Pyramid Ashok Mega Structure Pvt. Ltd. Nagpur. · GSR&C/0079/13- 14 Page 1 of 5 GEOsystemsTM 1....
Transcript of Pyramid Ashok Mega Structure Pvt. Ltd. Nagpur. · GSR&C/0079/13- 14 Page 1 of 5 GEOsystemsTM 1....
G E O T E C H N I C A L I N V E S T I G A T I O N
R E P O R T
• Project name :
P 0066
Proposed Construction of Pyramid City Type-VI
Residential Complex at Besa, Beltarodi, Nagpur.
• Report No. :
GSR&C/0066/2013 – 14 Dt. 25/03/2014
• Client/Authority :
Pyramid Ashok Mega Structure Pvt. Ltd. Nagpur.
• Ref. Work Order /date : ---Nil--- Dtd. 05/03/2014
• Material Category : SOIL
• Sampled by : GEOsystems Research & Consultants ( I) Pvt. Ltd.
• Sample condition : Sealed
• Type of test performed : As Given in report
• Date of Start of Work /test : 05/03/2014 Onwards
• Testing Method : As per BIS
VIJAYA GROUP ENTERPRISES
GEOsystems Research & Consultants (I) Pvt. Ltd. *Geotechnical Investigation * Soil, Steel, Concrete & Material testing Laboratory
M 1 - M2 Pushpkunj Comp. 26 , Farmland Central Bazar Road , Ramdaspeth , Nagpur – 10
TEL NO.; (0712) - 6618585 / 6611855, 2423984 Fax. No. 6618585
Email : [email protected]
Project Name :
P 0066
Proposed Construction of Pyramid City
Type-VI Residential Complex at Besa,
Beltarodi, Nagpur.
Report No.: :
GSR&C/0066/2013 – 14 Dt. 25/03/2014
Client /Authority :
Pyramid Ashok Mega Structure Pvt. Ltd. Nagpur.
Geotechnical Investigation for
Proposed Construction of Pyramid City Type-VI Residential
Complex at Besa, Beltarodi, Nagpur.
C O N T E N T S
1. Introduction………………………………………………………………… Pg. no.1
2. Stratification .………………………………………………....…………… Pg. no.1 - 2
3. Investigations ……………………………………………………………… pg. no.2 - 3
4. Computation of SBC ……………………………………………………. Pg. no. 3 - 4
5. Discussion and Recommendations ………………………………….. Pg. no.4 - 5
Annexure
1. Annexure I – Borelog ……………………………………………… Sheet no.1 to 4
2. Annexure II – Summary of Results………………………………... Sheet no.1
3. Annexure III – Calculation of SBC. ……………………………... Sheet no.1 to 4
4. Annexure IV – Sample Calculation …………………………... Sheet no.1 to 2
GSR&C/0079/13- 14 Page 1 of 5 GEOsystemsTM
1. INTRODUCTION:
Pyramid Ashok Mega Structure Pvt. Ltd. Nagpur has proposed to construct the Pyramid City Type-VI, a
Residential Complex at Besa, Beltarodi, Nagpur.
M/s. GEOsystems Research & Consultants (I) Pvt. Ltd. Nagpur was awarded with the job of
geotechnical Investigations to generate the required geotechnical parameters for design of suitable
foundations.
GEOsystems Research & Consultants (I) Pvt. Ltd. has completed the work of soil investigation at 4
boreholes locations. The test locations and depth of investigation were decided by the client. Standard
penetration tests (SPT) were conducted in boreholes. Disturbed & undisturbed soil samples were collected
from boreholes for laboratory testing. UU-triaxial shear test along with other soil tests were carried out in
laboratory to ascertain the safe pressure on the encountered strata.
The Allowable Bearing Capacity is presented in clause - 5 of this report (Findings & Recommendations). All
the tests were conducted as per B.I.S. codes.
2. STRATIFICATION:
The general stratification is reported below after completing the boring work at 4 nos. of borehole locations
up to maximum 9.00m (BH-1) depth from GL and as per samples recovered from site & tested in the
laboratory.
Borehole no 1:
At the top 3.00m thick layer of black clayey soil was encountered, followed by 3.00m thick layer of yellow
clayey soil up to 6.00m depth from GL. Below this layer 3.00m thick layer of yellow clayey sandy soil was
encountered up to 9.00m from GL (depth of borehole & investigation). The shear parameters obtained from
3.00m to 4.50m from UU- Triaxial test are ranges from C = 67 kN/m2 to 62 kN/m2 and φ = 10 to 1.50 .
The SPT values noted from 6.00m to 9.00m depth were ranges from N=12 to N=19.
Borehole no 2:
At the top 3.50m thick layer of black clayey soil was encountered up to 3.50m depth from GL. This layer was
followed by 2.95m thick layer of yellow clayey soil up to 6.45m depth from GL (depth of borehole &
investigation). The shear parameters obtained from 3.00m to 4.50m from UU- Triaxial test are ranges from
C = 60 kN/m2 to 64 kN/m2 and φ = 1.50 to 20 .
The SPT values noted at 6.00m depth was N=13.
Borehole no 3:
At the top 4.50m thick layer of black clayey soil was encountered, followed by 1.95m thick layer of yellow
clayey soil up to 6.45m depth from GL (depth of borehole & investigation). The shear parameters obtained
from 3.00m to 4.50m from UU- Triaxial test are ranges from C = 59 kN/m2 to 63 kN/m2 and φ = 1.50 .
The SPT values noted at 6.00m depth was N=10.
GSR&C/0079/13- 14 Page 2 of 5 GEOsystemsTM
Borehole no 4:
At the top 3.50m thick layer of black clayey soil was encountered up to 3.50m depth from GL. Below this
layer 2.95m thick layer of yellow clayey soil was encountered up to 6.45m depth from GL (depth of borehole
& investigation). The shear parameters obtained from 3.00m to 4.50m from UU- Triaxial test are ranges
from C = 54 kN/m2 to 59 kN/m2 and φ = 1.50 to 2.50 The SPT values noted at 6.00m depth was N=13.
Water table was not encountered at all the above mentioned borehole locations.
The detailed borelogs are presented in Annexure I sheet no.1 & 2 of this report.
3. INVESTIGATIONS:
A ) Field tests
3.1 Drilling Work:
Boring was carried out using rotary drilling method. The work was in general accordance to IS: 1892-1979.
3.2 Standard Penetration Test:
Standard penetration number N is the penetration resistance in terms of number of blows for 30 cm.
penetration of split spoon sampler (test conducted as per IS: 2131: 1981).
3.3 Collection & Preservation of Undisturbed & Disturbed soil samples from Boreholes:
Undisturbed & Disturbed soil samples were collected from the boreholes for laboratory tests. These samples
were sealed and transported in the laboratory with care and stored properly. After that further tests were
carried out on the samples.
Kindly note that representing soil samples & rock samples were preserved for 3 months only from the date
of report, any query should be raised before that.
3.4 Ground Water Table:
At present ground water table was not encountered at the time of investigation, however seasonal variation
in ground water table is expected.
B) Laboratory tests
3.5 Grainsize analysis:
In laboratory, the soil samples collected were tested for soil classification, summary of grain size analysis
(IS: 2720 Part – 4) are presented in Annexure II sheet no.1 of this report.
GSR&C/0079/13- 14 Page 3 of 5 GEOsystemsTM
3.6 Atterberg Limits, Free Swell Index & Classification:
Liquid limit, Plastic limits & Plasticity index (IS: 2720 Part – 5 & 6), Free swell Index (IS: 2720 Part – 40 )
tests were conducted on the soil samples collected and are classified as per IS : 1498 (1978) ,summary of
results are presented in the Annexure II sheet no.1 of this report.
3.7 Triaxial Shear Test:
Unconsolidated Undrained (UU) Triaxial shear test (IS: 2720 Part –11: 1971) was conducted on undisturbed
soil samples and C and Ø parameters were obtained. The bearing capacity has been worked out from these
values and calculated as per IS 6403:1981. The results are presented in Annexure: III Sheet no. 2.
3.8 Consolidation test:
Consolidation test were conducted in the laboratory on the undisturbed soil samples collected from
boreholes and parameters obtained from the test are reported in Annexure-III sheet no: 3 to this report.
4. CRITERIA ADOPTED FOR COMPUTATION OF SBC:
4.1 Computation of SBC by shear strength parameters (Triaxial):
The ultimate bearing capacity of soils with cohesion and angle of shearing resistance (C& Ø) as per IS:
6403: 1981 clause 5.1.2 are given in Annexure: III Sheet No.2
qd = C Nc Scdcic +q (Nq – 1) Sq dq iq + 0.5 B. γ Νγγ Νγγ Νγγ Νγ Sγ γ γ γ dγγγγ iγγγγ W` (General shear failure )
q`d = 2/3 C N’c Scdcic +q (N’q – 1) Sq dq iq + 0.5 B. γ Νγ Νγ Νγ Ν’γ γ γ γ Sγγγγ dγγγγ iγγγγ W` ( Local Shear failure )
4.1.1 : φ' = tan-1 (0.67 tan φ )
Corresponding values of Nc', Nq' & Nγ' are obtained from bearing capacity table1. (clause 5.1.1)
4.1.2: Shape factor (Sc = 1.30, Sq = 1.20, Sγ = 0.80) depth factor (dq=dγ = 1for φ <100 or dq=dγ = 1+ 0.1
Dt/B √Nφ 1for φ >100) & inclination factor is considered as 1.
4.1.3: Width of foundation B = 3 m
4.1.4: Effect of Water table W' = 0.5
4.1.5: Safe Bearing capacity qs = qd / 3 (Assuming F.S = 3)
GSR&C/0079/13- 14 Page 4 of 5 GEOsystemsTM
4.2 Check for Safe bearing pressure for clayey soil by Settlement criteria based on values obtained
from consolidation test:
Net S.B.C. check for settlement for permissible settlement as per IS: 1904 – 1986 & calculated as per IS:
8009 (Part I) -1976 is presented in Annexure: III sheet no. 3 of this report.
4.3 Computation of SBC by N value
The depth factor, shape factor and load inclination factors are mentioned below and assuming the water
table correction factor as 0.5 . The ultimate bearing capacity is calculated as per IS: 6403 Clause - 5.2.2.1
and results are presented in Annexure: III sheet no.4,
q d = q.(Nq – 1) Sq dq iq + 0.5 B. γ .Νγ γ .Νγ γ .Νγ γ .Νγ Sγ γ γ γ dγ γ γ γ iγ γ γ γ W’
Corresponding values of Nq & Nγ are obtained from bearing capacity table1. (Clause 5.1.1)
4.3.1: Shape factor ( sc = 1.30, sq = 1.20, sγ = 0.80 ) depth factor (dq=dγ = 1for φ <100 or dq=dγ = 1+ 0.1
Dt/B √Nφ 1for φ >100) & inclination factor is considered as 1.
4.3.2: Width of foundation B = 3 m
4.3.3: Effect of Water table W' = 0.5
4.3.4: Safe Bearing capacity qs = qd / 3 (Assuming F.S = 3)
4.4 Safe bearing pressure for cohesionless soil by settlement criteria based on SPT N- Value:
Net S.B.C. check for settlement for permissible settlement as per IS: 1904 – 1986 & calculated as per
IS: 8009 (Part I) -1976 is presented in Annexure: III sheet no.4 of this report.
5) FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS:
5.1) The general stratification of this site was comprised of black clayey soil at the top followed by yellow
clayey soil up to the depth of investigation. The soil encountered up to the depth of investigation is
highly swelling with high plasticity classified as CH. The same stratification was encountered at the
earliest investigation beside this site at Pyramid City.
5.2) Open/ Raft foundation may be provided for this site. The foundation should be rested at minimum
3.00m depth from GL. The allowable bearing capacity of 6.00T/m2 may be considered for
foundation design at & below 3.00m depth from exist EGL.
GSR&C/0079/13- 14 Page 5 of 5 GEOsystemsTM
5.3) At this site swelling clayey soil with high FSI & plasticity classified as CH was encountered at the top
layer, care should be taken to safeguard the floor cracks.
5.4) Immediately below PCC minimum 150mm thick sand/ stone dust layer should be provided for proper
leveling the uneven surface.
5.5) Soil excavated from foundation pits should not be utilised as back filling material in foundations. It must
be insured that the back filling shall be comprised of well graded strong cohesionless granular material
with good drainage properties & high compressive strength.
5.6) At founding level strata should be verified & confirmed before laying the foundation.
5.7) Report is prepared on the basis of subsoil conditions revealed at the test location of boreholes,
laboratory tests performed on the encountered & recovered samples from the site. Any discrepancy if
observed during construction shall be reported immediately to the concerned authorities & GEOsystems
Research & Consultants (I) Pvt. Ltd. Nagpur.
for GEOsystems Research & Consultants ( I ) Pvt. Ltd.
(S. M. WANKHEDE) M.tech. (Geotech) Consulting Engineer
TEST SPT (N) Type - No Depth (m)
0.00
0.50
1.00
1.50 UDS-1 1.50-1.95
2.00
2.50
3.00 UDS-2 3.00-3.45
3.50
4.00
4.50 UDS-3 4.50-4.95
5.00
5.50
6.00 SPT-1 N=12 (3/5/7) DS-1 6.00-6.45
6.50
7.00
7.50 SPT-2 N=15 (5/7/8) DS-2 7.50-7.95
8.00
8.50
9.00 SPT-3 N=19 (4/8/11) DS-3 9.00-9.45
VER :- NTS
HOR :- NTS
DS :-
WS :-
. UDS :- Undisturbed Sample
CP :- Core Pieces
S.P. :- Small Pieces
SPT :-
VST :-
WT :-
C A
S
I N
G
> >
1
50
mm
Yellow Clayey
Sandy Soil
Yellow Clayey Sandy Soil
Black Clayey Soil
3.0
0m
3.0
0m
Yellow Clayey Soil
3.0
0m
B O R E L O G
ANNEXURE - I Sheet no.1
BORE HOLE NO. :- BH-1
CLIENT :- Pyramid Ashok Mega Structure Pvt. Ltd. Nagpur.
AUTHORITY :- Pyramid Ashok Mega Structure Pvt. Ltd. Nagpur.
PROJECT :- Proposed Construction of Pyramid City Type-VI Residential Complex at Besa, Beltarodi, Nagpur.
FINAL DEPTH :- 9.00m METHOD OF BORING. :- Rotary wash method
DIRECTION OF BORING :- Vertical DATE OF START :- 05-03-2014
GROUND WATER :- Not Encountered DATE OF COMPLETION :- 07-03-2014
CA
SIN
G
DEPTH
(M)
TH
ICK
NES
S
OF L
AYE
R
LOG
25
REMARK CORE
PIECES
RECOVERY % R . Q. D. %
25 50 50 75 100
A B B R E V I A T I O N No.SCALE :-
VISUAL
DESCRIPTION OF
STRATA
FIELD TEST Type of sampleCORE DRILLING
75 100
Black Clayey Soil Disturbed Sample 3 no.
Email: [email protected]/ [email protected]
▼Water Table From GL Nil
Nil
Nil
Wash Sample Nil
CHKD BY ;- S. SURYAWANSHI
Yellow Clayey Soil
▼Borehole terminated
at 9.00m depth from
GEOsystems Research & Consultants (I) Pvt. Ltd. REFERENCE NO. GS RC /0066/ 2013-14
DATE :- 24-03-2014
3 no.
L O G
M 1 - M2 Pushp -kunj Comp. 26 , Farmland Central Bazar Road , Ramdaspeth , Nagpur - 10
TEL NO.; (0712) - 6618585 / 6611855, 2423984 Fax. No. 6618585
DRN BY:- TAHMEENA
Standard Penetration Test 3 no.
Vane Shear Test
6
TEST SPT (N) Type - No Depth (m)
0.00
0.50
1.00
1.50 UDS-1 1.50-1.95
2.00
2.50
3.00 UDS-2 3.00-3.45
3.50
4.00
4.50 UDS-3 4.50-4.95
5.00
5.50
6.00 SPT-1 N=13 (5/6/7) DS-1 6.00-6.45
6.45
VER :- NTS
HOR :- NTS
DS :-
WS :-
. UDS :- Undisturbed Sample
CP :- Core Pieces
S.P. :- Small Pieces
SPT :-
VST :-
WT :-
3.5
0m
LOG
DATE :- 24-03-2014
25 50
Black Clayey Soil
Yellow Clayey Soil
L O G
Standard Penetration Test
CORE DRILLING
10025 5075 75100
RECOVERY % R . Q. D. %
Email: [email protected]/ [email protected]
Vane Shear Test Nil
M 1 - M2 Pushp -kunj Comp. 26 , Farmland Central Bazar Road , Ramdaspeth , Nagpur - 10
TEL NO.; (0712) - 6618585 / 6611855, 2423984 Fax. No. 6618585
Black Clayey Soil 1 no.
Wash Sample
Disturbed Sample
GEOsystems Research & Consultants (I) Pvt. Ltd.
3 no.
CA
SIN
G
DEPTH
(M)
FIELD TEST Type of sample
SCALE :-
Nil
A B B R E V I A T I O N
Yellow Clayey Soil
C A
S
I N
G
> >
150 m
m
GS RC /0066/ 2013-14
▼Water Table From GL Nil CHKD BY ;- S. SURYAWANSHI
Nil
1 no.
DRN BY:-
REFERENCE NO.
GROUND WATER :- Not Encountered DATE OF COMPLETION :- 08-03-2014
REMARK CORE
PIECES
TH
ICK
NE
SS
OF L
AY
ER
VISUAL
DESCRIPTION OF
STRATA
07-03-2014
Pyramid Ashok Mega Structure Pvt. Ltd. Nagpur.
PROJECT :-
Pyramid Ashok Mega Structure Pvt. Ltd. Nagpur.
Proposed Construction of Pyramid City Type-VI Residential Complex at Besa, Beltarodi, Nagpur.
FINAL DEPTH :- 6.45m METHOD OF BORING. :- Rotary wash method
AUTHORITY :-
TAHMEENA
No.
CLIENT :-
DIRECTION OF BORING :- Vertical DATE OF START :-
▼Borehole terminated
at 6.45m depth from
GL.
2.9
5m
B O R E L O G
ANNEXURE - I Sheet no.2
BORE HOLE NO. :- BH-2
7
TEST SPT (N) Type - No Depth (m)
0.00
0.50
1.00
1.50 UDS-1 1.50-1.95
2.00
2.50
3.00 UDS-2 3.00-3.45
3.50
4.00
4.50 UDS-3 4.50-4.95
5.00
5.50
6.00 SPT-1 N=12 (3/4/8) DS-1 6.00-6.45
6.45
VER :- NTS
HOR :- NTS
DS :-
WS :-
. UDS :- Undisturbed Sample
CP :- Core Pieces
S.P. :- Small Pieces
SPT :-
VST :-
WT :-
Yellow Clayey Soil
4.5
0m
Black Clayey Soil
B O R E L O G
ANNEXURE - I Sheet no.3
BORE HOLE NO. :- BH-3
CLIENT :- Pyramid Ashok Mega Structure Pvt. Ltd. Nagpur.
AUTHORITY :- Pyramid Ashok Mega Structure Pvt. Ltd. Nagpur.
PROJECT :- Proposed Construction of Pyramid City Type-VI Residential Complex at Besa, Beltarodi, Nagpur.
FINAL DEPTH :- 6.45m METHOD OF BORING. :- Rotary wash method
DIRECTION OF BORING :- Vertical DATE OF START :- 08-03-2014
GROUND WATER :- Not Encountered DATE OF COMPLETION :- 09-03-2014
CA
SIN
G
DEPTH
(M)
TH
ICK
NE
SS
OF L
AY
ER
LOG
VISUAL
DESCRIPTION OF
STRATA
FIELD TEST Type of sampleCORE DRILLING
REMARK CORE
PIECES
RECOVERY % R . Q. D. %
25 50 75 100 25 50 75 100
▼Borehole terminated
at 6.45m depth from
GL.
L O G A B B R E V I A T I O N No.SCALE :-
C A
S
I N
G
> >
150 m
m
1.9
5m
Black Clayey Soil Disturbed Sample 1 no.
Wash Sample Nil DATE :- 24-03-2014
Yellow Clayey Soil 3 no.
▼Water Table From GL Nil
TEL NO.; (0712) - 6618585 / 6611855, 2423984 Fax. No. 6618585
Nil
DRN BY:- TAHMEENA
Standard Penetration Test 1 no.
Email: [email protected]/ [email protected]
CHKD BY ;- S. SURYAWANSHI
GEOsystems Research & Consultants (I) Pvt. Ltd. REFERENCE NO. GS RC /0066/ 2013-14
M 1 - M2 Pushp -kunj Comp. 26 , Farmland Central Bazar Road , Ramdaspeth , Nagpur - 10
Vane Shear Test Nil
8
VISUAL
DESCRIPTION OF
STRATA
FIELD TEST Type of sampleCORE DRILLING
REMARK
GROUND WATER :- Not Encountered DATE OF COMPLETION :- 11-03-2014
CA
SIN
G
DEPTH
(M)
TH
ICK
NE
SS
OF L
AY
ER
LOG
DIRECTION OF BORING :- Vertical DATE OF START :- 10-03-2014
PROJECT :- Proposed Construction of Pyramid City Type-VI Residential Complex at Besa, Beltarodi, Nagpur.
FINAL DEPTH :- 6.45m METHOD OF BORING. :- Rotary wash method
CLIENT :- Pyramid Ashok Mega Structure Pvt. Ltd. Nagpur.
AUTHORITY :- Pyramid Ashok Mega Structure Pvt. Ltd. Nagpur.
B O R E L O G
ANNEXURE - I Sheet no.4
BORE HOLE NO. :- BH-4
TEST SPT (N) Type - No Depth (m)
0.00
0.50
1.00
1.50 UDS-1 1.50-1.95
2.00
2.50
3.00 UDS-2 3.00-3.45
3.50
4.00
4.50 UDS-3 4.50-4.95
5.00
5.50
6.00 SPT-1 N=13 (4/5/8) DS-1 6.00-6.45
6.45
VER :- NTS
HOR :- NTS
DS :-
WS :-
. UDS :- Undisturbed Sample
CP :- Core Pieces
S.P. :- Small Pieces
SPT :-
VST :-
WT :-
C A
S
I N
G
> >
150 m
m 3.5
0m
Black Clayey Soil
2.9
5m
Yellow Clayey Soil
TEL NO.; (0712) - 6618585 / 6611855, 2423984 Fax. No. 6618585
Email: [email protected]/ [email protected]
CHKD BY ;- S. SURYAWANSHI
GEOsystems Research & Consultants (I) Pvt. Ltd. REFERENCE NO. GS RC /0066/ 2013-14
M 1 - M2 Pushp -kunj Comp. 26 , Farmland Central Bazar Road , Ramdaspeth , Nagpur - 10
1 no.
Vane Shear Test Nil
▼Water Table From GL Nil
DATE :-
Standard Penetration Test
24-03-2014
Yellow Clayey Soil 3 no.
Nil
DRN BY:- TAHMEENA
Black Clayey Soil Disturbed Sample 1 no.
Wash Sample Nil
▼Borehole terminated
at 6.45m depth from
GL.
L O G A B B R E V I A T I O N No.SCALE :-
75 100 25 50 75 100
VISUAL
DESCRIPTION OF
STRATA
FIELD TEST Type of sampleCORE DRILLING
REMARK CORE
PIECES
RECOVERY % R . Q. D. %
25 50
CA
SIN
G
DEPTH
(M)
TH
ICK
NE
SS
OF L
AY
ER
LOG
9
Fre
e S
we
ll
Ind
ex
Gravel SandSilt &
ClayWL WP IP
FSI
(%)
0.00-1.50 gs-079/BH-1/01 DS 0.00 7.13 92.87 40.35 57.00 25.32 31.68 70 CH � �
1.50-1.95 gs-079/BH-1/02 UDS 0.50 10.70 88.80 21.58 58.00 24.69 33.31 70 CH 14.81 12.18
3.00-3.45 gs-079/BH-1/03 UDS 4.40 6.96 88.64 22.93 57.00 24.33 32.67 70 CH 15.02 12.22
4.50-4.95 gs-079/BH-1/04 UDS 4.48 6.08 89.44 30.53 59.00 25.91 33.09 80 CH 15.01 11.50
6.00-6.45 gs-079/BH-1/05 DS 2.86 7.20 89.94 20.31 57.00 23.25 33.65 70 CH � �
7.50-9.00 gs-079/BH-1/06 DS 0.00 59.33 40.67 32.78 35.00 19.66 15.34 40 SC-CI � �
0.00-1.50 gs-079/BH-2/01 DS 0.46 7.87 91.67 26.53 53.00 24.32 28.68 60 CH � �
1.50-1.95 gs-079/BH-2/02 UDS 1.38 6.32 92.30 23.96 57.00 24.68 32.32 70 CH 15.11 12.19
3.00-3.45 gs-079/BH-2/03 UDS 0.70 11.62 87.68 22.70 57.00 23.54 33.46 70 CH 14.79 12.05
4.50-4.95 gs-079/BH-2/04 UDS 0.38 3.62 96.00 32.96 60.00 26.52 33.48 80 CH 14.85 11.17
6.00-6.45 gs-079/BH-2/05 DS 0.00 4.12 95.88 32.62 60.00 26.41 33.59 80 CH � �
0.00-1.50 gs-079/BH-3/01 DS 0.44 5.82 93.74 39.26 56.00 24.18 31.82 70 CH � �
1.50-1.95 gs-079/BH-3/02 UDS 0.00 5.92 94.08 21.13 55.00 22.86 32.14 70 CH 14.67 12.11
3.00-3.45 gs-079/BH-3/03 UDS 0.58 5.58 93.84 20.16 55.00 21.07 33.93 70 CH 15.19 12.64
4.50-4.95 gs-079/BH-3/04 UDS 0.00 2.60 97.40 27.11 61.00 26.15 34.85 80 CH 15.23 11.98
6.00-6.45 gs-079/BH-3/05 DS 0.00 5.64 94.36 24.98 62.00 26.99 35.01 80 CH � �
0.00-1.50 gs-079/BH-4/01 DS 0.00 6.14 93.86 32.44 56.00 22.98 33.02 70 CH � �
1.50-1.95 gs-079/BH-4/02 UDS 0.42 5.52 94.06 22.68 56.00 23.70 32.30 70 CH 15.07 12.28
3.00-3.45 gs-079/BH-4/03 UDS 1.12 6.06 92.82 22.59 56.00 23.67 32.33 70 CH 15.21 12.41
4.50-4.95 gs-079/BH-4/04 UDS 0.00 3.22 96.78 31.36 61.00 26.11 34.89 80 CH 14.92 11.36
6.00-6.45 gs-079/BH-4/05 DS 4.72 5.14 90.14 31.01 62.00 27.45 34.55 80 CH � �
CH
SC-CL
Clayey Soil With High Plasticity
Clayey Sandy soil With Low Plasticity
Depth (m) Sample No.
Sa
mp
le Grain Size Analysis (%)
ABBREVIATIONS
BH-1
BH-2
BH-3
BH-4
Annexure: II
Sheet no.1
SUMMARY OF THE TEST RESULTS
Atterberg Limit (%)
Cla
ssific
atio
n
Bu
lk D
en
sity
(kN
/m3
)
Dry
De
nsi
ty
(kN
/m3
)
WC (%)Bore
No.
10
11
Annexure: III
Sheet No. 1 Allowable Bearing Capacity
Bore hole No. Depth (m)
Allowable Bearing Capacity
T/m²
BH-1
3.00 6.00
4.50 7.50
6.00 8.00
BH-2
3.00 6.50
4.50 7.50
6.00 8.50
BH-3
3.00 6.50
4.50 7.00
6.00 8.00
BH-4
3.00 7.00
4.50 8.00
6.00 8.50
12
Annexure: III Sheet No. 2
CALCULATION OF SBC FROM UU- TRIAXIAL SHEAR TEST
Borehole
No.
Depth
(m) Sample No.
Cohesion -
C (kN/m² )
Angle of Sharing
Resistance Ø
(deg)
qd F.S S.B.C T/m²
BH-1 3.00 gs-079/BH-1/03 67 1.0 38.39 3 12.80 ≈ 12.50
4.50 gs-079/BH-1/04 62 1.5 39.83 3 13.28 ≈ 13.00
BH-2 3.00 gs-079/BH-2/03 64 1.5 37.61 3 12.54 ≈ 12.50
4.50 gs-079/BH-2/04 60 2.0 39.56 3 13.19 ≈ 13.00
BH-3 3.00 gs-079/BH-3/03 63 1.5 37.04 3 12.35 ≈ 12.00
4.50 gs-079/BH-3/04 59 1.5 37.96 3 12.65 ≈ 12.50
BH-4 3.00 gs-079/BH-4/03 59 1.5 34.73 3 11.58 ≈ 11.50
4.50 gs-079/BH-4/04 54 2.5 36.73 3 12.24 ≈ 12.00
Note:
1. Bulk unit weight - γ = 15.00 kN/m3
2. Factor of safety of 3 has been used for calculating qs. 3. Width of foundation (B) =3m , Dilatancy Correction value N’’ Assuming load inclination factors as unity(1) shape
factor ( sc = 1.30, sq = 1.20, sγ = 0.80 ) depth factor ( dq=dγ = 1+ 0.1 Dt/B √Nφ for φ > 10) and assuming the water
table correction factor W`= 0.5 (During Rainy season) 4. Calculations and B.C factors as per IS 6403 Clause 5.1.2
13
Annexure: III Sheet No. 3
CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS AND COMPUTATION OF SETTLEMENT
BH.
No.
Depth
- from
GL (m)
Sample No.
Initial
voids
ratio eo
Compressi
on Index
(Cc)
Pressure
Intensity
(T/m2)
Initial
settlem-
ent (mm)
Consolidation
settlement
(mm)
Total
settlement
(mm)
Total settlement
after applying
correction
factor (mm)
Remarks
BH-1
3.00 gs-079/BH-1/03 0.961 0.153 12.50 6.18 78.50 84.68 61.82
Consolidation settlement is on
higher side for 12.50 T/m2
6.00 2.96 45.34 48.31 35.26 Consolidation settlement is within
permissible limit for 6.00 T/m2
4.50 gs-079/BH-1/04 0.958 0.161 13.00 6.94 68.51 75.45 50.55
Consolidation settlement is on
higher side for 13.00 T/m2
7.50 4.01 44.68 48.68 32.62 Consolidation settlement is within
permissible limit for 7.50 T/m2
BH-2
3.00 gs-079/BH-2/03 0.964 0.147 12.50 6.47 75.31 81.77 59.70
Consolidation settlement is on
higher side for 12.50 T/m2
6.50 3.36 46.33 49.69 36.28 Consolidation settlement is within
permissible limit for 6.50 T/m2
4.50 gs-079/BH-2/04 0.958 0.164 13.00 7.17 69.79 76.96 51.57
Consolidation settlement is on
higher side for 13.00 T/m2
7.50 4.14 45.51 49.65 33.26 Consolidation settlement is within
permissible limit for 7.50 T/m2
BH-3
3.00 gs-079/BH-3/03 0.969 0.148 12.00 6.31 73.49 79.79 58.25
Consolidation settlement is on
higher side for 12.00 T/m2
6.50 3.42 46.53 49.94 36.46 Consolidation settlement is within
permissible limit for 6.50 T/m2
4.50 gs-079/BH-3/04 0.945 0.167 12.50 7.01 69.48 76.49 51.25
Consolidation settlement is on
higher side for 12.50 T/m2
7.00 3.93 44.10 48.03 32.18 Consolidation settlement is within
permissible limit for 7.00 T/m2
BH-4
3.00 gs-079/BH-4/03 0.980 0.139 11.50 6.45 66.59 73.05 53.32
Consolidation settlement is on
higher side for 11.50 T/m2
7.00 3.93 46.04 49.97 36.48 Consolidation settlement is within
permissible limit for 7.00 T/m2
4.50 gs-079/BH-4/04 0.968 0.153 12.00 7.36 61.06 68.37 45.81
Consolidation settlement is on
higher side for 12.00 T/m2
8.00 4.91 44.50 49.40 33.10 Consolidation settlement is within
permissible limit for 8.00 T/m2
Note: 1) The above settlement is checked for corresponding allowable pressure with respect to the corresponding depth.
2) For pressure intensity the total settlement is within the permissible limit as per IS: 1904 -1986. To keep the differential settlement within
the limit the size of the footing must be proportionate.
14
Annexure: III Sheet No. 4
Summary of Bearing Capacity based on settlement & shear criteria from SPT N Value
Borehole No. Depth - (m) Allowable Bearing Capacity T/m2
Recommended Allowable Bearing Capacity T/m2
BH-1 6.00 8.00
8.00 BH-2 6.00 8.50
BH-3 6.00 8.00
BH-4 6.00 8.50
CALCULATION OF SBC FROM SPT- N VALUE
BH. NO. Depth (m) SPT –N Value
N’’ φ φ φ φ
(deg) Nq Nγγγγ S.B.C. T/m2
BH-1 6.00 12 12 30.5 7.71 7.08 36.16
BH-2 6.00 13 13 31 8.04 7.51 38.08
BH-3 6.00 12 12 30.5 7.71 7.08 36.16
BH-4 6.00 13 13 31 8.04 7.51 38.08
� Factor of safety of 3 has been used for calculating qs.
� Width of foundation (B) =3m, Dilatancy Correction value N’’ Assuming load inclination factors as unity(1) shape
factor ( sc = 1.30, sq = 1.20, sγ = 0.80 ) depth factor ( dq=dγ = 1+ 0.1 Dt/B √Nφ for φ > 10) and assuming the water
table correction factor W`= 0.5
� Calculations and B.C factors as per IS 6403 Clause 5.2.2.1
SAFE BEARING PRESSURE BY SETTLEMENT CRITERIA BASED ON SPT N- VALUE (Net S.B.C check for settlement as per IS: 1904 – 1986 for cohesion less soils from fig.9 of IS: 8009
(Part I) -1976)
BH. NO. Depth (m) SPT –N Value
N” Permissible settlement
(as per IS:1904-1986)
(mm)
Safe Bearing Pressure T/ m
2
BH-1 6.00 12 12 50 8.33 ≈ 8.00
BH-2 6.00 13 13 50 8.62 ≈ 8.50
BH-3 6.00 12 12 50 8.33 ≈ 8.00
BH-4 6.00 13 13 50 8.62 ≈ 8.50
Dilatancy Correction value N’” and assuming the water table correction factor W`= 0.50. The above calculation is for 50mm permissible settlement. The safe bearing pressure can be provided for other permissible settlement if required.
15
Annexure: IV
Sheet No.1
SAMPLE CALCULATIONS
SAFE BEARING CAPACITY FOR CLAYEY SOIL BY SHEAR FAILURE CRITERIA: BH-1
Depth (Dt) = 3.00m
For width of foundation B = 3m
As per the report C = 67 kN/m2 & φ = 1 0 φ' = 0.670 Bulk unit weight (γ) = 15.00 kN/m3
q = γγγγ x Dt = 15.00 x 3.00 = 45.00 kN/m2
Based on φ' value N’c = 5.32 N’q = 1.08 N’γγγγ = 0.06
Assuming the depth factor, shape factor and load inclination factors as unity (1) & assuming the
water table correction factor as 0.5.Since φ = 1 0 local shear failure is considered. The ultimate bearing capacity is calculated as under: IS 6403 Clause -5.1.2
q`d = 2/3 C x N’c x Sc x dc x ic +q (N’q – 1) Sq x dq x iq + 0.5 x B x γ γ γ γ x ΝΝΝΝ’γ γ γ γ x Sγ γ γ γ x dγ γ γ γ x iγ γ γ γ x W`
= 370.697 + 4.32 + 0.54
= 376.65 kN/m2
= 38.39 T/m2
Considering factor of safety = 3
qs = 12.80 ≈ 12.50 T/m2
16
CHECK FOR SAFE BEARING PRESSURE FOR CLAYEY SOIL BY SETTLEMENT CRITERIA:
(As per IS 8009 (Part – I)-1976)
The SBC work out by shear failure criteria to be check for settlement as per IS:1904-1986 for
foundation resting on clayey soil.
Sample Calculation for BH. No.1 (Depth-3.00m
Total Settlement St= Sc + Si (As per clause 9.2)
I) Immediate Settlement for clays – Si (As per IS 8009 (Part – I)-1976)
Si = P x B (1 – µ2) x I
E
P = Intensity of pressure = 12.50 T/m2
B = Width of foundation = 3m
µ = 0.5 (for clays)
I = Influence factor as = 0.30
(From fig. 11 of IS 8009 (Part I) 1978)
L = Length of foundation = 3.00m
E = modulus of elasticity as per Bowles 100 qu to 500 qu
E = 100 qu
qu = Undrained shear strength
qu = 2C
C = Cohesión = 67 kN/m2 = 6.8298 T/m2
qu = 2 x 6.8298 = 13.6595 T/m2
E = 100 qu = 100 x 13.2518 = 1365.95 T/m2
Using above equation:
Si = 6.18 mm
17
II) Consolidation Settlement-Sc
D = 3.00m
q = 12.50 T/m2 (Intensity of pressure)
W = 3.00m L = 3.00m
3a 3b
a = 1 b = 1
Ht = 0.5m
Cc = 0.153 (Compression Index)
eo = 0.961 (Initial Voids Ratio)
Sc = 1 Ht 0 Cc log10 [Po + ∆ P] (1 + eo) Po
Layer No
Effective depth
(m)
Overburden Pressure
P0 (T/m2) z
m = a/z
n = b/z
Newmark’s Constant
K 4k
Pressure increment
∆ P =4 k x q
Settlement (mm)
1. 3.25 4.88 0.25 4.00 4.00 0.2463 0.9852 12.315 21.35
2. 3.75 5.63 0.75 1.33 1.33 0.1941 0.7764 9.705 16.99
3. 4.25 6.38 1.25 0.80 0.80 0.1461 0.5844 7.305 12.94
4. 4.75 7.13 1.75 0.57 0.57 0.0999 0.3996 4.995 9.00
5. 5.25 7.88 2.25 0.44 0.44 0.0700 0.2800 3.5000 6.23
6. 5.75 8.63 2.75 0.36 0.36 0.0511 0.2044 2.555 4.40
7. 6.25 9.38 3.25 0.31 0.31 0.0397 0.1588 1.985 3.25
8. 6.75 10.13 3.75 0.27 0.27 0.0316 0.1264 1.58 2.46
9. 7.25 10.88 4.25 0.24 0.24 0.0257 0.1028 1.285 1.89
Total Consolidation Settlement in mm 78.50 *Note: K = Influence factor for uniformly loaded rectangular area by After Newmark’s 1935.
Total settlement S = immediate settlement Si + consolidation settlement Sc
= 6.18 + 78.50
= 84.68 mm > permissible settlement (50mm)
For pressure intensity of 12.50t/m2 the total settlement is exceeding the permissible limit. Hence pressure intensity is reduce to 6.00 T/m2
18
For :
P = Intensity of pressure =6.00 T/m2
Si = 2.96 mm
II) Consolidation Settlement-Sc
Sc = 1 Ht 0 Cc log10 [Po + ∆ P] (1 + eo) Po
Layer No
Effective depth
(m)
Overburden Pressure
P0 (T/m2) z
m = a/z
n = b/z
Newmark’s Constant
K 4k
Pressure increment
∆ P =4 k x q
Settlement (mm)
1. 3.25 4.88 0.25 4.00 4.00 0.2463 0.9852 5.9112 13.45
2. 3.75 5.63 0.75 1.33 1.33 0.1941 0.7764 4.6584 10.22
3. 4.25 6.38 1.25 0.80 0.80 0.1461 0.5844 3.5064 7.43
4. 4.75 7.13 1.75 0.57 0.57 0.0999 0.3996 2.3976 4.91
5. 5.25 7.88 2.25 0.44 0.44 0.0700 0.2800 1.6800 3.28
6. 5.75 8.63 2.75 0.36 0.36 0.0511 0.2044 1.2264 2.25
7. 6.25 9.38 3.25 0.31 0.31 0.0397 0.1588 0.9528 1.64
8. 6.75 10.13 3.75 0.27 0.27 0.0316 0.1264 0.7584 1.22
9. 7.25 10.88 4.25 0.24 0.24 0.0257 0.1028 0.6168 0.93
Total Consolidation Settlement in mm 45.34 *Note: K = Influence factor for uniformly loaded rectangular area by After Newmark’s 1935.
Total settlement S = immediate settlement Si + consolidation settlement Sc
= 2.96 + 45.34
= 48.31 mm
Correction for depth factor = 0.73 (as per fig. 12 of IS: 8009)
Total Settlement after Correction = 35.26 < permissible settlement (50mm)
For pressure intensity of 6.00t/m2 the total settlement is within the permissible limit. To keep the differential settlement within the limit the size of the footing must be proportionate. Hence the allowable bearing capacity at 3.00m for footing size of 3m is 6.00 T/m2
19
Annexure: IV
Sheet No.2
SAMPLE CALCULATIONS
SAFE BEARING CAPACITY FOR COHESIONLESS SOIL BY SHEAR FAILURE CRITERIA FROM SPT N-VALUE:
BH-3 Depth (Dt) = 6.00m
For width of foundation B = 3m
As per the report N= 12 N’’ = 12 φ = 30.5 Bulk unit weight (γ) = 15 kN/m3
q = γγγγ x dt = 15 x 6.00 = 90.00 kN/m2
Based on φ' value N’q = 7.71 N’γγγγ = 7.08
Assuming the depth factor, shape factor and load inclination factors as unity (1) & assuming
the water table correction factor as 0.5.Since φ = 30 local shear is considered. The ultimate bearing capacity is calculated as under: IS 6403 Clause -5.2.2.1
q`d = q (N’q – 1) Sq x dq x iq + 0.5 x B x γ γ γ γ x ΝΝΝΝ’γ γ γ γ x Sγ γ γ γ x dγ γ γ γ x iγ γ γ γ x W`
= 978.26 + 86.02
= 1064.28 kN/m2
= 108.49 T/m2
Considering factor of safety = 3
qs = 36.16 T/m2
SAFE BEARING PRESSURE BY SETTLEMENT CRITERIA:
The SBC work out by shear failure criteria to be check for settlement for foundation resting on
cohesionless soil.
Permissible settlement = 50mm
N = 12 N’’ = 12
As per IS -8009 from fig. 9
Settlement -28.00 mm for 10 T/m2
Applying water table correction of 0.50
Settlement= 30/0.5=60 mm
Hence for permissible settlement of 50 mm
SBC= 10/60 x 50 = 8.33 ≈ 8.00 T/m2 at depth 6.00m.
Hence allowable bearing capacity at 6.00m depth for footing size of 3m is 8.00 T/m2 for isolated footing.