Quantifying Risks in a Supply Chain Through Integration of Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS

download Quantifying Risks in a Supply Chain Through Integration of Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS

of 11

Transcript of Quantifying Risks in a Supply Chain Through Integration of Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS

  • 8/17/2019 Quantifying Risks in a Supply Chain Through Integration of Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS

    1/11

    Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found athttp://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=tprs20

    Download by: [Lancaster University Library] Date: 16 February 2016, At: 02:0

    International Journal of Production Research

    ISSN: 0020-7543 (Print) 1366-588X (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/tprs20

    Quantifying risks in a supply chain throughintegration of fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS

    Avinash Samvedi , Vipul Jain & Felix T.S. Chan

    To cite this article: Avinash Samvedi , Vipul Jain & Felix T.S. Chan (2013) Quantifying risks in

    a supply chain through integration of fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS, International Journal of Production Research, 51:8, 2433-2442, DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2012.741330

    To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2012.741330

    Published online: 30 Nov 2012.

    Submit your article to this journal

    Article views: 902

    View related articles

    Citing articles: 25 View citing articles

    http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/citedby/10.1080/00207543.2012.741330#tabModulehttp://www.tandfonline.com/doi/citedby/10.1080/00207543.2012.741330#tabModulehttp://www.tandfonline.com/doi/mlt/10.1080/00207543.2012.741330http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/mlt/10.1080/00207543.2012.741330http://www.tandfonline.com/action/authorSubmission?journalCode=tprs20&page=instructionshttp://www.tandfonline.com/action/authorSubmission?journalCode=tprs20&page=instructionshttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2012.741330http://www.tandfonline.com/action/showCitFormats?doi=10.1080/00207543.2012.741330http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/tprs20http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=tprs20

  • 8/17/2019 Quantifying Risks in a Supply Chain Through Integration of Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS

    2/11

    Quantifying risks in a supply chain through integration of fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS

    A v i n a sh S a m v e dia, V ip ul J ai na a n d F e l i x T . S . C h anb*

    aDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, New Delhi, India;

    bDepartment of Industrial and Systems Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong

    (Received 21 February 2012; final version received 11 October 2012 )

    R i sk i s i n he r en t i n a l mo s t e v er y a c t iv i ty o f s u pp l y c h ai n m a na g em e nt . W i th t h e e v er - in c re a si n g p u sh f o re f f i c i e n c y , s u p p l y c h a i n s t o d a y a r e g e t t i n g m o r e a n d m o r e r i s k y . A d d i n g t o t h e d i f f i c u l t y o f d e a l i n g w i t h t h e s er is ks i s t he a mo un t o f s ub je ct iv it y a nd u nc er ta in ty i nv ol ve d. T hi s m ak es a na ly ti ca l e xa mi na ti on o f t hes i t u a ti o n v e r y d i f f i cu l t , e s p e c i a ll y a s t h e a m o u nt o f i n f o r m a t i on a v a i l ab l e a t a p a r t ic u l a r t i m e i s n o t s u f f i c i e ntf o r s u c h a n a n a l y s i s . T h u s a s u p p l y c h a i n r i s k i n d e x , w h i c h c a p t u r e s t h e l e v e l o f r i s k f a c e d b y a s u p p l y c h a i n i na g i v e n s i t u a t i o n , i s t h e n e e d o f t h e h o u r . T h i s s t u d y i s a n e f f o r t t o w a r d s q u a n t i f y i n g t h e r i s k s i n a s u p p l y c h a i na n d t h en c o ns o li d at i ng t h e v a l ue s i n to a c o mp r eh e ns i ve r i sk i n de x . A n i n te g ra t ed a p pr o ac h , w i th a f u zz ya n al y t ic a l h i er a rc h y p r oc e ss ( A HP ) a n d a f u zz y t e ch n iq u e f o r o r de r p r ef e re n ce b y s i mi l ar i ty t o t h e i d ea l

    s o l u t i o n ( T O P S I S ) a s i t s i m p o r t a n t e l e m e n t s , h a s b e e n u s e d f o r t h i s p u r p o s e . F u z z y v a l u e s i n t h i s s t u d y h e l p i nc a pt ur in g t he s ub je ct iv it y o f t he s it ua t io n w it h a f in al c on ve rs io n t o a c ri sp v a lu e w hi ch i s m uc h m or ec o m p re h e n si b l e . A c a s e s t u d y i s u s e d t o i l l u st r a t e t h e p r o po s e d m e t h o d ol o g y .

    Keywords:   s u pp l y c h ai n r i sk m a na g em e nt ; f u zz y A H P; f u zz y T O PS I S; r i sk i n de x

    1. Introduction

    A s ig ni fi ca nt f ea tu re o f t he r ap id ly e vo lv in g b us in es s c li ma te , s pu rr ed o n b y s ig ni fi ca nt t ec hn ol og y s hi ft s,

    i n no v at i on , c o mm u ni c at i on t e ch n ol o gi e s a n d g l ob a li s at i on , i s t h e i n cr e as i ng p r ev a le n ce o f r i sk i n a l mo s t e v er y

    a s pe c t o f o u r l i v e s ( W u a n d B l a c kh u rs t 2 0 09 ) . R i s k s o c c u r b e c a us e w e c a n n e v e r k n ow e x ac t ly w h at w i ll h a pp e n i n

    t h e f u t u r e . W e c a n u s e t h e b e s t f o r e c a s t s a n d d o e v e r y p o s s i b l e a n a l y s i s , b u t t h e r e i s a l w a y s u n c e r t a i n t y a b o u t f u t u r e

    e v en t s ( W a t er s 2 0 07 ) . T h i s u n ce r ta i nt y c r ea t es a g a p b e t w e en w h at r e al l y h a pp e ns a n d w h a t a f i rm h a s p l a n ne d f o r

    a n d c o n s e qu e nt l y c a us e s l o ss e s d u e t o t h e s e qu e nc e o f f a il u re s a n d/ o r c a u s a l e v e n t s ( L e w is 2 0 03 ) . H o we v er , a s r i sk

    h a s t h e p o t e n t i a l f o r l o s s , o r g a n i s a t i o n s m u s t a s s e s s t h e p o t e n t i a l f o r s u c h a s e q u e n c e o f f a i l u r e s . A c r u c i a l e l e m e n t o f            t h e r i sk m a na g em e nt p r oc e ss i s t h e i d en t if i ca t io n a n d a s se s sm e nt o f r i sk . T h is p r oc e ss i n vo l ve s u n de r st a nd i ng t h e

    c on di ti on s t ha t g iv e r is e t o p ot en ti al p ro bl em s, a nd t he n a ss es si ng t he l ik el ih oo d a nd n eg at iv e i mp ac t o f s uc h

    p r ob l em s ( T ap i er o 2 0 07 ) . T h e r e su l t o f t h is p r oc e ss w i ll b e i n fo r ma t io n r e ga r di n g s i tu a ti o na l r i sk s u p on w h ic h

    s t ra t eg i c d e ci s io n s c a n b e m a de .

    O rg an is at io ns h av e b ee n s te a di ly b ro ad en in g t he ir a pp ro ac h t o r is k m an ag em en t s in ce t he m id t we nt ie th

    c e n t u r y – i n i t i a l l y f o c u s i n g o n i n s u r a n c e m a n a g e m e n t , t h e n e x p a n d i n g t o f i n a n c i a l , s a f e t y a n d p u b l i c r e l a t i o n s i s s u e s ,

    a nd f in al ly , c om pa ny wi de a nd s up pl y c ha in i ss ue s ( No rr ma n a nd L in dr ot h 2 00 4) . T hi s i s d ue t o t he f re qu en t

    d i sr u pt i on s a s u pp l y c h ai n e n co u nt e rs o n a r e gu l ar b a si s . S v en s so n ( 2 00 0 ) d e fi n ed s u pp l y c h ai n d i sr u pt i on s a s

    u n pl a nn e d e v en t s t h a t m a y o c c u r i n t h e s u p p ly c h ai n , w h ic h m i gh t a f fe c t t h e n o r m al o r e x pe c te d f l ow o f m a te r ia l s

    a n d c o m p o n e n ts . D i s ru p t i on s n o t o n l y h a l t s u p p l y c h a i n o p e r at i o ns , w i t h ou t p r e p ar a t i on a n d p r e c a u t i o ns i t t a k e s

    t im e f or t he a ff ec te d s ys te m t o r ec ov er ( He nd ri ck s a nd S in gh al 2 00 5, S he ff i a nd R ic e 2 00 5) . A ll t hi s h as m ad e

    m a na g in g s u pp l y c h ai n r i sk s a c h al l en g e t h at i t w a s n e v e r b e fo r e. W he r ea s i n t h e p a st , s u pp l y c h a i n m a na g er s w e re

    m a in l y c o nc e rn e d w i th r e du c in g c o st , r e du c in g p u rc h as e p r ic e v a ri a nc e a n d m a na g in g i n ve n to r y, t o da y s u pp l y

    c o n t in u i t y i s t h e s i n g l e b i g g e st b u s in e s s d r i v e r .

    T h e m a j o r h i n d r a n c e i n a n a l y s i n g r i s k s c o m e s f r o m t h e f a c t t h a t t h e r e i s a l o t o f s u b j e c t i v i t y i n v o l v e d . I n p u t f r o m

    e x pe r ts o n t h e s u bj e ct m a in l y c o me s i n t h e f o rm o f s u bj e c ti v e a s se s sm e nt s . T hi s n e ce s si t at e s t h e u s e o f t h eo r ie s s u ch

    a s f u zz y o r g r ey a n al y si s w h ic h a r e c a pa b le o f d e al i ng w i th s u bj e ct i vi t y. T w o v e ry p o pu l ar t e ch n iq u es p r ev i ou s ly

    *Corresponding author. E mail: [email protected]

      20 1 T a yl o r & F r an c is

    http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2012.741330

    I n t e r n a ti o n a l J o u r n a l o f P r o d u c ti o n R e s e a r c h,   2013

    Vol. 51, No. 8, 2433–2442,

    3

  • 8/17/2019 Quantifying Risks in a Supply Chain Through Integration of Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS

    3/11

    u s e d i n s i m i la r s i t u a t i o ns a r e f u z z y a n a l yt i c a l h i e r a r ch y p r o c e s s ( A H P ) a n d f u z z y t e c h n i qu e f o r o r d e r p r e f e re n c e b y

    s i m i l a r i t y t o t h e i d e a l s o l u t i o n ( T O P S I S ) . T h e y h a v e t h e b e n e f i t o f c o m b i n i n g a p p r o a c h e s l i k e f u z z y t h e o r y , w h i c h b y

    i t s v e r y n a t u r e i s b u i l t t o h a n d l e s u b j e c t i v e a s s e s s m e n t s , w i t h a n a l y t i c a l t o o l s s u c h a s A H P , w h i c h i s a p r o v e n t o o l f o r

    h a nd l in g m u lt i c r it e ri a d e ci s io n m a ki n g ( M CD M) p r ob l em s ( K ar s ak a n d T o lg a 2 0 01 , Z a ye d   et al . 2 00 8) . T he

    r e su l ti n g t o o l g i ve s u s t h e p o w e r t o m a ke e f fe c ti v e d e c i si o ns a n d a t t h e s a m e t i me b e i m pr e ci s e w h i l e g i vi n g i n p u ts .

    T h at i s w h y t e ch n iq u es s u ch a s f u zz y A H P a r e b e c om i ng i n cr e as i ng l y p o pu l ar t o da y .

    T h e r e m a i n d e r o f t h e p a p e r i s o r g a n i s e d a s f o l l o w s . S e c t i o n 2 r e v i e w s t h e r e l a t e d l i t e r a t u r e o n s u p p l y c h a i n r i s k s ,f u zz y A H P a n d f u zz y T O PS I S. S e c ti o n 3 g i ve s , i n d e ta i l, d i ff e re n t k i n d s o f r i sk i n a s u pp l y c h a i n a n d a f r am e wo r k

    f o r a s se s sm e nt . A b r ie f d e sc r ip t io n a n d e x am p le s a r e i n cl u de d . S e c ti o n 4 d e sc r ib e s t h e p r op o se d m e th o do l og y a n d

    d e ta i ls t h e s t ep s i n vo l ve d i n t h e t e ch n iq u es u s ed . S e ct i on 5 i l lu s tr a te s t h e p r op o se d m e th o do l og y t h ro u gh a c a se

    s t ud y . S e ct i on 6 c o nc l ud e s t h e p a pe r w i th t h ou g ht s o n f u tu r e r e se a rc h s c op e s.

    2. Literature review

    I n t o da y ’s s c en a ri o , s u pp l y c h ai n p a rt i ci p an t s a r e b e co m in g i n cr e as i ng l y m o re c o up l ed , i n t h e s e ns e t h at d e ci s io n s

    t a ke n b y o n e f i r m i n a s u pp l y c h a i n d i r e c tl y a f fe c t t h e p e rf o rm a nc e o f o t he r f i rm s . T h i s l e ad s t o t h e d i s r up t io n s

    c au se d a t o ne l e ve l t o b e t ra ns mi tt ed q ui ck ly t o o th er l ev el s a nd t hu s r es ul ts i n h ug e i mp ac ts . T hi s h as l ed t o a

    g ro wi ng i nt er es t i n t he a re a o f s up pl y c ha in r is k a nd i ts m an ag em en t, a s e vi de nc ed i n t he n um be r o f i nd us tr y

    s u rv e ys , p r ac t it i on e r c o nf e re n ce s a n d c o ns u lt a nc y r e po r ts d e vo t ed t o t h e t o pi c , f o r e x am p le , M c Ki n se y ( 2 00 8 ).F u r t h e r , t h e e m p h a s i s t o d a y i s i n m a k i n g t h e c h a i n m o r e e f f i c i e n t , w h i c h m a k e s i t m o r e v u l n e r a b l e a n d l e s s r o b u s t i n

    d e al i ng w i th d i sr u pt i on s w h en t h ey o c cu r . M o re o ve r , t h er e i s s t ro n g e v id e nc e t h at s u ch c a ta s tr o ph i c e v e nt s a r e

    b e c o mi n g m o r e f r e qu e n t ( C o l em a n 2 0 0 6 ). E l k in s et al . ( 2 00 5 ) o b s e rv e d t h a t t h e r e h a s b e en a n i n cr e as e b o th i n t h e

    p o te n ti a l f o r d i s r up t io n s a n d i n t h ei r m a gn i tu d e. S u pp l y c h ai n e x e cu t iv e s a t I BM b e li e ve t h at s u pp l y c h ai n r i sk

    m a na g em e nt ( S CR M ) i s t h e s e c o nd m o st i m po r ta n t i s s u e f o r t h em ( I BM 2 0 08 ) . T h e r e se a rc h b y A M R i n 2 0 07 a l so

    r e p o r t e d t h a t 4 6 % o f e x e c u t i v e s b e l i e v e t h a t b e t t e r S C R M i s n e e d e d ( H i l l m a n a n d K e l t z 2 0 0 7 ) . L a v a s t r e  et al . ( 2 0 1 2 )

    p o i n t o u t t h a t S C R M i s v e r y i m p o r t a n t g i v e n t h e n e w e c o n o m i c a n d i n d u s t r i a l e n v i r o n m e n t i n w h i c h f i r m s c u r r e n t l y

    w o rk . H o we v er , f e w c o mp a ni e s h a ve t a ke n c o mm e ns u ra t e a c ti o ns ( M cK i ns e y 2 0 08 ) . M or e ov e r, t h e r e se a rc h

    i n f o rm a t i on a v a i l ab l e o n t h i s t o p i c i s m a i n ly q u a l it a t i ve i n n a t u r e ( T h u n et al . 2 0 1 1 , S i m a n g u n so n g et al . 2 0 1 2 ) a n d

    o n ly r e ce n tl y h a s a q u an t it a ti v e a p pr o ac h b e en a d op t ed ( H il l ma n a n d K e lt z 2 0 07 , W a ko l bi n ge r a n d C r uz 2 0 11 ,

    Diabat et al . 2 0 1 2 ) . W e t r y t o f i l l t h i s r e s e a r c h g a p b y p r o v i d i n g a r i s k i n d e x w h i c h w i l l b e v e r y h e l p f u l i n q u a n t i f y i n g

    s u pp l y c h ai n r i sk s . T h e m e t h od o lo g y a d o p te d u s es a n a p pr o ac h w h ic h i s a n i n te g ra t io n o f f u zz y A H P a n d f u zz yT OPSIS.

    A HP a nd T OP SI S a re b ot h m ul ti -c ri te ri a d ec is io n- ma ki ng m et ho ds . T he y a re u se d f or s el ec ti ng t he b es t

    a l te r na t iv e f r om a g i ve n s e t, u s in g t h ei r p e rf o rm a nc e u n de r d i ff e re n t c r it e ri a a n d s u b- c ri t er i a, w h ic h c o ul d b e

    e it he r q ua nt it at iv e o r q ua li ta ti ve i n n at ur e. A HP h as b ee n u se d i n a h os t o f d if fe re nt s it ua ti on s r es ul ti ng i n

    v e ry r i ch a n d e x te n si v e l i te r at u re ( T ab u ca n on   et al . 1 99 4, G au de nz i a nd B or gh es i 2 00 6, Z ay ed   et al . 2 00 8) ,

    h o we v e r t h e p r ob l em o f d e al i ng w i th s u bj e c ti v e a s se s sm e nt s r e ma i ns l a rg e ly u n so l ve d ( Wa n g   et al . 2 00 8) . T hi s

    h as l ed t o t he i nc lu si on o f t he or ie s, s uc h a s f uz zy a nd g re y, w hi ch a re c ap ab le o f d ea li ng w it h s ub je ct iv e

    a ss es sm en ts ( Dw ei ri a nd K ab la n 2 00 6, G u a nd Z hu 2 00 6) . F uz zy A HP h as p ro ve n t o b e a v er y u se fu l t oo l

    a nd q ui c kl y g ai ne d a cc ep ta nc e a mo ng a v as t a rr ay o f r es ea rc he rs ( Ch an a nd K um ar 2 00 7, H ua ng   et al . 2 00 8,

    Celik   et al . 2 00 9, S am ve di   et al . 2 01 2). Th e m os t c om mo n m eth od u se d i n th e s ol ut ion of fu zz y AH P

    a pp li ca ti on s i s t he e xt en t a na ly si s m et ho d p ro po se d b y C ha ng ( 19 92 ) ( Wa ng   et al . 2 01 2) .

    T O PS I S i s a w i de l y a c ce p te d m u lt i -a t tr i bu t e d e c is i on - ma k in g t e ch n iq u e d u e t o i t s s o un d l o gi c , s i mu l ta n eo u s

    c o ns i de r at i on o f t h e i d ea l a n d t h e a n ti - id e al s o lu t io n s, a n d e a si l y p r og r am m ab l e c o mp u ta t io n p r oc e du r e ( K imet al . 1 99 7) . A gr aw al   et al . ( 19 91 ) u se d T OP SI S f or r ob ot s el ec ti on , a nd A gr aw al   et al . ( 19 92 ) e mp lo ye d

    T OP SI S f or t he e va lu at io n a nd s el ec ti on o f o pt im um g ri pp er s. L ik e A HP , T OP SI S a ls o f ac ed t he s am e

    c on st ra in ts o f n ot b ei ng a bl e t o h an dl e t he v ag ue a ss es sm en ts g iv en b y e xp er ts a nd t hu s l ed t o i ts m er gi ng w it h

    f uz zy t he or y. C he n a nd H wa ng ( 19 92 ) f ir st a pp li ed f uz zy n um be rs t o e st ab li sh f uz zy T OP SI S ( Ku tl u a nd

    E k me k ci o gl u 2 0 12 ) . C h en ( 2 00 0 ) e x te n de d t h e T O PS I S m e th o d t o f u zz y g r ou p d e ci s io n -m a ki n g s i tu a ti o ns b y

    c o ns i de r in g t r ia n gu l ar f u zz y n u mb e rs a n d d e fi n in g a c r is p E u cl i de a n d i st a nc e b e tw e en t w o f u zz y n u mb e rs . F u zz y

    T O PS I S h a s b e en i n tr o du c ed f o r v a ri o us m u lt i -a t tr i bu t e d e ci s io n -m a ki n g p r ob l em s ( C he n a   et al . 2 00 6, Y on g

    2 0 06 , K a ya a n d K a hr a ma n 2 0 11 ) .

    2   A. Samvedi   e t a l .2434

  • 8/17/2019 Quantifying Risks in a Supply Chain Through Integration of Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS

    4/11

    3. Supply chain risks

    S up pl y c ha in r is ks c an b e c at eg or is ed i n m an y d if fe re nt w ay s a nd f ro m d if fe re nt p er sp ec ti ve s, s uc h a s f ro m a

    c o rp o ra t e g o ve r na n ce o r f i na n ci a l r i sk a g en d a, o r e v en i n t e rm s o f a m u lt i -l e ve l c o mp l ex s y st e m ( C hr i st o ph e r a n d

    P e ck 2 0 04 ) . O n e s i mp l e c l as s if i ca t io n c a n b e e x te r na l ( e ma n at i ng f r om f a ct o rs e x te r na l t o t h e c h ai n ) a n d i n te r na l

    r i sk s . E x am p le s i n s u ch c l as si f ic a ti o n c a n b e n a tu r al d i sa s te r s ( e xt e rn a l) a n d s u pp l ie r q u al i ty p r ob l em s ( i nt e rn a l) .

    W h en c l as s if i ed i n s u ch a w a y, t h in g s a r e s i mp l if i ed a n d c a n b e u n de r st o od b e tt e r, b u t i n r e al p r ac t ic e t h is f a il s t o

    a s si g n r e sp o ns i bi l it y t o i n di v id u al f i rm s f o r h a nd l in g r i sk s . A n ot h er c l as si f ic a ti o n c a n b e o f s t ra t eg i c, t a ct i ca l o ro p er a ti o na l r i sk s , b u t t h e m o st c o mp r eh e ns i ve a n d w i de l y u s ed c l as s if i ca t io n i s t h e o n e g i ve n b y C h ri s to p he r a n d

    P e ck ( 2 00 4 ). T h ey c l as s if i ed r i sk s i n t h re e c a te g or i es a n d t h e n f u rt h er d i vi d ed t h em i n to f i ve . I n t h is s t ud y , w e t r ea t

    i n t e r n a l r i s k s a s o n e , n a m e l y p r o c e s s r i s k . W e b e l i e v e t h a t i t m a k e s s i t u a t i o n s s i m p l e r t o u n d e r s t a n d a n d a l s o c o n t r o l

    r i s k s a r e a n y w a y p a r t o f t h e p r o c e s s d e c i s i o n s a n d t h u s t h e y c a n b e i n t e g r a t e d . T h e d e t a i l e d c a t e g o r i s a t i o n o f r i s k s i s

    g i ve n i n F i gu r e 1 .

    T h e c a t e g o r i es a r e b r i e fl y d e s c ri b e d b e l o w :

    ( 1 ) E nv i ro n me n ta l r i sk s : T h e se a r e t h e r i sk s e x te r na l t o t h e f i r m a n d c a n i m p a ct o n e e c h e l on i n di v id u al l y o r c a n

    i m p a c t t h e s u p p l y c h a i n a s a w h o l e . E x a m p l e s a r e n a t u r a l d i s a s t e r s , e c o n o m i c d o w n t u r n s , t e r r o r i s m , p o l i t i c a l

    i n s ta b i l i ty a n d c u l t u r a l g r i e v a nc e s . S u c h d i s a st e r s c a n h a v e a v a r y in g i m p a c t o n t h e s u p p ly c h a i n d e p e n d in g

    o n w h e r e t h e y s t r i k e . I f a m a j o r p l a y e r i n t h e c h a i n s u f f e r s t h e n w h o l e c h a i n w i l l b e s e v e r e l y i m p a c t e d . T h e r e

    a r e a l s o r i s k s w h i c h a f f e c t a l l t h e p l a y e r s , s u c h a s g l o b a l d o w n t u r n . T h e e a r t h q u a k e a n d r e s u l t i n g t s u n a m i i n

    J a pa n i n 2 0 11 i s a r e al - li f e e x am p le o f a n e n vi r on m en t al r i sk .( 2 ) P r oc e ss r i sk s : T h e se a r e t h e r i sk s w h ic h a r e i n t e rn a l t o t h e f i r m, a n d e m a n at e f r om t h e d i s tu r ba n ce s i n t h e

    f l o w o f t h e p r o d u c t t h r o u g h t h e d i f f e r e n t p r o c e s s e s w i t h i n a f i r m . T h e s e r i s k s i n c l u d e m a c h i n e f a i l u r e s , m a j o r

    F i gu r e 1 . C l as s if i ca t io n o f s u pp l y c h ai n r i sk s .

    International Journal of Production Research   32435

  • 8/17/2019 Quantifying Risks in a Supply Chain Through Integration of Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS

    5/11

    t e ch n ol o gi c al c h an g es , l a bo u r s t ri k es a n d q u al i ty p r ob l em s . A n e x am p le i s t h e r e ce n t l a bo u r s t ri k es i n t h e

    M ar u ti S u zu k i p l a n t i n I n di a , h a l t in g t h e p r o d uc t io n o f c a rs f o r a l m o st a m o nt h .

    ( 3 ) D e ma n d r i s ks : T h i s i s o n e o f t h e r i s ks i n te r na l t o t h e c h a in b u t i s e x te r na l t o t h e f i r m i n f o c u s, s u ch a s s u p p ly

    r i sk . D e ma n d r i sk r e la t es t o t h e d i sr u pt i on s a r is i ng f r om t h e f l uc t ua t io n s i n d e ma n d o f t h e p r od u ct , l e ad i ng

    t o a g a p b e t w ee n d e ma n d a n d s u pp l y, t h us a f fe c ti n g t h e f i rm . T h er e c a n b e v a ri o us r e as o ns f o r t h e se r i sk s .

    A n y c h a n ge i n t h e m a r k et c a n a l so t r ig g er t h es e r i sk s . F o r e x am p le , a r u mo u r o f a n y e s s e nt i al c o mm o di t y

    b ei ng e xh au st ed w il l c re at e p an ic a nd s en d t he d em an d f or t ha t p ro du ct s oa ri ng . A no th er f ac to r i s

    f o re c a st i ng e r ro r s, w h ic h c a n n e ve r b e t o ta l ly r e mo v ed b u t c a n b e m a na g ed w i th i n l i m i ts .

    ( 4) S up pl y r is ks : S up pl y r is ks r ef er t o t he r is ks e ma na ti ng f ro m t he p ro bl em s i n a s mo ot h f lo w f ro m t he

    d o wn s tr e am s i de . W i th t h e c o nt i nu o us p u sh b e in g g i ve n t o t h e o u ts o ur c in g o f t h e n o n- c or e a c ti v it i es o f a

    f i r m , s u p p l y r i s k s h a v e g a i n e d h u g e i m p o r t a n c e . A n o t h e r f a c t o r a d d i n g t o s u p p l y r i s k s i s t h e g l o b a l i s a t i o n o f            

    t h e s u pp l y c h a i n. D u e t o g l ob a li s at i on , a h o st o f f a il u re m o de s h a ve b e co m e a t ta c he d t o t h e u p s t re a m f l ow .

    A n e x am p le o f s u pp l y r i s k s i s t h e c l as s ic e x am p le o f N o ki a a n d E r i c ss o n ( N o r rm a n a n d J a ns s on 2 0 04 ) .

    4. Methodology

    T h is s e ct i on p r op o se s a m e th o do l og y f o r q u a n ti f yi n g t h e r i sk s i n a c h ai n a n d f o r d e te r mi n in g t h e r i sk i n de x . T h e

    m et ho do lo gy c on si st s o f f ou r s te ps a s g iv en i n F ig ur e 2 . T he f ir st s te p r eq ui re s t he f ir m t o c om e u p w it h a

    c om pr eh en si ve h ie ra rc hy o f a ll t he r is ks w hi ch m ay a ff ec t t he f ir m. T hi s i s d on e b y t ho ro ug hl y s tu dy in g t he

    c o ns i de r ed c h ai n a n d i d en t if y in g p o te n ti a l l o op h ol e s. T h es e a r e t h en a n al y se d f o r o v er l ap s a n d c a te g or i se d u s in gs i mi l ar c h ar a ct e ri s ti c s. T h is e x er c is e s h ou l d b e r e pe a te d w h en e ve r a m a jo r c h an g e i s m a de i n t h e c h ai n . T h e s e co n d

    s t ep i n t h e p r oc e ss i n vo l ve s a s si g ni n g w e i g h ts t o t h e c r i t e ri a a c co r di n g t o t h ei r i m po r ta n ce . F uz z y A H P i s u s ed f o r

    t h i s p u r p o s e a n d e x p e r t v i e w s a r e t a k e n a s i n p u t . T h e t h i r d s t e p i n v o l v e s d e t e r m i n i n g t h e s c o r e s o f d i f f e r e n t r i s k s b y

    a n al y si n g t h em u n de r f o ur d i ff e re n t c r it e ri a ; n a me l y t h ei r p r ob a bi l it y o f o c cu r re n c e, t h ei r i m pa c t o n s u pp l y c h ai n

    p e r f o r m a n c e , t h e e f f o r t a n d t i m e r e q u i r e d i n r e c o v e r i n g f r o m t h e i m p a c t a n d t h e l e v e l a t w h i c h t h e r i s k h a s a n a f f e c t .

    T h is i s b e ca u se , a s c a n b e s e en f r om t h e l i t e ra t ur e , a r i sk a f fe c ti n g t h e s t ra t eg i c l e v e l i s m u ch m o re d a ng e ro u s t h a n

    o n e a f f e c ti n g t h e o p e r at i o n al l e v e l .

    4.1   Fuzzy AHP 

    T h e f u z z y A H P m e t h o d o l o g y e x t e n d s S a a t y ’ s A H P b y c o m b i n i n g i t w i t h f u z z y s e t t h e o r y . I n f u z z y A H P , f u z z y r a t i o

    s ca le s a re u se d t o i nd ic at e t he r el at iv e s tr en gt h o f t he f ac to rs i n t he c or re sp on di ng c ri te ri a. T he re fo re , a f uz z y      judgment matrix can be constructed. T he final scores of alternatives are also represented by fuzzy numbers. T he

    o pt im um a lt er na ti ve i s o bt ai ne d b y r an ki ng t he f uz zy n um be rs u si ng s pe ci al a lg eb ra ic o pe ra to rs . I n t hi s

    m e t h od o l o gy , a l l e l e m e nt s i n t h e j u d g m e n t m a t r i x a n d w e i g h t v e c t o r s a r e r e p r e s e n te d b y t r i a n g u l ar f u z z y n u m b e r s.

    U s in g f u zz y n u mb e rs t o i n di c at e t h e r e l a ti v e i m p o rt a nc e o f o n e r i s k t y pe o v er t h e o t h e r, a f u zz y j u dg m en t v e ct o r i s

    t h e n o b t a i n e d f o r e a c h r i s k . T h e s e j u d g m e n t v e c t o r s f o r m p a r t o f t h e f u z z y p a i r w i s e c o m p a r i s o n m a t r i x w h i c h i s t h e n

    u se d t o d et er mi ne t he w e ig ht o f e a ch r is k. T ab le 1 s ho ws t he m ea ni ng o f l in gu is ti c e xp re ss io ns i n t he f or m o f            

    1• Finalise the SCRM hierarchy.

    2

    • Use expert advice for pairwise comparisons.

    • Find the weights using fuzzy AHP.

    3

    • Use expert advice to tabulate risk properties.

    • Combine using fuzzy TOPSIS to get scores.

    4

    • Consolidate scores and weights to get riskindex.

    F i gu r e 2 . F l ow o f t h e p r op o se d m e th o do l og y .

    T a bl e 1 . T r ia n gu l ar f u zz y n u mb e r e q ui v al e nt s t o t h e c o rr e -s p o nd i n g l i n g ui s t i c e x p r es s i o ns .

    L inguisticexpressions

    E quivalentf u z z y n u m be r s

    T r i a ng u l a r f u z z yn um be r ( l, m , u )

    Equal 1 (1, 1, 3)Little importance 3 (1, 3, 5)Strong importance 5 (3, 5, 7)Very strong importance 7 (5, 7, 9)Extreme importance 9 (7, 9, 9)

    4   A. Samvedi   e t a l .2436

  • 8/17/2019 Quantifying Risks in a Supply Chain Through Integration of Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS

    6/11

    f u z z y n u m b e r s . E x p e r t s a r e a s k e d t o g i v e t h e i r a s s e s s m e n t i n t h e f o r m o f t h e s e l i n g u i s t i c e x p r e s s i o n s w h i c h a r e t h e n

    c o nv e rt e d a n d a n al y se d t o f i na l ly g e t t h e w e ig h ts . C h an g ’s e x te n t a n al y si s m e th o d h a s b e e n u s ed f o r d e t e rm i ni n g

    w e i g h ts f r o m p a i r wi s e c o m p ar i s o ns .

    4.2  Fuzzy TOPSIS 

    T O PS I S i s a m u lt i pl e -c r it e ri a m e th o d t o i d en t if y s o lu t io n s f r om a f i ni t e s e t o f a l te r na t iv e s a s i n it i al l y p r op o se d b y

    C he n a nd H wa ng ( 19 92 ). T he u nd er ly in g l og ic o f T OP SI S i s t o d ef in e t he i de al s ol ut io n a nd t he n eg at iv e i de al

    s o l u t i o n . T h e a l t e r n a t i v e s a r e t h e n c o m p a r e d w i t h t h e s e i d e a l a n d n e g a t i v e i d e a l s o l u t i o n s , t o f i n d o u t t h e d i s t a n c e s .

    T he se d is ta nc es a re t he n u se d t o c om e u p w it h a s co re . T he o ne w hi ch i s c lo se st t o t he i de al a nd f ar th es t f ro m t he

    n e ga t iv e i d ea l g e ne r al l y q u al i fi e s f o r t h e o p ti m um . I n f u zz y T O PS I S, t h e n u mb e rs a r e c h an g ed t o f u zz y v a lu e s a n d

    t h e p r o c e s s n o w i n c l u d e s f u z z y m a t h e m a t i c a l t e c h n i q u e s . M o r e d e t a i l s a b o u t t h e f u z z y T O P S I S m e t h o d o l o g y c a n b e

    f o un d i n K a rs a k ( 2 00 2 ). D e ta i ls o f t h e m e th o do l og y a r e g i ve n b e lo w

    ( 1 ) I n t h is a p pr o ac h , w e f i rs t n o rm a li s e t h e g i ve n d a ta c o lu m n w i s e . T h i s i s d o ne u s in g t h e f o l l ow i ng f o rm u la

    rij  ¼   raij , rbij , rcij 

     ¼cþ j     cij 

    cþ j     a

     j 

    ,cþ j     bij 

    cþ j     a

     j 

    ,cþ j     aij 

    cþ j     a

     j 

    !

    where  cþ j    ¼   maxi  cij    and  a j    ¼   mini  aij .( 2 ) D e fi n e t h e i d ea l a n d a n ti - id e al s o lu t io n a s rþ j    ¼ ð1 , 1 , 1Þ   and  r

     j    ¼ ð0 , 0 , 0Þ   r e s p e c ti v e l y f o r j ¼ 1, . . . , n.

    ( 3 ) C a lc u la t e t h e d i st a nc e s o f a l l r i sk t y pe s f r om t h e i d e a l ( a nt i -i d ea l ) v a l u e s. T h e d i s t an c es b e tw e en t w o f u z z y

    n u mb e rs i s f o un d b y u s in g t h e f o r m ul a g i ve n b e lo w

    DðA1 , A2 Þ ¼  1

    2  max   a1  a2j j,   c1  c2j jð Þ þ   b1  b2j j

    T he d is ta nc e o f a r is k t yp e f ro m t he i de al ( an ti -i de al ) v al ue s c an b e f ou nd b y s um mi ng u p t he d is ta nc e s o f            

    r e s p ec t i v e p a r a m e t er v a l u e s f r o m t h e i d e a l ( a n t i - id e a l ) v a l u e s . E q u a l w e i g h ti n g h a s b e e n a s s um e d f o r a l l p a r a me t e r s

    i n t h is s tu d y.

    ( 4) C al cu la te t he s co re f or t he r is k t yp es b y c al cu la ti ng t he ir p ro xi mi ty t o t he i de al v al ue , u si ng t he f or mu la

    g i v e n b e l o w

    Score ¼  D i s t an c e f r o m t h e a n t i    i d e a l v a l u e

    D i s t a n c e f r o m t h e a n t i    i d e a l v a l u e þ   D i s t a n c e f r o m t h e i d e a l v a l u e

    T h e s c o r es o b ta i ne d a r e t h en c o ns o li d at e d w i th t h e w e ig h ts a s si g ne d b y t h e f u z z y A H P m e t h od a n d t h u s t h e f i n a l

    r i sk i n de x v a lu e i s r e ac h ed . T h e n e x t s e ct i on e x pl a in s t h e m e t h od o lo g y w i t h a c a se s t ud y a s a n u me r ic a l e x a m pl e .

    5. Numerical illustration

    A d e t a i l e d s u r v e y o f t h e I n d i a n t e x t i l e a n d s t e e l i n d u s t r y w a s c o n d u c t e d t o u n d e r s t a n d t h e s t a t u s o f s u p p l y c h a i n r i s k

    m a na g em e nt . T he s u rv e y c o ns i st e d o f p e rs o na l i n te r vi e ws w i th t h e s u pp l y c h ai n e x e cu t iv e s i n t h es e f i rm s a n d a n

    o n li n e s u rv e y q u es t io n na i re w a s a l so u s ed . F o r t h e s u rv e y, 1 5 7 c o mp a ni e s w e re c o nt a ct e d. T h e f i na l d a ta b as e

    c on si st s o f d at a f ro m 6 2 r es po nd en ts i n c ha rg e o f s up pl y c ha in m an ag em en t o r l og is ti cs a nd w ho a re t he re fo rea s su m ed t o b e t h e m o st s u it a bl e f o r p r ov i di n g t h e d e si r ed i n fo r ma t io n o n s u pp l y c h ai n r i sk m a na g em e nt . P e rs o na l

    i n te r vi e ws w e re c o nd u ct e d w i th 1 8 o f t h es e r e sp o nd e nt s . B a se d o n a n e x ha u st i ve l i te r at u re r e vi e w a n d r i go r ou s

    i nt er ac ti on s w it h e xp er ts f ro m t he c on ce rn ed i nd us tr ie s, t hi s s ur ve y h as b ee n u se d t o g en er at e t he d at a f or t he

    n u m e ri c a l i l l u st r a t io n o f t h e m e t h od o l o gy .

    T he r e a r e t w o m a jo r s t ep s i n t h e p r o c e ss , n a me l y a s si g ni n g w e ig h ts t o a l l t h e c r i t er i a a n d d e te r mi n in g t h e s c o r es

    o f a l l t h e r i s k s a t t h e l o w e s t l e v e l i n t h e h i e r a r c h y . T h e s e t w o v a l u e s a r e t h e n c o n s o l i d a t e d i n t o o n e s i n g l e - r i s k i n d e x

    v al ue . T he i np ut s c om e i n t he f or m o f l in gu is ti c v al ue s. E ac h i np ut p ar am et er i s d iv id ed i nt o f iv e l in gu is ti c

    e x pr e ss i on s w i th m e mb e rs h ip v a lu e s, a s s h ow n i n F i gu r e 3 .

    International Journal of Production Research   52437

  • 8/17/2019 Quantifying Risks in a Supply Chain Through Integration of Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS

    7/11

    T he f i rs t s t ep u s es f u zz y p a ir w is e c o mp a ri s on s b e tw e en t h e c r i t e ri a t o a s si g n t h e w e ig h ts . T h is i s s i mi l ar t o t h e

    p ai rw is e c om pa ri so n p ar t i n t he f uz zy A HP p ro ce ss . P ar t o f i t i s s ho wn i n T ab le 2 , w he re t he r is ks u nd er t he

    e n v i ro n m e nt a l c a t e g o r y a r e a s s i gn e d w e i g h t s . T h e p a i r wi s e c o m p ar i s on m a t ri x i s c o m p il e d u s i n g e x p e r t a d v i c e a n d

    t h e n s o l v e d u s i n g f u z z y s y n t h e t i c e x t e n t a n a l y s i s . A s a s i n g l e e x p e r t c a n s o m e t i m e s g i v e e r r o n e o u s d a t a , t h r e e e x p e r t s

    a r e a s k e d t o g i ve t h ei r a d vi c e a n d t h en t h e f u z z y v a l u es a r e a v e r ag e d u s i n g f u z z y m a t h em a ti c s. T he w e ig h ts o f a l l

    o t h e r r i s k t y p e s , a t e a c h l e v e l o f t h e h i e r a r c h y , a r e d e t e r m i n e d i n t h e s a m e w a y . T a b l e 3 g i v e s t h e w e i g h t s f o r a l l t h e

    o t he r r i sk t y pe s g i ve n i n t h e h i er a rc h y. T h es e w e ig h ts h a ve b e en g e ne r at e d r a nd o ml y f o r i l lu s tr a ti o n p u rp o se s .

    T he s e co n d s t e p o f t h e p r o c e ss , w h ic h i n vo l ve s a s si g ni n g s c or e s t o t h e l o w e r -l e ve l r i sk s i n t h e h i er a rc h y, u s es a

    f uz z y T OP SI S p ro ce ss . E ac h r is k i s m ea su re d a ga in st f ou r p ar am et er s, n am el y t yp e o f r is k, p ro ba bi li ty o f            o cc ur re nc e , i mp ac t o f t he r is k o n t he s up pl y c ha in i f i t o cc ur re d a nd h ow e as il y t he m it ig at io n w ou ld b e f or t he

    i mp ac t o f t ha t r is k. T he i np ut s f or t he v al ue s o f t he se p ar am et er s a re t ak en f ro m e xp er ts a ga in i n t he f or m o f            

    l i ng u is t ic e x pr e ss i on s w h ic h h a ve e a rl i er b e en d e fi n ed a s f u zz y i n te r va l s, a s s h ow n i n F i gu r e 3 . A d vi c e f r om t h re e

    e x pe r ts i s t a ke n a n d a v er a ge d , a s d o ne i n t h e p r ev i ou s s t ep . T h e l i n g ui s ti c e x pr e ss i on s a r e r a nd o ml y g e ne r at e d a n d

    a r e s h o w n i n T a bl e 4 . T h e p a r a me t er t y pe o f r i sk h a s b e e n d i vi d ed i n to f i ve l i ng u is t ic e x pr e ss i on s , n a m e ly s t ra t eg i c

    ( S ) , m i d - s t r a t e g i c – t a c t i c a l ( S T ) , t a c t i c a l ( T ) , m i d - t a c t i c a l – o p e r a t i o n a l ( T O ) a n d o p e r a t i o n a l ( O ) . T h e p r o b a b i l i t y a n d

    i m p a c t o f o c c u r r e n c e i s d i v i d e d i n t o l o w ( L ) , m e d i u m ( M ) , h i g h ( H ) , v e r y h i g h ( V H ) a n d e x t r e m e ( E ) . M i t i g a t i o n i s

    d i v i d e d i n t o v e r y e a s y ( V E ) , e a s y ( E ) , m e d i u m ( M ) , d i f f i c u l t ( D ) a n d v e r y d i f f i c u l t ( V D ) . T h e m e m b e r s h i p f u n c t i o n s

    a ss ig ne d a re t he s am e a s s ho wn i n F ig ur e 3 .

    T he a ve ra ge v al ue s o f t he f ou r p ar am et er s a re g iv e n i n T ab le 5 . T he l as t c ol um n o f T ab le 5 s ho ws t he s co re ,

    o bt ai ne d f or e ac h r is k u si ng f uz zy T OP SI S. T hi s i s d on e b y a pp ly in g t he p re vi ou sl y d es cr ib ed f uz zy T OP SI S

    m e t h od o l o gy t o t h e t h r e e c o m b i n ed p a r a me t e r s, p r o b ab i l i ty , i m p a ct a n d m i t i g a ti o n . T h i s r e s u l t s i n a v a l u e f o r e a c h

    r i s k w h i c h i s t o b e m u l t i p l i e d b y t h e m i d d l e v a l u e t h a t i s t h e m o s t p r o b a b l e v a l u e o f t h e t y p e o f r i s k p a r a m e t e r . T h er es ul ti ng v al ue i s t he s co re f or t ha t r is k, a s s ho wn i n t he l as t c ol um n o f T ab le 5 .

    T h e s e s c o r e s a r e t h e n c o n s o l i d a t e d u s i n g t h e w e i g h t s a s s i g n e d t o a l l t h e r i s k s . T h i s i s d o n e b y f i r s t n o r m a l i s i n g a l l

    t he s co re v al ue s s o t ha t t he r an ge i s n or ma li se d t o b et we en 0 –1 . T he se s co re s a re t he n m ul ti pl ie d b y t he w ei gh ts

    a s s i g n e d t o t h e r e l a t i v e r i s k s . T h e v a l u e s o b t a i n e d a r e t h e n a d d e d u p f o r t h e f i r s t l e v e l r i s k s . F o r e x a m p l e , t h e v a l u e s

    f o r f i r s t f i v e r i s k s a r e a d d e d t o g i v e a s c o r e f o r t h e e n v i r o n m e n t a l r i s k . T h e s c o r e s o b t a i n e d f o r t h e f i r s t l e v e l r i s k s a r e

    t h e n a g a i n m u l t i p l i e d b y t h e w e i g h t s a s s i g n e d t o t h e s e f i r s t l e v e l r i s k s a n d t h e r e s u l t i n g v a l u e s s u m m e d u p t o g e t t h e

    f i n a l r i s k i n d e x v a l u e , w h i c h i n t h i s c a s e c o m e s o u t t o b e 0 . 6 1 . T h e s i g n i f i c a n c e o f t h i s v a l u e i s j u d g e d b y d e t e r m i n i n g

    t h e m e mb e rs h ip i n d i ff e re n t l i ng u is t ic s e ts o f t h e o u tp u t f u nc t io n , a s s h ow n i n F i gu r e 4 .

    T a bl e 3 . W e ig h ts a s si g ne d t o t h e r e m a in i ng r i sk t y pe s .

    Risks Weights Risks Weig hts Risks Weights Risks Weights

    Demand 0.25 Sudden fluctuations 0 .4 Outsourcing risks 0.27 Machine failure 0.37Supply 0.20 Ma rket changes 0 .3 Supplier insolvency 0.25 L abour strike 0.21

    Process 0.10 Competition chang es 0 .1 Quality 0.15 Quality problems 0.28Environment 0.45 Forecasting errors 0 .2 Sudden hike in costs 0.33 T echnological change 0.14

    T a bl e 2 . F u zz y p a ir w is e c o mp a ri s on f o r r i s k t y pe s u n de r e n vi r on -m e n t c a t e g or y .

    T e rr o r E c on o mi c P o li t ic a l C u lt u ra l N a tu r al W e ig h ts

    Terror 1 – – 5, 7, 7 – 0.123Economic 5, 7 , 5 1 3, 5, 1 7, 9, 7 – 0.27 2Political 5, 5 , 7 – 1 3 , 3, 5 – 0.17

    Cultural – – – 1 – 0.027Natural 7, 7, 7 5, 7, 3 7, 9, 3 9, 9, 9 1 0.424

    0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

     µm

      Low Mild High V High Extreme

    F ig ur e 3 . M em be rs hi p f un ct io ns o f t he l in gu is ti cexpressions.

    6   A. Samvedi   e t a l .2438

  • 8/17/2019 Quantifying Risks in a Supply Chain Through Integration of Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS

    8/11

    T a bl e 5 . A v e ra g e d v a l ue s f o r t h e e x p er t i n pu t s a n d t h e f i na l r i sk s c or e .

    Risks Type of risk Probability Impact Mitigation Score

    Terror (0 .47, 0.67, 0.87) (0.07 , 0.27, 0.47) (0.6, 0.8 , 1) (0.47, 0.67 , 0.87) 0.2981Economic (0 .7 3, 0.93, 1) (0.2, 0.4, 0.6) (0 .53, 0.73, 0.93) (0.73, 0.93 , 1) 0.3345Polit ica l (0 .53, 0 .73, 0 .93) (0.13 , 0 .33, 0 .53) (0 .33, 0 .53, 0 .73) (0.53, 0 .73 , 0 .93) 0.3581Cultura l (0 .47, 0.67, 0.87) (0, 0.2, 0.4 ) (0 .13, 0.33, 0.53) (0.27, 0.47 , 0.67) 0.4440Na tural (0 .6 7, 0.87, 1) (0.33 , 0.53, 0.73) (0 .47, 0.67, 0.87) (0.67, 0.87 , 1) 0.3099Outsourcing risks (0 .47, 0 .67, 0 .87) (0.4, 0 .6, 0 .8) (0 .37, 0 .57, 0 .77) (0.47, 0 .67 , 0 .87) 0.2828Supplier insolvency (0 .53, 0 .73, 0 .93) (0.07 , 0 .27, 0 .47) (0 .4 , 0 .6, 0 .8) (0.33, 0 .53 , 0 .73) 0.4104Quality (0 .07, 0.27, 0.47) (0.53 , 0.73, 0.93) (0 .07, 0.27, 0.47) ( 0.2, 0.4, 0.6 ) 0.1499Sudden hike in costs (0.2, 0 .4 , 0 .6) (0.47 , 0 .67, 0 .87) (0 .13, 0 .33, 0 .53) (0.13, 0 .33 , 0 .53) 0.2298

    Sudden f luctuations ( 0, 0 .2, 0 .4) (0.4, 0 .6, 0 .8) (0 .27, 0 .47, 0 .67) (0.07, 0 .27 , 0 .47) 0.1140Market changes (0 .53, 0 .73, 0 .93) (0.27 , 0 .47, 0 .67) (0 .27, 0 .47, 0 .67) (0.33, 0 .53 , 0 .73) 0.3862Competition chang es (0 .7 3, 0 .93, 1 ) (0.13 , 0 .33, 0 .53) (0 .47, 0 .67, 0 .87) (0.33, 0 .53 , 0 .73) 0.4727Forecasting errors (0 .07, 0 .27, 0 .47) ( 0.73, 0 .93 , 1 ) (0 .07, 0 .27, 0 .47) (0.07, 0 .27 , 0 .47) 0.1481Machine failure ( 0, 0.2, 0.4) (0.6, 0.8, 1) (0 .2 , 0.4, 0.6) (0.13, 0.33 , 0.53) 0.1036Labour strike (0 .47, 0 .67, 0 .87) (0.27 , 0 .47, 0 .67) (0 .47, 0 .67, 0 .87) (0.47, 0 .67 , 0 .87) 0.2870Quality problems (0 .07, 0 .27, 0 .47) (0.6, 0 .8, 1 ) (0 .27, 0 .47, 0 .67) (0.27, 0 .47 , 0 .67) 0.1231Technological change (0 .6 7, 0 .87, 1 ) (0.4, 0 .6, 0 .8) (0 .27, 0 .47, 0 .67) (0.33, 0 .53 , 0 .73) 0.4291

    T a bl e 4 . E x pe r t i n p u ts f o r t h e p e rf o rm a nc e o f r i sk s o n d i ff e re n t p a r a me t er s .

    Risks Type of risk Probability Impact Mitigation

    Terror ST,T,T L,L,M E,VH,H M,D,MEconomic S,S,ST M,L,H H,VH,VH VD,VD,DPolit ical ST,ST,T L,M,M H,H,M D,D,MCultura l T,T,ST L,L,L M,M,L E,E,M

    Na tural ST,ST,S M,H,H H,VH,H D,D,VDOutsourcing risks T,ST,T H,M,VH H,M,H M,M,DSupplier insolvency ST,T,ST L,M,L H,H,H M,M,EQuality O,O,TO VH,VH,H L,L,M E,VE,MSudden hike in costs TO,O,T H,H,VH L,M,M E,E,VESudden fluctua tions O,O,O VH,H,M M.M.H VE,E,VEMarket changes ST,T,ST M,H,M H,M,M E,M,MCompetit ion changes S,ST,S M,M,L H,VH,H M,E,MForecasting errors O,O,TO E,VH,E M,L,L VE,VE,EMachine failure O,O,O VH,E,H M,M,M E,E,VELabour st rike T,T,ST H,M,M H,VH,H M,M,DQuality problems O,O,TO E,VH,H H,M,M E,E,MTechnological change ST,ST,T H,H,H M,M,H M,M,E

     µm

    0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

    Low Mild High V High Extreme

    0.9

    0.1

    F i gu r e 4 . D e te r mi n in g t h e m e mb e rs h ip v a lu e o f r i sk s c or e .

    International Journal of Production Research   72439

  • 8/17/2019 Quantifying Risks in a Supply Chain Through Integration of Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS

    9/11

    T h e s u p p l y c h a i n s t u d i e d h a s a v e r y h i g h m e m b e r s h i p v a l u e o f 0 . 9 i n t h e h i g h - r i s k s e t o f t h e o u t p u t f u n c t i o n a n d

    s c o r e s w i t h a l o w o f 0 . 1 f o r v e r y h i g h r i s k . T h i s s h o w s t h a t t h e s i t u a t i o n i n t h e s u p p l y c h a i n i s h i g h l y r i s k y a n d , i f n o t

    g iv en d ue a tt en ti on , c an m ov e t o v er y h ig h r is k s ta tu s q ui ck ly . S uc h n ew s s ho ul d s ou nd a w ar ni ng t o t he

    m a na g em e nt o f t h e f i rm a n d t h ey s h ou l d i m me d ia t el y i n cr e as e t h e t i mi n g f o r t h e r e so u rc e s a v ai l ab l e t o t h e r i sk

    m a na g em e nt t e am s o t h at m i ti g at i on c a n b e d o ne r a pi d ly . T h e r i s k s c or e t a bl e s h ou l d b e t h e s t ar t in g p o in t f o r t h e

    r i sk m a na g em e nt t e am a s i t d e ta i ls t h e w e i g ht s g i ve n t o t h e d i f f er e nt r i sk t y pe s a n d a l s o t h e p r es e nt s t at u s o f t h e

    s up pl y c ha in v ul ne ra bi li ty f ro m a p ar ti cu la r r is k. A ll t he s co re s s ho ul d b e p ut i n d ec re as in g o rd er a nd t he r is km a n a ge m e n t t e a m s h o ul d s t a rt h a n d li n g t h e t o p r i s k s i m m e di a t e ly .

    6. Conclusion

    S u pp l y c h ai n r i sk s a r e i n cr e as i ng e v e ry d ay d u e t o t h e h i gh l y t u rb u le n t e n vi r on m en t s t h at s u pp l y c h ai n s t o da y f a ce ,

    a s w e l l a s d u e t o t h e c o n t i n u i n g e m p h a s i s o n i n c r e a s i n g e f f i c i e n c y . T o a d d t o t h e v u l n e r a b i l i t i e s , s u p p l y c h a i n s t o d a y

    e x t e n d a c r o s s m a n y c o u n t r i e s w i t h s u p p l i e r s i n s o m e o f t h e s e c o u n t r i e s b r i n g i n g i n d i v e r s e k i n d s o f r i s k s t o t h e c h a i n .

    T h is a d ds a l o t o f r i sk s t o t h e o v e r al l s u pp l y c h a i n . T h i s c a l l s f o r e f f e ct i ve p o li c ie s f o r t h e m i ti g at i on o f t h es e r i sk s

    a n d h e n c e i s o f i n c r e a s i n g i m p o r ta n c e t o s u p p ly c h a i n r i s k m a n a g e m e nt . E f f ec t i v e m a n a g e m e nt c a l l s f o r a t h o r ou g h

    q u a n ti t a t iv e a n a l ys i s o f t h e s i t u a t i on , h o w e ve r r i s k i s a n i n t a ng i b l e p a r a m e te r , a n d i s v e r y d i f f ic u l t t o q u a n ti f y . T h i s

    h a s l e ad t o r e se a rc h i n t h is a l l- i mp o rt a nt t o pi c t o b e m a in l y o f t h e t h eo r et i ca l k i nd , a n d h a s i n hi b it e d q u an t it a ti v e

    research.

    I n t h i s s t u d y a c o m p r e h e n s i v e r i s k i n d e x h a s b e e n p r o p o s e d w h i c h i s g e n e r i c i n n a t u r e a n d c a n b e a p p l i e d i n a n y

    i n d u s t r y s i t u a t i o n . T h i s r i s k i n d e x t a k e s e x p e r t a d v i c e a s i t s i n p u t a n d d e l i v e r s a c r i s p n u m b e r b e t w e e n 0 – 1 a s t h e r i s k

    s co re . A p ro gr am i n t he m at la b e nv ir on me nt h as b ee n p re pa re d a nd u se d f or t he n um er ic a l i ll us tr at io n. T he

    p ro po se d m et ho do lo gy c on si st s o f f ou r m aj or s te ps , n am el y t he c on st ru ct io n o f r is k h ie ra rc hy f or t he s ai d

    e n v i r o n m e n t , d e t e r m i n a t i o n o f t h e w e i g h t s o f t h e r i s k t y p e s a t a l l l e v e l s , d e t e r m i n a t i o n o f t h e s c o r e s o f t h e r i s k t y p e s

    a t t h e l o w e s t l e v e l o f t h e h i e r a r c h y a n d c o n s o l i d a t i o n o f t h e w e i g h t s a n d s c o r e s i n t o o n e s i n g l e c r i s p v a l u e , w h i c h i s

    t h e r i s k i n de x . T h e d e te r mi n at i on o f t h e r i s k i n de x s h ou l d b e c a rr i ed o u t a t r e gu l ar i n te r va l s a n d a l so w h en e ve r a

    m a j o r c h a n g e i s m a d e i n t h e s u p p l y c h a i n , s u c h a s t h e a d d i t i o n o f a m a j o r s u p p l i e r . B e i n g n o t i f i e d o f t h e r i s k l e v e l o f            

    t h e c h a i n, a n o r ga n is a ti o n c a n d e ci d e o n w h en r i sk m a na g em e nt n e ed s a t te n ti o n. T hi s w i ll a l lo w t h em t o f r ee u p

    a v ai l ab l e r e so u rc e s f o r t h e r i sk m a na g em e nt t e am a n d t h us c a n l o we r t h e r e du n da n cy b e in g b u il t i n to t h e s y s t em .

    F ut u re a t te m pt s , i n p r op o si n g o r i m pr o vi n g u p on t h e p r op o se d r i sk i n de x , c a n b e t o p r ov i de i n du s tr y -s p ec i fi c

    r i sk i n de x es . T h e p r op o se d r i sk i n de x i s b a se d o n a g e ne r ic c l as s if i ca t io n o f r i sk s , w h i c h w i ll c h an g e w i th i n du s tr i es

    a s f i n e r d e t a i l s e m e r g e b y r e m o v i n g u n n e c e s s a r y r i s k s . A c u s t o m i s e d r i s k i n d e x w i l l b e m o r e u s e f u l a s t h e t r a i t s o f t h ec o n c e r n e d i n d u s t r y a r e b u i l t i n . A n o t h e r d i r e c t i o n o f f u t u r e r e s e a r c h i n t h i s a r e a c a n b e t o d e v e l o p n e w r i s k i n d e x e s

    b y i n c o r p o r a t i n g t h e n e w f r a m e w o r k s i n c o r p o r a t i n g v a r i o u s a r t i f i c i a l i n t e l l i g e n c e m o d e l l i n g t e c h n i q u e s , m u l t i - a g e n t ,

    P e tr i n e t, g r ap h t h eo r y, a n d s o o n , a n d t h en c o mp a ri n g t h e p e r f or m an c e s o f t h es e r i sk i n de x es w i th t h e p r o p os e d

    o n e. T hi s c a n t h e n b e f u rt h er e x te n de d b y d e ve l op i ng a h y br i d r i s k i n d e x w h ic h i n co r po r at e s t h e b e st p a rt s o f t h e

    b e s t p e r f o r m i n g r i s k i n d e x e s . T h e r e s u l t i n g p r o d u c t w i l l t h e n b e t h e o p t i m u m o n e a n d w i l l b e r e a d y f o r d e p l o y m e n t

    i n t h e i n d u s t r y . A f u r t h e r e x t e n s i o n o f t h i s w o r k c a n i n c l u d e c o n s i d e r i n g u s i n g f u z z y A N P f o r w e i g h t d e t e r m i n a t i o n .

    T h i s i s b e c a u s e t h e r i s k t y p e s h e r e h a v e b e e n c o n s i d e r e d t o b e i n d e p e n d e n t i n o r d e r t o k e e p t h e m e t h o d o l o g y s i m p l e .

    T h i s m a y n o t b e t h e c a s e i n a r e a l - l i f e s c e n a r i o a n d h e n c e f u z z y A N P , w h i c h t a k e s i n t o a c c o u n t t h e i n t e r r e l a t i o n s h i p s

    b e t w e e n t h e c r i t e r i a , m a y b e a b e t t e r c h o i c e . A n o t h e r e x t e n s i o n c a n b e t o u s e g r e y m e t h o d s i n s t e a d o f f u z z y m e t h o d s ,

    a s g r ey t h eo r y i s m o re r e ce n t a n d i s d e ve l op i ng r a pi d ly .

    Acknowledgements

    T h e w o r k d e s c r i b e d i n t h i s p a p e r w a s s u b s t a n t i a l l y s u p p o r t e d b y a g r a n t f r o m T h e H o n g K o n g P o l y t e c h n i c U n i v e r s i t y R e s e a r c hC o m mi t t e e w i t h f i n a n ci a l a n d t e c h ni c a l s u p p o r t t h r o u g h a n i n t e rn a l g r a n t ( p r o je c t n u m b e r G - Y L 2 6 ) .

    References

    A g r a w a l , V . P . , K o h l i , V . , a n d G u p t a , S . , 1 9 9 1 . C o m p u t e r a i d e d r o b o t s e l e c t i o n : t h e m u l t i p l e a t t r i b u t e d e c i s i o n m a k i n g a p p r o a c h.

    International Journal of Production Research, 2 9 ( 8 ) , 1 6 2 9 –1 6 44 .

    8   A. Samvedi   e t a l .2440

  • 8/17/2019 Quantifying Risks in a Supply Chain Through Integration of Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS

    10/11

    A g r a w al , V . P . , V e r m a , A . , a n d A g r a w a l , S . , 1 9 9 2 . C o m p u t e r- a i d e d e v a l u a t io n a n d s e l e c t i o n o f o p t i mu m g r i p pe r s. International 

    Journal of Production Research, 3 0 ( 1 1) , 2 7 1 3– 2 73 2 .

    C e li k , M . , E r, I . D. , a n d O z ok , A . F. , 2 0 09 . A p pl i ca t io n o f f u zz y e x te n de d A H P m e th o do l og y o n s h ip p in g r e gi s tr y s e le c ti o n: t h e

    c a s e o f T u r ki s h m a r i t i m e i n d u s t r y. Expert Systems with Applications, 3 6 ( 1 ), 1 9 0 –1 9 8.

    C h an , F . T. S . a n d K u ma r , N . , 2 0 0 7. G l ob a l s u pp l ie r d e ve l op m en t c o ns i de r in g r i sk f a ct o rs u s in g f u zz y e x t en d ed A H P- b as e d

    approach. Omega, 3 5 ( 4) , 4 1 7– 43 1 .

    C h a n g, D . Y . , 1 9 9 2 . E x t e nt a n a l y si s a n d s y n t h e t i c d e c i s i o n. Optimization Techniques and Applications, 1 ( 1) , 3 5 2– 35 5.

    C h e n , C . , 2 0 0 0 . E x t e n s i on s o f t h e T O P S I S f o r g r o u p d e c i s i on - m a ki n g u n d e r f u z z y e n v i r o n me n t. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1 1 4 ( 1 ) ,1–9.

    C h en , S . J. a n d H w an g , C . L. , 1 9 92 . Fuzzy multi attribute decision making   ( l e ct u r e n o t e s i n e c o n om i c s a n d m a t h em a t i c al s y s t e m

    s e r i es ) . N e w Y o r k : S p r i n g e r- V e r l ag , 3 7 5 .

    C he na , C .T ., L in , C .T ., a nd H ua ng , S .F ., 2 00 6 . A f uz zy a pp ro ac h f or s up pl ie r e va l ua ti on a nd s el ec ti on i n s up pl y c ha in

    management. International Journal of Production Economics, 1 0 2 ( 2 ) , 2 8 9 – 3 0 1.

    C h ri s to p he r , M . a n d P e ck , H . , 2 0 0 4. B u il d in g t h e r e si l ie n t s u pp l y c h ai n. International Journal of Logistics Management, 1 5 ( 2 ) ,

    1–13.

    C o le m an , L . , 2 0 0 6. F r eq u en c y o f m a n- m ad e d i sa s te r s i n t h e 2 0 th c e nt u ry. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management,

    1 4 ( 1 ) , 3 – 1 1.

    D i ab a t, A . , G o vi n da n , K . , a n d P a ni c ke r , V . V. , 2 0 12 . S u pp l y c h a i n r i sk m a na g em e nt a n d i t s m i t i g at i on i n a f o od i n du s tr y.

    International Journal of Production Research, 5 0 ( 1 1 ), 3 0 3 9– 3 05 0 .

    D w ei r i, F . T. a n d K a bl a n, M . M. , 2 0 0 6. U s in g f u zz y d e ci s io n m a ki n g f o r t h e e v al u at i on o f t h e p r oj e ct m a na g em e nt i n te r na l

    efficiency. Decision Support Systems, 4 2 ( 2 ) , 7 1 2– 7 2 6.

    E l k i ns , D . , et al., 2 0 0 5. 1 8 W a ys t o g u ar d a g a in s t d i s r up t io n. Supply Chain Management Review, 9 ( 1) , 4 6 – 53 .G au de nz i, B . a nd B or gh es i, A ., 2 0 06 . M an ag in g r is ks i n t he s up pl y c ha in u si ng t he A HP m et ho d. International Journal of 

    Logistics Management, 1 7 ( 1 ) , 1 1 4– 1 3 6.

    G u , X . a n d Z hu , Q . , 2 0 06 . F u zz y m u lt i -a t tr i bu t e d e ci s io n -m a ki n g m e th o d b a se d o n e i ge n ve c to r o f f u zz y a t t ri b ut e e v al u at i on

    space. Decision Support Systems, 4 1 ( 2 ), 4 0 0 –4 1 0.

    H e n d ri c k s , K . B . a n d S i n g h a l , V . R . , 2 0 0 5 . A s s o c i a t io n b e t w e en s u p pl y c h a i n g l i t c h e s a n d o p e r at i n g p e r f o r m a nc e. Management

    Science, 5 1 ( 5 ) , 6 9 5– 7 1 1.

    H i l l m a n , M . a n d K e l t z . , H . , 2 0 0 7 . Managing risk in the supply chain: A quantitative study, AMR Research Report . A v a i l a b l e f r o m :

    http://www.amrresearch.com/Content/View.aspx?pmillid=19994 [Accessed 9 January 2010].

    H u an g , C . C. , C h u, P . Y. , a n d C h ia n g, Y . H. , 2 0 08 . A f u zz y A H P a p pl i ca t i on i n g o ve r nm e nt - sp o ns o re d R & D p r oj e ct s e le c ti o n.

    Omega, 3 6 ( 6 ), 1 0 38 – 1 05 2 .

    I B M , 2 0 0 8 .  Supply chain risk management: A delicate balancing act . W h it e p a pe r . N e w Y o rk : I B M G l ob a l B u si n es s S e rv i ce s .

    K a rs a k, E . E. , 2 0 0 2. D i st a nc e -b a se d f u zz y M C DM a p pr o ac h f o r e v al u at i ng f l ex i bl e m a nu f ac t ur i ng s y st e m a l te r na t iv e s.

    International Journal of Production Research, 4 0 ( 1 3 ), 3 1 6 7– 3 18 1 .

    K a r s a k , E . E . a n d T o l g a , E . , 2 0 0 1 . F u z z y m u l t i c r i t e r i a d e c i s i o n m a k i n g p r o c e d u r e f o r e v a l u a t i n g a d v a n c e d m a n u f a c t u r i n g s y s t e m

    i n i n v e st m e n ts. International Journal of Production Economics, 6 9 ( 1) , 4 9 –6 4.

    K ay a, T . a nd K ah ra ma n, C ., 2 0 11 . M ul ti cr it er ia d ec is io n m ak in g i n e ne rg y p la nn in g u si ng a m od if ie d f uz zy T OP SI S

    methodology. Expert Systems with Applications, 3 8 ( 6 ) , 6 5 7 7 –6 5 85 .

    K i m, G . , P a rk , C . S. , a n d Y o on , K . P. , 1 9 97 . I d en t if y i ng i n ve s tm e nt o p po r tu n it i es f o r a d va n ce d m a nu f ac t ur i ng s y st e ms w i th

    comparative-integrated performance measurement. International Journal of Production Economics, 5 0 ( 1) , 2 3 –3 3.

    K u tl u , A . C. a n d E km e kc i og l u, M . , 2 0 1 2. F u zz y f a i lu r e m o de s a n d e f fe c ts a n al y si s b y u s in g f u zz y T O PS I S- b as e d f u zz y A H P.

    Expert Systems with Applications, 3 9 ( 1) , 6 1– 67 .

    L a v a s t r e , O . , G u n a s e k a r a n , A . , a n d S p a l a n z a n i , A . , 2 0 1 2 . S u p p l y c h a i n r i s k m a n a g e m e n t i n F r e n c h c o m p a n i e s . Decision Support

    Systems, 5 2 ( 4 ) , 8 2 8– 8 3 8.

    L e w i s, M . A . , 2 0 0 3 . C a u s e, c o n s eq u e n ce a n d c o n t r o l : T o w a r ds a t h e o re t i c a l a n d p r a c ti c a l m o d e l o f o p e r a t i o n al r i s k. Journal of 

    Operations Management, 2 1 ( 2 ), 2 0 5 –2 2 4.

    M c K i ns e y , 2 0 0 8 . Managing global supply chains: McKinsey global survey results. A v a i l a bl e f r o m : h t t p :/ / w w w .m c k i n se y q u ar t e r ly .

    com/McKinsey_Global_Survey_Results_Managing_global_supply_chains_2179 [Accesses 14 July 2010].N o r rm a n , A . a n d J a n s s o n , U . , 2 0 0 4 . E r i c s s on ’ s p r o a c t i v e s u p p l y c h a i n r i s k m a n a g e m en t a p p r oa c h a f t e r a s e r i ou s s u b -s u p p li e r

    accident. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management , 3 4 ( 5 ) , 4 3 4– 4 5 6.

    N o rr m an , A . a n d L i nd r ot h , R . , 2 0 0 4. C a te g or i za t i on o f s u pp l y c h ai n r i sk a n d r i sk m a na g em e nt . I n : C . B r in d le y , e d .  Supply

    Chain Risk, A s h g at e P u b l is h i n g, U K , 1 4 – 2 7 .

    S a mv e di , A . , J a i n , V . , a n d C h an , F . T. S ., 2 0 12 . A n i n te g ra t e d a p p r oa c h f o r m a c h in e t o ol s e le c ti o n u s i n g f u z z y A H P a n d g r ey

    r e l a t io n a l a n a l y si s. International Journal of Production Research, 5 0 ( 1 2) , 3 2 11 – 3 22 1 .

    S h ef f i, Y . a n d R i c e , J . B . , 2 0 05 . A s u pp l y c h a i n v i e w o f t h e r e s i li e nt e n te r pr i se. MIT Sloan Management Review, 4 7 ( 1 ), 4 1– 48 .

    S i m a ng u n s on g , E . , H e n d r y , L . C . , a n d S t e v e n s o n, M . , 2 0 1 2 . S u p pl y - c h ai n u n c e rt a i n t y: a r e v i e w a n d t h e o re t i c a l f o u n d a ti o n f o r

    f u t u re r e s e ar c h. International Journal of Production Research, 5 0 ( 1 6 ), 4 4 93 – 4 52 3 .

    International Journal of Production Research   92441

  • 8/17/2019 Quantifying Risks in a Supply Chain Through Integration of Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS

    11/11

    S v e n ss o n , G . , 2 0 0 0 . A c o n c ep t u a l f r a m e w or k f o r t h e a n a l y s i s o f v u l n er a b i li t y i n s u p p ly c h a i n s. International Journal of Physical 

    Distribution & Logistics Management, 3 0 ( 9 ) , 7 3 1– 7 4 9.

    T a b u ca n o n , M . T . , B a t a n o v , D . N . , a n d V e r m a, D . K . , 1 9 9 4 . I n t e l li g e n t d e c i s i o n s u p p o rt s y s t em ( D S S ) f o r t h e s e l e c t i o n p r o c e s s o f            

    a l t e r na t i v e m a c h in e s f o r f l e x i bl e m a n u fa c t u r in g s y s t em s ( F M S). Computers in Industry, 2 5 ( 2) , 1 3 1– 14 3 .

    T a pi e ro , C . S. , 2 0 07 . C o ns u me r s r i sk a n d q u al i ty c o nt r ol i n a c o ll a bo r at i ve s u pp l y c h ai n. European Journal of Operational 

    Research, 1 8 2 ( 2 ) , 6 8 3– 6 9 4.

    T h u n , J . H . , D r u k e , M . , a n d H o e n i g , D . , 2 0 1 1 . M a n a g i n g u n c e r t a i n t y – A n e m p i r i c a l a n a l y s i s o f s u p p l y c h a i n r i s k m a n a g e m e n t i n

    s m a l l a n d m e d i um - s i ze d e n t e rp r i s es. International Journal of Production Research, 4 9 ( 1 8 ), 5 5 11 – 5 52 5 .W a k o lb i n g er , T . a n d C r u z , J . M . , 2 0 1 1 . S u p pl y c h a i n d i s r u p ti o n r i s k m a n a g e m e nt t h r o ug h s t r a te g i c i n f o r m a t io n a c q u is i t i o n a n d

    s h a r in g a n d r i s k- s h a ri n g c o n t ra c t s. International Journal of Production Research, 4 9 ( 1 3 ), 4 0 63 – 4 08 4 .

    W a n g , X . , et al., 2 0 1 2 . A t w o - s t a g e f u z z y - A H P m o d e l f o r r i s k a s s e s s m e n t o f i m p l e m e n t i n g g r e e n i n i t i a t i v e s i n t h e f a s h i o n s u p p l y

    chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 1 3 5 ( 2 ) , 5 9 5– 6 0 6.

    W a n g , Y . M . , L u o , Y . , a n d H u a , Z . , 2 0 0 8 . O n t h e e x t e n t a n a l y s i s m e t h o d f o r f u z z y A H P a n d i t s a p p l i c a t i o n s. European Journal of 

    Operational Research, 1 8 6 ( 2 ) , 7 3 5 –7 4 7.

    W a te r s, D . , 2 0 0 7.  Supply chain risk management: Vulnerability and resilience in logistics . L o nd o n: K o ga n p a ge .

    W u , T . a n d B l a c k h u r s t , J . , 2 0 0 9 . Managing supply chain risk and vulnerability: tools and methods for supply chain decision makers .

    L ondon: Springer.

    Y o n g , D . , 2 0 0 6 . P l a n t l o c a t i o n s e l e c t i o n b a s e d o n f u z z y T O P S I S . International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technologies,

    2 8 ( 7 –8 ) , 8 3 9 –8 4 4 .

    Z a ye d , T . , A m e r , M . , a n d P a n, J . , 2 0 0 8. A s se s si n g r i sk a n d u n c e rt a in t y i n he r en t i n C h in e se h i gh w ay p r oj e ct s u s in g A H P.

    International Journal of Project Management, 2 6 ( 4 ) , 4 0 8– 4 1 9.

    10   A. Samvedi   e t a l .2442