Q1 - APSDPSapsdps.ap.gov.in/dp/downloads/Quarter1.pdf · Missions, 5 Grids and 5 Campaigns to...
Transcript of Q1 - APSDPSapsdps.ap.gov.in/dp/downloads/Quarter1.pdf · Missions, 5 Grids and 5 Campaigns to...
Q1 2015-16 (Quarter 1) - Assessment & Way Forward
Page | 1
9854
15834
32504
58191 9.72%
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
0
10000
20000
30000
40000
50000
60000
70000
Q1-Agriculture
Q1-Industries
Q1- Services Q1- GSDP Growth
% G
row
th
Rs.
Cro
re
Q1-(April - June) 2015-16 GSDP (Constant Price)
Quarter 1 (April - June) Year 2015-16
Assessment and Way Forward - Performance of Economy in Q1
- Annual Plan Performance - Q1
- Participatory Monitoring and Impact Assessment System (PMIAS)
- KPIs - Q1 & Q2 (up to 31st Aug 2015)
- Seasonal Rainfall Status (01.06.2015 to 17.09.2015)
- Formation of Farmer Producer Organizations (FPOs)
Q1 2015-16
Q1 2015-16 (Quarter 1) - Assessment & Way Forward
Page | 2
Q1 2015-16 (Quarter 1) - Assessment & Way Forward
Page | 3
FOREWORD
We have envisioned Andhra Pradesh to be among the top 3 states in the country by 2022 and the best state by 2029. We also aim to become a preferred global destination by 2050 by moving on a path of double digit growth and through global competitiveness.
To convert this vision into reality my government has initiated a focused approach by establishing 7 Missions, 5 Grids and 5 Campaigns to achieve double digit growth and to ensure people's participation in fulfilling our pledge of reconstructing the state of Andhra Pradesh.
To ensure accountability, I have decided to place my government's performance assessment in public domain for transparency and to seek opinion. In line with this aspiration, I am pleased to present the Performance Assessment report for the first quarter of 2015-16.
One of the key actions identified to put Andhra Pradesh on a high growth trajectory of double digit growth, for the next 15 years, is the adoption of a rolling plan approach which is published as ‘Achieving Double Digit Inclusive Growth- A Rolling Plan'. A consultative and participatory approach has been adopted to achieve the macroeconomic and social empowerment visions across sectors and regions in the state.
The first quarter results of the state are encouraging. The state economy has registered a growth of 9.72% during the first quarter of this financial year. We had set an ambitious target of achieving a Gross State Domestic Product (Constant Prices 2004-05) of Rs. 58,573 crore for the first quarter 2015-16. We have achieved Rs. 58,193 crore or 99.4 % of our target. Our efforts on the agriculture and allied sector fronts have resulted in achievement of 103% of sectoral target, while the industries and services sectors have achieved 99.3 % and 98.3% of their respective targets. This gives me confidence that our state is on the path to realize its ambitious vision. The continuous effort and collaboration among stakeholders will drive the state towards the goals of Vision 2029.
My government is committed to inclusive growth. We initiated first citizen engagement survey last month in both rural and urban areas to assess the perception of the citizens and obtain feedback on the initiatives taken by my government to continuously improve government service delivery. It is heartening to know that my government has been successfully meeting the expectations of the people. This engagement is a continuous process which will steer us in the right direction towards a Sunrise State of Andhra Pradesh which is brighter, happier and more prosperous.
Towards this goal, I seek the committed engagement of all the stake holders in this development endeavour.
Nara Chandrababu Naidu Chief Minister of Andhra Pradesh
Q1 2015-16 (Quarter 1) - Assessment & Way Forward
Page | 4
Q1 2015-16 (Quarter 1) - Assessment & Way Forward
Page | 5
Contents 1. Vision 2029- Sunrise State of Andhra Pradesh..............................................................................6
1.1 TOWARDS DOUBLE DIGIT INCLUSIVE GROWTH – THE RESULTS, GROWTH & STRATEGIC AGENDA. ........................ 6 1.2 FRAMEWORK FOR DOUBLE DIGIT INCLUSIVE GROWTH FOR AP (2015-2029) ................................................... 8 1.3 ANDHRA PRADESH E-PRAGATI CHANGES THE FACE OF CITIZEN SERVICES ............................................................ 8 1.4 TARGETS FOR VISION 2029 AND 2015-16 .................................................................................................. 9 1.5 IMPROVING SERVICE DELIVERY AND WELL BEING OF CITIZENS ....................................................................... 10 1.6 GSDP - SECTOR WISE GROWTH ENGINES GVA (RS. CRORE) TARGETS FOR 2015-16 AT CURRENT PRICES .......... 11 1.7 GSDP - SUBSECTOR WISE 1ST QUARTER ACTUAL GVA (RS. CR) FOR 2015-16 AT (2004-05) CONSTANT PRICES . 12 1.8 GSDP - SUBSECTOR WISE 1ST QUARTER ACTUAL GVA (RS. CRORE) FOR 2015-16 AT CURRENT PRICES .............. 13
2. Performance of the Andhra Pradesh State Economy between April 2015-16 & June 2015-16 ...... 14 2.1 ECONOMIC PERFORMANCE: Q1 – 2015-16 .............................................................................................. 14 2.2 SUB SECTOR ANALYSIS Q1 2015-16 (CONSTANT PRICES) ............................................................................ 15 2.3 SECTOR WISE PERFORMANCE .................................................................................................................. 16
a. Agriculture & Allied Sector .................................................................................................. …..16
b. Industries Sector ...................................................................................................................... 17
c. Services Sector ......................................................................................................................... 17
3. Performance of Districts ........................................................................................................... 18 3.1 DISTRICTS AS DRIVERS OF ECONOMIC GROWTH .......................................................................................... 18 3.2 ECONOMIC CONTRIBUTION FROM DISTRICTS IN ANDHRA PRADESH ................................................................ 18 3.3 HEALTH INDICATORS .............................................................................................................................. 20
4. Participatory Monitoring and Impact Assessment System for a robust vision delivery management ................................................................................................................................... 22
4.1 PARTICIPATORY MONITORING AND IMPACT ASSESSMENT SYSTEM (PMIAS) ................................................... 22 4.2 IDENTIFICATION OF PROBLEM AREAS AND PRIORITIES .................................................................................. 23 4.3 STAKEHOLDER PERCEPTION SURVEY .......................................................................................................... 24 4.4 ACTION PLANNING FOR THE NEXT QUARTER ................................................................................................ 26
5. Affordable Housing Initiative in Andhra Pradesh ....................................................................... 27 6. Annual Plan Performance ......................................................................................................... 28
6.2.1 FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE IN IMPLEMENTATION OF STATE PLAN SCHEME - 1ST QTR (APR-JUNE 2015) .... 29 6.2.2 FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE IN IMPLEMENTATION OF EXTERNALLY AIDED PROJECTS IN ANDHRA PRADESH ... 33
7. Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) Targets & Achievements ....................................................... 34 7.1 SELECTION OF KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS .......................................................................................... 35
8. District wise Rainfall Status from 01.06.2015 to 17.09.2015 ....................................................... 42 9. FPOs- Collective Action for Inclusive Development & Growth .................................................... 43 10. INDUSTRY INSIGHTS ................................................................................................................. 45 11. Best Practices ........................................................................................................................... 46 12. Special Economic Zones (SEZ) .................................................................................................... 50 13. Area, Population, GSDP & PCI of Major States & All India .......................................................... 52 14. Area, Population, DDP (Growth at Constant) & PCI (Current) Of Districts & A.P .......................... 53 This Quarter 1 (2015-16) booklet exercise at constant prices is in sync with GoI Q1 figures which
were released on 31st Aug and AP state Q1 figures are adjusted according to the GoI Q1 data on 10th
Sept 2015 by DES of AP. This book is in the same spirit of Vision - 2029 document of Andhra Pradesh
which is currently in progress and will be published soon. It is hereby informed that this document
will pave a way to the standardization of quarterly analysis from now on and review of each quarter
will be a taken across the missions, departments and at district level.
Q1 2015-16 (Quarter 1) - Assessment & Way Forward
Page | 6
1. Vision 2029- Sunrise State of Andhra Pradesh
The Vision 2029 is an ambitious program aimed at transforming Andhra Pradesh into a developed
state by 2029 in between navigating through one among the best three states by 2020 with a vision
to lay foundation of the Sunrise State of Andhra Pradesh. The program is being implemented under
the leadership of the Hon’ble Chief Minister Sri Nara Chandra Babu Naidu which aims at structural
transformation both in terms of economic transformation as well as transforming the well-being the
of the citizens of the state.
Achievement of the targets envisioned in Vision 2029 incumbent on the shift of the GSDP growth
rate to a double digit growth rate of more than 10% for each year, beginning from 2015-16.
1.1 Towards Double Digit Inclusive Growth – The Results, Growth & Strategic
Agenda.
Result-oriented Sectors - Welfare Development: Result-oriented sector
agenda is to provide a minimum levels of welfare and social support for all the citizens of Andhra Pradesh State.
It is a statutory procedure and social effort designed to promote the basic infrastructure requirements of people in need.
2015-16
2018-19
2021-22 Amongst the three High Performing
States in India
2028-29 Best State in the
Country
2050-51 Leading Investment Destination
in the World
The State of Andhra Pradesh envisions becoming the best state in the Country by 2028-29.
Registering double digit growth rate is an important step towards achieving inclusive growth &
bring about a structural change in the economy and leading investment destination in the world.
Q1 2015-16 (Quarter 1) - Assessment & Way Forward
Page | 7
Growth Sectors – Economic Development: Growth sectors are the
combined, collective and sustained initiatives of the policy makers, people & communities to promote the best standards of living and great economic health to the state of Andhra Pradesh.
Implementation of planned agenda in growth sectors will lead to Year on Year quantitative and qualitative changes that will lead to sustained economic development.
Strategic Sectors – Sunrise State of Andhra Pradesh:
Strategic Sectors deal with change in how government handles realities in technology, governance, global competition and political accountability.
Strategic sectors develop results oriented culture to outperform the competition significantly.
Q1 2015-16 (Quarter 1) - Assessment & Way Forward
Page | 8
1.2 Framework for Double Digit Inclusive Growth for AP (2015-2029)
1.3 Andhra Pradesh e-Pragati changes the face of citizen services
Q1 2015-16 (Quarter 1) - Assessment & Way Forward
Page | 9
The process of structural shift towards a high growth trajectory and radical reforms has been
initiated with the unveiling of the “rolling plan process” to provide necessary momentum to the
economy towards double digit growth.
1.4 Targets for Vision 2029 and 2015-16
With the implementation of the Vision 2029 and the structural transformation in the economic
growth, the GSDP of Andhra Pradesh is expected to grow by over 12% annually. The GSDP of the
state is expected to grow to Rs. 19.9 lakh crore by 2021-22 and Rs. 55.2 lakh crore by 2028-29
resulting in a per-capita
income of Rs. 3.3 lakh and Rs.
8.8 lakh in 2021-22 and 2028-
29 respectively.
To ensure that the state
achieves the targets set for
Vision 2029, a Double Digit
Inclusive Growth “Rolling
Plan” has been initiated. The
annual Rolling Plan report
presents a list of strategies
identified for various
departments which would
ensure that the goals of the
Vision 2029 are met, resulting
in double digit inclusive growth in the state.
12
.5
30
.1
5.2
19
.9
55
.2
0.9
3.3
8.8
0.92.1
4.8
0
2
4
6
8
10
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
2014-15 2021-22 2028-29
PC
I-R
s La
kh
GSD
P(C
urr
ent
pri
ces)
-Rs
lakh
Cro
re
Assessment Years
Scenario AnalysisGSDP-BAU GSDP- Vision 2029
PCI- Vision 2029 PCI-BAU
Q1 2015-16 (Quarter 1) - Assessment & Way Forward
Page | 10
To stay on course of the Vision 2029 and meet the targets set, a GSDP (current prices) target or
Rs. 6.19lakh crore has been envisioned.
1.5 Improving Service Delivery and Well Being of Citizens
In addition to achieving the economic target set in Vision 2029, the state is also committed to
improving the service delivery of its various planned initiatives and social services resulting in
improving the well-being and happiness index of its citizens.
Towards this end, the state has initiated a program to constantly engage and take feedback from its
citizens on a quarterly basis. The objective of engagement is to understand and act upon key issues
impacting the wellbeing and livelihood of citizens and improve the delivery to the citizens. Through
this interaction, the state would gather feedback from the citizens and their perception of
government initiatives on a quarterly basis, which would help in developing more, focused and
directed strategies and initiatives that would help the state in achieving the overall targets of Vision
2029.
A perception survey covering both rural and urban areas would be undertaken on a quarterly basis
to capture the pulse of the citizens. A survey interaction module would be developed to analyse the
service delivery in the following key social sectors.
Agriculture
Vaddileni runalu and financial inclusion
Livestock and fisheries
Medical and health services
Drinking water and sanitation
Welfare and security
Housing and Transport
Quality of Services
The interactive survey aims at broadly covering social indicators such as health and sanitation,
drinking water, social inclusion, housing and transport, security and corruption. Given the large rural
population and state’s dependence on agriculture, service delivery for agriculture facilities such as
fertilizers, seeds, technical support etc. have been included.
1.21
1.14
1.56
2.286.19
19%
18%
25%
37%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
6.00
FY 15-16Q1 FY 15-16Q2 FY 15-16Q3 FY 15-16Q4 FY 2015-16 Quarterly %
pe
rce
nta
ge
GSD
P -
Rs
lakh
cro
re
2015-16 Quarterly Targets ( Current prices)
GSDP Q1- GSDP% Q2- GSDP% Q3- GSDP% Q4- GSDP%
Q1 2015-16 (Quarter 1) - Assessment & Way Forward
Page | 11
1.6 GSDP - Sector Wise Growth Engines GVA (Rs. Crore) Targets for 2015-16 at Current Prices
Q1 2015-16 (Quarter 1) - Assessment & Way Forward
Page | 12
1.7 GSDP - Subsector wise 1st quarter Actual GVA (Rs. Crore) for 2015-16 at (2004-05) Constant Prices
Q1 2015-16 (Quarter 1) - Assessment & Way Forward
Page | 13
1.8 GSDP - Subsector wise 1st quarter Actual GVA (Rs. Crore) for 2015-16 at Current Prices
Q1 2015-16 (Quarter 1) - Assessment & Way Forward
Page | 14
2. Performance of the Andhra Pradesh State
Economy between April 2015-16 & June 2015-16 To achieve the initial growth momentum to propel the state to achieve the targets of Vision 2029,
the state has set yearly and quarterly economic growth targets. An in-depth analysis was carried out
by the State departments using the following approach to identify the growth engines. The Planning
Department of Government of Andhra Pradesh had initiated various consultative and participatory
events to inform the creation of the strategy plan titled “A Rolling Plan 2015-16”. Series of
discussions were held with the various district collectors and government departments – Finance,
Agriculture, Animal Husbandry and Fisheries, Energy, Industries and Commerce, Irrigation, Urban,
Education (Primary and Higher Education), Infrastructure, Transport, Roads and Buildings among
others. Their opinions and inputs had been incorporated to set the direction of the sectoral plan to
achieve the bold vision of an inclusive double digit growth.
The strategy document set a target of Rs. 6.19 lakh crore (current prices) for 2015-16, an increment
of over Rs. 1 lakh crore compared to the GSDP of 2014-15. Similarly a quarterly target for Q1 had
been set at Rs. 1.21 lakh crore. This chapter compares the performance the Andhra Pradesh
economy for the first quarter of 2015-16 (Apr-Jun).
The Quarterly Estimates of Gross State Domestic Product (QGSDP) for the First quarter (April-June.
Q1) of 2015-16 at constant (2004-05) prices is estimated based on quarterly data provided by the
Departments of Animal Husbandry, Fisheries, Mines & Geology, APSRTC, Commissioner of Transport,
IIP growth rate for estimating Industries sector contribution and appropriate key indicators for
Service sector and Central Statistics Office, Government of India.
2.1 Economic Performance: Q1 – 2015-16 As per estimates of the DE&S, Government of Andhra Pradesh, the Q1 GSPD (current prices) for the
state stood at Rs. 1.1 lakh core compared to a target of 1.21 lakh crore, a deviation of 5.5% from
proposed target. The Q1 GSDP (constant prices base 2004-05) results stood at Rs. 0.581 lakh crore
registering a growth of 9.72% compared to the targeted an Q1 GSDP output (constant price) of Rs.
0.585 lakh crore.
Constant Price (Base 2004-05) Current Price*
Sector (Rs Crore)
Q1: 2013-14
GVA
Q1: 2014-15
GVA
Q1: 2015-16 GVA
Q1: 2015-16 GVA
Growth Rate (Q1 2014-15 to Q1 2015-16)
Q1: 2015-16 GVA
Q1: 2015-16 GVA
Actual Actual Target Actual Target Actual Target Actual
Agriculture 7458 8758 9562 9854 9.19% 12.52% 18763 25305
Industries 14209 14771 15946 15834 7.96% 7.19% 36812 27985
Services 27719 29509 33064 32504 12.05% 10.15% 65168 60829
Total 49386 53038 58573 58191 10.44% 9.72% 120743 114119
*As per the methodology followed by CSO, the Advance Estimates and Quarterly Estimates are first compiled
at constant prices which are then estimated at current prices using Implicit Price Deflator(IPD) method .The constant prices inflated with the price indices (WPI/CPI ) and adjusted with ratio of current constant prices of previous year.
Q1 2015-16 (Quarter 1) - Assessment & Way Forward
Page | 15
The only sector to achieve the targets for Q1, set at the beginning of the financial year is the
agriculture sector. However, the Services and the Industries Sectors showed a deviation from their
target by not more than 2%.
2.2 Sub Sector Analysis Q1 2015-16 (Constant Prices) – Only Mining & Quarrying is
in Negative growth.
18763
36812
65168
120743
25305
27826
60829
114119
134.9%
75.6%
93.3%
94.50%
0.0% 50.0% 100.0% 150.0%
0 50000 100000 150000
Agriculture
Industries
Services
GSDP-Q1(Apr-Jun)
% Acheivement
GSDP -Q1 Rs. Crore
Sector Wise Performance: Current
Actual-GVA Targeted-GVA Target Achievement
9562
15946
33064
58573
9854
15834
32504
58191
103.1%
99.3%
98.3%
99.3%
0% 50% 100%
0 40000 80000
Agriculture
Industries
Services
GSDP-Q1 (Apr-Jun)
% Achievement
GSDP-Q1 Rs. Crore
Sector Wise Performance: Constant
Actual GVA Targeted Achievement
Live stock
Forestry
Fishing
Mining & Quarrying
Manu: Reg
Manu:Un-Reg
Electricity,Gas & Water Supply
Construction
Trade & Hotels
Railways
Transport & Storage
Communications
Banking & Insurance
Real estate
Public Adm.
Other Services
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
16%
0.0 %
2.0 %
4.0 %
6.0 %
8.0 %
10. 0%
12. 0%
-50% -40% -30% -20% -10% 0% 10% 20%
Q1
GSD
P C
on
trib
uti
on
(-ve) Deviation from target (+ve)
Q1 2015-16 (Quarter 1) - Assessment & Way Forward
Page | 16
The exhibit above, presents the performance of the subsector in Q1 as against their share to the
total Q1 GSDP of the state. The y-axis indicates the contribution of the sector to the Q1 GSDP and
the x-axis indicates the deviation from the target set for Q1. Sectors to the right of the red line or 0%
on the x-axis indicate that they have achieved beyond their set target, while those to the left of the
red linear 0% on the x-axis indicate the underperformance from the target. The percentages on the
y-axis indicate the percentage contribution of the sub sector to Q1 GSDP (Constant prices).
Sub Sectors that were not able to meet their quarter targets include mining and quarrying, public
administration, fishing, banking and Insurance, trade and hotels and other services. Sub sectors that
met their target by over 10% include forestry and transport & storage.
To Sum up, the estimates of all the sub sectors results in a deviation from the target of Rs. O.585
lakh crore (constant prices) was under O.7% .The analysis above also indicates that that those sub
sector with high contribution to GSDP and low deviation from the target such as fishing, trade and
hotels, real-estate, construction and other services can help in boosting the economy in the
remaining quarters provided improved interventions.
2.3 Sector Wise Performance
a. Agriculture & Allied Sector
Agriculture & Allied Sector (Rs. Crore)
Q1 2015-16 – Constant Prices Q1 2015-16 – Current Prices
GVA Target
GVA- Actual
Growth GVA
Target GVA-
Actual Deviation from Target
Agriculture 0 0 0 0 Live stock 3644 3780 11.29 % 9977 13164 132% Forestry & Logging 791 887 25.5 % 1637 2341 143% Fishing 5127 5187 11.44 % 7150 9800 137%
Agriculture & Allied Sector 9562 9854 12.52 % 18763 25305 135%
The contribution from the Agriculture and Allied Sectors during the Q1 of 2015-16 (Constant Price–
Base 2004-05) is estimated at Rs.9854 crore as against corresponding quarter of the previous year
(Q1 2014-15) of Rs.8758 crore, registering a growth rate of 12.52 %.
GVA of Agriculture which includes Agriculture & Horticulture is treated as “Nil” for the First
Quarter as no production is recorded during this quarter
In Livestock Sector, increase in production of Milk, Meat & Egg led to register an impressive
growth rate of 11.29 %( Constant Price–Base 2004-05).
The Fishing Sector registered a growth rate of 11.44 %( Constant Price–Base2004-05). The
growth rate in Fishing Sector was observed to be lower than Q1 2014-15 due to the
extended ban period of 45 days in 2015-16 as against the ban period of 30 days during 2014-
15.
Forestry & Logging Sector registered a significant growth of 25.50 % (Constant Price–
Base2004-05). and could be attributed to the sale of Red Sandals
Q1 2015-16 (Quarter 1) - Assessment & Way Forward
Page | 17
b. Industries Sector
Industries Sector (Rs. Crore)
Q1 2015-16 – Constant Prices Q1 2015-16 – Current Prices
GVA Target
GVA- Actual
Growth GVA
Target
GVA- Actual
Deviation from Target
a. Mining & Quarrying 1380 1045 -7.44 2856 2171 82% b. Manufacturing i. Registered 5213 5213 8.1% 9096 8072 89% ii. Un-Registered 2169 2183 8.1% 4241 3679 87% c. Electricity, Gas & Water 1400 1475 9.7 % 3392 2400 71% d. Construction 5784 5918 8.47 % 17228 11503 67%
Industries Sector 15946 15834 7.19 % 36812 27826 76%
The contribution from Industries Sector during Q1 of 2015-16 (Constant Price–Base 2004-05) is
estimated at Rs. 15834 crore, registering a growth rate of 7.19 % compared to Rs.14771crore in Q1
2014-15
Mining & Quarrying Sector is the only sub sector to register a -ve growth rate of 7.44%
(Constant Price–Base 2004-05) is due to the decrease in production of Natural Gas & Mica
in Major Minerals and also decrease in production of road metal & color granite in Minor
Minerals.
The Manufacturing Sector registered impressive growth of 8.10 %t, with an increase in
growth of IIP by 8.10 %.
Electricity, Gas & Water Supply Sector registered a growth rate of 9.70 %
Construction sector registered a growth of 8.47 %
None of the industries subsector was able to meet the current prices target for Q1 2015-16.
This sector registered the highest deviation compared to all sectors
c. Services Sector
Services Sector Q1 2015-16 – Constant Prices Q1 2015-16 – Current Prices
GVA Target
GVA- Actual
Growth GVA
Target GVA-
Actual
Deviation from Target
a) Trade, Hotel & Restaurants 6665 6299 9.26 % 12827 11678 91% b) Transport, Storage & Communications
i. Railways 444 457 14.7% 643 626 97% ii. Transport by Other means & Storage 3199 3587 20.01% 6885 7374 107%
iii. Communications 4012 4142 23.75% 1943 2102 108% c) Financing, Insurance& Business
Services 4233 3712.2 7.6% 5402 4807 89% d) Real estate, Ownership of Dwellings 5019 4876 4.52% 12994 11681 90% e) Public Administration 2850 2796 6.76% 6871 6378 93% f) Other Services 6642 6637 5.75% 17603 16182 92%
Services Sector 33064 32505 10.15% 65168 60829 93%
The contribution from Services Sector during Q1 of 2015-16 (Constant Price–Base 2004-05) is
estimated at Rs.32505 crore, registering a growth rate of 10.15 % compared to Rs.29509crore in Q1
2014-15
Appropriate growth rates based on the past trends, have been adopted for some of the
sub-sectors of services sector wherever state specific data sets are not available.
Q1 2015-16 (Quarter 1) - Assessment & Way Forward
18
3. Performance of Districts
3.1 Districts as Drivers of Economic Growth For the state economy to achieve the ambitious targets set in Vision 2029, participation from all stakeholders especially the districts is critical. Realisation of Vision 2029 is dependent upon districts performing as per the strategy developed. While overall strategy, vision and funding is expected out of the state, innovation, ideas and requirements resulting is economic growth is expected from the districts. Realizing the importance and contribution of districts in driving the economy of the state, the Planning Department held a series of discussions with various district collectors, government departments and other stakeholders while formulation of the strategy document “Achieving Double Digit Inclusive Growth - A Rolling Plan”. Their opinions and inputs have informed the direction of the sectoral plan to achieve the bold vision of an inclusive double digit growth. This consultative and participatory approach towards identifying drivers of economic growth was the first ever methodology to be adopted by a State Government in the Country. The Government of Andhra Pradesh in their budget allocated for the FY 2015-16, is providing Rs. 10 crore for innovation in growth strategy to each of the districts, which includes Rs. 1 crore towards external expertise in preparing detailed project reports and supporting the district officials with other similar activities, Rs. 2 crore for tourism and Rs. 1 crore for communication and publicity.
3.2 Economic Contribution from Districts1 in Andhra Pradesh The district of Vishakhapatnam is expected to be the largest contributor to the state economy in 2015-16. This district is expected to contribute over 14% of the total state economy. It also has the largest contribution from Services and Industries Sector. Krishna district is expected to be the largest contributor follower by East Godavari. The largest contribution towards the Agriculture and Allied Sector is expected from West Godavari, whose overall contribution to the state stands at Rs. 8834 crore. The District Wise GSDP Vs PCI (2013-14) & (2015-16) is given below.
1 District Wise Quarter Results and Constant price targets currently Not available
Q1 2015-16 (Quarter 1) - Assessment & Way Forward
19
Q1 2015-16 (Quarter 1) - Assessment & Way Forward
20
3.3 Health Indicators The Infant Mortality Rate (IMR) in the state for the months of April to August of 2015-16 stood at IMR is
12.4 per lakh live births. The highest IMR has been reported in the East Godavari District. The district
recorded over 892 still births, 303 infant deaths and 395 under 5 deaths. The districts with the lowest
infant mortality include West Godavari and Vizianagaram.
District Wise Infant Deaths for 2015-16 (June to August)
Q1 2015-16 (Quarter 1) - Assessment & Way Forward
21
The maternal deaths in the state for the period April – August stood at 90 per lakh live births. The
districts with the highest maternal mortality include Vishakhapatnam and Krishna, while those districts
that reported lowest maternal deaths were Srikakulam and Nellore.
With the improvement in services at health care centers and Anganwadis, the state is committed to
reducing both IMR and MMR to match with international benchmarks.
Q1 2015-16 (Quarter 1) - Assessment & Way Forward
22
4. Participatory Monitoring and Impact Assessment
System for a robust vision delivery management
The Sunrise Andhra Pradesh Vision 2029 envisages attaining socio-economic development through
systematic, targeted interventions in various sectors. The path for realization of vision has been
chartered in a mission mode by creating seven missions for better convergence of actions by the
departments towards ensuring focus on vision outcomes, which are under each of the six
transformational areas. Government has already laid the necessary foundation for outcome based
monitoring of Vision by initiating the necessary mission structures. Graduating from vision formulation
to its delivery involves managing stakeholders, prioritisation of interventions and resource allocation as
well as monitoring the delivery of interventions towards ensuring Vision outcomes.
State Outcomes in Transformational Areas
Inclusive Growth Inclusion, Jobs & Enterprise
Happy Society Human Development
Globally Competitive Industry & Trade
Knowledge Driven Connecting globally through Knowledge Economy
Greener & Smarter Preserving the wealth of the environment
Well Governed & Engaging Governing to excel
4.1 Participatory Monitoring and Impact Assessment System (PMIAS) Government of Andhra Pradesh intends to expand the scope of outcome based monitoring further to all
interventions being proposed as part of Vision 2029 to ensure that all its programs and projects and
associated action plans are aligned to outcomes mentioned under each of the transformational areas. A
robust Participatory Monitoring and Impact Assessment System (PMIAS) will be to continuously monitor
progress, identity problem area, propose corrective action, and assess outcomes and impacts of
interventions. Government desires to focus on three key aspects for effective vision delivery
management.
Key aspects for effective vision delivery management
1. Strategic Vision Management to ensure achievement of outcomes
2. Robust monitoring & evaluation of outcomes as well as tracking of Vision
interventions with respect to key milestones/targets.
3. Dissemination of results/learning and obtaining feedback from key
stakeholders towards ensuring that the course corrections are undertaken
either to the Vision interventions or the Vision outcomes
Q1 2015-16 (Quarter 1) - Assessment & Way Forward
23
Citizen Engagement Surveys: Q1, 2015-16
For obtaining continuous feedback and active citizen engagement in achieving the Vision 2029 goals,
regular surveys and studies will be carried out involving all sections of society. Feedback will also be
obtained through all available smart applications including those being developed.
4.2 Identification of Problem Areas and Priorities A statewide sample survey was carried out by the Planning board on identification of problem areas and
prioritizing areas for focused action planning.
Problem Areas
Drinking water (33%), Roads (17.5%),
Housing (10.7%), livelihoods (10.7%),
irrigation water (10.3%), and electricity (5.6%), and
health (4.8%) cover the major problem areas identified by about
93% of the sample respondents.
Priority areas
Respondents prioritized the problem areas for attention by
the authorities concerned. Corruption free governance
(32.5%), transparent governance (14.9%), improved roads (11.7%), uninterrupted power (7.7%), and profitable
agriculture (7.5%) were the top five priorities identified by 75
percent of respondents.
0 10 20 30 40
Corruption free Governance
Transparent governance
Improvement of roads
Uninterrupted power supply
Make agriculture profitable
Quality health services
Implement welfare schemes/ programmes
Distribution of quality items in PDS outlets
Better education facilities
Better irrigation facilities
Implement women’s welfare …
32.5
14.9
11.7
7.7
7.5
5.9
5.5
5.2
3.2
2.9
2.9
Q1 2015-16 (Quarter 1) - Assessment & Way Forward
24
4.3 Stakeholder Perception Survey The first quarter perception survey was conducted during July 2015 covering both rural and urban wards to
gauge citizens’ perception on the activities and performance of the government during the quarter on the
survey covering 802 randomly selected GPs/wards, interviewed about 18,000 stakeholders. The output of the
survey will be utilized as a starting point for improvement in service delivery concerning various social issues.
The results presented in the table below relate to the pilot study conducted on ‘perceptions of sample
households on various service delivery parameters. The questions relate to the six key result areas selected
for the pilot survey to start with.
Result oriented sectors covered in the pilot survey will
be further refined in subsequent surveys
All Result oriented sectors will be covered in future surveys to
build a robust Participatory Monitoring and Impact
Assessment System (PMIAS)
Double digit growth: Key result areas covered in pilot survey
and to be covered in future surveys
# Result Sectors –Welfare development Pilot survey
1 Transparency, control of corruption, govt. effectiveness Covered
2 Knowledge, skill & jobs To be covered
3 Connectivity & Logistics Covered
4 Citizenship, Aadhaar centric access to services Covered
5 Smart village, smart ward To be covered
6 Institutional reforms && improving employee performance To be covered
7 Investment & infrastructure (physical & technological) To be covered
8 Market efficiency & flexibility To be covered
9 Standards of living, health, nutrition & education Covered
10 24x7 power & adequate water To be covered
11 Drinking water, roads, solid waste management Covered
12 Housing construction Covered
13 New capital To be covered
14 Equity & Gender To be covered
15 Timely grievance redressal To be covered
Q1 2015-16 (Quarter 1) - Assessment & Way Forward
25
As the survey was carried out by a large number of investigators, there could be some inter-investigator bias in the current study. Quality will be improved further in the next phase.
Matrix showing satisfaction levels of sample households on various parameters ( % score)
Very good - 60 % and +
Good - below 60 %
Parameter/District SKLM VZM VSP EG WG KRI GUN PRAK NEL CHI CUD ANAN KUR STATE
1 Financial assistance for differently abled- amount
52 56 50 51 53 44 51 52 54 62 54 50 58 53
1 Financial assistance for differently abled-timely disbursal
52 54 50 52 53 44 53 51 54 62 53 51 57 53
1 Minorities- financial assistance- amount 49 53 54 44 53 42 49 45 50 68 54 54 58 53
1 Minorities-financial assistance disbursal timeliness
51 54 53 46 53 43 49 44 50 69 55 54 55 52
3 Public transport- adequacy 50 53 43 43 54 49 55 52 53 59 58 59 57 53
4 Fertilizer distribution-quality 53 57 53 52 60 50 60 55 55 61 57 60 57 56
4 Fertilizer distribution-quantity 52 57 50 52 59 50 59 53 52 60 59 57 55 55
4 Fertilizer distribution-Timeliness 52 56 51 52 59 50 59 54 54 60 58 59 55 55
4 Livestock-veterinary cover 53 57 51 48 57 50 56 53 58 60 58 59 58 56
4 Micro irrigation scheme -implementation 52 55 52 52 55 54 53 60 49 63 59 54 54 55
4 Micronutrients distribution-timeliness 52 56 53 51 60 48 55 57 55 57 61 56 54 55
4 Quality of seeds distributed 57 61 57 54 59 50 60 58 58 65 60 59 60 58
4 Seed distribution-quantity 56 60 51 55 59 50 58 56 55 63 57 56 56 57
4 Seed distribution-timeliness 57 60 55 49 59 50 59 57 56 66 60 59 57 58
4 Vaddileni runalu- time taken for disbursal 60 56 64 60 66 58 60 59 61 69 60 64 62 62
4 Vaddileni runalu- amount 56 55 58 56 60 57 53 52 56 64 58 58 57 57
9 Health and medical services-quality 59 62 56 56 63 53 58 58 59 62 62 63 59 59
9 Medical and health services- access 59 61 56 55 63 52 58 58 58 61 61 62 58 59
9 Nutrition- quality of food- school children 64 64 62 61 66 61 66 62 63 68 66 65 66 64
9 Nutrition -quality of food-anganwadi 65 64 60 60 66 62 66 63 63 67 67 66 67 64
9 Social welfare-SC/ST- financial assistance 51 47 52 49 54 44 50 46 48 67 53 59 57 52
9 Social welfare-SC/ST-financial assistance-disbursal timeliness
51 50 55 49 54 44 50 47 47 67 53 58 55 52
11 Drinking water supply-adequacy 58 57 52 53 60 52 50 48 54 53 53 58 54 54
11 Drinking water supply -access 59 59 54 54 60 51 50 49 55 55 53 59 56 55
11 Subsidy and sanitation programme- timely disbursal
49 53 50 48 54 46 52 51 51 58 49 51 51 51
11 Subsidy under sanitation programme-adequacy
50 54 50 49 55 48 53 52 54 60 50 53 53 52
11 Waste management- disposal of garbage-frequency
77 72 81 76 75 82 87 84 66 85 87 78 79 79
11 Waste management- place for disposal of garbage
67 64 64 62 55 60 63 69 69 72 72 69 68 66
12 Housing for BPL under IAY- quality 51 54 51 49 53 47 51 56 53 58 54 55 57 53
12 Housing for BPL under NTR scheme- quality
47 54 52 47 54 52 50 54 49 63 55 55 59 54
Q1 2015-16 (Quarter 1) - Assessment & Way Forward
26
4.4 Action plan for the next quarter (July – Sept 2015)
Taking into account feedback of the engagement, the government has identified the following key
initiatives to be implemented to improve citizens’ wellbeing for 2015-16.
Action areas Inputs required
Provide additional Anganwadi centers to be provided in poverty pockets to ensure full coverage of 0-5 age children.
• Technical support for better implementation of nutrition and health programmes.
• Improve the functioning of ANM and Asha workers and prenatal care and referral services for high risk pregnancies
Badi Bata campaign to be intensified
• Conduct regular household visits and periodic drives by local stakeholders for enrollment and retention of children.
Household Sanitation activities
• Phased coverage and saturation of IHHLs. • Districts to draw up a plan using previously collected data in
each village. • Remove bottleneck in the delay in payment system to build
confidence among people.
Swachh Bharat campaign • Use the SBC to improve drainage and solid waste management across the state.
CSR projects to be encouraged to provide toilets in Schools /AWCs without toilets.
• All the institutions, including schools, to focus on maintenance aspect to improve functionality.
• Incentivize Business model maintenance service, (PPP or CBO)
Facilities in PHCs and ST hostels
• Provide toilets in all institutional facilities. • Provide water facility in PHCs and ST hostels • Provide safe drinking water • Provide electricity connection.
Map skill gaps across habitations
• Youth shall be mobilized and motivated for skill training • Support to take up suitable trades
Credit demand for MSMEs • Conduct estimate and linkages to be facilitated. • Promote producer organizations of SHGs • Graduate FPO activities to provide space in the value chain.
Infrastructure projects • Districts shall analyze pending infrastructure projects and chalk out action plan to address bottlenecks.
• Time-bound implementation of projects by mobilizing resources from concerned departments.
Safety • Measures to be introduced to improve personal safety and security of people, especially of women, children and differently abled.
Q1 2015-16 (Quarter 1) - Assessment & Way Forward
27
5. Affordable Housing Initiative in Andhra Pradesh
Creating affordable housing for one million urban families in Andhra Pradesh
Govt of AP strives to achieve ‘Housing for All” by 2022 in line with the vision of Govt of India.
Revenue generation to the tune of Rs 2,000 crore by way of municipal fees for issue of building permits.
Generates employment to one million population in the state.
Since, the initiative addresses the important aspect of housing to the citizens, the state scores on happiness index too.
Rapid urbanization has resulted in people increasingly living in slums and squatter settlements and has deteriorated the housing conditions of the economically weaker sections of the society. This is primarily due to the skyrocketing prices of land and real estate in urban areas that have forced the poor and the economically weaker sections of the society to occupy the marginal lands typified by poor housing stock, congestion and obsolescence. Considering these factors, there currently exists a wide gap between the demand and supply of housing in urban Andhra Pradesh.
The Government of Andhra Pradesh is according utmost priority to the affordable housing for the EWS and middle class sections and has drawn ambitious plans to address the affordable housing requirements for all the poor and economically weaker sections of the state by 2020. The total demand for rural and urban housing in AP as per 2011 census is 40.85 lakh dwelling units. Rural populace in the state requires 30 lakh dwelling units. Demand for the urban AP is to the tune of 10 lakh houses to sustain the increasing migratory pressures due to the recent State Reorganization. To achieve this ambitious target within a span of 5 years, an annual target of 6.17 lakh houses in rural areas and 2.00 lakh houses in urban areas have to be achieved. Following is the total land requirements across all the cities for meeting the projected demand including the details of yield/acre
Projected demand for land requirement and the details of yield/acre
Total land required for 10 lakh houses - 15,151 Acres Expected yield per acre of land - 66,000 Sft (computed @ 55% yield/acre with 2.75 FSI)
No. of dwelling units/ Acre - 66 Units
Way ahead for District Administration
1. Identification of suitable land in the district headquarters within the proximity to all the public utilities.
2. Supply of Cement and other construction material at controlled / concessional rates.
3. Land pooling and providing house sites at the concessional prices to all the EWS and LIG beneficiaries
4. Involve private developers in construction of EWS/LIG houses by offering attractive Incentives like double FSI, TDR, waiver of betterment, approval and waiver of land conversion charges etc.,
5. Other relaxations to be given include waiver of seignorage charges on sand and quarry material and exemption of Registration, stamp duty for the purchasers.
6. Promote Investment in Urban Sector Housing on PPP mode.
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000
Krishna
Guntur
Visakhapatnam
Chittoor
Kurnool
Nellore
2548
2308
2183
1060
1372
1281
3805
2757
1248
689
562
593
District-wise YTD figures on the no. of permits sanctioned and the fees collected (Districts with Rs 5 Crore and above fees have been considered)
Total Fees Collected (Rs in Lakhs) No of Building Permits Sanctioned
CRDA Area 250000
VUDA Area 300000
TUDA Area 50,000
Other major cities in AP
400000
Indicative geographical distribution of housing demand in four major regions in AP
(figures represent no. of houses)
3788
4545758
6060
Geographic area-wise land requirement (in acres) for construction of 10 Lakh Houses under Affordable Housing in all the four regions in AP
CRDA
VUDA
TUDA
Other MajorCities
Q1 2015-16 (Quarter 1) - Assessment & Way Forward
28
6. Annual Plan Performance
To provide necessary impetus for economic growth in the state, it is essential that the initiatives and
schemes targeted at boosting the state economy are implemented in time bound manner to ensure
maximum economic output. During the Q1 2015-16, the state has initiated a process of tracking and
the performance of various departments under the Seven Missions. A comprehensive Monitoring
and Evaluation (M&E) framework has been implemented for the first time in the State to monitor
the growth in terms of the long-term vision of the state in addition to the annual plan monitoring.
While preparing Vision 2029 and formally the Double Digit Growth Strategy Document, the state in
consultation with key departments and stakeholder identified Key Performance Indicators for each
of the 96 Heads of Departments. Performance of 96 Heads of Department are tracked and evaluated
on a monthly basis to ensure timely and effective delivery of services.
6.1The M&E framework is designed to analyse the following;
Global Benchmarking - Global benchmarks, widely adopted sector specific global indices,
particularly conformity with Sustainable Development Goals.
Growth Engines – Under each sector/district growth engines that propel the district and
state economy, have been identified. The list of KPIs also include the indicators to review the
implementation and performance of the proposed / identified growth engines
20 Non-Negotiable Priorities – The indicators reflect the achievement on 20 non –
negotiable priorities identified under Smart Village and Smart Ward initiative
Financial Performance –Scheme wise financial achievement against the Budget Estimate
2015-16, fund released and Expenditure.
GoI Priorities –KPIs related to the GoI priorities.
Surveys/Studies– Studies and surveys beyond the indicators identified at the Mission Level.
6.2 For Q1 of 2015-16, the performance of the Seven Missions and their respective Heads of Departments has been categorized under the following heads;
a) Financial Performance in implementation of State Plan Scheme
b) Financial Performance in implementation of Externally Aided Projects
c) Physical Performance Targets & Achievements
Financial performance in implementation of State Plan Scheme includes evaluation of Sector wise,
scheme wise Plan Expenditure vis-à-vis the release on outlays. In addition to monitoring financial
expenditure, the state also monitors physical targets. The objective is to ensure that financial
expenditure matchs tangible outputs linked to economic output.
Q1 2015-16 (Quarter 1) - Assessment & Way Forward
29
6.2.1 Financial Performance in implementation of State Plan Schemes -
1st Quarter (Apr-June 2015) Total expenditure in Q1 2015-16 was accounted at Rs.10,040 crore or around 29.18% of the total
planned expenditure for the year for the state. The expenditure during the first quarter amounted to
93.33% of the total budget released for the quarter.
Total expenditure is accounted under Economic, Social and General Services. Economic Services
accounted for an expenditure of Rs. 8760.06 crore as against Budget Release Orders of Rs. 8433. 95
core during the first quarter of 2015-16.The Social Services accounted for an expenditure of Rs. 1267
crore as against a BRO of Rs. 2261.77 core, while the General Services accounted for an expenditure
of Rs. 12.92 crore as against a BRO of Rs. 61.91 crore. The table showcases the overall performance
of the Annual Plan.
Sector-wise Plan Expenditure of Annual Plan 2015-16 1st Quarter (Apr-June 2015) (RS Cr)
Services
BE
2015-16
BE After
Re-App
BRO
Issued
1st Quarter
Expenditure (Apr-Jun 2015)
% of
BRO
to BE
% of
Exp to
BRO
% of
Exp to
BE
% of
Exp to
Total
Exp
ECONOMIC 19346.99 23644.39 8433.95 8760.06 43.59 % 103.87 % 45.28 % 87.25 %
SOCIAL 14904.80 15164.40 2261.77 1267.06 15.17 % 56.02 % 8.50 % 12.62 %
GENERAL 158.05 329.98 61.91 12.92 39.17 % 20.87 % 8.18 % 0.13 %
TOTAL 34409.85 39138.77 10757.63 10040.05 31.26 % 93.33 % 29.18 % 100.00
Of the total expenditure accounted during the first quarter of the financial year, over 73% of the
expenditure was accounted under the State Plan. This was followed by the contribution from
Centrally Assisted Schemes at over 24.57 %. The detailed breakup of the Component-wise plan
expenditure of Annual Plan is presented below.
Component-wise plan expenditure of Annual Plan 2015-16 1st Quarter (Apr-June 2015)
Component BE
2015-16 BE After Re-App
BRO Issued
1st Quarter Expenditure (Apr-Jun 2015)
% of BRO to BE
% of Exp to BRO
% of Exp to
BE
% Exp to total
Exp Normal State Plan 20483.59 26510.57 6746.68 7382.02 32.9% 109.4% 36.0% 73.5% Centrally Assisted
State Plan 10003.49 10816.16 3943.10 2467.21 39.4% 62.6% 24.7% 24.6%
AIBP 1000.00 1000.00 0.00 52.70 0.0% 0.0% 5.3% 0.5% Externally Aided
Projects 1897.77 1897.77 34.08 91.33 1.8% 268.0% 4.8% 0.9%
RIDF 1025.00 1053.83 32.63 46.26 3.2% 141.8% 4.5% 0.5% Others 0.00 31.96 0.00 0.52 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Total Plan 34409.85 39138.77 10757.63 10040.05 31.3% 93.3% 29.2% 100.0%
Q1 2015-16 (Quarter 1) - Assessment & Way Forward
30
Sector Wise vs. Component Plan Expenditure of Annual Plan
Of the total expenditure of Rs.
10040 crore for the first quarter in
2015-16, over 59.2% of the
expenditure was reported under
Rural Development Department.
This was followed by the Irrigation
and Energy at 15.5% and Transport
Services at 8.3%. These three
departments together account for
over 84% of the total planned
expenditure for the first quarter.
Expenditure as percentage of BRO
for the agriculture and allied sectors
was recorded at 28% , which is
among the lowest for the first
quarter. Similarly, social security &
nutrition, general education, water
supply and sanitation have all
registered expenditure to BRO ratio
of below 40%. The lowest ratio has
been recorded for the Arts and
Culture at 5%.
1.5%
59.2%
15.5%
0.7%
8.3%
0.0%
2.0%
1.8%
0.1%
0.2%
0.0%
1.7%
0.2%
0.6%
2.8%
0.2%
3.3%
0.0%
1.7%
0.1%
0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0%
AGRL. AND ALLIED SERVICES
RURAL DEVELOPMENT
IRRIGATION & ENERGY
INDUSTRY & MINERALS
TRANSPORT
SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY &…
GENERAL ECONOMIC SERVICES
GENERAL EDUCATION
SPORTS & YOUTH SERVICES
TECHNICAL EDUCATION, HOD
ART & CULTURE
MEDICAL AND PUBLIC HEALTH
WATER SUPPLY AND SANITATION
HOUSING, HOD
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
INFORMATION & PUBLIC…
WELFARE OF SCS,STS,BCS AND…
LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT
SOCIAL SECURITY & NUTRITION
GENERAL SERVICES
Sector Wise Expenditure Share
7,382
2,467 53 91 46 1
10
,04
0
8,760
1,267
12.92
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
10000
11000
Normal StatePlan
CentrallyAssisted State
Plan
AIBP ExternallyAided Projects
RIDF Others Total Services
Rs.
cro
re
GENERAL SERVICES
SOCIAL SERVICES
ECONOMIC SERVICES
Q1 2015-16 (Quarter 1) - Assessment & Way Forward
31
Sector-wise detailed plan expenditure of Annual Plan 2015-16-1stQuarter(Apr-June 2015-16)(RsCr)
Sector/Head of Department
BE 2015-16
BE After Re-App
BRO Issued
Q1 Apr-Jun 2015 Expenditure
% of BRO to BE
% of Exp to BRO
% of Exp to BE
% Exp to total Exp
Agrl. And Allied Services 1863.9 1947.3 531.7 148.7 28.5% 28.0% 8.0% 1.5% Rural Development 8560.5 10300.0 7055.8 5941.3 82.4% 84.2% 69.4% 59.2% Irrigation & Energy 4774.3 6547.2 38.1 1560.9 0.8% 4097.9% 32.7% 15.5% Industry & Minerals 627.5 584.5 127.2 72.7 20.3% 57.1% 11.6% 0.7% Transport 2155.6 2588.3 304.5 834.9 14.1% 274.2% 38.7% 8.3% Science, Tech&Env 1.0 1.0 0.2 0.1 25.3% 54.2% 13.7% 0.0% Gen. Economic Services 1364.3 1676.2 376.3 201.5 27.6% 53.5% 14.8% 2.0%
Economic Services 19347.0 23644.4 8434.0 8760.1 43.6% 103.9% 45.3% 87.3%
General Education 2761.2 2801.4 499.8 182.2 18.1% 36.5% 6.6% 1.8% Sports & Youth Services 58.8 60.8 2.8 8.5 4.7% 307.3% 14.4% 0.1% Technical Education, HoD 232.8 234.7 50.7 21.4 21.8% 42.2% 9.2% 0.2% Art & Culture 26.7 26.7 6.5 0.4 24.5% 5.7% 1.4% 0.0% Medical And Public Health 1987.2 1989.2 91.0 174.2 4.6% 191.6% 8.8% 1.7% Water Supply&Sanitation 721.0 772.2 98.0 20.3 13.6% 20.8% 2.8% 0.2% Housing, HoD 655.9 655.9 62.2 62.7 9.5% 100.9% 9.6% 0.6% Urban Development 1733.7 1903.7 379.4 280.1 21.9% 73.8% 16.2% 2.8% Information & Public Relations, HoD 60.0 60.0 22.5 18.6 37.5% 82.7% 31.0% 0.2% Welfare Of SCS,STS,BCS And Minorities 5576.2 5568.1 580.2 327.7 10.4% 56.5% 5.9% 3.3% Labour And Employment 18.3 18.3 2.8 3.1 15.4% 108.5% 16.7% 0.0% Social Security & Nutrition 1073.2 1073.5 466.0 167.9 43.4% 36.0% 15.6% 1.7%
Social Services 14904.8 15164.4 2261.8 1267.1 15.2% 56.0% 8.5% 12.6%
General Services 158.1 330.0 61.9 12.9 39.2% 20.9% 8.2% 0.1%
GRAND TOTAL 34409.9 39138.8 10757.6 10040.1 31.3% 93.3% 29.2% 100.0%
Departments accounting for 90% expenditure of total expenditure 1st Quarter (Apr-June 2015)
Head of Department (Rs. Crore)
BE 2015-16
BE After Re-App
BRO Issued
1st
Quarter Exp
(Apr-Jun 2015)
% of BRO to BE
% of Exp to BRO
% of Exp
to BE
% of Exp to Total Exp
Rural Development. 8209.52 9900.58 6925.88 5848.96 84.4% 84.5% 71.3% 58.3% Water Resources 4678.13 6451.07 18.55 1560.89 0.4% 8414.3% 33.4% 15.6% MA& UD 1326.00 1496.00 326.75 269.07 24.6% 82.4% 20.3% 2.7% Enc,(R&B),A State Roads & RSW 340.50 353.12 0.00 246.78 - - 72.5% 2.5% CE (R&B), CRN & MD, RDC& PPP 843.02 843.02 1.09 201.31 0.1% 18468.6% 23.9% 2.0% Women Devp.&,Child Welfare 1049.12 1049.48 461.18 164.34 44.0% 35.6% 15.7% 1.6% Engineer-In-Chief (General &Pr) 196.00 381.05 271.45 161.63 138.5% 59.5% 82.5% 1.6% Tr & Buildings Department 183.00 365.00 23.75 144.45 13.0% 608.3% 78.9% 1.4% School Education 460.66 460.66 184.63 140.56 40.1% 76.1% 30.5% 1.4% Social Welfare 1646.74 1646.74 276.23 125.11 16.8% 45.3% 7.6% 1.3% Health And Family Welfare 1448.72 1448.72 64.00 123.40 4.4% 192.8% 8.5% 1.2%
Q1 2015-16 (Quarter 1) - Assessment & Way Forward
32
Major schemes contributing 75% expenditure to total expenditure 1st Quarter (Apr-June 2015)
Name of the Scheme BE
2015-16 BE After Re-App
BRO Issued
1st Quarter Expenditure
(Apr-Jun 2015)
% of Exp to
BE
% of Exp to Total
Exp
Capital Infusion to DWACRA Women groups 1000.00 2660.06 2660.06 2660.06 266.0% 26.5% MGNREGA 2717.61 2717.61 2252.14 1774.96 65.3% 17.7% NTR Pensions to old age persons & widows 3129.60 3129.60 1564.80 1066.46 34.1% 10.6% Canals and Distributaries 184.02 1488.70 0.00 482.01 261.9% 4.8% Major District Roads 246.33 246.64 0.00 223.91 90.9% 2.2% Land Pooling for New State Capital 94.84 262.84 201.62 199.77 210.6% 2.0% NTR Pensions to Disabled Persons 552.99 552.99 276.49 189.66 34.3% 1.9% Assistance to Panchayat Raj Institutions for construction of Rural Roads
50.00 233.00 232.90 160.90 321.8% 1.6%
Core Network Roads (Works) 299.50 299.50 0.00 148.69 49.6% 1.5% Cost sharing with Railways for construction of New Railway Lines
88.02 270.02 0.00 144.45 164.1% 1.4%
Restoration of Minor Irrigation Tanks 88.65 188.65 0.00 127.15 143.4% 1.3% Canals and Distributaries 113.56 125.43 0.00 112.75 99.3% 1.1% Economic Support Schemes 418.89 418.89 104.54 104.50 25.0% 1.0% Resettlement and Rehabilitation 44.74 105.74 0.00 103.65 231.7% 1.0%
Of the 775 schemes that are currently under implementation, 14 major schemes account for 75% of
the total expenditure. The largest contributor includes the Capital Infusion to DWACRA women
groups with at 26.49 % of expenditure to the total expenditure. MGNREGA is the second largest
contributor to expenditure at 17.68 % expenditure to total expenditure followed by NTR pensions to
old age persons and widows at 10.62 %. Other major schemes include cannels and distributaries,
major district roads, land pooling for new state capital, NTR pensions to disabled persons, assistance
to panchayat raj institutions for construction of rural roads, core network roads, cost sharing with
railways for construction of new railway lines, restoration of minor irrigation tanks, Economic
Support Scheme, Resettlement and rehabilitation.
The exhibit represents the number of
schemes reporting expenditure as
percentage to total BE. Of the 775 schemes,
only 42 schemes have recorded expenditure
to BE ratio of over 50%. There are over 546
schemes that have recorded expenditure to
BE ratio of under 10%.
546
84 10313 11 18
775
0
200
400
600
800
1000
<10 25-Oct 25-50 50-75 75-100 >100 Total
No
of
Sch
em
es
Expenditure to BE Ratio
Q1 2015-16 (Quarter 1) - Assessment & Way Forward
33
6.2.2 Financial Performance of Externally Aided Projects
Externally Aided Projects
with an outlay of over Rs.
1897.77 crore have been
earmarked for 2015-16.
These projects are broadly
categorised under irrigation,
power, transport, water
supply and sanitation and
urban development sectors.
During the first quarter of
2015-16, the total
expenditure realised under
these projects stood at Rs.
91,33 crore.
Externally Aided Projects (Rs Crore) Proposed
Outlay
Expenditure
(Up to June, 2015)
Irrigation
National Hydrology Project -Surface 0.5
National Hydrology Project -Ground water 1.5
A.P Water Sector Improvement of Project
(Modernisation of NS Canal with W.B) 841.5 34.79
A.P Livelihood Improvement Project - Major 67.24 5.34
Construction of M.I. Tanks under
APCBTMP & APLIP - Minor 104.24 5.24
Power
High Voltage Distribution System 94.12 0
Transport
A. P. Road Sector Project 436.02 38.09
Water Supply & Sanitation
Rural Water Supply Schemes 60.98 7.84
Urban Development
A.P. Urban Reforms and Municipal services 291.66 0
TOTAL 1897.77 91.33
1014.98
94.12
436.02
60.98
291.66
45.37
0
38.09
7.84
0
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
Irrigation
Power
Transport
Water Supply& Sanitation
Urban Development
Rs. Crore
Externally Aided Projects: Outlay vs. Expenditure
Q1 Expenditure Proposed Outlay
Q1 2015-16 (Quarter 1) - Assessment & Way Forward
34
7. Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) Targets &
Achievements
Key performance indicators are economic and non-economic indicators that any organization uses in
order to evaluate and fortify how successful the organization is in achieving its previously
established goals. Appropriate selection of indicators that will be used for measuring the
performance of the organization is of great importance. The recent decades have witnessed a
maturing of concern and interest in building performance that is increasingly evidenced in building
the success organization. Key
Performance Indicators are not
simply about attaining higher
performance standards or
investing in new values; it is also
about rethinking in designing
indicators and how it is placed in
achieving the goal.
Government of Andhra Pradesh
intends to develop the new State
rapidly over the next 10 years
adopting a Mission Approach.
Seven missions have been
launched to be implemented
under the guidance of Honorable Chief Minister to achieve the Sunrise Andhra Pradesh Vision. The
seven missions ensure bottom-up planning and lay special emphasis on the backward areas of the
state to achieve equitable growth and development. The missions act as catalysts for attaining
optimum levels of performance in identified with increased resource use efficiency. These seven
missions are: Primary Mission, Social Mission, Skill Development Mission, Urban Development
Mission, Industry Mission, Infrastructure Mission and Service Mission.
For each mission, the strategic objectives have been defined as part of Sunrise Andhra Pradesh
Vision. The service portfolio identified for each mission is also aligned to achieve strategic objective
of each mission. To continuously measure the progress of each mission, the underlying portfolio has
to be evaluated periodically. Hence the Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) have been defined.
Q1 2015-16 (Quarter 1) - Assessment & Way Forward
35
7.1 SELECTION OF KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
The KPI finalized by the missions and departments include the indicators from the following sources. GLOBAL BENCHMARKING - The M&E framework is aligned with global benchmarks, widely adopted sector specific global indices, particularly in conformity with Sustainable Development Goals. A snap shot of global indicators and global indices his placed below for reference from KPIMS website.
Q1 2015-16 (Quarter 1) - Assessment & Way Forward
36
GROWTH ENGINES – Each sector/district has identified certain growth propelling engines. KPIs also
include indicators to review the implementation and performance of the identified growth engines.
Snap shots of indicator slides are placed for reference from KPIMS website of Andhra Pradesh.
FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE – The M&E system is linked to the existing Finance Department’s portal for
reporting the scheme wise financial achievement against the Budget Estimate 2015-16, fund
releases and expenditure. Slide below is placed for reference taken from KPIMS website of
Andhrapradesh
Q1 2015-16 (Quarter 1) - Assessment & Way Forward
37
GOI PRIORITIES – The Government of India, from time to time, intimate its priorities. The proposed
set of indicators will also include some of the KPI related to the GoI priorities.
SURVEYS/STUDIES - The information on some of the Mission level indicators may not be readily
available and require conduct of studies by the respective departments. The list of studies/ surveys
to be undertaken are being finalized.
Snap shots of indicators slides placed for reference from KPIMS website of Andhra Pradesh.
20 NON-NEGOTIABLE PRIORITIES – The indicators reflect the achievement on 20 non –
negotiable priorities identified under Smart Village and Smart Ward initiative.
Q1 2015-16 (Quarter 1) - Assessment & Way Forward
38
7.2 MONITORING AND EVALUATION
A set of indicators pertaining largely to the input and output level will be at the department level
and the departments would review the progress in respect of these indicators elaborately at their
respective levels
The monitoring at Chief Secretary and Hon’ble Chief Minister level will be performed
Mission wise. The performance on this category of indicators, largely comprising of the
outcome and output indicators is intended for reporting by the Mission Coordinators to
Chief Secretary and Hon’ble Chief Minister.
In addition to the departments grouped at the Mission level, certain departments whose
indicators do not directly fall under any of the seven missions but require periodic
monitoring have been broadly classified as revenue earning and governance (including
regulatory departments).
7.3 MONTHLY REVIEWS
The progress presented by the Secretary of the department concerned and coordinated by the
Mission Coordinating Secretary will be reviewed every month by Vice Chairman of the Mission and
Chief Secretary. It will also include the following issues in addition to the progress on the KPIs.
Inter-departmental coordination.
Key project progress - identified as growth propelling projects.
Review the third party evaluation and adoption of best practices
Q1 2015-16 (Quarter 1) - Assessment & Way Forward
39
*Snap shots of indicator slides placed for reference from Social empowerment sector and Primary
Mission for reference from KPIMS website. (kpimsap.cgg.gov.in)
7.4 QUARTERLY REVIEWS BY HON’BLE CHIEF MINISTER The Mission Vice Chairman and the Mission Coordinating Secretary will present the Mission
Performance Report to the Hon’ble Chief Minister every month and the Chairman of the respective
Mission. The quarterly report is proposed to include following:
Selected indicators.
Key project progress.
Performance report by Hon’ble Minister and the Secretary concerned on the performance of the
department and mission and the steps taken by them to address the issues
Q1 2015-16 (Quarter 1) - Assessment & Way Forward
40
Q1 2015-16 (Quarter 1) - Assessment & Way Forward
41
7.5 MONITORING DOUBLE DIGIT GROWTH – STRUCTURE
A formal implementation review mechanism and structure will be established at various levels that
is, Planning Department, Mission Coordinators and District Collectors. The following units will consist
of the government personnel and the professionals hired on contract.
PLANNING DEPARTMENT – A Strategic Planning and Innovation Unit (SPIU) will be established
under Special Chief Secretary (Planning). The Unit will consist of Senior Consultants and
Research Fellows/Associates, GIS/MIS.
MISSION COORDINATOR LEVEL - Mission Support Unit (MSU) already notified for establishment
will also consist of experts of Knowledge Partner, GIS/MIS.
DISTRICT COLLECTOR LEVEL – District Delivery Unit (DDU) consisting of district level persons of
Primary Mission, SEM, Industry, Service Mission and Banking plan specialist, M&E specialist,
Capacity building person, GIS & MIS person, and NIC representative will be established
Q1 2015-16 (Quarter 1) - Assessment & Way Forward
42
8. District wise Rainfall Status from 01.06.2015 to
17.09.2015
Q1 2015-16 (Quarter 1) - Assessment & Way Forward
43
9. FPOs- Collective Action for Inclusive Development
& Growth
Formation of Farmer Producer Organizations (FPOs) was on the rise during the pilot launch by the Ministry of Agriculture, GOI and the year 2014 was announced as “Year of Farmer Producer Organizations”. Collectivization of farmers is one of the ways to overcome the problems of small & marginal farmers. Formation of FPO is a major step towards achieving the objective of inclusive growth as it acts as a platform for collective development. Concept of FPO Farmer Producer Organizations are groups of rural producers coming together based on the principle of membership, to pursue specific common interests of their members and developing technical and economic activities that benefit their members and maintaining relations with partners operating in their economic and institutional environment. Through the formation of FPO, farmers become shareholders- organize themselves, reduce cost-operate till retail market and earn profits. Institutional Structure
Cold Chain Management by FPOs A cold chain is a temperature-controlled supply chain. An unbroken cold chain is an uninterrupted series of storage and distribution activities which maintain a given temperature range. It is used to help extend and ensure the shelf life of products.
A standard practice through farmers’ organization in storing the products–refrigerated capacity, food losses, losses of fruits and vegetables, losses of perishable food stuffs due to lack of refrigeration can increase the profit of organization by 40 %. Integration of supply chain and value chain through the FPOs Integration of supply chain and value chain is the goal of FPO to eliminate the intermediaries. If integration is achieved, it can drastically reduce the cost of cultivation and increase the value of produces by the way of reducing input costs, increase in value addition by the time produce reaches the consumers. It has been evidenced that by integrating, the loss of cultivation has been reduced from 40 % to 21%.
Harvest
Supply
Procurement
Pre-cooling
TransportProcessing/
PackingProduction
storageRetrigerated
Transport
Objectives of FPOs
o To link small farmers to investments,
markets and technology
o To ensure backward and forward
linkages
o To integrate producers in the value
chain for better returns
Q1 2015-16 (Quarter 1) - Assessment & Way Forward
44
Supply Chain in FPOs
Value Chain in FPOs
Department wise target has been fixed
Districts Crops identified
Vizag Coffee Turmeric Paddy
East Godavari Vegetable Fisheries Dairy
Kurnool Redgram Bengal gram
Guntur Chillies Vegetables Dairy
Krishna Dairy Black gram Vegetables
Prakasam Chilli/ Paddy Bengal gram Fisheries
Nellore Paddy Black gram Fisheries
Kadapa Bengal gram Chillies Groundnut
Ananthapur Redgram Groundnut
Srikakulam Poultry Green gram Cashew
Vizianagaram Cashew Paddy Poultry
Chittor Vegetables Dairy
Production Collection Wholesale RetailConsumpti
on
Quality inputs
Technical Support
Credit linkege
Certification
Capacity Building
Marketing
120 48 20 50 33158 150
200
100
200
SERP (dairy, Agri& Non-form)
Horticulture Fisheries AnimalHusbandary
NGOs CRD-Watershed Agriculture Dairy
Outcome in Q1 2015-16
c) A series of meetings, workshops have been conducted with the departments of Primary Mission, NABARD, ICRISAT and NGOs to increase awareness about the importance of FPOs among a diverse range of stakeholders
d) An exposure field visit has been organized for all the stakeholders to observe the process involved from initial stage to formation of FPOs
a) A state level FPO consortium has
been formed with all stakeholders to
give technical support in forming and
promoting the FPOs.
b) Department wise FPO target is
finalized
Way forward
Targeted 2000 FPOs to be formed in
next five years
RO,SPMU & DPMU are to be formed
to sensitize the farmers and register
the FPOs
Formation of at least one FPO in
each panchayat in AP
At least 3 experts from each FPO
shall be trained on marketing, finance
management and social mobilization
Training and capacity building to be
given to farmers, stakeholders, BODs
and handholding organizations
New policy support may be given in
order to support and strengthen the
process of FPOs in AP
Q1 2015-16 (Quarter 1) - Assessment & Way Forward
45
380
642
680
758
861
885
1,076
1,149
1,249
1,314
1,399
1,507
3,243
Vizianagaram
Nellore
Ananthapur
Srikakulam
Vishakapatnam
Kadapa
Chittoor
West Godavari
Kurnool
Krishna
East Godavari
Prakasham
Guntur
10. INDUSTRY INSIGHTS
Industrial development promotes higher capital formation, raises wage incomes and absorbs surplus workforce to bring about equitable development. Therefore the State Government has accorded top priority to industrial growth as a means to mitigate overtly and unemployment.
Ensure sustainable and inclusive industrial growth
Be among the Top 3 states in terms of industrial investments by 2022
Be the most preferred logistics hub and India’s gateway to East and Southeast Asia by 2029
Enhance the quantum and quality of skilled manpower and create significant employment opportunities.
Increase the contribution of manufacturing to GSDP from 9.95%(2013-14)to 15% by 2020 and Increase the contribution of industries to GSDP from 20.7% (2013-14) to 25% by 2020.
Attract investment to the tune of Rs.2 lakh crore by the end of 2020
Create employment opportunities for an additional 10 lakh people by the end of 2020
Operationalize Industrial Corridors such as Vishakhapatnam-Chennai Industrial Corridor (VCIC), Chennai-Bengaluru Industrial Corridor (CBIC), Petroleum, Chemicals & Petrochemicals Investment Regions (PCPIR), National Investment & Manufacturing Zones (NIMZs) and various Special Economic Zones (SEZs)
Given the strong focus of the Government of India on initiatives such as “Make in India”, it has become key strategy to enhance share of manufacturing to the state’s economy. The secondary sector breakup indicates significant contribution of 8.1% growth by manufacturing subsector. There are about 653 industrial manufacturing registered units with 100 workers and above which constitute 27% of secondary sector contribution. In addition to this state government is focusing on promotion of SMEs. A highly developed manufacturing sector necessarily needs a vibrant and dynamic SME sector which forms the base for providing essential goods and services. There are 15,413 establishments registered under factories act with less than 100 workers and Guntur tops the chart with a strong network of agro-processing based SME’s.
Exhibit:A Thrust areas mapped to districts based on their potential synergies
Total No: 653 Total GVA (In Rs.Cr) : 29521.5 No. of Workers: 2,60,990
Exhibit:B District wise Manufacturing(Reg.) units under 2(mi) (2mii)
with 100 or more workers with positive GVA*
Exhibit:C District wise Manufacturing(Reg.) units under
2(Mi) (2mii) with less than 100 workers*
Q1 2015-16 (Quarter 1) - Assessment & Way Forward
46
11. Best Practices
Best Practice – Agriculture and ICT - Tamilnadu Transformation of Agricultural Extension using ICT tools
Context: Farm-crop management system to double the food production and triple the income of farmers, reduce yield gap and bridge knowledge gap. ICT is used for providing dynamic advisories to individual farmers (Text and Voice message), timely information on technology, inputs, and land and water.
The practice: ICT is used for creating farmers’ database, soil health mapping, issue of soil health card with SMS advisory, informing farmers about the schedule visits of extension officials, crop health monitoring, online benefit tracking system, etc.
Innovation: The state has put in place a comprehensive ICT application for agriculture extension starting from data base to delivering and monitoring services.
Process: A month-long village level campaign was conducted to collect farmers’ data; and the same was uploaded into PCs. Unstructured Supplementary Service Data (USSD) is to gather information and provide advisories. Mobile APP (linked to experts) is used for promoting virtual extension and monitoring stock.
Salient features: Database of 68 lakh (out of 81.8 Lakh) farmers is created by conducting a month-long village level
campaign.
As part of the soil health mapping, 68 lakhs soil samples were collected and results uploaded. SMS alerts sent to farmers on fertilizers to be applied. Soil health cards were generated and distributed to farmers.
Farmers that registered with the USSD are informed about the schedule visits of Extension Official.
Crop doctor, an information pack developed in all southern languages, provides virtual extension. Primary and secondary information is made available at GP level in the computers to help farmer to diagnose the crop health related issues and find solutions.
Field level monitoring of crop health using Tablet, PCs and Experts advice by the scientists through SMS to the farmers.
Online Benefit Tracking System: All the Agricultural Extension Centers in the state went online. The state is dong online beneficiary registration and tracking of benefits.
Mobile APP is used for monitoring stock (seed and fertilizer) of 9600 fertilizer dealers, 8400 seed dealers and 4500 PACS. Seed and fertilizer stocks are updated at the sale points.
Benefits: Farmers in the state benefited through information and improved access to services. There is improved transparency and accountability in the state. Scale and impact of the initiative is applicable to Andhra Pradesh.
Sustainability: GOI is planning to replicate this concept. The state will expand ICT application to online hiring of farm machinaries by farmers , workflow automation of the regulated markets activities, etc.
Innovative Practice – Irrigation & MIS - Gujarat Case Study: Gujarat Green Revolution Company Limited (GGRC) for implementation of Micro
Irrigation Scheme
Context: Subsidy for Micro Irrigation System (MIS) was available under different schemes and sub-
schemes. Varying subsidy assistance norms and implemented by multiple government departments
creating confusion among farmers. There was muddle among the farmers at ground level. In
addition, it was taking a long time to disperse the subsidy. The progress of micro-irrigation was very
minimal.
The practice: The state of Gujarat established a company (i.e., GGRC) to implement micro-irrigation in
PPP mode. All the available funds for micro-irrigation were integrated in one head and utilized
Q1 2015-16 (Quarter 1) - Assessment & Way Forward
47
efficiently to extend benefits to more farmers. GGRC is given relatively higher autonomy in its
functioning and decision making.
Innovation: The state transferred governance from government mode to corporate mode. It
delegated authority and responsibility for implementation of the Social Sector Scheme-MI to a
corporate body. The state also changed micro-irrigation from Agriculture department to Irrigation
department.
Process: Single window approach for sanctioning using a state-of-art IT application called C-MIMS
(GDRS, GWORKS, GSPRINK, FAS). There is transparency at every stage of application processing. MI
applications are cleared fist come first basis (geo-tagging and work order). Tripartite agreement is
signed. (Schematic diagram is shown to farmer to make him/her understand what MI Component is
provided by the Supplier). The state follows multi-stage monitoring. This involves:
Installation of system and verification by third party
QR code and GPS based mobile application for MI installation verification
Submission of verification /trial run report along with along subsidy release for final payment
Effective Quality Monitoring and Assurance System;
Concurrent evaluation of MI Scheme; and
Use of IT based application to prepare cost and design and to monitor the installed MIS.
Salient features:
Micro-irrigation was given highest priority. Policy intervention through a unique GR by the Govt of Gujarat
in 2005 with no ceiling on area and subsidy. Electricity connection is on overriding priority.
It is a well thought business model by linking to market forces. The public sector companies [i.e., GNFC
(46%), GSFC (46%) and GAIC (8%)] are equity holders in GGRC.
The scheme is implemented in a uniform mode for the entire state. The subsidy amount is decided based
crop spacing.
Provides basket of services to farmers such as maintenance, Warranty and Guarantee of MI Components
for five years, agronomic as well as system maintenance advisory services through SMS, insurance of the
MI System as well as farmer’s life and effective complaint redressal system.
Promotes IT based interventions such as incorporation of Barcode System, introduction of Biometric
System and Geo-fencing based Cost and Design Preparation
Benefits: MIS Scheme coverage increased from 2.26 lakh hectares (1.41 lakh farmers) in 2005 to
11,43,987 hectares (7,10,359 farmers). The average annual coverage increased from 15,000 ha./year
before GGRC to 1.11 lakh ha./year after establishment of GGRC.
Sustainability: SardarKrushi Package Conceptualized to promote Agro Services & Products offered by
GGRC/GSFC to the farmers under one roof. Promotion of Micro Irrigation, protected cultivation and
solar pumping Scheme, WSF as a part of SardarKrushi Package:
Q1 2015-16 (Quarter 1) - Assessment & Way Forward
48
2 It is suggested to be best approach in cold chain management
Cold Chain Management: Doing It Smarter2 Context: India is one of the largest producers of agricultural products. Various studies indicate that 18% to 40% of this produce is lost due to supply chain inefficiencies. These losses have been stated to be as high as USD 8 to 15 billion per annum from the agriculture sector alone. Food is lost-if not consumed. This happens when harvested produce escapes its end use. Malnutrition in many countries and the increasing world population demand better solutions to avoid food waste.
The practice: There is a need to focus on the preventing food loss during post-harvest (i.e., before reaching market in the value chain), besides emphasizing on producing more through improving farm level productivity (i.e., water efficiency, improved seed, etc). There is a requirement of inverse approach.
Innovation: Processed food (convenience food) fetches less value than fresh food. Smart management of the supply chain is important for achieving gainful productivity: Production from farm needs to reach consumption centers, so as to achieve “gainful-end-use” and to minimize loss of resource wastage. Each product needs different protocols as per existing scheme and system standards. This aspect is often ignored and emphasis was to create cold storage. Therefore, supply chain reports in the past indicated higher cold chain requirement. These were accepted by decision maker as approach followed was ‘how to store and sell’. Instead we need to be driven by concept of consume produce when it is fresh. It means we need to harvest (window) produce at different points.
Process: The prime objective of supply chain is to expand reach, open markets. Technology options for reducing food loss in supply chain are:
Conditioning: grading, cooling, pre-cooling, HACCP
Packaging: reusable, sustainable, breathable, cooling
Transport: cooling, vibration, insulation, tracking
Storage: insulation, air change, energy saving, HACCP
Distribution: TMS, JIT, Replenishment, shelf presence
Salient features: Studies carried out on cold storage facilities indicate that India has the capacity to handle large volumes. While 88% infrastructure created in supply is for storage, transport constitutes only 12%. Cold storage is more useful for import products; and domestic produce has limited advantage from cold storage. (Cold chain is doubling pollution. Ecological footprint of India is 0.91 and one of the greenest in the world. We are more sustainable than other western countries.) The effort is needed to make our own produce reaches market. This necessitates the market connectivity in form of associated logistics chain can be integrated into the agenda of enhancing agriculture productivity.
Benefits: The world needs to move from traditional farm level productivity to a measure of “gainful-productivity”. We need to address the losses caused by non-optimal cold chain processes and management. We need to follow ‘the First-Expired-First-Out strategy’ for optimized matching between the remaining shelf life and the expected transport duration; and by promoting intelligent food logistics.
Sustainability: The demand-driven needs estimated using the demand matrix (in recently conducted study) suggest that country requires 70080 pack houses, 61826 units of reefer transport, cold storage distribution hubs with a capacity of 93625 MT and cold storage bulk storage houses with capacity of 3.4 lakh MT.
Q1 2015-16 (Quarter 1) - Assessment & Way Forward
49
Initiatives of Industrial Development - Karnataka Escort officers promote and facilitate investments, and assist investors
Karnataka Udyog Mitra
It is a Government of Karnataka organization constituted under the aegis of the Commerce & Industries Department,
An initiative of the State to promote and facilitate investments, and assist investors. It chalks out plan and a clear road map to reach your destination with precise and user-friendly directions, has been providing the crucial direction and guidance for crores of investors for the last 15 years.
Thus it is a 'single point of contact’ for all investors who are looking at setting up businesses in Karnataka.
As the nodal agency, their role is to facilitate investments and execute initiatives to enable a smooth transition, from receiving an investment proposal to the eventual implementation of the project.
As an investment promotion and facilitation agency of the State Government, Karnataka Udyog Mitra is the Secretariat for grant of approvals and sanction of infrastructure facilities for approved projects.
Gujarat Industrial Extension Bureau - Gujarat
Industrial Extension Bureau, popularly known as iNDEXTb is a Government of Gujarat Organisation, established with the objective of accelerating the industrial development in the State.
The Bureau acts as a single point contact for entrepreneurs for establishing industrial ventures. In order to cater varied needs of entrepreneurs.
iNDEXTb has established separate cells like Investment Promotion Division, International Business Division, Project & Technology Division, IT Division etc. which are headed by senior officers.
The Bureau acts as catalyst of Industries Department of the Government in propagating industrial promotional policies, attracting industrial investment, organizing mega events, seminars, industrial fairs etc. iNDEXTb is an ISO 9001-2008 certified organization
iNDEXTb was set up with an intention to function as a ‘facilitating’ organization to ensure smooth and hassle-free experience for a prospective investor.
Their aim is to provide information to the public in general and entrepreneurs in particular, regarding the opportunities available in the State of Gujarat for industry, commerce, trade, business openings and participation therein. Also to search, encourage and identify the prospective entrepreneurs, technicians, artisans and investors. Support them in establishing industrial unit in the State of Gujarat.
Also to locate and contact prospective entrepreneurs residing in or outside Gujarat as well as those living abroad and to organize special campaigns to motivate them to set up industrial units or participate in any industry in Gujarat.
Govt. of Andhra Pradesh is also in process of appointing 30 escort officers in a phased manner as a part of Industrial Investment and Promotion policy (2015-20) for promoting large and medium industries.
Q1 2015-16 (Quarter 1) - Assessment & Way Forward
50
12. Special Economic Zones (SEZ) SEZs aim to provide simplified clearances and controls, world class infrastructure and a stable fiscal regime to attract foreign investments in the state. Various incentives will be given to the tenants of SEZs as declared by the Government of India in SEZ Policy announced in April 2000.
District Wise - Special Economic Zone3
SN District SEZs No. of units
permitted
No. of units
started
Total Outlay
proposed (Rs. in Crores)
Amount already
invested (Rs. in Crores)
Total no. of workers
/ employees
Further requirement of work force
1 Srikakulam Dr Reddy Labs 2 1 500 400 540 100
2 Vizianagaram
Industrial Growth Centre (1) & Industrial Parks (3)
416 147 1721.93 352.42 16159 -
3 Visakhapatnam
APSEZ, Atchutapuram, APIIC Ltd., Special Projects Zone
19 12 --- 1299.00 3286 17000
De-notified Area 45 0 --- 300.00 --- 167530
IT SEZ Hill 1 13 6 (40.00Acs)
1200 1000
IT SEZ Hill 2 11 5 (80.00Acs)
1500 4000
4 East Godavari IT - SEZ, Sarpavaram
1 1 30.00 29.55 1060 -
5 Krishna L&T Hi-tech City Ltd-SEZ
4 4 435.18 79.62 402 …*
6 Prakasam Building Product SEZ
20 17 547.21 453.25 3402 1200
7 Nellore
MPSEZ – Naidupet
4 3 879.00 594.34 2121 3289
M/s. Apache Foot Wear India
1 1 300.00 300.00 8500 1500
M/s. Bharathiya International SEZ Ltd.,
1 1 300.00 300.00 617 9383
8 Chittoor
M/s. Sri City Multi Product SEZ, Satyavedu
38 23 1870.00 714.69 6115 1757
M/s. Sri City Special Economic Zone Domestic Tariff Area (DTA), Satyavedu (M)
47 27 11172.00 4327.00 8370 5100
9 YSR Kadapa
K.Raheja Corp. Pvt. Ltd (Withdrawn the Allotment)
Proposal sent for De notification of SEZ as non SEZ
3 Figures are subjected to revision. Source:DES
Q1 2015-16 (Quarter 1) - Assessment & Way Forward
51
Industrial Parks Andhra Pradesh Industrial Infrastructure Corporation (APIIC) has developed over 300 industrial parks (Including SEZs) spread over an extent of about 1,21,655 acres. State government will develop new industrial Parks and upgrade/maintain the existing.
District Wise – Industrial Parks and other projects4
District Industrial Parks (I.P.)
No. of units permitted
No. of units started
Total Outlay Proposed (Rs. In crores)
Amount already invested (Rs. in crores)
Total number of workers/ employees
Further requirement of workforce
Anantapur
(Anantapuramu, Tadipatri, Guntakal, Gooty, Kadiri, Sajjaladinne, Gollapuram, Penukonda, Sadlapalli, Hindupur, Rapthadu)
12 949 750 - 143600 41025
Others (Major Projects)
Hindusthan petroleum Corporation Limited
1 1 1 -- 4342 100
Bharath Petroleum Corporation Limited
1 1 1 -- 5000 100
BMM Cements Limited
1 1 1 -- 33000 500
Lepakshi Knowledge Hub
1 1 Court Case
Total 4 4 3 -- 42342 700
Grand Total 16 953 753 -- 185942 41725
Kurnool
IP (Kurnool, Nandyal, Adoni, Dhone, Atmakur 289 287 - 5946 5199 -
Others (Major Projects)
Bharath Petroleum Corporation Limited
1 1 -- 100 170 --
Grand Total:5 290 288 6046.4 5369 --
4 Figures are subjected to revision. Source:DES 5 Figures are subjected to revision. Source:DES
Q1 2015-16 (Quarter 1) - Assessment & Way Forward
52
13. Area, Population, GSDP & PCI of Major States
& all India
Q1 2015-16 (Quarter 1) - Assessment & Way Forward
53
14. Area, Population, DDP (Growth at Constant) & PCI
(Current) Of Districts & A.P
Q1 2015-16 (Quarter 1) - Assessment & Way Forward
54
Q1 2015-16 (Quarter 1) - Assessment & Way Forward
55
Q1 2015-16 (Quarter 1) - Assessment & Way Forward
56
GSDP - Subsector wise 1st quarter Actual GVA (Rs. Crore) for 2015-16 at Current Prices