85 + 0.85𝑠0 1 −0.85𝑠

⋮ ⋮ ⋮

60000

𝑅2′ = 𝑅1 + 𝑅2

Manipulate this to get the zero in the middle entry

of the first column:

−1 −1 10 −1 0.15 + 0.85𝑠0 1 −0.85𝑠

⋮ ⋮ ⋮

600600

0 𝑅3

′ = 𝑅2 + 𝑅3

Then get a zero in the bottom entry of the second

column:

−1 −1 10 −1 0.15 + 0.85𝑠0 0 0.15

⋮ ⋮ ⋮

600600600

Rewrite the equations:

−𝐶 − 𝐼 + 𝑌 = 600

−𝐼 + 0.15 + 0.85𝑠 𝑌 = 600

0.15𝑌 = 600

Work from the bottom up:

𝑌 = 4000

Up one more equation:

−𝐼 + 0.15 + 0.85𝑠 4000 = 600

−𝐼 + 600 + 3400𝑠 = 600

𝐼 = 3400𝑠

Then:

−𝐶 − 3400𝑠 + 4000 = 600

𝐶 = 3400 − 3400𝑠

The answer in terms of the savings rate 𝑠 is:

Consumption is $(3400 − 3400𝑠)billion,

Investment is $(3400𝑠)billion, and

Total income of the economy is $4000billion.

Matrices make easy work of a large number of

equations.

Exercises: 1. Given an economy with the following facts, solve

for 𝐶, 𝐼 and 𝑌 using matrices. Government spending = 400, tax rate = 20% and savings rate = 15%.

2. Given an economy with the following facts, solve for 𝐶, 𝐼 and 𝑌 using matrices.

Government spending = 700, tax rate = 10% and savings rate = 25%.

3. Given an economy with the following facts, solve for 𝐶, 𝐼 and 𝑌 using matrices in terms of the tax rate 𝑡.

Government spending = 500, savings rate = 18%.

3.9 the determinant of a 𝟐 × 𝟐 matrix

For a small number of equations, using matrices

seems pointless, but with a large number of

equations, matrices simplify the mathematics.

This is why you should know a few different ways

of solving matrices.

Theory: the determinant of a 2 × 2 matrix is found

by multiplying the numbers in the right hand

diagonal, and then subtracting the multiplication

of the numbers in the left hand diagonal.

For the matrix:

𝐹 = 𝑎 𝑐𝑏 𝑑

The determinant of matrix 𝐹 is:

𝐹 = 𝑎𝑑 − 𝑏𝑐

Not to be confused with absolute values, the

determinant is written with two vertical lines

around either the whole matrix, or the letter

defining a matrix.

For the 2 × 2 matrix:

2 34 7

The determinant is:

2 × 7 − (4 × 3) = 14 − 12 = 2

An easy way of remembering this (especially if

you’re right handed) is right hand diagonal take

away left hand diagonal (actually do the karate

chops!).

To show that the determinant is being found,

straight lines are drawn either side of the matrix:

3 −45 −8

Example 1: find the determinant of the matrix

3 −45 −8

Page 66: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

66

Solution: the determinant is the multiplication of

the right diagonal minus the multiplication of the

left diagonal which gives:

3 × −8 — 4 × 5

= −24 − (−20)

= −24 + 20

= −4

Exercises: 1. Find the determinant of the following matrices:

𝑎) 2 −12 3

𝑑) 4 47 5

𝑔) −1 −22 −6

𝑏) −3 2−29 5

𝑒) 2 43 6

𝑕) 8 −3

−16 6

𝑐) 6 128 11

𝑓) −3 5−5 −3

𝑖) −2 47 0

3.10 the determinant of a 𝟑 × 𝟑 matrix

This is a harder section, so make sure you are very

comfortable with all the material in Section 3.9.

Intro example 1: find the determinant of the 3 × 3

matrix:

2 5 −3

−1 −1 −15 −3 −2

Solution: Circle the first entry (2), then cross out

all the numbers in that row and column, but leave

the circled number alone:

With the remaining numbers, draw a matrix:

−1 −1−3 −2

Find the determinant of this matrix using the right

hand/left hand method.

𝐷𝑒𝑡 = −1 −2 − −3 −1 = −1

Go on to the next number along in the original

3 × 3 matrix; circle it and cross out the vertical and

horizontal numbers:

Draw the matrix from the remaining numbers, and

find the determinant:

−1 −15 −2

𝐷𝑒𝑡 = −1 −2 − 5 −1 = 7

Go on to the last number:

Finding the determinant of the remaining

numbers:

−1 −15 −3

𝐷𝑒𝑡 = −1 −3 − 5 −1 = 8

Then bring it all together.

Theory: The determinant of a 3 × 3 matrix is:

𝐷𝑒𝑡 = + 1𝑠𝑡 𝑐𝑖𝑟𝑐𝑙𝑒𝑑 𝑛𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟

× det 𝑜𝑓𝑠𝑚𝑎𝑙𝑙𝑒𝑟 𝑚𝑎𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑥

− 2𝑛𝑑 𝑐𝑖𝑟𝑐𝑙𝑒𝑑 𝑛𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟

× det 𝑜𝑓𝑠𝑚𝑎𝑙𝑙𝑒𝑟 𝑚𝑎𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑥

+ 3𝑟𝑑 𝑐𝑖𝑟𝑐𝑙𝑒𝑑 𝑛𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟

× 𝑑𝑒𝑡 𝑜𝑓𝑠𝑚𝑎𝑙𝑙𝑒𝑟 𝑚𝑎𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑥

And the “circled numbers” are the numbers in the

top row.

Notice also the highlighted signs and how they

alternate (+, −, +) which we will come back to

soon.

The determinant of the original 3 × 3 matrix is:

𝐷𝑒𝑡 = + 2 −1 − 5 7 + −3 8

= −61

The +, −, + pattern does NOT come from the sign

of the numbers in the original matrix, but it is a

pattern unrelated to the original matrix. Many

students stuff up here, so don’t be one of them.

This pattern works for the top row, but as you will

soon see, sometimes you will not want to use the

top row.

2 5 −3

−1 −1 −15 −3 −2

2 5 −3

−1 −1 −15 −3 −2

2 5 −3

−1 −1 −15 −3 −2

Page 67: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

67

Theory: when finding the determinant using any

row or column, the pattern for the determinant

equation is given by the matrix:

+ − +− + −+ − +

An easy way of remembering this matrix is that the

top left is an addition sign, and then the signs

alternate across every row and down every

column.

Remember, this does NOT mean that the numbers

in the original 3 × 3 matrix are positive or

negative, but rather that when you come to find

the determinant, this is the pattern of signs you

put in front of the “𝑐𝑖𝑟𝑐𝑙𝑒𝑑 𝑛𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟 ×

𝑑𝑒𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑛𝑡” in the formula.

In the introductory example, the top row was

used, but any row or any column can be used.

There is a good reason why the +, −, + matrix

should be remembered.

Theory: when asked to find the determinant of a

matrix and one of the rows or columns has one (or

more) zeros in it, use that row or column.

It makes life a lot easier, as the following example

demonstrates.

Example 1: find the determinant of the matrix

𝐴 = −2 3 1−1 0 44 −5 −3

Plan: use the middle column (because it has a

zero): circle the top number and cross out the

other numbers in that row and column. Then find

the determinant of the remaining numbers.

Repeat for the other two numbers in the middle

column.

Use the “sign” matrix to get the correct pattern:

+ − +− + −+ − +

Since the middle column is being used, the signs in

the determinant equation will be −, +, −:

𝐷𝑒𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑛𝑡 =

− 1𝑠𝑡 𝑐𝑖𝑟𝑐𝑙𝑒𝑑 𝑛𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟 × det 𝑜𝑓𝑠𝑚𝑎𝑙𝑙𝑒𝑟𝑚𝑎𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑥

+ 2𝑛𝑑 𝑐𝑖𝑟𝑐𝑙𝑒𝑑 𝑛𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟 × det 𝑜𝑓𝑠𝑚𝑎𝑙𝑙𝑒𝑟𝑚𝑎𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑥

− 3𝑟𝑑 𝑐𝑖𝑟𝑐𝑙𝑒𝑑 𝑛𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟 × det 𝑜𝑓𝑠𝑚𝑎𝑙𝑙𝑒𝑟 𝑚𝑎𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑥

Solution: Circle the first number:

Find the determinant of the remaining matrix:

𝐷𝑒𝑡 = −1 44 −3

= −13

Circle the next number:

𝐷𝑒𝑡 = −2 14 −3

= 2

For the last number:

𝐷𝑒𝑡 = −2 1−1 4

= −7

𝐷𝑒𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑛𝑡 =

− 1𝑠𝑡 𝑐𝑖𝑟𝑐𝑙𝑒𝑑 𝑛𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟 × det 𝑜𝑓𝑠𝑚𝑎𝑙𝑙𝑒𝑟𝑚𝑎𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑥

+ 2𝑛𝑑 𝑐𝑖𝑟𝑐𝑙𝑒𝑑 𝑛𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟 × det 𝑜𝑓𝑠𝑚𝑎𝑙𝑙𝑒𝑟𝑚𝑎𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑥

− 3𝑟𝑑 𝑐𝑖𝑟𝑐𝑙𝑒𝑑 𝑛𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟 × 𝑑𝑒𝑡 𝑜𝑓𝑠𝑚𝑎𝑙𝑙𝑒𝑟 𝑚𝑎𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑥

𝐷𝑒𝑡 𝐴 = 𝐴

= − 3 −13 + 0 2 — 5 −7

= 4

But the middle number is (0)(2) = 0, so the

𝑑𝑒𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑛𝑡 × 𝑧𝑒𝑟𝑜 will always be zero. This is

why columns/rows with lots of zeros are chosen;

because the determinant of a circled zero does not

need to be found.

Try the above example using the middle row. You

should get the same answer.

−2 3 1−1 0 44 −5 −3

−2 3 1−1 0 44 −5 −3

−2 3 1−1 0 44 −5 −3

Page 68: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

68

Finding determinants of 3 × 3 matrices is not too

difficult, but it requires a lot of work. The more

you practice, the easier it will be.

Exercises: 1. Find the determinants of the following 3 × 3

matrices:

𝑎) 2 5 105 6 31 −2 8

𝑑) −1 4 −14 5 4

−1 4 −1

𝑏) 3 7 −15 8 41 9 9

𝑒) 3 2 −80 7 51 2 1

𝑐) 11 12 15

−11 19 183 23 27

𝑓) 0 5 3

11 −6 25 −6 0

3.11 using the Jacobian determinant

Previously, the values of 𝑥, 𝑦 and 𝑧 were found by

finding the zeros in the bottom left triangle. The

following is a different way of finding the solution

to a set of equations.

Intro example 1: to solve the matrix

2 5 −3

−1 −1 −15 −3 −2

⋮ ⋮ ⋮

190

−10

find the determinant of the 3 × 3 “variables”

matrix (left of the dotted line) which was done in

the previous section. The determinant was −61.

This is denoted by |𝐴| and it is the determinant of

the original 3 × 3 “variables” matrix.

Next, the column of the variable to be solved is

REPLACED by the column of constants. That is, to

solve for 𝑥, replace the 𝑥 column (i.e. first column)

in the matrix with the constants column (i.e. the

numbers on the right of the dotted line):

19 5 −30 −1 −1

−10 −3 −2 = 𝐴𝑥

Find the determinant of this new matrix using the

method from the last section.

Use the middle row as it has a zero (remembering

the “signs” matrix):

𝐴𝑥 = − 0 5 −3

−3 −2 + −1

19 −3−10 −2

− (−1) 19 5

−10 −3

𝐴𝑥 = −1 −68 − −1 −7 = 61

Then to find the actual value of 𝑥, the following

fraction is used:

𝑥 = 𝐴𝑥

𝐴 =

61

−61= −1

Theory: to solve for a variable using the Jacobian

Method, firstly find the determinant of the

variables matrix (|𝐴|). Then replace the

appropriate column (for the variable to be solved)

with the constants column, and find the

determinant of this (|𝐴𝑏 |). The solution is this

second determinant divided by the determinant of

the variables matrix:

𝑏 = 𝐴𝑏

𝐴

Example 1: solve for 𝑦 and 𝑧 using the Jacobian

Method in the matrix that was started above

2 5 −3

−1 −1 −15 −3 −2

⋮ ⋮ ⋮

190

−10

Plan: use the Jacobian method; find the

determinant of the variables matrix. Then replace

the constants column into the column of the

variable being solved, and find the determinant of

this new 3 × 3 matrix. Divide this determinant by

the determinant of the original variables

determinant to solve for the unknown variable.

Solution: to solve for 𝑦, replace the 𝑦 column with

the constants column

2 19 −3

−1 0 −15 −10 −2

= 𝐴𝑦

Find the determinant of this matrix using the

middle row:

Page 69: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

69

𝐴𝑦 = − −1 19 −3

−10 −2 + 0

2 −35 −2

− (−1) 2 195 −10

𝐴𝑦 = 1 −68 − −1 −115 = −183

Solve for 𝑦:

𝑦 = 𝐴𝑦

𝐴 =

−183

−61= 3

To solve for 𝑧:

2 5 19

−1 −1 05 −3 −10

= 𝐴𝑧

Find the determinant (yourself!) to make sure it is

𝐴𝑧 = 122, which then gives:

𝑧 = 𝐴𝑧

𝐴 =

122

−61= −2

Thus 𝑥 = −1, 𝑦 = 3, 𝑧 = −2, or −1, 3, −2 .

To make sure this answer is correct, substitute it

back into the bottom equation of the original

matrix:

5𝑥 − 3𝑦 − 2𝑧 = −10

5 −1 − 3 3 − 2 −2 = −10

−10 = −10

This is a complicated method, but the more you

practice the easier it becomes. When you have a

zero in a matrix, use it, and remember that you do

not need to find the determinant of the smaller

matrix when that zero is circled.

Example 2: solve for 𝑥, 𝑦 and 𝑧 in the following

matrix using the Jacobian Method

2 4 41 −2 10 1 −3

⋮ ⋮ ⋮

05

10

Plan: find the determinant of the variables matrix,

using the 3 × 3 method. Call this 𝐴 . Replace the

𝑥 column with the constants column. Find the

determinant of this matrix, and call it 𝐴𝑥 . Solve

for 𝑥 by:

𝑥 = 𝐴𝑥

𝐴

Repeat for 𝑦 and 𝑧 with the appropriate columns.

Also, when finding the determinant, remember the

“signs” matrix:

+ − +− + −+ − +

Solution: determinant of the variables matrix:

𝐴 = 2 4 41 −2 10 1 −3

Use the bottom row:

𝐴 = + 0 4 4

−2 1 − 1

2 41 1

+ (−3) 2 41 −2

𝐴 = −1 −2 + −3 −8 = 26

To find 𝐴𝑥 :

𝐴𝑥 = 0 4 45 −2 1

10 1 −3

Use the top row (leaving the zero out from now

on):

𝐴𝑥 = − 4 5 1

10 −3 + (4)

5 −210 1

𝐴𝑥 = −4 −25 + 4 25 = 200

To find 𝐴𝑦 replace the middle column with the

constants, and use the top row:

𝐴𝑦 = 2 0 41 5 10 10 −3

𝐴𝑦 = + 2 5 1

10 −3 + (4)

1 50 10

𝐴𝑦 = 2 −25 + 4 10 = −10

To find 𝐴𝑧 , replace the middle column with the

constants, and use the top row:

𝐴𝑧 = 2 4 01 −2 50 1 10

𝐴𝑧 = + 2 −2 51 10

− (4) 1 50 10

𝐴𝑧 = 2 −25 − 4 10 = −90

Finally, for a solution:

𝑥 = 𝐴𝑥

𝐴 =

200

26=

100

13

Page 70: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

70

𝑦 = 𝐴𝑦

𝐴 =

−10

26=

−5

13

𝑧 = 𝐴𝑧

𝐴 =

−90

26=

−45

13

The solution is 𝑥 = 100/13, 𝑦 = −5/13,

𝑧 = −45/13 or 100

13, −

5

13, −

45

13 .

Check if the answer is correct by substituting it

back into one of the rows of the original matrix. To

be consistent, use the bottom equation:

𝑦 − 3𝑧 = 10

−5

13− 3 −

45

13 = 10

−5

13+

135

13= 10

=−5 + 135

13=

130

13= 10

The solutions are fractions, so leave them as

fractions!

Exercises: 1. Solve the following matrices.

𝑎) 8 −1 2

−2 −2 −74 1 3

⋮ ⋮ ⋮

1145

𝑐) 1 −1 −32 −1 −4

−8 5 −3

⋮ ⋮ ⋮

777

𝑏) 3 6 8

−1 1 2−3 −2 1

⋮ ⋮ ⋮

121311

𝑑) 4 −6 2

−2 −1 −51 −7 −1

⋮ ⋮ ⋮

1065

2. Solve the following sets of equations using Jacobian determinants. 𝑎) 6𝑥 + 3𝑦 + 3𝑧 = 18

2𝑥 − 𝑦 − 𝑧 = 24

−2𝑥 + 2𝑦 − 4𝑧 = 15

𝑏) 4𝑥 + 5𝑦 = 2𝑧 + 6

5𝑥 = 𝑦 + 5𝑧 + 2

−3𝑥 − 𝑧 = −5𝑦 + 6

𝑐) 6𝑥 + 4𝑦 + 6𝑧 = 3

𝑧 − 𝑦 + 4𝑥 − 9 = 0

2𝑦 − 2𝑥 − 3𝑧 = 8

𝑑) 𝑥 − 9𝑦 + 3𝑧 = 2

−𝑥 − 2𝑦 + 2𝑧 = 6

4𝑥 − 2𝑦 + 2𝑧 = 8

3. A toy manufacturing company uses metal (𝑚) plastic (𝑝) and labour (𝑙). The company owns three identical factories in a country where the costs of each of the three inputs is different:

City 1: metal costs $2/𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑡, plastic costs $8/𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑡, labour costs $7/𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑡.

City 2: metal costs $5/𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑡, plastic costs $6/𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑡, labour costs $3/𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑡.

City 1: metal costs $7/𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑡, plastic costs $3/𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑡, labour costs $9/𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑡.

If all factories are at full capacity, the costs for each of the factories is as follows:

City 1 factory costs are $342

City 2 factory costs are $255

City 3 factory costs are $375 Determine: a) The equation in terms of 𝑚, 𝑝 and 𝑙 for each of

the three cities. b) The amount of labour, plastic and metal used

in each of the three identical factories.

chapter three summary

Method 1 to solve two equation systems: 1. set the 𝑦’s equal to each other. 2. substitute the functions of 𝑥 in and solve for 𝑥. 3. Substitute the solutions of 𝑥 back into either of the

original equations to find the 𝑦 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒 of the solution.

Note: setting the 𝑥’s equal to each other initially will give the same answer.

Method 2 to solve two equation systems: 1. isolate one variable in one equation 2. substitute it into the other equation. 3. solve for the other variable, 4. then substitute this solution back into any one of

the original equations to solve for the other variable.

To solve three simultaneous equations: 1. take one equation and substitute it into the other

two equations. This will make two new equations with only two variables.

2. substitute one of those equations into the other to solve for one of the unknowns.

3. use this solution to solve for one of the other variables.

4. lastly, use these two solutions to solve for the third variable.

The solution is also written in coordinate form 𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧 . The matrix ready form of an equation is:

𝑎𝑥 + 𝑏𝑦 + 𝑐𝑧 = 𝑑

To construct a matrix: 1. take the numbers in front of the variables and put

them into square brackets. 2. draw a new set of brackets and vertically write the

order of the variables you have chosen (e.g. alphabetical).

3. after writing an equals sign, the constants on the right side are written vertically in square brackets.

Manipulating matrices involve ROW operations; this is the process of adding/subtracting the COLUMNS of a matrix.

For two equation systems, a zero is needed in the bottom left corner. For three equation systems: zeros are needed in the bottom two entries of the first column (this must be

Page 71: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

71

done first), as well as the bottom entry of the second column.

Matrices can have:

A single solution

No solutions (if there is no common intersection of all lines)

Infinite solutions (if there are not enough equations and/or if some of the equations are the same)

The macroeconomic model of an economy is: 𝑌 = 𝐶 + 𝐼 + 𝐺 Where 𝑌 is the total income of an economy, 𝐶 is the total consumption expenditure in an economy, 𝐼 is the sum of all investment expenditure in an economy, and 𝐺 is government spending. Consumption is determined by what is not saved (at a savings rate 𝑠) and not taxed (at the tax rate 𝑡): 𝐶 = 1 − 𝑠 1 − 𝑡 𝑌 Investments comes from savings, 𝑆 = 𝐼: 𝐼 = 𝑠 1 − 𝑡 𝑌 Government spending (𝐺) is constant regardless of the level of income; the savings rate 𝑠 takes a long time to change, so is assumed to be constant; the government sets the tax rate 𝑡 and is usually the same for at least a year.

For the matrix:

𝐹 = 𝑎 𝑐𝑏 𝑑

The determinant is: 𝐹 = 𝑎𝑑 − 𝑏𝑐 The determinant of a 3 × 3 matrix is: 𝐷𝑒𝑡 = + 1𝑠𝑡 𝑐𝑖𝑟𝑐𝑙𝑒𝑑 𝑛𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟

× det 𝑜𝑓𝑠𝑚𝑎𝑙𝑙𝑒𝑟 𝑚𝑎𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑥 − 2𝑛𝑑 𝑐𝑖𝑟𝑐𝑙𝑒𝑑 𝑛𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟

× det 𝑜𝑓𝑠𝑚𝑎𝑙𝑙𝑒𝑟 𝑚𝑎𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑥 + 3𝑟𝑑 𝑐𝑖𝑟𝑐𝑙𝑒𝑑 𝑛𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟

× 𝑑𝑒𝑡 𝑜𝑓𝑠𝑚𝑎𝑙𝑙𝑒𝑟 𝑚𝑎𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑥 When finding the determinant using any row or column, the pattern for the determinant equation is given by the matrix:

+ − +− + −+ − +

It is easiest to find the determinant of a matrix using the row/column with the most zeros.

Using the Jacobian Method to solve a system of equations:

𝑏 = 𝐴𝑏

𝐴

Where 𝐴 is the determinant of the “variables” matrix, and 𝐴𝑏 is the determinant of the “variables” matrix with the 𝑏 column replaced with the solitary constants matrix.

chapter three questions

1. Convert the following sets of equations into matrix form: 𝑎) 𝑦 = 3𝑥 − 1 𝑏) − 3 = −𝑦 − 𝑥 𝑦 = −2𝑥 − 17 15 + 𝑦 = −3𝑥

𝑐) 17𝑦 − 13 = 𝑥 + 1 𝑑) 11𝑥 − 3 = 1.4𝑦 2𝑦 − 3𝑥 − 1 = 0 11𝑥 − 3 = 1.5𝑦 𝑒) 3𝑥 = 3𝑦 − 4 + 𝑧 𝑓) 𝑎 + 𝑐 = 𝑏 − 4

4𝑦 − 15𝑥 = 13 − 𝑏 = 𝑐 − 𝑎 − 1 1.4𝑧 − 𝑦 = 𝑥 3𝑎 − 3𝑏 − 𝑐 = 1

2. Solve the following sets of equations without using matrices: 𝑎) 5𝑥 + 𝑦 = 14 2𝑥 + 8𝑦 + 2 = 0

𝑏) 4𝑦 = 𝑥 + 6 7𝑥 + 3𝑦 = 20

𝑐) 3𝑥 = −7𝑦 + 30.5 4𝑥 + 𝑦 = 17.75

𝑑) 3𝑥 = −2𝑦 − 4𝑥 + 9 𝑥 + 𝑦 = −3𝑧 + 5 𝑥 + 𝑦 = −4𝑧 + 6

𝑒) 2𝑥 + 2𝑦 + 2𝑧 = 16 3𝑥 + 3𝑧 = 𝑦 + 20 3𝑦 + 𝑧 = 𝑥 + 6

3. Solve the following sets of equations using matrices: 𝑎) 12𝑥 + 7𝑦 = 19 𝑏) 𝑥 = 𝑦 + 1 8𝑥 + 13𝑦 = 21 3𝑥 + 3𝑦 − 9 = 0

𝑐) 6𝑦 = −8𝑥 + 6 𝑑) 12𝑦 + 22 = 5𝑥 5𝑦 + 6 = −3𝑥 3𝑥 + 8𝑦 + 2 = 0

𝑒) 7𝑥 + 12𝑦 = 319 𝑓) 2𝑥 + 13𝑦 = 140 9𝑦 = 18𝑥 − 63 2𝑥 + 8𝑦 = 80

𝑔) 𝑦 = 3𝑥 + 7 𝑕) 4𝑥 = 𝑦 − 5.75 8𝑥 + 2𝑦 = −10.5 2𝑥 + 𝑦 = 25.25

4. If possible, solve the following matrices for a unique solution:

𝑎) 2 1 ⋮

−2 2 ⋮ 8

−2 𝑏)

1 4 ⋮ 5 3 ⋮

2926

𝑐) −1 1 ⋮ 2 −2 ⋮

3−6

𝑑) 1 3 ⋮ 3 1 ⋮

106

𝑒) −2 −4 ⋮ 3 2 ⋮

14−9

𝑓) 4 5 ⋮ 3 6 ⋮

10084

𝑔) 1 5 ⋮ 2 −1 ⋮

42−9.5

𝑕) 3 3 ⋮

−2 2 ⋮ 2418

𝑖) 12 13 ⋮ 1 2 ⋮

104.516.5

𝑗) −3 12 ⋮ −18 7 ⋮

25.523

𝑘) 1 8 ⋮ 1 9 ⋮

3640.2

𝑙) −1 3 ⋮ −1 5 ⋮

18.433.6

𝑚) −9 1 ⋮ 4 1 ⋮

−65.826.5

5. Use matrices to solve for the following demand and supply equations: 𝑎) 𝑃𝑑 = −2𝑄𝑑 + 62.5 𝑃𝑠 = 2𝑄𝑠 + 28.5

𝑏) 𝑃𝑑 = −1.5𝑄𝑑 + 59.75 𝑃𝑠 = 1.8𝑄𝑠 + 30.5

𝑐) 𝑃𝑑 = −1.4𝑄𝑑 + 72.6 𝑃𝑠 = 2.2𝑄𝑠 + 4.2

𝑑) 𝑃𝑑 = −4.3𝑄𝑑 + 349/30 𝑃𝑠 = 4.1𝑄𝑠 + 97/30

𝑒) 𝑃𝑑 = −2𝑄𝑑 + 24.07 𝑃𝑠 = 0.41𝑄𝑠 + 3.7537

6. Solve the following sets of equations using matrices: 𝑎) 4𝑥 + 𝑦 + 8𝑧 = 21 5𝑥 + 2𝑦 − 𝑧 = −6 6𝑥 + 3𝑦 + 2𝑧 = 3

𝑏) − 2𝑥 + 𝑦 + 2 = 0 2𝑥 + 𝑦 − 3𝑧 + 11 = 0

Page 72: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

72

4𝑦 + 𝑥 = 𝑧 + 12

𝑐) 2.5𝑥 + 3𝑦 + 7𝑧 = 92 1.5𝑥 + 2𝑦 + 𝑧 = 17 3𝑥 − 2𝑦 + 𝑧 = 16

𝑑) 5𝑥 + 2𝑦 + 𝑧 + 4 = 0 1𝑥 + 5𝑦 + 3𝑧 − 5 = −5 3𝑥 + 𝑦 + 4𝑧 + 13 = 0

7. If possible, solve the following matrices:

𝑎) −3 2 12 3 31 −1 −2

⋮ ⋮ ⋮

4−14

𝑏) −2 8 12−1 7 04 1 2

⋮ ⋮ ⋮

4923

13.5

𝑐) 4 7 −71 −12 −114 5 11

⋮ ⋮ ⋮

−7−4949

𝑑) 1.2 12.2 1.73.3 −8.3 84.5 7.1 −2.9

⋮ ⋮ ⋮

67.4320.9128.08

𝑒)

4/3 2 27/9 −11/9 9

−1/9 1/2 1

⋮ ⋮ ⋮

26/3254/943/36

𝑓) 1.3 1.75 2.3

−1.3 2.1 −1.42.5 3.1 4.1

⋮ ⋮ ⋮

11.21−2.0720.51

𝑔) 4.1 4.2 0.23.6 4.4 03.8 2.6 1.1

⋮ ⋮ ⋮

−18.31−17.24−16.23

𝑕) −1.1 2.34 −1.21−1.22 4.11 −0.98

1 0.23 1.31

⋮ ⋮ ⋮

−0.18.12

10.78

8. Determine the number of solutions (none, one or infinite) for the following matrices. Justify your answer.

𝑎) 2 1 83 1 15 −2 −3

⋮ ⋮ ⋮

191221

𝑏) 2 1 3

−2 4 103 −1 −2

⋮ ⋮ ⋮

15205

𝑐) 2 1 58 −3 2

−10 −1.5 −14

⋮ ⋮ ⋮

74

−18 𝑑)

3 2 7−8 −3 45 2 1

⋮ ⋮ ⋮

021

𝑒) 1 5 −33 −21 185 1 3

⋮ ⋮ ⋮

8−918

𝑓) 5 −2 −1

−1 −4 59 −8 3

⋮ ⋮ ⋮

−37

20

9. Find the determinant of the following 2 × 2 matrices.

𝑎) 4 71 −1

𝑏) 18 12 3

𝑐) −2 −2−2 3

𝑑) 3 11 3

𝑒) 3 31 1

𝑓) −1 1.53.5 1

𝑔) 2.2 1.58 7

𝑕) 1/3 5/72/3 1/7

𝑖) 8/7 2.22/9 1/3

𝑗) 1.1 22 1.1

𝑘) 2 22 2

𝑙) 0 01 1

10. Find the determinant of the following 3 × 3 matrices:

𝑎) 5 2 61 3 21 1 2

𝑏) −1 5 71 1 23 −3 2

𝑐) 4 2 41 −2 21 0 −3

𝑑) −1 4 30 8 0

−2 1 −1

𝑒) 7 6 43 −1 6

−1 8 0 𝑓)

19 23 1420 41 180 37 0

11. Find the solution to the following matrices using the Jacobian Method:

𝑎) −2 4 1−1 1 1−2 1 9

⋮ ⋮ ⋮

62

16

𝑏) 7.5 5.5 91.5 3.5 −2.52.5 1 1.5

⋮ ⋮ ⋮

952119

𝑐) −4.5 2.25 8.254.5 1.75 −3.25

3.75 −0.5 1

⋮ ⋮ ⋮

60−139.25

𝑑)

1/3 1/2 1/91/6 1/4 2/95/6 3/4 1/3

⋮ ⋮ ⋮

1/38/302/3

12. A mobile phone manufacturer has three identical factories in Malaysia, Indonesia and Taiwan, all running at capacity. To make mobile phones, plastic (𝑃), silicone chips (𝑆) and labour (𝐿) is required. These three inputs all have different cost structures in the three countries (e.g. due to unions) which are: Malaysia: 𝑃 = $7.00, 𝑆 = $19.00, 𝐿 = $14.00 Indonesia: 𝑃 = $9.00, 𝑆 = $21.00, 𝐿 = $11.00 Taiwan: 𝑃 = $4.00, 𝑆 = $20.00, 𝐿 = $25.00 If the total costs of the three factories is: Malaysia: 𝑇𝐶 = $2853.00 Indonesia: 𝑇𝐶 = $2873.00 Taiwan: 𝑇𝐶 = $3594.00 Determine: a) Equations relating inputs and costs for the three

factories. b) The amount of labour, plastic and silicone chips

used in each of the three identical factories. 13. For the macroeconomic model of an economy with

the following facts, solve for 𝐶, 𝐼 and 𝑌 using matrices.

Government spending = 600, tax rate = 10% and savings rate = 10%.

14. For the macroeconomic model of an economy with the following facts, solve for 𝐶, 𝐼 and 𝑌 using matrices.

Government spending = 540, tax rate = 23% and savings rate = 9%.

15. For the macroeconomic model of an economy with the following facts, solve for 𝐶, 𝐼 and 𝑌 in terms of the savings rate 𝑠.

Government spending = 200, tax rate = 20%.

Page 73: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

73

Chapter 4

Non-linear functions Moving away from lines towards curves

4.1 Defining Non-Linear Functions 74

4.2 Defining a Quadratic Function 75

4.3 Quadratic Graphs 76

4.4 Sketching Quadratic Functions 77

4.5 The Cubic Function 80

4.6 The Exponential Function 82

4.7 The Logarithmic Function 84

4.8 Logarithmic Graphs 88

4.9 The Natural Number 𝑒 89

4.10 The Hyperbolic Function 90

4.11 Economic Applications 91

Chapter Summary 93

Chapter Four Questions 94

Page 74: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

74

4.1 defining non-linear functions

Theory: a function is defined as having only one

𝑦 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒 for every 𝑥 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒. That is, for every

value on the 𝑥 − 𝑎𝑥𝑖𝑠, there is only one

𝑦 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒 plotted by the curve. If this occurs for

all 𝑥 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒𝑠 on a given curve, then the curve is a

function. This does not mean that two different

𝑥 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒𝑠 cannot give the same 𝑦 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒. A

function is still a function if multiple 𝑥 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒𝑠

plot to a sinlge 𝑦 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒.

The curve above is a function as all 𝑥 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒𝑠

plot to only one 𝑦 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒: 𝐴→𝐵, 𝐶→𝐷. This is

the only thing that makes it a function. Two

different 𝑥 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒𝑠 (such as 𝐹 and 𝐺) can plot to

a single 𝑦 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒.

Theory: to find if a curve is a function, apply the

vertical line test:

𝐴 𝑐𝑢𝑟𝑣𝑒 𝑖𝑠 𝑎 𝑓𝑢𝑛𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑖𝑓 𝑎𝑙𝑙 𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑙 𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑒𝑠 𝑐𝑟𝑜𝑠𝑠

𝑡𝑕𝑒 𝑐𝑢𝑟𝑣𝑒 𝑜𝑛𝑙𝑦 𝑜𝑛𝑐𝑒

The curve above passes the vertical line test, so it

is a function, but the following curve does not pass

the vertical line test, and therefore a single

𝑥 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒 (e.g. 𝐻) plots two different 𝑦 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒𝑠

(𝐽 and 𝐾). Part of the curve passes the vertical line

test, but unless the whole thing passes, it is not a

function.

Different people denote functions differently. For

example, 𝑦 has been used when referring to linear

functions (lines), but there are many ways of

defining functions: 𝑓(𝑥), 𝑔(𝑥), 𝐷(𝑥), 𝑚, 𝑟 etc. All

these mean the same thing: they are all

“𝑓𝑢𝑛𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑠 𝑜𝑓 𝑥”. Graphically, the letters denote

the vertical axis, and 𝑥 is the horizontal axis.

Sometimes the letters might mean something: if

referring to revenue from selling a certain quantity

of computers, the function may be defined as:

𝑅 𝑄 = 50𝑄 − 0.6𝑄2

Where 𝑄 is the quantity of computers sold (the

𝑥 − 𝑎𝑥𝑖𝑠) and 𝑅 𝑄 means

“𝑟𝑒𝑣𝑒𝑛𝑢𝑒 𝑖𝑠 𝑎 𝑓𝑢𝑛𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑜𝑓 𝑄𝑢𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑡𝑦 𝑠𝑜𝑙𝑑”, (the

𝑦 − 𝑎𝑥𝑖𝑠).

Common non-linear functions include:

Look closely at the graphs above and you will see

that for each 𝑥 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒 (on the horizontal axis),

there is only one value for each function (colour).

All these curves pass the vertical line test (try it!),

therefore, they are all functions.

Cubic

Hyperbolic

Quadratic

Logarithmic

Exponential

𝑥

𝑦

H

J

K

L

M

𝑥

𝑦

𝐴 𝐶

𝐵

𝐷

𝐹 𝐺

𝐸

𝑥

𝑦

Page 75: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

75

Exercises: 1. Determine which of the following curves are

functions.

4.2 defining a quadratic function

The quadratic is by far the most common non–

linear function you will come across. It involves the

squaring of a variable.

Theory: the general form of a quadratic is:

𝑦 = 𝑎𝑥2 + 𝑏𝑥 + 𝑐

Where 𝑎, 𝑏 and 𝑐 are constants.

Example 1: find 𝑎, 𝑏 and 𝑐 for

𝑦 = 2𝑥2 + 3𝑥 − 5

Solution: 𝑎 = 2, 𝑏 = 3 and 𝑐 = −5.

Example 2: find 𝑎, 𝑏 and 𝑐 for

𝑓 𝑥 = −3𝑥2 − 2𝑥 + 4

Solution: 𝑎 = −3, 𝑏 = −2 and 𝑐 = 4.

It is easier to have the quadratic in the general

form to get the constants 𝑎, 𝑏 and 𝑐.

Example 3: find 𝑎, 𝑏 and 𝑐 for

𝑔 𝑥 = 2 − 7𝑥2 + 3𝑥

Solution: rearrange: 𝑔(𝑥) = −7𝑥2 + 3𝑥 + 2

So 𝑎 = −7, 𝑏 = 3 and 𝑐 = 2.

Example 4: find 𝑎, 𝑏 and 𝑐 in:

𝑕 𝑥 = 2 − 18𝑥2

Solution:

𝑕 𝑥 = −18𝑥2 + 2

where 𝑎 = −18, 𝑏 = 0 and 𝑐 = 2.

Note that 𝑏 or 𝑐 can equal zero, but 𝑎 cannot,

otherwise it would be a linear function.

The general form of the quadratic is not the only

quadratic form, however it is the easiest to work

with. When presented with other forms, rearrange

them into the general form using the crab-claw

method from Chapter 1.

Example 5: find the values of 𝑎, 𝑏 and 𝑐 for

𝑦 = 𝑥 + 2 (𝑥 − 3)

Plan: simplify using the crab-claw method.

Solution: draw the ‘crab-claw’, and then follow the

lines:

𝑦 = 𝑥2 + 2𝑥 − 3𝑥 − 6

𝑦 = 𝑥2 − 𝑥 − 6

So 𝑎 = 1, 𝑏 = −1 and 𝑐 = −6.

Example 6: find the general form of

3𝑦

(3𝑥 − 1) = 2 𝑥 + 1

Plan: simplify and rearrange using the crab-claw

Solution: Multiply both sides by (3𝑥 − 1) to get rid

of it on the left and have it as a multiplication on

the right.

3𝑦 = 2 𝑥 + 1 3𝑥 − 1

Then apply the crab-claw on the right side:

3𝑦 = 2 3𝑥2 + 3𝑥 − 𝑥 − 1

The 2 out front of the square brackets goes into

every term in the square brackets, after the inside

of the square brackets have been simplified:

3𝑦 = 6𝑥2 + 4𝑥 − 2

Isolate 𝑦 by dividing both sides by 3:

𝑦 =6𝑥2 + 4𝑥 − 2

3= 2𝑥2 +

4

3𝑥 −

2

3

3𝑦 = 2 𝑥 + 1 3𝑥 − 1

𝑦 = 𝑥 + 2 (𝑥 − 3)

𝑥

𝑦

𝐴

𝐵

𝐶

𝐷

𝐸

Page 76: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

76

Example 7: find the general form of

𝑦 = 𝑥 + 2 2 − 3

Plan: simplify and rearrange using the crab-claw

Solution: this is solved using the crab-claw

method, but the 𝑥 + 2 2 must first be rewritten

as two separate parts:

𝑦 = 𝑥2 + 2𝑥 + 2𝑥 + 4 − 3

Simplify:

𝑦 = 𝑥2 + 4𝑥 + 1

Note: remember from Chapter 1:

𝑥 + 2 2 ≠ 𝑥2 + 22

You cannot simply put the squared into every term

inside the brackets. This is where many students

stuff up, so don’t be one of them!

Exercises: 1. Determine the value of 𝑎, 𝑏 and 𝑐 in the following

quadratics: 𝑎) 𝑦 = 6𝑥2 − 5𝑥 − 1

𝑏) 𝑦 = 1 − 2𝑥 + 𝑥2

𝑐) 𝑦 − 6 − 𝑥2 = 2𝑥

𝑑) 𝑦 =2𝑥2

3+

1

2−

1

3𝑥

𝑒) 𝑦 = 8 − 8𝑥 − 3𝑥2

𝑓) 𝑦 − 2

𝑥 + 1= 2𝑥 − 1

𝑔) 𝑦 = 𝑥 + 1 2 − 8𝑥 + 23

𝑕) 𝑦 − −𝑥 + 2 2 = 2𝑥 − 1 2

4.3 quadratic graphs

Quadratics have a distinctive shape which you

must recognise.

Three different quadratics are drawn above in

general form with 𝑏 = 0 and 𝑐 = 0 (i.e. 𝑦 = 𝑎𝑥2).

The difference between the three graphs is the

value of 𝑎.

Theory: The larger the value of 𝑎, the steeper the

curve (black); similarly, the smaller the value of 𝑎,

the shallower the curve (blue).

The following functions are of the form:

𝑦 = 𝑥2 + 𝑐

That is, 𝑏 is set to zero.

The shape of the graphs are identical, except for

their vertical position (vertical displacement).

Theory: the value of 𝑐 in the quadratic equation

determines the vertical displacement of the graph.

Look at all the graphs so far; the turning points

(minimum points in the cases so far) have been on

the 𝑦 − 𝑎𝑥𝑖𝑠. However, if the value of 𝑏 is not

zero, there is a vertical and horizontal shift.

𝑦 = 𝑥2 + 3

𝑦 = 𝑥2 − 3

𝑦 = 𝑥2 − 1

𝑥

𝑦

𝑦 = 2𝑥2

𝑦 = 𝑥2

𝑦 = 0.5𝑥2 𝑥

𝑦

𝑦 = 𝑥 + 2 (𝑥 + 2) − 3

Page 77: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

77

Notice how the turning point has moved away

from the 𝑦 − 𝑎𝑥𝑖𝑠 and there has also been a

vertical shift.

Theory: changing the value of 𝑏 in the general

quadratic form shifts the graph both horizontally

and vertically.

Finally, a note about the sign of 𝑎.

Theory: a positive value of 𝑎 will result in

quadratics with a shape of a ‘smiley’ face, whereas

when the value of 𝑎 is negative, the shape

becomes inverted; a ‘sad’ face.

The values of 𝑎, 𝑏 and 𝑐 still change the graph in a

similar way, but the sign of 𝑎 determines if it is a

‘smiley’ or ‘sad’ face.

Exercises: 1. Match the graphs with the equations.

𝑦 = −3𝑥2 𝑦 = 𝑥2 + 2 𝑦 = 𝑥2 + 10𝑥 + 25 𝑦 = −𝑥2 + 8𝑥

2. Match the graphs to the equations

𝑦 = − 3𝑥2 + 2 −𝑦 + 5 = 𝑥2 𝑦 = 𝑥 − 3 2 + 3 𝑦 = −𝑥2 + 2𝑥 𝑦 = 3𝑥2 + 10𝑥 + 28

4.4 sketching quadratic functions

All quadratics can be described as having: a

𝑦 − 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑝𝑡; a turning point; and either two,

one or no 𝑥 − 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑝𝑡𝑠.

To find these three main features of quadratics,

theory from Chapter 2 must be applied.

Theory: To find the 𝑦 − 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑝𝑡 of any function,

set all the 𝑥’s in the equation equal to zero.

Example 1: Find the 𝑦 − 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑝𝑡 of

𝑦 = −2𝑥2 + 8𝑥 − 6

Plan: set all the 𝑥’s equal to zero.

Solution:

𝑦 = −2(0)2 + 8 0 − 6 = −6

So the point 0, −6 is the 𝑦 − 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑝𝑡.

The 𝑦 − 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑝𝑡 is also simply the value of the

constant 𝑐.

To find the 𝑥– 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑝𝑡(𝑠), set all the 𝑦’s equal

to zero. In the example above, this would be:

0 = −2𝑥2 + 8𝑥 − 6

Rearranging this to isolate 𝑥 is very difficult, so a

formula is used to solve for 𝑥. The formula is called

the Quadratic Formula (QF) which you must

memorise.

𝑥

𝑦

𝑥

𝑦

𝑦 = −𝑥2 + 4𝑥

𝑦 = −𝑥2 − 2𝑥

𝑥

𝑦

𝑦 = 𝑥2 + 4𝑥

𝑦 = 𝑥2 − 2𝑥

𝑥

𝑦

Page 78: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

78

Theory: the Quadratic Formula is:

𝑥 − 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑝𝑡 𝑠 =−𝑏 ± 𝑏2 − 4𝑎𝑐

2𝑎

This is a very important formula, and it may be

easier to memorise the words “negative 𝑏 plus or

minus the square root of 𝑏 squared minus four 𝑎𝑐,

all over two 𝑎”. This formula is finding where a

quadratic function crosses the 𝑥 − 𝑎𝑥𝑖𝑠 and these

point(s) are called roots.

Example 2: determine the roots of

0 = −2𝑥2 + 8𝑥 − 6

Plan: use the quadratic formula

𝑥 − 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑝𝑡𝑠 =−𝑏 ± 𝑏2 − 4𝑎𝑐

2𝑎

Solution:

𝑥 − 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑝𝑡𝑠 =−8 ± 82 − 4 −2 (−6)

2(−2)

=−8 ± 64 − 48

−4

=−8 ± 16

−4

=−8 ± 4

−4→ 𝑥 = 1 𝑂𝑅 𝑥 = 3

The last step is split into two. Instead of having the

± sign, it is separated out into a + and a − to get

two answers:

𝑥 =−8 + 4

−4=

−4

−4= 1 𝑂𝑅

−8 − 4

−4=

−12

−4= 3

So there are two 𝑥 − 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑝𝑡𝑠: (1,0) and (3,0).

The only point that remains to be found to

determine the nature of a quadratic is the turning

point (the point where the function “turns”). If you

memorised the quadratic formula, it makes finding

the turning point (TP) easier. Remembering that a

point has an 𝑥 and 𝑦 value, so once we find the

𝑥 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒, the corresponding 𝑦 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒 needs to

be found.

Theory: to find the 𝑥 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒 of the turning point

(TP), rewrite the Quadratic Function and only look

at the things not under the square root sign (i.e.

only look at the circled part):

Then to find the 𝑦 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒 of the turning point,

substitute this 𝑥 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒 into the original

function.

Example 3: find the coordinates of the turning

point of the quadratic

𝑦 = −2𝑥2 + 8𝑥 − 6

Plan: use the Quadratic Formula ( but ignore

everything under the square root sign) to find the

𝑥 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒 of the turning point, then substitute

this value into the original equation to find the

𝑦 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒.

Solution:

𝑇𝑃 𝑥 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒 =−𝑏

2𝑎=

−8

2 −2 = 2

Substitute 𝑥 = 2 into the original equation to find

the 𝑦 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒 of the turning point:

𝑦 2 = −2 2 2 + 8 2 − 6

= −8 + 16 − 6

= 2

Giving the turning point (2,2).

A different short-cut is knowing that the

𝑥 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒 of the turning point will always be half

way between the two 𝑥 − 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑝𝑡𝑠.

Example 4: Plot the results from Examples 1 − 3.

Plan: plot and label the coordinates, then join up

all the dots with a nice curve.

𝑇𝑃 𝑥 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒 =−𝑏 ± 𝑏2 − 4𝑎𝑐

2𝑎=

−𝑏

2𝑎

Page 79: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

79

Solution:

The dotted black line is what the graph should be,

and the blue line is a free–hand sketch. As long as

it approximately looks like a quadratic, and goes

through the labelled coordinates, then the curve

will be fine. Notice that this graph is a ‘sad’ face,

which from the last section, the value of 𝑎 must be

negative (𝑎 = −2). Also notice that the turning

point is half way between the two 𝑥 −

𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑝𝑡𝑠.

On a related topic, on the following graphs notice

that the blue function cuts the 𝑥 − 𝑎𝑥𝑖𝑠 twice, the

red function only just touches the 𝑥 − 𝑎𝑥𝑖𝑠 (cuts it

once), and the black function does not cross the

𝑥 − 𝑎𝑥𝑖𝑠 at all (cuts it zero times).

Theory: From the Quadratic Formula, it is possible

to determine how many times a quadratic crosses

the 𝑥 − 𝑎𝑥𝑖𝑠. The value underneath the square-

root sign determines this:

𝑏2 − 4𝑎𝑐

If the value of 𝑏2 − 4𝑎𝑐 is positive, then the

curve will cross the 𝑥 − 𝑎𝑥𝑖𝑠 twice (as the

square root of a positive number will have two

solutions – a positive and negative number).

If the value of 𝑏2 − 4𝑎𝑐 equals zero, then the

curve crosses (touches) the 𝑥 − 𝑎𝑥𝑖𝑠 only once

(the square root of zero is zero).

If the value of 𝑏2 − 4𝑎𝑐 is negative, then the

curve does not cross the 𝑥 − 𝑎𝑥𝑖𝑠 (as the

square root of a negative number does not

exist).

Example 5: using the Quadratic Formula,

determine how many times the following equation

crosses the 𝑥 − 𝑎𝑥𝑖𝑠

𝑦 = 2𝑥2 − 16𝑥 + 32

Plan: find the value of the part under the square

root sign in the Quadratic Formula: 𝑏2 − 4𝑎𝑐.

If it is positive → 2 intercepts, if zero → 1 intercept,

and if negative → 0 intercepts.

Solution:

𝑏2 − 4𝑎𝑐 = −16 2 − 4 2 32

= 256 − 256

= 0 ∴ only one x − intercept

Example 6: Sketch 𝑦 − 8𝑥2 + 26𝑥 = −7

Plan: rearrange to get the general form, then find

the 𝑦 − 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑝𝑡 by setting all 𝑥’s to zero. Find

the 𝑥 − 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑝𝑡𝑠 by setting 𝑦 = 0 and then

applying the Quadratic Formula:

𝑥 − 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑝𝑡𝑠 =−𝑏 ± 𝑏2 − 4𝑎𝑐

2𝑎

Use the part of the QF not under the square root

sign to find the 𝑥 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒 of the TP, then put back

into original equation to get the 𝑦 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒 of the

TP.

Solution: rearrange into the general form

𝑦 = 8𝑥2 − 26𝑥 − 7

𝑦 − 𝑖𝑛𝑡: 𝑦 0 = 8 0 2 − 26 0 − 7

𝑦 = 𝑥2 + 4𝑥 + 8

𝑦 = 𝑥2 − 5

𝑥

𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑥2 + 2𝑥 + 1

(2,2)

(3,0)

(1,0)

(0, −6)

𝑦

𝑥

Page 80: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

80

= −7

∴ 𝑦 − 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑝𝑡 𝑎𝑡 (0, −7)

𝑥 − 𝑖𝑛𝑡: 0 = 8𝑥2 − 26𝑥 − 7

𝑥 − 𝑖𝑛𝑡 𝑠 =−(−26) ± (−26)2 − 4 8 (−7)

2(8)

=26 ± 676 + 224

16

=26 ± 900

16

=26 ± 30

16→ 𝑥 = 3.5 𝑂𝑅 𝑥 = −0.25

Coordinates of 𝑥 − 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑝𝑡𝑠 are: (3.5,0) and

−0.25,0 .

𝑇𝑢𝑟𝑛𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑃𝑜𝑖𝑛𝑡:

𝑇𝑃 𝑥 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒 =−𝑏

2𝑎=

−(−26)

2(8)=

26

16= 1.625

𝑇𝑃 𝑦 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒 :

𝑦(1.625) = 8 1.625 2 − 26(1.625) − 7

= −28.125 ∴ 𝑇𝑃 𝑎𝑡 (1.625, −28.125)

Example 7: Sketch 3 𝑥 − 3 = 𝑥2 − 𝑦

Plan: set all 𝑥’s to zero to find the 𝑦 − 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑝𝑡,

then rearrange to get into general form, then use

the QF to find the 𝑥 − 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑝𝑡𝑠 and 𝑇𝑃.

𝑥 − 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑝𝑡𝑠 =−𝑏 ± 𝑏2 − 4𝑎𝑐

2𝑎

Solution: rearrange into the general form

3𝑥 − 9 = 𝑥2 − 𝑦

𝑦 = 𝑥2 − 3𝑥 + 9

𝑦 − 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑝𝑡:

𝑦 = (0)2 − 3 0 + 9 = 9

𝑦 − 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑝𝑡 coordinate: (0,9)

𝑥 − 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑝𝑡𝑠:

𝑥 − 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑝𝑡𝑠 =−(−3) ± (−3)2 − 4 1 (9)

2(1)

=3 ± 9 − 36

2=

3 ± −27

2

Since there is a negative number under the square

root sign, it means there are no 𝑥 − 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑝𝑡𝑠.

𝑇𝑢𝑟𝑛𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑃𝑜𝑖𝑛𝑡:

𝑥 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑇𝑃 = −𝑏

2𝑎= −

−3

2 1 =

3

2= 1.5

𝑦 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑇𝑃: 𝑦(1.5) = 1.5 2 − 3(1.5) + 9

= 𝑦 1.5 = 2.25 − 4.5 + 9 = 6.75

TP coordinate: (1.5,6.75)

Plot all the points, and remember, there are no

𝑥 − 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑝𝑡𝑠 and it is a “smiley” face as 𝑎 is

positive:

Exercises 1. Find the 𝑥 − 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑝𝑡𝑠 (if any) for the following

quadratics: 𝑎) 𝑦 = 𝑥2 + 2𝑥 − 15

𝑏) 𝑦 = 2𝑥2 − 20𝑥 + 42

𝑐) 𝑦 = 3𝑥2 + 18𝑥 + 27

𝑑) 𝑦 = 𝑥2 + 2𝑥 + 9

2. Sketch the following quadratics. 𝑎) 𝑦 = −𝑥2 − 5𝑥 − 6

𝑏) 𝑦 = 𝑥 + 2 2 − 1

𝑐) 𝑦 = 𝑥 − 1 2 + 𝑥 + 2 2

𝑑) 𝑦 = − −𝑥 + 1 1 − 𝑥 + 1

𝑒) 𝑦 = 𝑥2 + 𝑥 − 1 2 − 3

𝑓) 𝑦 = − 𝑥 − 2 2 − 2

4.5 the cubic function

Theory: The cubic function is a function where the

highest power of 𝑥 is 3 (i.e. 𝑥3).

For example:

𝑦 = 2𝑥3 − 4𝑥2 + 3𝑥 − 17

(1.5,6.75)

(0,9)

𝑦

𝑥

(1.625, −28.125)

(3.5,0) (−0.25,0)

(0, −7)

𝑦

𝑥

Page 81: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

81

Notice that there is an 𝑥2, but the highest power is

3 (i.e. the 2𝑥3) so this is a cubic function, not a

quadratic function.

Theory: The general form of a cubic function is:

𝑦 = 𝑎𝑥3 + 𝑏𝑥2 + 𝑐𝑥 + 𝑑

Where 𝑎, 𝑏, 𝑐 and 𝑑 are constants.

The simplest cubic is:

𝑦 = 𝑎𝑥3

where 𝑏, 𝑐 and 𝑑 are all zero. These simple cubic

functions have an ‘𝑆’ shape:

Here, there is only one 𝑥 − 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑝𝑡 (through the

origin), and unlike the quadratic functions, the

‘ends’ of the graph go in different directions. That

is, as 𝑥 becomes more positive (i.e. to the right of

the origin on the 𝑥 − 𝑎𝑥𝑖𝑠), the value on the

𝑦 − 𝑎𝑥𝑖𝑠 also becomes more positive; similarly,

when the value of 𝑥 becomes more negative (to

the left of the origin on the 𝑥 − 𝑎𝑥𝑖𝑠), the value on

the 𝑦 − 𝑎𝑥𝑖𝑠 also becomes more negative.

Compare this to a quadratic where both ends of

the graph go in the same direction (either both

ends go up, or both ends go down).

More complex cubic functions look like:

These functions still have the general ‘𝑆’ shape; it

is the values of 𝑎, 𝑏, 𝑐 and 𝑑 that determine the

sharpness of this ‘𝑆’ shape. The blue graph is much

‘sharper’ than the black one, which is ‘sharper’

than the red one.

Also, count how many times each colour crosses

the 𝑥 − 𝑎𝑥𝑖𝑠. The blue one crosses three times,

the black one crosses twice (touching the 𝑥 − 𝑎𝑥𝑖𝑠

counts as a cross), and the grey curve cuts the

𝑥 − 𝑎𝑥𝑖𝑠 only once.

Theory: depending on the values of 𝑎, 𝑏, 𝑐 and 𝑑, a

cubic can cross the 𝑥 − 𝑎𝑥𝑖𝑠 once, twice or three

times.

Just like in quadratics, the sign of 𝑎 in a cubic

function has an interpretation.

Theory: when 𝑎 is positive, the ends of the graph

extend to the top right and bottom left ↙↗ , but

when 𝑎 is negative, the ends of the graph extend

to the top left and bottom right ↖↘ .

The reason why 𝑎 is important is that as 𝑥

becomes very large in a positive direction or in a

negative direction, the cubed term dominates over

all other terms.

The number of times a cubic function crosses the

𝑥 − 𝑎𝑥𝑖𝑠 is determined by the values of 𝑎, 𝑏, 𝑐 and

𝑑, with the sign of 𝑎 determining the direction the

ends of the graph extends. Notice the sign of 𝑎 in

𝑦 = 𝑥3 + 2

𝑦 = 𝑥3 − 𝑥2 − 21𝑥 + 45

𝑦

𝑥

𝑦 = 𝑥3 − 𝑥2 − 20𝑥

𝑦 = 2𝑥3

𝑦 = 𝑥3

𝑦 = 0.5𝑥3

𝑦

𝑥

Page 82: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

82

the following graph and the direction the ends

extend.

Exercises 1. Match the following graphs to the equations:

𝑎) 𝑦 = 𝑥 + 4 𝑥 + 2 2 + 𝑥 𝑏) 𝑦 = 𝑥3 + 4 𝑐) 𝑦 = −3𝑥3 + 2.5 𝑑) 𝑦 = 𝑥 − 3 𝑥 + 1 −3 − 𝑥

Hint: expand all the brackets before deciding.

4.6 the exponential function

Before defining the mathematical exponential

function, an intuitive understanding is needed. You

are given $100 to go to the casino and have fun.

You play the coin-toss, and (somehow) can predict

the outcome every single time. After the first

round, you win $100. You then have $200, and

bet it again. You win, and now you have $400. You

bet it all again, and win again. Now you have $800.

You bet it once more and win, and end up with

$1600. Every time you play, you double your

earnings, but you don’t win the same amount

every time. The first round you won $100, and the

last round you won $800, which are not the same,

but every round, you doubled your earnings. This is

what exponential growth means. After every

round (or time-period), the final amount is a

certain ratio of the amount of the previous time-

period.

In the example above, the amount of money (𝑚)

after 𝑡 turns (assuming you keep winning) can be

defined by:

𝑚 = 100 2𝑡

The 2 comes from the fact that earnings are

doubled every time-period, and the 100 from the

initial amount.

Theory: an exponential function is one which has a

variable in the index. The general form of an

exponential function is

𝑦 = 𝑏(𝑎𝑥) + 𝑐

Where 𝑎, 𝑏 and 𝑐 are constants.

𝑎 is a number that determines the growth rate

(e.g. doubling;𝑎 = 2, tripling;𝑎 = 3 etc.)

𝑏 is the initial amount. It determines the shape

of the graph and where it intersects the

𝑦 − 𝑎𝑥𝑖𝑠.

𝑐 a constant that shifts the graph up or down,

but doesn’t change the shape of the graph. It is

also the value of the asymptote (the value the

function will approach but will never reach).

The simplest exponential is where 𝑏 = 1 and 𝑐 =

0:

𝑦 = 𝑎𝑥

This exponential function cuts the 𝑦 − 𝑎𝑥𝑖𝑠 at

0,1 as any number to the power of 0 equals 1.

𝑦

𝑥

𝑦 = −𝑥3 + 5

𝑦 = −𝑥3 − 𝑥2 + 21𝑥 + 45 𝑦

𝑥

Page 83: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

83

The shape of an exponential function:

The black line is the simplest exponential function,

and crosses the 𝑦 − 𝑎𝑥𝑖𝑠 at 𝑦 = 1, as 20 = 1. It is

also the value of 𝑏 (= 1). The asymptote is at

𝑥 = 0 as the further left the curve extends, the

closer it gets to the 𝑥 − 𝑎𝑥𝑖𝑠 (i.e. 𝑦 = 0).

The red line has the 3 out front, meaning that it

crosses the 𝑦 − 𝑎𝑥𝑖𝑠 at 𝑦 = 3 but also that the

general shape has been changed to be steeper.

Similar to the black line, the asymptote is at 𝑥 = 0.

The blue line is the same as the black line, except

that it has 3 subtracted from it. This shifts the

graph down 3 units and also changes the

asymptote to 𝑦 = −3. The graph will get closer

and closer to 𝑦 = −3 but will never reach it. The

other two functions have 𝑐 = 0 which means the

asymptote for those two functions is the 𝑥 − 𝑎𝑥𝑖𝑠.

Theory: to sketch an exponential function, the

𝑦 − 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑝𝑡 and the 𝑦 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒 of the

asymptote are required (remember, an asymptote

is a value that the function approaches but never

reaches).

The 𝑦 − 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑝𝑡 is found by setting all 𝑥’s

equal to zero.

The 𝑦 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒 of the asymptote is any

number added onto the end of the

exponential function (i.e. the number 𝑐).

Example 1: sketch the two exponential functions

on a single set of axes

1. 𝑦 = 3 2𝑥 + 4

2. 𝑦 = 0.5 2−𝑥 − 2

Plan: to find the 𝑦 − 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑝𝑡𝑠, set the

𝑥 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒𝑠 to zero. The asymptote is the number

added to the end of the exponential.

Solution: for the 𝑦 − 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑝𝑡𝑠

1. 𝑦 = 3 20 + 4 = 3 + 4 = 7

2. 𝑦 = 0.5 20 − 2 = −1.5

For the asymptotes

1. 𝑦 = 4

2. 𝑦 = −2

Notice that for the first function above, there is a 3

in front which makes the graph much steeper.

Conversely, the 0.5 in the second function makes it

shallower. There is also a negative sign in front of

𝑥 in the second function above meaning it is

flipped along the 𝑦 − 𝑎𝑥𝑖𝑠.

A concept similar to growth is that of decay; the

reverse of growth. For growth, the more time

passes, the faster the thing grows. In decay, the

more time passes, the slower things decay.

Theory: the general form of the decay function is

very similar to that of growth, except there is a

negative in front of the index x:

𝑦 = 𝑏(𝑎−𝑥) + 𝑐

𝑦 = 3 2𝑥 + 4

𝑦 = 0.5 2−𝑥 − 2

𝑦

𝑥

𝑦 = 4

𝑦 = −2

𝑦 = 3(2𝑥)

𝑦 = 2𝑥

𝑦 = 2𝑥 − 3

𝑦

𝑥

0,1

0,3

0, −2

Page 84: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

84

The graph which was shown in the last exercise is

one of decay, as are the following:

Exercises: 1. Match the following graphs with the equations:

𝑎) 𝑦 = 3 2𝑥 𝑏) 𝑦 = 3 2−𝑥 𝑐) 𝑦 = 5 3𝑥 𝑑) 𝑦 = 4 2−𝑥 + 5

2. Sketch the following equations on a single set of axes (they must be correct, relative to one another!):

𝑎) 𝑦 = 5 2𝑥 − 4 𝑏) 𝑦 = 2−𝑥 + 3 𝑐) 𝑦 = −2 3𝑥 + 1 𝑑) 𝑦 = 4 2−𝑥 + 5

4.7 the logarithmic function

For an exponential function such as:

𝑦 = 𝑎𝑥

𝑦 is already isolated, but sometimes 𝑥 needs to be

isolated. It is impossible to isolate 𝑥 without using

logarithms. A logarithm (log for short) is a

mathematical method used to solve exponents.

Intro Example 1: use common sense to solve:

10𝑥 = 10

Obviously 𝑥 = 1. Now how about:

10𝑥 = 100

The answer is 𝑥 = 2, as 102 = 100. These are

easy, but how about:

10𝑥 = 50

The answer is not 𝑥 = 1.5 because 101.5 ≈ 31.6. It

is exactly this sort of situation where logs are used.

Theory: the definition of a logarithm is:

For 𝑎𝑏 = 𝑐

𝑏 =log 𝑐

log 𝑎= log𝑎 𝑐

Where 𝑏 is called the index, and 𝑎 is called the

base. However, with the following log rules, this

definition can be easily found.

There are some log rules you will have to learn to

be able to solve these problems. Without knowing

these rules, you will make lots of mistakes. Back to

the previous problem:

10𝑥 = 50

Theory: RULE 1: taking logs of the whole of both

sides separately allows the index to be brought

down in front of the log.

Example 1: solve for 𝑥 in

10𝑥 = 50

Solution: log the whole of both sides

log 10𝑥 = log 50

Then bring down any exponents

𝑥 log(10) = log(50)

This is read as “𝑥 × log(10) is equal to log(50)”.

log(10) and log(50) are just numbers (the values

can be found using a calculator). Treat it as you

would any other number. To isolate 𝑥 in:

5𝑥 = 15

Divide both sides by 5. It is the same for

𝑥 log(10) = log(50)

log 10𝑥 = log 50

log 𝑎𝑏 = 𝑏 log 𝑎

𝑦

𝑥

𝑦 = 3 2−𝑥 + 1

𝑦 = 2−𝑥 𝑦

𝑥

𝑦 = 1

Page 85: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

85

Divide both sides by log(10):

𝑥 = log(50)

log(10)

That is the answer.

Always give this exact answer, but you can also

give a decimal answer; put it into your calculator

and you should get 1.69897 (5𝑑. 𝑝. ).

The place where most students fail is not realising

that something has to be logged. The logarithm

changes one thing to another. If you log nothing,

then how can it be changed? When travelling in

Europe, dollars need to be exchanged for Euros,

however if you give the bank nothing, nothing will

be exchanged! However, if you give the bank

$100, then that $100 will be changed to Euros.

The same applies to logs; you have to log

something!

Example 2: solve for 𝑥

73 3 𝑥 = 4

Solution: You could divide both sides by 73 and

then apply RULE 1. But if both sides were not

divided by 73 to begin with, and instead logged:

log[ 73 3 𝑥 ] = log[4]

The square brackets on the left is 73 × 3𝑥 , so the

index of 𝑥 cannot be brought down front. It is not

73 × 3 𝑥 , but rather two separate parts being

multiplied together (see Chapter 1).

Theory: RULE 2: the log of a multiplication of two

terms is equal to the addition of the logs of the

separate terms.

log(𝑎 ∙ 𝑏) = log 𝑎 + log 𝑏

Example 2 (cont): solving for 𝑥 in

log[ 73 3 𝑥 ] = log[4]

Solution: by RULE 2, 73 and 3𝑥 can be separated

into two logs, with an addition sign between:

log 73 + log 3𝑥 = log 4

Move the log 73 onto the other side by subtracting

it from both sides to get:

log 3𝑥 = log 4 − log 73

RULE 1 can now be applied to bring 𝑥 out front on

the left side:

𝑥 log 3 = log 4 − log 73

To solve for 𝑥, divide the whole of both sides by

log 3:

𝑥 =log 4 − log 73

log 3≈ −2.6435 (4𝑑. 𝑝. )

Finally, the last rule is similar to RULE 2, but it is for

division instead of multiplication:

Theory: RULE 3: the log of a division of two terms

is equal to the subtraction of the separate logs.

log 𝑎

𝑏 = log 𝑎 − log 𝑏

Example 3: solve for 𝑥 without simplifying first

4𝑥

56= 12

Solution: log the whole of both sides:

log 4𝑥

56 = log 12

Use RULE 3 to separate the 4𝑥 and the 56 by

subtracting their logs:

log 4𝑥 − log 56 = log 12

Use RULE 1 to bring 𝑥 out front and rearrange:

𝑥 log 4 = log 12 + log 56

Use RULE 2 in reverse on the right side:

𝑥 log 4 = log 12 × 56

Rearrange and simplfy:

𝑥 =log 12 × 56

log 4 =

log 672

log 4 ≈ 4.6962 (4𝑑. 𝑝. )

Theory: all rules can be used forwards or

backwards. It all depends on what is being found.

Think about it; if RULE 2 can be used to separate

the log of a multiplication into two log additions,

then there is no reason why it cannot be used to

Page 86: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

86

bring two log additions into a single log

multiplication. Practice with your calculator to

make sure. The same applies to both RULE 1 and

RULE 3.

Note: when given:

log 672

log 4

many students think they can bring everything

inside of a single log:

log 672

log 4 = log

672

4

This is not correct! Never write this! When two

logs are divided, they cannot be simplified further.

Similarly, if two logs are multiplied, they cannot be

simplified further.

One last rule is:

Theory:

RULE 4a: log(1) = 0, which is like saying 𝑦0 = 1.

RULE 4b: log 10 = 1 (ln 𝑒 = 1; this will be

explained later in the chapter)

Remember that you can use these rules backwards

or forwards. It all depends on what is being

isolated and where it is.

Example 3: a country’s Gross Domestic Product

(𝐺𝐷𝑃) has the following form (in $billions):

𝐺𝐷𝑃 = 4.3 1.1𝑡

When will 𝐺𝐷𝑃 reach $7billion?

Plan: substitute 7 for the left side in the above

equation (as 𝐺𝐷𝑃 is set to $7b), then solve using

log rules.

Solution:

7 = 4.3 1.1𝑡

This could be solved in a number of ways, but the

following is the harder way. Try find the short-cut.

Log the whole of both sides:

log 7 = log 4.3 1.1𝑡

Separate the right side into two logs using RULE 2:

log 7 = log 4.3 + log(1.1𝑡)

Move log 4.3 to the other side, and bring 𝑡 down

using RULE 1:

log 7 − log 4.3 = 𝑡 log(1.1)

Using RULE 3, bring the left side under a single log:

log 7

4.3 = 𝑡 log(1.1)

Then divide both sides by log 1.1:

𝑡 =log

74.3

log 1.1≈ 5.113 𝑦𝑒𝑎𝑟𝑠 (3𝑑. 𝑝. )

The short-cut is to simplify first, then use RULE 1.

However, there are times where you have to use

all the rules, so learn them.

Example 4: inflation is the growth in prices. The

estimated inflation rate, relative to the base year

0, is determined by the following function:

𝑝 𝑡 = 1.01 𝑡 1.02 𝑡−1 +1

51

The government wants to find out when the price

level will double.

Plan: when the price level has doubled, 𝑝 𝑡 = 2.

Substitute this into the equation above, and use

log rules to solve for 𝑡.

Solution:

2 = 1.01 𝑡 1.02 𝑡−1 +1

51

Rearrange before applying any log rules:

2 −1

51= 1.01 𝑡 1.02 𝑡−1

Log the whole of both sides:

log 2 −1

51 = log[ 1.01 𝑡 1.02 𝑡−1]

Using RULE 2, separate the square bracket into

two separate logs with an addition sign in

between:

log 2 −1

51 = log 1.01 𝑡 + log 1.02 𝑡−1

Use RULE 1 to bring down the two exponents in

brackets:

Page 87: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

87

log 2 −1

51 = 𝑡 log 1.01 + (𝑡 − 1) log 1.02

Half crab-claw the log 1.02 into the bracket:

log 2 −1

51 = 𝑡 log 1.01 + 𝑡 log 1.02 − log 1.02

Move the log 1.02 to the other side:

log 2 −1

51 + log 1.02 = 𝑡 log 1.01 + 𝑡 log 1.02

Factorise out the 𝑡 on the right side:

log 2 −1

51 + log 1.02 = 𝑡 log 1.01 + log 1.02

Divide both sides by the blue part:

log 2 −

151

+ log 1.02

log 1.01 + log 1.02 = 𝑡

Simplify the numerator (top) with RULE 2, and the

denominator (bottom) also with RULE 2:

𝑡 =log 1.02 2 −

151

log[ 1.01 1.02 ]≈ 23.63 𝑦𝑒𝑎𝑟𝑠 (2𝑑. 𝑝. )

This seems very complex, but only use rules when

you are trying to do something specific. That is,

isolating 𝑡 requires RULE 1, separating out two

parts which are logged requires RULE 2. Always

think about what you are trying to do as well as

the final outcome, and then decide which rules are

needed.

Theory: the logarithmic function log is usually used

to the base 10. There are many bases, but the

most commonly used bases are 10 and 𝑒:

log10 𝑋

log𝑒 𝑋

When a logarithm to the base 𝑒 is used, it is called

ln (the natural logarithm). All the same log rules

apply, but it is easier to use ln when working with

exponential functions involving 𝑒. NOTE: see

Section 4.9 below for a definition of 𝑒. For now,

treat it as just another number.

Example 5: An economist has come up with an

equation that tells how many cars (in thousands)

Nissan will be producing at a given year into the

future

𝐶 𝑡 = 48𝑒0.03𝑡 + 2

The head of Nissan wants you to find out when:

a) Output will break the 80,000 cars/year level.

b) Output will double.

Plan:

a) replace 𝐶(𝑡) with 80, and solve using log rules,

but instead of log, use ln (as the base is 𝑒).

b) Find out the number of cars at 𝑡 = 0 (i.e. the

starting point), then find 𝑡 when this will

double.

Solution:

a) Replace 𝐶 𝑡 with 80 and move the 2 to the

other side:

80 − 2 = 48𝑒0.03𝑡

Take the natural logarithm (ln) of both sides:

ln 78 = ln 48𝑒0.03𝑡

Since the square brackets have two things being

multiplied, RULE 2 will need to be used:

ln 78 = ln 48 + ln 𝑒0.03𝑡

Move ln 48 to the left side, and using RULE 1, bring

the 0.03𝑡 down in front:

ln 78 − ln 48 = 0.03𝑡 ln 𝑒

Use RULE 4b, ln 𝑒 = 1, so:

ln 78 − ln 48 = 0.03𝑡

Use RULE 3 to bring the two logs on the left into

one log, and then divide both sides by 0.03:

ln

7848

0.03= t ≈ 16.18 𝑦𝑒𝑎𝑟𝑠 2𝑑. 𝑝.

Determine how many cars are produced currently:

𝐶 0 = 48𝑒0.03 0 + 2 = 50

So 50 doubled is 100:

100 = 48𝑒0.03𝑡 + 2

98 = 48𝑒0.03𝑡

Page 88: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

88

98

48= 𝑒0.03𝑡

ln 98

48 = 0.03𝑡 ln 𝑒

ln

9848

0.03= 𝑡 ≈ 23.79𝑦𝑒𝑎𝑟𝑠 (2𝑑. 𝑝. )

In a problem with 𝑒, ln is used because ln 𝑒 can be

cancelled off (as ln 𝑒 = 1). If instead, both sides

were logged, the result would be log 𝑒 and this is

NOT equal to 1. If you used log instead, you can

still get the same answer, however a lot more

work is involved. As a general rule, use ln as it

allows manipulation using all the same log rules.

Remember to be consistent; if you use a log, keep

using log in that question; if you use ln for a given

problem, keep using ln throughout that problem.

Exercises: 1. Solve for 𝑥 leaving answers in the simplest form:

𝑎) 15𝑥 = 10

𝑏) 15𝑥+1 = 10

𝑐) 8 2𝑥 = 3𝑥−1

𝑑) 25 5𝑥 = 9 1𝑥5𝑥+1

𝑒) 2𝑥16𝑥+1 = 31 3𝑥

𝑓) ln(53) − ln(25) = 𝑥 ln 5

𝑔) 3𝑥2+2𝑥 = 9 3𝑥

𝑕) 8𝑥2−2𝑥 = 323−𝑥

2. Solve for 𝑥 in terms of 𝑦 in the following: 𝑎) 𝑦 = 15𝑥 + 18

𝑏) 𝑦 = 2𝑥𝑦3𝑥

𝑐) 𝑦 = 13𝑥2𝑥+132𝑥−1

𝑑) 𝑦 = 2𝑥232

𝑒) 3𝑦 + 42 = 243𝑥+1

3. If a country’s GDP (in $billion) grows according to the following equation:

𝐺𝐷𝑃𝑡 = 700 1.2 𝑡 Determine when GDP will reach $1200𝑏𝑖𝑙𝑙𝑖𝑜𝑛.

4. The government has employed you to study the inflation within a particular city, and provide future forecasts. You determine that the historic inflation rate can be accurately estimated using:

𝑝 𝑡 = 1.035 𝑡−1 +7

207

a) Forecast the price level in 4 years. b) Determine how long (in years) it will take for

prices to double. c) Determine how long (in years) it will take

prices to triple. 5. A manufacturer of laptop computers forecasts

costs will rise according to the equation: 𝐶 𝑡 = 1.03𝑒0.02𝑡 − 0.03

a) Determine the cost level in 5 years. b) Determine when costs will double.

4.8 logarithmic graphs

A log function has the general shape:

Theory: the key aspects of this graph are the

general shape of a lower case ‘r’, and that it is

asymptotic (approaches but never touches) to a

particular 𝑥 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒.

The graph comes from the equation of the general

form:

𝑦 = 𝑎 log(𝑥 + 𝑏) + 𝑐

Where 𝑎 determines the sharpness of the ‘r’

shape, 𝑏 shifts the whole graph left or right, and 𝑐

shifts of the whole graph up or down.

As you can see above, the grey line is exactly the

same as the black line in shape, except it has been

shifted right. The red line is also exactly the same

as the black one, except it has shifted vertically.

The blue line shows how 𝑎 determines the

“sharpness” of the curve.

Sketching log graphs is not as important as

knowing the four log rules and their applications,

so it will not be covered any further.

𝑦

𝑥

𝑦 = log 𝑥

𝑦 = log 𝑥 − 4

𝑦 = 5log 𝑥

𝑦 = log 𝑥 + 4

𝑦

𝑥

Page 89: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

89

Exercises: 1. Match the graphs to the equations.

𝑎) 𝑦 = 4 log(𝑥 − 2)

𝑏) 𝑦 = log(𝑥 − 4)

𝑐) 𝑦 = log 𝑥 + 4

𝑑) 𝑦 = 2 log(𝑥)

2. Sketch the following functions on the same set of axes (make sure they are correct relative to each other):

𝑎) 𝑦 = log(𝑥) − 3

𝑏) 𝑦 = log(𝑥 + 2) + 2

𝑐) 𝑦 = 3 log 𝑥

𝑑) 𝑦 = 2.5 log(𝑥) + 1

4.9 the natural number 𝒆

This section is all about a special number. This

number is called 𝑒 and is approximately equal to

2.7183 (4d.p.). It is like the number pi (𝜋), which is

used for circles, but 𝑒 is used to describe things

that are continuous (i.e. things that happen all the

time).

For example, a bank offering continuous

compounding of any savings will have to use the

number 𝑒, as say $1000 in an account must be

compounded all the time.

That is one situation of growth, but 𝑒 works just as

well in decay; business examples of continuous

decay are not as common as growth and usually

very complex.

Theory: any time 𝑒 is used, the variable in question

must be changing continuously. In very large

populations, 𝑒 can be a good approximation of

growth and decay.

A simple example will demonstrate this theory: if a

colony of ants doubles every year, which of the

following is occurring:

1. The population of the colony is constant

throughout the year, and then on December

31st, it suddenly doubles.

2. The population of the colony constantly

increases throughout the year, and at

December 31st, it just reaches the doubling

point.

The colony of ants obviously grows throughout the

year, and it is such a large colony that we can

assume that it grows continuously. It is in this sort

of situation where the number 𝑒 is used.

Theory: the growth of anything continuous has the

general form:

𝐴𝑡 = 𝐴0𝑒𝑟𝑡

In words; the amount available at some time 𝑡 in

the future 𝐴𝑡 is equal to the initial amount (𝐴0)

multiplied by the continuous growth base (𝑒) to

the power of the rate of growth per time period

multiplied by the number of time periods (𝑟𝑡).

This equation is very similar to the exponential

growth rate equation.

Example 1: the 𝐺𝐷𝑃 of England is estimated to be

growing at 2.3% per year. Currently, the 𝐺𝐷𝑃 is

£4trillion. Estimate the 𝐺𝐷𝑃 in 10 years time.

Plan: 𝐺𝐷𝑃 can be assumed to grow continuously

as the citizens of England are constantly earning

money throughout the year, so the 𝑒 growth

equation can be used. Substitute the growth rate,

time and initial amount into:

𝑦

𝑥

Page 90: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

90

𝐴𝑡 = 𝐴0𝑒𝑟 𝑡

then solve for 𝐴𝑡 , which is the 𝐺𝐷𝑃 in ten years.

Solution: replace the known variables in the

exponential growth rate equation:

𝐴10 = 4𝑒 0.023 10

The trillion has been left out, but will be brought

back at the end. Also, 0.023 has been used instead

of 2.3%. The reason is that for use in most

equations, the growth rate must be in decimal

form, not percentage form.

𝐴10 = 4𝑒0.23

𝐴10 = £5.03 𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑙𝑙𝑖𝑜𝑛 (2. 𝑑. 𝑝. )

Example 2: Woolworths, a large company, has a

growth in customers across it’s 400 stores in

Australia at a rate of 2.6% per year. If they

currently have 3.67million customers,

approximately how many years will it take for the

customer base to grow to 5million?

Plan: since 400 stores is a large number of stores,

and the growth of a population is accurately

approximated by continuous growth, the 𝑒 growth

formula can be used:

𝐴𝑡 = 𝐴0𝑒𝑟 𝑡

Substitute in all known information, then

rearrange to solve for 𝑡.

Solution: 𝐴0 = 3.67, 𝑟 = 0.026 and 𝐴𝑡 = 5, so the

equation is:

5 = 3.67𝑒0.026𝑡

Divide both sides by 3.67:

5

3.67= 𝑒0.026𝑡

Take the natural log (ln) of the whole of both

sides:

ln 5

3.67 = ln 𝑒0.026𝑡

ln 5

3.67 = 0.026𝑡

𝑡 =ln

53.67

0.026≈ 11.89𝑦𝑒𝑎𝑟𝑠 2𝑑. 𝑝.

Exercises: 1. Solve for 𝑥 in the following:

𝑎) 15 = 𝑒𝑥 + 1

𝑏) 15 = 𝑒𝑥+1

𝑐) 170 = 12𝑒0.1+𝑥

𝑑) 13 = 6.5𝑒0.03𝑥

𝑒) 21 = 10.5𝑒0.027𝑥 − 1

2. If 𝐺𝐷𝑃 of Fiji grows at a rate of 4.1%p.a. and is currently $50𝑏𝑖𝑙𝑙𝑖𝑜𝑛, determine:

a) The GDP in 5 years. b) How long it takes for the GDP to double. c) How long it takes for the GDP to triple.

3. A dishonest bank lends you $5000 to purchase a car, at a rate of 4%p.a. The fine-print stated that the amount is compounded every second. Determine the amount you will have to pay back in 3 years.

4. An investment portfolio is estimated to grow continuously for 7 years at 6.5% p.a. and then at 8.3% p.a. every year after that. If the initial investment is $1,000, determine: a) when the investment will double in value. b) how many years until the portfolio reaches a

value of $5,000. c) The value of the portfolio after 8 years, 312

days.

4.10 the hyperbolic function

Despite hyperbolic functions not being very

common, the basics are still important. You have

probably seen the function:

𝑦 = 1

𝑥

This is the simplest hyperbola. What makes

hyperbolas special is that they have two

asymptotes. Remember that an asymptote is a line

to which the function approaches but never

reaches. The following is the graph of this simplest

hyperbola:

𝑦

𝑥

𝑦 =1

𝑥

Page 91: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

91

In this case, the hyperbola (the two blue lines

constitute a single function) has two asymptotes;

the 𝑥 − 𝑎𝑥𝑖𝑠 and the 𝑦 − 𝑎𝑥𝑖𝑠. For the 𝑦 − 𝑎𝑥𝑖𝑠

asymptote, the closer the 𝑥 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒𝑠 get to zero

(trace it with your fingers by going towards the

origin), the greater the value of the function on the

𝑦 − 𝑎𝑥𝑖𝑠 becomes (but it never touches the

𝑦 − 𝑎𝑥𝑖𝑠). Similarly, the second asymptote is the

𝑥 − 𝑎𝑥𝑖𝑠 and the greater the 𝑥 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒𝑠 become

(both in a positive or negative direction) the closer

the function gets to the 𝑥 − 𝑎𝑥𝑖𝑠, but never

touches it.

Theory: the general form of a hyperbola is:

𝑦 = 𝑑

𝑎𝑥 + 𝑏+ c

The denominator (𝑎 and 𝑏) determines the

locations of the vertical asymptote. That is,

setting the whole denominator (𝑎𝑥 + 𝑏) equal

to zero and solving for 𝑥 is how the vertical

asymptote is found.

The value of 𝑐 determines the location of the

horizontal asymptote.

The value of 𝑑 determines how close the curve

gets to the intersection of the two asymptotes.

To make this last point clear, the following graph

shows the same hyperbolic function, with different

values of 𝑑.

The larger the value of 𝑑 (red), the closer to the

intersection of the asymptotes the graph will lie.

The smaller 𝑑 is (blue), the further from the

intersection of the asymptotes the graph will lie.

Example 1: sketch the following function

𝑦 = 1

2𝑥 + 3+ 5

Plan: for the vertical asymptote, set the

denominator equal to zero and solve for 𝑥. The

horizontal asymptote is the number added on to

the fraction.

Solution: for the vertical asymptote:

2𝑥 + 3 = 0

2𝑥 = −3

𝑥 = −1.5

For the horizontal asymptote, 𝑦 = 5. Lightly draw

the vertical and horizontal asymptotes, then draw

in the general shape of a hyperbola.

The dotted vertical line crosses the 𝑥 − 𝑎𝑥𝑖𝑠 at

𝑥 = −1.5, and the horizontal line 𝑐 = 5.

Exercises:

1. Match the following graphs to the equations:

𝑦 =2

2𝑥 + 4 𝑦 = −5 −

1

−6 + 𝑥

𝑦

𝑥

𝑦

𝑥

𝑦 = 5

𝑥 = −1.5

𝑦 =1

2𝑥 + 3+ 5

𝑦 =3

𝑥

𝑦 =1

𝑥

𝑦

𝑥

Page 92: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

92

𝑦 =3

3𝑥 − 9+ 3 𝑦 = 3 +

3

−3 + 𝑥

2. Sketch the following functions:

𝑎) 𝑦 =1

2𝑥− 1

𝑏) 𝑦 =2

𝑥 − 1+ 2

𝑐) 𝑦 =1

𝑥

𝑑) 𝑦 = −1

𝑥

4.11 applications

Economic theory: 𝐺𝐷𝑃 per capita is a measure of

the mean income per person in a particular

country. It is defined as:

𝐺𝐷𝑃 𝑝𝑒𝑟 𝑐𝑎𝑝𝑖𝑡𝑎 =𝐺𝐷𝑃

𝑝𝑜𝑝𝑢𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛

Example 1: a developing country like Papua New

Guinea (PNG) has a 𝐺𝐷𝑃 of 𝑈𝑆$60billion with a

growth of 4% per year. PNG has a population of

7million, which grows at 1.9%. When will 𝐺𝐷𝑃 per

capita reach 𝑈𝑆$15,000? Answer in years and

days.

Plan: 𝐺𝐷𝑃 and populations are both very large so

can be assumed to grow at an exponential rate:

𝐴𝑡 = 𝐴0𝑒𝑟 𝑡

Two equations are needed; one for 𝐺𝐷𝑃 growth

and one for population growth, as both grow at

different rates. These are then combined to get

𝐺𝐷𝑃 per capita.

Solution: the growth rate for 𝐺𝐷𝑃 is:

𝐺𝐷𝑃𝑡 = 𝐺𝐷𝑃0𝑒𝑟1𝑡

Substitute what is known:

𝐺𝐷𝑃𝑡 = 60 𝑏𝑖𝑙𝑙𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑒0.04𝑡

The population growth rate is:

𝑃𝑜𝑝𝑡 = 𝑃𝑜𝑝0𝑒𝑟2𝑡

𝑃𝑜𝑝𝑡 = 26 𝑚𝑖𝑙𝑙𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑒0.019𝑡

Here, 𝑟1and 𝑟2 have been used as 𝐺𝐷𝑃 and

population grow at different rates. Combining the

two formulas, 𝐺𝐷𝑃 per capita is:

𝐺𝐷𝑃 𝑝𝑒𝑟 𝑐𝑎𝑝𝑖𝑡𝑎 =𝐺𝐷𝑃𝑡

𝑃𝑜𝑝𝑡

𝐺𝐷𝑃 𝑝𝑒𝑟 𝑐𝑎𝑝𝑖𝑡𝑎 =60 𝑏𝑖𝑙𝑙𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑒0.04𝑡

26 𝑚𝑖𝑙𝑙𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑒0.019𝑡

Simplify the 60billion/26million

(billion/million=thousand):

𝐺𝐷𝑃 𝑝𝑒𝑟 𝑐𝑎𝑝𝑖𝑡𝑎 =60,000 𝑒0.04𝑡

26𝑒0.019𝑡

Simplify further using index rules (Chapter 1):

𝐺𝐷𝑃 𝑝𝑒𝑟 𝑐𝑎𝑝𝑖𝑡𝑎 =60,000 𝑒0.04𝑡−0.019𝑡

26

=60,000 𝑒0.21𝑡

26

This is the 𝐺𝐷𝑃 per capita function, but what is

required is when 𝐺𝐷𝑃 per capita will reach

𝑈𝑆$15,000. Set 𝐺𝐷𝑃 per capita to 15,000, and

solve:

15,000 =60,000 𝑒0.21𝑡

26

390,000

60,000= 𝑒0.21𝑡

6.5 = 𝑒0.21𝑡

Take logs of the whole of both sides:

ln 6.5 = ln(𝑒0.21𝑡)

Simplify:

ln 6.5 = 0.21𝑡 ln 𝑒

Remember ln 𝑒 = 1:

𝑡 =ln 6.5

0.21 ≈ 8.91𝑦𝑒𝑎𝑟 (2𝑑. 𝑝. )

Finally, to get the solution in years and days, take

the decimal (i.e. 0.91) and multiply it by the

number of days in a year (assume 365) to get

𝑡 = 8 𝑦𝑒𝑎𝑟𝑠, 333 𝑑𝑎𝑦𝑠 (to the nearest day).

Example 2: a company that takes care of its

employees spends 𝑆 dollars per year on the well-

Page 93: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

93

being of each employee, where 𝑆 is related to

profits (in millions of dollars), by the function:

𝑆 = 2500 1 − 𝑒−0.1𝜋

Determine:

a) The spending on each employee when profits

are $5million.

b) The profit level when spending on each

employee will double from that in part a).

c) The profit level when spending on each

employee is $2,000.

Plan:

a) Set 𝜋 to 5 and solve for 𝑆.

b) Multiply the 𝑆 from a), then substitute it in for

𝑆 in the equation; solve for 𝜋.

c) Set 𝑆 = 2,000 and solve for 𝜋.

Solution:

a) Set 𝜋 to 5:

𝑆 = 2500 1 − 𝑒−0.1 5

= 2500 1 − 𝑒−0.5 ≈ 983.67 2𝑑. 𝑝.

b) Multiply the exact value determined in a) by 2:

2 × 2500 1 − 𝑒−0.5 = 5000 1 − 𝑒−0.5

Set this equal to the original equation:

5000 1 − 𝑒−0.5 = 2500 1 − 𝑒−0.1𝜋

Divide both sides by 2500:

2 1 − 𝑒−0.5 = 1 − 𝑒−0.1𝜋

Rearrange to isolate 𝜋:

𝑒−0.1𝜋 = 1 − 2 1 − 𝑒−0.5

Take the natural log of the whole of both sides:

ln 𝑒−0.1𝜋 = ln 1 − 2 1 − 𝑒−0.5

−0.1𝜋 = ln 1 − 2 1 − 𝑒−0.5

𝜋 =ln 1 − 2 1 − 𝑒−0.5

−0.1≈ 15.462million

c) Set 𝑆 = 2000 and solve:

2000 = 2500 1 − 𝑒−0.1𝜋

4

5= 1 − 𝑒−0.1𝜋

𝑒−0.1𝜋 = 0.2

ln 𝑒−0.1𝜋 = ln 0.2

−0.1𝜋 = ln 0.2

𝜋 =ln 0.2

−0.1≈ 16.094million

Exercises: 1. Spain’s economy has a 𝐺𝐷𝑃 approximating

€800billion and grows at approximately 3.7%p.a. If the population of Spain is currently 40million, and is growing at 0.7%p.a., determine: a) When the population will reach 50𝑚𝑖𝑙𝑙𝑖𝑜𝑛. b) The current GDP per capita. c) The GDP per capita in 5 years time. d) When the GDP per capita will reach €30,000.

2. A company invests 𝑆 dollars in the health of each of its employees according to the equation:

𝑆 = 750 1 − 𝑒−0.08𝜋 Where 𝜋 is profit in millions of dollars. Determine: a) The amount spent on each individual if the

company has a profit of $7million. b) The total amount spent on healthcare when

profits are $10million and there are 19 employees.

c) The profit level when the amount spent on each employee is double that in part a).

d) The number of employees when profits are $15million and total spending on healthcare is $15,200.

chapter four summary

A function is defined as having only one 𝑦 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒 for every 𝑥 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒. A curve is a function if all vertical lines cross the curve only once.

The general form of a quadratic is: 𝑦 = 𝑎𝑥2 + 𝑏𝑥 + 𝑐 The value of 𝑎 determines the sharpness of the quadratic. The value of 𝑐 in the quadratic equation determines the vertical shift of the graph. Changing the value of 𝑏 in the general quadratic form shifts the graph both horizontally and vertically.

A positive value of 𝑎 will result in quadratics with a shape of a ‘smiley’ face, whereas when the value of 𝑎 is negative, the shape becomes inverted; a ‘sad’ face.

The Quadratic Formula is:

𝑥 − 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑝𝑡 𝑠 =−𝑏 ± 𝑏2 − 4𝑎𝑐

2𝑎

The 𝑥 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒 of the turning point (TP), if found in the Quadratic Formula by evaluating everything not under the square root sign. Then to find the 𝑦 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒 of the turning point, substitute this 𝑥 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒 into the original function. 𝑏2 − 4𝑎𝑐 determines the number of solutions:

Page 94: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

94

𝑏2 − 4𝑎𝑐 > 0 → two solutions

𝑏2 − 4𝑎𝑐 = 0 → one solution

𝑏2 − 4𝑎𝑐 < 0 → no solutions

The cubic function is the name of a function where the highest power of 𝑥 is 3. The general form of a cubic is: 𝑦 = 𝑎𝑥3 + 𝑏𝑥2 + 𝑐𝑥 + 𝑑 A cubic can cross the 𝑥 − 𝑎𝑥𝑖𝑠 once, twice or three times. When 𝑎 is positive, the ends of the graph extend to the top right and bottom left ↙↗ , but when 𝑎 is negative, the ends of the graph extend to the top left and bottom right ↖↘ .

An exponential function has the general form: 𝑦 = 𝑏(𝑎𝑥) + 𝑐

𝑎 is a number that determines the growth rate

𝑏 is the initial amount.

𝑐 a constant that shifts the graph up or down To sketch an exponential function, determine:

The 𝑦 − 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑝𝑡 is found by setting all 𝑥’s equal to zero.

The 𝑦 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒 of the asymptote is 𝑐. The general form of the decay function is:

𝑦 = 𝑏(𝑎−𝑥) + 𝑐

The definition of a logarithm is: For 𝑎𝑏 = 𝑐

𝑏 =log 𝑐

log 𝑎= log𝑎 𝑐

Where 𝑏 is called the index, and 𝑎 is called the base.

LOG RULE 1 log 𝑎𝑏 = 𝑏 log 𝑎 LOG RULE 2: log(𝑎 ∙ 𝑏) = log 𝑎 + log 𝑏

LOG RULE 3: log 𝑎

𝑏 = log 𝑎 − log 𝑏

LOG RULE 4a: log(1) = 0 LOG RULE 4b: log 10 = 1 (ln 𝑒 = 1) All these rules can be used forwards or backwards. The logarithmic graph has the general form: 𝑦 = 𝑎 log(𝑥 + 𝑏) + 𝑐 Where 𝑎 determines the sharpness of the “r” shape, 𝑏 the shifting of the whole graph left or right, and 𝑐 the shifting of the whole graph up or down.

Any time the number 𝑒 is used, the variable in question must be changing continuously. The growth of anything continuous has the general form: 𝐴𝑡 = 𝐴0𝑒𝑟 𝑡

The general form of a hyperbola is:

𝑦 = 𝑑

𝑎𝑥 + 𝑏+ c

Setting the whole denominator (𝑎𝑥 + 𝑏) equal to zero and solving for 𝑥 is how the vertical asymptote is found.

The value of 𝑐 determines the location of the horizontal asymptote.

The value of 𝑑 determines how close the curve gets to the intersection of the two asymptotes.

𝐺𝐷𝑃 per capita is a measure of the mean income per person in a particular country. It is defined as:

𝐺𝐷𝑃 𝑝𝑒𝑟 𝑐𝑎𝑝𝑖𝑡𝑎 =𝐺𝐷𝑃

𝑝𝑜𝑝𝑢𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛

chapter four questions

1. Determine if the following curves are functions:

2. Determine the values of 𝑎, 𝑏 and 𝑐 for the following

quadratics: 𝑎) 𝑦 = 3 − 4𝑥 − 5𝑥2 𝑏) 𝑦 = 3 − 𝑥 𝑥 + 2

𝑐) 𝑦

𝑥 + 2= 𝑥 − 2

𝑑) 𝑦 − 1

𝑥 − 3= 𝑥 + 1

3. Match the following quadratics to the functions.

𝑦 = 𝑥2 − 6𝑥 𝑦 = −3𝑥2 + 27𝑥 − 54

𝑦 = 𝑥2 − 25𝑥 + 150 𝑦 = −𝑥2 + 18𝑥 − 45 4. Find the roots of the following quadratics:

𝑎) 𝑦 = 𝑥2 + 3𝑥 − 6 𝑏) 𝑦 = 4𝑥2 − 9 𝑐) 𝑦 = 𝑥 − 1 𝑥 + 3 𝑑) 𝑦 = 𝑥 + 4 2 𝑒) 𝑦 = 3𝑥 − 6 2 − 9 𝑓) 𝑦 = 𝑥2 − 2𝑥 + 12

𝑔) 𝑦 + 5

𝑥 − 3= 𝑥 + 4

5. Sketch the following quadratics: 𝑎) 𝑦 = 𝑥2 − 3𝑥 − 10 𝑏) 𝑦 = 𝑥2 − 3𝑥 − 28 𝑐) 𝑦 = 𝑥2 + 11𝑥 + 30 𝑑) 𝑦 = 𝑥 − 3 2 𝑒) 𝑦 = −4 𝑥 − 5 2 𝑓) 𝑦 = 𝑥2 − 4𝑥 − 13

𝑔) 𝑦 + 6

𝑥 − 3= 𝑥 + 4

𝑥

𝑦

𝑥

𝑦

𝐴

𝐵

𝐶

𝐷

𝐸

Page 95: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

95

𝑕) 𝑦 𝑥 − 1 −1 =2

𝑥 + 2 −1

6. Determine the number of solutions for: 𝑎) 𝑦 = 𝑥2 + 5𝑥 + 6 𝑏) 𝑦 = −𝑥2 − 6𝑥 + 16 𝑐) 𝑦 = 4𝑥2 − 3𝑥 + 1 𝑑) 𝑦 = 𝑥2 − 18 𝑒) 𝑦 = 14𝑥2 − 2𝑥 − 2 𝑓) 𝑦 = 𝑥2 + 6𝑥 + 9

7. Match the following functions to their equations:

𝑦 = −3𝑥3 − 3 𝑦 = 2𝑥3 − 3

𝑦 = −𝑥3 + 5𝑥2 + 48𝑥 − 252 𝑦 = 𝑥3 + 12𝑥2 + 11𝑥 − 168

8. Match the following exponential functions to their equations:

𝑦 = 1.5𝑥 𝑦 = 3 2𝑥 𝑦 = 2−𝑥 + 2

9. Sketch the following exponential functions on the same set of axes. 𝑎) 𝑦 = 2𝑥 𝑏) 𝑦 = 3𝑥 + 2 𝑐) 𝑦 = 4 2𝑥 𝑑) 𝑦 = 3 3−𝑥 − 1

10. Match the following logarithmic functions to their equations:

𝑦 = 4 log 𝑥 𝑦 = log 𝑥2 𝑦 = 2 log 𝑥 − 2 + 5

11. Match the following to their equations:

𝑦 = −1

𝑥 − 2− 4 𝑦 =

1

𝑥 + 4− 6 𝑦 =

2

𝑥 − 5+ 5

12. Solve for 𝑥 in the following logarithmic functions: 𝑎) 12 = log 4𝑥 𝑏) − 13 = 2 log 3𝑥 𝑐) 7 = log 2𝑥+3 𝑑) log 2𝑥 = 4𝑥 + 2 𝑒) log 2𝑥−4 = 0 𝑓) 18 = 4 ln 2𝑥 𝑔) − log 8𝑥+1 = 182𝑥 𝑕) 7 − log 2𝑥 = 𝑥 − 1 𝑖) 25 − ln 3 = − ln 6𝑥−1

13. Solve for 𝑥 in the following exponential functions: 𝑎) 15 = 2𝑥 𝑏) 18 = 4 3𝑥

𝑐) 9 − 23 = 4𝑥−1 𝑑) 34𝑥 9 = 3𝑥2

𝑒) 2𝑥−1 = 32−3𝑥 𝑓) 4 2𝑥−3 = 2𝑥2

𝑔) 14 2𝑥−3 = 213𝑥−3 14. The 𝐺𝐷𝑃 of Indonesia is approximately

𝑈𝑆$550billion, and is growing at 4.1% p.a. If the population is currently 120million, and is growing at 1.1% p.a. Determine: a) When the population will reach 140million. b) The 𝐺𝐷𝑃 in 10 years time. c) When 𝐺𝐷𝑃 will reach $1trillion. d) When 𝐺𝐷𝑃 per capita will reach 𝑈𝑆$10,000.

15. The price level of an economy is accurately estimated by the function:

𝑝 𝑡 = 1.03 𝑡 1.05 𝑡−1 +1

21

Determine: a) The price level in five years time. b) When the price level will reach 1.5 times that

of the current level. c) When the price level will double.

16. A company invests 𝑟 dollars in the relaxation of each of its employees, according to the amount of profit (in millions) generated by the firm:

𝑟 = 1200 1 − 𝑒−0.1𝜋 Determine: a) The amount spent on each employee when

profits are $5million. b) The total amount spent on relaxation when

profits are $10million, and there are 20 employees.

c) The profit level when spending on each employee is $1000.

d) The number of employees when profits are $12million, and total spending on relaxation is about$10,900.

𝑦

𝑥

𝑦

𝑥

𝑦

𝑥

𝑦

𝑥

Page 96: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

96

Chapter 5

Single Variable

Differentiation Finding the slope of curves at any point along the function

5.1 What is Differentiation? 97

5.2 Differentiation by First Principles 99

5.3 Differentiation Rules: Power Rule 103

5.4 Differentiation Rules: Chain Rule 104

5.5 Differentiation Rules: Product Rule 105

5.6 Differentiation Rules: Quotient Rule 107

5.7 Differentiation Rules: 𝑒 Rule 109

5.8 Differentiation Rules: ln Rule 110

5.9 The Second Derivative 111

5.10 The Gradient Function Graph 112

5.11 Simple Applications 113

Chapter Five Summary 114

Chapter Five Questions 115

Page 97: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

97

5.1 what is differentiation?

Engineers, economists, financial analysts,

managers and most professionals use

differentiation in everyday tasks.

Theory: differentiation is finding the rate that one

thing changes when something else is changed.

Typically, it is the rate of change of the 𝑦 − 𝑎𝑥𝑖𝑠

when there is a change in the 𝑥 − 𝑎𝑥𝑖𝑠.

A revenue function is determined by how much

output is sold. Differentiation gives the rate of

change of revenue for changes in output (or the

marginal revenue; how much extra revenue will

be obtained from selling an extra unit of

output).

A profit function is also determined by the

quantity of goods sold. Differentiating this will

give the rate of change of profit as output

changes (or marginal profit).

Theory: the rate of change of a function is found by

finding the slope of a curve at a given point. The

slope of a curve at a given point is found by

determining the slope of a line just touching that

point (i.e. tangent to that point).

Four lines have been drawn tangent to the blue

function:

The gradient at a point along a curve gives

information about the function. If the slope is

positive, the function is increasing (e.g. points 𝐴

and 𝐷). This means the rate of change of 𝑦 as 𝑥

changes is positive (from the slope of the tangent

line).

If the slope is negative, it means the function is

decreasing (e.g. point 𝐵). Interpreting this, the rate

of change of 𝑦, as 𝑥 changes, is negative (as the

point has a negative gradient).

Theory: the gradient of a line tangent to a given

point is the rate of change of 𝑦 for changes in 𝑥.

The following is a profit function:

At point 𝐸, the tangency has a positive gradient, so

the rate of change of profit (𝑦 − 𝑎𝑥𝑖𝑠) for changes

in output (𝑥 − 𝑎𝑥𝑖𝑠) is positive. If output is

increased from 𝑄1, profits will also increase beyond

𝜋1. On the other hand, for point 𝐹, the tangency

has a negative gradient meaning the rate of change

of profit for changes in output is negative; as

output increases beyond 𝑄2, profit falls below 𝜋2.

Theory: The gradient of a given point along a curve

is often called the marginal value.

𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑖𝑒𝑛𝑡 = 𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑐𝑕𝑎𝑛𝑔𝑒 = 𝑚𝑎𝑟𝑔𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒

For the profit function, the gradient would be called

marginal profit, because the slope determines the

extra profit if output were to increase. Marginal

means “at the margin”, or “extra”.

Theory: Differentiation is the process of finding the

gradient at all points along a function.

𝐸

𝜋

𝑄

𝐹

𝜋1

𝜋2

𝑄1 𝑄2

𝐴

𝐵

𝐶

𝐷

𝑦

𝑥

Page 98: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

98

The gradient function is a function that gives the

gradient of the original function at all the points

along the original function.

For the functions above, the gradient (or slope) of

the tangent changes when moving along the

𝑥 − 𝑎𝑥𝑖𝑠. Differentiation provides a way of finding

the gradients of any given point along a curve.

The following shows a simple use of gradients.

Example 1: if output is currently 𝑄 = 50, and the

profit function is

𝜋 𝑄 = −𝑄2 + 110𝑄 − 1000

As a manager, you would like to know if increasing

output will increase profits.

Plan: if the rate of change of profit (marginal profit)

is positive, then additional output will generate

more profit. If the rate of change of profit (marginal

profit) is negative, additional output will reduce

profits.

Production is to increase from 𝑄 = 50 to 𝑄 = 51.

Solution: The profit function is a “sad” quadratic (as

𝑎 < 0), meaning there is a maximum. If current

output is to the left of the maximum, an increase of

one unit will increase profits (as the marginal profit

is positive). If current output is to the right of the

maximum, an extra unit will reduce profits

(negative marginal profit). Look at points 𝐸 and 𝐹

of the last graph.

Find the turning point (which is a maximum) using

part of the quadratic formula:

𝑥 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑇𝑃 = −𝑏

2𝑎= −

110

−2=

110

2= 55

Since 𝑄 = 50 is to the left of the maximum, the

slope at 𝑄 = 50 must be positive, so the marginal

profit is positive. This means that if output were to

increase to 𝑄 = 51, total profits will increase.

Find the profit at 𝑄 = 50 and at 𝑄 = 51 to make

sure of this result:

𝜋 50 = − 50 2 + 110 50 − 1000

= 2000

𝜋 51 = −(51)2 + 110(51) − 1000

= 2009

Thus profits will increase if output is increased by

one unit.

The actual value of the gradient at 𝑄 = 50 was not

determined, but from working with quadratics, it

was known that anything to the left of the

maximum must have a positive gradient. Most of

the time, however, it will not be so simple.

The rest of this chapter is devoted to finding the

gradient function mathematically. However,

before this can be done, the gradient function

must be denoted by something that distinguishes

it from the original function.

Theory: mathematicians denote the derivative

(gradient) function in a number of ways:

𝑦 ′ is pronounced “𝑦 prime”

𝑑𝑦

𝑑𝑥 is pronounced “dee y dee x”. For a small

change in 𝑥 (the 𝑑𝑥), 𝑦 will change by a certain

small amount (𝑑𝑦). The 𝑑 means very small.

Exercises: 1. Determine if the following points have a positive or

negative gradient

2. Using your knowledge of quadratics and turning

points, for the function 𝑦 − 7 − 3𝑥 = −𝑥2

Determine if the following points have a positive or negative gradient:

𝑥 = −1, 𝑥 = 2, 𝑥 = 6 3. Order the following points from lowest (i.e. most

negative) to highest (i.e. most positive):

𝑦

𝑥

𝐴

𝐵 𝐶

𝐷

𝐸 𝐹

𝐺

𝐻

Page 99: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

99

Hint: use a ruler and draw in the tangencies.

5.2 differentiation by first principles

Differentiation is simply finding the gradient

function of an original function. The following is

the long method, but it is necessary that you

understand it.

Intro example 1: beginning with the function

𝑓 𝑥 = 4 𝑥 − 2 2 + 2

for which the gradient at 𝑥 = 3 is to be found. On

the graph, draw a line through this point and

another point on the curve, say 1 unit up from 3

(i.e. 𝑥 = 4):

This is called a rough approximation of the

gradient at 𝑥 = 3. It is just an approximation, as it

is obvious that the gradient of this line (red) and

the tangent (blue) line are not the same. Ignore

this for the time being and determine the gradient

of this red line.

From Chapter 2, to find the gradient of a line, two

points are needed (i.e. two coordinates). The first

𝑥 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒 is 𝑥 = 3, but for a coordinate we also

need a 𝑦 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒. To find the 𝑦 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒,

substitute 𝑥 = 3 into the original function:

𝑓 𝑥 = 4 𝑥 − 2 2 + 2

𝑓(3) = 4 3 − 2 2 + 2

𝑓 3 = 4 1 2 + 2 = 6

The first coordinate is (3,6).

The other point on the red line is 1 unit above 3,

so 𝑥 = 4. Again, the 𝑦 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒 is found using the

original function:

𝑓 𝑥 = 4 𝑥 − 2 2 + 2

𝑓(4) = 4 4 − 2 2 + 2

𝑓 4 = 4 2 2 + 2 = 18

which gives the second coordinate (4,18).

Plot these two points on a set of axes (previous

graph), then find the gradient:

𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑖𝑒𝑛𝑡 =𝑟𝑖𝑠𝑒

𝑟𝑢𝑛=

𝑦2 − 𝑦1

𝑥2 − 𝑥1=

18 − 6

4 − 3=

12

1= 12

Thus 12 is the gradient of the red line. However,

this red line is not a good approximation to the

blue line. To get a better approximation, we look

back to the start of this problem and instead of

having a point 1 unit up from 3, a point a little

closer to 𝑥 = 3 is used, say 0.5 units up from 3 (i.e.

the other 𝑥 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒 is 3.5):

This red line is a closer approximation to the actual

gradient than the black dotted line (which was the

first approximation). Despite this new

approximation not being perfect, the gradient is

still found because this approximation is better.

Two coordinates are still needed: one is still the

point (3,6). The other coordinate has the

𝑦

𝑥 3 4 3.5

𝑦

𝑥 3 4

𝑦

𝑥

𝐴

𝐵

𝐸

𝐹

𝐺

𝐶 𝐷

Page 100: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

100

𝑥 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒 as 𝑥 = 3.5. The 𝑦 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒 comes from

the original function:

𝑓 𝑥 = 4 𝑥 − 2 2 + 2

𝑓(3.5) = 4 3.5 − 2 2 + 2

𝑓 3.5 = 4 1.5 2 + 2 = 11

Plot the two points on a set of axes (previous

graph), then finding the gradient of the connecting

line:

𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑖𝑒𝑛𝑡 =𝑟𝑖𝑠𝑒

𝑟𝑢𝑛=

𝑦2 − 𝑦1

𝑥2 − 𝑥1=

11 − 6

3.5 − 3

𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑖𝑒𝑛𝑡 =5

0.5= 10

This is a closer approximation to the actual

gradient at 𝑥 = 3, but it is still not the actual

gradient. How would we get a better

approximation? Instead of adding 0.5 to 3,

something smaller could be added, like 0.01, or

0.001 etc. This will not be done mathematically,

but the graph below shows what is meant:

As points closer and closer to 𝑥 = 3 are chosen as

the “other coordinate”, the approximations

become better and better (red arrow). So using

very small additions to 𝑥 = 3 gives approximations

very close to the tangent at 𝑥 = 3 (blue line).

Theory: to mathematically find an approximation

to the tangent at a point 𝑥 (this was 3 in the above

example), a point is chosen a very small distance

𝑠 above this 𝑥 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒. The other point will have

an 𝑥 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒 of 𝑥 + 𝑠 (i.e. the point in question

plus a very small amount). In the above example, 𝑠

was initially 1, then 0.5. Thus the two points are:

𝑥1 = 𝑥 (this is the base point)

𝑥2 = 𝑥 + 𝑠 (an 𝑥 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒 a little more than 𝑥1)

The 𝑦 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒𝑠 of these two 𝑥 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒𝑠 are

found using the original function 𝑓 𝑥 .

Since these are not numbers but rather letters, the

same process is done as if they were numbers.

For the first point 𝑥1, the function will be

𝑓(𝑥1), which is simply 𝑓(𝑥) ; the function that

is given. The coordinate is then 𝑥, 𝑓 𝑥 .

For the second point 𝑥2 = 𝑥 + 𝑠, the function

will be 𝑓 𝑥2 = 𝑓(𝑥 + 𝑠). The coordinate is

then 𝑥 + 𝑠, 𝑓 𝑥 + 𝑠 .

Having two coordinates allows the gradient of this

line to be found using rise/run:

𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑖𝑒𝑛𝑡 =𝑟𝑖𝑠𝑒

𝑟𝑢𝑛=

𝑦2 − 𝑦1

𝑥2 − 𝑥1

=𝑓 𝑥 + 𝑠 − 𝑓 𝑥

𝑥 + 𝑠 − 𝑥

=𝑓 𝑥 + 𝑠 − 𝑓(𝑥)

𝑠

This generalises what was done graphically.

However, remember that the gradient of the line is

not a good approximation of the actual gradient of

a point if the value of 𝑠 is too large. That is why

mathematicians invented something called a limit.

Theory: the limit as “𝑠 goes to zero”: lim𝑠→0

The idea is to get 𝑠 to “go to” zero (but not be

zero) because when 𝑠 is very small the

approximation becomes better and better.

Differentiation by First Principles is the formula:

𝑓 ′ = lim𝑠→0

𝑓 𝑥 + 𝑠 − 𝑓 𝑥

𝑠

Example 1: Find the gradient function of

𝑦 = 5𝑥 + 2

Plan: use the first principles formula;

𝑦

𝑥 4 3.5 3.75 3.25 3

Page 101: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

101

𝑓 ′ = lim𝑠→0

𝑓 𝑥 + 𝑠 − 𝑓 𝑥

𝑠

Solution: the trick with this formula is that only the

𝑓(𝑥 + 𝑠) part ever needs to be found. To find this,

replace every 𝑥 in the original function with

(𝑥 + 𝑠) in brackets:

The original function is

𝑓(𝑥) = 5𝑥 + 2

Replace every 𝑥 with 𝑥 + 𝑠 in brackets:

𝑓(𝑥 + 𝑠) = 5(𝑥 + 𝑠) + 2

𝑓(𝑥 + 𝑠) = 5𝑥 + 5𝑠 + 2

Substitute the 𝑓(𝑥 + 𝑠) in the first principles

formula with what was found above:

𝑓 ′ = lim𝑠→0

[5𝑥 + 5𝑠 + 2] − 𝑓 𝑥

𝑠

Then replace the 𝑓(𝑥) part, which is simply the

original function:

𝑓 ′ = lim𝑠→0

5𝑥 + 5𝑠 + 2 − [5𝑥 + 2]

𝑠

= lim𝑠→0

5𝑥 + 5𝑠 + 2 − 5𝑥 − 2

𝑠

Simplify the top by cancelling:

𝑓 ′ = lim𝑠→0

5𝑠

𝑠

And then the 𝑠

𝑠 part can be crossed off:

Only after crossing off 𝑠

𝑠 can every other 𝑠 be

replaced with zero. But since there is no 𝑠 left:

𝑓 ′(𝑥) = lim𝑠→0

5 = 5

The lim𝑠→0

part can now be ignored as there is no

longer an 𝑠 left, giving the gradient function:

𝑓 ′ 𝑥 = 5 𝑜𝑟 𝑑𝑓 𝑥

𝑑𝑥= 5

To repeat, this is the gradient function, and it is

different from the original function, however, they

are related (see section 5.10).

Think about the answer 𝑓 ′ = 5. The original

function was a line with equation 𝑦 = 5𝑥 + 2, and

from Chapter 2, the gradient of this line is 𝑚 = 5,

which is the same answer.

A line has the same gradient all along it, but the

gradient of a quadratic changes along its curve.

Example 2: find the gradient function of

𝑦 = 3𝑥2 − 𝑥 − 6

Plan: use the first principles formula

𝑑𝑦𝑑𝑥

= lim𝑠→0

𝑓 𝑥 + 𝑠 − 𝑓 𝑥

𝑠

Solution: The only thing we need to find in this

formula is 𝑓(𝑥 + 𝑠) and this is done by replacing

every 𝑥 in the original function with (𝑥 + 𝑠) in

brackets:

𝑓(𝑥) = 3𝑥2 − 𝑥 − 6

𝑓 𝑥 + 𝑠 = 3 𝑥 + 𝑠 2 − (𝑥 + 𝑠) − 6

Write out the “squared” term as two terms:

𝑓 𝑥 + 𝑠 = 3 𝑥 + 𝑠 𝑥 + 𝑠 − 𝑥 + 𝑠 − 6

𝑓 𝑥 + 𝑠 = 3 𝑥2 + 2𝑥𝑠 + 𝑠2 − 𝑥 + 𝑠 − 6

𝑓 𝑥 + 𝑠 = 3 𝑥2 + 6𝑥𝑠 + 3𝑠2 − 𝑥 − 𝑠 − 6

This is the 𝑓(𝑥 + 𝑠) part done, so replace 𝑓(𝑥)

with the original function in the first principles

formula:

𝑑𝑦𝑑𝑥

= lim𝑠→0

𝑓 𝑥 + 𝑠 − 𝑓 𝑥

𝑠

= lim𝑠→0

3𝑥2 + 6𝑥𝑠 + 𝑠2 − 𝑥 − 𝑠 − 6 − [3𝑥2 − 𝑥 − 6]

𝑠

The tricky part is to simplify this. The easiest way is

to look at the numerator (top), and you will see a

lot of terms can be cancelled off (colour coded

below). This results in something much simpler.

The ultimate goal is to get rid of the 𝑠 on the

bottom, by cancelling it off with an 𝑠 on top.

= lim

𝑠→0

𝟑𝒙𝟐 + 6𝑥𝑠 + 𝑠2 − 𝒙 − 𝑠 − 𝟔 − 𝟑𝒙𝟐 + 𝒙 + 𝟔

𝑠

𝑓 𝑥 + 𝑠 = 3 𝑥 + 𝑠 𝑥 + 𝑠 − 𝑥 + 𝑠 − 6

𝑓 ′ = lim𝑠→0

5𝒔

𝒔

𝑓 ′ = lim𝑠→0

𝟓𝒙 + 5𝑠 + 𝟐 − 𝟓𝒙 − 2

𝑠

Page 102: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

102

Note that the negative sign must be put into all the

terms of 𝑓(𝑥) when it is taken away from

𝑓(𝑥 + 𝑠).

𝑑𝑦

𝑑𝑥= lim

𝑠→0

6𝑥𝑠 + 𝑠2 − 𝑠

𝑠

To cancel off the 𝑠 in the denominator, an 𝑠 in the

numerator should be factorised out first. Only then

can it be cancelled off with the bottom one.

𝑑𝑦

𝑑𝑥= lim

𝑠→0

𝑠(6𝑥 + 𝑠 − 1)

𝑠

Having cancelled off the 𝑠 on the bottom, all other

𝑠’s can be replaced with zero, and the limit

notation removed:

𝑑𝑦

𝑑𝑥= 6𝑥 + 0 − 1 = 6𝑥 − 1

This is the derivative function. It is the function

that gives the derivative (gradient) at every point

on the original function. For example, the gradient

of the original function at 𝑥 = 2 would be found

by substituting 𝑥 = 2 into the gradient function

(i.e. 𝑑𝑦

𝑑𝑥 2 = 6 2 − 1 = 11).

Example 3: using first principles, find the

derivative function of

𝑦 =3

𝑥

Plan: use the first principles formula

𝑑𝑦𝑑𝑥

= lim𝑠→0

𝑓 𝑥 + 𝑠 − 𝑓 𝑥

𝑠

Solution: find 𝑓(𝑥 + 𝑠)

𝑓(𝑥) =3𝑥

𝑓(𝑥 + 𝑠) =3

𝑥 + 𝑠

This cannot be simplified right now, so substitute

everything into the first principles formula:

𝑑𝑦

𝑑𝑥= lim

𝑠→0

3

𝑥 + 𝑠 −3𝑥

𝑠

Isolate the numerator (top) of this fraction, so

simplification is easier (it will be brought back in

later):

3

𝑥 + 𝑠−

3

𝑥=

3

𝑥 + 𝑠 𝑥

𝑥 −

3

𝑥

(𝑥 + 𝑠)

(𝑥 + 𝑠)

This is finding a Common Denominator (Chapter

1). The Common Denominator is the multiplication

of the two denominators. Get rid of the brackets:

=3

𝑥 + 𝑠 𝑥

𝑥 −

3

𝑥 𝑥 + 𝑠

𝑥 + 𝑠

=3𝑥

𝑥 + 𝑠 (𝑥)−

3𝑥 + 3𝑠

𝑥 + 𝑠 (𝑥)

Having the Common Denominator present, a single

fraction can be written:

=3𝑥 − 3𝑥 + 3𝑠

𝑥 + 𝑠 𝑥 =

3𝑥 − 3𝑥 − 3𝑠

𝑥 + 𝑠 𝑥

Cancel off the 3𝑥 − 3𝑥:

=−3𝑠

𝑥 + 𝑠 (𝑥)

Bring everything back into the first principles

formula:

𝑑𝑦

𝑑𝑥= lim

𝑠→0

−3𝑠

𝑥 + 𝑠 (𝑥)

𝑠

From Chapter 1, the division of fractions can be

written as the multiplication of the inverse:

𝑑𝑦

𝑑𝑥= lim

𝑠→0

−3𝑠

𝑥 + 𝑠 𝑥 ∙

1

𝑠

Cross out the two red 𝑠:

𝑑𝑦

𝑑𝑥= lim

𝑠→0

−3

𝑥 + 𝑠 (𝑥)

Replace the remaining 𝑠 with zero and remove the

limit notation:

𝑑𝑦

𝑑𝑥=

−3

𝑥 + 0 (𝑥)=

−3

𝑥 (𝑥)= −

3

𝑥2

Differentiation by first principles requires knowing

how to simplify and factorise, so if you’re not

comfortable spend some time revising Chapter 1.

𝑑𝑦

𝑑𝑥= lim

𝑠→0

𝒔(6𝑥 + 𝑠 − 1)

𝒔

Page 103: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

103

Exercises: 1. Using Differentiation by First Principles, determine

the gradient function given the following original functions:

𝑎) 𝑦 = 7𝑥 − 3

𝑏) 𝑦 = −9𝑥 + 1

𝑐) 𝑦 = 𝑥2 + 2𝑥

𝑑) 𝑦 = −3𝑥2 + 14𝑥 − 11

2. Using First Principles, determine the gradient function of the following:

𝑎) 𝑦 = 3𝑥2 − 𝑥3

𝑏) 𝑦 = −5𝑥2

7+

12

5𝑥 − 1

𝑐) 𝑦 =5

𝑥

𝑑) 𝑦 =3

7𝑥

𝑒) 𝑦 =1

𝑥2

5.3 differentiation rules: power rule

This is a rule which makes the last 4 pages

redundant. Sorry, but at least now you’ll know

what you are actually doing.

Theory: the power rule states that to find the

derivative function, you bring the power to the

front and then subtract 1 from the power.

For the original function: 𝑦 = 𝑎𝑥𝑛

The derivative function is: 𝑑𝑦

𝑑𝑥= 𝑛𝑎𝑥𝑛−1

Example 1: use the power rule to differentiate:

𝑦 = 𝑥2

Solution: bring the 2 out front of the 𝑥, then

subtract 1 from the power:

𝑦′ =𝑑𝑦

𝑑𝑥= 2𝑥

Example 2: find the derivative of

𝑦 = 2𝑥3

Plan: use the power rule to bring the power out

front then subtract one from the power.

Solution:

𝑦′ = (3)2𝑥2

Multiply the 2 and 3 together to give the solution:

𝑦′ = 6𝑥2

Example 3: find the gradient function of

𝑦 = 4𝑥3 − 2𝑥2 + 7𝑥 − 1

Plan: use the power rule to differentiate each

section, one at a time.

Solution: the four sections are:

Apply the power rule to each of the sections:

𝑑𝑦

𝑑𝑥= 12𝑥2 − 4𝑥 + 7

Remember: when you see 𝑥 by itself, it is really 𝑥1

and when this is differentiated, it gives 𝑥1−1 =

𝑥0 = 1, so the 𝑥 is no longer present.

Theory: the derivative of a constant is zero. It

means the gradient of a horizontal line is zero.

This is why, in the last example, the −1

differentiated to give zero.

Example 4: differentiate

𝑦 = −3

𝑥4+ 5𝑥2 − 𝑥 + 15

Plan: use the power rule, one section at a time.

Solution: you cannot simply differentiate using the

power rule if the term is not up top. The original

function must first be simplified (see Chapter 1):

𝑦 = −3𝑥−4 + 5𝑥2 − 𝑥 + 15

Then differentiate each section separately:

𝑑𝑦

𝑑𝑥= −4 −3 𝑥−4−1 + 2 5𝑥2−1 − 1 𝑥1−1 + 0

= 12𝑥−5 + 10𝑥 − 1

Watch out for the negative signs!

Exercises: 1. Differentiate the following using the power rule:

𝑎) 𝑦 = 3𝑥2

𝑏) 𝑦 = −2𝑥3 + 𝑥2

𝑐) 𝑦 = −3𝑥3

7

𝑦 = 4𝑥3 − 2𝑥2 + 7𝑥 − 1

Step 1: = 𝑥2

Step 2: = 2𝑥2−1

Page 104: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

104

𝑑) 𝑦 =5

𝑥4−

𝑥2

5

𝑒) 𝑦 = −𝑥 −𝑥2

2−

𝑥3

3+

1

𝑥

𝑓) 𝑦 =1

𝑥+

1

𝑥2+

1

𝑥3

𝑔) 𝑦 = 33

4𝑥−3 + 𝑥2

𝑕) 𝑦 = 6 +15

−𝑥−4

𝑖) 𝑦 = 𝑥14 +1

𝑥14

𝑗) 𝑦 = −13𝑥−13 + 15 − 𝑥

𝑘) 𝑦 = 12

5.4 differentiation rules: chain rule

Intro example 1: differentiate

𝑦 = (4𝑥 + 2)3

Solution: to solve this, you might expand it using

the crab-claw, and then differentiate the

sections:

𝑦 = 64𝑥3 + 80𝑥2 + 48𝑥 + 8

Differentiate this:

𝑑𝑦

𝑑𝑥= 192𝑥2 + 160𝑥 + 48

This is a very long method (especially when you

show all working) but there is an easier method;

the chain rule.

There is the formal and informal way of

remembering the chain rule.

Theory: the informal method is: differentiate the

function as if using the power rule, then multiply

by the derivative of the inside of the brackets.

Example 1: differentiate the above example

𝑦 = (4𝑥 + 2)3

Plan: use the informal chain rule method:

differentiate the function as if using the power

rule, then multiply by the derivative of the inside

of the brackets.

Solution: Differentiate as if using the power rule:

3(4𝑥 + 2)3−1 = 3 4𝑥 + 2 2

Then multiply this by the derivative of the inside of

the brackets:

𝑑𝑦

𝑑𝑥= 3 4𝑥 + 2 2(4)

𝑑𝑦

𝑑𝑥= 12 4𝑥 + 2 2

The 12 came from multiplying the 3 and 4

together. We cannot put the 12 into the brackets

because the bracket is squared.

Example 2: Find the gradient function of

𝑦 = (𝑥2 + 3𝑥)5

Plan: use the chain rule to differentiate:

“differentiate the function as if using the power

rule, then multiply by the derivative of the inside

of the brackets”

Solution: the first underlined part of the following

is the as if part of the chain rule, and the second

underlined part is the derivative of inside the

brackets.

The 2𝑥 + 3 must be in brackets as 5 𝑥2 + 3𝑥 4

is multiplied by all of 2𝑥 + 3 . Otherwise, it would

imply that the 5 𝑥2 + 3𝑥 4 is only multiplied by

2𝑥, and then 3 is added onto the whole thing,

which is not the case!

This last example can be simplified to:

𝑑𝑦

𝑑𝑥= (10𝑥 + 15) 𝑥2 + 3𝑥 4

As the 5 can only go into every term in the bracket

which is to the power of 1.

Example 3: differentiate

𝑦 =2

3𝑥3 − 4𝑥2 + 1 −5.5

𝑑𝑦

𝑑𝑥= 5 𝑥2 + 3𝑥 4(2𝑥 + 3)

𝑦 = 4𝑥 + 2 4𝑥 + 2 4𝑥 + 2

𝑦 = 16𝑥2 + 16𝑥 + 4 4𝑥 + 2

Page 105: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

105

Plan: move everything up top so the chain rule can

then be easily used.

Chain rule: differentiate the function as if using the

power rule, then multiply by the derivative of the

inside of the brackets.

Solution: use index rules to bring the denominator

up top and change the sign of the index:

𝑦 = 2 3𝑥3 − 4𝑥2 + 1 5.5

Apply the chain rule: the first underlined part

below is the as if part, and the second underlined

part is “the derivative of the inside of the

brackets”.

Simplify the constants (2 ∙ 5.5) into the only

brackets which are to the power of 1 (9𝑥2 − 8𝑥):

𝑦 = 99𝑥2 − 88𝑥 3𝑥3 − 4𝑥2 + 1 4.5

The formal method of the chain rule is temporarily

inventing a new function.

Theory: formally, the chain rule is:

𝑑𝑦

𝑑𝑥=

𝑑𝑦

𝑑𝑢×

𝑑𝑢

𝑑𝑥

To demonstrate this, the following function will be

used:

𝑦 = (𝑥2 + 1)7

Invent the function 𝑢 = 𝑥2 + 1, which is whatever

is inside the brackets. Then replace the brackets in

the original equation with the function 𝑢:

𝑦 = (𝑢)7

Differentiate both of these new functions:

𝑑𝑦

𝑑𝑢= 7𝑢6

And:

𝑑𝑢

𝑑𝑥= 2𝑥

If these two derivatives are multiplied together,

the wanted derivative is obtained:

𝑑𝑦

𝑑𝑢×

𝑑𝑢

𝑑𝑥=

𝑑𝑦

𝑑𝑢×

𝑑𝑢

𝑑𝑥=

𝑑𝑦

𝑑𝑥

With the equation above:

𝑑𝑦

𝑑𝑥= 7𝑢6 × 2𝑥

= 14𝑥𝑢6

= 2𝑥 7 𝑥2 + 1 6

= 14𝑥 𝑥2 + 1 6

Replace 𝑢 with what it was originally defined as

(i.e. it was defined as (𝑥2 + 1) in this question).

You get the same answer using the formal or

informal method, however always write out the

theory used.

Exercises: 1. Differentiate the following using the chain rule:

𝑎) 𝑦 = 𝑥 + 1 3

𝑏) 𝑦 = 2𝑥 − 3 4

𝑐) 𝑦 = −3𝑥 + 1 4

𝑑) 𝑦 = 𝑥2 + 2 3

𝑒) 𝑦 = 2𝑥2 − 3 4

𝑓) 𝑦 = −4𝑥2 − 𝑥 3

𝑔) 𝑦 = 12𝑥 − 𝑥3 4

𝑕) 𝑦 = 4 𝑥2 + 𝑥 + 1 5

𝑖) 𝑦 = 5 −3𝑥3

8+

1

𝑥

4

𝑗) 𝑦 = 1

𝑥+

1

𝑥2

3

𝑘) 𝑦 = 12 𝑥2 + 𝑥 + 5 +1

𝑥+

5

𝑥2

2

5.5 differentiation rules: product rule

This rule applies whenever two separate functions

are multiplied together. The following shows

examples of two separate functions:

These cannot be differentiated using the rules

learnt so far, so a new rule is required: the product

rule.

𝑦 = 𝑥 + 2 −4 𝑥4 + 2 6

𝑡 = 𝑒𝑥2(4𝑥 − 1)

𝑟 = 3𝑥

4+ 2

2

1

𝑥+ 1

−2

𝑑𝑦

𝑑𝑥= 2 5.5 3𝑥3 − 4𝑥2 + 1 5.5−1(9𝑥2 − 8𝑥)

Page 106: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

106

Theory: given the function

where 𝑔(𝑥) and 𝑕(𝑥) are separate functions. The

derivative function is then:

𝑓 ’(𝑥) = 𝑔’(𝑥) ∙ 𝑕(𝑥) + 𝑔(𝑥) ∙ 𝑕’(𝑥)

Informally: “the derivative function is the

derivative of the first part multiplied by the second

part, plus the derivative of the second part

multiplied by the first part”.

𝑑𝑦

𝑑𝑥= 𝑑𝑒𝑟 1𝑠𝑡 × 2𝑛𝑑 + 𝑑𝑒𝑟 2𝑛𝑑 × 1𝑠𝑡

Example 1: find the gradient function of

𝑓(𝑥) = (15𝑥2 + 3𝑥3)(−4𝑥7 + 6)

Plan: use the product rule:

𝑓 ′ 𝑥 = 𝑑𝑒𝑟 1𝑠𝑡 × 2𝑛𝑑 + 𝑑𝑒𝑟 2𝑛𝑑 × 1𝑠𝑡

Solution: defining the two functions:

Following the product rule, do one section at a

time:

𝑑𝑒𝑟 1𝑠𝑡 = 30𝑥 + 9𝑥2

𝑑𝑒𝑟 2𝑛𝑑 = −28𝑥6

Put all the parts in brackets and substitute into the

power rule formula: 𝑓 ′ 𝑥

Try simplifying this last line using the crab claw

(twice). You should get:

𝑓 ′ 𝑥 = −120𝑥9 − 540𝑥8 + 54𝑥2 + 180𝑥

You could have crab-clawed the original function

and then applied the power rule four times. But in

harder examples, it would take too much time.

Example 2: find the gradient function of

Plan: two rules will be required: (1) the product

rule as our “base rule”, (2) the chain rule within

our base rule.

Solution: Use the product rule to find all the parts

needed (with the chain rule used within these

parts):

𝑑𝑒𝑟 1𝑠𝑡 = 3 4𝑥 2 4

= 12(4𝑥)2

𝑑𝑒𝑟 2𝑛𝑑 = 6 −3𝑥2 − 1 5 −6𝑥

= −36𝑥 −3𝑥2 − 5𝑥 5

Substitute into the product rule formula:

𝑑𝑦

𝑑𝑥= 𝑑𝑒𝑟 1𝑠𝑡 × 2𝑛𝑑 + 𝑑𝑒𝑟 2𝑛𝑑 × 1𝑠𝑡

This looks very big, but it is essentially in two parts,

separated by an addition sign. If you look carefully

in both sections, it is possible to factorise out some

of those parts (underlined below) to make it a bit

simpler:

Simplify the square brackets:

𝑑𝑦

𝑑𝑥= 4𝑥 2 −3𝑥2 − 1 5[−36𝑥2 − 12 − 144𝑥]

That is the extent of simplifying.

The product rule is not complicated, but

determining the two functions is sometimes

difficult, and the simplifications can, at times, be

complex.

Exercises: 1. Differentiate the following using the product rule:

𝑎) 𝑦 = 5𝑥 4 3𝑥2 + 1

𝑏) 𝑦 = 𝑥3 + 1 𝑥2 + 𝑥5

𝑐) 𝑦 = −3𝑥2 − 7 13𝑥4 − 𝑥

𝑑) 𝑦 = 12𝑥4 + 12𝑥5 𝑥7 2

𝑒) 𝑦 = 15𝑥3 + 7𝑥 13𝑥7 + 4

𝑓) 𝑦 = 15𝑥3 +1

𝑥

2

𝑥+ 5

𝑔) 𝑦 = 17 𝑥5 −𝑥

𝑥4

1

𝑥+

1

𝑥2

𝑕) 𝑦 = 0.25 𝑥 + 0.5𝑥 7𝑥3 + 7𝑥3

𝑑𝑦

𝑑𝑥= 4𝑥 2 −3𝑥2 − 1 5 12 −3𝑥2 − 1 + −36 4𝑥

𝑦 = (4𝑥)3 −3𝑥2 − 1 6

1𝑠𝑡 2𝑛𝑑

𝑑𝑒𝑟1𝑠𝑡 2𝑛𝑑 𝑑𝑒𝑟2𝑛𝑑 1𝑠𝑡

= (30𝑥 + 9𝑥2)(−4𝑥7 + 6) + (−28𝑥6)(15𝑥2 + 3𝑥3)

𝑓(𝑥) = (15𝑥2 + 3𝑥3)(−4𝑥7 + 6)

1𝑠𝑡 2𝑛𝑑

𝑓 𝑥 = 𝑔 𝑥 . 𝑕 𝑥

1𝑠𝑡 2𝑛𝑑

= 12 4𝑥 2 −3𝑥2 − 1 6 + −36𝑥 −3𝑥2 − 1 5 4𝑥 3

Page 107: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

107

2. Using all the differentiation rules learnt so far, differentiate the following:

𝑎) 𝑦 = 2𝑥 + 1 3 7𝑥2 − 1

𝑏) 𝑦 = 1 − 𝑥 5 2𝑥2 − 1 2

𝑐) 𝑦 = 1

𝑥+ 𝑥2

3

1

𝑥−4

2

𝑑) 𝑦 = 4 𝑥 + 𝑥7 − 𝑥 3 5

−𝑥−3− 1

5

5.6 differentiation rules: quotient rule

This rule is similar to the product rule, except now,

we have one function divided by another function.

Theory: the quotient rule applies for functions of

the form:

𝑦(𝑥) =𝑡(𝑥)

𝑏(𝑥)

For example, these can look like:

𝑦 =3𝑥2

1 + 𝑥−3

𝑦 = 𝑒2𝑥 + 𝑥

4𝑥

+ 3𝑥3

Theory: formally, the quotient rule is

𝑑𝑦

𝑑𝑥=

𝑡′ 𝑥 × 𝑏 𝑥 − 𝑏′ (𝑥) × 𝑡(𝑥)

𝑏(𝑥) 2

Informally, it is: “the derivative function is the

derivative of the top times the bottom minus the

derivative of the bottom times the top, all divided

by the bottom squared”.

For the numerator (top part of the fraction) the

order of what you differentiate first is important as

there is a minus sign.

𝑑𝑦

𝑑𝑥=

𝑑𝑒𝑟 𝑇𝑂𝑃 × 𝐵𝑂𝑇𝑇𝑂𝑀 − 𝑑𝑒𝑟 𝐵𝑂𝑇𝑇𝑂𝑀 × 𝑇𝑂𝑃

[𝐵𝑂𝑇𝑇𝑂𝑀]2

Ask yourself, would you naturally differentiate the

top or bottom first? Most people say they would

differentiate the top first, and that is what is done.

Example 1: differentiate

𝑦 =15𝑥4 + 3𝑥2

5𝑥 + 1

Plan: use the quotient rule:

𝑑𝑦

𝑑𝑥=

𝑑𝑒𝑟 𝑇𝑂𝑃 × 𝐵𝑂𝑇𝑇𝑂𝑀 − 𝑑𝑒𝑟 𝐵𝑂𝑇𝑇𝑂𝑀 × 𝑇𝑂𝑃

[𝐵𝑂𝑇𝑇𝑂𝑀]2

Solution: using the quotient rule, differentiate the

two parts:

𝑑𝑒𝑟 𝑇𝑂𝑃 = 60𝑥3 + 6𝑥

𝑑𝑒𝑟 𝐵𝑂𝑇𝑇𝑂𝑀 = 5

Substitute each section in brackets into the

quotient rule:

𝑑𝑦

𝑑𝑥=

60𝑥3 + 6𝑥 5𝑥 + 1 − 5 (15𝑥4 + 3𝑥2)

[5𝑥 + 1]2

You don’t usually need to expand the

denominator, especially if you need to use the

crab-claw method. This is because sometimes you

might be able to cancel it off. However, always

simplify the numerator; in this last case by using

the crab-claw method. Do it yourself, as the

following is only the answer:

𝑑𝑦

𝑑𝑥=

300𝑥4 + 60𝑥3 + 30𝑥2 + 6𝑥) − 75𝑥4 + 15𝑥2

5𝑥 + 1 2

=225𝑥4 + 60𝑥3 + 15𝑥2 + 6𝑥

[5𝑥 + 1]2

3𝑥 could also be factorised:

𝑑𝑦

𝑑𝑥=

3𝑥 75𝑥3 + 20𝑥2 + 5𝑥 + 2

[5𝑥 + 1]2

If simplification is obvious, then it should be done.

Example 2: find the gradient function of

𝑓 𝑥 =3𝑥2 − 𝑥−4

2𝑥 + 1

Plan: use the quotient rule

𝑑𝑦

𝑑𝑥=

𝑑𝑒𝑟 𝑇𝑂𝑃 × 𝐵𝑂𝑇𝑇𝑂𝑀 − 𝑑𝑒𝑟 𝐵𝑂𝑇𝑇𝑂𝑀 × 𝑇𝑂𝑃

[𝐵𝑂𝑇𝑇𝑂𝑀]2

Solution: find the derivative of each of the two

parts:

𝑑𝑒𝑟 𝑇𝑂𝑃 = 6𝑥 + 4𝑥−5

𝑑𝑒𝑟 𝐵𝑂𝑇𝑇𝑂𝑀 = 2

Substitute back into the quotient rule formula

(remember the brackets):

𝑑𝑦

𝑑𝑥=

6𝑥 + 4𝑥−5 2𝑥 + 1 − 2 3𝑥2 − 𝑥−4

2𝑥 + 1 2

Page 108: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

108

Then use the crab claw method (you should do it!)

to simplify the top:

𝑑𝑦

𝑑𝑥=

12𝑥2 + 8𝑥−4 + 6𝑥 + 4𝑥−5 − 6𝑥2 + 2𝑥−4

2𝑥 + 1 2

Bring together “like terms”:

𝑑𝑦

𝑑𝑥=

6𝑥2 + 10𝑥−4 + 6𝑥 + 4𝑥−5

2𝑥 + 1 2

Factorise out the number 2 from the top:

𝑑𝑦

𝑑𝑥=

2 3𝑥2 + 5𝑥−4 + 3𝑥 + 2𝑥−5

2𝑥 + 1 2

This next example combines the quotient rule with

other differentiation rules.

Example 3: find the derivative of

𝑦 = 4𝑥2 + 1 (−3𝑥−5)

2𝑥5

Plan: use the quotient rule as the base rule and

the product rule within the quotient rule:

𝑑𝑦

𝑑𝑥=

𝑑𝑒𝑟 𝑇𝑂𝑃 × 𝐵𝑂𝑇𝑇𝑂𝑀 − 𝑑𝑒𝑟 𝐵𝑂𝑇𝑇𝑂𝑀 × 𝑇𝑂𝑃

[𝐵𝑂𝑇𝑇𝑂𝑀]2

𝑑𝑦

𝑑𝑥= 𝑑𝑒𝑟 1𝑠𝑡 × 2𝑛𝑑 + 𝑑𝑒𝑟 2𝑛𝑑 × 1𝑠𝑡

Solution: find the derivative of each section of the

base rule:

𝑑𝑒𝑟 𝑇𝑂𝑃 = 𝑑𝑒𝑟 1𝑠𝑡 × 2𝑛𝑑 + 𝑑𝑒𝑟 2𝑛𝑑 × 1𝑠𝑡

= 8𝑥 −3𝑥−5 + 15𝑥−6 4𝑥2 + 1

= 36𝑥−4 + 15𝑥−6

𝑑𝑒𝑟 𝐵𝑂𝑇𝑇𝑂𝑀 = 10𝑥4

Substitute back into the Quotient Rule:

𝑑𝑦

𝑑𝑥

= 36𝑥−4 + 15𝑥−6 2𝑥5 − 10𝑥4 4𝑥2 + 1 (−3𝑥−5)

[2𝑥5]2

Factorise out 2𝑥4 from the top, and also simplify

the denominator (which we wouldn’t usually do,

except here, we can see that part of it will cancel

off with the denominator):

𝑑𝑦

𝑑𝑥=

2𝑥4[𝑥 36𝑥−4 + 15𝑥−6 − 5 4𝑥2 + 1 −3𝑥−5 ]

4𝑥10

Cancel off the 2𝑥4 with part of the bottom:

𝑑𝑦

𝑑𝑥=

[𝑥 36𝑥−4 + 15𝑥−6 − 5 4𝑥2 + 1 −3𝑥−5 ]

2𝑥6

Crab-claw the numerator (do it yourself!) and you

should get:

𝑑𝑦

𝑑𝑥=

96𝑥−3 + 30𝑥−5

2𝑥6

A rule of thumb for simplification using the

quotient rule is: if you can’t factorise anything out

or do a simple crab-claw, then don’t bother.

Keeping track of all the separate sections as well as

simplification are the hardest parts of using the

quotient rule, but the more you practice, the

easier it will become.

Exercises: 1. Differentiate the following using the quotient rule:

𝑎) 𝑦 =𝑥 + 1

3𝑥 − 1

𝑏) 𝑦 =𝑥2

𝑥 + 1

𝑐) 𝑦 =2𝑥3 + 1

5𝑥 + 𝑥2

𝑑) 𝑦 =3𝑥2 + 4𝑥3

𝑥2

𝑒) 𝑦 =14𝑥4 + 5

13𝑥3 − 𝑥2

2. Differentiate the following using any of the rules learnt so far:

𝑎) 𝑦 = 3𝑥4 − 𝑥 3

5𝑥 − 1

𝑏) 𝑦 = 2𝑥 − 1 7

3𝑥 + 1 3

𝑐) 𝑦 = 15𝑥3 + 3𝑥 2

1 − 𝑥 2

𝑑) 𝑦 =12𝑥2𝑥8𝑥−9

1 + 𝑥 5

𝑒) 𝑦 =8 13𝑥2 + 14

18𝑥 − 3 2

𝑓) 𝑦 = −

5𝑥4

3+ 1

2

12𝑥2 − 𝑥

𝑔) 𝑦 =

1𝑥

+ 𝑥2 3

𝑥 − 1 2

𝑕) 𝑦 =

1𝑥

+1𝑥2

1𝑥

−1𝑥2

3

Page 109: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

109

5.7 differentiation rules: 𝒆

Remembering that 𝑒 is just a number, there is no

reason why it could not have an index. In Chapter

4, an exponential function of the form 𝑦 = 2𝑥 was

discussed, but it could just as easily have been

𝑦 = 𝑒𝑥 . This is also an exponential function

because 𝑒 is a number, not a variable.

Theory: the formal 𝑒 rule is:

For the function 𝑦 = 𝑒𝑓 𝑥

The derivative is 𝑦′ = 𝑓 ′ 𝑥 𝑒𝑓 𝑥

The informal 𝑒 rule is: differentiate the exponent,

bring it out front in brackets, then multiply it by

the original function.

Example 1: differentiate the function

𝑦 = 𝑒2𝑥+1

Solution: differentiatie the exponent to get 2.

Bring this out front and then multiply it by the

original function:

𝑑𝑦

𝑑𝑥= (2)𝑒2𝑥+1

Example 2: differentiate

𝑔 𝑥 = 3𝑒𝑥2+2𝑥

Plan: use the exponential rule

“differentiate the exponent, bring it out front in

brackets, then multiply by the original equation”

Solution: differentiate the exponent:

𝑑𝑒𝑟 𝐸𝑋𝑃𝑂𝑁𝐸𝑁𝑇 = 2𝑥 + 2

Then bring it out front in brackets and multiply by

the original equation:

𝑑𝑦

𝑑𝑥= 2𝑥 + 2 (3𝑒𝑥2+2𝑥)

This can be simplified a bit, by putting the 3 into

each of the terms in the bracket:

𝑑𝑦

𝑑𝑥= (6𝑥 + 6)𝑒𝑥2+2𝑥

The 𝑒𝑥2+2𝑥 could be crab-clawed into the brackets

but in this case, there is no point.

Example 3: find the derivative of

𝑕 𝑥 = 14𝑒𝑥3+11𝑥−1

Plan: use the 𝑒 rule of differentiation

𝑦 = 𝑒𝑓 𝑥 𝑑𝑦

𝑑𝑥= 𝑓 ′ 𝑥 𝑒𝑓 𝑥

Solution:

𝑑𝑒𝑟 𝐸𝑋𝑃𝑂𝑁𝐸𝑁𝑇 = 3𝑥2 + 11

Put this out front in brackets, then multiply by the

original function

𝑔′ 𝑥 = 3𝑥2 + 11 14𝑒𝑥3+11𝑥−1

Simplify the 14 into the first bracket to get:

𝑔′ 𝑥 = 42𝑥2 + 154 𝑒𝑥3+11𝑥−1

The 14 was simplified into the front bracket as

could the 𝑒𝑥3+11𝑥−1, however it looks “cleaner” if

we do not. Either way is fine.

Example 4: find the gradient function of

𝑦 = (4𝑥3 + 𝑥)𝑒−3𝑥−5

Plan: use the product rule as the base rule with

the 𝑒 rule within it:

𝑑𝑦

𝑑𝑥= 𝑑𝑒𝑟 1𝑠𝑡 × 2𝑛𝑑 + 𝑑𝑒𝑟 2𝑛𝑑 × 1𝑠𝑡

𝑦′ = 𝑓 ′ 𝑥 𝑒𝑓 𝑥

Solution: the two functions are underlined

𝑑𝑒𝑟 1𝑠𝑡 = 12𝑥2 + 1

𝑑𝑒𝑟 2𝑛𝑑 = (15𝑥−6)𝑒−3𝑥−5

Substitute into the base (product) rule:

𝑑𝑦

𝑑𝑥= 12𝑥2 + 1 𝑒−3𝑥−5

+ (15𝑥−6𝑒−3𝑥−5)(4𝑥3 + 𝑥)

𝑑𝑦

𝑑𝑥= 𝑒−3𝑥−5

(12𝑥2 + 1 + 60𝑥−3 + 15𝑥−5)

A step was deliberately missed, so you should do it

and see if you can get the same answer.

Exercises: 1. Differentiate the following using the 𝑒 rule:

𝑎) 𝑦 = 𝑒2𝑥−3

𝑏) 𝑦 = 𝑒−4𝑥−2

𝑦 = 4𝑥3 + 𝑥 𝑒−3𝑥−5

Page 110: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

110

𝑐) 𝑦 = 𝑒𝑥2+1

𝑑) 𝑦 = 𝑒3𝑥2+𝑥

𝑒) 𝑦 = 𝑒1

𝑥+𝑥

2. Differentiate the following using any of the rules learnt so far:

𝑎) 𝑦 = 𝑒3𝑥2+1 1 + 𝑒3𝑥

𝑏) 𝑦 = 𝑒3−2𝑥2 10 − 𝑥3

𝑐) 𝑦 =15𝑥2 + 𝑥

𝑒9𝑥−2

𝑑) 𝑦 = 𝑒2𝑥−1 + 𝑥 − 2 4

𝑒) 𝑦 = 12 𝑒1𝑥 + 5𝑥

2

𝑓) 𝑦 = 1

𝑒3−2𝑥+ 𝑥

4

𝑔) 𝑦 = 1

𝑥+

1

𝑒4𝑥2 5

𝑕) 𝑦 =𝑒𝑥4−1

𝑥 + 𝑒3−3𝑥

5.8 differentiation rules: 𝐥𝐧 rule

The natural log is the log of a function with 𝑒 as

the base rather than 10. If you don’t understand

this, go back to Chapter 4, but it’s not entirely vital

for this section.

Theory: formally, the ln rule is:

For the function 𝑦 = ln 𝑓(𝑥)

The gradient function is 𝑦′ =𝑓 ′ 𝑥

𝑓 𝑥

Informally:

To differentiate the log of something in brackets:

“differentiate the inside of the brackets, then

divide by the inside of the brackets”.

If you are to find the derivative function of

𝑦 = ln(𝑥2 + 1)

Differentiate the inside of the brackets, then divide

by the inside of the brackets (NOT the whole

function, just the inside of the brackets). So in this

case, the derivative function would be:

𝑑𝑦

𝑑𝑥=

2𝑥

𝑥2 + 1

Ignore the ln when differentiating the function.

Example 1: find the gradient function of

𝑦 = ln 3

𝑥4 + 16𝑥 − 5

Plan: simplify the brackets, then use the ln rule:

“differentiate the inside of the brackets, then

divide by the inside of the brackets”

Solution: simplify the inside of the brackets:

𝑦 = ln 3𝑥−4 + 16𝑥 − 5

Differentiate using the ln rule:

𝑑𝑦

𝑑𝑥=

−12𝑥−5 + 16

3𝑥−4 + 16𝑥 − 5

That is the extent of the ln rule. It only gets more

complex when other rules also need to be used.

Example 2: find the derivative of

𝑦 = 3𝑥5 + 1 ∙ ln(𝑒𝑥4)

Plan: use the product rule (as there are two

functions being multiplied together) as the base

rule

𝑑𝑦

𝑑𝑥= 𝑑𝑒𝑟 1𝑠𝑡 × 2𝑛𝑑 + 𝑑𝑒𝑟 2𝑛𝑑 × 1𝑠𝑡

then the ln rule and the 𝑒 rule within the base

rule.

Solution: the two functions for the product rule

are underlined

𝑑𝑒𝑟 1𝑠𝑡 = 15𝑥4

In 𝑑𝑒𝑟 2𝑛𝑑 both the ln rule and the 𝑒 rule were

used. The 𝑒𝑥4 cancelled off so only 4𝑥3 was left.

Substitute into the base (product) rule:

𝑑𝑦

𝑑𝑥= 15𝑥4 ∙ ln 𝑒𝑥4

+ 4𝑥3 (3𝑥5 + 1)

Factorise out 𝑥3 and simplify inside the brackets:

𝑑𝑦

𝑑𝑥= 𝑥3 15𝑥 ∙ ln 𝑒𝑥4

+ 4 3𝑥5 + 1

𝑑𝑦

𝑑𝑥= 𝑥3 15𝑥 ∙ ln 𝑒𝑥4

+ 12𝑥5 + 4

𝑑𝑒𝑟 2𝑛𝑑 =4𝑥3𝑒𝑥4

𝑒𝑥4 = 4𝑥3

𝑦 = 3𝑥5 + 1 ∙ ln(𝑒𝑥4)

Page 111: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

111

Exercises: 1. Differentiate the following using the ln rule:

𝑎) ln 𝑥

𝑏) ln 15𝑥

𝑐) ln 𝑥2

𝑑) ln 𝑥2 + 3

𝑒) ln 3𝑥4 + 17𝑥2

𝑓) ln 𝑒𝑥+1 − 1

2. Differentiate the following using any of the rules learnt so far:

𝑎) 𝑦 = ln 𝑥2 + 1 3 − 𝑥4

𝑏) 𝑦 = 𝑒𝑥2+3𝑥 ln 𝑥2 + 3𝑥

𝑐) 𝑦 = ln −4𝑥3 + 7𝑥2 8

𝑥+ 𝑥3

𝑑) 𝑦 = ln 2

𝑥5− 𝑥 𝑒6−3𝑥

𝑒) 𝑦 = 1

𝑥+

2

𝑥2 ln 3𝑥2 − 1

𝑓) 𝑦 = ln 𝑒𝑥2+ 𝑥 4𝑥3

𝑔) 𝑦 =ln 5𝑥 − 3

𝑥2 + 1

𝑕) 𝑦 = ln ln 3𝑥

5.9 the second derivative

Theory: the second derivative of a function is

obtained by differentiating the function once, and

then differentiating the derivative.

Similar to the first derivative, there are several

different notations for a second derivative, the

common ones being:

𝑦′′ 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑑2𝑦

𝑑𝑥2

Example 1: find the second derivative of

𝑦 = 2𝑥2 + 1 3

Plan: differentiate the function, then differentiate

that derivative.

Solution: find the first derivative:

𝑦′ = 3 2𝑥2 + 1 2 4𝑥

𝑦′ = 12𝑥 2𝑥2 + 1 2

To find the second derivative, 𝑦′ must be

differentiated, and the product rule is required.

𝑑𝑦

𝑑𝑥= 𝑑𝑒𝑟 1𝑠𝑡 × 2𝑛𝑑 + 𝑑𝑒𝑟 2𝑛𝑑 × 1𝑠𝑡

𝑑𝑒𝑟1𝑠𝑡 = 12

𝑑𝑒𝑟2𝑛𝑑 = 2 2𝑥2 + 1 4𝑥

= 8𝑥 2𝑥2 + 1

Substitute it into the product rule:

𝑦′′ = 12 2𝑥2 + 1 2 + 8𝑥 2𝑥2 + 1 12𝑥

Factorise out 12 2𝑥2 + 1 :

𝑦′′ = 12 2𝑥2 + 1 2𝑥2 + 1 + 8𝑥2

𝑦′′ = 12 2𝑥2 + 1 10𝑥2 + 1

Example 2: find the second derivative of

𝑦 = 𝑒3𝑥−6 1 −𝑥3

−2

Plan: differentiate, then differentiate the

derivative.

Solution: simplify first:

𝑦 = 𝑒3𝑥−6 1 + 0.5𝑥3

Differentiate using the product rule:

𝑑𝑒𝑟1𝑠𝑡 = 3𝑒3𝑥−6

𝑑𝑒𝑟2𝑛𝑑 = 1.5𝑥2

Substitute into the base (product) rule:

𝑦′ = 3𝑒3𝑥−6 1 + 0.5𝑥3 + 1.5𝑥2𝑒3𝑥−6

Now to find the second derivative, you must use

the product rule twice (for the two sections shown

below). You should do this one section at a time to

avoid confusion:

𝑦′ = 3𝑒3𝑥−6 1 + 0.5𝑥3 + 1.5𝑥2𝑒3𝑥−6

Differentiate the red section first:

𝑑𝑒𝑟1𝑠𝑡 = 9𝑒3𝑥−6

𝑑𝑒𝑟2𝑛𝑑 = 1.5𝑥2

Substitute into the product rule formula:

𝑦′′ 𝑟𝑒𝑑 𝑠𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 = 9𝑒3𝑥−6 1 + 0.5𝑥3 + 1.5𝑥23𝑒3𝑥−6

𝑦′′ 𝑟𝑒𝑑 𝑠𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 = 9𝑒3𝑥−6 1 + 0.5𝑥3 + 4.5𝑥2𝑒3𝑥−6

Differentiate the blue section:

𝑑𝑒𝑟1𝑠𝑡 = 3𝑥

𝑑𝑒𝑟2𝑛𝑑 = 3𝑒3𝑥−6

Substitute into the product rule formula:

𝑦′′ 𝑏𝑙𝑢𝑒 𝑠𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 = 3𝑥𝑒3𝑥−6 + 3𝑒3𝑥−61.5𝑥2

𝑦′′ 𝑏𝑙𝑢𝑒 𝑠𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 = 3𝑥𝑒3𝑥−6 + 4.5𝑒3𝑥−6𝑥2

Page 112: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

112

The second derivative is the sum of the derivative

of the red section and the blue section:

𝑦′′ = 9𝑒3𝑥−6 1 + 0.5𝑥3 + 4.5𝑥2𝑒3𝑥−6 + 3𝑥𝑒3𝑥−6

+ 4.5𝑒3𝑥−6𝑥2

Factorise out 𝑒3𝑥−6 because each term has 𝑒3𝑥−6:

𝑦′′ = 𝑒3𝑥−6 9 1 + 0.5𝑥3 + 4.5𝑥2 + 3𝑥 + 4.5𝑥2

Then simplify everything inside the square

brackets:

𝑦′′ = 𝑒3𝑥−6 4.5𝑥3 + 9 + 9𝑥2 + 3𝑥

After the first derivative was found, the 𝑒3𝑥−6

could have been factorised out, and then the

derivative found that way. Both methods will give

the same solution. Try it.

Example 3: find the second derivative of

𝑦 = ln(3𝑥4 + 𝑥)

Plan: differentiate the function, then apply

differentiation rules to differentiating the first

derivative.

Solution: the first derivative is

𝑦′ =12𝑥3 + 1

3𝑥4 + 𝑥

To differentiate this, the quotient rule is needed.

𝑑𝑒𝑟 𝑇𝑂𝑃 = 36𝑥2

𝑑𝑒𝑟 𝐵𝑂𝑇𝑇𝑂𝑀 = 12𝑥3 + 1

Replacing the base (quotient) rule:

𝑦′′ =36𝑥2 3𝑥4 + 𝑥 − 12𝑥3 + 1 12𝑥3 + 1

3𝑥4 + 𝑥 2

Try simplifying this last equation to see if you get

the following:

𝑦′′ =−36𝑥6 + 12𝑥3 − 1

3𝑥4 + 𝑥 2

Exercises: 1. Find the second derivative of the following

functions: 𝑎) 𝑦 = 𝑥3 + 𝑥2 − 1

𝑏) 𝑦 =𝑥4

−4+ 𝑥2

𝑐) 𝑦 =1

𝑥2 + 𝑥

𝑑) 𝑦 = 3 5 − 3𝑥 5

𝑒) 𝑦 = 2𝑥2 1 + 3𝑥4

2. Find the second derivative of:

𝑎) 𝑦 = 𝑒2𝑥2 5𝑥2

𝑏) 𝑦 = ln 𝑥2

3+ 1

𝑐) 𝑦 = ln 4𝑥3 + 2𝑥2

𝑑) 𝑦 = 𝑒4𝑥 7 − 𝑒1𝑥

3

𝑒) 𝑦 = 𝑒2𝑥−1 ln 𝑒2𝑥2+ 1

5.10 the gradient function graph

Just like any function, a gradient function can be

graphed.

Theory: The gradient function is related to the

original function: any value of the gradient

function at a given 𝑥 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒 is the gradient at

that same 𝑥 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒 of the original function.

That is, to find the gradient of any point on the

original function (which has not been shown

above), you go up from that point on the 𝑥 − 𝑎𝑥𝑖𝑠

to hit the gradient function, then across to the

𝑦 − 𝑎𝑥𝑖𝑠 which gives a value; this value is the

gradient of the original function.

On the graph above, the gradient of the original

function at 𝑥 = 1, is 2. At 𝑥 = 3, the gradient of

the original function is 7 (Note: the original

function is not shown).

Shown below is shown a function as well as its

gradient function, to reinforce the relationship.

𝑥

𝑦 𝑑𝑦

𝑑𝑥

1 3

2

7

Page 113: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

113

Whenever the original function (blue) is sloping

upwards (i.e. a positive gradient), the gradient

function (red) is above the 𝑥 − 𝑎𝑥𝑖𝑠 (i.e. is

positive). For any 𝑥 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒 to the left of 𝑥 = −2,

the gradient of the original function is positive, and

so the gradient function to the left of 𝑥 = −2 is

above the 𝑥 − 𝑎𝑥𝑖𝑠. Similarly for any 𝑥 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒 to

the right of 𝑥 = 1.

Whenever the original function is sloping

downwards (i.e. negative gradient), the gradient

function is below the 𝑥 − 𝑎𝑥𝑖𝑠. That is, any

𝑥 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒 between 𝑥 = −2 and 𝑥 = 1, the slope

of the original function is negative, and so the

gradient function is below the 𝑥 − 𝑎𝑥𝑖𝑠.

Where there is a maximum or minimum on the

original function, the gradient is zero, and this is

where the gradient function crosses the 𝑥 − 𝑎𝑥𝑖𝑠.

That is, at 𝑥 = −2, 𝑥 = 1.

Theory: a positive gradient on the original function

gives a value above the 𝑥 − 𝑎𝑥𝑖𝑠 on the gradient

function. A negative gradient on the original

function gives a value below the 𝑥 − 𝑎𝑥𝑖𝑠 on the

gradient function. When the original function is at

a stationary point, the gradient function crosses

the 𝑥 − 𝑎𝑥𝑖𝑠. An inflection point on the original

function maps to a turning point on the gradient

function (i.e. either a maximum or a minimum).

The steeper the slope at a particular point on the

original function, the further the gradient function

is from the 𝑥 − 𝑎𝑥𝑖𝑠. Similarly, the smaller the

slope of the original function, the closer the

gradient function is to the 𝑥 − 𝑎𝑥𝑖𝑠 at that point.

Re-read this section before trying the following

exercises, as it takes a little time to fully

understand.

Exercises: 1. Sketch the original function (i.e. the quadratic):

𝑦 = 3 𝑥 + 3 2 − 5 (using theory from Chapter 4) then sketch the gradient function on the same set of axes.

2. Given the function graphed below, sketch in the gradient function.

3. Given the gradient function below, sketch in the

original function.

5.11 simple applications

Remember that the gradient function gives us a

method of finding the gradient of a point on the

original function.

Theory: to find the gradient of a point 𝑥 = 𝑎

where 𝑎 is a number, differentiate the original

function to get the gradient function, then put the

number 𝑎 into the gradient function. The value

𝑥

𝑦 𝒅𝒚

𝒅𝒙

𝑥

𝑦

𝒚 = 𝒇(𝒙)

𝑑𝑦

𝑑𝑥

𝑦 = 𝑓(𝑥)

𝑥

𝑦

−2 1

Page 114: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

114

from the gradient function is the gradient of the

original function at 𝑥 = 𝑎.

Example 1: find the gradient of

𝑦 =𝑥2 − 3𝑥

𝑒4𝑥 − 1

when 𝑥 = −3 and also when 𝑥 = −1.

Plan: use the quotient rule as the base rule

𝑑𝑦

𝑑𝑥=

𝑑𝑒𝑟 𝑇𝑂𝑃 × 𝐵𝑂𝑇 − 𝑑𝑒𝑟 𝐵𝑂𝑇 × 𝑇𝑂𝑃

[𝐵𝑂𝑇𝑇𝑂𝑀]2

then use the 𝑒 rule to find the gradient function.

Substitute the 𝑥 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒𝑠 (one at a time) into the

gradient function.

Solution:

𝑑𝑒𝑟 𝑇𝑂𝑃 = 2𝑥 − 3

𝑑𝑒𝑟 𝐵𝑂𝑇𝑇𝑂𝑀 = 4 𝑒4𝑥

Substitute into the quotient rule:

𝑑𝑦

𝑑𝑥=

2𝑥 − 3 𝑒4𝑥 − 1 − 4 𝑒4𝑥 𝑥2 − 3𝑥

𝑒4𝑥 − 1 2

Simplification is not required as only the final

number is needed (i.e. the gradient at a point). To

get this number, substitute 𝑥 = −3 into the

gradient function:

𝑑𝑦

𝑑𝑥 −3

= −6 − 3 𝑒−12 − 1 − 4 𝑒−12 9 + 9

𝑒−12 − 1 2

Simplifying gives:

𝑑𝑦

𝑑𝑥 −3 =

−9𝑒−12 + 9 − 72𝑒−12

𝑒−12 − 1 2

=−81𝑒−12 + 9

𝑒−12 − 1 2≈ 8.9996 (4𝑝. 𝑑. )

Thus the gradient of the original function at

𝑥 = −3 is approximately 8.9996.

For the gradient at 𝑥 = −1, substitute 𝑥 = −1 into

the gradient function:

𝑑𝑦

𝑑𝑥 −1 =

−2 − 3 𝑒−4 − 1 − 4 𝑒−4 1 + 3

𝑒−4 − 1 2

Simplify:

𝑑𝑦

𝑑𝑥 𝑥 = −1 =

−5𝑒−4 + 5 − 16𝑒−4

𝑒−4 − 1 2

=−21𝑒−4 + 5

𝑒−4 − 1 2≈ 4.7892 (4𝑑. 𝑝. )

which is the gradient of the original function at

𝑥 = −1.

Example 2: a car manufacturer has a monthly

profit function

𝜋 = −𝑄2 + 150𝑄 − 5000

and is currently producing 70 cars per month. Use

the properties of the gradient function to

determine if it is more profitable for the firm to

increase production.

Plan: differentiate the profit function, then

substitute 𝑄 = 70 into the gradient function. If the

gradient is positive, more output will increase

profits. If the gradient is negative, then increased

output will reduce profits.

Solution:

𝑑𝜋

𝑑𝑄= −2𝑄 + 150

Substitute 𝑄 = 70 into this gradient function:

𝑑𝜋

𝑑𝑄 70 = −140 + 150 = 10 > 0

Since the gradient is positive, if output is

increased, profits will also increase.

Exercises: 1. Determine the gradient of the function

𝜋 = 5𝑄4 +1

𝑄− 7

At the points 𝑄 = 4, 𝑄 = 7. Give exact answers. 2. Determine the gradient of the function

𝑦 = 𝑒𝑥2 𝑥3 + 2 2

At the points 𝑄 = 2, 𝑄 = 5. Give exact answers and approximations.

3. A firm manufacturing cranes has current output of 10 and a profit function: 𝜋 = −207𝑄 log 0.03𝑄2 + 0.02𝑄 − 30𝑄 − 400

Will increasing output lead to increased profits? Justify your answer.

Page 115: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

115

chapter five summary

Differentiation is finding the rate the 𝑦 − 𝑎𝑥𝑖𝑠 changes when there is a change in the 𝑥 − 𝑎𝑥𝑖𝑠. The gradient of a line tangent to a given point is the rate of change of 𝑦 for changes in 𝑥.

𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑑𝑖𝑒𝑛𝑡 = 𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑐𝑕𝑎𝑛𝑔𝑒 = 𝑚𝑎𝑟𝑔𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒

The gradient function is a function that gives the gradient of the original function at all the points along the original function.

Differentiation by First Principles is the formula:

𝑓 ′ = lim𝑠→0

𝑓 𝑥 + 𝑠 − 𝑓 𝑥

𝑠

The power rule: For the original function 𝑦 = 𝑎𝑥𝑛 The derivative function is 𝑦′ = 𝑛𝑎𝑥𝑛−1

The derivative of a constant is zero

The chain rule: differentiate the function as if using the power rule, then multiply by the derivative of the inside of the brackets.

𝑑𝑦

𝑑𝑥=

𝑑𝑦

𝑑𝑢×

𝑑𝑢

𝑑𝑥

The product rule: For the function:

The derivative function is: 𝑓 ’(𝑥) = 𝑔’(𝑥). 𝑕(𝑥) + 𝑔(𝑥). 𝑕’(𝑥)

𝑜𝑟 𝑑𝑦

𝑑𝑥= 𝑑𝑒𝑟 1𝑠𝑡 × 2𝑛𝑑 + 𝑑𝑒𝑟 2𝑛𝑑 × 1𝑠𝑡

The quotient rule is. For the function:

𝑦(𝑥) =𝑡(𝑥)

𝑏(𝑥)

The gradient function is:

𝑑𝑦

𝑑𝑥=

𝑡 ′ 𝑥 × 𝑏 𝑥 − 𝑏′(𝑥) × 𝑡(𝑥)

𝑏(𝑥) 2

𝑑𝑦

𝑑𝑥=

𝑑𝑒𝑟 𝑇𝑂𝑃 × 𝐵𝑂𝑇𝑇𝑂𝑀 − 𝑑𝑒𝑟 𝐵𝑂𝑇𝑇𝑂𝑀 × 𝑇𝑂𝑃

[𝐵𝑂𝑇𝑇𝑂𝑀]2

The formal 𝑒 rule is:

For the function 𝑦 = 𝑒𝑓 𝑥

The derivative is 𝑦′ = 𝑓 ′ 𝑥 𝑒𝑓 𝑥

Formally, the ln rule is: For the function 𝑦 = ln 𝑓(𝑥)

The gradient function is 𝑦′ =𝑓 ′ 𝑥

𝑓 𝑥

The second derivative of a function is obtained by differentiating the function once, and then differentiating the derivative.

The gradient function is related to the original function: any value of the gradient function at a given 𝑥 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒 is the gradient at that same 𝑥 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒 of the original function. A positive gradient on the original function gives a value above the 𝑥 − 𝑎𝑥𝑖𝑠 on the gradient function. A negative gradient on the original function gives a value below the 𝑥 − 𝑎𝑥𝑖𝑠 on the gradient function. When the original function is at a stationary point, the gradient function crosses the 𝑥 − 𝑎𝑥𝑖𝑠. An inflection point on the original function maps to a turning point on the gradient function (i.e. either a maximum or a minimum).

To find the gradient of a point 𝑥 = 𝑎 where 𝑎 is a number, differentiate the original function to get the gradient function, then put the number 𝑎 into the gradient function. The value from the gradient function is the gradient of the original function at 𝑥 = 𝑎.

chapter five questions

1. Order the points on the following graph from lowest gradient to highest gradient:

2. Use differentiation by first principles to determine

the gradient of the following functions: 𝑎) 𝑦 = 18𝑥 𝑏) 𝑦 = 𝑥2 𝑐) 𝑦 = (𝑥 + 3)(𝑥 + 4) 𝑑) 𝑦 = 𝑥3 + 4𝑥2

𝑒) 𝑦 =5

𝑥 𝑓) 𝑦 =

1

𝑥2

3. Using the power rule, differentiate the following functions: 𝑎) 𝑦 = 3𝑥2 𝑏) 𝑦 = 15𝑥2 + 𝑥 𝑐) 𝑦 = 2 + 𝑥2 + 𝑥3

𝑑) 𝑦 =17𝑥3

2+ 5𝑥2

𝑒) 𝑦 = 8𝑥−4 + 𝑥3 − 6 𝑓) 𝑦 = 12𝑥−2 + 𝑥−3 + 𝑥3 + 2

𝑔) 𝑦 =1

𝑥2

𝑕) 𝑦 =15

3𝑥2+ 𝑥2

𝑖) 𝑦 =1

𝑥+

1

𝑥2−

1

𝑥3

4. Using the chain rule, differentiate the functions: 𝑎) 𝑦 = 𝑥 + 1 2 𝑏) 𝑦 = 3𝑥 − 4 5 𝑐) 𝑦 = 2 𝑥 + 5 6 𝑑) 𝑦 = 12 1 − 4𝑥 3 𝑒) 𝑦 = 75 𝑥2 + 𝑥 4

𝑓) 𝑦 = −3 4𝑥 − 1 4

5

5. Using the product rule, differentiate the following functions (Hint: underline the two functions first): 𝑎) 𝑦 = 𝑥3 15𝑥 + 2 𝑏) 𝑦 = 𝑥3 − 1 𝑥9 + 1 𝑐) 𝑦 = 15𝑥4 1 − 𝑥3 𝑑) 𝑦 = 4𝑥−7 𝑥2 + 𝑥4

𝑒) 𝑦 = −1

3𝑥3 + 𝑥4 𝑥5 3

𝑦

𝑥

𝐴

𝐵

𝐶

𝐷 𝐸

𝐹

𝐻

𝐺

𝑓(𝑥) = 𝑔(𝑥). 𝑕(𝑥)

Page 116: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

116

𝑓) 𝑦 = 𝑥−6

−4+ 2𝑥 −1 − 𝑥−3

𝑔) 6 𝑥−6 − 6 𝑥6 − 6𝑥 6. Use the quotient rule to find the derivative of the

following functions:

𝑎) 𝑦 =𝑥 + 1

𝑥 − 1 𝑏) 𝑦 =

2𝑥 + 1

1 − 2𝑥

𝑐) 𝑦 =3𝑥 − 2

1 − 𝑥2 𝑑) 𝑦 =

𝑥2 + 1

𝑥2 − 1

𝑒) 𝑦 =

13𝑥2 + 1

5 − 𝑥 𝑓) 𝑦 =

𝑥2 − 𝑥3

𝑥2 − 2

𝑔) 𝑦 =13𝑥−3 − 𝑥3

1 + 𝑥−4+ 9

𝑕) 𝑦 = 𝑥2 + 1 3 + 𝑥

1 − 3𝑥2

7. Use the 𝑒 rule to find the derivative of the following functions: 𝑎) 𝑦 = 𝑒2𝑥 𝑏) 𝑦 = 𝑒5𝑥−1

𝑐) 𝑦 = 𝑒1−4𝑥 𝑑) 𝑦 = 𝑒𝑥2−1

𝑒) 𝑦 = 𝑒13𝑥−𝑥2 𝑓) 𝑦 = 2𝑒𝑥4−1+𝑥−3

𝑔) 𝑦 = 12𝑒4/𝑥 𝑕) 𝑦 =2𝑒𝑥−3−

𝑥2

−7

8. Using the ln rule, find the derivative of the following functions: 𝑎) 𝑦 = ln 5𝑥 𝑏) 𝑦 = ln 𝑥2 𝑐) 𝑦 = 2 ln 5𝑥 − 1 𝑑) 𝑦 = −3 ln 𝑥2 − 𝑥

𝑒) 𝑦 = −4

−3ln 𝑥−3 + 𝑥

𝑓) 𝑦 = 2 ln 𝑥2 − 𝑥−3 +1

𝑥

𝑔) 𝑦 = 0.04 ln 8𝑥 − 2𝑥−2 9. Using any of the rules, determine the derivative of

the functions: 𝑎) 𝑦 = 2𝑥3 − 1 2 3𝑥 + 5 3 𝑏) 𝑦 = 1 − 𝑒−5𝑥−1 𝑥 − 1 4

𝑐) 𝑦 = ln 𝑒0.2𝑥3+𝑥

𝑑) 𝑦 =1 − 𝑒𝑥2

1 + 𝑒𝑥2

𝑒) 𝑦 = 15 ln 12 − 𝑥−3 4

𝑓) 𝑦 = 1

𝑥5 − 1 1 + ln 𝑥

𝑔) 𝑦 = 5𝑥2𝑒3𝑥−1

𝑕) 𝑦 =1

−3∙

𝑒𝑥 + 1

2𝑥−3 − 𝑥4

𝑖) 𝑦 = 2𝑥3 − 1 7 1 + ln 𝑒𝑥2+ 1

𝑗) 𝑦 =𝑒7𝑥−1 + 𝑥4

ln 𝑥5 + 𝑥−7+ 18𝑥4 − ln 𝑥7 − 1

10. Find the first and second derivatives of the following functions: 𝑎) 𝑦 = 𝑥4 + 15𝑥3 − 1

𝑏) 𝑦 =17

𝑥4+ ln 8𝑥

𝑐) 𝑦 = 0.03𝑥9 + 𝑥2 − 1 4

𝑑) 𝑦 = 𝑒2 1 − 𝑥4 + 𝑒𝑥2−1 1 − 𝑥

𝑒) 𝑦 = 12 − 𝑥

3𝑥2 + 1

𝑓) 𝑦 = ln 5𝑥2 + 𝑥 11. Determine the gradient at 𝑄 = 10 and at 𝑄 = 35

for the production function: 𝑄 = ln 𝑥0.25 + 4𝑥

12. For the following original function, sketch in the gradient function:

13. For the following gradient function, sketch in the

original function:

14. For the total cost function:

𝑇𝐶 = 𝑄3 − 15𝑄2 + 75𝑄 − 5 Determine: a) The gradient function (i.e. marginal cost

function). b) When the marginal cost function is at a

minimum. c) The gradient of the marginal cost function at

𝑄 = 15. d) Sketch the marginal cost function using

quadratic theory. e) Sketch the total cost function from the

marginal cost function. 15. A company producing fishing rods faces a cost

function of the form: 𝑇𝐶 = 50 ln 0.1𝑥2 + 2 3 + 15𝑥 − 18

Determine: a) The marginal cost function. b) The gradient of the marginal cost function

when 𝑄 = 30 and when 𝑄 = 60.

𝑥

𝑦

𝑓 ′ 𝑥

𝑥

𝑦

𝑦 = 𝑓(𝑥)

Page 117: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

117

Chapter 6

Applications of differentiation

The usefulness of differentiation

6.1 Graphical Optimisation 118

6.2 Mathematical Optimisation 118

6.3 The Nature of an Optimal Point 120

6.4 Inflection Points 123

6.5 Combining All Theory 124

6.6 Applications – Profits 126

6.7 Applications – Break-Even 129

6.8 Applications: Marginal and Average Values 130

6.9 Differentiation and Elasticity 133

6.10 Elasticity and Total Revenue 135

Chapter Six Summary 137

Chapter Six Questions 138

Page 118: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

118

6.1 graphical optimisation

Theory: optimisation is the process of finding an

optimal point, with that point usually being a

maximum or minimum.

A shop selling mobile phones aims to maximise

profit. As a consumer, you would like to minimise

how much you pay for a given phone. These are

two optimisation problems; in one case, the firm is

finding a maximum, and in the other case, the

consumer is finding a minimum.

The profit of a firm (usually denoted by 𝜋) is a

function of the quantity of goods sold to

consumers. The following is a typical profit curve,

with 𝜋 on the 𝑦 − 𝑎𝑥𝑖𝑠 and quantity, 𝑄, on the

𝑥 − 𝑎𝑥𝑖𝑠. How many units would you produce?

Any rational person would aim to sell 50 units. Any

other quantity, such as 25 or 90 units, does not

give maximum profit, so these are not optimal

points.

The maximum above is both a local and global

maximum.

Theory: a global optimum is a point that is the

optimal point over the entire number range (i.e.

𝑥 − 𝑎𝑥𝑖𝑠). A local optimum is an optimal point

only over a small range around that point.

Above, there are two maximum points and one

minimum point. Point 𝐴 is a local maximum (a

maximum over a small range around the point),

whereas point 𝐶 is a local and global maximum (a

maximum over the entire number range: 𝑥 −

𝑎𝑥𝑖𝑠). Point 𝐵 is a local minimum, but is not a

global minimum as the ends of the curve are

lower.

Be aware that an optimal point may not always be

the globally optimal point (most of the time it will

be, but you have to make sure).

Exercises: 1. For the graph below, determine which points are

local maxima/minima and global maxima/minima.

6.2 mathematical optimisation

Finding optimal points graphically is quite simple,

however most of the time only the original

function is given, which may be difficult to draw.

This is where differentiation becomes very useful.

Below is a graph where the gradients of optimal

point have been drawn in.

𝑦

𝑥

𝐴

𝐵

𝐶

𝐷

𝐸

𝐹

𝐺

𝑦

𝑥

𝐴

𝐵

𝐶

𝜋

𝑄

𝜋 𝑄

50 25 90

Page 119: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

119

Theory: the gradient at any maximum or any

minimum is always zero.

This feature allows the original function to be

differentiated to obtain the gradient function; the

gradient function is set equal to zero to solve for

the optimal point(s).

Theory: the First Order Condition (FOC) is found by

setting the first derivative equal to zero:

𝑑𝑦

𝑑𝑥= 0

That is, differentiate the function and set it equal

to zero. Solve for the unknown(s).

Example 1: Find the optimal point(s) of the

quadratic

𝑦 = 2𝑥2 − 8𝑥 − 1

Plan: use the FOC to find the 𝑥 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒 𝑠 of the

optimal point(s)

𝑑𝑦

𝑑𝑥= 0

Solution: differentiate the original function:

𝑑𝑦

𝑑𝑥= 4𝑥 − 8

Set it equal to zero:

𝑑𝑦

𝑑𝑥= 4𝑥 − 8 = 0

Rearrange to solve for 𝑥:

4𝑥 = 8

𝑥 = 2

There is an optimal point at 𝑥 = 2.

A point also requires a 𝑦 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒 which comes

from the original function:

𝑦 2 = 2 2 2 − 8 2 − 1

𝑦 2 = −9

Thus 2, −9 is an optimal point.

Example 2: find the optimal point(s) for the

function

𝑦 = 𝑥3 + 3𝑥2 − 24𝑥 + 5

Plan: use the FOC to find the optimal point(s).

𝑑𝑦

𝑑𝑥= 0

Solution: differentiate the original function and set

it to zero (i.e. FOC):

𝑑𝑦

𝑑𝑥= 3𝑥2 + 6𝑥 − 24 = 0

Solving for 𝑥 requires solving this quadratic. To

solve the quadratic, the Quadratic Formula must

be used:

𝑥 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒𝑠 =−𝑏 ± 𝑏2 − 4𝑎𝑐

2𝑎

𝑥 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒𝑠 =−6 ± 62 − 4 3 (−24)

2(3)

𝑥 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒𝑠 =−6 ± 324

6

𝑥 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒𝑠 = −4 OR 𝑥 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒 = 2

This gives two optimal points, but they also require

𝑦 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒𝑠 which come from the original function:

𝑦 −4 = −4 3 + 3 −4 2 − 24 −4 + 5

𝑦 −4 = 85

𝑦 2 = 2 3 + 3 2 2 − 24 2 + 5

𝑦 2 = −23

Both −4,85 and 2, −23 are optimal points.

From the cubics section in Chapter 4, there should

be one local maximum and one local minimum.

Determining which value corresponds to the

maximum and which to the minimum is left to the

next section.

𝑦

𝑥

𝑓 𝑥

Page 120: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

120

Example 3: find the optimal points of the function

𝑓 𝑥 = 𝑥2𝑒2𝑥+3 + 7

Plan: differentiate using the product rule as the

base rule:

𝑑𝑦

𝑑𝑥= 𝑑𝑒𝑟 1𝑠𝑡 × 2𝑛𝑑 + 𝑑𝑒𝑟 2𝑛𝑑 × 1𝑠𝑡

Use the 𝑒 rule within the product rule:

𝑦′ = 𝑓 ′ 𝑥 𝑒𝑓 𝑥

Then apply the FOC:

𝑑𝑦

𝑑𝑥= 0

Solution: define the two functions:

Find the derivative of each of the two parts:

𝑑𝑒𝑟 1𝑠𝑡 = 2𝑥

𝑑𝑒𝑟 2𝑛𝑑 = 2𝑒2𝑥+3

Substitute into the product rule:

𝑑𝑓 𝑥

𝑑𝑥= 2𝑥𝑒2𝑥+3 + 2𝑒2𝑥+3 𝑥2

Simplify and factorise:

𝑑𝑓 𝑥

𝑑𝑥= 2𝑥𝑒2𝑥+3 1 + 𝑥

Apply the FOC:

2𝑥𝑒2𝑥+3 1 + 𝑥 = 0

For the solution, one of the products on the left

side must equal zero. There are three options:

1. 2𝑥 = 0, so 𝑥 = 0;

2. 𝑒2𝑥+3 = 0, but this will never occur as this

never crosses the 𝑥 − 𝑎𝑥𝑖𝑠; or

3. 1 + 𝑥 = 0, giving 𝑥 = −1.

There are two optimal points with 𝑥 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒𝑠

𝑥 = 0 and 𝑥 = −1. For the 𝑦 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒𝑠:

𝑓 0 = 0 2𝑒2 0 +3 + 7

𝑓 0 = 7

𝑓 −1 = −1 2𝑒2 −1 +3 + 7

𝑓 −1 = 𝑒1 + 7 = 𝑒 + 7

Thus 0,0 and −1, 𝑒 + 7 are optimal points.

Exercises: 1. Find any stationary point(s) for the functions:

𝑎) 𝑦 = 𝑥2 − 13𝑥 + 15

𝑏) 𝑦 = 3𝑥3 + 2𝑥2 − 5𝑥 + 15

𝑐) 𝑦 = −7𝑥3

8+ 12𝑥 − 1

𝑑) 𝑦 = 3𝑥2𝑒4𝑥−1

𝑒) 𝑦 =𝑥2 + 1

𝑥 − 3

𝑓) 𝑦 = 𝑒3𝑥+1 + 2𝑒−2𝑥+1 − 6

𝑔) 𝑦 = −𝑥2 + 3𝑥 + 5 𝑒𝑥+5

𝑕) 𝑦 = 𝑒𝑥2 𝑥2 − 3

6.3 the nature of an optimal point

After finding an optimal point, it is important to

determine if that point is a minimum or maximum.

Profit is something which is usually maximised and

if an optimal point was chosen using the FOC

without checking it is a maximum, profit might in

fact be minimised.

The nature of an optimal point is found (i.e. if an

optimal point is a maximum or minimum) using

the second derivative.

Theory: the Second Order Condition (SOC) is used

to find the nature of an optimal point. The point in

question is:

A minimum if the second derivative evaluated

at the optimal point is greater than zero.

Minimum if 𝑑2𝑦

𝑑𝑥2> 0

A maximum if the second derivative evaluated

at the optimal point is less than zero.

Maximum if 𝑑2𝑦

𝑑𝑥2< 0

A stationary inflection point if the second

derivative evaluated at the optimal point is

equal to zero.

Stationary inflection point if 𝑑2𝑦

𝑑𝑥2= 0

The process is quite simple and is easily

demonstrated in an example.

𝑓 𝑥 = 𝑥2𝑒2𝑥+3 + 7

Page 121: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

121

Example 1: find the optimal point and the nature

of this optimal point for the function

𝑦 = −𝑥2 + 2𝑥 + 15

Plan: use the FOC to find any stationary points

𝑑𝑦

𝑑𝑥= 0

Find the second derivative and evaluate at the

optimal point. Then apply the SOC to determine if

it is a maximum or minimum.

Solution: to find any stationary points:

𝑑𝑦

𝑑𝑥= −2𝑥 + 2 = 0

−2𝑥 = −2

𝑥 = 1

The 𝑦 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒 is obtained from the original

function:

𝑦 1 = − 1 2 + 2 1 + 15

𝑦 1 = 16

The second derivative is:

𝑑2𝑦

𝑑𝑥2= −2

Apply the SOC:

𝑑2𝑦

𝑑𝑥2= −2 < 0 ∴ maximum

Thus there is a maximum at 1,16 .

From Chapter 4, since the value of 𝑎 in the

quadratic is negative, a maximum is expected.

Example 2: find any optimal points and their

nature for the function

𝑦 = 𝑥3 − 12𝑥2 + 36𝑥 + 24

Plan: use the FOC to find any optimal points. Then

find the second derivative, and evaluate it at any

optimal points; apply the SOC to the results.

Solution: find the optimal points

𝑑𝑦

𝑑𝑥= 3𝑥2 − 24𝑥 + 36 = 0

Solve using the Quadratic Formula:

𝑥 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒𝑠 =−𝑏 ± 𝑏2 − 4𝑎𝑐

2𝑎

𝑥 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒𝑠 =−(−24) ± (−24)2 − 4 3 (36)

2(3)

𝑥 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒𝑠 =24 ± 576 − 432

6

𝑥 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒𝑠 =24 ± 12

6

𝑥 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒𝑠 = 2 𝑂𝑅 𝑥 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒 = 6

The two optimal points have 𝑥 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒𝑠 of 𝑥 = 2

and 𝑥 = 6. The corresponding 𝑦 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒𝑠 are:

𝑦 2 = 2 3 − 12 2 2 + 36 2 + 24

𝑦 2 = 56

𝑦 6 = 6 3 − 12 6 2 + 36 6 + 24

𝑦 6 = 24

Thus the two points are (2,56) and (6,24).

Find the second derivative:

𝑑2𝑦

𝑑𝑥2= 6𝑥 − 24

Evaluate the second derivative at 𝑥 = 2:

𝑑2𝑦

𝑑𝑥2 2 = 6 2 − 24 = −12 < 0

∴ maximum at 𝑥 = 2

Evaluate the second derivative at 𝑥 = 6:

𝑑2𝑦

𝑑𝑥2 6 = 6 6 − 24 = 12 > 0

∴ minimum at 𝑥 = 6

Thus 2,56 is a maximum, and 6,24 is a

minimum.

To summarise the process:

1. Find the optimal 𝑥 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒𝑠 from the FOC

and their corresponding 𝑦 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒𝑠.

2. Determined if the point(s) are maxima or

minima by substituting those 𝑥 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒𝑠

from the FOC into the second derivative,

3. Applying the SOC.

Example 3: find and define any optimal points for

𝑦 = 𝑒𝑥2−3 + ln 4 − 𝑥2

Plan: find any optimal points using the FOC

𝑑𝑦

𝑑𝑥= 0

Page 122: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

122

The 𝑒 rule and power rule need to be used. Then

find and evaluate the second derivative at the

optimal points, and apply the SOC.

Solution: find the optimal points using the FOC:

𝑑𝑦

𝑑𝑥= 2𝑥𝑒𝑥2−3 − 2𝑥 = 0

2𝑥𝑒𝑥2−3 − 2𝑥 = 0

2𝑥(𝑒𝑥2−3 − 1) = 0

So either 2𝑥 = 0 or 𝑒𝑥2−3 − 1 = 0

If 2𝑥 = 0, then 𝑥 = 0.

If 𝑒𝑥2−3 − 1 = 0 then

𝑒𝑥2−3 = 1

The only time when an exponential is equal to 1 is

when the exponent is equal to zero. So 𝑥2 − 3 = 0

is required:

𝑥2 = 3

𝑥2 = 3

𝑥 = − 3 and 𝑥 = + 3

There are three solutions for optimal points:

𝑥 = 0, 𝑥 = − 3 and 𝑥 = + 3

For the 𝑦 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒𝑠:

𝑦 0 = 𝑒 0 2−3 + ln 4 − 0 2

= 𝑒−3 + ln 4

𝑦 − 3 = 𝑒 − 3 2−3 + ln 4 − − 3

2

= ln 4 − 2

𝑦 3 = 𝑒 3 2−3 + ln 4 − 3

2

= ln 4 − 2

Giving points − 3, ln 4 − 2 , 3, ln 4 − 2 and

0, 𝑒−3 + ln 4 .

Use the second derivative to find the nature of the

three points:

𝑑2𝑦

𝑑𝑥2= 2𝑒𝑥2−3 + 2𝑥 𝑒𝑥2−3 2𝑥 − 2

= 2𝑒𝑥2−3 + 4𝑥2 𝑒𝑥2−3 − 2

The product rule was used to evaluate the second

derivative however simplification is not needed as

all that is required is to evaluate the second

derivative at each of the three optimal points:

1. For 𝑥 = 0:

𝑑2𝑦

𝑑𝑥2(0) = 2𝑒0−3 + 4(0)2 𝑒0−3 − 2

= 2𝑒−3 − 2 ≈ −1.9 < 0 ∴ maximum

The −1.9 can be obtained from a calculator.

2. For 𝑥 = − 3:

𝑑2𝑦

𝑑𝑥2(− 3) = 2𝑒(− 3)2−3 + 4(− 3)2 𝑒(− 3)2−3 − 2

= 2𝑒0 + 12𝑒0 − 2 = 12 > 0 ∴ minimum

3. For 𝑥 = 3:

𝑑2𝑦

𝑑𝑥2 + 3 = 2𝑒 + 3

2−3 + 4 + 3

2 𝑒 + 3 2−3 − 2

= 2𝑒0 + 12𝑒0 − 2 = 12 > 0 ∴ minimum

Thus − 3, ln 4 − 2 and 3, ln 4 − 2 are

minima, and 0, 𝑒−3 + ln 4 is a maxima. The two

minimums are flanking a maximum (the shape of a

W).

Note: a good way of remembering the SOC is that

it is not what is intuitively expected. If the second

derivative at the point in question is greater than

zero, it is a minimum (see, it’s not what is

intuitively expected). Similarly, if the second

derivative at the point in question is less than zero,

it is a maximum (again, not what is intuitively

expected).

Exercises: 1. Find any stationary points for the functions below,

then determine the nature of these stationary points.

𝑎) 𝑦 = 3𝑥2 − 11𝑥 + 10

𝑏) 𝑦 = 𝑥3 + 4𝑥2 − 5𝑥 + 1

𝑐) 𝑦 = −2𝑥3

9+ 2𝑥 − 19

𝑑) 𝑦 = 5𝑥2𝑒−7𝑥+4

𝑒) 𝑦 =4𝑥2 + 3

5 − 𝑥

𝑓) 𝑦 = 𝑒−3𝑥−6 + −5

6 𝑒7𝑥+1 − 5

𝑔) −3𝑥2 + 5𝑥 + 12 𝑒𝑥+4

𝑕) 𝑦 = 3𝑒𝑥2 2𝑥2 − 8

Page 123: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

123

6.4 inflection points

Theory: Inflection points are points of a function

where a function changes from concave to convex

(or vice versa).

Concave means that the curve looks like part of a

cave when drawn on a set of axes; and convex is

when a “cave” cannot be drawn (for a technical

definition, consult a second year mathematics for

economists text book).

Below, the red lines are concave, as they could be

drawn into a smooth “cave” shape, whereas the

blue lines cannot, so they are convex.

Theory: an inflection point is where a function

changes from convex to concave (or concave to

convex).

But a much easier way of understanding this is to

draw an inflection point.

Notice that the function is initially concave (red)

and then changes to convex (blue). The point at

which this change occurs is the inflection point.

Theory: There are two main types of inflection

points:

1. Stationary inflection points have a gradient of

zero at the inflection point, but are not

maxima nor minima.

2. Non-stationary inflection points do not have a

gradient of zero at the inflection point.

The blue function has a non-stationary inflection

point, whereas the red function has a stationary

inflection point.

The mathematical way of finding inflection points

is a continuation of the SOC.

Theory: if the SOC is evaluated for a stationary

point and is found to be zero, that point is a

stationary inflection point.

A generic way of finding any inflection point (not

just a stationary inflection point) is a continuation

of the SOC:

SOC for any inflection point: 𝑑2𝑦

𝑑𝑥2= 0

That is, set the second derivative equal to zero,

then solve for 𝑥. This finds all inflection points.

Example 1: find any inflection point(s) (if they

exist) for the function

𝑦 = 𝑥3 − 3𝑥2 − 28𝑥 + 60

Plan: find the second derivative, set it to zero then

solve for 𝑥.

Solution: differentiate the function twice:

𝑦

𝑥

stationary inflection point

non-stationary inflection point

𝑦

𝑥

inflection point

𝑦

𝑥

Page 124: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

124

𝑑𝑦

𝑑𝑥= 3𝑥2 − 6𝑥 − 28

𝑑2𝑦

𝑑𝑥2= 6𝑥 − 6

Set the second derivative equal to zero.

6𝑥 − 6 = 0

𝑥 = 1

There is an inflection point at 𝑥 = 1. To find the

corresponding 𝑦 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒 use the original function.

𝑦(1) = 1 3 − 3 1 2 − 28(1) + 60

= 1 − 3 − 28 + 60 = 30

There is an inflection point at (1,30).

Theory: if the FOC and SOC (inflection point) have

the same 𝑥 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒, then that inflection point is a

stationary inflection point.

Example 2: prove the following function has one

inflection point, and that it is a stationary

inflection point

𝑓 𝑥 = 𝑥 − 1 3 + 2

Plan: find any stationary points using the FOC

𝑑𝑓 𝑥

𝑑𝑥= 0

Then find any inflection points by setting the

second derivative equal to zero

𝑑2𝑓 𝑥

𝑑𝑥2= 0

If a single 𝑥 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒 is both an inflection and

stationary point, then it must be a stationary

inflection point.

Solution: find any stationary points using the FOC:

𝑑𝑓 𝑥

𝑑𝑥= 3 𝑥 − 1 2 = 0

For the left side to equal zero, (𝑥 − 1) must equal

zero, as then 3 0 2 = 0. So if 𝑥 − 1 = 0, 𝑥 = 1.

There is only one stationary point at 𝑥 = 1.

Expanding the brackets and applying the Quadratic

Formula will give the same solution.

To find any stationary points:

𝑑2𝑓 𝑥

𝑑𝑥2= 6 𝑥 − 1 = 0

Again, for the left side to be equal to zero (𝑥 − 1)

must equal zero. This means 𝑥 = 1.

Since 𝑥 = 1 is a stationary point (from the FOC)

and at that same point it is also an inflection point

(from the SOC), then it must be a stationary

inflection point.

Finally, to find the 𝑦 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒 at 𝑥 = 1, substitute

𝑥 = 1 in to the original function:

𝑓 1 = 1 − 1 3 + 2 = 2

There is a stationary inflection point at (1,2).

Exercises: 1. Determine any inflection points for the functions

below (Note: some functions do not have inflection points).

𝑎) 𝑦 = 𝑥3 + 5𝑥2 − 2𝑥 + 1

𝑏) 𝑦 = −3𝑥3 + 7𝑥 − 13

𝑐) 𝑦 =−13𝑥3

4+ 12𝑥2 − 54 + 𝑥

𝑑) 𝑦 = 2𝑥4 + 13𝑥3 − 12𝑥

𝑒) 𝑦 = 0.25𝑥4 − 𝑥3 − 10𝑥2 + 12𝑥 − 71

𝑓) 𝑦 =𝑥2 + 1

𝑥 − 3

𝑔) 𝑦 = −2𝑥2 + 4𝑥 + 10 𝑒𝑥+3

𝑕) 𝑦 = ln 𝑥2 − 9

6.5 combining all theory

Theory summary: The FOC finds the stationary

point(s) of a function.

𝐹𝑂𝐶: 𝑑𝑦

𝑑𝑥= 0

Evaluating the second derivative at any stationary

points, then applying the SOC finds the nature:

𝑑2𝑦

𝑑𝑥2> 0 is a minimum

𝑑2𝑦

𝑑𝑥2< 0 is a maximum

𝑑2𝑦

𝑑𝑥2= 0 is a stationary inflection point

To find any inflection points, set the second

derivative to zero and solve for 𝑥:

Page 125: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

125

𝑑2𝑦

𝑑𝑥2= 0

To find 𝑦 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒𝑠, substitute the respective

𝑥 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒𝑠 into the original function.

Example 1: find the nature of all stationary and

inflection points for the function

𝑓 𝑥 = 0.25𝑥4 − 18𝑥2 + 31

Plan: use the FOC to find any stationary points:

𝑑𝑦

𝑑𝑥= 0

Then evaluate the second derivative at these

points, and apply the SOC. Finally, set the second

derivative equal to zero to find any inflection

points.

Solution: use the FOC to find any stationary points:

𝑑𝑓 𝑥

𝑑𝑥= 𝑥3 − 36𝑥 = 0

𝑥3 − 36𝑥 = 0

𝑥(𝑥2 − 36) = 0

So either 𝑥 = 0 𝑂𝑅 𝑥2 − 36 = 0

Separate the second part into two answers:

𝑥2 − 36 = 0

𝑥2 = 36

𝑥 = ±6

The stationary points have 𝑥 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒𝑠 𝑥 = 0, 𝑥 =

−6 and 𝑥 = 6.

Find the nature of these points:

𝑑2𝑦

𝑑𝑥2= 3𝑥2 − 36

1. 𝑑2𝑦

𝑑𝑥2 0 = 3 0 2 − 36 = −36 < 0

∴ maximum

2. 𝑑2𝑦

𝑑𝑥2 −6 = 3 −6 2 − 36 = 72 > 0

∴ minimum

3. 𝑑2𝑦

𝑑𝑥2 6 = 3 6 2 − 36 = 72 > 0

∴ minimum

A maximum at 𝑥 = 0 is flanked by minima at

𝑥 = −6 and 𝑥 = 6.

To find the inflection points:

𝑑2𝑦

𝑑𝑥2= 3𝑥2 − 36 = 0

3𝑥2 = 36

𝑥2 = 12

𝑥 = ± 12

There are two inflection points; one at 𝑥 = − 12

and another at 𝑥 = + 12.

Having figured out the 𝑥 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒𝑠 of all the

important points, the 𝑦 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒𝑠 can now be

found using the original function (see if you get the

same 𝑦 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒𝑠):

minimum at (−6, −293)

inflection point at − 12, −149

maximum at 0,31

inflection point at ( 12, −149)

minimum at (6, −293)

Sketching this function is quite simple; plot these 5

points, and at each minimum draw a small happy

face, and then at each maximum draw a small sad

face:

Then simply extend the lines to form a curve.

Obviously, this sketch is not to scale, but as long as

the general shape is correct and the important

points labelled, that is all that matters. The

𝑦

𝑥

(0,31)

( 12, −149) (− 12, −149)

(6, −293) (−6, −293)

Page 126: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

126

𝑥 − 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑝𝑡𝑠 could also be found, but they are

beyond the scope of this book.

Example 2: determine the nature of any stationary

points, as well as any inflection points for

𝑔 𝑥 = 3𝑥𝑒−𝑥−4

Plan: use the FOC and SOC to find the nature and

location of any stationary point(s), then set the

second derivative equal to zero to find any

inflection points.

Solution: the FOC using the product and 𝑒 rules:

𝑑𝑒𝑟 1𝑠𝑡 = 3

𝑑𝑒𝑟 2𝑛𝑑 = −1 𝑒−𝑥−4

Substituting into the product rule:

𝑔′ 𝑥 = 3𝑒−𝑥−4 + 3𝑥 −1 𝑒−𝑥−4

𝑔′ 𝑥 = 3𝑒−𝑥−4 1 − 𝑥 = 0

There are two possibilities:

1. 3𝑒−𝑥−4 = 0, which is not possible, as this

exponential never crosses the 𝑥 − 𝑎𝑥𝑖𝑠.

2. 1 − 𝑥 = 0 therefore 𝑥 = 1.

There is only one stationary point. To determine

the nature of this point, find the second derivative

(using the product rule on 𝑔′ 𝑥 above):

𝑔′′ 𝑥 = 3 −1 𝑒−𝑥−4 1 − 𝑥 + −1 3𝑒−𝑥−4

Simplify this to the extreme (easier to work with):

𝑔′′ 𝑥 = −3𝑒−𝑥−4 1 − 𝑥 − 3𝑒−𝑥−4

𝑔′′ 𝑥 = −3𝑒−𝑥−4 1 − 𝑥 + 1

𝑔′′ 𝑥 = −3𝑒−𝑥−4 2 − 𝑥

Evaluate the second derivative at the 𝑥 = 1:

𝑔′′ 1 = −3𝑒−1−4 2 − 1 ≈ −0.0202

𝑎𝑠 − 0.0202 < 0 ∴ maximum

To find any inflection points, set the second

derivative equal to zero:

𝑔′′ 𝑥 = 0

−3𝑒−𝑥−4 2 − 𝑥 = 0

For this to be true, either −3𝑒−𝑥−4 = 0 which

we know from our work with exponentials is never

the case, or 2 − 𝑥 = 0 which is true when 𝑥 = 2.

Thus there is an inflection point at 𝑥 = 2.

Finally, the 𝑦 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒𝑠 of the two points are

obtained from the original function:

𝑔 1 = 3 1 𝑒−1−4 =3

𝑒5

𝑔 2 = 3 2 𝑒−2−4 =6

𝑒6

Remember index rules; that is why the 𝑒’s become

denominators.

There is a maximum at (1,3

𝑒5) and an inflection

point at (2,6

𝑒6). The inflection point is not a

stationary inflection point as there is no

corresponding 𝑥 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒 in the FOC.

Exercises: 1. Determine the nature of any stationary points for

the following functions, then determine if there are any inflection points. 𝑎) 𝑦 = 3𝑥4 + 5𝑥3 − 2𝑥2 − 14

𝑏) 𝑦 = 4𝑥 − 3 4

𝑐) 𝑦 = ln 5𝑥 + 3 + 𝑥 − 2 𝑥 − 3

𝑑) 𝑦 = ln 8𝑥 + 7 + 𝑥 − 1.5 0.5𝑥 − 2.75

𝑒) 𝑦 = −4𝑥2 + 4𝑥 + 12 𝑒5+𝑥

2. Sketch the following functions after the nature of all stationary points and inflection points have been found. 𝑎) 𝑦 = 𝑥 𝑥 − 3 𝑥 + 7

𝑏) 𝑦 = 𝑥 − 5 𝑥 − 3 2 𝑥 + 5

𝑐) 𝑦 = 5𝑥4 − 3𝑥3 + 12𝑥2 − 8𝑥 + 18

6.6 applications – profit

Intro example: you have just finished your

business degree and all you want to do is lie on the

beach all day and not work. But you need to make

money, so you open a small shop on the sand and

you sell surfboards. You obviously want to

minimise your time in the shop and also maximise

your profits. You’ve done a business degree so you

sit down one day and determine the approximate

demand function for surfboards to be

𝑃𝑑 = 350 − 5𝑄𝑑

Page 127: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

127

You purchase the surfboards from a supplier for

$50 each, and it costs you $400/month to rent the

sand from the local government. What price

should you set to maximise your profits? This is a

very common application of optimisation.

Theory: the general form of profit is:

𝑃𝑟𝑜𝑓𝑖𝑡 = 𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑅𝑒𝑣𝑒𝑛𝑢𝑒 − 𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝐶𝑜𝑠𝑡𝑠

𝜋 = 𝑇𝑅 − 𝑇𝐶

Total revenue can also be simplified:

𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑅𝑒𝑣𝑒𝑛𝑢𝑒 = 𝑃𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑒 × 𝑄𝑢𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑖𝑡𝑦 𝑠𝑜𝑙𝑑

𝑇𝑅 = 𝑃 ∙ 𝑄

If you sold 10 surfboards at $200 each, total

revenue would be 10 × $200 = $2000. But there

is another layer: the quantity of goods sold

depends on the demand for the goods. Thus

𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑅𝑒𝑣𝑒𝑛𝑢𝑒 depends on the demand function.

To find profits, costs need to be defined.

Theory: in general, total costs are represented by:

𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝐶𝑜𝑠𝑡𝑠 = 𝐹𝑖𝑥𝑒𝑑 𝐶𝑜𝑠𝑡𝑠 + 𝑉𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑏𝑙𝑒 𝐶𝑜𝑠𝑡𝑠

𝑇𝐶 = 𝐹𝐶 + 𝑉𝐶

Variable costs are usually represented by:

𝑉𝐶 = 𝐶𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡 × 𝑄

Where the constant is how much a single item

costs from the supplier.

Above, the $400/month to rent the area on the

sand is a fixed cost, because it does not matter

how many surfboards are sold, that $400 still

needs to be paid to the local government. The

variable costs are those costs which are affected

when a good is sold. When a surfboard is sold at

the beach, you as the owner would have bought

that from a supplier.

Theory summary:

𝜋 = 𝑇𝑅 − 𝑇𝐶

𝑇𝑅 = 𝑃 ∙ 𝑄

𝑑𝑒𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑓𝑢𝑛𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑖𝑛 𝑡𝑕𝑒 𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑚 𝑃 𝑄

𝑇𝐶 = 𝐹𝐶 + 𝑉𝐶

All functions are in terms of 𝑄 as profits are

directly determined by the quantity of goods sold.

To solve the above example:

𝑇𝑅 = 𝑃 ∙ 𝑄

Insert the demand function into the 𝑇𝑅 function to

substitute away the 𝑃 and have 𝑇𝑅 in terms of 𝑄:

𝑇𝑅 = 350 − 5𝑄 𝑄

Simplify:

𝑇𝑅 = 350𝑄 − 5𝑄2

𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝐶𝑜𝑠𝑡𝑠 are:

𝑇𝐶 = 𝐹𝐶 + 𝑉𝐶

𝑇𝐶 = 400 + 50𝑄

The 400 is the rent, and the 50𝑄 is the cost of

buying 𝑄 surfboards from the supplier (i.e. $50 for

each surfboard multiplied by the quantity of

surfboards sold, 𝑄).

Now that both 𝑇𝑅 and 𝑇𝐶 have been found, the

profit function can be determined.

𝜋 = 𝑇𝑅 − 𝑇𝐶

𝜋 = 350𝑄 − 5𝑄2 − 400 + 50𝑄

𝜋 = 350𝑄 − 5𝑄2 − 400 − 50𝑄

𝜋 = −5𝑄2 + 300𝑄 − 400

Note: the 𝑇𝐶 function was written in brackets, to

emphasise the negative sign goes into all terms

inside that bracket. This is where many students

screw up, so don’t be one of them.

The quantity of surfboards to be sold to maximise

profit is found by determining the maximum of this

profit function using the FOC and SOC:

𝑑𝜋

𝑑𝑄= −10𝑄 + 300 = 0

−10𝑄 = −300

𝑄 = 30

To make sure this is a maximum:

𝑑2𝜋

𝑑𝑄2= −10

Page 128: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

128

𝑑2𝜋

𝑑𝑄2 30 = −10 < 0 ∴ maximum

Thus 30 surfboards need to be sold to maximise

profit. However, as a supplier, you can never

control how many surfboards you sell, but you can

control the price. The demand function gives the

price required to sell 30 surfboards per month,

which maximises profit.

𝑃 = 350 − 5𝑄

𝑃 30 = 350 − 5 30

𝑃 30 = 200

The surfboards should be priced at $200 each.

Lastly, how much profit will be made per month if

30 boards are sold? Using the profit function,

because as its name implies, it determines profit:

𝜋 = −5𝑄2 + 300𝑄 − 400

𝜋(30) = −5 30 2 + 300(30) − 400

𝜋(30) = −5 30 2 + 300(30) − 400

𝜋 30 = 4100

Example 1: Mr Watkins opens a cake store called

Sugar Overload, and he specialises in wedding

cakes. He figures out his monthly demand is

𝑄 = 80 −𝑃

5

The rent for the bakery he works in is

$500/month, and one cakes costs him

approximately $100 to make. Find the number of

cakes he needs to sell to maximise profit, the price

per cake, and the profit he will make at this price.

Plan: use the profit equation

𝜋 = 𝑇𝑅 − 𝑇𝐶

Replace 𝑇𝑅 with 𝑃 ∙ 𝑄 where 𝑃 is the rearranged

demand function (𝑃 in terms of 𝑄).

Apply the FOC to find any optimal points, then

apply the SOC to determine if it is a maximum.

Substitute the optimal quantity back into the profit

function to determine the maximum profit, then

into the rearranged demand function to get the

price.

Solution: the demand function needs to be

rearranged to isolate 𝑃:

𝑄 = 80 −𝑃

5

𝑄 − 80 = −𝑃

5

(−5)(𝑄 − 80) = 𝑃

𝑃 = −5𝑄 + 400

Substitute this into the 𝑇𝑅 equation:

𝑇𝑅 = 𝑃. 𝑄

𝑇𝑅 = (−5𝑄 + 400). 𝑄

𝑇𝑅 = −5𝑄2 + 400𝑄

Find the 𝑇𝐶 function:

𝑇𝐶 = 𝐹𝐶 + 𝑉𝐶

𝑇𝐶 = 500 + 100𝑄

Set up the profit function:

𝜋 = 𝑇𝑅 − 𝑇𝐶

𝜋 = −5𝑄2 + 400𝑄 − 500 + 100𝑄

𝜋 = −5𝑄2 + 400𝑄 − 500 − 100𝑄

𝜋 = −5𝑄2 + 300𝑄 − 500

Apply the FOC to find any stationary points:

𝑑𝜋

𝑑𝑄= −10𝑄 + 300 = 0

−10𝑄 = −300

𝑄 = 30

Mr Watkins needs to make 30 cakes per month. To

make sure this quantity will give maximum profit,

the SOC must be used:

𝑑2𝜋

𝑑𝑄2= −10

𝑑2𝜋

𝑑𝑄2 30 = −10 < 0 ∴ maximum

What price should Mr Watkins charge for each of

these cakes? Using the (rearranged) demand

function:

𝑃 = −5𝑄 + 400

𝑃(30) = −5(30) + 400

Page 129: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

129

𝑃 30 = −150 + 400 = 250

Looking back to what the question is asking, if Mr

Watkins sells 30 cakes at $250 each, the profit he

will make is:

𝜋 = −5𝑄2 + 300𝑄 − 500

𝜋(30) = −5 30 2 + 300(30) − 500

𝜋 30 = −5 900 + 9000 − 500 = 4000

Thus Mr Watkins should sell 30 cakes per month at

$250 each and he will make a maximum profit of

$4000 per month.

Exercises (remember to prove they are optimal points): 1. A company manufacturing mining truck trays has a

yearly demand of: 𝑃 = −0.05 𝑄 + 200 𝑄 − 200 + 20,000 If the costs labour and capital which average out to $15,500/𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑦 and fixed costs of $7,500/𝑤𝑒𝑒𝑘, determine: a) The yearly revenue function b) The annual cost function c) The annual profit function d) The maximum yearly profit attainable

2. A manufacturer of surfboards faces a monthly demand function of form:

𝑃𝑑 = −0.2𝑄𝑑2 + 110

If costs of making a board are $60 and the factory has fixed costs of $745/𝑚𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑕, determine: a) The revenue function b) The cost function c) The profit function d) The maximum profit attainable

3. A company imports motorbikes from China and sells them onto consumers at an inflated price. If they purchase each motorbike for $5,000, and when on-selling the motorbikes, they face a domestic demand function of: 𝑃𝑑 = − 0.1𝑄 + 15 2 0.1𝑄 + 13 (𝑄 − 22) If there are no other costs, determine: a) The profit function b) The profit maximising quantity.

6.7 applications – break-even

When a business “breaks even”, it means the

revenues just meet the costs. This implies that at

break-even, profit is zero.

Theory: break even is when 𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝐶𝑜𝑠𝑡 equals

𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑅𝑒𝑣𝑒𝑛𝑢𝑒, which implies profit is zero.

𝜋𝐵𝐸 = 0

This is very similar to the previous section, except

that instead of maximising profit, the profit

function is simply set equal to zero.

Example 1: find the break-even quantities for a

firm with a profit function

𝜋 = −𝑄2 + 200𝑄 − 7500

Plan: set the profit function equal to zero and

solve.

Solution: set 𝜋 = 0:

0 = −𝑄2 + 200𝑄 − 7500

Use the Quadratic Formula:

𝑄𝐵𝐸 =−𝑏 ± 𝑏2 − 4𝑎𝑐

2𝑎

𝑄𝐵𝐸 =−200 ± (200)2 − 4 −1 (−7500)

2(−1)

𝑄𝐵𝐸 =−200 ± (200)2 − 4 −1 (−7500)

2(−1)

𝑄𝐵𝐸 =−200 ± 10000

−2=

−200 ± 100

−2

𝑄𝐵𝐸 = 150 or 𝑄𝐵𝐸 = 50

Thus the two break-even quantities are 150 and

50. Mathematically, these are simply the roots of

the profit function:

Example 2: A firm produces wide-screen TV’s and

their estimated demand is

𝑄𝑑 =440 − 4𝑃𝑑

2

If they faces the increasing cost function

𝑇𝐶 = 0.5𝑄2 + 1800

find the break-even output levels for this firm.

𝜋

(50,0) (150,0)

𝐵𝐸1 𝐵𝐸2

𝜋𝑚𝑎𝑥

𝑄

(100,0)

Page 130: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

130

Plan: find 𝑇𝑅 in terms of 𝑄, then replace the profit

equation 𝜋 = 𝑇𝑅 − 𝑇𝐶 to find the profit function.

Set this equal to zero and solve for break-even

output levels.

Solution: rearrange the function to isolate 𝑃:

𝑄 =440 − 4𝑃

2

2𝑄 = 440 − 4𝑃

2𝑄 − 440 = −4𝑃

𝑃 = −0.5𝑄 + 110

Replace the 𝑇𝑅 equation:

𝑇𝑅 = 𝑃. 𝑄

𝑇𝑅 = −0.5𝑄 + 110 𝑄

𝑇𝑅 = −0.5𝑄2 + 110𝑄

Having 𝑇𝑅 and 𝑇𝐶, the 𝜋 function can be formed:

𝜋 = 𝑇𝑅 − 𝑇𝐶

𝜋 = −0.5𝑄2 + 110𝑄 − 0.5𝑄2 + 1800

𝜋 = −0.5𝑄2 + 110𝑄 − 0.5𝑄2 − 1800

𝜋 = −𝑄2 + 110𝑄 − 1800

To find the break even quantities, set 𝜋 = 0:

𝜋𝐵𝐸 = 0

−𝑄2 + 110𝑄 − 1800 = 0

Use the quadratic formula to solve this quadratic:

𝑄𝐵𝐸 =−𝑏 ± 𝑏2 − 4𝑎𝑐

2𝑎

𝑄𝐵𝐸 =−110 ± (110)2 − 4 −1 (−1800)

2(−1)

𝑄𝐵𝐸 =−110 ± 4900

−2=

−110 ± 70

−2

Thus the firm breaks even at 𝑄𝐵𝐸 = 90 or

𝑄𝐵𝐸 = 20.

Exercises (remember to prove they are optimal points): 1. A company selling financial services (e.g. financial

planning) has a monthly demand for the services (on a per minute basis) according to the function:

𝑃 = ln 7𝑄 + 130 If the costs are commissions ($100/𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑡) and fixed costs of $500/𝑚𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑕, determine: a) The revenue function b) The cost function c) The profit function d) The break-even profit e) The maximum profit attainable

2. A manufacturer of mobile phones faces a monthly demand function of form:

𝑃 = 5𝑒−0.5𝑄+6 If costs of making a single mobile phone are $10 and the factory has fixed costs of $1412/𝑚𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑕, determine: a) The revenue function b) The cost function c) The profit function d) The break-even profit e) The maximum profit attainable

3. A company imports cheap golf-clubs from China and sells them onto consumers at an inflated price. If they purchase the golf-clubs for $5 each, and when on-selling the clubs, they face a domestic demand function of:

𝑃 = 𝑄 + 800 𝑄 − 700 If there are no other costs, determine: a) The profit function b) The break-even quantities. c) The profit maximising quantity.

6.8 applications – marginal and

average values

Theory: the average of a group of variables (e.g.

cost) is the sum of all the individual variables (e.g.

sum all the costs) divided by the number of units

(e.g. the number of units sold). The “marginal”

value of a variable is the addition to the total from

an extra (marginal) unit. In mathematical terms:

𝐴𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑔𝑒 =𝑠𝑢𝑚 𝑜𝑓 𝑣𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑏𝑙𝑒𝑠

𝑛𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟 𝑜𝑓 𝑣𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑏𝑙𝑒𝑠

𝑀𝑎𝑟𝑔𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑙 =𝑑𝑦

𝑑𝑥

It is easier to remember that whenever you read

the word “marginal”, it means the derivative.

For example, the average output of labour is the

total output divided by the number of workers.

Similarly, marginal productivity of labour is the

additional output obtained from an extra

(marginal) person being employed (which is found

using the first derivative).

Intro example: a firm manufactures wooden

cabinets in a small factory. When the firm hires the

first worker, that worker produces three cabinets

per day. The firm then hires another worker, and

Page 131: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

131

these two workers, together, produce eight

cabinets (as they are specialising: one cuts the

timber, the other sands it etc.). The firm hires

another person, and now the three employees

produce 12 cabinets. When one worker wants to

use the saw, another worker is using it. After hiring

yet another worker, all four people make 14

cabinets. Hiring any more workers will not at all

increase production, as some of them are always

waiting to use the equipment. In summary:

Worker 1:

o 𝑎𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑔𝑒 𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑝𝑢𝑡 𝑜𝑓 𝑙𝑎𝑏𝑜𝑢𝑟 =3

1= 3

o 𝑚𝑎𝑟𝑔𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑝𝑢𝑡 𝑜𝑓 𝑙𝑎𝑏𝑜𝑢𝑟 = 3

Worker 2:

o 𝑎𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑔𝑒 𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑝𝑢𝑡 𝑜𝑓 𝑙𝑎𝑏𝑜𝑢𝑟 =8

2= 4

o 𝑚𝑎𝑟𝑔𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑝𝑢𝑡 𝑜𝑓 𝑙𝑎𝑏𝑜𝑢𝑟 = 8 − 3 = 5

Worker 3:

o 𝑎𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑔𝑒 𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑝𝑢𝑡 𝑜𝑓 𝑙𝑎𝑏𝑜𝑢𝑟 =12

3= 4

o 𝑚𝑎𝑟𝑔𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑝𝑢𝑡 𝑜𝑓 𝑙𝑎𝑏𝑜𝑢𝑟 = 12 − 8 = 4

Worker 4:

o 𝑎𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑔𝑒 𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑝𝑢𝑡 𝑜𝑓 𝑙𝑎𝑏𝑜𝑢𝑟 =14

4= 3.5

o 𝑚𝑎𝑟𝑔𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑝𝑢𝑡 𝑜𝑓 𝑙𝑎𝑏𝑜𝑢𝑟 = 14 − 12 = 2

Economic theory: as more labour (or other input)

is added to a production process, output initially

increases greatly. However, past some point,

additional labour adds less and less to total output.

Eventually, no additional output can be obtained

from additional labour (and in theory, output may

start to fall).

There are three distinct regions:

1. When output is increasing at an increasing rate

(i.e. convex).

2. When output is increasing at a decreasing rate

(i.e. concave)

3. When output begins to fall.

The point at which it changes from convex to

concave is the inflection point. This theory is

known, in general terms, as the Law of Diminishing

Marginal Returns.

The theory of marginal and average values can be

applied to mathematical functions.

Example 1: find the average cost and marginal cost

functions if the total cost function is

𝑇𝐶 =1

3𝑄3 +

5

2𝑄2 + 50

Plan: divide the 𝑇𝐶 function by 𝑄 to get average

cost, and differentiate 𝑇𝐶 with respect to 𝑄 to get

marginal cost.

Solution: for average costs:

𝐴𝐶 =𝑇𝐶

𝑄

𝐴𝐶 =

13 𝑄3 +

52 𝑄2 + 50

𝑄

𝐴𝐶 =1

3𝑄2 +

5

2𝑄 +

50

𝑄

For marginal costs:

𝑀𝐶 =𝑑𝑇𝐶

𝑑𝑄

𝑀𝐶 = 𝑄2 + 5𝑄

𝐼𝑛𝑝𝑢𝑡

𝑂𝑢𝑡𝑝𝑢𝑡

1. 2. 3.

1 2 3 4

3

8

12

14 𝑂𝑢𝑡𝑝𝑢𝑡

𝐿𝑎𝑏𝑜𝑢𝑟

Page 132: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

132

Example 2: for the given function, find

1. the point where marginal costs are at a

minimum.

2. an expression for average cost.

𝑇𝐶 =𝑄3

100+

−3

10𝑄2 + 3𝑄 + 7

Plan:

1. differentiate 𝑇𝐶 to get 𝑀𝐶. Then find the

minimum of the marginal cost function using

FOC; make sure it is a minimum using the SOC.

2. Average cost is 𝑇𝐶

𝑄

Solution: differentiating 𝑇𝐶:

𝑑𝑇𝐶

𝑑𝑄= 𝑀𝐶 =

3

100𝑄2 −

6

10𝑄 + 3

To find where marginal cost is at a minimum, the

FOC must be applied to the marginal cost function:

𝑑𝑀𝐶

𝑑𝑄=

6

100𝑄 −

6

10= 0

Solve this for 𝑄:

6

100𝑄 =

6

10

𝑄 = 10

To prove this is a minimum:

𝑑2𝑀𝐶

𝑑𝑄2=

6

100> 0 ∴ mimimum

The 𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝐶𝑜𝑠𝑡 at this point is:

𝑇𝐶 10 = 10 3

100+

−3

10 10 2 + 3 10 + 7

𝑇𝐶 10 = 10 − 30 + 30 + 7 = 17

An expression of average costs is:

𝐴𝐶 =𝑇𝐶

𝑄=

𝑄3

100 +−310 𝑄2 + 3𝑄 + 7

𝑄

𝐴𝐶 =𝑄2

100−

3

10𝑄 + 3 +

7

𝑄

Example 3: find the level of output when

productivity of labour changes from increasing at

an increasing rate to increasing at a decreasing

rate, for the production function:

𝑄 = −𝐿3 + 4𝐿 + 10𝐿2 + 20

Plan: remember 𝐿 is the independent variable and

𝑄 the dependent variable. The inflection point

needs to be found (as it is at this point where the

function changes from increasing at an increasing

rate to increasing at a decreasing rate). We know

from Section 6.4 that this is done by setting the

second derivative equal to zero.

Solution: differentiate the function

𝑀𝑃𝐿 =𝑑𝑄

𝑑𝐿= −3𝐿2 + 4 + 20𝐿

Finding the inflection point of an original function

is the same as finding the maximum/minimum for

the first derivative (Chapter 5). So using the FOC

on the 𝑀𝑃𝐿 function:

𝑑𝑀𝑃𝐿

𝑑𝐿=

𝑑𝑄2

𝑑2𝐿= −6𝐿 + 20 = 0

Solving this gives:

6𝐿 = 20

𝐿 =20

6≈ 3.33

Thus between the third and forth unit of labour,

the productivity of labour changes from increasing

at an increasing rate to increasing at a decreasing

rate.

Example 4: find the point where average costs are

equal to marginal costs, for the cost function:

𝑇𝐶 = 0.02 𝑄3 − 36𝑄2 + 432𝑄

Plan: find 𝑀𝐶 and 𝐴𝐶, then set them equal to each

other.

Solution:

𝑀𝐶 =𝑑𝑇𝐶

𝑑𝑄= 0.06𝑄2 − 1.44𝑄 + 8.64

𝐴𝐶 =𝑇𝐶

𝑄

𝐴𝐶 =0.02𝑄3 − 0.72𝑄2 + 8.64𝑄

𝑄

𝐴𝐶 = 0.02𝑄2 − 0.72𝑄 + 8.64

Page 133: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

133

Set 𝑀𝐶 = 𝐴𝐶:

0.06𝑄2 − 1.44𝑄 + 8.64 = 0.02𝑄2 − 0.72𝑄 + 8.64

Bring everything onto one side:

0.04𝑄2 − 0.72𝑄 = 0

Either factorise out 𝑄 or use the quadratic formula

to solve for 𝑄:

𝑄 0.04𝑄 − 0.72 = 0

So either:

1. 𝑄 = 0, or

2. 0.04𝑄 − 0.72 = 0

0.04𝑄 = 0.72

𝑄 = 18

Marginal cost is equal to average cost when 𝑄 = 0

and when 𝑄 = 18.

Exercises: 1. Sketch the function of marginal productivity of an

extra lawn mower (i.e. capital) for a lawn mowing firm with four employees. Justify your interpretation. Initially the firm has no lawn-mowers.

2. Find expressions for the marginal and average costs of the following functions.

𝑎) 𝐶 = 15𝑄2

𝑏) 𝐶 = 16𝑄3 + 12𝑄2 + 5𝑄

𝑐) 𝐶 = 0.05𝑄𝑒0.1𝑄+4

3. Find the marginal productivity of capital in the following production functions:

𝑎) 𝑄 = 14𝐾1.5

𝑏) 𝑄 = 0.01𝐾𝑒4𝐾−1

𝑐) 𝑄 = 𝐾 ln 𝐾 + 1

4. For the revenue and cost functions: 𝑅 𝑄 = 𝑄2 − 257𝑄 + 12,222 𝐶 𝑄 = 5,000 + 180𝑄 a) Determine when marginal revenue and

marginal costs are equal. b) Find the profit function, and find the quantity

where profit is maximised. c) Compare the answers from a) and b) above.

5. For the following functions, find where the average product of labour is equal to the marginal product or labour.

𝑎) 𝑄 = − 𝐿 + 5 2

𝑏) 𝑄 = 𝐿3 − 20𝐿2 + 125𝐿

𝑐) 𝑄 = 𝐿𝑒𝐿−5 − 𝐿2

6.9 differentiation and elasticity

Before reading this section, revise the concept of

elasticity in Chapter 2. Remember that the formula

for elasticity is either:

𝜀 =%∆𝑄

%∆𝑃 𝑂𝑅 𝜀 =

∆𝑄

∆𝑃×

𝑃

𝑄

The formula on the right can be rewritten as:

𝜀 =𝑑𝑄

𝑑𝑃×

𝑃

𝑄

This makes finding elasticities a great deal easier

and allows us to find elasticities of non-linear

functions.

Example 1: find and interpret the elasticity of

supply for the supply function 𝑄𝑠 = 𝑃2 + 𝑃 − 6

when output is 50 units.

Plan: use the elasticity formula:

𝜀𝑠 =𝑑𝑄

𝑑𝑃×

𝑃

𝑄

Differentiate the supply equation, then substitute

into the elasticity equation. Find 𝑃 by substituting

𝑄 = 50 into the supply equation.

Solution: differentiate the supply equation:

𝑑𝑄𝑠

𝑑𝑃= 2𝑃 + 1

Substitute this into the elasticity formula:

𝜀𝑠 = 2𝑃 + 1 𝑃

𝑄=

[2𝑃 + 1] 𝑃

𝑄

Find 𝑃 when 𝑄 = 50 from the supply equation:

𝑄𝑠 = 𝑃2 + 𝑃 − 6

50 = 𝑃2 + 𝑃 − 6

0 = 𝑃2 + 𝑃 − 56

Solve for 𝑃 using the quadratic formula:

𝑃 =−𝑏 ± 𝑏2 − 4𝑎𝑐

2𝑎

𝑃 =−1 ± 12 − 4 1 −56

2 1

=−1 ± 225

2

𝑃 = −8 𝑜𝑟 𝑃 = 7

Page 134: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

134

Price can never be negative so disregard 𝑃 = −8.

Price is therefore 𝑃 = 7.

Substitute 𝑃 = 7 and 𝑄 = 50, into the elasticity

formula:

𝜀𝑠 = [2𝑃 + 1] 𝑃

𝑄

𝜀𝑠 = 2 7 + 1 (7)

(50)

𝜀𝑠 = 2.1

Take the absolute value of 2.1 (it is still 2.1) and

apply the elasticity rules; the interpretation is that

this good is elastic in supply. That is, if price was to

increase by, say 10%, supply would increase by

21%.

Example 2: you have just got a new job at a big

finance firm, and your boss gives you the following

demand function of one of his client’s products (a

type of computer):

−200𝑃 + 400,000 = 𝑄𝑑 + 5 2

He wants to test your skills so asks you to find the

elasticity of demand at the current sales of 480

computers/month, and what it means.

Plan: use the elasticity formula:

𝜀𝑑 =𝑑𝑄

𝑑𝑃×

𝑃

𝑄

Differentiate the demand function, then substitute

it into the above equation. Find 𝑃 when 𝑄 = 480

from the demand function.

Solution: rearranging this demand function to

have 𝑄𝑑 by itself is very difficult (try for yourself

using the reverse of BIMDAS).

To make things simpler, isolate the other variable

𝑃 (which is a lot easier):

−200𝑃 = 𝑄𝑑 + 5 2 − 400,000

𝑃 = 𝑄𝑑 + 5 2 − 400,000

−200

𝑃 = −0.005 𝑄𝑑 + 5 2 + 2000

Differentiate 𝑃 with respect to 𝑄𝑑 (the opposite of

what is required, as the derivative of 𝑄𝑑 with

respect to 𝑃 is needed for the elasticity formula):

𝑑𝑃

𝑑𝑄𝑑= −0.005 2 𝑄𝑑 + 5

𝑑𝑃

𝑑𝑄𝑑= −0.01𝑄𝑑 − 0.05

Inverting the whole of both sides of this last

equation gives the derivative that is required:

𝑑𝑄𝑑

𝑑𝑃=

1

−0.01𝑄𝑑 − 0.05

Substitute everything into the elasticity formula:

𝜀𝑑 = 1

−0.01𝑄𝑑 − 0.05 ×

𝑃

𝑄

Having been given 𝑄𝑑 = 480, 𝑃 is obtained from

the rearranged demand equation:

𝑃 = −0.005 𝑄𝑑 + 5 2 + 2000

𝑃 = −0.005 480 + 5 2 + 2000

𝑃 = 823.875

Substitute 𝑃 = 823.875 and 𝑄𝑑 = 480 into the

elasticity formula above:

𝜀𝑑 = 1

−0.01 480 − 0.05 ×

823.875

480

𝜀𝑑 ≈ −0.354

This means demand is inelastic. That is, if price is

increased by a certain percentage, quantity

demanded would be reduced by only 0.354 of that

percentage.

Exercises: 1. Determine the elasticity of the following demand

functions at the shown output. Interpret the result.

𝑎) 𝑄𝑑 = −1

4𝑃𝑑 + 48 𝑎𝑡 𝑃 = 20

𝑏) 𝑄𝑑 =−2𝑃𝑑

7+ 71 𝑎𝑡 𝑃 = 23

𝑐) 𝑃𝑑 = −0.27𝑄𝑑 + 77 𝑎𝑡 𝑄 = 13

𝑑) 𝑃𝑑 = −𝑄2 + 4𝑄 + 54 𝑎𝑡 𝑄 = 5

𝑒) 𝑃𝑑 = −0.25𝑄2 + 4𝑄 + 121 𝑎𝑡 𝑄 = 28

2. Determine the elasticity of the following supply functions at the price indicated. Interpret the result.

𝑎) 𝑃𝑠 − 3

0.7= 𝑄𝑠 𝑎𝑡 𝑄 = 2

𝑏) 𝑃𝑠 = 𝑄2 + 5 𝑎𝑡 𝑄 = 13

𝑐) 𝑃𝑠 = 7 ln 𝑄 + 5 + 3 𝑎𝑡 𝑄 = 6

Page 135: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

135

𝑑) 𝑃𝑠 = 𝑒3𝑄+4 + 19 𝑎𝑡 𝑄 = 14

𝑒) 𝑃𝑠 = 𝑄 + 5 𝑄2 + 4𝑄 + 4 𝑎𝑡 𝑄 = 15

6.10 elasticity and total revenue

Most retail businesses have a relatively constant

supply curve (especially when they import goods).

Such firms focus mainly on maximising total

revenue, which is determined by the quantity of

goods sold, which in turn comes from the demand

function.

The elasticity concept can be used to determine if

changes in price will lead to an increase (or

decrease) in total revenue.

Theory: given the definition of total revenue:

𝑇𝑅 = 𝑃 ∙ 𝑄

Take the log of the whole of both sides:

log 𝑇𝑅 = log 𝑃 ∙ 𝑄

log 𝑇𝑅 = log 𝑃 + log 𝑄

Taking the logs of an equation is a good

approximation to the percentage change of the

two sides, so:

%∆𝑇𝑅 = %∆𝑃 + %∆𝑄

Since from elasticity, %∆𝑃 and %∆𝑄 can be found

easily, then the %∆𝑇𝑅 can also be determined.

Example 1: given the elasticity of demand is

−0.69, and prices rise by 20%, by what

percentage will total revenue change?

Plan: find %∆𝑄 from the elasticity formula, then

applying the %∆𝑇𝑅 formula.

Solution:

𝜀𝑑 =%∆𝑄

%∆𝑃

−0.69 =%∆𝑄

20

%∆𝑄 = 20 −0.69 = −13.8%

Then applying the percentage change in total

revenue formula:

%∆𝑇𝑅 = %∆𝑃 + %∆𝑄

%∆𝑇𝑅 = 20 + −13.8 = 6.2%

For a 20% price increase, total revenue will

increase by 6.2%.

Even though the price has increased, demand is

inelastic so this means that for a given price

increase, quantity demanded will be reduced less

than the increase in price so overall revenue will

increase. But this is not always the case.

Example 2: determine the percentage change in

total revenue if the demand function for a retail

good is

𝑄𝑑 = −0.5𝑃 + 54

when initial quantity sold is 20, and the owner

wants to raise prices by 5%.

Plan: find the elasticity of demand at 𝑄 = 20 using

𝜀𝑑 =𝑑𝑄

𝑑𝑃×

𝑃

𝑄

Then use the original definition of elasticity to

determine %∆𝑄

𝜀𝑑 =%∆𝑄

%∆𝑃

which can then be used in the %∆𝑇𝑅 formula

%∆𝑇𝑅 = %∆𝑃 + %∆𝑄

Solution: find the elasticity:

𝜀𝑑 = −0.5 ×𝑃

20

To find 𝑃, use the demand equation:

20 = −0.5𝑃 + 54

𝑃 =20 − 54

−0.5= 68

This gives an elasticity of:

𝜀𝑑 = −0.5 ×68

20= −1.7

This means that demand is elastic at this point

(why?). Find the %∆𝑄:

−1.7 =%∆𝑄

5

%∆𝑄 = −1.7 ∙ 5 = −8.5%

Finally, apply the %∆𝑇𝑅 formula:

Page 136: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

136

%∆𝑇𝑅 = 5 + −8.5 = −3.5%

So for a 5% price increase, there would be a fall of

3.5% in total revenue.

These last two examples show that for a price

increase, total revenue can either increase or

decrease. It all depends on the elasticity of

demand. In Example 2, the percentage change

could have been found using the original demand

equation, however this is difficult.

Theory: for an inelastic demand function:

A price increase will increase total revenue

(the diagram below shows that as price rises

from 𝑃1 to 𝑃2, the area 𝑃 ∙ 𝑄, which is also 𝑇𝑅,

increases. Initially, it is the red and green area,

then after the price rise, it is the green and

blue area. Since the blue area is larger than the

red area, 𝑇𝑅 must increase).

A price decrease will decrease total revenue

(work through the same logic as above, but

backwards).

For an elastic demand function:

A price increase will decrease total revenue (in

the diagram below, as price increases from 𝑃1

to 𝑃2, the 𝑇𝑅 rectangle changes from the

green and red, to the green and blue. Since the

red rectangle is larger than the blue one, 𝑇𝑅

must decrease).

A price decrease will increase total revenue

(using the same diagram, work the other way

to make clear that a decrease in price will

increase 𝑇𝑅).

When elasticity is equal to 1 (in absolute terms), a

change in price will leave total revenue

unchanged.

Example 3: given the demand function

𝑄 = −0.4𝑃2 + 77

and current sales of 𝑄 = 37, how will a 15%

decrease in prices affect total revenue?

Plan: find the elasticity of demand at 𝑄 = 37 using

𝜀𝑑 =𝑑𝑄

𝑑𝑃×

𝑃

𝑄

then use the original definition of elasticity

𝜀𝑑 =%∆𝑄

%∆𝑃

to determine %∆𝑄, which can then be used in the

%∆𝑇𝑅 formula: %∆𝑇𝑅 = %∆𝑃 + %∆𝑄.

Solution: find the derivative of the demand

function:

𝑑𝑄

𝑑𝑃= −0.8𝑄

Find the value of 𝑃 when 𝑄 = 37 by rearranging

the demand equation:

37 − 77 = −0.4𝑃2

−40

−0.4= 𝑃2 = 100

𝑃 = ±10

Price must be positive, so 𝑃 = 10.

Substitute this in to find the elasticity:

𝜀𝑑 = −0.8𝑄 ×𝑃

𝑄

𝜀𝑑 = −0.8 ∙ 10 ×10

37

𝜀𝑑 = −80

37≈ −2.162

𝑃1

𝑃2

𝑄2

𝐷𝐷

𝑄1

𝑃

𝑄

𝑃1

𝑃2

𝑄2 𝑄1

𝐷𝐷 𝑃

𝑄

Page 137: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

137

To find %∆𝑄 when price decreases by 15%, use

the original elasticity formula:

−80

37=

%∆𝑄

−15

%∆𝑄 = −15 −80

37

%∆𝑄 =1200

37≈ 32.43%

Finally, apply the %∆𝑇𝑅 formula:

%∆𝑇𝑅 ≈ −15% + 32.43% = 17.43%

Thus, total revenue will increase by approximately

17.43% for a 15% price decrease.

Exercises:

1. Given the following elasticities, determine how 𝑇𝑅 will change for a 17% price decrease. 𝑎) 𝜀𝑑 = −0.4

𝑏) 𝜀𝑑 = −1.9

𝑐) 𝜀𝑑 = −0.9

𝑑) 𝜀𝑑 = −1.01

𝑒) 𝜀𝑑 = −1

2. For the weekly demand function

𝑄𝑑 =1000

3−

2𝑃𝑑

0.6

and sales of 55 units per week, determine how a 5% price decrease will affect total revenue.

3. For the demand function 𝑃𝑑 = 𝑄2 + 10𝑄 − 3000 and sales of 33 units per week, determine how a 24% price increase will affect total revenue.

4. For the monthly demand function 𝑃𝑑 = −5 ln 𝑄2 + 5 + 20 And sales of 5 units per week, determine how a 15% price increase will affect total revenue.

chapter six summary

Optimisation is the process of finding an optimal point, with that point usually being a maximum or minimum. A global optimum is a point that is the optimal point over the entire number range (i.e. 𝑥 − 𝑎𝑥𝑖𝑠). A local optimum is an optimal point only over a small range around that point.

The gradient at any maximum or any minimum is always zero. The First Order Condition (FOC):

𝑑𝑦

𝑑𝑥= 0

Then solving for the unknowns. The nature of an optimal point is found using the Second Order Condition (SOC):

𝑀𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑚𝑢𝑚 𝑖𝑓 𝑑2𝑦

𝑑𝑥2> 0

𝑀𝑎𝑥𝑖𝑚𝑢𝑚 𝑖𝑓 𝑑2𝑦

𝑑𝑥2< 0

𝑆𝑡𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑟𝑦 𝑖𝑛𝑓𝑙𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑛𝑡 𝑖𝑓 𝑑2𝑦

𝑑𝑥2= 0

Any inflection point is using the SOC:

𝑆𝑂𝐶 𝑓𝑜𝑟 any 𝑖𝑛𝑓𝑙𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑛𝑡: 𝑑2𝑦

𝑑𝑥2= 0

Inflection points are points of a function where a function changes from concave to convex (or vice versa). The two types of inflection points: 1. Stationary inflection points have a gradient of zero

at the inflection point. 2. Non-stationary inflection points do not have a

gradient of zero at the inflection point.

The general form of profit is: 𝜋 = 𝑇𝑅 − 𝑇𝐶 Total revenue can also be simplified:

𝑇𝑅 = 𝑃 ∙ 𝑄 In general, total costs are represented by: 𝑇𝐶 = 𝐹𝐶 + 𝑉𝐶 Variable costs are usually represented by: 𝑉𝐶 = 𝐶𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡 × 𝑄 All functions are in terms of 𝑄 as profits are directly determined by the quantity of goods sold. Break even is when 𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝐶𝑜𝑠𝑡 equals 𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑅𝑒𝑣𝑒𝑛𝑢𝑒, which implies profit is zero. 𝜋𝐵𝐸 = 0

𝐴𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑔𝑒 =𝑠𝑢𝑚 𝑜𝑓 𝑣𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑏𝑙𝑒𝑠

𝑛𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟 𝑜𝑓 𝑣𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑏𝑙𝑒𝑠

𝑀𝑎𝑟𝑔𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑙 =𝑑𝑦

𝑑𝑥

As more labour is added to a production process, output initially increases greatly. However, past some point, additional labour adds less and less to total output. Eventually, no additional output can be obtained from additional labour (and in theory, output may start to fall). The point at which it changes from convex to concave is the inflection point. This theory is known, in general terms, as the Law of Diminishing Marginal Returns.

%∆𝑇𝑅 = %∆𝑃 + %∆𝑄 For an inelastic demand function:

A price increase will increase total revenue

A price decrease will reduce total revenue. For an elastic demand function:

A price increase will reduce total .

A price decrease will increase total . When elasticity is equal to 1 (in absolute terms), a change in price will leave total revenue unchanged.

Page 138: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

138

chapter six questions

1. Determine which of the following points are local/global maxima/minima:

2. Determine the FOC for the following functions:

𝑎) 𝑦 = 𝑥2 + 3𝑥 − 1 𝑏) 𝑦 = 15𝑥3 + 1 − 𝑥 4

𝑐) 𝑦 = 12𝑥2𝑒1−𝑥2

𝑑) 𝑦 = 2 𝑥 − 1 2 𝑥3 − 1 2

𝑒) 𝑦 =𝑥 − 1

𝑥 + 1

3. Determine the nature of any stationary points for the following functions: 𝑎) 𝑦 = 𝑥 − 1 𝑥 + 3 𝑏) 𝑦 = 𝑥3 + 3𝑥2 − 45𝑥 + 18 𝑐) 𝑦 = −2𝑥𝑒𝑥+3 𝑑) 𝑦 = 𝑒4−𝑥 𝑥 − 3 2

𝑒) 𝑦 = 1

14.5𝑥 𝑒𝑥2+3 + 19

𝑓) 𝑓 𝑥 =1 − 𝑥

𝑥2 + 1

4. Find all stationary and inflection points for the following functions, and determine their nature where applicable: 𝑎) 𝑦 = 𝑥3 − 𝑥2 + 15𝑥 − 79 𝑏) 𝑦 = 𝑥 − 1 𝑥 − 5 𝑥 + 4 𝑐) 𝑦 = 𝑥 + 3 2 1 − 𝑥 𝑑) 𝑓 𝑥 = −𝑥𝑒4−𝑥 𝑒) 𝑓 𝑥 = 𝑥2𝑒1−𝑥

𝑓) 𝑦 = ln 𝑒4𝑥2−3𝑥+2

5. A company has determined their profit function to be:

𝜋 = −100𝑄2 + 10,000𝑄 − 47,500 Find: a) The break-even quantities. b) The quantity that maximises profit. c) The maximum profit.

6. A factory manufactures music players and sells them at $350. The factory faces a cost function of the form:

𝑇𝐶 = 0.2𝑄2 + 40 Determine: a) The total revenue function. b) The profit function. c) The break-even quantities. d) The quantity for profit maximisation. e) The maximum profit. Sketch the profit function, and plot all the important points.

7. A company faces a demand function of the form

𝑃𝑑 =1

0.1𝑄+ 0.25

And a total cost function of the form: 𝑇𝐶 = 0.2𝑒0.01𝑄+4

Determine: a) The total revenue function. b) The profit function. c) The output for maximum profit. d) The price corresponding to maximum profit. e) The maximum profit attainable.

8. Determine the average and marginal values for the following functions: 𝑎) 𝜋 = −𝑄2 + 20𝑄 𝑏) 𝑇𝐶 = 0.1 𝑞 + 20 𝑞 + 5 𝑐) 𝑇𝑅 = 𝑄0.5 𝑄 + 1 𝑑) 𝑇𝐶 = 0.01𝑥2 ln 𝑥 + 1 𝑒) 𝜋 = −0.1 𝑒𝑄−5 + 𝑒5−𝑄 + 10 𝑓) 𝜋 = 𝑞𝑒−𝑞+1

9. For the profit function 𝜋 = −3𝑄3 + 75𝑄2

Determine the values of 𝑄 where average profit is equal to marginal profit.

10. Determine when the average product of labour is equal to the marginal product of labour, for the function:

𝑄 = 5𝐿0.5 + 𝐿2 + 4𝐿 11. A firm manufacturing microwave dishes determines

its profit functions to be 𝜋 = −1.5𝑄3 + 50𝑄2

Determine: a) An expression for average and marginal profit. b) The break-even quantities. c) The quantity corresponding to maximum

profit. d) The maximum profit attainable. e) The output level where average profit and

marginal profit are equal. 12. A production function has the form:

𝑄 = 15𝐿3 + 3𝐿2 +1

4𝐿

Determine the levels of labour where the marginal productivity of labour is double the average productivity of labour.

13. Given the demand function

𝑃𝑑 = 𝑒−0.01𝑄2−0.05𝑄+3 + 180 Determine and interpret the elasticity at 𝑄 = 8.

14. Determine and interpret the elasticity for the following supply function, at output of 20 units:

𝑃𝑠 = 100 ln 0.1𝑄 + 4 + 0.9𝑄 15. The owner of a firm producing car rims wants to

increase price by 5% from a level of 𝑄 = 20. Given the demand function is

𝑃𝑑 =100

𝑄 + 1

Determine if total revenue will increase or decrease with the 5% increase in price.

16. For the following demand function 𝑃𝑑 = − 𝑄 + 50 2 𝑄 − 40 𝑒−𝑥

If output is at 4, and the owner of the factory wants to increase price by 25%. How will total revenue be affected? Give a numerical answer, and relate it

𝑦

𝑥 𝐴

𝐵

𝐶 𝐷

𝐸

𝐹

Page 139: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

139

back to the elasticity obtained. Hint: to differentiate this function, the product rule has to be used within the product rule.

17. A firm produces top quality surfboards and has a demand function of the form:

𝑃𝑑 = −0.5𝑄 + 2500 Each surfboard costs $250 to make, and the factory in which they are manufactured has a rent of $1500. Determine: a) The total cost function b) The total revenue function. c) The profit function. d) The break-even quantities. e) The quantity for maximum profit. f) The maximum profit. g) The price per surfboard to attain this profit. h) The marginal profit function. i) The average profit function. j) Where the marginal and average profit

functions are equal. If output is initially 1000, and the owner is thinking of raising prices by 10%, determine: k) The elasticity at 𝑄 = 20, and its interpretation. l) The extent to which total revenue would

change, if the 10% price rise went ahead.

18. A firm produces sandstone sculptures, and has a demand function of the form:

𝑃𝑑 = − − 0.4𝑞 + 4276 Each sandstone sculpture costs $80 to make, and the factory in which they are manufactured has a rent of $200. Determine: a) The total cost function b) The total revenue function. c) The profit function. d) The break-even quantities. e) The quantity for maximum profit. f) The maximum profit. g) The price each sculpture is sold at, to attain

this profit. h) The marginal profit function. i) The average profit function. j) Where the marginal and average profit

functions are equal. If output is initially 4000, and the owner is thinking of raising prices by 25%, determine: k) The elasticity at 𝑄 = 24, and its interpretation. l) The extent to which total revenue would

change, if the 25% price rise went ahead.

Page 140: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

140

Chapter 7

Multiple Variable Differentiation

Differentiation with more than one variable 7.1 Additional Variables 141

7.2 Simple Partial Differentiation 142

7.3 Complex Partial Differentiation 144

7.4 Second Order Partial Derivatives 146

7.5 Application of Partial Differentiation 147

7.6 Total Differentiation 148

7.7 Optimisation with Many Variables 151

7.7 Economic Applications 155

Chapter Seven Summary 158

Chapter Seven Questions 158

Page 141: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

141

7.1 additional variables

Theory: multivariable or multivariate simply

means more than one variable. Multivariable

functions means that a dependent variable is

determined by two or more other variables.

All the previous chapters have only had a single

independent variable 𝑥 determining the

dependent variable 𝑦 through a certain function:

𝑦 = 𝑓 𝑥

The function could be quadratic, cubic, etc.

Theory: the simplest multivariable functions have

the form:

𝑧 = 𝑓(𝑥, 𝑦)

Where 𝑧 is a dependent variable, and it depends

on two independent variables 𝑥 and 𝑦. That is, 𝑧 is

a function of 𝑥 and 𝑦, and can also be written as:

𝑧(𝑥, 𝑦)

This is now a three-dimensional function (i.e. it is

drawn on three axes):

Mathematically, an example of a multivariable

function is:

𝑧 = 𝑥2 + 𝑦2

This is a multivariable equation (𝑧 is a function of 𝑥

and 𝑦). Because there are now three variables,

these graphs are three dimensional in nature. The

above multivariable function is the shape of a cup.

Similar to a quadratic, the function above has a

minimum which can be visually determined.

Multivariable functions are very useful as they

represent the real world much better. Most goods

require many different inputs. For example, a

block of chocolate needs cocoa powder, sugar,

water, milk, heat to melt it, paper to wrap it, ink to

print on the paper etc. Each one of these inputs

has its own market; paper prices change up and

down, cocoa prices might be high from low rainfall

in South America etc.

A very common economic function is called the

Cobb-Douglas Production Function which is an

approximation for production of a good from the

inputs of capital equipment (e.g. a factory) and

labour.

Theory: the Cobb-Douglas Production Function has

the general form:

𝑄 = 𝐴𝐿𝛼𝐾𝛽

where the values of 𝐴, 𝛼 and 𝛽 are all positive

constants.

A numerical example could be:

𝑄 = 5𝐿0.43𝐾0.6

Which specifies that the production of a certain

good (e.g. 𝑄𝑡𝑜𝑛𝑛𝑒𝑠 𝑜𝑓 𝑤𝑕𝑒𝑎𝑡 ) is a function of capital

(𝐾: tractors, storage sheds etc.) and labour (𝐿:

people driving the tractors, fixing the sheds etc.).

Obviously, there are other factors, such as rainfall,

soil condition etc., but they are ignored for now.

𝑥

𝑦

𝑧

𝑥

𝑥

𝑦

𝑦 𝑧

𝑧

Page 142: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

142

Exercises: 1. List all the different variables that a baker needs to

take into account when baking a cake. 2. Think of a few goods that that do not require many

different types of inputs. What do they have in common?

3. Which of these are not Cobb-Douglas Production Functions?

𝑎) 𝑄 = 5𝐿0.2𝐾0.4

𝑏) 𝑄 = 5𝐿𝐾0.4

𝑐) 𝑄 =5𝐿0.7

𝐾−0.4

𝑑) 𝑄 =5𝐿−0.7

𝐾−0.4

𝑒) 𝑄 = −3𝐿0.4𝐾0.6

7.2 simple partial differentiation

An intuitive explanation of partial differentiation is

best to get your head around this concept.

Intro example 1: two factories, an aircraft

manufacturer (such as Boeing) and a metal

manufacturing company (such as Metalex), are

located close to one another; Metalex supplies

Boeing with the metal sheeting to cover the

aircraft. Both companies require electricity to run

their large production factories (Boeing to build

the planes, and Metalex to create the highest

quality metal) but the electricity system cannot

handle any more current (electrical flow).

Say Boeing wanted to introduce electrical heating

to their factory. That would mean more electricity

would need to flow to Boeing, costing them more.

Assuming prices of electricity are constant, this is

the direct effect of increasing the use of electricity

(that is, the extra cost of using more electricity for

heating). What is not being taken into account is

that when Boeing increases their use of electricity,

this will reduce the amount of electricity available

for Metalex, making the metal more expensive.

Metalex must then charge Boeing more for the

metal, making it more expensive to produce

aircraft. This is the indirect effect of Boeing using

more electricity.

When talking about partial differentiation, any

possible indirect effects are ignored, and assumed

not to exist. This is a big assumption, and later in

this chapter it will be removed.

Theory: partial differentiation is finding the rate at

which the dependent variable changes when an

independent variable changes assuming all other

variables are held constant.

That is, it is assumed that the other “independent”

variables do not affect the independent variable

that is changing (even though in reality, they

might).

Partial differentiation is written in one of two

ways:

1. 𝜕𝑧

𝜕𝑥 𝑂𝑅

𝜕𝑧

𝜕𝑦

This is read as “the derivative of 𝑧 with respect to

𝑥 holding everything else constant”. The “curvy

dees” are “deltas” and are not the same as normal

𝑑’s used in differentiation.

2. 𝑧𝑥 𝑂𝑅 𝑧𝑦

In this method of defining a partial derivative, the

subscript is the variable being differentiated, and it

is assumed that all other variables are constant.

Intro example 2: partially differentiate 𝑧 with

respect to 𝑥 for the function

𝑧 = 𝑥𝑦 + 5𝑥 − 7𝑦

The 𝑦 has to be treated as if it were a constant,

even though it obviously is not:

ELECTRICITY

BOEING METAL MANUFACTURER

direct effect (cost of extra electricity)

indirect effect (increase in metal costs)

Page 143: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

143

𝜕𝑧

𝜕𝑥= 1𝑦 + 5

The 1𝑦 comes from differentiating 𝑥𝑦 with respect

to 𝑥 treating 𝑦 as if it were a constant; if 3𝑥 had to

be differentiated, the answer would be 3 1 = 3.

Similarly above, the 𝑦 is treated as if it were a 3,

but in fact it is still 𝑦. An absurd example might

help.

Intro example 3: find the partial derivative of 𝑧

with respect to 𝑥 for the function:

𝑧 = 𝑥 𝑦 𝑤 𝑝 𝑞 𝑟 𝑒

This equation has lots of variables, all multiplying

one another, but all that is relevant is the 𝑥, as

everything else is held constant.

𝜕𝑧

𝜕𝑥= 𝑦 𝑤 𝑝 𝑞 𝑟 𝑒

You may be wondering why the answer is not zero,

as everything else is a constant? The reason is that

these “constants” are multiplying 𝑥. If they were

added to 𝑥, then the derivative would be zero.

Theory: to partially differentiate a multivariable

function with respect to a single variable,

differentiate the function with respect to that

variable while treating all other variables as

constants.

Example 1: find the partial derivative with respect

to 𝑥 for the function

𝑧 = 𝑥2𝑦2𝑝𝑘 + 𝑝𝑓𝑑 + 3𝑥

Plan: differentiate using the normal rules, but

assume everything other than 𝑥 is a constant.

Solution:

𝜕𝑧

𝜕𝑥= 2𝑥𝑦2𝑝𝑘 + 3

The first part of the original equation has 𝑥2 and

all the other variables 𝑦2𝑝𝑘 are assumed to be

constant. Thus 𝑥2 is differentiated and then

multiplied by the remaining “constants”. The

second part of the original equation is 𝑝𝑓𝑑 and

since there are no 𝑥’s and differentiating a

constant (remember, everything other than an 𝑥 is

assumed to be a constant), gives zero. The last part

of the original equation is 3𝑥, so it is differentiated

to give the constant 3.

Example 2: find the partial derivative with respect

to 𝑥 in the following equation

𝑧 = 𝑥2 9 4 5 + 4 8 7 + 3𝑥

Plan: simplify the numbers then differentiate using

the normal rules, but assume everything other

than 𝑥 is a constant.

Solution: simplify the numbers:

𝑧 = 180𝑥2 + 224 + 3𝑥

Differentiate using the normal rules:

𝜕𝑧

𝜕𝑥= 2 180 𝑥 + 3 = 360𝑥 + 3

Look back at the last two examples. The second

example is identical to the first, except the

variables (other than 𝑥) are replaced with actual

numbers. If Example 2 was done without

simplifying first, the answer would be:

𝜕𝑧

𝜕𝑥= 2𝑥 9 4 5 + 3

Which is very similar to the answer in Example 1.

It is very important you understand that the other

variables are held constant when partially

differentiating.

Example 3: partially differentiate with respect to 𝑥

and then with respect to 𝑦 for the function

𝑧 = 𝑥2𝑦 − 3𝑦3𝑥2 + 5𝑥 − 7𝑦

Plan: for 𝜕𝑧/𝜕𝑥 differentiate the function holding

𝑦 constant. Then for 𝜕𝑧/𝜕𝑦 differentiate the

function holding 𝑥 constant.

Solution: finding 𝜕𝑧/𝜕𝑥:

𝜕𝑧

𝜕𝑥= 2𝑥𝑦 − 3𝑦32𝑥 + 5

In the original function:

Page 144: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

144

The first red section: differentiate 𝑥2 then

multiply by the rest of the red section (i.e. 𝑦)

giving: 2𝑥𝑦

The first blue section: differentiate 𝑥2 then

multiply by everything else in that section (i.e.

−3𝑦3) giving: −3𝑦32𝑥

The second red section: differentiate the 𝑥,

then multiply by everything else in that section

(i.e. 5) giving: 5.

The second blue section: there are no 𝑥’s so

the derivative of a constant is zero.

Put these together and simplify:

𝜕𝑧

𝜕𝑥= 2𝑥𝑦 − 6𝑦3𝑥 + 5

Now for 𝜕𝑧/𝜕𝑦, differentiate the original equation

holding 𝑥 as a constant:

𝜕𝑧

𝜕𝑦= 𝑥2 − 9𝑦2𝑥2 − 7

Figure out how this last answer was obtained, one

section at a time.

In the above example, you may have noticed that

when looking at each section, 𝑥 was isolated and

differentiated, then everything else was brought

back in. This is a good technique to use, but only

use it where there are no division signs.

Example 4: find both partial derivatives of

𝑧 = 2𝑥3𝑦2 + 2𝑥𝑦 − 3𝑥 + 2𝑦 + 15

Plan: for 𝜕𝑧/𝜕𝑥 differentiate the function holding

𝑦 constant. Then for 𝜕𝑧/𝜕𝑦 differentiate the

function holding 𝑥 constant.

Solution: for 𝜕𝑧/𝜕𝑥:

𝜕𝑧

𝜕𝑥= 3𝑥2 ∙ 2𝑦2 + 2𝑦 − 3

𝜕𝑧

𝜕𝑥= 6𝑥2𝑦2 + 2𝑦 − 3

And for 𝜕𝑧/𝜕𝑦:

𝜕𝑧

𝜕𝑦= 2𝑦 ∙ 2𝑥3 + 2𝑥 + 2

𝜕𝑧

𝜕𝑦= 4𝑦𝑥3 + 2𝑥 + 2

It is vital you understand this simple partial

differentiation before moving on.

Exercises: 1. Find both first order partial derivatives for the

functions: 𝑎) 𝑧 = 𝑥2𝑦 + 3𝑦2𝑥 + 7𝑥𝑦

𝑏) 𝑧 = 3𝑥2 + 3𝑦2 + 3 𝑥𝑦 7

𝑐) 𝑧 = 5𝑥𝑦 + 𝑥2𝑦 + 11

𝑑) 𝑧 = 2𝑥𝑦 − 2𝑥2𝑦3 + 𝑥−1

𝑒) 𝑧 = 2𝑥𝑦−2 +3

𝑥𝑦− 2

2. Differentiate the following with respect to both 𝑥 and 𝑦 (each individually):

𝑎) 𝑧 = 3𝑥7𝑦−3 + 5𝑥 + 5𝑥𝑦 − 3

𝑏) 𝑧 = −2𝑥−2𝑦 + 7𝑦−2𝑥

𝑐) 𝑧 = 15𝑥2𝑦3 − 15𝑥−2𝑦−3

7.3 complex partial differentiation

This section applies the more complex rules

(product, chain etc.) to partial differentiation.

Example 1: find both partial derivatives of

𝑧 = 𝑥2 + 𝑦3 3𝑥4 − 𝑦 + 3 2

Plan: for 𝜕𝑧/𝜕𝑥 differentiate the function holding

𝑦 constant. Then for 𝜕𝑧/𝜕𝑦 differentiate the

function holding 𝑥 constant.

Use the product rule as the base rule, with the

chain rule within it.

Solution: for 𝜕𝑧/𝜕𝑥:

𝜕𝑧

𝜕𝑥= 𝑑𝑒𝑟 1𝑠𝑡 × 2𝑛𝑑 + 𝑑𝑒𝑟 2𝑛𝑑 × 1𝑠𝑡

𝑑𝑒𝑟 1𝑠𝑡 = 2𝑥

𝑑𝑒𝑟 2𝑛𝑑 = 2 3𝑥4 − 𝑦 + 3 1 . 3 4𝑥3

= 24𝑥3 3𝑥4 − 𝑦 + 3

The 𝑑𝑒𝑟 2𝑛𝑑 was obtained by using the chain rule,

and treating 𝑦 as a constant. The 𝑦 is still there as

due to the chain rule, the bracketed terms are

rewritten with the power reduced by one.

For the solution, substitute into the base (product)

rule:

Page 145: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

145

𝜕𝑧

𝜕𝑥=

2𝑥 3𝑥4 − 𝑦 + 3 2 + 24𝑥3 3𝑥4 − 𝑦 + 3 𝑥2 + 𝑦3

And for 𝜕𝑧/𝜕𝑦:

𝜕𝑧

𝜕𝑦= 𝑑𝑒𝑟 1𝑠𝑡 × 2𝑛𝑑 + 𝑑𝑒𝑟 2𝑛𝑑 × 1𝑠𝑡

𝑑𝑒𝑟 1𝑠𝑡 = 3𝑦2

𝑑𝑒𝑟 2𝑛𝑑 = 2 3𝑥4 − 𝑦 + 3 1(−1)

= −2 3𝑥4 − 𝑦 + 3

Substitute this back into the base function:

𝜕𝑧

𝜕𝑦=

3𝑦2 3𝑥4 − 𝑦 + 3 2 + −2 3𝑥4 − 𝑦 + 3 𝑥2 + 𝑦3

Both the solutions above can be simplified by

factorisation (see Chapter 1 and 5).

Example 2: find both partial derivatives of

𝑧 = 𝑥2 + 𝑦 3

𝑥 − 𝑦

Plan: for 𝜕𝑧/𝜕𝑥 differentiate the function holding

𝑦 constant. Then for 𝜕𝑧/𝜕𝑦 differentiate the

function holding 𝑥 constant. Use the quotient rule

as the base rule, and the chain rule within the

quotient rule.

Solution: for 𝜕𝑧/𝜕𝑥:

𝜕𝑧

𝜕𝑥=

𝑑𝑒𝑟 𝑇𝑂𝑃 × 𝐵𝑂𝑇 − 𝑑𝑒𝑟 𝐵𝑂𝑇 × 𝑇𝑂𝑃

[𝐵𝑂𝑇𝑇𝑂𝑀]2

𝑑𝑒𝑟 𝑇𝑂𝑃 = 3 𝑥2 + 𝑦 2 2𝑥

= 6𝑥 𝑥2 + 𝑦 2

𝑑𝑒𝑟 𝐵𝑂𝑇𝑇𝑂𝑀 = 1

The chain rule was used to obtain the derivative of

the top. Remember the chain rule: bring the power

out front of the brackets, take one off the power,

then multiply by the derivative of the inside of the

brackets.

Substitute everything into the Quotient Rule:

𝜕𝑧

𝜕𝑥=

6𝑥 𝑥2 + 𝑦 2 𝑥 − 𝑦 − (1) 𝑥2 + 𝑦 3

𝑥 − 𝑦 2

Factorise 𝑥2 + 𝑦 2 out of the top:

𝜕𝑧

𝜕𝑥=

𝑥2 + 𝑦 2 6𝑥 𝑥 − 𝑦 − 𝑥2 + 𝑦

𝑥 − 𝑦 2

Further simplify the square brackets:

𝜕𝑧

𝜕𝑥=

𝑥2 + 𝑦 2 5𝑥2 − 6𝑥𝑦 − 𝑦

𝑥 − 𝑦 2

For 𝜕𝑧/𝜕𝑦:

𝜕𝑧

𝜕𝑦=

𝑑𝑒𝑟 𝑇𝑂𝑃 × 𝐵𝑂𝑇 − 𝑑𝑒𝑟 𝐵𝑂𝑇 × 𝑇𝑂𝑃

[𝐵𝑂𝑇𝑇𝑂𝑀]2

𝑑𝑒𝑟 𝑇𝑂𝑃 = 3 𝑥2 + 𝑦 2 1

= 3 𝑥2 + 𝑦 2

𝑑𝑒𝑟 𝐵𝑂𝑇𝑇𝑂𝑀 = −1

Substitute into the base (quotient) rule:

𝜕𝑧

𝜕𝑦=

3 𝑥2 + 𝑦 2 𝑥 − 𝑦 − (−1) 𝑥2 + 𝑦 3

𝑥 − 𝑦 2

Factorise and simplify the top (do it yourself!):

𝜕𝑧

𝜕𝑦=

𝑥2 + 𝑦 2 3𝑥 − 2𝑦 + 𝑥2

𝑥 − 𝑦 2

Make sure you fully understand the last two

examples before trying the following exercises.

Exercises: 1. Differentiate with respect to both 𝑥 and 𝑦

(individually) using the Chain Rule: 𝑎) 𝑧 = 𝑥 + 𝑦 3

𝑏) 𝑧 = 3𝑥2 + 𝑦 4

𝑐) 𝑧 = 7𝑥2 + 7𝑦2 5

𝑑) 𝑧 = −2𝑥−2 + 𝑦−2 4

𝑒) 𝑧 = 3𝑥𝑦 + 2𝑥2𝑦3 −3

2. Differentiate with respect to both 𝑥 and 𝑦 (individually) using the Product Rule: 𝑎) 𝑧 = 𝑥2 + 5𝑦 3𝑥 + 7𝑦2

𝑏) 𝑧 = 𝑥2 + 𝑦 𝑦2 + 𝑥

𝑐) 𝑧 = 3𝑥𝑦 − 𝑥2 𝑥𝑦3 + 1

𝑑) 𝑧 = 3𝑥2 +1

𝑦 𝑥𝑦 − 𝑦4

𝑒) 𝑧 = 3

𝑥+

3

𝑥𝑦

4

𝑥2−

4

𝑥𝑦

3. Differentiate with respect to both 𝑥 and 𝑦 (individually) using the Quotient Rule:

𝑎) 𝑧 =𝑥 + 𝑦

𝑥 − 𝑦

𝑏) 𝑧 =3𝑥2 − 2𝑦3

𝑥2𝑦

𝑐) 𝑧 =2𝑥𝑦 − 2𝑥2𝑦

15𝑥𝑦 + 1

𝑑) 𝑧 =4𝑥𝑦4

1 − 𝑥𝑦

𝑒) 𝑧 =1 + 𝑥𝑦2

1 − 𝑥𝑦2

Page 146: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

146

4. Differentiate with respect to both 𝑥 and 𝑦 (individually) using the 𝑒 and ln rules:

𝑎) 𝑧 = 𝑒𝑥𝑦−𝑥2

𝑏) 𝑧 = 𝑒𝑥2𝑦−𝑦2𝑥

𝑐) 𝑧 = ln 𝑥𝑦 − 𝑥2𝑦

𝑑) 𝑧 = 𝑒 ln 𝑥𝑦−1

𝑒) 𝑧 = ln 𝑒𝑥3𝑦3+3𝑥2𝑦 − 1

5. Differentiate with respect to both 𝑥 and 𝑦 (individually) using any rules:

𝑎) 𝑧 = 𝑒𝑥2𝑦−1 + 𝑥𝑦 3𝑥𝑦 − 1 3

𝑏) 𝑧 = 5𝑥2𝑦 − 𝑥 ln 15𝑥𝑦 + 𝑒𝑥𝑦

𝑐) 𝑧 = ln 15𝑥𝑦 + 𝑒1

𝑥𝑦 + 𝑒𝑥𝑦2

2

𝑑) 𝑧 =𝑒

𝑥𝑦 − 𝑥2𝑦

𝑥𝑦 − ln 𝑥𝑦

𝑒) 𝑧 = 3𝑥𝑦 − 𝑥2 4

1 − 𝑥𝑦

7.4 second order partial derivatives

This is a very simple concept. In theory it is the

same as a normal second derivative.

Theory: the second order partial derivative is

simply partially differentiating the original function

twice.

The second order partial derivative is denoted in

one of two ways:

𝜕2𝑧

𝜕𝑥2 ,

𝜕2𝑧

𝜕𝑦2 𝑂𝑅 𝑧𝑥𝑥 , 𝑧𝑦𝑦

Example 1: find all second order partial derivatives

for the function

𝑧 = 𝑥3𝑦7 − 3𝑥𝑦 + 2𝑥 − 𝑦2

Plan: differentiate the function with respect to 𝑥

twice, then differentiate the function with respect

to 𝑦 twice.

Solution: differentiate with respect to 𝑥:

𝜕𝑧

𝜕𝑥= 3𝑥2𝑦7 − 3𝑦 + 2

Differentiate with respect to 𝑥 again:

𝜕2𝑧

𝜕𝑥2= 6𝑥𝑦7

For the second order partial derivative of 𝑦:

𝜕𝑧

𝜕𝑦= 7𝑦6𝑥3 − 3𝑥 − 2𝑦

Differentiate this equation with respect to 𝑦 again:

𝜕2𝑧

𝜕𝑦2= 42𝑦5𝑥3 − 2

This is very similar to what was learnt in Chapter 5,

however there are two more second order partial

derivatives. These are called mixed partial

derivatives.

Theory: mixed partial derivatives are found by

differentiating with respect to one variable first,

then differentiating with respect to the other

variable. They are denoted in a similar way to the

straight second order partial derivatives:

𝜕2𝑧

𝜕𝑥𝜕𝑦 ,

𝜕2𝑧

𝜕𝑦𝜕𝑥 𝑂𝑅 𝑧𝑥𝑦 , 𝑧𝑦𝑥

Example 1 cont: finding both mixed partial

derivatives:

1. Differentiate with respect to 𝑥 first:

𝜕𝑧

𝜕𝑥= 3𝑥2𝑦7 − 3𝑦 + 2

Then differentiate with respect to 𝑦:

𝜕2𝑧

𝜕𝑥𝜕𝑦= 3 7 𝑥2𝑦6 − 3

= 21𝑥2𝑦6 − 3

2. Differentiate with respect to 𝑦 first:

𝜕𝑧

𝜕𝑦= 7𝑦6𝑥3 − 3𝑥 − 2𝑦

Then differentiate with respect to 𝑦:

𝜕2𝑧

𝜕𝑦𝜕𝑥= 7(3)𝑦6𝑥2 − 3

= 21𝑥2𝑦6 − 3

Notice that the two mixed partial derivatives are

the same. This is always the case, however it is a

good idea to always write out the theory.

Theory: mixed partial derivatives are the same, no

matter which way they are found.

𝑧𝑥𝑦 = 𝑧𝑦𝑥

Page 147: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

147

The following example has minimal narration so

use scrap paper to see if you can get the same

answers.

Example 2: find all second order partial derivates

for the function

𝑧 = ln 𝑥2 +1

𝑦3+ 5

4

Plan: find the first order partial derivatives, then

differentiate again to find the straight second

order partial derivatives. Then find the mixed

second order partial derivatives.

Solution: for the first order partial derivatives, the

ln rule is used, with the chain rule within it:

𝑧𝑥 =

4 2𝑥 𝑥2 +1𝑦3 + 5

3

𝑥2 +1𝑦3 + 5

4

𝑧𝑥 =8𝑥

𝑥2 +1𝑦3 + 5

𝑧𝑦 =

−3𝑦−4 4 𝑥2 +1𝑦3 + 5

3

𝑥2 +1𝑦3 + 5

4

𝑧𝑦 =−12𝑦−4

𝑥2 +1𝑦3 + 5

For the straight second order partial derivatives

(using the quotient and chain rules):

𝑧𝑥𝑥 =8 𝑥2 +

1𝑦3 + 5 − 2𝑥 8𝑥

𝑥2 +1𝑦3 + 5

2

𝑧𝑥𝑥 =−8𝑥2 +

8𝑦3 + 40

𝑥2 +1𝑦3 + 5

2

𝑧𝑦𝑦 =

48𝑦−5 𝑥2 +1𝑦3 + 5 − −3𝑦−4 −12𝑦−4

𝑥2 +1𝑦3 + 5

2

𝑧𝑦𝑦 =

48𝑥2

𝑦5 +12𝑦8 +

48𝑦5

𝑥2 +1𝑦3 + 5

2

For the mixed second order partial derivative:

𝑧𝑥𝑦 = 𝑧𝑦𝑥 =24𝑥𝑦−4

𝑥2 +1𝑦3 + 5

2

Exercises: 1. Determine all four second order partial derivatives

for the following functions (and make sure 𝑧𝑥𝑦 = 𝑧𝑦𝑥 ):

𝑎) 𝑧 = 5𝑥𝑦 + 3𝑦 3

𝑏) 𝑧 = 12 𝑥2𝑦 + 𝑥𝑦2 𝑥 + 𝑦 2

𝑐) 𝑧 =𝑥2 + 𝑥𝑦

𝑦 − 𝑥

𝑑) 𝑧 = 𝑒𝑥2𝑦+4𝑥

𝑒) 𝑧 = ln 7𝑥2𝑦 + 4𝑦

2. Determine all four second order straight partial derivatives, and make sure that the mixed second order partial derivatives are the same. 𝑎) 𝑧 = 𝑒5𝑥𝑦 + 4𝑥𝑦 3

𝑏) 𝑧 = ln 𝑒𝑥2𝑦2+5𝑥𝑦

𝑐) 𝑧 = 1

𝑥+

1

𝑥𝑦

2

𝑥−3𝑦−2 + 1

7.5 application of partial differentiation

The Cobb-Douglas Production Function is a very

common application of partial derivatives.

Theory: the partial derivative of the Cobb-Douglas

Production Function gives the marginal product of

labour (𝜕𝑄/𝜕𝐿) and the marginal product of

capital (𝜕𝑄/𝜕𝐾). The higher the value of the

marginal product, the greater the increase in

output from an extra unit of that input.

Economic Theory: returns to scale are defined as

the extent output changes when inputs are

changed by a certain ratio. For the Cobb-Douglas

Production Function

𝑄 = 𝐴𝐿𝛼𝐾𝛽

Page 148: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

148

If:

1. 𝛼 + 𝛽 < 1 then there are decreasing returns

to scale; if inputs are doubled, output will less

than double.

2. 𝛼 + 𝛽 = 1 then there are constant returns to

scale; if inputs double, output will double.

3. 𝛼 + 𝛽 > 1 then there are increasing returns to

scale; if inputs double, output will more than

double.

Example 1: find the marginal productivity of labour

for the function

𝑄 = 4𝐿0.3𝐾0.7

when 𝐿 = 30 and 𝐾 = 46. Also determine the

returns to scale.

Plan: partially differentiate 𝑄 with respect to 𝐿.

Add the indices to determine the returns to scale.

Solution:

𝜕𝑄

𝜕𝐿= 4 0.3 𝐿−0.7𝐾0.7

= 1.2𝐿−0.7𝐾0.7

Substitute 𝐿 = 30 and 𝐾 = 46:

𝜕𝑄

𝜕𝐿= 1.2 30 −0.7 46 0.7 ≈ 1.619 3𝑑. 𝑝

Output will increase by 1.619 units for an extra

unit of labour.

Since the addition of the indices is 0.3 + 0.7 = 1,

there are constant returns to scale.

Example 2: find the marginal productivities of

labour and capital for the following production

function

𝑄 = 12𝐿0.5𝐾0.75

at a labour level of 46 and a capital level of 71.

Plan: differentiate with respect to 𝐿 then

substitute in 𝐿 = 46, 𝐾 = 71 to find the marginal

productivity of labour. Similarly for 𝐾.

Solution: for marginal productivity of labour:

𝜕𝑄

𝜕𝐿= 6𝐿−0.5𝐾0.75

𝜕𝑄

𝜕𝐿= 6 46−0.5 710.75 ≈ 21.64 2𝑑. 𝑝.

And for marginal productivity of capital:

𝜕𝑄

𝜕𝐾= 9𝐿0.5𝐾−0.25

𝜕𝑄

𝜕𝐾= 9 460.5 71−0.25 ≈ 21.03 2𝑑. 𝑝.

Thus for an extra unit of labour, output would

increase by approximately 21.64 units, and for an

extra unit of capital, output would increase by

approximately 21.06 units.

In this last example, if the cost of a unit of labour

and a unit of capital were the same, it would be

better to employ more labour, as they will add

(slightly) more to output than capital.

Exercises: 1. Determine the marginal productivity of labour and

capital in the following Cobb-Douglas Production Functions and also the returns to scale. 𝑎) 𝑄 = 4𝐿0.5𝐾0.5

𝑏) 𝑄 = 13𝐿0.6𝐾0.4

𝑐) 𝑄 = 12.5𝐿0.7𝐾0.4

𝑑) 𝑄 = 75𝐿0.8𝐾0.5

𝑒) 𝑄 = 0.8𝐿0.6𝐾0.3

𝑓) 𝑄 = 100𝐿0.2𝐾0.9

𝑔) 𝑄 = 5.73𝐿0.79𝐾0.41

𝑕) 𝑄 = 2.118𝐿0.812𝐾0.417

If you had the option of increasing either labour or capital by one unit in each of the above questions, which one would you increase? Why?

7.6 total differentiation

At the beginning of the chapter, the electricity

example was used to demonstrate the theory of

partial differentiation. Boeing had installed electric

heaters in their plant, which reduced the amount

of electricity available for the metal manufacturer

Metalex. Boeing assumed that their decision

would not affect costs other than the use of

electricity (i.e. direct effect). However, Metalex

will not produce as much metal, so will charge

Boeing more per sheet of metal. This is the indirect

Page 149: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

149

effect of using more electricity. Adding the direct

and indirect effects gives the total effect; this is

what total differentiation finds.

As a manager, better decisions are made when

variables are not assumed to be constant. Knowing

the total effect is better than pretending variables

are constant, when in reality, they are not.

Theory: the following is a formula that allows us to

move from partial differentiation to total

differentiation. The total derivative equation is:

𝑑𝑧 =𝜕𝑧

𝜕𝑥𝑑𝑥 +

𝜕𝑧

𝜕𝑦𝑑𝑦

It is much simpler than it seems.

In the Boeing example, the variables are: total

costs (𝑧), cost of electricity (𝑥) and the cost of

metal (𝑦).

Note: this equation finds the gradient function of a

multivariable equation. For small changes in either

or both of the input variables, this equation is a

good approximation. When the changes are large,

then the approximation will be less accurate. For

the reason, consult a second year text book

dealing with “linear approximations and errors”.

Example 1: for the following function, determine

the extent total production will change if

electricity use increases by 5 units from 150, and

metal prices decrease by 3 units from 400.

𝑃 = 5𝐸2𝑀 + 5𝐸2 − 2𝑀2 + 3𝑀 − 6𝐸 + 550

Plan: partially differentiate the function 𝑃, then

substitute the partial derivatives, the changes in

electricity and metal, and the original levels of

electricity and metal into the total derivative

function.

Solution: the partial derivatives are:

𝜕𝑃

𝜕𝐸= 10𝐸𝑀 + 10𝐸 − 6

𝜕𝑃

𝜕𝑀= 5𝐸2 − 4𝑀 + 3

The small change in 𝐸 is 𝑑𝐸 = 5 and the small

change in 𝑀 is 𝑑𝑀 = −3. It is negative because it

is a decrease.

Substitute the partial derivatives into the total

derivative equation:

𝑑𝑃 =𝜕𝑃

𝜕𝐸𝑑𝐸 +

𝜕𝑃

𝜕𝑀𝑑𝑀

𝑑𝑃 = 10𝐸𝑀 + 10𝐸 − 6 𝑑𝐸 + 5𝐸2 − 4𝑀 + 3 𝑑𝑀

Further substitution of 𝑑𝐸 = 5 and 𝑑𝑀 = −3:

𝑑𝑃 = 10𝐸𝑀 + 10𝐸 − 6 (5) + 5𝐸2 − 4𝑀 + 3 (−3)

Finally, substitute the original values of 𝐸 = 150

and 𝑀 = 400:

𝑑𝑃 = 10 150 400 + 10 150 − 6 5

+ 5 150 2 − 4 400 + 3 −3

𝑑𝑃 = 3,007,470 − 332,709 = 2,674,761

Production will increase by approximately two and

a half million units.

This is still an approximation. To get the actual

change in production, find the production at the

original input level of 𝐸 = 150, 𝑀 = 400 and then

the production at the new input level of

𝐸 = 155, 𝑀 = 397 (these numbers come from the

original plus the change in the inputs; 𝐸 = 150 +

5, 𝑀 = 400 − 3). Finding the difference between

these two production levels gives the precise

change in production (actually do it and you should

get 2.702million units (3d.p.)).

The total derivative approximation method is used

because often, the 𝑧 function (the cost 𝑃 in this

example) cannot be isolated easily, but the partial

derivatives can easily be found with other

𝑑𝑧 =𝜕𝑧

𝜕𝑥𝑑𝑥 +

𝜕𝑧

𝜕𝑦𝑑𝑦

very small change in 𝑥

very small change in 𝑦

Partial derivative with respect to 𝑥

very small

change in 𝑧

Partial derivative with respect to 𝑦

Page 150: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

150

techniques. You will learn this in second year, if

you continue with economics.

Theory: to get the actual change in a multivariable

function, find the value of the function at the New

variable level then subtract the value of the

function at the Original variable level:

∆𝑧 = 𝑧 𝑥𝑁 , 𝑦𝑁 − 𝑧 𝑥𝑂 , 𝑦𝑂

Example 2: find the approximate change in output

for the production function

𝑄 = 5𝐿0.6𝐾0.5

when the original levels of the inputs are 𝐿 = 500,

𝐾 = 700 and when 𝐿 increases by 2 units, and 𝐾

decreases by 3 units.

Also, find the exact change in 𝑧.

Plan: find the partial derivatives of 𝑧, then

substitute everything into the total derivative

function to solve for 𝑑𝑧.

To find the actual change in 𝑧, find the difference

between the values of 𝑧𝑁 𝑥 = 502, 𝑦 = 697 and

𝑧𝑂 𝑥 = 500, 𝑦 = 700 .

Solution: the partial derivatives are:

𝑄𝐿 = 3𝐿−0.4𝐾0.5

𝑄𝐾 = 2.5𝐿0.6𝐾−0.5

Substitute these into the total derivative equation:

𝑑𝑄 =𝜕𝑄

𝜕𝐿𝑑𝐿 +

𝜕𝑄

𝜕𝐾𝑑𝐾

𝑑𝑄 = 3𝐿−0.4𝐾0.5 𝑑𝐿 + 2.5𝐿0.6𝐾−0.5 𝑑𝐾

Then substitute 𝐿 = 500, 𝐾 = 700, 𝑑𝐿 = 2 and

𝑑𝐾 = −3:

𝑑𝑄 = 3 500 −0.4 700 0.5 2

+ 2.5 500 0.6 700 −0.5 −3

𝑑𝑄 = 1.416 3𝑑. 𝑝.

For the actual change:

𝑄 𝐿 = 500, 𝐾 = 700 = 5 500 0.6 700 0.5

≈ 5506.8219

𝑄 𝐿 = 502, 𝐾 = 697 = 5 502 0.6 697 0.5

≈ 5508.1863

∆𝑄 = 𝑄 𝐿 = 502, 𝐾 = 697 − 𝑄 𝐿 = 500, 𝐾 = 700

∆𝑄 = 5508.1863 − 5506.8219 = 1.364 (3𝑑. 𝑝. )

Example 3: using the following Cobb-Douglas

Production Function

𝑄 = 40𝐿0.7𝐾0.6

with the current use of labour at 400 units, and

the current use of capital at 300 units, find an

approximation for the change in production when

labour is increased by 1% and capital is reduced by

0.5%.

Plan: use the percentage changes in 𝐿 and 𝐾 to

find the actual changes (in units). Partially

differentiate the function, then substitute

everything into the total derivative equation.

Solution: The actual changes in 𝐿 and 𝐾 are:

∆𝐿 = 1

100 400 = 4

∆𝐾 = −0.5

100 300 = −1.5

the partial derivatives are:

𝜕𝑄

𝜕𝐿= 40 0.7 𝐿−0.3𝐾0.6 = 28𝐿−0.3𝐾0.6

𝜕𝑄

𝜕𝐾= 40 0.6 𝐿0.7𝐾−0.4 = 24𝐿0.7𝐾−0.4

Substitute these along with 𝐿 = 400, 𝐾 = 300,

𝑑𝐿 = 4 and 𝑑𝐾 = −1.5 into the total derivative

equation:

𝑑𝑄 =𝜕𝑄

𝜕𝐿𝑑𝐿 +

𝜕𝑄

𝜕𝐾𝑑𝐾

𝑑𝑄 = 28𝐿−0.3𝐾0.6 4 + 24𝐿0.7𝐾−0.4 −1.5

𝑑𝑄 = 28(400)−0.3(300)0.6 4

+ 24(400)0.7(300)−0.4 −1.5

𝑑𝑄 = 324.96 (2𝑑. 𝑝. )

This is the approximate change in quantity from

changes in both inputs. To determine the exact

change, find 𝑄𝑂(𝐿 = 400, 𝐾 = 300) then subtract

it from 𝑄𝑁 𝐿 = 404, 𝐾 = 298.5 . Do this

Page 151: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

151

calculation, and see if you get

∆𝑄 = 322.16 2𝑑. 𝑝. .

Exercises: 1. For the function

𝑧 = 0.3𝑥𝑦2 + 0.5𝑥2𝑦 Determine an expression for the total derivative (leaving any unknowns as variables).

2. The following production function approximates the output of a farm: 𝑄 = 4.75𝐾0.7𝐿0.3 Determine: a) An expression for the total derivative. b) An expression for the total derivative when

𝐿 = 50, 𝐾 = 70. c) The approximate change in output when 𝐿

increases by 1unit and 𝐾 increases by 2 units. d) Find the actual change in output. (Hint: find

the output at the two different 𝐿, 𝐾 combinations)

e) The returns to scale. 3. The following is a production function which

approximates the production of a cabinet maker: 𝑄 = 53.5𝐿0.71𝐾0.32 Determine: a) An expression for the total derivative. b) An expression for the total derivative when

𝐿 = 300, 𝐾 = 140 c) The approximate change in output when 𝐿

decreases by 2 units and 𝐾 increases by 1 unit. d) Find the actual change in output. (Hint: find

the output at the two different 𝐿, 𝐾 combinations)

e) The returns to scale.

7.7 optimisation with many variables

Partial derivatives play an important role in finding

the optimal points of functions. Similar to

optimisation in Chapter 5, optimisation for

multivariable function has first and second order

conditions, but with some modifications.

Theory: the First Order Condition (FOC) is to set all

first order partial derivatives to zero.

𝜕𝑧

𝜕𝑥= 0 and

𝜕𝑧

𝜕𝑦= 0

Then solve for 𝑥 and 𝑦 using simultaneous

equations, to find any stationary points.

Example 1: find the stationary point(s) for

𝑧 = 0.5𝑦2 + 𝑥𝑦 + 𝑥2 − 𝑦 − 3𝑥 + 5

Plan: use the FOC by setting both partial

derivatives equal to zero, then solving for 𝑥 and 𝑦.

Solution: using the FOC:

𝜕𝑧

𝜕𝑥= 𝑦 + 2𝑥 − 3 = 0

𝜕𝑧

𝜕𝑦= 𝑦 + 𝑥 − 1 = 0

Use simultaneous equations to solve for 𝑥 and 𝑦:

′ : 𝑦 = −2𝑥 + 3

Substitute ′ → :

−2𝑥 + 3 + 𝑥 − 1 = 0

−2𝑥 + 3 + 𝑥 − 1 = 0

𝑥 = 2

Substitute back into ′ : 𝑦 = −2 2 + 3 = −1

There is one stationary point at 𝑥 = 2, 𝑦 = −1. A

“point” in a three dimensional graph also requires

the value of the dependent variable (i.e. the 𝑧).

This is found from the original function:

𝑧 2, −1 = 0.5𝑦2 + 𝑥𝑦 + 𝑥2 − 𝑦 − 3𝑥 + 5

= 0.5 −1 2 + 2 −1 + 2 2 − −1

− 3 2 + 5

= 2.5

Thus there is a stationary point at 𝑥 = 2, 𝑦 = −1,

𝑧 = 2.5 or in coordinate form 𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧 =

2, −1, 2.5 .

The question now becomes: is this stationary point

a maximum or a minimum (or something called a

saddle point)?

This is unknown yet, but firstly, what is a saddle

point?

Theory: a saddle point is a stationary point that is

neither an overall maximum nor an overall

minimum. It looks like a saddle:

Page 152: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

152

Look closely: in one direction there is a minimum,

but it the other direction, there is a maximum. This

is a stationary point, but it is not an optimal point.

Theory: to find out whether a stationary point is a

maximum, a minimum or a saddle point, the

Second Order Condition (SOC) is used:

Find the value of all straight second order partial

derivatives at the point(s) obtained from the FOC,

then apply the following:

1. The point is a possible maximum if:

𝜕2𝑧

𝜕𝑥2< 0 𝐴𝑁𝐷

𝜕2𝑧

𝜕𝑦2< 0

That is, if both second order straight partial

derivatives are less than zero, it is a possible

maximum.

2. The point is a possible minimum if:

𝜕2𝑧

𝜕𝑥2> 0 𝐴𝑁𝐷

𝜕2𝑧

𝜕𝑦2> 0

That is, if both second order straight partial

derivatives are greater than zero, it is a possible

minimum.

3. The point is a saddle point if the signs of the two

straight first order partial derivatives do not

match, or if one is equal to zero.

Example 2: for the function from Example 1

𝑧 = 0.5𝑦2 + 𝑥𝑦 + 𝑥2 − 𝑦 − 3𝑥 + 5

determine the possible nature of the stationary

point at 2, −1, 2.5 .

Plan: evaluate the straight second order partial

derivatives at 𝑥 = 2, 𝑦 = −1.

Solution: straight second order partial derivatives:

𝜕2𝑧

𝜕𝑥2= 2 > 0

𝜕2𝑧

𝜕𝑦2= 1 > 0

Both straight second order partial derivatives are

greater than zero, so this is a possible minimum.

The process used up to now has been similar to

that in Chapter 5, but the following is a new rule.

Theory: once the straight second order partial

derivatives have been evaluated, and a possible

minimum or possible maximum has been

established, to make sure it is a minimum or

maximum, the delta test must be used:

∆= 𝜕2𝑧

𝜕𝑥2 𝜕2𝑧

𝜕𝑦2 − 𝜕2𝑧

𝜕𝑥𝜕𝑦

2

The delta test is: the two straight second partial

derivatives multiplied together with the mixed

partial second derivative squared, subtracted.

𝐼𝑓 ∆ > 0, the point is what was suspected.

𝐼𝑓 ∆ < 0, ignore everything, the point is a saddle.

Written simpler:

∆= 𝑓𝑥𝑥 𝑓𝑦𝑦 − 𝑓𝑥𝑦 2

Example 2 cont: confirm the nature of the point at

2, 7, 34.5 .

Solution: the mixed partial second derivative:

𝜕2𝑧

𝜕𝑥𝜕𝑦= 1

Apply the delta test:

∆= 2 1 − 1 2 = 1 > 0

Thus the point is what it was thought to be. Since

it was thought to be a minimum in this example,

the delta test confirms this.

𝑥

𝑦

𝑧

Page 153: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

153

Theory: the delta test does NOT tell us whether a

point is a maximum or a minimum, the SOC

determines this. The delta test just proves or

disproves what was suspected from the SOC.

Example 3: determine the nature of all stationary

points for the function

𝑧 =1

3𝑥3 −

1

2𝑦2 −

3

2𝑥2 − 𝑥𝑦 − 20𝑥 − 5𝑦 − 10

Plan: using the FOC, find the partial derivatives

and set them to zero. Solve for the variables.

Next, find the straight second order partial

derivatives and evaluate them at the stationary

point(s). From their signs, determine the possible

nature of the stationary point.

Find the mixed second order partial derivative, and

apply the delta test to confirm the nature.

Solution: find the FOC:

𝜕𝑧

𝜕𝑥= 𝑥2 − 3𝑥 − 𝑦 − 20 = 0

𝜕𝑧

𝜕𝑦= −𝑦 − 𝑥 − 5 = 0

Use simultaneous equations:

′ : 𝑦 = −𝑥 − 5

Substitute′ → :

𝑥2 − 3𝑥 − (−𝑥 − 5) − 20 = 0

𝑥2 − 3𝑥 + 𝑥 + 5 − 20 = 0

𝑥2 − 2𝑥 − 15 = 0

Solve for 𝑥 using the Quadratic Formula:

𝑥 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒𝑠 =−(−2) ± (−2)2 − 4 1 (−15)

2(1)

𝑥 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒𝑠 =2 ± 64

2

𝑥 = 5 𝑂𝑅 𝑥 = −3

These are the 𝑥 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒𝑠 of two stationary points.

The 𝑦 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒s are obtained from ′.

For 𝑥 = 5: 𝑦 = − 5 − 5 = −10

For 𝑥 = −3: 𝑦 = − −3 − 5 = −2

Thus the two stationary points are:

Point 1: 𝑥 = 5, 𝑦 = −10

Point 2: 𝑥 = −3, 𝑦 = −2

Lastly, get the 𝑧 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒𝑠 for these two points

(see if you get these same values):

𝑧 5, −10 = −555

6

𝑧 −3, −2 = 29.5

The SOC needs to be used to determine the nature

of these two points:

𝜕2𝑧

𝜕𝑥2= 2𝑥 − 3

𝜕2𝑧

𝜕𝑦2= −1

Look at each of the two points individually:

Point 1: 5, −10, −555

6

𝜕2𝑧

𝜕𝑥2 𝑥 = 5, 𝑦 = −10 = 2 5 − 3 = 7 > 0

𝜕2𝑧

𝜕𝑦2 𝑥 = 5, 𝑦 = −10 = −1 < 0

The two signs do not match, so this is a saddle

point.

Point 2: −3, −2,29.5

𝜕2𝑧

𝜕𝑥2 𝑥 = −3, 𝑦 = −2 = 2 −3 − 3 = −9 < 0

𝜕2𝑧

𝜕𝑦2 𝑥 = −3, 𝑦 = −2 = −1 < 0

Both signs are less than zero, so this point is a

possible maximum. To confirm this, the delta test

is used:

∆= 𝜕2𝑧

𝜕𝑥2 𝜕2𝑧

𝜕𝑦2 − 𝜕2𝑧

𝜕𝑥𝜕𝑦

2

The mixed second order partial derivative is:

𝜕2𝑧

𝜕𝑥𝜕𝑦= −1

Put everything into the delta formula:

∆= −9 −1 − −1 2 = 9 − 1 = 8 > 0

Since ∆ > 0, this confirms what was suspected

from the SOC; since the SOC gave a possible

Page 154: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

154

maximum, the delta test confirms this.

𝑃𝑜𝑖𝑛𝑡 1: 5, −10, −555

6 (𝑠𝑎𝑑𝑑𝑙𝑒 𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑛𝑡)

𝑃𝑜𝑖𝑛𝑡 2: −3, −2,29.5 (𝑚𝑎𝑥𝑖𝑚𝑢𝑚)

Example 4: determine the nature of any stationary

points for the function

𝑧 = 𝑥2𝑒𝑥 + 𝑦2 − 𝑒0.5𝑥𝑦

(𝑒 is the number, not a variable).

Plan: use the FOC to find any stationary points:

find both partial derivatives, set them equal to

zero and solve using simultaneous equations.

The 𝑒 rule will have to be used.

To find the nature of these: find the straight

second order partial derivatives and evaluate them

at the points found using the FOC. Determine if

any of the stationary points are possible

maxima/minima. Use the delta test to make sure

of their nature.

Solution: the partial derivatives are:

𝜕𝑧

𝜕𝑥= 2𝑥𝑒𝑥 + 𝑥2𝑒𝑥 − 0.5𝑒0.5𝑥𝑦 = 0

𝜕𝑧

𝜕𝑦= 2𝑦 − 𝑒0.5𝑥 = 0

Solve these simultaneously:

′ : 𝑦 =𝑒0.5𝑥

2

Substitute ′ → :

2𝑥𝑒𝑥 + 𝑥2𝑒𝑥 − 0.5𝑒0.5𝑥 𝑒0.5𝑥

2 = 0

Simplify:

2𝑥𝑒𝑥 + 𝑥2𝑒𝑥 − 0.25𝑒𝑥 = 0

Factorise:

𝑒𝑥 2𝑥 + 𝑥2 − 0.25 = 0

For the left side to be equal to zero, either:

1. 𝑒𝑥 = 0 which is impossible, or

2. 𝑥2 + 2𝑥 − 0.25 = 0

Solve using quadratics:

𝑥 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒𝑠 =−𝑏 ± 𝑏2 − 4𝑎𝑐

2𝑎

𝑥 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒𝑠 =−2 ± 22 − 4 1 (−0.25)

2(1)

𝑥 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒𝑠 =−2 ± 5

2

𝑥1 = −1 − 5/2 𝑜𝑟 𝑥2 = −1 + 5/2

This gives two stationary points at the two

𝑥 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒𝑠 above with approximations

𝑥1 ≈ −2.118 and 𝑥2 ≈ 0.118. But each of these

points also needs a 𝑦 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒 which is found from

either of the simultaneous equations (′ is easiest

as 𝑦 is already isolated):

𝑦 𝑥1 = −1 − 5

2 =

𝑒0.5 −1−

52

2≈ 0.1734

𝑦 𝑥2 = −1 + 5

2 =

𝑒0.5 −1+

52

2≈ 0.5304

So the two stationary points are:

Point 1: 𝑥 = −1 − 5/2, 𝑦 =𝑒

0.5 −1− 52

2

Point 2: 𝑥 = −1 + 5

2, 𝑦 =

𝑒0.5 −1+

52

2

To obtain the 𝑧 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒𝑠, substitute each of these

pairs of 𝑥 and 𝑦 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒𝑠 into the original

equation and simplify. Do it and you should get:

𝑧1

−1 − 5

2,𝑒

0.5 −1− 52

2

= 𝑒−1− 52 2 + 5

𝑧2

−1 + 5

2,𝑒

0.5 −1+ 52

2

= 𝑒−1+ 52 2 − 5

To find the nature of these points, use the SOC:

𝜕2𝑧

𝜕𝑥2= 2𝑒𝑥 + 2𝑥𝑒𝑥 + 2𝑥𝑒𝑥 + 𝑥2𝑒𝑥 − 0.25𝑒0.5𝑥𝑦

𝜕2𝑧

𝜕𝑦2= 2

Page 155: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

155

Evaluate each of the stationary points at each of

the two partial derivatives (approximate values are

used as it is very difficult to work with the exact

values; the reason will be clear later):

Point 1: 𝑥1 ≈ −2.118, 𝑦1 ≈ 0.1734

𝜕2𝑧

𝜕𝑥2≈ 2𝑒−2.118 + 2 −2.118 𝑒−2.118

+ 2 −2.118 𝑒−2.118

+ −2.118 2𝑒−2.118

− 0.25𝑒0.5 −2.118 0.1734

≈ −0.254 < 0

𝜕2𝑧

𝜕𝑦2= 2 > 0

The signs do not match up so this is a saddle point.

Point 2: (𝑥2 ≈ 0.118, 𝑦2 ≈ 0.5304)

𝜕2𝑧

𝜕𝑥2≈ 2𝑒0.118 + 2 0.118 𝑒0.118 + 2 0.118 𝑒0.118

+ 0.118 2𝑒0.118 − 0.25𝑒0.5 0.118 0.5304

≈ 2.657 > 0

𝜕2𝑧

𝜕𝑦2= 2 > 0

Since the signs match up and both are greater than

zero, this point is a possible minimum.

To prove that this point is a minimum, the delta

test needs to be evaluated at this point. The mixed

partial derivative is:

𝜕2𝑧

𝜕𝑥𝜕𝑦= −0.5𝑒0.5𝑥

Evaluated at Point 2 (𝑥2 ≈ 0.118, 𝑦2 ≈ 0.5304):

𝜕2𝑧

𝜕𝑥𝜕𝑦≈ −0.5𝑒0.5(0.118) ≈ −0.5304

Apply the delta test:

∆= 𝜕2𝑧

𝜕𝑥2 𝜕2𝑧

𝜕𝑦2 − 𝜕2𝑧

𝜕𝑥𝜕𝑦

2

∆≈ 2.657 2 − −0.5304 2 ≈ 5.033 > 0

This proves what was suspected from the SOC.

Since the SOC gave a possible minimum, the delta

test proves this is true. Thus:

Saddle point: −1 − 5

2,𝑒

0.5 −1− 52

2, 𝑒−1−

5

2 2 + 5

Minimum: −1 + 5

2,𝑒

0.5 −1+ 52

2, 𝑒−1+

5

2 2 − 5

Note: the only reason approximations were used

(to at least three decimal places!) when evaluating

the SOC and the delta test was that the sign of the

value was needed, not the precise value at that

point. If the approximation gives a SOC result quite

a bit above/below zero, then that

positive/negative sign can be taken with certainty.

However, if the SOC was close to zero (around

0.01), then more decimal places or the exact

answer would have to be used to be 100% sure

that the SOC is really positive/negative.

This was a very difficult example, but look over it

again and write out what is being found and why in

each of the steps before trying the following

exercises.

Exercises: 1. Determine if the following functions have any

stationary points, and determine their nature. 𝑎) 𝑧 = 4𝑥𝑦 − 3𝑥2 − 5𝑦2 + 7 𝑏) 𝑧 = 4𝑥 + 5𝑦 − 3𝑥2 − 2𝑦2 𝑐) 𝑧 = 𝑥3 + 𝑦3 + 18 𝑑) 𝑓 𝑥, 𝑦 = 2.5𝑥 + 3.5𝑦 − 2.2𝑥2 − 1.8𝑦2 𝑒) 𝑧 = −4𝑥4 − 5𝑦4 + 32𝑥 + 40𝑦 𝑓) 𝑓 𝑥, 𝑦 = 3𝑥𝑒𝑥+𝑦 + 2𝑦 + 𝑥

2. Given the profit function: 𝜋 = 𝐾0.4𝐿0.5 − 0.3𝐾 − 0.4𝐿 Determine any stationary points, and if there is a maximum.

7.8 economic applications

Theory: the total revenue from two different

goods is simply the sum of the revenues of the

individual goods.

Example 1: a direct computer

manufacturer/retailer sells two different types of

Page 156: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

156

computers; laptops (𝐿) and desktops (𝐷). They sell

these computers at the prices:

𝑃𝐿 = $1197.00

𝑃𝐷 = $864.00

The company pays $560 in rent and face a variable

cost function:

𝑉𝐶 = 0.3𝐿2 + 0.45𝐷2 + 0.3𝐿𝐷

Determine:

a) The profit function

b) The optimal levels of 𝐿 and 𝐷 (prove this).

c) The maximum profit possible.

Plan: find the 𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝐶𝑜𝑠𝑡 function using

𝑇𝐶 = 𝑉𝐶 + 𝐹𝐶

Then find the 𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑅𝑒𝑣𝑒𝑛𝑢𝑒 function (which just

comes from 𝑃 × 𝑄 for each of the two computers).

Determine the profit function using:

𝜋 = 𝑇𝑅 − 𝑇𝐶

Find any stationary points using the FOC then

prove their nature using the SOC and the delta

test. Substitute the (𝐿, 𝐷) combination back into

the profit function to determine the maximum

profit.

Solution: the 𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝐶𝑜𝑠𝑡 function is:

𝑇𝐶 = 0.3𝐿2 + 0.45𝐷2 + 0.3𝐿𝐷 + 560

The 𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑅𝑒𝑣𝑒𝑛𝑢𝑒 function is the sum of 𝑃 × 𝑄

for each of the two goods:

𝑇𝑅 = 1197𝐿 + 863.10𝐷

Thus the profit function is:

𝜋 = 1197𝐿 + 864𝐷 − 0.3𝐿2 − 0.45𝐷2 − 0.3𝐿𝐷 − 560

To find stationary points, use the FOC:

𝜋𝐿 = 1197 − 0.6𝐿 − 0.3𝐷 = 0

𝜋𝐷 = 864 − 0.9𝐷 − 0.3𝐿 = 0

′ : 0.3𝐷 = 1197 − 0.6𝐿

′′ : 𝐷 = 3990 − 2𝐿

Substitute ′′ → :

864 − 0.9 3990 − 2𝐿 − 0.3𝐿 = 0

864 − 3591 + 1.8𝐿 − 0.3𝐿 = 0

𝐿 = 1818

Substitute this into ′′ to give:

𝐷 = 3990 − 2 1818 = 354

To determine the nature of this stationary point,

the SOC must be used:

𝜋𝐿𝐿 = −0.6 < 0

𝜋𝐾𝐾 = −0.9 < 0

Both straight second order partial derivatives are

negative so this is a possible maximum. To prove it,

the delta test must be used:

𝜋𝐿𝐾 = −0.3

∆= 𝜋𝐿𝐿𝜋𝐾𝐾 − 𝜋𝐿𝐾 2

∆= −0.6 −0.9 − −0.3 2

∆= 0.54 − 0.09 = 0.45 > 0

Since the delta test is positive, it confirms what

was suspected from the SOC (i.e. the point is a

maximum).

To determine the actual profit attainable,

substitute 𝐿 = 1458 and 𝐷 = 1074 into the profit

function:

𝜋 1818,354 = 1197 1818 + 864 354

− 0.3 1818 2 − 0.45 354 2

− 0.3 1818 354 − 560

𝜋 1818,354 = 1,240,441

Thus to attain a maximum profit of approximately

$1.24million, output should be set at 1818 laptops

and 354 desktops.

Example 2: a company faces a demand function of

the form

𝑃𝑑 =1000

𝑄𝑑+ 20

and a production function of the form:

𝑄 = −𝐿2 − 2𝐾2 + 𝐿𝐾 + 5𝐾 + 10𝐿

If each labour unit 𝐿 costs $20 and each capital

unit 𝐾 costs $30, and fixed costs are $600,

determine the profit maximising level of capital

and labour, and also find the maximum profit.

Page 157: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

157

Plan: find the 𝑇𝐶 function using the fixed costs and

variable costs. Then find the 𝑇𝑅 function, using the

demand function and the production function.

Use 𝜋 = 𝑇𝑅 − 𝑇𝐶 to determine the maximum

profit levels of 𝐿 and 𝐾, then substitute back to get

the maximum profit.

Solution: to find total revenue:

𝑇𝑅 = 𝑃 ∙ 𝑄 = 1000

𝑄+ 20 ∙ 𝑄

𝑇𝑅 = 1000 + 20𝑄

To find 𝑇𝑅 in terms of labour and capital,

substitute in for 𝑄:

𝑇𝑅 = 1000 + 20 −𝐿2 − 2𝐾2 + 𝐿𝐾 + 5𝐾 + 10𝐿

𝑇𝑅 = 1000 − 20𝐿2 − 40𝐾2 + 20𝐿𝐾 + 100𝐾 + 200𝐿

Total costs come from the cost per unit costs and

the fixed costs:

𝑇𝐶 = 20𝐿 + 30𝐾 + 600

The profit function is:

𝜋 = 𝑇𝑅 − 𝑇𝐶

𝜋 = 1000 − 20𝐿2 − 40𝐾2 + 20𝐿𝐾 + 100𝐾 + 200𝐿

− 20𝐿 + 30𝐾 + 600

𝜋 = 400 − 20𝐿2 − 40𝐾2 + 20𝐿𝐾 + 70𝐾 + 180𝐿

To find any stationary point, use the FOC:

𝜋𝐿 = −40𝐿 + 20𝐾 + 180 = 0

𝜋𝐾 = −80𝐾 + 20𝐿 + 70 = 0

Rearrange 𝜋𝐿 to isolate 𝐾:

𝐾 =40𝐿 − 180

20= 2𝐿 − 9

Substitute into 𝜋𝐾:

−80 2𝐿 − 9 + 20𝐿 + 70 = 0

−160𝐿 + 720 + 20𝐿 + 70 = 0

𝐿 =79

14

Substitute this into the isolated 𝐾 equation:

𝐾 = 2𝐿 − 9 = 2 79

14 − 9 =

16

7

Thus there is a stationary point at

𝐾 =16

7 , 𝐿 =

79

14

Use the SOC to determine the nature of this

stationary point:

𝜋𝐿𝐿 = −40 < 0

𝜋𝐾𝐾 = −80 < 0

Since both are less than zero, this stationary point

is a possible maximum.

To make sure it is a maximum, use the delta test.

The mixed second order partial derivative:

𝜋𝐿𝐾 = 20

∆= 𝜋𝐿𝐿𝜋𝐾𝐾 − 𝜋𝐿𝐾 2

∆= −40 −80 − 20 2 = 2800 > 0

This proves that what was suspected from the SOC

is actually correct. The SOC gave a possible

maximum, and the delta test confirmed this.

To find the profit at 𝐿 =79

14 and 𝐾 =

16

7 substitute

into the profit equation:

𝜋 = 400 − 20𝐿2 − 40𝐾2 + 20𝐿𝐾 + 70𝐾 + 180𝐿

𝜋 = 400 − 20 79

14

2

− 40 16

7

2

+ 20 79

14

16

7

+ 70 16

7 + 180

79

14

𝜋 = 9876

7≈ 987.86 2𝑑. 𝑝.

Exercises: 1. A farmer in a perfectly competitive industry grows

wheat and barley. If the rent on the farm is $4,000 per year, and the prices for the two crops are:

𝑃𝑊 = $225/𝑡𝑜𝑛 𝑃𝐵 = $190/𝑡𝑜𝑛

With variable costs being approximated by: 𝑉𝐶 = 0.5𝑊2 + 0.4𝐵2 + 0.6𝑊𝐵

Determine: a) The profit function b) The optimal levels of production c) The maximum profit attainable.

2. A shipyard uses two inputs, 𝐿 and 𝐾. If the demand for their services are approximated by

𝑃𝐷 =2500

0.5𝑄𝐷

+ 50

And the firm has a service production function of the form

𝑄 = −0.5𝐿2 − 2𝐾2 + 2𝐿𝐾 + 8𝐾 + 12𝐿 If each 𝐿 costs $25 and each 𝐾 costs $40, determine: a) The profit function in terms of 𝐿 and 𝐾. b) The optimal levels of 𝐿 and 𝐾. c) The maximum profit attainable.

Page 158: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

158

3. A firm imports two types of televisions from Malaysia [plasma (𝑀) and LED (𝐿)] at a cost of:

𝑃𝑀;𝑖𝑚𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑡 = $300

𝑃𝐿;𝑖𝑚𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑡 = $500

If the domestic demand functions for each of the two types is approximated by:

𝑃𝑀 = 𝑀 −2𝐿2

𝑀+ 𝐿 + 1300

𝑃𝐿 = 𝐿 −5𝑀2

𝐿+ 2𝑀 + 1000

If the cost to rent the shop is $500,000, determine: a) The two total revenue functions b) The total cost function c) The profit function d) The optimal sales of the two types of

televisions. e) The two domestic prices of the televisions. f) The maximum profit attainable.

chapter seven summary

Multivariable functions means that a dependent variable is determined by two or more other variables. 𝑧 = 𝑓(𝑥, 𝑦) 𝑜𝑟 𝑧(𝑥, 𝑦)

The Cobb-Douglas Production Function has the general form:

𝑄 = 𝐴𝐿𝛼𝐾𝛽 where the values of 𝐴, 𝛼 and 𝛽 are all positive constants.

Partial differentiation is finding the rate at which the dependent variable changes when an independent variable changes assuming all other variables are held constant. 𝜕𝑧

𝜕𝑥 ,

𝜕𝑧

𝜕𝑦 𝑂𝑅 𝑧𝑥 , 𝑧𝑦

To partially differentiate a multivariable function with respect to a single variable, differentiate the function with respect to that variable while treating all other variables as constants.

The second order partial derivative is simply partially differentiating the original function twice.

𝜕2𝑧

𝜕𝑥2 ,

𝜕2𝑧

𝜕𝑦2 𝑂𝑅 𝑧𝑥𝑥 , 𝑧𝑦𝑦

Mixed partial derivatives are found by differentiating with respect to one variable first, then differentiating with respect to the other variable.

𝜕2𝑧

𝜕𝑥𝜕𝑦 ,

𝜕2𝑧

𝜕𝑦𝜕𝑥 𝑂𝑅 𝑧𝑥𝑦 , 𝑧𝑦𝑥

Mixed partial derivatives are the same, no matter which way they are found.

The higher the value of the marginal product, the greater the increase in output from an extra unit of that input.

Returns to scale are defined as the extent output changes when inputs are changed by a certain amount. For the Cobb-Douglas Production Function

𝑄 = 𝐴𝐿𝛼𝐾𝛽 1. 𝛼 + 𝛽 < 1 then there are decreasing returns to

scale. 2. 𝛼 + 𝛽 = 1 then there are constant returns to scale.

3. 𝛼 + 𝛽 > 1 then there are increasing returns to scale.

The total derivative equation is:

𝑑𝑧 =𝜕𝑧

𝜕𝑥𝑑𝑥 +

𝜕𝑧

𝜕𝑦𝑑𝑦

To find the actual change in a function: ∆𝑧 = 𝑧 𝑥𝑁 , 𝑦𝑁 − 𝑧 𝑥𝑂 , 𝑦𝑂

To find an optimal point: 1. The First Order Condition (FOC) is:

𝜕𝑧

𝜕𝑥= 0 𝐴𝑁𝐷

𝜕𝑧

𝜕𝑦= 0

Then solve for 𝑥 and 𝑦 using simultaneous equations, to find any stationary points. A saddle point is a stationary point that is neither an overall maximum nor an overall minimum. It looks like a saddle. 2. To find out whether a stationary point is a maximum, a minimum or a saddle point, the Second Order Condition (SOC) is used:

a) The point is a possible maximum if: 𝜕2𝑧

𝜕𝑥2< 0 𝐴𝑁𝐷

𝜕2𝑧

𝜕𝑦2< 0

b) The point is a possible minimum if: 𝜕2𝑧

𝜕𝑥2> 0 𝐴𝑁𝐷

𝜕2𝑧

𝜕𝑦2> 0

c) The point is a saddle point if the signs of the two straight first order partial derivatives do not match, or if one is equal to zero.

Use the delta test to make sure the point is what is suspected:

∆= 𝜕2𝑧

𝜕𝑥2

𝜕2𝑧

𝜕𝑦2 −

𝜕2𝑧

𝜕𝑥𝜕𝑦

2

𝐼𝑓 ∆ > 0, the point is what was suspected. 𝐼𝑓 ∆ < 0, ignore everything, the point is a saddle.

The total revenue from two different goods is simply the sum of the revenues of the individual goods.

chapter seven questions

1. Find both first order partial derivatives for: 𝑎) 𝑧 = 2𝑥𝑦 + 3𝑥 − 𝑦 + 4𝑥2𝑦3

𝑏) 𝑓 𝑥, 𝑦 = 12𝑥4 + 𝑥𝑒𝑦 − 12

𝑐) 𝑝 = 15𝑟0.3𝑚0.7 + 15𝑚𝑟

𝑑) 𝑧 = 18𝑥0.4𝑦0.8𝑥2 𝑦4 − 3𝑥𝑦 + 𝑥2

𝑒) 𝑧 = 𝑥 − 𝑦 𝑥 + 𝑦 4

𝑓) 𝑓 𝑥, 𝑦 = 3𝑥 − 4𝑦2 5 𝑥𝑦

𝑔) 𝑧 =𝑥2 − 𝑦3

1 − 𝑥 − 𝑦

𝑕) 𝑧 =12𝑥𝑦2 − 𝑦

1 − 𝑥𝑦

𝑖) 𝑧 = ln 1 − 𝑥2𝑦2 + 𝑥

Page 159: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

159

𝑗) 𝑧 = 𝑒4𝑥−𝑦 𝑥3 + 4𝑥𝑦 − 3

𝑘) 𝑧 = 𝑥2𝑦2 − 1 𝑒4𝑥𝑦

𝑙) 𝑧 =9𝑥𝑦

𝑥𝑦 − 1+ ln 15 − 𝑥 + 15 ln 4 − 2

𝑚) 𝑧 =1 − ln 1 + 𝑥𝑦

1 − 𝑒𝑥𝑦

2. Find all four second order partial derivatives for: 𝑎) 𝑧 = 𝑥2 + 𝑦2 − 3𝑥𝑦 − 𝑥 + 4𝑦 + 12

𝑏) 𝑧 = 2𝑥𝑦2 + 𝑦𝑥2 − 3

𝑐) 𝑧 = 𝑥3𝑦4 + 2𝑥𝑦 − 4𝑥 − 6𝑦 + 8

𝑑) 𝑓 𝑥, 𝑦 = 2𝑥𝑦2 4 + 18𝑥𝑦2 − 13𝑥𝑦

𝑒) 𝑧 = 𝑒2𝑥2+𝑦

𝑓) 𝑧 = 𝑒𝑥2+𝑦2− 2𝑥𝑦2

𝑔) 𝑓 𝑥, 𝑦 = ln 2𝑥2 + 𝑦3

𝑕) 𝑧 = ln 13 − 𝑥𝑦 + 𝑥2 + 15 𝑥 − 𝑦 2

3. For the following functions, find any stationary points and determine their nature: 𝑎) 𝑧 = 2.2𝑥𝑦 − 3.3𝑥2 − 5.5𝑦2 + 1

𝑏) 𝑧 = 2𝑥 + 2𝑦 − 3𝑥2 − 3𝑦2 + 2𝑥𝑦

𝑐) 𝑧 = 8𝑥3 + 3𝑦3 − 𝑥𝑦 + 500

𝑑) 𝑓 𝑥, 𝑦 = 1.2𝑥 + 2.4𝑦 − 2.4𝑥2 − 1.8𝑦2 + 1.2𝑥𝑦

𝑒) 𝑧 = −2𝑥4 − 3𝑦4 + 10𝑥 + 20𝑦

𝑓) 𝑓 𝑥, 𝑦 = 5𝑦𝑒𝑥−𝑦 + 3𝑦 − 8𝑥

4. A pharmaceutical company uses capital equipment and labour as inputs into the manufacture of paracetamol. If the company has a demand function for the final product as:

𝑃𝑑 =1

𝑄+ 20

The firm also has a production function of the form: 𝑄 = 𝐾0.5𝐿0.4

And the cost function is approximated by: 𝑇𝐶 = 5𝐾 + 10𝐿 + 20

Determine in terms of 𝐾 and 𝐿: a) The total revenue function b) The profit function c) When profit is at a maximum. d) The price at the maximum (if the maximum

exists). e) The quantity sold at the maximum.

5. Given the profit function: 𝜋 = 𝐾0.4𝐿0.5 − 0.3𝐾 − 0.4𝐿

Determine any stationary points and their nature. Is maximum profit a possibility?

6. Use the total derivative function to find the approximate change in 𝑧 for the function

𝜋 = 𝐾0.7𝐿0.4 + 0.02𝐾𝐿 − 0.3𝐿 − 0.4𝐾 when 𝐿 is increased by 0.2 from 154 and 𝐾 is increased by 0.1 from 310. Also determine the exact change in 𝜋, and compare the two answers.

7. Approximate the change in the objective function 𝑅 𝑅 𝑔, 𝑘 = 0.1𝑔2𝑘 + 0.3𝑘2𝑔 − 4𝑔𝑘 + 15

when 𝑔 is decreased by 0.5 and 𝑘 is increased by 0.9, given the original levels of 𝑔 and 𝑘 being 78 and 104 respectively. Also determine the exact change in 𝑅.

8. For the production function

𝑄 = 8𝐾0.4𝐿0.5 Find a) an expression for the approximate change in

output if 𝐿 is decreased by 0.4% and 𝐾 is increased by 0.2% (i.e. only in terms of 𝐿 and 𝐾).

b) the exact change in output, given 𝐿 was originally 200 and 𝐾 was 180.

9. A profit function has the form 𝜋 = 4𝐾 + 7𝐿 − 12𝐾2 − 14𝐿2 − 0.01

Determine the level of utilisation of the two inputs at maximum profit, and also the maximum profit.

10. A firm imports two goods from China, televisions (𝑇) and radios (𝑅), and sells them on the domestic market. The costs to the firm are related to the amount they import, and the approximate cost function is

𝑇𝐶 = 3𝑇2 + 4𝑅2 + 400 + 𝑅𝑇 The two goods sell on the domestic market at the following prices:

𝑃𝑇 = 300 𝑃𝑅 = 150

Determine: a) The total revenue function. b) The profit function. c) The levels of 𝑇 and 𝑅 for profit maximisation. d) The maximum profit attainable.

11. A factory producing portable music players has a demand function of the form

𝑃𝐷 =1100

𝑄𝐷

+ 45

with a production function of the form: 𝑄 = −2𝐿2 − 3𝐾2 + 2.5𝐿𝐾 + 8𝐿 + 12𝐾

If labour costs $50 and capital costs $35, and if fixed costs are $550, determine: a) The total revenue function in terms of 𝐿 and 𝐾. b) The total cost function in terms of 𝐿 and 𝐾. c) The profit function. d) The levels of 𝐿 and 𝐾 for maximum profit. e) The maximum profit attainable.

12. A firm imports two similar products from Brazil at fixed costs: refrigerators (𝑅) cost $650 and air conditioners (𝐴) cost $350. Given the domestic demand for refrigerators is:

𝑃𝑅 = 𝑅 −4𝐴2

𝑅+ 𝐴 + 1400

And the domestic demand for air conditioners is:

𝑃𝐴 = 𝐴 −6𝑅2

𝐴+ 3𝑅 + 1200

With fixed costs amounting to $10,000, determine: a) The two revenue functions. b) The total cost function. c) The profit function. d) The number of 𝑅 and 𝐴 that need to be sold to

maximise profit. e) The domestic prices of the two goods. f) The maximum attainable profit. g) Do these prices make sense?

Page 160: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

160

Chapter 8

Financial Mathematics Mathematics and money

8.1 Index Numbers and Averages 161

8.2 Series and Sums 163

8.3 Simple Interest 167

8.4 Compound Interest 168

8.5 Annual Interest Rates 170

8.6 Net Present Value 172

8.7 Internal Rate of Return 174

Chapter Eight Summary 177

Chapter Eight Questions 177

Page 161: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

161

8.1 index numbers and averages

In this context, index numbers are not related to

indices learnt in Chapter 1.

Theory: in a finance sense, index numbers

represent values in terms of a base value.

For example, the Consumer Price Index provides a

value of the price level of a basket of goods in a

certain year in terms of that same basket of goods

in a given base year (e.g. the year 2000).

Theory: to find the indexed value of a given

commodity, use the formula:

𝐼𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑥𝑡 =𝑉𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒𝑡

𝑉𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒0× 100

This is very similar to finding a percentage, except

that it is always to a base year.

The base year is given an index value of 100.

Example 1: an index is to be constructed with the

year 2000 as the base year (with a value of 100). If

gold prices in 2000 were $731.53 and in 2009

were $1091.20, determine the value of the index

in 2009.

Plan: use the index formula

𝐼𝑡 =𝑃𝑡

𝑃0× 100

Solution: substitute all the known values:

𝐼2009 =1091.20

731.53× 100

𝐼2009 = 149.17

This is not a difficult idea. However, in finance,

usually you will only have access to an index and

not the raw data. You will have to know how to

manipulate an index to extract useful information.

Theory: to obtain the percentage difference

between two time periods in an index, use the

formula:

%∆𝑡→𝑡+1=𝐼𝑡+1 − 𝐼𝑡

𝐼𝑡× 100

You might be thinking why not just take the two

indices from one another as they are already in

percentage form. This is correct but the difference

between two index entries gives the percentage

difference between the two years in terms of the

base year, which in most cases, is useless.

Example 2: given the following data, determine

the percentage change in crude oil prices between

2002 and 2003

Plan: use the percentage change formula

%∆2002→2003 =𝐼2003 − 𝐼2002

𝐼2002× 100

Solution: substitute the index values:

%∆2002→2003 =119.2 − 112.3

112.3× 100

%∆2002→2003 = 6.14%

If the difference between the two years was taken,

the value would be 6.9%, but this is in terms of

the price in 2000, which is irrelevant.

Example 3: given the following Consumer Price

Index values, determine the percentage change in

prices between:

a) 2005 and 2006

b) 2008 and 2009

Plan: use the percentage change formula

%∆𝑡→𝑡+1=𝐼𝑡+1 − 𝐼𝑡

𝐼𝑡× 100

𝑌𝑒𝑎𝑟 𝐶𝑃𝐼 2005 149.1 2006 154.4 2007 157.9 2008 164.8 2009 168.1

𝑌𝑒𝑎𝑟 𝐶𝑟𝑢𝑑𝑒 𝑂𝑖𝑙 𝐼𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑥 2000 100 2001 105.6 2002 112.3 2003 119.2

Page 162: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

162

Solution:

a) Substitute 𝐼𝑡+1 = 154.4 and 𝐼𝑡 = 149.1

%∆2005→2006 =154.4 − 149.1

149.1× 100

= 3.55% 2𝑑. 𝑝.

b) Substitute 𝐼𝑡+1 = 168.1 and 𝐼𝑡 = 164.8

%∆2008→2009=168.1 − 164.8

164.8× 100

= 2.00% 2𝑑. 𝑝.

Example 4: determine the percentage change in

the growth of gold prices from 2005 to 2009, given

the following index entries for the two years:

𝐼2005 = 123.2

𝐼2009 = 141.3

Plan: use the percentage change formula:

%∆𝑡→𝑡+𝑛 =𝐼𝑡+𝑛 − 𝐼𝑡

𝐼𝑡× 100

Solution: substitute 𝐼𝑡+𝑛 = 141.3 and 𝐼𝑡 = 123.2,

and solve:

%∆=141.3 − 123.2

123.2× 100 = 14.69% 2𝑑. 𝑝.

In the example above, there was growth of

14.69% over the four years from 2005 to 2009.

The average growth rate in gold prices over these

four years can be found in one of two ways.

Theory: the arithmetic average is the traditional

method of finding an average:

𝐴𝐴 =𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑔𝑒 𝑐𝑕𝑎𝑛𝑔𝑒

𝑛𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟 𝑜𝑓 𝑦𝑒𝑎𝑟𝑠

The geometric average is a concept similar to

compound interest (see later in Chapter). It

assumes that the percentage change is

compounded, thus to reverse the compounding:

𝐺𝐴 = 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑔𝑒 𝑐𝑕𝑎𝑛𝑔𝑒

100+ 1

𝑛

− 1

With 𝑛 being the number of years. The geometric

average is more realistic as it assumes growth is

relative to the most recent year, rather than the

first year.

Example 5: Find the arithmetic and geometric

average percentage change per year in the CPI

given the percentage change over four years was

21%.

Plan: apply the two formulae for averages.

Solution: for the arithmetic average:

𝐴𝑟𝑖𝑡𝑕𝑚𝑒𝑡𝑖𝑐 𝑎𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑔𝑒 =21

4= 5.25%

For the geometric average:

𝐺𝑒𝑜𝑚𝑒𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑐 𝐴𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑔𝑒 = 21

100+ 1

4

− 1

= 1.048809 − 1 = 0.048809

Thus a geometric average of about 4.88% p.a.

The concept of the arithmetic average in this last

example is the simplest kind of average, so will not

be explained in depth. The concept of the

geometric average in this last example, however,

will be. In the first year, the CPI grew by 4.88%

from some base amount, say 100. So after one

year, it is 104.88. During the second year, the CPI

grows another 4.88%, however, it is now growing

from a base of 104.88, and this gives, at the end of

the second year, a value of 110. During the third

year, the CPI grows again at 4.88% relative to the

previous year (i.e. 1.10), so at the end of the third

year, it has a value of 115.4. At the end of the

fourth year, the value of the CPI is 121, or 21%

higher over the four years. The geometric average

is similar to compound interest, but in reverse.

Compare the geometric average to the arithmetic

average, where the arithmetic average is finding

only the average percentage relative to the first

year.

Page 163: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

163

Example 6: the consumer price index table is

shown below with some entries missing (which is

common in data sets).

Determine

a) the percentage change in the CPI from 1994 to

1999.

b) The arithmetic average percentage change per

annum from 1994 to 1999.

c) The geometric average percentage change per

annum from 1994 to 1999.

Plan: use the percentage change formula:

%∆𝑡→𝑡+1=𝐼𝑡+1 − 𝐼𝑡

𝐼𝑡× 100

Then use the arithmetic average formula:

𝐴𝐴 =𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑔𝑒 𝑐𝑕𝑎𝑛𝑔𝑒

𝑛𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟 𝑜𝑓 𝑦𝑒𝑎𝑟𝑠

then the geometric average formula:

𝐺𝐴 = 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑔𝑒 𝑐𝑕𝑎𝑛𝑔𝑒

100+ 1

𝑛

− 1

Solution: for the percentage change:

%∆=122.9 − 111.6

111.6× 100 = 10.13% 2𝑑. 𝑝.

For the arithmetic average over the five years:

𝐴𝐴 =10.13%

5= 2.03%

For the geometric average over the five years:

𝐺𝐴 = 10.13

100+ 1

5

− 1

= 0.0195 4𝑑. 𝑝.

Thus a percentage growth per year of

approximately 1.95%.

Exercises: 1. Given the following data table:

𝑌𝑒𝑎𝑟 𝐶𝑃𝐼 1960 13.8 1961 14.1 1962 − 1963 − 1964 14.5 1965 15.1 1966 15.5 1967 − 1968 16.7 1969 17.1

Determine: a) The percentage change from 1960 to 1961. b) The percentage change from 1961 to 1964. c) The percentage change from 1960 to 1969. d) The percentage change from 1966 to 1968. e) The arithmetic average from 1961 to 1964. f) The geometric average from 1961 to 1964. g) The arithmetic average from 1960 to 1969. h) The geometric average from 1960 to 1969.

8.2 series and sums

Series are extremely common in business

(especially accounting and investments) and

simply put, they are the repetition of a certain

mathematical function.

Theory: a series is list of numbers with a constant

pattern. Each individual entry of a series is

important but so is the sum of the series.

Each of the following is a series; try find the

pattern.

2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12

3, 10, 17, 24, 31, 38, 45

2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64

100, 50, 25, 12.5, 6.75

Theory:

An arithmetic series has a constant difference

between terms.

A geometric series has a constant ratio

between terms.

Looking at each of the following arithmetic

progressions, you will see a common feature:

𝟓, 11, 17, 23, 29, 35, 41 +6

𝑌𝑒𝑎𝑟 𝐶𝑃𝐼 1993 109.5 1994 111.6 1995 − 1996 119.8 1997 − 1998 121.1 1999 122.9

Page 164: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

164

𝟏, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4 +0.5

𝟓𝟎𝟎, 490, 480, 470 (−10)

Each of these sequences has an initial number

(bolded) and also a constant addition/subtraction

between terms (in brackets).

Theory: the 𝑛𝑡𝑕 term of a sequence is given by the

formula:

𝑇𝑛 = 𝑎 + 𝑛 − 1 𝑑

Where 𝑎 is the initial number, 𝑛 the term you want

to find, and 𝑑 the difference between terms in a

sequence.

Example 1: find the 6𝑡𝑕 term of the following

arithmetic progression:

8, 17, 26, 35 …

Plan: determine the first term and the difference

between each term, then apply the formula

𝑇𝑛 = 𝑎 + 𝑛 − 1 𝑑

Solution: the initial number is 𝑎 = 8, the

difference between all the numbers is:

𝑑 = 9, and the 6𝑡𝑕 term is 𝑛 = 6. Substitute into

the equation:

𝑇6 = 8 + 6 − 1 ∙ 9

= 8 + 5 ∙ 9 = 53

Add two more 9’s to 35 to see if it is correct.

Example 2: find the 27𝑡𝑕 term of the following

progression:

3, 10.5, 18, 25.5, 33 …

Plan: determine the first term and the difference

between terms, then apply the formula:

𝑇𝑛 = 𝑎 + 𝑛 − 1 𝑑

Solution: the first term is 𝑎 = 3, the difference is:

𝑑 = 7.5, and 𝑛 = 27. Substitute this into the

formula:

𝑇27 = 3 + 27 − 1 ∙ 7.5 = 198

Example 3: find the 13𝑡𝑕 term of the sequence:

100, 97, 94, 91, 88 …

Solution: the first term is 𝑎 = 100, the difference

is:

So 𝑟 = −3, and 𝑛 = 13. Substituting this into the

equation:

𝑇13 = 100 + 13 − 1 ∙ −3 = 64

Summing a sequence is important in many

business disciplines. For example, the revenue of a

company might grow at a certain amount each

month, so to find out how much revenue the

company will earn over the whole year requires

summing a series.

Theory: the sum of an arithmetic series is found

using the formula:

𝑆𝑛 =𝑛

2 2𝑎 + 𝑛 − 1 𝑑

Example 4: find the sum of the sequence:

4, 9, 14, 19, 24, 29

Plan: determine the values of 𝑎 and 𝑑, then

substitute into the formula:

𝑆𝑛 =𝑛

2 2𝑎 + 𝑛 − 1 𝑑

Solution: the first term is 𝑎 = 4, the difference is

+5 (make sure of this) and there are 𝑛 = 6 terms.

Substitute into the formula:

𝑆6 = 6

2 2 ∙ 4 + 5 ∙ 5 = 99

Use your calculator to actually sum up the

sequence and makes sure 99 is correct.

Example 5: find the sum of the first 15 terms of

the sequence

100, 97, 94, 91, 88 …

−3 −3 −3 −3

3, 10.5, 18, 25.5, 33 …

7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5

8, 17, 26, 35 …

9 9 9

Page 165: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

165

200,179,158,137, …

Plan: determine the values of 𝑎, 𝑑 and 𝑛 then

substitute into the summation formula.

Solution: 𝑎 = 200, 𝑑 = −21 and 𝑛 = 15.

Substitute into the summation formula:

𝑆15 =15

2 400 + 14 −21 = 795

Example 6: Bentley, a luxury car manufacturer,

increases production by ten cars each year,

relative to the previous year. If Bentley

manufactured 316 cars this year, what is the total

number of cars Bentley will make in two decades

(including this year)?

Solution: 𝑎 = 316, 𝑑 = 10, 𝑡 = 20, applying the

sum formula:

𝑠20 = 20

2 2 ∙ 316 + 19 ∙ 10 = 8220

Moving on to geometric progressions; the

following three progressions are all geometric:

𝟑, 6,12,24,48,96,192,384 (𝑟 = 2)

𝟓, 35,245,1715,12005 (𝑟 = 7)

𝟏𝟎𝟐𝟒, 256,64,16,4,1,0.25 𝑟 = 0.25

Remember that a geometric progression has a

constant ratio between terms. Above, all three

progressions have an initial term (in bold) and a

constant ratio between each term (in brackets).

Theory: the 𝑛𝑡𝑕 term of a geometric progression is

found using the formula:

𝑇𝑛 = 𝑎𝑟𝑛−1

Where 𝑎 is the first term, 𝑟 the ratio between

terms and 𝑛 the term being found. To find the

ratio, divide a term by the one before it:

𝑟 =𝑇𝑛

𝑇𝑛−1

Example 6: find the 8𝑡𝑕 term of the geometric

progression:

2, 6, 18, 54, 162

Plan: determine the values of 𝑎, 𝑟 and 𝑛 then

substitute into

𝑇𝑛 = 𝑎𝑟𝑛−1

Solution: 𝑎 = 2. To find the ratio, divide one term

by the one before it:

162

54=

54

18=

18

6=

6

2= 3

So 𝑟 = 3, and 𝑛 = 8. Substitute this into the

formula:

𝑇8 = 2 ∙ 37 = 4374

Sometimes, the ratio will need to be determined,

but consecutive terms will be unavailable.

Theory: for two terms with 𝑝 terms missing

between them, the ratio is determined by:

𝑟 = 𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑟 𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑚

𝑒𝑎𝑟𝑙𝑖𝑒𝑟 𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑚

𝑝+1

Example 7: determine the ratio of the GP:

2, ∎, ∎, 54, …

Plan: use the ratio formula above.

Solution: the later term is 54, and the earlier term

is 2. The two terms are separated by 2 terms, so:

𝑟 = 54

2

3

= 273

= 3

Example 8: find the 12𝑡𝑕 term of:

256, ∎, 64, …

Plan: find and substitute the constant ratio 𝑟, the

first term 𝑎 and 𝑛 into the formula:

𝑇𝑛 = 𝑎𝑟𝑛−1

Solution: the constant ratio is:

𝑟 = 64

256

2

= 1

4

2

= 0.5

𝑎 is 256 and 𝑛 is 12:

𝑇12 = 256 0.5 12−1

= 0.125

Page 166: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

166

Theory: the sum of a geometric progression is

found by applying the formula:

𝑆𝑛 =𝑎 𝑟𝑛 − 1

𝑟 − 1

Example 9: find the sum of the geometric

progression

4, 8, 16, 32, 64, 128, 256, 512

Plan: find 𝑟, 𝑎 and 𝑛, then apply the sum formula:

𝑆𝑛 =𝑎 𝑟𝑛 − 1

𝑟 − 1

Solution: the constant ratio is:

8

4=

16

8= 2 = 𝑟

And 𝑎 = 4, 𝑛 = 8, so substitute this into the

formula:

𝑆𝑛 =4 2 8 − 1

2 − 1= 1020

Example 10: if sales of computers this year are

400, and sales are expected to increase by 20%

each year for the next 9 years, how many

computers will be sold in the tenth year, and how

many computers will be sold in total over the next

ten years (including the base year).

Plan: find 𝑎, 𝑟 and 𝑛, then apply the geometric

progression term formula, then the sum formula.

Solution: the ratio 𝑟 is 1.2 (as it is a 20% increase

over the previous year), the first term is 𝑎 = 400,

and 𝑛 = 10 (as the base year is included).

Apply the term formula:

𝑇10 = 400 1.2 9 = 2064 𝑟𝑜𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑑 𝑢𝑝

Apply the sum formula:

𝑆10 =400 1.2 10 − 1

1.2 − 1

= 10,383 𝑟𝑜𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑑 𝑑𝑜𝑤𝑛

Example 11: a financial services firm can invest in

one of two schemes which run for 15 years;

Scheme 1: has an initial return of $1000 which

grows at 5% per year.

Scheme 2: has an initial return of $1100 which

grows at $45 per year.

Determine:

a) Which of these two schemes has a better

overall return over the fifteen years.

b) Which of the schemes has a higher return in

the tenth year.

Plan:

a) determine the sum of both series over the

fifteen years using the two sum formulas.

b) determine the tenth term of both schemes

using the two term formulae.

Solution: since Scheme 1 increases by 5% each

year, the Geometric Progression formula is used.

For scheme 1, 𝑎 = 1000, and 𝑟 = 1.05. Similarly,

since Scheme 2 increases by a constant $45 each

year, the Arithmetic Progression formula is used.

For scheme 2, 𝑎 = 1100 and 𝑑 = 45.

a) Applying the sum formulae for 𝑛 = 15:

Scheme 1:

𝑆15 =1000 1.05 15 − 1

1.05 − 1

= $21,578.56

Scheme 2:

𝑆15 =15

2 2 1100 + 15 − 1 45

= $21,225

Thus Scheme 1 is better overall.

b) Applying the term formulae for 𝑛 = 10:

Scheme 1:

𝑇10 = 1000 1.05 10−1

= $1,551.33

Scheme 2:

𝑇10 = 1100 + 10 − 1 45

= 1,505.00

Thus Scheme 1 is better in the tenth year.

Page 167: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

167

Exercises: 1. Given the sequence:

3.1,11.9,20.7,29.5, … Determine: a) The 15𝑡𝑕 term.

b) The 25𝑡𝑕 term. c) The sum of the first 19 terms.

2. Given the sequence: 10,15,22.5,33.75, …

Determine:

a) The 12𝑡𝑕 term. b) The sum of the first 10 terms. c) The sum of the first 20 terms.

3. A firm can invest money into one of two projects each which runs for 12 years and each which has a return of: Project 1: 3500 in the first year, and this increases by 9% every subsequent year. Project 2: 4000 in the first year, and this increase by 300 every subsequent year. Determine a) which project has a larger overall income.

b) Which project has a larger return in the 5𝑡𝑕 year.

8.3 simple interest

When working with interest rate calculations,

some basic theory is required.

Theory:

The “principal” is the initial amount of money

invested.

The interest rate is the rate at which this

money increases in value per time period.

In simple interest, the amount of money which the

interest rate applies to does not change, so the

extra money earned from interest each year is

constant. This is similar to arithmetic progressions

in that a constant amount is earned each year.

Theory: the simple interest formula is:

𝐼𝑡 = 𝑃0 ∙ 𝑟 ∙ 𝑡

In words, the interest earned after 𝑡 years from

today (𝐼𝑡) is equal to the principal (𝑃0) times the

per annum interest rate (𝑟) times the number of

years it has been invested for (𝑡).

Example 1: find the interest earned, and also the

total amount of money in the bank when $1000 is

saved for 4 years at 7% p.a.

Plan: use the simple interest formula.

Solution: the principal 𝑃0 = 1000, 𝑡 = 4 and

𝑟 = 0.07. The rate must be in decimal form.

𝐼4 = 1000 0.07 4 = 280

This is the interest earned, but the total amount is

the interest earned plus the principal:

𝑃4 = 𝑃0 + 𝐼4 = 1000 + 280 = 1280

Theory: the total value of an investment is the

principal plus the interest earned over the given

time.

𝑃𝑡 = 𝑃0 + 𝐼𝑡

Example 2: a $4000 savings account is opened

with a bank which offers an interest rate of 9.3%

p.a., with a minimum period of 5 years. Using

simple interest, determine:

a) the interest earned over five years.

b) the total amount available after five years.

Plan: use the simple interest formula to calculate

the interest over the five years. Then add the

principal amount to determine the total amount in

the account.

Solution: to determine the interest earned:

𝐼𝑡 = 𝑃0 ∙ 𝑟 ∙ 𝑡

𝐼5 = 4000 0.093 5 = $1860

Add this amount to the principal to determine the

total amount available:

𝑃5 = 𝑃0 + 𝐼5

𝑃5 = 4000 + 1860 = $5860

Exercises: 1. A bank offers an interest rate of 4.6%, and you

invest $100. Using simple interest, determine the amount of interest you will have earned over 2.5 years, and also the total amount you will have available.

Page 168: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

168

8.4 compound interest

Simple interest is not realistic in most situations.

Intro example 1: you win $1000 from a lottery and

decide to save it until you finish university. The

interest rate at which you save it is 20% p.a. How

much will you have at the end of the three years?

Solution: break the three year period into three

shorter periods, each a year in length:

Year 1: at the end of the year, the amount in the

bank will be:

1000 1.20 = 1200

The 1.20 comes from the original principal (the 1)

plus the interest rate (0.20).

Year 2: at the beginning of this year, the initial

amount available is the final amount of the

previous year. This amount is 1200, which is the

new principal. The value of this amount at the end

of the second year will be:

1200 1.20 = 1440

The 1200 can be rewritten in the way it was

originally found:

1000 1.20 1.20 = 1440

The left side can be simplified to:

1000 1.20 2 = 1440

Year 3: the initial amount in the third year is the

amount at the end of the year before:

1440 1.20 = 1728

This can be re-written as:

1000 1.20 1.20 1.20 = 1728

1000 1.20 3 = 1728

After three years, the value of the 1000

investment is 1728.

This example was to show what is meant by

compounding the principal each year. Notice that

to find the value after three years, the rate was to

the power of 3.

Theory: the value of an investment after 𝑡 years is

given by:

𝑉𝑡 = 𝑉0 1 + 𝑟 𝑡

Where 𝑉𝑡 is the value of the investment after 𝑡

years, 𝑉0 is the initial investment amount, and 𝑟 is

the interest rate. The interest rate must be written

as a decimal.

Example 1: find the value of $2000 invested at an

interest rate of 5% for 10 years.

Plan: determine the values of 𝑉0, 𝑟 and 𝑡, then

substitute into the compound formula. The

interest rate, 𝑟, must be written as a decimal.

Solution: substituting 𝑉0 = 2000, 𝑟 = 0.05, 𝑡 = 10

into the compounding formula:

𝑉10 = 2000 1 + 0.05 10 = 2000 1.05 10

𝑉10 = 3257.79

It should become evident that compound interest

is similar in theory to a geometric progression and

also a geometric average.

Example 2: a finance firm invests $1million for five

years in a Dubai construction project, which has an

expected return of 8% p.a. compounded annually.

Determine the value of the investment after 5

years, and also the interest earned over this time.

Plan: use the compound interest rate formula to

find the total value of the investment. Then to find

the interest earned, take the principal away from

the total value of the investment.

Solution: substitute 𝑉0 = 1, 𝑟 = 0.08 and 𝑡 = 5:

𝑉𝑡 = 𝑉0 1 + 𝑟 𝑡

𝑉5 = 𝑉0 1 + 0.08 5

𝑉5 = $1.469million

The interest earned is the total value take the

principal:

𝐼5 = 𝑉5 − 𝑉0

𝐼5 = 1.469 − 1 = $0.469million

Page 169: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

169

Theory: the interest earned from compound

interest is the total value of the investment

subtract the principal amount:

𝐼𝑡 = 𝑉𝑡 − 𝑉0

Compounding every year is not what many banks

do with savings accounts. Rather, they set an

annual interest rate but compound monthly.

Theory: for an annual interest rate 𝑟 compounding

𝑚 times per year gives the formula:

𝑉𝑡 = 𝑉0 1 +𝑟

𝑚

𝑚𝑡

This is simpler than it looks.

Example 3: find the value of a $5000 investment if

it is invested at 6% p.a. for three years,

compounded monthly.

Plan: find the values of 𝑉0 , 𝑡 and 𝑟, as with normal

compounding, but then determine the number of

times, 𝑚, per time period, 𝑡, compounding is

occurring.

Solution: the initial amount is $5000 (𝑉0 = 5000),

the yearly interest rate is 6% (or 𝑟 = 0.06), the

time the investment lasts is 𝑡 = 3, and it is

compounded 𝑚 = 12 times per year. Substitute

into the formula:

𝑉3 = 5000 1 +0.06

12

12 3

= 5000 1.005 36

𝑉3 = 5983.40

Example 4: find the number of years (to the

nearest month) when an investment of $1000 will

reach $2000 at an interest rate of 9% p.a.

compounded every quarter.

Plan: use the compound formula (𝑚 times per

year) and substitute all known variables.

Rearrange to isolate 𝑡 to find the solution.

Solution: having 𝑉𝑡 = 2000, 𝑉0 = 1000, 𝑚 = 4

and 𝑟 = 0.09, substitute into the compound

formula:

𝑉𝑡 = 𝑉0 1 +𝑟

𝑚

𝑚𝑡

2000 = 1000 1 +0.09

12

4𝑡

Simplify:

2 = 1.0075 4𝑡

Take the log of both sides:

log 2 = 4𝑡 log 1.0075

Rearrange and solve:

4𝑡 =log 2

log 1.0075

𝑡 =

log 2log 1.0075

4≈ 23.19𝑦𝑒𝑎𝑟𝑠

Rounding up to the nearest quarter as that is what

the question is asking. Therefore the answer is 23

years and 1 quarter.

Theory: whenever finding when an investment will

exceed a certain amount, always round UP to the

nearest given time period. If it was to be rounded

down, the investment would not exceed the given

amount.

Example 5: a company can save $4000 in one of

two banks for a five year period. The two banks

offer the following returns:

Bank 1: 15% p.a. compounded weekly.

Bank 2: 15.5% p.a. compounded semi-annually.

Determine which of the projects is a better

investment.

Plan: use the compound formula (𝑚 times per

year) to determine which of the investments will

give the largest return after five years.

Page 170: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

170

Solution:

Bank 1: 𝑟 = 0.15, 𝑚 = 52, 𝑉0 = 4000 and 𝑡 = 5:

𝑉𝑡 = 4000 1 +0.15

52

5 52

𝑉𝑡 ≈ $8,458.86

Bank 2: 𝑟 = 0.155, 𝑚 = 2, 𝑉0 = 4000 and 𝑡 = 5:

𝑉𝑡 = 4000 1 +0.155

2

2 5

𝑉𝑡 = $8,437.87

Notice that just because Bank 2 offers a higher

advertised interest rate, Bank 1 has a better actual

return due to the number of compounding periods

per year.

Theory: the more times an investment gets

compounded, the closer it is to being continuously

compounded, in which case the number 𝑒 is used:

𝑉𝑡 = 𝑉0𝑒𝑟𝑡

Which is identical to exponential growth from

Chapter 4.

Example 6: an investment offers an interest rate of

10%, compounded every minute of every day. The

investment has an initial value of $4000, and is

invested for one year. Find the value of the

investment using the compound interest formula,

then use the exponential formula. Compare the

answers.

Plan: find the number of minutes in a year, then

set this as 𝑚. Substitute this and all other known

variables into the compound interest formula, to

find 𝑉𝑡 .

Then, substitute all the known variables into the

exponential formula, to find 𝑉𝑡 .

Solution: number of minutes in a

year=minutes×hours×days = 60 ∙ 24 ∙ 365 =

525,600, 𝑉0 = 4000, 𝑟 = 0.10, then:

𝑉𝑡 = 4000 1 +0.10

525600

525600 ∙1

𝑉𝑡 ≈ 4420.68363

Now use the continuous formula above:

𝑉𝑡 = 4000𝑒0.10∙1 = 4420.68367

The two are very close, and the continuous

formula can be used as an accurate approximation

to very short time period compounding.

Example 7: find the value of a $4,000 savings

account which is compounded every second, if the

savings account is left for 5 years at 4.65% p.a.

Plan: use the continuous compounding formula.

Solution: 𝑉0 = 4000, 𝑟 = 0.0465, 𝑡 = 5 is

substituted into the continuous compound

formula:

𝑉𝑡 = 𝑉0𝑒𝑟𝑡

𝑉5 = 4000𝑒0.0465 ∙5

𝑉5 = 5047.00 2𝑑. 𝑝.

Exercises: 1. A bank offers an interest rate of 4.75% p.a., and

you decide to save $4,300 for four years. Determine: a) The interest earned after four years. b) The total value of the savings account.

2. A conservative company decides to save a cash-flow of $12,391 in a term deposit account which has a return of 8.2% p.a., compounded weekly. If the term deposit is for 10 years, determine: a) The value of the term deposit account after ten

years. b) The interest earned over the ten years.

3. You have purchased new car worth $12,000. If the interest rate is 7.25% p.a. and is compounded monthly, determine the amount you would owe after a three year loan, assuming you made no repayments.

4. A disreputable agent loans you $10,500 at 5.5% p.a. compounded continuously. Determine the amount you would have to pay back after two years.

8.5 annual interest rates

Example 5 from the previous section is a good

indicator that the advertised interest rate is not

always the realised interest rate.

Page 171: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

171

Theory: the annual interest rate is lower than the

realised interest rate if the principal is

compounded more than once per year.

Intro example 1: for an advertised interest rate of

5%, $100 is invested for a year, compounded

semi-annually (every half year). Find the value of

the investment after one year.

Solution: 𝑉0 = 100, 𝑡 = 1, 𝑚 = 2, 𝑟 = 0.05:

𝑉1 = 100 1 +0.05

2

2∙1

= 100 1.025 2

𝑉1 = 105.06

From this, we can also see that the realised annual

interest rate is 5.06% rather than the advertised

5%.

If this was simple interest, the value of the total

investment would be:

𝑉1 = 𝑉0 + 𝐼1 = 100 + 5 = 105

It is obvious that with compound interest, the

realised interest rate (5.06%) is larger than the

advertised 5%. This makes a big difference with

large sums of money, such as home loans.

Theory: the realised interest rate is found using:

𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑠𝑒𝑑 = 1 +𝑟

𝑚

𝑚

− 1

This is very similar to the compound interest

formula except that there is no 𝑡 nor are there any

amounts (𝑉’s). The −1 gets rid of the original

amount, and just leaves the realised interest rate.

Example 1: find the realised annual interest rate

for an investment where the advertised interest

rate is 4.75%, and is compounded monthly.

Plan: apply the realised interest rate formula.

Solution:

𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑠𝑒𝑑 = 1 +0.0475

12

12

− 1 ≈ 0.0485(4 𝑑. 𝑝. )

Thus the realised interest rate is 4.85%, which is

higher than the advertised rate.

Example 2: a company has a cash inflow from its

customers tomorrow morning, the precise amount

is yet unknown. This company has two savings

accounts at two different banks. The offered

interest rates are:

Bank 1: 7% compounded quarterly

Bank 2: 6.9% compounded weekly

Which is a better investment?

Plan: use the realised interest rate formula to

determine the realised interest rates of the two

banks.

𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑠𝑒𝑑 = 1 +𝑟

𝑚

𝑚

− 1

Solution:

Bank 1: given 𝑟 = 0.07 and 𝑚 = 4:

𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑠𝑒𝑑 = 1 +0.07

4

4

− 1

𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑠𝑒𝑑 = 0.07186 5𝑑. 𝑝.

Thus a realised rate of approximately 7.186%.

Bank 2: given 𝑟 = 6.9% and 𝑚 = 52:

𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑎 𝑙𝑖𝑠𝑒𝑑 = 1 +0.069

52

52

− 1

𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑠𝑒𝑑 = 0.07139 5𝑑. 𝑝.

Thus a realised rate of approximately 7.139%.

Given the realised rates, Bank 1 is a better option.

Exercises: 1. A bank advertises an interest rate of 5.45% p.a.

compounded monthly. Determine the realised annual interest rate.

2. An investment promises a return of 6.24% p.a. compounded once every 4 months. Determine the realised interest rate.

3. Two banks are in competition, one with an advertised interest rate of 3.45% p.a. compounded monthly, and the other with an interest rate of 5.1% p.a. compounded once every six months. If you are borrowing money, which bank is a better choice?

Page 172: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

172

8.6 net present value

Theory: Net Present Value is a way of finding the

value of income in the future, in terms of today’s

dollars. It is similar to the concept of

compounding, except backwards.

That is, $1000 today has a higher value than

$1000 some time in the future. The reason is that

if that $1000 dollars was invested at the given

interest rate, the value of the $1000 would grow

(through earning interest).

Intro example 1: for an investment of $1000 at an

interest rate of 10% per annum, compounded at

the end of each year, how much is that investment

worth in a year’s time?

Solution:

𝑉1 = 1000 1 + 0.1 1 = 1100

This means that getting $1000 today is the same

as getting $1100 dollars in one years time.

Intro example 2: if you need to repay a loan worth

$2000 in one year’s time, how much do you need

to invest today at 7% p.a. compounded only once,

at the end of the year?

Solution: 𝑉0 is unknown but 𝑉1 is known (= 2000),

𝑟 = 0.07, 𝑡 = 1:

𝑉𝑡 = 𝑉0 1 + 𝑟 𝑡

Rearranging to isolate 𝑉0 gives:

𝑉𝑡

1 + 𝑟 𝑡= 𝑉0

Substitute in to get:

𝑉0 =2000

1 + 0.07 1= 1869.16

So $1869.16 would need to be invested today to

have $2000 in one year’s time. This means that

$1869.16 today has the same value as $2000 in

one year.

Theory: the formula for the net present value of a

single future cash flow is:

𝑁𝑃𝑉 =𝑉𝑡

1 + 𝑟 𝑡

The 𝑁𝑃𝑉 is the same as 𝑉0 from the rearranged

annual compound formula.

Example 1: find the net present value of $5000 in

three years’ time at an interest rate of 4.25% p.a.

Plan: apply the NPV formula.

Solution: 𝑉3 = 5000, 𝑟 = 0.0425, 𝑡 = 3:

𝑁𝑃𝑉 =5000

1 + 0.0425 3=

5000

1.04253

𝑁𝑃𝑉 = 4413.08

This means that $5000 in three years’ time has the

same value as $4413.08 today.

Theory: if there are multiple cash-flows at

different years, the NPV of all the cash flows is the

sum of the NPVs of the individual cash flows.

𝑁𝑃𝑉 = 𝑁𝑃𝑉𝑛

𝑛

The overall NPV is simply the sum of all 𝑛

individual net present values.

Example 2: find the NPV of the two cash-flows:

Cash-inflow 1: $4000 in 3 years

Cash-inflow 2: $2400 in 7 years

The interest rate is assumed constant at 5.25%.

Plan: find the NPV of each of the two cash-inflows

individually, then sum them to find the overall

NPV.

Solution: discount each of the cash-inflows:

Cash-inflow 1:

𝑁𝑃𝑉1 =4000

1 + 0.0525 3≈ 3430.79

Cash-inflow 2:

𝑁𝑃𝑉2 =2400

1 + 0.0525 7≈ 1677.48

The NPV of both cash-inflows is:

Page 173: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

173

𝑁𝑃𝑉 = 𝑁𝑃𝑉1 + 𝑁𝑃𝑉2 = 3430.79 + 1677.48

𝑁𝑃𝑉 = $5108.26

Theory: any project with a positive net present

value is accepted, as it is profitable.

Example 3: find the Net Present Value of the

project which has the following cash flows:

Assume that the interest rate is 6.25%.

Plan: find the NPV of each of the cash flows, then

sum them to find the overall NPV.

Solution:

Year 0: the NPV of a cash-flow at year 0 is the

value of the cash-flow. Since it is an outflow, the

NPV is:

𝑁𝑃𝑉0 = −4000

Year 1:

𝑁𝑃𝑉1 =4000

1 + 0.0625 1

𝑁𝑃𝑉1 = $3764.71

Year 2:

𝑁𝑃𝑉2 =500

1 + 0.0625 2

𝑁𝑃𝑉2 = $442.91

Thus the overall NPV is the sum of all the

individual NPV:

𝑁𝑃𝑉 = 𝑁𝑃𝑉0 + 𝑁𝑃𝑉1 + 𝑁𝑃𝑉2

= −4000 + 3764.71 + 442.91

= $207.62

Since the overall NPV is positive, this project is

worthwhile.

Example 4: determine the Net Present Value for

the following investment opportunity:

Assuming the interest rate is a constant 10%.

Plan: find the NPV of the individual cash-flows,

then sum them.

Solution:

Year 0:

𝑁𝑃𝑉0 = −983

Year 1:

𝑁𝑃𝑉1 =267.3

1 + 0.1 1= 243

Year 2:

𝑁𝑃𝑉2 =532.4

1 + 0.1 2= 440

Year 3:

𝑁𝑃𝑉3 =399.3

1 + 0.1 3= 300

Thus the overall NPV is:

𝑁𝑃𝑉 = 𝑁𝑃𝑉0 + 𝑁𝑃𝑉1 + 𝑁𝑃𝑉2 + 𝑁𝑃𝑉3

= −983 + 243 + 440 + 300 = 0

Thus the NPV of the project is zero, so there is no

point going ahead with the project, as the same

return could be obtained by saving the initial cash

outflow in a bank at an interest rate of 10%.

Exercises: 1. Given the following cash-flow data, determine the

NPV of the project and if it is worthwhile. Assume the interest rate is 4.5%.

𝑌𝑒𝑎𝑟 𝐶𝑎𝑠𝑕 − 𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑓𝑙𝑜𝑤 𝐶𝑎𝑠𝑕 − 𝑖𝑛𝑓𝑙𝑜𝑤 0 $6000 0 1 0 $4000 2 0 $1000 3 0 $1500

2. Your supervisor gives you the following data on a project introducing a new advertising campaign. They want you to find out the NPV of this project, and if it is worthwhile to go ahead with it. Assume that the bank is offering an interest rate of 6.1% p.a.

𝑌𝑒𝑎𝑟 𝐶𝑎𝑠𝑕 − 𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑓𝑙𝑜𝑤 𝐶𝑎𝑠𝑕 − 𝑖𝑛𝑓𝑙𝑜𝑤

0 $983.00 0 1 0 $267.30 2 0 $532.40 3 0 $399.30

𝑌𝑒𝑎𝑟 𝐶𝑎𝑠𝑕 − 𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑓𝑙𝑜𝑤 𝐶𝑎𝑠𝑕 − 𝑖𝑛𝑓𝑙𝑜𝑤

0 4000 0 1 0 4000 2 0 500

Page 174: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

174

𝑌𝑒𝑎𝑟 𝐶𝑎𝑠𝑕 − 𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑓𝑙𝑜𝑤 𝐶𝑎𝑠𝑕 − 𝑖𝑛𝑓𝑙𝑜𝑤 0 $10,000 0 1 0 $3000 2 0 $4000 3 0 $5000

4 $2000 $2500 5 0 $3000

3. Given the following data about cash-flows from customers and suppliers, and an interest rate of 7.25%, determine the NPV of all the cash-flows.

𝑌𝑒𝑎𝑟 𝐶𝑎𝑠𝑕 − 𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑓𝑙𝑜𝑤 𝐶𝑎𝑠𝑕 − 𝑖𝑛𝑓𝑙𝑜𝑤 0 $1500 $2000 1 $2500 $1000 2 0 $3000 3 0 $800

4 $4000 $1000 4. Describe, in your own words, the meaning of net

present value.

8.7 internal rate of return

In the last example of the previous section, there

was a NPV of zero. This is the definition of internal

rate of return.

Theory: the internal rate of return is the interest

rate that would give a net present value of zero.

The internal rate of return is the rate of return of

the project, and is unrelated to the market interest

rate.

Intro example 1: determine the internal rate of

return of the following project:

𝑌𝑒𝑎𝑟 𝐶𝑎𝑠𝑕 − 𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑓𝑙𝑜𝑤 𝐶𝑎𝑠𝑕 − 𝑖𝑛𝑓𝑙𝑜𝑤

0 $3000 0 1 0 $3500

Solution: the market rate has not been given, so

there is no way the NPV can be found. However,

the internal return of the project is unrelated to

the market rate. To find the IRR of the project, use

the NPV formula and set the overall NPV equal to

zero. Also, instead of using a number for the

interest rate, use the letter 𝑖:

𝑁𝑃𝑉 = −3000 +3500

1 + 𝑖 1

Set this equal to zero:

0 = −3000 +3500

1 + 𝑖 1

Then solve for 𝑖:

3000 =3500

1 + 𝑖

3000 1 + 𝑖 = 3500

3000 + 3000𝑖 = 3500

𝑖 =1

6= 0.1667

Thus the rate of return of the project is 16.67%,

and this is unrelated to the market rate.

When the number of years increases, the ability to

isolate 𝑖 becomes more and more difficult.

Intro example 2: find an expression for the

internal rate of return of the following project, and

then attempt to isolate 𝑖.

𝑌𝑒𝑎𝑟 𝐶𝑎𝑠𝑕 − 𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑓𝑙𝑜𝑤 𝐶𝑎𝑠𝑕 − 𝑖𝑛𝑓𝑙𝑜𝑤 0 $10,000 0 1 0 $3000 2 0 $4000 3 0 $5000

Solution:

𝑁𝑃𝑉 = −10000 +3000

1 + 𝑖 1+

4000

1 + 𝑖 2+

5000

1 + 𝑖 3

Set this equal to zero to find an expression for the

internal rate of return:

0 = −10000 +3000

1 + 𝑖 1+

4000

1 + 𝑖 2+

5000

1 + 𝑖 3

Now, to isolate 𝑖, the −10000 will be first moved

to the other side:

10000 =3000

1 + 𝑖 1+

4000

1 + 𝑖 2+

5000

1 + 𝑖 3

Then to be able to add the fractions on the right, a

common denominator is needed. The common

denominator is 1 + 𝑖 3, so change the form of the

other fractions:

10000 =3000 1 + 𝑖 2

1 + 𝑖 3+

4000 1 + 𝑖

1 + 𝑖 3+

5000

1 + 𝑖 3

Simplifying:

10000 =3000 1 + 𝑖 2 + 4000 1 + 𝑖 + 5000

1 + 𝑖 3

Page 175: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

175

Rearranging and expanding the brackets would

take a long time, and in the end, a cubic function

would need to be solved. Try this for yourself and

see if you can get:

0 = 10000𝑖3 + 27000𝑖2 + 20000𝑖 − 2000

Solving this is difficult, but a program can be used.

This above example is an exact method of finding

the internal rate of return. However, as the

number of years increases to 4, the exact solution

will involve solving something with 𝑖4 which is

difficult; for 5 years, the solution will involve 𝑖5, so

it gets more and more difficult.

However, there is a much easier method which

gives an approximate answer.

Theory: the method of finding the approximate

internal rate of return is split into two stages:

STAGE 1: find two interest rates; one which gives a

positive NPV, and one which gives a negative NPV.

This step is a trial-and-error method. The thought

process is:

Try a random (low) interest rate and find the NPV.

If it is positive, use another (higher) interest rate to

get a negative NPV. If the initial (low) interest rate

had a negative NPV, use another (lower) interest

rate to find a positive NPV.

This theory is demonstrated in the following

example.

Example 1: find two interest rates, one with a

positive NPV and one with a negative NPV, given

the following investment project:

Plan: find the NPV of the project using a relatively

low interest rate, then increase the interest rate

by, say 2%, to find one with a negative NPV.

Solution: use a low interest rate to begin with. This

can be anything you choose, so let’s use 3%.

𝑁𝑃𝑉3% = −8000 +5000

1.03 1+

2000

1.03 2+

2000

1.03 3

𝑁𝑃𝑉3% = $569.84

The low interest rate should give a positive NPV. If

it does not, lower the interest rate further. Now,

since the 3% gave a positive NPV, to get a negative

NPV, we use a higher interest rate, say 5%:

𝑁𝑃𝑉5% = −8000 +5000

1.05 1+

2000

1.05 2+

2000

1.05 3

𝑁𝑃𝑉5% = $303.64

This is still a positive NPV, so increase the interest

rate to say 10%:

𝑁𝑃𝑉10% = −8000 +5000

1.10 1+

2000

1.10 2+

2000

1.10 3

𝑁𝑃𝑉10% = −299.02

Both 3% and 5% gave a positive NPV, but for part

two of this approximations, the interest rate that

gives a NPV closest to zero is used, so in this case,

the 5% has a NPV closer to zero, than the 3%.

Theory:

STAGE 2: having two interest rates (relatively close

to one another) with one giving a positive NPV and

the other giving a negative NPV, apply the formula:

𝐼𝑅𝑅 ≈𝑖2𝑁𝑃𝑉1 − 𝑖1𝑁𝑃𝑉2

𝑁𝑃𝑉1 − 𝑁𝑃𝑉2

It does not matter which interest rate-NPV

combination you define with a subscript as 1 or 2,

as the formula works either way.

This method is a linear approximation of a curve.

The closer the positive and negative NPV’s are to

being zero, the better the approximation.

Example 1 cont: given the following pairs of NPV

and 𝑖, find the approximate IRR:

𝑖1 = 5%, 𝑁𝑃𝑉1 = 303.64

𝑖2 = 10%, 𝑁𝑃𝑉2 = −299.02

Plan: apply the IRR formula.

𝑌𝑒𝑎𝑟 𝐶𝑎𝑠𝑕 − 𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑓𝑙𝑜𝑤 𝐶𝑎𝑠𝑕 − 𝑖𝑛𝑓𝑙𝑜𝑤 0 $8000 0 1 0 $5000 2 0 $2000 3 0 $2000

Page 176: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

176

Solution: substitute this into the formula:

𝐼𝑅𝑅 ≈ 0.10 303.64 − 0.05 −299.02

303.64 − −299.02

𝐼𝑅𝑅 ≈45.31

602.66≈ 0.0752

Thus the internal rate of return of this project is

approximately 7.52%.

Theory: the IRR will always be between the two

interest rates which gave the positive and negative

NPV’s, and will be closer to the interest rate which

has its NPV closer to zero.

An internal rate of return higher than the market

interest rate means the project is worthwhile.

Conversely, an internal rate of return lower than

the market interest rate means the project is not

worthwhile.

Example 2: determine the internal rate of return

for the project shown below.

If the market rate is 9%, is the project

worthwhile?

Plan: use a low interest rate to find the NPV; then

if that gives a positive NPV, use another higher

interest rate to find a negative NPV. If the first

interest rate gives a negative NPV, use a lower

interest rate to find a positive NPV. Apply the

results to the IRR formula, and compare it to the

market rate.

Solution: finding the NPV at, say, 5%:

𝑁𝑃𝑉5% = −7000 +3000

1.05+

2500

1.052+

1500

1.053+

1500

1.054

𝑁𝑃𝑉5% = 654.53

Since this is a positive NPV, a higher interest rate

will give a negative NPV. So try 10%:

𝑁𝑃𝑉10% = −7000 +3000

1.1+

2500

1.12+

1500

1.13+

1500

1.14

𝑁𝑃𝑉10% = −55.12

Having two interest rates, one which gives a

positive NPV and one which gives a negative NPV,

apply the IRR formula:

𝐼𝑅𝑅 ≈𝑖2𝑁𝑃𝑉1 − 𝑖1𝑁𝑃𝑉2

𝑁𝑃𝑉1 − 𝑁𝑃𝑉2

Many students screw up with the substitution, so

it is best to rewrite the known variables, with

appropriate subscripts:

𝑖1 = 0.05, 𝑁𝑃𝑉1 = 654.53

𝑖2 = 0.10, 𝑁𝑃𝑉2 = −55.12

Substitute this into the formula:

𝐼𝑅𝑅 ≈ 0.10 654.53 − 0.05 −55.12

654.53 − −55.12

𝐼𝑅𝑅 ≈ 0.0961

Thus the internal rate of return is 9.61%. Since the

IRR is greater than the market rate of 9%, the

project is worthwhile.

Note that the IRR is closer to 10% than to 5%, as

the NPV of the 10% is closer to zero (i.e. −55.12)

than the NPV of the 5% (i.e. 654.53).

Exercises: 1. For the following data, find an approximation for

the internal rate of return.

𝑌𝑒𝑎𝑟 𝐶𝑎𝑠𝑕 − 𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑓𝑙𝑜𝑤 𝐶𝑎𝑠𝑕 − 𝑖𝑛𝑓𝑙𝑜𝑤 0 $7,000 0 1 0 $3000 2 0 $2500 3 0 $2800

2. Given a market interest rate of 8.5%, determine if the following project is worthwhile using the IRR method.

𝑌𝑒𝑎𝑟 𝐶𝑎𝑠𝑕 − 𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑓𝑙𝑜𝑤 𝐶𝑎𝑠𝑕 − 𝑖𝑛𝑓𝑙𝑜𝑤 0 $12,430 0 1 0 $7800 2 0 $5100 3 0 $1100

3. In your own words, describe what internal rate of return measures.

𝑌𝑒𝑎𝑟 𝐶𝑎𝑠𝑕 − 𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑓𝑙𝑜𝑤 𝐶𝑎𝑠𝑕 − 𝑖𝑛𝑓𝑙𝑜𝑤 0 $7000 0 1 0 $3000 2 0 $2500 3 0 $1500 4 0 $1500

Page 177: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

177

chapter eight summary

Index numbers represent values in terms of a base value:

𝐼𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑥𝑡 =𝑉𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒𝑡

𝑉𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒0

× 100

The base year is given an index value of 100. The percentage difference between two time periods in an index is found using:

%∆𝑡→𝑡+1=𝐼𝑡+1 − 𝐼𝑡

𝐼𝑡× 100

𝐴𝑟𝑖𝑡𝑕𝑚𝑒𝑡𝑖𝑐 𝑎𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑔𝑒 =𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑔𝑒 𝑐𝑕𝑎𝑛𝑔𝑒

𝑛𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟 𝑜𝑓 𝑦𝑒𝑎𝑟𝑠

𝐺𝑒𝑜𝑚𝑒𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑐 𝑎𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑔𝑒 = 𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑔𝑒 𝑐𝑕𝑎𝑛𝑔𝑒

100+ 1

𝑛

− 1

A series is list of numbers with a constant pattern. Each individual entry of a series is important but so is the sum of the series.

An arithmetic series has a constant difference between terms.

A geometric series has a constant ratio between terms.

The 𝑛𝑡𝑕 term of a sequence is given by: 𝑇𝑛 = 𝑎 + 𝑛 − 1 𝑑

The sum of an arithmetic series is given by:

𝑆𝑛 =𝑛

2 2𝑎 + 𝑛 − 1 𝑑

The 𝑛𝑡𝑕 term of a geometric progression is found using the formula:

𝑇𝑛 = 𝑎𝑟𝑛−1 To find the ratio, divide a term by the one before it:

𝑟 =𝑇𝑛

𝑇𝑛−1

When 𝑝 terms are missing, the ratio is found by:

𝑟 = 𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑟 𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑚

𝑒𝑎𝑟𝑙𝑖𝑒𝑟 𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑚

𝑝 +1

The sum of a geometric progression is given by:

𝑆𝑛 =𝑎 𝑟𝑛 − 1

𝑟 − 1

The simple interest formula is: 𝐼𝑡 = 𝑃0 ∙ 𝑟 ∙ 𝑡

The total value of an investment is: 𝑃𝑡 = 𝑃0 + 𝐼𝑡

For compound interest, the value of an investment after 𝑡 years is given by:

𝑉𝑡 = 𝑉0 1 + 𝑟 𝑡 The interest earned from compound interest is:

𝐼𝑡 = 𝑉𝑡 − 𝑉0 For an annual interest rate 𝑟, compounding 𝑚 times per year:

𝑉𝑡 = 𝑉0 1 +𝑟

𝑚

𝑚𝑡

Whenever finding when an investment will exceed a certain amount, always round UP to the nearest given time period.

For continuous compounding (or very short time period compounding) the 𝑒 formula is used:

𝑉𝑡 = 𝑉0𝑒𝑟𝑡

The annual interest rate is lower than the realised interest rate if the principal is compounded more than once per year. The realised interest rate is found using:

𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑠𝑒𝑑 = 1 +𝑟

𝑚

𝑚

− 1

Net Present Value is a way of finding the value of income in the future, in terms of today’s dollars. The formula for the NPV of a single future cash flow is:

𝑁𝑃𝑉 =𝑉𝑡

1 + 𝑟 𝑡

If there are multiple cash-flows at different years, the NPV of all the cash flows is the sum of the NPVs of the individual cash flows.

𝑁𝑃𝑉 = 𝑁𝑃𝑉𝑛

𝑛

Any project with a positive net present value is accepted, as it is profitable.

The internal rate of return (IRR) is the interest rate that would give a net present value of zero, and is unrelated to the market interest rate. To find an approximation to the IRR: STAGE 1: find two interest rates; one which gives a positive NPV, and one which gives a negative NPV. This step is a trial-and-error method. STAGE 2: having these two interest rates, apply the formula:

𝐼𝑅𝑅 ≈𝑖2𝑁𝑃𝑉1 − 𝑖1𝑁𝑃𝑉2

𝑁𝑃𝑉1 − 𝑁𝑃𝑉2

The IRR will always be between the two interest rates which gave the positive and negative NPV’s, and will be closer to the interest rate which has its NPV closer to zero. An internal rate of return higher than the market interest rate means the project is worthwhile. An internal rate of return lower than the market interest rate means the project is not worthwhile.

chapter eight questions

1. Given the following Consumer Price Index table: 𝑌𝑒𝑎𝑟 𝐶𝑃𝐼 1980 89.9 1981 92.4 1982 93.5 1983 − 1984 100 1985 103.1 1986 107.2

1987 −

Determine: a) The percentage change from 1980 to 1981. b) The percentage change from 1982 to 1984. c) The arithmetic average from 1982 to 1984. d) The geometric average from 1982 to 1984. e) If the geometric average from 1982 to the

missing value of 1987 is 3.32%, determine the

Page 178: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

178

missing index entry. Hint: find 𝐼𝑡→𝑡+𝑛 then substitute into the geometric average formula.

2. The gold index has the following historic data: 𝑌𝑒𝑎𝑟 𝐺𝑜𝑙𝑑 𝐼𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑥 1971 150.2 1972 168.4 1973 172.3 1974 163.0 1975 154.0 1976 142.3 1977 133.1

Determine: a) The percentage change from 1971 to 1973. b) The percentage change from 1971 to 1977. c) The arithmetic average from 1971 to 1973. d) The geometric average from 1971 to 1973. e) The arithmetic average from 1971 to 1977. f) The geometric average from 1971 to 1977. g) Explain how the average percentage change over

the years 1971 to 1973 is positive, however if the time period is extended slightly from 1971 to 1977, the average percentage change is negative.

3. Given the following series: 3,3.75,4.5,5.25,6,6.75, …

Determine: a) The 13𝑡𝑕 term. b) The 21𝑠𝑡 term. c) The sum of the first 9 terms. d) The sum of the first 16 terms.

4. Given the following series: 1331,484,176,64, …

Determine:

a) The 15𝑡𝑕 term.

b) The 27𝑡𝑕 term. c) The sum of the first 11 terms. d) The sum of the first 16 terms.

5. An investment firm is offered one of two investments, each which has the following returns: Investment 1: $6000 in the first year, and this increases by $250 every year after. Investment 2: $4350 in the first year, and this increases by 13% every year after. If the investment is for 8 years, determine: a) Which of the two investments has a higher

return in the fifth year. b) Which of the two investments has a higher

return up to the fifth year. c) Which of the investments has a higher overall

return. 6. Mark lends David $1430 for an airfare home. The

deal is that David pays 3% simple interest per month, for the four months it takes to earn the money. Assuming David repays Mark in a lump-sum, determine: a) The interest Mark has earned over the four

months. b) The total amount David has to repay Mark after

the four months. 7. A father opens a savings account for his son, and

deposits $20,000. If the interest rate is 5% p.a.

(compounded annually), but the son takes out the interest at the beginning of each year, determine: a) How much money the son has taken out after 7

years. b) How much money the son has taken out after 11

years. 8. A firm saves $5600 at an interest rate of 4.65% p.a.

compounded monthly. Determine: a) The value of the account after 4 months. b) The value of the account after 5.5years. c) When the value of the account will first exceed

$10,000. d) The value of the account after 6 years, given that

after 3years, the firm withdrew $2000. 9. Having won $11,457 in the lottery, you save the total

amount at 7.1% p.a. compounded monthly. Determine: a) The value of the account in 5 years. b) When the value of the account will first exceed

$20,000. c) When the value of the account will first exceed

$20,000 given that after 2 years, you withdraw $5,000.

10. A student needs to have $5000 to pay his university fees in three years time. If the prevailing interest rate is set at 6.6%p.a. compounded semi-annually, determine how much the student needs to save today to be able to pay the university bill.

11. A firm wanting to save a future cash-flow has the option of two bank accounts:

Bank A: 5.1% p.a. compounded yearly

Bank B: 5% p.a. compounded weekly Determine which of the banks is the better deal.

12. A firm is looking to borrow money from one of three banks:

Universal Bank: 8.1%p.a. compounded quarterly

Sun Bank: 8%p.a. compounded weekly

Bank of Vark: 8.2% compounded semi-annually Determine which of the banks is the better deal.

13. Given the following investment project: 𝑌𝑒𝑎𝑟 𝐶𝑎𝑠𝑕 − 𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑓𝑙𝑜𝑤 𝐶𝑎𝑠𝑕 − 𝑖𝑛𝑓𝑙𝑜𝑤

0 $60,000 0 1 0 $48,200 2 0 $21,500 3 0 $9,100

For a market rate of 4%, determine: a) The NPV b) The internal rate of return c) If the project is worthwhile.

14. Given the following potential project: 𝑌𝑒𝑎𝑟 𝐶𝑎𝑠𝑕 − 𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑓𝑙𝑜𝑤 𝐶𝑎𝑠𝑕 − 𝑖𝑛𝑓𝑙𝑜𝑤

0 $12,000 0 1 0 $5000 2 0 $5000 3 0 $2000

4 $4000 $2500 5 0 $4000

For a market rate of 9%, determine: a) The NPV and the IRR b) If the project is worthwhile.

Page 179: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

179

Page 180: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

180

chapter one solutions

Question 1: a) 15 b) −4 c) 50 d) −6 Question 2:

a) 1

6

b) 1

12

c) 1.5

d) −8

15

e) 21

49

f) 27

g) 36

13

h) 40

9

Question 3:

a) 5

6

b) 19

24

c) 25

12 𝑜𝑟 2

1

12

d) −7

22

e) 23

65

f) 5

12

g) 187

210

h) 68

21 𝑜𝑟 3

5

21

Question 4:

a) −25

42

b) 11

30

c) 3+𝑥

3𝑥

d) −5

6

e) 9

10

f) 25𝑥+12

12𝑥

g) 7𝑥

h) 3𝑦+2𝑥

3𝑥𝑦

Question 5: a) 𝑥3𝑦6 b) 216𝑥9𝑦1.5

c) 1

𝑥4𝑦8

d) 2

3𝑥2

e) 243𝑥4𝑦8 f) 1024𝑥2𝑦0.125

g) 𝑦7/6

6𝑥9/2

h) –𝑦0.125

25

Question 6: a) 34 b) 24 c) 9 d) −33𝑥 e) −186 f) −38 g) −64 h) −2𝑥 + 2𝑦 + 6 Question 7: a) 𝑥2 + 4𝑥 + 4 b) 𝑥2 − 6𝑥 + 9 c) 4𝑥2 + 4𝑥 + 1 d) 1 − 2𝑥 + 𝑥2 e) 𝑥2 + 8𝑥 + 5 f) −4𝑥2 + 7𝑥 − 1

g) 3𝑥2 − 6𝑥 + 4

h) – 𝑥2 − 2𝑥 − 4 Question 8: a) 𝑥 = 5 b) 𝑥 = 2 c) 𝑥 = 1

d) 𝑥 =11

3

e) 𝑥 =13

2

f) 𝑥 =1

21

g) 𝑥 = −9

10

h) 𝑥 = 3 −𝑦

3

i) 𝑥 =𝑦+1

2

j) 𝑥 =3𝑦−9

4

Question 9: a) 2 𝑥 + 𝑥𝑦 + 1 b) 2𝑥 𝑥 + 3𝑦 − 4𝑦2 c) 𝑦 13𝑥 − 12𝑦 + 1 d) 3𝑥2 1 + 3𝑥 + 4𝑥3 e) 𝑃𝑄 4 + 𝑟 − 𝑥𝑦

f) 1

6 2𝑥2 + 2𝑥4 + 1

g) 5𝑥 3𝑥2 + 5 − 10𝑥3

h) 1

𝑥 1 +

1

𝑥−

1

𝑥2 𝑜𝑟

1

𝑥3 𝑥2 + 𝑥 − 1

Question 10: a) 𝑥 𝑥 − 1 = 0

𝑥 = 0 𝑜𝑟 𝑥 = 1 b) 𝑥 𝑥 + 3 = 0

𝑥 = 0 𝑜𝑟 𝑥 = −3 c) 2𝑥 1 − 3𝑥 = 0

𝑥 = 0 𝑜𝑟 𝑥 =1

3

d) 4𝑥 𝑥 + 1 = 0 𝑥 = 0 𝑜𝑟 𝑥 = −1

e) 𝑥2 𝑥 − 1 = 0 𝑥 = 0 𝑜𝑟 𝑥 = 1

f) 𝑥3 3𝑥 − 5 = 0

𝑥 = 0 𝑜𝑟 𝑥 =5

3

Question 11: a) 4 𝑥2 + 3𝑥 + 3 b) 6 2 − 𝑥

c) 7𝑥2 +1

𝑥2

d) –𝑥2

2− 2.25𝑥 + 16

e) 𝑥2 4𝑥2 − 1 f) 𝑥 −5𝑥4 + 3𝑥2 − 5𝑥 + 3

Question 12: a) 𝑥 = 3 𝑜𝑟 𝑥 = 2 b) 𝑥 = −7 𝑜𝑟 𝑥 = 4 c) 𝑥 = 2 𝑜𝑟 𝑥 = 3

d) 𝑥 = −1

3 𝑜𝑟 𝑥 = −

15

6

e) 𝑥 = 0 𝑜𝑟 𝑥 = 2 f) 𝑥 = 1 Question 13: a) 3 b) 4 c) 1 d) 15 e) 0.1 f) 1

chapter two solutions

Question 1: a) 𝑦 = 𝑥 − 1

b) 𝑦 = −𝑥

2+

3

2

c) 𝑦 = 𝑥 + 1 d) 𝑦 = 2𝑥 − 4

e) 𝑦 =5 14𝑥+3

7 𝑜𝑟

𝑦 =70𝑥 + 15

7

f) 𝑦 = 2𝑥 −1

2

g) 𝑦 =5 𝑥−12

3 𝑜𝑟

𝑦 =5𝑥 − 60

3 𝑜𝑟

𝑦 =5𝑥

3− 20

h) 𝑦 = 5𝑥 − 12

i) 𝑦 = 9 −5𝑥

3

Question 2: a) 𝐷, 𝐹, 𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶, 𝐸 b) 𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐹, 𝐶, 𝐷, 𝐸 c) 𝐴, 𝐹, 𝐵, 𝐶, 𝐷, 𝐸

Question 4:

a) 𝑦 =6

5𝑥 − 6

b) 𝑦 = −3𝑥 − 3 Question 5: a) 𝑦 = 6𝑥 − 3 b) 𝑦 = 5𝑥 − 9

c) 𝑦 =4

3𝑥

d) 𝑦 = −𝑥 + 6

e) 𝑦 = −5

4𝑥 − 8

1

4

Question 6: a) 𝑦 = 2𝑥 − 1 b) 𝑦 = 3𝑥 + 2 c) 𝑦 = 𝑥 d) 𝑦 = −2𝑥 − 12 e) 𝑦 = −2.5𝑥 − 6.6 Question 7: a) −6, −9 b) 6,15 c) −1,12

d) 331

7, −36

5

7

e) 9,4.25 Question 8: 𝑄 = 18, 𝑃 = 80 Question 9: 𝑄 = 5, 𝑃 = 22 Question 10:

𝜀𝑑 = −62

27 meaning this

good is elastic in demand, as |𝜀𝑑 | > 1. Question 11:

𝜀𝑠 =25.8

21=

129

105 meaning this

good is elastic in supply, as 𝜀𝑠 > 1. Question 12:

a) 𝑄 = 28

30𝑡𝑕𝑜𝑢𝑠𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑠,

𝑃 = 22182

300≈ 22.61

b) 𝜀𝑑 = −3391

68≈ −49.72

meaning this good is very elastic in demand.

c) 𝜀𝑠 =3391

1054≈ 3.22 which

means this good is elastic in supply.

Question 13:

a) 𝑄 =732

155≈ 4.723𝑚𝑖𝑙𝑙𝑖𝑜𝑛

𝑃 =3592

155≈ 23.17

b) 𝜀𝑑 = −8980

3111≈ −2.89

which is elastic.

c) 𝜀𝑠 = −898

61≈ −14.72

meaning this good is elastic in supply.

Note; the supply curve is backward bending in this case.

Page 181: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

181

chapter three solutions

Question 1: a) −3𝑥 + 𝑦 = −1

2𝑥 + 𝑦 = −17 b) 𝑥 + 𝑦 = 3

3𝑥 + 𝑦 = −15 c) −𝑥 + 17𝑦 = 14

−3𝑥 + 2𝑦 = 1 d) 11𝑥 − 1.4𝑦 = 3

11𝑥 − 1.5𝑦 = 3 e) 3𝑥 − 3𝑦 − 𝑧 = −4

−15𝑥 + 4𝑦 = 13 −𝑥 − 𝑦 + 1.4𝑧 = 0

f) 𝑎 − 𝑏 + 𝑐 = −4 𝑎 − 𝑏 − 𝑐 = −1 3𝑎 − 3𝑏 − 𝑐 = 1

Question 2: a) 3, −1 b) 2,2 c) 3.75,2.75 d) 13, −11,1 e) 2,1,5 Question 3: a) 1,1 b) 2,1 c) 3, −3 d) 2, −1 e) 13,19 f) −8,12 g) −1.75,1.75 h) 3.25,18.75 Question 4: a) 3,2 b) 1,7 c) Infinite solutions d) 1,3 e) −1, −3 f) 20,4 g) −0.5,8.5

h) −0.5,8.5 i) −0.5,8.5 j) −0.5,2 k) 2.4,4.2 l) 4.4,7.6 m) 7.1, −1.9 Question 5: a) 𝑃 = 45.5 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑄 = 8.5

b) 𝑃 = 465

11 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑄 = 8

19

22

c) 𝑃 = 46 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑄 = 19

d) 𝑃 = 71

3 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑄 = 1

e) 𝑃 = 7.21 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑄 = 8.43 Question 6: a) −1,1,3 b) 3,4,7 c) 2,1,12 d) −1,2, −3 Question 7:

a) 1

6, 3

13

18, −3

17

18

b) 1.5,3.5,2 c) 1.75,1.25,3.25 d) 3.1,4.4,5.9 e) 5, −1.5,2.5 f) 3.1,2,1.6 g) −2.1, −2.2, −2.3 h) 2,4,6 Question 8: a) Unique solution b) Infinite solutions c) Unique solution d) Unique solution e) Infinite solutions f) No solutions Question 9: a) −11 b) 52

c) −10 d) 8 e) 0 f) −6.25 g) 3.4

h) −3

7

i) −34

315

j) −2.79 k) 0 l) 0 Question 10: a) 8 b) −30 c) 42 d) 56 e) −280 f) −2294 Question 11: a) 2,2,2 b) 2,8,4 c) 1,3,7 d) 0.2,0.4,0.6 Question 12: a) 𝑀: 2853 = 7𝑃 + 19𝑆 + 14𝐿

𝐼: 2873 = 9𝑃 + 21𝑆 + 11𝐿 𝑇: 3594 = 4𝑃 + 20𝑆 + 25𝐿

b) 𝑃 = 111, 𝑆 = 40 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝐿 = 94 Question 13: 𝐶 = 4860, 𝐼 = 540 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑌 = 6000 Question 14: 𝐶 = 1827.91, 𝐼 = 180.78 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑌

= 2608.70 Question 15: 𝐶 = 800 − 800𝑠 , 𝐼 = 800𝑠 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑌

= 1000

chapter four questions

Question 1: Functions: 𝐴, 𝐶, 𝐷 Not Functions: 𝐵, 𝐸 Question 2: a) 𝑎 = −5, 𝑏 = −4, 𝑐 = 3 b) 𝑎 = −1, 𝑏 = 1, 𝑐 = 6 c) 𝑎 = 1, 𝑏 = 0, 𝑐 = −4 d) 𝑎 = 1, 𝑏 = −2, 𝑐 = −2 Question 3: 𝑦 = −3𝑥2 + 27𝑥 − 54: black

𝑦 = −𝑥2 + 18𝑥 − 45: blue 𝑦 = 𝑥2 − 6𝑥: red 𝑦 = 𝑥2 − 25𝑥 + 150: green Question 4:

a) 𝑥 =−3± 33

2

b) 𝑥 = 1.5 𝑜𝑟 𝑥 = −1.5 c) 𝑥 = 1 𝑜𝑟 𝑥 = −3 d) 𝑥 = −4

e) 𝑥 =36± 396

18

f) 𝑁𝑜 𝑠𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛

g) 𝑥 =−1± 69

2

Question 6: a) Two solutions b) Two solutions c) No solutions d) Two solutions e) Two solutions f) One solution Question 7: 𝑦 = −3𝑥3 − 3: blue 𝑦 = 2𝑥3 − 3: red 𝑦 = −𝑥3 + 5𝑥2 + 48𝑥 − 252:grey 𝑦 = 𝑥3 + 12𝑥2 + 11𝑥 − 168: black

Question 8: 𝑦 = 1.5𝑥 : blue 𝑦 = 3 2𝑥 :red 𝑦 = 2−𝑥 + 2: black Question 10: 𝑦 = 4 log 𝑥: black 𝑦 = log 𝑥2: blue

𝑦 = 2 log 𝑥 − 2 + 5: red Question 11:

𝑦 =2

𝑥−5+ 5: red

𝑦 =1

𝑥+4− 6: blue

𝑦 = −1

𝑥−2− 4: black

Question 12:

a) 𝑥 =12

log 4

b) 𝑥 = −13

2 log 3

c) 𝑥 =7

log 2−3

d) 𝑥 =2

log 2−4

e) 𝑥 = 4

f) 𝑥 =18

4 ln 2

g) 𝑥 = −log 8

182+log 8

h) 𝑥 =8

1+log 2

i) 𝑥 = −25−ln 3

ln 6+ 1

Question 13:

a) 𝑥 =ln 15

ln 2

b) 𝑥 =ln

18

4

ln 3

c) 𝑥 =ln 1

ln 4+ 1

d) 𝑥 =4± 24

2

e) 𝑥 =2 ln 3+ln 2

ln 2+3 ln 3 𝑜𝑟

𝑥 =ln 18

ln 54

f) No solutions

g) 𝑥 =ln 14

14 ln 2

Question 14:

a) 𝑡140 =ln

14

12

0.011≈ 14.01𝑦

b) 𝐺𝐷𝑃10 = 𝑈𝑆$828.75𝑏

c) 𝑡1000 =ln

100

55

0.041≈ 14.58𝑦

d) 𝑡 =ln

120

55

0.03= 26.01𝑦

Page 182: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

182

Question 15: a) 𝑝 5 = 1.457

b) 𝑡 =ln

61

42 + ln 1.05

ln 1.03+ln 1.05 𝑜𝑟

𝑡 =ln 1.525

ln 1.0815 ≈ 5.39𝑦

c) 𝑡 =ln 2.05

ln 1.0815 ≈ 9.16𝑦

Question 16: a) 472.16 b) 15,170.89 c) $17.918𝑚𝑖𝑙𝑙𝑖𝑜𝑛

d) 13𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑜𝑦𝑒𝑒𝑠

chapter five solutions

Question 1: 𝐻, 𝐺, 𝐷, 𝐶, 𝐸, 𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐹 Question 2: a) 𝑓 ′ = 18 b) 𝑓 ′ = 2𝑥 c) 𝑓 ′ = 2𝑥 + 7 d) 𝑓 ′ = 3𝑥2 + 8𝑥

e) 𝑓 ′ = −5

𝑥2

f) 𝑓 ′ = −2

𝑥3

Question 3: a) 𝑦′ = 6𝑥 b) 𝑦′ = 30𝑥 + 1 c) 𝑦′ = 2𝑥 + 3𝑥2

d) 𝑦′ =51

2𝑥2 + 10𝑥

e) 𝑦′ = −32𝑥−5 + 3𝑥2 f) 𝑦′ = −24𝑥−3 − 3𝑥−4 + 3𝑥2

g) 𝑦′ = −2

𝑥3

h) 𝑦′ = −10

𝑥3 + 2𝑥

i) 𝑦′ = −1

𝑥2 −2

𝑥3 +3

𝑥4

Question 4: a) 𝑦′ = 2 𝑥 + 1 b) 𝑦′ = 15 3𝑥 − 4 4 c) 𝑦′ = 12 𝑥 + 5 5 d) 𝑦′ = −144 1 − 4𝑥 2 e) 𝑦′ = 300 2𝑥 + 1 𝑥2 + 𝑥 3

f) 𝑦′ = −48

5 4𝑥 − 1 3

Question 5: a) 𝑦′ = 3𝑥2 15𝑥 + 2 + 15𝑥3 b) 𝑦′ = 3𝑥2 𝑥9 + 1 + 9𝑥8 𝑥3 − 1 c) 𝑦′ = 60𝑥3 1 − 𝑥3 − 45𝑥6 𝑜𝑟

𝑦′ = 60𝑥3 − 105𝑥6 d) −28𝑥−8 𝑥2 + 𝑥4 + 2𝑥 + 4𝑥3 4𝑥−7

e) 𝑦′ = −𝑥2 + 4𝑥3 𝑥15 + 15𝑥14 −1

3𝑥3 + 𝑥4

f) 𝑦′ = 1.5𝑥−7 + 2 −1 − 𝑥−3 + 3𝑥−4 𝑥−6

−4+ 2𝑥

g) 𝑦′ = −36𝑥−7 𝑥6 − 6𝑥 + 6 6𝑥5 − 6 𝑥−6 − 6 Question 6:

a) 𝑦′ = −2

𝑥−1 2

b) 𝑦′ =4

1−2𝑥 2

c) 𝑦′ = 3𝑥2−4𝑥+3

1−𝑥2 2

d) 𝑦′ = −4𝑥

𝑥2−1 2

e) 𝑦′ =−130𝑥−3+39𝑥−2+1

5−𝑥 2

f) 𝑦′ =−𝑥4−4𝑥+6𝑥2

𝑥2−2 2

g) 𝑦′ =−39𝑥−4−3𝑥2+13𝑥−8−7𝑥−2

1+𝑥−4 2

h) 𝑦′ =6𝑥 𝑥2+1

2+1−18𝑥3 𝑥2 +1

2 +3𝑥2+6𝑥 𝑥2+1

3

1−3𝑥2 2

Question 7: a) 𝑦′ = 2𝑒2𝑥

b) 𝑦′ = 5𝑒5𝑥−1 c) 𝑦′ = −4𝑒1−4𝑥

d) 𝑦′ = 2𝑥𝑒𝑥2−1

e) 𝑦′ = 13 − 2𝑥 𝑒13𝑥−𝑥2

f) 𝑦′ = 2 4𝑥3 − 3𝑥−4 𝑒𝑥4−1+𝑥−3

g) 𝑦′ = −48

𝑥2 𝑒4/𝑥

h) 𝑦′ = −2

7 −

3

𝑥4 −1

2 𝑒𝑥−3−

𝑥

2

Question 8:

a) 𝑦′ =1

𝑥

b) 𝑦′ =2

𝑥

c) 𝑦′ =10

5𝑥−1

d) 𝑦′ =−3 2𝑥−1

𝑥2−𝑥

e) 𝑦′ =4

3 −

3

𝑥4+1

𝑥−3+𝑥 𝑜𝑟

𝑦′ =−

4𝑥4 +

43

𝑥−3 + 𝑥

f) 𝑦′ =2 2𝑥+3𝑥−4−𝑥−2

𝑥2−𝑥−3+1

𝑥

g) 𝑦′ =0.04 8+4𝑥−3

8𝑥−2𝑥−2

Question 9: a) 𝑦′ = 12𝑥2 2𝑥3 − 1 3𝑥 + 5 3 + 9 3𝑥 + 5 2 2𝑥3 − 1 2 𝑜𝑟

𝑦′ = 2𝑥3 − 1 3𝑥 + 5 2 54𝑥3 + 60𝑥2 − 9 b) 𝑦′ = 5𝑒−5𝑥−1 𝑥 − 1 4 + 4 𝑥 − 1 3 1 − 𝑒−5𝑥−1 𝑜𝑟

𝑦′ = 𝑥 − 1 3 5𝑥𝑒−5𝑥−1 − 9𝑒−5𝑥−1 + 4 c) 𝑦′ = 0.6𝑥2 + 1

d) 𝑦′ =−4𝑥𝑒𝑥2

1+𝑒𝑥2

2

e) 𝑦′ =180

𝑥4 12−𝑥−3

f) 𝑦′ =−5𝑥4 1+ln 𝑥

𝑥5−1 2 +1

𝑥 𝑥5−1

g) 𝑦′ = 10𝑥𝑒3𝑥−1 + 15𝑥2𝑒3𝑥−1 𝑜𝑟 𝑦′ = 5𝑥𝑒3𝑥−1 2 + 3𝑥

h) 𝑦′ = −𝑒𝑥 2𝑥−3−𝑥4 + 6𝑥−4+4𝑥3 𝑒𝑥 +1

3 2𝑥−3−𝑥4 2

i) 𝑦′ = 42𝑥2 2𝑥3 − 1 6 1 + ln 𝑒𝑥2+ 1 +

2𝑥𝑒𝑥2

𝑒𝑥2+1

2𝑥3 − 1 7 𝑜𝑟

𝑦′ = 2𝑥 2𝑥3 − 1 6 21𝑥 1 + ln 𝑒𝑥2+ 1

+𝑒𝑥2

2𝑥3 − 1

𝑒𝑥2+ 1

j) 𝑦′ = 7𝑒7𝑥−1+4𝑥3 ln 𝑥5 +𝑥−7 −

5

𝑥−7𝑥−8 𝑒7𝑥−1+𝑥4

ln 𝑥5 +𝑥−7 2+

72𝑥3 −7𝑥6

𝑥7−1

Question 10: a) 𝑦′ = 4𝑥3 + 45𝑥2

𝑦′′ = 12𝑥2 + 90𝑥

Page 183: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

183

b) 𝑦′ = −68𝑥−5 + 𝑥−1 𝑦′′ = 340𝑥−6 − 𝑥−2

c) 𝑦′ = 0.27𝑥8 + 8𝑥 𝑥2 − 1 3 𝑦′ ′ = 2.16𝑥7 + 8 𝑥2 − 1 3 + 48𝑥2 𝑥2 − 1 2

d) 𝑦′ = 𝑒2 −4𝑥3 + 2𝑥𝑒𝑥2−1 1 − 𝑥 − 𝑒2 1 − 𝑥2 +

𝑒𝑥2−1 𝑜𝑟

𝑦′ = 𝑒2 −4𝑥3 + 2𝑥𝑒𝑥2−1 + 4𝑥4 − 2𝑥2𝑒𝑥2−1 − 1

+ 𝑥2 − 𝑒𝑥2−1

𝑦′′ = 𝑒2 −12𝑥2 + 2𝑒𝑥2−1 + 4𝑥2𝑒𝑥2−1 + 16𝑥3

− 6𝑥𝑒𝑥2−1 − 4𝑥3𝑒𝑥2−1 + 2𝑥

e) 𝑦′ =3𝑥2−1−72𝑥

3𝑥2+1 2

𝑦′′

= 6𝑥 − 72 3𝑥2 + 1 2 − 12𝑥 3𝑥2 + 1 3𝑥2 − 1 − 72𝑥

3𝑥2 + 1 4

f) 𝑦′ =10𝑥+1

5𝑥2+𝑥

𝑦′′ =10 5𝑥2 + 𝑥 − 10𝑥 + 1 2

5𝑥2 + 𝑥 2

Question 11:

𝑓 ′ =0.25𝑥−0.75 + 4

𝑥0.25 + 4𝑥

𝑓 ′ 10 = 0.0968 4𝑑. 𝑝. 𝑓 ′ 35 = 0.0282 4𝑑. 𝑝. Question 14:

a) 𝑀𝐶 =𝑑𝑇𝐶

𝑑𝑄= 3𝑄2 − 30𝑄 + 75

b) 𝑄 = 5 c) 𝑀𝐶 ′ 15 = 60 Question 15:

a) 𝑀𝐶 =𝑑𝑇𝐶

𝑑𝑄=

30𝑥

0.1𝑥2+2+ 15

b) 𝑀𝐶 ′ =60−3𝑥2

0.1𝑥2+2 2

𝑀𝐶 ′ 30 = −0.312 3𝑑. 𝑝. 𝑀𝐶 ′ 60 = −0.082 3𝑑. 𝑝.

chapter six solutions

Question 1: Local minima: 𝐶, 𝐸 Local maxima: 𝐷, 𝐹 Global minimum: 𝐴 Global maximum: 𝐵 Question 2: a) 2𝑥 + 3 = 0 b) 45𝑥2 − 4 1 − 𝑥 3 = 0

c) 24𝑥𝑒1−𝑥2− 24𝑥3𝑒1−𝑥2

= 0 𝑜𝑟

24𝑥𝑒1−𝑥2 1 − 𝑥2 = 0

d) 4 𝑥 − 1 𝑥3 − 1 2 + 4 𝑥3 − 1 𝑥 − 1 2 = 0 𝑜𝑟 4 𝑥 − 1 𝑥3 − 1 𝑥3 + 𝑥 − 2 = 0

e) 2

𝑥+1 2 = 0

Question 3: a) −1, −4 𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑚𝑢𝑚 b) 2, −52 𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑚𝑢𝑚

−5,193 𝑚𝑎𝑥𝑖𝑚𝑢𝑚 c) 1, −2𝑒4 𝑚𝑎𝑥𝑖𝑚𝑢𝑚 d) 3,0 𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑚𝑢𝑚

5,4

𝑒 𝑚𝑎𝑥𝑖𝑚𝑢𝑚

e) 1

2,

1

14.5 1

2

𝑒3.5 + 19 𝑚𝑎𝑥𝑖𝑚𝑢𝑚

− 1

2, −

1

14.5 12

𝑒3.5 + 19

𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑚𝑢𝑚

f) 1 + 2, − 2

4+2 2 𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑚𝑢𝑚

1 − 2, 2

4 − 2 2 𝑚𝑎𝑥𝑖𝑚𝑢𝑚

Question 4: a) No stationary points

1

3, 83

25

27 𝑖𝑛𝑓𝑙𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑛𝑡

b) 4+ 244

6, −27.719 𝑚𝑎𝑥𝑖𝑚𝑢𝑚

4 − 244

6, 41.127 𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑚𝑢𝑚

1

3, 13

13

27 𝑖𝑛𝑓𝑙𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑛𝑡

c) −3,0 𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑚𝑢𝑚

−1

3, 28

4

9 𝑚𝑎𝑥𝑖𝑚𝑢𝑚

−10

6, 14

2

9 𝑖𝑛𝑓𝑙𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑛𝑡

d) 1, −𝑒3 𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑚𝑢𝑚 2, −2𝑒2 𝑖𝑛𝑓𝑙𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑛𝑡

e) 0,0 𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑚𝑢𝑚

2,4

𝑒 𝑚𝑎𝑥𝑖𝑚𝑢𝑚

2 + 2, 6 + 4 2 𝑒−1− 2 𝑖𝑛𝑓𝑙𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑛𝑡

2 − 2, 6 − 4 2 𝑒−1+ 2 𝑖𝑛𝑓𝑙𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑝𝑜𝑖𝑛𝑡

f) 3

8,

23

16 𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑚𝑢𝑚

No inflection point Question 5: a) 𝑄 = 5 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑄 = 95 b) 𝑄 = 50 c) 𝜋 = 202,500 Question 6: a) 𝑇𝑅 = 350𝑄 b) 𝜋 = 350𝑄 − 0.2𝑄2 − 40

c) 𝑄𝐵𝐸 = 875 ± 122468

0.4 𝑜𝑟

𝑄𝐵𝐸 ≈ 0 𝑜𝑟 𝑄𝐵𝐸 ≈ 1750 d) 𝑄𝑚𝑎𝑥 = 875 e) 𝜋 = 153,085 Question 7: a) 𝑇𝑅 = 10 + 0.25𝑄 b) 𝜋 = 10 + 0.25𝑄 − 0.2𝑒0.01𝑄+4

c) 𝑄 =ln 125−4

0.01≈ 82.8314

d) 𝑃 = 0.371 3𝑑. 𝑝. e) 𝜋 = 5.708 3𝑑. 𝑝. Question 8: a) 𝐴𝜋 = −𝑄 + 20

𝑀𝜋 = −2𝑄 + 20

Page 184: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

184

b) 𝐴𝐶 = 0.1𝑞 + 2.5 +10

𝑞

𝑀𝐶 = 0.2𝑞 + 2.5

c) 𝐴𝑅 =𝑄+1

𝑄0.5

𝑀𝑅 = 1.5𝑄0.5 +0.5

𝑄0.5

d) 𝐴𝐶 = 0.01𝑥 ln 𝑥 + 1

𝑀𝐶 = 0.02𝑥 ln 𝑥 + 1 +0.01𝑥2

𝑥 + 1

e) 𝐴𝜋 =−0.1 𝑒𝑄−5+𝑒5−𝑄 +10

𝑄

𝑀𝜋 = −0.1𝑒𝑄−5 + 0.1𝑒5−𝑄 f) 𝐴𝜋 = 𝑒−𝑞+1

𝑀𝜋 = 𝑒−𝑞+1 1 − 𝑞 Question 9: 𝑄 = 0 𝑜𝑟 𝑄 = 12.5 Question 10:

𝐿 = 5

2

23

≈ 1.842 3𝑑. 𝑝.

Question 11: a) 𝐴𝜋 = −1.5𝑄2 + 50𝑄

𝑀𝜋 = −4.5𝑄2 + 100𝑄

b) 𝑄 = 0 𝑜𝑟 𝑄 = 331

3

c) 𝑄 = 222

9

d) 𝜋𝑚𝑎𝑥 = 8230.45 2𝑑. 𝑝.

e) 𝑄 = 162

3

Question 12:

𝐿 = 1

20

4

≈ 0.473 3𝑑. 𝑝.

Question 13:

𝜀𝑑 = −𝑒1.96 + 180

1.68𝑒1.96≈ −15.69

Since 𝜀𝑑 > 1 the good is elastic at this price. Question 14:

𝜀𝑠 =3 100 ln 6 + 18

154≈ 3.84

Since 𝜀𝑠 > 1 this good must be elastic in supply. Question 15:

%∆𝑇𝑅 = −0.25 so 𝑇𝑅 will decrease if the owner Question 16:

𝜀𝑑 = −27

107≈ 0.252

%∆𝑄 = −633

107%

%∆𝑇𝑅 = 1874

107%

Since demand is inelastic, the increase in price will outweigh the decrease in quantity sold, so total revenue will increase. Question 17: a) 𝑇𝐶 = 2500𝑄 + 1500 b) 𝑇𝑅 = −0.5𝑄2 + 2500𝑄 c) 𝜋 = −0.5𝑄2 + 2250𝑄 − 1500 d) 𝑄𝐵𝐸 ≈ 1 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑄𝐵𝐸 ≈ 4499 e) 𝑄𝑚𝑎𝑥 = 2250 f) 𝜋𝑚𝑎𝑥 = 2,529,750 g) 𝑃 = 1375 h) 𝑀𝜋 = −𝑄 + 2250

i) 𝐴𝜋 = −0.5𝑄 + 2250 −1500

𝑄

j) 𝑄 = 30002

3 ≈ 208.01 k) 𝜀𝑑 = −4 ∴ 𝑒𝑙𝑎𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑐 l) %∆𝑇𝑅 = −30% Question 18: a) 𝑇𝐶 = 80𝑄 + 200 b) 𝑇𝑅 = −0.4𝑄2 + 4276 c) 𝜋 = −0.4𝑄2 + 4196𝑄 − 200 d) 𝑄𝐵𝐸 ≈ 0 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑄𝐵𝐸 ≈ 10489 e) 𝑄𝑚𝑎𝑥 = 5245 f) 𝜋𝑚𝑎𝑥 = 11,003,810 g) 𝑃 = 2178 h) 𝑀𝜋 = −0.8𝑄 + 4196

i) 𝐴𝜋 = −0.4𝑄 + 4196 −200

𝑄

j) 𝑄 = 5002

3 ≈ 63.00

k) 𝜀𝑑 = −1269

400 which is elastic in demand.

l) %∆𝑇𝑅 = −1613

16%

chapter seven solutions

Question 1: a) 𝑧𝑥 = 2𝑦 + 3 + 8𝑥𝑦3

𝑧𝑦 = 2𝑥 − 1 + 12𝑥2𝑦2

b) 𝑓𝑥 = 48𝑥3 + 𝑒𝑦 𝑓𝑦 = 𝑥𝑒𝑦

c) 𝑝𝑟 = 4.5𝑟−0.7𝑚0.7 + 15𝑚 𝑝𝑚 = 10.5𝑟0.3𝑚−0.3 + 15𝑟

d) 𝑧𝑥 = 43.2𝑥1.4𝑦4.8 − 3𝑦 + 2𝑥 𝑧𝑦 = 86.4𝑥2.4𝑦3.8 − 3𝑥

e) 𝑧𝑥 = 𝑥 + 𝑦 4 + 4 𝑥 + 𝑦 3 𝑥 − 𝑦 𝑜𝑟 𝑧𝑥 = 𝑥 + 𝑦 3 5𝑥 − 3𝑦 𝑧𝑦 = − 𝑥 + 𝑦 4 + 4 𝑥 + 𝑦 3 𝑥 − 𝑦 𝑜𝑟

𝑧𝑦 = 𝑥 + 𝑦 3 3𝑥 − 5𝑦

f) 𝑓𝑥 = 𝑦 3𝑥 − 4𝑦2 4 18𝑥 − 4𝑦2 𝑓𝑦 = 𝑥 3𝑥 − 4𝑦2 4 −44𝑦2 + 3𝑥

g) 𝑧𝑥 =2𝑥−𝑥2−2𝑥𝑦−𝑦3

1−𝑥−𝑦 2

𝑧𝑦 =−3𝑦2 − 3𝑦2𝑥 + 2𝑦3 + 𝑥2

1 − 𝑥 − 𝑦 2

h) 𝑧𝑥 =11𝑦2

1−𝑥𝑦 2

𝑧𝑦 =24𝑥𝑦 − 1 − 12𝑥2𝑦2

1 − 𝑥𝑦 2

i) 𝑧𝑥 =−2𝑥𝑦2+1

1−𝑥2𝑦2+𝑥

𝑧𝑦 =−2𝑦𝑥2

1 − 𝑥2𝑦2 + 𝑥

j) 𝑧𝑥 = 4𝑒4𝑥−𝑦 𝑥3 + 4𝑥𝑦 + 3𝑥2 + 4𝑦 𝑒4𝑥−𝑦 𝑧𝑦 = −𝑒4𝑥−𝑦 𝑥3 + 4𝑥𝑦 + 4𝑥𝑒4𝑥−𝑦

k) 𝑧𝑥 = 2𝑥𝑦2𝑒4𝑥𝑦 + 4𝑦𝑒4𝑥𝑦 𝑥2𝑦2 − 1 𝑧𝑦 = 2𝑦𝑥2𝑒4𝑥𝑦 + 4𝑥𝑒4𝑥𝑦 𝑥2𝑦2 − 1

l) 𝑧𝑥 =9𝑦 𝑥𝑦−1−𝑥

𝑥𝑦−1 2 −1

15−𝑥

𝑧𝑦 =9𝑥 𝑥𝑦 − 1 − 9𝑦

𝑥𝑦 − 1 2

m) 𝑧𝑥 =−

𝑦

1+𝑥𝑦 1−𝑒𝑥𝑦 +𝑦𝑒𝑥𝑦 1−ln 1+𝑥𝑦

1−𝑒𝑥𝑦 2

Page 185: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

185

𝑧𝑦 =−

𝑥1 + 𝑥𝑦

1 − 𝑒𝑥𝑦 + 𝑥𝑒𝑥𝑦 1 − ln 1 + 𝑥𝑦

1 − 𝑒𝑥𝑦 2

Question 2: a) 𝑧𝑥𝑥 = 2, 𝑧𝑦𝑦 = 2, 𝑧𝑥𝑦 = 𝑧𝑦𝑥 = −3

b) 𝑧𝑥𝑥 = 2𝑦, 𝑧𝑦𝑦 = 4𝑥, 𝑧𝑥𝑦 = 𝑧𝑦𝑥 = 4𝑦 + 2𝑥

c) 𝑧𝑥𝑥 = 6𝑥𝑦4 , 𝑧𝑦𝑦 = 12𝑥3𝑦2 , 𝑧𝑥𝑦 = 𝑧𝑦𝑥 = 12𝑥2𝑦3 + 2

d) 𝑓𝑥𝑥 = 192𝑥2𝑦8 , 𝑓𝑦𝑦 = 896𝑥4𝑦5 + 36𝑥,

𝑓𝑥𝑦 = 𝑓𝑦𝑥 = 512𝑥3𝑦7 + 36𝑦 − 13

e) 𝑧𝑥𝑥 = 4𝑒2𝑥2+𝑦 + 16𝑥2𝑒2𝑥2+𝑦

𝑧𝑦𝑦 = 𝑒2𝑥2+𝑦

𝑧𝑥𝑦 = 𝑧𝑦𝑥 = 4𝑥𝑒2𝑥2+𝑦

f) 𝑧𝑥𝑥 = 2𝑒𝑥2+𝑦2+ 4𝑥2𝑒𝑥2+𝑦2

𝑧𝑦𝑦 = 2𝑒𝑥2+𝑦2+ 4𝑦2𝑒𝑥2+𝑦2

− 4𝑥

𝑧𝑥𝑦 = 𝑧𝑦𝑥 = 4𝑥𝑦𝑒𝑥2+𝑦2− 4𝑦

g) 𝑓𝑥𝑥 =−8𝑥2+4𝑦3

2𝑥2+𝑦3 2

𝑓𝑦𝑦 =12𝑦𝑥2 − 3𝑦4

2𝑥2 + 𝑦3 2

𝑓𝑥𝑦 = 𝑓𝑦𝑥 = −12𝑥𝑦2

2𝑥2 + 𝑦3 2

h) 𝑧𝑥𝑥 =26+2𝑥𝑦−2𝑥2−𝑦2

13−𝑥𝑦 +𝑥2 2 + 30

𝑧𝑦𝑦 = −𝑥2

13 − 𝑥𝑦 + 𝑥2 2+ 30

𝑧𝑥𝑦 = 𝑧𝑦𝑥 =−13 + 𝑥2

13 − 𝑥𝑦 + 𝑥2 2− 30

Question 3: a) Stationary point at 0,0 . SOC gives a possible

maximum. Delta test confirms this. b) Stationary point at −1.75, −0.25 . SOC gives

possible maximum. Delta test confirms this. c) Two stationary points: 𝑃𝑜𝑖𝑛𝑡 1: 0,0

𝑃𝑜𝑖𝑛𝑡 2: 1

5184

3, 24

1

5184

2

3 . SOC says the first point

is a saddle point. SOC says the second point is a possible minimum. Delta test confirms this.

d) Stationary point at 5

11,

9

11 . SOC gives a possible

maximum. Delta test confirms this.

e) Stationary point at 5

4

3,

5

3

3 . SOC gives possible

maximum. Delta test confirms this.

f) Stationary point at 8

5,

8

5 . SOC says it is an inflection

point. Question 4: a) 𝑇𝑅 = 1 + 20𝐾0.5𝐿0.6 b) 𝜋 = 20𝐾0.5𝐿0.6 − 5𝐾 − 50𝐿 − 399 c) Maximum profit at 𝐿 = 10.486, 𝐾 = 26.214. SOC

provides a possible maximum, delta test confirms this. The profit is 7.2144.

d) 𝑃 = 20.08 e) 𝑄 = 13.107 Question 5: There is a stationary point at 𝐾 = 12.8601, 𝐿 = 12.0563. The SOC gives a possible maximum, and the delta test confirms this. Question 6: 𝑑𝑧 ≈ 1.7579 and the actual change in 𝑧 is 1.7583 4𝑑. 𝑝. Question 7: 𝑑𝑅 = 2421.64 however the actual change in 𝑅 is 2409.80. Question 8: a) 𝑑𝑄 = −0.016𝐾0.4𝐿0.5 + 0.0064𝐿0.5𝐾0.4 b) Exact change in output is −1.0874 4𝑑. 𝑝. Question 9:

Maximum profit is obtained at 𝐿 =1

4, 𝐾 =

1

6. The SOC

indicates a maximum, and the delta test proves this. The maximum profit attainable is 1.198 3𝑑. 𝑝. . Question 10: a) 𝑇𝑅 = 300𝑇 + 150𝑅 b) 𝜋 = 300𝑇 + 150𝑅 − 3𝑇2 − 4𝑅2 − 𝑅𝑇 − 400

c) 𝑇 = 4741

47 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑅 = 12

36

47 with the SOC indicating a

maximum, and the delta test proving this. d) 𝜋𝑚𝑎𝑥 = 7738.30 Question 11: a) 𝑇𝑅 = 1100 − 90𝐿2 − 135𝐾2 + 112.5𝐿𝐾 + 360𝐿 +

540𝐾 b) 𝑇𝐶 = 50𝐿 + 35𝐾 + 550 c) 𝜋 = 550 − 90𝐿2 − 135𝐾2 + 112.5𝐿𝐾 + 310𝐿 +

505𝐾

d) 𝐿 = 3581

639 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝐾 = 3

319

639 for maximum profit. SOC

indicates a possible maximum, and delta test confirms this.

e) 𝜋𝑚𝑎𝑥 = 2039.48 2𝑑. 𝑝. Question 12: a) 𝑇𝑅𝑅 = 𝑅2 − 4𝐴2 + 𝐴𝑅 + 1400𝑅

𝑇𝑅𝐴 = 𝐴2 − 6𝑅2 + 3𝐴𝑅 + 1200𝐴 b) 𝑇𝐶 = 650𝑅 + 350𝐴 + 10,000 c) 𝜋 = 750𝑅 + 850𝐴 − 5𝑅2 − 3𝐴2 + 4𝐴𝑅 − 10000

d) 𝑅 = 1796

11 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝐴 = 261

4

11 with the SOC giving a

possible maximum, and the delta test confirming this. e) 𝑃𝐴 𝑑𝑜𝑚𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑐 = 1259.96 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑃𝑅 𝑑𝑜𝑚 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑐 = 319.04 f) 𝜋𝑚𝑎𝑥 = 168,409.09 g) The prices don’t make sense as the cost of the

refrigerator is greater than the sales price, however due to the interdependence of the two goods, then it does make sense. That is take a small loss on one good to make a big profit on another.

chapter eight solutions

Question 1: a) 2.781% b) 6.952% c) 3.476% d) 3.418% e) 110.1

Question 2: a) 14.714% b) −11.385% c) 7.357% d) 7.105% e) −1.897%

Page 186: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

186

f) −1.994% g) A big drop in price in between. Question 3: a) 12 b) 18 c) 54 d) 138 Question 4:

a) 𝑇15 = 1331 4

11

14

b) 𝑇21 = 1331 4

11

26

c) 𝑆11 =1331

4

11

11−1

−7

11

≈ 2091.54

d) 𝑆16 =1331

4

11

16−1

−7

11

≈ 2091.57

Question 5: a) Investment 2 (7092.56) is better than investment 1

(7000) in the fifth year. b) Investment 1 (32,500) is better than investment 2

(28,189.18) up to the fifth year. c) Investment 2 has a return of 55,494.09 whilst

investment 1 has a return of 55,000. Question 6: a) 171.60 b) 1601.60 Question 7: a) 6000

b) 10,000 Question 8: a) 5687.31 b) 7228.43 c) 12𝑦 6 𝑚𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑕𝑠 d) 5099.35 Question 9: a) 16322.67 b) 7𝑦 11𝑚𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑕𝑠 c) 14𝑦 8𝑚𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑕𝑠 Question 10: 4114.98 Question 11: Bank 2 is a better deal at the effective rate 5.125% is better than the 5.1% offered by Bank 1. Question 12: Bank of Vark has the best effective rate of 8.368%, which is better than Sun Bank (8.322%) and Universal Bank (8.349%). Question 13: a) 𝑁𝑃𝑉 = 14,313.98 b) 𝐼𝑅𝑅 ≈ 20.5% c) The project is worthwhile as 𝑁𝑃𝑉 > 0 and

𝐼𝑅𝑅 > 𝑚𝑎𝑟𝑘𝑒𝑡 𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑒 Question 14: a) 𝑁𝑃𝑉 = −122.99 and 𝐼𝑅𝑅 ≈ 8.51% b) The project is not worthwhile, as more could be

earned from the market interest rate.

Page 187: Quantitative Methods for Business and Economics (Jakub Kielbasa)

187

Index A Absolute values (26) Adding fractions (8) Annual interest rates (170) Arithmetic average (162) Arithmetic series (163) Averages

arithmetic (162) geometric (162) standard (130)

B BIMDAS (18) Break-even (129)

C Compound interest (168) Cubic functions (80)

D Determinant (65-66) Differentiation

multiple variable (140) partial

applications (147,155) complex (144) simple (142) second order (146)

rules Chain (104) 𝑒 (109) ln (110) power (103) product (105) quotient (108)

single variable elasticity (133) first principles (99) introduction (97) second derivative (111)

total (148) Dividing fractions (7)

E 𝑒 (85) Elasticity

differentiation (133) interpreting (44) introduction (42) total revenue (135)

Equations (21) Exponential functions (82)

F Factorisation (25) Fractions (7-12)

G Geometric average (162) Geometric series (165) Gradients

function (112) negative (33)

H Hyperbolic functions (90)

I Index numbers (161) Indices (14) Inequalities (26) Inflection point (123) Interest rates

annual (170) compound (168) simple (167)

Internal rate of return (174) Intersecting lines (38)

J Jacobian Determinant (68)

L Linear Equations,

graphing (34) introduction (31) macroeconomic applications (40) main features (32) obtaining equations (36)

Logarithm applications (91) functions (84) graphs (88) rules (84)

M Marginal value (130) Matrix

applications (62) determinant (65-66) introduction (54) notes (61) solving 2 × 2 (55) solving 3 × 3 (59)

Multiple variable differentiation (140) Multiplying fractions (7)

N Negative numbers (6) Net present value (172) Non-linear function (74)

O Optimal point, nature (120) Optimisation

single variable application (124) graphical (118) mathematical (118)

multiple variable (151)

P Partial differentiation Profit (126)

Q Quadratic Functions

defining (75) graph (76) sketching (77)

S Simple interest (167) Simultaneous equations

introduction (50) two (50) three (52)

T Total Revenue

definition (127) elasticity (135)

V Variables, defining (13)

Z Zero (27)