Quantification of Mitral Stenosis - Wake Forest Baptist … of Mitral Stenosis: Planimetry, pressure...

12
Quantification of Mitral Stenosis: Planimetry, pressure Half time, Continuity Common Errors Christopher J Kramer RDCS Advanced Cardiovascular Services Aurora Health Care Milwaukee, WI No Disclosures Baumgartner, H., et al JASE January 2009 How to Grade Mitral Stenosis Routine evaluation of MS severity should combine: Mean Gradient and Valve area using Planimetry and Pressure 1/2t methods. In case of discrepancy the result of planimetry is the reference measurement, except with poor acoustic windows. Continuity equation or PISA not recommended for routine use but may be useful in certain patients when standard measurements are inconclusive.

Transcript of Quantification of Mitral Stenosis - Wake Forest Baptist … of Mitral Stenosis: Planimetry, pressure...

Quantification of Mitral Stenosis:

Planimetry, pressure Half time, Continuity Common Errors

Christopher J Kramer RDCSAdvanced Cardiovascular Services

Aurora Health CareMilwaukee, WI

• No Disclosures

Baumgartner, H., et al JASE January 2009

How to Grade Mitral Stenosis

• Routine evaluation of MS severity should combine:

• Mean Gradient and Valve area using Planimetry and Pressure 1/2t methods.

• In case of discrepancy the result of planimetry is the reference measurement, except with poor acoustic windows.

• Continuity equation or PISA not recommended for routine use but may be useful in certain patients when standard measurements are inconclusive.

Quantification Methods

• Valve Area• Planimetry • Pressure Half Time (PHT)• Continuity Equation• Proximal Isovelocity Surface Area (PISA)

• Mean Gradient

Recommended Recordings Mitral Stenosis

• Apical window• CW Doppler• PW Doppler

• Leaflet tips

• Use Color Doppler to line up with MV inflow jet

• Parallel to Flow• Parasternal short-axis MV level / long-

axis

Mitral Stenosis: Game Plan

Normal Sinus Rhythm and Rapid Atrial Fibrillation

Echocardiographic Quantification

Pathophysiology of MS

Right Heart

Failure

↑ RA Size

RV Hypertrophy

↑ RV Volume

Pulmonary

Edema

“Backward Failure”

into Right Heart

↑ LA Size

↑ LA Pressure

Narrowed MV

Orifice

Kinney MR & others: Comprehensive cardiac care, 7th ed. St. Louis, 1991, Mosby.

PulmonaryHypertension

Case #1

49 year old femaleHistory significant for rheumatic feverVitals – 72 bpm– Sinus rhythm– BP 132/80– Grade 1/6 diastolic rumble

Planimetry

Minimum Diameter = 1.2cm

Planimetry

Minimum Diameter = 1.2cm

Planimetry

Planimetry

Area = 1.8cm2

Mitral StenosisSeverity Guidelines

Severity Mean Gradient MVA (cm2) PHT(msec)

Mild < 4 mmHg > 1.5 <150 Moderate 5 - 9 mmHg 1.1 - 1.5 150- 219 Severe > 10 mmHg < 1.0 > 220

Pressure Half Time

Pressure Half Time

V1 0.7V1PHT

Time for the pressure to drop in halfVelocity

Time

MV PHT= 120ms

MVA= 1.8cm2

Mitral StenosisSeverity Guidelines

Severity Mean Gradient MVA (cm2) PHT(msec)

Mild < 4 mmHg > 1.5 <150 Moderate 5 - 9 mmHg 1.1 - 1.5 150- 219 Severe > 10 mmHg < 1.0 > 220

Continuity Equation

X MVA

SV

CP935823-29

MVA= LVOTSV/MVTVI

LVOTTVI= 25cm

Continuity Equation

LVOT= 2.1cm

Continuity EquationMVPeak=1.5m/s

MVTVI= 52cm

Continuity Equation

LVOTTVI= 25cm

LVOT= 2.1cm

MVTVI= 52cm

x x.785( )2

=1.7cm2

Mitral StenosisSeverity Guidelines

Severity Mean Gradient MVA (cm2) PHT(msec)

Mild < 4 mmHg > 1.5 <150 Moderate 5 - 9 mmHg 1.1 - 1.5 150- 219 Severe > 10 mmHg < 1.0 > 220

Vp

θrVa

PISA

MVA = 6.28 x r2 x Aliasing velocity x θ MV peak velocity 180

Rifkin RD et al. JACC 1995

PISA

PISA

MVA = 6.28 x (1.1cm)2 x (39cm/s) x 150 150cm/s 180

θ=150o

=1.6cm2

Mitral StenosisSeverity Guidelines

Severity Mean Gradient MVA (cm2) PHT(msec)

Mild < 4 mmHg > 1.5 <150 Moderate 5 - 9 mmHg 1.1 - 1.5 150- 219 Severe > 10 mmHg < 1.0 > 220

Mean Pressure GradientMVPeak=1.5m/s

MVMean= 4mmHg

Mitral StenosisSeverity Guidelines

Severity Mean Gradient MVA (cm2) PHT(msec)

Mild < 4 mmHg > 1.5 <150 Moderate 5 - 9 mmHg 1.1 - 1.5 150- 219 Severe > 10 mmHg < 1.0 > 220

Case #1Quantification

– PlanimetryMVA= 1.8cm2

Mild MS

– PHTMVA= 1.8cm2

Mild MS

– Continuity Equation

MVA= 1.7cm2

Mild MS

– PISAMVA= 1.6cm2

Mild MS

– Mean GradientMild MS

Case #2

69 year old femaleHistory significant for Rheumatic feverVitals – 110bpm– Atrial fibrillation– BP 140/84

Planimetry

Planimetry

Planimetry

Minimum

Diameter= .85cm Area=1.2cm2

Pressure Half Time

Pressure Half Time

MVPV=2.4m/s

PHT=188ms

MVA=1.2cm2

MVPV=2.2m/s

PHT=177ms

MVA=1.2cm2

MVPV=2.2m/s

PHT=196ms

MVA=1.1cm2

MVPV=2.6m/s

PHT=186ms

MVA=1.2cm2

MVPV=2.6m/s

PHT=185ms

MVA=1.2cm2

MVPV=2.6m/s

PHT=191ms

MVA=1.2cm2

Average MVAPHT=1.2cm2

LVOTDiam=1.9cm

Continuity Equation

PV=1.3m/s

TVI=20cm

PV=1.3m/s

TVI=20cm

PV=1.2m/s

TVI=18cmAverage TVI=19cm

Continuity Equation

MVPV=2.4m/s

MnGr=14mmHg

MVTVI=34cm

MVPV=2.2m/s

MnGr=11mmHg

MVTVI=43cm

MVPV=2.2m/s

MnGr=11mmHg

MVTVI=69cm

MVPV=2.6m/s

MnGr=16mmHg

MVTVI=52cm

MVPV=2.6m/s

MnGr=15mmHg

MVTVI=70cm

MVPV=2.6m/s

MnGr=12mmHg

MVTVI=68cm

Average MVTVI=56cm

Continuity Equation

MVA=(1.9cm)2 x .785 x 19

56cm

=.96cm2

PISA

PISA1.1cm

θ=165o

PISA

MVA = 6.28 x (1.1cm)2 x (34cm/s) x165 240cm/s 180

=.99cm2

MVPV=2.4m/s

MnGr=14mmHg

MVTVI=34cm

MVPV=2.2m/s

MnGr=11mmHg

MVTVI=43cm

MVPV=2.2m/s

MnGr=11mmHg

MVTVI=69cm

MVPV=2.6m/s

MnGr=16mmHg

MVTVI=52cm

MVPV=2.6m/s

MnGr=15mmHg

MVTVI=70cm

MVPV=2.6m/s

MnGr=12mmHg

MVTVI=68cm

Mean Pressure Gradient

Average Mean Gradient=13mmHg

Mitral StenosisSeverity Guidelines

Severity Mean Gradient MVA (cm2) PHT(msec) Mild < 4 mmHg > 1.5 <150 Moderate 5 - 9 mmHg 1.1 - 1.5 150- 219 Severe > 10 mmHg < 1.0 > 220

NOTE:Heart rate dependent!

Case# 2Quantification– Planimitery

MVA=1.2cm2

Moderate MS

– PHTMVA=1.2cm2

Moderate MS

– Continuity Equation

MVA=.96cm2

Severe MS

– PISAMVA=.99cm2

Severe MS

– Mean GradientMean PG=13mmHgSevere MS

Indicators

LA Volume (ml/m2)RVSPRV SizeRV Function

Average TR Velocity=3.4m/s

MV 3D

MV 3DQ

Take Home Points

• Use all tools in your toolbox, Mean Gradient, MVA; P1/2 time, Planimetry

• Know your limitations of MS• Always record the HR when reporting

the mean pressure gradient • Measure a minimum of 5 beats when

atrial fibrillation is present• Incorporate the supportive indicators

when determining the severity of stenosis