Qqml2015 murphy derven

22
“all changed and changed utterly” Technological innovation in two Irish libraries Hugh Murphy, Senior Librarian, Maynooth University Library Caleb Derven, Head, Technical & Digital Services, Glucksman Library, University of Limerick

Transcript of Qqml2015 murphy derven

Page 1: Qqml2015 murphy derven

“all changed and changed utterly”

Technological innovation in two Irish libraries

Hugh Murphy, Senior Librarian, Maynooth University LibraryCaleb Derven, Head, Technical & Digital Services, Glucksman Library,

University of Limerick

Page 2: Qqml2015 murphy derven

Introduction• Within 5 years, library services at

Maynooth and Limerick have been completely transformed

• Changes have varied across technologies and services

• Sustainability was key - changes occurred in context of national recession

• Fine balance between using technology to do a better job and the seductions of “techno determinism”

Page 3: Qqml2015 murphy derven

Background

• Irish context: staffing difficulties, financial and other limitations.

• Challenges enabled innovation

• While similar changes occurred in both Limerick and Maynooth, we note only the most dramatic and relevant of each.

Page 4: Qqml2015 murphy derven

Literature Review• Incremental vs. radical change - is the

former innovation? (Ettlie, et al., 1984)

• Organisation support is an enabling factor for innovation (Balk, et al., 2014)

• Library leadership is a factor in innovation (Jantz, 2014)

• Institutional size influences capacity to innovate (Nowvskie (2013)

Page 5: Qqml2015 murphy derven

Literature Review, continued

• Technical vs. Administrative innovation

• Economic crises enabled innovation, but leadership served a significant role

• “ If leaders have a positive attitude toward change, then initiation of an innovation becomes possible.” (Jantz, 2014)

Page 6: Qqml2015 murphy derven

Literature Review - Size Matters

• Size can impact on the capacity of the institution to innovate. (Ettlie, 1984)

• Importance of decentralised and non-hierarchical approaches (Nowviskie, 2013)

• Innovation creates a public value (Balk, 2014)

Page 7: Qqml2015 murphy derven

Technologies

• Kaizen-type approach - iterative and focused on improvements

• Necessity of apt context

• Technology as enabler, not prime mover

Page 8: Qqml2015 murphy derven

Audio Visual transformation (MU)

• Starting from a low base

• Policy as important as service

Page 9: Qqml2015 murphy derven

Audio Visual Transformation (MU)

‘wow’ factor v service provision

Page 10: Qqml2015 murphy derven

Use Case 2 - Adopting a Discovery Solution

• Nationally - consortial purchasing body which means similar resources across institutions

• Search across resources = changed perception of library services

• Technology means Library seen as ‘better’

• Market determines products and services; library doesn’t drive the innovations

Page 11: Qqml2015 murphy derven

Adopting a Discovery Solution (MU)

• MU implementation of Summon and new website at the same time

• Initial testing with students -hugely positive

• General increase in e-resource usage (‘easier’)

• Strong positive feedback from most users

• Some find transition difficult (education)

Page 12: Qqml2015 murphy derven

Adopting a Discovery Solution (UL)

• UL: European Documentation Centre material loaded monthly into Summon

• Clear, quantitative evidence that discovery solution is preferred searching route for most students

• Website redesign during 2015 will allow us to revisit single search box on Library homepage

Page 13: Qqml2015 murphy derven

3D Printing (MU)

“Gartner predicts that the 3D printer market will have revenue growth rates of over 100%, beginning in 2018. Revenue

will grow fastest in enterprise 3D markets, while unit shipments will expand rapidly in the consumer 3D market, with more-low-

cost units driving broader adoption”

Page 14: Qqml2015 murphy derven

3D Printing (MU)•Give users what [we think] they want

•Broadens service provision

•Not all users want books (print or ‘e’)

•Increased traction with academic departments

•Staff views on technology opened / challenged

•Library seen as innovative

•Library as ‘centre for everything’ on campus

Page 15: Qqml2015 murphy derven

Collection Management Workflows (UL)

• Increasing reliance on provision of shelf-ready services set the stage

• Faster and more efficient access of material for students and academic staff

• Staff willingness to embrace new roles and tasks

Page 16: Qqml2015 murphy derven

• All stages of the acquisitions process directly utilize EDI

• Single workflow: bibliographic record created at point of ordering

• Over 90% of books are put into stock automatically at the book sorter

Collection Management Workflows (UL)

Page 17: Qqml2015 murphy derven

Digital Library Services (UL)● Change of work practices in

collection management at Limerick = new focus on descriptive metadata, digital imaging and digital standards

● Staff retrained in digitisation and metadata practices

● The adoption of an open-source, community-of-practice-based digital repository allows the full range of users to access unique collections

Page 18: Qqml2015 murphy derven

Use Case 5 - Digital Library Services

• Staff expertise refocused on new areas: cataloguers on unique collections, others on digitisation

• Innovative services and practices directly enabled by shifts in ordering process

• Building innovative, digital services strengthens the strategic role of the Library

Page 19: Qqml2015 murphy derven

Use Case 5 - Digital Library Services

• Omeka• Hydra• Incrementa

l• Scalable

Page 20: Qqml2015 murphy derven

Conclusions

• Strategic role of innovation on local and national levels

• Direct staff benefit - re-orienting key skills

• Future innovation – strategy

• Library becomes ‘centre for everything’ on campus

Page 21: Qqml2015 murphy derven

BibliographyBalk, H., Library Innovation: Enablers and Obstacles. Library Innovation: Enablers and Obstacles. Available at: https://libraryinnofactors.wordpress.com/ [Accessed May 10, 2015]

Balk, H., Kwant, E. & Neudecker, C., 2014. What makes innovation work? Innovation practice in the National Library of the Netherlands. IFLA journal, 40(3), pp.157–168

Ettlie, J.E., Bridges, W.P. & O’Keefe, R.D., 1984. Organization Strategy and Structural Differences for Radical versus Incremental Innovation. Management Science, 30(6), pp.682–695

Jantz, R.C., 2012. Innovation in academic libraries: An analysis of university librarians’ perspectives. Library & information science research, 34(1), pp.3–12

Jantz, R.C., 2014. The Determinants of Organizational Innovation: An Interpretation and Implications for Research Libraries. College & Research Libraries, pp.crl14–580

Nowviskie, B., 2013. Skunks in the Library: A Path to Production for Scholarly R&D. Journal of Library Administration, 53(1), pp.53–66

Vinopal, J. & McCormick, M., 2013. Supporting Digital Scholarship in Research Libraries: Scalability and Sustainability. Journal of Library Administration, 53(1), pp.27–42.

Page 22: Qqml2015 murphy derven

Thank youHugh Murphy,

Senior Librarian,

Maynooth University Library

[email protected] @hughtweet

Caleb Derven, Head,

Technical & Digital Services, Glucksman Library, University of

Limerick

[email protected]@calebderven