QoS in SIEPON Standard

9
Jeff Stribling Hitachi 4/20/12

description

Presentation from SIEPON Seminar on 20 April in Czech Republic, sponsored by IEEE-SA & CAG. Opinions presented by the speakers in this presentation are their own, and not necessarily those of their employers or of IEEE.

Transcript of QoS in SIEPON Standard

Page 1: QoS in SIEPON Standard

Jeff StriblingHitachi4/20/12

Page 2: QoS in SIEPON Standard

Services Landscape

User Type Data Voice Video

SMB

SFU

MDU/MTU

Examples

HSDCell BackhaulCloud Computing

E‐Line/E‐LANVoIPIPTVEveryone wants everything!

Simple to say, but a complex problem to solve.

4/20/2012 2IEEE 1904.1 SIEPON Seminar, Prague

Page 3: QoS in SIEPON Standard

EPON Architecture

Optical Splitters

EPONOLT

EPON ONU

EPON ONU

EPON ONU

Central Office

Customer PremisePON

EPON can cost effectively provide access for any and all users within fiber reach. What about providing varied services?

4/20/2012 3IEEE 1904.1 SIEPON Seminar, Prague

Page 4: QoS in SIEPON Standard

The Problem of QoS

Different services and different use cases have different requirements for traffic treatment.

To simultaneously support all these services, QoS must be both comprehensive and flexible.

Bandwidth

Latenc

y/ J

itter

Voice Video

Data

4/20/2012 4IEEE 1904.1 SIEPON Seminar, Prague

Page 5: QoS in SIEPON Standard

SIEPON’s QoS MandateAddress the previously stated problem: create a comprehensive and flexible QoS architecture using EPON transport that simultaneously enables vendor interoperability.This starts with defining service parameters we can use as metrics to ensure the service requirements (and operator SLAs) are met:

CIR/CBS

PIR/PBS     

EIR/EBS

Frame Delay (FD)

Frame Delay Variation (FDV)

Frame Loss Ratio (FLR)4/20/2012 5IEEE 1904.1 SIEPON Seminar, Prague

Throughputparameters

Page 6: QoS in SIEPON Standard

EPON Service Paths (ESPs)

Reference: Figure 6‐1, IEEE P1904.1, draft D2.3

ESPs can be:Upstream

Downstream@ ONU@ OLT

One LLIDMany LLIDs

ULTIMATE FLEXIBILITY!

4/20/2012 6IEEE 1904.1 SIEPON Seminar, Prague

Page 7: QoS in SIEPON Standard

Distributed vs. Centralized Intelligence

CentralizedSuited for:SFU or SMB with single customers with multiple services on a single ONUMTUs with business services needing strict QoS control

DistributedSuited for:MDUs with multiple customers on a single ONUReducing overhead and resources at OLT

4/20/2012 7IEEE 1904.1 SIEPON Seminar, Prague

Page 8: QoS in SIEPON Standard

Queue Service Discipline (QSD)

(a) Threshold‐firstPrevents starvation, improves quality of “Best Effort Traffic”Typically used in high bandwidth systems with small numbers of users

(b)Priority‐firstImproves quality of higher priority traffic, but cannot prevent starvationTypically used in bandwidth‐limited systems with large numbers of users

(c) Strict PriorityImproves quality of the highest priority trafficUsed only when this highest priority traffic must be ensured at all costs

4/20/2012 8IEEE 1904.1 SIEPON Seminar, Prague

Page 9: QoS in SIEPON Standard

Final Thoughts

Everyone wants everything!

QoS architecture must be flexible

SIEPON introduces ESPs and defines service parameters to control QoS portions of ESPs

Flexibility of ESP allows for proper treatment of service for different user types

Flexibility of QSD allows for proper treatment of service for different service types

Everyone gets everything!

4/20/2012 9IEEE 1904.1 SIEPON Seminar, Prague