QC of Baby Care Products
-
Upload
sesha-madhavi-maruvada -
Category
Documents
-
view
411 -
download
58
description
Transcript of QC of Baby Care Products
Topics Covered
1. Introduction
2. Baby Care Products
3. Quality Control of Cosmetics
1. General Evaluation
2. Qualitative Analysis
3. Microbiological Evaluation
4. Dermatotoxicological Studies
1. Safety Evaluation
2. Efficacy Evaluation
5. Conclusion
1. Introduction
‘Cosmetic’ – Greek word – Kosmein = ‘to adron’
Def. –
Articles intended to be rubbed, poured, sprinkled, or
sprayed on, introduced into, or otherwise applied to
the human body or any part thereof for cleansing,
beautifying, promoting attractiveness, or altering the
appearance
Cosmeceutical – popularized by Albert Kligman – to
bridge the gap between Cosmetics and Pharmaceuticals
‘Make Up’ – used to connote ‘Cosmetics’ – poet Richard
Cranshaw
1.1 Biology and Structure of Skin
Epidermis showing four layers and corresponding four important cells
1.2 Pediatric Skin Care
Anatomical Differences between Baby & Adult Skin
Cells – normal number
Melanocytes – less pigmented
Dermis – fibroblasts – less in number
Hypodermis – adipoblasts –small size, triglyceride
Hair – very thin, faintly pigmented
1.2 Pediatric Skin Care
Physiological Differences Between Baby & Adult Skin
Dermal Absorption
Pharmacokinetic parameters
Diaper Area & Non-Diapered Area
TEWL
pH
2. Baby Care Products
Intended for use on new born babies to children upto 5
years
Functional rather than decorative
Criteria for consideration during development
High quality raw material
Non irritant substances
Allergen free
pH- skin friendly
Addition of anti-oxidants, chelating agents, skin
barrier protective ingredients
2.1 Baby Cosmetics Types
Cleansing cosmetics
Bath products
Soaps & Syndets
Shampoos
Cleansing Milk
Baby Wipes
Protective Cosmetics
Face/Body Creams
Baby Oil
Baby Powder
2.2 Baby Shampoo
pH : 6-7
Mild surfactants (e.g. – non ionics & amphoteric)
Avoidance of eye contact - Polysorbate 20 & PEG 600
distearate – controls viscocity
2.2 Baby Shampoo - Formulation
Ingredients %w/w
Magnesium Laureth Sulfate (27.5%A) 11.00
Cocamidopropyl Betaine (30%A) 5.00
Polysorbate 20 1.00
PEG 600 Distearate 3.50
Preservative q.s.
Perfume q.s.
Citric Acid to pH 6.0 q.s.
Colour q.s.
Water (deionized) 100.00
Magnesium Laureth Sulfate mild foaming agent
Cocamidopropryl Betaine Amphoteric Surfactant
Polysorbate 20 non ionic detergent
PEG 600 Distearite Emulsifier
Tetrasodium EDTA Chelating Agent
Citirc Acid Buffering Agent
2.3 Body Cream
Face/Body – Moisturizing effect
Napkin Zone – protect from aggressions
O/W cream
W/O cream or water free ointment – talc, kaolin, ZnO
Barrier Creams – winter
2.3 Body Cream – Formulation
Ingredient Wt %
Mineral Oil 30.00
Pertrolatum 2.00
Stearic acid 1.20
Stearyl alcohol 1.00
Cetyl alcohol 0.70
Triethanolamine 0.65
Propylene glycol 1.00
Water 63.45
Perfume, preservatives, etc. q.s.
Water Vehicle
Glycerine, propylene Glycol Humectant
Mineral Oil, petrolatum Prevents water loss
Cetyl Alcohol, Stearyl Alcohol, Stearic Acid Emulsifiers
EDTA Prevents rancidity
Dimethicone (silicone) Gives silky feel
2.4 Baby Oil
Mineral Oil Type Natural Veg Oil Type
• High Moisturizing effect
• Clogs the pores –
prevents natural release
of toxins
• If accidentally ingested
– vitamin deficiencies
• Low Moisturizing
effect
• More therapeutic
effect
Cleansing and Moisturizing effect
2.4 Baby Oil - Formulation
Mineral Oil
Ingredient Wt%
Mineral Oil 70.00
Octyl palmitate 5.00
Isopropyl myristate 10.00
Cyclomethicone 15.00
Perfumes, solubilisers,
antioxidants, etc.
q.s.
Vegetable Oil
Caprylic/Capric Triglyceride
Coconut nucifera (Coconut) Oil
Gardenia tahitensis Flowers (Monoi)
Persea gratissima (Avocado) Oil
Prunus ameniaca (Apricot) Kernel Oil
Camellia sanqua Oil
Lavandula angustifolia (Lavender) Oil
Anthemis nobilis (Chamomile)Oil
Simmondsia chinensis (Jojoba) Oil
Tocopherol (Natural Vitamin E)
2.5 Baby Powder
Absorb Moisture
Prevent irritation of fragile skin
Talc – need sterilization
Contamination with Clostridium tetanie
NZ – 4 child deaths
Britain – 2 child deaths
2.5 Baby Powder - Formulation
Ingredient Wt%
Talc 77.90
Starch 20.00
Zinc Oxide 2.00
Perfume 0.10
3. QUALITY CONTROL OF COSMETICS
Quality Control - Quality Control is the process involved
within the system to ensure job management,
competence and performance during the manufacturing
of the product or service to ensure it meets the quality
plan as designed.
Quality control Includes
1. General Pharmaceutical Evaluations of Baby
Cosmetics
2. Qualitative Analysis of Various Classes of Cosmetic
Compounds
3. Stability Studies
3.1 General Pharmaceutical Evaluations of
Baby Cosmetics
Evaluation of Baby Shampoos
Clarity
Viscosity
pH
Surface Tension
Detergency & Cleansing Action
Foam Quality
Wetting Action
3.1.1 Evaluation of Baby Shampoos
Clarity
Cloud point & Clear point - difference ≯ 100C
Viscosity
Rotational Viscometer 1- 100 rpm @ 23.2±0.40C
500-1500 cps
pH
pH meter, undiluted shampoo
6.5-8.5
Surface Tension
Traube Stalagmometer, 10% shampoo (200C)
𝜎 = 𝜌. 𝑔.𝑉
2. 𝜋. 𝑟. 𝑛
3.1.1 Evaluation of Baby Shampoos
Detergency & Cleansing Action
Gravimetric method - % sebum removed after
washing is calculated
Foam Quality
Foam Volume – DLS stirrer, 500 rpm, 10 sec
Foam Density – rubber stopper method
Wetting Action
Canvas Disc sinking test – time reqd. to sink disc
3.1.2 Evaluation of Baby Creams
pH
pH meter
4.5 – 6 (skin pH)
Viscosity
Brook-Field Viscometer, spindle no. S-06
Spreadability
Parallel plate method
𝑆 = 𝑚 × 𝐿
𝑇
Centrifugation Test
5000 rpm, 10 min (200C) = effect of gravity for 1 yr.
24 hr, 7, 14, 21, 28 days – no phase separation
3.1.2 Evaluation of Baby Creams
Rheological Studies
Beaker inclined – checked for consistency
Electrophoretic properties
Zeta potential – assess flocculation – sign of oil
droplet aggregation and instability
Determination of Total Fatty Substance
Oil phase extracted with ether – extracts filtered and
weighed.
3.1.3 Evaluation of Baby Powders
Determination of matter insoluble in boiling water 1g (wetted with spirit) + 200ml H2O – boiled – filtered - dried and
weighed
Test for solubility of colors 1g + 50ml H2O – boiled – filtrate 10ml soln. + 15 ml spirit (reflex &
filtered) – colorless/faintly colored
Determination of fineness 10g in 150µ sieve – running tap water – residue dried & weighed
Determination of moisture and volatile matter 5g in porcelain dish – dried & weighed
Determination of pH of aq. Suspension 10g + 90ml H2O – suspension(within 5min) – pH meter
3.1.3 Evaluation of Baby Powders
Pay off Measure of adherence to the puff or skin
Incorrect compaction, adversely effects this pressure
Pressure Testing Penetrometer
Penetration of a sharp metal point into pressed powder
Breakage Testing Godet dropped onto a wooden board from 8-10 in. height – chip or
break
3.1.4 Evaluation of Baby Oils
Refractive Index (R.I.) – measure of purity
Melting point
Capillary tube method
Slip melting point method
Wiley melting point method
Iodine Value – measure of degree of unsaturation
𝐼𝑜𝑑𝑖𝑛𝑒 𝑉𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒 =(𝐵 − 𝑆) × 𝑁 × 12.69
𝑆𝑎𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑒 𝑤𝑡. (𝑔)
Peroxide Value – degree of lipid oxidation
𝑃𝑒𝑟𝑜𝑥𝑖𝑑𝑒 𝑉𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒 = 𝑆 − 𝐵 × 𝑁 × 1000
𝑆𝑎𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑒 𝑤𝑡. (𝑔)
3.2 Qualitative Instrumental Analysis
1. Analysis of Actives
2. Analysis of Surfactants
3. Analysis of Preservatives
4. Analysis of Residual Toxic Compounds
3.2.1 Analysis of Actives Analyte Sample Technique
2- Chloro Ethanol Shampoos GC
Glycerine Hair Care Products Volumetry
Aloins Skin Care GC-MS
Alkanol Amines Shampoos LC
Carbocysteine Shampoos UV/Visible
Quaternary Ammonium Compounds Hair Care LC
N-Nitrosodiethanol amine Shampoos
Cream
Emulsions
LC & GC
Glycolic Acid Shampoos
Creams
Gels
LC
EDTA Shampoos LC
Vitamins A,C,E Lotions LC
Elements
Antimony Shampoos VU/Visible
Electro Chemical
Selenium Shampoos UV/Visible
LC
Lead Talcum Powder
Shampoos
UV/Visible
FAAS
ETAAS
Zinc Pyrithione Shampoos LC
Volumetry
3.2.2 Analysis of Surfactants
Amphoteric Surfactants
Surfactant Matrix Technique
Cocoamidopropyl Betaine Baby Bath
Baby Shampoos
Other Facial Cleansers
LC
FTR - ATR
Coco Betaine Baby Bath NIR
3.2.3 Analysis of Preservatives
3.2.3 Analysis of Preservatives
Preservatives Matrix Sample Preparation Analytical Technique
Parabens
(Methyl Ethyl Butyl
Benzyl)
Shampoo
Body Lotion
Sample extraction
with H2O:MeCN by Vortex mixer and heating LC-UV/V, C18 Column
Formaldehyde
Imidazolidmyl urea
Different
Cosmetics
One gram of sample is diluted in 10 ml of
THF:H2O mixture derivitized with 2,4 dinitrophenyl
hydrazine in acidic medium and then is buffered to
pH 6-8
LC-UV/V, C18 Column &
H2O:MeCN(30:70) as mobile phase
Quaternery Ammonium
Compounds Creams
Homogenization with MeOH or 0.1M HCl acidified
MeOH, centrifuged and submitted to a cation
exchange catridge. Eluate is evaporated and
redissolved in MeOH for running TLC TLC-UV/V
Benzethonium Chloride
BenzoicAcid
Chlorphenesin
DMDMH
Methylisothiazoline
Different
Cosmetics
TLC, in Si & Al plates, with
Ethylacetate:isopropylether:ETOH:25
%NH3 as eluent
3.2.4 Analysis of Toxic Residual Compounds
Residual Compound Residual Compound
formed during the
synthesis of
Technique
1,4 – dioxane Ethoxylated Alcohols and
Ethoxylated Alkyl Amines
GC
GC-MS
LC
N-Nitrosamines Reaction between
amines with nitrating
agents
Chemiluminiscence
detector TEA coupled
with GC/LC
Formaldehyde Ethoxylation process LC-UV
Sodium monochlorate Betane
Cocoamidoporpyl
betaine
LC-UV
Dicholoroacetic acid Betane
Cocoamidoporpyl
betaine
GC
3.3 Microbiological Evaluation
I. Test for microbial count
II. Investigation for the presence of specific
microorganisms
III. PET (Preservative Efficacy Test)
Establishment of microbial limits
i. Products of baby, eye, mucus membrane – 100 cfu/g in
0.5g of product
ii. Other products – 1000 cfu/g in 0.1 g of product
iii. Pathogenic microorganisms – Pseudomonas
aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus and C. albaicans
must not be detected in above two products
3.3.1 Test for microbial count
Sample Preparation 10% homogenous soln./suspension prepared with sterile buffered
peptone saline soln. at pH 7
Non soluble products - 0.1% Tween 80
Bacterial and Fungal Counts
1ml soln. + 15ml melted agar
Bacteria – TSA – 30-350C for 5 days
Yeast and moulds – SCA - 20-250C for 5-7 days
Anaerobic plate count – used for talcs and powders
Clostridium tetani
MLA, preredused 5% defibrinated sheep blood
Anaerobic jar (5-10% CO2)
Subcultured - cooked meat broth – incubated at 350C for 2 days
Detection - differential spore stain
3.3.2 Investigation for the presence of
specific microorganisms Enterobacteria and other gram-negative organisms
1ml soln. + 100ml EEB (Entirobacteria Enrichment Broth) – incubated –
35-370C for 24-48 hrs.
Subcultured - VRBG agar - 35-370C for 18-24 hrs.
Detection
Escherichia coli 1ml + 100ml Mac Conkey broth – 43-450C for 18-24 hrs.
Subcultured - Mac Conkey agar – 43-450C for 18-24 hrs.
Lactose fermenting gm –ve – detected
Pseudonomas aeruginosa 1ml + 100ml TSB - 35-370C for 24-48 hrs.
Subcultured - Cetrimide agar - 35-370C for 24-48 hrs.
Detection
3.3.2 Investigation for the presence of
specific microorganisms Staphylococcous aureus
1ml + 100ml TSB - 35-370C for 24-48 hrs.
Subcultured - Baird Parker agar - 35-370C for 24-48 hrs.
Detection
Molecular Diagnosis – Very rapid (27 hrs.)
ATP bioluminiscence
PCR Assay
3.3.3 Preservative Efficacy Test
4. DERMATOTOXICOLOGICAL STUDIES
Safety Evaluation
Acute systemic toxicity
Skin corrosion/irritation
Eye irritation
Skin absorption
Miscellaneous
Efficacy Evaluation
Stratum Corenum Moisture
TEWL
4.1 Safety Evaluation
Ban on animal testing
Aim for non-animal testing
3 Rs
Reduction (animal number)
Refinement (reducing the pain and distress)
Replacement (animals by non-sentient material)
4.1 Safety Evaluation
Acute Toxicity
NRU cytotoxicity assay
Skin Irritation
Alternative test Test system Endpoints
EPISKINTM human skin model
(commercial system)
Reconstructed human
epidermal
Cell viability
(MTT-test)
EpiDermTM human skin model
(commercial system)
Reconstruced human
epidermal
Cell viability
(MTT-test)
SkinEthicTM human skin model
(commercial system)
Reconstructed human
epidermal
Cell viability
(MTT-test)
Mouse skin integrity function
test (SIFT)
Excised mouse skin Transepidermal water loss (TEWL)
and electrical resistance
Non-perfused pig ear test Pig ear TEWL
4.1 Safety Evaluation
Eye irritation test
Alternative tests Test system Endpoint
Bovine corneal opacity and
permeability (BCOP) test
Excised cornea from the bovine
eye
Opacity and permeability of the
cornea
Isolated rabbit eye (IRE) test IRE corneal swelling Corneal opacity and fluorescein
retention
Chicken enucleated eye test
(CEET)
IRE corneal swelling Corneal opacity and fluorescein
retention
Hen’s egg test – chorioallantoic
membrane (HET-CAM)
Hen’s egg CAM Damage to chicken CAM
4.1 Safety Evaluation
Skin absorption studies
4.1 Safety Evaluation
Comedogenicity
Subacute and subchronic toxicity
Genotoxicity/mutagenicity
UV-induced toxic effects (phototoxicity, hotogenotoxicity,
photoallergy)
Carcinogenicity
Reproductive and developmental toxicity
4.2 Efficacy Evaluation
Features to be evaluated Measured Properties Technique
Skin surface moisture Stratum corneum hydration,
Cutaneous pH,
epicutaneous emulsion quality
Corneometry,
pHmetry,
evaporimetry
Transepidermal water loss
Erythema
Perspiration
Cutaneous microcirculation
Evaporimetry
Laser Doppler velocimetry
5. Conclusion
Baby Cosmetic ingredients
mild
Non irritant
Non allergent
Less concentration of preservatives, perfumes
Quality is an essential aspect in baby cosmetic products
as it effects safety and efficacy