Puzzle Theory 102

15
1 Puzzle Theory 102 Scott Blomquist (Team Shark Bait) | GC Summit (Feb 18, 2010) [email protected]

description

 

Transcript of Puzzle Theory 102

Page 1: Puzzle Theory 102

1

Puzzle Theory 102

Scott Blomquist (Team Shark Bait) | GC Summit (Feb 18, 2010)

[email protected]

Page 2: Puzzle Theory 102

2

Agenda

• What is Puzzle Theory?• Recap from last time• Overview of confidence and acceleration

Page 3: Puzzle Theory 102

3

Puzzle Theory

• Provides a structured framework within which to study construction and solving of puzzles.

• Not quite math yet.• Needs your help to develop! (

http://groups.google.com/group/puzzletheory)

Page 4: Puzzle Theory 102

4

What do we know so far?

• Information Reduction Puzzle (IRP)– Describes most Game puzzles (as well as

Mystery Hunt, Puzzle Hunt, etc.)– Solver is provided with an initial set of data

and the goal is to reduce the information content of this data to a word or short phrase

• IRPs consist of Layers (or steps) of Transforms applied to Information Streams

Page 5: Puzzle Theory 102

5

New stuff

• Information: less refined info, usually provided explicitly by the puzzle

• Knowledge: more refined info, usually obtained by Transforming Information

• Fact: an atomic bit of Knowledge (e.g. a word in a crossword, or a digit in Sudoku)

• Confidence: The amount of trust that you put in a particular Fact

• Acceleration: Emerges from later Facts being partially determinable from earlier Facts, and thus easier and quicker to fall

Page 6: Puzzle Theory 102

6

The story of a crossword

• Empty grid: no “Knowledge”, only “Information”

• Seeking answers to clues which yield “Facts”

Page 7: Puzzle Theory 102

7

The story of a crossword

• Start by filling in “the easy stuff”– Usually means “high

confidence stuff”

Page 8: Puzzle Theory 102

8

The story of a crossword

• Fill in more Facts, building on earlier Facts

• Look, a sled! (probably)• Bonus points: guessable

Facts?

Page 9: Puzzle Theory 102

9

The story of a crossword

• Oh, crap. No sled.• Tie broken by comparing

approximate Confidence.• OAF is probably not

OAS, and the O and A are Locks from the down clues.

• So must be FLED, a totally reasonable word.

Page 10: Puzzle Theory 102

10

The story of a crossword

• Fill in still more Facts, probably getting down further in Confidence– (i.e. wth is GSA? LAC?)

• Might have enough Knowledge to apply the next IR Transform– (How many of you have a

teammate who like to get 100% on each Layer?)

– (How many of you are that teammate?)

Page 11: Puzzle Theory 102

11

The story of a crossword

• Almost done--one pesky letter remains..– This means we failed to

resolve two clues.– Beware puzzles where

there’s only one way to get critical information.

Page 12: Puzzle Theory 102

12

The story of a crossword

• Done!– We now have 100% of the

Knowledge for this Layer.– All Facts are gettable two

ways.• Crossword constructors call

that a “fully checked grid”.• (Cryptic crosswords get a

partial hall pass on this because each clue reads two ways.)

Page 13: Puzzle Theory 102

13

Applying these topics

• Construction– The best puzzles give you multiple ways to

get each fact, or require less than 100% of the facts. (Good to have an idea what fraction you’re shooting for.)

• Solving– Be aware of Confidence. Don’t let low

Confidence info distract you even if you wrote it down. If you ever reach a Contradiction, focus on low Confidence info first.

– Communicate Confidence explicitly to your teammates.

Page 14: Puzzle Theory 102

14

Puzzle Theory awards

• Best self-appointed lab rat: http://solvingpuzzles.tumblr.com/

• Best recent puzzle construction advice: http://foggyb.livejournal.com/2010/01/

Page 15: Puzzle Theory 102

15

Contact me

• http://puzzlepro.com• http://twitter.com/puzzlepro• [email protected]