Quantifying Risks in a Supply Chain Through Integration of Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS
Transcript of Quantifying Risks in a Supply Chain Through Integration of Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS
-
8/17/2019 Quantifying Risks in a Supply Chain Through Integration of Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS
1/11
Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found athttp://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=tprs20
Download by: [Lancaster University Library] Date: 16 February 2016, At: 02:0
International Journal of Production Research
ISSN: 0020-7543 (Print) 1366-588X (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/tprs20
Quantifying risks in a supply chain throughintegration of fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS
Avinash Samvedi , Vipul Jain & Felix T.S. Chan
To cite this article: Avinash Samvedi , Vipul Jain & Felix T.S. Chan (2013) Quantifying risks in
a supply chain through integration of fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS, International Journal of Production Research, 51:8, 2433-2442, DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2012.741330
To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2012.741330
Published online: 30 Nov 2012.
Submit your article to this journal
Article views: 902
View related articles
Citing articles: 25 View citing articles
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/citedby/10.1080/00207543.2012.741330#tabModulehttp://www.tandfonline.com/doi/citedby/10.1080/00207543.2012.741330#tabModulehttp://www.tandfonline.com/doi/mlt/10.1080/00207543.2012.741330http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/mlt/10.1080/00207543.2012.741330http://www.tandfonline.com/action/authorSubmission?journalCode=tprs20&page=instructionshttp://www.tandfonline.com/action/authorSubmission?journalCode=tprs20&page=instructionshttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2012.741330http://www.tandfonline.com/action/showCitFormats?doi=10.1080/00207543.2012.741330http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/tprs20http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=tprs20
-
8/17/2019 Quantifying Risks in a Supply Chain Through Integration of Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS
2/11
Quantifying risks in a supply chain through integration of fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS
A v i n a sh S a m v e dia, V ip ul J ai na a n d F e l i x T . S . C h anb*
aDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, New Delhi, India;
bDepartment of Industrial and Systems Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong
(Received 21 February 2012; final version received 11 October 2012 )
R i sk i s i n he r en t i n a l mo s t e v er y a c t iv i ty o f s u pp l y c h ai n m a na g em e nt . W i th t h e e v er - in c re a si n g p u sh f o re f f i c i e n c y , s u p p l y c h a i n s t o d a y a r e g e t t i n g m o r e a n d m o r e r i s k y . A d d i n g t o t h e d i f f i c u l t y o f d e a l i n g w i t h t h e s er is ks i s t he a mo un t o f s ub je ct iv it y a nd u nc er ta in ty i nv ol ve d. T hi s m ak es a na ly ti ca l e xa mi na ti on o f t hes i t u a ti o n v e r y d i f f i cu l t , e s p e c i a ll y a s t h e a m o u nt o f i n f o r m a t i on a v a i l ab l e a t a p a r t ic u l a r t i m e i s n o t s u f f i c i e ntf o r s u c h a n a n a l y s i s . T h u s a s u p p l y c h a i n r i s k i n d e x , w h i c h c a p t u r e s t h e l e v e l o f r i s k f a c e d b y a s u p p l y c h a i n i na g i v e n s i t u a t i o n , i s t h e n e e d o f t h e h o u r . T h i s s t u d y i s a n e f f o r t t o w a r d s q u a n t i f y i n g t h e r i s k s i n a s u p p l y c h a i na n d t h en c o ns o li d at i ng t h e v a l ue s i n to a c o mp r eh e ns i ve r i sk i n de x . A n i n te g ra t ed a p pr o ac h , w i th a f u zz ya n al y t ic a l h i er a rc h y p r oc e ss ( A HP ) a n d a f u zz y t e ch n iq u e f o r o r de r p r ef e re n ce b y s i mi l ar i ty t o t h e i d ea l
s o l u t i o n ( T O P S I S ) a s i t s i m p o r t a n t e l e m e n t s , h a s b e e n u s e d f o r t h i s p u r p o s e . F u z z y v a l u e s i n t h i s s t u d y h e l p i nc a pt ur in g t he s ub je ct iv it y o f t he s it ua t io n w it h a f in al c on ve rs io n t o a c ri sp v a lu e w hi ch i s m uc h m or ec o m p re h e n si b l e . A c a s e s t u d y i s u s e d t o i l l u st r a t e t h e p r o po s e d m e t h o d ol o g y .
Keywords: s u pp l y c h ai n r i sk m a na g em e nt ; f u zz y A H P; f u zz y T O PS I S; r i sk i n de x
1. Introduction
A s ig ni fi ca nt f ea tu re o f t he r ap id ly e vo lv in g b us in es s c li ma te , s pu rr ed o n b y s ig ni fi ca nt t ec hn ol og y s hi ft s,
i n no v at i on , c o mm u ni c at i on t e ch n ol o gi e s a n d g l ob a li s at i on , i s t h e i n cr e as i ng p r ev a le n ce o f r i sk i n a l mo s t e v er y
a s pe c t o f o u r l i v e s ( W u a n d B l a c kh u rs t 2 0 09 ) . R i s k s o c c u r b e c a us e w e c a n n e v e r k n ow e x ac t ly w h at w i ll h a pp e n i n
t h e f u t u r e . W e c a n u s e t h e b e s t f o r e c a s t s a n d d o e v e r y p o s s i b l e a n a l y s i s , b u t t h e r e i s a l w a y s u n c e r t a i n t y a b o u t f u t u r e
e v en t s ( W a t er s 2 0 07 ) . T h i s u n ce r ta i nt y c r ea t es a g a p b e t w e en w h at r e al l y h a pp e ns a n d w h a t a f i rm h a s p l a n ne d f o r
a n d c o n s e qu e nt l y c a us e s l o ss e s d u e t o t h e s e qu e nc e o f f a il u re s a n d/ o r c a u s a l e v e n t s ( L e w is 2 0 03 ) . H o we v er , a s r i sk
h a s t h e p o t e n t i a l f o r l o s s , o r g a n i s a t i o n s m u s t a s s e s s t h e p o t e n t i a l f o r s u c h a s e q u e n c e o f f a i l u r e s . A c r u c i a l e l e m e n t o f t h e r i sk m a na g em e nt p r oc e ss i s t h e i d en t if i ca t io n a n d a s se s sm e nt o f r i sk . T h is p r oc e ss i n vo l ve s u n de r st a nd i ng t h e
c on di ti on s t ha t g iv e r is e t o p ot en ti al p ro bl em s, a nd t he n a ss es si ng t he l ik el ih oo d a nd n eg at iv e i mp ac t o f s uc h
p r ob l em s ( T ap i er o 2 0 07 ) . T h e r e su l t o f t h is p r oc e ss w i ll b e i n fo r ma t io n r e ga r di n g s i tu a ti o na l r i sk s u p on w h ic h
s t ra t eg i c d e ci s io n s c a n b e m a de .
O rg an is at io ns h av e b ee n s te a di ly b ro ad en in g t he ir a pp ro ac h t o r is k m an ag em en t s in ce t he m id t we nt ie th
c e n t u r y – i n i t i a l l y f o c u s i n g o n i n s u r a n c e m a n a g e m e n t , t h e n e x p a n d i n g t o f i n a n c i a l , s a f e t y a n d p u b l i c r e l a t i o n s i s s u e s ,
a nd f in al ly , c om pa ny wi de a nd s up pl y c ha in i ss ue s ( No rr ma n a nd L in dr ot h 2 00 4) . T hi s i s d ue t o t he f re qu en t
d i sr u pt i on s a s u pp l y c h ai n e n co u nt e rs o n a r e gu l ar b a si s . S v en s so n ( 2 00 0 ) d e fi n ed s u pp l y c h ai n d i sr u pt i on s a s
u n pl a nn e d e v en t s t h a t m a y o c c u r i n t h e s u p p ly c h ai n , w h ic h m i gh t a f fe c t t h e n o r m al o r e x pe c te d f l ow o f m a te r ia l s
a n d c o m p o n e n ts . D i s ru p t i on s n o t o n l y h a l t s u p p l y c h a i n o p e r at i o ns , w i t h ou t p r e p ar a t i on a n d p r e c a u t i o ns i t t a k e s
t im e f or t he a ff ec te d s ys te m t o r ec ov er ( He nd ri ck s a nd S in gh al 2 00 5, S he ff i a nd R ic e 2 00 5) . A ll t hi s h as m ad e
m a na g in g s u pp l y c h ai n r i sk s a c h al l en g e t h at i t w a s n e v e r b e fo r e. W he r ea s i n t h e p a st , s u pp l y c h a i n m a na g er s w e re
m a in l y c o nc e rn e d w i th r e du c in g c o st , r e du c in g p u rc h as e p r ic e v a ri a nc e a n d m a na g in g i n ve n to r y, t o da y s u pp l y
c o n t in u i t y i s t h e s i n g l e b i g g e st b u s in e s s d r i v e r .
T h e m a j o r h i n d r a n c e i n a n a l y s i n g r i s k s c o m e s f r o m t h e f a c t t h a t t h e r e i s a l o t o f s u b j e c t i v i t y i n v o l v e d . I n p u t f r o m
e x pe r ts o n t h e s u bj e ct m a in l y c o me s i n t h e f o rm o f s u bj e c ti v e a s se s sm e nt s . T hi s n e ce s si t at e s t h e u s e o f t h eo r ie s s u ch
a s f u zz y o r g r ey a n al y si s w h ic h a r e c a pa b le o f d e al i ng w i th s u bj e ct i vi t y. T w o v e ry p o pu l ar t e ch n iq u es p r ev i ou s ly
*Corresponding author. E mail: [email protected]
20 1 T a yl o r & F r an c is
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2012.741330
I n t e r n a ti o n a l J o u r n a l o f P r o d u c ti o n R e s e a r c h, 2013
Vol. 51, No. 8, 2433–2442,
3
-
8/17/2019 Quantifying Risks in a Supply Chain Through Integration of Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS
3/11
u s e d i n s i m i la r s i t u a t i o ns a r e f u z z y a n a l yt i c a l h i e r a r ch y p r o c e s s ( A H P ) a n d f u z z y t e c h n i qu e f o r o r d e r p r e f e re n c e b y
s i m i l a r i t y t o t h e i d e a l s o l u t i o n ( T O P S I S ) . T h e y h a v e t h e b e n e f i t o f c o m b i n i n g a p p r o a c h e s l i k e f u z z y t h e o r y , w h i c h b y
i t s v e r y n a t u r e i s b u i l t t o h a n d l e s u b j e c t i v e a s s e s s m e n t s , w i t h a n a l y t i c a l t o o l s s u c h a s A H P , w h i c h i s a p r o v e n t o o l f o r
h a nd l in g m u lt i c r it e ri a d e ci s io n m a ki n g ( M CD M) p r ob l em s ( K ar s ak a n d T o lg a 2 0 01 , Z a ye d et al . 2 00 8) . T he
r e su l ti n g t o o l g i ve s u s t h e p o w e r t o m a ke e f fe c ti v e d e c i si o ns a n d a t t h e s a m e t i me b e i m pr e ci s e w h i l e g i vi n g i n p u ts .
T h at i s w h y t e ch n iq u es s u ch a s f u zz y A H P a r e b e c om i ng i n cr e as i ng l y p o pu l ar t o da y .
T h e r e m a i n d e r o f t h e p a p e r i s o r g a n i s e d a s f o l l o w s . S e c t i o n 2 r e v i e w s t h e r e l a t e d l i t e r a t u r e o n s u p p l y c h a i n r i s k s ,f u zz y A H P a n d f u zz y T O PS I S. S e c ti o n 3 g i ve s , i n d e ta i l, d i ff e re n t k i n d s o f r i sk i n a s u pp l y c h a i n a n d a f r am e wo r k
f o r a s se s sm e nt . A b r ie f d e sc r ip t io n a n d e x am p le s a r e i n cl u de d . S e c ti o n 4 d e sc r ib e s t h e p r op o se d m e th o do l og y a n d
d e ta i ls t h e s t ep s i n vo l ve d i n t h e t e ch n iq u es u s ed . S e ct i on 5 i l lu s tr a te s t h e p r op o se d m e th o do l og y t h ro u gh a c a se
s t ud y . S e ct i on 6 c o nc l ud e s t h e p a pe r w i th t h ou g ht s o n f u tu r e r e se a rc h s c op e s.
2. Literature review
I n t o da y ’s s c en a ri o , s u pp l y c h ai n p a rt i ci p an t s a r e b e co m in g i n cr e as i ng l y m o re c o up l ed , i n t h e s e ns e t h at d e ci s io n s
t a ke n b y o n e f i r m i n a s u pp l y c h a i n d i r e c tl y a f fe c t t h e p e rf o rm a nc e o f o t he r f i rm s . T h i s l e ad s t o t h e d i s r up t io n s
c au se d a t o ne l e ve l t o b e t ra ns mi tt ed q ui ck ly t o o th er l ev el s a nd t hu s r es ul ts i n h ug e i mp ac ts . T hi s h as l ed t o a
g ro wi ng i nt er es t i n t he a re a o f s up pl y c ha in r is k a nd i ts m an ag em en t, a s e vi de nc ed i n t he n um be r o f i nd us tr y
s u rv e ys , p r ac t it i on e r c o nf e re n ce s a n d c o ns u lt a nc y r e po r ts d e vo t ed t o t h e t o pi c , f o r e x am p le , M c Ki n se y ( 2 00 8 ).F u r t h e r , t h e e m p h a s i s t o d a y i s i n m a k i n g t h e c h a i n m o r e e f f i c i e n t , w h i c h m a k e s i t m o r e v u l n e r a b l e a n d l e s s r o b u s t i n
d e al i ng w i th d i sr u pt i on s w h en t h ey o c cu r . M o re o ve r , t h er e i s s t ro n g e v id e nc e t h at s u ch c a ta s tr o ph i c e v e nt s a r e
b e c o mi n g m o r e f r e qu e n t ( C o l em a n 2 0 0 6 ). E l k in s et al . ( 2 00 5 ) o b s e rv e d t h a t t h e r e h a s b e en a n i n cr e as e b o th i n t h e
p o te n ti a l f o r d i s r up t io n s a n d i n t h ei r m a gn i tu d e. S u pp l y c h ai n e x e cu t iv e s a t I BM b e li e ve t h at s u pp l y c h ai n r i sk
m a na g em e nt ( S CR M ) i s t h e s e c o nd m o st i m po r ta n t i s s u e f o r t h em ( I BM 2 0 08 ) . T h e r e se a rc h b y A M R i n 2 0 07 a l so
r e p o r t e d t h a t 4 6 % o f e x e c u t i v e s b e l i e v e t h a t b e t t e r S C R M i s n e e d e d ( H i l l m a n a n d K e l t z 2 0 0 7 ) . L a v a s t r e et al . ( 2 0 1 2 )
p o i n t o u t t h a t S C R M i s v e r y i m p o r t a n t g i v e n t h e n e w e c o n o m i c a n d i n d u s t r i a l e n v i r o n m e n t i n w h i c h f i r m s c u r r e n t l y
w o rk . H o we v er , f e w c o mp a ni e s h a ve t a ke n c o mm e ns u ra t e a c ti o ns ( M cK i ns e y 2 0 08 ) . M or e ov e r, t h e r e se a rc h
i n f o rm a t i on a v a i l ab l e o n t h i s t o p i c i s m a i n ly q u a l it a t i ve i n n a t u r e ( T h u n et al . 2 0 1 1 , S i m a n g u n so n g et al . 2 0 1 2 ) a n d
o n ly r e ce n tl y h a s a q u an t it a ti v e a p pr o ac h b e en a d op t ed ( H il l ma n a n d K e lt z 2 0 07 , W a ko l bi n ge r a n d C r uz 2 0 11 ,
Diabat et al . 2 0 1 2 ) . W e t r y t o f i l l t h i s r e s e a r c h g a p b y p r o v i d i n g a r i s k i n d e x w h i c h w i l l b e v e r y h e l p f u l i n q u a n t i f y i n g
s u pp l y c h ai n r i sk s . T h e m e t h od o lo g y a d o p te d u s es a n a p pr o ac h w h ic h i s a n i n te g ra t io n o f f u zz y A H P a n d f u zz yT OPSIS.
A HP a nd T OP SI S a re b ot h m ul ti -c ri te ri a d ec is io n- ma ki ng m et ho ds . T he y a re u se d f or s el ec ti ng t he b es t
a l te r na t iv e f r om a g i ve n s e t, u s in g t h ei r p e rf o rm a nc e u n de r d i ff e re n t c r it e ri a a n d s u b- c ri t er i a, w h ic h c o ul d b e
e it he r q ua nt it at iv e o r q ua li ta ti ve i n n at ur e. A HP h as b ee n u se d i n a h os t o f d if fe re nt s it ua ti on s r es ul ti ng i n
v e ry r i ch a n d e x te n si v e l i te r at u re ( T ab u ca n on et al . 1 99 4, G au de nz i a nd B or gh es i 2 00 6, Z ay ed et al . 2 00 8) ,
h o we v e r t h e p r ob l em o f d e al i ng w i th s u bj e c ti v e a s se s sm e nt s r e ma i ns l a rg e ly u n so l ve d ( Wa n g et al . 2 00 8) . T hi s
h as l ed t o t he i nc lu si on o f t he or ie s, s uc h a s f uz zy a nd g re y, w hi ch a re c ap ab le o f d ea li ng w it h s ub je ct iv e
a ss es sm en ts ( Dw ei ri a nd K ab la n 2 00 6, G u a nd Z hu 2 00 6) . F uz zy A HP h as p ro ve n t o b e a v er y u se fu l t oo l
a nd q ui c kl y g ai ne d a cc ep ta nc e a mo ng a v as t a rr ay o f r es ea rc he rs ( Ch an a nd K um ar 2 00 7, H ua ng et al . 2 00 8,
Celik et al . 2 00 9, S am ve di et al . 2 01 2). Th e m os t c om mo n m eth od u se d i n th e s ol ut ion of fu zz y AH P
a pp li ca ti on s i s t he e xt en t a na ly si s m et ho d p ro po se d b y C ha ng ( 19 92 ) ( Wa ng et al . 2 01 2) .
T O PS I S i s a w i de l y a c ce p te d m u lt i -a t tr i bu t e d e c is i on - ma k in g t e ch n iq u e d u e t o i t s s o un d l o gi c , s i mu l ta n eo u s
c o ns i de r at i on o f t h e i d ea l a n d t h e a n ti - id e al s o lu t io n s, a n d e a si l y p r og r am m ab l e c o mp u ta t io n p r oc e du r e ( K imet al . 1 99 7) . A gr aw al et al . ( 19 91 ) u se d T OP SI S f or r ob ot s el ec ti on , a nd A gr aw al et al . ( 19 92 ) e mp lo ye d
T OP SI S f or t he e va lu at io n a nd s el ec ti on o f o pt im um g ri pp er s. L ik e A HP , T OP SI S a ls o f ac ed t he s am e
c on st ra in ts o f n ot b ei ng a bl e t o h an dl e t he v ag ue a ss es sm en ts g iv en b y e xp er ts a nd t hu s l ed t o i ts m er gi ng w it h
f uz zy t he or y. C he n a nd H wa ng ( 19 92 ) f ir st a pp li ed f uz zy n um be rs t o e st ab li sh f uz zy T OP SI S ( Ku tl u a nd
E k me k ci o gl u 2 0 12 ) . C h en ( 2 00 0 ) e x te n de d t h e T O PS I S m e th o d t o f u zz y g r ou p d e ci s io n -m a ki n g s i tu a ti o ns b y
c o ns i de r in g t r ia n gu l ar f u zz y n u mb e rs a n d d e fi n in g a c r is p E u cl i de a n d i st a nc e b e tw e en t w o f u zz y n u mb e rs . F u zz y
T O PS I S h a s b e en i n tr o du c ed f o r v a ri o us m u lt i -a t tr i bu t e d e ci s io n -m a ki n g p r ob l em s ( C he n a et al . 2 00 6, Y on g
2 0 06 , K a ya a n d K a hr a ma n 2 0 11 ) .
2 A. Samvedi e t a l .2434
-
8/17/2019 Quantifying Risks in a Supply Chain Through Integration of Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS
4/11
3. Supply chain risks
S up pl y c ha in r is ks c an b e c at eg or is ed i n m an y d if fe re nt w ay s a nd f ro m d if fe re nt p er sp ec ti ve s, s uc h a s f ro m a
c o rp o ra t e g o ve r na n ce o r f i na n ci a l r i sk a g en d a, o r e v en i n t e rm s o f a m u lt i -l e ve l c o mp l ex s y st e m ( C hr i st o ph e r a n d
P e ck 2 0 04 ) . O n e s i mp l e c l as s if i ca t io n c a n b e e x te r na l ( e ma n at i ng f r om f a ct o rs e x te r na l t o t h e c h ai n ) a n d i n te r na l
r i sk s . E x am p le s i n s u ch c l as si f ic a ti o n c a n b e n a tu r al d i sa s te r s ( e xt e rn a l) a n d s u pp l ie r q u al i ty p r ob l em s ( i nt e rn a l) .
W h en c l as s if i ed i n s u ch a w a y, t h in g s a r e s i mp l if i ed a n d c a n b e u n de r st o od b e tt e r, b u t i n r e al p r ac t ic e t h is f a il s t o
a s si g n r e sp o ns i bi l it y t o i n di v id u al f i rm s f o r h a nd l in g r i sk s . A n ot h er c l as si f ic a ti o n c a n b e o f s t ra t eg i c, t a ct i ca l o ro p er a ti o na l r i sk s , b u t t h e m o st c o mp r eh e ns i ve a n d w i de l y u s ed c l as s if i ca t io n i s t h e o n e g i ve n b y C h ri s to p he r a n d
P e ck ( 2 00 4 ). T h ey c l as s if i ed r i sk s i n t h re e c a te g or i es a n d t h e n f u rt h er d i vi d ed t h em i n to f i ve . I n t h is s t ud y , w e t r ea t
i n t e r n a l r i s k s a s o n e , n a m e l y p r o c e s s r i s k . W e b e l i e v e t h a t i t m a k e s s i t u a t i o n s s i m p l e r t o u n d e r s t a n d a n d a l s o c o n t r o l
r i s k s a r e a n y w a y p a r t o f t h e p r o c e s s d e c i s i o n s a n d t h u s t h e y c a n b e i n t e g r a t e d . T h e d e t a i l e d c a t e g o r i s a t i o n o f r i s k s i s
g i ve n i n F i gu r e 1 .
T h e c a t e g o r i es a r e b r i e fl y d e s c ri b e d b e l o w :
( 1 ) E nv i ro n me n ta l r i sk s : T h e se a r e t h e r i sk s e x te r na l t o t h e f i r m a n d c a n i m p a ct o n e e c h e l on i n di v id u al l y o r c a n
i m p a c t t h e s u p p l y c h a i n a s a w h o l e . E x a m p l e s a r e n a t u r a l d i s a s t e r s , e c o n o m i c d o w n t u r n s , t e r r o r i s m , p o l i t i c a l
i n s ta b i l i ty a n d c u l t u r a l g r i e v a nc e s . S u c h d i s a st e r s c a n h a v e a v a r y in g i m p a c t o n t h e s u p p ly c h a i n d e p e n d in g
o n w h e r e t h e y s t r i k e . I f a m a j o r p l a y e r i n t h e c h a i n s u f f e r s t h e n w h o l e c h a i n w i l l b e s e v e r e l y i m p a c t e d . T h e r e
a r e a l s o r i s k s w h i c h a f f e c t a l l t h e p l a y e r s , s u c h a s g l o b a l d o w n t u r n . T h e e a r t h q u a k e a n d r e s u l t i n g t s u n a m i i n
J a pa n i n 2 0 11 i s a r e al - li f e e x am p le o f a n e n vi r on m en t al r i sk .( 2 ) P r oc e ss r i sk s : T h e se a r e t h e r i sk s w h ic h a r e i n t e rn a l t o t h e f i r m, a n d e m a n at e f r om t h e d i s tu r ba n ce s i n t h e
f l o w o f t h e p r o d u c t t h r o u g h t h e d i f f e r e n t p r o c e s s e s w i t h i n a f i r m . T h e s e r i s k s i n c l u d e m a c h i n e f a i l u r e s , m a j o r
F i gu r e 1 . C l as s if i ca t io n o f s u pp l y c h ai n r i sk s .
International Journal of Production Research 32435
-
8/17/2019 Quantifying Risks in a Supply Chain Through Integration of Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS
5/11
t e ch n ol o gi c al c h an g es , l a bo u r s t ri k es a n d q u al i ty p r ob l em s . A n e x am p le i s t h e r e ce n t l a bo u r s t ri k es i n t h e
M ar u ti S u zu k i p l a n t i n I n di a , h a l t in g t h e p r o d uc t io n o f c a rs f o r a l m o st a m o nt h .
( 3 ) D e ma n d r i s ks : T h i s i s o n e o f t h e r i s ks i n te r na l t o t h e c h a in b u t i s e x te r na l t o t h e f i r m i n f o c u s, s u ch a s s u p p ly
r i sk . D e ma n d r i sk r e la t es t o t h e d i sr u pt i on s a r is i ng f r om t h e f l uc t ua t io n s i n d e ma n d o f t h e p r od u ct , l e ad i ng
t o a g a p b e t w ee n d e ma n d a n d s u pp l y, t h us a f fe c ti n g t h e f i rm . T h er e c a n b e v a ri o us r e as o ns f o r t h e se r i sk s .
A n y c h a n ge i n t h e m a r k et c a n a l so t r ig g er t h es e r i sk s . F o r e x am p le , a r u mo u r o f a n y e s s e nt i al c o mm o di t y
b ei ng e xh au st ed w il l c re at e p an ic a nd s en d t he d em an d f or t ha t p ro du ct s oa ri ng . A no th er f ac to r i s
f o re c a st i ng e r ro r s, w h ic h c a n n e ve r b e t o ta l ly r e mo v ed b u t c a n b e m a na g ed w i th i n l i m i ts .
( 4) S up pl y r is ks : S up pl y r is ks r ef er t o t he r is ks e ma na ti ng f ro m t he p ro bl em s i n a s mo ot h f lo w f ro m t he
d o wn s tr e am s i de . W i th t h e c o nt i nu o us p u sh b e in g g i ve n t o t h e o u ts o ur c in g o f t h e n o n- c or e a c ti v it i es o f a
f i r m , s u p p l y r i s k s h a v e g a i n e d h u g e i m p o r t a n c e . A n o t h e r f a c t o r a d d i n g t o s u p p l y r i s k s i s t h e g l o b a l i s a t i o n o f
t h e s u pp l y c h a i n. D u e t o g l ob a li s at i on , a h o st o f f a il u re m o de s h a ve b e co m e a t ta c he d t o t h e u p s t re a m f l ow .
A n e x am p le o f s u pp l y r i s k s i s t h e c l as s ic e x am p le o f N o ki a a n d E r i c ss o n ( N o r rm a n a n d J a ns s on 2 0 04 ) .
4. Methodology
T h is s e ct i on p r op o se s a m e th o do l og y f o r q u a n ti f yi n g t h e r i sk s i n a c h ai n a n d f o r d e te r mi n in g t h e r i sk i n de x . T h e
m et ho do lo gy c on si st s o f f ou r s te ps a s g iv en i n F ig ur e 2 . T he f ir st s te p r eq ui re s t he f ir m t o c om e u p w it h a
c om pr eh en si ve h ie ra rc hy o f a ll t he r is ks w hi ch m ay a ff ec t t he f ir m. T hi s i s d on e b y t ho ro ug hl y s tu dy in g t he
c o ns i de r ed c h ai n a n d i d en t if y in g p o te n ti a l l o op h ol e s. T h es e a r e t h en a n al y se d f o r o v er l ap s a n d c a te g or i se d u s in gs i mi l ar c h ar a ct e ri s ti c s. T h is e x er c is e s h ou l d b e r e pe a te d w h en e ve r a m a jo r c h an g e i s m a de i n t h e c h ai n . T h e s e co n d
s t ep i n t h e p r oc e ss i n vo l ve s a s si g ni n g w e i g h ts t o t h e c r i t e ri a a c co r di n g t o t h ei r i m po r ta n ce . F uz z y A H P i s u s ed f o r
t h i s p u r p o s e a n d e x p e r t v i e w s a r e t a k e n a s i n p u t . T h e t h i r d s t e p i n v o l v e s d e t e r m i n i n g t h e s c o r e s o f d i f f e r e n t r i s k s b y
a n al y si n g t h em u n de r f o ur d i ff e re n t c r it e ri a ; n a me l y t h ei r p r ob a bi l it y o f o c cu r re n c e, t h ei r i m pa c t o n s u pp l y c h ai n
p e r f o r m a n c e , t h e e f f o r t a n d t i m e r e q u i r e d i n r e c o v e r i n g f r o m t h e i m p a c t a n d t h e l e v e l a t w h i c h t h e r i s k h a s a n a f f e c t .
T h is i s b e ca u se , a s c a n b e s e en f r om t h e l i t e ra t ur e , a r i sk a f fe c ti n g t h e s t ra t eg i c l e v e l i s m u ch m o re d a ng e ro u s t h a n
o n e a f f e c ti n g t h e o p e r at i o n al l e v e l .
4.1 Fuzzy AHP
T h e f u z z y A H P m e t h o d o l o g y e x t e n d s S a a t y ’ s A H P b y c o m b i n i n g i t w i t h f u z z y s e t t h e o r y . I n f u z z y A H P , f u z z y r a t i o
s ca le s a re u se d t o i nd ic at e t he r el at iv e s tr en gt h o f t he f ac to rs i n t he c or re sp on di ng c ri te ri a. T he re fo re , a f uz z y judgment matrix can be constructed. T he final scores of alternatives are also represented by fuzzy numbers. T he
o pt im um a lt er na ti ve i s o bt ai ne d b y r an ki ng t he f uz zy n um be rs u si ng s pe ci al a lg eb ra ic o pe ra to rs . I n t hi s
m e t h od o l o gy , a l l e l e m e nt s i n t h e j u d g m e n t m a t r i x a n d w e i g h t v e c t o r s a r e r e p r e s e n te d b y t r i a n g u l ar f u z z y n u m b e r s.
U s in g f u zz y n u mb e rs t o i n di c at e t h e r e l a ti v e i m p o rt a nc e o f o n e r i s k t y pe o v er t h e o t h e r, a f u zz y j u dg m en t v e ct o r i s
t h e n o b t a i n e d f o r e a c h r i s k . T h e s e j u d g m e n t v e c t o r s f o r m p a r t o f t h e f u z z y p a i r w i s e c o m p a r i s o n m a t r i x w h i c h i s t h e n
u se d t o d et er mi ne t he w e ig ht o f e a ch r is k. T ab le 1 s ho ws t he m ea ni ng o f l in gu is ti c e xp re ss io ns i n t he f or m o f
1• Finalise the SCRM hierarchy.
2
• Use expert advice for pairwise comparisons.
• Find the weights using fuzzy AHP.
3
• Use expert advice to tabulate risk properties.
• Combine using fuzzy TOPSIS to get scores.
4
• Consolidate scores and weights to get riskindex.
F i gu r e 2 . F l ow o f t h e p r op o se d m e th o do l og y .
T a bl e 1 . T r ia n gu l ar f u zz y n u mb e r e q ui v al e nt s t o t h e c o rr e -s p o nd i n g l i n g ui s t i c e x p r es s i o ns .
L inguisticexpressions
E quivalentf u z z y n u m be r s
T r i a ng u l a r f u z z yn um be r ( l, m , u )
Equal 1 (1, 1, 3)Little importance 3 (1, 3, 5)Strong importance 5 (3, 5, 7)Very strong importance 7 (5, 7, 9)Extreme importance 9 (7, 9, 9)
4 A. Samvedi e t a l .2436
-
8/17/2019 Quantifying Risks in a Supply Chain Through Integration of Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS
6/11
f u z z y n u m b e r s . E x p e r t s a r e a s k e d t o g i v e t h e i r a s s e s s m e n t i n t h e f o r m o f t h e s e l i n g u i s t i c e x p r e s s i o n s w h i c h a r e t h e n
c o nv e rt e d a n d a n al y se d t o f i na l ly g e t t h e w e ig h ts . C h an g ’s e x te n t a n al y si s m e th o d h a s b e e n u s ed f o r d e t e rm i ni n g
w e i g h ts f r o m p a i r wi s e c o m p ar i s o ns .
4.2 Fuzzy TOPSIS
T O PS I S i s a m u lt i pl e -c r it e ri a m e th o d t o i d en t if y s o lu t io n s f r om a f i ni t e s e t o f a l te r na t iv e s a s i n it i al l y p r op o se d b y
C he n a nd H wa ng ( 19 92 ). T he u nd er ly in g l og ic o f T OP SI S i s t o d ef in e t he i de al s ol ut io n a nd t he n eg at iv e i de al
s o l u t i o n . T h e a l t e r n a t i v e s a r e t h e n c o m p a r e d w i t h t h e s e i d e a l a n d n e g a t i v e i d e a l s o l u t i o n s , t o f i n d o u t t h e d i s t a n c e s .
T he se d is ta nc es a re t he n u se d t o c om e u p w it h a s co re . T he o ne w hi ch i s c lo se st t o t he i de al a nd f ar th es t f ro m t he
n e ga t iv e i d ea l g e ne r al l y q u al i fi e s f o r t h e o p ti m um . I n f u zz y T O PS I S, t h e n u mb e rs a r e c h an g ed t o f u zz y v a lu e s a n d
t h e p r o c e s s n o w i n c l u d e s f u z z y m a t h e m a t i c a l t e c h n i q u e s . M o r e d e t a i l s a b o u t t h e f u z z y T O P S I S m e t h o d o l o g y c a n b e
f o un d i n K a rs a k ( 2 00 2 ). D e ta i ls o f t h e m e th o do l og y a r e g i ve n b e lo w
( 1 ) I n t h is a p pr o ac h , w e f i rs t n o rm a li s e t h e g i ve n d a ta c o lu m n w i s e . T h i s i s d o ne u s in g t h e f o l l ow i ng f o rm u la
rij ¼ raij , rbij , rcij
¼cþ j cij
cþ j a
j
,cþ j bij
cþ j a
j
,cþ j aij
cþ j a
j
!
where cþ j ¼ maxi cij and a j ¼ mini aij .( 2 ) D e fi n e t h e i d ea l a n d a n ti - id e al s o lu t io n a s rþ j ¼ ð1 , 1 , 1Þ and r
j ¼ ð0 , 0 , 0Þ r e s p e c ti v e l y f o r j ¼ 1, . . . , n.
( 3 ) C a lc u la t e t h e d i st a nc e s o f a l l r i sk t y pe s f r om t h e i d e a l ( a nt i -i d ea l ) v a l u e s. T h e d i s t an c es b e tw e en t w o f u z z y
n u mb e rs i s f o un d b y u s in g t h e f o r m ul a g i ve n b e lo w
DðA1 , A2 Þ ¼ 1
2 max a1 a2j j, c1 c2j jð Þ þ b1 b2j j
T he d is ta nc e o f a r is k t yp e f ro m t he i de al ( an ti -i de al ) v al ue s c an b e f ou nd b y s um mi ng u p t he d is ta nc e s o f
r e s p ec t i v e p a r a m e t er v a l u e s f r o m t h e i d e a l ( a n t i - id e a l ) v a l u e s . E q u a l w e i g h ti n g h a s b e e n a s s um e d f o r a l l p a r a me t e r s
i n t h is s tu d y.
( 4) C al cu la te t he s co re f or t he r is k t yp es b y c al cu la ti ng t he ir p ro xi mi ty t o t he i de al v al ue , u si ng t he f or mu la
g i v e n b e l o w
Score ¼ D i s t an c e f r o m t h e a n t i i d e a l v a l u e
D i s t a n c e f r o m t h e a n t i i d e a l v a l u e þ D i s t a n c e f r o m t h e i d e a l v a l u e
T h e s c o r es o b ta i ne d a r e t h en c o ns o li d at e d w i th t h e w e ig h ts a s si g ne d b y t h e f u z z y A H P m e t h od a n d t h u s t h e f i n a l
r i sk i n de x v a lu e i s r e ac h ed . T h e n e x t s e ct i on e x pl a in s t h e m e t h od o lo g y w i t h a c a se s t ud y a s a n u me r ic a l e x a m pl e .
5. Numerical illustration
A d e t a i l e d s u r v e y o f t h e I n d i a n t e x t i l e a n d s t e e l i n d u s t r y w a s c o n d u c t e d t o u n d e r s t a n d t h e s t a t u s o f s u p p l y c h a i n r i s k
m a na g em e nt . T he s u rv e y c o ns i st e d o f p e rs o na l i n te r vi e ws w i th t h e s u pp l y c h ai n e x e cu t iv e s i n t h es e f i rm s a n d a n
o n li n e s u rv e y q u es t io n na i re w a s a l so u s ed . F o r t h e s u rv e y, 1 5 7 c o mp a ni e s w e re c o nt a ct e d. T h e f i na l d a ta b as e
c on si st s o f d at a f ro m 6 2 r es po nd en ts i n c ha rg e o f s up pl y c ha in m an ag em en t o r l og is ti cs a nd w ho a re t he re fo rea s su m ed t o b e t h e m o st s u it a bl e f o r p r ov i di n g t h e d e si r ed i n fo r ma t io n o n s u pp l y c h ai n r i sk m a na g em e nt . P e rs o na l
i n te r vi e ws w e re c o nd u ct e d w i th 1 8 o f t h es e r e sp o nd e nt s . B a se d o n a n e x ha u st i ve l i te r at u re r e vi e w a n d r i go r ou s
i nt er ac ti on s w it h e xp er ts f ro m t he c on ce rn ed i nd us tr ie s, t hi s s ur ve y h as b ee n u se d t o g en er at e t he d at a f or t he
n u m e ri c a l i l l u st r a t io n o f t h e m e t h od o l o gy .
T he r e a r e t w o m a jo r s t ep s i n t h e p r o c e ss , n a me l y a s si g ni n g w e ig h ts t o a l l t h e c r i t er i a a n d d e te r mi n in g t h e s c o r es
o f a l l t h e r i s k s a t t h e l o w e s t l e v e l i n t h e h i e r a r c h y . T h e s e t w o v a l u e s a r e t h e n c o n s o l i d a t e d i n t o o n e s i n g l e - r i s k i n d e x
v al ue . T he i np ut s c om e i n t he f or m o f l in gu is ti c v al ue s. E ac h i np ut p ar am et er i s d iv id ed i nt o f iv e l in gu is ti c
e x pr e ss i on s w i th m e mb e rs h ip v a lu e s, a s s h ow n i n F i gu r e 3 .
International Journal of Production Research 52437
-
8/17/2019 Quantifying Risks in a Supply Chain Through Integration of Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS
7/11
T he f i rs t s t ep u s es f u zz y p a ir w is e c o mp a ri s on s b e tw e en t h e c r i t e ri a t o a s si g n t h e w e ig h ts . T h is i s s i mi l ar t o t h e
p ai rw is e c om pa ri so n p ar t i n t he f uz zy A HP p ro ce ss . P ar t o f i t i s s ho wn i n T ab le 2 , w he re t he r is ks u nd er t he
e n v i ro n m e nt a l c a t e g o r y a r e a s s i gn e d w e i g h t s . T h e p a i r wi s e c o m p ar i s on m a t ri x i s c o m p il e d u s i n g e x p e r t a d v i c e a n d
t h e n s o l v e d u s i n g f u z z y s y n t h e t i c e x t e n t a n a l y s i s . A s a s i n g l e e x p e r t c a n s o m e t i m e s g i v e e r r o n e o u s d a t a , t h r e e e x p e r t s
a r e a s k e d t o g i ve t h ei r a d vi c e a n d t h en t h e f u z z y v a l u es a r e a v e r ag e d u s i n g f u z z y m a t h em a ti c s. T he w e ig h ts o f a l l
o t h e r r i s k t y p e s , a t e a c h l e v e l o f t h e h i e r a r c h y , a r e d e t e r m i n e d i n t h e s a m e w a y . T a b l e 3 g i v e s t h e w e i g h t s f o r a l l t h e
o t he r r i sk t y pe s g i ve n i n t h e h i er a rc h y. T h es e w e ig h ts h a ve b e en g e ne r at e d r a nd o ml y f o r i l lu s tr a ti o n p u rp o se s .
T he s e co n d s t e p o f t h e p r o c e ss , w h ic h i n vo l ve s a s si g ni n g s c or e s t o t h e l o w e r -l e ve l r i sk s i n t h e h i er a rc h y, u s es a
f uz z y T OP SI S p ro ce ss . E ac h r is k i s m ea su re d a ga in st f ou r p ar am et er s, n am el y t yp e o f r is k, p ro ba bi li ty o f o cc ur re nc e , i mp ac t o f t he r is k o n t he s up pl y c ha in i f i t o cc ur re d a nd h ow e as il y t he m it ig at io n w ou ld b e f or t he
i mp ac t o f t ha t r is k. T he i np ut s f or t he v al ue s o f t he se p ar am et er s a re t ak en f ro m e xp er ts a ga in i n t he f or m o f
l i ng u is t ic e x pr e ss i on s w h ic h h a ve e a rl i er b e en d e fi n ed a s f u zz y i n te r va l s, a s s h ow n i n F i gu r e 3 . A d vi c e f r om t h re e
e x pe r ts i s t a ke n a n d a v er a ge d , a s d o ne i n t h e p r ev i ou s s t ep . T h e l i n g ui s ti c e x pr e ss i on s a r e r a nd o ml y g e ne r at e d a n d
a r e s h o w n i n T a bl e 4 . T h e p a r a me t er t y pe o f r i sk h a s b e e n d i vi d ed i n to f i ve l i ng u is t ic e x pr e ss i on s , n a m e ly s t ra t eg i c
( S ) , m i d - s t r a t e g i c – t a c t i c a l ( S T ) , t a c t i c a l ( T ) , m i d - t a c t i c a l – o p e r a t i o n a l ( T O ) a n d o p e r a t i o n a l ( O ) . T h e p r o b a b i l i t y a n d
i m p a c t o f o c c u r r e n c e i s d i v i d e d i n t o l o w ( L ) , m e d i u m ( M ) , h i g h ( H ) , v e r y h i g h ( V H ) a n d e x t r e m e ( E ) . M i t i g a t i o n i s
d i v i d e d i n t o v e r y e a s y ( V E ) , e a s y ( E ) , m e d i u m ( M ) , d i f f i c u l t ( D ) a n d v e r y d i f f i c u l t ( V D ) . T h e m e m b e r s h i p f u n c t i o n s
a ss ig ne d a re t he s am e a s s ho wn i n F ig ur e 3 .
T he a ve ra ge v al ue s o f t he f ou r p ar am et er s a re g iv e n i n T ab le 5 . T he l as t c ol um n o f T ab le 5 s ho ws t he s co re ,
o bt ai ne d f or e ac h r is k u si ng f uz zy T OP SI S. T hi s i s d on e b y a pp ly in g t he p re vi ou sl y d es cr ib ed f uz zy T OP SI S
m e t h od o l o gy t o t h e t h r e e c o m b i n ed p a r a me t e r s, p r o b ab i l i ty , i m p a ct a n d m i t i g a ti o n . T h i s r e s u l t s i n a v a l u e f o r e a c h
r i s k w h i c h i s t o b e m u l t i p l i e d b y t h e m i d d l e v a l u e t h a t i s t h e m o s t p r o b a b l e v a l u e o f t h e t y p e o f r i s k p a r a m e t e r . T h er es ul ti ng v al ue i s t he s co re f or t ha t r is k, a s s ho wn i n t he l as t c ol um n o f T ab le 5 .
T h e s e s c o r e s a r e t h e n c o n s o l i d a t e d u s i n g t h e w e i g h t s a s s i g n e d t o a l l t h e r i s k s . T h i s i s d o n e b y f i r s t n o r m a l i s i n g a l l
t he s co re v al ue s s o t ha t t he r an ge i s n or ma li se d t o b et we en 0 –1 . T he se s co re s a re t he n m ul ti pl ie d b y t he w ei gh ts
a s s i g n e d t o t h e r e l a t i v e r i s k s . T h e v a l u e s o b t a i n e d a r e t h e n a d d e d u p f o r t h e f i r s t l e v e l r i s k s . F o r e x a m p l e , t h e v a l u e s
f o r f i r s t f i v e r i s k s a r e a d d e d t o g i v e a s c o r e f o r t h e e n v i r o n m e n t a l r i s k . T h e s c o r e s o b t a i n e d f o r t h e f i r s t l e v e l r i s k s a r e
t h e n a g a i n m u l t i p l i e d b y t h e w e i g h t s a s s i g n e d t o t h e s e f i r s t l e v e l r i s k s a n d t h e r e s u l t i n g v a l u e s s u m m e d u p t o g e t t h e
f i n a l r i s k i n d e x v a l u e , w h i c h i n t h i s c a s e c o m e s o u t t o b e 0 . 6 1 . T h e s i g n i f i c a n c e o f t h i s v a l u e i s j u d g e d b y d e t e r m i n i n g
t h e m e mb e rs h ip i n d i ff e re n t l i ng u is t ic s e ts o f t h e o u tp u t f u nc t io n , a s s h ow n i n F i gu r e 4 .
T a bl e 3 . W e ig h ts a s si g ne d t o t h e r e m a in i ng r i sk t y pe s .
Risks Weights Risks Weig hts Risks Weights Risks Weights
Demand 0.25 Sudden fluctuations 0 .4 Outsourcing risks 0.27 Machine failure 0.37Supply 0.20 Ma rket changes 0 .3 Supplier insolvency 0.25 L abour strike 0.21
Process 0.10 Competition chang es 0 .1 Quality 0.15 Quality problems 0.28Environment 0.45 Forecasting errors 0 .2 Sudden hike in costs 0.33 T echnological change 0.14
T a bl e 2 . F u zz y p a ir w is e c o mp a ri s on f o r r i s k t y pe s u n de r e n vi r on -m e n t c a t e g or y .
T e rr o r E c on o mi c P o li t ic a l C u lt u ra l N a tu r al W e ig h ts
Terror 1 – – 5, 7, 7 – 0.123Economic 5, 7 , 5 1 3, 5, 1 7, 9, 7 – 0.27 2Political 5, 5 , 7 – 1 3 , 3, 5 – 0.17
Cultural – – – 1 – 0.027Natural 7, 7, 7 5, 7, 3 7, 9, 3 9, 9, 9 1 0.424
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
µm
Low Mild High V High Extreme
F ig ur e 3 . M em be rs hi p f un ct io ns o f t he l in gu is ti cexpressions.
6 A. Samvedi e t a l .2438
-
8/17/2019 Quantifying Risks in a Supply Chain Through Integration of Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS
8/11
T a bl e 5 . A v e ra g e d v a l ue s f o r t h e e x p er t i n pu t s a n d t h e f i na l r i sk s c or e .
Risks Type of risk Probability Impact Mitigation Score
Terror (0 .47, 0.67, 0.87) (0.07 , 0.27, 0.47) (0.6, 0.8 , 1) (0.47, 0.67 , 0.87) 0.2981Economic (0 .7 3, 0.93, 1) (0.2, 0.4, 0.6) (0 .53, 0.73, 0.93) (0.73, 0.93 , 1) 0.3345Polit ica l (0 .53, 0 .73, 0 .93) (0.13 , 0 .33, 0 .53) (0 .33, 0 .53, 0 .73) (0.53, 0 .73 , 0 .93) 0.3581Cultura l (0 .47, 0.67, 0.87) (0, 0.2, 0.4 ) (0 .13, 0.33, 0.53) (0.27, 0.47 , 0.67) 0.4440Na tural (0 .6 7, 0.87, 1) (0.33 , 0.53, 0.73) (0 .47, 0.67, 0.87) (0.67, 0.87 , 1) 0.3099Outsourcing risks (0 .47, 0 .67, 0 .87) (0.4, 0 .6, 0 .8) (0 .37, 0 .57, 0 .77) (0.47, 0 .67 , 0 .87) 0.2828Supplier insolvency (0 .53, 0 .73, 0 .93) (0.07 , 0 .27, 0 .47) (0 .4 , 0 .6, 0 .8) (0.33, 0 .53 , 0 .73) 0.4104Quality (0 .07, 0.27, 0.47) (0.53 , 0.73, 0.93) (0 .07, 0.27, 0.47) ( 0.2, 0.4, 0.6 ) 0.1499Sudden hike in costs (0.2, 0 .4 , 0 .6) (0.47 , 0 .67, 0 .87) (0 .13, 0 .33, 0 .53) (0.13, 0 .33 , 0 .53) 0.2298
Sudden f luctuations ( 0, 0 .2, 0 .4) (0.4, 0 .6, 0 .8) (0 .27, 0 .47, 0 .67) (0.07, 0 .27 , 0 .47) 0.1140Market changes (0 .53, 0 .73, 0 .93) (0.27 , 0 .47, 0 .67) (0 .27, 0 .47, 0 .67) (0.33, 0 .53 , 0 .73) 0.3862Competition chang es (0 .7 3, 0 .93, 1 ) (0.13 , 0 .33, 0 .53) (0 .47, 0 .67, 0 .87) (0.33, 0 .53 , 0 .73) 0.4727Forecasting errors (0 .07, 0 .27, 0 .47) ( 0.73, 0 .93 , 1 ) (0 .07, 0 .27, 0 .47) (0.07, 0 .27 , 0 .47) 0.1481Machine failure ( 0, 0.2, 0.4) (0.6, 0.8, 1) (0 .2 , 0.4, 0.6) (0.13, 0.33 , 0.53) 0.1036Labour strike (0 .47, 0 .67, 0 .87) (0.27 , 0 .47, 0 .67) (0 .47, 0 .67, 0 .87) (0.47, 0 .67 , 0 .87) 0.2870Quality problems (0 .07, 0 .27, 0 .47) (0.6, 0 .8, 1 ) (0 .27, 0 .47, 0 .67) (0.27, 0 .47 , 0 .67) 0.1231Technological change (0 .6 7, 0 .87, 1 ) (0.4, 0 .6, 0 .8) (0 .27, 0 .47, 0 .67) (0.33, 0 .53 , 0 .73) 0.4291
T a bl e 4 . E x pe r t i n p u ts f o r t h e p e rf o rm a nc e o f r i sk s o n d i ff e re n t p a r a me t er s .
Risks Type of risk Probability Impact Mitigation
Terror ST,T,T L,L,M E,VH,H M,D,MEconomic S,S,ST M,L,H H,VH,VH VD,VD,DPolit ical ST,ST,T L,M,M H,H,M D,D,MCultura l T,T,ST L,L,L M,M,L E,E,M
Na tural ST,ST,S M,H,H H,VH,H D,D,VDOutsourcing risks T,ST,T H,M,VH H,M,H M,M,DSupplier insolvency ST,T,ST L,M,L H,H,H M,M,EQuality O,O,TO VH,VH,H L,L,M E,VE,MSudden hike in costs TO,O,T H,H,VH L,M,M E,E,VESudden fluctua tions O,O,O VH,H,M M.M.H VE,E,VEMarket changes ST,T,ST M,H,M H,M,M E,M,MCompetit ion changes S,ST,S M,M,L H,VH,H M,E,MForecasting errors O,O,TO E,VH,E M,L,L VE,VE,EMachine failure O,O,O VH,E,H M,M,M E,E,VELabour st rike T,T,ST H,M,M H,VH,H M,M,DQuality problems O,O,TO E,VH,H H,M,M E,E,MTechnological change ST,ST,T H,H,H M,M,H M,M,E
µm
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Low Mild High V High Extreme
0.9
0.1
F i gu r e 4 . D e te r mi n in g t h e m e mb e rs h ip v a lu e o f r i sk s c or e .
International Journal of Production Research 72439
-
8/17/2019 Quantifying Risks in a Supply Chain Through Integration of Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS
9/11
T h e s u p p l y c h a i n s t u d i e d h a s a v e r y h i g h m e m b e r s h i p v a l u e o f 0 . 9 i n t h e h i g h - r i s k s e t o f t h e o u t p u t f u n c t i o n a n d
s c o r e s w i t h a l o w o f 0 . 1 f o r v e r y h i g h r i s k . T h i s s h o w s t h a t t h e s i t u a t i o n i n t h e s u p p l y c h a i n i s h i g h l y r i s k y a n d , i f n o t
g iv en d ue a tt en ti on , c an m ov e t o v er y h ig h r is k s ta tu s q ui ck ly . S uc h n ew s s ho ul d s ou nd a w ar ni ng t o t he
m a na g em e nt o f t h e f i rm a n d t h ey s h ou l d i m me d ia t el y i n cr e as e t h e t i mi n g f o r t h e r e so u rc e s a v ai l ab l e t o t h e r i sk
m a na g em e nt t e am s o t h at m i ti g at i on c a n b e d o ne r a pi d ly . T h e r i s k s c or e t a bl e s h ou l d b e t h e s t ar t in g p o in t f o r t h e
r i sk m a na g em e nt t e am a s i t d e ta i ls t h e w e i g ht s g i ve n t o t h e d i f f er e nt r i sk t y pe s a n d a l s o t h e p r es e nt s t at u s o f t h e
s up pl y c ha in v ul ne ra bi li ty f ro m a p ar ti cu la r r is k. A ll t he s co re s s ho ul d b e p ut i n d ec re as in g o rd er a nd t he r is km a n a ge m e n t t e a m s h o ul d s t a rt h a n d li n g t h e t o p r i s k s i m m e di a t e ly .
6. Conclusion
S u pp l y c h ai n r i sk s a r e i n cr e as i ng e v e ry d ay d u e t o t h e h i gh l y t u rb u le n t e n vi r on m en t s t h at s u pp l y c h ai n s t o da y f a ce ,
a s w e l l a s d u e t o t h e c o n t i n u i n g e m p h a s i s o n i n c r e a s i n g e f f i c i e n c y . T o a d d t o t h e v u l n e r a b i l i t i e s , s u p p l y c h a i n s t o d a y
e x t e n d a c r o s s m a n y c o u n t r i e s w i t h s u p p l i e r s i n s o m e o f t h e s e c o u n t r i e s b r i n g i n g i n d i v e r s e k i n d s o f r i s k s t o t h e c h a i n .
T h is a d ds a l o t o f r i sk s t o t h e o v e r al l s u pp l y c h a i n . T h i s c a l l s f o r e f f e ct i ve p o li c ie s f o r t h e m i ti g at i on o f t h es e r i sk s
a n d h e n c e i s o f i n c r e a s i n g i m p o r ta n c e t o s u p p ly c h a i n r i s k m a n a g e m e nt . E f f ec t i v e m a n a g e m e nt c a l l s f o r a t h o r ou g h
q u a n ti t a t iv e a n a l ys i s o f t h e s i t u a t i on , h o w e ve r r i s k i s a n i n t a ng i b l e p a r a m e te r , a n d i s v e r y d i f f ic u l t t o q u a n ti f y . T h i s
h a s l e ad t o r e se a rc h i n t h is a l l- i mp o rt a nt t o pi c t o b e m a in l y o f t h e t h eo r et i ca l k i nd , a n d h a s i n hi b it e d q u an t it a ti v e
research.
I n t h i s s t u d y a c o m p r e h e n s i v e r i s k i n d e x h a s b e e n p r o p o s e d w h i c h i s g e n e r i c i n n a t u r e a n d c a n b e a p p l i e d i n a n y
i n d u s t r y s i t u a t i o n . T h i s r i s k i n d e x t a k e s e x p e r t a d v i c e a s i t s i n p u t a n d d e l i v e r s a c r i s p n u m b e r b e t w e e n 0 – 1 a s t h e r i s k
s co re . A p ro gr am i n t he m at la b e nv ir on me nt h as b ee n p re pa re d a nd u se d f or t he n um er ic a l i ll us tr at io n. T he
p ro po se d m et ho do lo gy c on si st s o f f ou r m aj or s te ps , n am el y t he c on st ru ct io n o f r is k h ie ra rc hy f or t he s ai d
e n v i r o n m e n t , d e t e r m i n a t i o n o f t h e w e i g h t s o f t h e r i s k t y p e s a t a l l l e v e l s , d e t e r m i n a t i o n o f t h e s c o r e s o f t h e r i s k t y p e s
a t t h e l o w e s t l e v e l o f t h e h i e r a r c h y a n d c o n s o l i d a t i o n o f t h e w e i g h t s a n d s c o r e s i n t o o n e s i n g l e c r i s p v a l u e , w h i c h i s
t h e r i s k i n de x . T h e d e te r mi n at i on o f t h e r i s k i n de x s h ou l d b e c a rr i ed o u t a t r e gu l ar i n te r va l s a n d a l so w h en e ve r a
m a j o r c h a n g e i s m a d e i n t h e s u p p l y c h a i n , s u c h a s t h e a d d i t i o n o f a m a j o r s u p p l i e r . B e i n g n o t i f i e d o f t h e r i s k l e v e l o f
t h e c h a i n, a n o r ga n is a ti o n c a n d e ci d e o n w h en r i sk m a na g em e nt n e ed s a t te n ti o n. T hi s w i ll a l lo w t h em t o f r ee u p
a v ai l ab l e r e so u rc e s f o r t h e r i sk m a na g em e nt t e am a n d t h us c a n l o we r t h e r e du n da n cy b e in g b u il t i n to t h e s y s t em .
F ut u re a t te m pt s , i n p r op o si n g o r i m pr o vi n g u p on t h e p r op o se d r i sk i n de x , c a n b e t o p r ov i de i n du s tr y -s p ec i fi c
r i sk i n de x es . T h e p r op o se d r i sk i n de x i s b a se d o n a g e ne r ic c l as s if i ca t io n o f r i sk s , w h i c h w i ll c h an g e w i th i n du s tr i es
a s f i n e r d e t a i l s e m e r g e b y r e m o v i n g u n n e c e s s a r y r i s k s . A c u s t o m i s e d r i s k i n d e x w i l l b e m o r e u s e f u l a s t h e t r a i t s o f t h ec o n c e r n e d i n d u s t r y a r e b u i l t i n . A n o t h e r d i r e c t i o n o f f u t u r e r e s e a r c h i n t h i s a r e a c a n b e t o d e v e l o p n e w r i s k i n d e x e s
b y i n c o r p o r a t i n g t h e n e w f r a m e w o r k s i n c o r p o r a t i n g v a r i o u s a r t i f i c i a l i n t e l l i g e n c e m o d e l l i n g t e c h n i q u e s , m u l t i - a g e n t ,
P e tr i n e t, g r ap h t h eo r y, a n d s o o n , a n d t h en c o mp a ri n g t h e p e r f or m an c e s o f t h es e r i sk i n de x es w i th t h e p r o p os e d
o n e. T hi s c a n t h e n b e f u rt h er e x te n de d b y d e ve l op i ng a h y br i d r i s k i n d e x w h ic h i n co r po r at e s t h e b e st p a rt s o f t h e
b e s t p e r f o r m i n g r i s k i n d e x e s . T h e r e s u l t i n g p r o d u c t w i l l t h e n b e t h e o p t i m u m o n e a n d w i l l b e r e a d y f o r d e p l o y m e n t
i n t h e i n d u s t r y . A f u r t h e r e x t e n s i o n o f t h i s w o r k c a n i n c l u d e c o n s i d e r i n g u s i n g f u z z y A N P f o r w e i g h t d e t e r m i n a t i o n .
T h i s i s b e c a u s e t h e r i s k t y p e s h e r e h a v e b e e n c o n s i d e r e d t o b e i n d e p e n d e n t i n o r d e r t o k e e p t h e m e t h o d o l o g y s i m p l e .
T h i s m a y n o t b e t h e c a s e i n a r e a l - l i f e s c e n a r i o a n d h e n c e f u z z y A N P , w h i c h t a k e s i n t o a c c o u n t t h e i n t e r r e l a t i o n s h i p s
b e t w e e n t h e c r i t e r i a , m a y b e a b e t t e r c h o i c e . A n o t h e r e x t e n s i o n c a n b e t o u s e g r e y m e t h o d s i n s t e a d o f f u z z y m e t h o d s ,
a s g r ey t h eo r y i s m o re r e ce n t a n d i s d e ve l op i ng r a pi d ly .
Acknowledgements
T h e w o r k d e s c r i b e d i n t h i s p a p e r w a s s u b s t a n t i a l l y s u p p o r t e d b y a g r a n t f r o m T h e H o n g K o n g P o l y t e c h n i c U n i v e r s i t y R e s e a r c hC o m mi t t e e w i t h f i n a n ci a l a n d t e c h ni c a l s u p p o r t t h r o u g h a n i n t e rn a l g r a n t ( p r o je c t n u m b e r G - Y L 2 6 ) .
References
A g r a w a l , V . P . , K o h l i , V . , a n d G u p t a , S . , 1 9 9 1 . C o m p u t e r a i d e d r o b o t s e l e c t i o n : t h e m u l t i p l e a t t r i b u t e d e c i s i o n m a k i n g a p p r o a c h.
International Journal of Production Research, 2 9 ( 8 ) , 1 6 2 9 –1 6 44 .
8 A. Samvedi e t a l .2440
-
8/17/2019 Quantifying Risks in a Supply Chain Through Integration of Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS
10/11
A g r a w al , V . P . , V e r m a , A . , a n d A g r a w a l , S . , 1 9 9 2 . C o m p u t e r- a i d e d e v a l u a t io n a n d s e l e c t i o n o f o p t i mu m g r i p pe r s. International
Journal of Production Research, 3 0 ( 1 1) , 2 7 1 3– 2 73 2 .
C e li k , M . , E r, I . D. , a n d O z ok , A . F. , 2 0 09 . A p pl i ca t io n o f f u zz y e x te n de d A H P m e th o do l og y o n s h ip p in g r e gi s tr y s e le c ti o n: t h e
c a s e o f T u r ki s h m a r i t i m e i n d u s t r y. Expert Systems with Applications, 3 6 ( 1 ), 1 9 0 –1 9 8.
C h an , F . T. S . a n d K u ma r , N . , 2 0 0 7. G l ob a l s u pp l ie r d e ve l op m en t c o ns i de r in g r i sk f a ct o rs u s in g f u zz y e x t en d ed A H P- b as e d
approach. Omega, 3 5 ( 4) , 4 1 7– 43 1 .
C h a n g, D . Y . , 1 9 9 2 . E x t e nt a n a l y si s a n d s y n t h e t i c d e c i s i o n. Optimization Techniques and Applications, 1 ( 1) , 3 5 2– 35 5.
C h e n , C . , 2 0 0 0 . E x t e n s i on s o f t h e T O P S I S f o r g r o u p d e c i s i on - m a ki n g u n d e r f u z z y e n v i r o n me n t. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1 1 4 ( 1 ) ,1–9.
C h en , S . J. a n d H w an g , C . L. , 1 9 92 . Fuzzy multi attribute decision making ( l e ct u r e n o t e s i n e c o n om i c s a n d m a t h em a t i c al s y s t e m
s e r i es ) . N e w Y o r k : S p r i n g e r- V e r l ag , 3 7 5 .
C he na , C .T ., L in , C .T ., a nd H ua ng , S .F ., 2 00 6 . A f uz zy a pp ro ac h f or s up pl ie r e va l ua ti on a nd s el ec ti on i n s up pl y c ha in
management. International Journal of Production Economics, 1 0 2 ( 2 ) , 2 8 9 – 3 0 1.
C h ri s to p he r , M . a n d P e ck , H . , 2 0 0 4. B u il d in g t h e r e si l ie n t s u pp l y c h ai n. International Journal of Logistics Management, 1 5 ( 2 ) ,
1–13.
C o le m an , L . , 2 0 0 6. F r eq u en c y o f m a n- m ad e d i sa s te r s i n t h e 2 0 th c e nt u ry. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management,
1 4 ( 1 ) , 3 – 1 1.
D i ab a t, A . , G o vi n da n , K . , a n d P a ni c ke r , V . V. , 2 0 12 . S u pp l y c h a i n r i sk m a na g em e nt a n d i t s m i t i g at i on i n a f o od i n du s tr y.
International Journal of Production Research, 5 0 ( 1 1 ), 3 0 3 9– 3 05 0 .
D w ei r i, F . T. a n d K a bl a n, M . M. , 2 0 0 6. U s in g f u zz y d e ci s io n m a ki n g f o r t h e e v al u at i on o f t h e p r oj e ct m a na g em e nt i n te r na l
efficiency. Decision Support Systems, 4 2 ( 2 ) , 7 1 2– 7 2 6.
E l k i ns , D . , et al., 2 0 0 5. 1 8 W a ys t o g u ar d a g a in s t d i s r up t io n. Supply Chain Management Review, 9 ( 1) , 4 6 – 53 .G au de nz i, B . a nd B or gh es i, A ., 2 0 06 . M an ag in g r is ks i n t he s up pl y c ha in u si ng t he A HP m et ho d. International Journal of
Logistics Management, 1 7 ( 1 ) , 1 1 4– 1 3 6.
G u , X . a n d Z hu , Q . , 2 0 06 . F u zz y m u lt i -a t tr i bu t e d e ci s io n -m a ki n g m e th o d b a se d o n e i ge n ve c to r o f f u zz y a t t ri b ut e e v al u at i on
space. Decision Support Systems, 4 1 ( 2 ), 4 0 0 –4 1 0.
H e n d ri c k s , K . B . a n d S i n g h a l , V . R . , 2 0 0 5 . A s s o c i a t io n b e t w e en s u p pl y c h a i n g l i t c h e s a n d o p e r at i n g p e r f o r m a nc e. Management
Science, 5 1 ( 5 ) , 6 9 5– 7 1 1.
H i l l m a n , M . a n d K e l t z . , H . , 2 0 0 7 . Managing risk in the supply chain: A quantitative study, AMR Research Report . A v a i l a b l e f r o m :
http://www.amrresearch.com/Content/View.aspx?pmillid=19994 [Accessed 9 January 2010].
H u an g , C . C. , C h u, P . Y. , a n d C h ia n g, Y . H. , 2 0 08 . A f u zz y A H P a p pl i ca t i on i n g o ve r nm e nt - sp o ns o re d R & D p r oj e ct s e le c ti o n.
Omega, 3 6 ( 6 ), 1 0 38 – 1 05 2 .
I B M , 2 0 0 8 . Supply chain risk management: A delicate balancing act . W h it e p a pe r . N e w Y o rk : I B M G l ob a l B u si n es s S e rv i ce s .
K a rs a k, E . E. , 2 0 0 2. D i st a nc e -b a se d f u zz y M C DM a p pr o ac h f o r e v al u at i ng f l ex i bl e m a nu f ac t ur i ng s y st e m a l te r na t iv e s.
International Journal of Production Research, 4 0 ( 1 3 ), 3 1 6 7– 3 18 1 .
K a r s a k , E . E . a n d T o l g a , E . , 2 0 0 1 . F u z z y m u l t i c r i t e r i a d e c i s i o n m a k i n g p r o c e d u r e f o r e v a l u a t i n g a d v a n c e d m a n u f a c t u r i n g s y s t e m
i n i n v e st m e n ts. International Journal of Production Economics, 6 9 ( 1) , 4 9 –6 4.
K ay a, T . a nd K ah ra ma n, C ., 2 0 11 . M ul ti cr it er ia d ec is io n m ak in g i n e ne rg y p la nn in g u si ng a m od if ie d f uz zy T OP SI S
methodology. Expert Systems with Applications, 3 8 ( 6 ) , 6 5 7 7 –6 5 85 .
K i m, G . , P a rk , C . S. , a n d Y o on , K . P. , 1 9 97 . I d en t if y i ng i n ve s tm e nt o p po r tu n it i es f o r a d va n ce d m a nu f ac t ur i ng s y st e ms w i th
comparative-integrated performance measurement. International Journal of Production Economics, 5 0 ( 1) , 2 3 –3 3.
K u tl u , A . C. a n d E km e kc i og l u, M . , 2 0 1 2. F u zz y f a i lu r e m o de s a n d e f fe c ts a n al y si s b y u s in g f u zz y T O PS I S- b as e d f u zz y A H P.
Expert Systems with Applications, 3 9 ( 1) , 6 1– 67 .
L a v a s t r e , O . , G u n a s e k a r a n , A . , a n d S p a l a n z a n i , A . , 2 0 1 2 . S u p p l y c h a i n r i s k m a n a g e m e n t i n F r e n c h c o m p a n i e s . Decision Support
Systems, 5 2 ( 4 ) , 8 2 8– 8 3 8.
L e w i s, M . A . , 2 0 0 3 . C a u s e, c o n s eq u e n ce a n d c o n t r o l : T o w a r ds a t h e o re t i c a l a n d p r a c ti c a l m o d e l o f o p e r a t i o n al r i s k. Journal of
Operations Management, 2 1 ( 2 ), 2 0 5 –2 2 4.
M c K i ns e y , 2 0 0 8 . Managing global supply chains: McKinsey global survey results. A v a i l a bl e f r o m : h t t p :/ / w w w .m c k i n se y q u ar t e r ly .
com/McKinsey_Global_Survey_Results_Managing_global_supply_chains_2179 [Accesses 14 July 2010].N o r rm a n , A . a n d J a n s s o n , U . , 2 0 0 4 . E r i c s s on ’ s p r o a c t i v e s u p p l y c h a i n r i s k m a n a g e m en t a p p r oa c h a f t e r a s e r i ou s s u b -s u p p li e r
accident. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management , 3 4 ( 5 ) , 4 3 4– 4 5 6.
N o rr m an , A . a n d L i nd r ot h , R . , 2 0 0 4. C a te g or i za t i on o f s u pp l y c h ai n r i sk a n d r i sk m a na g em e nt . I n : C . B r in d le y , e d . Supply
Chain Risk, A s h g at e P u b l is h i n g, U K , 1 4 – 2 7 .
S a mv e di , A . , J a i n , V . , a n d C h an , F . T. S ., 2 0 12 . A n i n te g ra t e d a p p r oa c h f o r m a c h in e t o ol s e le c ti o n u s i n g f u z z y A H P a n d g r ey
r e l a t io n a l a n a l y si s. International Journal of Production Research, 5 0 ( 1 2) , 3 2 11 – 3 22 1 .
S h ef f i, Y . a n d R i c e , J . B . , 2 0 05 . A s u pp l y c h a i n v i e w o f t h e r e s i li e nt e n te r pr i se. MIT Sloan Management Review, 4 7 ( 1 ), 4 1– 48 .
S i m a ng u n s on g , E . , H e n d r y , L . C . , a n d S t e v e n s o n, M . , 2 0 1 2 . S u p pl y - c h ai n u n c e rt a i n t y: a r e v i e w a n d t h e o re t i c a l f o u n d a ti o n f o r
f u t u re r e s e ar c h. International Journal of Production Research, 5 0 ( 1 6 ), 4 4 93 – 4 52 3 .
International Journal of Production Research 92441
-
8/17/2019 Quantifying Risks in a Supply Chain Through Integration of Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS
11/11
S v e n ss o n , G . , 2 0 0 0 . A c o n c ep t u a l f r a m e w or k f o r t h e a n a l y s i s o f v u l n er a b i li t y i n s u p p ly c h a i n s. International Journal of Physical
Distribution & Logistics Management, 3 0 ( 9 ) , 7 3 1– 7 4 9.
T a b u ca n o n , M . T . , B a t a n o v , D . N . , a n d V e r m a, D . K . , 1 9 9 4 . I n t e l li g e n t d e c i s i o n s u p p o rt s y s t em ( D S S ) f o r t h e s e l e c t i o n p r o c e s s o f
a l t e r na t i v e m a c h in e s f o r f l e x i bl e m a n u fa c t u r in g s y s t em s ( F M S). Computers in Industry, 2 5 ( 2) , 1 3 1– 14 3 .
T a pi e ro , C . S. , 2 0 07 . C o ns u me r s r i sk a n d q u al i ty c o nt r ol i n a c o ll a bo r at i ve s u pp l y c h ai n. European Journal of Operational
Research, 1 8 2 ( 2 ) , 6 8 3– 6 9 4.
T h u n , J . H . , D r u k e , M . , a n d H o e n i g , D . , 2 0 1 1 . M a n a g i n g u n c e r t a i n t y – A n e m p i r i c a l a n a l y s i s o f s u p p l y c h a i n r i s k m a n a g e m e n t i n
s m a l l a n d m e d i um - s i ze d e n t e rp r i s es. International Journal of Production Research, 4 9 ( 1 8 ), 5 5 11 – 5 52 5 .W a k o lb i n g er , T . a n d C r u z , J . M . , 2 0 1 1 . S u p pl y c h a i n d i s r u p ti o n r i s k m a n a g e m e nt t h r o ug h s t r a te g i c i n f o r m a t io n a c q u is i t i o n a n d
s h a r in g a n d r i s k- s h a ri n g c o n t ra c t s. International Journal of Production Research, 4 9 ( 1 3 ), 4 0 63 – 4 08 4 .
W a n g , X . , et al., 2 0 1 2 . A t w o - s t a g e f u z z y - A H P m o d e l f o r r i s k a s s e s s m e n t o f i m p l e m e n t i n g g r e e n i n i t i a t i v e s i n t h e f a s h i o n s u p p l y
chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 1 3 5 ( 2 ) , 5 9 5– 6 0 6.
W a n g , Y . M . , L u o , Y . , a n d H u a , Z . , 2 0 0 8 . O n t h e e x t e n t a n a l y s i s m e t h o d f o r f u z z y A H P a n d i t s a p p l i c a t i o n s. European Journal of
Operational Research, 1 8 6 ( 2 ) , 7 3 5 –7 4 7.
W a te r s, D . , 2 0 0 7. Supply chain risk management: Vulnerability and resilience in logistics . L o nd o n: K o ga n p a ge .
W u , T . a n d B l a c k h u r s t , J . , 2 0 0 9 . Managing supply chain risk and vulnerability: tools and methods for supply chain decision makers .
L ondon: Springer.
Y o n g , D . , 2 0 0 6 . P l a n t l o c a t i o n s e l e c t i o n b a s e d o n f u z z y T O P S I S . International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technologies,
2 8 ( 7 –8 ) , 8 3 9 –8 4 4 .
Z a ye d , T . , A m e r , M . , a n d P a n, J . , 2 0 0 8. A s se s si n g r i sk a n d u n c e rt a in t y i n he r en t i n C h in e se h i gh w ay p r oj e ct s u s in g A H P.
International Journal of Project Management, 2 6 ( 4 ) , 4 0 8– 4 1 9.
10 A. Samvedi e t a l .2442