Qrs – Tradeweave Keystone

33
QRS – Tradeweave - Keystone Fred Lizotte

description

 

Transcript of Qrs – Tradeweave Keystone

Page 1: Qrs – Tradeweave   Keystone

QRS – Tradeweave - Keystone

Fred Lizotte

Page 2: Qrs – Tradeweave   Keystone

Mission and Vision

To be a leading provider of demand chain management services to suppliers of consumer goods.

Page 3: Qrs – Tradeweave   Keystone

Key Dates

1987 – QRS keystone catalog was developed. It caused great success for the company.– It helped retailers and suppliers improve their

purchasing and fulfillment operations– Keystone contained almost 73 million UPC’s as

of mid-1999, 42 million of them being apparel related.

Page 4: Qrs – Tradeweave   Keystone

Key Dates 1993 – It had its initial public offering 1993-1998 – Generated sales growth of 33% and

net income growth of 36% on a compound annual basis

1998 – sales and net income were $91.9 million and $12.1 million.

1996-1999 – Market capitalization grew 43% annually.

1999 – QRS market capitalization was $697 million.

Page 5: Qrs – Tradeweave   Keystone

Key Dates 1999 – The company had become a leading

provider of electronic data Interchange EDI services to the U.S. retail industry. QRS had achieved a 40% market share for EDI services in the soft goods sector (apparel, accessories, and footwear). It had also developed the retail industry’s largest and most widely used uniform product code UPC catalog. With more than 7,700 customers, including 270 retailers and nearly 7,500 manufacturers and carriers, QRS was an ingrained service provider to the retail industry.

Page 6: Qrs – Tradeweave   Keystone

Source: QRS internal research

Facts of the case

QRS Keystone was the basis for the companies success.

The catalog contained more UPC’s than any competing product and was more than an order of magnitude larger than the average retailer’s UPC portfolio of 1 million. 1

Page 7: Qrs – Tradeweave   Keystone

Facts of the case QRS has pursued a hub-and-spoke customer

acquisition strategy. The Keystone catalog cut retailers’ costs by

automating processes, improving information quality, and tightening monitoring and control.

QRS hub retailers announced that they would only procure products electronically through QRS– This caused the requirement that the vendors “spoke” had

to upload all their product information on to QRS Keystone catalog.

– This value chain was captured by charging subscriptions and transaction fees to both hubs and spokes.

Page 8: Qrs – Tradeweave   Keystone

Value Chain

Page 9: Qrs – Tradeweave   Keystone

Value Chain

Page 10: Qrs – Tradeweave   Keystone

Goals and Strategies QRS had fears that they have successfully

penetrated and saturated the apparel market. They decided to move into a broader market

– QRS broadened its customer acquisition efforts to include large vendors, many of which had already become QRS customers through their relationships with large retailers.

To gain more revenue QRS had developed new products within its Inventory Management Service and Logistics Management Services product lines.

Page 11: Qrs – Tradeweave   Keystone

Goals and Strategies QRS acquired a few companies

– Service bureaus• Helped small vendors convert electronic purchase

orders from retailers to hard copy for vendors and converted paper documents from vendors to electronic format for transmission to retailers.

– Retail Data Services• A National market research and data management

firm serving grocery and consumer packaged goods markets that collected, verified, and analyzed competitive retail pricing, promotion, and distribution information

Page 12: Qrs – Tradeweave   Keystone

Goals and Strategies

QRS was trying to figure out how to keep consistent growth happening for the company and came up with three options

Page 13: Qrs – Tradeweave   Keystone

Option one

Broaden the scope of the installed base beyond apparel to include other UPC-driven verticals, such as sporting goods, canned foods and grocery, household furnishings, toys, and general merchandise.

Page 14: Qrs – Tradeweave   Keystone

Option two and three

Create more new product offerings in-house. To acquire more companies that could enhance the

QRS product portfolio. Also a thought of creating new, organizationally

segregated businesses that might enhance and deepen the QRS product offering to provide a more complete solution for the needs of its existing and future customers.

Page 15: Qrs – Tradeweave   Keystone

QRS and the apparel goods supply chain Apparel retailing was a $192 billion market in the

US in 1998. Of the top 10 apparel retailers, 8 of them were

QRS customers in 1998, distributed approximately 50% of apparel retailing dollar volume.

Of the top 50 apparel retailers, 26 of them were QRS customers in 1998, distributed approximately 83% of this dollar volume.

Of the remaining apparel retailers, only a few were QRS customers in 1998.

Page 16: Qrs – Tradeweave   Keystone

Apparel Goods Supply Chain Breakdown

Page 17: Qrs – Tradeweave   Keystone

Apparel Goods Supply Chain

QRS did business with retailers that represented approximately 57% of the apparel retailing market.

General Merchandise department stores were the largest channel within this market– 34% of the total volume

Page 18: Qrs – Tradeweave   Keystone

The Profit

The problem we see here is that retail segments had very low profit.– Department and discount stores – 3.1%– Grocery stores – 2.2 %– Home improvement stores – 4.7%– Drug stores – 2.6%– Apparel retailers – 6.9%– Apparel retailers had the highest profit, and

QRS knew this.

Page 19: Qrs – Tradeweave   Keystone

Apparel goods supply chain In 1998 QRS believed that there was about 7,000

vendors supplying apparel and general merchandise to retailers.

These vendors could be segmented into a few categories– Basic merchandise– Fashion– Top

Net profit margins for most vendor segments were typically below 5%.

Page 20: Qrs – Tradeweave   Keystone

E-Commerce opportunities

Surplus merchandise area Merchandise that is marked down due to

certain things– Time– Damage– Style– Demand– Returns

Page 21: Qrs – Tradeweave   Keystone

Opportunity

For an apparel vendor with low profit margins– A product underage can cost more than a

product overage

For an apparel retailer– Failing to stock a specific item that was in

demand was more costly than carrying an item that did not sell right away.

Page 22: Qrs – Tradeweave   Keystone

Opportunity

Both vendors and retailers had a plan for the extra products that don’t sell in time– In 1998, approximately 15% of merchandise

that apparel vendors distributed had to be liquidated, implying a vender-generated surplus merchandise market of $11 billion.

In apparel, retailers are generally responsible for demand forecasts and determining order quantities and pricing.

Page 23: Qrs – Tradeweave   Keystone

Opportunity

In 1998 apparel retailers disposed of 5% of the merchandise they acquired outside of their stores.– Retailers generated surplus merchandise market

of 9 billion.

With the 11 billion market that vendors have we now have a $20 billion dollar market of these surplus goods.

Page 24: Qrs – Tradeweave   Keystone

Surplus Merchandise Disposition

Both apparel vendors and retailers considered surplus merchandise disposition a time consuming, inefficient, and painful process.

To get rid of surplus– Retailers would reduce the price of the

merchandise as much as 45%– Big retailers made contracts with vendors that

they would buy back the products at a certain cost.

Page 25: Qrs – Tradeweave   Keystone

Surplus Problem

The problem remains that in the end there still is a surplus taking up room, thus costing money to hold.

With these products the retailers still had to keep track of the UPC’s, costing them money in handling costs.

Retailers only got maybe 10-20 cents per item from the whole sales cost.

Page 26: Qrs – Tradeweave   Keystone

Training

Retailers were scared that if they consistently dispose of their apparel clothes to reducing the price, customers would use this to their advantage and wait to buy till the product is cheaper.

Retailers also have the fear that if they discount their products it may cause a channel conflict.

Vendors had a fear that if they discounted these apparel products, brand dissolution could happen to the high named brand

Page 27: Qrs – Tradeweave   Keystone

Solution Some vendors shredded their apparel surplus and sold it

as rags. Some maintained relationships with trusted resellers to

sell their surplus apparel. These resellers made sure that their selling the surplus

apparel would reduce the channel conflict that occurs.– Selling to foreign markets

40% - to 60% of apparel surplus merchandise were disposed of using outlet stores or web sites.

30% - 50% were sold to large resellers such as TJ MAXX, Burlington Coat Factory

5% - 10% went to other intermediaries

Page 28: Qrs – Tradeweave   Keystone

Supply Chain to Apparel Surplus

Page 29: Qrs – Tradeweave   Keystone

The solution to the problem

Page 30: Qrs – Tradeweave   Keystone

New Entrant QRS

QRS believed that none of the current players was adequately servicing the apparel goods vertical.

All the new entrants had maintained a broader focus on only connecting buyers to sellers or on surplus merchandise in general.

B2B

Page 31: Qrs – Tradeweave   Keystone

Demand Chain Inefficiencies QRS had a goal of helping to reduce apparel surplus They would do this by increasing the technology

used to improve communication and inefficiencies The problem seemed to be bigger than that, vendors

had to decide what type of clothing and how much to produce, months ahead of time. Retailers communicated the demand, but only when it came time to order the apparel.

QRS’s inventory management and sales analysis products improved the functioning of the retail demand chain

Page 32: Qrs – Tradeweave   Keystone

Organizational and Implementation Issues QRS saw an opportunity to use the internet to do

more for retail demand chain to attack the core problem that caused the surplus in the first place.

Given time-to-market pressure, a key issue would be how to design, develop, and launch a product quickly.

The more time spent researching the opportunity, the higher the chance of producing the right product, but the greater risk of missing the window.

Page 33: Qrs – Tradeweave   Keystone

Summary QRS was having fears that their tremendous growth was

temporary and needed to be solved They saw a good opportunity in the Apparel Goods Supply

Chain They also saw a good opportunity dealing with the surplus

of the merchandise– They were essentially double dipping, they made money off of

the retailer getting the products from the vendor and then made money again when it came time to get rid of the surplus in various ways.

They tried to stop surplus from happening in the first place.

That’s where the case ends.