~ I

~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ I I I ~ I

~ ' I I ~ I I

~ ' ~ ~ I 5 I~ ~ ~ II ~

~ 'l I ~ ~ ~~ 11 ~ 5

\ +

~'

~ ~

I I I I ~ I ~ ~

I ~

~I

~ ~ ~ ~ IIIII 5 ~

~ I I I

5 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ff ~ ~ ~ 11

~ ~ ~ ~ ~

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ni~ ~ ~

.\ I 55II' P

5 I~

~ l

I ~

~ II ~ '

~ ~

~ ~ ~ I ~ I I ~

45 R

~ '~ 00' l

~ ~ ~ I 5

/ /Pk

'l

5

9

AUDIT REPORT

Activity Audited: Southwest Fabricating & Welding Company, Inc.Houston, Texas

Audit Report No.: QAA/702-3

Auditors: A. E. Hall - Lead AuditorT. L. Kosmatin

'I

Date: March 14-16,1978'ersons

Contacted: Southwest Fabricatin

*B. J. Goodwin - President

2

~Suh(ha( SF&W has been contracted to supply the power plant piping syst™iincluding hangers, seismic restraints> supports~ and supporingsteal for Units 1, 2, 3, and 4 of the SHNPP. By contract, SF&Wis required to provide a quality assurance system which is in com-pliance with Appendix B of 10CFR50, Ebasco 's QuaH,ty System Proce-dure CAR-SH-ME-12 (860-72), those portions of Section IIX of 1971ASME Code, including all addenda thxough Summer 1973, which appliesto Code Classes 1, 2, and 3 equipment, and ANSI B31.1.0 for powerpiping.

SF&W's Quality Assurance System applicable to this contract isdelineated Xn their QA Manual (QAM), Revision 9, dated 12-9-77.In turn, thc QAM is supplemented by Shop Detail Sheets and Manu-facturing Record Sheets,,which are prepared for each piping spoolconfiguration and serve as, the detail drawing and shop traveler,respectively. I

To date, SF&W has'egun fabrication fox ASME Code Class 3 fabricatedcarbon steel yard 'piping. SF&W has not been released to beginfabrication on 'Code Classes 1 and 2 piping to date.

During the course of(this audit, the auditors reviewed the NRC's"White Book" on NRC IE vendor audits of SF&W during 1977 with SF&Wquality assurance management personnel. The auditors were concernedwith the negative inspection results reported by NRC as a resultof their, audits conducted 3/14-18/77, 6/13-16/77, and 12-12-77 atSF&W. These three 1977 NRC audits identified: (1) three findings;(2) three findings and one unresolved item; and (3) eleven findingsand five unresolved items, xespectively. The auditors were able todetermine by review of these audit records and SF&W response lettersthat the findings, fox the first,and second 1977 NRC audits of SF&Whave been 'closed by thc NRC. The third audit of 1977 by NRC ofSF&W is still not closed by the NRC, however, the auditors determinedthat SF&V has responsed to the NRC audit rcport. The NRC hasrequested, additional response on at least three of the findings.SF&W plans to review, these problems with the NRC during their nextvisit, which is scheduled for March 27, 1978.

.I,I

mV'(I

'he,

auditors reported in the last audit report, QAA/702-2 (March 22-'24, 1977), that a review had'een conducted with SF&W qualityassurance management personnel concerning the NRC IE vendor auditsat Bergen Paterson Pipe Support Corporation located in Laconia,N. H. As, a point of information, Bergen Paterson (B/P) is SF&W'ssubsupplier of the pipe hangers and restraints for the SHNPP. Aswas pointed out in QAA/702-2, SF&W stated they planned to conductan audit of the B/P, Laconia facility after the NRC scheduled audit.The auditors determined that this audit of B/P had not been accom-plished. In addition, the auditors reviewed an Ebasco letter, dated7»20-77, No. EB-S-252 with SF&W management which in part stated,"We therefore request,that SF&W establish a quarterly audit ofBergen Paterson facilities until both Southwest and Ebasco concux

e

'p s

,o~ II

'„''I

I

I eCI

'> i".'>

0

I

~(

that an adequate confidence level of the B/P Program implementationhas been attained.'" The auditors did learn „that SF&W personnelhave visited the B/P engineering facility at Hempstead, N» Ye~ onceto audit only their quality assurance system and not B/P's designor design verification capabilities. The auditors further learnedthat SF&W has not visited the fabrication facility of B/P at Laconia,N. H. The auditors discussed with SF&W's pro)ect manager theirposition in regards to Ebasco's requested quarterly audits of B/P.He stated:SF&W does not intend to comply wi.th Ebasco's request,and that he has, called Ebasco and', discussed t'e 'SF&W position. Itshould be pointed out, however, that SF&W has failed to formallyansw'er in writing Ebasco's letter No. EB-S-252.

e2

r

Implementation of the corrective action taken by SF&W to resolve theFindings 1, 2a,, 2b, 3a, and 3b previously identi,fied in Audit ReportQAA/702-2 was audited. The 'action taken to resolve these findingswas considered sufficient,except one, Finding Item 1, therefore,this finding is reopened in this audit z'eport as Finding Item 1.The remaining Findings,2a, 2b, 3a, and 3b have sufficient actiontaken and implemented to resolve them and Audit QAA/702-2 is closed.

"SF&W Quality Assurance Program continues to, be adequate to meet therequirements of P,O. NY435035 when, the findings in this audit zeportare closed.

As a result of this audit,,four items were presented at the postauditmeeting as requiring .formal correction action and response by SF&W.

Findin s and Corrective Action:

During the audit, the following items werc identified as nonconformingfindings that will require corr'ective action and formal response.Item':

~Re ereememe:

10CFR50 Appendix B, Criterion XI, Quality Assuzancc Program

Nonconformance:

Criterion II requires that the QA Program shall provide for indoc-trination and training of personnel performing activities affectingquality as necessary to assure that suitable proficiency is achievedand maintained'. In .reviewing Paragraph 2.2.3.1 of SF&W's QAH,which outlines the procedures 'for training, it was observed bythe auditors that training and indoctrination requirement forengineering personnel and, upper management QA/QC personnel arenot presently covered by written procedures. This item,was pre-sented in Audit Report QAA/702-2 as Finding Item 1 and is beingheld open. SF&W still has not provided and implemented correctiveaction as of this audit.

'eelr

ne.rt n

2

I »I

+ 6r n

Pr 1

I

nNQ

'e'

A t: h

Acknowled ement and Res onse:

SP&W will develop procedure for each and have referenced in Revision 10of their QAM. They will implement both required procedures priorto'he issuance of Revision 10 of their QAM.Iten 2:

~Re ettenent:

10CPR50 Appendix B, Criteria VI, Document Control and V, Instructions,Procedures, and Drawings

Nonconformance:1

The auditors were verifying SP&W's response to General Item 1 of'Audit,Report QAA/702-2 and corrective action committed by SP&W'sletter, dated 3-.31-77, to CP&L. Their letter stated the ProcedureQC-100, Revision 2', dated 6-7-.76, "Nondestruction Examination Per-sonnel," would, be distributed during the week of June 6, 1977.The auditors 'determined that SF&W'ad placed this, procedure in their"Procedures Manual." However,,it was, determined by the auditors thatSF&W has no;written document control procedure for the issuance andcontrol of these procedures. In addition, SF&W does not have a documentcontrol record which shows 'the distribution»of these procedures bydate issued,,to whom issued,,and by whom distributed.

Acknowled ement and Res onse:

SF&W will developh,a document control procedure for control of thesequality documents and develop necessary records for the properdocument control.

Zten 3:

e

O.

I

I

+I I. I)

1 ~

»Q

0

»

I,» I

~Ra nttenent:

SP&W QAM'ection 13, Audits, Paragraph 13.1.2»410CPR50 Appendix B, Criteria XVI, Corrective Action and XVII, Audits

r'e

Nonconformance:

a. Audi.tors reviewed SP&W internal audit report (12-6-77) performedby R. B. Bhavsar, where the reaudit of corrective action waspcrformcd by N. H. Moerke on 12-12-77. This was documented byinitial and date beside each corrective action listed exceptone, Number Sd, which was not signed or dated as having beenreaudited.

„h le

1

I

I

NIE>K,

E

5E

Et"

b. Auditors„reviewed internal, audit report (2-14-78) performed byR. B. Bhavsar. This audit reported five findings. No writtencorrective action could be, presented to the auditors. Thisaudit was followed by'udit report (3-8-78) by R. B; Bhavsarwhich does not,document an actual follow-up of 'the findingsof audit dated 2-14-79. The rcport dated 3-8-78 does notcross-reference or close-out the finding of audit dated 2-14-78,SF&W had, intended the later, audit to close out the previousaudit of 2'-14-78 by. not finding any problems in the same areasof those nonconformances. , This intention of SF&W does not meetthe requirements of, 10CFR50, Appendix B, Criteria. 44 .. It

Acknowled ement,and Res onse:I

SF&W'ill document,each audit finding on a separate page of a newform to be developed. This, form,will list for each finding; its

- correction action and effective date; and the documentation ofcorrective action follow-up by signatures and dates.

I '

5

g- I E"

0I4

I

(E',

LEr

IE

\

E'

EE 'e

'd'-;

I

'I

tII,E

>'O E

I„leC~

Item 4:

~Ree>eeeeee:

10CFR50 Appendix B, Criterion. II, Quality Assurance ProgramNonconformance:

Crit'erion II>'~ states in part,, "Management of organizations parti-cipating in',the QA Program shall regularly review the status andadequacy of that part o'f the QA Program which they are executing."The auditors, determined; contrary. to the requirements of Criterion II,the managers, of various,SF&W Departments whom execute that part ofthe QA Program for, which, they have responsibility have not formallydocumented participation in review of the QA Program prior itsrevisions being issued and implemented.

Acknowled ament and Res onse:

SF&W stated they had reviewed .the QA Program for necessary revisionon an informal'asis, and had not documented evidence of their reviews.SF&W, stated,,they will, in the future, document their management reviewsof their QA Program and. maintain these records.

General:

During the postaudit meeting, the following five concerns werediscussed:

1. Ebasco s Specification CAR-SH-M-30, Revision 3, "General PowerPiping," in Part 2> Paragraph 21.l.c requires "marking pens,ink, and tape shall',be,certified by chemical analysis and

I

I 1''I

."PI

"4r

,5"II

ILE

5E'4

IE I

II

!

't

'I4

$t

h.

~ \ ~

hI

I, r,

approved, by Purchasex for use on st'sinless steel." SF&W ~sdecided to use different marking pens nnd tape for stainlesssteel than those for which they obtained approval from Ebnscoto use. The, auditors axe concerned if SF6W has obtained Ebasco'sapproval for the nev, materials, they plan to use, since noevidence of Ebasco's approval was presented to the auditorsduring this audit.

«

-«I

g 'f'f

LII r

« '0

0

~ i I' { I

I '

l ~ ~ {' I Il ' ~ I

I I 11

i l ' ~ ~I ' I

~ ~

~ ~ I l

~ I ' ~

~ I

'i{tt«I

I ~'rj

I~

, 'It

~ I I I

I ~ ~ ;:I.'/~ I ~ 1

~ ~

~ ~ ~ ~

l~»

~ ~ ~ i I

I

I

; rt(,'{.I

«I. ~

'tt .!

I

. 'i'.

~ ~-, rfg+

kCtZVLTE

C

Southwest Fabricating & Wel,ding Co., Houston, TexasREPORTNO QAA(702-3

AUDIT PROCEDURE QAAP-1

March 14-16, 1978

UALITY ASSURANCE AUDIT CHECK LIST

AUDITSUMECT Implementation of Quality Assurance/Contxol Program

R A. E. Hall AUDITOR(S) T. L. Kosmatin

1.0

. CHARACTERISTICS

ualit Assurance/Control Pro ranCOi&TTS

alit /Or anization Pro ram

1.1.1

1.1.2

1.1 3

alit /Or anization Pro ranDo SP&W organization charts reflect thecurrent organization7

Verify that an acknowledgement receipt hasbeen received from Ebasco indicatingreceipt of the most current revision ofSF&W QAM.

Verify that a review of SP&W QAM has beenconducted upon receipt of an ASME coderevision or at intervals not exceeding sixmonths.

-1 wash curren

v o r v. were transmittedto Ebasco on 2/28/78 alon with an acknowled ement sheet foreach co . The co sent to B. R. Mazo of Ebasco wasreturned si ned 3 2/78. The other two copies No. 12 toA. Cesnanicius and No. 125 to M. S. Brown o Ebasco have notet sent back their acknowledgement sheets.

A r view was conducted and documented on 6/6/77 b an audit- w wa. o ducted b J. Harris and W. H. Shemis: however,

reviews erformed b the mana ers of the various de artnentswho execute that are of the OA Pro ram that they have re-s onsibilit for were not documented and available for audit.i id ified as findin 4 in the audit re ort.

Page 1 of 15

Ci

, ~

'

=0

CHARACTERISTICS COMMENTS

1 2

1.2.1

Q.2.2

1.2.3

Desi Control

Assure that a pre-)ob conference, to re-viev contractual (design) requirementsincluding current )ob specificationsfrom Ebasco, has been held and theminutes recorded?

Assure that SP&W engineering has verifiepressure-temperature limitations foreach piping class in the piping specifi-cation?

Have the "Detail Sheets" and "Manu-facturing Record Sheets" (MRS)been prepared for P.O. 435035 byEngineering?

il bein e otiated between SP&W and Ebascoa d as not et been finalized. Conferences were held on 1/9/78and 1 18 78 to list the contract and code re uirements. Minutesvere not formall ke t but fabrication sheets had been marked uvith notes resultin from the meetin

1.2.2 SP&W mana ement stated that this is not re uired for this contractbecause the do not have desi n res onsibility.

1.2.3 Yes. Detail Sheets and manufacturin record sheets MRS havebeen re ared for a roximatel 7000 feet of 30 pipe. This pipeis desi nated for service water, Class 3, and is the only itemthat has been released for fabrication to date.

1.2.3.1 Yes. The applicable HDE, weld, heat treat, etc. proce ure sidentified on the MRS including the latest revision, supp ementand revision, and attachment and revision.

2-4 Yes Index sheets have been re ared for the 30" i e identifiedabove. The index sheets list 3301 SW sheets 1-56 3303 SWsheets 1-48. 3305 SW sheets 1-74. and 3307 SW sheets 1-74.

L

y PL S

+'.2.3.3.

Are the applicable contract proceduresincluded on the Manufacturing RecordSheets, including revisions andsupplements thereto?

2 In addition to the status of rocedures indicated in audit checklist AA 702-2 the follovin status vas verified:

G

\

1.2.4 Has Engineering prepared an "Index Sheet"for this P.O.?

1.2.5 Have the following documents beenapproved by Ebasco and all the commentsresolved?

Page 2 of 15

0'

s

REPORTQAA/702-3

CHARACTERISTICS COMMENTSd a o.

1.2.5.1 Applicable welding procedures andprocedure qualification test reports?

1.2.5.2 Meld repaiz procedures.

A 2 77.v v a o 12 77.

7 v. A roved bas o 12 77..01. 40 Rev. 0 A roved b Ebasco 12 9 77.

01.01.947 Rev. 0 A roved b Ebasco 12 9/77..01.948 Rev. 0 A roved b Ebasco 12 9 77.

01.08.906 Rev. 2 A roved b Ebasco 1 20/78.MMC-2 Rev. 0 A roved b Ebasco 12/9/77.

1.2.5.3

91.2.5.4

Applicable NDE procedures.

Cleaning, preserving, marking andpacking for shipment procedures?

08.08.010 Rev. 0 Re ected b Ebasco.08.08.011 Rev. 0 Re ected b Ebasco.08.08.008 Rev. 1 Re ected b Ebasco.08.08.006 Rev. 2 A roved b Ebasco 12/9/77.08.08.009 Rev. 2 Acce ted with comments b Ebasco 12 9 77.08.08.007 Rev. 2 A roved b Ebasco 12/9/77.08.08.005 Rev. 3 Acce ted with comments b Ebasco 12 9 77.

1.2.5.5 Heat treating procedures?

1.2.5.6 Visual inspection procedures?

1.2.5.2 9-103, Rev, 2, A roved b Ebasco 1 20 78. This is the on yweld re air roceduze that will be used.

1.2.5.3 Status of NDE procedures has not changed. They are alla roved.

.4 M 001 Rev. 1 A roved b Ebasco 1 23 78.

1)~r

5

1.3

1.3.1

Procurenent Docunent Control

Verify that Material Control hasreviewed applicable CP&L-related pur-chase zequisitions and classified theafor processing.

M1001 Rev 2 A roved b Ebasco 3 6 78.EP-7804 Rev. 0 A roved b Ebasco 3 8 78.EP-7710 Rev 0 A roved b Ebasco 1/ll 78.EP-7710 Rev. 1 A roved b Ebasco 3 8/78.-10-123 Rev; 0 A roved b Ebasco10-124 Rev. 0 A roved b Ebasco10-127 Rev. 1 A roved b Ebasco 1/23/78.10-127 Rev. 2 Submitted to Ebasco but not et a roved.

1.2.5.5 HT-Pl-1 Rev. 3 Submitted to Ebasco 1/25/78 but not eta roved.

HT-P8-1 Rev. 0 A roved bv Ebasco.

1.2.5.6 10-118 Rev. 0 Submitted 2/10/78 to Ebasco but not yeta roved.

Also SF4W stated that all the bending procedures had beena roved b Ebasco.

..-5

4

1

5'r

j

Page 3 of 15

I ~ tt

~ ~ ~ ~

~ I r I

REPORXQAA/702;3

CHARACTERISTICS COMMENTS

1 3.2 When purchase requisitions are classifieas "reclassification orders" (RO) formaterial from SF&W stock, verify that theRO is signed and dated by QA indicatingapproval, of the material selected forreclassification.

Re uisition No. 4 dated 5 8 74 for SO-3 Ol-SW w mawas to be removed and reworked for the ro er classificationhowever it was decided at the tine that the material was notneeded and the re uisition had been voided. Nevertheless itwas verified from this re uisition that A had a roved the

RO as re uired b rocedure on 5 9 74.

1.3.3 Are purchase orders reviewed against the

9 requisition and approved by QA prior toissuance.

1.3.3 Yes. Re uisition No. 48 was reviewed and it was noted that theA Mana er had reviewed and si ned it 1/7/78. When the P O.

was corn leted, it was a ain reviewed b A on 2/25/78 to assureit was identical to the re uisition.1.3.4 This was verified b corn arin re uisition No. 46 a ainst P. 0.

No. 3301N-5 to Ta lor For e. It was noted that sone s ecialre uirenents had been transferred from the re uisition to the

1.3.4 Verify that the special requirements ofthis contract are being included inSF&W pufchase documents, as applicable.(App. B, Crit. IV)

P. 0. The onl material in work at this time is sone carbonsteel which has few uni ue re uirenents.

1.3. .1 Yes. The purchase acka e includes re uisitions reclassifi-cation orders when applicable, manufacturin work orders. andrequisitions for material on manufacturing work orders whenapplicable; It was verified that all these documents had been

1.3.4.1 Is Material Control forwarding thepurchase package to QA for approval?

reviewed and signed by QA as noted in the questions above.

1.4

1.4. lDocument Control

Verify that the Manufacturing RecordSheet; (MRS) for this contract isproperly completed, i.e., identificationnumber, operation numbers, currentrevision of procedures, and holdpoints.

1.4.1 It was verified that the identificatio umb r o oDetail S eet and MRS mat h d — W — 4

erations had been corn 1 ted and ini ia edAll rocedure revision numbers were included as r u d.the ANI and SF&W hold oints were indicated on the MRS. Eba ohad not re uested an on this ITS. However two of he MRSsreviewed did have omissions on them. One was on 3301-SWSheet 42 Rev. 2 ~here t e reference o PT-1 A a m nt 1the test acce tance criteria was not referenced. In additionMRS No. 3301-SW Sheet 2 indicated an attachment was to beused with a reference nrocedure but failed to correctlvidentif the attachment b its correct number. This is identi-fied as Comment No. 5 in the audit re ort.

Page 4 of 15

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

~' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '

~ ~ '

~ ~

~ ~ ~''

~' ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ s ~ I ' I

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ 'l ~

~ tl ~

~ ~

I ~

~ ~ ~ ~ I ~

~ ~ '

~ \ ~ '

~ ~ ~ ~ II ~ ~ ~ ~

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 'I ~ ~ ~'

~ II ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

~ ~

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 5 ~ ~' ~ ~

~ II ~ ~ Il

~ ~ ~ ~

~ ~ ~ I

~ ~ ~ ~ ~

~ ~'

~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~

I I I ~ ~~ ~ Ii ' ~ ~

~ ~ ~ t tl

I ~ ~ ~ I II ~ I ~ I

~ ~ ~

~ ~ ' ~

~ ~

~ ~

~ ~

~ ~ '

~ ~ ~ \ ~ ~ ~

REPORTHO. AA 702-

1.5.3

CHARACTERISTICS

Verify that Certified Material TestReports are recieved with all nuclearclass material. (Spec. M-30, App. H,ASME 4442.2)

~ ~ This was verified b checkin P. 0. 3 01 N-4section is re rinted and.includes a re uireme f riaTest Re orts to be furnished with all materials as was hecase with this P. 0. This re rinted notes section isattached to all nuclear-related orders.

I

* '~" . ~ ';vP-''.;;:

'/

1.5.3.1

1.5.3.2

Verify that the MTRs are reviewed byQA and stamped to signify approval byan individual's QA stamp on the MTRand initial and date on the packingslip. (ASME 4442.2, Spec. ME-12,Par. 8.1)

Verify that the individual doing thereview of the MTRs has the requiredrange of chemical and physical testvalues available to be used asacceptance criteria. (Spec. 1K-12,Par. 8) (App. B, Crit. V)

1.5.3.1 This was verified on P. 0. 3301 N-4 where the ackin sliwas initialed and dated b'he receivin ins ector. The

ackin sli is ut with the Material Test Re ort MTR andthe date is stam ed b the mail room and also the ins ection .re ort I-1001A which is also si ned.and dated b theReceivin Ins ector. The acka e is sent to the Ins ectionClerk who corn ares the MTR a ainst the a licable ASTMstandard. He then stam s the MZR with his ins actor's stam .

1.5 3 2 This was verified when c eIns ection Clerk has the entire t of Adesk and uses them to verif be re uired za m aand h sical tes va ue arHowever SF&W has not ab is a la f r v r fthe values shown on the kfTRs are accurate b erf rmi ainde endent test.. SF&W mana e~nt stated that ave noconducted an tests on this order because the i r — 'bes ecification to mean erform a corn arison onl between theMTR and ASTM s andard. The auditors a1so e t s ed con emthat this re uirement has been removed from Eba o S ec.CAR=SH-ME-12 . Rev. 1 which is sti'll under ne otiation

,c~g %!~l

) '.

/'I

f

C

Q..6

1.6.1

Identification and Control of Material,Parts and Com onents

Have measures been established tocontrol stored material and items toassure that only correct materials anditems are used for fabrication and toprevent the use of incorrect materialor items? (Spec. ME-12, Par. 6)

1.6

between SF&W and Ebasco.Q,

Identification and Contro1 of Material Parts and Com onents

ob. The a licable len th of i e also has stam ed on itthe heat numbe- serial number and sho order number. Thei e material release and rint are cleared b A before use.

Page 6 of

i this ia e e carbon t e fi

a re wer several in-were bein s acked close

a s of continued

C/w.j

0,'C'r

.I

I'

a~

I

teT

4 W \ l, f4 - +~,".W,,I

'1 i. A' . ~.' I ~ I

I IDI

l ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ l ~ ~ ~ ~

~ ~

~ ' ~I I ~

I ~ ~ I

I ' l~ ~

1~; ~~ ~ ~ ~

C~

p

~ ~ 'l ~~ ~

~ l ~ l \ l ~ ~

~ ~

, ~ I I

~ I IX

~'

~ ~ ~ ~ ~

~ ~

~ I ~ ~

~ ~

~ ~ ~

~ ~'

~ I

~I ~

~ ~

~ ~

~ ~ ~ tt

~ ~

~ ~ H ~

~ ~ ~

~ ~

~ ~

~ ~

II ~~ I~

~ ~

I

~ ~

~ ~ 'I t ~

I ~

I ~

~ ~ ~

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '

~ ~

H

I ~ '

~ ~

~' ~ ~

II ~

~ ~

~ ~

~ ~

~ ~ ~ ~

~ ~

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '~ ~

~ ~

~ ~

~ I I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ t ~ ~ ~ ~11 ~

~ ~

~, ~ ~ ~~ I ~ ~

'

~ ~

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ \ ~

~ ~ ~, ~, ~ ~~ ~

~ ~

~ ~ '

~ ~ ~ ~

~ ~

~ ~

~ ~

~ ~ . ~ '

~ ~

~ 4

l I ~ ~ ~ t

~ ~ I ~ ~ ~

~ ~ I ~ ~

~ ~

~ y ~

~ ~

~'

~ ~

H

~ ~ H ~ ~ ~ ~

~ I I ~

~ ~

~ ~

~ ~ ~ ~

I ~

0

/

t

RH%1%

1.7.2

CHARACTERISTICS

Assure ghat veld data records containthe information for veld )oints andrepairs as required by Par. 6, AppendixG of Specification M-30.

COMMENTS

1.7.2 The auditors verified b review of i in subassenbl onMRS 3301-SW, Sheet 42, iece marked Yard-SW-49-19. Allitems re uired b Para. 6, A endix G, S ec. CAR-SH-M30,Items 6a, 6b, 6d, and 6f are recorded on the MRS. Postveld heattreatment is not applicable to the piping subassenbly.

1..7D Verify that welding naterial identifica-tion, weld procedure used, and welder'synbol is verified by the QCInspector and entered on the MRS.

1.7. 3 Verified See 1.-8.2

1.7.4 Not a licable to ASME Section III Class 3 carbon steeli in bein manufactured durin this audit.1. 8. 1 Yes verified in 1.8.2.

1.7.4 Is SF&W maintaining Heat Treating Logsfor this contract?

1.8.2 Verified b review of i e assembl in SF&W we1d sho onMRS 3305-SW-Sheet 42 Serial No. 14763 and NationalBoard No. 559 ASME Code Class 3. The ins ector had ro erentries on the'MRS and verified velder's sta identificationrecorded on the MRS=-in fact was stam ed on i e subassemblat veld. oints.

1.8

1.8.1

Ins ection Test Control.

Is the MRS being completed by the QCInspector to 'indicate-completion of theinspection operations? (ASME NA 4530,ME-12, Par. 8.2)

1.8.3 'Yes SF&W submitted a t ical MRS to Ebasco which hasbeen'eturnedvith witness oints.marked, with Ebasco Letter

No. 10 -V=1 dated 1 18 78. Witness oints identified werefit-u of 'veld oints, PT or ÃI, and cleanin &,prep to shiper Procedure EP-7710- Rev. 1.

Verify that the inspection/test andoperating status of the. material or partis being maintained throughout manu-facturing. (NA 4540, ME-12, Par. 8.2)

1.8.3 Has SF&W submitted its fabricationsequence to Ebasco? (Spec. ME-12,Par. 8)

Page 8 of 15

I

CHARACTERISTICSYes see 1.8.3.

COMMENTS

1~8.3~1 Have the examination or witness pointsbeen identified by Ebasco on thefabrication sequence. (Spec. ME-12,Par. 8)

.4 SF&W onl checks wall thickness of "C" bore which isrecorded on the MRS.

1.8.4.1 At resent SF&W i in desi ns for ASME Code Classes 1, 2,& 3 do not use an cast fittin s.

1.8 4 Are there provisions on the Shop DetailSheet for correct measurement ofpressure boundary items for minimumwall thickness'

1.8.4.2 Not a licable see 1.8.4.1.

1.9.1 Verified b review of measurin tool recorded in manu-facturin areas and traced to calibration recor s. Ver ewere (1) extension micrometer S N , calibratedue for recalibration 3 20 78, 2 Tube micrometer N

1.8-4.1 Does this include measurement of all casfittings in piping systems (SafetyClass 1, 2, or 3)? (Spec. M-30,Par. 9.9)

calibrated 3 13 78, due for recalibration , an(3 Inside micrometer S N 11 & I , ca ratefor recalibration 3 20 7 . All were in agreement tcalibration labels on instruments an recor car s.

ue

I.8.4.2 Is the information provided as required-by part one-Specification M-30,-Paragraph 9.9, a through e.

1.9 Control of Measurin and Test E ui ment

1.9.1 Verify that calibration rags are placedon each item calibrated and includeinitial of persons performing calibra-tion, date of calibration, andcalibration due date.

Page 9 of 15

"i

1

I

1.9.2

1.9.3

1.9.4

CHARACTERISTICS

How are personally owned inspectionequipment used by SF&W QC personnelcontrolled?

Verify that inspection instruments aretraceable to the QC Inspector using theinstrument and to the item measured.

Are instruments calibrated usingcertified standards which are traceableto national standards where suchstandards exist'? (ASME NA 4610)

COMMENTS

1.9.2 SF&W A S"E ui ment tools au es and instrum nControl for acce tance are to be the ro er f

1.9.3 This is covered b SF&W AM Section 8 in Para ra h 8.Was verified b review of Ins ector's lo in weld sho area.Inspector lo ed b sho order number serial number ofmeasurin tool used and date and sheet number of MRS whichis all traceable to each i in subassembl manufactured.Yes, veri ied by review of followin measurin devices andca ibration records, which did have traceabilit tonationa standards.

1 Ga e Block Set - Serial No.outside laborator due 2 7 79.

2 Ton tester We1din Machine Calibra onNo. 35011-6 calibrated 2 20 78 b o sidue 2/20 79.

Py4

. «c» tfy*:j

1.10 Handlin Store e and Shi in

1.10.1 Verified b review of MRS 3301-SW Sheet 42 for nstee1 ASME Ciass 3 ard i in . Exterior of i in cleanedb sand blastin . Per SF&W Procedure EP-7804 and interiorof i in cleaned b sand blastin er SF&W Procedure 10-2Revision 2.

I 10.I. Verify that the procedure for cleaningpipe and pipe components prior to

0 shipment is listed on the MRS.(Spec. M-30, Par. 9.5)1.10.2 Verify that stainless steel pipe

a~siting shipment has flanges, weldends, and other openings covered withprotective covers and are sealed withcertified halogen free waterproof tape.

1.10.2 Verified b review of SF&W's subsu liers certification ofta e "Pol ken" No. 222 made b Kendall Boston Mass.which stated the Halo en corn ounds were less than 250 P.P.M;The auditors determined this ta e is different than the ta epreviously approved for use b Ebasco. This a ears in theaudit report as General Item 1.

I fg

nCIg

- n

Page ~ of 15 0

0.

REPORT?iO. AA 702-3

CHARACTERISTICS

Verify that all paints and preservativesbeing used for this contract have beenapproved by Ebasco prior to use.(Spec. M-30, Part 2, Par. 22.2.d)

COMMENTS

dures to be used for manu-ard i in . Interior

vi io 2 dated 2 27 78 wasrior coatin Procedure

a a rov d Ebasco 2 13 78.

1.11 Nonconformin Material/Corrective Action

Verify that SF&W is documenting thecause of reported discrepancies.

view of SF&W's "Re ort of Nonconformance" (RON)rm oth in o en files and closed out files. The cause

and corrective action is listed on the RON form Exhibit 10-1,in heir AM.

.11.2 While a RON is bein reviewed b SF&W material review board,this review determines the need to notif their customer othe nonconformance.

1.11.2

1.11.3

Verify that SF&W has provisions fornotifying customers of nonconformances.

Verify that Reports of Nonconformances(RONs) are being logged in bysequential number and the authorizedInspector is notified of the RON.

1 11.3 Verified b review of RON lo . SF&W ersonnel 1og n orback RON the RON number, sho order number, date issued,shee t number,.and date of acceptance of rework or repair.

1.11.4': = The auditors verified that corrective action is being ocu-.mented, see 1.11.1. However, the corrective action is notverified to revent recurrence. The auditors are concernethat SF&W does not follow up" the corrective action ste ontheir RONs for any significant condition a verse to qua tyor erform any trend analysis o their RO s to etermrne-si nificant conditions. This appears in t e audit report asGeneral Item -2.

1.U..4 Is corrective action being documentedand verified to prevent recurrence.(NA 4800; App. B, Crit. XVI)

Page ll of 15

RH%RX

1 12

CHARACTERISTICS

lit Assurance Records na e o ver fASME Clas caras of i a d t.

COMMENTS

1.12 1

1-13.1

1 14

1.14.1

Verify that a check list of documents tobe accumulated for the DocumentationPackage has been made a part of theMRS.

Audits

Verify that corrective actions todeficiencies found during audits areverified to be corrected by reauditwithin one month.

Review of Findin s/Corrective Action forAudit AA/702-2

Verify that the training and indoctrina-tion for Engineers and upper QA/QCmanagement personnel is addressed inthe SF&W QA Manual. (Finding No. 1,qAA/702-2)

1.13.1 The auditors reviewed SF&'W internal audit re ort 12-6-77erformed b R. B. Bhavsar where the reaudit of corrective

action was erformed b N. H. Moerke on 12-12-77. This wasdocument b initial and date beside each corrective actionlisted exce t one Number 5d which was not si ned or datedas havin beeen reaudited. This a ears in the audit re ortas Findin Item No. 3. The auditors reviewed internal auditre ort (2-14-78) erformed b R. B. Bhavsar. This auditre orted five findin s. No written corrective action couldbe resented to the auditors. This audit was followed baudit re ort (3-8-78) b R. B. Bhavsar which does not docu-ment an actual follow-u of the findin s of audit dated2-14-78. The re ort dated 3-8-78 does not cross-referenceor close out the findin s of audit dated 2-14-78. SF&W hadintended'he later audit to close out the revious audit of2-14-78 by not'indin an roblem in the same areas of thosenonconformances. This intention of SF&W does not meet therequirements of 10CFR50 Ap endix B, criteria. These twoproblems appear in the audit report as Finding Item 3a and

b.

1.14.1 In reviewin the im lenentation of SF&W's corrective actionfor this findin Iten 1 of AA 702-2 the auditors determinedSF&W still has not rovided and im lenented corrective actionas of this audit and is bein "'held o en. This a ears inthis audit re ort as Findin Item l.

1.14.2 Verified b review of records for D. Hartman which now com lvwith re uirements of SF&W's Procedure C-102.

1.14.2 Verify that the auditor qualificationrecords of D. Hartman have been revisedto reflect his participation in surveysand audits over the past, two years.(Finding 2a, QAA/702-2)

Page 12 of

t

II'

. ~

A':~

I I IA

~ ~ ~'

~

e

~ 8 ~~ ~ ~

s I I4: Ii ~ I ~ ' ~ ' I ~ ~ ' ~

~' ' ~ ~ ~ ~ '

~ ~ ~

~ ~ ': ~ ~~ - I

~ ~ ~

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~

~'

~ ~

I

~ ~ I ~

~ ~

~ ~

~ 1I ~; ~ ~ ~ ~~ ' I ~ ~ ~ ~

~ '~ tl ~ ~

~ ~

~ ~

~ ~ ~ ~

~ ~

~ ~

~ ~

~ ~ I4

~ ~ ~

~ $ ~

~ i

I ~ 0~

'

g ~ e ~ o t I

~; ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~

~ ~ ~ I ~ ~

~ ~ ~ ' ' I

~ ~

~ ' ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ' ~ ~

~ ~'

~ ~ ~

I ' ~ ~

~ ~' I

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ It

~ '\ ' ~ ~

u Qr

+( CE ID

< ~

REPORT'O.

QAA/702-3

CHARACTERISTICS COHMENTS

Pc

5

t

1.14.6

l.14. 7

Verify that procedure QC-100, "Nonde-structive Examination Personnel,"Rev. 2 dated 6-7-76 has been distributed(General comment No. 1, QAA/702-2)

Verify that the qualification records ofInspectors B. Reynolds and G. Baumbackhave been signed and the date of theirqualifications established.(General comment No. 2, QAA/702-2)

Verify that the audit program assuresplanned and periodic audits of thefollowing areas and within the notedtime span:

W ad aManua ". However i waSP&W has no written document control rocedure for issuanceand control of these rocedures. In addition SP&W 'doesnot have a document control record which shows the distri-bution of these rocedures b date issued to whom issuedand b whom distributed. This a ears in the audit re ortas Pindin Item 2.

1.14.7 Verified b review of both ins ectors which now meet there uirements of SP&W's rocedures.

1.14.8.1 Verified b review of records which showed reaudit was doneon dates 11-7-77 and 3-9-78.

1.14.8.2 See 1.14.6.

1.14.8.1 Auditor qualification records at inter-vals not to exceed six months.(Finding No. 2a, QAA/702»2)

1.14.8.2 Verification that procedures referencedin the QAH reflect the requirenents ofthe QAM, at intervals not to exceed thetime established in audit procedures.(General comment No. 1, QAA/702-2)

Page 14 of

0

~ I IZI

,k-!Q

I ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ +t".~ I ~ ~ '

~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~

~'

~

~ «w ~

~ ~ ~

i I

I ~ ~ ' I~ ~ '

~ '

~ ~ ~

~ '

~ ' ~~ ~ ~ ~

pic $

g„

~ ~

~ ', I~ ~ I PI

f

k;

I

t

P ~

lp

-n

l

'll

k y"

E

0, „

l

I

l'

1i

I

1

I

';'AA/702«3'1,

I I'l I I

Mr. John Hnrris,4Prefect Manager

Southwest Pnbricn< ting & Welding Company,,lna.7525 Sherman StrcatP. 0. Box 9449,Houston, Toxna 77011

CO 000680

cc: Mr. John Harris (2)Mr. L. V», Tfiiorwechtor (2)

I

IJJ

I

c

4 '

4

CAROLINA POWER,& LIGHT COMPANY,, HARRIS PROJECT'1984-86-88-,90-3600 MW-UNITS 1» 2, 3' 4 ,REFERENCES! J(l) .P», 0» NY-'435035

(2),SP&W S LETTER» DATED*'7/12/78I

» '» 4Dear.Mr. Harriat' .

a

Reference ia 'mnda to.your latter above wherein you provided corzectiva actionto Pinding 3.b. of,CP&L .Audit Repoit QAA/702-.3. Carolina Power & Light (CP&L)has 'completed'vnlu4ntionr Of SW&F'a corroctive'ction'esponse, 'and commentsconcerning thin raviaw are, aa follows:

I Il. When wo rocaiva your QA,Manual Revision 10~ we will evaluate'orrective action for Pinding 3lb., Xf it ia satisfactory~ wewill clone out this Finding 3.b. and,clone out this audit.

2. Tha CP&L Corporate Nuclear Safety & Quality, Aasuranco AuditSection done not have tha responsibility for approval of yourQA Manual; 'owever, wo wi11 'forward it,to the proper paoplowho hnvo this responsibility.'r. N. J~ Chiangi> Managor-Enginaaring nnd Construction Quality Assurance, supervisesthio QA Section.

4

Should you have,any additionnl quoationa', please contact me. "~,

Yours very truly,,( Jr jqtn

4

'I

4

J

'I'

lJ

r vlsu2i2la co. lNc.* 4)O)M)o)o ol III II)~ )so)4I ~ I

July 12, 1978

2424 She)m)o Swool

It'll.

4oa 4444 I HO))OOn, Tooo) 220ll I ulsl 4204l41 I IwXi410 44l l400@718194)l7~

0

g+GS~ ii o)lG ~g pi+q,SS

l

'1

'),l

)01'I

Mr. S. McManus, ManagerCorporate Nuclear Safety 6 QA AuditsCarolina Power & Light CompanyP. O. Box 1551Raleigh, NC 27602

Sub)ect: Shearon Harris Nuclear Power PlantOur S. 0. 3301/3308 and

4121/4128'PEW

Quality Assurance Manual Revision 10

Ol

42)

'l Jm

l

I)

11

Dear Sir:

In our recent response to findings reported as a result of your QAAudit, we advised you that Revision 10 of our QA'Manual, scheduledto be finalized by July 10, 1978, would address'the 'mat'ter to resolvecertain discrepancies'hat weie noted. We further informed you thatthe changes to the manual were subject to 'acceptance by the InspectionSpecialist of 'our Authorized Inspection'gency.

Our QA Manual Revision 10 dated 7/10/78 has been 'accepted by ourAuthorized Inspection Agency. We are implementing the new provisionsinto our QA Program. Implementation .will be finalized and Revision 10will be the effective document'or our QA'rogiam 'on July"17, 1978.The changes incorporate requirements through, the Winter 1977 Addendato ASME III, as well as functional changes, and address .pertinentprovisions of 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, and ANSI/ASME N45.2.

A copy of Revision 10 will be directed to your office as soon as themanual is received from the printer. We shall appreciate your earliestapproval of Revision 10 since it is mandatory that the latest QA Manualrevision be employed in our QA Program.

Very truly yours,

N. H. MoerkeVice President-Engineering (QA/QC)

L

NHM:dc

0

~ lL

I"

f

Il. 'C,>~ ~"-~

Yorm 21~0% i,A

'QK

' CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT COMPANYRhLEIGII~ NOKTII chROLINh slat

k. i 8'fc.Y

t

I

o.

~ l

E

COO 633QAA/702-3

1'.e'. ~Mr. -John Barri'a, Pro5ect ManagerSouthwest Fabricating &'elding Company, Inc.7S25~~ Sherman

Street'.

0, Ease 9449Houston, Tcncaa 770K.

,'CAROLINA, POWER" & LIGHT~COMPANYHARRIS PROJECT1984-86-88-90", 3600 MW -,UNITS 1) 2, 3) &'RElfERENCEc (1) P.O. NY43903$

'2)SF&W's lottor, dated,6/9/78A t

Dear Mr. Berries

Reference is'ade to your letter referenced above, wherein you providedcorrective action to Findings 3b and 4 of CP&L Audit Report No. QAA/702-3.Carolina Power & Light '(CP&L) has completed evaluation,of Southwest Pabrica-ting & WaXding Company, Inc.'s (SF&W) corrective "action reaponaoa, andccrmcents concerning t'his 'eview'ro~ ea 'follows s

ll(fl. Your response to Audit Finding 4 'is 'considered adequate to prevent

recurrence of the„,finding. The'rofora,i Finding 4,la hereby:closed.

2. In the case of,Audit Finding 3b, your corroctivo action ia to'boimplemented by 7/10/78 with revision 10 'of tho SP&W'A Manual.Therefore, we:,will hold this Finding 3b open until SF&W'an supplyevidence this corrective action haa„been

implomantod,'t-'a

requested that you review'hese comments, to"your"xoaponso and',provide'CP&L tho necessary .additional,inforuuxtlon within thirty .'(30)'ays., Your„ ',attention to this .'matter is appreciated, end dhould you have any quodtiona,please contact ma.

/open~~, CQpI I c~ s canus'I ~i

hS. McManuo; Manager, CorporateNuclear'Safety &" QA Auditv

C

- l 1

', 'AEH/nchF2

,des Mr. John Harris (2)Mr~ L. 'V. ~e'xwechter (2)

bccs Maaara., N.„J. ChiangiP. Wi"HoweJ. D. E. JoffriosJ. 'M. JohnsonV. B.

Kfncald''.Rc .Lo

Wo W.S. DiMo Fo

Maytonp JnMorganSmithThompson, Jr.

"I

'1

\

I ~{'5, 1{{I

t

{o { I'I

~ 1

I

o

0

~ I

>j {'

t.,gJ ~

o

1P{ r

o

SQUTI+N~F'A8KCATlNG

rr{4{ELDtKlCa {NC,4 1 ~ 4III{oI1 ~ 1 10 {4{1{~ oII~ o ~ I

June 9, 1978

)MS Sherman 4{m{I Ol). Ooo OOOO IHOo{{oo,ZOOOa 11014 I V{41 0240{4{ /1{NX{0 10 OO{ 1400gC3{4 51m

0)

a~I~~oo Cp@gCt/v Pg qI|4 {J

FOP+68{{81~~

Mr. S. hhNanusl ManagerCorporate Nuclear Safety, &,Qh AuditsCarolina ~ & Light 'Ganpany,Raleigh, NC 27602

Reference: P. 0. NY435035 - Harn.s Project Units 1, 2, 3 & 4Subject: CP&L Audit,of,South~st Fabricating & Welding Co., Inc.

March 14-16, 1978

Dear Mr. McHmus4

In response to your letter of, May 8, 1978 which was directed to Mr.John Harris, we present the following {ocmrents for your information:

Audit Findin 3B't

1

Revision" 10 of- the 'SF&W QK Manual is scheduled for release and imple-4{entation on or about 7-10-78., 'Ihe revised Internal Audit form whichis described in'ur May 3 letter willbe included in Revision 10,provided the Authorized Inspection Agency a~ this change.

'The co~ve action described in our May 3 letter has been implemented.An example of our implementation provi~ by the attached form dated 5/31shcws acceptance of the proposed QA Manual changes by the Chief Engineer.

If you have any additional questions, please contact us.Very truly yours,

N. H. ~eVice President-Engineering (QhjQC)

NHM:dcencl.

{'o

I

,I

~ 0 ~ .Im % I

0 - ~

I ~ I

0 0

0 000

~ 0 ~

0 0

0 0

~ 0

~ ~ ~ ~ '

0

~ '0~ ~

0 ~

0 0 0 ~

0 0 ~ 0 0 ~ 0 ~

0

~ Or'0 0 0

0 ~ ~ ~ I00

~ 00 IOO~ ~

IO 0 0

~ ~ ~

I~

~ 0 ~~ ~ 0

~ 0

~ 00 ~ 00 ~ ~~ ~

0 ~ ~ ~

~ 0' 0 Dl ~

~ ~ ~ 0 ~ 0 0~ 00 ~ ~ 0

~ 0

~ ~ ~ 0

~ Jl ~

0 ~ ~ ~ 000 ~ 0

~ 0 ~ 0 ~ ~

0 0 ~ A

~ ~

00~ ~

I

r~

p

P

FORINT 21 50M

k

t1

'I

(

* p,

Carolina'Power 8 light Companyflalolgh, M, C. 27C42

Hay 8,, 1978

Pile i Qhh/702-3 C0800558

Hr. John Harris, Pro/oct HanngorSouthwest Fnbricnting h Molding Conpany,,lnc.7525,Shaman StreetP, 0, Boa 9449Houston, Toxno

77011'AROLINA

POMER 6 LlglfZ CNPhllYHAPJllS PROJECT1904-86-88-90 - 3600 HM - UNITS 1, 2, 3, h 4REFERENCEt '(1) Po 0. NY435035

(2) SF&M'S LETTERo DATED 5-3-78,>h

Donr Hr. Harriet

Reforonce is made, to your lattor referenced above, wherein you providedcorrective action to Findings 1, 2, 3a, 3b, nnd 4 of'PhL Audit RcportNo. Qhh/702-3. Carolina Po'ver 6 Light (CPSL) has completed evaluationof Southeast Fabricating &, Molding Gxrpany, Inc.'a (SPAM) co ectivoaction responses, and ccmacnta'oncerning this review nro; '.lowed

l. Your response to Audit Pindingo '1, 2, and 3a ie considered'adequateto prevent rocurrcnco,of tho findings. Therefore, Findi~~s 1, 2$and 3a aro hereby closed.

2. In tho casa of Audit Finding 3b, your corrective action io considered'ndaquatc. However, aa discussed in your'etter reforcncod sbovo,thio corrective action will not be implomentod untie. Revision 10 ofyour Qh Manual 'ia approved and issued. Therefore, wa .will holdthin Finding 3b open.

3. In tha ense of Audit Finding 4, your corrcctivo ection is conaidozcdadequate. However, na discussed in your letter referenced above,this corroctivo action inpkcncntntion dona not explain whoa by datethat this corrective action willbe inplomcntod. Therefore, wowill hold thin Finding 4 epona

P

h

~ ql I

d

S

Mr. John Barrio

f:,%7

I1.1

.Q

I

I

I

Nap'> 1970„

ifj'lj

IJ

U

Zt io requested thoR you rovicv thooo ccaacnto to your r~mnaa andprovtda„cp&L tho necessary cdditiona1 in''cemtion uithin thirQ ($0)days, Your attcnt5m to this tatter io,appreciated, cad ahouId you havoaxgr questions,, ploaoo,,contact no,

I

v ru1L~g,;:Ps"g. 2'sggplgvs( VlcWLQflvB

S. HcManua, NanagorCorporate Nuclaar Sataty 5

Quaiity'ssurance Audit

AZtI>fdcH7

cc: " Hr-,, J. 'orrid '(2)Mr, „L', V Thiozvechtcr (2)

beat MassrsU N.. J. 'hiangi,v/a"'ref arencaaP. Q. Maw'a'''U iJeftriasj,WU SU KillcaidR'. Hsytan„ Jr.

G., McGovernM. M. Morgan,8. D. SaithM. P. Thonpaon," Jr.

U

I

~ '

I(17

U

jf

U ~

fk'

*

I II

U

'U:4

~U

oC 7

"j*.C'

ff g

I 'l I'U

fk

UI., O„

I U

(IU,j~~

I"

'o

f-'P +'UIMUUW .y- g,P 'j'ICA',I

,/

A

c ~t t

tlr, John Barrio May. 8, 1978

ihh

$,h

Zt io rcquoatcd that you reriev those canto to'our roapoaao andprovido CPM the necessary additicenX information v5thin thirty ()0)days, . Your attontion to thia eattor ia appreciated, and ohouht you heraany quostiona, p3.oaaa,contaat jmo.

1

'Ng.':PS"g. Pug

S. 'NcÃanua> ManagerCorporate Nuclear,Safety 6

gua1ity'osuzance Au@it

hXH>fdcN7'c:

Hr'. J.'Barris (2)'fr.L.'. Thiearechtcr (2)

I

bccs Messrs. N.,J; Chiangi .v/a refcrcnccs,'P. W. iioveJ. D. R. Jaffrias,V.,B. Kincaid,R. 'L. Mayron, Jr.

i'

C. McGovsrnW., W. Morgan,S. D. SmithN. F. Thompson, Jr'.

r

n

'jjj

I

11

k

»

E

I

I('

1

n It ~ I,,

k

ll

I

o wfLorN6 r:+rNc,A SAsrJlerr ~ I Iv la> ~ 4ssl

rets s~~. bier I r a oo. eve ~ rr~~~o;n.» llorl/rrrx ere orM r rwx eroeer rroo'u

b r.(

May 3, 1978

Mr. S. htcManus, ManagerCorporate Nuclear Safety & QA AuditsCarolina Power & Light CtarpanyP. O. Box 1551Raleigh, NC 27602

Reference: P.„O. NY435035 - Harris Project Units 1, 2, 3 & 4Subject: CP&L Au3it of Southwest Fabricating & Welding Co., Inc.

bhrch 14-16, 1978

Dear Mr. bhKnus:,

In response to your letter dated March 28, 1978, directed to our Mr.J..E. Harris, we suhnit'our ocrments to the findings that werc reportedby your auditors, Messrs. A. E. Hall and T. L. Kosmatin. Our responsewith co~ve action and implerrentation are outlinod below.Item 1

E~uirerrent:

10CER50 Appendix B, Criterion II, Quality Assurance ProgramNonconformance:

fc

0

'b

'th

Criterion II requires that the QA Program shall provide for ixxloctrin-ation'nd training of personnel performing activities affecting qualityas necessary to assure that suitable proficiency is achieved-and main-tained. In reviewing Paragraph 2.2.3.1 of SF&W's QAM, which outlinesthe procedures for training, it was cbserved by the auditors that train-ing and indoctrination requirement for engineering personnel and uppermanagerrent Qh/QC personnel are not presently covered by written procedures.This item was presented in Audit Report Qhh/702-2 as Finding Item 1 andis being held open. SF&W still has not provided and implerrented correc-tive action as of this audit.

g

I

'i

SOUTHNfESTF'ABRICATING

&VgLDNQCO,IHC.4 lib)Idio)g ~ I Ill N)i)i~ )itiol

'

Mr. S. h~us/CP&L May 3, 1978

Corrective Action

l. In accordance with our ccnmitnent to assure that Engineeringand upper QA/0 managenent personnel receive training and in-doctrination necessary to assure that suitable proficiency isachieved and maintained, we have prepared and distributed thefollaring proacdures:

a)

b)

QC-107, dated 3/15/78, "Training and Indoctrination ofEngineering Personnel."

QC-108, dated 3/15/78, "Training and Indoctrination ofQuality Assurance Personnel."

2. Paragraph 2.2.3.1 of the QA Manual will be revised to add QC-107and QC-108 to the listing of p~ures. 'Xhis addition will beincorporated in Revision 10 of the QA Manual that is scheduledto be issued by July 1, 1978.

Implementation

1. QC-107

The report, "Qualifications of Engineering Personnel," dated3/24/78 fran R. P. t eber, Chief Drafts', to E. R. McAnally,Chief Engineer, evaluated and updated the canpetency of eachperson in the departnent. The previous evaluation ofindividual proficiency was )distributed 5/19/77.

The report sunmarizes the Engineering Departnent personnel whoare classified "Qualified to Nuclear,"'o the satisfaction ofthe Chief Engineer in,the following disciplines:

Qualified to Detail NuclearQualified to Take Off NuclearQualified to Check NuclearQualified to be Squad Supervisor/Nuclear

2. QC"108

Quality Assurance training and indoctrination neetings have beenconducted by the Manager of QA and Assistant Manager of QA. Thesubjects presented and the list of attendees have been recordedand distributed:

'XJ

0'I

~ ~

0 ~ ~

~ ~ ~ 0

50

tc C

~ ~

~ ~

~ ~

~ 00 ~

0 ~

~ ~

~ ~~ ~

~ ~ ~ ~

000 ~ 0~ ~

~ i~

~ ~ ~ ~

'0 ~~ ~

0 0

~ ~

~ 00 ~ ~ ~~ ~ 0 ~

~ t ~ 0~ ~

~ ~

00 ,~ 0 ~ ~

0

~ ~ t

OV ' ' 0 ~ ~ 0 ~ ~~ 0C0

0 ~ ~

~ ~

~ 0 ~ '~ V~.

~ 00~ ~

~ ~ ~ ~

~ ~ - ~ II~ j ~0l

~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

~ ~ ~ 0C 0 ~ 0 ~ ~ 0 ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

0 ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ 0 .0 ~~ ~

~ ~

~ ~

~ ~

00 00 ~~ ~ ~ ~

~ ~

~ 0

0 00 ~ ~ 0 ~ 4~ 0

~ ~ tc~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~

~ ~ ~

0 1

~ c~ 0 4 ~

~ ~

0 ~

~ ~

0

1

lL

'I

I

E

1

SGUTHVlfE5TFABRICATlNG

I'fWCLOIIIGCO( IIIC,6 Sr1(kl ~ (r ~ I IV )r(~ (rr(lrrrl

G

Mr. S. l4"'4anus/CP&L May 3, 1978

2. Paragraph 2.2.3.1.2 of the QA Manual establishes the locationsof the seven volumes of the Procedure Manual that are currentlymaintained. The distribution, record for all volunes shall bemaintained in the office of the QA Technician who is assignedthe responsibility for recording and distributing procedures.

lenentation

1. The recoxd for procedure distribution was initiated on 4/27/78to provide a doculent to verify issuance of each proceduxe anQinsertion into the Procedure Manuals.

2. A revision to the format of the Procedure Control form was madeon 5/3/78. This revision was made to provide a format that willalso provide a suitable record for planned changes in proceduredistribution. These changes. will be incorporated into Revision10 of the QA Manual, when accepteQ by the Authorized InspectionAgency, to impxove the convenience of procedure maintenance andusage by segerating manufacturing procedures frcm administrativep(. Ocedures .

Item 3

Rec(uirenent:

SF&W QAM Section 13, Audits, Paxagraph 13.1.2.410CFR50 Appendix B, Criteria XVI, Corrective Action and XVIZ, Audits

Nonconformance:

a. Auditors reviewed SF&W internal audit report (12-6-77) perfoxmed byR. B. Bhavsar, where the reaudit of corrective action was perfoxmedby N. H. Ruxke on 12-12-77. This was Qocunented by initial and datebeside each corrective action listed except one, Number 5d, whichwas-not signed, or dated as having'been reaudited.

b. Auditors reviewed internal audit report (2-14-78) performed by R. B.Bhavsar. This audit reported five findings. No written correctiveaction could be presented to the auditors. This audit was followedby audit report (3-8-78) by R. B. Bhavsar which does not doclment anactual folly-up of the findings of audit dated 2-14-79. The reportdateQ 3-8-78 does not cxoss-reference or close-out t)M.'finding ofaudit dated 2-14-78. SF&W had intended the later audit to close outthe previous audit of 2-14-78 by not finding any problans in thesane areas of those nonconfoxmances. This intention of SF&W does notmeet tlat requirements of 10CFR50 Appendix B, Criteria.

0

lg

A

0. SGUHWIEST

FABRICATINGI

4 Svln41 ~ Iy ~ I IV l«t«I«etio«elI

Mr, S, bhNanus/CPEL

f

~ «

May 3, 1978

%0 «

I

$1,

II

'IIg'0 II:

I,r

jg! I I I

I

V

j,

4,

. ~a

&jVEUNNGCQ,WC,4 lAI(t(~ Iy ~ I IV la( ~ Ia ~ Iieaej

th. S. lkManus/CP&L'ay 3i 1978

')a I

part of the QA Program which they are executing." The auditors deter-mined, contrary to the requirennnts of Criterion II, the managers ofvarious SF&W Departnmnts whcm execute that part of the QA Pxogram forQjich they have responsibility have not formally docjxjjented participa-tion in review of the Qh, Program prior its revisions being issued andzlplGAented o

Corrective Action

>„j«'~ When future revisions to the QA Manual are contemplated, written7

1

n J

()

A

6 v(ELotNG cQ, INc4 SAJI4) ~ tg tl IV 4( ~ (P ~ 14 ~ )

S. McManus/CP &L May 3, 1978

3.

opinion of SF&W QA, this i.s a repetitive condition, the vendor isnotified of the large number 'of rejects and an explanation of pre-ventive measures is requested. Further, these data are reviewedprior to QA vendor audit to be certain, that the audit plan includesinput fran performance histoxy.

Bmsoo's Specification CAB-SH-M-12, Revision 0, "Quality ControlRequirements for Suppliers of Bpu.ghent and Services," (860-72) inParagraph 8.1 states, "For items and services purctmsed fran sub-suppliers, seller shall conduct necessary inspections and tests atpoints of receipt to verify conformance to applicable physical,chemical, or other technical requirenents." The auditors are oon-cerned that SF&W has not established a pxogram for, verifying byoutside laboratory anlysis, a check against their subsuppliexschemical and physical .test,reports. SF&W's managenent stated theyhave not established such a progxam because they interpret theabove specification) requirenerit to be met by performing a cxxnpmisonbetween their subsupplier's chemical and physical test report andthe appropriate ASMB„or, ANN material specification. The auditorsagree .that the Ebasco requixanant as. stated above is interpretable.The auditors are aLso concerned,that, this Bmsco specificationrequixerent has, been renaved fxan CAR-SH-ME-12, Revision l. Thenrvr revision of the specification which is required by a latexxevision of Specification CAR-,SH-M-30 has not been made a part ofthe oontract in effect during this audit.

t)h)l (

ResEIonse

The questions concerning intexpretation of applicability of specifi-cations was referred to R. Georgio of Ebasco by J. E. Harris's letterdated,3/9/78. However, only oral cammts have been received to date.Also, no schedule for resolution has been established.

The auditors are concexned that there are several instances in SF&Wmaterial storage areas where carbon steel fittings were being stackedclose to stainless steel pipe which'was designated for "QA relateuse," (ASME Cede Material) by blue and pink markings on the material.In one storage area, a quantity of 12-inch carbon steel elis hadfallen fxcm their stack and were within one inch of touching thestainless steel pipe. The concern is that other elis could continueto fall fran the stack and ccme in contact with the stainless steelpipe J

Response

Material handling supervision and manufacturing supervision personnelare cognizant of problems associated with storage to minimize

*

rI

)

r

~ 'I ~

.SbUTHNK%''AHA

CATlNGr wctu»Na ca,wc.

0 4A)l4>a)g ~ I I)> I~ ro)ae)l ~ I~ I

Mr. S. McManus/CP&L May 3, 1978

V

, contaminatian. It is a continuing daily enforcement problem toenfarce the discipline with the rapidly nnving inventory of stain-'less materials in the shop. Therefore, QA surveillance audits areconducted to cantrol this productian problem,. even though notrecorded as, an, official internal audit.

5. The auditors are concerned that in som instances SPEW MRS's con-tained errors'fter canpletion and being drawing checked twice bytwo different drawing»checkers. Several MRS's were revimM bythe auditors; and the following two identified contained errors.MRS No. Q3301-SW;, Sheet 42, Revision 2, referenced Procedure PT-1

'where the p~ure attachment for test acceptance criteria was notreferenced's required., In addition, MRS No. Q3301-SW, Sheet 2,indicated'n attachment was to be used with,a reference procedure,but failed to correctly identify the attachment by its correctnumber.

I'

)g

)'

.„o

'r

)r,

r)

I)

)

0)

))

>'0 ')

1

)

~ )

)'ery;

truly yours,

N. H. NxxkeVice President-Engineering (QVQC)

NHM:dc

cc: G.,B.R.RoW.K.Jr

H. LockwoodJ. GoodwinP. 'BornesL. PearsanP. KnightD. PowellEr HarriS

E es~nse

Engineering has been advised of the apparent checking deficiencies,and has taken appropriate action to nunimize recurrence.

Please advise us if you desire any additional information.

rg ) o iQ

rt

0

e

FI:;P!AR~HOtlrp3PhIJ5$4fy'gt tyt1/Tj.-'r'I'Ig'Q+~~~9:;ftfg'IE"-(')(I-I ' '- '-F )FORII NPP-I RATA REPORT'FOB FABRICATER htlCLEAR PlylbC oLOAEIEqfntJES' '

(Ao Brqolrrd by)ho Provl¹loo ~ of.)ho,AEIIE Code Rolrsl ] )'L] 'g [")jjJ. h

(tdame aha Addrr e ~ ~ I t'abrscas at)I Fabrscasoo oy

r—.Fabncasro Fer(Prana aha Addrr ~ ~ )

Cu olin!( Pobfer 5 Li ht CO ~ ~ . Eoca lon of Pl nt~e e h Orth Carolina

SPENT FIdoEL SERIAL 816893S P'Othe Sytleo Idenssllcslsos {Dtsel arsctsplson o snlrn ~ ~ord usr mess cessant ~ It >

) ) )) .'330d SP SIIT p d )y~Sout vI 5 M)r).' o ')) lf766

B~,he e or ~ rsaf drasfn, conslrus'sion, and vrorbmanahlp comp((e ~ wslh ASA(E Code Stclloh Dl Clos ~

Kcl«sn 1C ~ ACdenca DoleC.—P 1a73

~ Case .'Ia

geroara ~ I Ideroofacturersr Desa Repono properll Identified ehd ~ ICnad by Carmiasiasrd lasarnen have been furnsehed for

ELL-S hr.FCO TUBE CORPORATION (A) S/ll-. I-8222F-15; PipeIhe fotlaorssC sltn ~ Of Ihs ~ rcport f I ol part lltm supper~ qdahufsclurel ~ rlsoe urd ddessllyshc ~ loop)

SnD.CO(P1) S/sd-~II2595-8'-'lf p2 S/'III RSI2)95 8 10 & P3) S/N Ys 2595 8 22.

, ~ Shop Kvoass ~ tlc Te ~ I ys psl,

MK( F3-P 6-2-SF-8-1: SA«358 CL.I- TP-304 WLDB Deectspqsah of plplnC Insprcted (Include-warts o, malersal spr nom. pspt ~ str-scarc)sl ~ or Insc\nrss Irnclh

12" (.375"vl) 5'- 6" & 9'- 6" LEN S'A"403 MP-304 'stlo 12" 90oI STO:lsssrnC ~ I eh(r ~ r tsc I

wT. LR. ELL

rb ~~ )C

I Psrg

APR 25 l979

"

i"EA'5(pt ro't

NPP-I" ','"," .I"'f~,;".",gPCITO@II~g.~giV'ISIONPI'-"".SUBSECVIQN~Nhs'~;)I('jgJgUpi;qg7(fjIlIU/'I'II(Iqf~l~)tI'

FORqI gpp'j'(back) 9' 'I "utf" '"'~ ~ '

y Wr ~ ~

Dtecrlptton s( FI ~ Id Fobtlcotlon'f

~ ~ ~

~ ~ ~ ;b ~~ 1 ~

~ ~

'5

~I(5 Fl ~ ld )(ydtoot ~ ttc Test

E

pel ~

u' csnlfy that th ~ (laid fobrlcstlon o( the described PIPlng conforms with thr tequttements of SECTION Ql of the ASME BOILER ANDPRESSIIRE VESSEL CODEt Clat ~ ~ Edltlon ~ Addend a D st ~ Case Ho.

Det ~ ~ 19 Signed(Fabrtc ~ Iot) ( tprterntattvc)

Ovt Crnl(Ication of hlnhorlcatlon Io usr theCtr.lllcot~ of Author(cotton No.

Symbol Exp(rat l9

CERTIFICATE OF FIELD FABRICATIOIIINSPECflp.'I

I~ thr lalltrt~ (Cnrd holding ~ valid comml ~ ~ lon I ~ eutd by Ihe Hot(anal Board o( Boiler osd Ptreewt Veto ~ I Inepectot ~ and/orIh ~ St ~ I ~ rt Ptovttlct 0(~ AC ~ teplsyelt by olhove ctvspottd the ~ t ~ temrnt ~ In thl ~ Manufectuttr ~ Dot ~ Rcport with Ihe dtoctlbtd plplAC end ~ tetr that thr pone rrftnrd Iao ~ EE ~ I ~ It~ Est , not Included In the cenlf loot ~ o( shop Inspection have bren Ineprctrd

by tsr and that Io Iht be ~ I of my ttnowledgt snd bcllef Ihe manufoctutrr hor conettucttd thl~ piping In ~ econ(ence «lth Iht ~ Ipl(coul ~ ~ ~ ctlon of the ASME CODE SECTIOII

flf.'y

~ (going thl ~ certlllc~ I~ ntlthct tht Inspector nor hl ~ cltlplot'rt matte ~ ony wenanty copra ~ ~ rd or Implltd, concrrnlng the ptptng drecribtd ln thl ~ Manu( ~ Cturtr' Dots Rcport. Funhctmore, nelthrr the Ineprctsr sot ht ~ rrpteyer shall be llabl~ tn snymannet (er any personal Infuty or proptny damage ot a loe ~ of ony ttlnd atl ~ Ing (tom or cotrltctrd with thl ~ Inspection,

Dot ~ l9

InspectorComrsl ~ ~ lone

Nattonal Bsan4 Stater Provtnco and hot

SRRB%t

~«$go „~~P ~ry-

Shttt tio.Southwest Fabricating & )Yl.'lding Co., Inc.

LIQUID PENETRANT INSPECTION REPOflT iPoge ol

o.. P- 9d'7P

~ CSIProcedure No;CL«f t ~ I

r~r=-.( ~nM~«„S.".„~+~Re o.oble 0 lho}le Spot

Check

MAI CIIIAL OC S ctllr1 IOH tAATCnl*L TYrc

I I.HC In*It1SKI.-S IBSKLw Q

mf Oo/~ncMovcn oA Tell Ho 0'cvcLottcn OATCM HOOA TC ~ I HOSK C.S

~~ Wote. Q E~g4 " gg~>O

stt:.f" «

sltnt'Ac c co«col TSON

I CMncnA IVIIC

-.o '"I IICCL\ A ~litt IYI~ 1.nA ~ ctt Ho

-P r:-cCLCAH1.n OnYIHC TIMC

Minvtes4&@

OIICLL 1 IMC

Minvles

r CH c I HAH T n CMOVAL AI C THOOISolvent Wiped Pf

t«CMO V Ctl Otl 'I IHC I IMC

hlinv1 ~ I

OCVCLOI Ml.tt I I IMI.

hlinvles

rost cl.cAHT.nI i",i H «tr. Q

IIIv XIII 0Q

0III0

0

DESCRIP TION OF INDICATIONS

~l&e-

«-v iC

A t~/I;VP«~jIIA;

ltd

- ~ ~-

'VIvl

Q Q

I

Q7 IVI0' In

v

z

~ '/ i' i (gQjPe ~)"Cjkggg, PgQ'AV7IAee.~-;

i TESJ 'REIIORT':,":!0)SWEPCO TUBE CORPOR TXON

QNC CLIFTQee OOVSCVANO ~ CLISTON. NCW JERSCV 07075

Soutllwest Fab & We'dingP.O. Box 9449IIouston, Texas

77011

5HIP

T0

rg "e~o 'o '~4-Southwest Fab & Welding200 No. 76th Street)Iouston, Texas

77011 ~g g CZ

e i~ 7//77 8

I2ot) 776 QQQOYWX NO. 7IO-Ot)O-7OOO

TELEX NO 1SMRI

e DI51RIBUTQR g~ ~ C 5 Oeusr UE R rg P 0 NUMBER1 ~Swepco SP grade f).ttdngs T 304 to ilSI/IE SA 240 a f

ASIIE-SA-403, WP-30"W & ASNE Sect. III Class 3, 1971 Edition including 1973Sut"7ter AddEnda, weld x-rayed lOOX per Para UW-51, Sect. VIII, NPT-3 codestamped & inspected, annealed, water quenched to below 800 deg. F within 3minutes.

~ree ere -~«~ ooE LD wlRE IIEAT NQ,

+BED HFg

HEAT TREATMENT o~~+0

SOLUTION AIINEALED P IT ~dg oFFOR ~6'ltiUTES MINIMUMAND

RAPID AIR COOLED'WATER DUE tiCIIEO

CHEMICAL

SIZEI /+ 'e7 d) e /O Cee(' HC44SWEPCO PC. NOS ~

SI( Idj r»Z-C - t radS. IFSI

BASE METAL '

PIPE HELD-TRAti')VERSE

YIELD P.S ~ le

30 DDOeee~slLE p.s.l.

7~OD O

CLOvc I~ eCC~ ee Ceroei

I

gtsPaao ~ p/aOd) v rr. D

serio I~IceOCleo FLAT

PIPE wELD TRANSVERSE

PIPE WELD.TRANSVERSE

PIPE WELD.TPAtiSVERSE

PIPE HELD.TRAKSYFRSE

lilt'I reb LD

Ill�/IIISYI'It/i

EBASC

R CVlibVII

i~cci.

~rAIF~"

) lhIGINf.E

VIRIIlaO 5V

'(8/PV.....i .

Q

I'lI'E HELD.ttittiSVERSE~ s ~ ~ v v E ASCO VQ

E XAhIINATIONS

keee'LIS *sec S> Cuvl IISICt 1

3 RADIOGRAPHY IILTRASOtetC LIQUID Pt.'N. CORROSION4S~E- I7 W+ ee/.r/ I

IMI ACT HYDRO. P.S.I

RE Sill,tS IAs' E'/D 7 eb

vh

)~krak V ~

TELE'lO. 133321 (201) 778 3000",I 44 . d (S.Lvkf'Ihh,i~ ffl~~ha

REVIEWED FOR CORRECTNESSAND COMPLETENESS SY

NO. (201) SS71 d2OQ

'Pd c

'll

)I ~

SV7 ZPCO TU 33K COONE CLI!TTON 8OULKVARO ~ Cl IFTON4 N R I rt3t8

FOR)I ssi-2 stIAisUFACTURERS DATA REVOIR F

.d(61dssd r,, g-p.2 yyEIIASCO V@A REP

]. (a) Manufactured by SWEPCO TUBE CORPORATIOV I CLIFTON BLVD. CLIFTON, N..il f Southwest Fao cx Neldzn Houston, TX

(Name and address of Manufacturer of completed nuclear component)

NAlsICES

Identification-Manufacturer's Serial No. of Part M-8222-F Nat'I Bd. No. N A

lr'"

(a) Constructed According to Drawing 'No. Dra~ing Prepared by

(b) Description cf Part Inspected *16 I3cs 12 3' D x 3/8 W x 90 de ~ LR ELLS (weldedD

'm""" Sr.-403 Section III Class 3'manufacture (R/M SA-240 T-304 Ht.

I ~e

I ~

/ 'STOMCRXoc////Mr.-. r

$- II I C 0 II F I T . I re 0 5 I 2 E

(2. 0

JOS NO

periTHICKNE55 L CNCTH

90 c'H Ez u'.w ~r$ ~

j-+ I l.~ I I j i

i I I; i i I~i IIy e ~ ~

rOleM Idg CO

Q K~ ~ ~

* DEPT C B.

~ ~ Q y

~ ~

ggg ~ ~I ~

~ ~

~ ~ 4

~ ~ ~

~ ~ ~

ERRM

~ ~

~ al PVVv.'4 V'", 'g 'V,4'y'bW'„(VV',VvvlwVI.":'h~.-agan~

g>~A

4 ~

~ fv V VVVV ~ ~ '

~ ~ ~

7I by

..F~-'$;I

~ ~

4V ~jt IJ(

V~~ (QA

VV'44%, S V~ ~ ~ ~

Vw"<

~ ~'

V

P ~

rq P,(gV

4

"V$~>glVyfj'»

A

0 ~

~ I ~ ~ ~

h."",„; w4;tVV '

,)f/'-Vi,C,rl v4,

~ ~ ~

r ~

~ ~ ~

~ p ~

~ o o

I

~ ~

gq'~la'zUI'AC1'L'l(L'llS 0 a, TA I(EI'0ll'I''()EBASCO VQA REP.

ENANCES

]. (a) L!anufsciured by(b) Vanufoctured Icr

trEPCO TUllE CON VORATION I CLINTON BLVO. ~CLIFTON. N.~n>~111" ~t c Pb 6 Ivr ldina Houston TX QC:sni tol P ioe

(Na=e and address of Manufacturer of completed nuclear coioponrnt)Houston)

2 Ident>f>cation.Mahufactuter' Serial No. of Part(e'p fs A Nst'I Bd. No.

(s) Constructed According to Drawing No

(b) Dc scription of Par: Inspected

(c) Applicable ASM Code>Sec Jon IU, Ed

em 'A-358 I'lass 1 ti,T- 304, Ht. Ho. E'80817 ),p') led, hydro tested 0'=Swepco ho. SN M-2595-8.

s 12 /4" O.D. N 3/6 "W 20'/L Weld d~eoir a.'-U—"'L

Section IIX, Class 3, mansifac" ure (R/M SA240 ~welds x-rayed 100~ per Para PN-51, annealed and1324 P.S.I. minimum. S.W.E'. h o. 33-2-F-5.Pc. >Io. 16,17,2$ ,24,25,26,27.

te censfy Ihr I Iht ~ I ~ >stash> ~ rh 1st In Ihs ~ ~ aport ate con eel ~ hd Ihssrr> ihe n ~ ~ sf coll ~,hrclrcrl of Ihe AS>>C Code S ~ c>soh fft.

QYht ~ pp:stso: ~ Ce ~ rih Sorcslscsisoh shd Stir ~ ~ Reoori s ~ e hoi Ihe respohsstsst~ ~ spohsloie for fums ~ tltc ~ ~ eprr ~ I ~ t ~ sea Spec>frees>oh shd S>rt ~ s Rtpors sf Ihr~ ioh shd Srr ~ ~ ~ Rrpon.i

ee ~ ~ ~ I ps ~ I or sppuh rrset ~ ~ ~ Censed sh sht Cade cohforts ~

Isy Ol Iht peti 611U>at>ur ~ r An sppurst shet 'rrhlrfaC>urtt ~ S~ pour>oleo ~ s

g>IuJtd sh I ~ e ~ ~ 'e ~ ~ chSptcsl>ca

grEn Coord.

I, ~~/8 nn .=.encry-

Certificate A'Authorizstfoo Expires

g„, ~7/ ls 7Q er'rn t>>s= rr O(Manufacturer)

6/11 79Cerif>cate c( Author>-at)>co No.

T 304S4240 75000 Nombsa) 3/8 corrosion0 1 3/4 20

I R/X,d. She U: Y~ teria l ——T.S. Thictcnc s —in. AUowance —>n. Di~ . fL in Length—~

r s

(K>nd (a Spec. No) (MIr- of Range Specified)

s „. L I 1 I~le N V R T ~t.~sr Ell I „1 IOQ ~ eI

G Lms> H.T. R.T. No. of Cov.r r.s

CEFTIFIQATION OF DESIGN FOP. APPl.ilTENANCE (»hen ai>piicnI>IC)

Des�>gm

LnformaeJon oo file at

St~as scaly ~ i ~ repcr. on file ~ t

De s: —.sp.c:fico t)cns cerJ fied by

S s rcport cerdied by

hs/A

Pro(. Eng. State

Pro fr 1 gr Si ~ te

Res. No

Rag. Nch

ode Section III.

Uie Inspector nur his employer =ages any warranty, eap:cs ~ r.d or impl>s:d. concern'1g' Par>ut Dat ~ Rcpor>. fur'ncr. ore, neither the Ins;hctor nor his cm loyer sin ~ U bc'1lury or rop«ly damage or a loss of any ILLnd aria>ng (ross or ccnnecitd wsth t..i ~

By ~ >going this ccr 'cate, nea~~rihr. p r. deacr:t .d us this Hanufacts'r

!

' b'tc 1 ~ 1y . ~ ...c:r (or any psrsonal

p~~W Y'. ': 3 RJ. 64fa GH:0 A r'D. PA. C"".M. >h'. C. " r 7

CommiaaicnsN a 1> 0 n a I B c, rs r ~ I ~ I C ~ P. Irv in. e C r n N Oe

CEIITIFICATCOF Siifir ii~ EC»oiunde>a>~Wed, bOiding ~ V ~ lid CcmmiaaiOO ISSued by:1e Nui>pnat BOrrd Of Br>iler «1d P..SS = 'e'CSSC! IOSWCI=.E

a1d/or '„nc'tate ot P oviticc of Es eW Je «Seser and rrptoycd by CGM>rlERCIAI U:lsON "ISI:RANCE CCM?ANYo( BCSTCN. MA.. hsve tnaPcctcd I..e P ~ re of a Ptessure vessel described in this Stsnufectuter's Pa..>at Data RcPort oo

I / 5/ "t)C 19 I and state rthat to thc b st o( my snowledge and bel>e(, the M nufactu~r hs s cons Jctcdth>a,~.. '". I cccrdrnce w>th tbe ASME C

~ I ~ ~ ~

~ ~ ~ ~

~ ~

~ ~

- ~ ~ ~ '. ~- ~ ~ ~

~ '

~ ~ ~ ~

~ o

~ r

~ ~ ~

~ ~

J" ~' . ~, rc'rr ''~ i, < .,''

QQ QUBEQN < C«pTOhs DQUt EVARQ

I'()I('I1 .'I'-" MitsliL'FAC'FUHE:[C!3!)3tTAHt:lsOlCT I'0

REVIEWED FOR CORRECTNEISSAND COMPLETENESS BY~ ~ ~~VX CO~EBASCO EN

NVISVPSIIENFlEEII75Y"

.f'f/6Nke......hSZ-.rI...,, E A QpU)( SNA,"e CES

], ( ~ ) Lfanufoetured by(b) h!onufactured for

S%'EPCO TVDE CORPORATION I CLIFTON BLVD.. CLIPTOli. N. I.

(Name ond address of llanufhcturer of completed nuclear cosrponenl)

r >-2595-8 N ~ t I Dde NoI 'cntification Manufacturer's Seri ~ I No. of Part(o) Constructed According to Drawing No.

(b) Desctiptioo of Part Inspected

(c) Applicable ASI(E CodeiSection III, Edition~~, Addenda date Cs v Coar No. Class ~Drawing Prepared by

O.D. x 3/8M' 20'/L (>t 3.ded oioe)

SA-358, Class 1,7-304, rit. h'o. F80827),

, =ic3(led, nydro tes ted C~St'caco No. Sh I"3-2595-8,

Section XXX, Class 3, manufacture (R/t4 SA-24ofields x-rayed 10090'er Pa"a PN-51, annealed and1324 P S.X. min'mum. S.N.r., ho. 3302-'~-5Pc. 1-2-3-5-7-10-11.

el

T-304SR2C0 75000 R . ~ i 3/8 c ' 1 3('d

S'.. II:I~I;I —T.S. ll e'. * A II - — . Dt ~ . F\ — I .Sih(s d!ese e.s' (If o(R s Seeefo df

R.T. Cc,.nleto Sff .; e =(2Q'IG~ H.T. R.T. Nc,. of Cc uises

'

~ renliv shel Ihe ~ I ~ Iemcnl ~ node in Ihs ~ sepoelco ice e~e ~ ot condsn clion ot ihe ASMC Code Seclson ttt.I he ~ poler ~ Sir tie ~ sin 5 pe est ~ tees ~ Cn one Slee ~ ~ tc coors ~ sr~ e ~ sine el,i ~ ioe iuesehsnc ~ ~ epoease De ~ isn Specihcolioh ond

~e.ei ~ .Dn snc Side ~ ~ Repose.l

nOl Ihe s ~ ~ ptnssastelS ot Ihe Peel sf~I ~ eiveee An ~ I puelenvne ~ snonufoesueee ~ ~Seer ~ ~ Repen il ihe oppuesos nce.cs ~ rfsi ded ~ n sre 'ied ~ ri Prese»periiiro

.„ /'-. '., /"Q~~

6J&n Hencry Ene~'oord.

Ce..if t of;h I tice p s

I9 78 Signed eQ'c elf Itis< cl .Ss(Manufacturer)

7'Doieen

h'-1418"'1Ce..i!scate of Authorization No.

oer corieci end ini ~ ve ~ s ~ I peel oe vrd ur endo r ~ ~ ~ denned en che code ronroeri ~

CERTIFICSITIO.'e OF UESIG.'e FOR APISL'RTE.'cheh'CE (eellcn afsplica41e)

Design snformation on file atS ass analysis report on fsle "atDesign ~ Iketfsections certified by

ce..ified by

S'ts'I

iQ;".'~3G2!:-$:"Ms 2'27J;-'O~7GL--';

Prof. Eng. State

Prof. Eng. State

Reg. Nch

Reg. No.

~ r ~ n

p f h

~

1 L

CER tlFICA IF OF Silei IiSPECTIOi;, thc undersigned, holding ~ valiC coma reason I surC by !nc .'eef tonal Board of Boiler on(.'ressu~ Vessel inspector ~

~ 14/or the St ~ 'e or Prov'1cc of heeln'erSesve - onC e..ploved by COethlERCDL UNIO:e D(SURANCE CQh: ANYcf IIO TON, MA., have tns;oectcd the ps rt of a pressure vessel described in this etonufvcls er's pari ~ I Dot ~ Report on s

>/ ~g /7~ '9, ond state tr. ~ t to the ~~st of ...y Lnowleos,e onC belie f, thc eivnufocturerr hns constructed:his;u A in ~ ccordvnce wc'-". the *SW Code Section III.

Dy signing this crrttorioate, neither the Inss~ctor nor his ecsPIoyer mat(rs any warranty, vs;Irrs ~ ed or s...Plied. Concerning!hc -vr. described in this I'onufocturer'a Parial Data Repor'urthermore, nc.ither the inst~clos nor his eo.ptohc'r shalt be:sob;r in any monner for ory personal injeey or proieerty damage or o loss of s ny csnd orsssng frem or connected with I-I~

3 ~ W 7M

Qefkctor s Sign ~ 'ure

if Pcl',v ceo I'Ieat Tres'tcdo

c .

~ ~

tf. Y. ~ I 't J ( '6 CIIIO lee'r O. pA, C(,'e"ec, '9, C. ~"9 7National Board, St ~ te, Province ond No

c ~

(e

I

)5FA'S

. Ft YlelDHoutSTrtIN. TCI(AS 12-1 2-

Corrected copy

hN-Tlxll l,hll. Bl'.VOllT NO. 9213

t)II I'AI1.I:I) ALAI,)'SIS I(l'.I'()lk'1'lallt

XXKKJO No

C(ISTOMf.RS'ROl'RN(3

0152

D E S C R IPT I0 N ~ ~~Iitl

It t oiNINI

~ II0 tOtaltla lgvtal

~al a

l(N5N (51N(NCIN

f(N 5OV1II(IN(II

tlallalIII'a(a

Iroaaa I

tltl~ al~I trN ~

~ ro~~a ~ tl~

VII YS ICALS,OF MATCIIIALSFAOM WIIICIIMADE

P S SI CR

CHEMICAL ANAI YSIS

MO Cu

HEATOR(.OT(IIO.

Sf(C(tKA'I IOtl Of

((ATTNIN(,ffOt( (f1(ICA

5(NOT

1/8"~132" iooil|oor Ioo Ilier. 'I'-308

Stainl(iss Steel Weld

Report( d 072

Va

1.96

TLcb+Ta

.004

Co

.27 21.0 9.65 .10 .11

Wire. SPecificatinll: .01 .07 .02 .06

SFh-5. 9 C I ass l'.R-3(N

m + ro.071

Va

2.39

Ch ck hl

,Olil .006cb+Ta Co

al .is.46 21.97 9.93 .02 22

~

'hemicalnalysis'or

Infor ation „,':l

IA - mn~q., -, z orIrl p

.06 .08 .041 .09 PurposesI 1

nly.

,Z Z0:. o' nfll

zill I

I'err

; Scl

-9% 'alcu

leff3er D

ate( from

agr, m.

the Cl eck h al is

usl IP h. HF. S cti n III Div. Fig. NB 433.1

l'err te-. everI Gua re thl n 7t57 less th: 10%

~ia.coFH ore han 5 les. than 8.

I HEREI3Y CERTIFY THIS REPORT TO OE TRUE AND CORRECTACCORDING TO RECCNDS IN%HE POS+ESSION Of THIS CORPORATION

'C~~(.'r' - 0 (~ .

4PPt

.'j

l ~

n

Otfr1»V

ztTl ~ Q

rtlUn g0

O

g 0z»Qr.lrr

7II -,- FPE3R Mi.,hN-Tt)ctt i.h8. uEVO.n No. 78-1377

DETAII.RD AHAI,'3'SISREI'016'OUSTOH,

TE')IAS

TestIrCIi?Or

~ riser< rrlr~ r I ~ o ~ oar I rlts ~ ~ ' ~

~ l

i4Wa SYSTEMS

mtsrrurncyvncrss or TccHtrrcnLLY cotsynoLLco wsrscstnINLcss syccL NrcsscL, r4otrcL,'>cotrcL, ItrcotccL x

I 0 Yl nr I O Y 5 Y C C I 5 sY C Lo I rr o ns I o Y sn I 0 W, MC o Ist ter ~ sr IC

Q gQ cp na

KlO A

m

A

rsr>s

O

Its pOt X S

Cosnl>ustion Enoinccrinrl, Inc.C.E WiteS22rs Stsscsrrstorrl nohrtNorcross. Grorosrr 30093

cLIETDMEII5 onoEn No.

77-2010

SIIOI'nocn NO.

2egg

DATE SIIIPPED

12-9-Tl

IIPPEOTO

Southwest I'abricating &, Molding7525 Shcrrmn IIfouston, Texas 770ll

Spec. SPAMARKFO:

ITEM cPNslsTLNG or- 06

50 Coils shipped ( 2 skids)Coil//. 6 through 55

I/8" ~125" & 8/6(i" ( g~y.SPECI F ICATION

.Ogil ')ia ~ Type; 300 S.S. Ifcld Hire

GCNTLIthIENI WC I ICACOV CCnrlr V TIIATMATI:.AIALAEFCAAED TO ADOVF CONFOllMS TO THC PHYSICALAf'IO C)INIMICAL TCSTS AS FOLLOWS ANO IS IN ACCOAOANCE WITH 5PECIFICATIONSI-

1'1. Vc.

Q@PUi .0 j2hlu. Sr. S. P.

.27,0011 .023 21 0Nr. Cu, XBZ

.045 .01Cts. ~ Ts.

0

Mo. Co.

,o6 - .-

1"cL rDc

TENSILE STAENGTII VIE I,O ST AENGTII E LON. GRAIN SIZE ROCKWELL SIIEAR

Ircldi»p Temper

YOU REQUESTED T)

a

A

'I ~ ~ ~ 0

L4LI1 l~ I ~

~; ~~l

*

1 ~ ) RW

!

YC

» 8»

F

F's

)F t. t»A P~ .- ~

=.'I 7 tt' t 't

»

R't

;—~;-"p?

R

)),'t'

1

S\

Rt .t ~ = t.

yO~ ~ ~~ ~

~ I~ ' 0 ~

~ I

~ e~ » ~ '

~ jt

~ ~

~ ~

'

I

~ ~

~ ' I ) ~ S'

~ I ~

~ KR»t»Y»

~ t 1Ra»»KIRI»KIR-'R»»aa»~alTKIXI\8Raaata»aRa~

: Ra~~ O ~ > a

rr i-¹M55 o gOlt45~e~e~e~o~o e ~ ~

mmiisamem Ram aaaaaRRRRRKSRXQgXRXR~~ ~~mm~~~~~RSRQNRRSMk3RKR- ~EIRSIXEEIH~~~ERXRR~~~~~~~~~~~~~55555~~~55555~~~~~~~~~~~~~55555~~~IIIRRRR~~~IHRRRX~~~El5555~~~lHRXRR~~~~l35EER~~~II554 ~xmIR~~~~~l35555~~~~

~ RRRRX~~~EERX ~RIIE%~~~~ lSRRRX~~~KKR ~SR@X~

~ - EIRRRXIK85ERXRERRSRIHiXI5 ~KsmR5RR5~~~RXXEX~~~~HIRRRX~ZEXEXHXX!IXIsXEHEEE%L%RXX ~ERR%~~~~RRRRR~~RRRERE885~555555XKRE ~IESSXINI55m~~~~~RRRRX~~RRRRXEI8% ~IRI8558NE~~55555~~~~55555~~~~RXXXR~~~~%5555~~~~95555~~~~ IIIHHX~~~~BIRRXX~~~~RRRRX~~~~ ~~~~mmm~~~~RRXRX~~~ ~~~ ~5!IRRImZKPRI~EREEE~INNNRR~~ ~~~ &55IEEIXI5EX~U~hEERX~R!XIE~ ~~~~~M55555~~~~ ~~~~lkW...;, .MMRRRRX~ ~hi%~EERRR~ ~ ~~~~~E@r ~~ EI@Ig~KXEEX~~~~ ~~~~~I~~ZEXER~~~~HlRRRX~~RRERX~ENXX~~.KRRRX~

KKRKKKIKKKRaa»amRSKKSKK.- ISRIRKISR~a~SKI»a»R» ~ ' ' ' »» ~ Q 'KK~IIF~»a~~~~»a I ~~K~a»I»a~~~~»aKaKK»RI I ~IK~~~~Kabaal�»a~~~~ Ka ~~~ ~~~~IRK~~~ ~MM

«;RQ-t

S~

»

~ Sa

Pt

~ t=t»tY

7

- a»*'

g

'K

f

4q 0I

Enclosure 11 to Serial: HNP-99-069

Generic Code Data Report forCompletion of Code Related Activities in the

Spent I'uel Pool Activation Project

(2 Pages)

OWNER'S REPORTFOR

CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIESASSOCIATED WITHCOMPLETION OF THEHARRIS SPENT POOL COOLING FACILITITE

Remarks

Certificate of Inspection

I, the undersigned, holding a valid commission issued by the National Board ofBoiler and Pressure VesselInspectors and the State or Province of , and employed by of

have inspected the components described in this Owner's Report during the periodto , and state that to the best ofmy knowledge and belief, the Owner

has performed examinations and taken measures described in this Owner's Report in accordance withdesign requirements of the ASME Code, Section III,and Quality Assurance requirements of the Owner's10CFR50 Appendix B Quality Assurance Program Manual as augmented by the "Supplemental QARequirements" section of ESR 95-00425

Inspector's SignatureCommissions

National Board, State, Provide and Endorsements

Date 19

Notes: 1) Attach supplemental sheets and sketches as required2) Applicable manufacturer's Data Reports to be attached.

Enclosure 12 to Serial: HNP-99-069

Representative WDR for Construction of theUnits 2 8c 3 Spent Fuel Pool Cooling System

(1 Page)

P)EI&g Q OP'~TURNOVER Uc~y~~~

8 3 —zs r -ig'~sF 'o ~s)I-5l—i5 ~ KS!GNl!Nc NO I I c!C'/ )g -Ij I+4/ g IA I

CAT. ISO. NO. K . OWG. NO. W D

3 2 SKI 8'4/ fLSYSTKM

5FBASE METAL SPEC. 8 GRADE 'Ol IT YoE ~ o BR) F 08, pipe

ISKT, OTHcR

WELD t. f'A REF'vR''(PROCESS CONTROL CHECKL!ST)

(PROCEDURE COC-I9)REV. 2 5/24/78

PC NO. TO PO NO.

TO HT NO.M~E

WELDING PROCEDURE & Q. NO.~/.(.v. (

MATc'Pi!AI ~

TH!CKNESS ~a 'PlFILl METAl TYPEF'8 .zc.el

PWHT PROCEDURE & CKV II IT=MiCCRD

:iO.

WELDING ENG. VERI ATION DATE AN . VIEW cCR I POIIITS AT IIEI.E SED OR WELDING OA F.1

!2

Enclosure 13 to Serial: HNP-99-069

Alternative Plan Letter of Endorsement fromThe Hartford Steam Boiler Inspection and Insurance Co.

(1 Page)

MAR- 8-SS fiOH 17'19 HSB AT EHG FAX HO. 7703926252NAR 88 199cr 16i1'? FR HTFD STEAN ENGINEER 668 722 5538 TO HSBTMT

P,02P. 81W1

Dr. Richard Ei Fcr SetVice Prcsidccit Pool-It"Fax NOte 7671

The Hartford Steam BonerIarpecrioa and reauraiice Co.KO. Box 5024Oae State StreetEatrord CT 061M

II

Pnclosure 14'to Serial: HNP-99-069

Present Corporate (Appendix B) Quality Assurance Manual