Q1 The committee set attainable initiatives.

Planning & Budget Assessment End of Year Survey 2017-2018

1 / 29

Q1 The committee set attainable initiatives.Answered: 15 Skipped: 0

0.00%0

0.00%0

6.67%1

73.33%11

20.00%3

15

4.13

Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree

(no label)

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

STRONGLYDISAGREE

DISAGREE NEUTRAL AGREE STRONGLYAGREE

TOTAL WEIGHTEDAVERAGE

(nolabel)


2 / 29

Q2 The committee completed Initiative 1: Review Rubric WeightingAnswered: 15 Skipped: 0

80.00%12

6.67%1

13.33%2

15

1.92

Yes No Not sure

(no label)

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

YES NO NOT SURE TOTAL WEIGHTED AVERAGE

(no label)


3 / 29

Q3 The committee completed Initiative 2: PERS/STRS StabilizationAnswered: 15 Skipped: 0

80.00%12

0.00%0

20.00%3

15

2.00

Yes No Not sure

(no label)

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%


(no label)


4 / 29

Q4 The committee completed Initiative 3: Technology Plan ReviewAnswered: 15 Skipped: 0

13.33%2

73.33%11

13.33%2

15

1.15

Yes No Not sure

(no label)

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%


(no label)


5 / 29

Q5 The committee completed Initiative 4: Collaborate with the InstitutionalEffectiveness Committee to develop and implement an assessment tool to

measure how institutional priorities were met via funding sources.Answered: 15 Skipped: 0

60.00%9

0.00%0

40.00%6

15

2.00

Yes No Not sure

(no label)

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%


(no label)


6 / 29

Q6 The committee completed Initiative 5: Identify Additional RevenueSources

Answered: 15 Skipped: 0

46.67%7

40.00%6

13.33%2

15

1.54

Yes No Not sure

(no label)

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%


(no label)


7 / 29

Q7 What initiatives would you recommend for next year?Answered: 4 Skipped: 11


8 / 29

Q8 Committee members received clear and timely meeting information.Answered: 15 Skipped: 0

0.00%0

0.00%0

13.33%2

66.67%10

20.00%3

15

4.07


(no label)

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

STRONGLYDISAGREE



(nolabel)


9 / 29

Q9 Committee members received appropriate budget materials to supportdecisions.


0.00%0

6.67%1

26.67%4

46.67%7

20.00%3

15

3.80


(no label)

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

STRONGLYDISAGREE



(nolabel)


10 / 29

Q10 Committee members received timely budget materials to supportdecisions.


0.00%0

0.00%0

14.29%2

71.43%10

14.29%2

14

4.00


(no label)

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

STRONGLYDISAGREE



(nolabel)


11 / 29

Q11 I understood the Planning & Budget process well enough to providecritical input.


0.00%0

6.67%1

13.33%2

33.33%5

46.67%7

15

4.20


(no label)

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

STRONGLYDISAGREE



(nolabel)


12 / 29

Q12 The committee made decisions and recommendations in a timelyand effective manner.


0.00%0

0.00%0

6.67%1

73.33%11

20.00%3

15

4.13


(no label)

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

STRONGLYDISAGREE



(nolabel)


13 / 29

Q13 The committee has the appropriate number of members.Answered: 15 Skipped: 0

0.00%0

0.00%0

6.67%1

73.33%11

20.00%3

15

4.13


(no label)

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

STRONGLYDISAGREE



(nolabel)


14 / 29

Q14 The committee has appropriate representation.Answered: 15 Skipped: 0

0.00%0

0.00%0

6.67%1

66.67%10

26.67%4

15

4.20


(no label)

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

STRONGLYDISAGREE



(nolabel)


15 / 29

Q15 The committee’s composition reflected an appropriate mix of skills,experience, backgrounds, and diversity.


0.00%0

0.00%0

14.29%2

64.29%9

21.43%3

14

4.07


(no label)

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

STRONGLYDISAGREE



(nolabel)


16 / 29

Q16 Please list any training you would like regarding committeedocuments and/or processes.



17 / 29

Q17 Budget assumptions were received, updated, and changes to theassumptions requested by the committee were made.


0.00%0

0.00%0

14.29%2

64.29%9

21.43%3

14

4.07


(no label)

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

STRONGLYDISAGREE



(nolabel)


18 / 29

Q18 The 311 Quarterly reports were presented and there was anopportunity to ask questions.


0.00%0

0.00%0

0.00%0

78.57%11

21.43%3

14

4.21


(no label)

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

STRONGLYDISAGREE



(nolabel)


19 / 29

Q19 The Resource Allocation Rubric was used accurately to rankinstitutional needs.


0.00%0

0.00%0

21.43%3

64.29%9

14.29%2

14

3.93


(no label)

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

STRONGLYDISAGREE



(nolabel)


20 / 29

Q20 The weighting of the scoring areas on the rubric provide a fairassessment of the needs of the institution.


0.00%0

7.14%1

35.71%5

42.86%6

14.29%2

14

3.64


(no label)

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

STRONGLYDISAGREE



(nolabel)


21 / 29

Q21 Do you think additional scoring areas need to be added?Answered: 13 Skipped: 2

15.38%2

46.15%6

38.46%5

13

1.25

Yes No Not sure

(no label)

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%


(no label)


22 / 29

Q22 The technology needs were ranked according to institutional needs.Answered: 14 Skipped: 1

0.00%0

14.29%2

21.43%3

50.00%7

14.29%2

14

3.64


(no label)

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

STRONGLYDISAGREE



(nolabel)


23 / 29

Q23 The one-time needs were ranked according to institutional needs.Answered: 13 Skipped: 2

0.00%0

0.00%0

15.38%2

69.23%9

15.38%2

13

4.00


(no label)

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

STRONGLYDISAGREE



(nolabel)


24 / 29

Q24 The on-going needs were ranked according to institutional needs.Answered: 14 Skipped: 1

0.00%0

0.00%0

14.29%2

71.43%10

14.29%2

14

4.00


(no label)

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

STRONGLYDISAGREE



(nolabel)


25 / 29

Q25 The cluster presentations helped inform my subjective ranking.Answered: 14 Skipped: 1

0.00%0

0.00%0

7.14%1

57.14%8

35.71%5

14

4.29


(no label)

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

STRONGLYDISAGREE



(nolabel)


26 / 29

Q26 There was sufficient time allowed for cluster presentations.Answered: 14 Skipped: 1

0.00%0

7.14%1

14.29%2

57.14%8

21.43%3

14

3.93


(no label)

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

STRONGLYDISAGREE



(nolabel)


27 / 29

Q27 Allowing clusters to prioritize ten requests is an appropriate number.Answered: 14 Skipped: 1

0.00%0

0.00%0

21.43%3

71.43%10

7.14%1

14

3.86


(no label)

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

STRONGLYDISAGREE



(nolabel)


28 / 29

Q28 Guidelines for the Resource Allocation Process were properlyenforced.


0.00%0

0.00%0

14.29%2

71.43%10

14.29%2

14

4.00


(no label)

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

STRONGLYDISAGREE



(nolabel)


29 / 29

Q29 Guidelines for the Resource Allocation Process were clear and easilyunderstood.


0.00%0

0.00%0

21.43%3

64.29%9

14.29%2

14

3.93


(no label)

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

STRONGLYDISAGREE



(nolabel)

Q1 The committee set attainable initiatives.

Documents

Transcript of Q1 The committee set attainable initiatives.