Quality of Care in Managed Care - Texas Council of Community
Quality of care
description
Transcript of Quality of care
![Page 1: Quality of care](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070403/56813a07550346895da1d501/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Quality of care Israel De Alba, MD MPH
Clinical Professor
Health Sciences
University of California, Irvine
![Page 2: Quality of care](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070403/56813a07550346895da1d501/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Content Introduction: quality of care today
Core measures
HCAPS Patient Satisfaction Survey
Hospital Readmission Reduction Program
Universal Protocol (Time out)
![Page 3: Quality of care](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070403/56813a07550346895da1d501/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
The new face of health care Emphasis on efficient, lean care
Change in payment structure Emphasis on disease rather than on health
Disease makes money; health doesn’t
The standard fee-for-service system that encourages doctors and other caregivers to give lots of tests, individual treatments and to prescribe drugs, instead of keeping patients well
Oversight: Governtment agencies
Insurance companies
Quality agencies
Patients
![Page 4: Quality of care](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070403/56813a07550346895da1d501/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Quality of care (Institute of Medicine) Safe – avoiding injuries to patients from the care that is supposed to help them.
Effective – providing services based on scientific knowledge to all who could benefit and refraining from providing services to those not likely to benefit (avoiding underuse and overuse).
Patient-centered – providing care that is respectful of and responsive to individual patient preferences, needs, and values and ensuring that patient values guide all clinical decisions.
Timely – reducing waits and sometimes harmful delays for both those who receive and those who give care.
Efficient – avoiding waste, in particular waste of equipment, supplies, ideas, and energy.
Equitable – providing care that does not vary in quality because of personal characteristics, such as gender, ethnicity, geographic location, and socioeconomic status.
![Page 5: Quality of care](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070403/56813a07550346895da1d501/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
![Page 6: Quality of care](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070403/56813a07550346895da1d501/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
![Page 7: Quality of care](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070403/56813a07550346895da1d501/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Center for Medicaid and Medicare Services HCAHPS (Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems) survey is
the first national, standardized, publicly reported survey of patients' perspectives of hospital care.
Contains 18 core questions communication with nurses and doctors
responsiveness of hospital staff
the cleanliness and quietness of the hospital environment
pain management
communication about medicines
discharge information
overall rating of hospital
would they recommend the hospital
![Page 8: Quality of care](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070403/56813a07550346895da1d501/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Patient satisfaction
![Page 9: Quality of care](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070403/56813a07550346895da1d501/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Core Measures: Joint Commission
![Page 10: Quality of care](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070403/56813a07550346895da1d501/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Heart failure
![Page 11: Quality of care](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070403/56813a07550346895da1d501/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
MI timely care
![Page 12: Quality of care](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070403/56813a07550346895da1d501/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
MI effective care
![Page 13: Quality of care](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070403/56813a07550346895da1d501/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Pneumonia markers
![Page 14: Quality of care](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070403/56813a07550346895da1d501/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
DVT prevention
![Page 15: Quality of care](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070403/56813a07550346895da1d501/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Hospital acquired infections
![Page 16: Quality of care](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070403/56813a07550346895da1d501/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Hospital readmission reduction
![Page 17: Quality of care](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070403/56813a07550346895da1d501/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Decreasing Hospital Readmissions Beginning in fiscal year (FY)2013, hospitals with higher than expected readmission rates
will experience a decrease in payment for all Medicare discharges
Reduce payment to hospital by 1% in FY 2013 and 2% in 2014 and 3% beyond
Expected to save $7.1 billion over 10 years
Performance data will initially be based on 30 day readmissions for MI, HF and pneumonia
Additional conditions added in 2015 (COPD, CABG, PCA)
![Page 18: Quality of care](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070403/56813a07550346895da1d501/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Avoidable Readmissions Evidence suggests many rehospitalization may be preventable
No one knows what proportion of readmissions are truly “avoidable”?
Large interstate and inter-hospital variation
Many readmissions are outside the control of the hospital or health system
Many readmissions are appropriate and the goal is not to avoid all readmissions
Some interventions have demonstrated the ability to decrease readmissions
![Page 19: Quality of care](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070403/56813a07550346895da1d501/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Readmission rates
![Page 20: Quality of care](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070403/56813a07550346895da1d501/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
The patient perspective Patients did not necessarily see hospital readmissions as a problem
Many patients felt they were discharged too soon.
Many did not understand their discharge instructions.
Care instructions were too general.
Patients and caregivers wished they had been more assertive.
New diagnoses posed special challenges.
Primary care physicians were missing from the picture.
Some had only limited or no support once home.
Some were not ready to change behaviors
A few had chronic health conditions for years but were not educated about their illnesses.
![Page 21: Quality of care](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070403/56813a07550346895da1d501/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
The physician perspective The issue is on their radar.
Readmissions are complicated.
There are financial pressures to discharge as soon as possible.
The quality and training of the providers can make a difference.
Some hospitals are improving the discharge process and in-hospital experience to reduce readmissions.
Some hospitals try to avoid readmissions by referring patients to their own outpatient clinics for follow-up care.
![Page 22: Quality of care](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070403/56813a07550346895da1d501/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
![Page 23: Quality of care](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070403/56813a07550346895da1d501/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Project RED Discharge Checklist
Eleven mutually reinforcing components: 1. Medication reconciliation 2. Reconcile discharge plan with national guidelines 3. Follow-up appointments 4. Outstanding tests 5. Post-discharge services 6. Written discharge plan 7. What to do if problem arises 8. Patient education 9. Assess patient understanding10. Discharge summary sent to PCP11. Telephone reinforcement
![Page 24: Quality of care](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070403/56813a07550346895da1d501/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
![Page 25: Quality of care](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070403/56813a07550346895da1d501/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
What is Universal Protocol? The Joint Commission Board of Commissioners originally approved the Universal
Protocol for Preventing Wrong Site, Wrong Procedure and Wrong Person Surgery
Process that involves 3 steps Pre-procedure verification
Site marking
Time out
![Page 26: Quality of care](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070403/56813a07550346895da1d501/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Universal Protocol
Three steps to patient safety
1. Pre-procedure verification 2. Site marking 3. Time Out
![Page 27: Quality of care](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070403/56813a07550346895da1d501/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
1. Pre-procedure verification• The first SAFETY CHECK
• Is a process of information gathering and confirmation, including verification of:
• Correct patient, correct procedure, correct site
• Documentation (H&P/interval note, consent form, other assessments)
• Supplies: blood products, implants, devices, and/or special equipment for the procedure
• Other: labeled diagnostic and radiology test results
• Assures that missing information or discrepancies are addressed before starting the procedure
![Page 28: Quality of care](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070403/56813a07550346895da1d501/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
2. Site Marking• Required prior to procedures involving incisions or percutaneous puncture or
insertion
• Mark the site before the procedure is performed and involve the patient in the site marking process, if possible
• The site does not need to be marked for bilateral structures
Department Name | Month X, 201X
![Page 29: Quality of care](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070403/56813a07550346895da1d501/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
3. Time-Out
• Final SAFETY CHECK before starting the procedure
• Activities are suspended so that ALL team members can fully engage in the time out.
• The focus is on ACTIVE confirmation of the patient, site, and procedure
• For bedside or ambulatory practice procedures, the physician performing the intervention or other trained member of the procedural team may lead the time-out.
• The procedure is NOT started until all questions or concerns are resolved.
![Page 30: Quality of care](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070403/56813a07550346895da1d501/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Time-Out
The time-out must address: Correct patient identity Accurate procedure consent form or physician order Correct side/site marked Agreement on procedure to be done
The time-out should also address, where applicable: Correct patient position Relevant images/results displayed The need to administer antibiotics or fluids for irrigation Safety precautions based on patient history or medication use.
![Page 31: Quality of care](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070403/56813a07550346895da1d501/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
31
QUEST Documentation
Department Name | Month X, 201X
![Page 32: Quality of care](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070403/56813a07550346895da1d501/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
32 Department Name | Month X, 201X
![Page 33: Quality of care](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022070403/56813a07550346895da1d501/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Summary and conclusions Quality of care: why it matters to you
New paradigm
These changes will affect how we practice medicine